Public Safety Committee - Regular Meeting
The Public Safety and Health Committee discussed an ordinance to amend food truck operating hours in entertainment districts, with a focus on public safety concerns. The committee also addressed the Milwaukee Police Department’s plan to maintain public safety in entertainment districts and the Department of Community Wellness and Safety’s response to teen takeovers. Additionally, the appointment of Karen Tyler as the Community Wellness and Safety Director was considered, and a substitute resolution regarding opioid settlement funds was debated.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Public Safety Committee
- Meeting Type
- Public Safety Committee
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI
- Meeting Date
- April 10, 2026
Transcript
884 sections (from 997 segments)
To the Friday, April 10 meeting of the Public Safety and Health Committee. It is now 09:06. We'll get started. I'm Alderman Scott Spiker, Chair of Committee, joined to my right by Alderman Burghel's Vice Chair, joined to his right by Alder Taylor, and joined to my far left by Alder Moore. Alder Chambers will be joining us shortly, also joined by Staff Assistant Joanna Burtiz. With that, we will start with Item one on the agenda, file number 251,990, an ordinance relating to parking controls.
Morning Chair, community members, Kevin Anzac, DPW. We have a few items here today for you. First involves South 9th Street where there's a reconstruction project going on. We will be supplying more parking to the neighbors. So basically on the East Side of South 9th Street from Greenfield to National Avenue, we will be removing a no parking restriction and also installing a street sweeping restriction in that area.
Secondly, on North 31st Street between Wisconsin Avenue and Wells Street, residents have asked for the removal of the winter parking restriction and we will replace them with no parking anytime restriction. Next one is on the west side of North 45th Street from Juneau Avenue to a point two fifty four feet north at any time to be removed. The restriction is no longer needed. And lastly is the allowance of two side night parking on South Lennox Street from East Conyers Street to East Homer Street. All these have been coordinated through local alder persons and if you have any questions.
Any questions from committee members?
No. Move approval.
Alder Berglaus has moved passage of the ordinance to recommend passage and hearing no objections so ordered. Item two, file number 251,991, substitute ordinance relating to traffic controls.
Kevin Anzac, DPW again. Just a few additional stop signs being recommended at this point. First one is on West Dogwood Street at North 87th Street. Second one on North Greenwood Terrace at North 87th Street. On Leon Terrace and at West Constance Avenue on West Magnolia Street and at North 87th Street in westbound direction on West I I I Avenue at South 1st Street on South 1st Place at West Wilbur Avenue and lastly on South 1st Street at West Wilbur Avenue.
Very good. Courtesy will Okay. Also take Any questions? If not, Alder Moore would move to recommend passage and hearing no objections, so ordered. Thank you. Thank you. Item number three, file number 252,101, this is a substitute ordinance relating to time related futrexone, says sponsored by Alderman Baumann. I believe Alder Zammerit, but you're also a sponsor?
I'm Okay. Not Very good. So with that, we'll kick it off to the sponsor, Alderman Baumann.
Yeah. Thank you, Mr. Chair, members of the committee. Good morning, everyone. Yes, this file is a direct response to some of the disorder that's already taken place in the Water Street Entertainment District and to a lesser degree, the King Drive Entertainment District, former Old World 3rd Street area.
Basically in response to requests from MSOE who are here today, Milwaukee School of Engineering, which has a major presence in this area on the East side of the river. And in response to the concerns we have heard expressed by Milwaukee Police Department, We are taking some measured approaches to attempt to diminish the disorder that occurs on these weekend nights, especially when the weather is warm. So this file basically amends the food truck prohibition from what is currently 1AM to a 10PM prohibition. So no food trucks would be permitted anywhere in the zone. The down basically the downtown zone with a very small piece also in the sixth district and an even smaller piece in the 3rd District.
But the vast majority is 4th Automatic District. And hopefully this will thwart some of the disorders, some of the loitering, some of the congregating, some of the tailgating that goes on in the evenings and especially late in the evenings near closing time for these bars. So that's the filing.
Very good. And have you had the opportunity to speak with the elder of the sixth and the third?
We have mentioned this to them.
Okay. With that, do you have anybody you want to bring to the table, the police department, anybody else?
Kirby is certainly here and Mr. Bruning is one of their trustees so he certainly can whenever I can speak as well.
Yes. That's why I was checking for cosponsorship. But if you would like to speak now before, is there anything you would like to queue up?
Yes, please. Mr. Chair, thank you. I do want to thank Alderman Bowman for reaching out to me on this file. This does affect time limited food truck zones.
In Burnham in the Burnham Park neighborhood, as you know, we do have a both a time limited food truck zone and a density limited food truck zone on Burnham. And so this would affect the food truck zone in the 8th Aldermanic District. I did work with Bob and and do some negotiating and so although the downtown zone that he speaks to will close at 10PM per this file, the Burnham Food Truck zone will now close at 11PM. So a little bit later in hopes that that could be a little bit easier pill to swallow for the food truck operators. I have reached out to all of the food truck operators who have a reserve spot in the food truck zone on Burnham.
I do see at least one operator in the audience here today. I assume they would want to provide testimony if you would allow it, Mr. Chair. But I did let them let them all know I've spoken with one of them personally. And I also do have several neighbors who are in support of the measure although you might have some opposing view today, I see, with one operator in the audience.
And am I correct that you are in support of this file or
That's correct. I appreciate Bob working with me. I did think ten p. M. Was a bit early for my district but it's similar in that it's now going to close at eleven p. M. As opposed to one a. M.
Okay. Very good. MSOE, would you please introduce yourself and state your case?
Sure. Kendall Brunig. I am an alumni of MSOE and I
am on the Board
of Regents. I also own a property half a block away at the Blatt's office complex. So this affects me and MSUE in a lot of ways. MSUE has about 2,900 students and we have about 300 students that live on Water Street at the corner of Water And Juneau. So far, there hasn't been anyone injured from MSOE, but the rate things are going, that's just a matter of time.
The recent shooting, there was four food trucks in the 1200 Block Of North Broadway. Last night, I drove past there by four p. M. There was already three food trucks parked there. Now the food trucks are not the problem. It's the crowds that gather around them. And especially later at night, these the crowds do not patronize the restaurants. They're there to hang out and then and I I don't know if if the streets being open or closed is better or worse. That's a different situation. I know the last shooting, the streets were open when it occurred.
So the food trucks draw the crowd. The other thing is know, Amisui the, has on the 1st Floor, we have two restaurants. We have a new sushi bay that just opened and we have Qdoba. I don't know if anybody is going to be here to represent them, but I this affects them. If you have a business and you're paying $30,000 $60,000 a year in property taxes and there's nothing stopping a food truck from parking in front of your business, that's not really fair.
I know that there's not a law against it, but I think the ordinances should take that into account and
Let's stay focused on the present ordinance, just what's Okay. Before us,
Well, my point of that is that I think that the ordinance right now is a good intermediate step. I think the long term solution is to tie the locations that food trucks are allowed at to licensed food dealers and have a distance from it. There are other municipalities that have laws like that in other states. So that wouldn't be unreasonable.
A On that point
Yes, fine. But let's be brief on it because that is an entirely separate issue. That's a whole We different looked at that
as an option. Yes. But we thought that would be very hard to enforce. You have to MPD would have to be out there with tape measures basically measuring where food trucks start and end. And so this is a pretty bright line test. It should be very easy for MPD to enforce this prohibition. The map is pretty clear. It's very logical. And if MPD sees a food truck parked there at 10:30, it's a very clear violation. And so they can either be ticketed or asked to leave.
Yep. Very good. So are you speaking for MSOE or just For MSOE. Okay. As a
Regent, the President wanted to be here but he has a commitment until 09:45 so I don't think he will be able to speak here for this.
Okay. Very good. Thank you for your testimony. Members, do we have any questions that would require other folks to the table or questions in general?
I have a question.
Alder Bergaus.
Thank you. And this question is more for the sponsors. Own this ordinance change only affects food trucks that are in the public right away or on state property.
That's correct.
So if I own own a food truck and I park it on my apron or in my driveway or on my private parcel, I can operate however I want to.
Consistent with the zoning code. Consistent with that, would become a potential zoning issue in terms of whether a peddler activity on private property would be permitted.
Right. You need occupancy for
that. Fair enough.
And if it's ready for that.
Thank you.
Thank you. Other questions? Is there anybody else in the audience who wants to testify on this briefly? If not, Chief of Stafford, you want to briefly say a word?
Mr. Chair, I just wanted to note, you may have missed one of the operators in the back stood up.
Okay. He can come to the table too. Or she. Or she. Oh, there. Way back there.
See? You didn't see
it. Obviously. Ms. Huff?
Yes. Thank you. Heather Huff, Chief of Staff, Milwaukee Police Department. Milwaukee Police Department is very supportive of this ordinance and the restrictions of time for these food truck zones. We know last year and this year we have issues with people congregating around the food trucks that are not patrons.
We have individuals in these areas in the age range of below 21 years of age who utilize these open spaces and places to congregate and that has caused us problems in the past. We'll be talking more about it in the next file but just wanted to get on the record that MPD is supportive from a community safety perspective.
Okay. Very good. And that would you please introduce yourself?
Yeah. Hi. Good morning. Name is Jennifer and I am Could
you state your first and last name, please?
Yeah. Jennifer Martinez. I am one of the owners in the type two food truck zone.
Okay. And your testimony?
Well, I just came because I received this email on Tuesday. I just wanted to mention about basically in the two type zone, we've never had any crime that I know of. Never have seen any presence of police in the area. I do, and accept, that there is a lot of trash in there. I try to put my part, but we are several trucks, and I can't speak for them.
Even though I always try to put on my part, I in my opinion, I just wanna ask if if there's any possibility that even an hour can be increased. In my situation, I have already had, to unemploy one person. And in this case, I would have to unemploy one more person. Okay. On their job.
So that's your testimony. You're not in favor of the legislation is currently crafted for those reasons?
Yes. Yeah. Okay.
Thank you for your testimony. Any questions from committee members?
Mister Chirkins.
Alder Chambers.
Thank you mister chair. I don't have a question for her. I have a question for ref for MSOE.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you. So,
thank you for coming back up here mister Berger. So, I I guess I'm a little perplexed. I was against the the move that they were making when this legislation came far as reducing the time limit for, you know, food trucks for those who come down and you know, patronize the entertainment district. I I voiced my concerns when the food truck rest the food truck legislation was created and put a onus to like the bar owners and things of that nature. So the reason why I actually come up here and thank you again is, you know, you have a fenced in parking lot that's right on Water Street right in front of Water and is it Kilborn or Juneau or something?
Juneau. Yeah. Juneau. Okay. Right. During those hours, during those nighttime hours, that is pretty empty. Correct. Have thoughts or talks have been in there to allow like the food truck to be in there, to fence in, to control those that come in and those that come out in order to you know, alleviate some of the stress that goes on to the entertainment district.
For our end, it's easier to control what happens by not letting people into that lot. Once we let people into the lot, we wouldn't have much control over what happens after that. What do you mean by that? Well, it's fenced in right now. Right. So we it's rented for parking during the day. But at that time, we don't. We close it so that the crowds can't gather in there. And actually the fence is not an MSOE fence. It's actually a city fence that was put up for crowd control.
Right. So, we're trying to control the crowd and you have this, you know, parking structure. I'm just thinking outside the box here. You know, you have public safety. You have, you know, school public safety and we also have police there within Cole Red. If there's something that we can possibly partner with you and having police or public safety at the entrances to allow those who are actually coming for food as opposed to congregating to go through there during those hours between ten and one or whatever. I I guess I'm trying to figure out what is the the reservation or what's the hesitation of allowing that to use the parking if you're not using that night anyways.
Let's hang on one second. Is DNS in the audience? Because the occupancy can't just set up a food truck zone anywhere, a private parking lot. It's for parking if there's an accessory use.
But it's still within.
So I am just asking if D and S is in the audience, they could clarify this because it might not be allowable. If they
are not,
it's could still 10 within the entertainment district.
Mr. Chair, if I may on this point.
Yes. Briefly on that point then let's get Alder Chambers answer the question.
He is a great corporate citizen in Milwaukee. They've done a lot of outstanding development downtown. They have a lot of students and faculty and staff downtown and to put the burden on them that somehow they have to assume the responsibility to entertain people that want to hang out on Water Street is absurd.
understand. Mister liability exposure would be massive. You'd be congregating these people on private property.
Okay.
They don't insure for that. So why are we fencing? Some are triple their security forces. So why are
we fencing? Okay. Hold on, gentlemen.
Mister chairman. Alderman Chambers, you asked the question for the audience. I did not want this back and forth. So we are going to halt that right now. You can you give a direct answer to Alderman Chambers'
questions I
haven't consulted with the rest of the Board of Regents, but I think that we would oppose doing that. It would further the problem in my opinion. I think these crowds are not patronizing the local establishments. And by there may be another place where a food truck park could be created similar to on the sell side, but that's not something that we're interested in doing.
Okay. I respect that. So why are we fencing the private parking lot? I guess that's a DNS question as well, Mr. Chair?
DNS could tell whether it's allowable, next whether file
because the next file is a broader discussion of what MPD is doing relative to public safety in these entertainment districts and the fencing is part and parcel of that. I believe MPD requested that the fencing be put up.
Yeah, I I guess I guess where I'm at with this, I guess where I'm at with this and sorry to put you to the fire so it's not necessarily towards you is that, you know, the the issues that we're going to face is, you know, a number a good amount of officers that come from our neighborhoods go down to downtown every weekend to protect the entertainment district. Every weekend. About 10 to 15 at minimum. Those are resources that's going away from our neighborhood. If we restrict those opportunities for them to go get food or anything, guess where they come back into our neighborhoods where those officers are going. So I I guess I'm just trying to figure out how we're going to balance the two.
That is Right now. Yeah, I'm sorry.
Go ahead. Thank you. And right now, I don't see it. So, I mean, in respect to his district and his decision, he needs to have every right to do that. You know, I'm not pushing back on that. I'm just trying to figure out what type of solutions that we can do to meet in the middle. And I don't think this is one of them. Okay.
You. And Alder Baumann is correct that that's a broader discussion that would involve MPD. We can save it for the next file which will be in a couple of minutes. So with that, are there any other questions from committee members? Then do I have a motion relating to the file?
Move passage.
Alder Berglis would move passage. Are there any objections? I will address. One objection noted from Alderman Chambers. Any other discussion? Then the resolution passes or the ordinance passes on a four to one vote. Thank you very much. Moving on now to the communication file relating to some of this. Item number four, file number 252067, communication from the Milwaukee Police Department relating to their plan to maintain public safety in the King Drive and Water Street Entertainment Districts during the 2026. This is also sponsored by Alderman Baumann. So to whom we will turn to queue things up, Alderman Baumann.
Yeah. I'll just turn it over to MPD at this point. Obviously, we've had some incidents of disorder including some shootings in the Water Street Entertainment District. As soon as the weather turns 70 degrees, it appears the guns come out and the loiters come out and all the chaos is triggered and that's just been a few 70 degree nights. We're coming into spring and soon summer.
So, I I'm trying to get ahead of this as much as possible so we're not here mourning the homicides of various people rather than trying to get ahead of it by seeing what is the plan, what are the resources that are going to be devoted, how do we protect resources in the neighborhoods because Alderman Chambers has a legitimate point when we are flooding downtown with MPD personnel, they come from somewhere and that somewhere can very well be my West Side neighborhoods, his Northwest Side neighborhoods and our neighborhoods of everybody on this council. So that is a very legitimate issue to be watchful for. And one other thing, also during your comments, I also want you to speak to the issue of scooters because the next thing we're contemplating banning in this downtown district is scooters after 10PM because it appears that scooters, I've had anecdotal reports from business owners and including the Milwaukee Symphony that the scooters provide a very excellent form of mobile transportation. They're cheap to use and people running around on scooters can quickly move from the 3rd Street Food Market to water in Juneau to Highland and And King so the next thing, please speak to the issue of scooters and whether you will be in support of a 10PM scooter ban in the entire downtown district.
Very good. With that, we'll kick it off to MPD if you wouldn't mind introducing everyone at the table.
Morning, committee. Heather Hough, Chief of Staff again, MPD. I'm joined by leadership in the patrol bureau and the criminal investigation bureau, who will introduce themselves shortly. I just wanted to say a couple of things before we get started. One, I want to acknowledge we have a large police presence in the room.
These are our captains, our leadership. Recently, we believe it's very important for them to see the council process because we all work together. And so we have tasked our captains with coming and observing these processes. So if you're wondering why there's a large presence here, they are, here to see, how the council works, firsthand. Second, I want to say on behalf of the department, the MPD's responsibility is not just the entertainment district downtown.
We recognize the priority for the department is public safety for the entire city. And so while we're going to be talking about certain deployments and strategies for the downtown area, please know that these types of strategies exist for all kinds of problems citywide depending on the district, depending on what the issues are and wherever there's a need for additional resources, they will be deployed. So just wanted to put that out there to assure not just this committee but the public that we don't solely focus on the downtown entertainment district. We recognize this is a very large city and while there were some incidents downtown, there were many others citywide that are still the same on equal footing priorities for the department. And with that, I will turn it over to Inspector Grant and Inspector Lau to talk about our strategies, to talk about our clearances of some of the issues downtown and to talk about some of the problems we've had and seen in terms of those clearances.
Okay. And let's just make sure we address the sponsor's questions at some point during the discussion.
Yes. Alright. Good morning, everybody. Sharonda Grant, inspector of police patrol bureau. And so thank you all very much for allowing us to be present to speak to you all this morning. I wanna just talk about some things that Heather also referred to. As it relates to violent crime in the city of Milwaukee, I'm pleased to share that our part one crime which includes
a little closer.
Could. Sure.
