Code Enforcement Board - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

The board addressed several cases, granting fine reductions for some property owners facing financial hardship or seeking to resolve long-standing issues. They also set compliance deadlines and per diem fines for various code violations, including unpermitted work, unregistered vacant properties, and businesses operating without proper certificates.

About this meeting

Government Body
Code Enforcement Board
Meeting Type
Code Enforcement Board
Location
Miami, FL
Meeting Date
July 14, 2026

Transcript

674 sections

1:31Speaker 12

Continue to stand if you are here to testify, to be sworn in.

1:35Speaker 19

Do you solemnly swear, could you please stand?

1:40Speaker 19

Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth? You may have a seat.

1:58Speaker 12

We have a new interpreter.

2:03Speaker 19

Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you would translate from English to Creole and Creole to English to the best of your ability? Thank you.

2:26Speaker 19

Do you solemnly swear or affirm that you will translate from English to Spanish and Spanish to English to the best of your ability? Thank you.

2:33Speaker 1

Thank you. Roll call.

2:54Speaker 19

Moshi Malka.

2:57Speaker 19

Ulysses Adias. Mr. Juan Galan.

3:02Speaker 19

Mr. Javier Rodriguez.

3:04Speaker 19

Mr. Keon Williams.

3:06Speaker 19

We have a quorum.

3:08 – 6:06Speaker 29

Good evening. Everybody here tonight is either here for a mitigation, an extension of time, or you're here for the first time. We'll call mitigations first, then extensions of time, and then those who are here for the first time. If When your case is called, please come to the podium and state your name and the address of your property. If you're here for mitigation, the clerk has given you a handout. Study that handout because that is all the board is entitled to mitigate to. So they're stuck with that chart. Study it and let the board know why they should mitigate the fine. And a vote will determine by majority vote or unanimous vote, depending on what they're mitigating to, what the amount should be. Once your case is complete, wait for me over here, and I'll bring the signed order with the total amount, if there is an amount, to be paid, and I'll give you a handout that tells you how to pay it. If you're here for an extension of time, you've been here before, go ahead and come up and state your name and address, tell the board what you've done so far. The city will make a recommendation as to how many days, if they're in agreement with the amount of days, or they think you need more or less, and the board will have final say and decide whether You get more days, less days, or the days you requested. If you're here for the first time, after you state your name and the address you're here for, you're going to plead the property guilty or not guilty. If you plead the property guilty, the city will summarize the nature of the violation. The board will determine the amount of days necessary to comply, and if you don't comply by that date, they will assess a per diem violation. If it is a residential violation, and it's a first-time violator, it's up to $250 per diem, and if it's a commercial non-residential property, it's up to $1,000 per diem. If you're a repeat violator, if it's a residential property, it's up to $500 per diem. If it's a non-residential commercial property, it's up to $5,000 per diem. When your case is complete, there's a handout that's at the podium that tells you how to request an extension of time. So long as you request an extension of time before the time to comply has expired, the fines don't start running. But if you miss that date, that's when the fines start running. So make sure you take that piece of paper and you request a time before the time to comply has expired. So they give you 30 days, request the extension of time on the 20th day, if you're not going to comply by the 30th, so you don't have any fines to worry about. If you plead not guilty, the city will put on its case. You can put on your defense, and the board will determine by majority vote whether you're guilty or not guilty. If they find the property guilty, then they will assess a number of days to comply with a violation and a per diem fine. All orders of the board are available to the 11th District Circuit Court of Florida within 30 days.

6:08Speaker 12

Thank you. We have a board member that has an excused absence. I have a motion.

6:16Speaker 3

So move for excused absence for your leases. Second. All those in favor? Aye.

6:21 – 6:38Speaker 12

And so what I want to do is we got two mitigations. Can I call those up first and get those out the way? And then I think we have one special appearance. Okay. Okay. You think it's going to be long on a special appearance? I would just get those out the way quickly if we can. Not particularly.

6:39Speaker 29

I don't know the nature of the special appearance.

6:41Speaker 14

I did speak with her about it.

6:43Speaker 29

So if it's going to be quick, then yeah.

6:45Speaker 14

Pretty standard in a lot of ways.

6:49Speaker 12

All right. Let's do the two mitigations.

6:51 – 7:06Speaker 19

Okay. First case, page number 103. 103. Case number 00023069, property address 744 Northwest 44th Street, page 103.

7:07 – 7:18Speaker 14

This property is a T3 property. It does not have homestead exemption. The lien ran to $146,250. The minimum is $10,000, or by a unanimous determination, you can go as low as zero. Good evening. Yes, good evening.

7:26Speaker 12

Could you state your name and address for the record?

7:28Speaker 16

Andra Bailey.

7:29 – 7:41Speaker 12

Andra Bailey. And one second with you real quick here. In our book, it does say that it has homestead exception. Is that incorrect? It does not now when I looked it up. Okay.

7:42Speaker 14

I'll double check for you.

7:43Speaker 12

Please do. It's still circling. Can you state to us why you are looking for mitigation?

7:49 – 8:25Speaker 16

Yes, because number one, I inherited this house from my grandparents. So this is my first time coming into home ownership. And it's like I have the problem. The problems came upon me. Why everything wasn't done, but I did bring it up to code because I came into financial situations. And I also have a child with autism. So we're dealing with that, and then the death of her dad and everything like that with her with the tantrums, it slipped my mind about the extension and everything. So that slipped my mind, but it has been hard for me. So now this is like my first time coming to home ownership. I'm learning a lot.

8:26Speaker 14

She has it now. She does have the homestead now.

8:28Speaker 16

Are you living in the property as well? I'm sorry.

8:30Speaker 12

Are you living in the property as well? No.

8:32Speaker 16

I stay in the home.

8:33Speaker 12

Yeah. I stay in the home. That's what I was asking. Okay, that's what I was asking.

8:38Speaker 16

Oh, I'm sorry.

8:39Speaker 12

Gotcha. Can I get a motion? Anybody got any questions?

8:44Speaker 3

No, no, just to confirm, you said you live in the property, correct?

8:46Speaker 16

Yes, I stay in the property.

8:48Speaker 3

Can I get a motion? I would move to reduce it to zero. Second. All those in favor?

8:52Speaker 12

Aye. Thank you. Just wait for your order.

8:59 – 9:14Speaker 19

Next case, page number 105. Case number 00058626, property address 1268 Northwest 3rd Street, page 105.

9:14 – 9:26Speaker 14

The property is a commercial property. The lien ran to $124,750. The minimum is. $15,000 for a commercial property. Understood.

9:26Speaker 12

Good evening.

9:27Speaker 14

Good evening.

9:28Speaker 12

You state your name and address for the record.

9:29 – 9:57Speaker 11

Alain Rodriguez, 1268 Northwest 3rd Street. Gotcha. We know you're here for mitigation. Can you give us your reasons why? I'm the accountant for the thing. They gave me a power of attorney to have it if you want to see it. We submitted the application. We paid the fine. An inspection happened. We thought everything was okay. We didn't hear anything, and then a year and a half goes by, and then we get this letter, and that's why we're here. How much did you pay for the fine? I'm sorry?

9:58Speaker 12

The fine. How much did you pay? We haven't paid anything for the fine. We're trying to get it abated.

10:03 – 10:14Speaker 14

They had to pay the past due for their licenses, the past due that was owed, right? Then to do their application for their CU and their BTR.

10:15 – 10:29Speaker 14

So that's, those are minimal. This was, total was $124,750. And it is a commercial property, so $15,000 is the minimum. An apartment.

10:30 – 10:42Speaker 12

All right, so you understand the lowest we can go is $15,000. So that would be a discount of, you know, $100,000. You cool with that? Yeah. Can I get a motion, please? Yeah, move to reduce it to $15,000.

10:43Speaker 12

All those in favor? Aye. Thank you.

10:46Speaker 3

Thank you very much. Let's wait for your order.

10:54Speaker 14

We're going to call the special appearance.

10:58 – 11:13Speaker 19

Next case is a special appearance, page 112, case number 00006535, property address 332. 337 Southwest 9th Terrace, page 112.

11:14 – 11:48Speaker 14

Okay, for this property, I did speak with counsel prior to the hearing. There are two other cases that she's requesting. They are both related to this property from 2022 that have running liens. The other cases are 0015921 And 00015878, she is requesting that you also consider those at the same time for a partial release. Those are all related to the four different units located on this property.

11:50Speaker 12

Good evening. State your name and address for the record.

11:53Speaker 5

Suzette Reyes, and I'm counsel for the property at 3337 Southwest 9th Terrace.

11:59Speaker 12

Thank you. Could you give us your position?

12:02 – 12:31Speaker 14

Yeah, so this is just so you, obviously there are the violators. Half the violators was the parent who's now deceased. So the city can't support it because of our own code. But I guess it's the son who has it in the name with the father. And council will tell you they're going to sell the Coral Gables property, which is worth substantial amounts in order to be able to fix this. but she can represent to you everything else. So good evening.

