Town Board - Regular Meeting

Okay. And you are Mr. Wilson.

Swear. You ready? We swear me in. Just wait.

You should be okay. So it's nine o'clock. What day are we today? Friday, May 28th.

And we're beginning the second session of reviews. at nine o'clock, 9.01. And the first thing I will do is swear in our assessor, Jeremy Baraka. Jeremy, do you solemnly affirm or swear that the information you're about to give will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your ability to do so?

I do.

Thank you. For the record, it's May 29th.

Okay, May 29th. That's for the record.

That's good. That's good. That's good. All right. So very nicely, we have our first person here a little bit ahead of time. So we'll go ahead and get started. And you are here representing Christy Wilson. Is that correct?

Yes. Yes, I am. She's not feeling well. She couldn't make it. I do have her hand right now. If you guys have authorization. If you guys need that, she just wrote that tax, an old tax map, actually. I'm sorry. Property map.

I'm going to take that. Let me swear at you.

Yes, yes. You solemnly affirm that in the profession you're about to be able to give an accurate and accurate point to the best of your ability. Yes. You're welcome.

Okay. So you have two things that are before us. One of the things we have done is we have split out on different properties. So we sort of have the lead on that.

Yes. Great.

Um, so Elaine, I think you're on the first one. So let's so um but what we normally at the process we normally go through we ask you to make the presentation okay then the lead person may have some questions and at the end we'll ask jeremy if he has any comments to make about what you have already presented okay great so this is on the record we're talking about the 12.2 acre parcel okay on deer haven lake as opposed to the other

Of the other parcel. Okay, so I'm going to just ask this now, and I've presented my five-minute presentation based on both the parcels that we're talking about. If that's okay, can I speak on that? Absolutely. Or would I have different timelines?

We may have different questions, but you'll have plenty of time.

Okay. So good morning, members of the board and town assessor. My name is Michael S. Wilson representing Christy Ann Person Wilson. I'm here to present the form formal legal arguments supporting the form RP-524, grievances for tax map ID 68.2-2-40, that'd be the 12.2 acres. and tax map ID 68.2-2-15, the 5.8 acres on Deerhaven Lane. The tentative assessments violate the statutory mandates of uniformity under New York State real property tax law sections 305 and 502. They completely ignore the statutory building codes under New York State Town Law Section 280-A. These errors constitute an illegal over-assessment based on documented administrative omission. I am requesting total reduction of $204,000 to restore statutory equity. Our first argument rests on RPTL, real property tax law section 305, which mandates that all real property must be assessed at uniform percentage of value. On May 22nd, my wife and I met with the town assessor. He admitted on the record that his office has completely overlooked the valuations of three directly adjoining parcels on our exactly.

You weren't listening.

Sorry.

Okay, sorry.

No, we apologize to you.

Oh, no. All right. Sorry. Okay, so the admission the May 22 2026 Myself and my wife met with the town assessor and he admitted on the record that his office completely overlooked the valuations of three directly adjoining parcels on our exact road when setting my tentative figures. This omission created an unconstitutional non-uniform assessment. Adjoining baseline properties to our properties, HACS ID numbers 68.2-2-47, 68.2-2-39.210, and 68.2-2-39.220. They carry an average land assessment of exactly 1,931 per acre, yet the assessor has valued my identical dirt on the same road at 10,000 per acre for tax map ID 68.2-2-15 and 15,655 per acre for tax map ID 68.2-2-40, 12.2 acres. Applying radically diverse valuation baselines to contiguous geographic tracts cannot stand as a matter of law. Furthermore, traditional arm's-length market comparables do not exist on these parcels because unmaintained private roads have destroyed the open market. They do not trade on MLS, therefore the town's own internal assessment road is the only valid baseline available to measure uniformity today. Furthermore, during our recorded meeting on May 22nd, the town assessor explicitly admitted on the record that this specific assessment is, and I quote, definitely wrong.

And- Excuse me, can you be specific to which assessment? Was it one or the other or both? when he said this assessment is wrong.

He said this assessment is definitely wrong on tax ID number 68.2-2-39.210, Mr. Delgado, 8.3 acres at $20,000 And 800 20,800 for 8.3 acres. That is specifically what he said. This is definitely wrong.

And that was on Delgado's parcel. One of your parcels.

That is correct.

And what's the, I'm sorry. What's the connection then. Okay.

I'm getting to that. I am getting to that, but I can be more specific. And thank you. When, when saying that. Okay. Okay. And in quotes, definitely got missed there. While the assessor stated it is on his list to be corrected next year. New York law does not allow the town to knowingly over assess, excuse me, over assess a property owner for 12 months based on admitted administrative oversight. The Board of Assessment Review has explicit legal authority and duty to correct this acknowledged error today. Our second argument involves a severe impairment on the land itself. The assessor has valued the parcels underneath the assumption that they are prime, immediately developable residential building sites. This is a severe legal error. Deerhaven Lane is unmaintained private right-of-way, which I have the agreement here. If you guys would like to see this, my wife just would like to copy back.

Yeah, I'll take a look.

Thank you. Deerhaven Lane is unmaintained private right-of-way. Under New York State Town Law Section 280-A, Subdivision 1, The town is strictly prohibited from issuing a building permit here. Furthermore, the road suffers from severe physical limitations. It is unmaintained. During the winter months, you absolutely require a four-wheel drive vehicle just to access the property. For instance, this winter was a bad winter. There was many of my neighbors with two-wheel drive. that moved up from the city and they couldn't get to their own properties because of the snow and unmaintained road. This lack of reliable year-round access creates an absolute roadblock for institutional financing. Traditional banks refuse to issue mortgages on land lacking compliance with town law section 280-A. By ignoring this defect, the assessor is valuing these parcels as if they can be financed easily In reality, eliminating 95% of the market forces a steep cash investor discount, destroying open market values under real property tax law section 305. To be perfectly clear, I would welcome the town to take over the dedication and maintenance of our private road. However, upgrading Deerhaven Lane to municipal standards, this would cost the town millions of dollars. To summarize, in conclusion, the current assessments violate RPTL Real Property Tax Law 305 uniformity, stem from admitted administrative oversight under Real Property Tax Law 502, and ignore statutory building prohibition law under Town Law 280-A. In conclusion, to bring these parcels into immediate compliance, I would request the Board to equalize both tracts to a uniform baseline of 2,500 per acre. Tax Map ID 68.2-2-40 reduced from 191,000 to 30,500. Tax map ID 68.2-2-15 reduced from 58,000 to 14,500. The statutory rules are absolute and the math cannot be defended. I respectfully ask the board to grant these reductions to make the town's assessed role legally correct. Please be aware that we have built a clear legal record today. If the board cannot fix this clear error, we are fully prepared to take the next legal step and file an Article 7 lawsuit against the town and the New York State Supreme Court. We truly hope to resolve this mistake locally today without forcing the town to spend public tax dollars defending an unequal assessment in court. And I thank you again for your time.

