Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, February 3, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Planning Commission
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Location
Milton, GA
Meeting Date
February 3, 2026

Transcript

40 sections (from 181 segments)

0:21 – 0:380

They'll always testing one too. Um even though we can do everything always still

5:390

recording in progress.

9:550

[laughter] We'll go ahead and get started. Is that okay?

9:59 – 10:460

All right. All right. So, um I'll go ahead and call order and um you know, this is a regular design review board meeting of the city of Milton. I'm Ken Moore like the seven board uh seven member board appointed by the city of Milton mayor and city council which was created for the purpose of holding public hearings and making recommendations. The design review board reviews plans and makes recommendations to the community development director for the developments in the formbbased code and overlay districts except for single family residential. In addition, the design review board approves and denies demolition requests and shall make design recommendations to the board of zoning of appeals on variance cases. So, with our introduction script out of the way, I would like to ask everyone to rise for the pledge of allegiance.

10:47 – 11:310

Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. All right. Thank you. Um, so at this time, we'll go ahead and introduce our staff and our board members. Remma Abdel Feta, planner one. Natalie Henderson, rural designer. Michael Cardan, senior planner. Damn Coker, Chelton Hamwalk. Ralph Devilla, Bethany Road. Celeste Jackson, Saddle Springs Drive. Jim Warick, Hipworth Road. Danielle Gagny, Morning Mountain Way.

11:29 – 12:130

David Jackson, Bethany Way. And Danella, Hbridgeidge Lane. All right, great. So, next I will call for an approval of tonight's or an amendment of tonight's u meeting minutes. Why? We have an amendment. What do we have an amendment? For approval. Oh, excuse me. Or no, if any amendments if you want to make it. Oh, no, no, no. Sorry. Sorry. I thought you were making an amendment. No, no, no. I was like, hold on. I'll rephrase that. a time this motion for either approval or an amendment of tonight's agenda. I'll make a motion to approve tonight's agenda. I'll second. All right. So, we have a motion and a second. All those in favor?

12:13 – 12:540

I I You sure? No. I'm just making sure I know what I'm voting for. Um All right. So, I will uh next call for an approval or amendment of the meeting minutes from the January 6, 2026 DRB board. I'll make a motion to approve the minutes from the January 6th meeting. I'll second. All right. So, we have a motion for approval and a second. All in favor? I I [snorts] unanimous approved. All right. So moving on to 5A, demolition of structures 16225 Birmingham Highway. [snorts]

12:58 – 13:390

Evening board members. Good evening, Rema. How are you? I'm good, thank you. Okay. 16225 Birmingham Highway. So the applicant, Mr. Steve McGlamry, is here tonight. The request is to demolish two onestory single family houses, a barn shed, concrete block structure, a blacksmith shop, and a play set. And also all the walkways and fencing on the site. The site is actually it's 3.3 acres, my mistake. Zoned AG1 residential.

13:41 – 13:520

Say that again. How many acres? 3.3. Thank you.

13:48 – 15:450

And here's an aerial view. Here is the site plan. And I've circled all the structures to be demolished in red. Okay. So, we'll start with photos of house one, which is this concrete block structure which was built in 1945. Can see all angles of the house in these photos. And here are some photos of the interior of the house. And moving on to house two, which was built in 1924. This house was originally a duplex. So you can see the front, the sides, and the rear of the home. So, we're going to do a little background on um house number two um since it was listed in the Milton Historic Survey List. Um it's a one-story bungalow, originally a duplex, Craftsmanstyle architecture. Just to note, the last survey date for this house was done in 1995. The exterior material, wood, weatherboard, clapboard, siding, and a

15:43 – 17:410

stone foundation. The roof style is gable front oriented. The roof material is asphalt shingles, brick chimney, and front ver style porch. And then there was a field survey evaluation done on August 20th of 1996 and at that time it was not determined if the structure is eligible for um a national registry listing. So the house is currently in disrepair. Most of the flooring is rotted. It's soft. You can't [snorts] walk on it without falling through to the crawl space. Um, so we were unable to get any interior photos of this house. And just a little more supplemental information. Um, so it is listed in the Georgia Historic Resources GIS, but it's not nationally registered. And then again, it's also listed in the City of Milton's Historic Survey List as of 2015. So, I did reach out to the Milton Historical Society um and they did a little background research for me as well and ultimately it was determined that there's limited historical information available on this structure. The duplex is small in scale and significantly deteriorated. There's no clear association um found with any notable family, individual or historic event. And while this house is early for this um part of Milton, it does not align with the city's genuinely historic resources, specifically early 19th century settlement period structures that are well doumented and identifiable as significant. So the lack of verifiable ties to a

