Nuisance Abatement Board - Regular Meeting

Please remain standing to be sworn in.

Please raise your right hand and repeat after me. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. Thank you.

Do you want me to swear? Did you swear everybody in? Okay.

Spanish interpreter?

Do you swear to translate from English to Spanish and Spanish to English to the best of your ability? Si necesitas un interprete en español, por favor, póngase de pie. Intéprete en español.

Two. Two people. Three.

Where did she go?

Four.

You need to swear them in. You need. You could go to the microphone. Mr. Creel Interpreter. I just wanted to translate from English to Creole, and Creole to English to the best of your ability.

Good evening. Is there anyone in the room who can speak English well? Who needs help with English? Anyone? Okay. Thank you very much.

Just roll call. Roll call. And then.

Mr. John Connell.

Present.

Mr. Keon Williams.

Present.

Ms. Yvonne Bayona. Mr. Gustavo Chacon.

Present.

Mr. Juan Galan.

Present.

Mr. Rick Madan. Mr. Anufo Ramos.

Present.

We have a quorum.

Ready? Okay, we're going to start with the nuisance abatement agenda. Starting with the first case, it's on page 5, 723 Northwest 73rd Street. The owner, Mr. Barry Washington is present. You can go to the other podium. Well, so I will be dismissing the complaint. He just wanted to be here to see it. But at this time, the city is going to dismiss the complaint. You're good to go. All right. Next case. Yeah, take care. Next case is on page 53. Property is 4821 Northwest 15th Court. Call it out for owner Roxanna Christina Amaro. members of the board uh notice was posted so at this time i'm going to proceed in absentia i have detective perez here to testify regarding the allegations in the complaint he is in the back if i can get the portable microphone as he does undercover work so if you can testify off camera You want to come on camera? Yeah. Hello? There. There we go. Got it. OK. State your name for the record, please. Detective Richard Perez. And who do you work for?

City of Miami Police Department.

And what department within the police department you work for?

I work within the narcotics unit, Vin Detail.

As part of that detail, do you execute search warrants on properties? Yes, sir, I do. Investigate narcotic investigations utilizing confidential informants?

Yes, sir, we do.

Are you familiar with the property 4821 Northwest 15th Court? Yes, sir, I am. And did you and your unit participate in the narcotic sales and search warrant of that property? Yes, sir, we did. Okay, let me draw your attention to January 8th of 2025 was a confidential informant utilized to purchase narcotics at that property. Do you hear me? Yeah. And on that date, did the CI purchase $40 worth of narcotics in exchange for eight baggies of fentanyl?

Yes, sir.

Okay. And once the narcotics are received from an individual within the property, are they then handed over to you? Yes, sir, they are. Let me draw your attention to the next day, January 9th of 2025 was a confidential informant utilized to purchase narcotics at the property? Yes. And did the confidential informant purchase $30 worth of fentanyl on that day?

Yes.

Let me draw your attention to January 16th of 2025, based on the two prior drug sales, was a search warrant executed on the property? Yes, sir. And was an individual arrested and charged with various narcotic-related felonies? Yes, sir. Okay, and that property was ultimately searched? Yes, sir. And the search of that property revealed the following 52 baggies of marijuana, approximately 120 grams, 142 baggies of cocaine, approximately 98 grams, 14 baggies of MDMA, approximately 4 grams, 69 baggies of fentanyl, approximately 16 grams, and 18 pills of oxycodone, approximately 9.2 grams. Is that correct?

Yes, sir. Okay. Thank you.

And at this time, the city of Miami would seek to admit the complaint that with the attachments A, B, and C, which include the property ownership records, the affidavit from the area commander, and the warrants, reports, and arrest affidavits, including the testimony from Detective Perez as our evidence. Admitted. At this point, the city would ask that the board find the property guilty pursuant to section 46-1, subsection 2, in that it's been utilized on more than two occasions within six months as a site of controlled sale, delivery, manufacture of controlled substance. And the recommendation would be as follows. Meet with the neighborhood resource officer within one week. Remove all landscaping interfering with the line of sight within 30 days. Execute a trespass affidavit within one week. Install no trespass sign within one month. Provide the necessary adequate lighting to ensure the property is well lit. and provide a rent roll for the tenants, the names of the tenants, including their vehicle information and tag numbers, and we would request a reset 30 days to, I think it's May 25th, nuisance abatement agenda. Mr. Chair, motion?

Motion. So moved. Second? Second. All in favor? Aye.

