Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

order. It's 5:17 on my clock. We're going to go down to seven and nine because these appear to be real short ones. Um, is anyone here from the credit union beginnings? New beginnings. Okay. What they essentially Well, did you guys have a chance to look at this? Yeah. Uh, they want approval for uh changing the the faces of existing signs. So the signs themselves as I understood it wouldn't get any bigger just indicating their new name going from CSU to beginnings. Um any well can I have a motion to approve that first law? Sure.

All right Mike second all right discussion question. All right. All right. All those in favor of number seven, the minor site plan for CSU with their uh name change on the existing sign say I. I. Anyone opposed? All right. Motion prepared. All right. Number nine. We're going to skip down to that one too. Uh because the person is here for that. Um Felicia Outlaw, are you here? Yeah, I'm here. Okay. You want to tell us about your proposal?

So, we're proposing a sign for our new business at 50 Main Street in Portland. Um, it is a red cursive sign of just our name. It is going to have um LED lighting in the back that's going to illuminate very softly. Um, it's going to illuminate white or soft um, as close as we could get it to white. And um the sign I was told has to be 4x4 to fit onto our building cuz our building is a shared building between us and Portland Standard with one main entrance and then two split off.

So um so I've got two sizes here. I've got 60 by 34 in type, but then underneath it says 70 by 42. Which one of those is accurate? So the we had learned prior to submitting that that it has to be 45. So we have the new specs and I gave those to Andy at the meeting. I just Oh, it's wrong. I'm just going by when we were at the historical meeting. It was just shortly like a day before that that we found out that it has to be the 4x48.

Yeah. So, I um got a hold of Celco who's going to be doing our sign and he mocked something up and I presented it at the meeting and I left the whole mockup with the measurements there and said I just found out that it has to be the 4x4 unless we apply for a variance which at this time um I don't think we're going to have time to do that. So, yeah, I do have that downstairs on my desk, but uh the historical store commission approved that. Okay. So, we're looking at approving a a 4 foot 4ft x 4 foot sign as opposed to what's on the um application there.

It's the same. You know, it's going to be exactly the same, just a little bit shorter, like four inches. I think he said on each side. Okay. All right. Can I have a motion to approve this uh minor site plan review for a 4x4 ft sign for this business? I'll make the motion. Second. Seconded. All right, Jen. All right. Further discussion. All right. All those in favor of this 4x4 foot sign say I. I. Anyone opposed? All right. Motion carries. All right. Good luck with your sign. Thank you.

All right. Now, we're going to go back. Two number one on the list. This is 95 Fort Watson Street. So planner do Ted McBride seeks approval of plans to expand parking areas of an auto sales and repair business. Please Mr. McBride here. Hi. I want to come up and tell a about your plan, please.

Good evening. Um, I founded Boss Auto with a partner almost 10 years ago and uh, kind of clawed my way up from that to the bottom. I didn't know that you needed a parking plan or or you were limited on the cars you could have. All I knew is I had an automotive repair, you know, facility that I, uh, work very hard to turn into something. Um, opened up as like full service, all make models and, uh, quickly figured out that's the hard way to make a living really hard. So, um, moved into retail in the last few years, um, which is where I think this issue arose from. I just pretty much capitalized on all my, you know, road frontage that I could and put a car, you know, as many cars as I could out there. And probably far too many, um, you know, at times, um, going back 10 years, I had the place you couldn't even walk through there with basically jump cars. And I was doing the best I could and through the years, um, they're improving. You know, I don't have the best cars, but not the worst. and I serve uh, you know, the common public. You know, $10,000 cars. Um, if you want to sell a few a week, you can't only have five on the lot.