Well, thank you for your presentation. Now, let's get down to the properties that you cited.

Yes, ma'am.

Delgado. I forget what the other parcels. I have their numbers. I don't know who particularly owns them. But do they have access? Are they on Deerhaven Road?

Yes, ma'am.

They are on your head. Yes. Can you show me on this map?

Yes, ma'am.

Where these parcels are, because they're marked as rear and yours is not. And rear means that they are landlocked.

Yeah. So if it would be easier for the board, I can pull up the tax map on the town parcel viewer. Right.

It may not be working.

Well, the tax map, you can get the tax map.

Oh, I off of it. But that the tax map looks well, this this is this is I can show you. Yeah, if you don't mind, I have the exact tax map.

No, but I can pull up the tax map off of that site. Oh, yeah.

Yeah, it's it's Ulster County.

Yes. You are not connected to the Internet.

I can I can pull up a...

I can you just show us if you show it on the easier because then we have that as something we can pass around to each other.

Yes, ma'am. That's why I brought it. Yeah. And okay. So you asked specifically.

Right. One of the reasons your assessment is so different is that they are all marked rear property. which means they're landlocked. Yes, ma'am. And you're not. You're marked as primary and residual, and in part because I guess at one point there was this building on your site.

That is our home.

Oh, okay. It's still there.

Yes, ma'am. Absolutely. So just so you're aware.

Is this a separate parcel then?

There's been some confusion in the past that they have corrected. Okay.

I'm going to answer my question, though.

I am going to answer that question. In being said, this, where our house has been since 1973, her father built this A-frame. Okay. They had this on 12.2 acres.

Right. They had it on parcel A.

Which was incorrect.

It's not parcel A.

So I will show you on the map.

Okay.

Okay. So Deer Haven, this is the 12.2. Yeah. Our house is on 15th. This is our house.

Okay. So this is really over here.

This was just an evaluation. So disregard that. That's not the house. Okay. Our driveway that goes through Mr. Delgado's.

Okay. So where's Delgado?

So Delgado is right here.

Okay. So he doesn't touch Deer Haven Road.

Well, he doesn't touch Deer Haven Road. Our driveway, our right-of-way was given by Barry. Barry is the old property owner that Mr. Delgado bought the property from, okay? Right. Our driveway to our home is not from here.

Right.

It connects down here and it runs...

Right, I've seen that on the tax now.

Yes, and that is a right-of-way.

That is a right, yeah.

Okay. He owns this property. This is the, in matter of fact, it was devaluated at $20,000 for 8.3 acres, 8.3. 0.3 acres.

Right. Where does he get access? I mean, this starts with another person's property.

So can I do something that would even be easier for all of us? Sure. And I have a hunting. I hunt. I'm an avid hunter and fisherman. And this kind of is more accurate because it's GPS and it's relative and it gives names and

What site?

Oh, I'm sorry. This is huntstand.com. I'm sorry.

Let me look at the huntstands on my phone. Okay.

I look at everybody's. Because I want to know where I'm legally allowed. Okay. All right. So this is our 12.2 that I have highlighted in red. Okay. This is Mr. Delgado's right here. Okay. I'm just giving you for reference. That's okay. And then our house is located here. Okay. So the properties that we're discussing right now is this 5.8, which is ours, and this 12.2, which is ours. Okay. Now.

I can't see because you're in the room.

I'm sorry. Can I go over there? That's okay. So I'm not in your.

The question is, where does the right-of-way start?

The right-of-way starts at Deerhaven, which I just gave you the agreement.

Right, I have that.

Okay.

Take pictures of it. Oh, so it starts at Deerhaven.

Yes.

So Delgado's doesn't go to Deerhaven.

Okay.

Show me where Delgado is.

Okay, Mr. Delgado is right here. Right, he's the... And he's right here. He has access from Acretown. From his house, he has access because he owns this property. I didn't mean to move your hand.

That's right. So he has a separate parcel, but he's got access.

From both.

From Bankertown. And Deerhaven.

No, and it all. I don't mean to cut you off. He also has access through Deerhaven. Because when this deal went down back when her father made the deal with the old owner, Barry, that is my wife. had a cop has a copy and i can bring it to the board i can go back to the house and get it has a copy of mr delgado's right away he has a separate right of way he has he has his own property that goes up he's got a he's got a joining car yes ma'am and that gives him um access from from his from bakertown but he also has a right of way right away on our specific driveway Two, he owns on our driveway.

Oh, so the driveway. That's right. Yes. I've seen the right-of-way buses through Delgado's.

His 1.7 right there, right, was traded for this right-of-way. And this was also part of the deal. And I have all this paperwork. My wife has a file this big from her father, who had passed away young. who went through all of this back and forth. Okay. So if you want me to bring that, I can bring that.

So let's go through these other fossils because they are, again, they're all marked here, which has, which explains why the properties are so, the values are so different. So Delgado has a right of way. And I have seen that on the text next.

Yes. And I can hold on.

Because I have to.

Yeah.

Okay. So Delgado is Wow. Delgado is 68224. This is Delgado. He has a right of way.

Delgado's.

Now neighbor one 68224. 47. Where is that? Again, that's...

I'm going to make this really simple. I'm going to pull this up on the Ulster County 5144.

Does it have access to... What I need to know is... Who has access?

Everybody that I listed on there has access. How? Through Deerhaven Road.

But they're not adjoining Deerhaven Road. They're not located on Deerhaven.

They are absolutely on Deerhaven.

Okay, can you show me, because here, this is the easiest thing. Can you show me where they are? Delgado was here as far, he doesn't touch. But he has access to the other properties.

Through Baker's time, right.

But they're not here. This is the Ulster Downing website. And this is what I've been studying for a few weeks now. So I can pull out an app directly. exactly where we are. This is 6801. Just give me a second to get adjusted here. Yeah, it's a bit...

I got that part. I couldn't print it out.