Thank you. I
want to indicate that I'm pleased to share that our part one crime, which includes homicides, nonfatal shootings, robberies, carjackings, batteries, motor vehicle thefts, etcetera, have seen a significant decline this year compared to the same year last year as it relates to our crime trends. And so for the decrease, I would like to give a special thank you to all of the men and women of the Milwaukee Police Department who risk their lives each day to to keep our community safe. I also wanna make sure that I thank our partners, our CVI partners, four one four Life, the Department of Community Wellness and Safety, and a variety of other partners who also assist in quelling the violence that takes place in the city of Milwaukee. Now Water Street is very important, but so is Mitchell Street. So is Burleigh.
So is Brown Deer Road. So is Capital. And so our officers are tasked with assisting and serving the residents throughout the city of Milwaukee. Although Water Street is extremely important, we cannot deploy all of our resources to that location. We have to be strategic.
We have to be mindful knowing that all residents regardless of their economic status, regardless of their race, ethnicity, etcetera. They need services too. Alright? So the shooting that took place on Water Street, March 22, and it took place at about 01:00 in the morning, and it involved individual one individual who had a feud with others. And they to have that discussion at that location at which time one individual shot three people killing one. Mhmm. Alright? And I wanna pass it on to inspector Loud to provide additional information regarding that and after that, then I'll go back into our deployments for Water Street.
Yeah. Thank you. Inspector Paul Lyle, I'll be very brief on that incident. There was three people shot. We did take a suspect into custody and while I understand the loitering and all that is an issue down on Water Street.
It's our feeling that this particular suspect who committed this act who's charged with this probably should have been out because he's convicted of several felonies and put on probation just four days later for felonies that committed while he was incarcerated, I believe, up in Lincoln Hills. So that's something right there that it it saying that we're alleviating blame from us, but it's we we can't own all that. This guy should probably should not have been out. He should not have had a gun and he was down there and unfortunately, one young man died and three others or two others were shot. Is there any other ones you want me to speak on right now?
Nope. That's it. And then also it should be noted that three of the four individuals that were involved, three of those were on probation and parole. Now in being completely transparent, three of the four individuals that were involved in this incident, three of those individuals were under the age of 21. Alright?
And that's just for transparency purposes because I wanna make sure that you guys know that we're not holding anything back. We're being forthright and truthful. As it relates to the incident that took place on March 22, that night, Code Red, we had 26 officers that were in deployment throughout the Code Red Entertainment District, which consists of four different zones downtown. And that was an increase from the nine officers that we initially had that were going to be deployed at that location. We increased the number of officers because we knew that warm weather brings out more individuals and we wanted to make sure that we provided as much safety as we possibly could.
Now I know that may some of you may be thinking that we pull resources from other districts. No. We we did not. The individuals that were assigned to this deployment operation were on overtime using code red funds, but then also the officers that were assigned to district one. District one's second shift, the hours between 4PM and midnight, those officers, their shift was extended based upon the fact that district one that night was extremely busy.
Those officers did not get off work until about 02:30, 03:30 in the morning just based upon all of the issues that were place. Alright? So that night, and this is just a a very brief synopsis regarding gun related calls in the downtown area, there was a call for shots fired which took place in the in the downtown area, which officers were removed from their locations to investigate that. And there was an arm an armed robbery that took place in the area of Juno And Water where an individual pistol whipped a subject and removed his property from him. Officers pursued that individual on foot, took him into custody, and also recovered the gun.
So thank you very much for officers for being at that location at that time on Water Street. And then there was the unfortunate triple shooting slash homicide that took place not too much longer afterwards. So as it relates to our strategies, we will continue to work with our downtown businesses, the the security that work that bounce and work in these establishments and bars. When they see individuals who are loitering, they can provide us with the information, and we will do the best that we can to either disperse those individuals, warn them, and if they refuse to leave site and at the very last resort, make the arrest of those individuals because we know that when we remove officers from the the the deployment areas, it creates an opportunity for more issues to take place. Last year, we worked in partnership with the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office, which I am very appreciative of that partnership and that relationship with our other law enforcement partners, and we will continue this year as well.
We worked hand in hand with the Department of Wellness, Community Safety and Wellness, four one four Life along with a variety of our other CVI teams. And so the strategies that we utilized after in July had to do a lot with the strategies that we utilized for Juneteenth. So we know that our officers, we can only do so much, but when we have boots on the ground, individuals who are playing clothes, individuals who have lived experiences, and individuals who are able to disperse crowds of people such as our community partners, that works and they can provide us information. Hey, this group over here, they need to go. We told them.
We can move in and make that disbursement. So, our plan is to elevate that plan that we had last year when I was brought here for that communication file but that's only as needed because we do not want to remove other officers from other districts because the entire city needs to be safe.
Very good. Alder Baumann, would you like to do any follow-up? Did your questions get answered?
What what are we heard a TV report from the first district captain who I understand is in Nashville inspecting their entertainment zone protocols and so he's not here which is fine. Glad to glad to see him traveling to other cities to inspect what they're doing. What are we doing about curfew issues? I mean, there was some a deal floated about a curfew holding center that people who were found in violation of curfew in the entertainment districts would be transported somewhere and then held until picked up by their parents or guardians. And I thought, how can that happen?
Sure.
Wouldn't that take a lot of people
out of a lot of
police out of service? Transported how? In in patrol cars and and vans and and what's the authority to put people hold people if they're not because he does the question was asked why are they under arrest and he and the answer was no. Well, I said well then what's the authority to hold them if they're not under arrest?
Sure. I can speak to that Alderman Baumann. So one of the ideas for dealing with those violating curfew and those are 17. So know that there are two problematic populations congregating downtown. It's the 18 to 21 and then the 17 below.
One of the issues is when we are enforcing curfew downtown and we have an individual who's a minor who is violating curfew, those officers from downtown then have to stay with that person until we are able to get a hold of a parent or a guardian to come pick them up, from the location and it takes those officers offline for amount of time not being able to patrol the downtown area. So one of the ways we thought a solution would be to this issue was working with the Department of Community Wellness and Safety, where we would identify a minor who is breaking curfew. We would transport them to that facility. There would be dedicated officers, not many there to to wait until a parent would be able to pick up that minor and then community wellness and safety would offer resources and individuals to provide activities or resources to those youth while they were awaiting pickup. So really for us we weren't the lead on organizing what the curfew center would be.
We just felt it was something that would alleviate our resources and also do something positive for those breaking curfew in providing them this centralized location for pickup and then also resources. And I would say community wellness and safety can speak more to the plan for the curfew center. I think that the model that was envisioned has changed over time and that is really within that department's wheelhouse to speak more to what it looks like, what the status is at this point.
And our legal authority to detain transport and then hold someone until their parents arrive or guardians is what?
Alderman Baumann, can you pull the mic closer? They're having trouble hearing you.
Is that what that means?
Inspector Grant, how do we normally handle curfew
with detainee? Wonder
if they're 17. Yes.
All depends. As it relates to if an officer is to take a a young person into custody for a curfew violation, that young person would generally speaking go to a district to be processed and then we would wait for that parent to arrive if we're not a or or we would try to drop that young person off at that period or guardian's residence.
And so if you have 200 juveniles under the age of 17 loitering around Water Street, you're calling 200 people back to the district or delivering them to their parents' home?
That's what if we were to enforce curfew where we would to, as your example, was explained, taken in to custody three hun or 200 individual that that removes several officers from the employment.
It removed dozens of officers. Yes.
So as a practical matter, I think it's apparent to almost anyone in this room and anyone watching on TV that enforcing curfew is a lot harder than it sounds. Mhmm. If not impossible when you're dealing with large numbers. Is that a fair statement?
Yes, sir. That is a fair statement.
Thank you. Alder Chambers, you
had questions. Thank you, mister chair. Inspector Grant, he brought up an event that happened and the the manpower that went from nine to 26. He was saying some was from on extended OT from District 1 and people signed up for OT from various districts. Were the other districts busy as well?
So, yes, sir. However, when it comes to the code red overtime, that's voluntary. So those officers are off work already. Mhmm. And so those officers so say, friend, they can get a text message, a phone call from another start from a sergeant from district one asking them if they wanted to come and work the overtime. So it's not mandatory. And if if, say for instance, there was an overtime opportunity at that district, that officer has the choice whether or not he or she wants to work overtime at that district if there's an opportunity or if they want to work overtime down at Cobre Ed.
I mean, who would I mean, from what I've been hearing from officers, Cobre Ed is is is easy. It's easy money. You know, that's why a lot of people signed up for it. So, I guess, you know, what type of parameters we put in place to, I guess, have a cutoff list for, you know, co red and and whatever overflow going back into the districts. I mean, they signed up for overtime.
I guess, you know, my issues with co red have been well documented on this in this council. You know, because I just think it's taken away resources from my neighborhoods who need it in our those businesses and other places in our in our in our neighborhoods are taking bigger hits than the ones downtown. Plain and simple and and I guess where I'm trying to figure out is how do we find that ball and I still have not heard anything with this. So, I'm I'm seeing these communication files. I'm hearing these communication files and all I'm thinking about and seeing is more resources going away from our districts to come downtown to to protect downtown.
And then we're to ask OCWS or DCWS to come and pull their resources from the communities that they serve to come downtown. I have a problem with that.
Mister chair. Oh, yeah. I'm not No.
I'm not.
I'm getting the queue.
Oh, thank you. Sorry. Mhmm. So I'll just I'll just leave it at that. I'll let you go. Hold on.
Thank
you. We actually have a queue going. So I'll put Alder Moore after Taylor and Burgales who also Just clarity, I thought you said the the code red and I thought this came out in the communication file last year was, the extra staffing you had. So, you know, normally have nine, you had 26. That extra staffing comes from people volunteering for overtime, not being mandated?
Yes, sir.
And is that a nicety we supply our staff or is it contract mandated that we have to ask?
Could you repeat that question one more time? I'll do that.
Can we volunteer somebody to you're gonna do overtime? Is that contractually allowed?
The volatile part was when the officers from district one that worked from 4PM to midnight were extended. Okay. So that is the violent toll part and that's based upon the busyness of the the district at that at on the March 22. As it relates.
And real quick, that is not limited to district one.
Yes. So
that happens often times across the city depending on what's going on where these shifts are extended and officers are requested to stay extra hours.
But as far as bringing in bodies who were not going to work that night, that's are we contractually obliged to ask as opposed to tell folks?
We ask we ask the officers.
So that's if it's contractually required that we have.
Okay. Well, we we have to ask them. So in order for them to work.
Right. But they don't have have to show up.
Correct.
And is there not having to show up a matter of contractual obligation? No. Okay. So we could, in theory, voluntell people who are not scheduled to work that night to come in. Not suggesting we do. I'm just wondering if it's legally allowed.
Yes.
Point of order on that, mister?
There's no point of order on that. Not If a want a follow-up question, you can ask that.
Sure. Yeah. That's what I was going up. Okay. Thank you.
A very complimentary thing.
Thank you. To that point, Alderman Spiker brings up a great point. I had an incident this past weekend in my district at Primo's and there were squads that were pulled from District 3, District 5, and District 4. All pulling from different resources from within this. I know that happened quite often. I'm just bringing like far as like the resource that we're pulling, they could be protecting their neighborhoods within their respective districts moving back and forth far as that. So, that's where I'm getting at with that. So, thank you.
Yes, sir. Can I make a one point?
Sure, quickly. Follow-up and then we have to to elder Taylor.
Okay. We work we our patch says the Milwaukee Police Department. So we serve the entire city of of Milwaukee. And as it relates to scooter, sir, we are in support of any assistance as relates to reducing individuals from coming down to downtown neighborhoods to create issues. So if the individuals are driving, we don't want them there. If they're on scooters and they're in in their causing issues, we don't want them there either. So we are in support of any assistance that we can receive.
Well, then we'll do that. That file will
be introduced this cycle before hearing next cycle.
Speaking of transfer Hold on. Alder Baumann, we have a a queue, so we have to be respectful of of members' opportunity to ask questions. So, Alder Taylor?
Thank you very thank you very much, chairperson. So so as I sit here and listen to what's being said, it sounds like we are trying to reroute those that are under 21 because I've heard that several times now, and 17 and below from downtown to wherever. Right? We can get them. It's it's also looking at the last file where food trucks are being closed at ten.
Now, I'm gonna say this too because I'm not a fan of being being being open past 10:00. So seeing that, I I understand that 10:00 is is a good cut off. Right? I I really believe that for neighborhoods that nothing nothing past ten or eleven, right? Because then things seem to go downhill from there.
However, though, there is a school MSOE is here and they talked about crowds and so we often talk about our 21 and what are they going to do because they're getting into trouble but what do we do to be part of the solution. So Alderman Chambers mentioned something about being part of a solution like maybe just controlling them as they go in and out of a gate. That was shut down. Okay. But we spend a lot of time on security in the neighborhoods.
Every bar that potentially opens or is open in the neighborhoods, my first question is what do you do for security? You know, how do you secure it so that they can come in, have fun, go home safely? Are not not of people care in
We We
encountered any of these first establishments. I have two questions now. Hiring security firms that you as police officers can work along with. So to lessen the amount of resources from our police department having to be downtown having to go from nine to 26.
Sure. So Captain Teal I know works with all the businesses in the downtown area and the bid does fund security, different types of individuals downtown to monitor different types of situations. The captain of the downtown district does work hand in hand with those individuals and is in constant communication about what goes on there. The issue is that the security that private businesses hire, it's limited to those private businesses and they can't patrol the streets or the public areas. And so one of our I mean, biggest issue is controlling the individuals that are downtown in those public spaces, which is ours to own and identifying all the different ways we can manage those crowds.
What we're seeing is businesses can have wants to warn people for weapons. They have machines to ensure people are 21 when they're in the businesses. But in those public areas, those safety measures don't exist and that is problematic for us. Even though we do coordinate our efforts with those different security companies that are providing that private security for those businesses in those public spaces is where the challenges lie. So when we have the people congregating there who haven't been wanted, who may be 21 and, may have alcohol in their vehicles that we're not aware of at the time. Bad things can and have occurred.
Okay. So are you saying is so yes, there are security firms that are down there. But they're limited and that is why. I tell your title again.
I'm sorry. Inspector Grant.
Inspector Grant mentioned that it they're working in conjunction with different entities through OCWS because then they're there to support you as well. I guess I'm just looking at we're putting a lot of stress and strain on our resource, and and it's constantly increasing. And then we are, you know, sort of pushing our young people out. And I I I'm not advocating for them to be out all hours of the night. I do think that we do need to have that curfew in place.
And, again, like I said, things should not be open past 10:00, 11:00 at the latest because things go downhill. But I'm just looking at how do we relieve some of that stress off of a resource that's so important to the entire city, because we have to pour so much of that energy into our downtown area. I think that we're not really focused on the solution because we just keep looking at this problem and so we really need to focus on the solution of what to do with our young people that are 21 because that seems to be one of the focuses because you mentioned it several times that these individuals are 21 or 17 and below. And then we're constantly pouring our resources. So we need a solution.
Agree. Agree. And we are asking for all the help we can get from businesses, community organizations, faith based places, the council, help find productive things for our young ones to do in the city.
Right. Yes, ma'am.
Are you concluded, Alder Tiller?
I'm going to yield for a moment. Yes.
Okay. Yep. And we can always come back to folks. So with that, we'll go oh, is I know Alder Chambers had mentioned in a press release things relating to the parents. Are there any discussions relating to that? I know there is an ordinance on the books that actually I don't think has produced a case recently of parental responsibility. I checked with Muni Court. I don't I think there was one case that was before the court and it was dismissed. Dismissed. So is that a matter that the police department considers, discusses? Sure.
So part and parcel with the curfew ordinance, there is a parental ordinance if your child breaks curfew. And there's a number of different factors in that ordinance to meet. One, you know, the parent has to have some type of knowledge or or there's a multitude of factors that have to be met in order for those to work. To be honest, in those situations where curfews being enforced and particularly downtown, the time it would take then to hold the parent liable in that that moment and gathering all the information on that end once an individual is transported is a challenge of resources. I know know last
last year year Alder Baumann highlighted highlighted with actually
Correct.
Calling people out of there that that would take such a tremendous amount of resources. It wouldn't be worth it. Is that the response?
Well, it's worth it, but correct. It does. It's a balance of resources.
It's practical to do. Briefly, President, press, and then we go to
a lot So of
what what kind of traction do you have on this curfew? I mean, it sounds like people have been thinking about it. Is it have you put pencil to paper? Have you, I mean, how far along is this idea about curfew and taking people or young people to some location because it sounds like a different form of tabs to me and except that instead of it being truancy from school, it's like curfew. So, I'm wondering how far along is this initiative?
I would defer to the Department of Community and Wellness Safety on that because I know they are the primary planners on the facility and and the pieces for the curfew center that they're envisioning.
Okay. I'm so. So you but you're the police department's involved in some way, shape, or form. So. Correct. You don't know how at what stage this is at or is this real? Is this a conversation? What I mean? Sure. Because you talked about engaging I'm not sure who you've engaged from the council but it's I'm curious to know how you're engaging the council on on this initiative.
So we've been in contact with the Department of Community Safety and Wellness regarding what a the the beginning plans to pry the preliminary plans of what a building would look like. And they would have to speak as far as what it looks what the building is. I believe the it could be a possibility for a location that's located at 32nd And Brown perhaps. However, we're still at the very beginning stages. Now, of course, we have officers that can take these young people into custody if they are violating curfew.
Like I mentioned before, it does take officers offline. And our goal, we really don't want to have to write these citations to kids because we know that could be detrimental to the future as well. But we want to have some type of a space where we can take these young people to a location where there are adults that are there that are trusted, verified, etcetera. And like you said, it would be a reversal on the TABS program. For you have an officer perhaps that may be there throughout the duration, but this is still in the very preliminary stages.
Okay. So just to be clear, the officer committee wellness should should be briefing council and figuring out how we how we can engage.
Can you repeat that, sir?