The third case is appearing on page 88, properties 1278 Northwest 58th Terrace. An individual on behalf of the property was present. However, the owner is out of town, and we are... Sorry, what is your name?

Raul Casillo.

Oh, okay. Your niece was just here and said that you were out of town, so I guess you're present. No.

I'm not aware of that. I unfortunately was not properly noticed for this hearing. I didn't receive any notice. I got a call from a neighbor that there was something posted on the gate. But I never received a mail or anything to my place of residence.

For 1278 Northwest 58th Terrace?

Correct.

Do you have a tenant that lives there?

Yes, there is somebody there.

Is it a female?

Not that I'm aware of.

Someone was just here with the notice in their hand.

I don't know. I mean, we could talk about it or let me know what's going on. That's why I came here, just to kind of see what's going on. Okay. What's the mailing address? Well, the registered agent for the property.

Well, no, he's an individual owner, so the mailing address is the property. So they posted on the property.

I have no idea of what this hearing is even about.

Yeah. Do you want to proceed, or do you want to have a discussion for a minute with him, or...? I mean, I don't think it's a one-minute discussion.

It could be, but I can pass this. Okay.

Yeah.

Just talk to her. She'll sort of explain what's going on. Yeah, no problem. Okay. Next case is appearing on page 128. Property is 1427 Northwest 69th Terrace. Property owners calling out for Mayra and Marcia Fernandez or Orlando Fernandez. Is that you, sir? Can you come up to the podium? Can you state your name, please?

Orlando Fernandez. Orlando Fernandez.

Okay, put the microphone closer to your mouth so we can hear you.

Orlando Fernandez. Orlando Fernandez.

And are you the owner of 1427 Northwest 69th Street, Miami, Florida?

This property was cited under the same section 46-1, subsection 2, as a property two or more sales within a six-month period. I guess at this time, ask the board to inquire from the gentleman whether or not he wishes to plead guilty or not.

First of all, does he know why he's here? Okay, and he's aware of the allegations that have been lodged against him and the property, correct? Okay, does he wish to plead guilty and explain to us or does he want to plead not guilty? Okay, go ahead. He's going to enter a plea of not guilty so the city can proceed.

Again, we have Detective Perez. Say your name one more time for the record.

Detective Richard Perez.

Detective Perez, you work for the City of Miami Police Department in the narcotics unit? Yes, sir. Are you familiar with the property at 1427 Northwest 69th Terrace? Yes, sir. And did you and your unit participate in narcotic sales and a search warrant at that property? Yes, sir. Okay, let me direct you to September 11th of 2024 was a confidential informant utilized to purchase oxycodone at that property. Yes, sir. And was there a conversation exchange that took place between the CI and a individual at the property for one pill of oxy in exchange for $15? Yes, sir. And let me direct your attention to September 13th of 2024. Same questions. Was a confidential informant utilized to purchase narcotics at that property? Yes, sir. I'm sorry. I forgot we were interpreting. Is that going too fast? Louder? Okay. How much of what I previously said did he hear? Did you repeat the question for him? Which one?

There was no pending question. Has he heard what the city has said? Or actually, have you heard it so that you can translate it to him?

Let me start over because I forgot.

You need to put the microphone closer to your mouth. Your mouth so we can hear you. You're translating. Okay.

Detective Perez, did you and your unit conduct narcotic sales in a search warrant at 1427 Northwest 69th Terrace?

Yes.

This isn't meant for a question.

This isn't a question. You're just relaying the information that you hear to him. It's not a pending question.

Let me direct your attention to September 11th, 2024. Did a confidential informant go to the property and purchase narcotics?

Yes, sir.

And did the confidential informant hand an individual $15 in exchange for one oxycodone pill? Yes, sir. Let me direct your attention to September 13th, 2024, was a confidential informant utilized to purchase narcotics at the property.

Yes, sir. I know.

I don't think she knows. Are you live translating, Tim? Yes.

She hasn't translated anything, that's the problem.

I've slowed down so you can live translate to him. This isn't a question answer for him.

No, I know that, I know that, but you're, excuse me, but you need to talk a little louder and a little bit slower.

Madam, madam, he's speaking very loud. The detective is speaking loud. I'm speaking loud. I'm watching you, and you're not translating anything to him. After he talks, your lips should be moving to tell him exactly what he just said, okay? If not, we can do this in Spanish or another language.

And I think you understand English too, right?

So I think as far as up to the first September 13th date, you've heard all of that testimony, correct? After, we'll talk about that. But you heard that testimony, correct? Okay, so now we're going to move on to after the September 13th next, I think it was a service of the warrant you were getting into.