17:38 – 18:490

historically significant use limits its ability to meet local historic significance criteria. So given the current documentation, it is difficult to justify preservation or insist that the structure remain standing. So we'll move on structures on the property. photos of the shed, the barn, um this concrete block structure, an out building which was used as a blacksmith shop, and the play set. Um so staff does recommend approval of the demolition per the site plan with the typical following conditions. Complete the demo permit application. Level and grass the area that is disturbed and then no trees to be removed without a permit. Any questions? Any questions for staff?

18:47 – 19:280

All right. Thank you so much. You're welcome. All right. So, at this time, Steve, if you have anything to add to Remma's uh you know, explanation of the property, go for it. We we are just requesting permission to demo the old structures and clean the property up. Um, you know, it's going to be much better than it is now when we get through. So, that's pretty much it. Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Do we have any questions for the applicant? Oh, all right. Thanks so much. Appreciate it. All right. Um, seeing no more questions for the applicant, I will open up for public comment. We have no public comment.

19:26 – 19:380

Anyone in the the audience that would has anything to say? Um, all right. Seeing no public comment, we'll close public comment. Any board discussion?

19:35 – 20:160

I got a question. So, if historical society did find the it historically relevant and then what what would we do at that point? I think that um in this situation where staff has reached out to just historical society that's usually like kind of the first steps right and then if they deem it that it's more than you know more than capable of being either rehabbed or something like that then you know there could be the options to see if there's somebody who wants to preserve it wants to possibly move it okay um

20:14 – 20:370

because it's not registered on the historic so even though it's it's labeled as, you know, on the preservation or or society because it's not actually registered. You can move it. So, you can mobilize it. You don't have to use the existing foundation. The problem is is unfortunately on a lot of these cases is these homes have been vacant for many, many, many years and just fall into disrepair.

20:35 – 21:190

Um, and then the other thing is too is from my experience is a lot of the materials used on these contain asbestous lead. So that gets into yeah, you might try to be preserved the look and feel in the future, but how much of a mess are you creating in sight? So, you know, had it been um preserved or in much better condition, I think we'd probably have maybe a different conversation tonight. But for me, um Okay. What else? That's all I had. I'm just curious. Do you know when the last time somebody inhabited this property? I don't think anyone's lived in that teal blue property for many years. Yeah.

21:15 – 21:450

It's an old block building that it might have been in the historical district before. Yeah. Many many years ago. It probably rotted and somebody built it back with block. Yeah. Because it's a block building block. I mean back in 1996, right? Might have been in pretty good condition. But fast forward, it none of the structures are even salvageable. Yep. Okay. Yeah. Yeah, the swing set looks like it's in the best condition.

21:44 – 22:250

I was thinking about that, too. It's like I think somebody just popped the swing set out there [laughter] and but you know, we need to find the maker of that that So, um All right. Any other questions? No. Okay. Um discussion. Oh. All right. So, seeing no more discussion, I will open it up for a motion. I'll make a motion to approve the demolition of 16225 Birmingham Highway. A second. All right. So, we have a motion for approval and a second. All those in favor? I. Unanimous. Good luck. Appreciate it. Good. All right. Good night. Thank you.

22:24 – 22:490

You do the same. Thank you so much. Thank you for your time. Uh, all right. Moving on. 6A or courtesy reviews. V26-012410 Bethany Ben. Good evening board members. Hey there. Good evening. How are you? I'm doing well. How you all doing? It's above 35° so much better. Yeah, I'm from the frozen tundra. So,

22:54 – 24:510

the applicant owners are Steve and Heather Green. The representative is uh Mana Woodruff from Woodruff Design Associates and the address is 2410 Bethany Ben. These are the following variance requests. Section 8813 B3 of UDC to increase the 1500 square ft guest house accessory structure heated floor area maximum to 1544 an increase of 44 ft. and section 8813B5 UDC to allow guest house accessory structure to be located in front of the existing single family home. Some additional background information. The applicant purchased the property in July 2023. The property has state waters in the rear of the property and the applicants are seeking variance to locate the guest house in front of the single family home and are also requesting an increase of 44 square feet past a maximum 1500 to allow for a guest house. And the leeal details the guest house is to be 88 compliant for a direct family member who is in need of care. During the surveying process of the property, a 0.22 22 acre discrepancy was discovered when locating the iron pins between 2410 Bethany Ben and 2420 Bethany Ben. And this discrepancy will be corrected through the minor plat process. The uh zoning is AG1 and you can see from its shape it is a flag lot. Here is the site plan and you can see the state waters in the rear of the property. Here is the single family home. And here's the guest house. I'll have a zoom in shot here shortly. See it better here. Turn into the garage. This is where the proposed guest house is be located in front of the single family home. And you