You know, if you have 15, you might sell three and then I can pay the light bill. So, that's kind of what I've done. And, um, it's kind of caught off guard by if I need, you know, the issues that arose from that. And I'm just seeking I kind of drew up a cartoon drawing of kind of what I have going on right now. Um, that allows for access from the fire department and all by the utilities. also my customers to come and go and uh get get as much you know uh out in the public eye as possible. I realize it's kind of a it's not the best place on on the block but it's definitely not the worst. I'm in an area that's, you know, directly across another dealer and a 50 corners the gas station and right next to me is like a construction zone where they're mixing around concrete and all my co cars were covered in red dust for the last year and probably the next year and I've never said a word and I I want everyone to succeed including myself. I'm just trying to feed my kids by put some cars on my retail lot. So the according to the application uh there's let's see one two looks like three requested area variances. Um maximum front yard supposed to be between 42 and or it's supposed to be 42. Am I not reading it right? Um it says 4230 ft. Not sure what that means. So maximum 30.

Oh it's 40. So he exceeds that then what's the other way or something maximum maximum is 30 and he's a maximum what um front yard um what do I mean maximize I'm not sure all that's been approved has been approved all all conditions they put are right there on the Oh so everything's been approved I I'm trying to get to try to try to get these to the ZBA first. Gotcha. So So they've already given there. Okay. Yes. Oh, sorry. Isn't if it's not there, he has a copy.

Okay. Oh, no. That's fine. I just misunderstood the the application. Yeah, they're right. Maybe I should take those out when I No, that's you guys. That's fine. It's a lot of paperwork to sort through. All right. So, CBA's approved all the area variances. So really all we're looking to do is approve the site plan right here with the same conditions the same conditions that CBA is approved. Um you guys have any questions for this gentleman?

Of course you do on your own. Sure. I I don't think so. Uh other than how do we keep you to some type of Yeah. maximum, but I think that's it here.

Yeah, the conditions are a maximum of 18 vehicles located on the park at any given time. No more than 16 of said vehicles may be located, parked or stored outside unless it detailed site plan is submitted for 20 vehicles and three all parking spots be identified with proper parking. So, you guys can live with that with the CPA approve. This is the first I heard of that, but I can live with that. Yeah. As far as any other comments or concern. So, basically what that says is you're allowed 18 maximum of 18 vehicles. Maximum of 18 with two being inside

16 outside at night. But I I did the best mockup I could, but it's not a scale. If you can bring something into in into me to scale to show scale, they gave you a maximum with 20. So I might be able to squeeze a couple more if you have an architect. All right. Okay. That's very fair. Thank you. All right. Any other questions or concerns? Sorry. Can I have a motion to approve the site plan review for 95 W Street? I'll make that motion by Jen. Second. Second. Mike. Further discussion. All right. All those in favor say I.

I. Anyone opposed? All right. Motion carried. Good welcome to the same parame. All right. Next order on the agenda is 2628 Elm Street to planer view. Paul Stewart seeks approval of plans for construction of the new parking area to accommodate one vehicle on the Greenbush side of the corner lot. You know, Minister Stewart. Yes. Okay. Now, tell us a little bit about your plan.

Well, it's the side of it's at the corner of Elman Green Bush. Uh there's never been I've never been able to park any kind of I got two four bedroomedroom units there. I've only got parking for two cars. So, I need parking from the other the other apartment. Um, the zoning board already approved this. As far as I know, they approved it, but I had to come and talk to you guys today. So, ZBA they're okay. Yes. Uh, I got to cut a curb, 5 foot curb cut on the curb. Is it going to be behind? I'm trying to visualize where the spot's going to be. Is it behind the building then or where?

No, it's on the side. It's at green bush. I know where Green Bush is, but where's the where? Yeah. So, I'm in Green. Take a look at these photos, which are new from No, I wasn't sure what they Yeah. So, this Yeah. Okay. No, we didn't. No, it never got to we first DBA. retitled it or tabled it, brought it back to the ZBA last meeting and he made some revisions to his original application. So, there's going to be a curb cut allowing a car to pull in there and um how's the parking space? Is it going to be like cement or what's it going to be made out of?

Black. Black top. That's one parking area. Then the other one I'm not sure if you guys are even considering or you have to consider it is a driveway that I share with the apartment next door or the building next door. I I give them the right away. I own the dirt off the ground street that's off of Green Bush. Also off Green Bush.