Let me direct your attention to September 19th of 2024. Did you and your team execute a search warrant on the property?

Yes, sir.

And did that search warrant reveal contraband within the property? Yes, sir. to include 32 baggies of marijuana, approximately 154 grams, 70 pills of oxycodone, approximately 18 grams, 123 pills of alprazolam, approximately 13 grams, 28 pills of amphetamine, approximately 12 grams, eight pills of another controlled substance, five grams, and three firearms with 37 live rounds, 21 live rounds, and six live rounds.

Yes, sir.

That's all I have. And at this time, the city of Miami would seek to introduce the complaint with all the exhibits to include the search warrant, arrest warrant, property ownership records, and affidavit from the area commander confirming the facts within the complaint.

Admit it.

And at this time, the city would ask that the board find the property guilty in violation of section 46-1, subsection 2.

With the same request as the previous one.

I was going to make the recommendations, but I didn't know if we wanted to adjudicate it first, and then I would. We're going to hear from him.

Go ahead and you can explain your situation or defend the city's statements. In the microphone, in the microphone.

He says that he did not live in that property.

Okay.

And he did not sell anything.

Okay. And it was not his. He wasn't accused of selling it. The allegation is that those sales took place at that property. So he doesn't know whether or not those sales ever took place, correct?

Mr.

Chair, could you ask him if there's a tenant living in the property? Could you ask him if there's a tenant that he's renting to that lives in the property?

His son lives there.

His son lives there? Was his son living there last year in September?

Yes. Okay.

So someone is living there, has been caught selling drugs, has been caught with three firearms, has been caught with a... 32 bags of marijuana, 70 pills, 23 pills of something else, fentanyl, and about $20,000 in cash. Yes. Okay. So my question to him is, can he explain that? Can he explain why was that found at the property? Okay.

Okay, he was not living in the property at the moment and he did not know what was going on.

What's his son's name? What is his son's name?

Orlando Fernandez.

I have a question.

Did you visit your son at any time when he was living there at the house? Did you visit your son at any time when he was leaving the house? Did you visit your son? Did you go see him at least once or twice a year at that house?

Sir, what's the name of your son? What's your son's name? The same name as his. And that's on the arrest report?

No, the name on the arrest report is Asantos. Santos Mechans.

Okay.

Well.

I mean, honestly, he can say he don't know. That ain't got nothing to do with us. This is a property that has been accused of and processed of selling drugs within 1,000 feet of a church. Obviously, this is in my district, and this is problems that we continue to have with the continued drug use, the drugs being available, the type of weapons that they have on the streets shouldn't even be allowed, but they're there. And unfortunately, my neighborhood gets a bad rep as a result of it because property owners like him don't know what's going on in their properties. And unfortunately, the community suffers. Quality of life suffers. And so this is what we're trying to crack down on and get rid of. So I don't know if we're calling for a motion because he has not said anything that would refute any of the evidence that's been presented against him.

And I'm looking, if you look at Exhibit, Or page 159 of the Exhibit C, the city's exhibits that were already admitted. Yeah. There is an Orlando Fernandez. That's your son, Orlando Fernandez? He was arrested. He was the one that got arrested with the majority of it.

He's a co-defendant.

Yeah. Oh, yeah, a co-defendant. Yeah. Oh, so it's your son.

Does he know that? Does he know your son got arrested?

Yeah. Oh, okay.

Oh, okay.

Okay.

I'm motioning for the board to find the property guilty based on the evidence presented. Do you want me to give the recommendations now?

Yeah, just so we can have it for the record for the full motion.

So the motion is city is going to ask the board to find the property guilty pursuant to section 46-1, subsection 2. And the recommendations would be as follows. To meet with the neighborhood resource officer within one week.

Remove- Please translate, this is very important.

Please translate each one of these to him, because this is what he- Meet with the neighborhood resource officer within one week. Remove all landscaping interfering with the line of sight within 30 days. Execute a trespass affidavit within one week. Install a no trespass sign within one month. Provide necessary and adequate lighting to ensure that the property is well lit. And provide a list or name of the tenants, including their vehicle information and tag numbers to the officers.

Within one week?

Yes, within one week. And we'll recommend a reset of 60 days to the July nuisance abatement agenda. Which is on... Is there, do we have a July one?

Yeah, July 23rd.

July 23rd would be the next hearing. Do we have a motion?

So moved.

Second. All in favor? Aye.