12:33 – 13:15Speaker 5

My client recently retained me, and we've been working at correcting the violations, and I met with the inspector today with Gina, and she mentioned that it looks like a lot of it's come into compliance. They have to go back out, and we have some after-the-fact permits, but since I've come in, we've been moving it along. What we're asking for is there's a separate property that his parents owned with him, and they both have passed away, We want a partial release so we can release that property that's not the one with the violations so that we can use those funds to pay off the tax deed that's coming and also correct this property because he does reside at this one. So we want to use that partial release to be able to bring this one up to code.

13:16Speaker 3

What's the address of the property that you want released?

13:21Speaker 14

It is 345 Malaga Avenue, Coral Gables.

13:30Speaker 4

And you said the other one is in a tax deed? You mean like a tax deed sale?

13:33 – 13:48Speaker 5

It doesn't have a tax deed at the moment and there's no sale. We want to release that one before it gets to that and then use the funds from that to pay off the taxes and bring this property to code since this is the one that he resides on and he wants to bring it.

13:48Speaker 14

The value of the property with the property appraiser on Malaga Avenue is 1.5 million.

13:54 – 14:07Speaker 4

Okay. And they plan to sell that one in order to... satisfy the taxes. I'm assuming they don't have the funds right now to pay the taxes because the person died and it got reassessed and it went up. Is that correct?

14:10Speaker 4

Is the release going to jeopardize the city's position on this?

14:15Speaker 14

No, it still attaches to the property, the violating property. But it's removed from the other one.

14:23Speaker 14

With a promise that they're going to use that money to fix this.

14:28Speaker 14

All the violations are from 2022.

14:30Speaker 4

Is the Malaga Avenue property listed currently or are they taking steps to sell it?

14:35 – 14:48Speaker 5

I'm not sure. I have to check. I know that he has a realtor and he's in the process of it. They did. Yes, it is listed. Sorry. They let me know that they recently got an offer, but we can't move on it because we know we have this situation. Understood.

14:49Speaker 3

Okay. I get a motion. Yeah, so based on the testimony, I would move to issue a partial release at the property located at 345 Malaga Avenue, Coral Gables. I'll second.

15:00Speaker 14

And that will be for, before you do the second, that will be for all three cases that were announced today, right?

15:05Speaker 3

Yeah, case 6535. Yeah, 15921 and 15878. Okay.

15:09Speaker 14

I appreciate it. Thank you. I get a second.

15:13Speaker 12

Second. Any other discussion on this? All those in favor? Aye. Aye.

15:19Speaker 14

And I'm going to give you my card if you can email me in the morning, and that way I'll, because I have to write up the partial release in the morning.

15:28Speaker 12

All right. Let's get to the, let's get to the meat. We're good now.

15:36Speaker 19

Okay. So next would be to be heard.

15:40 – 15:51Speaker 19

Page 8, case number 00131479, property address 586. Northwest 48th Street, page eight.

15:54 – 16:05Speaker 12

This is Antonio F. Rodriguez and Luis Antonio Rodriguez. Good evening. Good evening.

16:05Speaker 9

State your name and address for the record. Luis Rodriguez. My address is 586 Northwest 48th Street.

16:11Speaker 12

Thank you. And at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty? Guilty. Thank you very much. Inspector?

16:19Speaker 21

Inspector Troutman, North Office.

16:23Speaker 14

So what does he need to do to finish up with the tree violation? It started as a ticket. Yes.

16:28Speaker 21

We're in the mitigation phase.

16:30 – 16:48Speaker 21

So we just spoke before hearing. He provided me with the permit number. He's working with the city arborist to complete the after the fact permit to bring the property, bring the violation into compliance. And I would recommend 120 days. And resides at the property? Excuse me?

16:48Speaker 14

You reside at the property?

16:51Speaker 14

Is it a residential or commercial?

16:53Speaker 9

It's a residential.

16:54Speaker 12

It's a residential, T3L.

16:57Speaker 3

So I move for a finding of guilt with 120 days and a $150 per diem fine thereafter. Hold on, let me make sure. Is it 150 or 250?

17:06Speaker 14

With residentials, you know, the single family duplexes, we've been keeping it at 150, which I think is reasonable.

17:12 – 17:29Speaker 9

Understood. I mean, I already pay a fine. Hold on, can I get a second? Yeah, I already paid a fine at the beginning, so right now I'm just waiting for the answer from Karen to finalize the permit.

17:29 – 17:41Speaker 14

You won't ever have to pay any of this fine as long as you either come into compliance within 120 days or there's a piece of paper, so everybody keep this in mind, right there on that, see that piece of paper there?

17:42 – 18:27Speaker 14

Right. That tells you how to request an extension of time. So before you leave here, when you go and sit in your car, put in 100 days and have an alarm go off to say, did I get my affidavit of compliance yet? If not, you go to miamigov.com, type in Extension of time for a code board, a little tile pops up, you click on that, you put that in before, you just come back and ask for more time. As long as you do that, you will not have to pay any more from here. I don't know what you have to pay on your mitigation, but I know here, as long as you request that extension of time timely, or you get your affidavit of compliance from Inspector Troutman prior to that 120 days, you won't have to pay anything for this case at this time at all.

18:27Speaker 9

Okay, so it's just a late fee, right?

18:30 – 18:42Speaker 14

It's a per diem, right. And then if you don't request it, see those people who were just here before and they had to come back for mitigation and somebody didn't have to pay money, somebody has to pay $15,000? That's what happens.

18:42Speaker 12

That's what happens. Okay. Okay, so we're going to give you 120 days to get started. If you need more time, request an extension.

18:50Speaker 12

All those in favor? Aye.

18:55 – 19:06Speaker 19

Next case, page 65, case number 00161453, property address 1050 Northeast 83rd Street, page 65.

19:06Speaker 12

This is Vera Baker?

19:10Speaker 12

Okay, thank you. Good evening.

19:19Speaker 20

Good evening, hello.

19:20Speaker 12

State your name and address for the record.

19:22Speaker 20

Sumari Barker, speaking on behalf of my mother, Vera Barker, 1050 Northeast, 83rd Street.

19:28Speaker 12

It's a beautiful name, Vera, by the way.

19:31 – 19:42Speaker 14

At the time of the violation- Wait, Ms. Barker, Ms. Vera Barker, can you put your name on the record? Yes. Vera Barker. Do you wish to have your daughter speak on your behalf for this case?

19:42Speaker 7

Yes, thank you.

19:43Speaker 12

Thank you. At the time of the violation, is the property guilty or not guilty? Guilty.

19:49Speaker 20

At the time, guilty, but it has been and was remedied.

19:53Speaker 20

In a timely manner. I have the picture.

19:56Speaker 12

I got you. Give me a second. So guilty, right?

20:00Speaker 22

Guilty at the time.

20:01Speaker 12

At the time. Thank you. Inspector?

20:03 – 20:31Speaker 22

Inspector Bailey, North Office. She had a shed, a fence in her backyard that was encroaching on the neighboring property behind her. I think it pushed out about three and a half feet. It was required for her to get permits to verify that she was able to build that fence like that. I haven't had any opportunity with her to see that she produced a permit. I haven't seen any permit application.

20:32Speaker 16

You have it?

20:33Speaker 10

She has two permits, one for the shed, one for the fence. City recommends 120. Okay. Okay.

20:41 – 21:21Speaker 20

I also have a prescriptive easement from AT&T. I am still waiting, though, to add to the permit application the affidavit of encroachment, some kind of permissionary letter like that from AT&T, but since this has been started, the person who was working this at AT&T has since left and turned it over to someone else who we've been having quite a time getting in touch with, but we were sent the prescriptive easement quite a while ago. Understood. that fence, the survey should be finished this week that shows that the fence is not on the neighbor's property. It's actually on the easement for which this was written.

21:22Speaker 4

Okay. I'll motion for 120 days and $150 a day thereafter.

21:28Speaker 12

I get a second.

21:30Speaker 4

With the finding of guilty.

21:32Speaker 4

All those in favor?

21:33 – 21:44Speaker 12

Aye. Okay, so we're going to give you 120 days. Get everything cleared up, and if you need more time, that paper there for the extension, okay?

21:44Speaker 20

Thank you very much.

21:45Speaker 12

You're more than welcome, okay?

21:48Speaker 19

Have a wonderful evening.

21:49Speaker 12

You too. Thank you.

21:51Speaker 19

Next case, page 25, case number 00157663, property address 2865 Northwest 17th Avenue, page 25. Good evening.

22:10Speaker 8

Good evening. Gustav Arnoldson, 520 West 31st Street.

22:14Speaker 12

Thank you. And at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty?

22:20Speaker 8

I believe it was guilty, yes, sir.

22:23Speaker 8

Inspector, what do you need to do?

22:26 – 22:44Speaker 25

Inspector Hallman, Central Office. And what's going on? What do they need to do? And how much time do you think he needs? 30 days. There's one last food truck with the expired tag that needs to be removed. Everything else has pretty much been cleaned up.

22:47Speaker 12

Would you want to add anything?

