City Council - Regular Meeting

Good evening, everyone. We'd like to welcome you to the Tuesday, August 18th Radio City Council meeting. As always, we'll start out by reviewing the agenda items. We do have some executive session items. We have a good, healthy work session on our regular meeting agenda. On consent, F1, consider approval of the minutes of the August 4th regular city council meeting. F2, consider resolution adopting the official population. What's that number again? What was the population? 47-727. 47-727. Close it up and confirm it. 47-727. Councilman won't beat you to a punch. F3, consider a resolution approv

Awesome. And then F4, consider an ordinance approving a negotiated settlement between the Atmos City Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corp. Mid-Tex Division. It comes up once a year. Yes, sir. Any questions on consent items F1 through F4?

I've got a comment on 4. Yeah. Being a newbie to this group, this was like trying to read Arabic for me. that in the future, new people get advised what the heck this is before we just ask the judge on it.

Yeah. No, I agree. I agree. It's a good comment. Do you have any questions now, though?

Not after I spoke to the person I spoke with. Thanks for running that down. Did you try to, like, I'd also reach out to staff, but if they have trouble about there's not enough items out there this one had quite a few items on it but yeah but that's a good way in the future spent that the atmosphere and the encore when we do encore to and it's it's a lot of gobbledygook as well sometimes yeah and we do this every year just this mostly yeah they did so that will see the steering committee works

maybe come in and do a short new councilman. There's a person assigned to this area and they agreed they would love to do that to get them on board as far as.

Heck, every councilman. Doesn't hurt. Yeah.

For sure. They would be willing to do it. And so when they reach out, I'll mention it to them. than that, Mayor. According to what she gave me in a five-minute speech was how much money they're putting back into new infrastructure and stuff like that. I'm looking at an atlas name and it tells me that I'm also going to be making a decision on their pensions and retiring medical benefits. I'm like, I didn't know that was part of the game. They would like to come in and talk. Sure.

Let's connect them. Good work. Any other questions on consent agenda F1 through F4? Okay, awesome. H1 is, and thank you, Councilman Armstrong, for digging into that. Let me know and connect and figure out how to get that information to the rest of the council. H1, consider resolution approving Chapter 380 agreement. to the city's economic, according to the city's economic development policy with Hopps Keller Incorporated at 200 Keller Parkway, authorizing the city manager to execute the documents if we approve. Any questions on H1?

Yeah, I would have preferred this than an exec. I know we've talked about it twice, but usually, staff, when we do these type of negotiations or Chapter 380s, an exec, we get to a finalized set of numbers that the majority of council agrees with, and then we first go to But anyway, if council would be willing, I know we have a hefty exec agenda. Because this is the first time we're seeing the finalized numbers. I know Economic Development saw it last night, I believe, the final numbers for the first time. And I did watch that, so I got to see some of it. But if the majority of council doesn't

I agree with you generally. In this case, because we've already looked at it twice now in executive session, I think it's fine to hear the presentation.

I think it's fine if we hear it. It's on the agenda. And then if we have reservations about it or anything like that, we can table it. not put the cameras on personally?

No, I'm just saying whether it's legal or chapter 380s, that's why we do it. Otherwise, we would have just gone to the dais to begin with. That's why we went through exec the first time. So again, I'm not going to die on this mountain. I'm just saying I have nothing to hide. I just prefer the general process. That's the way we do it. But again, it's not the end of the world. We can move on.

Has the numbers changed since we last saw them in executive session?

Okay. Yeah, so the numbers really didn't change that much, and I remember discussing the forward fee at some point as a group. So I don't... They excluded it. Yeah, they excluded it. I guess for that reason, because they haven't materially changed at all, I'm okay with moving forward. seven folks so yeah I'm fine if we don't I was just and in the future though generally we finalize and then we go out there okay I'm interested all right okay age two public hearing considering SUT approximately 1,815 square foot detached garage For the new colleagues on council, most of this is just testing my r

I've gone out and looked just over the fence at this. It's a big place, nice place. I don't think it's going to be visible from the road.

H3, also a public hearing, considered ordinance, approving UDC amendments, the town center medical overlay area, relating to allowable uses, providing penalties, authorizing publication, and establishing an effective date. And this was kind of like a cleanup item, right, Sarah?

