About this meeting
- Government Body
- Town Council
- Meeting Type
- Town Council
- Location
- Paradise Valley, AZ
- Meeting Date
- April 9, 2026
Transcript
1045 sections (from 1,231 segments)
All set? Alright. Well, good afternoon everybody. The meeting is called to order. Would the clerk please call the roll.
Mayor Stanton? Here. Vice mayor Labelle?
Here.
Council member Andean Keller?
Here.
Council member Liepman?
Here.
Council member Moore? Here. Council member Pace? Here. Council member Thomason? Here. We have a quorum.
Awesome. Thank you. As a reminder, this meeting is being streamed live on the Internet and will be archived on the town's website for future viewing. The first item on the agenda is the study session. These items are scheduled for discussion among the council staff, council staff and their designees.
Votes will not be taken on these items at this time but may be scheduled for a final action later in the meeting or at a future meeting. Members of the public are asked to hold their comments until call of the public scheduled to begin shortly after 6PM. Public comments will also be invited when the agenda topic is placed on a future agenda item for action. And the first item on study session is 20 six-one 102 committee, commission and board volunteer interviews and I want to thank everybody going through the packet of information that we have on the candidates that have been applying for these positions and as we discussed in the last meeting our Vice Mayor will be asking questions today of the candidates and as you may recall decided that would be a good process because it would keep the questions focused and I think it's always tempting because we have such amazing candidates that you see something on a resume or a background and next thing you know you want to do a deep dive and I think that's wonderful and important but I think for the sake of expediency today and respect for the time and what we're trying to accomplish.
I would ask to to keep those for another discussion point. Mayor, vice mayor will go through and I'll start the meeting by thanking them and then turn it over to the vice mayor. Vice mayor has the questions that were circulated so she's going to go ahead and ask those questions. I would again ask that we try to stay focused on the questions that she's asking to keep continuity and consistency and well and how we're dealing with the applicants and giving them all a fair chance to to present themselves. Again, it's an honor and a privilege to have these these folks come in and apply and with that I'll turn it over to the vice mayor.
Mister mayor, can I just I'm sorry? Just I wanted to let you know that at your council seat, I've printed a list of all the the interviews, and then I've also provided the the committee rosters and the charts on on appointments. Committee has the the absences for all committee members. I wanna let you know that, Jane Horn, Stanley Marks, and David Seldon will be interviewing on Zoom. So, we'll have them up when they get to that point.
And then so the the the process is we'll we'll interview them in an open meeting. And then after immediately after the last tenure oh, I guess, I should also let you know that initially Susan Hawthorne was not able to interview. She was gonna be traveling, but she got injured and stayed in town. So she will be here in person, and she was slotted in at the last interview at 04:45. So we will get to hear from her.
And then immediately after all the interviews, there'll be a motion to go into executive session, where the council can talk about any of the applicants for appointment and any of the people scheduled for reappointment. So they were all notified that they may be discussed in executive session. So the council's authorized to do that. And then that might take us until 06:00. We'll just have to wait and see how the time goes. So the thought is that at 06:00 we would reassemble into council chambers, go through the very quick business meeting and then come back in this room for the study session item on the budget.
Wonderful. And thank you Mr. Miller for that. And do we know if there are going to be any committee or board chairs that are going to sit in on the discussions? Mr. Mayor,
yes, Chairman Pamela Georgios from the Planning Commission will be here, but later in the meeting just for the Planning Commission applicants. There was a third person who applied for the Planning Commission, but he withdrew his application. And so we have two people who specifically expressed interest in the planning commission. And then one person, our first applicant is interested in any committee. So his application was provided to Chair George Ellis also. Colleen Steinberg sent me something in writing that I will share with the council during the executive session. And then I have some emails that I can read that I received received from members of
the Mountain Sherve Trust. Very good. Very good. With that, Councilor Repacio, a question?
One quick question, Duncan. And thank you for all the hard work as always. This is a lot of work for you at this time of
the year. When we look at
the absences and we see people that have five and four and three, so they didn't participate by Zoom or anything, they were just
not They were not present.
Okay. Thank you.
And that was for that date range that I told you all of 2425 and '26.
Thank you, Mr. Miller. Any other questions about the process before we dive in and start to meet the candidates? No, everybody's on the same page? Okay. Vice Mayor.
I did just before we start before we go into executive session, it's fine right now with the interviews, but my is not connected. So before we get into the rest of the meeting, I don't know if there's somebody that could take a look at this. Can't get on the yeah.
I'll take care of it. Mr. Karmar, our first applicant, is here. And I can bring him in and then I will take.
Thank you, Duncan. If on the way over to IT you wanna invite mister Karmar in. Hello, Mr. Carmer. Hi.
Thank you for coming in today. We greatly appreciate your interest in being here today and volunteering for the town. My name is Mark Stamson. I serve as the mayor and very proud to go through this process with the wonderful candidates that are applying for different positions And so welcome. Thank you. I think we've we've got the full council here. The way we're looking at the process this this year is the vice mayor is going to to ask questions that we've all agreed that are the point you to the positions that you're maybe interested in. And then obviously if you have any questions for us, we're happy to respond to those as well. We're just grateful that you're here today and appreciate that. We are being live streamed.
So people can watch this today or it'll be archived. Thank you for your willingness to participate and send the information in. And again, we're trying to keep the conversation to about ten minutes if we can. And with that, I'll turn it over to the vice mayor.
Thank you, Mr. Karmar. I'm Vice Mayor LaBelle and we're going to start out with just a few quick questions and then a couple of follow-up questions and a closing question. So I noticed that you had responded with any of the open positions. I am wondering if you could let us know if there's one or two that you're more interested in. And along with that, just kind of briefly describe your background and why you're interested in any one of those committees.
Right. Thank you. I'd be happy to do that. Well, yes, when I filled out the form, I said I'd be willing to serve on any committees because basically I retired in 2020 and I've been a resident in Paradise Valley since 2004. On my previous job, I traveled a lot, but now that we're that I'm retired and I have time and I just been a long time resident and I'm interested in helping out wherever I can.
As far as the my business background, I was with a large company, kind of First American Title Insurance. I ran the Western Part of The United States Of America for about the last fifteen years of my career. But the three committees, the Advisory Committee on Public Safety and Paradise Valley Mountain Preserve Trust and the Arts Advisory Council. I mean Arts Advisory Council, I have my wife and I have always kind of prided ourselves on focusing on local artists. And so we're a little bit in the art scene here and visited often.
And we've acquired like Michael Carson's and Max Hammonds and people like that because they're local. And so I'd be interested in doing that. Obviously, the Public Safety Committee, I'm not really I've never been in law enforcement or anything, but I would love to help out as far as, with the relationship between the police and the city and the citizens and those kind of things. And the Mountain Valley, or the Paradise Valley Preserve Trust, I do have a background in, like I said, in real estate and title and adjudication of title and those kind of things for almost forty years. So I have some you know, experience in those areas.
But so anyway, I'm willing to, know, start anywhere and do anything just to be of service.
Thank you. Because you did mention that I heard you say arts once or twice and we certainly don't want to pigeonhole you into one of these committees if you have interest in some of the others. But I would want to follow-up with your level of interest there with what is your vision for the role of the Paradise Valley Arts Board in town? Do you know much about what they're doing now? And even if you don't, do you have ideas or thoughts about where you like to see that go or expand or grow or outreach?
Well, as I read it, the committee was to one of the things they did was pick the artists that display their art in here. I had a friend. I've been here for a couple of those, Bolino, aunt miss Bolino. She's a friend of mine and her art was displayed in here. Think it was like a few a couple two or three years ago.
But so, yeah, I'm a proponent of local original art, not to clays and copies and stuff like that. So I think it's just great that we would foster those relationships artists and expand that any other way outside the current responsibilities they do now.
Thank you. Also, what you said, sounds like you're retired. You have plenty time. So you understand the lift of whatever committee you'd want to be on the role. You have the time to attend the meetings and help with committee work and committed to that process.
I've got too much time. That's what my wife told me. I'm jealous. Yeah. So I'm I'm available, you know, just other than being a grandparent and doing a little bit of traveling. I'm I'm available to easily to serve on to meet the I about the I know I read in the on the website the number of meetings they usually have and the timing and so that wouldn't be a problem for me.
Yeah. Well, thank you for checking into the actual committee and how often it meets and all of those items. So if you had to say put in order of how you if it were in a perfect world, what would be your order of preference on the committees?
Well, I'm just making an assumption. I don't know. I'm sure that there's a lot more interest in competition for the Mountain Preserve Trust even though I have that background and title and real estate and adjudication easements. I guess realistically being a first time volunteer doing this kind of thing, either the Arts Advisory Council or the Public Safety Committee is probably more a better place to start and go to build your experience in the community and get to know people better in the government and the leadership.
Okay. Thank you. Is there anything else that you'd want to add to let us know before we wrap up our interview.
No, I just really appreciate you taking the time. And like I said, this is kind of a first time for me to do something like this and reach out. I hope I can help out in some way.
Yeah. Well, thank you so much for your time. And it was wonderful to meet you.
And I assume we'll just hear back from Mr. McMullen.
Yeah. We'll interviewing candidates this afternoon and then discussing an executive session about where best to slot people that have shown interest and then we'll circle back with all the candidates and let them know how the next steps may proceed. But most importantly, this town thrives and survives on volunteerism. That's we're all volunteers. Our judiciary, our municipal judges are all volunteers and it's a well worthwhile investment of time because it's such a wonderful wonderful town and thank you for stepping up. We appreciate that.
Thank you. Nice to meet you.
Our next applicant is not quite here yet, but I also wanted to mention that at the council deus, the motion memo tonight, it's a little different than what you're used to saying. I've split it out by committee. So when the council makes their appointments, it'll be you're doing one committee at a time. And so each committee is a little different because some, the mayor makes the appointment, but there has to be a motion to confirm the mayor's appointments. And then some are council appointments, like planning commission is council. So the motion is a little different. So I have those on the dais, and I didn't know helpful if you had those with you for the executive session so you can
fill in your thoughts there.
Yeah. We got a lot of papers. No, I think. Thank you, Charlie. Appreciate it.
Mr. Mayor? Charlie Hirf.
Hello, mister Hirf. Mr. Herb, thank you for joining us. We appreciate seeing a familiar face. Good to see you.
Thank you for putting your name forward. We appreciate that very much. My pleasure. Grateful because as you know, this town is all about volunteerism and the support of the community and thank you for putting your name forward. Just to give you a little snapshot, entire council is here obviously and we are live streaming this and recording it for the website for our archives and our minutes.
But today we're going to I'm going to turn it over to the vice mayor and she's got some set questions that we've all agreed that we would channel to the applicants. So there's continuity. We're just grateful that you're here and we're grateful for the time. So after we the vice mayor goes through that, we'll wrap up and then the next steps will be later today. The council will discuss the best fits that we see with the applicants, but it's always a tough decision because all of the applicants are just wonderful. So we're grateful to have you here.
Well, is the first time since I retired that I've had a vacuum in volunteer unpaid jobs, and I felt I had to scratch the itch.
Good for you. And this is the vice mayor, Christine LaBelle.
Well, thank you for joining us, mister Herf. I I appreciate you being here. And, I will let you know this particular interview is a little bit more, structured, a little less open ended than we've done in the past. So I'm gonna start with, just a a question asking you to briefly describe your background, which we saw on the resume and is very impressive, why you're interested in serving on the committee, then we're going to have a few follow-up questions and a closing. So feel free to tell us everything you need and want to in your opening statement, and then we'll follow with some more structured questions.
Okay. I've been a resident since 1978, married. We had three children. We lost one daughter to cancer about five years ago. My background is as a lawyer.
So right now, I am a retired recovering lawyer. And I have been a member of the well, my retirement consisted of being a volunteer judge pro tem, which I'd done for thirty seven years, twenty years as a constitutional law professor at ASU, and ten years as a Paradise Valley cop. And I think if there is one thing I have done that I really enjoyed the most for PV is I was one of the people that interviewed your candidates last time you had a go around for judges. They were all very impressive. I think all of them that we agreed should be judges are still judges.
And you have a wonderful group. I was asked would I like to be a PV judge? And my response was, I'm sticking with a superior court because that way I can't irritate any of my neighbors when their kids come around and lie to me. So that was it. I have been retired now. I think it's fourteen or fifteen years. And like I said, I did volunteer stints for the Superior Court, for the town, and for Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. And tell me what else you'd like to know about me. Right now, I play pickleball and take afternoon naps.
Nice. Oh my gosh. You're all making me very jealous. So because of your background, of course, in law enforcement and the legal world, it makes perfect sense that you're interested in ACOPS.
Correct. Let me just add if I can. When Chief Pete had a conflict, I've already been to the ACOPS meeting, and I think Julie may have been the representative of the council at that time. So I think what they do is very worthwhile. You get diverse ideas. We pass them on to the police, and they can do what they want with
specifically on, say, improving communication between the police department and the residents? Although I think they do a good job. Think
especially Freeman Kearney is very, very receptive to ideas and concepts that he may accept or he may refine. He's a great enhancement to our police department.
I agree with you there. In the event you had to pick a different department if ACOPS was not open right now, is there another area you would ever consider volunteering in?
Well, ten years as a volunteer as a cop was enough. And most of the people I traveled with was enough. And when you get to a certain age, your reactions are not what they should be. Your speed is not what it should be. And I thought that was time time to step down from that job.
Understood. And you obviously understand the role of the committee. You have time to attend all the meetings, the events, and help with all committee work. I mean, seems to go without saying.
Nowhere near as much time as being a volunteer cop.
Well, that's really all I've got for you. If you wanna add anything at all, feel free. But I I feel like your resume speaks for itself. And as the mayor had mentioned earlier, we have a robust group of volunteers this year. And we appreciate you coming. We're going to be talking about it later today and we'll get back at a later date to you.
Sounds good. If anyone has any questions shoot away.
We're grateful you're here. And you know I think we're trying to be condensed so that we don't bounce too far out of that timeline but anything you want to add before we wrap up? I think that's it.
As you get older your life gets more simplified. I'm hoping. I never took a nap till after Thank I was
you for that advice. Yeah, it's a pleasure to have you here. Thank you for coming.
Thank you. Thank you Mr. Her, appreciate it.
And I'm
wondering what the bylaws are.
Correct. So the the the roster that you have in your hand right now is is is the key. The only committee or maybe there are two committees that the council has some more flexibility in in changing the the number of members is arts because their bylaws specifically say a range of no less than. And so we've had 15, we've had seven. The historical advisory committee doesn't really have a clear council adopted governing documents.
The council could theoretically appoint additional members to the historical advisory. But the other committees are actually in code and are very specific in the number of members.
Well, last year we added a new position to Hillside Building. Is it?
That's correct because you amended the code.
Can we is that possible to do it this time or we'd have to hold off?
You'd have to go through the the process to amend the code and have a study session and adopt it at a future meeting. Got it.
Thank you. Could we adopt some and not others? I mean can we appoint some and hold off on some?
Mr. Mayor, Council Member Liebman, yes. The town code does because, again, all committee terms start April 1 except that our code does say that appointments haven't been made, that the incumbents continue in office until the council has has made an appointment. So council has the authority to put off certain appointments.
Thank you.
Councilor Mervais?
No. And that's a good topic that councilor Mervais was asking about because I was looking at ACOPS and it seems something to think about because we're gonna have campaigns for two cycles. It might be something we talk about if we have good candidates that maybe we expand it because we're gonna need more help there because we got two general elections four years out, you know, two and two and then other activities at the legislature. So just something to think about if we can do that might be worth some discussion more. Just a thought.
Jane, can you talk about?
The next candidate is I don't see Jane in the the waiting room, but Stanley Marks is the person who's waiting. She's Zoom. Yes.
So we're gonna bring in mister Marks.
Well, he's not scheduled until
He's at 02:45.
02:45. And we're waiting on As
it is interviewing her, do I stare at that?
Yes. Okay.
Yeah, you'll look into that camera.
Allergy season. It's here. It's here. So Duncan, do we have an idea if she's trying or she knows? I think we should.
Yep. Or maybe not.
Hello,
mister Marks. Thanks for joining us.
Hi there. Can you hear me?
Yes. Absolutely. I'm Mark Stanton. I serve as the mayor and the entire town council is here and we're excited to have you.
He can't hear us.
Oh. He can't hear us?
I don't know. Let's find out.
I don't see where my volume is on this thing. Let me just
No. Hold on. This is done. This is
Well, that's interesting. Alright. Can we do it by telephone? How am I how am I supposed to do this by volume? That's one of my that's one of my weaknesses. Let me do this. See if I can do this. At least in the interim, I can tell you who I am. Can you hear me okay?
Yes.
Good.
Good. All right. First of all, am Stan Marks. I have been a resident of Arizona since 1965. I came here, after law school, clerk for the Arizona Supreme Court, and have been a resident of Paradise Valley for about fifty years.
I joined a firm that does trial work. I represented a lot of police officers. I have sued police officers. So I know litigation reasonably well. I am reasonably well informed as a judge as well, which I have been a volunteer judge for the county as well as a judge in Garnett's Valley for about thirty five years. I thought I could be of some assistance to the committee with my background. One of the negatives is I am not
really that computer savvy, which
is obvious in this conversation. I spend
half
a year in Del Mar where I'm currently situated. I do that in the summers as you know that gets a little toasty in the summer. And if you can get away sometimes it's preferable, and I do. So I'm not seeking to be a chair of this committee. I'm seeking really to have some assistance to it. And unfortunately, maybe you can write out something. If I can figure out how to do I usually my office set this up and I didn't do that and that was obviously an error.
You can chat about
that, that would be
a great idea. You have the questions.
Can't see where it has that I am on mute here. So that is unfortunate. Can hear me but I cannot hear you. So is there anything you can do? To do that? Am I turning? The keyboard? Doesn't say anything about the
yeah. It's gonna communicate I love it.
I it. Volume or anything.
There's top. You got it.
The I'll tell you what you can do. One of you can just call me. I mean, I have my cell phone, and if you have some questions to ask of me, and then I can answer them out loud. What is that? Wait. Wait. Don't move it around. I can see Yeah. Hold on. Turn on chat. Where is where do I see that
on the computer chat?
That's so funny.
I I see what you're saying. Oh, wait a minute. I do see chat pop up here. Chat. Can you hear me now? Obviously, can hear me before. Can someone say something? I clicked on chat. I'm feeling really good. I apologize. This is not one of my strengths.
What is the question? Yeah. Why don't
we call it cell phone? I think that's Hold
on a second. Audio Well, I don't I don't wanna go through the whole thing. Selective speaker. Here here is one one question. Why don't why don't maybe as chair, who is it? Who's ever chairing this meeting? I assume
I know.
It's the mayor. The
The volume
is too. Can you just call me? Do you have a cell phone? Yeah. If you have any questions. My cell number is (602) 463-2373.
Okay.
602602. 46323. 2373.
Do you want me to call since I'm supposed to do that?
Give me
a call, and, I can we can circumvent in my lack of knowledge on how I find K. To get sound from you.
It's 602.
602463
Okay.
Hold on.
2 Okay. 273.
Wait. Hold on. This morning.
I've got 2273.
2373.
2373.
(602) 463-2373. Is that correct? Yes.
Thank you. What are my thoughts on oh, I see. Oh, that's interesting what you're doing. You're doing it in writing here. That's good. What are your thoughts on improving communications between police department and residents? By the way, don't know what I mentioned. I was chairman of MAD.
Just listen to me.
The governor appointed me to chair a committee on alcohol and highway safety since, I don't know, twenty years ago, which I did. And then they asked me to share a meeting to we decided that a consumer group needed to be appointed to deal with the drunk driving situation. And I chaired that committee. And they asked me to start MAD, which I did. And I was chairman of MAD for several years.
And we really did change the way people thought about drunk driving because if you killed someone as a drunk we were the toughest state in the country. You do you do eight, ten years in prison where most most states, you do a slap on the wrist and maybe get six months in jail. So it was dramatically different. And people know that in Arizona, you you damn well better use an Uber if you're intoxicated. And I think we've done a pretty damn good job as far as our police department, as far as maintaining the awareness of you don't speed in Paradise Valley and you don't get drunk in Paradise Valley.
He able to read the chart?
Well, I always have some exceptions, but he did. Did. Just I go
continue with that.
I think that committee that we had before on public safety, that temporary committee about four years ago, was it? We had a committee on, on because of the police, it had to do with police response time primarily. We had a home break in and, candidly, I did not think they were treating it, with the urgency that, we were home and we had some people come into my house. Luckily, my dogs barking and they didn't take much, but they had their phone numbers and everything and they didn't do anything. And I was really unhappy with that.
So I mean I think the police department is doing generally a very good job. I can work with them. I have a lot of my clients are police officers because I have police officers on my board when I was MAD Chairman and they asked me to represent them over the years and my office still does that. So I know that I can deal with police officers on one side and when they do something that is really a violation of their duty, they may end up in trouble. I think I can be of help to the committee.
Other questions? What is your understanding of the role of the committee? Well, that's interesting because I don't know what the role of the committee is. Assuming it's to advise you as to what conduct would be appropriate for the council to take. The committee doesn't act on its own, but merely as an advisory committee is my understanding, but I got no clear delineation delineation of what our responsibility would be on the committee.
But I think it's merely to advise you as to what a group of Paradise Valley folks who are interested in this recommending that you follow. And do you have the time to attend the meetings? Yes, I have time. Am basically quasi retired now. Am certainly not a youngster here.