So I'm going to have one two parking areas. One on the grass that I was talking y about before. Now, the other one is going to be a parking spot. I'm going to black top it. It's It's already my driveway. I just want to let you know I'm going to black top that 30 ft deep, 14 ft wide. So So the one vehicle is going to end up on a grass. One vehicle will be there where that truck is. That it's going to be black. That's going to be black tile.

Yes. Correct. Entrance off a green bush with a 5 foot to expand the paper 5T. I see. And the second one you're saying is to the right of where this picture is. It's still right now. So you're that was going to be right here. Right where that that vehicle is. That's a driveway. Yeah. Right there. So it's it's um all it's old gravel that's probably 20 30 year old. I'm going to black top it the whole driveway. It's essentially going to have room for two more vehicles.

Exactly. Right. Yeah. Yeah. One one on the grass that will be black and the other one right there. Give me my two parking spots. Right. Now, did ZBA have to take a look at this or no? Yeah, ZBA approved it uh through the variances with the condition that the curb cut expanded 3 to 5 ft. Okay. uh with the concrete approaching from the curve that's going toward the intersection. Correct. It's right here facing the south. Okay. Right. So, this allows Mr. Stew to meet the minimum requirements for parking where he didn't meet that before. The requirements are two per unit.

Okay. This is the only way he could do it. and and also to also to avoid stacking. Right. Right. All right. Can I have a motion then to approve the um plan for 2628 street plan review approved? I got a motion Tony. All right. Second. Seconded. Jen. All right. Further discussion. You don't have any other issues then? No, he I mean we did have a bunch of issues. They tabled it. He came back with with a new plan. I think this this this plan works better.

Okay. No, he's he's going to put up some curbing to make sure they don't use it as a driveth through. He's going to put So, there's a rod iron fence up there now, right? He's gonna put that back so they can't use it as a circle driveway. Everything that he that the ZBA said was wrong came back. So I I don't have an issue. All right. Uh seeing no further discussion, all those in favor of the site plan for 26 28 street say I. I. Anyone opposed?

All right. Motion carried. Thank you. just uh right other conditions other than what CBA [Music] I didn't mean to do that. All right, let's go back and do number two. This is the one at street CNY food service group which operates Dunkin Donuts seeks approval of plans as part of a rebranding one.

Oh, okay. I'm sorry. Yes. Yes. That's um anyone here from Duncan? Yeah, I am. All right. Sorry. I knew there was two Duncan, but I for some reason I saw Don just seems like just I think last name is Yeah. Hi, my name's Tom today. All right. Um, so yeah. So the uh being a franchisee with Duncan, we're required about every 10 years or so to update our signage and our color scheme and the theme. Um, so that's what this proposal was for. Um, exterior the building. We're going to take down the static menu boards and put up digital menu boards. It's going to be about half the square footage that it currently is.

Um, we're also going to put up a canopy. Yeah. Over the order taker to cover to protect the guests as they order. I saw the one over on Clinton. That looks good. That looks nice. I think people will be happy to have a little coverage as they're getting their drinks back. And Yeah. So, and there's also a canopy going over the window. Yeah. On the blind side to to protect them as well. And then just updating the signage, updating the lens on the road sign. Right. Uh, no. I believe the actual building make it a little smaller because it's Duncan now and not donuts. Twice a one word. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, interior all we're doing is we upgrade the countertops, new mill work, uh, tile and color scheme for paint.

All right. Any questions? So the special use permit is just a cleanup on their part that should have been done last time they did a major renovation again was not the service station every business is supposed to have a special use. Okay. So we need to have not only the site interview but also special work with the gold place.

That was nothing that just came up because they're here just typically like like we normally do with a lot of stuff. So it's not and site plan is just the state was a little more involved with the signage. Okay. All right. So, can I have a motion to approve the site plan review and the special use permit for 1562 Tom Street? I'll Mike second.

Tony, I hear Tony first. All right. Any further discussion? Question. But while I'm thinking about it, you can add a condition that it's nothing to do with these guys, but if there's any actions in the future that the owner of the property, which is a speed and place sign, a monument type sign that they need to do that.