The Office of Community Wellness or Department of Community Wellness should be connecting with the council to figure out how we get engaged in this process with deciding this initiative or helping make this initiative a reality?
I would say that MPD, the Department of Community Safety and Wellness, all of us should be involved in that discussion with the council regarding what the next steps look like and how we can support one another's efforts.
Okay. I just wanna know how far along we are. That's all.
Yes,
sir. Alder Bergaus. Thank you, mister chair and and if you would indulge me for four questions. Last year, there was a a very tragic incident where a vehicle struck through, broke through a two by four barricade that was blocking and protecting people on the street. The department has since invested in mobile barricades.
We saw that they were deployed and then soon after that, they were pushed to the side, left on the curb or in the terrace or in the parking lot and not installed because it was a burden to do so because it took about sixty minutes to install them. The manufacturer's website says it takes ten minutes to install them. Are those mobile barriers installed every day that Code red is in place?
So first and foremost, Alderman, thank you very much for bringing that to my attention because that was something that I was not aware of.
I was That was discussed in this committee previously.
Okay. So that's a discussion that I will have with captain Teal regarding. But the plan is we purchased those median barriers so that we could have the optimum protection of the individuals who frequent the downtown on Water Street area. And so the plan is to utilize those every night that every weekend night. Of course, we're not going to utilize them on a Wednesday or a Thursday. But when the code red is activated, officers are deployed for those operations. Those meridian barriers should also be activated as well.
And to be clear, I wanna clarify the incident that happened in March, our full Code Red deployment wasn't in place at that time. We had additional a
was closed a because there was an orange two by four barrier.
Oh, I I mean this year.
So I
just wanted to clarify this year so far we have not put up the meridian barriers. Last year, we did not have them in the area where that tragedy occurred. Okay.
So officers have the option to take voluntary overtime to work code red. Is the street takeover task force also staffed with voluntary overtime?
Well, thank you very much for discussing street takeovers because that is also problematic from time to time in the city of Milwaukee, not just on the North Side, not just on the South Side, but throughout the entire city. And so the deployment strategy regarding the street takeovers is that there are two officers assigned from each district to assist in case there is an incident that takes place in the in on any street in Milwaukee, and that is governed and supervised by a sergeant. And so if there is a a large amount of vehicles that are drag racing and engaging in these types of events, and if we are aware of that, that sergeant along with those two officers from each district, if it's if they are needed, will go and disperse
those That's not that's not voluntary overtime. That's just a regular that's a regular
yes, sir.
It's a regular
alright.
So the extra overtime in code red does not subtract from the street takeover task force.
Correct. That is its own entity.
The street takeover task force only starts at what time in the evening?
It depends because so right now
night, it starts
at 09:00. Well, we have our officers, our late power officers from 7AM or excuse me, 7PM to 3AM who are committed to that deployment in case there is a situation that takes
when I had a street takeover in my district, I was told, sorry, they don't start until 08:00. They'll be there around 08:30. And the the takeover
It's crazy.
Went uncontrolled with zero police response for ninety minutes.
I will tell you that was very early on in the stages when we had a task force dedicated to that work. And I recall that situation. And once it was brought to our attention, we addressed it with those individuals who were assigned and we explained the expectations and talked and discussed that they would be available throughout the entire ship. So there were some issues there and we acknowledge that. But as the work continues, as it's now become a process, that will no longer be the response.
Is that enormous city resources are being spent downtown where every property owner in the city of Milwaukee pays property taxes. In my district, I have one squad squad on on patrol. Patrol. And when I need more, I get told you need to wait ninety minutes before we
Mhmm.
Finish our roll call and make our way there. Right? That's a problem for me. That's a problem for my residents. Other cities that have entertainment districts control their entertainment districts with private security like the bid or the business association or the neighbors on that in that entertainment district pay for that security.
You need to check your They check IDs when people enter that entertainment district on the public street solely because this is not MPDs to own solely because this is a public street. If there is a drain on resources from other neighborhoods in the city, that neighborhood draining those resources needs to step up and come to this council for a plan. We can change whatever ordinance we need to so that that entertainment district can thrive but can also pay for its own needs. The cash cow of overtime on Code Red tells me that there are there are fewer resources, not just monetary, but if there was a need for street takeover over time, those 26 officers are no longer eligible to go protect neighborhoods. That's a problem for me.
That's a problem for my district. Thank you, mister chair.
Thank you. Alder Moore.
Thank you so much mister chair. So, probably, there was a few questions that I had and so if I'm going back, forgive me. I didn't want to interrupt my colleagues. Can you, inspector Grant or Heather, either one of you, can you talk a little bit about numbers? So for example, for Code Red, specifically, ideally, the volunteer portion, or the the the officers that volunteer, what is roughly the number of officers that are needed to support that?
And so that there are Even
if it's a range. So there are four zones
that we cover regarding, COREED. And so to support those, the efforts in keeping the individuals there as safe as possible, I know that in the past that we've had up to about 40 officers that have worked some of those deployments. But that's keeping in mind that we have Water Street North, we have Water Street South, and we have a variety of other entertainment zones downtown as well. But to give you an an exact number of what is proper to ensure that no one is harmed, I can't provide that because that even if we had like, we had 26 officers deployed on March 22 and someone still was was victimized.
Let me be a little bit more succinct. On average, how many officers are working code red no I understand that there's four zone on average you know what we typically have 20 officers or 25 or 30 what is the average number of officers. That are typically. Supporting that area.
I don't want to assume. Okay. Order one woman and I don't want to give you any false or inaccurate information. Can I provide that information
to Okay? You another I appreciate that. Thank you. And then so aside from just for my clarification. Aside from those officers that are supporting code red, these four zones, they are still regular, you know, appointed officers that are already scheduled to be there. What does that number look like? Sure.
So, that number generally is about nine. The nine officers that worked the the late power or nine or so officers for the that deployment. Yeah.
Those officers would, if there's a call for service, then be pulled and deployed to respond to that call for service anywhere in District 1.
Anywhere. Got it. Yep.
Yep. So perfect that you answered. That was a follow-up. So you all mentioned quite a bit about the support of some of our other agencies such as DCWS. Can you talk a little bit about when that relationship sort of started because I know they weren't always not to my recollection I know they were always coming down there- to help support. When did that relationship begin and what were the conversations about like what is needed of- of the staff.
Sure. Well, I know I had reached out and this is just anecdotally based upon my memory of my own conversations. I had reached out to Ashanti Hamilton back when he was the director and I can't honestly recall if it was last year or the year before to say hey listen, you know I get I know you're deployed in all these areas but maybe it would be helpful like let's start a conversation about coordinating in the downtown area. So that for code red probably happened within the last couple of years, but I don't know the exact date. Just know he was the director.
I'm just looking for just a timeline. Couple years ago, whatever that that makes sense. Yes. Thank you. That's all the questions I have for now. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Briefly on that point, Alder Chambers is still in the queue.
Okay.
Alder Chambers?
Thank you. Okay, I'll go I'll work backwards. Inspector Grant, you said that there's four zones and the zones are Water North, Water South, Brady, MLK. Correct?
Yes, sir.
Okay. And it's code red on all of these, like, every weekend?
Yes. We do have officers assigned every weekend to these locations.
So there was an incident that happened at Element where there was no officers over there.
That isn't part of the cold red.
Isn't that Water South?
That is Water Water South. And there if I'm if my memory serves me correctly, there were officers that were in that vicinity or in that general area. However, I would have to review additional reports regarding that. Okay. But that is Water South.
Yeah. I I because I just try to I guess the deployment is what can confuses me because I mean, the video stated that there was no officers near there. So then that would take me to my next question, and this is for you, miss Huff. You mentioned in your earlier testimony that the bid fund fund have funds for security. Do you know the dollar amount for their their funds?
So the the bid security is not NPD security.
I got you.
I do not know that information.
Do you know what are you aware of what the bid secure within their bid?
I know they utilize their resources for a number of different things in the downtown area, so they have a homeless outreach team. They have different security for different things, but I really honestly can't speak intelligently about what all of the resources are.
Talking about me that bill bid 31, is that that's the 21? Okay.
Well, for part of it, not not all the zones, not the four zones. The 21 with number two
of the four zones. Okay.
They will cover Brady Street which has its own bid and
That's Matt doing that.
Cover three of them.
That's Matt, correct? Matt's the bid direct. I can ask him that question. And then going back to Auto Woman Taylor's point earlier, piggyback on my point, thank you. NPS has had some success the Auto Woman to be traders were like this, had some success with their twilight centers. You know, with the amount of kids that, you know, come into there, I mean, maybe it's a question that we can, you know, since auto emboss has said the the great impact MSOE did, they have the beautiful current center literally right there on the corner. You know, maybe we could possibly look into doing something far as a twilight center there for the weekends.
Soccer
field. Yeah. Or the soccer field, you know, the twilight centers for them during the night to work off, brush off some steam, to charge em you know, a nominal amount, dollars 5 or something like that to help do that or that could be one of the centers that we drop off the kids to and they can get exposed to some college education or some college, you know, environment and see if they like that in the future as opposed to the the stuff that they're embarking. So, I just really that's more of a comment than as a of a question. You know, I I really want us to find creative ways to minimize the strain that we are already putting not only on you but the city and our residents because we get those calls when we hear about the lack of police response and to Alderman Burgales' point, you know, we do that.
And then, you like this one. I guess, you know, I had an incident. Again, I brought up last week where resources were pulled from various districts. Three, five, I drove there myself and saw the cars. You know, when a shooting when a shooting occurs or a major incident occurs downtown, all resources come from various districts if, you know, if, you know, we need it. The if a major incident or shouldn't come, do people come from downtown to go out to those incidents, or do they stay downtown?
They also respond to different locations throughout the city of Milwaukee if there is a violent or a major incident that takes place because I indicate as I indicated before, sir, we service the entire city of Milwaukee. So if there is an incident, a major incident, a shooting, a stat or a shooting, a significant issue that takes place on one side of the city, if those officers that are assigned to that district, if they're on other significant, calls for service, officers from other districts will respond to those services. And so it goes both ways.
What about officers that's working code red?
They can't be pulled. If if there is a major incident that's taking place in the city of Milwaukee, a life threatening incident, or where resources are needed, they can be pulled and utilized, sir.
How often are they pulled?
Right now, don't have that information but that's something I can follow-up with you on if that's okay.
Because you know, I I believe that but I just I I know people didn't go from co red down to the other incidents and I think that since they are working overtime and they are considered extra bodies as opposed to pulling resources from other districts who are securing a district, I think they should be the first ones to go. Just my, you know, point of view. But, you know, I I really think we need to reimagine this and, you know, get away from status quo because right now, I think we're just really stagnant and that's why we're having these conversations now. So, thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Chair.
Thank you. I think President Perez was in the queue and then back to Alder Moore. President Perez?
Yeah. I just wanted to just say that I think there is a lot of conversations going on and it doesn't feel like the council is at the table And I think we should be at the table. We have lots of council members that are committed to helping solve this problem, committed to prevention, committed to sharing resources, information and especially if there's going to be any dollar spent, the council must be at the table. It doesn't feel that that's the case at this point. So I just want to make that clear that we should be at the table. And then just one anecdotal thing I just wanted to ask is with the Fusion Center, we can't get ahead of the street takeovers in a in a in a timely fashion.
So, I believe our next file will touch a little bit on the street and teen takeovers but briefly. Save it for then. Okay.
Thank you. Alder Moore?
I'll make this really brief. Thank you so much, mister chair. I think one of the things that I wanna say is that I don't expect the police department to create programs for the young people. That's not what you're designed to do. Yes, you can partner. Absolutely. But it is the role of, community partners, even specific departments in our city to be able to take the lead on what that could look like. There's a room full of community partners that are are in the room. There are plenty that may be watching online. That is a strategy for us to be able to figure out while saying, okay, MPD, how can you support this particular initiative?
But in my opinion, it is not for you all to solve that issue. You all are the police. We want you to figure out how to, you know, make sure you're policing the entire you know supporting the entire city around the needs that we have not just again not just downtown and this isn't I don't want to make this you know this file is about you know downtown but we're talking about a citywide issue here. So I'm hoping that I hear you know from- and this is where we come in as well with looking at you know- resources that we may have to be able to put back into our generation, back into our young people because there are not a lot of skating rinks and bowling alleys that allow these young people to be at. And I know that some people don't want young people out late, you know, but once you get to be a certain age and you're a teenager, you know, there needs to be some structured and safe spaces for our young people to be.
We can have that. It's happened in other communities. We can figure that out. I just push us to be able to work together to figure out what that looks like and to be able able to again leverage resources philanthropy- you know community the city the state whatever but to leverage resources so that we can. Again I'm support the issues that we're having in the city and not just you know write off our young people so we can get I know we can get there because we got a lot of people in this room that care. Thank you thank you Mr chair.
Mister chair. Thank
you- elder Taylor's in the queue then we'll go back to the sponsor and- maybe wrap things up.
Thank you
so much. So appreciate all the woman Charlotte Morrissey. Thank you, Wayne, me right into where I want to go. So I was just going put in a plug for district nine because often I say that we need to be part of the solution, right? And so she's right. MPD is not responsible for programming, but there are a lot of people in the room that I can see right now who do care and they wanna come up with a solution. So my plug is that district nine has is in the process of opening a roller rink for our young people, but it is not
a free for all.
There is going to be accountability. There is high security. There is parental involvement. There is ID checking. So, but we are trying to be part of the solution to have a space for young people because we can't just keep pushing them from area to area to area without a solution because that's what's gonna happen.
And we're never gonna stop these street takeovers and over utilization of our resources. So we have to come up with solutions. So that is my plug for District 9. Flow roller rink will hopefully open sometime in October. But we're going to try to, like I said, have all of our security pieces in place so we're not over utilizing our resources.
We love that. Thank you.
Thank you very much. You are welcome.
Thank you. Alder Baumann. Yeah. Thank you Mr. Chair. I certainly take to heart the comments of my colleagues regarding the need for police resources in the neighborhoods and that the co red may or may not be consuming too much police resources. But I just having said that, I also represent neighborhoods. So I understand that concern.
Yeah.
But I have to say for the record and for people watching on TV, this area in yellow represents 22% of the city's tax base. This tax base is what allows the city to provide public services and public safety in other parts of the city. This has 2% of the city's land there, land mass in this yellow area. There's about 90,000 jobs in this this yellow area. There's about 10,000 hotel rooms in this yellow area.
There's about 8,000 residents in this area. There's a major university in this area. There are numerous entertainment venues which are economic drivers of the hospitality industry in downtown and frankly for the entire city. You have the Baird Center and the Convention Center and Fiserv Forum and the Panther Arena and Miller Theater and the new Live Nation Theater and all the other, the PAPS Theater Group. You have numerous entertainment venues.
So downtown is everybody's neighborhood. It does deserve the police resources necessary to maintain this economic engine. So this engine continues to function and continues to produce economic value and social value for all the citizens of Milwaukee and frankly for all residents of Southeast Wisconsin. So let's not put pit neighborhoods against neighborhoods because this is everybody's neighborhood. And this is the economic engine of Milwaukee and Southeast Wisconsin.
So I but I'm all in favor of measures that can reduce the incentive to come downtown and tailgate. And one of those methods and this has been discussed before, is fencing off these entertainment districts and creating entry points where people are wanted and go through magnetometers and are checked for weapons. Are we looking at that? Had we have any plans in place? Are we penciling out what that would cost?
So from a policing perspective, we would love to be able to have controlled areas in entertainment districts or elsewhere where large numbers of people congregate that are fenced off, where private security is wanting individuals checking IDs. We know that in other entertainment districts nationwide that
the model and that seems to have worked in some of the places. In fact, Captain Teal is visiting Nashville now. I think they do that in a number of different places and spaces. I think that's a bigger conversation than police and I don't mean to pass the buck. We can absolutely recommend and I know the chief is very supportive of areas where we could start.
A challenge with Milwaukee to acknowledge is that the downtown area is vast and there are a number of micro entertainment areas within the downtown areas. But we say let's start one place. Let's see. Let's see if it works and is effective because we also while we police citywide, we also agree with all the statements that you said as well. So I know that the police department is committed to having a conversation about dedicated entertainment districts.
We would be happy to make recommendations from a public safety perspective in that conversation. But I think that that would involve more than just us because there needs to be some decision and policymakers.
What's the administration's position on that?
Very supportive.
About Oh. Oh.
I thought you meant the police administration. I apologize. I can't speak to the administration's position.
Miss Daniels is here. She could perhaps speak. Would you like to speak to the position of the administration or not?
Well, I guess how do we get this process started? Do I introduce a file in two weeks that directs DPW to put a fence? Yeah. Just to get the conversation going?
Make defense of MSOE. Take defense from MSOE.
It's not their responsibility to police downtown Milwaukee.
Right. So so but what I'm I guess, just to kinda wrap things up. So what I'm hearing is when this many folks congregate, you are overwhelmed. There is not a response that you can do with even 26 officers that are is going to make that manageable. If you wanted to enforce anything, whether it's curfew, parents, the rest, that would take all your officers and more.
So Alder Baumann is discussing the fencing alternative as a way for you to get a handle on things. So worth further discussion, worth deeper dive with the administration to see if they'd support it. Alder Baumann wants to bring forward a file to to make that put that in motion. It's it's his district where this would be happening. So that's something that could be pursued. Alder Chambers, you had a super quick question. We usually end up with the sponsor.
Yes, sir. And I really appreciate my colleague on this and I know that he is working hard and has done tremendous work for you know, his district and representing downtown very well. So, I won't, you know, push back on that far as that but miss Huff, what is the I guess I want to know like what is the the the amount of officers that are currently stationed at district one.
Or what what's the what's the I guess the the the rate of employment I guess as far as like productivity and things of that nature. I know we previously had a study and I know that district one and six had the highest like productivity rate after being proactive, having proactive cause as opposed to reactive cause. Meanwhile, district four, district seven, and district five had reactive cause to a high amount. I guess where I guess what I'm trying to figure out is there's more than enough officers that are district one that can man the entire district. I would assume. Correct? Or they are thin as well. Guess that's the question I'm asking.