And the I am still a judge and I have still maintained that. And I am going to go I have to go to the I have to come in in the summer to the judicial conference to maintain my ability to remain as a municipal judge in Paradise Valley. And I think that I can attend meetings by Zoom. Hopefully, will learn a little bit more how to get voice out of it. Actually next time I'll ask my office to set it up, which I've done in the past.
But I certainly can attend by Zoom. But I'm not here a good five, six months out of the year. I'm not in PB, I in I'm in I'm in I have a home in Delmar. So yeah. Which is just North of San Diego.
So this the summers are a little better out here, I must admit, in the in the California. But the I I love I I well, when I got to Phoenix in the sixties, I became western man. I mean, was fun to be a horseback riding every weekend. And and for those of you who've been around Arizona that long, you know that how much of a Western state we were with dirt roads and a lot of horses all around. And it was really an exciting time to be there. Any further questions? Thank you for taking the time to meet with us. Mr. Miller will contact me in the next few days about the next steps. I appreciate that. Appreciate your concern. I appreciate your volunteer. Thank you very much.
Appreciate
it. Thank you, Mr. Marks. I know you can't hear us, but the public can. So thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Marks.
Do you shut that down or do I? Let's see.
Think
Did Jane show up?
Yes. And the meeting now is the view.
That's tough. That's tough, but he did a great job.
So
mister Miller, do we have any contact from Jane? Okay. Miss Kesser. Yeah. Please take a few minutes here.
I I'd have to give that some thought. ACOPS is one of those resolutions that was amended multiple times.
And currently there's one position.
Because seven seems to be the general number for most of our committees. It's just what's unique about one of the members of ACOPS is that the chair is a council member.
mean, I don't recall anything
would have
to be a council.
I mean my only concern as customer Moore was asking is that there was a reason why it was limited is because we don't want people who are anti police to have a big group and start having problems with this department supposed to be very complicit type fit, you know design that way but.
Well I think this is a good idea for kind of a look back. So once we get through this process I would support a look back on how we again this is a constantly improving and evolving program and anything for best practices I think would be a good thing to bring up in a study session for the group.
Future study because this wasn't agenda sized for tonight. This is just interesting. Plus the Mr. Miller Correct. But the seventh is a council member.
There we go. Six plus the chair.
Six plus the council member. Yeah. The chair.
Mr. Miller did you say Ms. Keswick is coming in person? She'll be in person. Well, thank you for joining us, miss Gessek.
My name is
Mark Stanton.
Hello. Pleasure to
meet you. Serve as the mayor and the entire council crew is here and we're grateful. Thank you for sending your application in. We enjoyed reading your background and your interest. So today is a chance for us to just meet face to face, very informal. I'm going to turn over the Vice Mayor and she's going to go through a few questions for you. Perfect. But it's also your turn if you got questions for us. We're happy to fill those as well. This town as you know, our town drives on volunteers. We're all volunteers and we are grateful for the wonderful residents at Step Forward and you're one of those and thank you very much.
Whatever we can do.
This should take about ten minutes. It won't be a big time ask. But with that I'll introduce Vice Mayor Christine LaBelle.
Hi, nice meet you. It's miss Kesick, is that correct? Yes. Okay. Yes, Vice Mayor LaBelle. We're just gonna have a little bit of just a structured rather open ended conversation today. So just if you could want to briefly describe your background, why you're interested in ACOPS and serving on that committee. And then we'll have a few follow-up questions and closing question. Okay. But one of the questions I would have for you, go ahead and give me your story as well you're here and then we'll follow-up with
the Okay.
Well, my husband and I fell
in love with Paradise Valley about six years ago. We moved here right before COVID from North Scottsdale. Our ranch was up that way. And the kids were closer to school at Chaparral, so we decided to move, and we loved it. So we have our house that was built in 1972, two and onetwo acres off Mockingbird, just built a new house. So we just love our neighbors. We love the area. We love that very tight knit community. And we love how safe we feel. And that's really about it.
I used to work for Scottsdale Unified for about ten years. I volunteer for the Arizona Supreme Court. So I'm on one of their committees there. I am also very active in our church, Saint Sava, a Serbian church. So I'm Serbian, so not to be confused with Syrian or Siberian.
And also, safety is a huge concern. Even though my kids are grown, we have neighbors who now have little ones. And I can hear them playing in their backyards. And it's a nice change to hear the voices instead of nothing other than just birds. Some people don't like it.
I do because it's like a new life in the neighborhood. So that's why I decided to apply to want to become a volunteer because I think if we have enough people in the community to reach out to other members of the community, I think it would be beneficial to all of us safety wise for the kids, for the parents, for the elderly who their caretakers are walking them around everywhere in the neighborhood. So I just figured an extra voice would be awesome for Paradise Valley now.
And we thank you so much for stepping up. As the mayor said earlier, our town thrives on volunteers. We're all volunteers at this table. We appreciate even initiating the Oh absolutely. Yeah, to be here. So did you look at ACOPS and say, do you go to Coffee with a Cop? Or are you familiar with our department?
So we're familiar with the department. We're familiar with Coffee with a Cop. We have gone periodically. And then when I actually saw it was the town email. And then I saw it also on was it I think it was the Paradise Valley Police's x page that yes, they were looking for
that they were looking
for volunteerism. I said, you know what? Let's
do it. No, that's great. I'm glad that we had some outreach that you were able to see and find. So I think that's wonderful. Do you have any specific ideas as far as improving communication between the police departments and the residents? Do you think they're already doing a good job? Do you have any out of the box ideas?
I think the police department itself, they're doing a good job. I think the last post from the town of Paradise Valley on X was like 2025. And that's where a lot of people, the younger I'm not younger, but younger ish. Yes. I'm hearing That's how they get to know everything and know when coffee with a cop is. And if people don't sign up for the town email, they don't know anything. Right. No, I appreciate your input.
Can see you're paying attention.
So I appreciate that. Yeah. And then what I do is like with neighbors, I'm like, well, should go onto the website, put your email address in there. They'll send you emails every week. You can look. But just a little bit more I don't wanna say outreach, but a little bit more social media because I think that that's
Let's not set this up. Yes.
That's the way to go these days, sadly. You know, I mean, it's not a a mailer in the mail. It's Right. Hey, we're having a meeting or Right.
No, appreciate that input and I appreciate your honesty. Oh, yeah, for being able to reach out and let us know that. In the event you hadn't seen an opening for would there have been a number two? Would there have been another committee that you might be interested in?
Any way I can help out the community. I mean, I'm game for whatever. Safety was kind of concern because of my neighbors and the kids and bike lanes and just with the construction going on and the safety with all of the community members. So that would have been my first pick. But as I emailed Duncan before, I said if there's another committee you want to throw me on, absolutely. I would do it to help the community.
I appreciate that. And maybe just one last closing question because you seem very engaged. Do you have an understanding of the town's general plan? Have you ever looked at that?
So I have. Honestly, some of it I can't understand. Like some of it's like right over there, right over the head. But general goal, I can kind of figure it out, but it's almost like I need to speak with someone who I know like, hey, what is this? What is this? Please explain it all to me. But
yeah. No, that's great. You've been a great interviewer. That You we have a large roster today. So the process will be that you'll hear back from the mayor in the next few days.
Not a problem. I'm around.
No, appreciate it. If there's anything else you want to add otherwise that's you know we're
perfect. Thank you guys for the time. I appreciate it.
Thank so much for showing up. Nice to meet you.
Thank you.
Mr. Miller, do we have Mr. Barry in person or online? Yeah. Sub Samaritans.
Yep. Absolutely. We're running a few minutes ahead of time, so please. Yeah. We're moving here.
Pretty good clip. Yeah. It's very efficient. You might be. No, I'm fine.
Thank you. Yeah, it is. Yeah. Ready for it. Yes, sir.
Mister Barry, hello. Thanks for coming in. If you wanna have a seat there at the table, thanks for putting your name forward. My name is Mark Stanton. I serve as the mayor of Paradise Valley, and this is the town council. We're all present and accounted for. And like yourself, we're volunteers, and we're appreciative of all the residents that have come forward, and thank you for submitting your background and the application. So just kind of a process for today. This should take about ten minutes. I'm going to turn it over to the Vice Mayor Christine LaBelle and she's got a few questions for you. It's 2 Way Street, so if you've got some questions for us, we'll be happy to entertain those as we go along or as we wrap up. And again, thank you for your participation. I'll turn over to Vice Mayor.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Berry. Thanks for being here. As the Mayor said, we're all volunteers here, so we really appreciate you taking the time to step up and offering your services. So yeah, we're going to
kind of keep a
little structured ten minute session going here. So we're going to start out with just kind of ask you to describe your background and why you're interested in serving on one of those committees. And then we'll follow-up with some questions and close-up and we want you to feel free to ask questions also. So just let us know why those two committees and do you have a favorite? And I'd like to hear more.
I came prepared for the public safety one. Can you focus on that?
Okay, sure.
I've lived here about five years now.
No, no, please do. Keep going. I thank you for all those ideas. You put some real thought into what you would do if you were involved with ACOPS. Know that how would you do you go to Coffee with a Cop at all now?
I don't. I think we'll be working this time.
Yeah, yeah. Okay, fair enough. Yeah, I get it. Are you able to see any of the public outreach from the police department at all on either social media or through our town weekly? Do you get any of that information?
On Facebook.
Okay. Yeah, no, I'm glad we're reaching you. That's great. And I know that you had also mentioned that I'm gleaning, and correct me if I'm wrong that ACOPS would be your first choice but if that wasn't available do you know much about the Paradise Valley Mountain Preserve Trust and also I see in your background do you do any mean would there be any other departments that might appeal to you? We have a lot of applicants but we don't want to do. Okay, do you have any questions for us?
Well,
thank you so much. And I would say that keep in mind, I think we have what 15 or so applicants or maybe a little bit and not very much space, but I would never want anyone to think that we wouldn't, that they're not being chosen. There's just not enough spots. So I would say that depending on where it goes, the mayor will be in touch with you. But please keep coming back. We need the volunteers and you sound very engaged. Yeah. Yeah. And that's not a preemptive anything. It's just saying I'm very happy that you're here. So I appreciate it.
Thank you for showing.
Nice to meet you. Yeah.
Thanks very much. Have a great afternoon. Hello. Mister Kenny, thank you for coming in today and putting your application in to be a volunteer for the town. My name is Mark Stanton, serve as the mayor.
This is the council, my colleagues, and we're so grateful because we're volunteers in our roles here on the council and this town, our town has really thrived on the success from our volunteer efforts. So thank you for putting your name forward and submitting your application today. So this will be about a ten minute process and it's gonna be a couple of questions from the vice mayor Christine LaBelle and we'll hope if you got questions we're happy to field those as well and so we'll we'll cut right to it. I'll turn over to vice mayor but sincere thank you for being here today.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Kinney and I echo the mayor's comments. So it's gonna be a little bit of a more structured approach but I want feel free to ask questions and share about yourself and how you found out about the opening and just basically briefly describe your background, why you're interested in serving on that committee and we'll follow-up some other questions after.
Okay.
Thanks. Well I moved here recently with my family to Paradise Valley and one of the things that struck me about this area was the natural and open spaces of Camelback, Mummy, and Phoenix Mountains and how they stood in such stark contrast to the urban development that's grown up around the Phoenix Metro Region. Growing up in New England, which is where we moved from, I spent a lot of time around preserved land, whether hiking or volunteering later as an Eagle Scout on various preservation works. And now as a resident, I can truly see the value that these open spaces provide in shaping the character of the community. Professionally, I work in an environment where stewardship and long term thinking, deliberate decision making are emphasized and I hope to bring those skill sets to support the mission of the trust which will outlast any individual member specifically the preserve itself.
Well thank you for sharing that and I really like that you're talking about you know your background in New England with that and the hiking and that you noticed we like that you noticed the open spaces here and we must be doing something right in that aspect so I appreciate that. Do you know much about the trust itself? Have you done research on it or looked into how it works?
Yeah, I have done a little bit of research. I did read the most recent meeting minutes which I understand are from last year but I don't know how relevant they still are. I know they haven't met very often. I did get a look at all the backgrounds of the trust members that were posted on the website, so I'm somewhat familiar with those individuals as well. And I know it's a nonprofit organization that's not necessarily part of the town government but is closely associated and that makes a lot of sense to me the way that's organized.
Thank you. It sounds like you've done some homework. Do you in the event that the Paradise Valley Mountain Preserve Trust was not available, if it hadn't been advertised, would there be another volunteer opportunity within the town that you might be interested in?
Yes. Since we moved here now that the moving activities have settled down I'm definitely very interested in some doing some volunteer work and spending some of my time in that area. I did notice there were other positions available. I didn't actually apply to any of those but I would certainly be open to other volunteer work. I just felt that this position met or matched my qualifications the most as opposed to the others.
Right. And to that point, just one more question. If you could expound a little bit more on your specific skills, legal, financial, fundraising, outreach, what do you think you'd be able to bring to the trust?
Primarily I think there's two main aspects where I could be a positive force as a member. The first has to do with stewardship and long term sustainability. I believe that is probably
one of
the challenges the trust will continue to face and probably has faced in the past as the cost of preservation efforts are always expected to increase and any decisions we make or the trust makes have to make sense thirty to forty years from now. Can't just make sense right now. The second area where I believe I can contribute is in collaboration and community engagement. I think in this area where there's obvious pressure on increasing development, urbanization, there there will be that tension between the preservation efforts and the access efforts. And I think those tensions really can only be resolved by effective listening, collaboration, and engagement to understand the real intent of all the stakeholders in those kinds of situations.
I I really appreciate your your your input on that and I just you have any questions for us regarding either general volunteer questions, anything about the town or this position itself?
So generally what do you feel would make for an effective member of this trust?
I'm gonna pass it off to the mayor
on What
this committee does or? No. So a new member being part of this trust, what do you think would make them effective in that role? What attributes or skills or personality? Good question and there's
a few different things. One is the more familiar you are with the town the more comfortable you be in some of the issues we face in particular. In this case, reading through and understanding the intent and the structure of our general plan would be very helpful and how the town has evolved and uses that as it's really backbone of all we do in terms of development and how how we look forward for residents that may be thinking of building a house or redoing a house and those that we have in the SUP, the special use permit properties, the resorts and the and the houses of worship and the schools. So I think becoming familiar with that would be a very good step. I think also getting to attending the meetings when they do occur or getting to know some of the members and asking some questions about what they do and what they've encountered.
I think that would be helpful as well. I think that getting to know the entire town structure attending to different volunteer programs like coffee with a cop or getting involved with the arts in some capacity. We have a lot of community activities that are good for all residents to participate in, But in particular, those folks that may wanna volunteer, it just gives them better understanding of the culture of the of the community in the town and what we're trying to achieve and and how we're very protective of the culture of our town and that this is a priority to us. This whole program, the the Mountain Reserve Trust really came from those points you brought up earlier that we know there's always the chances for people to wanna develop or redevelop or expand or and that we're very protective of the mountains and we wanna make sure that we as stewards of the community are using our best tools and this committee is one of those tools. If you visit the town hall very often, if you come in through the front entrance there by the post office, there's a beautiful display that describes the the history and some of the successes of the Mountain Preserve Trust.
So this is a really near and dear to our hearts because really protecting our development process and the quiet residential community is a top priority for us. So I think immersing yourself in that space would be helpful.
Okay. Yeah. I I did appreciate the coffee with the cops that I have attended.
Those were nice. Alright.
Thank you for attending that. Continue to show up and as we've mentioned before I think there's about 15 applicants for a very limited number of spaces But we love our volunteers and we hope you'll be hearing in the next few days where we placed everybody but continue to show up. I will. And thank you so much for joining us today and applying. Yeah, was nice to meet you.
Thank you all.
Thank you, Mr. Ginny. Oh, you did?
Where you at? All right.
I grew up in Wayland. Can I get to shaking all your hands?
Thank
for your questions. Of course.
Yeah, thank you for your answers.
Oh, is that right? That's awesome. Mister Miller, is mister Nichols scheduled for the interview? Next. Hello, mister Nichols. Please have a seat. Thank you for coming in. Appreciate Nice
to be in front of all you guys.
We're grateful you're here. We're all volunteers on the council. This is the full council. I'm Mark Stanton. I serve as the mayor. But we're all here for the love of the town and we appreciate and really value those folks that step up and offer to volunteer and become part of a committee or a subcommittee and and put their time and we value that immeasurably. So thank you for submitting your application. Today we're going take about ten minutes and not big ask. I'm going to turn over a moment to the Vice Mayor Christine LaBelle and she'll go through some questions but it's a two way street. If you have questions for us we're happy to entertain those and try to field those but most importantly we're just grateful you've come in and that you applied.
We're very lucky that we have residents like yourself that will go the extra mile and and offer them services to the town. Thank you again and I'll turn it over to the Vice Mayor.
Thank you. Thank you Mr. Nichols. I thank you for being here Vice Mayor Lavelle. So we're just gonna I'm just gonna briefly ask you, to describe your background and why you're interested in serving on Mount Preserve Trust, then we'll follow-up with, some additional questions, closing question, and feel free to pipe in anytime you have questions also. So just let us know a little bit about your background, how you heard about the position, why you're interested. And we'll go from there.
Well, basically I saw one of the papers for the volunteers. And I put in an application once before, like probably four years ago, three years ago, to be more engaged in the community. My wife and I were empty nesters. And so I always had opportunity to be volunteer stuff. And I basically always turned it down because I said the family is the most important. Let's do our stuff. And so now I have time to give. Now when it comes to the PVPMT, I'm like, well, I didn't really understand a lot of it, but I figured it would be a good challenge for me to try it. I've been in the construction industry. When I say that, I'm talking I've worked for a lumberyard for a very long time.
That's kind of still my main employment and always been my employment for thirty two years, same company. And I've gone out and done my GC license. I like to do stuff and challenge myself. And I figured this one would be kind of a neat challenge to kind of learn and understand part of it. I lived in a lot of different places and I think it's a great town in all the different volunteers and associations and everything like that.
So basically to get more engaged, that's really the big part of it. I'm not going to say I'm an expert in the conservation easements or whatever you want to call it, but I do understand it. I'll say this. I was raised in Southern California. And I grew up in a town called Glendora. And we had a town south of us called Diamond Bar. I don't if you guys are familiar with Diamond Bar. But Diamond Bar let everybody build everything they could on all the hillsides. Just went haywire. And everybody would make fun of it, in a sense.
And Bondora was always proud of the foothills, however it goes. And I know there's a fine line between all that. And I don't tend to fall on either side of it. I'm more of carrying on the tradition kind of person because obviously you guys ended up here through basically all the timeline or what have you. And I think that I'm not here to change anything. I'm just here to continue it is really the way I look at stuff. So that helps. And I ended up here. I had two kids go go to ASU. I love the area. I've been coming out here since the late '70s, early '80s. I'm sure you hear a lot of that. And so it's always been a great place to live or visit.
No, I appreciate that. It sounds like you have an appreciation for what what the trust is trying to do and the heritage of the town and and that I appreciate. The specific question I think we would have about the Mount Preserve Trust is what specific skills and you you you touched on some of them legally, financially, fundraising and outreach would you bring to help the trust meet its goals to preserve more hillside open lands? You have to be super specific but just generally what do you feel you can give to the trust
in that aspect?
I'll be honest with you on that front. I don't have a lot of connections here by any stretch. I kind of wondered, one of my questions was being that I saw the videos and some of the stuff and read the background of it. But when this really started, I guess 'seventy eight someone donated the first land and 'ninety seven became when you guys turned it into a trust. But is there a lot more to donate? I mean, are you talking outside Paradise Valley? Are talking inside Paradise Valley? Inside Paradise Valley. Is there that much more to donate in terms of there is.
Yeah. And there's a lot to learn. And I like that you're questioning and you're being transparent and honest. And I would say a couple of questions, additional extra questions on that would be, it sounds like you're really interested in our town and you're coming from the right place. Are you familiar with our general plan? And do you show up for any of the other volunteer events like Coffee with a Cop or meetings? No. And if you don't, maybe start I
see. Looking
into
I'm in your system. I get all the texts and the email and the meeting minutes and stuff like that. It's just a matter of looking through something.
No, of course. Yeah. And then if you hadn't seen the Mountain Preserve Trust opening on the website or the newspaper, what other areas what are you interested in? Art, history,
That might not be my ability, but definitely the other departments were like when you had anything to do with the construction side of things.
Okay, planning.
Yeah, any of that stuff I definitely volunteer for. I'm totally open. Really feel like I want to give back to the community I live in if I can. That's really kind of my thought. So when I do have extra free time and so I
No, I really appreciate it. And as the mayor already mentioned, we're all volunteers. Just continue to educate yourself on the town and stay involved. And it will be a couple of days before we have like 15 applicants and limited space, but we want our volunteers to continue to show up and continue to learn more about the town. Do you have any additional questions for us besides that?
I don't know what position what is actually the what do you do? Mean in terms of like how many hours do you give and how many people are on the committee and what does that entail in terms of your commitment to the committee?
Sure. Well, every committee has different requirements and so they have a mission and they have sort of a charter if you will why they're in business. The Mountain Reserve Trust is just as it sounds. We're trying to protect open space and encourage those landowners to consider donating that land. They may not be developing or may not be really developable but donating it into the trust and taking whatever benefits they could from that gesture.