Yeah, because the poll signs are not allowed. Not allowed. Okay. Can we get that in the minutes, Andy? What Roy just said? Repeat that back to me. Um, any any further exterior action on the property will require the owner, which is Esmart LLC to replace the pole sign on the property with a compant sign to what we did. with developing. Well, yeah. What we did with the other with the other Yeah. The other speedway. I was I thought you were talking about the scient which is if you look at the over there, that's what did I really? Okay. All right. Any other further discussion before we vote on this one?

All right. All those in favor of the site plan review and special use permit for 156 Hopkins say I. I. I. Anyone oppose. All right. Motion carried. All right. Good luck. Thank you. Have a good night. You too. All right. Uh for whatever reason they went out of order to so we're going to go down to four now. That's the next next item on our agenda. Uh this is for 40 Grant Street site planner special use permit for central Portland. They seek to approve approval of plans for a mass transit facility. Is anyone here on their behalf? Yes, sir. You want to tell us about your plan?

Yes. I am Bren Dice, uh the associate VP of communications and planning at Centro and I'll let you introduce yourself. David Kashi. I'm the facilities project manager at Central.

You may have noticed that we are in town lately. We started service in March of uh this year and um so we created a new LLC um which is the Cetro of Portland. Uh we found a property at 40 Grant Street and we have leased it and um are looking to make it into our um garage and office space. Uh no physical changes are planned other than cosmetic upgrades uh which we've been uh working on. Our hours of operation will be 5:30 a.m. approximately to 6:30 p.m. approximately. We have 23 buses that Portland central of Portland own currently. Um and we will be um storing them in the garages as much as we can but also um throughout the property. We included a site plan of where those could go. Uh any major upgrades to body work or um engine work are done at the Syracuse garage. So it's really for this garage is really for um preventive maintenance and and basic tires, oil changes and such. Anything that breaks

any major down Yeah. goes goes right up to our office in Saves. Um, and then we'll use that front uh building for office space um and break rooms and such for our um 10 or 12 drivers. I I I just had one question. I think you said there's like 20 vehicles now that are 23 that we own. 23 service Portland. How many actually are going to be inside garages? I'd like an exact number. I think for our board we need that. You know, there are four bays that are currently in operation. um two two vehicles in each bay probably the side of the vehicles be one at the bay that's a new actual repair shop

and there's two other outline buildings they are not currently set up to hold vehicles but that's yeah so we can pull them in there but not most effective way there's other structures inside the building we and those ones are closer to the railroad tracks exactly okay that's and we actually for your information don't have all 23 buses here right now Um, for example, six of them are in Syracuse. So, right now we only have 17 17. Um, go back to my write up. How many you say full passing? 23 buses or three.

Um, you know, it'll be daily vehicle staging and dispatch coordination. uh pre-ervice vehicle inspections and safety checks and then driver shift chains changes, break room for them and lunchroom, etc. Um they've cleaned up the the building a lot and done a lot of that cosmetic stuff already and it looks great. Um we also also had a lot of 88 clients so door handles, the restroom we opened up with that 60inch turn around. Um all the railings we blocked out so that way we have a handicap accessible restroom inside. And right now we're out to bid for stairs to we'll move the ramp the ADA ramp to the front of the building allowing public access in Roy CBA or no

they're not changing anything. Oh, they're not changing. Okay. Yeah. So if if you do make any change to CBA and then it'll come to us. We do and and I'll give you more information. Um since we do not own the building, we do not plan for major changes until and unless we own the building. So um obviously we're you know a federally funded um agency which means we have to go through all of the FEMA um all of those things and get um environmental approval before we can buy any properties. And you're leasing the property now.

We Yes. And we have that option to buy um should all that um environmental approval get approved then we can um move forward with our is Grant Street the owner of the property? No, it's the Grant Street Auto was the owner and it went out and they went up for auction. Okay. And it's a construction company that is local here that has paving and a couple other branches as well. economy payment that's parsing. So we have a 10-year lease agreement signed for starting I believe in April. Yeah.