So right now, if I'm not mistaken, we are down at least a 100 officers citywide, if not more than that. So we would welcome, and I appreciate you auditors for pushing out that we're hiring because we are definitely hiring and looking for more members to join our forces to support all of our vast diverse communities. But as it relates to the staffing of district five, I can give you that number district one, I can give you that number in a closed door session, sir. But right now, they are still just based upon the the resources that we have. They're still understaffed as well as other districts throughout the city.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much.
I'll place you on file.
Well, let's ask the sponsor if it's his wish to have this placed on file or would you like to keep it held
for I like keeping file alive. So hold and call it a chair.
I'll do that.
Okay. Alder Chambers then moves to have this item held to the call of the chair. Are there any objections? Then that matter is dispensed with. Thank you. Moving on to an adjacent file where community wellness and safety has been noticed and we'll have a seat at the table as well. This is item number five, file number 25200131. Communication from the Milwaukee Police Department and the Department of Community Wellness and Safety relating to their response to teen takeovers. This is sponsored by Alder Moore, myself, and Alder President Perez. Alder Moore, you are taking lead. So we will go to you.
Thank you, so much. Are we having other folks come to the Tech Bowl or?
Community wellness and safety has been noticed so they should, come on down.
Is that a presentation you have, that's her?
Okay. Let me call City Channel. Oh, you think.
Thank you. I'm actually leaving the table for this one.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you so much, mister Sher. One of the more recent issues that have transpired in our city has been sort of the team takeover. So we had the street takeovers.
Now we have the team takeovers. And this is an opportunity for us to get a little bit more clarity around just sort of and again, these opportunities are for us to- communicate back. To our residents as to what it is that we're doing you know when these sorts of issues- happen we know that there is police response but at the same time. What is- our department's response or even our community's response or the collaboration thereof on how we're addressing these particular issues. And so I just wanted to call the department to just share what it is that, they've they've done what you know how they've participated in the process, just so that we can get a sense of the work, that's taking place.
Again, this helps us, figure out if there there's a need, if there's anything missing, what do we need to do as elected bodies you know, to put some, you know, ordinance together, whatever it may be but it's that sort of relationship where we're looking for that communication. So thank you so much mister chair. If any of our my colleagues want to add to that.
Very good. President Perez, anything to add before we go to the departments?
No, I think my colleague captured it well. We just want to hear what's going on and I guess for the viewing public just to be able to measure some outcomes of commitments that are going to be made to some of the things we need to address.
Very good. With that, we'll throw it to the police department and Department of Community Wellness and Safety.
All right. So I also have Captain Vanetta Norberg, is our commanding officer of our school resource officer division as well as our community resource division. As it relates to the team takeovers, I was advised directly by our intelligence fusion center as well as community partners, CVI teams who provided direct information regarding where these team takeovers would take place. And that was an Instagram post with which had a variety of different flyers. And so I'm thankful for the partnerships that we have with our CVI teams and our CVI partners who provide us information so that we can get ahead of our strategic deployments, etcetera.
And so when advised about Carmen Park and Moody Park, we worked with our school resource officers, the officers from district four, officers from district five, and also our Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office to deploy law enforcement personnel at those locations. Our officers engaged with the youth that were there. We also know that four one four Life Department of Community Safety and wellness along with other CVI teams were at these locations engaging with the youth and that they also dispersed some of the individuals that were there. Based upon the information that I have is that a lot of the CVI partners actually diffused situations before they escalated. As it relates to the teams that were at these locations, a lot of the teams were there to have fun.
I was advised that a lot of the youth were there walk walking dogs, on roller skates, playing basketball, actually there to have fun at the park where they should be allowed to be kids and to and to partake in those activities. We were then advised that there could be a possible team takeover at 3rd Street Market. Our officers along with the Milwaukee Sheriff's Department or office responded to that location and worked in con conjunctively with the security personnel there, and there were no incidents that took place there. We were also advised that there was gonna be a teen takeover at district stations. And so that causes significant alarm because what teen is advising other teens to go to police districts to try to take over a police department.
And so it causes us to investigate if these are adults that are putting these flyers together. We know that this is nationwide, Atlanta, other places throughout The The US have experienced this during spring break and also responded. And so our message to our community, our message to our parents and guardians. Please know where your kids are going. Please know who's gonna be there. Please know if there's gonna be responsible adults. We know that we have a variety of community partners and resources who have programming for our youth, please take advantage of those programs and be very cautious of just dropping your kids off. Okay.
Office or Department of Community Wellness and Safety, do
you have
anything to add?
Sure. Hello, committee members, president the council and other council members. My name is Karen Tyler, interim director for the Department of Community Wellness and Safety. I'd like to first kind of emphasize with emphasize what inspector Grant stated. This is a national situation that's taken place.
So we are going to be under the guidance of the National Office of Violence Prevention Network and there is an emergency meeting scheduled for later this month. With that being said, we have done some research locally and I want to turn it over to Julian Pfeifer who leads our data and research work within the office and we'll talk about some statistics and some information that we've put together.
So I don't think this was shared with me in advance. So how long would the presentation
It's very brief.
Like five minutes, ten minutes?
For sure. Okay. Yes. Four?
Yeah. Please try to keep it brief so we will have time for questions from members.
Sure. Thank you.
Good morning. My name is Julian Pfeiffer. I work in community outreach projects for the Department of Community Wellness and Safety. As we think about our response to takeovers, I think it's important to be guided by the data. The data tells us that Milwaukee is a young City.
Nearly one in three residents is 20 according to the health department's community health assessment. Share of residents 20 in Milwaukee is about 27% higher than national average. That helps explain the scale of what we are dealing with here. It means that Milwaukee faces a higher demand for places to go, things to do, and ways to connect as the alderwoman mentioned. There's a greater responsibility to provide space, structure, and opportunity.
If we're not meeting that demand, then it's going it's going to show up somewhere. Uh-huh. Before team takeover, street takeovers were a thing, that community health assessment highlighted the need of investing in safe spaces and youth programs that help young people thrive. Speaking to that, there's a social engagement index conducted by the health department, which is a measure of things like what are people involved in, how do people feel connected, feel like they belong somewhere, and whether they feel like there's positive ways to connect with others. What what the index showed was that Milwaukee, city of Milwaukee ranks numb the lowest, second lowest among the 19 municipalities in the county.
Even within the city, there's a 30 gap between the most connected and least connected neighborhoods. That's that explains a big difference between how people experience daily life. Low social engagement means that there's going to be greater isolation. Higher higher isolation means that there's gonna be more instability. Where there's instability, there's violence.
Mister chair?
President press. I just
could you just explain how you how you got there? I mean I mean you you just threw out that we're second and how did you measure that? How?
Well, that was a research from the city of Milwaukee health department released in their in their recent release, recently released community health assessment. Those were their figures.
And this is within Milwaukee County. It's not a comparison of us with other peer cities around the country.
It's a ranking of the 19 municipalities in the City Of Milwaukee by the health department.
In the county of Milwaukee? The county. Okay. County. But not with peer cities across the country.
Nope. They looked at Okay. Purely Milwaukee County.
Do we have any data on that or how we compare to other peer cities as far as the social engagement?
That's very fascinating. I'd be happy to have that conversation.
Mr. Chair. Okay. President Preza, you concluded or
Yeah.
I just mean, it's an interesting ranking that we're second lowest. I just want to know how we got there or the data to back that up.
I'd love to have the health department here. We've talking about engaging and coordinating on more of these sort of things but
that's health department data.
And you know, I say that because I believe I I've heard publicly. I know the mayor said it that we have a plethora of things for young people to do. And so I'm I'm I wanna make that connection between what you're saying here and the plethora of things for young people to do in the city.
According to the metrics that they looked at and that they're comparing, what they're saying is between neighborhoods, There is a 30 gap. So there are neighborhoods where that engagement is high and then there are other neighborhoods where it's lower. Okay.
Alder Burgales?
Yeah. I just don't see the relevance of this at all. You just said just now a moment ago that there are there's a 30 gap between neighborhoods within Milwaukee County. So the relevance of a social engagement index amongst municipalities, one that has a whole lot of people in West Milwaukee with 4,500 residents, 900 of them go to the bake sale. That's not a fair comparison. So I I really just have to question the relevance of any of this in.
Well, the relevance in my opinion if I could say that, you know, Milwaukee is a city with young youth population, population 20, which which is 27% higher than national average. That that gives us a greater responsibility to provide this this support in a structure and these venue opportunities for young folks. We got more young folks than most cities, sir.
You're comparing apples to elephants. I I don't see it. Thank you.
Okay. Please proceed. And we wanna make sure we have time for questions. So again, was promised five, seven, ten minutes max. So I'll let you proceed without interruption but let's conclude so we can have questions.
Okay. So I'm pointing out here that the city of Milwaukee Department of Community Wellness and Safety has invested in our youth. Our summer of healing program provides safe, fun, skill building activities for youth to get signed up for and involved in during the summer months. That investment has been made. Also, we have partnered with Employ Milwaukee for the growth opportunities program.
That's for for kids ages 15 to 18, mentoring, job training, conflict resolution, skill building. These are some of the responses that the Department of Community Wellness and Safety has. These should be considered part of the response to the issue of what our young people are facing in the city. This slide here details the coordinated response as described by Inspector Grant, another MPD. Our street outreach teams are coordinating, looking to stay ahead, keep an eye on the chatter, what's happening, and respond to incidents.
What do we have here? Our summer of healing grantees have agreed on a creative way to create our own takeovers and surround those with positive healthy events. So there's some creative things happening. There's also been some discussions with gaining additional support from philanthropists. We've had some businesses who have offered to provide facilities, space, and provide support to capacity building for our efforts, prevention efforts.
Thank you. Thank you. And I would just request for the department next time to provide the slides in advance. We can have it added to the file and then members can have it on their computer so they can see it. Some of the text was really hard to see and also helps us prep in advance. Thank you. With that, are there questions from committee members for either MPD or DCWS? Mr. Chair? Alder Moore.
Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you for sharing that context with us. It's you know, sort of sad to see that we're the second lowest when it comes to social engagement. I know that the health department pull puts out this report. I want to say maybe yearly or every year. I always remember them seeing a report. Do you know if this is a yearly report or
I believe it's every two years.
Every two years? Yes. And I think my question is and congratulated them on the data in there that I don't know if anybody reads it. It's amazing. And we actually should be using the health report as a tool to gauge some of the things that we do here in the city.
So, sort of knowing that. So, and and my colleague, all the president Perez mentioned in regards to, you know, yeah, we have a plethora of activities for our young people. That's the that's the the summer camps, the internships but what we're really talking, you know, at at 10:00 at night or 09:00 at night, we're not talking about those things, right? We're talking about this social, this social engagement. So, knowing this information, I mean, when were you all so let me back up. When were you all aware of this information?
Well, it has informed our efforts. Our summer of healing programming. We've gone in. We're going into this summer represents the third year that our summer of healing program has been going on. So, we've we've that informs our work.
And the report that just came out, what what is the date on it?
2025. I think it was released in January '25.
Okay. And so you all have been using that information to sort of inform some of the things that you all do.
Along with other reports, studies.
Yes. No. That's that's awesome. That is that is really good and so then with that, what has been the plan to coordinate these sort of social engagements because again, you know, I shared before that the the this is not the police sort of- duty right to put together programs for young people or coordinate strategies right- they could be part of it so what have you all done. To be able to- core Nate knowing that the so, you know, this was in 2025. What has been done to help coordinate putting partners together using this data to actually strategize some things.
There have been conversations with folks like the health department in agreement on collaborating and coordinating on prevention issues. And so we look forward to that partnership. One of the things that we've talked about is ways to leverage the influence and the resources of sister city agencies who also have a stake in this, engage other stakeholders, and pursue opportunities where priorities and goals align and prevent violence.
Thank you. And I hear you and I hear what you're saying, but a lot of what I'm hearing is, oh, we're in conversation, we're in talks. I wanna know what's been done.
Summer of healing's been done. Growth opportunities in Milwaukee has been done. These are things
Social let's go back to
the social engagement. So, like, I'm very familiar with Summer of Healing. I'm very familiar with some of the partners that are at the table. What I'm saying is, what what is the strategy? So young people doing this sort of stuff, this ain't new. When I was young, what they had was cruising. The signs are still up on what is that? Sherman? Right? We were around during you know, we're young ourselves, but we're around during that time.
When when when a city is void again, we're the second lowest. When a city is the void, you already said it, of these operate opportunities it creates a higher demand and guess what. Young people are gonna you know find their own ways to do things as we've seen it morphs into different things right street takeovers teen take overs, whatever, right? What I'm asking is, yes, there is summer of healing. Yes, there's this growth opportunities that's very prescriptive to a small group of young people or a very structured opportunity what I'm asking is.
What is the strategy what has been the strategy to talk about how we address young people how we support. Young people you know and I and and- and anybody can answer but I'm I'm I'm trying to get to the yeah we're working on the I haven't seen anything. I just so I'm so that's what I'm pulling that's what I'm sort of pulling out. What what is the talks right now? What has been done right now to address that? Go ahead, boss.
So, that just and thank you very much for allowing me to jump in real quick. Our order woman more. I just wanna tell you, yes, you're absolutely you're absolutely right. Our role as law enforcement professionals is to protect and serve. However, our officers are engaging with the youth on a regular basis. I know that we have a great relationship with MPS and the young individuals that attend the schools. And Katherine Norberg can provide you with information regarding what our school resource officers are currently doing in the programming and the partnership inside of the schools.
I wanted to jump in because last year, when we had the shooting downtown Can you please introduce yourself? Von Mays, founder of Conforce. I'm one of the peacekeeper teams under DCWS. Last year, I sat here in the seat when we had the shooting downtown and I specifically say it that on top of the resources, the presence, and all of that stuff that we needed to have down there. We cannot do that without providing these alternative spaces for young people. I said that last year. Yep. And this is a continuation of that not being done and prioritized. So, what we're seeing is a continuation of young people figuring their own spaces, putting their own things together. Right?
So, mister Mays, when you share that information, who did you share that information with?
When I shared that, I was talking to the this.
Talking to this
body. Yes. Okay.
But what I will say is after that happened, the only so we have a lock in program. Yep. And this goes to Alder regardless of of the question he asked about the relevance, right? There's a difference in things that people do. You have people who go to bars, then you have people who go to after sex.
There's a total difference in that. Yes. This is why we have all these programs that people talk about but they wonder why the kids won't go to those programs or aren't attending those spaces. The specific group that we're talking about, you have to be intentional in the space you create for them. Yes. Because a lot of these other place that are in place may not be welcoming to them. Some of them don't want them there or don't want to work with that specific population. So, the program that we created was a was a direct response to the buck shooting that we had a number of years ago. The lock in program was created for that and it was birthed in order woman Taylor's district and the the week before we opened that launched that program, there was a shooting in her district. Lots away from where we first launched.
After that, there was there were no more shootings in that district and we did that program in her district for about a year. Last year, DCWS, OCWS at the time sponsored the only lock in we had last year. We had the the most attendance we ever had in the lock in. Yep. So, when we talk about spaces, we have to be intentional and specific about the space we create for certain young people because there are spaces for other young people but you know, to be honest, a lot of the conversation we're not having is a lot of these other organizations do not want to work with the population that needs the most help. Right. We have to be honest about that.
And then we have to be intentional about that space. So, even there's been some interruption because of what happened with Adam and his having to step down because the conversation that we keep having about the space where MPD is supposed to take in people, that was conversation started with myself and Adam and other partners about what that was supposed to look like and that has been interrupted since he's had to to step down. So, the the idea was to have the missing piece the the twilight centers. Yep. Lock ins, different alternatives for them to go to depending on what the needs of those young people were because some of them will go to the the Twilight Centers.
Some of them will go to the missing piece. They have great programming and stuff that happens there all the time but some of them specifically, we keep having these conversations with young people and they're telling us what they want.
They want.
The lock ins is literally created from everything that they want and they like to do. And I'm not trying to shameless plug. I'm just saying the hard work is specific for the issues that we're talking about. So it will be great to have some of that a lot more of that those conversations and I want to shout out the CVI ecosystem for bringing together the critical protocol response and how we are coming more collective and a lot of the stuff that we're doing and bouncing off each other. Even so much as we're seeing this spill out into other municipalities.
We've seen this spill out to Bakeshore. We've seen this spill out to Mayfair and these are again because even they are not providing spaces where they are but these are where people go And our young people go where everybody else goes. They want to be included, and they want to do some of the same things. And so, like you said, nobody wants young people to be out in the middle of the night, but you have to have something that accounts for the young people who will be out in the middle of the night and do that in a safe conducive and supported way.
So I'll take this back
to the department. So, Von, you mentioned that the conversation had been interrupted since Adam left as far as and my colleague talked about- the space the curf you know. Figuring out how do we do curfew violations are again- I'm inspector grant was just like this is not about you know punishing young you know. We can cite them all day we don't want to do that that doesn't work- it doesn't curve the behavior right- sort of make some things other things worse- but I want to bring it back to the department as far as- if this was interrupt why was it interrupted because I don't want to make this about. An actual person I want to make this about if the if there's a department that has.
You know these are the things that we're supposed to be doing and if somebody comes into the- or or is part of. These decisions or these conversations, why didn't it continue? So, I'll I'll bring that back to you miss Tyler as far as because I've been hearing about This curfew spaces I think there might have been an article about it and I was confused because I hadn't heard anything from you know from anybody- particularly the department that it started in as far as just communication. You know this is this is what we're thinking about so why was that conversation interrupted because again we're going into the summer months we know that when the you know the weather peaks. Right you know we probably got to praise god for the rain because it might simmer some things down but we know that things are you know folks will gonna be outside.