Yeah, I couldn't either, and this is why it's a little bit frustrating. Yeah, because... And it moves around on its own, so you have to find exactly, and then you have to which now where's um your Haven Road here well just give me one second and usually I can find it right away and I should have this prepared I'm sorry um this must donate this must indicate the right way or it's

Yeah, it was that maybe that's dear.

Okay, so that's how Stevenson that is this work over.

Well, I just remember. Somehow this doesn't show them touch it.

But could we ask that he come out of parts for the on the parts that he had listed the parents, the parcel parcels that indicate on that how they have access with that help.

Yes, all of those have access.

Okay, they're all okay. Look, they're all for the status.

I'm trying to get to this right here. So The other parcel, which is here, Mr. Ryder, that is the one that is listed as another one that is listed as rear.

Okay, but how does he touch Deerhaven?

That is Deerhaven. That is to Connie Suter, which is that agreement.

Wait, where is?

Deerhaven is right there. This is a new couple that just bought the house up there. This is deer. Yep. And it continues all the way to Donnie's house, which is right here.

So these have access to.

Absolutely. And I can show you on the map if I can pull it up. And it's right. And it shows a dotted line saying right away.

Could I is it because we are getting a time.

I'm sorry.

Would you be able to.

Print this out?

Print that out. Okay. And then show the connections.

Yes.

To that.

Absolutely.

So if you could do that, and then would you be able to do it and bring it back to us this morning?

I'll go to the library.

Okay. Yeah.

Or if I have a printer here, I can do it here.

I don't think we really have access to that.

Okay. No problem. And I'll get that work and I'll get the agreement actually from Mr. Delgado this as well.

We'll just need to see. You're saying they have access to dear. Yes, but they're there. And I can see now. Okay. Yeah. From just this map.

No, we got to go on. Perfect. All right.

Come back.

Yep.

No problem.

Absolutely. Thank you for your time, board. Okay.

Yes.

Yes. I want to.

I'm sorry. Is the is the statement that you read? Yes. You have a copy. It's on. It's in the package. Yeah. Okay. Yes.

And I can.

You're a very good reader.

Thank you. I tried a little stressed out. Yeah. My wife being sick and her not coming in today, she's usually the better half. Well, thank you.

You probably did a good job. My goodness, I haven't heard that since my wedding vows.

Oh, man. Thank you.

35 years ago.

Ma'am, do I need to get that printed out and come back? Yeah.

And if we just leave it at the back here.

Okay.

Is that okay with you?

Is that okay?

We need to see how they touch.

Absolutely.

Access is different.

How they touch.

If they touch. If they touch via a right-of-way, then we need to know it's a right-of-way that leads them to Deerhaven. Yes. Like the one thing you showed me, Deerhaven went through the property.

Yes.

Okay.

I will show you all that. Okay. You're welcome.

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much. Thank you.

You are not committed.

Okay.

I'm sorry. Just before you leave, we have one second. Did you want to ask Jeremy his input? Oh, yes. Jeremy.

So we did speak about the parcels and I did mention that it's possible those may have been misclassified or not correctly maintained during the reval. So I'd have to look into them further, research the deeds right away and have the county look into those.

So it was the Delgado parcel and those other parcels, the ones that were marked real, those were the ones that were misclassified.

Potentially. They would have to look into. Correct. But again, I did point out to them that just because somebody's under-assessed doesn't get them the right to get under-assessed. Okay. All right. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you. Well, thank you. Thanks. I'll be back.

Okay. Cynthia Tacty? Yeah, of course. Come on up. We'll have to swear you in first. Okay.

I just wanted to know. I haven't figured that out yet. It means more if you say it when you're swearing.

Okay. That's what I know. That's why I asked. Okay. Well, now set a new precedent.

Okay.

But you can sit down. Okay. Okay.

You both solemnly and firmly swear that the information you're about to give will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your ability to do so. Yes.

Good morning. Good morning. Hey. So if you could start off by telling us.

We have two.

Okay, we are going to start with 155. Is that how you do it? The house? Or do you want to start with? No, we'll start with the house.

Yeah, we'll go with you. Is 150 the house? It's the house, yes.

Oh, I have 124 then. I must just have, no, I must have that. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. You're 124, right? I'm 120. That's the, that doesn't mean. Okay. So we are going 150. Okay. So.

So, well, okay. The way we live, you go up the road. We live on. The mountain goes this way and this way. You know what I'm saying? The roads, we're on the low side of it. It's like our neighbors are here, we're here. The road goes up. So it's pretty much, we get wetlands coming down the road, down this way, you know, down the mountain this way. It follows the road down. We still got a puddle here. I have to dig ditches around the goat pen all the way down through the yard to drain. You can't really build a, you can't maintain a lawn until it's dry now.

It's starting to dry now. She still has dishes. Her entire lawn is ditches.

All right. So now I live, like I said, I live up this way. So it's wetlands. It's not wetlands, but it's soggy. You really can't keep a lawn. They have us assess that The shed, they have two sheds. One's a truck body. It's like a run-in shelter.

Which I believe you have pictures of. Yeah, I've seen them.

And others are dilapidated sheds on cinder blocks that we buy, you know, like on Tour Line, they have them.

Amish.

Amish, but it's really needs to be replaced. My front deck is gone because, I mean, it's just a wet property.

Right. And the other... shed that you guys have is a truck body that holds the goats. Okay, I'm sorry.

Yes, and we saw that, and we saw the, it must have been one of the sheds with the siding coming out.

Yeah, yeah. That's the regular shed. It has holes in the roof. The roof needs to be replaced. The whole shed needs to be replaced, obviously.

It just holds animal feed, basically. So it's in the bucket. Anyway.

So how would you describe their conditions?

The condition of the shed. Right. The condition of the shed, it needs to be replaced.

It's got holes in the roof.

The whole siding is deteriorated. The cinder blocks are literally going into the ground. So it would have to be lifted up and taken away. It's falling apart.

You would say it's even worse than poor. Yes. That's just the shed she's talking about. Well, the other one is a... Right.

I mean, we haven't talked about the house. These are just the...

Right. But they count and we're all given... Right. Okay. So then you do have wetness. Yes. It's dry enough now.

And then how... But to make one other point, to make the problem worse, in between me and a neighbor, the town ran a culvert pipe down from the top part, and it runs down. And it's supposed to be run like this. They have a gully that they dug out.

It runs into our property.

