City Council - Regular Meeting
The Cedar City Council approved a general plan and zone change, discussed the upcoming South Interchange median design with UDOT, awarded the Cross Hollow Event Center outdoor arena bid, and revised city personnel policies.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Council
- Meeting Type
- City Council
- Location
- Cedar City, UT
- Meeting Date
- October 14, 2026
Published excerpts
Only published remarks appear here. The full transcript is not published.
175 sections (from 189 segments)
I miss some of that because they're much more lively. I love Jesus. We need to be more lively. He did. I went and talked to him, actually. The kid? Yeah, I went out and I said, hey, I'm going to call on the government. Is he ready? Yeah. He said that he talked to him, and he said if they shortened it more than what we suggested, they would have to do a new environmental study. He says I'd have to go up a couple of rounds. We're too far down the road. Oh, yeah.
No, no, they need to know that. They do. We tried.
And I said you need to make sure you present that eloquently and .
No. Thank you, Carter. It is after time. And that was one of my goals to make sure we start on time. So I apologize for being late tonight. But we will call the meeting to order. We're grateful for everybody being here. Tonight, we are going to be honored to have Dallin Alcott give us the opening prayer. And then Scott Phillips will lead us in the pledge.
Mayor, just to confirm, we're recording, right? Even though that's usually Randall and he's not here. So I just wanted to make sure. Okay. Okay.
Thanks, Alan. Will you please join me in the pledge of allegiance to our flag?
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Mayor, I would move that we approve the agenda order for this action meeting of city council on October 14th, 2026. Second. I have a motion and a second. All in favor?
Any opposed? Fantastic. Don't have anything under mayor and council. We have one under staff and then I'm going to add one other one. I think it would be good because we, I don't think we have it still as a, the future agenda item, right? The South Interchange kind of discussion, Kent? It's on the agenda. It is down there for the, okay. I do have one personal privilege, please.
Yes. I'm just wondering, and I'm not sure if this is streets or, it's certainly public works, so take it. I was just recently driving on Main Street at Coal Creek where the stoplight is located. I don't know if this was initiative driven or city, but there's some flags there for crossing, you know, the orange flags on poles, but they're just stuck in this chain link fence. So if we're going to provide them, we need to create a bucket or something for them. But I don't know if that's just people do it on their own, but they were just stuck in the chain link fence. Noted. It's not us. We didn't create flags for the pedestrians to cross.
Could you just reach out to Matt and just find out what's going on there? Thank you. That's all. Thank you.
All right. Staff comments. We have a library update.
That's what is in your budget that we award. Okay.
Well, but part of that would be fees and all that kind of stuff would fall under that, which my understanding is we don't even, Charge late fees, correct?
And we charge for room rentals and things like that?
How long does a person not return the book where it goes from being late to being we figure it's lost and here's your total bill?
OK. I'm curious, and I don't expect you to know this answer, but I know that there's library conferences and things every year. What would a place like Park City, for example, what would they do with $2 million? I mean, did they have a renovation? Did they have? No, they're paying 150.
Well, that wouldn't be more dollars. I'm being 50 serious. Anyway, okay. Thank you. Congratulations.
I do think those are good things to point out, though, right? You are efficiently running in your operation and achieving good outcomes. So thank you, Dallin. Okay. American Legion. Scotty.
Being a member of the Triple Deuce for over a decade, it's very fitting to have you there.
I thought the dryer was shrinking my clothes, but it turned out it was the refrigerator.
Scotty, I have a question. Yes, sir. On your Thanksgiving dinner flyer, you have Extension, Utah State University. What is their role in this?
Oh, you were gonna, he just thanked you. And I interrupted.
So 12 to 5. 12 to 5. If you were to have like a, I don't know, 10 or 12 volunteers... When would be the right time to have them?
Okay, thank you, thank you. You're awesome, Scotty. Thank you so much for all you do.
Mayor, if I may, I actually do have one question. And it's not something really to discuss now, but I'm just curious if we need to put it on the agenda for following meetings. We all got the email this week from Nicole Rosenberg about these PIDs. Is there anything, maybe Paul, is there anything we need to do or be involved in any of what's going on or
Okay. So we'll work on it and report back.
As counsel, we don't need to do anything with Nicole's email.
I think she's probably making you aware of the issues, so.
I did send it to two of the developers. That you knew? Good job. I forwarded it to them and said, take care of this.
Okay. First item on our, is then our consent agenda. I'll entertain a motion.
