Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

And we're ready to go okay. Call the meeting to order can I have a roll call please.

We have a set of minutes from August 1820 26 regular meeting doing your motion Mister chair.

Yes, Mr. Jasper. I make a motion to approve the minutes as submitted.

We have a motion to approve. Do I have a second? Second. We have a second by Mr. McKeon. Any discussion? Seeing none, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed the same. And the approval passes. I'm assuming we don't have any audience participation.

Oh, right. I thought I was accurate about that. That brings us up to a variance petition number 26-34VZ, PAM Health Menace Signs. The staff is Nicole Tremblay, the agent is Kathy Song, Titan Sign Company. This is a quasi-judicial hearing. I do have a memorandum to read. This is to certify that the public hearing for this petition was appropriately advertised on August 15, 2026, as required by the City of Venice Land Development Code. Proof of publication is on file in the Planning and Zoning Office. And with that, I will open the public hearing. And can I ask the attorney to question the membe

And with that. There's been a request for a continuance on this one.

Okay with that do I hear a motion. Yes, Mister McCann.

A motion to continue variance petition number 36 test 34 BC to the next regularly scheduled planning Commission meeting on September 15th at the regularly scheduled meeting time.

We have a motion to approve the continuous by Mister McKeon do I have a second. The second by Mister Irwin. Any further discussion. Seeing none can we have a vote please. And that passes unanimously. The next two are very similar, so if there's no objection from Madam Attorney, I'll just run these simultaneously. All right, thank you. So we'll do both of these. I will, at the end, need two separate motions on the petitions. The first one is design alternative petition number 26-39DA. Lightning Fast Car Wash. The staff is Brittany Smith, the agent is Jackson Boone, the owner is 2001 Laurel, LLC

Okay. And we confirm speaker cards have been completed by all those who offer testimony. And with that, Brittany, take it away.

Thank you. Any other questions for me. Thank you ma'am appreciate it.

Any questions for Mr. Boone? Looks like you did a really good job. Thank you. Thank you, sir. And the audience participation signed up on this one, thank you. And I'm assuming no additional staff comments. Thank you. All right you with that close the public hearings and I will need to separate motions. So the first one. They will have a moot hope to excuse me construction, yeah. The first one is going to be for design alternative petition number 26-39DA. Yes, sir. Mr. McCann.

Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony and evidence provided, double P, during the public hearing, the planning commission sitting as local planning agency finds this petition complies with the design alternative criteria in section 1.11.3 of the land development code and therefore moves to approve design alternative petition number 26-39DA.

I have a motion to approve by Mister McKeon do I have a second. And Mister Hale will be our second. We have a motion and a second. Is there any additional discussion? Seeing none, can I have a vote please? And that one passes unanimously. And that will then bring us to site and development plan petition number 26-25SP. Do I hear a motion? Yes, Mister Jasper.

Based on review of the application materials, the staff report and testimony and evidence provided during the public hearing, the Planning Commission, sitting as a local planning agency, finds this petition complies with the land development go including these decision criteria in section one point 9.4 and therefore moves to approve site and development plan partition number 26 dash 25 SP.

Thank you we have a motion to approve by Mister Jasper do I hear a second.

And we have a second by Mr. Hale. We have a motion to second. Any further discussion? Seeing none, can I have a vote, please? And that one also passes unanimously.

I was at that meeting also and I see there's one of our former petitions is coming back to us.

I have a curiosity question okay. On the vehicle routing exhibits that could show the site plan. Do they assume that the parking spots are all empty when they do that analysis or and the reason I ask is occasionally the red line gets very very very close to a parking spot. So I was just it's a curiosity question my educational curiosity question.

But I was just curious because you picked up. Ford 350 as the typical vehicle, and those are large vehicles, especially if they have a trailer hitch hanging out behind them. It adds an extra footer so it can lift in a car.

Thank you. Any other questions for Roger? No. Any other comments by the commissioners? Seeing none, we are adjourned. Yeah, but I knew it would be a pretty quick one today.