Anyway, it rips down. Yeah, it runs slow because it's older, and it kind of runs into the bullpen. So I got the water coming from the bullpen like this. I got a ditch from here to there, so it runs away from my house. And then I have to run it from here to here, and then from here to here, because you can't load this all with.

Of the 2.3 acres that made up 150 Richmond, how much of that would you say is left?

80%?

Yeah, because you got the front and then the back slopes down. It's closer down to the swamp.

I'm sorry, doctor, is the house 80%?

How much property do you think your house and immediate surroundings that are not wet take up then? You're saying that's only another 20%?

Yeah. With the ditches a little more, maybe. How about it? With the winters, usually by now, I can stop them on the Yeah.

It seems to be getting wetter and wetter. Let's see. I don't see it.

We were never told by the owner that it was wet like that.

There's pipes all over the ground, I find out.

Is there anything about the house?

The roof itself needs to be replaced because we had something chew in the soffit and tried to get out, I guess, and chewed actually with a fly board and chewed where I could see the shingle, but it's not leaking yet. I'm trying to... In the rooftop.

And the soffit has been replaced with used pieces. But they're not in great shape either because they're used pieces instead of brand new pieces.

Okay, so let us see. The house was described as the in the normal condition. So you'll have one kitchen, one for that, and two bedrooms? Yes. Okay. And other than the roof, is there anything else?

We have to replace the side deck. It strikes the very time I replace it. It just rots from the bottom up. Flaps.

Okay. So it sounds like wetness is a real... Yeah.

It runs down to my backyard. I'm on a slope like that, so it's...

Okay, I think we are looking for 250. You want your assessment reduced to 200?

That's what our lawyer has put together with us. And that's what our lawyer has decided after going through everything, talking to us, looking at pictures.

Okay. Are there any mistakes?

Yeah, there is. That leads into the land because I... Okay, Jeremy shows the book, but why don't we start with the land for you?

Who's on the land?

Okay.

Okay.

All right.

So you have the house, but this is in the D. There's a right away to that back land in our D. So here's here's our house. Right here, here's our driveway. So on this side of the driveway, well, into the driveway, there's a right of way to go back to that back layer.

The corner of our backyard.

And that's the only way to get in there. That's why our lawyer, at the time of our closing, put in there the right way, because there was no other way.

When we bought it, the guy offered us 2.39 from Stonewall to Stonewall, or he'd give us a deal if we cut off part of it. It would be just under two acres. I wanted to say yes. I said, I want to go from stone to stone. and that's why ed carroll who was the lawyer said we weren't going to do the deal in the house because we weren't we didn't buy that property at first we would just buy the house and he said we had to have exclusive right away on this side or or the deal was off so they put it in our feed so we went wall to walls 2.39 acres But he showed me on the county map, they say, I have a road. That goes down and that's how I found the culvert that leads into my. That goes down the side of my problem.

That's our house property, but that's all property.

We didn't even know we had to find a house to property 5 acres a year almost a year later. Yeah, because. They were going through a divorce, so we offered it to me for 8,500. So, you know, I mean, if we bought this acreage, it's 2.39 from here to here. And they're saying we have five acres back here. This part that you're talking about would be roadfront. Not only was it a drop like this that would cost, I don't know how many thousands of dollars to put in, but it's part of our 2.39 acres. That's what we bought originally. We didn't buy the five acres until a year later when he was going through a divorce. So you can't say it's 2.39 from here to here. But this roadway access, I'd have to cut through my goat pen. We bought it at this much, 2.39. There was no roadway. That's why the guy offered us less. He wouldn't put the roadway in there. But we bought it. Like I said, not planning on buying that. We just bought it, and then he offered it to us, so we bought it. We own it.

We had to have the railway put in because there was no other way to get to this platform.

Let me see if I understand this. You have the home. The home has something in there that says you must give right away to this other property which you never owned before.

We didn't plan on buying it.

I'm just trying to understand the situation right now. If you were to sell your home It has that right of way. Correct. It would go along with it.

Correct. And the two properties, are they continuous? They're back to back. So you would sell the whole thing if you wanted to, right? Yeah.

I mean, I thought we'd have to sell it in two parcels. That's another thing. They're not one whole parcel.

Right. You can do a lot line division. What? A lot line division. What's that? You move. the lines so they can incorporate both properties.

You can get the two properties put together as one.

Oh, okay. That's interesting.

We don't want to sell. Also, it was classified wrong back acres because this is a neighbor on the same side as another neighbor and we're here. This is the five acres, right? Wetlands, wetlands,

No. Did you happen to look on the map to see if it was classified as weapons?

Jeremy looked first. He said no.

It's not. But here's another situation which our lawyers found out. Of our 5.2 acres back there, two acres are considered undeveloped lands. 3.2 acres as residual. Well, how did they come up with that? Because it's all undeveloped land.

The way they do it there, it splits it up, making it worth more value, which is unfair. And it should be what land?

But math technically does not show. Influence codes. Right, right. But I'm just trying to understand.

It went too long. The last we've been staying, there was a guy here. He's on the board now. He looks a little oriental. I'm not sure of his name. I don't mean to be mean or not. But he even admitted it because I got the same rocks here in Swamp that they got on both sides. At the time, they were assessing us. This was way back. What was it? What were the assessments?

I was working at... The real estate office. The guy across from us was paying $2,000 an acre.

He was assessed that.

So he was paying $2,000 an acre. We were paying at $11,000 an acre.

Does that work? I mean, we haven't done nothing. It's just the same spot.

I was able to produce.

Jeremy, do you have anything you want to add?

So as regards to the house, what I'm hearing there sounds like some adjustment is warranted there. Okay. Reference to the house. You need five acre parcel. I did make an adjustment when we met back in March or April there, but a negative influence to the wetness on there. I'm sorry. Yeah, the influence code has a 50% effect on that.

land because of wetness in the single part, in the separate parcel, the 5.1.

But have you come up with the two different acreage of two as undeveloped and 3.2?

So what happens is when they look at a vacant land and they look at your zoning, you're zoned for two acres. So they set aside two acres as undeveloped because it has Potential of being developed as a way of sight. That's why they set aside those two acres. Because it could be used to build a house. And then the remaining, because you're in two acre zoning, so you need two acres to build a house. The remaining length then becomes residuals.

Okay, there's no way to build a house back there.

But what it does is it leaves that opportunity so that it could be sold like that. And you're saying there's no way?