Right that's and that's where they should be. But how did that conversation not continue because it seemed like it was an idea to again figure out how to curb or curtail the issue. Miss Tyler.
We have a couple of them, sir.
So the the conversation definitely continued. So we didn't talk specifically about the lock ins, but we did talk to other youth organizations because it's beyond just violence prevention. It's it's youth engagement. So we have one of our great partners here, Uncom. They have youth organizations across the city. You know, we have contracted partners with running rebels and like our summer healing so. Again we're trying to be creative so for an example we talk
about the example of the curfew sit you you know the space for the curfew that's what I'm trying to. Get a little bit more understanding about
yes so first of all there's so much that we have to talk about and we have to talk about how do we even invest in this type of idea. So it's very preliminary. So when the media report came out, you know, we haven't finalized anything. So, yeah. So again, it's just preliminary conversations now. But what we learned from the police department is that they do to have youth and that it requires a lot of their time. So then we thought let's talk about this. Let's see what we can do because if we can bring youth into a location, we can possibly explore wraparound services. We can see what's going on. Why are they been out after curfew?
We know the statistics state that, you know, they're at higher danger when they're out. That's where the higher prevalence of violence is for you too. So so definitely we're just exploring a lot of different things and getting geared up for summer, but we have a lot of transitional things going on within our office right now. But definitely, we want to make sure we have concrete plans. But again, we're meeting regularly about this. As you see, we're doing the research so we can go in the right direction.
I understand that. And, you know, I understand that there may be some transitional things that may be impeding the department. So, with so, with that, then, will the work not get done because it's now April, right? You know, if we're talking about a plan for summer, it should we we should already know what that is because you know, I did a summer use resource fair and I apologize to people because we should be talking about summer in January, right? Because you know, that's when all people are signing up for stuff from just planning.
It's now April. When when will we get a, you know, is it something that's looking to be implemented a pilot this year? Is it, you know what? We're just going to plan for next year. I'm just trying to get an understanding of like we can talk and talk and talk and we're sitting and we're meeting but I'm a person that I'm just like, I, we need to get to the table, figure out what we need to do, call the partners, you know, get a plan together because summer is going to be here sooner than you know it and there's nothing that's concrete that is, you know, set in stone of how we're going to be supporting young people, you know, this summer.
So for you all is the it is there a timeline. Is there you know what we're looking to have things finalized by a particular time like give me a little sense of. Where you all are on just sort of the planning process because. I don't want us to be planning in June.
Yeah so. For one we had two major meetings yesterday one with the our fast with a lot of our- partners across the city. As well as an and I know Lynn Lewis is here who leads the critical response protocol. And so because it we want to explore that with the entire CVI ecosystem as well as youth organizations across the city. So yeah we know we do have a tight timeline and we and we we did anticipate starting early with things, but then we had an abrupt change in leadership. And now with the transition, it is affecting like our coordination, but for sure we know we mean, this
How is hard
it affecting the coordination? Well, for one, you gotta think. We went from an office to a department. Mhmm. So we had to look at that. We had to look at restructuring. Again, we had an abrupt change in leadership. Mhmm. We so there was differences in regards to the direction. We don't know who is going to be the leader. So so that's another thing. We're down five staff currently. But you're the
one that want to be the leader though. You know so yes so.
You to be an issue.
No want to be and actually is the leader.
Enter.
Well yes the the correct but that shouldn't deter things from still moving forward because you're Well, they're practicing that what you are doing.
So I'm down five. I'm not that. I can't even hire anyone right now. I can't even hire. So we're down five staff. And so I think people need to take have some grace for our department. Again, we went to we went from a we're a standalone department now. That requires a lot of infrastructure considerations. And then again, we can't hire. We can't fire. So we can't really make a lot of changes. So, we're down five seven. That's pretty significant. So, I believe we're doing the best we can and we are moving things forward but there's challenges. You.
Thank you so much, mister. Go ahead. Can I also
add? Bring it back
to chair.
Let's let's hold on here. So, we're having a very involved discussion. There's members with questions. Let's make sure we get members to have the opportunity to ask those questions. So, Alder Chambers, you were next in the queue.
Thank you, mister chair and and my apologies to my colleague for coming in. I'm going to be the one to apologize to you, miss Karen, and to your department because actions made by this council within the budget. You know, you know, indirectly harm your department for a short period of time and now, you're going through what you're going through right now and I can speak for myself and myself alone and I'm a say, I apologize for that because, you know, had we known at least for me, the decisions that we made within the budget process, it probably would have been a bigger fight in far as doing that. So, I'm going to be the first to say that because you as an intern, you don't have powers to do anything as you stated. As far as hiring, firing, or even monetary monetary decisions to actually, you know, hand out contracts and do things to your department, to your organization, Vaughan and various organizations that are here.
So I think it's very unfair to put you through that fire when you can't because if you had that ability, you probably would have done what you needed to do. So I'm not saying that to get applause. I'm just saying it to state facts. So, thank you. You know, I I just think that, you know, when we, you know, as my colleague stated, Auto Woman Moore, we all need to, you know, pull in our resources and pull in our thing and I came to a lock in.
I came to a lock in the day before my back to school festival just to see that missing piece. How far is this and it was fantastic. It was about 65 kids there singing, dancing, eating, loaded, Cheetos, and playing basketball and they were face pain. They was learning how to cook. They were playing video games. They were doing a ton of things not in the street.
That's it.
So, I want y'all to continue to do that work and one of I personally want to continue to support the efforts that everyone is doing far as doing this. My my question my question to you mister Mays is How do you see this? How do you see? How do you envision a true response and a true partnership between the departments as far as MPD and DCWS moving forward on combatting that? Because they can't do this alone. As you said, how do you how do you envision that?
I I think the route that we were going on originally when I was having these conversations with Adam about creating this new response. I think they've done done an amazing job of of kind of letting us come up with that initially and what that looks like about not wanting to be necessarily handing out, you know, tickets and all that stuff but trying to get these young people resources because even in 2016, the same issues at Sherman Park and much of the response was these kids won't go home at 10:00.
Oh, yeah.
Get them out of here, arrest them what's going on. Nobody was asking why or what could be done and I think some of the conversation that ended up happening was, okay, some of these young people may not have a home to go to. Some of these young people are getting abused and don't want to go home. So, once you start dealing with it from that way, you can go to Sherman Park right now and it's totally different, right? And so, I appreciate them for for that response. We have to maintain control of what that looks like to maximize the impact and make sure that it's not necessarily just punitive unless we have to go those routes. And also, there are other factors in this. Again, Bayshore, this has been an issue with them for over a year. Yeah. Almost two years and I've been in contact with the auditor and the mayor there.
They still haven't moved on this. And so it's not just a issue here. Other people and other entities who are impacted by this have to be part of the solution. Yeah. Because if you're losing money and this is affecting you, you can't just leave it on us to to come save you or to intervene in these situations. So, I think if we can continue to have these talks and we are able to build out and identify viable places these young people can go and then get the resources and the the the programs and stuff that they need inserted in those places to maximize while they're there, what we can do for them as as quickly as we can do that. I I think it's doable. We just have to do it.
Can I just interrupt for a second?
Sorry, I have to get out of here soon. I'm captain Norberg from the school resource office, community resource division and I just want to offer some resources, you know, that we may have or some connections that we can help anyone sitting out here have as well. So you guys already know that our school resource officers are assigned to 12 high schools across the schools engaging with more than 9,000 students every day when we can engage with them. So, we talk a lot about youth safeties, conflict resolutions, and we also take in their concerns, what they're looking to do, and what concerns they have in the city of Milwaukee. We do programs with one specifically is a 12 with 12 program at King where we cover human trafficking, reckless driving, forensic science, and also K nine operations and try to support those after school curricular activities including one high school is trying to get a flag football team started for the girls.
They also officers also do a voice to men talking circle, girls of color. So, I just want to put out there that we are a resource. Anyone can contact me to let me know what we can put out to the students, to the parents. We also have a parent academy meeting every month. We don't get a lot of show from the parents, but we consistently do it on our own so that we have a way to communicate information to parents. We have one that is coming up soon. That'll be at North Division High School, but we're gonna talk about the team take overs and what suggestions parents may have. Students are invited as well. What do they have? What do they do?
Or what can we give them as well? I just want to put out there that school resource office is a resource to to get information to the students, to the parents, just to the school community.
And really quick, mister Chair, can you please add us to that communication? Okay.
The parent academy or.
Whatever you all are putting out, we would love to hear. Okay. About that information. So, you can send it to the city clerk. He'll get it to all of us but I would love to know what's going on because I don't and so for this body again to help make, you know, decisions and to just know what's going on or do you even share communication with our constituents to be able to say, hey, you know, there's a there's a parent academy that's going to be this month. Right? So we want to be partners in that as well. But please communicate with us. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Out there the floor, mister chair.
Apologize. Very good. Yeah.
Alright. Elder Chambers and then elder Taylor.
Thank you. Miss Tyler, prior to you getting your the second time being intern, what was some of the things that you were working on in your capacity? Not as intern, at your capacity prior to that under the leadership of former director, I don't know his last name.
Can you save that for, I think
Is this relating to the team takeover
bid is this It's the related next
to the previous points that were made by my colleague. But if we want to wait to number five, we can wait to number six, we can wait. It's still relevant. But
Yes. I'll If it relates the team takeover, it's completely germane.
If it
doesn't, then we should hold over to the other one.
No. Just wait. Just wait to it.
Okay. You, Mr. Chair. Alder Taylor.
All right. Thank you so much, Chairperson Spikert. So what I'm going to do is just point out the lesson to be taken from the conversation that was just had. It's continuity that when things are set up, it should be set set up with continuity. So regardless of what's happening, that there's no break in it.
So let's take that as a lesson that we when we set things up, that it is able to keep going even if someone leaves, that they that we can do that. It's important to do that when we're dealing with young people. So I do I did want Captain Norberg to hear a thank you to her for all that the school resource officers are doing especially this parent academy meeting because so often we forget about the parents. So Von Mays hit on something that is extremely important that we're looking at young people who are looking for things to do, but they're also dealing with trauma.
Mhmm.
So and now I'm speaking from an educator having taught for more than twenty years. Mhmm. That that is a big reason why our young people are moving directions that they're moving in. And so we have to find a way to deal with that. So I want to say thank you to Von Mays for the work that you're doing. These programs that you're talking about this lock in program twilight centers. And I want to say thank you to the organizations like on common running rebels and summer healing those are so important it is so important. That we keep this organization DC- W. S. In place.
Because we have to have people who are going to invest their time. And efforts into helping our young people. They have to be able to have someone to help them transition from young folks to adults.
Right
because otherwise we're to have the same behavior from young folks going into adulthood and then we end up with all these situations and then we go oh my god what are we going to do. Right so you start. Before they get to that point. To help with some of that healing. From those traumas redirect that negative energy into something positive.
And so I'm saying that to say that can we look at involving other entities as well that are working with that trauma. Right and so we have those things like Montreal Kane who are dealing with our children and helping to heal them with some of that trauma. You have youth victory over violence from Tracy Dent. Though I I don't want to stop with, think you're doing an awesome job. Absolutely love the things that you're doing because like you said, so often we just wanna push them aside and not even think about what's happening
Mhmm.
With our young people. We cannot do that. Those young people become adults, and we want them to be responsible adults. So we have to invest time. But it's not just investing time with just creating activities. We have to deal with the issues that they are coming with.
We have to talk
to them about those issues and figure out what's going to help them best. So I think what you're doing is important, and I really wanted to point that out. But I also want to point out that as we are moving forward, let's look at how do we create continuity so no matter what happens, that we don't lose ground when we're dealing with our young people.
Mister vice chair.
Put me in the queue. Sure.
I'm done.
Can I respond
briefly, please?
And I I did wanna highlight two other programs that we do fund. So we do fund Milwaukee County trauma response team that is a youth focused mental health support system. So if there's a family that deals with something, they focus on the youth in that the youth in that family and provide supportive services. And then we also have our safe futures initiative and that's in MPS where we bring mental health resources as well as employment opportunities and and other services too. So, we have a lot of youth focus initiatives as well as our youth ambassadors who who help advise us on what we should do with youth, which is very important too.
Mhmm. So I think it's a last comment. I think it's very important then as old woman more stated is to make sure that we stay connected. That you let us know what these things are so that we can also assist you.
Yeah. For sure.
Okay. You mentioned some funding of a county program, which is fine. Are there any grants that the city receives related to youth programming specifically from the state?
Oh, from the state? From the state. Oh, yes. So like with our ARPA funding, we have allocated youth engagement support. So, we do fund Uncom which is a collective of youth organizations across the city and then again ours
But that was city ARPA, not state ARPA.
Right. Forgive me.
Okay.
All right.
I'll pass it back I to Alder Woman
just had one final question. It was just simply around, again, the file is just really centered around the response in regards to the teen takeovers. How much communication did you provide the full counsel on sort of what was going on, what to expect? Did you email us or how much communication did you share with us?
We have not communicated with the council with this.
Thank you so much, mister
We were waiting to talk to
No problem. Thank you so much.
Okay. Any other discussion on this item? Any motions for this
item? Can I just say one last thing? As a MPD member, I just want to say that I appreciate all of all of the support from, all of our community partners, Department of Community Safety and Wellness, four fourteen, life, our CVI partners, just everyone, mister Von Mays, all of the support that we receive from our community, it assists us to do our job because they can take on things that can relieves us from taking on those same responsibilities. While we're protecting and serving, they're stepping in into some of spaces that we may not be able to just because of the uniforms that we wear. So I just wanted to just thank all of our partners and also the men and women of the Milwaukee Police Department.
Awesome.
Alright. And thank you to you. Thank you.
Mister chair, I just
I request that
we hold to
the call of the chair.
Alderman Mamore moves to hold the call of the chair. Any objection on that motion? Hearing none. Do you want to add anything? Hearing none, so ordered. Thank you. Thank you all very much. Moving on to item six, file two five one seven seven eight, appointment of Karen Tyler as the community wellness and safety director by do the
have a PowerPoint but I no, I did not send that in so I need
to ask
I think we're gonna just this is the second time you've appeared before the committee. Think we're just going to take questions that were relevant to sending this file back to committee. I think Channel twenty five will come back and take the PowerPoint down.
And Mr.
Chair
There are elders from that are participating remotely. Alder Bowman, one more.
I just
introduce item?
Good morning. Committee, my name is Amber Daniels, council liaison for Mayor Johnson. I'm here to reintroduce, again, Ms. Karen Tyler, who the mayor has chosen to lead the, new Department of Community Wellness and Safety. So I will turn it over to you for questions.
All right. Thank you. So this item has been before us before. We'll start with questions. Well, I think it would be fair to give the interim director, the mayor's appointment, an opportunity for an opening statement and then we will go to questions.
Thank you.
Again, good morning. Council members, committee members, council members. Thank you for the opportunity to appear again as you consider my appointment to serve as the director of the Department of Community Wellness and Safety. I stand before you today not only as a candidate for this role but as someone who has dedicated nearly a decade of service to the city of Milwaukee through public health, violence prevention, and community wellness. My professional foundation includes almost ten years with the health department and over eight years in this office.
Where I have led work ranging from disease intervention and contact tracing to complex citywide violence prevention strategies. I held a bachelor's degree in business administration which has strengthened my ability to lead operations, manage budgets, build systems, and ensure accountability in public service. I am also deeply humbled by the broad support this nomination has received. I have received letters of support from members, community based organizations, the National Office of Violence Prevention Network, the National Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, and the support of our Commissioner of Public Health. To me, that support reflects confidence not only in my leadership but in the vision we all share for a safer, healthier Milwaukee.
Beyond titles and credentials, what I bring to this position is range, lived experience, and an unwavering dedication to this city. I have spent decades working in community with Milwaukee families. I have sat on the floor with a mother crying after after the loss of her child to violence, helping to navigate unmanageable grief. I have stood in neighborhoods after tragedy listening to residents, outreach workers, and community partners about what safety truly means. And I have also stood in spaces like this one before the common council prepared to answer difficult questions, make data informed decisions, and lead with transparency.
During times of leadership transition, I have consistently stepped forward to ensure this office remains stable, responsive, and focused on its mission. When leadership changed, I did not step back. I stepped up. I did what was necessary to maintain continuity, support staff, strengthen partnerships, and keep prevention efforts moving because our city cannot afford instability in this work. I may not be the most polished public speaker but what but what Milwaukee needs most in this moment is a leader who can relate to all people.
From families in crisis to frontline staff, to elected officials, and to community stakeholders. Our city needs someone who listens, who cares deeply, and who will work tirelessly every day to make our community safer. I am committed to leading this department with a public health lens grounded in community voice, New prepared to lead with heart, discipline, and accountability York, and to give everything I have to the people of Milwaukee because our families deserve safety, healing, and hope. I respectfully ask for your support and the opportunity to continue serving. And at this time, I I welcome your questions.
Alright. Well, thank you for that statement. Thank you for that. We've clearly received an avalanche of emails, letters, phone calls about this appointment. Many are in support. A handful are in opposition. Solicited for support or how were how did we suddenly get so many letters of support two weeks ago?
I wouldn't say they were solicited. I think people are watching this process and really in contacting me about how they can support. And so I think so many are. So as I reviewed all the letters, some I don't even really know, but they have watched my journey. I'm very if you even look on social media, I have a lot of support there too.
I mean, I've been doing this work for decades. So I think this is a very high visible situation that's taking place right now, but I think it speaks to the support I have and especially from stakeholders. I know that there was something said about that last time, but I think that speaks to the collaboration efforts that we have and that I have close relationships with partners that they're willing to support my leadership in this moment.
It's a lot easier to support if they're getting revenue from your department. Okay. We'll start with questions. Elderwoman Moore
asked to start off. Thank you. Are you chairing? Mr. Chair? Thank you, mister chair. First of all, I I I would like to just say thank you for your time and commitment and dedication to the department. That's something for me that hasn't gone unnoticed. I just have of just an opening statement that I just want to share. I know there has been a lot of questions and confusion about this sort of appointment process.