22:50Speaker 8

No. 30 days is okay for you? Yes, sir.

22:54 – 23:07Speaker 12

I don't know who the gentleman is behind you. Well, you don't have standing, sir. Only the owner does. Thank you. So 30 days just should be a sufficient time for you? Absolutely. Okay.

23:07Speaker 3

So move for a finding of guilt, 30 days for compliance, and $250 fine per diem thereafter. And if you need more time, just grab the paper there, okay?

23:18Speaker 14

Even with 30 days, again, May 29, make the request if you need some more time. All those in favor?

23:24Speaker 8

Aye. Aye. Thank you, everyone, for being here. Thank you. Appreciate you.

23:35 – 23:46Speaker 19

Next case, page 82, case number 00127039, property address 1651 Northwest 22nd Place, page 82.

23:49Speaker 12

Good evening. You state your name and address for the record.

23:52Speaker 10

I'm Christian, last name Prieto.

23:53Speaker 12

Okay, and at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty? Guilty? Yes. Okay, thank you, Inspector.

24:01Speaker 14

Is on her way, and I believe the recommendation was 120 days. Okay. And $150 a day after. You reside there, is that correct?

24:10Speaker 3

Okay. Can I have a motion? Yeah, move for finding of guilt, compliance in 120 days, and $150 fine per diem thereafter.

24:19Speaker 12

All those in favor? Aye. Aye. You're good. Yep, 120 days, just take that paper, just in case if you need more time. Appreciate it. Okay. Okay.

24:32 – 24:43Speaker 19

Next case, page 21, case number 00123364, property address 56 Northwest 39th Street, page 21.

24:49Speaker 12

Good evening.

24:50Speaker 7

Good evening, Javier Lorenzo, 56 Northwest 39th Street.

24:54Speaker 12

Thank you, and at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty?

24:59Speaker 12

Guilty, okay, give us a second here, Inspector.

25:01Speaker 21

Good evening, Inspector Troutman, North Office.

25:05Speaker 12

What do you need to do?

25:07 – 25:31Speaker 21

So I spoke to the owner. He has two structures in the rear of his property. He discussed that he's going to complete a demolition of those structures in the rear. We discussed that he has to pull a permit to bring the property into compliance, which he said he's in the process of doing. Since I spoke with the owner, I would recommend 120 days for Property, the structures in the rear demolished.

25:32Speaker 11

Okay. And we do have an open demo permit.

25:35Speaker 12

Understood. Director, we're good? The city recommends 120. She's correct. Thank you. Can I get a motion, please?

25:42Speaker 3

Yeah, motion for guilty compliance in 120 days and $150 fine per diem thereafter. Second.

25:48Speaker 12

All those in favor?

25:50Speaker 12

Thank you, sir. In 120 days, take that paper up there, okay? Thank you. Just in case. You never know. Things happen.

26:01 – 26:12Speaker 19

Next case, page 84, case number 00045940, property address 1798 Northwest 19th Street, page 84.

26:14Speaker 14

This is our inspector who's not here yet, just letting you know. Understood.

26:18Speaker 12

Good evening, sir. Good evening. Can you state your name and address for the record?

26:22Speaker 24

Gina Gonzalez, 1798 Northwest 19th Street, Miami.

26:26Speaker 12

And at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty? I think so. You think it was guilty?

26:31Speaker 24

I think so, yeah. I bought the property with five code violations. I fixed four of them. Okay. These ones still remain.

26:37Speaker 14

Yeah, there's still one outstanding in your processing, getting the permits and the plans.

26:41 – 27:42Speaker 24

No, so I bought the property. I wanted to improve it. There was an illegal extractor. I pulled the permit to do a demolition. It was demolished. And then I called the inspector and her boss. They came to the property to see what I needed to fix. I took out a fence, pulled carpet. There was a water pump, took it out. And then there was some construction inside that needed to be fixed. I went through engineering and architectures to try to build out a plan to bring it up to code, went through four rounds of revisions with the city, but they were requesting that I fix something on the outside as well, which the engineering firms did not want to do. There was this whole issue with that, and then so, We stopped during that track and I figured it would be easier to do a demolition and to then start and build three townhouses. Building costs then changed all of a sudden, so it doesn't make sense anymore. So it's been a bit of a money pit, this property. I haven't given up on it.

27:43Speaker 14

So you're still figuring out?

27:45 – 28:41Speaker 24

I'm going to demolish it. There was last year, lightning struck one of the trees. And before the inspector came, the branch fell on the roof. So it's a mess. So I need to demolish the property. It does take time to figure out financing. I do have a mortgage on the property and to figure out all that will be structured. So yeah, I do need time to do the demolition, pull the permit, figure out financing and work out the timing. I did talk to the mortgage company and they told me they don't have a time for, they requested that I send a request for approval for the demolition. I sent it, and then they said that my mortgage servicer is changing, so now I need to wait for that to happen. So I do need more time. I hope the 120 days will be enough. Likely I'll need an extension, but it is what it is. I will get you started. I understand.

28:41Speaker 3

Is there any objection to 120 days?

28:43Speaker 10

The city agrees.

28:44Speaker 3

Okay. So move for a finding of guilt, 120 days for compliance, and $150 per diem fine thereafter. Second. Second.

28:52Speaker 12

All those in favor? Aye. Aye.

28:54Speaker 14

Don't forget to take the ability to ask for the extension. Exactly.

28:58Speaker 24

One question. What happens after that 150 days that he's coming here and then it's all sold?

29:04 – 29:34Speaker 14

No, at the 120 days. 120 days. Before 120 days, if you don't have your affidavit of compliance, which you may not because you're waiting on a new servicer, you need to make sure you're going to put a reminder on your phone at like day 100, go online, miamigov.com, request an extension of time. About 10 days later, you're going to get a notice telling you, hey, this is when your extension of time hearing is. Then you're going to come back, see this lovely board and say, this is where I am now. This is what's going on. And hopefully by then you'll already be processing plans.

29:35Speaker 24

Okay. And then online, can I check on the status of this case as well or no?

29:39 – 30:08Speaker 14

Not on this case, no. Okay. But if you need anything, it's just not online. You can always contact your inspector or... The assistant director's card is right over here, so you can grab that. And you can email him and get status updates. But for here, just remember, day one starts tomorrow. You have 120 days. So I would just put a reminder in there in like 100 days and just go online and request my extension of time. Then you're good. You're safe.

30:08Speaker 12

Thank you. You're more than welcome. Good evening.

30:14 – 30:25Speaker 19

Next case, page 23, case number 00111679. Property address 2141 Northwest 34th Street, page 23.

30:30Speaker 28

Good evening. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, board members, Mr. Franke, Ms. Dooley. Good to see you. Bert Hernandez on behalf of the property owner.

30:38Speaker 12

Okay, and how does the property plead?

30:44Speaker 12

On this side. Guilty.

30:46Speaker 14

It's an Allen play. Yeah.

30:51Speaker 21

Inspector Troutman, North Office. What does he need to do?

30:56Speaker 12

What does he need to do or his clients? A lot.

30:59 – 31:27Speaker 21

So during my inspection, I found that there was an addition in the rear built without a permit. Driveways without a permit. Two shed in the rear encroaching without a permit. And what they have to do is they have to generate permits to comply. Well, they have generated permits. It's a permit in the system. They have to complete the permit. They have active permits. They have to complete that permit to comply the violation for work without a permit. And I would recommend 120 days to get that permit completed.

31:28Speaker 28

That's good enough for us. Okay.

31:31Speaker 4

Motion for finding of guilt, 120 days, and this is commercial?

31:37Speaker 4

And $150 a day thereafter. Second.

31:40Speaker 28

All those in favor? Aye. Thank you, have a wonderful day. Thank you.

31:47Speaker 19

Next case, page 45, case number 00089760, property address 1331 Northwest 59th Street, page 45.

32:09Speaker 12

Yeah, I was going to say, do we have a mic? Sir? One second. We'll bring you a mic.

32:21Speaker 14

We can accommodate you.

32:33Speaker 15

Hello, my name is Will and Pringley.

32:36Speaker 12

Good evening, Ms. Pringley.

32:38Speaker 15

Good evening.

32:39Speaker 12

Could you state your address for the record for me?

32:43Speaker 15

1331 Northwest 59th Street.

32:47Speaker 12

Gotcha. And at the time of the violation, was the property guilty or not guilty?

32:54Speaker 12

Okay. We're going to let the city put on its case, okay? Okay.

33:02 – 33:43Speaker 15

I have the information to verify the facts that I have stated. The problem is I was going to the wrong entity. I should have gone to the city as opposed to the entity that I went to. and I have all the information in this folder to verify. When someone give me an ultimatum or request something of me, I follow the instructions. I've done that.

33:44Speaker 12

Okay, so give us one moment here. And then we'll bring all the paperwork up.

33:50 – 34:01Speaker 14

And then we'll bring all the paperwork forward. Then you can bring the paperwork up. Yeah. Not yet, just give us just a minute and then the chair can review it. Inspector, please state your name for the record.