Yeah, because from my house, from the backyard, on the side where the road supports go down, it actually, the water will come up. It's all wet. It goes down, so it's wet. It runs from the front yard all the way down.

You're not a picture showing the back of the land. It goes right down. streams going through it. They slowed down.

I mean, now they were slow. They slowed down. I mean, it could, but it cost a lot of money.

Okay. Anything else, Jeremy? Okay. Thank you for coming in. We will Taking into consideration, you'll hear something by July 1st. All right.

Thank you. Thank you. I love your goats. I saw the picture of one.

Yeah, that was Elsa. Oh, she's a good girl. She's a good girl. Thank you. Thank you.

Oh, thank you.

Next one. Oh, is she down?

Yeah.

Come on down. We'll have to swear you in first. Yes. So if you will stand there. We'll set a new precedent. Come stand here.

solidly firm a swear that the information you're about to be able to be given actually is a good place to call your building.

I do. Sure. And let me tell you, I had a little deja vu when I saw your pictures. It's an old pizza place. Yes, yes.

We actually visited it, my husband and I visited it long before we ever were even married. when it was a pizza place. So yeah, definitely.

Oh, sure. I'm sorry. This is G122. Okay. So why don't you, why don't you go ahead and tell us what you're here for?

Sure. So, um, the, I'm sorry.

I'm sorry.

Here. The preliminary assessment value was $715,000. And so I really only brought forward one comp, which I didn't think I needed more. It's the property that abuts my property, which sold in November of 2025. It's 297 Bobby Turnpike. if it is supposed to be representative of the value of the property in June or July of 2025. So that property that abuts my property, very comparable house-wise. It's 2,300 square foot minus 27, so a little larger, but not significantly. That house was completely redone because, you know, obviously updated kitchens and bathrooms and open floor plan, all the beautiful things that people expect of properties these days. My house, not so much. It's a Center Hall Colonial, so never going to be an open floor plan unless someone wants to put in a lot of money.

Open a pizza place.

In the garage. Yeah, in the garage. I'm sorry. that comparable property also has a garage although detached similar in size but detached some people think that's higher value some don't whatever um i think the only significant difference in buildings is that we do have one out building it's six by twelve um there were some other buildings noted on the reporting however they're actually trailers movable registered licensed

I saw your name. Yeah.

Yeah. So we only had one outbuilding at six by 12. But the noticeable difference in the properties is our property is 2.7 2.8 acres, their property at 17. And it's sold for $620,000. So I am trying to understand who might want to spend $100,000 more than that on a much smaller acreage for a very similar property. So some other differences, right? We do have a pool, but they have a pond.

Right. Is it in ground pool?

It is in ground, yeah. So aside from that, that's pretty much the basis for the conversation.

Okay, great. I think it, It matches very much with what you had in here. Jeremy, is there anything you wanted to add?

Well, I did take a look at this one. And we ran into what was generated under number 570.

Well, we can't offer it yet.

But that's aligned with what we thought, right? So that's much more aligned.

but you will hear officially. Perfect. By July 1st. Perfect. Thank you for coming in.

Thanks all. Have a good day.

Okay. Since we have some time, I would like... Jeremy? Do you think you could run through some of the ones we have not scheduled so that we can get those in the record if we go back? Are you?

What? Just real quickly, though, can you just repeat the amount that you recommended on the TACD?

Five, one TACD. TACD. I wouldn't recommend another one. I know. On the 5804, it's going to be different. the 94th on the Vegas. Okay, I'm sorry.

That was which, 124 or 125? That was 125. You said something and I just couldn't write faster.

That was 125.

I'm sorry, you've already reduced it to that much, or you're now recommending a further window?

Yeah, it was actually reduced to that.

Yeah. Yes, it was reduced. That's right. So you're recommending no change then? Right.

Right. That would be March or April that we met, so I don't have to do a step or anything.

OK, so if we can use this time just to try to run through Your recommendations on some of the parcels where people have not been in attendance.

Right.

And if we can start with G one. Did just arrive. I'm sorry. 10 o'clock just arrived. Coming in, they're going to be walking.

Okay. Okay, if you'd like to come on up, we're a little early.

You're ready for us. We are. If you want to come up, we'll need to swear you in first. Of course. I've done this a few times before.

Not your side of it, but which is only important, right?

Stand up please and swear yourself in.

Affirm or swear that the information we're about to give will be given actively and truthfully to the best of your ability to do so. Yes. Yes, we do.

I do. Beatrice Haugen, don't you? And this is my son Clayton Haugen. Son.

Yes. And the other relative.

That is correct. Your Honor, how are you today?

Unfortunately, on the...

Still chewing up my...

Listing. People. It only lists me, but it's supposed to actually list both.

Excuse me.

Go ahead. Sorry.

What I said was the listing only shows myself as on the property owner, but in fact, it should list both of us.

on the list. It's okay.

I should say I went by parcel viewer. It shows it on parcel viewers. I don't want to show this.

So go ahead.

Okay. Do you missing a member? Do you want?

No, we're not. We're waiting for three of us today.

Oh, okay. Very good. All right. Do you have in front of you the folders that should have been given to you by the secretary?

Yes. But if you would go ahead and present your case, that'd be nice.

Okay. I just did

This is G-120. Were they sworn in? Yes, they were sworn in.

Okay. We are looking at the property on 191 Samsonville Road. It's descriptive as 311 residential vacant land. The acreage is 1.7 acres Of residential land, um. This land is residual to the house property. Okay, and with that being said, we, uh. Have a tentative adjustment on the tentative roll of 8,500 dollars. We are respectfully asking for consideration. At this be lowered based on the specific conditions prior to that.

I think it was a reduced from. From yes, 17,000. So it's already been cut in here. Correct. Okay.

Okay. I'm a little confused because that's not on the 524. It's what made me hesitate. No point. Do we have to list that on the by hand?

But we are having discussions on the property. That's why you're here.