I want to make sure that our community understands that this is the first time that the council has had an opportunity to vet candidates for this role. Previously, the mayor's office had sole and complete appointing authority for this former office. My colleague has shared that, you know, he wasn't necessarily in favor of it moving from an office to a department. The train has already left the station. So, you know, right now, it it's where we are right now.
Starting with the abrupt dismissal of Arnita Holloman, the administration has continuously made the best leadership decisions for their office. Now, as a department, we have this unprecedented opportunity to determine the leadership of a department that is focused on one of the most important issues facing our city. We have a duty and responsibility to ensure that candidates for this department and others are not only qualified but prepared to carry out their duties with the competence and integrity that our residents deserve. I hold myself and my staff to a high high standard of service when it comes to my role as a council member and I have that same standard for any appointed leader of a city department serving the residents of our city because as my colleagues can attest, when those services fall short, we are often the ones who get the calls from angry residents, frustrated business owners, community agencies, and activists. From the airwaves to the town hall, community members don't hold back when sharing their concerns and how the city does business.
I want to see that change. I'm not here to take a space to to take up space. I'm here to the do do the job. I was selected, elected to do and that's all I want for everyone who works for the city. As the longest serving member of the department, there is a track record of performance that comes within internal candidate that must be considered.
I wish we had a range of candidates to consider in the previous rounds and this one, excuse me, in this one, but we can only work with what the mayor has given us. The difference between the last round and this one is our authority. I want city government to be a place where top talent chooses to work and can do their best to deliver the highest quality of services to our community. That starts with the leadership of every department that is hired and funded by taxpayer dollars to deliver those services and that's a responsibility that I take seriously. I would love to be able to support this appointment but whether I do or don't will solely be based on my confidence in miss Tyler doing the role well and clear and clear support from the administration ensure ensuring her success.
I'll I'll con continue with just a just a question but I'm really perplexed because I think that the department could have done a better job supporting you. The times that you've been passed over could have been opportunities for them to pour into your leadership and supporting you just being that whether it was an office or department, whatever but just being a strong leader for the department that could have happened and you know, I think that my apology goes to their their failure in not having and not being able to support you in the ways that could have been done and so that's my stance on that. I think again, the only question that I have for you miss Tyler is just communication. Like you've been in the department for years but just since the last just since the last time you were here how many times have you communicated with the full council. That's the question.
How many times have you communicated with the full council? Provided an update?
Miss mister chair?
No. I I I'm just I need her to answer just a question because it's.
But we sent this back because of funding. This is we act we ask those questions the last
this is this is commute this is about her appointment and her.
This is the role of the position.
More has the floor she asked a question.
I just I just simply want to know how
many times have you been using the table.
Okay so we'll
move it around the room.
Okay thank you. First I would like to clarify something I haven't been passed over multiple times so the the one time that I did apply for this appointment is when I did become a finalist. I started my work with the office in 2017. I started as a coordinator. Yep. I moved up to a manager and to an operations manager. So I have progressive development in that way. Most of the time in regards to communication with the council that wasn't necessarily my role. It was a director's role. Sure. So when I was
in So what's
the with that though miss Tyler? Yeah. Just that I I just needed to ask about the when you were in the when you applied for the role. Why didn't the administration give you the opportunity to to lead during that time? I I don't even think it was a it wasn't a department at that time. No, it wasn't. It it was still the office at that time. Why didn't the department not?
Quick. Amber Daniels, the council liaison for mayor Johnson. I think that was more of a question for the administration. And during that time, it was asked by the council, and the community that we do move forward with a community session or a community listening session, and consider several candidates statewide, nationwide, you know, local, all inclusive. And so during that time, that is what the mayor committed to and he did and Karen did make it as a finalist as well as two others who were candidates outside of Milwaukee, outside of Wisconsin. So, the the short answer is that we heard from the council that you all wanted the mayor to consider more than just an internal candidate and that he should extend his search. Correct.
And miss Daniels, there were two external and one internal candidate and the mayor went with no one. Again, there were some situations but the mayor then went with no one and then instead of choosing his internal candidate, went with somebody that wasn't even on the ballot in a sense. So, I'm just trying, I'm just trying to understand because I respect miss Tyler And for her to have had so it's not numerous times. So thank you for correcting me about that. So the time that she did apply she was then looked past to another candidate that wasn't even considered.
So the so the question is, why did the mayor then choose a candidate instead of choosing someone that has been with the division for several years?
And went through the process.
And went through the process that she went through the community meetings. Why did the mayor overlook her during that time? If especially if the other two, if they had, if they had a you know, choke gave it to someone else and it didn't work you still had she still made the top three. Right. Why did the mayor choose someone else.
Okay I think it's an also just important to note yes he did make a decision to move forward with Adam Pursell. We did not foresee this issue coming where he became a department. It was no longer able to hold that position. And so we're back here. And the mayor has felt like in that time of transition, Karen has been the person that folks have depended on in that office to continue that office forward, and she was a valuable, asset in making sure that those things happened, which is one of the reasons why he landed back on choosing Karen. He has faith that she's gonna continue to move the department forward.
I'm just still confused as why he didn't have faith in her before. My question goes back to you, miss Tyler, and I just simply wanted a just very brief. And it wasn't about forgive me for interrupting you. I just really wanted because I know other colleagues had questions to ask as well. I just wanted to ask about the communication. Since your since holding the interim position, since being here because a lot has transpired with the teen takeovers. There's been homicide. There's lot has transpired. How much communication have you provided the full council as as an updates?
So, I have met with council members individually but definitely moving forward, I can update them on any initiatives or strategy that So, wants once you know,
you have made no full communication whether it's an email. I'm looking for communication as to updates. No communication has been provided to the full council.
Not to the full council. No. In regards to team takeovers.
Okay. Any other questions for now?
Not at this time. Think we'll do it. I yield.
We may have an
opportunity for a second round. Any other committee members right now that have questions? Alderman Chambers?
Thank you. I'll keep this brief. We just literally heard a file previously from Milwaukee Police Department in regards to their response to team takeovers and their opportunity to maintain public safety in the entertainment districts. This gives me a sense this gives me a bit of deja vu for my former colleague, your predecessor, Alderman Bergelis, Alderman Burkowski, and he would just ask him, you know, where's OVP? DCWS is not that.
I just say I'm I apologize. I got the floor. No. No. No. No. Somebody keep calling me. No caller ID. It only happens when I'm in front of this body. With this issue. So, whoever it is, please stop. It's not. It's not cute. Thank you.
Sorry to interrupt. No worries.
DCWS, OVP, OCWS, or anything like that is not the Milwaukee Police Department.
Correct.
You know, they are not going to be able. They're they don't have the capacity. They do not have the the technology or the resources to respond to each and everything and have everything on file. Now, they we've heard in the previous files that their responses to the the team takeovers and some promise keepers went to Bayshore that was not even in the city of Milwaukee. So if that's in your leadership, thank you.
However, I just think it's very unfair that we are holding a particular individual to the fire of not having to reach out because I don't need day to day contact from you on your on your outreach far as this because I put faith in your your group's ability with the outreach of the community and the community that are here to do what's best and if we need to interject and intervene, that's what we are here for. We're here as the stop. So and I'm only speaking for myself and myself alone. So when when we think of that, you know, that's where I'm at. But we are here today subtly because there were some concerns about funding within that that came out from governor Everest.
That was the reason that everyone passed on to send this nomination back to the committee and I hope that that's what we discuss and do not regurgitate the same thing that we had in the previous cycle. So that is my hope, mister chair, that we stick to. Do have a
question there?
I'm I'm finishing up. Okay. Good. It's a comment more than a question. Thank you. My hope is that we stick to the reason why we sent this why we sent this back. And that was because of the funding that we did not receive from governor Ebers and his administration. Nothing more, nothing less. You are within your right to do what you need to do, but if we're gonna stay consistent because when we talk about this all the time, consistency, we need to be consistent at this body to stick to why we sent this back in committee. Thank you, mister chair.
Appreciate your comment. Do you have
any questions for the nominee? I I don't have a question for the nominee. I'm perfectly fine.
Any other questions
from the At committee the appropriate time, I'll move for confirmation.
I think it's
At the appropriate time.
Okay. I do want to acknowledge Alderman Westmoreland has joined us. President Perez has joined us. Any other questions from committee members?
Mr. Chair. Alderman Spiker. I guess just very briefly on that. So yes, there was an award by the state OVP to several entities in the city including Employ Milwaukee. OCWS at the time was unsuccessful in their grant application. Could you just speak briefly about your involvement with that process? Was that something that was handled by the previous director or were you involved in creating the grants application? What was the role there?
So the author of that proposal was Adam Pursell and he his intention was to be highly collaborative. So it's almost basically a pass through funding proposal anyway. We were going to give additional funding to four zero four Life, WestCare Wisconsin to expand outreach teams as well as MPS and ONCAM. I believe that's the four. Yeah.
So basically that's what that was. I did support him in assisting write the budget for that particular proposal but I did not. It wasn't my concept for sure.
Okay. And then I have one question for the mayor's office. There was a discussion and we already had a two hour discussion with miss Tyler, so I'm not looking to recreate that. But there was discussion I had some confusion about how is the department going to survive given their funding sources are dropping out, ARPA is dropping out, recast is looking bleak. So the next the future of the department is going to be very different than in the past unless there is some supplementation with dollars.
So the question is, of course, there will be an attempt to seek other grants to make up the shortfall whether those successful or not is a very open question. So my I guess my question for the administration either the budget officer or Ms. Daniels is, is the mayor committing to fund the department at levels that it was funded last year and backfill it with levy dollars if needed? And I'm saying not he should or he shouldn't. I just want to know what's his view.
Good morning, committee. Nick Kovac, Budget Management Director. In short, the answer is yes. I mean, I'm not here to commit to exact dollar amounts because we have a whole budget process. We'll go through. We'll work with the council while we do that. But these are core services and the Mayor is there a priority for the Mayor. Obviously, grant funding is preferred, but levy funding if needed will be made available to continue these services.
And what would be the shortfall if the nightmare scenario happens and no additional grant funding is secure, what would be the shortfall in levy dollars that would have to be made up?
Well, will be part of our evaluation to prepare this budget to determine what the service level is, what the cost is. It it Can you
just remind me what last year's Yeah.
Can. Mean, in general, I can refer you to the to the service table and the budget documents.
Because the lost grant we heard was mostly pass through funding and it wasn't administrative support.
Correct. So that will I mean there is two issues here. One is the 14 staffers who actually work in the Department of Community Wellness and Safety but that is a minority of their overall budget especially when you include their special purpose accounts and their grants. So I mean if you look at the total, if you look at our service summary table in the 2026 budget, you'll see inclusive of SPAs that includes the violence the $750,000 violence prevention SPA and the 200,000 or so Crisis Response SPA, which if actually you're reading the budget, you got to look at a different page. But we try to put that all together in the service table in the summary documents, the narrative budget.
That's $2,300,000 And then grants, it's more of an art than a science frankly giving trying to annualize grants because they come in multi year, they don't come in all on January 1. But our best estimate when we try to look at total grants that includes ARPA, which obviously is about to expire, so that's really the main and the grant we're talking about today was would have been an additional ARPA grant. So would have not would have been irrelevant to '27 anyway, the grant under discussion today. So certainly the end of ARPA being or ARPA having to be spent by 12/01/2026. It's going to put pressure on several departments, but most especially
this year.
What was
that number? Sorry, was giving a long preamble and all you want was the number. 2,800,000.0.
So 2,000,000 And that's all
grants, not just ARPA.
All the grants, dollars 2,800,000.0, dollars 2,300,000.0 in levy support before Yes, operating budget and special budget So accounts, that's 5.1 budget and if the nightmare scenario happens, 2.8 would have to be supplied from the levy to make the amount for next year.
If the nightmare scenario
there was
no grants at all, then yes, suppose.
Right. Okay. Just wanted the ballpark, so around 3,000,000 just under $3,000,000 we are talking about here. Okay. Thank you.
Alderman Speicher has concluded his questions in the first round. Any questions from other council members? Press?
Yeah. I'll just make a comment. Miss Tyler, I think we share some lived experience when it comes to gun violence and things of that nature. And I I know you've been through a process. I just have to express my disappointment with the process.
You're not the first person where I believe the administration had someone in this position or ready to go in this position, took them back, and then after a process was in place, then came back again and it gives us the impression or to blame us that we're the problem when I don't think that if if if the first 20. I think think that's that's which I've said from the very beginning when they went around the process with the community to put mister Purcell there that they just took the community out of it, the process out of it, and now we're back here and you're in this position and I don't think it's fair to you and I just wanted to express that.
Mr. Chair. Please. Thank you. I wanted to just push back a little bit because as I said, the mayor did choose to when he didn't necessarily have to choose to have a community process which is where Karen and the two other individuals went before two different settings. One on the North Side, one on the South Side and they we did receive community input. So, I do want to say that that was something that the mayor did value and he chose to to do the process that way.
Yeah. I understand that but with that process in place and having candidates, if you whether you rank em or have em and they went through that process, one person either got offered the job, didn't take it, whatever the case was that they didn't do it. You had other candidates in the queue and you went right you just disregarded everything that had happened and that. And this isn't the first time that that someone is in that is in in that position close to being in that position, working that position, you take em out, it happen with the labor negotiator. Right?
You put someone else in, had this process to to put someone else temporarily in there, the chief of staff does when at the at the very beginning, we said, put her back and she'll never take the job. She'll never do it. And she did it. And I don't think the process was fair to anybody.
Okay. We have that on the record. Any closing comments before Hubert? I guess
before we go to the I would say that one advantage of having it be the department now is we have confirmation authority. So miss Daniels said the mayor didn't have to have a public engagement. He gifted that to the community. We can insist on it now. So that is an advantage going forward is if we feel the community engagement has not been robust enough, we can say, well, then we're not moving forward.
So I think that is an advantage of the process and I think having the council involved is a good idea. It had unforeseen consequence from the city attorney's office which nobody knew about and including apparently the city attorney's office back then and that might have affected things, but we are where we are right now. So but I would like to underscore the need to engage the community in this is vital. The council is now a bulwark to ensure that that happens in the future, not just for this nominee, but for all future ones. So thank you.
I will add that we do get gifts from the mayor's office on occasion. The surprise ones aren't always welcome, but we do appreciate collaboration whenever possible. Mister chair. Any closing comments?
Just closing. I I just have to underscore as well my colleague sentiments that we should be doing a better job especially as government connecting and engaging community, not when the train has left the station but that we value their input and we need to start doing things differently when it comes to that, right? There's a lot of value that is added when we ask our community's input, when we engage and pull up pull our community in, when we ask what do they think, or when we ask what do you think the solution is? Like, that should be the norm. It shouldn't be a gift.
It should be the norm and we ask for that because we value this particular position and again, I underscore my colleague sentiments here about the process was completely circumvented when miss Tyler was at the table in the first place. So so I get it but we have to not bypass those sort of processes that have been put in place that we've asked for but again, because it wasn't codified in words, now it is, we have the opportunity to be able to do that. Thank you so much, Mr. Chair.
I'll add that we value the position, we value the people, but we depend on the results. The entire community depends on the result. Could any final statements, comments, questions? Nothing on the board. I I will acknowledge Alderman Cogs has joined us virtually. Closing thoughts? Sure. Or miss Tyler.
I would just like to thank the council for their support and for the consideration of this appointment. I think you all may have seen that communication has has increased for sure in regards to homicide notifications and different things like that. I also wanna say that we are working on sustainability. So, we have already gotten gotten a commitment from the Annie Casey Foundation for 2027 and so we'll have specific numbers in regards to how much that investment will be. But we really just want to get out of this transition space so we can do the the work that you are counting on on us to do.
So thank you and I appreciate your Alright.
Thank you very much for coming back to committee. Alderman Chambers has moved confirmation. I'll ask for a roll call, please.
Alderman Chambers? Aye. Alderman Moore? No. Alderman Alderman Taylor?
Yes. Alderman Bergales?
Mister chair.
Mister chair.
Mister Mister chair.
Spikers. Alderman Spiker? No. Alderman mister chair, Alderman Regales. Aye.
Three to two. Confirmation moves forward to the full council for consideration.
Think our
next council meeting next Tuesday. Thank you. Thank you. The next item on our agenda is item number seven which we'll return to chairman's by director. Thank
you. Thank you Alderman Burgles. Item seven is file number 250,956. This is an ordinance relating to noise variances. It's sponsored by president Perez.
My understanding is that this item is, needs a little more time, so, alder Moore would move that it'd be held to the call of the chair and hearing no objections so ordered. While the room clears, we can call the next item, but we'll give it a minute to clear. So the next item when folks are ready will be item eight, file number 250874. This is our substitute resolution authorizing the expenditure of opioid settlement funds. It is sponsored by Alderman Perez and President Jackson.
Again, we'll give it a minute. Yeah. That was funny. By president Perez and Alderman Jackson, we'll give it about twenty more seconds to clear, and then we'll go to the sponsors starting with President Perez.
Can they pull up that door? Oh, there we go.
Alright. Appreciate it, mister chair. I'm just looking forward to the presentation. I think we have some questions as we move forward. Appreciate the department bringing forward a plan. I think many of us in the community are eager to figure out how this has an impact in our communities and how we work together and just wanna to see this for the rest of the community to see.
Okay. Very good. Alderman Jackson, do you have any comments to start?
I already did. Okay. Well,
with that then, we will turn it over to departments for a brief discussion and then if the sponsors have any follow-up questions, feel free to jump in. Thank you.
Mr. Chair, I just have a clarifying question. Are we responding to the original proposal or this substitute amendment that's been uploaded to the file?
