Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

On August 17, you are welcome to come to the city planning and Yongdo Regional Council. We will start the meeting at 6 p.m. Please stand up and swear to the national flag together. Thank you very much. Yes, I agree.

The consent case is treated as a consent once, including items that are common and generally non-concerned. You can exclude items from the case in order for a member or an employee to vote individually. Members, is there anyone who wants to exclude items from the case?

Mr. Felter, I suggest that you approve the consent case as recommended by the employee. Is that a formal consent? Yes, I agree. All right. Mr. Bronski. Yes, I will suggest. Request. All right. There was a consent and a request to approve the consent case. Please vote. 7 votes in favor, 0 votes in opposition. Mr. Binder couldn't attend this evening. All right. It's a personal opinion.

Individual review items. It is a public hearing item. As long as there is no special instruction for the committee, the speaker will be appointed according to the registration order. The applicant can have a total of 15 minutes of presentation time and 5 minutes of discussion time when necessary. The remaining speakers are assigned 3 minutes per person within a total of 30 minutes of testimony time. You can adjust the time if you think the committee is necessary. The administrative review item must be approved if the urban development regulations meet. In addition to the legal restrictions, more measures are provided. In the case of non-objective items of the public hearing, the chairman will allow the public opinion on cases that have not been announced as public hearings. The chairman can set a time limit considering the number of requests, length of cases, and efficiency of the meeting, and include a total time limit. This is the first item. As a request for approval for the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning and development of 184 areas of the planning The applicant wants to modify the existing conditions related to the use of this area. This planning and development area has a large number of land owners, and the applicant has obtained some of the necessary owner's signatures for the use change application, but not all of them have been received. Therefore, the applicant is requesting the establishment of a meeting of the committee, and the department of management recommends that the planning and development committee hold a meeting of the committee for this. If you have any questions, we will answer them. Good.

Do you have any questions for the department? No? All right. Mr. Bronski. I agree to submit a petition on this case according to the recommendation of the department. Mr. LaRue. I request.

All right.

There was consent and request for the submission of the petition. I'll express it. All right. Please vote. It's a 7 to 0. That's right. This is the second case.

The applicant is Ple Inosi. This case is a legal consideration. Hello, I am Robin Clark. I am the chief planner of the Development Service Department. I will briefly explain the background of this case. The signage regulation has been going on for quite a long time on the part of the PNZ work program. This project is different from a production project or a UDC project. It is expected that it will be part of the purchase request before the UDC passes, and it will be adjusted with the changes needed for UDC later. Last year, the department received instructions on the ban on full-sign and memorandum signage regulations from P&Z last year. And in April this year, we discussed again for additional instructions, including a clear explanation of the memorandum signage design standards. Currently, the contents of the request form are almost complete. Final review of our department and the law and construction inspection department is underway. The committee will receive the request form completed through the packet when the public hearing case is dealt with. Therefore, the current department of the department requests the public hearing to hold a public hearing to review the request form.

All right. Then, at the meeting, is there a chance to ask questions about the request and hear a clear explanation?

Yes. I'll be happy to answer your questions, but I don't have the full information on the request account right now.

All right. Mr. Bronski. I agree to hold a public hearing on this case according to the recommendation of the department. Mr. Relly. I request. All right. There was a request for a public hearing on the signboard request. Please vote. It's 7 to 0. All right. Is there anything else to discuss at the committee meeting tonight? All right. I'm leaving at 6.06 p.m. so