And what are the cohabitation rules with Mor and Grant Street's still down there? They still have a service or is that what you're taking over that whole area? I believe we're taking over I don't think Grant Street Garage is there anymore. all those whole parcel. It's seven shaders. Gotcha. That was the reason why we identified this property was because they were going out.

We're also looking to put some signs up um on the front sign on the street. We're going to keep the sign right in the footprint that's there and and and put our central logo in. And then we would like to put a central logo also on the um exterior of the garage. And basically you tell us what we can put up and and that's what we'll uh we'll work on. So they would probably have to come back that decide. We don't have Yeah, I don't have anything in front of me. I just don't.

All right. Um any other question before we move on? The um county planning made four recommendations before um let's see the staff recommends approval of these site plan review and special permit only under the following conditions. One that if the applicant intends to construct any additional structures, fencils or sidewalks, the applicant adheres to code 138-12A. That the city required the applicant to adhere to FEMA FEMA regulations regarding outdoor indoor vehicle storage. that the city determine whether the current landscaping buffer configuration adequately adequately shields neighboring residential properties from both the visual and auditory impacts of the proposed operation and four that the applicant adhere to all sign guidelines provided in 300-1 12 general sign standards. So, it seems like we'd do that at the next step whenever they open the proposal. If you ever did, we did fill out a sign permit. We paid for a sign permit and we sent those photos in. But if you need more than that, I can certainly

Yeah, the side of the street. Awesome. Yeah. All right. Uh, any other thing you guys want to know about or make sure we have those four uh parameters that are if you want to adopt those same conditions or you know consistent with the county's conditions I'll capture that in the fact

I think that would be wise if it was okay I think it's important for you guys to number three is about the the landscape where offers um it's important to recognize that yes there are railroad tracks over there so these people have lived with that

noise per but this is this is a new situation. Um there are some residential residential buildings on the branch street side of the property and there are also some on the other side of the rail tracks and possibly again the river and then so there's not I don't believe there's any the rickety side for the river but then you have the apartments on the other side. Right. Right. So, the concern the county and the city have what's going on over there is the light pollution from the from the buses because they leave early in the morning. I don't know. I don't know what time to get back and there's just some history here. I'm trying to avoid it happening here. It happened at some other other locations. Okay. And also, how long do you leave the buses running in the winter time? in terms of like warming them up so they ready to go. I mean their PMS the mornings just their 10-minute pre free preide.

How close to the property you just uh the proposal for where the buses will be lined up for center of the building just to left of the gates. I'm just trying to think ahead the exhaust. I don't see it being a problem but I'm trying to brainstor some some test problems that's

and just to clarify um we do not expect folks to get on and off the buses here. Um our main you know central location is still the county office building. Yeah. It's just where our drivers will pick up the buses obviously and do their breaks. So my biggest concern and also the counties based on that is the light pollution with the lights in the morning and pulling it in and out there lights hitting other other properties as well as the noise again that's pulling it out that that was why they wanted buffers in the fast light just the lights of the vehicles I mean this time they're not adding any additional exterior

it's the lights let's say let's just say we're trying to avoid a problem that has happened elsewhere in the city then wasn't their fault. They got thrown out. County that prey any other question for you guys. All right. Can I have a motion then to approve the uh site plan review and special use for 40 Grant Street for Central Portland, Inc. I'll make that motion by Jen. I a second.

So you can just change one thing. Yes, sir. 5359, right? That lot needs to be paved when they do purchase the property. It's currently not paved. Is the entire property not paid or is it the entire property back there? The front apron's paid, but it's very well. We'll just put the qualifier on that. If you do decide to buy the property, it must be done then at that point paid. I've already got this discussion. Just want to make sure we got it in the minutes. That is a requirement, but I I'll not pay.