But we're encouraging residents to be aware and that there is an opportunity to help preserve our mountains and our open space. And it is a surprise to a lot of people that we do have so much open space available, but there is that consideration that there are people that may want to develop it. And so we're giving that option to them and encouraging that. So this committee has a group. They work really independently from this body, but they're very focused on meeting residents and encouraging that consideration of donation, building awareness of the idea of sustainability.
And what that means, it's one of the tenants of our general plan and what we believe is important to keep the quality of life in Paradise Valley. So the folks that are currently sitting on that have background either on hillside development or in real estate and have been involved in different aspects of it, but they all come from that same space of sustainability and protecting our mountains and protecting our open space. So the time is it really is contingent upon what activities are going on. So for example, if this group is trying to recruit residents to consider giving or donating that land, there may be meetings that would be one offs, there would be discussions among themselves. They usually meet a few times a year as a collective body and talk about what their strategy may be and the timing and such.
And so so it's not a huge lift, but it's for this committee. But it's more of a intensity based on the subject matter that it's meeting residents, encouraging those residents to consider donating that property to the trust. But in terms of all of the committee assignments, they're all a little bit different based on activity. Some are more hands on. Some some like the arts board are very very busy and they have a lot of activities.
We have our advisory committee on public safety that that meets on a regular basis and discusses issues with the police department talking about ways that that that residents can be collaborative and helping the police department and vice versa what the police department wants to make sure that residents are aware of. So every committee has a little bit different. This committee is is a little more laser focused and it doesn't have I wouldn't say it's abundant with its meetings, but it's important work and it ebbs and flows throughout the year.
Okay. Got it. Which I'm very appreciative of the PD quite honestly. Feel special that I'm in the community. Wouldn't want to be like in Phoenix half the time worrying about how that's going to go down. Anyways
We're glad you're here.
Yeah. Thank you so much for coming.
You'll do a great job.
Well, you. I continue to show up. Yeah. Thank you.
Is that it? Yeah. That's all. Thank you very much. Nice to meet you. I appreciate all you guys and thanks. Appreciate it.
Yeah, terrific applicants. Mr. Miller, next And then, okay, that's Mr. Selden. Okay.
Did she say that she's gonna excuse herself? Okay. Okay.
We can
take a few minutes of a break. Oh, yeah. That's right. Good pop culture. Yep.
If she was Yeah.
Assuming we
could just ask
her to step out of Yeah. She was as prepared to excuse herself. That's encouraged, but it's not required. Yeah. Yeah.
But it's not a Alright. Mister Seldon, are you there?
Hello,
David. Can you hear us all right?
Can hear you now.
You. Awesome. Thank Well, thank you for joining us. We greatly appreciate your ongoing commitment to the town and putting your name forward for the volunteer position and we gratefully appreciate your time. I think you know my colleagues pretty well, so I welcome you from the whole team.
So we're going take about ten minutes, David, and we're going to I'm going to turn it over to the Vice Mayor and she's going to ask a few questions. And then if you've got questions for us, feel free to exchange those and we'll do the best we can to answer them. We greatly appreciate the time and as you know, we thrive on volunteerism. That's what makes this town so special and we appreciate you and you coming forward to offer your time and commitment to a very worthwhile committee and cause. But thank you very much and let me turn over to the Vice Mayor.
Okay, thank you Mr. Selden. Vice Mayor Labelle here as you well know. We just are going to have a little structured way we're going to do it today. So I'm going to briefly ask you to describe your background. Why specifically you're interested in serving on the Mountain Preserve Trust. Then we'll have a couple of follow-up questions, closing question and of course any questions that you might have. So once again if you just briefly describe your background, why you're interested in serving on this particular committee.
Sure. And first, I apologize that I'm not there in person. I had signed up with Duncan to be there in person, but I chose yesterday morning to have a tear in the quadriceps in my one knee. So I have the crutches here to prove my immobility. So I apologize that I'm having to do this remotely.
The Paradise Valley is defined really by its mountain preserves and its mountain terrain and its scenic views, whether people live in flat land and have views of the mountain or whether people live on one of the mountains, that's one of the things that we cherish about our low density in ambiance. And that's certainly embodied in the in the town's general plan. You know, I I had dinner last Saturday at the sanctuary with my college roommate, who is a retired lawyer from Connecticut, and his wife. And one of the first things they said in explaining that they still live in the same house that they moved into fifty years ago after they first got married was that the person that owns the property behind them is a 62 acre estate that has a conservation easement. So it remains woods, because of tax, benefits for that.
And that really makes their, house, you know, modest as it was when they first moved into it and they've expanded it, but it makes it such a defining essence of why they love where they are. And that same factor is present in Paradise Valley. So I'm committed to wanting to preserve the mountains here. We've lived either with a view of Camelback or on Camelback with a view of Mowing Mountain and the North Mountain Preserve for more than twenty five years now. So if I can contribute, and I think I can given my background, I'd certainly be delighted for the opportunity to work with the other members of the Mountain Reserve Trust and members of the community to advance its mission.
Thank you. Just a follow-up question to some of what you've already touched on, but if you could expound a little bit on what skills, legal, financial, fundraising, outreach, would you bring to help the trust meet its goals to preserve more hillside land for open space?
Sure. Well, I'm a lawyer, of course, and have a rather diverse background. I did prepare a resume that I submitted to you, so I won't belabor the point. But I represented public entities, including a number of municipalities as well as the state government agencies and also several county governments. So I've worked within the public sector structure.
I've done litigation on matters involving real estate conveyancing, including the Phoenician Resort, which was a very complex transaction because it involved ground leases and all kinds of other differing property interests. And then prior to being a lawyer in Arizona, I worked for members of congress for twelve years. I did the staff work for my boss who was the author of the bill to preserve the Appalachian Trail. And that is a it is kind of a linear version of the Peavey Mountain Preserve Trust in terms of the preservation of the scenic aspects of it, although that also involves a public use, which I know is not our goal or use of the Peavey Mountain Preserve Trust. But that's putting together efforts 2,000 miles long in 14 states, primarily private property owners, and making available conservation easements and trail use easements to preserve that asset.
And so I've had a long standing commitment to that. And then I've certainly worked in the philanthropic environment as well, which is, of course, part of the mission of the Mountain Preserve Trust. Chairman John Graham was previously Chairman of the Phoenix Symphony Board of Directors, which I'm a member of. I've worked with him in that context and would be delighted to do so again.
Well, thank you for expounding on that. Yes, it's in the resume, but also just for the public. So thank you for bringing that up. And as we've asked every other applicant today, I want to follow-up with if this particular position was not available and you wanted to volunteer for the town, what other options would you be open to?
Well, my focus is really on the Mountain Preserve Trust. That would be my objective and where I think my skills. Obviously, I have an interest in the arts. Our house has more than 1,000 works of art in it. But my focus in terms of, I think, helping PV would be on the Mountain Reserve Trust.
Okay. Thank you for that. Any questions for us?
Questions for you. I think I have a handle on how the PV Mountain Reserve Trust works. I'm not a stranger to tell what goes on in PV for reasons that are, I think, readily apparent. But so I'm comfortable with the role and would be enthusiastic to do whatever I could to help.
Right. And I I thank you for for stepping up and for your patience with the interview questions. We have a very standardized way we're doing it this year. So despite your familiarity, I appreciate you allowing it. So thank you so much for being here and if there's no other questions you're good to go. Yes, appreciate. Thank you.
Thank you, David. Thank you. Yeah. I want council, will you? I will.
I will. Hello, Andy. Thanks for coming in. I think you know most of my colleagues here. This is the town council and my role as mayor. We are so glad to see you and thank you for submitting your name and your background. This is going be pretty straightforward maybe ten minutes. We're not gonna put you through any torture. We are just grateful that you're willing to donate your time and your expertise and your background. I'm gonna turn it over to the vice mayor and she's got a few questions for you. And again, we also love to answer your questions you might have as we move ahead.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Knaussik. I'm Vice Mayor Lebel. Nice to meet you. I don't think we've ever met before. So it's nice to nice I've seen your name, but nice to meet you. We are going to start off today. We have a little bit more of a structured format, a little less open ended. Of course, we want you to feel free to ask questions and tell us about yourself. So really just briefly, we're going to ask you to describe your background, why you're interested in serving on the Mountain Preserve Trust. Then we'll have a couple of follow-up questions and closing questions and time for any questions you might have for us. So just let us know why you're here and what your goals are.
Perfect. Well, I'm I I love living in Paradise Valley. I've I've now probably twenty five years and I just made my first enter Paradise Valley move from where we were for twenty five years to a new place that's up on the hillside and beautiful views, got more work to do than I planned. But it is it's it's yeah. We've loved my wife and I have raised our kids, all three kids here, and just just love the place.
The the leadership, the openness of the the the council, kind of the I've always admired the kind of the spirit of volunteerism that that we're blessed we're blessed to have that helps the the professionalism of of the staff every time as a resident, I've I've had a question or or something, it was immediately addressed. And as somebody does spend time in other jurisdictions and finding the secret there is no secret code. A lot of places are just not responsive to either their residents or you know, businesses or anybody else that's that's making inquiries. So, again, that's a a great credit and probably why people that that live here choose to live here very consciously. And I've as and by way of background, I've I've lived in Maricopa County all my life in in the valley.
Grew up in Mesa. Lived in in Phoenix and Paradise Valley for all of my adult life. And, you know, I've always been in the real estate business related, ventures, always in kind of real estate centric from agricultural type endeavors in Arizona and primarily Arkansas and Iowa. We do some farming in those places. I always come home or really never really called anywhere else home but Arizona.
And I I did spend about almost twenty years on the board of supervisors for Maricopa County, where I think I first came in contact with I don't know if it's the precursor to the non preserved trust. Early on, one of my first forays or treks down to town hall here was, to deliver a deed for a quite a bit of, property up on the Mummy Mountain. So I don't remember if I signed the deed, but I've they gave me the honor of being able to to deliver it. Now I I I checked, and I think it's it's owned by the trust now. I think the town conveyed it to the trust.
And and I think the more we can, you know, respect the the rights of property owners, but also kind of the desire of the the town, the stated desire to to maintain these beautiful vistas. And to the extent we could make all that happen, I think the trust is the place and the vehicle to do that. It's not a coercive approach. It's very, I think, from what I've seen on other acquisitions, it's beneficial to everybody involved in those transactions. And I do think that's the way to that it should be, and and hats off to you to you and your predecessors for for going that route.
But, you know, you could always always do more. I I think that would be my goal if if you pick me to be on the on the trust and and leaning in and and ways that that might be actively, using the tools that you have either through just solicitations or asks of people that might have sensitive lands and situations where they can afford or it makes sense to make donations, that would be great. Are there other resources available through grants or other revenues, both private and public funds, if available, would be great to find and deploy to further the goal. I, yeah. I just, I I I think I would love to lean in and and work on what you all have done so far and and do my part to give back to the community here.
So if you have any questions, I can talk all day. And I don't want to.
Well, was going to say, I think you answered all the follow-up questions that my script gives me. So I think you've already got ahead of it. One of them was, you know, what skills, legal, financial, fundraising outreach would you bring to help the trust meet its goal to preserve more hillside? I think you covered that. But if you have anything additional to say about that, that's fine also.
I don't know what, what the range of possibilities. Don't know if there's what's out there, but I assume from looking at knowing your staff and recognizing some of the other people that are on the trust, there's probably a lot of just wherewithal and ability to turn every stone to find ways to make it better.
Perfect. Thanks.
That's what I would commit to endeavor to persevere.
And as is standard with our interviews today, have about 15 interviewees for a very limited amount of spots. So as we're asking everybody today, would you also be interested in any other volunteer assignment with the town at all? If Mountain Preserve wasn't on the table, just for fun, where would you see yourself landing if not I'm
not qualified to be a judge. I don't know. I don't know what's out there. The land use and planning is something I've had a lot of experience with on the board of supervisors. If there's other open space related, I love your monuments and some of your, whether it's Barry Goldwater or some of the other cities we call them pocket parks or something.
I I love I just love having those little respites around the around the community and transportation safety is a you know, especially with where my new house is located. I I would I would love to even if it's a short term working group work with finding things to improve safety and access to Tatum for people, residents that are coming in and out of there and that really between Doubletree and Lincoln is where I focus.
Thank you for that input. I appreciate it. And then any questions for us?
I don't think so.
Good answer. No, just kidding.
It is great to see everybody. Feel like I've known a lot of almost everybody. I think we have our kids.
Our kids, yes. Think Yeah, like Katie who's Yes, Emily and Katie were friends at Cherokee or Chaparral. That's funny. Yeah. But we've never met.
I'm here. Oh, good. Yeah. We missed him. We missed him
by a little bit. But it's great to And see I see Anna at church once in a while when I go. You're there all the time.
So I I we so appreciate you showing up. You know it's a volunteer town. Thank you for being here. And the mayor will be in touch over the next few days Okay. To give everybody where we all landed. Great. So thank you for coming. Appreciate it. Nice to meet you.
You all.
I believe she is. Yeah. We have a few minutes. Yeah. We've got Drake.
Great. It's great. So Duncan, we've got Ms. Nagel coming in in person, correct? I think I'm gonna go
as well. Take a quick break.
Thank you so much for coming in. It's great to see you. Well, we appreciate you stopping in today and putting forward your application. We're great grateful for that type of engagement from all of our residents. I think you know my colleagues and my services as the mayor and we're all volunteers. This is what we do to give back and we appreciate all of our residents that have stepped away. Have a pretty great turnout of candidates that have asked to can be considered. So we're grateful for that.
So today it's gonna be
a pretty straightforward discussion. It's gonna be about ten minutes give or take and we've got a standardized process that the vice mayor Christine LaBelle will lead lead you through. But a sincere thank you for what you've done for the town and what you're offering to do for the town. We thrive and survive on our residents that volunteer and we're grateful. So thanks, welcome and I'll turn it over to Vice Mayor.
All right.
Thank you, miss Nagel, for being here. Vice mayor Labelle,
I should Yeah.
We have a a little of a bit of a a structured process today. Okay. So we're first, we're gonna ask you to briefly briefly describe your background.
Okay.
Why you're interested in this position specifically. Okay. And then we're going to follow-up with some questions and maybe a closing question and there'll be plenty of time for your questions for us to So ask basically just a little bit about why planning interests you, how your background is a good fit for that and we'll go from there.
Great. Well I'll begin with my background. So I'm a career educator. I have a Master's in Fine Arts from the University of Notre Dame where I began my teaching career and a PhD in English Literature and Textual Theory from the University of Washington. I also have postgraduate training in public history institutions including archives, museums, things of that sort.
Twenty years experience teaching and designing graduate and undergraduate courses at a range of colleges and universities, most recently for Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. And for the past five years, I've been a high school teacher. So, English, history, government and civics. Being sort of neck deep in the humanities for my career, my skill set is very humanities based. So critical thinking, communication and collaboration, creativity, curiosity.
And I believe this is really the I think more and more we're realizing this is the twenty first century toolkit. And I believe that so much I've devoted my professional life to helping students gain and master those skills and I'm really proud of that. I think that they are useful and significant regardless of what one is doing. And I think in terms of intellectual capacity, really is AI proof as we can possibly get. Additionally, before coming to Paradise Valley in 2020, my husband and I owned and ran two fine art galleries in Sedona.
And as part of the Sedona Gallery Association, we were involved in a lot of conversations about managing things like growth and sort of tourism traffic and things like that. And how do we balance that with the specific special quality of Sedona? And I think a lot of those questions apply to the considerations here in Paradise Valley. And then finally, I've served on the historical advisory committee for the past five years and it's really been an honor and a privilege to do that. It would be an honor and a privilege to continue to do that, but I also feel like I could do more and if now or in the future there's an opportunity for me to do more, I welcome that.
I'm raising my daughter here in Paradise Valley that is the most important thing to me. And so if I can be part of the conversations about the future of this town, I can't think of any better way to use my skill set.
Thank you for that and well said. A couple of Planning Commission specific questions. How would you express your understanding of the town's general plan as a guide to land use decisions and as the town's North Star? And how do you see it applying to your ability to navigate the planning commission? How will you use what you know about
it? So my understanding and I'm you know is humble enough to admit that there's room for my understanding to grow. But my understanding currently is that it's you know it's about balancing those demands for preserving the things that make Paradise Valley, Paradise Valley. Low density, that kind of semi rural feel. A limited kind of positive relationship with our businesses, our schools and our resorts but kind of limiting that sort of action in the town, open spaces, the scenic mountain vistas, the kind of the Sonoran Desert landscape, all of those things as being central to the particular character and the reason that people love Paradise Valley.
But, of course, if you're only thinking in terms of preservation, you know, any living thing ossifies, right? So, you have to balance that sense of preservation with a notion that things grow and change. And so, I think foundationally, I've been thinking about that a lot in my own academic work, owning galleries in Sedona and then now as even as a resident and as a member of the historical advisory committee. So I think that it's really about that tension and finding a way to navigate that tension.
Thank you for that. Couple more questions. Planning commissioners are required to balance, you kind of touched on this a little bit, the rights of the individual against the values the community. Sure. It also involves a lot of understanding of code and technical aspects. Yes. So as you said, humanity is based on some level. How do you see yourself getting using your tools to learn more
about that? I'm not gonna pretend that I I don't have a lot to learn, but what I'm good at is learning and and maybe what I'm best at is learning. Understanding what resources are available, knowing how to use those resources. And I guess it would offer that in some situations a kind of a learner's mindset approaching a situation with openness, with curiosity can avoid or sometimes offer a kind of a new perspective. You avoid entrenched positions, you avoid kind of knee jerk reactions to things, you avoid assumptions.
The person in the room who's learning and is comfortable asking the naive questions, sometimes that's the question that needs to be asked. So, I would answer that with those two principles. One, that I admit that there would be a lot to learn, but I'm good at that. But also that sometimes bringing a fresh perspective and the curiosity of a fresh perspective, sometimes that might just be what's needed.
Okay. Thank you. I would ask you, would you also be interested in any other volunteer assignment for the town? But I think that's already taken care of.
So that's a really
good end. Do you have any questions for us?
I'm curious as you know, as I've been watching some of the planning commission meetings on Zoom, it's really wonderful resource to have that available at home. I'm curious about how council views the ideal relationship between the planning commission and council. Is there a is there a sort of an ideal role that that planning commission serves?
You know, I'm gonna defer to either the mayor or the town manager on that one.
Well, I think we could all give you some some thoughts that may vary a little bit, but but we look at the planning commission as a very critical arm of how this municipal government works, especially in light of the fact that that development and issues pop up. We need a group that's solely focused on on that process. Sure. So the the relationship that I've seen over the years and many of us including vice mayor, we serve as liaison to that group and we have a former chair council member Leitman and council member Moore has served on that as well. So we look at it as a as a partnership separate but focused in the same direction which is being true to the general plan, is being true to the low density approach to our town and what we value and protect.
So so we obviously, that's a very important role and so we see the collaboration. We have our dedicated vice mayor to serve as a liaison. They're very important meetings and discussions, and they're not easy. We know that the planning commission's got a very it's not an easy job. It's a it's a very responsible job.
And I think someone had mentioned the idea of the balancing the needs of the resident and the property owner versus what the the the town has and what we believe. So so we look at it as a critical aspect and I'm more than happy to open that up to other members of the council but I will tell you we appreciate what they do and how they do it and they've done it for years and we also look at their guidance of what they see doing a deeper dive on subject matter and on the details and the incredible dedication that those planning commissioners have. And they're it's and they're not all development experts. They bring different backgrounds and we appreciate that as well. But but we rely on them and we rely on them and we trust them.
And so to us it's a partnership. They have their we'll we'll interact with them as needed. We'll provide a statement of direction should it be required for a special use permit project. But we trust that they're gonna be doing the job and of course there's a lot of attention on what they do at the meetings and how that schedules. Some of the years they've had meetings that have taken busy all through the summer. So where the council does take a break unless there's an urgent need for a special meeting, Planning Commission bears right through. They put their shoulder to it and they keep going and we appreciate that. Thank
you for your volunteer work with the historic and thank you for being here and mayor will be in touch in the next few days with we have 15 applicants and very limited spots. So thank you so much. Thank you all for
your time. Thank you, thank
you. Thank you, council members. Thank you, Jenny. Thanks, bye.
Thank you.
We've got David. Is it Lemelin? Susan. And Susan Hawthorne. David Lemelin. Lemelin? Duncan, did we hear anything from Jane Horn? Did she ever?
No. I have not heard from her.
I have a significant amount in this weekend. Oh, I thought it was due on the end of the week. I don't have it in tomorrow. Thank you for being here. Good to see you.
Thanks for putting your name forward in an application for volunteerism. You attend so many town events, so it's only fitting that you want to continue that passion that you and Jim have had over the years. And we greatly appreciate all our residents that have come forward. We had about 15 or so candidates but it's heartwarming to see you and to welcome you here. Thank you. Good to have you here.
We're glad
I didn't go on that trip and I could come in.
Well I'm sorry, I understand that. I hope your shoulder is okay.
I have just one wing.
Oh, okay.
We're gonna
do surgery on the twentieth at Torque. We're not gonna make you do any push ups or anything. That's not gonna be part of this.
I'm bad from the mountain for a little bit.