I wanted to chat real quick. Just wanted to ask a question to the director.

Go ahead.

Director, so we're all on the same page here. Nuisance is asking for certain things to be done. If those things are not done, obviously by the time the hearing comes back, what's our line of action? Or does Cole get involved anywhere in ensuring that that's being done?

conditions so with the conditions well it doesn't have any it doesn't have anything to do with code compliance as far as nuisance we're limited to fines so it's a fine each and every time there's no continual non-compliance we'll just keep resetting them 30 days and we have a year of jurisdiction and then we can potentially restart the the process I just want to go on record again because again

You know, anytime I see a property that's in my district, you know, and we know how impactful these type of activities are to the neighborhoods, I just think it's important that, you know, and I'll have a conversation with my commissioner, try to figure out other ways that we can do to help strengthen, you know, what NUSA is allowed to do, because it seems like our hands are tied in so many regards, and unlike code, We could be very impactful to send a message, and I just wish NUSA had the same amount of ability to send a message that this is not allowed in our neighborhoods. And so, you can call for the motion, Mr. Chair. Okay, yeah, yeah.

Motion passed, right?

Okay, thank you. The next case is appearing on page 178. The property is 7101 Northwest 7th Avenue. The owner is Edwards Body Shop and Auto Repair Inc. I believe we have the registered agent present. Excuse me, the owner of the body shop.

178.

Is that not it? You have it?

178. 177, 178, yeah, that's it. 178, right?

Yeah. Sir, can you state your name for the record?

George Raymond.

Hey, Mr. Raymond, are you the owner of Edwards Body Shop and Auto Repair, Inc.?

Correct.

Okay. Based on our previous conversation, I believe your intent was to plead guilty to the complaint? Correct.

Yes. And is that in fact what you're going to plead guilty?

Yes. Okay. I just want to clearly, if I'm pleading, I'm accepting this plea, Based on all the conditions that we, I mean, I don't know if you just want to say it right there.

The city is going to go on the record, say the conditions and then whatever you want to explain to us, you'll have that opportunity. I'll begin plenty of time.

Okay. A quick factual proffer regarding this property. This was 4 separate confidential formant buys for. The 1st time was for 3 ounces of. SILO sideband, which is mushrooms. The second one was for LSD. Third one was for LSD. And the last one was for mushrooms and LSD. And there was a search warrant on the property that revealed six firearms. Just for the record, the dates of the bywalks were November 15th, 2023. June 27th, 2024, July 18th, 2024, August 29th, 2024, and there was a search warrant executed on September 19th of 2024. Based on the guilty plea, the city would recommend the following conditions as it relates to this property, that the property owner meet with the neighborhood resource officer within one week, Remove any and all landscaping if applicable. Interfere with the line of sight as this is a commercial business, not a residential business or residential property within 30 days. Execute a trespass affidavit within one week. Install a no trespass sign within one month. And sir, if those already are in place, then you've satisfied those conditions. And finally provide necessary and adequate lighting to ensure that the property is well lit and will request a reset date 90 days. Actually, let's do 60 because I don't believe there's an August. Nuisance abatement, am I correct?

Yeah, it's usually in recess, right?

So let's do July 23rd reset to July 23rd please.

Did you want to explain? No, I think he hit all the points, what I wanted to hear. Oh, okay. I just want to comply. Okay.

Sounds good. I got a question. Is the activity still taking place that you're aware of?

That I'm aware of, no, but I have a detective who is about to leave the room here if you want to ask him.

I would like to.

Detective, can you grab the microphone real quick? Yes, sir. Can you just state your name for the record?

Detective Freddy Quintero.

There's a question from a member of the board directed at you.

Yeah, I was just asking, is the activity still taking place?

As far as I know, no.

Okay, thank you.

You're welcome.

You're good to go. Do we have a motion?

One question that I have. Yes, go ahead. During that time, we had firearms taken. What I know had nothing to do with any of this and just never was returned. I really wanted to know when would those firearms be returned?

So you're going to have to go to the police department and inquire from their property unit. Oftentimes they take them for safekeeping, and if they're at all related to a criminal charge, they'll keep them up until the criminal case is resolved, and they'll be returned to an owner that is eligible and legally allowed to have a firearm. Right. So you've got to go over to the City of Miami Police Department. I don't know if you have a property receipt or anything like that.

Okay, I think we do.

Okay. Thank you.

Do we have a motion? Do we have a second? Second. All in favor? Aye.