Okay. Awesome. Any questions on H3? All right. And then H4, consider resolution. the city council to adopt a tax rate that will be lower than the no new revenue rate we're going to call it the mayor pro tem deverly and councilman will rate any questions on h4 all right So the council is now recessed so that the council in compliance with provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act as authorized therein shall go into executive session to consider matters allowed therein and as stated in the agenda specifically section 551.071 consultation with attorney, closed meeting, a governmental body may not

All right. We do have some action to take, but one thing I would like to do beforehand is we have a proclamation and presentations, and um you know sometimes the the best news comes at the beginning of a meeting and I've had the the honor of honestly taking a program that was handed over to me and um doing a the mayor's internship program and when I first got a hold of it you know we kind of didn't know what to expect or what it was going to be about but you know as this council will tell you um as a as a as a team, any time we have an opportunity to engage our residents, we're certainly going

Okay, before we get into the rest of the agenda, I'm going to go ahead and go kind of out of order, because we do have action to be taken from our executive session, and we have a motion from our mayor pro tem, Shannon Doverly. Shannon?

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. A lot's occurred over the last three weeks, and I just want to thank you for your leadership of the city in the last three weeks. A lot's happened. You've done an amazing job, and For the citizens out there, just to let you all know, the council, but especially the mayor, had been tireless in his advocacy for the residents. With that, I'd like to make a motion to authorize the city's special council and the city manager to take all steps necessary to take legal action regarding the proposed data center.

Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem. Councilman Will? I second. We have a motion and a second. Any questions? If not, let's go ahead and take a vote. Councilwoman Brennan?

All right. That motion passes 6-0. I will make a... some brief comments because we don't take this action lightly. As it relates to the town of Westlake's proposed data center, we have now pursued every diplomatic avenue available to us. We raised our concerns, made reasonable and substantive requests, and formally asked Westlake to address the impacts this project could have on our community. Westlake is proposing a 1.1 million square foot data center just 506 feet from Keller's backyards. Yet despite our request to meet with Westlake leadership to discuss options for reducing this developmen

Well said. Thank you. All right. We have Holly Doty, and then on deck, Stuart Rennie.

Thank you. And Ms. Doty, just in case it wasn't clear for the record, it is an item that's been noticed and we just voted on it. Yeah, I just want to make it clear that we did vote to put the full weight of the city behind this. So thank you for being here. Stuart Runney and then Angela Matthews is on deck.

Thank you, sir. Angela and then Alicia Ostermeyer.

Thanks for being here. All right. Alicia? And I think that's all we have signed up to speak. If there's anyone else that would like to speak, though, just visit with Kelly real quick if you don't mind.

Thank you. All right. I think that's everyone. Thank all the speakers for being here this evening. All right, for our consent agenda. Item F1, consider approval of the minutes of the Tuesday, August 4th, 2026 regular city council meeting. Item F2, consider resolution adopting the official population as of January 1st, 2026 for the city of Keller, which according to Councilman Greg Will, is 47,727 people. Did I get that right, Councilman? You did. All right, thank you, sir. F3, consider a resolution approving a memorandum of understanding. Actually, we're going to pull F3, and we'll have Chief

Yes, sir, thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move we approve consent items F1, F2, and F4 as presented.

Thank you, sir. Councilman Will? I second. All right, we have a motion and a second. Let's vote. Councilwoman Brennan? All right, thank you. All right, so that passes. Five, two, one. Five, zero with one abstention. All right. Chief, for F3, you have a presentation. It's considered a resolution approving a memorandum of understanding with the city of Fort Worth for the city of Keller's participation as a member of the Trident Center and authorizing the city manager to execute the agreement.

It's like really impressive marshalling of resources there. How long is the agreement?

Yes, sir. So for some reason, that's laid plans. We need to get out of it. You know, we can pretty conveniently. 30 days. Yes, sir. And then what was the total fiscal? I know there's one employee involved. The personal cost of one employee. Okay. Those are my questions. Thanks for going through this. I don't know if it's the big stage, but the lights are brighter. Any questions, council? If not, we have a motion from our mayor pro tem.

Motioning again. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move we approve item F3 as presented. Thank you, sir. I'll second.

We have a motion to second. Let's take a vote. Councilman Brennan. Aye. Thank you. All right, and that passes 6-0. Thank you all. Thank you, Chief.