Mayor, I would move that we approve the consent agenda that is laid forth. Second.
I have a motion and a second. All in favor? Any opposed? I will make one apology in the way that this is worded that we are not releasing but replacing Jill.
No, no, I just want to make sure that was clear on the record. I'm sorry, where is that comment at? That we're replacing Jill's seat that she held. She passed away. We're not releasing her. I just wanted it for the record. So we'll make sure we correct that. I did miss one thing. I wanted to ask a question on one of the bills, and I meant to get to somebody earlier this morning, and I forgot to do it. We are paying for porta potties on the industrial Fort Cedar Road project. My assumption is, but it's an assumption that it was for the pump track installation and stuff like that, was that not p
With the release versus replace though, I guess that does raise the question for Sam Dodd's appointment, is he filling the remainder of a term or are we starting a new term over for him? Whatever hers was. I think she had just started. I think this is pretty much. So he's finishing her term?
Yep. Okay, item number nine is to consider general plan change from central commercial to business light manufacturing, industrial manufacturing. I'm in the vicinity of 22, 226 North 3325 West, Dallas.
Nothing's changed. I think it's a good call. I'll make a motion that we consider the general plan change as stated in item nine.
Have a motion? Second. Second from Councilman Galan. All in favor? Any opposed? Okay, next one is to consider a zone change from Annex.
His motion happened to be only general plan change.
Yeah, I said number nine. So general plan and zone change.
Okay. So now we'll entertain a motion for number 10 since we already passed nine. Second. Mm-hmm. So Phil made the motion on number 10. Robert, second. All in favor? I think you have to do both by roll call.
Okay. So let's go back. You'll get it. I mean, it's tough.
This is terrible. Maybe by the end of four years, I'll get this figured out. Number nine. Roll call vote starting with Councilman. Aye.
Aye. unanimous now to the motion second on number 10 roll call starting with councilman Cox hi hi hi hi hi for the fun of it it's the theatrics in a little nervous okay so good did you have anything else you wanted to to talk about there Because you're still standing, so we did 9 and 10.
We did 9 and 10. You're good. You're good. I was wondering if there was something else. I'm looking down like, nope, you're not number 11. Go do some more.
Okay, number 11 is to consider the redesign of the barrier on Royal Hunt Drive. And I'll turn first to Kent, let you go through what research we have worked on this week.
So just to clarify, if they put it in and we as a city determine that it needs adapted, it's our property at that point, we don't have to go back to them, we could adjust it at that point?
Let's not make it complicated. Let's make it simple.
Number two, I don't understand, Kent, and you need to educate me on this, when you say the environmental study, what are you referring to, or what are they referring to?
There's no sage grouse on, that's why I'm like, what is environmental like?
Hang on, let him answer. He was the same question.
So you've answered my question, and this is what I suspect at not being an expert on these kinds of projects with UDOT and other authorities around the country. So inside of that environmental study is an analysis of what we have today. versus what we will have with these quote improvements in terms of traffic flow, reduced accident rates, better management of whatever flows and so forth, right?
I need to see that compared to taking this thing down to the red mark. I don't have enough information to, in my mind, to stand here and say, you know what, that piece of median is so necessary to the flow and the increase improvement and lowering the accident rates and the flow of traffic in all directions that we just cannot move it more than five feet. So, Otherwise, as a member of this council, I have to kind of say I can't make a decision on helping these individuals that are here mitigate losses because of a cement barrier we're putting in the middle of the road. I mean, their traffic in
Give me. Can I add one part to that, Waldo? Yes, please. As you guys are processing this decision that you are being asked to make tonight, I called Devin personally to make sure that I heard firsthand from him what his stance was. And the harsh reality is the project is going to go in the way it's currently designed. The opportunity to make the modifications to any of that they won't allow us to. It will push their project back because of the legal process. They have to go through with the new environmental and it would kill the project currently. They are not going to do that. They would fig
And that's why I had the question is, just to reiterate what you said, the state is only going to give us five feet right now. But if we go down the road and say, hey, this is just not working, it's destroying this, we have the ability as a city to go back and modify that.
Do another environmental, show why we think it's all right and make the change.
Correct. And that would be during the process before they build it. No, no, no, no.
They have to put it in the way it is. Yeah, that's the thing.
So then why? But once it's in, I don't know why we have to go in an environment. Once they turn it over to us, it's our city street and it's our island. We can tear the thing out if we wanted to.