34:01Speaker 17

Inspector George, after hours.

34:03Speaker 14

Did you cite this particular property for failure to maintain the lot as well as failure to register the vacant lot with the city?

34:11Speaker 14

Are both those violations outstanding? Correct.

34:13Speaker 17

No, just the registration of the line.

34:15Speaker 14

She still has to register it?

34:16Speaker 17

Yeah, she still hasn't registered it.

34:18Speaker 14

Okay, and can you do that online?

34:21 – 34:46Speaker 14

Yes, she can. Okay. All right, you put together pages 1 through 46 for today's hearing, is that correct? Correct. And the notices were sent, both the original violation and the summons were sent to Ms. Pringley. at the address provided for by the property appraiser report. All of those documents, including your proof of mailing and the warranty deed and the property appraiser report are located in this digital file. Is that correct?

34:47 – 35:00Speaker 14

All right. Here's the proof of mailing. So we'll just show the one picture. This is the property, but it has been taken care of, cut and cleaned at this time. Is that correct?

35:01Speaker 14

The only thing that's missing is it to be currently registered, yes?

35:06Speaker 14

And registration is required every year. Is that correct?

35:10Speaker 17

I stated that.

35:10Speaker 14

Okay. All right, so at this time, the city would seek to admit pages one through 46 into evidence.

35:17 – 35:28Speaker 14

All right, we don't have anything further at this time. I believe that Ms. Pringle already testified she was doing stuff and had some documents that she wanted the chair to review, sir. Do you want to?

35:28Speaker 5

Yeah, please.

35:30 – 35:50Speaker 14

She says she has a folder. I can read what it is and then give it to you. Yes. So we have the notice of violation and the summons to appear.

35:53Speaker 14

That's three pages. Okay. We have the life estate deed showing that she's the owner.

36:01 – 36:42Speaker 14

the land care where she just paid to get that done, so we know that's complied. And she is paying them. Now, let's see, I guess we got, hopefully they're doing the work every time they say they are. These are her receipts from, and this was from April of, this is back from 2024, when this started. And it just got, it got cleared now. We go back to June of 26, June and July. There's a May, and there's an April. And to March. So it's been being maintained since March, so that violation was complied.

36:42Speaker 12

Is that of 2024 or 2026?

36:45 – 37:02Speaker 14

2026 are the receipts, so she's paying somebody to maintain it, clearly. The only thing left to do is to register the vacant land online, and maybe you were doing that at the county instead of the city. So do you need to see, I think. I don't need to see it.

37:02Speaker 15

Is that what everything is that you want them to look at? Yes.

37:06Speaker 12

Okay. Yeah, we don't, we could, we understand.

37:09Speaker 14

All right, I mean, would you like that admitted into evidence? We'll take the copies and put them in? Do you want to do that? We can do that. We can make copies for you. Yes, ma'am.

37:18Speaker 12

Okay, we'll do that. We'll admit it.

37:23Speaker 14

Okay, anything else you want to talk about registering the property?

37:28Speaker 15

I was totally ignorant of that, and I will get that done within a short period of time.

37:35 – 37:46Speaker 12

Okay. Okay. We'll give her the time to do it. So, Ms. Well, I'll go ahead and accept a motion.

37:46Speaker 3

How much time do you think you need, Ms. Pringle, to register the lot? Is 30 days enough?

37:53Speaker 15

Thank you so much. I'm sure. Is 30 days sufficient? You call me 30.

37:58 – 38:09Speaker 3

Okay, so I would move for finding of guilt on failure to register the vacant lot only, 30 days to come into compliance, and $150 per diem fine thereafter.

38:10Speaker 12

Second. Second. Any other questions?

38:13 – 38:27Speaker 14

I was going to say, make sure that, sir, we're making the copies. We'll give you the originals back. And then you get a copy of the paper up there if for some reason she needs more time to register it. You can go over there and get that piece of paper on the podium.

38:28Speaker 5

At the podium.

38:29Speaker 12

So you can request an extension of time if needed.

38:32Speaker 14

Just don't leave until you get your papers back in your folder. No, no, get that one. Just stay here until we give you your folder back.

38:40Speaker 12

It's here at the podium. Sir, it's here at the podium.

38:47Speaker 12

Yeah. So before you get to the 30 days, like 25 days or day 20, request an extension of time if Ms. Prinkley still needs more time.

38:57Speaker 4

Okay. Do you have the information for where to register the lot?

39:04Speaker 4

Ms. Prinkley, you don't know where to register the lot at?

39:07Speaker 15

I'm afraid not. Okay.

39:09Speaker 4

Maybe somebody can help her get the proper website.

39:12Speaker 12

Inspector, can you help her with that?

39:13Speaker 15

Yeah, I'll help her.

39:14Speaker 12

Okay. Okay. Okay.

39:22Speaker 14

All right. So we've made the copies of everything in the blue folder. We kept a copy. We gave them the originals back.

39:28 – 39:56Speaker 12

We've admitted that. McLeod made the copies. Okay. No, we just had a motion of second. I just asked for questions. I don't know if there's anything else. All those in favor. Aye. Aye. Okay. So Ms. Prinkley, you have 30 days. Um, we've also given you the paper to do the extension if you feel like you need more time and the inspector is going to help you, um, navigate the website to be able to file for the, uh, register to register the vacant lot. Okay.

39:56Speaker 15

Thank you so much.

39:58Speaker 12

You're more than welcome.

39:58Speaker 15

I appreciate your help.

40:00Speaker 12

Well, thank you, ma'am.

40:05 – 40:24Speaker 19

I don't have any more to be heard, but I do have two absentia present. Okay, we'll go with them. The first case is page 50, case number 00145410, property address 563 Northeast 67th Street, page 50.

40:25Speaker 12

This is for, the address is 53, 563? 563 Northeast 67th Street. Okay.

40:36Speaker 12

Good evening.

40:37 – 40:55Speaker 12

Now, listen, the cases you don't have standing. So we're going to listen to them and then we may give you an opportunity to speak depending on what it is that needs to be done. OK, but thank you for coming, because that shows us that you're taking this matter seriously. OK, so give us a moment. OK, Inspector.

40:56Speaker 14

Inspector Lubin, North Office. Okay, so let me go through because we have to present it in absentia. Did you put together pages 1 through 40 for tonight's hearing?

41:06Speaker 14

Okay, and you cited the property for no certificate of use, is that correct? Correct. And notice was sent to the owner of record, which is a corporation as well as their registered agent pursuant to Sunbiz, yes?

41:17 – 41:47Speaker 14

The notice and the summons for tonight were mailed certified as well as the property was posted, is that correct? We have copies of all of those notices, your affidavit of posting and mailing for both of them, as well as copies of the postal service proof of mailing, copy of the property appraiser report, copy of the SunBiz report, copy of the business detail. And what we have here is a TCU which is on hold. Is that correct? Well, where is it now?

41:48 – 41:59Speaker 18

It's still technically on hold. FIRE is requesting for them to reach certain requirements in order to proceed with giving them the certificate of use.

41:59 – 42:20Speaker 14

Okay, relating to their occupancy, is that correct? Correct. How many people are in there? Okay. Is the business still operating? Yes. And what is operating there? I believe it's a daycare.

42:22Speaker 26

It's an enrichment center. Sorry.

42:25Speaker 18

Or education center. They may be able to elaborate for you. Okay.

42:29 – 42:41Speaker 14

But there should be no business operating there until fire has approved it as being safe for occupancy. Is that correct? Correct. Okay. This time the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 40 into evidence?

42:42Speaker 14

All right. Any contact with the owner or the tenants?

42:49Speaker 14

Okay, which?

42:51Speaker 18

I believe both stated that they were the owner. These are the tenants. The person who I communicated with stated that they were the owner, so.

43:02Speaker 19

And what did they say?

43:03Speaker 18

They stated that they were still in the process of getting into compliance in order to get the proper permits to get the approval from FIRE.

43:17Speaker 14

All right, and we have the latest notation from zoning.

43:24Speaker 18

Yeah, what does it say?

43:25Speaker 14

It's October of 2025. Yeah. That's the last time.

43:29Speaker 14

I mean, it's a learning center.

43:36Speaker 14

Do we know the ages of the people there? Do you know?

43:39Speaker 18

I don't know what it ranges from, but it seems like toddlers.

43:44Speaker 26

It's 30 months to five years old.

43:49Speaker 14

So the city, evidence was admitted.

43:55 – 44:18Speaker 14

The city would rest, ask for a finding of guilt, 10 days for compliance. Compliance means not running the business until you get proper occupancy. I don't know what's going on. Obviously, we have a concern. with young children in a property without fire approval.

44:18Speaker 3

Understood. It's my concern that the business is operating without the proper certificate or occupancy.

44:26Speaker 12

Yeah. Are you gonna be the one speaking further? Yes. Okay, I'll give you a moment to speak. Introduce yourself.

44:33Speaker 26

Yes, my name is Mariana Amate.