Well, Susan, we're so grateful. So you know my colleagues is the full council and we're all volunteers as you as you know and and as as We love it just like all of our residents that step forward and just like all of our judicial branch. They're all volunteers as well for the municipal court. So, we're And so today, it's a pretty straightforward process. Only be about ten minutes. So it's not a heavy lift other than just asking you a few questions. And then if you've got questions for us, we're happy to field those as best we can. And and to lead us through the process is gonna be our vice mayor, Christine Labelle, and she'll go ahead and but feel free if you've got questions for us to fire them off and we'll do the best we can. Vice mayor?
Thank you, miss Hawthorne. Vice mayor Lobel here and thank you for being here as as the mayor said. So we have a pretty structured standardized group of questions today and first we're just gonna ask you to just briefly describe your background and why you're interested in serving on either one of these committees. And then I'm going to do some follow-up questions and we'll do a little closing question. And then as many questions as you have you're able to ask us, okay?
So just a little bit about your background, why these positions, why planning, why the Arts Board and is what, oh ACOPS or Arts Board, And if you have a personal, you know, if you have a number one or two, we'd be interested in hearing that too. Okay. Thank you.
I actually wrote a little piece out. Do I have time to read it or no?
No, terrific. Absolutely.
Will give you a little Yes. Oh, get my own mic. Alright. I'm known as Southern Susie Q and I was born and raised on a farm in Evergreen, Louisiana, the oldest of six kids. I got my masters in elementary ed and I taught first grade for six years in Shreveport.
One day, this sweet Texas Aggie swooped in and just stole my heart. We married and started moving all around The US with the pharmaceutical industry. I was birthing a kid in every state that I moved to. After four states, I finally figured that out, and we still moved to three more states after that. We moved to Scottsdale in 1994, lived there twenty one years, then built in PV about eleven years ago.
You've just got to picture this. Jim and me slowly moving all our worldly belongings into the new house, arriving in the minivan with our mattresses strapped to the top like we were granny and Jed Clampett, hoping that the new neighbors weren't peeping through their blinds and thinking, here come the Beverly Hillbillies to Paradise Valley. Out of all the states we lived in, Arizona is hands down my favorite, and living in Paradise Valley is really the icing on the cake. It's small enough to know your neighbors, know most of the city council, and get great hugs from the mayor. It's just a hop, skip, and jump from the airport in downtown.
I live close enough to the crown jewel, Camelback Mountain, to walk to it about five every morning, climb halfway up, and then walk back home. Just a real treasure. Where else could you go to have coffee with a cop once a month for a great program with coffee and bagels and visit with the fine men and women who keep us safe? And where else could you find a chief who periodically calls me to make sure I'm doing okay, and could he or his officers help me in any way? Only in Paradise Valley.
I do love this town so much. I also love the Lord. I love my four kids, my eight little grandchildren who live in the area, love all my friends. God has blessed me in so, so many ways. On a sad note, my beloved Jim went to be with the Lord ten months ago after a battle with pancreatic cancer.
He had just earned his PhD in archaeology with about seven digs in Jordan under his belt. We also got to celebrate our fiftieth anniversary before he died. He served for several years on ACOPS. I would really feel honored to serve PV by taking Jim's place on ACOPS. If not, I'll always be one of the biggest cheerleaders for the town and I'm willing to help out wherever y'all need me.
Can we clap? No, I'm sorry.
Didn't hear ramble. No. Your
love for the town is palpable. And I thank you for being here today. So my follow-up question is going to be yeah. Don't know. Pretty boring compared to what you just told us. But I see that, again, you said ACOPS or arts. It sounds like your love is for ACOPS. Don't want put words I love in your the officers
and the chief. They're just awesome.
Yeah. And I think you got ahead of some of the questions I would have answered as a follow-up. Like how would you describe the current relationship between the police department and the residents? I think you
did that. So
I would probably just follow-up with if you were an art sport, because we know your love for ACOPS, what would be your vision for that role? What do you know about it? What would be your vision for that role if you were to do it?
I don't know. I remember Jim was their secretary or something. He took their notes, but I'm not real sure what all they did. I think they just gave feedback and I'm not sure I'm not sure what they actually did, though. I never did ask Jim about that.
Okay. And did you have any questions for us? It sounds to me like you probably know more about what's going on over there at ACOPS and the cop and everything.
I just love going over there. If y'all have if some of you haven't been there on those Wednesdays, they're just amazing.
Yeah. With the turnout. Yeah. Any any questions for us or anything else you wanna add?
No. I'm appreciative of you guys because you do this from the love of your heart too. And you don't get paid enough for what you do. Yeah. I I agree. You just get really tough. Well, you
you obviously are here for for the love of the town yourself. I So you you recognize it. Yeah. And I I thank you for being here. And I know that there are 15 applicants at a a very small But you the mayor will be in touch and if there's nothing else. Alright. Thank you. Thank you so much.
Was so
glad you could make it.
And her shoulder gets better soon.
Damn. I'll bring them by one day for y'all. I make those Louisiana pralines and and usually share them. I meant to do that today. Yeah.
I didn't wanna do that. I didn't wanna go there. Yeah. And then they used to call in this Jim Southern name was it was James Raymond. So, we call him Jimmy Ray. Oh, yeah. Aw. The two the two names. Thank you, guys.
Thank you. Yeah.
It completely tore us, so they're gonna they're gonna have to do some major surgery on it. You can't keep cute.
Thank you, Susie.
Keep cute out. No. No.
We want to. It's all good.
Take care.
Thank you, Susie. Thanks for being here. Thanks for your love of the town. Mr. Lemelin, thank you for joining us.
Hi there.
Hi there. Thank you so much for spending some time. My name is Mark Stanton. I serve as the mayor and these are my council colleagues, and the full council is here today
Good.
To meet all the wonderful applicants that are wanting to volunteer. And as you are probably well aware, we're all volunteers, and our municipal judges are all volunteers. You're applying to be in the ranks of loving the town and working to support it and help it develop and grow in the right way. So today, we've had the honor to meet about 15 applicants for different positions and we know that you've submitted your application and we've had chance to review that background. So this will be about a ten minute process. I'm gonna turn it over to the vice mayor Christine LaBelle and she'll lead that discussion. But we're grateful. We're grateful for your interest, thankful for your background and appreciate you being here today. Great.
Hi. Thank you for being here, Vice Mayor Lobel. Thank you for showing up and for your interest in Planning Commission or Arts Board. That's what's on the
Or both.
Or both. Yeah. Right? So the the process today is a little bit structured. So I'm gonna start off with asking you to just briefly describe your background, why you're interested serving on either one of those committees. Feel free to expound on both. And then we'll follow-up with some specific questions and a closing question. And if you have any questions at that time for us, we we're here and happy to answer. So just tell us a little bit about yourself and and why planning and why arts board and and what would be your first pick?
It's interesting on on what would be my first pick. The reason I'm here is because I do appreciate the role that each of you play and other members, you know, caring members of our community, volunteer their time. I would like to be, you know, in direction. Point. And great great a maintain that, and I I I think think two that's areas that I could potentially contribute are in these two areas.
By way of background, I was a very sort of left brain person for a good part of my career and a good part of my life. Raised on the Air Force Academy, the old three boys. Went into marketing, went into research, went into analysis early in my career with a phone company. I did a lot of stakeholder management, public policy management. I worked with the legislative groups that interfaced with the state legislatures in the the seven state region and later a a 14 state region after the breakup of the Bell system.
I was a company futurist for several years. So that whole left side of the brain analysis and understanding how data, facts, a direction leads to good outcomes when you truly do look at facts, data. I had a chance to take a look at the general plan in detail, and I think it hits all the marks. We wanna keep Paradise Valley what it is and what attracted us all to it. That involves knowing how the water flows.
That involves knowing how what people want in the community, what they expect from the community. People have made significant investments in living here. They've invested in a lifestyle. They've been let invested in a way of living that they are proud of and they wanna protect. I did listen to the planning commission meeting from earlier this week, and I thought it was very interesting.
It had two agenda items. One was Phoenix Country Day School wanting to put in a new ballpark and then put in a a a wellness center. It's interesting because when I worked for the phone company, worked in that Fife Simonton building that looks out over Phoenix Country Day. So when I moved here in '89, I saw some of the things that were happening with Phoenix Country Day. So I was able to and it was very interesting.
That meeting hit the right marks. I think the planning commission asked the right kind of questions. They're gonna have signs that, you know, are electric and could be used in a variety of ways, but they were assured that it's just gonna be directional, letting people know that they're direct them to the events that could be occurring. They also asked about the signage. They asked about traffic flow.
When they are doing construction of the wellness center, where are people gonna be parking? They asked all the right kind of questions. So I think understanding, you know, what we want to achieve. I I know that commission looks at, you know, various waivers, but the the thing that's most attractive and the name of that commission is planning. You know, I've made a career in planning.
I made a career in strategy. I made a career in analysis consultation. I've I've I've consulted with some of the the largest c suites in the country and really relied on facts and data from me and opinion. I'm I'll always talk about facts and data before I'll talk about opinion. But I think having the general plan and the direction of the general plan guides the right kind of decisions and and and the right kind of activities.
And so I would love to contribute there. I said I'd start off with the left side of the brain. I then had two daughters. One was a competitive dancer. The other was in musical theater. I had an appreciation for the arts very quickly for a lot of years. And then I moved into my house in Paradise Valley. I think Scott might have been in this house. There's an art gallery in my house. It was built by art collectors.
Being an analytical person, I was able to combine both interest in the arts and sort of the whole idea of wanting to maybe get into collections and really appreciating art. And I try and have a balance of local artists that I have on display in the house as well as some of the, you know, the the things you would expect. A lot of, a lot of, apels. I do have some Peter Max and just, you know, some like an artist print from Salvador Dali and quite a bit of that, but also a few local artists. Leland Beaman being one of them.
I have one of his unique pieces. I also have some of Philip Campbell Curtis. And I happened to be at the installation of the art display at Shadow Mountain Resort last week. I met with a curator. I sort of talked to her about my interest in art.
She asked me who I had locally, and I told her about me having some of the Philip Curtis pieces. She goes, oh, I know someone who has a cattle track art that works at cattle track art that has a private collection and all that. So we're actually gonna be meeting in May for that. So I definitely have a very strong interest in art and appreciation for it. I'm sorry.
I know that you've had different artists displayed over time. These Dickmans are interesting. You know, I've I've got a couple of agama graphs in the house as well, and so he sort of played on the whole agama graph concept. So very much art is a is a passion of mine as is just trying to I've I've been very fortunate in my career. I've been very fortunate in life.
And as I'm getting closer to retirement, I'm looking for ways of contribute contributing. I've already had a discussion with Andrew and James about using some AI tools to reach out to the public with surveys. It could be very he put a QR code as an example, a QR code on the monthly mailer emailer that he sends out and just ping people on opinion about something. Tools of getting public input. I know that the general plan has not been updated for a lot of years, and it doesn't get updated all that often.
But it also needs to be a living plan, and I think that's where the planning commission comes in. Where do you stay true to the tenants in that general plan, but also where do you recognize that our community is changing? Our population is not. We still have 75% of our land is private residential. It's gonna remain private residential.
We've already gone through the development of some of the resort development and and and other development that has taken place. I think that what will be facing the the town in the next several years as people abandon California and New York and other parts of the country and they come here, they'll be attracted to some of that private privately held open space. And making sure that that privately held open space still stays true to the tenants of the general plan, I think, is important, but also has to be a living document and a a process. So I appreciate that. I think also from a reach out standpoint in the arts, You know, one of the other the other businesses we have in this town are mostly resorts and churches and schools.
So tying art and and and the reach out of art to those organizations that we have, I think, would be something to maybe consider. And I might have some thoughts in those areas. So let me just stop there.
Thank you so much. I don't even think I can ask a question because I think you may have answered them all. I I would I would like you to
for a living.
Yeah. No. It's great. Maybe expounding on a couple of things. And, you know, when we when we do our tech board, maybe we'll we'll, you know, we'll circle back to you too. Oh, that's part
of it part of it too is
Sorry. I didn't I I talked to apologize. Mark.
Yeah. Early on when I went to one of the breakfast. My background is telephony. Yeah. Our cell service is horrible. We have we don't have enough macro cells and the micro cells or when there's other technologies we should be using. There are some high points of steeples and churches, a tower over at Cosanti. You know, those kinds of things can be incorporated to try without making these ugly towers have some way of doing it. So technology is know, I
could talk technology all I like I said, I went off script. I I actually did have a couple of questions for you, if that's okay. So you were talking a lot about and I'm going to ask questions both about the Planning Commission and Arts Board because you seem to have equal passion for what I'm hearing almost for both. So you said you had some ideas about the PV Arts Board. Do you have a vision of what other things they could be doing or events or the outreach as you as you mentioned? You don't have to deep dive on it, just some general ideas of of, you know, the way your right left brain is working on that. And then I had one more question about planning commission after that, but I'll let you.
Yeah. One of the things that I talked to Cece about, the curator over at Mountain Shadows, was whether or not this commission, you know, the arts board deals with works with her or anything on the installation of the art programs and and some sort of interface between what the art that we have here in city hall and the resorts getting maybe some of the the resorts to come take a look at the art. You know, these local artists can benefit. Dickman would probably love to have a little bus pull up because people wanna see the art because there's a flyer, you know, in the the resort if they're interested in the local artists. Yeah.
We are having a tour, actually. Okay. I don't know if you're aware of that, but No. Maybe the the arts liaison could fill you in after this, so if you were interested. It's Sunday. I'm sorry.
Okay.
It's this Sunday. Yeah. And then one more question if you would, if you don't mind about planning. Again, hearing you, you're paying attention. You seem very engaged. Planning commissioners are very often required to balance the property rights of an individual against the values of the community. Do you have thoughts on that? And aside from the way you recognize that the general plan is sort of that North Star, aside from that, where where do you land on that?
I think those individual owners like I said, one of the issues is going to increasingly become this this privately held open space. I think as long as we stay, you know, to some of the things like was raised in the the meeting earlier this week, there's a right there has to be a fire hydrant. There has to be, you know, the the right kind of infrastructure in place as long as it it and it's staying to minimum of one acre. And there might be some other things involved in that too, access. We have some weird access on some of these lots, you know, where there's multiple driveways that sort of spear out.
I don't know what those if there's people that have issues with that or not, but I'd be interested in in finding out if people do. I think where I default to is sort of listening to the facts and then holding up against the general plan, but also people's rights to their property as long as they are not infringing significantly on on others.
Thank you so much. Do you have any questions for us?
I guess one of the questions I have is I see that they're on the planning commission. I think there's three that are up. I don't know if they expire. I don't know if people renew or how you go about how do you go about making your decisions?
I think every year it's a little different. So there we have a a toolkit, and I'm gonna defer to the mayor on that one.
So we look at we look at those folks that may wanna be reappointed or not. We look at what's available. There are different circumstances in every committee or commission. Some folks may be for example, there's a couple of folks that that may be running for public office, so they'll they'll at some point, they'll roll off sooner than their term. So it's always a little bit a little varies a little bit differently.
And then there's the life gets in the middle of it. There's we've had folks that have moved, folks that have sadly have have passed away and so there's some cycles to it. We have the set term limits that we have term and then we have a renewal if people want to not everybody wants to. So we look at that every session to see who's applied, where we are in the cycle. We talk to the chair of the committees to find out what preference is. We look at attendance. We look at things that sort of reflect how they've done in that role. And so when we go through this process, we're just checking the sort of the tone and the the pulse of those applicants and and seeing those that may want to step into those roles if they're available now or if they
may be. Okay. Good. Thank you.
I'll just say that, you know, I like I said, I feel blessed to live here and love to get back in some ways.
Well, I'd just like to say thank you for showing up. You for being Thank you for loving the town and and learning more about it. And it's we have 15 applicants in very limited spaces. And and in the next few days, you'll be getting an email for the mayor, and we'll we'll we'll see where we all land.
Okay. I'd still
like I'd still like to shoot for that twofer.
Yeah. And thank thank you so much for being here.
Alright. Thank you, mister Ramalli. Appreciate it. Yeah.
Thank you.
Mister mayor, that was our last interview for today. Would you like to hear from chair Georgios at this point? Pardon me? Do would you like to hear from chair Georgios at this point?
I I think so. I know, panelist Georgios is the is the planning commission chair. I guess a couple questions for you. One is we're going to move into an executive session and suspend the live feed and so that is part of the evaluation process. I did touch base with the town attorney and I understand that we could if we council decides to have council or chair George Ellis in the exec committee, we'd invite her to do that. We need a motion to two two points. One, I'd like to have the motion to go into executive session and then also a motion to approve Ken Cherry George Ellis being part of the discussion.
I'll move. Yes, sir.
I'll move.
Are you looking for miss George Ellis to be
in through the whole executive
No. Only on the planning commission. Yeah. Thank you for the clarification.
Good point. I move that we go into executive session and that as part of executive session, we have chair planning chair, Pam George Ellis, participate in the planning. I'll second that.
All right, moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. All right, we'll suspend the live feed and for those on the home edition, we'll be coming back at six p. M. For the business meeting. So thanks everybody. Well, good evening, everybody. Apologize for a little delayed start. Executive session ran a little bit longer than planned, but the town council meeting for 04/09/2026 is now called to order. Would the clerk please call the roll?
Mayor Stanton? Here. Vice mayor Lavelle? Here. Council member Andean Keller? Here. Council member Liebman? Sorry. That's it. Council member Moore. Here. Council member Pace. Here. Council member Thomason. Here. Council member Liepman.
Thank you. Alright. With that, next up order is the pledge of allegiance, and I would ask if everyone could please stand, and I will lead the pledge of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Alright.
Next up is presentations. We we have a special presentation tonight. There are thousands of children in Arizona who have experienced abuse or neglect. Voices for CASA Children seeks to give a voice to these children through the court appointment special advocate volunteer. At this time, I would like to invite Bonnie Brown, executive director for Voices of CASA Children to come forward and receive a proclamation from the town.
Alright. Thank you, Bonnie. So I'll read the proclamation, then I'd like to invite my colleagues to come up and do a photo. And if you've got some of your colleagues here, we'd be more than happy to welcome them too. So, whereas the health, safety, and well-being of Arizona's children are fundamental to the to the prosperity of our communicate communities and future of our state and whereas each of your thousand of Arizona children enter the child welfare system due to reports of abuse or neglect, experiencing uncertainties, inabilities, and a general lack of consideration and support during the challenging time in this their young lives.
And whereas, a court appointed special advocate, CASA, is a trusted volunteer appointed by a judge to advocate for the best interest of a child in force and foster care and ensuring that their voices are heard and the needs are met in court proceedings, placement decisions, and other critical areas. And CASA volunteers provide an invaluable resource by building trusted relationships with their appointed youth advocating for timely, permanently and sustainability, promoting their more positive outcomes and helping the children pursue their lives and dreams and lead a self determined life. And whereas in Arizona, CASA volunteers work diligently in partnership with the judges, attorneys, social workers, and community partners to ensure that these children have support, resources, and opportunities now and in the future. And whereas the work of the CASA volunteers has a profound and lasting impact on the lives of vulnerable children providing them with a consistent, compassionate and presence to help them restore a more balanced and hopeful future. And whereas CASA volunteer week provides an opportunity to recognize and honor the dedication of the CASA volunteers, raise awareness of about and the urgent need for more volunteers to be volunteer, Paradise Valley, to volunteer and to help step forward and make a difference in the lives of these children for their future success.
I therefore, Mark Stanton, mayor of the town of Paradise Valley, do hereby proclaim 06/1226 as Casa through the sixth through the twelfth, 2026 as CASA volunteer week. And I encourage all residents of the town to learn more about CASA volunteer programs, applaud the incredible work that they provide, and become a CASA volunteer themselves. Thank you. There you go. And if you guys are the council wants to come and join me and do a photo op.
Mayor and Council members, thank you very much for this opportunity.
We're with
Voices for CASA Children and it's with great gratitude. We thank you for recognizing CASAWeek and the important work that the CASA volunteers do on behalf of the children living in foster care and for advocating for all children and well-being. Thank you very much.
See you. Yeah. We'll catch up.
Thank you again and congratulations. Alright. Next item is going to be call to the public. The call to the public is an opportunity for residents to address the council on matters not on the agenda. In conformance with open meeting laws, the council may not discuss or take action on any matters raised. However, the council may respond to criticism after all public comments have been made. Ask the staff to review the matter or ask that it be placed on a future agenda. Speakers are asked to state if they're a town resident and also limit their comments to three minutes. And if you'd like to address the council, please fill out a speaker request form at the podium on the way in to the council chambers. They're located at the lectern, and once completed, turn them over to our town clerk.
And with that, I'd ask mister town clerk, do we have any request for call to the public?
I have not received any requests.
Alright. Not seeing any, we'll move on to the consent agenda. Items on the consent agenda are considered by the council to be routine and are normally enacted by a single motion. If a member of the council or the public would like to discuss any of these items, it will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. Would the town manager please summarize tonight's consent agenda?
Thank you, mister mayor. We have two items on tonight's consent agenda. Item 26 dash zero nine seven, approval of the minutes of the town council meeting of 03/26/2026 and '26 dash one zero four. Discussion and possible action to adopt resolution number twenty twenty six dash zero three, which is the extension of the town of Paradise Valley's membership in the Arizona Metropolitan Trust, also known as AZMT. Thank you.
Thank you. Would any council member like to remove an item from the consent agenda?
Mayor, I would like to remove item 26 dash one zero four.
All right, with that, I would ask if there is a motion to approve the balance of the consent agenda, which would be 20 six-ninety seven.