24:49 – 26:480

can see the edge of the state waters here as well. And uh the applicant actually put together a a contour map that shows how aggressive the topography is on site. And she also put a nice little triangle that showed the little discrepancy um that will be corrected the minor plat process. This is a 7 acre plus parcel. Here's the aerial map and you can kind of see how wooded it is where um the guest house is to be located and the distance to all the other adjacent residential properties. Here are the proposed elevations. We're proposing brick And here's the floor plan, but this is right up the driveway. You can see a house in the background. This is the location, the proposed guest house. When you turn in view to the north, backyard showing the little pond where all the buffers came from. View to the south and the location of the guest house. You can see all the natural screening in play here. View to the east and view to the west. Any questions for staff for call the applicant.

26:46 – 27:180

What is that building right there in your view to the west? That is a shed that was discovered to not been built without a with a permit. So the applicant and the homeowner working towards making that a compliant structure, but no variance is needed. It was just constructed without a permit. And how many total acres are there on seven? Go back to the the house plan. Can you zoom in on that? Yeah. Want to see a couple dimensions? [snorts]

27:20 – 27:440

Yes. Here's the master bedroom. And then there's like a mother-in-law suite on the other side. And I'll let the applicant expand. Um believe she said they wanted additional uh suite if they had to have a additional medical care. So the main house on the property is already existing. They're just looking to add this.

27:42 – 28:220

That is correct. They actually originally reached out to me to do um a gas south house in the rear, but a stream buffer variance is a lot more cumbersome than locating it elsewhere because it has environmental impacts. And the 1500 square feet is the maximum allowable heated square feet for an accessory structure. Correct. For a guest house specifically. Okay. An accessory structure just has to be subordinate to a primary structure. Okay. If it's not a guest house. So is the garage heated? It is not. That's not including the 1500 feet. Correct.

28:18 – 28:400

Correct. Okay. I can go down a little. Okay. Yeah. Any other questions for staff?

28:44 – 29:090

Thank you, Michael. Appreciate it. So, at this time, the applicant like to come forward and Hi, I'm Kathleen Woodruff. I live in Do need to know where I live? I live in Walton. It took me about two hours to get here. The traffic was so bad. So, I'm sorry for scooting in just under the wire. And congratulations to the champions. [laughter] We were keeping up with that. I went to Indiana.

29:06 – 30:280

I'm a Tennessee V fan. We've had a rough time. So, [laughter] yes. Um, so I'm the I'm I'm here representing Heather and Steve. And unfortunately, one of their children was in a horrible accident and will not be able to be unassisted for the rest of their life. And [snorts] so the ADA compliant has been a really big part of this project. um they purchased the property a couple of years ago and the buffers in the rear the entire rear yard with the pond and the stream is taken up with the state um impervious and undisturbed buffer. So we are proposing this ADU to serve the direct family member in a more flat area that's amidable to what the property is in existing condition. The additional square footage is so that in case this daughter needs overnight care or if something comes up, a nurse or caretaker could stay overnight if necessary. So that's the request for the additional 44 square ft. Um, and I guess so that's front and yes, those are the two requests that we're seeking in order to help the family be able to move forward. and I'm happy to answer questions if it's pretty small, obviously, pretty straightforward, but

30:260

thank you. Um, any questions for the applicant? I have one. Um, have the homeowners reached out to any of the neighbors?

30:34 – 31:330

Absolutely. We have been in touch with all of our neighbors and even the neighbor to the south. Um, they're so well screened. I mean, that was really the only question we had, but we are not taking down any existing trees with this project. So the, you know, the distances of screening exceed 50 and 60 feet and they're all in support for this family. They've all, they had a Christmas party together. Who has Christmas parties with their neighbors? [laughter] I don't. I don't even know my neighbor's name on the left. Um, I like it that way. But yes, they have all been um in contact with each other. I've even spoken with them since we've been working on the platting issue. We found Michael actually helped us find a small area. It appears to have been at some point in time a a land swap that was privately done and never recorded correctly. So, we're working on a platting process to fix that situation.