44:35Speaker 12

You can pull it down to you, there you go, yeah.

44:39 – 45:35Speaker 26

My name is Mariana Amate. I'm the owner of Crafty Minds, which is their enrichment center. We got a certificate of use approval once we opened. We got all our inspections passed, such as fire inspection and co-compliant inspection at the moment. So we had a green light to open. That's why we did it. And I have all the proof here. But after we opened, a couple months after, we were advised that it was a hold by fire. And we've been meeting with them bunch of times. We have five review cycles in the master permit, and we already did almost all of the things they required, but the process takes a lot of months to be reviewed, and every review, it's a lot of comments, so that's why they gave me the certificate of use, but then FHIR held it for a little bit. Yeah, the FHIR alarm is installed, and I mean...

45:39Speaker 4

So when did they put it on hold?

45:41Speaker 26

They advised us of the hold in September.

45:44Speaker 4

And when did you get it, the certificate of use?

45:47Speaker 26

So I have all the inspections that you can see that I passed. But after the hold, they said, no, forget about those inspections passed. Now you need to do these things.

45:56Speaker 4

From when you said you got an approval or certificate of use until the hold, how long was that, period?

46:03 – 46:39Speaker 26

The inspections were in July and I got the approval around September and then in October we got the notice and we understood, we didn't know, we received an email at that point that there was a hold. And in there, we had meetings with the fire marshal, and then he said, you know, we're going to help you. You can open with a phasing plan. We did a phasing plan. They have it. And right now, we're about to get our master permit to do the final thing, which is an egress there. But yeah, we've been in good faith, complying, and we just didn't know that there was a hold.

46:40Speaker 3

So are you guys currently operating the business? Yeah.

46:44Speaker 12

I'm not clear. What else needs to be done? What's pending?

46:47Speaker 14

They need fire egress. They need safety exits.

46:54 – 47:06Speaker 26

We have all the exits. It's just in the second floor because the travel path is a little bit longer than they would prefer. We need to do the egress there in the top. Right. That's what I'm saying.

47:06Speaker 14

You need a fire egress.

47:08 – 47:45Speaker 26

It doesn't matter where you're operating. You need a fire egress. No, understood. We did a fire-facing plan because they require it, and they said, you know, we're going to get our approval. We're waiting. It takes one month, two months for it to review cycle, and it's been almost a year of us trying to open. We were approved a fire inspection. I have the proof here that you can see where they approved me as a learning center educational. They approved me, but then I guess something changed. and they decided they require me to do that, and I'm gonna do it, I wanna do it right now. If it's for me, I'll do it today.

47:45Speaker 14

Well, they were giving you provisional approval based upon the master permit that was going through, right?

47:54 – 49:05Speaker 14

Right? You have a master permit. So you got a temporary certificate of use based upon the permitting that you were processing, right? Yes. Okay. So then what happened as they continued to review your permits, they realized you were missing something for fire safety, and so they put it on hold as they're going through the reviews. I know it's here, and I do have it up there, because it shows your hold, removing halt, but we know that means hold, in July, like you said, and then in September, zoning put a hold on it, said do not issue TCU per fire and building department requirements. The next note and the last note that we have for this in particular is from October of 2025. There's a fire occupancy requirement before proceeding with the CU application process. Applicant was reminded that once fire requirements are met, applicant must notify zoning supervisor, Denise Matthews, for further instructions on proceeding with the CU application, right? Is that about right?

49:06 – 49:18Speaker 26

Yes, I would like for you to see that we received the Miami-Dade County Certificate of Use, all our BTR from Miami-Dade, and I would like you to see our past inspection for fire as well.

49:18Speaker 14

You can present all of that to the... We'll take it. If you want to read it, and I don't have any objection to it.

49:25Speaker 12

No, we'll just admit it.

49:26 – 49:43Speaker 26

And then also her permit. And we also had the fire requested for a fire safety evaluation for an architect, and he did it and we passed. So they're reviewing that, but we passed the fire safety for the business.

49:44Speaker 12

Has fire given you an update on when the next review is gonna take place?

49:48 – 49:59Speaker 26

Yeah, they just review it and resend it today, and everything was good. We're just waiting for the final master permit so we can build the egress, but it's almost done.

50:00 – 50:11Speaker 14

then they're still gonna have work to do. The city's still recommending 10 days. Obviously, they can request an extension of time and come back with wherever they are at that point.

50:13Speaker 3

I have a question, Madam Attorney. Is the compliance for them, to get their certificate or for them to stop operating? Or is it?

50:23 – 50:53Speaker 14

Well, they have options. You stop operating, you automatically comply the violation. That's what I'm passing. That's pretty simple. but that's something you can only do through a court of law. Shut a business down. You don't have the authority to do that here. Or they get the TCU reissued. And maybe they'll get the TCU issued. If they are where they are, that may happen. They can get that to the inspector and that will also comply them. The choice is theirs.

50:53Speaker 26

So is the liability. We asked them, but they said the master permit has to be finalized and there's

51:01 – 52:09Speaker 12

Reviews going on this almost done as you can see is almost all approved, but it takes time like they take time Yeah, so so what we can do here today based off the city's recommendation is that we can give you ten days I Know and that's and here's the thing is it's just a life safety issue right when whenever fires involved It's just one of those situations where yeah everything is magnified and as a city the That would be very responsible about that response. We've got to be responsible about that. So you have some options. Naturally, if we give you 10 days, you can apply for an extension. However, you still got to get the work done. And so I would be encouraging you to reach out to not only fire, but also maybe your commissioner to fire and your commissioner to see what else can be done. Because if you're doing the work and you already Have what you have. I don't know why it's taking so long to review, but that's just naturally the process. And maybe some interference is needed to be ran on your behalf.

52:09Speaker 26

I honestly don't think 10 days is going to, I mean.

52:12Speaker 12

I understand. Yeah.

52:15Speaker 14

Your property owner will need to request an extension of time.

52:21Speaker 14

And you'll need to have a power of attorney to appear.

52:24 – 52:42Speaker 12

Potentially. It depends on what you come back with. And that's where we would be at for right now. Depends on what we decide right now, but that's the recommendation from the city. We typically don't ignore those recommendations, especially when it comes to life safety. So it's kind of... The violation is not on you guys.

52:42Speaker 14

And you need a power of attorney from the property owner. He needs to give you the authority to be here if you come back again.

52:48Speaker 12

Yeah. I would highly recommend getting that.

52:50Speaker 14

For the next time?

52:51Speaker 12

Yes. Or have the owner come with you.

52:55Speaker 14

If you don't have it and the owner's not here?

52:58Speaker 14

The time will simply expire and the lien will start running.

53:02Speaker 26

And then can he ask for an extension online? Yes.

53:06Speaker 14

We have to come here, though.

53:08Speaker 26

We'll have to come for hearing.

53:09Speaker 12

Apply for it and still come and ask for the extension. We're going to ask you, what have you done since then? Since then would be from today.

53:16Speaker 26

Like 10 days? In 10 days, what we've done in 10 days?

53:20 – 53:37Speaker 12

Well, yeah, there's a lot you could possibly do within 10 days, especially when getting in contact with FIRE, getting an update. I was going to a department, reaching out to your commissioner. There's a couple of things you can do. It's going to run you through the weekend. But, yeah, there's a couple of things that can be done in the process.

53:38Speaker 14

Go meet with fire. Have them approve your stuff.

53:44Speaker 14

Go meet with fire.

53:45Speaker 12

Sit there. Go meet. Sit with them.

53:47Speaker 26

We did. Yeah, we did everything.

53:51Speaker 14

Well, now you can let them know that you're under the gun now.

53:56Speaker 12

You can go to them and tell them we've given you the 10 days.

54:00Speaker 12

And this is a make or break for you.

54:03 – 54:19Speaker 12

Okay? But that's where we're at right now. Again, your property owner can apply for the extension of time. The fact that we even have this exchange and doing all of this is a real courtesy. We normally don't even hear it. We just, three days.

54:20Speaker 14

And make sure the documents they gave to you that... That, no, they go to, they'll be uploaded.

54:26Speaker 12

To be admitted, yeah.

54:28Speaker 12

Let us upload this into evidence for you because you have done your part and you're continuing to do that and we appreciate that. So we want to document that for you as well.

54:36Speaker 14

Do you need copies back of this or is that good? No, I'm good. I have it. Okay.

54:40Speaker 12

Okay, so we'll just admit those into evidence for you, okay? Can I get a motion?

54:46Speaker 3

Yeah, a motion for finding of guilt, 10 days to come to compliance, and $250 per day on fine thereafter.

54:55Speaker 12

Any other discussion? All those in favor? Aye. Okay.

55:01Speaker 4

These meetings are all public, so you may be able to take this to fire and show them what happened here, and maybe that can help you advance your process.

55:09Speaker 26

Okay. Thank you. Okay. Okay.

55:19Speaker 12

All right, we got one.

55:19Speaker 19

Next case would be another absentia. Okay. Page number 33, case number 00151682, property address 1951 Northwest 7th Avenue, unit 190. Page 33. Gotcha.