Is this substitute Dean Offord? 508. Yes. Okay. I will. We will see if the it exists, then we will see if someone wants to offer it. So do we have printed copies?
There are no.
That's under the pile. Okay. Okay. So this is proposed sub by Alder Jackson. Okay. So, Alder Jackson, would you like to have this one held? We'll have to make a motion if
If we get copies.
We can't discuss it. It's not moved.
If yeah. We'll see. I'm just asking him if he would like to have this before us to discuss. Yes. And if so okay. Do I have a motion for this to be before us to discuss? You can do with it whatever we want, but a member would like to have his proposed substitute discussed. Do have a motion in that regard? So we can discuss it? Okay. Alder Taylor would move that this item be before us so that we can discuss it. Are there any objections?
I'll object.
Alder Bergalis, one objection, then so ordered. So this item is to be discussed. You can do dispense with it how we will and move back to something else if we wish but it is now before us. So, Alder Jackson, would you like to say how this differs from what was originally in the file?
The difference is we will be funding the mooring program to the end of the year. I think LRB work with the fire to get that get those figures in so that'll actually line it up with the budget process. And aside for 250 k to a independent third party to audit the funding expenditures up until this point.
Okay. And if the LRB is here, they can come to the table if there's any more clarity, but it it looks fairly straightforward. So this would fund more until the end of the year, as Elder Jackson said, and then reserve $250,000 in settlement funds to basically do some program review of the existing programs, proposed programs to judge their effectiveness, I guess, before scaling up. Okay. So with that, to the departments, do you have any comments on this? I know this is substantially different from the original file. Sure.
I guess I'm coming before this committee to seek some clarification. As we've been communicating for over the last year, we were putting this plan together and we've also had some allocations of opioid funds to do some of the initial work but the majority of that money has gone unspent because we did not have a concrete plan and we didn't want to expend money just erroneously throwing that money out there. I am confused given that we put forth a three year plan that took a year to get put together that looks at the continuum of services that are offered in the city and set forth
I'm sorry, mister I'm sorry to interrupt, mister chair. The health department isn't funded in this proposed substitute. So I'm unclear why the health department is commenting on the sub.
Oh, yeah. Good point.
Well, I assume because the sub doesn't fund them for the three years. So it's a fair I mean, I'm happy to give you the space to discuss. But so the changes and we can actually cut this short by going to the sponsor. My understanding of the intents is there was a plan, a three year plan by the health department, a three year plan by the fire department to expend opioid funds to the tune of $17,000,000 We had a meeting about that, so heard it and discussed. There was some concern with members about whether before we looked back and evaluated.
So the Mori program given where funding is at where they have spent through most of their dollars, the idea was to fund it through the end of the year. Health department to put a pause for at least a cycle and see whether there could be some discussions about some evaluation looking at what other cities have done, it's kind of all over the map. But in general, I believe the thought is before you spend $17,000,000 on what you think will work in the future, you should evaluate what has has been accomplished thus far and look at possibly bringing in a third party to evaluate some of these expenditures in the health department and see whether that's been effective. Now this could spark a larger conversation about evaluation has already been done. We had the LRB do an analysis.
There was some evaluation of the activities of the programs. It was a little slim on the outcomes so that would be something a conversation to be had I guess with the health department and the sponsors about what sort of evaluation would be more robust before scaling to the full $17,000,000 or whatever figure we're talking about here. Is there anything else, I guess, from the sponsors?
Yeah, mister chair.
Yeah. Press.
Just wanted to add at at the appropriate time, I wanna be added as a co sponsor and yes, I did meet with both the health department and the fire department. We had a robust discussion. I continue to have questions about intervention and I wanted to work with Alderman Jackson on the sub and making sure that Maury, as you said, which is in place and moving forward, still move without a beat and figuring out some opportunities to get better engaged that that I think from my neighborhood with some of the nearby stakeholders and to figure out how they participate and get a better understanding of the RFP process that's on the table and moving forward. And so I just I needed more time. That's why I thought we could work on this for another cycle and there's just a lot of questions.
I mean, I I got the proposal for the three year plan and met for the first time a week ago and want to continue the dialogue and figure out how to understand it in a even deeper way in the impact it's going to have and really to measure some of the outcomes for what I'm seeing in my neighborhood and just have more clarity on that.
Okay. Other questions from committee members? Mr. Chair. Alder Berglis?
I know. I kind of cut off the health department, but I'll ask a question so you can maybe finish your thought and get back on to it. But with this proposed substitute, you have no funding for the next three years for this program. What happens to the staff and the people you've hired?
That's a great question. I also And
then how does that impact the community by you having an interruption of funding?
Mhmm.
We're this this proposed substitute pulls the plug on your department and your response to the opioid crisis. Yeah. With money that the city's received as a settlement for the opioid crisis. This makes no sense to me. Please walk me through the dollars.
I I would agree. And just for this committee's awareness, if you didn't already know this plan for the three year allocation to both the fire and the police department or the fire and health department way before our board of health, it was tweaked slightly given their guidance to have ensuring that there were community groups that would be funded through that and you know over 5,000,000 of the allocation to the health department is to fund community based work. So we've been very clear with that. We've also been very clear that we've already done the due diligence on putting this plan together. We provided all of that due diligence.
We've explained it ad nauseam and now we're being told we want to waste $250,000 to what? Evaluate the evaluation that we already did and mapping out what needs to be funded in the city?
I I'm not sure how the evaluation works at this point to be honest with you. So
But you're putting forth an amendment to fund an evaluation that you don't understand? Is that what you just
Let me try to understand. Doctor. Todoritis, come on now. That's what
he just said.
Well, we're gonna keep the quorum here and so we're gonna engage each other respectfully and we may have a policy disagreement but we're gonna keep it.
Okay. So we we heard from the thank you. I Yeah. Okay. Thank you.
So then, my next question is to the to the fire department. What does the change in having a three year forecast of funding available for Maury change in your department? My understanding of it is that Mori currently is funded mostly with or facilitated mostly through overtime, voluntary overtime, and that your plan had been to add regular staff so that firefighters aren't working extra overtime to make this program a success, a success a successful one. Are you still able to hire full time staff with a one year with well with eight months of funding left for 2026?
Alderman Berglis, I appreciate the question. So in 2022, the common counsel unanimously resolved that the opioid settlement funds should go towards Maury and harm reduction. That's the two of going do do to to to do that. Fair, but we're we set out on that task on the Mori half, gangbusters, let's go do this. And as the grant money started to drive, we were largely grant funded for the better part of five or six years, four or five years.
As that starts to drive, because they're not just going to keep throwing grant, I mean, sounds like a wonderful idea if we could get more grant money, but they're not going to study the same thing over and over again,
which is what
most grants are coming down to. Opioid settlement funds, we then start to pivot as the problem, the scourge of overdose and fatal overdoses continues over this set of time. We continue scaling up under the belief we're doing that with the full support of the common council. But every time any words related to this program
come up,
here we are. So what does it do for me? You want to talk about inefficiency? For us to be able to create a position, get it through finance and personnel, get the equipment, get RFP through purchasing, that eight months is a drop in the bucket in that world. So this will keep us alive with the present staff we have.
That is what it will do for us. What we are hoping for, which is why coming into 2025 as we were discussing it in 2024, we put forth a five year plan so that we could create a coherent thread, an arc that could be tracked and followed. But what you will presently be evaluating is a program that has been stitched together meeting after meeting after meeting every time it comes up. If you thing. A And And good
every time my department
who And is out there today saving lives has to come here and and be beat up at the table. I appreciate your call for decorum. I fully support it. And I hope we can do that moving forward. We're saving lives out here.
And the the studies that and cut me off if I'm out of order for drifting side to we're road. And from around the nation that you have all referred to in various meetings. The you know, the it's based on a document called the Principles to Guide State and Local Spending of Forthcoming Opioid Litigation Settlement Funds. That's 31 leading organizations, which I will not pain you to read them all. So it's based upon best.
And that's just one of the studies that was studied and incorporated into this larger continuum of care. I will own for our part and I think I've spoken with people directly on this. As we had our head down and we were doing the work, we probably could have called and informed you. And I apologize for that. Does not mean that does not mean the work does not need to be done and that this is not crucial.
So I sit before you and I beg you, you know, I not sure I'm know. I got this at this table. So we would love to have an open dialogue, but can it be in two directions? We are doing our best right now. There are people dying in the streets. That is the reality of it. And if I seem
Thank you, Chief. So
I addressed my three questions and kind of three parts of the substitute. Why the health department is not getting funding from it, why the fire department's funding is cut by two years for the Mori program in this proposed substitute. The third part of it is a $0.02 $5,000,000 reserved for an audit. So my question is to the author, author, what difference would an outside independent audit provide or what valuable information would we be looking to get that an internal audit from the comptroller's office would be unable to provide us.
You think the you think the comptroller will be able to do a better audit?
The comptroller is already, we have professional auditors in the comptroller's office that do audit different departments in city government continuously. What what better audit are we going to get from a with a quarter of $1,000,000? Well. What we can get?
It's up to.
Of course, I think it probably only like $100. It's up to. I'm not the expert in that place. Not the expert in that department but the audit is an independent third party audit.
The comptroller's independent. As well. I
I don't think I think that the the comptroller gets into the details of the programming versus the financial part of the audit?
Granted, we don't have epidemiologists in the comptroller's office. I'll give you that one. All right. Thank Mr. Chair.
Thank you. And I guess a couple of quick clarifications. I believe the $250,000,000 up to was for a program evaluation, for an audit of existing practices. It was to see whether the health department has spent approximately half of the money that's been allocated to you thus far. So to see whether those investments have yielded the products one would hope for, to see whether the investments for the I think it's something like eight point something in the three year plan, whether those are investments that have a track record as far as what we see in other cities for having the effect.
My understanding and I think it might have been mischaracterized is for the sub to basically put a pause on a cycle for the health departments funding to have a more robust discussion especially around the community based organizations and the process for selecting that and whether there's been adequate communication with the aldermanic offices to make sure that the people who are most directly impacted by the scourge of the opioid crisis that we're having conversations with them about because there are a number of groups out there. An aldermanic office will have a knowledge base that perhaps is lacking at the 50,000 feet level. So I know a lot has been said but my understanding is the idea is to pause at a cycle while we engage in those conversations around the CBOs understanding Mori needs to be funded through the end of the year for sure and the question moving forward is the three year plan and having a more robust engagement with the council. So I understand that waiting a cycle is frustrating but the proposal as I understand it is to hold off a cycle, have that engagement with the council on the health department side about the community based organizations and some of the other pieces of it.
So that's my understanding. Don't know that it's a fair characterization to say it's a funding of something but anyway that's a discussion, you know, worth having, I guess.
Mister
chair, why wouldn't we just hold the item for a cycle and have those discussions? Well And have that collaboration The which
fire department is in danger of running out of money.
We have $20,000 remaining. So From '25. Right.
So I believe the fear was if you held it a cycle that you might put that work in danger. And so giving the Chief the surety of getting through the end of the year, I believe, was the rationale for that.
Then also skimming $0.02 $5,000,000
That's an interesting characterization. Alder Taylor, do you have any questions? Okay. Any other questions? Alder Moore?
So, yes, Mr. Chair, I just want to make sure I have a little clarity on this. So right now, what were what's proposed is this sub that we need to vote on?
Yes. The sub before us would have funding for Mori through the end of the year February up to late set aside for an independent valuation and then would remain silent. Yes. In the analysis it does.
And then in with the understanding that, you know, in the next, cycle there may be further conversations between the health department, the sponsors, council members about what that three year plan or any plan might look like moving forward.
Thank and just a question then back to either probably the health department for the no. Let me ask for either of you. Is the primary issue with the sub the two fifty for the review and evaluation? Or you all don't like the sub? Hear, you know, from what I'm hearing from Doctor. Schroderitis is, you know, the the 250 is.
Well, I'll answer first. Sure. If if that's alright, doc.
I'm just trying to understand. We
had no understanding whatsoever what was contained in the sub. So we're catching up in real time. We had a general idea that some of these topics were coming. So I will say I think that, boy, in my experience, the comptroller has audited all kinds of stuff in my department. Every year, they give us a list of things.
They're digging into everything. So I don't know if that's an option perhaps for cost saving, but just they're in all my business and that's fine. They do it. They're fair evaluators. At the risk of looking a gift horse in the mouth because you've this sub lets us stay alive for the rest of the year, at which point, again, we're going to be back here arguing about things that I don't have a crystal ball to tell you exactly if Option A or Option B or C is empirically the best.
But what we are doing good good
thing. And I a
And Again, that's we thought with the common council's blessing, I thought with the proposed item that the president and Alderman Jackson submitted for inclusion on the agenda one week ago. And now I have to stump a little bit on behalf of the health department. The things that you are asking for are codified already. We don't get to pick what the procurement processes or what that.
to able
of of And part And
And I a of of part
the the
of that's do And that. That. And And
we're
the health department's wheelhouse. Are one tiny slice of this. I would advocate strenuously that this entire plan and notes I'm off topic here because we're now on a sub. The entire program has submitted be afforded ability to move forward so that we can begin work.
And there was one question I guess when we had our meeting I had asked questions about how this coordinates with the county efforts and has been communication since then. That is also a point of discussion as the city just has one piece of this. The county has a larger funding stream and a different emphasis. So asking for clarity about coordination with that, that was also a topic of discussion. That's something outstanding that could perhaps be filled in in a future discussion.
Is it mister chair,
is it actually outstanding because we did provide information about one of the specific assets about recovery efforts that the county is providing and we Yep. Provided a detailed response to that. So I'm unaware of another other outstanding.
Is that the piece that's in the file you're talking about?
The question that you asked of why there's only a small dollar amount to the recovery groups, we provided that answer
Right. To
And there it would be helpful to have the and I understand the county is undergoing some change now with Mr. Lapham being relieved of his position. But from the meeting, sounded like there wasn't a department head to department head coordination on this. This is where you had Ms. Narvi involved on
That is not true. Shakita and I communicate regularly.
Okay. We had that discussion in the meeting. Anyway, I'm sorry. Alder Moore, you weren't concluded?
Yes. I think I'm I'll have a little bit more clarity on right now. We are looking at moving what's before us. Correct?
Yep. Yeah. The file before us would basically, put a pause on any three year plan, have a one year plan or for the remainder of '26 for Mori and then delay cycle that fuller conversation. And also, I guess, the piece that is new is setting aside money for a program evaluation, not an audit by the comptroller, but a program evaluation of some of the things that would be stood up under this. Mr. Hang on. Alder Moore, does that clarify? It does. Okay. Thank you. Hang on just one second. Do other members have questions about this item?
I'm listening right now.
Okay. All right.
Did we want to ask any questions to the department to seek clarity or Alder Chambers isn't here. Okay. Then I'll kick it back to the sponsors if there's any clarity you would add to this discussion.
No, I just you know because I just dig deeper in this, I have more questions that I couldn't that I just need to answer to and I'm looking at community members. I do want to see something move forward. I do believe the health department is doing some great work. I am just not ready to vote either today or if I were in committee or in council for the plan to go through as is and that's why I asked for some more time.
Okay. I mean, I guess what I've seen in the past is if we're talking holding a cycle for there to be a Kumbaya moment then next cycle. But yes, the sponsors have proposed a sub that would basically put a pause on things for one cycle.
Mister chair, I I won't need more than a cycle. I mean, either we're we get in a room and just get some clarity on some of the things that have been brought to my attention in recent days and we can just figure that out or, know, hear it again next cycle and the committee and the council could move forward Okay. As
Very good. And I just so people are clear, I'm deferential in this regard. This impacts the city. I care very much about the city. It doesn't impact my district as much as as president, president, and Alderman Jackson's as well. Elder Taylor and then elder Moore.
Okay.
So, yes, I sit here and make my decision. So I guess this is to the the sponsors. Are you are you saying that that if we adopt this, that you will be buying more time as you get this evaluation done?
No, I, for me, it's I need some clarity on a couple issues with intervention and our role, maybe the county's road should have some clarity, defining some outcomes, some of the RP. I just need as I talk to my stakeholders, I want some clarity on that. I needed a cycle. If this body decides to move forward as is, then, that's the decision they make. I just can't be ready now to to do that.
But so this this evaluation is going to give you that clarity.
I, the the evaluation is just for as we were digging into stuff, we looked at evaluation opportunities and thought we should include it now early on. If part of the process says we don't need it or we have a different way or the comptroller's office satisfies what we can do, then that would be a different conversation. But for me, I just I need a cycle to figure some stuff out.
Mr. Chair? Thank you.
I believe Alder Moore has that was a question for the sponsor. So Alder Moore, you have a question?
I just wanted to just ask perhaps of you all. If let's say we don't go through with this and we go with the original plan. What president Perez is asking, does that preclude us from having those conversations with you all? No. Okay.
Because, you know, there was some questions that I had as well as just particularly On the prevention side because that's the part that I am most interested in. How do those you know how are those dollars going to be deployed and I and I'm sure that a lot of that still hasn't been codified correct as of. Yet so. It's okay. So that's one thing. The the second thing is if we do go through with this. No no no. If we wait if we wait to hold it
Mhmm.
Would the fire department be able to still continue its work? Because it's going to be more than a few cycles because it still has to go through council for the improvement. Will the fire department still be able to fund the program during that time.
So, the fire department will be able to fund one tiny slice in the continuum of care, our slice, the Maury slice.
Correct.
And that. That's that's kind of, I mean, that's in this sub here.
But if we hold it though, chief, that's what I'm saying. If we hold it,
would Yeah.
If you held it, then they would run out of money.
Yeah. I'm not a parliamentarian. So if this gets I
don't know.
If this sub passes, then they would have money through the end of the year.
Got it. Okay.
Mr. Chair.
Mr. Chair.
Yeah. Alder Cogs has a question that might be relevant to this. We haven't heard from Alder Cogs yet. So please, Alder Cogs.