That is true. Okay. The water mitigation. There's great drainage issues on there. They are as a result of persistent, you know, there's persistent standing water and ongoing drainage issues. It limits the property's functionability and reduces the potential development opportunities. And it has increased the maintenance responsibilities on the property. The source of drainage is through no fault of our own. It is external. And environmental factors beyond our control. And for proof of this damage or further evidence, if you will, of this damage for better wording. The planning board chair and 1 member came because of the result of the 50,000 square foot building being put on the property at the top of the hill, which is. Owned by and LLC. And with that large size of building, it was determined that that would cover the acreage of 1 acre tripping or triggering the need for a swift, which is a stormwater pollution prevention plan. And that has been asked for by the planning board as part of secret. And it has been determined that. Drainage abatement is necessary. Because it currently all of the stormwater runs. And they have buildings up there in excess of the prior footprint right on the. Antiguous property edge, which has caused more drainage over the past 2 years. This this friend further problem with the drainage. Of this contiguous uphill property and increase in land coverage by future buildings. The drainage will increase exponentially. Rendering this property unsuitable for residential use. There, um, you won't be able to perk a septic. You'd have to put in a background. I don't know what else you would have to do, but it's very bad. I can't mow it. I'm pushing water as I know. As I stated, this parcel is separate from the house. This lot is not equivalent to a one-acre standard lot. The lack of road frontage affects access and marketability, and in Ulster County, this parcel could fall into limited access, below average, and utility-restricted property. If this property were to be sold separately, there would be a need to purchase a right-of-way in one of the contiguous properties. Due to the setbacks, this right-of-way is not attainable through 191 Samsonville Road. There has been no inspection by the town assessor. I'm sure he assumed this was average land He did not account for the drainage until I went in to speak to him, at which point you know the figures now. And what we want you to know is that this uphill drainage is beyond our control, which makes it, that is one of the reasons we are here seeking a lower assessment and the lack of road frontage. This parcel, I can't find a parcel that's comparable. I can't. I don't know of any uphill properties that have an uphill. Expansion of use like. If I could find 1, I'd be happy to share it with you. But I cannot so in summing up some of this, we are still, we still feel that the 8500 overstates. The properties market value and we have given you a figure of 3294.

How did you come up with that thing?

Would you like to?

I would love to expand on that. The number was developed based on 53% evaluation to bring it to its full 100% evaluation. Now, when you say it was lowered from 17, it was actually raised from the original number to meet the standard. The 17,000, so the original number, if we were compounded to that 100% would be the 3,000. I don't have the number. 3294 it started at, um.

1696.

Which was the original assessment number and then raised to that.

The original market value.

What's that?

The original market value. That's correct.

Now, the other thing to keep in mind with that property is with the amount of wetland that consumes the property, which would be about half of the property, the way that that half is divided with the wetland, it wouldn't allow for any residential expansion anyway into that wetland because it wouldn't meet the necessary setbacks for construction. The property, not only is it restrained by the inability to purchase a right-of-way, it's simply because any of the property lines where the houses sit on the surrounding properties sit without the ability to construct another driveway to get to that property. So in other words, it's surrounded by housing, which wouldn't allow for the right-of-way to get into the house other than through, which would be the Kerr-Honkson LLC property, which would be down. That's hotel versus residential property. That's why it makes this more of a residual value, simply because it's only of use to 191. What's that?

A rear value.

Okay. Or I consider it residual because it's only usable by the person that's at 191.

Right. And you have access to it. You're saying the surrounding properties couldn't grant access. Could you grant access?

No, we couldn't as well because we don't have the setbacks because the non-conforming pre-structure on there, we wouldn't be able to get the driveways on either side of the house from 181 or from Samsonville Road.

yes it's another way so are you saying the only way you could sell that property was if it would be sold with your house it would be sold with the house that's correct as part of the property so it's a standalone parcel it is it's standalone and that's why and as a standalone right exactly

the properties behind your house. Yes. And it's sort of a narrow, your house is on a narrow property and there's not enough room on either side. That's correct. The driveway, if you look, unfortunately, you have to look out for a viewer.

pictures that you would like.

Yeah, it shows it shows the driveway is actually a very narrow driveway. It goes between a set of hedges, telephone pole from Central Hudson, and then goes past the house. There's not even enough room to barely enough room for one car as it is with pre-existing drives. So in order to gain access to that, you would actually have to go through that with that driveway turn go around the garage that's there and then you would be able to gain access to that property all of the other houses the same thing every house has a narrow driveway or a garage that blocks the end of that driveway it's great and i don't i know and i appreciate it and it is um

I just, I wear it.

I know Jeremy, did you have anything else you would like to add.

Just have it. That's why the residual land said what this influence on there. So it's not being considered as billable lot.

you did have it as the 50%, the wetland. Because I don't know if there's any wetlands. Yeah, that's the... That was your estimate. Yeah, that was the comfortable estimate. And unfortunately, in the wet of spring, sometimes it might creep over a little more. Or heavy rainfall in the summer might get severe. We all know it. Yeah. I mean, quite frankly, for two generations, we've been trying to navigate the water around the house as a result of those heavy rainfalls. You'll see ditches that get mowed and fill in, then have to be dug again. And her basement is constantly running with water. I've replaced a sump pump in her basement a dozen times. And it gets really severe.

Two years, it's gotten much worse. We used to be able to play baseball. You can picture me playing baseball. We used to play baseball in the field.

Everybody's place has changed. Yeah, it is.

It is.

Okay. There's nothing else? Thank you.

I have a question.

You will hear by July.

You'll hear by July 1st? Okay, because the legal notice was published yesterday that said you weren't meeting until the 2nd. There's a legal notice published June.

No, no, you mean, I'm sorry. By July 1st, you will receive something in the mail that indicates what our decision is.

Okay, that was going to be my next question is how will we be notified?

Will we be notified?

Okay. Thank you very much. Good to see you.

Excuse me? Has it been a long time? Yes, it has. Well, in your other capacity, I don't want to speak.

okay so we do have 10 minutes before the next meeting um okay

Jeremy, could you run through for us?

And we need our official minute taker right here. We need our minute taker. We need our minute taker. It's been a run through the, the ones that are outstanding. Okay.

I'm sorry to interrupt, but I don't have access. What is the one? There should be a guest.

Then you have to end up trying to get the center.

We don't know. All right.

Okay. So if you could run through starting with G one or 42 path route.

This one is a multiple residents property. Site one is a two-story house built in 1880. We have an effective view of 1990, shown in fair condition with a covered porch, a 270-square-foot barn on 5.9 acres. Site one is being valued at $336,000. We have site two, a 1935 built, 504-square-foot cottage, in average normal condition, with the covered porch being valued at $100,000. And so number three is a 1945 built 456 square foot cottage an average normal condition can be valued at 100,000 take the 336 and then to 100s. 36 the property transfer to 914 2023 for 272,500 which was not an arms like transaction. was sorry say that again it was not an arm's length transaction it was a transfer between relatives one of the buyers was also to sell it uh my notes are the um property owner probably did not respond to the property data mailer back in october as it appears that some of our data is incorrect uh they're saying that these are year-round rentals while we have them as seasonal cottages So it could not be assessed as an income producing property when it is classified as seasonal residences. Multiple multi-family residences are done on the income approach there. So I reached out to the property owner for an inspection on 5-13-2026 with the time constraints. And I think by the time he contacted us back, he didn't have any time to get an inspection done before he could stay.