55:40Speaker 12

All right, sir, just give us one moment here. Inspector? Inspector, Jean Noel, after hours. Okay.

55:46Speaker 14

Inspector, did you initially cite this property with a ticket warning letter for not having their VTR and renewing their CU?

55:55Speaker 7

That is correct.

55:56Speaker 14

Okay. And that was sent to the owner of record pursuant to the property appraiser report and to that owner's registered agent pursuant to Sun Business. Is that correct?

56:06Speaker 14

So we have proof of your ticket warning letter. And then you issued the actual ticket, correct?

56:14Speaker 7

Correct, for failure to pay.

56:17Speaker 14

And that was in March of 2026, correct?

56:20Speaker 7

That's correct. Okay.

56:21Speaker 14

All right. And still there was no compliance, is that correct?

56:26Speaker 14

And so now we're here today because they haven't complied, and you issued the NOV, the summons, for tonight's hearing for failure to comply. Is that correct?

56:35Speaker 14

Okay. Okay. And we're here for failure to obtain the business tax receipt. Yes?

56:42Speaker 14

Do they have a CU yet?

56:45Speaker 7

They do not. I saw that it was pending in Miami Biz.

56:49 – 57:02Speaker 14

Okay, but nothing's completed, is that correct? Nothing's completed. Okay. And so all the notices were sent to the owner of record as well as their registered agent pursuant to certified mail and the property itself was posted, is that correct?

57:03Speaker 14

The proof of mailing of all of these and the posting is also in the file, is that correct?

57:07 – 57:18Speaker 14

We have the property appraisal report, the warranty deed, the sum business report, and now we have photographs. Yeah. Of the business, which has some Florida licenses.

57:19Speaker 14

What's operating there?

57:21Speaker 7

It's a restaurant.

57:22Speaker 14

Okay. And we have a county license, but we don't have city licenses. Is that correct?

57:29Speaker 14

All right. At this time, the city seeks to admit it. Sounds like it's good. How's it, Mac? Admit it. Pages 1 through 37 into evidence.

57:37Speaker 14

All right, any contact with the owner?

57:39Speaker 7

I have had contact, not with him, but I'm not sure what her relationship to him is. Okay, that's his wife, okay. I've had contact with his wife.

57:50Speaker 7

And they have been making progress to obtain the CUNBTR, but right now it's currently stuck at zoning for other violation that they have to correct.

57:59Speaker 14

What's the other violation? Is it building related?

58:01Speaker 7

Correct, yeah, it's building related that they have to- Is it Durham? I'm not 100% sure.

58:06Speaker 12

Do you know what it is? One second here.

58:12Speaker 27

Introduce yourself.

58:14Speaker 12

State your name for the record.

58:15Speaker 27

How you doing? I'm Derek Turton, 1951 Northwest, 7th Avenue.

58:20Speaker 14

Is it with Derm?

58:21 – 59:06Speaker 27

It's with Derm, yeah. Okay. So the issue we've been having, though, is... So first we went in there and they said that we needed to give the landlord's signature. It's a U.N. building. And so first they said we needed to give that. So we got that. And then we brought that in. They didn't accept that. Then they said they needed a property manager. So then we went back and we got that. And then they wouldn't accept that. And then we went back and they said we need the landowner's signature. And then we got that, and they didn't accept that. So it's just like, you know, we just keep moving the goalposts. I don't really know what to do. I hired two expediters. I've gotten my grease trap pumped five times for Durham to come do an inspection. I'm doing everything I'm supposed to do. Let me ask you a question.

59:06Speaker 12

How long have you been operating in that location prior to this issue?

59:13Speaker 12

No, like when did you first start operating in the location?

59:16Speaker 27

Two years. We've been in two years now.

59:17Speaker 12

Okay. Thank you.

59:20Speaker 10

The city recommends 120 because it's correct. Hold on a second.

59:23Speaker 14

I have to, so we're going to, with the evidence having been admitted, the city rests.

59:28Speaker 14

That's our finding of guilt. You're recommending. It's an absentia, but we're recommending.

59:34Speaker 10

120 being that.

59:35Speaker 5

120 days, $250 a day thereafter.

59:39Speaker 14

If they're going to need more time, you're going to have to come back with the power of attorney. Correct. We will accept it. What is it? It's at UM?

59:45Speaker 27

UM. It's the UM building on 28th and 7th Ave.

59:49Speaker 14

All right, so you'll have to get something from them stating that you have the authority to be here on their behalf.

59:56Speaker 27

But I mean, so my lease doesn't... No.

1:00:01Speaker 14

So this encumbers property. Your lease allows you to run a business. It doesn't allow you to encumber their property with liens that could cause it to be foreclosed upon.

1:00:10Speaker 14

Yeah. So this is a... Think of this as like you're in county court.

1:00:15Speaker 14

So although you don't have to have an attorney, even though you're a corporation here, since it's administrative in nature, we still have to do all that good stuff.

1:00:25Speaker 27

But the challenge with me with that is like, so who from the property?

1:00:28Speaker 14

Well, so when you get close at that hundred days, if you don't have your stuff.

1:00:33 – 1:01:30Speaker 14

I'm going to give you my card and then you're going to send me an email. You're going to be like, I just we've we've requested it. Now, here's all the stuff we have here, you know, and I'll try to assist you. Okay. We'll try to figure out who from UM can give you the AOK. Usually with the university, they will have their building management does have the authority to give you the authority. They wouldn't accept that? No, that's Durham. This is different. This is for us. This is totally different than Durham. That's a whole other animal. This is for us, usually for large Universities, they have building facilities. The person who runs their building facilities does have the authority to give you the right to, yeah, you can go ahead and deal with that. But that's usually a call between myself or even the board's attorney just to A-OK that with them and then have you to be good to go to come here. So that's something we can work out in advance so when you get here, you got the right stuff.

1:01:31Speaker 12

Potentially, you can use that to then go to them and say, I'm in contact with the city.

1:01:36 – 1:02:04Speaker 3

attorney about this okay help me out anyway i get a motion yeah move as stated guilty guilty 120 days to come to compliance and 250 per day i'm fine thereafter second all those in favor all right okay thank you and here you go sir for my card yeah and you take the extension of time paperwork too

1:02:07Speaker 14

So we just left to regular abstentions, which we know the chair loves. Hold on. We have one. You're on the clock.

1:02:14Speaker 12

45 seconds each.

1:02:16 – 1:02:31Speaker 14

Hold on. Two, three, four, five, six. See, I can count, too. Seven, eight, nine, 10. And 10.

1:02:31Speaker 12

Are you sure there's no parliamentary procedure that we can do for extensions? Nope. Nope.

1:02:42Speaker 12

All right. Nope. 604. Let's go.

1:02:44 – 1:03:08Speaker 14

If they were tickets, yes, because somebody else is appealing. If they don't show up, it's just a blanket. Boom. But we still have to do it. But we're going to start with Inspector Troutman. on page 17, 509 Northwest 41st Street, 00121215. It's 602, by the way. Inspector, please state your name for the record.

1:03:08Speaker 21

Inspector Troutman, North Office.

1:03:11Speaker 14

Did you put together pages one through 90 for today?

1:03:14Speaker 20

That's correct.

1:03:15Speaker 14

Okay, because originally you had five different violations, yes?

1:03:20Speaker 14

The only one remaining is work without a permit, is that correct?

1:03:23Speaker 14

And what's the work?

1:03:25Speaker 21

Uh, they have converted a duplex into a fourplex.

1:03:28 – 1:03:47Speaker 14

Okay. So you might need a permit for that. Yeah. Okay. So, uh, you sent the notices, both of the violation and the summons for today to the owner of record and their registered agent. Is that correct? That's correct. We have copies of all the documents related to that. Your affidavits of postings, copy of the postings, photographs of the postings, copies of the property appraiser report and the sunbiz report. Yes.

1:03:49Speaker 14

All right. And so, and you also attached many, many, many, Building plans, is that correct?

1:03:57Speaker 22

That's correct.

1:03:57Speaker 14

All right, so this is the property?

1:04:00Speaker 14

So it's supposed to be one unit here and one unit here on the floor?

1:04:05Speaker 14

Okay, and instead it's four. It's two on each?

1:04:08Speaker 21

Yes, now we convert it into four.

1:04:10Speaker 1

Okay. According to the building plan.

1:04:13 – 1:04:52Speaker 14

Do these photos fairly and accurately depict what the property looks like? Correct. With the four entries and you even got inside, which you always do. It's very impressive. All right, and were you in all four units or just one of them? All four. Okay. This time the city seek to admit pages one through 90 into evidence. Admit it. We have four electrical, too. All right. At this time, the evidence having been admitted, the city rests as for a finding of guilt, three days for compliance, $250 a day thereafter.

1:04:53Speaker 4

Move as stated. Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Aye.

1:05:00 – 1:05:17Speaker 14

Okay, our next ones will be, we have a few with Inspector George, page 48760. Northwest 64th Street, page 4800154850. Inspector, please state your name.