Yeah. To piggyback on where I think other woman Moore was going, chief, if this doesn't pass today, will you run out of money before it would pass the next time or a version of it will pass the next time, next month or or, you know, at the next ten.
So short answer, yes. Medium answer is I have $20,000 left and some of our most recent payroll stuff has not yet cleared. So I guess the math on that is I'm at about zero. So, yes, I will run out of money.
So I'm not on the committee, but mister chair, would it not be possible if there are concerns about needing more time for the rest of it? It seems like the committee seems to be clear on support of the existing program through the rest of the year. Could not sir, before you be amended to just include that? And the rest is taken up at a in the whether it's four to three years, whether to do a a 200 and 50 thousand and all of that. Because I think the one thing that it seems to be clear that people support is the existing program and the need for it to go to at least the end of the year.
And it would seem to me because it's already included in this sub that it could be amended to just have that part. So at least that's done while other conversations take place. That's just a thought. I'm not on the committee. Just throwing it out there.
Okay. And your your thought is to strip it further still to just have the mooring funding to the end of the year and putting on pause the $2.50 for the broader discussion? Is that what you're suggesting, Alder Cox?
Okay.
So that's to the sponsors. If we just want to focus it on getting more through the end of the year, give the three week pause, leave the rest for the further discussion. Mr.
Chair. Is it in
the queue? Yes. Okay. Alder Berglaz.
Thank you. So if we don't fund the health department programming as proposed in the substitute that is before us, what happens to the health department's program?
I having just received this amendment, I can't fully tell you what that's gonna do. I'm a bit confused how the level of engagement and communication to the folks that are sitting here at this table has been clear and has answered the questions and there was no communication to me after those conversations that this was an issue until fifteen minutes before this committee. So I can't answer that question.
All right. So all right. Thank you for that. The sub is before us. Mr. Chair, I will move to reject the sub. I think that we need to return to the original file that was presented and circulated and shared with departments and the public and the council prior to today. If there are changes in that allocation that we need to revisit moving forward. The council has every right and ability to do that now or thirty five months from now. This is really just unusual to have this come in at the last minute with no input, no collaboration.
If we need to change something, let's change something. But I'm very fearful of interrupting the health department's efforts on the opioid crisis. This does not affect my district like it affects other districts. But I cannot support interrupting the continuum of care and the programs that this council has already set in place. We have to fund this. We don't have a different substitute in front of us. If we don't approve the substitute, we can certainly consider the original file. And if we need to tomorrow or a year from now adjust those allocations, we certainly have that right and privilege to do so. Thank you, Mr. Chair. So I Thank you. Made a
Clarification for the LRB. So there are, I believe, of the 1.5 allocation, there is roughly seven fifty left for the health department?
Health department would have to confirm that for me, yes, so that was my understanding.
It was 1.47 and I believe there's something like $7.50 left.
That's what remains. So
there is money there to the tune of $7.50, I believe. So, okay. So just briefly before I go to you, Chief. So again, if the districts that are Alder Berglis like me stated that his district isn't as directly impacted, of course, we both care about the city as a whole. I would tend to be deferential to my colleagues whose districts are more impacted if they want more time to discuss this, but you know, that's just me. Alder Taylor, you had?
Okay. Alder Taylor.
Yes. So I guess I was trying to figure out too how essential it was to have this $250,000 set aside for an evaluation. Whether we do that or not, I do think that we I agree with Alderman Burgallis that we don't want that break in service. So I don't want to don't want to lose any care that we can give. So I guess all the Roman Cox asked how soon would you run out of money?
We meet once a month. So we'll be meeting again next month. Can't we redo this? Make sure that you guys are good to the end of the year so we can decide. Because I guess I'm still trying to understand why. If the comptroller's office can do evaluation, what would be the difference between this 2 50? And I haven't gotten a I'm not real clear on that yet. So I don't wanna say, no. We don't need this if I'm not real clear on it, but I also don't want to lose service that you guys can't provide. So I think we need a little more time if we have it, and we're not gonna this is not gonna be held off to the end of the year.
So I think that we just need a little more time kind of figure that out, but I do wanna make sure that you guys get funded to the at least to the end of the year before we make that decision on that three year. That's that's what I'm understanding is that they want this evaluation to decide on that. But until that is all kind of figured out that I know I'm just you know I do want to make sure you have funding so we don't lose service.
When you say you are you talking about the fire department.
Fire department and because this what we're looking at is funding both right for three years is that.
That was the original item.
Right
now this what this is proposing is to take the fire department to the end of the year.
Yeah we'll take the more to the end of the year because they're about to run out of money and I guess to Mister Hillard the the health department has $7.50 in the kitty of the 1.47 allocation or thereabouts. That should make them three weeks for sure. But were you able to confirm that?
Yes. So that's based on the spreadsheet that we got from the health department. If I could can I have
the memo back really quickly so I
can reference the exact number? Yes. According to the spreadsheet that we got, there is still approximately $719,000 remaining that's allocated to the health department. Okay. And then just could I briefly clarify what the LRB has been asked to do with regards to the evaluation as well? Because just to clarify, at least our understanding is what we've been tasked with is now find organizations that will be capable of carrying out an evaluation of a large public health program like this. So this is not something that would be done within the next week or anything like that. This is more of a long term identify who could do this and then approach them and see if they are able to and willing to do it. It's not a there's not an immediacy to it. Yeah.
Then so I guess I'm understanding that we can possibly, according to what Aldwoman Cox just said, is just strip that portion out and just make sure that you guys are funded to the end of the year until we sort things out.
Yeah. The the $2.50 would be setting aside money for a program evaluation if, you know, you look out at the folks in the space out there, decide that's not an adequate allocation, you could roll that back at that point. But this would reserve it now if folks want to wait for the larger discussion. That's up to the sponsors whether they would advocate for that. But if you just want to make it focused on the Mori piece then you would make that amendment and leave the two fifty aside for the larger discussion with the understanding that LRB could still proceed to see who is in that space.
And my understanding is and I know the health department feels like they have a good handle on the program. This would be seeking, I guess, somebody outside of the health department to evaluate the health department's work in this regard. But again, can be part of a larger discussion. I'm sorry, Elder Moore, had been in the queue.
Yes. I just particularly around the on the prevention side and so as long as this process doesn't preclude us from coming back to the table. So, if we look at I love what Alderman Cogs was sharing as far as what do we call it, editing or as far as this particular substitute. I just want to make sure that we have an opportunity to come back to the table to talk because summer is upon us. That's where we see things spike, right?
So we're going to need to get our partners together, how that RFP process is going to work, that sort of thing. But the support that will be needed for summer is one of my primary concerns. So as long as we're able to come back to the table to be able to discuss that, that was one of my preliminary things.
So you're saying, just making sure I'm understanding, Alder Moore, that you, as part of this discussion before next cycle, you would like to have a discussion with the health department about whether the prevention side of things was adequately funded in this proposal?
It is adequately funded. I'm just trying. I just want to know how that process is going to be outlaid to our community partners because we have a variety of community partners small and large. I don't want our process to be so cumbersome that it Xs out those that are literally on the ground doing some of this work and again when I'm talking about the prevention side. It in capital encapsulate a lot of the work that goes into supporting some of our young people.
And I'm trying also be mindful and respectful of you know what my colleagues are asking for. I do have some questions around you know the review the cost for the review and evaluation I you know I can't I don't have enough information to even speak to that. But definitely want to make sure that the program the Mori program is supported until the end of the year. So that those are the things that are for me that is sort of going through my mind. I want to make sure that the chief has the funding to be able to continue the program.
But I understand that my colleagues you know have questions as well and want to you know give the space for that to be for that to happen and then come back to the table to discuss the rest of the funding. Okay. Thank you.
Sister True. Do you have a motion and then we'll go to the chief relating to that? Or?
We made a motion.
You had the motion to defeat the file. So reject is the sub. Right, the sub. So if there's a motion to amend then we can consider But okay. So would you accept it as a friendly amendment if Alder Moore moves to strip the $250,000,000 and just have it the clean Mori through the end of the year a bit? Would that be a better thing to have before us? I don't know if that sits well with the sponsors. Again, we could add it back in, in the next three year or three week cycle.
Okay. If that motion or if I can put that motion on the table but it would be up to me because my colleague would have to resend his motion but if if that's something that would be amenable.
An amendment would take precedence now.
Yeah. We're just we're we're be amending what's before us so that what would be before us would be something more slender. So, do have any problem with that? Okay. So, Alder Moore would move. I don't know if the sponsors are. Yeah. Would the sponsors be amenable to that just to kick off that conversation till later?
Kick off the what?
The $2.50. So Alder Cogs had suggested just make it clean. Just have it more refunding through the end of the year, fold in that 250,000 program evaluation piece into our larger discussion of over the next three weeks, over the next cycle about what this whole package should look like.
That'll work because Chris had solid numbers at the time.
Yes. Okay. So he'll have an opportunity to outreach. So I think this would be a simple amendment then. So Alder Moore would move that file before us be amended so that what is before us is just the funding more through the end of the year stripping out the two fifty funding up to two fifty funding and settlement funds. Mr. Hillard, is that relatively clear? Yes. Understood. So that's a simple amendment. We don't need that in writing. This is in counsel. It's relatively clear what's being proposed here. So then what is properly before us then is the proposal to fund Mori through the end of the year leaving everything else for discussion for a later day. Alder Geragles, you'd still like to move against that?
I don't have a motion anymore on the amended Okay. On the amended substitute.
Okay. So the amended substitute before us funds more through the end of the year skips the two fifty piece. So are there further questions about that? I wanted to give the Chief a chance to weigh in on the amended version. Okay. Chief?
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I think we sit before you ready to answer any questions that you have. I think our proposal is information rich. I think it is founded on national best practices.
And to address the if you'll just give me a little bit of levity here, we brought a lot of people here specifically to answer those questions for you here. I have our Medical Director, Doctor. Ben Weston, who represents the Milwaukee County Office of Emergency Management EMS and is directly tied into their opioid and over dose response efforts. I have my Mori team here. I have our peer support team here, members of our peer support team.
And more importantly, so lest we not forget what we're talking about here, we have two people here who are alive today because of the Mori program. People who we have invested time and energy in and who are sitting here today ready to testify on our behalf. That's just on the fire department side. I know the health departments brought other people along. Have long we have long heard at this table that don't you guys talk to each other stovepiping.
So now we're talking to each other and now we're being restow piped by this motion. This entire plan really, really is nose to tail and I love the fact that we get to stay alive till the end of the year until we have the next argument. That's great. But this entire plan, I mean there's a lot more that needs to be happening right now and that just comes to a full stop now.
So with that, so Alder Moore has the so the amendment the motion to amend has been made. Alder we're losing members here. Alder Taylor has left the room, but do I have a motion on that sub that's before us, which is the funding of Mori till the end of the year, the intent being to take this up again in three weeks with looking at the more robust plan. There is a level if members have had a chance to look in the file, there is a level of specificity with respect to FTEs in the Mori proposal that isn't quite there with the health department proposal. I know last time we had discussed this back in 2024, was a very detailed breakdown of the FTEs and where the money would be going.
It's a little less clear now in the current version, but that can be corrected, I'm sure, by next cycle as well. So, Aldermore, do you have a motion with respect to the amended file before us?
As far as moving through with the amended motion. I just just for clarity, I just wanna, you know, share that. For me, this is just me hearing what my colleagues are saying and trying to come to a middle ground. This definitely doesn't preclude the Mori program because again it's a small slice of it and that's how I'm looking at it from being fully funded. Conversation that I would love that are.
Authors you know some of the things that they brought up but for me where my stance is and you know where. I'm more interested is sort of the community. I'm strategy on what this looks like and just getting some questions and so I think I believe that we can do that. Within the next few weeks to be able to get those questions answered. So at least, you know, my colleagues were able to provide the space for them to get some of those answers as well as any of our colleagues that also isn't here.
So this was probably the best, you know, way for us to be able to look at a win win for now and then be able to come back to the table. Mister chair. With the full. Front full version of what this what this is but I I just want to be able to figure out how to move forward.
Okay. So, was that a motion in there?
Yes. I'm putting my amended.
Okay. We'll
share before we get to a motion.
Recognize the motion but if you were in the motion so you can discuss whatever you want to discuss.
Thank you, mister Chair. I'm sorry, the Chief said it's a little big. I didn't see our Chief Medical Examiner or Chief Medical Director from Milwaukee County here, Doctor. Ben Weston. I would like to hear from him so I can better understand the perspective for the countywide impact of delaying the three year allocation.
Okay. If the medical director wants to speak briefly on that, again, we're approaching the 01:00 hour here. So it would have to be brief. This isn't a full discussion of the three year plan. But if you wanted to say what would happen if
Well, question would be, well, is the impact if we only fund Mori through the end of the year as opposed to funding that and the health department's programming for three?
For right now, correct?
For the next three weeks.
Well, that's what we
next have for three weeks. Got it. Okay.
So we'll be brief. Doctor. Wesson, thank you for coming. Please introduce yourself. Obviously, we've spoken many times. Appreciate your expertise. If you could speak to the what the impact would be of a delay of three weeks in not caring for the three year plan proposed by the health department.
Sure. I'm Ben Weston. I'm associate professor at the Medical College of Wisconsin and the chief medical director for EMS for the county and then the Milwaukee Fire Department. I think a couple quick thoughts, I'm happy to expand. I think program evaluation is really important. And I think when you're putting this much money towards something, it's really important to understand, are we really making a difference. I think the challenge is that we could name them off but it's the Institute for Health and Humanities, the Comprehensive Injury Center, the Substance Use Research Center have all done evaluations that frankly probably cost a lot more than $250,000 of these programs and shown promise and probably
more I'm sorry. They've already evaluated the programs?
I think there have been evaluations of many of the programs. I think more substantially than that though is all the methods that are being used, in naloxone, peer support, fentanyl test strips, buprenorphine in particular have had tens of millions of dollars of studies showing their importance. So I think it's sort of like if we want to spend money to see if antibiotics work against infection, we can do that but we kind of know the answer. And so stopping them from giving out antibiotics for infection would not be a great idea. But to your specific question, I think we have a lot of momentum right now.
We've cut opioid deaths by fifty percent in the city. Wow. Fifty percent. That's wild over just a few years and not many other cities can say they've done that. And I think it's because of these sort of efforts. It's because of all these evidence based, well researched things that are being done at the health department, at the fire department. So I think we have a big risk of losing momentum. Even if it's I I were meant now I'm not I don't know the operations of the fire department or the health department but I would imagine it's hard to plan ahead when you don't know the guaranteed funding. So for example one big initiative we're doing and I'll stop after this because you asked me be brief. One big initiative we're doing in Milwaukee County is buprenorphine.
So, buprenorphine is medication assisted treatment for opioid use disorder. It doubles the likelihood of somebody actually stopping using opioids and that's what we're we're using in the fire department with support from the health department. In the next couple months, we're expanding that department wide as opposed to just with a subset of paramedics. That's going to greatly expand our ability. Beyond that fifty percent, we're going to really accelerate it up of getting folks into treatment as opposed to using opioids.
But for the fire department to implement the processes that that takes and for the health department to implement the wraparound sort of services that it takes to maintain something like that, I would imagine there's a lot of planning that goes into that because that's going to be years long sort of program to bring that 50% to 25% to 10% and keep driving it forward. So I'll stop there. I'm happy to talk further but I'll keep it brief.
Yes. Since we have a motion, I think we will try to wrap it up. So Alder Moore had the motion to approve the amended sub, which funds Mori through the end of the year with the intent then coming back to this in three weeks for an opportunity to have the sponsors have the conversation with the health department on some of the impacts in their neighborhoods and whether the for example, whether the RFP process to Alder Moores Point might end up selecting only bigger fish as it were and so versus the smaller people who maybe don't have the same back end support. The same thing we've encountered for years with community wellness and safety. But okay, with that we have a motion before us.
Elder Moore has moved to approve the motion as subbed. Do we have any questions, discussion? Okay. Do we have any objections to that motion then?
I will object.
Objection by Alder Bergalis. That means the motion passes on a three-one vote. And we will see you in three weeks. All right. Thank you.
With that, we will move on to Item nine. This is 251,407 substitute resolution directing the health department to collaborate with Department of Employee Relations to develop strategies to prevent clinic closures due to staffing shortages. This is sponsored by Alder Cogs, who may have left us. Is she still on? She dropped off.
Okay. Well, that went on longer. So, if the sponsor is not here, then this item should be held. So with that, Alder Taylor would move that it be held to the call of the chair. Item 10, file number 251,745, resolution relating to access to Fire and Police Commission meetings by members of the Common Council that sponsored by me. Alder Bergalis would move to place this on file. It's no longer necessary. Hearing no objection so ordered. And then the last one is item number 11, file number 252,056, communication from FPC relating to SOPs. So this is our monthly update on SOPs that have been altered.
Good morning, Mr. Chair, committee members, Alders. I'm going to pretend it's still the morning. Lee Todd, Executive Director of the Milwaukee Fire and Police Commission. There's one policy change before you today which was heard at the March 19, FPC meeting that relates to SOP seven forty seven body worn cameras. The changes are routine administrative updates. I'm happy to answer any questions, but they're outlined in a memo in the file.
Okay. Any members have any questions about these? The one on body worn cameras, could you just give that one briefly?
Yes. So the Milwaukee Police Department did amendments that changed the term evidence sync to the more generic term evidence application as the term has changed a few times already for that application and this change will avoid having update the SOP every time Axon renames the application.
Okay. That's good. Okay. There is some other similarly Yes. Drum ones. Is that the only one?
That's the only SOP, yes.
Okay. All right. Sorry, I thought I saw something else in there earlier when I was reviewing the file.
It looks like it doubled for some reason but it's one SOP.
Got you.
Okay. That helps. All right. With that then, given these just technical changes, Alder Berglowski moved that this item be placed on file and hearing no objections ordered. Thank you very much. We are adjourned.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.