Other than the harm it would do to relationship. You're correct. Correct.
Yeah, but that's, to your point, is we wouldn't have to go through, once it's ours, we can do what we want with it.
I just wanted to let council know, and you, Mayor, I also spoke to Devin Squire, and very much the same kind of questions, and I asked why environmentally we had to do this, because there are no prairie dogs out there in that location, whatever it was. And I kind of got a similar answer to what you stated, and it's much more on a national level. I do want to say, and I express this to some people I spoke with, this is over a $100 million project, and we are not going to return that money because of a median. What we need to do is see if we can find a solution, and I think that's what's brought
Russell, is there anything you wanted to add to the discussion tonight?
Well, this is one of the things that we were just mentioning over here, and I'm sorry to interrupt you, is how did we get here when we've had a bazillion public meetings for discussion and input and so forth, and clearly this is something that is going to have an impact one way or another on the businesses. Anyway, but we are at a position where I think we just need to move forward, get rid of the five feet or seven feet or whatever it is so that you can get your trucks in there, and then we'll figure out a way to mitigate losses going forward one way or another. I promise you I'm going to wor
So that was the truck with the pup, right? It's longer than the pup.
Kent, to answer his previous question, do you know when the final, whatever rendition of the design we're on now, do you know when that one was adopted? When was this decision, yep, this is it, finally, we're done, stamp it, move it along?
Well, there's been changes in it since then.
I was just going to say, I know there's been some changes. I think maybe one of the frustrations, and I know, Kent, we're directing this to you, and you're not UDOT. Unfortunately, you're the representative there trying to interpret for UDOT. But in talking to Mr. Jenkins today, one of his frustrations was that as property owners, they were not notified of these public meetings. Now, we sent out stuff on our website, and we did various publications to try and get people there. I went to two of them. But I guess my question is, does UDOT not have a standard for if it's affecting your property,
So the U3 that talked to the state UDOT representative, did you express the frustration of not communicating and what was the response there? Because that's frustrating. I feel for them if they've tried for six months and haven't gotten a response. I didn't bring that up in my discussions.
I did. brought up this modeling I said they told us in the meeting they've been asking for a modeling to show the bigger truck can make it since April and there hasn't been anything he forwarded me an email that last communication was April with the old model in it and then I pointed out to him like that's the point this isn't the model they're asking for so I did I expressed the frustration is there a possibility that Devin could be at a next action meeting so where we can channel our questions and our concerns to a UDOT representative instead of Kent
Why don't we give you his phone number and you call him directly?
Okay. That's just the hard reality. This stage in the game, the city, the state will not modify that project. It will delay the entire interchange project.
Russell, I shared something with Eric this afternoon, this morning, whenever it was, because we have a similar frustration. on one of the design elements from the city standpoint. Both the mayor and I are very concerned about a location of a detention pond. And it's in the plans, it is done, we can change it. Now, when we take over the project, we're gonna try and go back and get that changed and pipe the water in the right direction. But it's done, and we're stuck with that. And we're not happy about it.
I think it's in writing. It'll be in the minutes.
I mean, I think we're willing to have that conversation.
For sure. I mean, I think all of us are willing to reevaluate that once the project's completed.
To that point, Russell, whether we put it in writing or you have the same right to bring anything before this council, whether we tell you we put it in writing or not. So we can put it in writing and say, yeah, you have the right to bring this back and we'll look at it another day. But us putting that in writing is no different than you just calling her and putting it on the agenda and coming to us anyway. The answer is yes.
Other than that, we're going to have a conversation.
Yeah, we'll have the conversation, of course.
It definitely is the answer to that. Okay. Well, probably not as frustrated as you are. I'm not the one that has business. Yes, definitely not as frustrated as you are. Okay. But I empathize with the frustration.
At least from my perspective, we hope that it works and it doesn't kill your business and that it's going to be fine. And hopefully when they get it in, that's the case and we don't need to do a traffic study and it'll be good. So that's the optimistic view.
Things are not as good or as bad as they initially seem. That's what I'm hoping.
I think what everybody's saying is that we are willing to take a look at this once this massive project is finalized without any interruptions so that we can get all the other benefits as opposed to stopping it now for this thing. Does that make sense? And then afterwards, we'll give it a whirl. I promise you we will. Thank you, Russell. Thank you. Thank you.
do we, sorry, before they do step away though, let's, we, as far as the five feet thing, do we want them to analyze this now that they have it? If he wants to come back and say, Hey, the five feet would be good. Just go to Kent with that information.