Mayor, I move, Approve the twenty six dash zero nine seven minutes of the town council meeting 03/26/2026.
There a second?
Moved and second. All those in favor? Aye. Anybody opposed? Alright, Council Member Thomason, I know you asked to remove item 26 dash one zero four.
Thank you, mayor. I wanted to remove this item so that I could publicly thank our human resource director, Ms. Monger. Over the last few months, she has worked very hard on decisions relative to the trust and also to our compensation. Having spent a career in compensation and benefits, I know that these are very difficult decisions. The decision to be in the trust or not be in the trust is not an easy decision, and it's not like just picking an insurer. So, I know that decision was made thoughtfully and with great regard for all of our town employees. I have observed her work, she always shows great diligence and good intent in her work, and I just wanted to publicly applaud her for her work on this trust decision.
Thank With that, I would ask if there is a motion to approve 26Dash104.
Mayor, I would like to enthusiastically vote to approve discussion and action item to adopt resolution 202603, extension of the town of Paradise Valley's membership in the Arizona Metropolitan Trust. Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes, thank you. Alright. There are no public hearings tonight, so we'll move on to action items. The next item is to make appointments. Oh, actually, we're gonna take the we're going to go into exec at this point. Is that correct? So we're gonna postpone this until after the exec meeting. So with that, I
I would move we go into executive session.
Yep.
Second.
Second. Moved and seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Awesome.
We'll regroup in the Study Session Room. Yeah. Susan. All right. Welcome back to the business meeting.
The next item is to make appointments and reappointments to the town's committees, commissions, and boards. We'll take a separate vote for each committee. The first is the advisory committee on public safety. These appointments are made by the town council and there are two reappointments and one new appointment to be made. Is there a motion?
Mayor, I move that we appoint reappoint Mark Winograd, Julie Schwalbe and appoint Charlie Herve to the ACOPS Committee. Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. Next up is the board of adjustment. Appointments to the board of adjustment are made by the mayor and confirmed by the council and there are three reappointments that I would like to make. The first is for Ken Barnes. The second is for Hope Ozer. And the third is for Quinn Williams. Is there a motion to support that appointment?
I move that we confirm the reappointments of Ken Barnes, Hope Ozer, and Quinn Williams. Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Next up, we have the Hillside Building Committee. Appointments to the Hillside Building Committee are made by the mayor and confirmed by the town council. There is one reappointment to be made and that is Blair, Portugal. And I would ask if there is a motion to confirm that appointment.
Mayor, I move that we confirm the reappointment of Blair Portugal to the Hillside Building Committee.
Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor? Aye. Alright. Next up is Planning Commission. Appointments to the Planning Commission are made by the town council and there are, three appointments to be made. Is there a motion?
Mayor, I move that we reappoint Bob Brown and Jim Rose and appoint Jenny Nagel to the Planning Commission. Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Alright. Next up we have see I'm getting a lot over is historical advisory committee. Is that correct? Okay. Appointments to the historic advisory committee are made by the town council and there are three reappointments to be made and that's Julie Garrison, Kathy Hankey, and Susan Schultz. Is that correct?
Yes. Mayor, I move that we reappoint Julie Garrison, Kathy Hankey, and Susan Schultz, and appoint Danielle Kesick for the vacancy that arose on historical advisory committee to replace Jenny Nagel. Second.
Second, moved and seconded. All those in favor?
Aye. Any
opposed? Alright. Next up is the Paradise Valley Mountain Preserve Trust. The Mountain Preserve Trust is appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the council. And there are two appointments that I would like to suggest. I'm appointing Andy Kanasek and Chip Karmer.
Mayor, I move to confirm the appointments of Andy Knacic and Chip Karmer to the Paradise Valley Mountain Preserve Trust. Second.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion?
Yes. Yes,
sir. Yes, sir.
Thank you. I have a question for our town clerk. Mister town clerk, the applicants for all positions have been made public. Do we have any last minute applicant applications for the Mountain Preserve Trust or notifications of any interest in applying for the trust.
Point of order, Mayor, we're voting on a motion.
I would ask the town attorney, do we have any?
Person on the floor has a question that the council member the council member with the floor has a question for the clerk. The so it's in order for
the clerk to answer the question.
Mister mayor, council member Thomason, we've not received any new applications, but I did receive an email from a member who is currently an emeritus member of the Paradise Valley Mount Shared Trust expressing interest in in in a a full position on the trust.
Thank you. I have a second question. Have we see received any other correspondence from the chairman of the trust or other members of the trust regarding this request for reappointment?
Mister mayor, council member Thomason, we did receive a follow-up email from the chair of the Mountain Basher of Trust expressing support for Andy And, actually, if you give me a second, I'd like to just read that into the record. All members support Andy Kinessick and are further fairly split on the second position. To complicate things further, Joan Levinson has let me know she would like to be reappointed, and I am happy to support the mayor's lead.
Sorry. Think we oh, go
ahead. Happy to support
Yeah. Mayor's lead? Yes. The mayor's lead.
Thank you. So we had just to confirm, we had multiple correspondence from members of the trust supporting the Emeritus member. Had one, I just want to be clear about received. The correspondence that we received from the chair supported mister Knessick and supported the mayor's choice. The correspondence from the chair, besides mentioning mister Knacek, did the chair mention any other potential appointment by name?
To complicate things further, Joan Levinson has let me know she would like to be reappointed. I am happy to support the mayor's lead. Thank you. And did we receive any other correspondence regarding miss Levinson's request to be reappointed? Mr. Mayor, Council Member Thomason, we did receive, an email this afternoon from former mayor Ed Winkler expressing support for Joan Levinson and an email from member of the Mountain Preserve Trust, Fred Pecos, who expressed, support for Joan Levinson.
Alright. Thank you for that clarification. So we had two letters of support for miss Levinson. Miss Levinson requested to be reappointed, and the chair supported mister Knacic and mentioned miss Levinson and supported the mayor's choice.
Correct.
Thank you. Thank you, mayor.
You're welcome. Alright. Vice mayor?
Thank you. I just have one question, for our town clerk. When did the, applications open for, volunteers, and when did they close? And were there more than one opportunity to apply and has anyone else indicated interest outside of the window? Sorry. Yeah. Gotta look that up.
Generally. Right? I'm trying to find I believe I'm sorry. Mister Mayor, Vice Mayor Liddell. Having microphone issues. Your first question was when the applications opened, they opened I mean
But when did they close?
They closed they were extended and closed March 30. After the deadline, we did receive an application from somebody that will keep that application on file. And then we did not receive any other applications, but I got an email from Joan Levinson this afternoon expressing interest in the Mountain Preserve Trust.
So the application that came in after the deadline wasn't on our plate today?
Correct. You did not receive that application and it was not included in the interview schedule.
And the applications were gonna close and then we kept them open to get more because there wasn't as much interest. Am I correct?
Yes. Was previous deadline that was extended to March 30.
Alright. Thank you, Aigel.
Alright. I'll go back to my original point and that is these appointments are made by the mayor and confirmed by the council. I appreciate the discussion. I do appreciate them out and preserve trust and I certainly enjoyed being in their last meeting and I did not receive those that direction from the the the trust to me. But I do believe that I'm moving forward with my appointments for Andy Knoesick and Chip Carmer and I believe there is a motion to confirm that. Is that correct? So is there a second? Second. Alright. Moved and seconded. With that I'd ask all those in favor please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Nay.
Nay. Alright.
Motion passes. Okay. Next up we have the Planning Commission is our Nope. Nope. Got that. Public safety. Public safety personal Personnel Retirement Board. Appointments by the PR PR BRS are made by the mayor and confirmed by the council and the term of the mayor's representative expires in 2030. Is that correct here?
Yes.
Yep. So I would like to appoint the representative to James Van Houten. Any
motion?
I move to confirm the reappointment of James Van Houten. I'm glad he's there and hope he's succession planning for other people to learn. It's important position.
It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All those in favor please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Alright. The last step on the boards and commissions. If I'm tracking along with the with the agenda here. Appointments to the PD arts board are made by the town council and there are five rep appointments up and three new appointments to be made. I'd ask if there is a motion.
Mayor, I move to reappoint Kim Knoesick, Beth McCray, Natalie Montenegreneau, Colleen Steinberg, Ellen Ull, and to for reappointments and to add new members David Lemelin, Susie Hawthorne, and Jane Horn.
Second.
Alright. It's been moved and seconded. Is there any discussion? All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Now we are going on to the I will finish future agenda items now. We'll finish the business meeting and then go back to the study session. Is that correct? Okay. So with that, the town's future agenda is subject to change and the public meeting schedule is available at wwwparadisevalleyaz.gov and click on meetings and agendas. Are there any items on upcoming agendas that the town manager would like to note at this time?
Thank you, mister Merrill. Just briefly note that our next scheduled meeting, which is on April 23, we have a number of items including an update from the Save the Spire group, a statement of direction on the Franciscan renewal centers, SUP amendment that they're asking for. There'll be an Arbor Day planting as well as currently we have scheduled the tentative budget adoption, also the undergrounding of the SRP lines along Rose Lane. So lots of things to look forward to on April 23. Thanks.
Thank you, mister John. Are there any questions or clarifications for the future agenda items? Yes. Councilmember Leibman.
Thank you, mayor. I had understood that we were going to be looking at a draft of the updated zoning code that was has that been moved back or what happened to that, please?
Mister mister Rever says coming soon. Do we have but not for this meeting. And it's not it's not currently listed within the next couple of meetings before the hiatus. So I'd have to defer to him to give us a better
Mayor, council members,
thank you.
We are working diligently with our consultant. We had a new piece of a draft come in this week, so we're just trying to get all the pieces and parts together into something rather cogent before we bring it back, but soon.
Thank you. And my request stands that we have a chance to look at it and have a study session before it be presented.
Yes. That's the plan.
Thank you.
Alright. No other questions. I'd ask, does any council member wish to make a motion to add items to a future agenda? Alright. Not seeing anything. We'll open it up for council, mayor, manager comments. Are there any reports from council? Council member, Andean Keller.
Thank you, mayor. The historical committee met yesterday and we have several houses in the pipeline for coming up to be recognized as historic homes and we're working on all sorts of different stuff. I love this committee. They're very hard working and that's all I have.
Very nice. Other comments or reports? Councilmember Leitman.
Thank you, Mayor. I am the liaison to the Arts Board, I'm pleased to announce that the once again, announce that the studio tour of three artists who have studios in Paradise Valley is this Sunday. I believe there are a few more spots that are open if people want to sign up. You can go to the town website and it's right on the opening page. Thank you.
Any other reports from council?
Vice Mayor? No actual report just a nod once again the theme of the night seems to be volunteerism and no matter what whether it's council members and planning commission or everything we're going through tonight including recognizing the voices for CASA you know with the CASA liaisons for foster children it's you know it's what makes the world go round. So I just want to shout out to everyone who volunteers in any aspect of their life and thank you for showing up. It's a lift.
Awesome. Thank you Vice Mayor. I have just a couple of quick announcements. One, I was so proud of the way the Valley represented during the women's final four event in in in Phoenix and I was very excited to learn that South Carolina was the team. It was staying at Montalucia in Paradise Valley. So that was pretty awesome to have Paradise Valley represented for that. Again, I concur with the with the reports that we thrive on volunteerism. Thanks for all of those great people that volunteered to apply and consider for that. We appreciate them. And if they didn't get appointed at this session, we hope that they'll reconsider and apply to the next round.
We greatly appreciate that and all of our volunteers. And as as I always say, just make sure your doors are locked and you're enjoying this weather, but keep keep an eye on your neighborhood. Alright. With that, there's the town manager report. Nothing? Okay. Well then, let's move ahead and continue with the study session and that will be led by is this by Leslie? Alright. Awesome.
I need them, don't I? Alright. Good evening. This is another, study session for budget. Tonight, I'm gonna talk about our pension funding, revenue stress testing, and, give a preliminary budget overview.
And then if we want to discuss any of the any follow-up items we can do that as well. After this meeting as Andrew mentioned earlier April 23 we'll be bringing the tentative budget for adoption during a special meeting And then the final adoption is scheduled to go on May 14. So again, funding, revenue stress testing, preliminary budget, and then a kind of follow-up discussion. So this is an excerpt from our pension policy that we are required to submit once a year to the state. It is already dated.
I'll be updating it with our new funding ratio this year. But our goal is to be between 95110% funded. And with the most recent valuation that came out we are now at 101.3% funded in tier one and tier two pension. So that is significant accomplishment I think because we are within our range I am not going to be asking for a contingency payment to the pension this year. However this is something that is in constant change and I expect that we may be looking for a payment next year.
I'm just going to continue unless you have a question about the pending.
Are there any questions at this point? Please continue.
Okay. So, for the operating budget, one of our policies is to do stress testing of the revenue and I have done this. This is my third time doing it but we did bring forward a model last year and I used the same model again with the same four scenarios. However the model itself you can build any kind of scenario that you want into it and it is available if anybody would like to do that. But I'm going to discuss the four different scenarios with you now and what some of them what some of the underlying assumptions are.
So the first presentation here is a modest growth and on the left hand side it shows our revenues and expenditures over time. We are at fiscal year twenty twenty six and this the assumptions here are that we have a 3% sales tax growth and also state shared revenue and all other revenues but also an increase to expenditures of 3%. So modest growth in revenue, modest growth in expenditure and we have a gap between the revenues and expenditures which means we would be increasing our fund balance every year. And you can see that on the other side on the right hand side this is the columns are our fund balance and our projected fund balance and the dark blue area is our policy to have a minimum fund balance. So we're well exceeding that minimum fund balance in this scenario.
So the second example is a flat revenue and so when I plug these in it plugs it in for all years from now forward. So if we say we don't have any increase in revenue over the next five years but we have increases in expenditures eventually in year 2031 we will start dipping into fund balance in order to pay for our expenditures. This is a very very unlikely scenario but I'm using it to show you what could happen. Even still with this scenario on the left you can see that having our minimum fund balance our actual fund balance is going to be significantly higher even with this scenario. And I am kind of projecting right now that we're not going to have completely flat revenue but it's not going to be growing at 3% either so we're I think we're going to be in my opinion we're going to be in between the 03% somewhere in between.
The third scenario is if we had declining revenue now this would this could be indicative of something like what we may have seen during the pandemic. We didn't actually see it but if we had some extreme scenario where our revenues were actually decreasing this is what you would see. This is so unlikely I'm hesitant to even put it out there but I do it just so you can see absolute worst. This is almost like apocalyptic right here but even still we would be not reaching into fund balance until 2029 and you can see in the overall fund balance we would still be okay even through 2032 and probably more into the future as well. And the last example, and this is something that we started to consider if something occurred where we had to unexpectedly raise our base expenditures by $5,000,000 So if, you know, for example, hypothetically, we had to put in place a brand new motor pool unit with 12 new employees or something, might be a increase of several million dollars at one time.
So what that would do to us would be to close that gap for the fund balance. So we would still be okay. We would still be increasing our fund balance but by a much smaller amount and you can see over time we'd still be maintaining a very healthy fund balance.
Are there any questions at this point? Council Member Thomason? Councilmember?
Thank
Thank you, Mayor. So could you go back to the beginning of the revenue stress testing? So we call it a revenue stress testing and offered to explain any details behind it. What it looks to me is that you took all of our revenues and just assumed they all go up 3%. That's correct.
Okay, so one of the components is state shared revenue. Based on what I hear at the legislature and what I saw over the last two years, our state shared revenue went down. So we have three different sources of state shared revenue and two of them went up and one of them went down and so overall it's up but not by very much and again overall revenues I'm expecting to increase slightly, not at 3%. Okay. I'm looking at the I appreciate the explanation.
Thank you. I'm looking at table two of our ten year financial report. Report and there's a line item that just says state shared revenue and that changed to state shared revenue and urban revenue sharing together they're the old state shared revenue. Right, yes. I'm guessing.
So that went down 25 versus '24. What's our expectation for 2026? So we just received I think it was last week we received the final estimates from the league. And as I said before I believe state shared or the one that's based on income tax might be going down slightly, sales tax is up and VLT is up. Okay.
I guess I'm concerned based on what I hear at the ledge that we're not that state shared revenue to municipalities is not going to go up in the future. So I'm just expressing concern about an assumption of a three percent growth rate. Right. And you should because it's always at risk. So I do take that into consideration.
All of our revenues are at risk at some level and state shared revenue they're always trying or I shouldn't say always. There's always a risk that they're going to change something and we're not going to get what we plan on doing. And the league has been very good about advocating for cities and towns and helping us to maintain the state share revenue. But you are correct that is something that's always at risk. This is just a model to show if everything is going really well for this example this is what you would see.
So yeah we can go in and we can change any percentage here that we want. Like the next example is like with no increase at all and I feel like we are going to land between those two in this upcoming year. Okay, thank you. More questions if I may, Mayor?
Please.
our revenue sources, I'm going to say roughly 47,000,000, it's just the schedule that I'm looking at. Approximately 10,000,000 of that 9 0.5 this year, 9.9 the year before comes from construction sales tax revenue. If at the legislature that was changed so that the revenue goes to the source of the point of sale rather than coming here, we would lose 9 to $10,000,000 a year. Have we modeled that at all and why not? Have we modeled it at all?
As far as I know that that has not nothing has moved forward in that for this upcoming year that we will expect that kind of a decrease. I have not been notified that we should expect that to happen. However, that is just one source of our revenue. And again, we are always looking at what is in last year it was food tax this year it is construction tax there's always a risk and we're monitoring that. Okay thank you.
I think my only other comment is I made similar comments last year. And I know that five years ago we did a very rigorous and detailed stress test that was much more detailed and scenario based. And I think last year I asked that we take a more detailed and event based approach to our long term planning this year. Obviously that didn't happen. I would like to bring up to my counsel colleagues again support for a request that in future years we take advantage of the past modeling that we had and take a more nuanced approach.
Because these lines all look good, but in one or two bad scenarios, these lines can start crossing over very quickly and our fortunes can change pretty quickly. And as a council member, I just want to know what our possibilities are so that we don't look at our residents and say, gee, we didn't see this coming. I just want us to be prepared. So that's my request, for support from my colleagues. I think we can do, you know, the the charts you did last year are fine, but I think we can do better in terms of a more granular analysis that can reflect our future.
Thank you.
I think you're saying that you would like to look at all of the potential risk to our revenue and evaluate them each individually. Do you want to see that evaluation? Thank you for the clarifying point. My point of reference is the work we did four or five years ago. I don't know and I'm not sure if you've even seen that analysis.
So you haven't even seen the stress testing analysis that we did. So that was done with the major sources of revenue not everyone but the major sources of revenue. It was done for free by some ASU graduate students. It was an impressive body of work. And I think we would benefit from going back to that level of detail doing that kind of analysis especially if we can get that kind of work done for free. So again I'm just asking my colleagues for support for a more detailed event based analysis for our future planning.
Your point I'd ask is that Tom manager have any thought about that?
Yes. I do. One of the things that Leslie mentioned, but I'll go into more detail. These slides that you're seeing are are screenshots of an interactive model. In other words, every single variable that's listed on the lower left hand can be changed. You could have a dynamic screen up right now and we could walk through every single major source of revenue and we've named them, right? Local sales tax is a major source of revenue. State shared revenue is a major source of revenue. The all others line, we could break out with specificity and expand that box. So what you're looking at here is not just a picture, it is actually a dynamic model.
And when you do that, if you were to change the assumption from a 3% growth rate to let's say a 1% or 1.5% growth rate, the lines would change and you would see it in real time. We can do that now. If you want us to break five minutes, we can bring it up to you like immediately or we can bring it back to you at another time. The point being is that each of the four slides that you have in front of you is an example of a type of scenario. How deep or how not deep you go is completely up to anybody at this table who would like to take a deeper dive.
And all it takes is changing the numbers in that little red box down there in the upper left hand on the lower left hand side to change any of those there. The one we wouldn't change is the council's policy, which is 90% of operating budget, but the rest of them are all plug and play. So if you assumed, you know, negative growth over the course of years, but with also a 5,000,000 unexplained event, that would change the line precipitously. You'd see it go from this to this. And all of those scenarios and would would you could you could play out any of them using this. That's part of the reason we heard you, but we believed that this particular dynamic modeling would meet that concern.
I appreciate that, but that does not contemplate a legislative change on construction sales tax, for example.
It could. In other words, if we said we have $9,500,000 in construction sales tax that we could lose in a future legislative session, you pick the year, you decrease the amount of incoming revenue by $9,000,000 which of course also makes a further assumption that the legislature wouldn't find other sources of revenue like tweaking the formula on VLT or the state share revenue that could make up that difference. But again, if you take one variable and you say we're down $9,000,000 because we're no longer collecting point of delivery construction sales tax, this can do that. In fact, I would say Slide nine, no excuse me, Slide 10 where it talks about increase to base expenditure, that's adding in a variable that could also just easily say decrease to construction sales tax because of legislative action minus $9,000,000 going forward. So you could do that.
This this can do that.
That level of detail, not necessarily this evening, but that level of detail that is scenario based and more responsive and nuanced, I would find more helpful. And I think responds to it shows our residents that we paying attention to the details and we are thinking about any surprises and we are prepared for any surprises. That's what I wanna convey to our residents. Yeah. And we do have a weekly meeting with the league and they go over in excruciating detail all of the risks.
And so we are all very aware of them and we are always planning for those types of scenarios.