1:05:18Speaker 17

Inspector George at the house.

1:05:20Speaker 14

All right, you cite the aforementioned property for failure to register and failure to maintain. Correct. Are both still outstanding?

1:05:27Speaker 17

They maintained it. So the only thing they need to do is register.

1:05:30Speaker 14

Just to register it? Yeah. Okay. And you put together pages 1 through 29 for today?

1:05:36Speaker 14

And the notice of violation as well as the summons for today was sent certified mail to the owner and the property itself was posted. Is that correct?

1:05:43Speaker 14

We have proof of all of the posting and the mailing located within the documents that you created. Is that correct?

1:05:50Speaker 14

So this was part of the failure to maintain. It was overgrown and had dirt and everything else around it. Yes?

1:05:56Speaker 14

Not dirt. Trash.

1:05:57Speaker 15

Trash. Why is it dirt?

1:05:59Speaker 14

Grass. Of course it is dirt there. But the lot itself is yet to be registered, correct? Correct. All right. At this time, the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 29 into evidence.

1:06:09Speaker 14

Evidence having been admitted, city rests as for finding of guilt. Three days for compliance. $250 a day thereafter.

1:06:16Speaker 4

Second. All right. I do see here that the address for the lot is also the mailing address, so if maybe he's not getting any of these notices... Might be.

1:06:26Speaker 17

They are, because the daughter got in contact with me.

1:06:28Speaker 4

Okay, that's what I want to ask, if you had communication with them, so...

1:06:31 – 1:06:46Speaker 14

Sometimes people do that. Isn't that a great idea? I have a vacant lot. I'm going to send my mail to the vacant lot. It's a good plan. But then some of them also do forwardings with the post office so that while that's the mailing address, it gets... They have a permanent forward.

1:06:47Speaker 19

Yeah. Yeah. We have had those two.

1:06:49 – 1:07:05Speaker 14

All right. Page 52. Same inspector. 50 Northwest 41st Street. Make sure I put the right one up first. Yes. Case 00101763. Inspector, please state your name for the record.

1:07:06Speaker 17

Inspector George.

1:07:08Speaker 14

Okay. Did you put together pages one through 77 for today's hearing?

1:07:13 – 1:07:24Speaker 14

All right. And you cited the property for failure to register the vacant structure, failure to maintain the exterior, improper outside storage of materials, as well as being vacant, blighted, unsecured, and or abandoned.

1:07:26Speaker 14

All right. Are all of those still outstanding?

1:07:28Speaker 14

Okay. You sent the notice of violation and the summons to the owner of record as well as that corporation's registered agent. Yes?

1:07:36Speaker 14

And you found that information from the property appraiser as well as Sun Biz?

1:07:40Speaker 14

All those documents are attached here too, including your proof of mailing, yes?

1:07:46 – 1:08:27Speaker 14

All right, so let's get to the pictures. Trying to quicken up on the front part to make the chair happy, all right. I just got some side eye. These are your emails back and forth checking on registration and everything else, is that correct? All right. All right. And then it went all the way down. Here we go. All right. So this is what we're talking about. Overflowing bins, garbage everywhere. This is fairly inaccurately to pick what the property looked like then as well as what it looks like today.

1:08:28Speaker 14

And this is from 24. Yes.

1:08:30Speaker 17

And it's done like that.

1:08:34Speaker 14

And now we're in 26, and it's certainly not much better from June 20th.

1:08:39Speaker 14

Okay. At this time, the city seeks to admit pages one through 77 in evidence.

1:08:45Speaker 14

Evidence having been admitted, city rests as for finding of guilt, three days for compliance, $250 a day thereafter.

1:08:52Speaker 12

So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye.

1:08:55 – 1:09:23Speaker 14

All right, we have another one with Inspector George, page 56, 951 Brickell Avenue. I guess, suite one or number one. Case 00089802. Inspector, please state your name for the record. Inspector George, after hours. Did you cite the aforementioned property for failure to have a BTR? Correct. Okay. And the signed one was voided, correct?

1:09:23 – 1:09:58Speaker 14

All right. So you put together pages 1 through 44 for today's hearing and sent out The notice of violation as well as the summons for tonight's certified mail to the owner of record and the registered agent. Is that correct? Correct. We have your proof of mailings, proof of who the owner is, as well as the registered agent pursuant to the property appraiser and Sun Biz here as well. Is that correct? Correct. All right. And let's see. What they are missing is, so this is for, is this the business? Correct. It's the valet? Correct.

1:09:58Speaker 17

A valet, yeah. That's an old one.

1:10:05Speaker 14

And this is from 2023, that's what they're showing you?

1:10:10 – 1:10:25Speaker 14

You let them know it was 2026? All right. Maybe. All right, at this time, the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 44 into evidence. Admitted. Evidence having been admitted, city rests as for finding of guilt, three days for compliance, $250 a day thereafter.

1:10:26Speaker 12

So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye. All right.

1:10:30 – 1:10:43Speaker 14

Now, Inspector Encinosa, page 61676, Northwest 2nd Street, case number 00161468. Inspector, please state your name for the record.

1:10:43Speaker 6

Inspector Eric Encinosa, code compliance after hours.

1:10:46 – 1:10:58Speaker 14

All right. Did you cite the aforementioned property for failure to maintain, failure to maintain the facade, failure to maintain it safely? No. Removal of landscaping as well as work without a permit?

1:10:59Speaker 14

Okay. All those violations still outstanding?

1:11:02Speaker 6

Correct. No contact from owner.

1:11:04 – 1:11:15Speaker 14

Okay. You beat me to the punch. All right. You put together pages 1 through 58 for tonight's hearing? Yes. And you sent the notice of violation as well as the summons to the owner of record as well as their registered agent pursuant to Sunbiz. Is that correct?

1:11:16 – 1:11:28Speaker 14

All copies of the notices that were sent as well as your information from the Property Appraisal Report and Sunbiz and the Postal Service proving your mailing are included in in pages 1 through 58. Is that correct?

1:11:29Speaker 14

All right. And then we will go to here, the pictures. All right. So this is the property?

1:11:38Speaker 6

Correct. That's the wooden fence they were building inside.

1:11:42Speaker 14

Okay. Probably to block what you can see through the chain link fence.

1:11:48Speaker 14

Yes, clever, but a little late. So we have the photographs with the tires outside, which are not allowed to be outside, actually, because they are mosquito catchers, correct?

1:11:58Speaker 6

Yeah, they have trees inside them.

1:12:00Speaker 14

Yeah. This is the property itself, which is the facade is not maintained.

1:12:05Speaker 6

Correct, you can see some of the decaying parts of the roof there.

1:12:08Speaker 14

The roof is pulling away, yes.

1:12:15Speaker 6

That was the worst one.

1:12:16Speaker 14

Yeah. Well, obviously, we've got water intrusion in the structure itself.

1:12:21 – 1:12:42Speaker 6

I did not cite for vacant, blighted, unsecured structure at the time because there were windows open and I saw mail. And all those coverings were on the fence. They've since been removed. So I know somebody's been doing something there. And on the return visit, I could see that the building was empty. So I missed the opportunity to site it originally.

1:12:42Speaker 14

All right. Well, we got one, so I think we're good. And this is all of the garbage and debris that's being left outside, is that correct?

1:12:49Speaker 6

Yes, it's in the back area of the house.

1:12:51Speaker 14

Okay. And it's been continued to be maintained in this manner since you sited it?

1:12:56Speaker 6

There's a little less stuff. That's the incredible one. It's a one-story house, and they built an entire second story.

1:13:02Speaker 14

Yeah. With plywood.

1:13:05Speaker 6

Which is boarded up.

1:13:06Speaker 14

Yeah. Yeah. Probably not to code.

1:13:09Speaker 12

You can't make this up. What? You just can't make this up.

1:13:13Speaker 4

No, you can't. It says here it's owned by a church, too. International Evangelical Church.

1:13:19Speaker 14

Well, that's what it says in the name. That doesn't mean it's what it is.

1:13:24Speaker 6

There's a lot of cross-referencing through the registered agents, but I managed to find the correct one by the deed and the mailing address. Excuse me.

1:13:36Speaker 6

Most of that stuff is still there.

1:13:38 – 1:13:52Speaker 14

Okay. All right. At this time, the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 58 into evidence. Admit it. Evidence having been admitted, city rests as for a finding of guilt, three days for compliance. How many units is this supposed to be?

1:13:52Speaker 6

I think it's a multi-unit. I'm not entirely certain.

1:13:58Speaker 14

Yeah. $250 a day thereafter.

1:13:59Speaker 4

Move is stated. Second. All those in favor? Aye. All right. Thank you.

1:14:05 – 1:14:27Speaker 14

Well, thank you for that interesting perusal to this property. You do. The next one, Inspector Bailey, page 63, 828 Northeast 76th Street, case number 00159048. Inspector, please state your name while Inspector Encinos is bothering you.

1:14:27Speaker 22

Inspector Bailey, North Office.

