Planning Committee - Regular Meeting
The Development Review Committee approved a record plat amendment, two development plan revisions, and recommended approval of a revised district development plan to the City of Lyndon.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Planning Committee
- Meeting Type
- Planning Committee
- Location
- Louisville, KY
- Meeting Date
- September 16, 2026
Published excerpts
Only published remarks appear here. The full transcript is not published.
35 sections (from 38 segments)
I'll start by reading the opening statement. This is a regular meeting of the Louisville Metro Review Committee to hear cases as documented for the meeting today. Public notice has been provided and materials have been available for review by the public. Following rules are in place for today's meeting. Number one, please silence all cell phones. Number two, please be courteous and respectful of the committee and your fellow citizens. Number three, for those participating virtually, chat messages are not part of the record and are not monitored by all members. Please refrain from sending messa
Okay, the minutes first thing on the agenda number one is the 9 to 26 DRC minutes.
Yes. Under new business number 226 implant 0018 record plat amendment. Sydney Fawcett.
Thank you. Commissioners, any more questions for Sydney?
All right. We don't have anybody signed up. Is there anyone here that wishes to speak for or against this? Is there anyone in line? Okay. I your thoughts commissioners.
All right. Any other further comments? Someone would like to make a motion?
All sick. Properly made motion and second roll call.
Next on the agenda item number 326 DDP 0038 in Sydney again.
This is going back to them for final approval, right?
Okay, any other questions for them. Either one of them. All right. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else who would like to speak on this case? We don't have anyone to stand up. Is there anyone online? No. Okay. We'll move to deliberation. I, you know, Mint Julep Tours has been around since bourbon tourism started, I think. And they run a good ship. I'm glad to see they've grown to six buses.
I've been on a couple of their tours and they pretty much pick up people that are here in town at the hotel or at someone's house or whatever.
second. Properly made motion in second roll call.
I'll second. Probably made motion, second, roll call.
All right. Item number four on the agenda, 26 DDP0046. And Zach Jones.
Okay. Any other questions? Emily, thank you.
Any other questions? Thank you. Any discussion? Anyone else here wants to speak for or against this? Is there anyone online? Okay. Commissioners, what do you think?
Second. Properly made motion. Second roll call, please.
Yes. Okay, case approved. Case number five today on the agenda is 26 DDP0033, Revised Detailed District Development Plan, Catherine Gomez.
Okay. Any questions? All right. Thank you very much. Sophia, can you clear, put a light on this?
So how many units are going to be there?
So in proving what they're talking about,
I didn't remember from what I read, but now that you're discussing it, I do. And... You know, I see the problem was the old plan basically not enacted. So he's come up with a new plan to make this squared away. So he'd be non-compliant. But he needs the plan approved before he can do it. I understand that.
Well, they parked in right in the driveway, right?
So, just so I'm clear on this, there's six available parking places, right? And what is the correct standard by, you know, is it six or is it eight?
It's allowable. We're not making any special.
And Jay do we let's move forward and we'll put this in discussion do we have anything else for Sophia.
Wait, hold on a minute. Can you identify your full name and your address?
Okay, you can proceed with what you're going to say.
Okay. Any questions to Joe from Christianers? All right. Thank you very much, Joe. You're welcome. Do we have anyone else speaking in favor of it? Jonathan, is that you? You wrote neutral here. Well, come on down. I think there's no one else here wanting to speak. You want to address us? First, full name and what your address is.
All right, Sophia, you want to address this on your rebuttal?
Any other questions for Sophia? All right. Thank you very much. And Jonathan, I guess you want to come back up and I just wanted to verify that you felt like your questions were answered or at least addressed.
And I really sympathize with what you're saying, but then again, you're penalizing. I mean, I don't know what we could go on to say. You can't improve your property because it's so bad that, um. I mean, I just don't.
In many subdivisions have been involved with. You see nice amenities turn into problem areas in communities, but you know it always boils down to the rights of the people that live there. You know it's a tough question it's it's not fully answerable, but eventually You know, it just resolves the people that live there if they tolerate it or not. And you obviously don't. And hopefully that's the direction that these new people would take because they don't approve their property to have a nice sitting place overview in the park. So it's a delicate question for us to resolve.
Yeah, I think it does. I appreciate your candor with this. And I think that's what the next-door neighbor is looking for is someone that's concerned and going to look after their property more than anything. Yes. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you. We'll move back into deliberation. Remarks. Commissioners.
Second. Sovereignly made motion and second. Roll call, please.
These excerpts are remarks by officials whose identity a person confirmed, from a transcript generated automatically from the official public meeting video and presented unedited. Accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.