And if I make a modest suggestion, mister mayor and members of council, a week from yesterday, we have our second community budget forum. The interactive model that I just described could certainly be up and members of the public who can be there and present in council chambers next week in addition to those who will be able to watch it after we record it can watch us run through any number of scenarios by using the same interactive model.
And I would would support that especially for the this budget open house that we're having. But I also know that the audience may not know the questions to ask. So I would ask for scenarios. Again, that doesn't have to be exhaustive but I think it would be important to showcase the examples. I support council member Thomson's thought that better to show that we've got the stress testing at the level you do than to leave anything to guess.
But I do think in the light of that meeting, would be important to to paint those scenarios. Again, I would not make it exhaustive and we've got a we've got a civilian audience there that may not do a deep dive, but I think it would be great to show some examples and and if you could do that in that meeting and then moving forward, I think Leslie, I would appreciate that obviously as we come into these meetings because I don't think we should wait for a year. I think we we can do things now that are gonna give those answers, then let's do them now and make sure we're making as many efforts as we can to explain how the budget works, where we are with vulnerabilities, and why we're making decisions that we're making. I support that. I think council member Page you have a question.
No. Thank you. So I look at PowerPoint nine or page nine and we already have declining revenue in there and what happens if I understand this right. So if the legislature pulls things or does things, that's when we're going to be our expenditures are going to exceed our revenue and we could be in a bind there depending on which one which of the lever they pull right to go after. So
this could be an example of the legislature stepping in and taking away some of our revenue. And I just did it kind of evenly 3% across the board towards all of our revenues, but I could have also done just take away one source of revenue.
And I think it shows, mean declining revenue this one shows how much our $140,000,000 in reserves or rainy day fund whatever you want to call it is there and where it would happen if we are now out of money to pay our bills. But the one that talks about the adjusted growth, I mean the variables there, maybe I wouldn't want to spend a lot more time to create something completely new. I like the dynamic approach that you explained, the town manager explained. I think that's helpful. But I think if we put some examples there for that forum, it's already here on PowerPoint nine.
Because the way we're taking, you say it's the worst thing to look at. Well, it's not so worse this year we had the legislature want to do a bill that would have done that, right? And I mean we can name it. I mean and it's coming back. I mean so we all went full bore and started working our magic to try to stop it for this year. But if that had gone in, I can't remember the bill number now, should be whatever it was. Did this cover that? I guess that was a real bill that's really being pushed and we're taking away the revenue. And my question is if we look at PowerPoint nine, did that even encompass how bad that would have been?
Because I don't know. So this particular slide is actually a little bit more generic that it shows a 3% decrease in all revenues for every year. So if this legislature were to step in, it would decrease at the one time and then it would probably be flat. So this is probably even a little bit worse than that scenario because this is meant to be like the worst case scenario. On February 9, okay.
And just to add to that, I mean the other assumption that this slide nine makes is that notwithstanding a sharp decrease in revenue that the budget approved budget in these years twenty twenty six through '32 continue to increase the spend at a 3% increase rate year over year, which I think in the realm of things that are likely is probably not particularly likely. But it raises the point that if that did happen that the lines would cross at 2029 and you see at that point a decrease in the fund balance because the only way you can balance your budget is by drawing down from the reserves. That was sort of the graphic point that was being made there. But we also know that it's unlikely that future councils would continue to spend at a year over year 3% growth rate revenues are declining in what's basically almost a depression like scenario.
Okay. And that helps to look at nine for this for the examples we're talking about here right now is if it's dynamic and you can say in in the form or whatever way you want to explain it, this is the one if it goes down, boom, you put your bet and here's where we're at. You still have enough money to cover, but we've gotta deal with the issue. Because I don't I don't wanna see a rework and the one if this works dynamically, you don't need to redo and start from scratch. But we'd like to see a little bit of, can you play with it and figure it out? And maybe we do this more often, like during the legislative, maybe every three months. If they have a bill here's what would help me. If they had a bill that like they were talking about to take away our revenue. Right? If I can show this to legislators to say, hey.
We did this and here it is right here, and this is how much it goes down, and we're out we're out right here at money, and we're down here. I mean, it's a real thing. We know what it is.
Yeah. And we can make this model available to you, and you could absolutely do that. Sorry.
Right. For instance, at an upcoming legislative breakfast, if we were concerned about threats to our revenue with our LD4 team sitting with us in the future, we can say here's some scenarios we can show you in real time what would happen if we lost revenue source or was impaired as a result of legislative action. And see where our lines cross. It affects us at a local level.
As council member
Or even other that's those are examples of where that could happen.
No. But council member Kelly just made a good point is that you have to be careful about this because we're the only city in town that has this much money sitting in reserve. So a legislator if I was looking at it, I'd be like, you guys are way too bloated and you need to be like, you know, giving us some money back. And that's the risk because nobody has this much money sitting around. So it's a it's a it's a we use it all the time to say, hey, we have no property tax here. We're being conservative. We're being careful. So I guess we have to be careful on both sides. We have to understand in here where it's going to go if we lose funding. But I'm not sure now that I said that we want to advertise how much we have sitting. Yeah, okay. There you go. The finance was. The left side. You said that too. Okay. All right Leslie. So the left side. All right, got it. That will be helpful. Thank you. Right, thank you.
Any other questions at this point? Leslie, please continue.
Okay, so the other thing I want to show is our governmental fund balance. And you can see every year our change in fund balance has been positive and it has been running about 20,000,000 increase per year. I do expect a fund balance increase for fiscal year twenty six as well. I don't think it's going to be $20,000,000 I'm thinking it will be less than that but still positive. And so we are currently sitting on about $150,000,000 fund balance.
Councilmember Andy Keller.
I have a question. We had the investment income that is not subject to expenditure limitations. For this year, it was quite high. It was what 7,000,000
About $6,500,000
Yes.
Is that investment income immediately it flows into our general fund for us to use or is it a user or goes into our
fund balance?
Yeah, goes into it. So our fund balance increases. It takes all of our revenues for the year minus all of our expenditures. So it's basically like your profit that will become an increase or decrease to your profit loss will become an increase or decrease to your fund balance. So as long as we're positive, it will increase our fund balance. Not necessarily the investment piece alone, but just overall. But for budgeting for the next year,
we can use that $6,500,000 in our budget?
Yeah, the $6,500,000 is used to offset the expenditure limitation. Correct. That's not subject to this expenditure limitation.
So my question is what if we had fund balances and what was the return that we had the prior year that gave us the $6,500,000 Was it what 67%
or something like that?
Are you talking about the interest rate? So it varied but we were hitting up more like 5% which was good for the type of investments we have.
The only thing that occurred to me is when the fund balance continues rising and we have these years where we have high returns, I mean we could be looking at 10,000,000 or $15,000,000 in investment income that would go into the general fund. And I would say for long term planning that maybe there should be some guardrails around how it's used. I don't know that's there is no we don't have any process on how the investment income is used once it flows into our budget, correct?
Not separately, but we do have guardrails on just how all of the revenue are used. So not specifically to investment, but for all.
Just worries me if we get a different council than the one we have here that likes to spend money that we don't have some sort of system in place that says, well, you can spend this much money on this or this much money if it's for the investment income. That's something that just came into my head when I was thinking about it. If you have $150,000,000 and you make a 10% return, that's $15,000,000 So, and I know we don't have 10% returns, but it's something to think about for long term planning in my opinion.
So definitely we have moved into position as our fund balance increases so our returns are based on how much money we have and the return. So as our fund balances increase and our investments increase, they're definitely getting higher even when even though I expect and you've seen interest rates have gone down. On that part it's going down but our balances are going up so we're still going to see a healthy investment. Yeah. So Yeah. We could we could build something into the policy.
Yeah. So I mean, this is for future councils. I won't be here, but it's something to think about if you get a liberal council that wants to spend money.
Mister mayor, just for on that point, just so we're we're clear. If the this council set a policy, the next council could change the policy.
You're not
permitted to bind that future council to the policy you've adopted. They would have
to change it, but it would
at the time. And so it's it's
a it's something that is in it's not permanent, if I can put it that way.
Okay. Well, it's something to think about.
And so it's also if you wanna think about that too, I will be bringing forward the financial policies in a later session in May. And we do things like we build reserves where we set aside that money for future things. So that's something to think about too. We do have policies in place that put guardrails on we spend.
Okay. I mean, for instance, you've had for some years a 90% of the the fund balance policy has been 90% of operating budget, right? You or a future council could change that. 90% is a pretty conservative amount. A lot of other municipalities usually hover somewhere between 2030%. I'm not saying one is right or wrong, but all of this stuff is subject potentially to amendment by this council and future councils as the circumstances may dictate. So just want to make sure you understand that kind of accentuate the point that was being made, but yes.
Well, it's definitely something to think about for all my colleagues here. I yield. Thank you. Councilmember Pace.
So for the money we have extra this year, can we do some storm water drainage by year end like on the list? Sorry, it's always my thing. But if we got 10,000,000 or $15,000,000 coming in, we've got a small project. $6,500,000 whatever it is and then we've
got another coming. The storm water project is already built into the CIP.
Wait, wait, wait, I got it here because that's so we already spent the 6 and a half million is that already counted in? I thought we were it wasn't in. Thought it
was new. This year? Yeah. So if you wanted to spend extra money, that is something you could choose to do to direct us to bring forward through contingency.
The caveat
there though, councilor Pace, is that in fiscal year twenty six, we could only spend up to what council has approved in this year's budget. So in this year's budget, we have a $3,500,000 contingency. So spending would have to be limited in fiscal year twenty six, which ends on 06/30/2026 up to that point. Any other spending we can't. For instance, I mean, we understand that the amount of expenditure that we budget is below what we actually spend consistently.
We all know that we've seen the actuals to the projected, to the budgeted, etcetera, etcetera. However, anticipating a decrease cannot allow you to spend beyond what was actually stated in the budget. So we spend like that.
Just 6 isn't million dollars year, we
can't spend, but it's going to go into our general fund for anything?
I'll ask Leslie to correct me if I'm wrong on this. But the $6,000,000 that we are realizing in our investments is already been budgeted as a part of the fiscal twenty twenty seven budget. And how we budgeted it is, I understand it Leslie is that we are we went from about a $3,500,000 to a much larger contingency for next year.
And then contingency increased and also our capital project.
Capital projects contingency and capital project increased.
And that's just coming from our investment money is extra to be able to do them because we don't have enough money in our regular budgets. So we now grab the investment income instead of going into
the It's not found money in fiscal twenty six, it's budgeted money in fiscal twenty seven.
Yes. And you'll see that in slide.
Yes. Okay. Let me say another way. In the past we've been putting some of that investment income into our general fund rainy day. We weren't always using it for these projects like we're doing now, correct? That's how we got to 01/1940 and 01/1950? So
it's not like we say we take this little piece of income and we put it towards a project. It doesn't really work that way. It's like we have this amount of revenue and we have this amount of expenditure and if we want to spend on capital projects we build that into the budget and it's
not one
on one investment revenue to to capital projects just a. But
the past few years, we've been gaining to $150,000,000 because we've been taking the investment income every year and putting it back in the rainy day fund or it's leftover contingency money that didn't
get used or it's both? So our fund balance has been increasing because our revenues have exceeded our expenditures and part of that is the investments. Okay,
but we're doing a better job now to maybe use some of that investment income planned into our budgets to do more projects, correct? Yes. Okay, fair enough. Thank you.
Other comments or questions at this point? Vice Mayor?
Just a couple of thoughts about some of my thank you, Mayor. My council colleague
Can you bring the microphone down?
Yes. My council colleague comments. Thank you for explaining that those previous slides were organic. And that I think that is helpful. It sounds to me, and correct me if I'm wrong, that that takes care of the ask of Councilmember Thomason you know, concern with can we play with that and and see the scenarios.
And I like the idea of bringing it to the the public budget forum, this way if these things come up. The the other thought that I had while I do appreciate all of the the comments about being fiscally aware, fiscally conservative, How do we put guardrails on things? How do we earmark things? I do think that just like any other council that we can't tie the hands I wouldn't be in support of tying hands of future councils who, when I'm not going to be here, I think that that is to the point of the concern. I get it.
But I think that that's what elections are for. And whoever is here is going to do their thing. And I would want to respect that just like I would hope for that same respect in my sitting at council. But all good ideas and that's really my only thoughts and notes as I've been listening along. So thank you everybody for the great discussion.
Thank you vice mayor. Leslie, please continue. So
right now here's our preliminary proposed budget and this is the general fund portion. In this budget I have added the comp study request so the change is a 3.1% increase over the prior year budget in total. The
class and comp study 3% that was presented two weeks ago. There was a recommendation to do a one time 3% increase that is now reflected in the change in the dollar amounts of this particular slide.
when you say
that there was three components of compensation we talked about. One was a 3% increase in a comp study about market rate. The other one was a 3% COLA and the other was a 2% don't know what was it merit? Not everyone they get. So your budget last time talked about the three and the two and then Gina, our HR person focused on the 3% comp. Are you saying you added eight in here? Yes. But I don't know that we made that decision.
That's exactly correct. Okay. This is a recommended
method. Okay.
This is just
for the purposes. Just making sure because I don't think that's correct.
Other
questions at this point? Thank you for that clarification. Council member Leitman.
I have a question. When you last year there was a three merit and this year there's the two percent merit. What percentage of do we spend all of that? Does everybody get a merit raise or only some people?
So everybody gets the COLA portion. Understood. And then the merit portion is based on their performance. So everybody gets a performance review and if they meet their objectives and pass their performance review they get the merit piece as well.
Understood but what is the actual fact?
How many people get it? Yeah. Well we haven't done performance reviews yet this year so I don't know but I believe last year everybody got it.
We what? I believe last year everybody received it. So the assumption is that everybody will get 5% or this year was 5% and next year would be 8%.
That is correct.
Thank you.
The only caveat to that is that the people who worked here during their performance rating period last year would have been eligible for a merit increase if they met their job expectations. Okay. We also know that in that same fiscal year last year, there were any number of employees who either a, were terminated, b, were not moved off of probation and therefore were terminated or left. So those employees while we paid them for a portion of last year did not receive the merit moving into the next year. So, but they were in that rating period.
The other thing I would just real quick mention is that our and we've talked about this in previous council meetings and I've mentioned it before. Our determination for the purpose of kind of really recognizing exceptional performance because we think it's important not just to correct bad performance but to reward good performance is we have what we call I think the exceptional performance program or award where every department gets to nominate a certain number of employees. We have a budget set aside for it. I wanna say it's like 25 or $30,000, something in that realm. And so if they qualify and the executive team approves it, those employees are eligible for a one time bonus of is it 2,000 or 2,500?
Each year. Okay. And last year, I wanna say it was either I think last year was either 2,000 or 2,500. So it's a one time. And the reason we did that is because in years past, there was a sort of sliding scale that if some people performed better relative to their peers than others, they might get a 3.2 and their neighbor might get a 2.8.
And what we found was we thought philosophically that baking in an increase that is permanent based upon someone's performance in one year's rating period didn't seem to make a lot of sense financially. That you can do that with a one time bonus that doesn't have the increased cost on a forever basis because the next year their performance may not be quite as good, they may not be eligible, but the amount of money they got the year before remains as long as they're tendered with us. So the one time made more sense.
That makes sense, but my question now is the 2% merit that is baked in then to the base salary?
If they receive it, it is baked into their base salary, yes.
So everybody who still was with us received that last year, so they actually got a 5% raise?
Total, yes.
Yes, understood. Total. Thank you.
And I just want to make a point of clarification. The COLA part is going to move the range itself and the merit base does not.
Understood. That's why it was two and three last year and three and two is the suggestion for this year. Understood. Thank you.
Councilmember Pace.
Thank you for those questions, Councilmember Wootman, and follow-up. So being the employment lawyer, I gotta ask the question. Merit to me and at will employment is merit. It doesn't go to everybody automatically. 3% COLA, I get it, but I'm having a hard time with the 2% merit goes to everybody. I'm not sure I understand. Merit is supposed to be someone coming together and picking those that really deserve it. It's not automatic. I mean, that's my interpretation a little But if we're if it's just under COLA, it's 5%, then it's 5% is really what you're saying. We're not really doing it like merit anymore. We used to.
Don't understand. We have we have three categories in our performance ratings. We have does not meet expectations, meets expectations and exceeds. If someone exceeds, they are eligible for the program we just talked about. At least I think that's where we used to do performance evaluations.
It used to be called out much more detailed than that. And if you envision it as sort of a bell curve, if you have a bunch of employees who come to work and do their job and perform their functions up to the expectation, then yes, they would receive the merit. Terminology wise, I understand your point. But your point is, if you make no distinction between a person getting it who's at the lower end of the bell curve versus someone who's at the upper end of bell curve, you have a problem. The other problem that we have, and I think this has been proven both in this organization and in other organizations is that if you start making if supervisors in a work group start making fine distinctions in these situations between one person or another person, we were getting very granular and the effect of it was that it was a morale killer much more than it was a recognition of someone's relative merit to someone else.
So we could invest a lot of time in saying you have a budget of x for merit, but we're going to allocate it so that this person gets slightly more than this person because we think over the course of a twelve month period that we can actually quantify that that person's performance was that quantum better. The problem is when you get into that level of granularity, there's always going to be some level of belief whether it's true or not that that person was too close to that employee or that there was some factor that they missed and it proved to be a problem from a morale standpoint. Going to this system, while it does sort of flatten out the notion of what meritocracy is, it does at the same time create an expectation for the entire organization that if they are in fact doing everything you've asked them to do, they ought to get the 2%. Because the COLA is related to the economy. The 2% is related to their employment.
Got it. But it's
And I understand your point. You've renovated this point around this with our executive team quite robustly over the course of time when we had those conversations. And this is where we landed.
It's just it's a factor that know personally I prefer a more merit based system. That's just me. I'm not I see I'm it's up to everyone. I get this is your decision. You're the town manager. You guys are the ones dealing with it. But when you're asking us this year for three buckets, you know, you're really saying a 5% automatic for everybody and then you're now asking for 3% comp increase. It's a lot to digest and then we're adding in I mean, I hate to say this in unemployment where you're adding a fourth bucket. It's now the merit bucket of twenty five to thirty thousand because we're not really getting it with the merit. I'm not going to I'm just throwing these out.
I'm not asking you guys. I have to like I'm just throwing out just it comes across a little bit healthy of an increase in a way that I'm not I almost would rather you say, I want to take x amount of money and really give it to the people with merit. So I'm always about pushing the merit, right, in this employment, right? We want to get the best people doing the best things, driving for the goals, doing we don't want to just reward everybody for everything. And that's the COLA. So I don't know. I just one person's thought that I think it comes into our minds that it's a pretty generous guarantee.
It is.
And it's not happening in the private sector
like that.
They're not getting 5%. I can tell you that right now. So that's all.
In fiscal twenty twenty four, it was 5.5 total. I think it was three point five and two. Last year was three and two. This year it's two and three. The only point of distinction for this year is that this is the year we did the classification and compensation study, which again, it is an increase to employees.
But again, it's an increase to get the workforce in total up to the midpoint of our competitor comparison cities and towns. So it's it's a recognition that after nineteen years of not doing one of those studies, we had work to do. It was not meant to be considered to be sort of an expectation that, oh, by the way, if your high watermark in fiscal twenty seven is 8%, that is now the new place we start from and next year everyone expects eight plus something. No. My guess is and I'm only guessing is that if we continue to be able to be in a financial position to offer any of this that we would be again talking back in that 5% range in total, not 8% because that's a catch up.
And once you're caught up, you're caught up until you do the study again and then that becomes a different question. But I want to make very clear that this is that one time this year only. Only.
Thank you. That was a good discussion. Thank you, guys.
Councilmember Thomason? Before she goes, I think Gina. No,
no. Councilmember Pace, I just wanted to respond to your comments about the merit increase. And what I will say to that is what the town manager touched on briefly, which is we do a really good job managing our workforce, I would say. I would say our supervisors are very involved. That's one of the advantages I would say being small. You know everybody from top to bottom. Which is why when we showed the statistic the last council meeting there you saw a relatively high number of probationary separations. Our probationary employees are not eligible for the merit increase until they successfully complete their probation. So those folks did not get the increase when the rest of the workforce did. With respect to everyone else getting it, I generally expect that.
And I say that only because I'm having conversations with supervisors and they are dealing things at the lowest level. I understand your background and so what I would say is that because we are managing and mitigating performance issues, they don't rise to the level to where we would say overall for the course of twelve months you did not expectations. Yes you had some blips on the screen. We talked about it. We documented it.
But by and large I mean that is what our supervisors are doing is managing their people. And I think you know I can speak on behalf of the town and saying that I think we are doing a better job of hiring and we are watching out for those things. I know Isaac has struggled hiring in part because of applicants but also in part of getting a best fit for his group because he's worked really hard to make a culture that people want to come work in. So it's a combination of both. But duly noted on the why is it how 100% of people get merit, right? But I would say it's the work we're doing behind the scenes because we want people to succeed and it's our job to make people succeed.
No, and that's a good point, Gina. So thanks for coming up and saying
that because it is true. I mean, in a
big organization, there's just no way there could be that many good people to be all named there. Right? You are right. We're a smaller organization and and good for you to come up and defend and remind us that you guys are managing things more with your staff and with your supervisors and you're not ignoring the weak ones and you're doing probationary. I mean that's important because you know some organizations especially in public sector they just get a little weak on that and it's just expect automatic and it just you know doesn't always sit well. But you're right we're a little bit different. That helps, so thank you for coming up and saying that. 10 gold stars. Right.
