Planning Commission - Regular Meeting
The Planning Commission approved conditional use permits for two cannabis dispensaries, including a new storefront for Embarc Hanford and a transfer for STEEZY, despite public and commissioner concerns regarding parking and safety for the new location. Additionally, an amendment for Sensory Rock to add an outdoor play area was approved, and an annexation request was continued.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Planning Commission
- Meeting Type
- Planning Commission
- Location
- Hanford, CA
- Meeting Date
- August 25, 2026
Published excerpts
Only published remarks appear here. The full transcript is not published.
36 sections
Planning Commission meeting dated August 25th. Roll call.
public comment this is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of the commission this is also the public's opportunity to request an item from the consent calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda comments related to public hearing items will be heard at that time item is discussed. The maximum of time is three minutes allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your residence, city of residence. Seeing no comments needed. yes yes none the approval
I move to approve the minutes from July 28th.
Having been recommended and seconded, the minutes are approved. And then roll call, please, Ms. Dinah.
Yes. Public hearing? First agenda item. This is time to... We'll take the general business item. Yes. Yes. Sorry, I skipped down. Under general business, community development, cannabis retail business approval process.
Can you clarify how many storefronts are operational right now?
We open public hearing. Item A, Community Development Condition Use Permit, number 0071, Act 26, a request by Embark and Hanford to permit a cannabis business to operate a storefront dispensary for retail of cannabis products at 610 West 7th Street in the MXD Downtown Mixed Use Zone District. APN 012, Act 061, Act 007.
I have questions. thought I saw it in there but I when I went back to look I couldn't find it do we know where the employees will be parking I believe in the rear of the building the rear of the building okay So they had, in their executive summary, they had detailed how there's 10 dedicated spots. That's great for customer convenience. When I looked at the building plans, it did not have any rear entry. So the handicap spot and any parking in the rear aren't really customer convenient. So that would leave parking only in front of the building. So they do talk about... parking being available
I do have an additional question, just like it's similar to what Commissioner McQueen mentioned. So it's like, how the missing back door impacts the emergency egress and accessibility plans?
Yeah, I mean, I think in part of the plans, they were not.
There's only the delivery door on the plans, which is closed off. So if there's people inside the building, the only way out would be through the front because all of it's locked down.
I'll open the public comment portion of the public hearing. I will now open the public portion of the public hearing. We take comments from those in favor first. Five minutes will be allowed for each speaker. Please state your name for the record. We cannot require a name if a person refuses. Anyone opposed wish to, I'm sorry, we'll stay with the in favor of. Anybody in favor that wants to make comments?
Generally speaking, are you talking about where the stereo shop is right now? Yes. Okay. Generally speaking, it's the property owner's responsibility to lease their parking lots and... No, no, I'm not saying that part.
If you have towing signs as a property owner, you can tow.
Go ahead, sir. Please step up. State your name and city of residence, please.
I think that's a question for staff. It is a question for staff. Jason?
Is there anybody who wishes to also talk, not in favor of? No. Correct.
Seeing none, we'll move on to the next item.
Need a motion for the item? Somebody? Go ahead.
I move to adopt Resolution Number 482617, approving Conditional Use Permit Number 007126. Do I have a second?
The motion has been adopted, has been recommended for approval. Full call, please.
i don't believe we meet number five of the cup findings so i'm voting no i'll also vote no due to the loitering yes
So. move on to item a in the public hearing this is the community developed conditional use permit number zero zero seven zero two six request for sensory rock to amend conditional use permit number two zero one eight zero eight allow the construction of a new outdoor play area at two four zero North Irwin Street in the mixed downtown Use Zone District APN 012, TAC 052, TAC 004. Anybody wishing to speak in favor? Please come forward. I'm sorry. Staff report, please. Sorry.
Does the Commission have any questions regarding this report?
course since this falls into the historic overlay zone and City Council is going to review that or consider that historic resource permit next week I believe September 1st if we approve it today and they don't approve it does that make our vote void
Any other commission comments? I open the public comment portion for this part of the hearing. Anybody in favor? Want to speak? Seeing none, any opposed? For recommendation, motion.
Yes. We will move into Item C, Community Development Condition Use Permit number 0066, TAC 26. A request to allow a new storefront retail cannabis dispensary business within the existing building in MXD downtown mixed-use zone district. The proposed project is located at 104 North Doughty Street, APN 012-054-001. Staff report, please.
Does the Commission have any questions for the staff report that was just presented? No.
I do. This one also falls in the historic overlay zone. Are there regulations on the window coverings and signage that they have to have approved before they come to the Planning Commission?
Right. So does it not already have frosted windows?
Any other questions or questions? Thank you. I will now open the public comment portion of the public hearing. We'll take comments from those in favor first. Five minutes will be allowed for each speaker. Anybody in favor of? Please come forward. Seeing none. Anyone opposed to address the council? Seeing none. I will now close the public comment. And I have a recommendation for a motion, please.
Motion has been made and seconded. Roll call, please.
Yes. Yes. Next item is Community Development Continuation Request for Annex 167. Request to annex approximately 16.65 acres into the City of Hamlet limits from the Kings County area to the southeast. Now proposed to be developed at this time 2.7 acres. Residential 5.08 and RM medium density residential 8.3, consistent with the general plan designation. Entity subdivision map 00023, TAC 26, parent 952, parent, a request to subdivide 13.44 acres of the annexation into 74 single family resident lots. mitigation negative decoration number two zero two six tax seven three request to certify is MD a
The motion's been made and seconded. Roll call, please.
Thank you. Thank you. Commissioner's items of interest at this time. Any commissioner may ask a question for clarifications of matters within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction, make an announcement, or report briefly on activities in their role as Planning Commissioner. In addition, subject to the Planning Commission's handbook commissioners may request to report back to the Planning Commission at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter within the commissioners jurisdiction GC 5495 sorry let me start that again GC 54954.2
Okay. Any other commissioners? So thank you very much for your time. Meeting is adjourned.
These excerpts are remarks by officials whose identity a person confirmed, from a transcript generated automatically from the official public meeting video and presented unedited. Accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.