Okay, sounds fair. All right. Any other further discussion before we vote on this? Um but uh specifically when we say paid as Paul but what area the the entrance way all employee parking um bus parking I mean there was a shaded area we talking about that whole shaded area in the diagram that we saw anything they're not using I don't doesn't really have to be paid for using

and most of that looked like it was going to be used for what you described I'm not sure back at closer to the also to know the other side anything being used for uh traffic or parking probably third or two if if we're firstand building a new property on our new building at that time there's architects involved too so it can be enough which we have a whole whole section on how parking lot's supposed to be designed and that's what your architect will get to okay so yeah I guess we didn't talk about that But if we if we purchase the building, then we would be looking at a new build.

Yeah. Okay. All right. Any other questions or concerns? All right. Um, all those in favor of the site plan review of special use permit for 40 Grant Street Central Court say I oppose. All right. Motion car. All right. Thank you. Next item on the agenda looks like 66 Pendleton Street site plan review Mark Button seeks approval of plans to install an 8ft security fence rear area in

how you doing Mark button been in business for almost 20 years at that same spot September will be 20. It's I think it's time. It's time to have a fence to secure cars. We got a lot of unhoused people around the backside of us that are starting to walk through and go through different things and um just want to put a little security in that area. We're going to have a security system come in, put some cameras up, too. So, I mean, that's all we're looking to do. Just fence in or pick a fence in an area to have cars out back at night time when we're not there. So I'm assuming the 8 foot exceeds the allowed. No, that's uh GB GB1. So

Okay. So that's okay. That's what I'm worried about. Um so basically an A for passenger to kind of give you a little more security. They said um cameras and such. Yeah. I I want to put a security camera on the the base, but I'm not sure if I'm going to do that. But you're not doing that yet. That's the fact right now. Yep. Sorry. That's um questions for Mr. Bern. All right. I have a motion then to approve the site plan review at 66 Pendleton Street to put an 8 foot uh security fence in the rear of his property. I'll make that motion.

Tony second. Seconded. Jim. Further discussion. All right. All those in favor say I. I. I. I. Anyone opposed? All right. Motion carried. All right. Good luck. Thank you. All right. Next on our agenda is 8 and 8 and a half South A subdivision. Uh Peter Benedy seeks approval of plans to subdivide the property into two lots at 8 and 8 I'm sorry, 8 and 8 and a half and 10 and a half south. Uh first off, it's my understanding that you're going to need a site plan. one is uh in process but it's not ready yet

as of today. So either we can reschedu this to the next meeting in the meantime if you want to get the questions over with tonight we can do that also. Um we we probably should have the site plan in front of us vote on it. That's my I mean how do you guys feel? That's that's my gut feeling. Yeah. I mean that I mean I have just what's the intent the subdivision I guess why why are we doing right why are we doing it it's really not being done for me here I have a buyer for the a property he had three buildings on the property his lender does not do commercial loans so he wants to separate into two and one

simple as that okay

yeah I mean it would be I don't want to screw your plans up but it be okay with you if we brought back a site plan review for our September meeting with the vote on it that you know but I I don't think we can do too much without the site plan review but but I I appreciate what you know told us about the plan anyway makes sense so uh the CBA considered it they uh tabled their consideration of the area variances and there was suggestion there knowing that the site plan not been submitted or this discussion about having a sketch plan conference prior to the next CPA plan I guess. So um did anything or did we get anything initiated about doing that? No, but so what you're going to need come back is you're going to need a complete 10,000 foot view of both new parcels with parking and because um our local law says that they're going to have when you do get approval, they're going uh the chairman of the planning commission has to prove it. And the nanny's got it run down and put a a stamp on it.

Okay. Apparently, so that's that's the way you have to handle things. So besides, you're going to need it anyway. It can't be just one 10. It can't be view of both properties. It has to be each subdivided prop. You have to have a copy of both copies as they would be if they're but a 10k view. Yeah. You know, doesn't got, you know, doesn't got to be elevation drawing. It just has to show property lines are going to be where you plan on putting the parkings. That was a big question that that the EBA, right? Okay.