Well, the motion I would say would be appropriate here would be for council to make a motion to ask for that
I wouldn't limit it to five. I'd just give it to Kent to say what we need.
Please take this and see if we can make that turn as usable as possible.
Mayor, with that, I would move that we direct Kent, our city engineer, to work with the Jenkins on letting them analyze the data that has been given to them and UDOT and work on a plan to shorten that island by however many feet is needed to make it good for their truck.
I'll second that. I have a motion and a second. All in favor? Okay. So we'll do the best we can to get it as good of a turn radius as possible for now.
Okay. Next one is to consider bids for the covered outdoor arena project at the Cross Hollow Event Center.
I'm assuming the only reason this is... Oh, there he is.
Okay, I make a motion that we award the bid as stated. We need to make Scott come up with stock first.
He loves talking in public. It's his favorite thing.
Well, but the reason it's on action is because we were talking about the funding, right? Right. No, we were talking about the impact. The bid's funded.
So what was the motion then? So I make a motion that we approve the bid for the covered outdoor arena project. Second.
Mayor, I haven't voted yet. Oh. And my reason for this is not the bid, not the project. It's just that I'm concerned about the location, and I remain concerned about the location. And once we do this, and once the building's up, we can't move it.
So you have to have a warm-up arena next to the other arena. Where are you going to put it? Why not the back side? There's no room on the back side. Why isn't there?
Plus there's a whole bunch of elevation.
You're going to have to do $100,000 of excavation to get on the back side. The hill coming off the back of the arena. That's the perfect spot because you're in between both arenas, the indoor and the outdoor. But what I'm saying about you won't even be able to see the arena.
Can I ask you a question, Scott? Yeah. What is your specific concern with the locality?
My specific concern is what the optics are of having an outdoor rodeo arena at the Iron Rangers Arena, and you can't see the arena.
Have you ever been there when there's no, you can't see it when there's a rodeo anyway.
I guess you're right. There's so many vehicles and trailers. You're right.
Stuff stacked all the way to cross all the way.
But, Scott, I will say this. Nelson and Cox, you're so wise on so many things.
But your concern is noted, and you can vote against it still if you'd like to.
No, no, because I'm not against the project. Yeah, I know. So I will vote aye. Okay.
Mayor, I do have one point that I want to talk about this real quick. This project is kind of what brought it to life, and it's not on the agenda, so if we need to put it on the agenda. I am still concerned. I know in this situation we talked about the impact fees and the transportation. Oh, yeah, I forgot there were two separate items. Thank you.
You're OK. You can start it. We're now on item 13 about impact fees.
Yeah, 12 is done. Mike, my concern here as far as this is, I just want to give this as an example. We kind of try, citywide, especially when it comes to impact fees, we throw everything under the same hat. So they're in the same basket. So I wanted to, let's say for example, I owned a big factory and I had a hundred employees and I added a 33,000 square foot addition to my factory and I only added five employees. I'm not adding much more transportation, but that same factory, because they happen to be commercial, they're going to get charged $84,915 in an impact fee.
Okay. So it's not office square footage?
My question is do they even know that big book of uses exists and that they have that right to essentially appeal it?
Did we have someone look at it and try to whittle this down?
So who wrote this book? all the smart engineers.
So, Mayor, if I make a motion, which I'm ready to do, to not waive anything, because I don't think any of us... That's what's on our agenda. That does not eliminate the opportunity for them to reevaluate the amount and possibly lower it. Make that as part of your motion.
Okay. So then what I'll do is, Mayor, I move that we deny the waiving a portion or all of the impact fee for the new covered outdoor arena. But that the city will cover it. But that the city will cover it and that we will continue to work to see if. For what that is.
Any opposed? You're still getting your arena, Scott. Don't worry.
And Gina's not paying for the impact fees. Okay, number 14, consider resolution amending the city's personnel policy.
Just remind me. When they leave our employment. When they leave employment.
Did you get any feedback from department heads and employees staff on these changes?
I just wondered if she got any feedback from division heads and employees and she said no news so no news is good news so I guess we nailed it.