And so do you have a recommendation?

Based on it again like that is like the wrong. So really inspection would be the best thing. Otherwise, I would recommend no reduction.

And you will provide us written copies on all of these. Correct. Thank you. Okay. Okay. G2. Do you have anything on that one?

Don't have anything for G2. G3 Subject is a 6.8 vacant parcel with no topography or wetness issues that I know of that are noted. And unless there's something I don't know of, I recommend no reduction.

Next one you have is?

Next one would be G5. Subject is a 904 square foot cottage built in 1973 on 6.3 acres of land. And they have the comp sheet attached here, coming out around $325,000.

And, I'm sorry, what was it previously?

Do you have it there? I figured there. Okay. Actually, that's this one.

Which, what are we talking about? G5, yeah. Right now it's G5.

Don't want to G six, but even the key seven here. Okay. This one is a 1965 built ranch, 2,171 square feet of living space and fair condition on 65.1 acres of land, barns and sheds and poor condition. After reviewing the tentative assessment property data, applying some wetness influence on the land, coming up with a land value of 465,900. market value of $735,000.

Okay, do you want to do one more and then we'll stop?

G8 is a 1.7 story contemporary style house with 2,106 square feet, 4.5 acres.

That's good quality construction, average condition. and have some comp sheets attached showing range of value of $965,000 to $1,068,500.

OK, thank you. I'm sorry, would you repeat the list, the portion, $1,000,000?

Comp sheets attached with a value range of $965,000 to $1,068,500. OK.

Okay. Oh, Sullivan?

Yes.

Come on up.

Thank you.

Okay, you may have to bring one more chair.

Yeah, yeah. And we're doing two properties at one side.

Okay, so we are on the same. Where you sit down, where you sit down. and 127 and 128 and 128.

Do you all solemnly affirm or swear that the information you're about to give will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your ability to do so? Yes, we swear.

So let me see. The first property would start with 127. We're calling it 127. 74 Woodrow?

Yes. Right.

Yes. And looks like it's, well, tell us about it because I've got my own impression, but I want to hear directly from you.

It's not necessarily our properties themselves. It's the access to our properties. Woodrow is not a clear road. Woodrow is like a lane. It runs through a dead end. 25. it ends with us. It runs through 25 and 63. 25 and 63. Yes.

And just stop for one second. This is not a new thing. This is going back before Howard Lipman was the supervisor. This is going way back. And it's just, it doesn't go away. It's just on and on. What is it?

It is these photos I have here of what we have to drive through every day on both sides of the vehicle, five feet from the vehicle. It's not a real road. It's just a lane. And we have complained and filed through court enforcement.

enforcement for years and been told that something be done have not received responses from code enforcement we're going to resume that process we met the new guy we're going to resume that process however right now to understand before you go on you're talking about your access to your houses right passing having to go through this yes okay and it's on both sides of the lane

And within five to seven feet of the car, there are car parts.

And it runs four tenths of a mile. And it's not a junkyard. It's more like a debris field. In a junkyard, you have organization. You have cars, you have tires, you have whatever part. This is multiple businesses operating out of 25. Sorry, 63 Wood Road. There's excavation equipment. There's oil tanks. There's engines. There's race cars. There's excavation equipment. There's a dump truck. Sorry.

Are these all one property?

This is on one property. There are two properties. The stuff that I'm running is on 25 specifically. There's other... What I'm talking about now. We can talk about 63 also. But all of that is on 25. Okay. So it's...

Dump trucks.

Abandoned vehicles. Car parts, engines.

Trash. Normally, we have that in Accord. It's understandable. There's properties that aren't maintained. This is beyond regular homeowner not maintaining property. There's businesses going on there. There's environmental issues in there. There's oil probably leaking. There's engines that are on the property from the car repairs they do on the property. They do a tree business where they bring in wood, not just top, they've denuded all the wood on the property, but they're bringing in wood with likely has invasive species on it. And then they process the wood on the property as a business and sell it. And they do that all winter long. And they're working on excavation. And we'll share the pictures with you, but that's 20, and the people have come down the road and they're intimidated by the ownership.

He cuts trees down. You know, someone has dead ash, cuts them down, brings the dead ash over. They'll dig out the barberry bushes, bring that over, and just stack it there. And every now and then they'll burn it or bury it in the ground.

By the new logs.

Yes, yes. Log lengths before I would have proposed to say, and just jump. It's just ongoing.

About your own property, your houses themselves.

Well, hold on, because I'm also focusing on the influence codes.

Right. This is very important. Okay. Okay. Once you get... Did you want more? Yeah. I want to hear everything.

Okay. Because I have a decision on this.

So the property has been in their family since his parents bought it in the 60s. This was not there then. This has happened in the 80s, one of the trailers and then added on to. And actually, 63, it's fairly decent until right around COVID. And that's when it just went really just awry.

We completed in 23. We followed up in 24. PB, David Ensign he or he. : 25 we have. PB, David Ensign he or he. : Those.

PB, David Ensign he or he. : So your road has to go through this. PB, David Ensign he or he. : looks you're right worse than a junkyard. PB, David Ensign he or he. : And it's not. PB, David Ensign he or he. : Why don't you leave this with us. PB, David Ensign he or he.

: That is soccer. PB, David Ensign he or he. : You.

PB, David Ensign he or he. : And it's not like there's a setback off the lane where. stuff occurs.

Does it impede your travel? Yes.

Sometimes it does. Sometimes it does. And we're told we should call the constable or whatever if that happens. And it's like whack-a-mole.

Yeah. Okay.

Because they run, I guess, the vehicles to the car races. And they'll pull off the trailer in the cars and leave them in the road and So in terms of property values, if we look at your land is valued at 130, I'm not looking at 74 wood road, the total assessed value is 500,000.

Is there anything about the Putting aside the land value, is there any other things we should consider when looking at the house or the property value?

Well, the structure was their parents, and it has not been updated since probably the 70s. I mean, it's totally like stepping back in time.