Next, no old business, so item H1, new business. Consider a resolution approving a Chapter 380 economic development program agreement pursuant to Chapter 380 of the Texas Local Government Code and pursuant to the city's economic development policy. with Hopps Keller Incorporated at 200 Keller Parkway and authorizing the city manager to execute said documents on behalf of the city of Keller, Texas. Hey, Anna.

Thanks, Anna. All right, this is not a public hearing, so, Any questions for staff, for the applicant, who I believe is here? I'll just really briefly say how excited I am for everything that y'all are doing as the owners of Hush and Hops. It's bringing a new level of vibrancy to Old Town Keller. right up the alley of what our citizens want. You know that as business owners and entrepreneurs, but I'm really excited about this and thank the Economic Development Board, our staff, colleagues on council for getting us to this point. With that, we do have a motion.

Councilman Armstrong. Mr. Mayor, motion to approve new business item one. Thank you, sir. I'll second.

We have a motion to second. Let's go ahead and vote. Councilwoman Brennan.

Approved. All right, and that passes 6-0 unanimously.

It was your motion. I think I was comfortable with the recommendation from the Economic Development Board. Yeah, the incentivized, yeah. That's the one I- You want us to restate it? Are we good? We're good? Got it, Kelly? Awesome.

Well done. Good catch. H2. It is a public hearing to consider an ordinance approving a specific use permit for an approximately 1,815 square foot detached garage located on 1.108 acres on the south side of Ottinger Road located approximately 968 feet northeast from the Florence Road and Ottinger Road intersection, legally described as Lot 1A, Block A of the Inspired Ranch subdivision, zoned SF36,000, lot size or greater, address 1289 Ottinger Road, Jonathan Savas, applicant, owner.

All right. Thanks, Alexis. This is a public hearing. Is there anyone from the public who would like to speak on this item? If not, Councilman Wohl, did you have a question? I do, but I can wait until the public hearing is closed. Oh, you had a motion to close the public hearing?

I'll second that. We have a motion and a second. Let's take a vote. All right, public hearing's closed, according to Councilwoman Brennan, right? All right. Yes. Thank you, Councilwoman.

My question is for the applicant. All we have is this computer-generated drawing of what the building's going to look like. Is it going to be substantively similar to the design features of the primary residence? I just wanted to make sure. Correct.

I just wanted to make sure we knew what we were voting on. I appreciate it.

All right. If there are no other questions, Mayor Pro Tem.

Thank you for working through the journey. With that, I move we approve item H8 as presented. Sorry, that's H2. I apologize. It's been a long day. H2 as presented. Thank you. All right.

Councilman Armstrong? Second the motion. We have a motion to second to approve item H2. Let's take a vote. Councilwoman Brennan?

That passes 6-0. Thanks for taking the journey, as the Mayor Pro Temp said. I look forward to it. Congrats. Thank you very much. Of course. Thank you. Appreciate it. All right. H3, also a public hearing. Consider an ordinance approving amendments to the City of Keller UDC adopted by Ordinance No. 1746, dated July 7, 2015, by amending Article 8, Section 8.18, Town Center Medical Overlay relating to allowable uses, providing penalties, authorizing publication, and establishing an effective date.

Thanks Alexis. This is a public hearing and it is an exciting ordinance. Is anyone from the public here tonight to speak on item H3? If not, I'll make a motion to close the public hearing. All right. Dr. Rankleaf?

Well done, sir. Motion to second. Let's take a vote. Councilwoman Brennan? All right. Public hearing is closed. Any questions for staff? All right, I'll make a motion to approve item H3. Dr. Rankleve, do you have a second?

I don't know what's going on, but yes, I will second.

Okay. I defer to my Councilman Rankleve with his powerful second. I don't know what's going on. It says Shannon on this.

No, it says Charles Rankleve, sir. What's going on? All right, we have a motion. Second from Dr. Rankleve. Thank you, sir. Let's vote. Councilman Brennan? Aye. All right. Item H3 passes. We're going to get through it. Item H4, consider a resolution of the City Council of the City of Keller, Texas, to consider a proposal to adopt a tax rate that will be lower than the no new revenue and voter approval tax rates and providing an effective date.

Yes. Yeah, it's not even so at or below.