Councilman Phillips. I just wanted to make a comment and then perhaps propose something before we get into motions and discussions and things. First of all, I want you to know that I greatly respect each and every one of you and you can see that what makes our city stronger, I think, is that we have many voices and out of many voices come, I hope, wise decisions that sometimes we all have to move and compromise a bit on and hopefully the best decisions rise to the top. At least that's the intent, right? And I particularly want to thank Councilman Gallon and Councilman Cox for their hours of wo
One quick question I have on this. I think he's picking the January 1. This all takes into effect January 1, correct?
So to your point then, Councilman Phillips, the past employees, the current employees versus the new ones, that would also take effective...
whenever the new policy is. And I think January 1, if it's better for HR to do it now, that's fine too. I just don't know what that appropriate time would be.
On your end, does that cause a lot of an issue to have past employees on one program and new employees on a little bit of another?
I mean, it's a pretty simple thing, I think, but. I mean, we're gonna have different caps on them, I believe, so. Yeah, you will. Councilman. Yeah, we have different.
Councilman Schmidt. Okay, I talked to a couple department heads on this. I'd like to stay at 120. I think 120 is fair. We have some areas around the state that are 40, some are 80. We are by far on the higher end of things at 120. There's very few that are higher than we are. I don't like a split between existing employees and new employees. I think we should be 120 across the board.
I would agree that we just leave it the way that we got to this.
One of the concerns I had when we talked about this in the committee and how high that is, is trying to find a number that actually helps the departments to function in what should be normal working processes. And you've got to remember, they worked time, and now we're paying them time and a half in taking that time off. So if we have high amounts of that that we want them to use every year or are creating policy to allow them to use every year, I think the more rational argument would be if we're bumping up against that 120 consistently in departments, then we probably are understaffed and we
But as a city, we also run 24 hours a day. We don't have Eight to five.
Exactly. And there's emergencies that happen, right? That's why you have them for fire or police. If somebody calls out sick, you've got to cover the shift still, right? But I think that 120 is a very reasonable number to be able to make sure that those kinds of emergencies can be covered. And to push it higher encourages opportunities to build time when do we need them to be building that time. It's just the way I look at it. I feel like it's a fair number that allows us to function and run efficient effectively and so it's good. Waldo first and then back to Carter.
I kind of appeal to the softer side of my heart when searching for it and was there a couple hours ago but then I have had the unfortunate experience of digging into some of these The practices that have generated some of these numbers, and I'll say it, I don't know if it's politically correct or not to say it, but there's a bit of abuse of this adopted bad habit that has taken place to fund whatever. I'm not gonna get into the specifics, I can if you want me to, but I won't in this meeting. And I think the effect of those abuses have been reflected in an extra cost to the citizens of our city
So going along, we've had a lot of discussions of this as this week has gone on, and I do feel there's kind of two sides to this. One, the city has a very robust, in my opinion, as I've mentioned, I think this is a very robust and good time off policy, benefit package, whatever you want to call it, that in the past we've maybe had to be better than others just because of pay, and so, but I think in the years as we've worked hard to increase pay to try and make us more comparable with others, the private sector and public sector, We don't need to be as robust in this. That's why I'm fine at 120
Not when you just want to work overtime.
You just want to work overtime, yeah. You want to take a shorter lunch. We want our employees, we all have worked many hours in our personal lives. We know the effects of burnout. And as an employer, we don't want our employees to burnout. We want them to take their time off. We want them to take their lunches like they're supposed to so that they're more productive when they are working. And so I do share that major concern of people They count on this and they maybe work it to their advantage other than what it's initially intended for. So I'm honestly still torn between the two. I could go
Councilman Phillips. Mayor, I think in light of conversation and the feelings of my colleagues that I'm going to withdraw the attempted motion on the 160 because I don't think it's going to pass.
But thank you for the discussion. And I agree with you 100%. Fair discussion. Absolutely. As we have them, that's what makes us better. Sure. Fair discussion. So thank you for bringing it up.
With that, I'll make the motion that we adopt the resolution. He made a motion. No, he drew it. Oh, you drew your motion.
I never had the motion. Okay, I apologize.
Before you do, Robert, I think Phil had a comment.
Did you have something to say, Phil? No. I was just telling Councilman Phillips, fair job.
Yeah, absolutely, and I think it's fair. So I would make a motion that we adopt the resolution with the changes that she outlined and adopt this resolution.
I'll second that. I have a motion and a second. This one's a resolution, so we get to start a roll call with Carter. Aye. Aye. Aye.
Aye. Thank you, thanks for all your work. Natasha, I've said it a million times, I'm gonna say it a million one. Thank you. Thank you so much.