So, if you could come back with those in time for our next meeting. Our next meeting is September 8th. It's like the Monday after Labor Day. So when the site plan is ready, I drop it off at the code office. Is that uh it'll go with these. You can bring it to the meeting if you want to. You don't want it beforehand to look at. I I mean we can do that's up to you guys. You want to do a sketch plan meeting and that that way you have a month to decide what he needs to change on it. That would probably the idea that being before the full before they go have the full plans done, you know, look it over sure that conceptually things are lined up.

Okay. So, does that seem reasonable? Sketch plan. Yeah. First and then, you know, there's any changes, we'd like to see, you could do those before this actually gets approved. Okay. All right. So the sketch plan is not the final plan. Is that my understanding? That's as I that's as I see it. I mean you would approve the sketch plan. I would go back and and up to the board. Right. You go back to your designer who's ever doing it for you to be like these are the comments that we got make sure he's abiding by our

Yeah. You know, if you want to contact either myself or the clerk's office or the code office to get that scheduled, it would involve in a minimum the chairman of the mission and the code enforcement zoning officer. Anybody else who would like to participate, but that's the minimum. And uh that's downstairs. Uh yeah, second floor city clerk's office. Um, I'll just uh give you my uh need.

So, I don't really know if we need to table this because there's really no site plan attached. So, we I guess we're just going to schedule a sketch meeting before a regular meeting. Yeah, because that might Yeah, I don't know. I'll do it on So, well, I think um I think you need to table that table it. Yeah. All right. Opposite J makes sense to me. Okay. So, can we get a motion to table number six the eight 88 8 and a half south a sub subdivision that Mr. Bendy is proposing? I make a motion. All right. Mike's got the motion. Second got it tim. All right. Any further discussion?

All right. All those in favor of tableing this item bill for in time for scheduling say I. I I any oppos There's not one or let's see what there's one more we didn't do number eight on our list I don't think that's just the yeah minor site for that uh Chris Mkeley seeks administrative approval of plans to install a facade sign for new business Sund Dog Downtown Clubhouse. Yep.

Is anyone here for that? No. Uh signed either one. Is that okay? Did what? He did. Oh, was that one of the three things I signed? Yeah. Oh, okay. Yeah. Okay. Good. But that was approved by the historic commission as well. Excellent. Good. Good. Good. Okay. Um we do have two sets of minutes to approve before we adjourn. We've got our June minutes and July minutes. Why don't we take them in chronological order? Um any changes or corrections to the June 2025 minutes that we received? I wasn't here. Be hard for you to vote on.

Um which one was this? We've been Oh, you can still vote. Don't need to recruit yourself. So, okay. You can build presuming you watch the recording. Did you watch you didn't you didn't tune in? Um, I will. All right. All right. Um, any corrections or changes to the minutes before we approve them?

All right. Can I have a motion to approve the June 2025 Portland Planning Commission minutes? I'll make that motion. I Jim makes a motion. Second. I'll second Tony. Sorry. Further discussion. All right. All those in favor of the June minutes say I. I. Anyone opposed? Anybody abain? I say. Yeah. Otherwise, we got put them off for one more one more month, but I guess that's not the end of the world. Okay. Now, you were here for this, I was. All right. So, uh same thing for the July 2025 minutes. Uh any corrections or changes to those minutes? Let's see.

Good. Pretty straightforward. Okay. Uh can I have a motion to approve those? Then we'll make that motion. Oh, we got a tie there. We'll have Mike. We'll give you the second Tony second. So, did we agree to approve the June or We got four four Oh, on the June minutes. Now, everybody was here for the July meeting. So, I think everybody feels comfortable voting on these. All those in favor of the July 2025 minutes, say I. I

I opposed. All right. Motion carried. All right. We need a motion to adjourn. Just keep in mind, guys, that the next meeting is not until September 8th. It's because September 1st is Labor Day and we don't meet on August. So, put that on your uh on your calendar. All right. Can I have a motion to adjourn our August meeting? All right. Mike's got the motion. Second. I'll second. All right. Any further discussion? All right. All those in favor say I. I anybody opposed? My motion carries. So I pleading September 8th.