How long have we been at or below? Nine straight years. No, but like, were we above the state's no new revenue rate 10 years ago? Then is that what I can reasonably infer?

Yes, right here in FY18. Yeah. We've been below it ever since? Yes, sir. Okay, so good work.

Yeah, to be clear on that one, though, it's not like a beautiful renovation. We're just trying to make sure the thing doesn't fall off the back of town hall, right? Absolutely, yes. It's a foundation thing.

Sorry. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And obviously, we're not going to talk really discuss the budget approvals until September 15th. But I just wanted to make sure I got that. So you were saying the valuations of the houses went down about 4% or $19,000. And even with that, we're still looking at a rate below the no new revenue rate. Just clarifying. That and with massive inflation. Thank you.

Yeah, I think, you know, we're definitely in a different fiscal climate than when I first joined council back in 2020. You know, we're feeling different constraints as a city, but I think it's very amazing that we've gone nine years in a row below the no new revenue rate, all while supporting our staff, maintaining excellent quality of service. And so I just want to say thank you to our staff in particular and our residents for supporting us in that effort. It's amazing to see, you know, when you think about real dollars saving over $100 a month of what it would have been. I mean, it's rare th

Thank you, sir. Councilwoman Brennan, do you have any remarks? Are you ready to vote?

Thank you. All right, and that is, our item H4 is approved, 6-0. With that, we do have a couple of work session items, and so we'll probably go ahead and tackle the work session before some of the executive sessions so we can get staff home, but we'll see you in work session. All right, we're back. Our projector has not turned on in work session, so we're going to be replacing that light bulb and starting our work session out here. So item D2, I think Sarah and her team have a presentation to discuss possible unified development code amendments related to fencing. Not the sport, I presume.

Probably more fun. No, it's important. All right.

So you're saying the front of the property is the front door, not the road in this case? Or am I looking at this map wrong where the dotted line is?

Yeah, you were saying it's in the front of the one on the bottom of the picture. Keller Smithfield's on the left. Correct. And that's what I'm saying. You're basing it off the front door, I guess. Yes. Okay. Yes. That's what I was asking.

I've been asked that. Why, especially like in Chase Oaks and other Why do we require the open fencing? I don't mean to put you on the gun here, but what's the thought process on that? Because I get asked by residents and I don't really have a good answer.

Right, right, but I meant the why. Is there a reason that we did just visual aesthetics?

No, that makes sense. I get asked, I'm like, other than code.

I mean, y'all have any questions or comments for Sarah before we weigh in on? Would you bring up, if you don't mind, the slide where you were asking for direction, basically?

Yeah. I mean, any thoughts, Council? Yeah.

on you know unfortunately we might have to go one by one and if i don't know like some of them seem obvious to me when there's a hundred feet in the front of the house is the front door pointing north but 99 of citizens would consider the front of the house what's facing the road and people pulling the driveway just because someone chose to put their door on one side and the other neighbor wants a privacy fence and then also the open fencing the green ways i get that um because you want it open but We do have those rare situations where people want privacy for their pool and their kids swimmin

Thanks, sir. Can I jump in if you have any? Councilman Brennan, do you have anything? I always want to make sure you're here.

Not really, other than I'd I can relate to people having a hard time with the requirement that you have open style fencing along your backyard. If it's next to, is it a green space or parkland or a trail or whatever the rule was associated with that? Cause people have pools and stuff back there and you know, people want privacy and I, and I get it. Not everybody wants to do all the gardening and bushes and plants and stuff. It seems like we should have some,

leeway on that particular one um that's my two cents thanks councilwoman by the way some of us just don't have that skill set some of us like plant things and then they die so i'm joking i'm joking good comments um councilman armstrong one of the photos is in my neighborhood in

that fence has been an issue since the last at least 10 years. The original change in that backyard, the resident came in and put that wooden fence up against the stockade or the wrought iron fence. And then it was, they were asked to move it back. They claimed that it was that way when they bought it. There was pictures proven that it was not there. So they did move it back and it's moved back almost two feet from the wrought iron fence. It's not maintained very frequently. And then there's one section that's about six inches from the wrought iron fence again, and it's not maintained at all.