1:14:31 – 1:14:57Speaker 14

Did you cite the aforementioned property for failure to register the vacant structure? Correct. Is that still outstanding? It is. Okay. Initially, you gave them a warning to the corporate owner and their registered agent via certified mail that they needed to register the structure. Is that correct? That's correct. Back in March. Did they do it? They did not. They did not. So then you went and you gave them an actual ticket in April. Is that correct?

1:14:57 – 1:16:02Speaker 14

And did they register it? They did not. Okay. Okay. And now we have issued the summons, and they didn't even appeal the ticket, did they? They did not. Okay. And now, as of May, you issued the summons for them to be here in July. Is that correct? That is correct. Same ones sent to their registered agent as well as them, certified mail, and all copies of all of those notices, postings, proof of postings with the photographs as well as the USPS documents are present in pages 1 through 37. Is that correct? That's correct. All right. So at this time, just Is the property registered as vacant? It is not. Okay. Let's go to the photograph. Any contact with the owner? No contact. All right. They just have their for sale sign up. Looks like by owner. Hmm. And that's the property. Yes? Yes. All right. At this time, the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 37 into evidence. Admit it. Evidence has been admitted. City rests as for finding of guilt. Three days for compliance. $150 a day thereafter.

1:16:03Speaker 3

So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye.

1:16:07 – 1:16:32Speaker 14

I'm getting closer. It's just Inspector Bailey that's keeping it. All right. Next is page 67 with Inspector Bailey. 1150 Northeast... 87th Street, I want to make sure because there was an 83rd Street. Case number 00161581. Inspector, please state your name for the record.

1:16:32Speaker 22

Inspector Bailey, North Office. All right. You put together pages 1 through 32 for tonight's hearing.

1:16:39 – 1:17:04Speaker 14

I did. All right. And initially you cited and mailed to the corporate owner and their registered agent a ticket for improper removal of eight trees. Is that correct? That's correct. All right. And they did not appeal that ticket, did they? They did not. Okay. So the ticket was upheld and we have a copy of the ticket that was issued as well as the proof of mailing to both of those parties. Is that correct?

1:17:05 – 1:17:19Speaker 14

All right. And since they failed to appeal or do anything to come into compliance, which would be getting an after-the-fact permit and mitigating the removal of the trees, a summons was issued for this evening for them to be here. Is that correct?

1:17:19Speaker 15

That's correct.

1:17:20 – 1:17:39Speaker 14

Any contact with them? No contact. Okay. And so notice was sent to, again, the property owner pursuant to the property appraiser report as well as their registered agent pursuant to Sunbiz. Yes? Yes. And we have the proof of mailings and postings and copies of the property appraiser report as well as the warranty deed and the SunBiz report showing the registered agent. Is that correct?

1:17:39Speaker 22

That's correct.

1:17:40 – 1:18:14Speaker 14

All right. And so even though we're not really here for the ticket, these are the trees, right? This is the before. And then we see the tree's gone. And the after. That pretty much it? That's it for that. All right. And they've not pulled any permits. They've not come to talk to you, not gone to environmental, have a discussion with anybody about these removals. Is that correct? That's correct. All right. At this time, the city seeks to look at that. It's nice and empty now.

1:18:16Speaker 14

Seeks to admit composite exhibit. Thank you. Exhibit having been admitted, city rests. As for finding of guilt, three days for compliance, $150 a day thereafter.

1:18:25Speaker 4

So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye.

1:18:29 – 1:19:07Speaker 14

Our next one will be same inspector. Page 69, 425 Northeast 76th Street, case 00157050. Inspector, please state your name for the record. Inspector Bailey, North Office. You issued initially a ticket for failure to register a vacant structure, is that correct? Right. All right, you sent it to, again, like with the other ones, the corporate owner as well as their registered agent. Right. And when you gave them the warning letter, did they register it? They did not. They did not, all right. And so then you issued them a ticket, is that correct, in April? And did they register it? They did not. Okay. And you sent the notice to both those parties again, certified mail and posting. Yes?

1:19:08 – 1:19:20Speaker 14

So then you sent them an invitation to be here this evening to both the registered agent and the corporate owner, and they have not appeared. Is that correct? That's correct. Have they registered the property? They have not. They have not.

1:19:23 – 1:19:36Speaker 14

Here's the copies of all of the documents. Proof of posting. And here's the vacant property itself. Is that correct? Correct. At this time, the city seeks to admit pages 1 through 34 into evidence.

1:19:37Speaker 14

Evidence having been admitted, city rests. As for finding of guilt, three days for compliance, $150 a day thereafter.

1:19:43Speaker 4

My book here says complied on 5-18-2026.

1:19:48Speaker 4

This is page 69?

1:19:51Speaker 4

It says complied on 5-18-2026? Yes.

1:19:56Speaker 1

What is that? I didn't hear.

1:19:56Speaker 14

I'm sorry. No, it's not complied. Yeah, it says complied.

1:19:59Speaker 4

Our booklet says this has been complied 5-18-2026.

1:20:03 – 1:20:23Speaker 12

It's for you to register a vacant structure. It says it's compliant on 5-18. Yeah, we're just confirming before we roll. Here, I'll pull this up. Here. I paused the timer. I just want to be fair to your average.

1:20:23 – 1:20:38Speaker 14

You know what, they did open a... It's still open. So what you have is the ticket, and once it's switched from the ticket to the NOV, now we're into the NOV per diem. It's not complied. That's a misnomer on that.

1:20:38Speaker 19

Because it went from ticket to summons hearings.

1:20:44 – 1:20:55Speaker 14

So we probably need to talk to IT about not using that word. But it's still open. It's not been registered.

1:20:55Speaker 3

So move as stated. Second.

1:20:58Speaker 12

All those in favor? Aye.

1:20:59Speaker 14

All right, our next one, again, Inspector Bailey. Page 75, 268 Northeast 80th Street, case number 00112429.

1:21:14Speaker 22

Inspector Bailey, North Office.

1:21:16 – 1:21:29Speaker 14

Thank you. In this case, you issued a ticket for the removal of four trees. Is that correct? Correct. Notice of this violation was sent to the corporate owner of record as well as the registered agent pursuant to Sun Business. Is that correct?

1:21:29Speaker 22

That's correct.

1:21:30Speaker 14

Did they appeal this ticket? They did not. They did not appeal it. Okay. And so did they pull any after-the-fact permits?

1:21:38Speaker 14

Have they spoken to you or anybody else with environmental that you are aware of?

1:21:42Speaker 22

They have not.

1:21:43 – 1:21:57Speaker 14

Okay. Okay. And so we have proof of all of those, the notices of the ticket, the posting, as well as the mailing. And so after they did not appeal it nor come in with an after-the-fact permit, you have issued the summons for here. Is that correct?

1:21:57Speaker 20

That's correct.

1:21:58 – 1:22:29Speaker 14

And here's a copy of the upholding of the ticket and the lien that was issued for the ticket that was issued, which is in the amount of $4,000. Correct. So then we have the summons again sent certified mail to both of those parties as well as posted. Yes? Yes. All right. Here's all the proof. Proof of mailing. Now in this particular case, they had permits.

1:22:32Speaker 22

For the trees being removed?

1:22:33Speaker 14

Not for the trees. Were they doing work on the property?

1:22:36Speaker 22

Oh, yeah. The work had the permits, but the removals sent over from environment.

1:22:40Speaker 14

So what they did was they took their lot and they clear cut it so they could do whatever they wanted to do.

1:22:46Speaker 14

Okay. At this time, the city asks for the admission of pages 1 through 55.

1:22:53Speaker 14

Evidence admitted. City rests as for finding a guilt. Three days for compliance. $250 a day thereafter.

1:23:00Speaker 12

So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye.

1:23:04 – 1:23:27Speaker 14

And we have one more left, but I think they're not here, so that's a reset for Inspector George on page 93. That's going to be reset because we have a new owner, and so the notice is switched, so that'll be a reset. We said it anyway in case the new owner did show up, but since they didn't, we'll reset it. That's it.

1:23:28Speaker 12

Gotcha. No more? Your best case was 11 seconds. Your longest was three minutes and 41 seconds.

1:23:35Speaker 14

My worst was 41 seconds? That's not bad. Yeah, 341, that's not bad. Not bad. Are we adjourned?

1:23:44Speaker 12

Motion to adjourn.

1:24:23 – 1:24:56Speaker 23

To report violations like this, remember that you can call 311. If you have a vacant lot or a structure, be it a house that no one is living in, you have to register it with the city of Miami. Go to the website where you search for court compliance, there is the way to register.

1:25:06 – 1:25:28Speaker 13

Leave No Trace policy, it's been extremely successful ever since we launched. We removed trash containers from our spoil island. We want boaters to keep their trash within their vessel. Pack out what you pack it. Leaving trash behind, especially plastic, is extremely detrimental for marine life. We are servicing the islands on a weekly basis. City of Miami Marine Patrol, they're actively enforcing the rules on the spoil island.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.