He spent a lot of time with us, so thank you.
Okay, last agenda item is public comment. Anybody here tonight that wants to share something with us? Now is your time. I will restate them just so that everyone remembers, or if you haven't been here before, I have a little beeper here. Three minutes is what we allocate per comment. You'll hear it when it goes off, but thank you for being here. State your name as well.
That'll be completely changed. There'll be two left turn lanes.
So, Mr. Jessup, what you're referring to is what we call stacking. You want to make sure the stacking is adequate in the left-hand lane so that they don't stack into the through lanes. Exactly.
And I think we do have some concerns in some areas out there. There are. At the lights, I think they've got double lanes to where they'll...
But that's the term is for stacking in those left lanes. It's a very fair comment.
And there's two lanes to stack for the left turn, so you can do a U-turn or turn in, so it should... We're hopeful it's way better. Based on the NETA and all the engineers we paid, it should be sufficient.
And if you're interested, if this is something you just like, just so you're aware, if you Google the South Interchange Cedar City. UDOT's page will pull up to have like a map of what it's designed to look like. If it's something you're just interested in.
There's no signage there on those maps at this point. I don't remember seeing any signage that says no U-turns or U-turns. No, not the signage, but it shows the lanes.
That's a good comment. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much for taking time.
While we're talking about that, Mayor, I will say I spoke with Chief Adams today. At all those lights, they are all designated left-hand turns, I mean U-turns, until we as a council, we're the only ones that can designate a no U-turn. He can't do it. So if we do want to say no U-turns anywhere, it has to come before this body. Well, that will hurt the businesses. No, I agree. That's what I'm saying. So there was just a lot of talk last week of no U-turns.
You deserve to be up here. You're every week.
I told you, Bill, that I was not going to be there.
You give us something like that, and they're going to try to get you in the water, too.
Was this a polar plunge in October? Where was this polar plunge?
It was at the city park. Good work, Chief, good work.
I was in Canada, I was out of the country. Anybody else? Yeah, come on up, Scott.
And to that point, there's no more traffic going in between there, so they don't have to go through all the cars and traffic to get to one side and the other.
That's kind of how it is now, though, with the addition, right? There's no traffic.
So they don't have to go through the crowds and the cars and stuff to get from one barn to another is my point.
Hold on, Scott. Go ahead, Phil. We'd like to know, I was talking with Robert about this, and you know as well as all of us, when we're having a livestock show or whatever, the air gets pretty bad. So I would like you to get to us the number of vents or fans that need to be upgraded or that are not working, and also, and I'm going to talk to a couple of Plumber is about putting some more cross fans, vent fans on one side, a fan on the other side to see if we can't do something to clean up that arena because it's just way too bad when we have all those livestock kids and everybody in there. It's
So those north fans I don't think work at all, right? The ones on the north?
Not the north ones. I'm talking about the old part of the building. South? No, on the north side so we can pull it out of the old part when all the animals are there for the stock show. Oh, are they swamp coolers? They used to be exit fans, didn't they?
But we need to do something because it is bad. Yeah. So can you give us or get with me or Robert and let's get this figured out and what we got to do and I'll get some prices and some sizes and let's see if we can't get a lot better ventilation east, west, north, south.
I will say this, though. If we didn't have Councilman Phillips to worry about the pure aesthetics of things, we would be a much uglier city. So somebody has to worry about the aesthetics. We leave that up to him because that's your major concern. My phone's on all the time.
I just want you to know, we were there last weekend for the Pumpkin Festival, and your crew couldn't have been better. They were there for every issue, every problem, and they were jumping on the spot, so kudos. In fact, I said to Colin, I said, does Scott ever give you a day off? He said, I might get Sunday afternoon off if I'm real good.
If you give me a call sometime later this week or first part of next week or whatever, and I'd be happy to go with you and take a look at some of this stuff and kind of see what we can do.
You bet that'd be great and thank you for your vision out there you have made this a very welcoming and you've brought so many activities in that has benefited this city in this community so thank you for your vision and for what's going on out there amen so thank you appreciate that thank you just getting started so yeah I just heard him say he's got another 15 years anybody else
Mayor, I would move that we adjourn this action meeting. Second.
Thank you. Good job. Not even 7 o'clock. I'll try. Good job, Robert, on the policy. I know it was huge.
These excerpts are remarks by officials whose identity a person confirmed, from a transcript generated automatically from the official public meeting video and presented unedited. Accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.