The sixth case is appearing on page 230. The property is 7001 Northwest 15th Avenue. The owner of Saha Buildings Corp., I believe the registered agent for that corporation is present.

What?

Where's the individual that was here on... Where'd he go? 7001 Northwest 15th Avenue, Zaha Buildings Corp. Vanessa, did he file a power of attorney with you, an individual? No.

I'm sorry, what was his name again?

I don't remember his name. 7001 Northwest 15th Ave. There was a power of attorney that was filed. He showed it to me. Where'd he go? Okay, well, he was present and he did have notice, so I'm going to present in absentia unless he walks in. This is a complaint cited pursuant to 46-1 subsection 2. I have Detective McGehee, who is present in, oh, there he is. Okay. Good evening.

Good evening. State your name for the record. Well, Scott. And are you the owner of 7001 Northwest 15th Avenue, apartment 19 and 21? I am the property manager. You're the property manager.

And sir, you have power of attorney that you filed?

That is correct. Okay. We have that, Jose?

Yeah, he delivered it, and for nuisance abatement, it's up to the city to allow us to speak.

And do you plead guilty or not guilty to the allegations?

Not guilty. Okay.

Go ahead.

All right. Detective McGahee. Yes. Can you state your name for the record?

Detective Maurice McGahee.

And detective, who do you work for?

City of Miami Police Department.

And what unit you work for?

Special Investigation Sections, Narcotics Unit, Vendita.

Okay, and as far as that detail, are you familiar with the address 7001 Northwest 15th Avenue, Units 19 and Unit 21? Yes. And did you and your unit conduct narcotic buys and eventually search warrants on both of those properties? Yes. Okay, let's start with Unit 19. I'm going to direct your attention to July 24th of 2024. Was information received to you that narcotics were being sold at that property on that day?

Yes.

And let me direct your attention to July 30th 2024 was a confidential informant utilized to purchase narcotics from that property on that day.

Yes.

And did a CI purchase 7 baggies of for 40 dollars? Yes. And that MDMA was ultimately returned to you and impounded in property?

Yes.

Okay, let me direct your attention to August 1st, 2024, was a CIA utilized to purchase eight baggies of MDMA for $40 from that property?

Yes.

And the narcotics were returned to you and impounded?

Yes. Okay.

Drawing your attention to August 14th of 2024, was a search warrant executed on that property?

Yes.

And did the search of that property reveal eight capsules of fentanyl, $60 and one scale?

Yes.

Okay, let me direct your attention to Unit 2021. On July 2nd of 2024, did detectives receive information that narcotics were being sold at that property on that day? July 9th, 2024 was a CI utilized to purchase two baggies of MDMA and five baggies of rock cocaine for $40. Yes. Drawing your attention to July 11th, 2024 was a CI utilized to purchase five baggies of rock cocaine for $40. And July 19th of 2024 was a search warrant executed on that property?

Yes.

And there were four separate individuals that were arrested that day, is that correct?

Yes.

And a search of that property at Unit 21 revealed the following four pills of oxycodone, five baggies of MDMA. 11 baggies of cocaine, four pills of Xanax, one firearm, 18 .45 caliber live rounds, 80 12-gauge shotgun cells, and multiple miscellaneous empty baggies?

Yes. Okay.

And at this time, the City of Miami would seek to introduce the complaint with all the attached exhibits, including the arrest report, the search warrant, the affidavit from the commander affirming the facts in the complaint, and the testimony of Detective McGehee as city's evidence, and ask that you find the property guilty pursuant to 46-1 subsection 2 as a site. As a property, there were two or more narcotic sales within a six-month period, and the property is used as a site of sale, manufacture, cultivation of a controlled substance.

The evidence is omitted. Sir, do you want to respond?

I do. First and foremost, I would like to state that case number 19, from what I from through my own investigation was dismissed. Now, I am not debating that the fact that there were individuals who probably sold cocaine or contained firearm at the property. What I am disputing the fact is that it was actual tenants of our tenants, even though it was probably friends of friends, but what we definitely did do is we definitely did evict those tenants. But the individuals who actually owned the property were actually were a trespass. We do have a trespass. We did deal with the resource officer. I have been on myself on the property of numerous occasions. I have dealt with city of Miami of numerous officers as well. So I am not debating that the fact that these things probably has occurred on the property, but what I'm stating that we should not be found liable for those because those were not our tenants nor were those done inside of the unit in itself.

Hearing that he doesn't dispute that the transactions took place at the property, what's the city's position as far as recommendations?