It's a cabin built in the 30s, basically.

It did an addition to in the 70s.

And back to the land, yes, there's whatever, five point whatever acres. Four of them. maybe three and a half are usable. The rest are, you know, they're locks. And it's fireproof. That's all you can really do.

On 74 Wood Road, most of the land is not usable.

You said it has trees. Trees can be cut down, as you know, from your neighbor. Is there something else about the land?

You can't develop it.

You have to switch back to get up the hill. There's only about two acres.

Well, you can get up and down all those areas. You can't get down with a car. How much of the... At least two acres, probably.

Now, the house, is anybody living in the house? I see it retains with wood.

We're there for part-time. We're part-time.

We're two or three months out of here. Is it seasonal?

I'm sorry?

Seasonal. Do you think in the winter? Yeah.

Sometimes. We make them in. Yeah, we make them in. Yeah. We went over it for a couple weeks, but yeah. We were here last November.

So it's all year round.

Yeah.

Yeah. Insulated?

Yes. It needs updating. Poorly insulated. How about that? 40 years of mice. There's nothing there.

Mice and squirrels in 1938, but yeah. Okay, and...

All right. But otherwise, do you have any other heat other than wood?

It has oil in it.

Oh, it has oil. Yeah. All right.

Is there a one-car garage, two storage buildings ? There's a one-car garage and then, yeah, a couple. Yeah, yeah.

And it's one car garage for a very small vehicle. It's an eight-foot garage.

I do have a question about this one picture. It's like a gray building. I don't know what that is. Is that the Gregory?

That's a chicken coop, the chicken brooder.

That was a chicken coop.

Yeah. And the red garage, that is not theirs. That is mine.

OK, the red garage. It's a different property. But this is the chicken brooder? Yes. What's in front? It looks like it's open and falling apart. I can't tell the condition.

Oh, that's just in the back of it. It's a small lean-to shed just for an old tractor.

listed as a Cape Cod on the tax rate.

You got the wrong copy. That's mine.

Oh, this is a Cape Cod.

That's 69.

Yeah. All right. So please, would you like to be heard separately on 127? Or do you want to do 127? OK. So then let's move on to 2869 Woodrow.

Yes.

Okay. That's the one with the It's been running for this.

Yep. Too bad when you have that.

Yep.

And the garage.

Yes, you can hear

The red garage that was originally built back when it was Howard Anderson had it. So, I don't know, 40 years, 50 years. Anyways, I built that in 93 myself. 94 moved in. Everything was fine and dandy except for the junkyard next door. And that was in the process of getting cleaned up. And then... It stopped getting cleaned up and became worse and worse and worse. And I had gone through the grievance, I think this would be the fifth or sixth time in the last 25 years. So it's an ongoing, and I've always heard they've got a new code enforcement coming in. They're great for some. It gets cleaned up, and then it reverts back the way it was.

Is the junkyard, which is it adjacent?

It's adjacent. It's adjacent to his property. To your property. That's the one we're talking about. 63.

It's actually adjacent to both properties because on one side of the road, it's Michael's, and on the other side of the road, it's ours. Both of them are adjacent. Okay. Okay.

So right now we're talking about 69. Correct. Let's see, you have two acres primary, 4.10 acres residual. Anything special about the property other than the junkyard?

I don't have a check card. I can add one if that's the most...

Janet Callahan- It's always changed. Janet Callahan- Bound by the neighbors.

I'm also there and make it nice. Anything special about his web. Yeah, it's clay. What it retains.

That's, that's, that's car.

And rock.

Right.

Yeah. Put a spoon in the ground, you get two rocks and a half spoon of clay. Right. And then The back portion of it, I had to fight with the county because there's a small stream down there, Brooks, and that, they're saying that I flood, my property floods, which it does, that bottom 100 feet does. Like, no, there's, like there is, we're on a hill and the back portion, two acres or whatever, I'm not sure of the exact. It's, you know, it's on the, you know, steer paths and what have you. Is it steep or is it? Yes. Extremely steep. Yes. Yes.

It's a great area.

Oh, yeah. It would be if we didn't. So it's all learning.

You're asking 280? That would be the right assessment.

That was me. 280.

Right. Is there anything about the, other than what you described, is most of the buildings... were built in 1994. We had an old barn.

Yeah. The garage was there when I got the land from my parents. We got it through a tax sale in 1984, I think it was.

And is there, you said you built a garage?

I built the house.

Oh, you built the house.

And I went there, I built that, yes. In 1994.

Yes, 1993, 1994. um now it's uh checked car it's one bed one bath one and a half baths two bedrooms yeah and the basin is partially finished so what in particular is driving your um assessed down to 280.

It's just, if I want to try to sell it, I'm not going to get what they're saying. I mean, I understand.

But why? What is it about the property?

My property is probably just going past the other two properties that you can't avoid to get to it.

You think that it cuts the value?

Absolutely. There's no alternative to go around. There's an absolute one dead end road that you must pass. And at Accord, you have options on most other streets. So that is the issue. And I would encourage... anyone to drive up.

But it's intimidating. You can just make it past the gauntlet. But I still do like you.

Let me ask this question. If that entryway would change, would you be comfortable with your settings?

At 563? Yes.

No, I think that's too high.

We don't have a 563.

That was the original guard.

The letter we received from them was $5,500 now. Yeah, you're right. Okay, so really the main issue really is that.

Yes. inability to, if you wanted to sell it right now, it would not be.

Right. But secondly, the house absent that, the one that we live in, the land, like you said, is probably 130. The house is a cabin, which is maybe a couple hundred. So two and 130, maybe 250 or something like that. That's probably what the value of that would be.

Tell me which one you are again. I'm 74.

74. 74. Yes. 74, you think, would be somewhere in that. Like 350 to 400 if everything was a perfect world. Right.

Well, your grievance, you're looking for 160,000. You're looking for it to be reduced to 160,000.

Given where it is.

Yeah. And given its age, condition.

If that issue was gone, whole different scenario. I wouldn't be here. I would probably have done this and got this resolved already. Thank you.

Jeremy, you have anything to add?

So what these people have done a week or so ago in a different location, I was coming up at a time of 74 with road G127. I was coming up with 445, I had made an offer. I'm hearing a little more about how the condition of the house is. It sounds like that probably may be adjusted down a little bit further as well.

I'm sorry, which one is this? You said 125.

74. The older little cabin there. 76.

127, your case number.

The address, please.