Councilmember Thomason.
Thank you, Mayor. I unfortunately for the hour have a ton of So purpose of tonight's agenda is to review the revenue forecast and to go back and answer questions from the previous two meetings. Is that correct? All right. Just a process question.
So at the last meeting relative to the pay raise, one of us was in favor of the raise as presented and the rest of us either said no or wanted more information. So in response to that feedback, you came back with the same number. Now I want to take a tangent for a second and comment on staff performance and pay. Our staff does an awesome job, an excellent job. Most of us are proud to run into our neighbors and hear good comments about our feedback.
My comments two weeks ago regarding a potential 8% pay increase is not reflective of the work that I think our staff is doing or how I appreciate them or not appreciate them. My comments are relative to my fiscal response about my fiduciary duty residents. So question one, I'm just curious why the same budget came back to us when the majority of council was not in favor. Parallel question to the administrative staff add to the town manager's office, which I'm guessing is still in there. And I know staff has said many times and I appreciate the perspective that it's not a staff add, we simply moved it.
But it's a new body of work being assigned to a new person. And so I think in that we had six or seven of us say we weren't convinced yet. So just surprised you came back with the exact same budget that we had before. I'll ask a couple of questions then I'll take a breath because I have a whole lot more questions. For the third time I have asked for a comparison of year to date actual to year to date budget.
A year ago staff committed to providing that to us quarterly. We got it once. I've asked for it three times and we still don't have it. So I would like to see budget to actual so I know what we're spending before I make a decision about what budgeted to spend in the future. So I'll take a breath with those questions for now.
Response from the town manager?
I'll start with the first and the second and then I'll let Leslie handle the third that was just asked. The reason why this came back in this form is because this is the town manager's recommended budget. We heard a lot of comment. We heard a lot of asks for additional information. What I didn't hear was when we come to the next budget meeting, do not recommend the budget that you think is the one that is the responsible one for this organization that you manage, mister manager. Didn't hear that.
Fair enough.
Still haven't heard that. That's why this is here. This is the accumulated information that I have received from the professional staff you see behind you and myself to believe that this is the responsible budget that we should have in fiscal twenty seven. Ultimately, is your decision. If you want to direct us to remove things, add things, or otherwise, you still have that opportunity.
That didn't happen two weeks ago. There was a lot of discussion. There were queries about information that was needed, and we are gonna continue to try to answer that. But there was I I synthesized what I heard and I still believed that the responsible thing to do is to look at the data that was given to us in the classic comp study and implement it in this fiscal year. Part of the reason why I feel that way is that even by including that $470,000 450,000 plus $20,000 for extraneous people who would have to be moved from their new bottom of the range up, That only gets us to a 3.1% total net change in the total spend year over year, which I think, and correct me if I'm wrong, Leslie, is probably the most modest increase of budget that the town of Paradise Valley has had in multiple fiscal years.
So if you wanna think about fiscal responsibility as an overall function of the budget that the professional staff of this town is presenting to you, 3.1%, which is the number right there at the lower right hand corner of the screen, represents a concerted effort that I give credit to our elected officials, our staff, and and the the watchful eye of our community to ask lots and lots of good questions. For instance, spending 2 and a half million dollars last year out of contingency had a direct impact on the ability to have our number be less because we ended up spending a whole lot less in public safety contributions. So it had a net positive impact that affected our budget and got us that 3.30.1% in part. And when you do responsible things, you ought to also do the responsible things that keep our our workforce competitive, keeps morale at a good level, and represents sort of, you know, I think that when we ask for data and information or report, we would be remiss to say thank you very much, but we don't think that we should do that. Of course, that's a staff perspective.
Ultimately, counsel will have to make that decision. But those are my reasons for numbers one and two.
Thank you. Sure. Budget to actual. So I actually did submit the budget to actual. It didn't get to you yet. It must have got lost somewhere, but we just did finish up this the quarter at March 31. Those numbers we got from the state, we've got them entered. I will be preparing a half year update for you and make sure that you get that. Did we did we get six months? Did we get the 12/31 numbers budget to action? I don't recall getting You
did three months. You did not get the six months.
Thank you.
But you are going get the nine months and you'll get the six and the nine together. I'm not sure exactly why you didn't get the six, but I know that they worked on both, but we'll make sure you get that right away.
Thank you. I have more questions, but I want to wait my turn.
Alright. Let's go around the room if there's other questions at this point. Council member Leibman?
Just one. Do we yet have did I miss it? Do we have a final
cap from the state? Yes, it came in. It was $200 more than the previous estimate.
I'm sorry, what?
It was $200 more than the previous estimate. $200 more than? Their preliminary estimate. Oh, okay. Not not more than Not significant.
Yeah. So what percentage is that?
Zero. Last year's expenditure limitation versus this year, I wanna say it was about a two point.
Let me go right to It went up 2.9% over the
prior year because last year's inflation I looked up was 2.8. So it was one over inflation. That's very interesting.
There are a lot of different inflation factors so it would depend on which inflation factor you
were looking at. Okay. Thank you.
Other questions or comments vice mayor at this point? Well, do you have more?
I have more.
Go ahead councilmember Thomaston go ahead.
I'm sorry.
No no no she took a breather. She needed to catch her breath. Regroup. She's good.
I took a pause on purpose. All right relative to the general budget and the 3.1%. And this is just perspective. So in a municipal budget, we always look at this year's budget over last year, this year over last year. And the objective is to keep it less.
However, my question and I mentioned this last year the concept of zero based budgeting. Now Mr. Resch, you did a beautiful job at the community meeting explaining why you don't do zero based budgeting in a municipal environment because there are essential services. So I appreciate that. However, last year's budget had $1,300,000 of one time expenditures.
I won't bore the public with details. But so last year's budget had $1,300,000 of onetime expenditures. This year's budget has 3% more than last year. So last year's onetime expenditures rolled into the baseline and we just go up from there. And so I think I'm just expressing frustration or a philosophical query or why is it okay that we go up every year with and the previous year had one time expenditures in them?
Again that's perhaps
the this year first also has one time expenditures so let me just give you a couple examples of those. We do a refresh on our computer systems every year and we do in thirds. So we do a one time expenditure every year for one third. We do vehicles every year. Again, we're not replacing every single vehicle so we rotate them.
So every single year we have one time expenditures. So yes, we eliminated a lot of the one time expenditures, but we also have new one time expenditures plus there's inflation and things change and needs change. So yes, to see a small increase like this is not is actually unusual in government. I've actually seen higher than this most of the time. But I think maybe that's some of what you're looking for,
maybe. Okay.
Capital budget. I'll wait on that because we're not on the capital budget. One other question about so this year's budget, the mayor and council or the town manager's office has the $35,000 a year intern, the fellowship in it. So it's in this budget. We didn't talk about it. We'll just do it again. So is it presumed that that's going to roll forward every year?
No, I'd like to speak to that. The commitment to ASU and the Marvin Andrews program is a two year commitment. We said we'll try it for two years. At the end of that two years, it's my intent to to review it and to speak with, you know, our professional team, our executive team to get a recommendation whether or we think we should continue in the program or not. There's no expectation and I've not represented to ASU that we're just going to be in forever.
We're going to pause since we did say we would do the two year, it's a share of the two positions with the city of Tolleson. So once that is concluded and it will conclude right around this time next year when we're talking about next year's budget and we will have a recommendation for council at that time whether it will continue. So I would call that a limited time. I wouldn't call it one time because they had to stretch over two fiscal years because that's just the way the program works. It's a two year MPA program, so two years with the students. After that, I would come back and make a recommendation. But we'll see. I mean, this year has been good, but we haven't seen the second person. There's a lot of variables. We don't know.
We have to respond to legislative changes, things like that. And that's why even though we don't zero base budget, we look at our line items very conscientiously and we'll make adjustments when we need to, both upwards and downwards, which is hopefully reflected in the document you see.
This will be my last question.
I'm very patient, Mayor. Thank you. My colleagues are
very Good questions.
So let's go back to the administrative position, the additional the administrative position in the town manager's office. So as I have reflected on this and talked to many people about it, and I step way way back. As a council member it is not my responsibility, my duty, nor in my purview to advise you on how you manage the town and the staff. There are two points where I can influence that. One is in an annual performance review budget.
And so if I have a concern about adding an additional position, my only way to say no to it is in the budget. And so I'm thinking out loud I apologize for that. So I've asked for some additional information about that and I'd like to have it. I'd like the job description of the incumbent that's going away, Diane's position. I've asked for a description of Amy Revenar's position.
I've asked for them and I'd like to have them. I now understand we have two part time deputy town clerk positions. I didn't know we did. So I'd like to see the job. The other job description that involves that I have one of them. Because as I look at the need for additional staff, there is intersection with other staff members. So I want to be fair in evaluating this. I truly do want to be fair, and I just need more information. I appreciate that you have provided to all of us a list of the expected tasks and duties for this new position. That was very helpful.
In my creative mind, I look at that body of work that needs to be done and I ask myself, could any of that be done by volunteers? For example, the town youth group that's looking for volunteer opportunities. Opportunities, could any of that work be done through the use of improved technology or artificial intelligence. So for me to get comfortable with supporting a budget that includes a new position, I'm just looking for more information. And that's really where I sit with the overall increase.
I actually combed through the League of Cities and Towns salary data. And I deeply respect our comp consultant and the work they did. I'm just seeing enough other data that I have questions. So I want to be convinced and I'm not yet convinced. So that's where I sit on those two items. Thank you. Thank I'm now really done.
Okay. And if you think of more, we can come back. But as a response at this point from the town manager,
I think the response would be I I thought that we had included the job descriptions in the packet. Maybe it was just those are the duties we included. The job description for management analyst, we have it and we'll make sure that you get it. Go ahead, Jan.
To speak to the items that were listed in the council agenda packet, that is existing work. That is not new work that was created for the sake of filling this position. This is work that is being done by directors positions. So the goal is to relieve directors from doing administrative work so they can focus on things that are more at the level that frankly the position should be doing. We're paying a lot of money for some of these things.
So I can speak personally. I need help recruiting and all those things. And there's things that I know we chatted about different ideas and so forth. But the ambassador thing, the concept, it only goes so far. Yes, it can do some things and yes, we need to look at opportunities for technology, but it doesn't replace the needs that we have and again this list that we compiled, this was a list that when we recognized that the position was not going to be filled in the town attorney's office, I raised my hand on behalf of my colleagues and said we need help.
We need help doing these things so we can focus on the higher level things, the asks that council have of us, our staff, the town manager, everyone. So this is not new work. This is not a new position. This is us realigning our existing resources to make them the best use of them and so that is why that we are asking that. Also to the other, the two positions that have the deputy, that is the management analyst positions and that is in addition to like supporting the town manager, supporting the commissions and boards in the community development department. Those are just added duties to those existing positions. They don't function independently as deputy clerks.
Understand. Thank you. And
to kind of get to a couple of other sort of points of clarification in your question. And because Gina introduced the concept that I hadn't mentioned to the council yet about ambassador, that just was a word that few of you I saw your ears perked up a little bit. What happened in the two weeks between the last meeting and this meeting was staff got busy and we got together twice on our regular executive team meetings and talked about a lot of subjects that were related to the conversations and the threads that we pulled from the March study session on budget. And there were certain, like I said, when I say threads, what I mean is one of the things that I think I heard pretty well is, which is unsurprising for those of us who understand or attempt to understand what this the town and its values is, which is some deep respect for the work of volunteers. And we see them through the conversations we had earlier today about your board of commissions, all of you who are volunteers, the police volunteers that help our police department on a daily basis with a lot of tasks.
That if they weren't there, that we may have to hire staff to do. And we don't because they are very generous with their time to be volunteers. So as I was thinking about all this, I thought one of the things that we don't currently have is a volunteer opportunity for residents to work in and around town hall or with public works in certain types of tasks. And when I began to sort of think out loud about this idea, a couple of things I think had to sort of ground my thinking. One is it's an it's good and it certainly I think is very much in in in line with the way this town thinks operates in its values.
But there are tasks that we have listed in that list of representative duties of the proposed not new position. I want to make sure very clear, not a new position. It's the same FTE that currently exists in the current budget and has for twenty five years or longer. So it's the same position. It just repurposed with different duties than what the incumbent had.
So the repurposing of an existing position includes with it tasks that we can't give to volunteers. What I mean by that is Gina in HR deals with lots of confidential records. We probably wouldn't hand over to even a well meaning volunteer information that would compromise the confidentiality of health records, personal identifying information, etc, etc. So, there's got to be some parameters around work that volunteers can do. Now, that being said, you know, there's a long standing kind of imaging of records that we're trying to do as an organization.
Can I see a volunteer potentially assuming that the records aren't ones that they shouldn't be looking at, could feed it through a document imaging machine, also known as a scanner? Don't know why I called it document imaging machine. That sounds like AI talking. That doesn't sound like a human being talking. When I say document imaging machine, that's the next thing.
Had a chip implanted between last meeting and this one to be more AI attentive. No. The scanner, certainly, that's something I think that volunteers can and should do. Okay? So there are some duties that should the second thing that grounded me was is that the understanding is that if we brought in three or four incredibly talented and generous individuals from the town to be town hall ambassadors, which was my working title for this idea, someone would have to supervise them, which would be would not be a volunteer, it'd be professional staff, and you would add to the duties of professional staff.
So my point in all of this is to say that idea didn't just arise today. It's been something we've been thinking about. Number one. Number two, it's not fully vetted. Number three, it's not meant to be a complete supplantation of what you have in front of you.
So I want to make very clear about that point. The other thing, when you talk about AI and technology, I don't think I would have been paying very good attention to the last meeting if I was able to tell you that I heard a lot of conversation. It all started with Melania Trump walking down the aisle with an AI robot of some sort. Since then, I've looked at innumerable AI robots, some much more human like than the one that she happened to have at the White House. But my point in all this is, and I and when I think about how that notion of use of technology, why use use of technology, it comes down to a few kind of grounding principles for me.
Number one, we're still a people first organization. When we think about the concierge level of service that we're so proud of in the town of Paradise Valley, to me the contemplation of that now and into the indefinite future is a concierge is still a person, right? And there's still someone who picks up the phone and talks to you here at the town when you call today. I had a resident who just happened to call my direct line and we had a wonderful conversation about concerns that they had about construction in their neighborhood. Took down their information, going to write them back, get them an answer.
That person did not have to sit on a phone tree for five minutes figuring out how to get in touch with somebody, and AI couldn't do that. I'd like to selfishly say that about myself in advance of my performance review, which of course will ultimately be your call. But getting back to the point, do I think that we can and should look much more at how we can use technology to make all of us more efficient? 100%. Do I think that that's a reason to withdraw the request to repurpose an existing FTE?
I do not because I don't think that I can tell you that we are integrated enough to do that, okay. You know, I think, because it's been a long night, but one of the people you interviewed today, Mr. Lemelin, had told you that myself and James and Mr. Lemelin, as a result of conversation I had with him at a recent breakfast, has an AI tool for survey that is very promising. But again, it's one of those things where I can't tell you that we're going to start surveying people using this really sophisticated AI tool that he and his company is developing and would love to beta test with the town of Paradise Valley because I don't necessarily know that this elected body is comfortable if staff just starts surveying its public over and over again on anything that we start sort of just crowd sourcing our decision making.
I don't think that's a wise use of technology. I think there is potentially limited applications. I know for a fact that the police department does customer service surveys all the time with people who they come in contact with. Do I think that matching up that technology with the kind of thing they're already doing might make it better and a stronger and a more powerful tool for them? Yeah, I probably do.
But again, it's not yet at a point where I can tell you it's fully integrated or even close to being fully integrated since it's really just a concept. What I do know is that I have to listen to my professional staff if I respect them and I do and if they tell me that this position we can responsibly integrate those that position into functions that are getting not prioritized right now and stay within and not ask for another FTE, which by the way if you look at fiscal twenty three through '26, we have added less than a position over the course of that. In fact, I think we're maybe negative in positions over that time. Leslie can tell you. We're not adding positions willy nilly.
We had a comment that was made at a council meeting that the town has 136 position. That was incorrect. That was wildly off. You can see the numbers. They're all there for anyone to look at and we are not adding a bunch of positions and this is not what this is. And so when my professional staff, the public works, clerk, HR tell me that this position that we already have could help them, I'm going to on the side of believing that that is accurate. A, because I watch them and I know when I talk to them that they have things that they wish they could do but they're not doing and we've had some conversations about that since the last meeting. But there are other things that ultimately come down to who do you choose to trust. And I choose to trust my professional staff.
Alright, Vice Mayor.
Okay, great discussion tonight. I'm going to take a little different approach here. And just bear with me because I've been jotting down some notes about what I'm seeing, what I've seen this week, what I'm seeing last week, what I'm seeing a little bit as a trend. I'm going to take a macro approach, not a micro. So I'm not even going to talk about dollars.
What I want to talk about is what I'm seeing is a messaging problem, a gap in messaging between staff and us. And I know in my heart that we all care about the organization in the town. And I shared some of this with the town manager last week. And what it feels like to me is it's not it's a perception issue in my opinion. It's not about the 3.1 or the 40,000 extra dollars for this or that.
But that's what we're getting in the weeds about. And I'd like to take a more macro look and approach. And I think that the I'll give an example. I don't think anyone at this table really has a problem with an employee that's going to support our staff if they're saying they need it, an admin position of some sort or a deputy clerk. I think that even the town manager when you're saying it's not a new position, it's not a new position, it's just a yeah it's not but I would rather hear hey we're losing this position but I haven't asked.
I'd like you know I really am hearing my staff say this. Can we translate that over? It just feels like sometimes there's a lack of trust going. And to your point, Talmadge, that the trust, you trust your staff. I do too but I think that there we're seeing things differently and so I I think a communication issue a little I think at night like tonight is great because this is the stuff we should all be doing.
I love having Gina come up and saying, no, well this is why I'm seeing it differently. Because eventually we'll get to the other stuff. But I feel like I just want to continue to encourage conversation and openness and not defensiveness on both sides, not that there are sides. For instance, another thing that I think optic wise could be an issue and people brought up tonight. And all it is really is just labels.
So when we talk about a merit pay 2%, 3% and then the other one is 2% or 3% or 5%. The question does everybody get the merit pay basically that creates a 5%. And that's fine. But I think that the communication about, hey, the way you, Gina, when you talked about, well, is why. Because we're so proactive.
Proactive. So these kind of conversations are good. Would encourage everybody not to get real defensive and stay open minded about it. I have a bunch of other questions that are micro that could get in the weeds, but I think everybody else has enough of that. So I would just like to, know, encourage we hear from residents inbox more so this year than ever in my life. And who did you call? What did you do? And what's going on with it? And who do we report to? And we are not hearing anything back.
So when we're being asked for more positions, when we and I've only been here four years, but I feel like sometimes the response time and maybe it's reflective that people need more help that's fine let's have that conversation because what we're seeing is okay we're going to put more positions and more money into something that's not even that we're feeling more gaps in the system. And I can't speak for everybody here but this is what I think I'm seeing and hearing and I'm gonna leave it at that but I think that just let's get our messaging right and let's talk to each other about what are why we need it, what our needs are, why it's in the budget. And and I think it'll it'll it'll get us far, I hope, and that's I yield to sit.
Well, we still have more presentation to so I'm gonna encourage that. I'm gonna thank my colleagues and staff for that discussion. And Gina, in particular, thank you for the eye opening on the comp and classification. I think that was a real eye opener for the whole council. And I I I read the same with with the team here.
We have a job as electeds to look at the details, look at the the nuts and the bolts and say why because we do get asked. But also that's that's part of our responsibility. Staff has our full trust and support. We know that you all under Andrew Ching's leadership are doing the job plus plus plus and and we we see see that that and we hear about that. So our trust is with Andrew and the leadership team and everybody on the staff to continue to improve and look at that.
I see that as this is part of that process. I see that we had an eye opener with the comp study and I again, applaud the fact we finally did it after nineteen years and it did open our eyes and it did ask some questions that we're kind of looking at and it ties also to this AI discussion. I get it. I know that people kind of want to defer to AI. I'm not a 100% on that vote.
I think that there is a there are guardrails you have to have in place. Same with your I'm excited to hear more about the ambassador program. But that too needs guardrails in place and supervision. So I am very encouraged as I was at the comp study that that we're gonna find a good pathway that's gonna continue to support an excellent staff. And I too, when you call my office number, it rolls to my cell phone number.
And I'd like to say that every single call that the mayor gets is, hey, you guys are doing great. But it turns out that that's not always the case. So I hear thoughts about the town and about issues and concerns and I pass them along to the town manager or the the appropriate staff as needed but I will tell you again this council has absolute belief and trust in the staff. This is not a question of any one person or committee or group or division or department. This is a question of the bigger picture of the budget and please know that we are very lucky to have the staff that we have and continue to support that effort and if there are ways to improve and if that includes getting the town manager a robot, we'll talk about that.
But in the meantime, I just want to say again, I hear around the table there's a lot of granularity because we have questions and we're just looking to get those answers so that we can feel confident where we're going. We know there's change foot. We know that. So with that, I'd ask that Leslie, please continue.
Alright. So moving on in the general fund, we have two other categories that are pulled out. Tourism and promotion. This is an expense that is based on how much bed tax we receive. I'm keeping it flat this year because just to be conservative, this gets trued up every year regardless. So if it comes in over, we'll true up. If it comes in under, we'll true up. And then the contingency which is increasing by $2,100,000, that is a good thing. That just means, we have more cushion. It is not a planned expenditure at this point, but if the council so chooses, they could direct that to be spent later on.
