Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

All right. Joint planning commission for the month of October. All the commissioners are present. Uh this is our information where we'll have the applicant come up. Let us know what you're looking for. Uh there'll be questions from the board to the applicant just clarifying any questions we might have. We'll just now have a small discussion commissioners at that time and then we will open it up a like favor of the proposal if anybody would like to speak against the proposal and then if necessary applicants we then for two weeks do our own research come back two weeks and then make our decision. That being said that's not by ordinance. So if it is a straightforward um thing that we feel could get out tonight, we will do so.

All right. First item on the agenda is review and approve complaint from September 3rd. From third meeting minutes as presented, we have a motion to approve. Do we have a second?

All those in favor? I opposed. Motion carries. Next item on the agenda is from the web family on road number 288005B. Uh somebody know [Music]

my name is Austin1. I'm here today half and also joining us today jump. [Music] It's a 38 acre parcel that Patricia and Web have had own for the last 30 years 1988. They had dreams building homeless property since they were first and since that hasn't come to fruition to buildings. So I'll talk a little bit about how it the zone to permit why it's not buildable and why request approval is appropriate.

So I think it's roughly page eight. I'll let you know when this not your own is there. Just go back one.

Thank you. So as you can see mostly parcel is the resource conservation district. A principal per mill in this area is single family. We also have that corner that's zone 81. So not single family use but it does permit. out. We're starting with uh the ability to build a single family dwelling on C2 property, but it's notable because due to the property street, a minimum of 50 ft. And so unique about this property is it actually road at all. You can kind of see just north of that right that yellow strip is another property and that's what LA road has agreement that's with the county uh that gives access to road um do you mind scrolling down pages [Music]

keep going yes right there this is uh in your practice as well you know this bottom image kind of gives you an idea of what So property outlined red outlined in yellow and then the east agreement they have about that property is blue. So the east itself is 66 ft wide but we're actually bus that red should be moved up. just wanted to see where we're connected. So we would need to extend an additional 17 ft north to reach that 50 foot minimum requirement. So that's why the first note to look at as it is position why we're here today why we're asking for and why we need the commission permission to miss a single family home to be built that has access to a public road with only 33 ft requirement so we understand process that we have the three step out so I'm going to briefly a bunch of those. Um, so we must show that code property. I think we're all also certainly like not something that itself is unique. The second thing we need to show is that unnecessary present. As I discussed before, the current zoning does C2 area and they're not able to have that exercise right to build that property that type of building property

and that's just um if you could go back a couple [Music] more Perfect. This is a map out of the Wal County 2050 comprehensive landing plan and this was adopted in 2019 as probably more than I. Uh so most of that is currently z C2 is natural resource area and this area uh is permitted in the comprehensive plan to have zoning. So could be in a natural resources area. It just build and that southwestern corner that is current residential rural orision to be at least rural resial district to be specific. So both uh current zoning and future zoning is u contemplates single is amended use preventing the use the tax and overall value of property that are facing the third in the test show interest. There's plenty of things I could probably be with public interest because of the current and zoning. It really goes along with the vision that the town has and the websites are happy to fill that vision.

I'm going to make you just one more time. Uh maybe more. Let's see. I mean, yes, right there. Um so this is again visual. Uh we haven't built a lot of research, but one area of consideration is up at the top that red one. So you can see there's plenty of room not only in this area but about a 38 acre parcel to build res that will impact the neighbors. You know wherever they build there they're going to be surrounded by nature any additional robust landscape that they do to increase the fors will be there enhance the beauty of the area and along the character of property. Third, we have any uh construction that's on this property will be served by system. So there's not going to be any burdens in your neighbors or any either res is not going to [Music] be quite a few or a day be the norm. Last special time considering where the wet wetlands are and so we are already due wet wetlands and will properly comply with any erosion um requirements through those channels. So because we need to demonstrate that the compliance with the with the code prevented by the teachers that that we face unnecessary and the variance will not be interest. So simply put we're asking for the

commission for a single family only front of a road just shy 17 requirement. That's a little more than half the distance of football we may make.

Any doubt after allows here in downtown Detroit. So we believe this practical solution will serve to serve. So thank you for your time and are happy to address any questions you may have. I just when you bring up wetland, but it's not there's no there so there's notation done or anything.

No, not yet. Um something though that we look into I understand that. Um it just interesting that you brought out wetland and there is no donation on there. We've been in to make sure that we get there just beware. So that's just top of mind and to be a good hasn't performed yet hasn't done yet. Any other question?

Very very curious. Um the A1 property is that currently being and continue and then the exists is that the people on the end of that drive? Yes. Yeah. That that property next. It gives a little bit more right there. Sorry. Thank you. Gives you a little bit better idea that amen.

That's all I curious. Any other question for the applicant? Thank you. Uh just quick discussion among commissioners. I mean it's a 38. They're not asking for subdivision. They're asking for one another. And maybe this is this is a technicality. It's a 33t. My opinion. Correct. Correct. It's easy. You can build a house and do it to anybody else in this room except for him.

So, so there commissioners totally agree with you. I would audience like speak in favor of their proposal. Would anybody like speaking against the proposal though? I think we could take a motion. Motion to approve varants for taxp.

We have a motion to approve second. All those in favor I opposed. Motion carries. Is there any other business commissioners or public comments? We have one motion. Do we have a second? All those in favor?

I [Music]