As far as the recommendations would go, it would be to meet with the neighborhood resource officer within one week. Remove all landscaping interfering with the line of sight within 30 days. Execute a no trespass affidavit if not already done so. Install a no trespass sign within 30 days. provide necessary and adequate lighting to ensure that both properties are well lit and also provide the names of all the tenants, including their vehicle information and tag numbers to the neighborhood resource officer within one week. And request a reset for, let's do 120 days as soon as September.

Mr. Chair, I have a question. Yes. If I want to have a discussion, should I just wait until we make the motion in a second and then proceed or do it now? Question for you. Do you know who your commander is for that area? No, I do not. His name is Commander Williams. All of the cases that are being brought before us, Commander Williams' name is on those cases. In your case, since you're saying you're not aware of it and you're saying you should be held liable for it, I would advise you to seek out Commander Williams, get his number, and engage that commander for that area whenever you have folks on your property that are not a part of your tenant role that are conducting those activities. Because unfortunately, this is happening in our neighborhoods. But thankfully, City of Miami is doing its job, and you're here today, and you've agreed to do those things that they're putting in place as a result of us holding the property liable, even though you're saying that it's not your folks that's doing it. So I would encourage you to reach out to that particular commander because he's doing his job.

We have done everything. We even enforced the parking. We even hired a private parking. We have given the City of Miami Drug Investigation Unit all tenants of our names, of our tenants' numbers. Probably the only thing we probably have not done is probably remove maybe some of the bushes on the back area. But everything that the city has required, we have already complied with.

Commander Williams is somebody you can access very easily. You have a problem going on, you see that type of activity, call your commander. That's what they're there for. They'll send units out immediately because they want to resolve the problem. Thank you.

Anything else, Vice Chair? Do we have a motion? Motion. Do we have a second? Second. All in favor? Aye.

And I believe the September date is September 16th, 2025 for the reset. All right, thank you, sir.

That's going to be the reset date, September 16th.

You'll get posted notice again. The last case is 1272 Northwest 59th Street. Is the owner of that property present?

What page is this?

Is that EZKG Investments? Yeah, apologies, 327. Okay, I have Detective McGehee present to testify, sir.

Yes.

Say your name for the record.

Detective Maurice McGehee.

Okay, you familiar with the property at 1272 Northwest 59th Street? Yes. Okay, and did you and other members of your union conduct narcotic sales and execute a search warrant on that property? Yes. Let me direct your attention to September 3rd, 2024. Did you receive information that narcotics were being sold at that property and observe individuals engaged in hand-to-hand transactions throughout all hours of the day?

Yes.

Okay. September 12th, 2024. Did a CI purchase eight baggies of fentanyl for $60? Yes. Let me direct your attention to September 13th, 2024. Was a CI utilized to purchase 10 baggies of fentanyl for $60? Yes. And September 19th of 2024, did you and your detectives again observe individuals on that property engaging in hand-to-hand transactions?

Yes.

Finally, on September 25th, 2024, was a search warrant executed on that property? Yes. And that search revealed 50 baggies of fentanyl, approximately 10.1 grams, and a Glock 19 9mm firearm with 17 live rounds? Yes. Yes, at this time, the city would seek to introduce the complaint with all the exhibits of the search warrant, the rest affidavits. The property ownership records and the affidavit from the area commander confirming the. Facts within the complaint and the city would recommend the following conditions meet with the neighborhood resource officer within 1 week. Remove all landscaping interfering with the line of sight within 30 days. Execute a trespass affidavit within one week. Install no trespass sign within one month. Provide necessary adequate lighting to ensure the property is well lit. And provide the rent roll for the tenants, including the vehicle information and tag numbers, and reset this to the September 16th date.

So moved.

Second. That is all. Thank you, guys. The evidence is admitted, and the officer's testimony that all of these incidents took place in 2024 is admitted. Do we have a motion? So moved. Do we have a second? Second. All in favor? Aye.

That concludes the nuisance abatement counter. Oh, I'm sorry, we have one individual that came in late. We're gonna reset it. It is on page 88, 1278 Northwest 58th Terrace. Raul Casio, he showed up. After conversation with him, we're gonna reset this to the June nuisance abatement, which is, what is that? 25th? Yeah, June 25th, please.

Do you need a motion or no? Okay.

And that concludes the calendar, thank you.

Sorry.

You guys adjourning? Did you vote to adjourn?

Motion to adjourn. Do we have a second?

Second.

All in favor, aye.

Aye. There we go. We're technically still here.

Start the code enforcement board.

Let's see.