Actually, Councilman Armstrong, the way he ended was kind of what I was going to push for. Maybe that's the easiest way to give you all the power to do that, but if you all need clear expectation, unfortunately some of these situations are very specific, even though they happen a lot. So I don't know, Mr. Mayor, unless we want to update specific code, unfortunately maybe as it comes, or maybe you come back with the three or five most common ones like you did here. and just say, hey, can you 100% clarify, which kind of did, but, you know, just my two cents.

Yeah, I think I'm kind of where the mayor pro tem's at, and what he said there, and maybe pick the most common ones that are creating issues, I mean, you're right, Shannon, I always go back to the, like, if the fence has been there for 40 years, and has caused no harm, it's probably okay for the fence to be there another 40 years type situation, and so if we can As you said, Sarah, continue to hold new development to a high standard and find ways to make our code a little bit more resident-focused for existing neighborhoods. I think that's smart. The only thing I would tell you is I wouldn't s

Good. Thanks for asking. I mean, if Alonzo gets his way, we're going to need like 25 sculptures for the City of Keller, so be ready.

Well, it's just one sculpture of you, right, that's going in every roundabout.

People start crashing. So ugly. All right.

Thanks, Jordan. Well, anyone that's seen me comment over the years on public art knows that it's usually a foot and mouth moment almost every time. So just to start, are the sculptures permanent? Is that the idea?

So yeah, it's not like it's going to be a rotating thing? No, sir. Or some poor soul gets out there and like lifts it up and leaves it everywhere. All right. So is there a picture of all three on one slide?

Okay. Can't get cattle egrets out of my brain when I look at that. So I'll just be really straightforward. I love the idea of the sculpture. I'm just one of six here tonight. So if we have a foot-in-mouth moment, then they can clean up whatever I said. But I'll be honest with you. I would love to see something a little bit more like Keller-centric in terms of, because we only have two roundabouts, right? Three? Where's the third? This will be the third. Oh, so this is for the new one. Got it. Yes. So I was looking at Johnson.

All right. Perfect. Yeah, it would be really cool to see something that has a little bit more of a Keller connection. That's just my immediate, like, instinctual feedback. there's some things that, you know, tie into this town, whether it's the water tower, the railroad, Samantha Springs. I mean, there's just things that, you know, when I look at these sculptures, I don't know, was that a consideration or a factor that was really weighed?

This one looks like my yard a little bit. Sure. The dandelions.

Okay, and this comes from the public arts? Okay, cool. That's helpful for me. Mayor Pro Tem.

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I love this kind of stuff. That said, Councilwoman Brennan, She's very artsy, and I would love to hear her opinions on this in a second. I defer to the arts board in a lot of these. I like that one. I like that they're choosing ones that are 14. That one was 20 feet. I will say this. I have to go through Colleyville a lot, and their statues are fine. I like that these are very different. I have no problem with the mayor's recommendation, but I kind of like the one the art board did, although the color of the other ones was interesting. But I really like the idea of puttin

Got just a couple of questions. Number one, why are we going different for this roundabout than we've done the other two? That's one question. Because the other one at Johnson, it's just full of plants. Sure. Okay. And the second question will be the money, I'm sure, has already been discussed and allocated somewhere prior to me getting here. But I'm going to be probably the least one that's artsy on this group in terms of If we are going to go artsy, I would prefer it to be more coloristic like you're talking about. But if you'll answer those, thank you.

I'm assuming you've already thought of this, but I just want to, for my due diligence, ask the question anyway. Are these going to be up on pedestals or something so that way somebody looking at their cell phone doesn't? take out a $30,000 sculpture just based on the tire marks on the current roundabouts. I want to make sure that we're not going to throw money down the drain.

Good question, Councilman Will, Councilman Rankleaf, and then Councilman Brennan. We'll go to you next in case you have any comments.

I'm happy to yield my time to the resident.

No, you know what? You just go right ahead. I'll go last.

Yeah, I agree with the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem and Councilman Armstrong. I think it'd be nice to see these a little bit more Keller-centric, I would add, though, too, that when we think about like a train or a water tower, maybe also include maybe wildlife as part of that consideration as well. I mean, we do have wide open spaces and lots of trees. And from time to time, I do see white-tailed deer and all sorts of other stuff out here.

But not a statue of a tree, right? That's not what you're saying.

