City Council - Regular Meeting

Salt Lake County
Tuesday, September 8, 2026

The West Valley City Council denied a proposed single-source towing contract, opting to maintain the current rotation system for local businesses. The Council also rejected an amendment to a development agreement for senior condos, while unanimously approving parking restrictions on Erin Hill Lane for safety.

About this meeting

Government Body
City Council
Meeting Type
City Council
Location
West Valley City, UT
Meeting Date
September 8, 2026

Published excerpts

Only published remarks appear here. The full transcript is not published.

9 sections

1:17 – 1:56•Cindy Wood

Thanks, Mayor Protan. Yesterday was the first Monday in September, and it was also Labor Day. When I was young, I know my parents always taught me that it was a day to recognize the hardworking people of our country. And it's a great day, and it also, to me, signifies kind of the end of summer. When I was growing up, school always started right around Labor Day. So I think we need to acknowledge the hardworkers in our country and in our city and in our state. that have made our lives better in so many different ways. So given that, let's all rise and repeat the Pledge of Allegiance.

2:38•Cindy Wood

I'll move to approve the minutes of August 25, 2026.

45:33 – 45:58•Cindy Wood

Yeah. I appreciate all those residents that came out. I drive through there as well, and it's an absolute nightmare. I feel your pain. So I'm glad that this is an option for our city to restrict parking, to make it safer and more accessible for your subdivision and others throughout the city. We've done it before and it works. And so anybody else have a comment?

46:28 – 46:51•Cindy Wood

One more thing that I think Steve's here, but the comment from the gentleman with that commercial building, I mean, we can't do anything with this, but would they be restricted for letting their customers park out there? Because it'd be on the north and the west side for the restrictions, but that building is on, the access is on the south side.

48:25•Cindy Wood

I'll go ahead and make a motion. Move to approve. My computer's booting, so maybe somebody else better make the motion.

1:07:34 – 1:08:19•Cindy Wood

Cindy? Yeah, I just have another comment. So regardless of how I vote for this resolution, I have total confidence in our staff that whatever information they provided adheres to state regulations. I trust them, and I mentioned that to people that contacted me when they wanted to debate rates and things. It's like we rely on our city attorney. We rely on our police department. So I am in support of them. I understand why this was brought, and I just wanted it to be made known. Whatever the outcome is or how I vote, I do support our city staff, and they do the best job that they can do, and I a

1:16:13 – 1:16:30•Cindy Wood

So I have another question, Steve. So before this was approved, it would have been the RE zone here because of the size of the acreage. So at the time that the 55 plus came, that was a zone change.

1:16:34 – 1:17:16•Cindy Wood

I voted against it on planning commission and I'd rather see our E zone be here then. Because I also, I remember the residents coming in and they were concerned about traffic and all of that. So I, and the other thing is we have denied changing development agreements just in the year and a half. I've been on the council and I was, I'm don't know that I agree with that, but I understand it. And, to me if we start amending development agreements, it's just gonna blow up on us. And so I have strong feelings towards that. It's nothing about you, but that's my, you know, that's how I feel.

1:17:22•Cindy Wood

Yeah, I'd move to deny ordinance or resolution 26-101. Do we have a second?

These excerpts are remarks by officials whose identity a person confirmed, from a transcript generated automatically from the official public meeting video and presented unedited. Accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.