31:29 – 32:100

Thank you. I I'd say to follow up, do y'all [clears throat] have letters from the neighbors? Actually, yes, we have. Um I don't know if Everett sent those to you yet. Not yet. Not yet. We um we will we do have letters. Um, Michael helped us create a template so that the letter the neighbors could state on that letter they were in support and we can probably have that by the end of the week. Great. Yeah. Okay. All right. Um, seeing no more questions for the applicant. I'll open up for public comment. They have no public comment.

32:09 – 32:390

Okay. I'll close public comment. Any board discussion? I have passed by there I don't know how many times and I've tried to see the house. Can't see the house. [clears throat] It's a very long driveway. Yeah. Um I think the [clears throat] the way that it curves back in there Mhm. I think even if there is structure in front of it, it's not going to

32:35 – 33:180

offend the Milton viewshed. I think the only question I have is is we've got the plans and stuff like that and I don't think that um I don't I mean typically I would ask why 44 feet why why the additional you know if you could take a foot out the back or something but this situation where you don't really see it what do you have a an idea of color is it going to represent the existing home there is it going to be it is going to represent the existing home but the existing home is actually a stucco finish so we're going to be matching or going with a brick facade and some of the finishedration for the front porch and all will, you know, match the colors of the existing structure. Okay.

33:16 – 33:570

So, it will intend that and the 44 it really backing into the ADA compliance for the restrooms and the bedrooms and the doorways. It we really didn't come up with that square footage. It it just revealed itself to us when the architect completed the floor plan. Got it. Okay. Thank you. Um, okay. Any other comments, discussion? I I just have one comment. Is um and I [clears throat] have don't recall the floor plan, but is it ADA accessible to the entry or do you need to go through the garage and go through Okay.

33:590

No. And no steps. Okay.

34:08 – 35:080

Yeah. I think um you know in this situation obviously we make recommendations for um for you and for the the ZBA but [clears throat] um I I think that you know um David and Ann hit on that is it's going to go a long way if you actually have signed letters from [clears throat] the neighbors albeit as private as it is. that usually goes a pretty long way when you get to the [snorts] next board. Um, you know, as far as the layout, the design, um, you know, and and if it kind of matches the existing home, then then I really don't see any issue with it. Yeah, I'd say when you present in front of the BCA, if you could go through the four reasons um why you're need a variance and include the the ADA compliance in there and the the fact that you can't build behind. I mean, those are kind of the

35:06 – 35:510

hardships that they're looking for. Yes. The site itself topographically is is pretty steep. It it dives into a creek into the pond. So there's not a ton of area to place an ADA compliant footprint. And then the second thing is green buffers. Yeah. Right. All along the rear. Yeah. Just make sure that that that letter that you submit has all of that and BCA will really appreciate it. [clears throat] Yeah. Showing the topography matter. I think you covered that in the because that really shows that it kind of just dictates that's really the only spot on the on the lot that we do. Yeah. Okay. Okay. Um, thank you. Sure.

35:48 – 36:300

All right. So, any further discussion? No. All right. So, do we want to make a recommendation with those um or make those kind of recommendations for the BZA? I think they're more sens. I don't think I think Yeah. I don't even know if they need to be recommended formalized. Yeah. Well, I think we formally have to say, hey, like these are some recommendations that I correct or Oh, you could just um recommend approval or you could recommend approval with some comments behind it. Okay. Okay.

36:28 – 37:130

Um well, seeing that then I will um I'll recommend approval. I do think the suggestions that that we kind of made are go a long way when you you do that board, but I'll recommend approval for u the BZA for V2601 2410 Bethany Bend for the two variances um for the increase of the 1500 foot uh accessory structure maximum and the guest house accessory structure to be located in the front. I'll second. All right. So, we have a motion for approval and a second. All in favor? I unanimous. Good luck. Thank you very much.

37:11 – 37:560

Thank you. [laughter] Enjoy your 2hour drive home. Although we got about Well, we have some lovely restaurants if you want to go. I know. I'm so I thought gosh, maybe I could run through the McDonald's drive and get a happy meal, but I thought, no, I don't have [laughter] time. You should enjoy mine twin, right? Surely there's something [laughter] that are here for sure. Thank you. [clears throat] Thank you. Have a good evening. Yeah. All right. So, uh, moving on. There's no final reviews, no new business, no old business. Can I get a motion for adjournment? Make a motion to adjourn. I'll second. All right. A motion for adjournment and a second. All in favor? I.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.