No, not a statue of a tree. I just want to be very clear. We have lots of trees.

All right, on that note, Councilwoman Brennan, please weigh in.

Yeah, so, yeah. Yeah, I appreciate the Public Arts Board's work they did in coming up with options for us to look at. For me, the last one, the one that's the tall blue bird, that's $31,500. I think that's a bit much. I think having something, a bright color right there doesn't really fit in. Mount Gilead and Borland's kind of rural. And so, I mean, I rather agree with the art board's recommendation of that dandelion. I think that's pretty cool. And it's kind of, you know, it's vegetation. I know it's not Keller themed, although some people who don't do very good job in their yards have a lot

Yeah, great comments, Councilwoman. What are the prices again? So the heron is $31,500.

I wonder, just a thought, if we kind of blend the ideas being discussed, I wonder if we go with the, seems like the design and aesthetic of the public arts board recommendation is, I mean, I agree with Councilman Brennan out of the options, I wonder if we go to that artist and say, hey, could you kind of come up with some ideas that, not just Keller, but Councilman Rankley's point, are also very Texan in nature. That could be pretty cool, and maybe have them do just a small handful of mock-ups. That's such a broad way to describe it. You could do like a... kind of a ranching theme. You could d

Yeah, I agree. Mr. Mayor, that's fine. I was just going to add, for those listening and to our new council members possibly, and ask the city manager, the funds for this come from the arts fees from developers when they develop, right? So for those listening... The payment for these is the money paid for by developers, and they develop within the city. A little small portion of that goes to art, and that's where the funds for this come from. Just wanted to clarify that.

Mr. Mayor, if I had to pick one, and we go with the choices that I would agree, this one is probably named appropriate since it's closest to the potential data center.

That's dry humor. Gotta love it, Councilman. I hear you. Keller will be heard. Dr. Rankleaf?

You know, it's really hard to follow that. I just want to be really clear. I don't want a statue of a tree around about.

Come on. That's good. Good feedback. Councilman Brennan, any cleanup comments? Or have you kind of shared your piece?

Yeah, I'm good. I'm the first of all of wants to present. I like to be in line the best. And if somebody wants to go back and revisit the theme and do something, I had no problem with that either.

Awesome. So, you know. As Councilman Rankley stated, we don't want a tree. Maybe as I was trying to explain at commission, a couple of just concepts. I don't want them to toil away for just tons of time, but just if they have some easy to understand, easy to mock up concepts that incorporate Texan or Keller themes as well, then that would kind of give us probably a small handful of options to choose from, and maybe we end up going with the dandelions. Thanks, Jordan. All right. Impact fee program credits.

Good evening, Mayor, Councilmembers, Alonzo Lignon, Public Works Director.

Okay. Thanks, Alonzo. So, Mayor Pro Tem?

I was just going to, so you kind of answered it at the end. I was going to ask if it actually, because water conservation is a big issue, and I know there's several council members that are looking into doing a task force on water conservation, but does this have, do you think this will have any actual tangible effect? in development of using newer technologies in water conservation? Or is this more of just checking the box because looking for actual results?

Thanks, Shannon. So I guess if I was, Karen, did you have something?

I did. Go ahead. Just a couple things. Of course, I like this idea. I like the fact it's not mandatory. You're not making anybody do it. It's giving an incentive to save water because we know water is a long-term issue for the state of Texas, and that's a good thing. I like the fact also that it's measurable. So we're not just topping talking points. They have to demonstrate it by data over a five-year period. And so I thought, well, it doesn't hurt anything. I mean, somebody doesn't have to do it, but I think anything we could do to encourage people to conserve water in the state of Texas is

All right. So it's a program that we're required to implement by the state?

Has the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee reviewed this?

Okay, and did they have any specific recommendations? They did not.

Okay. I just want to make sure that we got their input. So we don't need to vote on it? That's correct.

Thanks, Alonzo. Unless the council has any other questions on it, then Karen, you good? I'm good. Okay. All right. So we do have a few executive session items. Thanks, staff, for getting us through the work session fairly quickly. I'll go ahead and read off the required language. The council meeting is now recessed so that the council in compliance with the provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act is authorized therein shall go into executive session to consider matters allowed therein as stated in the agenda according to section 551071, consultation with attorney regarding ITEMS B, BEVERLY G