We say later on if we need to spend it by June 30 for small storm
water This fiscal year 2017.
I know I keep saying that. I'm just
going to keep saying that. Thank you.
We're running out of fiscal year twenty six. So if you wanna do that, you're gonna have to do it fast. Next we look at our special revenue funds. You can see the HEERF fund went down and that is due to the fact that we had a bump in our payment preservation program last year. We're coming back down to a more normalized cost there. Some of the other special revenue funds are seeing increases. Debt service fund is decreasing because we have no, we've paid off our debt service. Capital project funds have increased significantly. And you have seen the CIP program at a previous council meeting and this has not changed since that. Enterprise funds are increasing as well.
The majority of that is in the fire service fund because we need to replace all 10 fire service doors at about $40,000 each. So I'll stop here in case you have any questions on some of these other funds.
I have questions at this point. Councilmember Leitman.
Thank you, mayor. My question is about the fire service. I know we had an earlier meeting where some people questioned whether we should support more, support less, whether the town should be paying all of that, whether the fund should be paying all of that. And I know there were some differing opinions and what is the decision for this
budget? So this budget is just where the rates are staying the same. The general fund will continue to subsidize it as it has been. I believe the direction was from council to go back to the history and try and pull together some history of what the intention was of the original fire service fund back in 2003 or whenever it started and I still have to go back and try and find that information and bring it back.
Because thank you. I was very interested. I I was surprised by the strong opinions about whether that gets more subsidized or less or stays the same by the town. And I think that information will be very useful to us in making a decision. And just as a side point oh, forget it. Thank you.
Oh, man. We've informed, for some of the future. Council member Pace.
Thank you, mayor. Going to the enterprise funds, the alarm fund, are you guys gonna get us the trend and how many in the last you were gonna pull that stuff for us we can make a decision about alarm fund? Do we have any? Did I miss this?
No. We've asked the
Oh, okay. I'm sorry if I missed it. Was like, I thought I read everything. I can miss things all the time. But on the enterprise fund, I'd like to look at that. Well, suit my But I would like to at least know how many people are signed up, how has it been going the last five years. We usually got a trend of this every year. And it showed us whether it's trending down or it needs more people. We already heard when we asked last time, it's a real amount of work, a lot of work, Chief Carney said. And that's a concern about the cost of that and how much are we subsidizing in that total even if we count the hours of the officers. Why are we should we do that? I mean, it's something to think about. And it's got some problems right now. So, you know what are the options on outsourcing it and not be in this business? I mean this is one that I don't understand.
So before we go on the ARM fund is solvent right now So the fees that we collect for it does pay for it right now. But yeah, there are issues with it that and I know they're looking into other options.
Okay. And I apologize, I didn't hear the first part of the question.
So just we were just looking I just didn't wanna make this sound like it's a sign off tonight, at least for me on the enterprise fund, particularly the alarm fund. I wanted to see how many people are using it. Has it gone down in trend or is it going up? Was it stable? I mean, there's a use if it's stable. And then are we looking at options and how much is the cost of officer time that's being put into the program? The solvency, I get that we're putting in a lot of cost to officers hours to pick this up and any problems with it. So it's you know, should we be in the alarm business anymore and it doesn't look like it's something to keep or think about an option?
Yeah. So we have been looking at different options for that. And again, it comes back to counsel's, direction on what you would like us to do. We do offer the ability to have that kind of boutique way to service the community that no other jurisdiction does. So it's something very unique to Paradise Valley but yes it is labor intensive for our folks to be able to maintain. I can tell you for part of the questions that
you
had our subscribers right now we're at two fifty nine, revenues at 118,000, expenses are at 190,000, investment income is at 20,000, so our net loss is 50,000.
Net loss, did you know that word? Yeah. So if there's consensus on the table, think what we wanted to do is look at that and see if there's options. Because most municipalities have made a choice to outsource that, especially with cybersecurity changing services, the world out there. It's a hard thing for our little town to keep up with. And if it's taking officer time, I'm not much of a fan of
that if it's taking a lot of officer time.
But that's one person's voice. But we need data to tell you that. So I don't support it going forward tonight because I don't have enough information as to support it. And I'd like to think about doing something else if we could save money and use that for something else, like storm water drainage project.
If I could just say one thing on that. So as far as the officer time, the officers are gonna have to respond to alarm calls whether it's being generated internally or externally. So that part of it is pretty consistent and will remain that way. Where the labor part of it comes into play is on the administrative side.
I know.
And so it's our our records tax and we no longer have a designated position that is strictly for managing the alarm. So that part's been delegated amongst several people. So it's saving their time.
It's so the administrative part is delegated amongst several of our more experienced people in the police department. Correct? To handle the administrative?
It's right now, it's part of the administrative section, so it's under our record specialists.
Okay.
They are not
Okay.
Some of our more tenured, they have had to do a lot of trial by fire, they are becoming our experts on on how to do it. So but, yes, that is something that is ancillary to their primary duty.
And if they didn't so our our officers again being asked to wear many hats like everyone in our town and that seems to be a repeat thing in Paris Valley. Everybody wears many hats here. But for the the team that's doing that, would they still be busy enough if they weren't doing all this administrative stuff with the alarm? Indeed. Okay. So we can't just cut it and cut FTE out of it. Correct?
Correct.
They were just doing more work. And is any of it overtime work sometimes to keep up with all this?
Generally no.
No no no they're doing in their several hours. Well I just I think it's time to look a fresh look and look back on this. We said we would do that. It's starting to get expensive if it's a loss and now we need to know that. And how many people use it but I'm you know if I thought it was a perfect unique thing that everybody loved and they loved having PD, having access and all that, that's one thing. But we've got complaints. There's issues. It changes all the time. It's not a steady program, and and technology changes too much. So I just think it's time to think about that.
Then the other thing to get money for storm water drainage or something else is we talked about waiting to talk about funding. And I don't know if that's where revenue is. And if I'm out of line and it's not tonight, that's fine. But when are we going to talk about the lot at Doubletree And Scottsdale Road and potentially whether we're gonna, as a council, keep it or sell it? And what can we do with that money? So there's my three questions. It keeps being told I have to wait until we're talking about revenue. So we're at revenue.
Okay. Let's I'd like to talk about the alarms first. Fair enough. So my recommendation to counsel would be that we leave the program in the budget because it's either operating at or near capacity or if there's a loss, it has already been booked. And the reason I wouldn't recommend that we cut it out of the budget is because we would need time to transition those people to something else.
We wouldn't just turn their alarms off. That would be bad. So to me, I look at that the policy question of do we or do we not have an alarm system to be just that. It's less of a budget issue and more of a policy because certainly as we know, we can subsidize enterprise funds if whatever we're doing is worthwhile for subsidy. I agree they should pay their weight and if we wanted to have a conversation about how they they pay and make sure that it's at least a breakeven, we can do that and I would want our staff to prepare that for a future study session outside of the budget world.
But you're right, mean in terms of funding, this is as good a time as any place raise the issue. So from my perspective, consider it raised and we'll look into that further to to give to give some recommendation.
Before you move on to to the double tree, thank you. That's very helpful to to you. But I also wanna know about complaints. Because I hear there's complaints. Complaints about our our The alarm systems. Alarm systems. Affect our offices reputation and our town's reputation. That's a big part of the communication that I'm worried about. Is it's a reputational issue for us to manage something that's not our expertise. And then we have residents, you know, upset. And then after 09:11 goes down, they're upset. Mean, there's lots of things that go into this. So I'm just and just for your point, just one more institutional history to add on. So I was chair of ACOPS when chief Hong Kong and I went out and added the alarm. I had to take that one on.
To add charges to the alarms that are false alarms, that was one the things I had to do. And that was a hard sell. The chief wanted to
do it, but how do
you tell the residents, hey, we're now gonna charge you for false alarms. And the reason was when we looked at the cost of two officers having to go to every alarm and people just hadn't kept up. So we did a big education and we wrote the letters and we did it Because if we didn't do that, nobody cared about the extra cost and then it was killing our staff time. And so we made that pitch and we told them to transition and to get people to service their stuff at their houses and all the stuff. Everyone was afraid of that, but we won worked. And it worked and didn't decrease. We had our numbers and we had our stats. It made a huge difference. There's no difference with having to make a decision and sending all people a letter to say, hey, you have ninety days or one hundred and six months or a year to transition off this program and then sending another one in six months, another five. I don't worry about communication.
We would do it the right way and there'll plenty of time and we would have options or things for them to do. So they've heard this in the past. We went through a whole exercise. We can transition off if that's the best choice. I don't know yet, but I'm just saying the complaint part matters. And I heard the chief say that to us.
I Councilman arrived. I think we got we got that message and I think that the town manager said it is going to come back to us in more detail on a policy.
We'll come back at a future study session and address those concerns.
Okay. Thank you.
I'm just trying to be respectful of the time and the details. Remember we're focusing on study session for the budget, not necessarily policy and and and book of work that we got there. Yes. Council member Leithman.
Thank you, mayor. And this is just a clarifying question so I understand. Yes. There's about two fifty eight or two two fifty nine subscribers and there's about 6,000 households. So my rough math is that's about 4% of the households actually take advantage of this. Is that correct?
Or am I, like, really off? I think we have to make this a study session item to make sure we get the content.
I just
wanna understand. I guess that's a small percentage.
Okay.
Thank you.
Yeah. Again, think we it's a very valid question. Very valid discussion point. But I and I know I remember council member base when we went through that exercise. So I think we've got it. Understood.
Can Now now double check. Thank you.
Yeah. So on that lot, staff can prepare whatever council gives us direction to prepare to talk about and have a discussion when we get such direction. The direction up to this point has been that it remains within the town's real estate portfolio to be determined what future use might come. That doesn't mean that precludes the idea or option of selling, but we just haven't gotten that direction from counsel. So unless until we do, that's the status quo remains the status quo.
But how do we know what the value is and what can the funds be used for to make that decision? I mean that's sort of what we've been asking is.
Right. The value would be determined by an appraisal by an appraiser. And we would do that at the point where I guess what I'm saying is I've yet to get direction in this budget year or any previous one that we should schedule regular appraisals of a piece of property absent a reason to do so. And the reason would be to help counsel make a decision whether or not there should be conversation about what to dispose of the property in some way.
Okay.
Okay. So I guess I'm not trying to be coy. I'm just I'm trying to sort of create sort of the the the setting in which I'm answering your question, which is it's a vacant piece of property the town owns and it remains that unless and until we get other direction. And
what can we use the money for if we sell it?
I'll defer to Leslie on that to me.
Or does it go into the general fund or storm water drain?
What can we
use it for?
It would just be part of
the general fund.
It would just be, yeah. Default would be general fund.
Police training center could be used for storm water drainage. It could be used for it go in general fund. So if it's worth realtor friend, or renter, council member I mean, like, if it's worth a couple of million dollars, then we can use that for a project. And we just don't know because you're saying you want us to give direction. So where are we supposed to do that? At the end of the session in council where we make motions of things not on the agenda? Because I've already given it to you on the agenda. Think Councilor Mundane Keller has given it
to on agenda. So where are
we supposed to make that? You said we had to wait to revenue to look at it. Where do we do this, Mayor? I mean, I don't where are we supposed to have this discussion about how we all feel about looking at it closer. I'm not saying to do it, I'm saying look at it closer.
Right. No, I understand. Well, we're having the discussion now in the context of budget. And again, in the budget conversation, I guess the way I would fashion it within that those confines that we're currently discussing is, if we gave you direction to sell that piece of property, what impact would that have on the budget for fiscal twenty twenty seven? That would be a budget conversation about that land.
But until we have that direction, I mean I could I I shouldn't say that. Let me rephrase. I would say this. If the direction I get from counsel is please provide us with you know, a recent a up to date valuation of the property which would assist us for a conversation that we wanna have about what to do with that property. We could do that. We have funds that would be set aside for that purpose.
If everyone agrees. That's Yeah.
If every well, if the consensus agrees.
Well, how
Yeah. And I appreciate that. I do think it's come up a couple times with council discussions and I do think there is a definite appetite to look at what an appraisal and how we would get that done and also what the process would be. So I think if we look at the appraisal and then what the process would be to consider the sale of that land, think that's what we're seeing the request. Unless I see something different I
think That's when I would turn to Andrew M and he'd be able to give you the process as to how general law towns are allowed to sell and dispose of real property because it's a little different.
And again, don't think we need a full description tonight. I do think it's something that we've banded around in a couple of different agenda setting meetings and we've talked more more globally about this but I think that it is fair to not deep dive on this tonight but again look at either setting a future agenda study session for this and based on the timing that that the town needs to look at what an appraisal would cost to do, when we could do the appraisal, and what the process would be. I think that would be the ask. Okay. Alright. Next questions. Councilmember Thomason.
I can't help myself on this topic. If
we want to
go forward with an appraisal, I have no objection to that. But we have plenty of money in our reserve fund. The discussion is we take an asset that's a piece of dirt, we sell it, we turn it into an asset that's cash. So it's one asset turning into another asset. If we wanted to buy anything, we don't lack for it. So whether or not we sell a piece of property or a municipal or a federal treasury bill doesn't matter, right? An asset is an asset. I'm over complicating the question. It's just an asset. Right?
It's a piece of dirt that we would turn into cash. It goes into the general fund. We spend it how we decide to spend it. Do you not need the money from the sale of the property to make purchases. We don't need the money from selling the property to do whatever we want to do. Yes. Thank you.
Any other questions? Councilmember Randy Keller.
I just wanted to pipe in and say that I support a study of the alarm fund. I too have always thought this was a matter of private industry and if the amount of people or subscribers is less than five percent I was definitely out on continuing. A study on that. The fire service fund fees and study on that and then also the Drobble Tree and Scottsdale appraisal. But I wouldn't take the alarm fund out of the budget because we would have to study it and then yes, do like a year. Yes. So I yield.
Any questions at this point or go ahead. No. We're not quite at the recap yet. We keep we keep keep derailing it.
Thank you. Thank you, mayor. I would support studying the enterprise fund for the fire. I think that's from the very beginning. I looked at that. It made no sense. It's not in alignment with what a fund is supposed to be. We can call it something else and figure out if we're going to subsidize fire services. That's not the issue I have if that's a choice that we make as a council. It's calling it an enterprise fund when it's not functioning as one.
Why not just get get it where it's supposed to be? Alarm I feel the same as my colleagues if it's if it doesn't make sense and it's not even a really good public outreach type situation, what is the point? Doubletree Lot, I don't have any problem looking at our options. And at the end of the day, it'll be a council vote if that's what we want to do. I think there's other items at play there.
It's not just a way to produce revenue. It's a big open empty lot that maybe somebody on that street wants to see a nice house there. I don't know. Mean I'm not going to get into it right now, but I think it's worth a discussion. And when we get to the recap, we'll have a couple more questions.
Okay, we're getting long in the hour here. Leslie, please take us to the slide and then of course the recap.
We're getting near the end. So pulling it all together, this is a look at how all the funds look together with our exclusions and our expenditure limitation. There's just a summary, a recap of the previous slides.
Other I think go. It's councilor Thomson. Okay. Go right ahead.
Point of clarification for our residents. Earlier this year, we approved to ask we approved to send to the ballot two questions for our voters. Number one, if we should increase our general fund expenditure limitation and number two, if we should fund a capital projects accumulation fund. If they pass funding a capital accumulation projects fund and if we have sufficient funds, when we do this calculation, the row capital projects fund would come out. So it would not be counted against our expenditure limitation.
We would be funding our capital projects out of a separate bucket. That could it could come out if we funded it 100% with yes. If we funded it 100%. It would still show the expenditure but it would come out as an exclusion. So the exclusions would Okay. So if we had it in place this year, if we had a fully funded capital projects accumulation fund and that $16,000,000 was out, we would have an extra $16,000,000 to reach our expenditure limitation? That is correct. Thank you. I appreciate that.
Council Member Levin.
Thank you mayor. Following up on that, how long do we how many years will it take until the capital projects fund is funded say at $10,000,000 or $15,000,000 accumulation fund? Yeah, yep, sorry, sorry.
So that could take several years. It couldn't come into effect until after it was adopted and then we would have to set aside a certain amount of money every year depending on what our balance is if we have a funded increase. So we'd have to have like a profit every year. And we
I'm sorry we would need to fund it on what I just didn't hear you.
So every year when I think we'll have revenue over expenditure there's that balance that will roll into our fund balance. At that point in time we can take a portion of that and say it goes to the capital projects funds. Well we don't know what that amount will be every year so it could be very variable on how long
it Understood. So basically going back to your earlier stress test depending on our income and how the economy does, we could be funding it significantly or not at all. Exactly. Understood. Thank you and I apologize for asking the question about the 2.9% because I see it right there but I missed it before so thank you.
Other questions at this point? Leslie, please continue. So now we're at
a recap. So we talked about pension, the revenues, preliminary budget. Again, we're going to bring the tentative budget 04/23/2026. It will look like this unless we have direction otherwise. And then I did leave I was hoping to leave time to talk about any follow-up questions that you may have based on the information that we put in the package or anything else.
So questions and then the recap that I'd like to is there anything based on this that we want to ask before we do the recap? Ahead.
Historical home recognition program because there was a question about what's in the agreement for the plaques because they're looking for an increase in dollar spent. So in 2018 this was initially approved and it did say that the property owners could purchase a commemorative plaque. Then it was revised in 2021 and that sentence was removed. So it's up to our discretion. So just passing it on to
the Thank you for the update. Going around Councilmember Thomason.
Thank you mayor. Capital budget, this is a follow-up item question. Mr. Town Manager.
Another quarter. You're wearing down the microphones.
That's true.
It's okay. Let the record show the mayor said I was wearing down the microphone. Let the record show council member Thomason agrees with him. Apologies. Follow-up question, Mr. Cheng, capital budget related. One of the items in the capital budget includes a police training facility and I had asked for two pieces of information which I don't expect you to have off the top of your head but I'd like a follow-up on that. Number one, how many donations have we received from the public for this training facility? And secondly, if you could update us about the cash received from the state, the amount and if it's been received and if there are any restrictions associated with that.
I think I can do that right now. The number of donations we received. Well, let me make a clarification first. The the facility you're speaking of is not in the capital budget. It's in the five year capital plan for year two. But this
isn't sorry. Isn't this isn't a feasibility study
being There is a design you're right.
Thank you.
I will amend by amendment to say that there is a feasibility study that's in year one, but that the capital expenditure for for construction architecture being years two and possibly three. Understood. Okay. So setting all that aside, to date, we've received $0 of donations, private donations. To date, we have received from last year's legislative session, I want to say $125,000 and that those dollars were earmarked for a police facility.
So we would put it, I think, into a restricted fund. Right? And would be held for that purpose because that's the that's the intent behind why we received it in the first place. So it's it's restricted dollars.
Okay. So that was just a grant from the state to the town of Paradise Valley for this training facility? Yes. Perfect. Thank you for the answer to question. Oh, sorry. Did you have more?
No, that's it. I said yes.
Switching to the Community Budget Forum. Two concerns. Number one, I appreciate the additional transparency to residents about the scenario planning. However, I'm concerned that we would do fiscal scenario planning to the general public that we haven't yet done to the council. Which leads me to my second point.
Unfortunately, I cannot attend, which I would love to. I know that we are not showing that live stream because your thinking was we don't allow community to comment on council meetings so it wouldn't be appropriate to allow community to comment at a budget forum. We do however live stream our council meetings. So my personal request, at least just for consideration, is that the community budget forum be live streamed. And then again I'd really rather not see us do specific or preplanned scenario planning for the public that council hasn't seen.
Yeah, I'm sensitive to that. I don't want to show the public things that you haven't had a chance to look at. My rationalization for that would be that what you saw in the packet that Leslie just went through, all this would be would be exactly what you saw with different numbers based upon different variable assumptions plugged in and how the line would move a certain direction. Or we could just show them what we have and leave it static. Again, was caught up in my youthful exuberance that we know that we have this interactive dynamic program that is helpful to answer the question you originally had, which is how do we how can we graphically see what it would look like if we change some of the assumptions, whether it be expenditure of new assumptions.
The point is we could change them in that little red box and it will make the lines move depending on what assumptions, what variables you numbers you plug in. We don't have to do that in sort of a live scenario with public members of the public. You know, in a perfect world, actually, I'll take a picture of your book, Councilor Lippin, and say strike that. I don't want at this hour of the night start opining about what a perfect world looks like other than to say my hope is that in the in the spirit of transparency that the public's ability to better understand why we budget and how we budget would would give us the opportunity at budget forums where we invite the public with staff to give presentations, to give robust presentations but never in a way that would disadvantage council's initial understanding. I'll just leave it at that.
Councilmember Leitman.
Thank you mayor. I feel I I agree with my colleague. I feel very strongly that sharing that tool live with citizens as much as we love to be transparent is not a great idea because there are decisions that need to be made at the council level. And I'm really don't want to invite the public in a public forum to try to micromanage the budget if that makes sense.
It does.
But I do welcome the having the forum and answering questions or taking things under advisement because I do like, I encourage community participation but I echo my colleagues concerns. Concerns. Understood. Thank you. Other
questions or comments? Vice mayor.
Thank you. Just a couple of questions about this particular budget that's been that is put in front of us that I didn't ask last time. So just clarification on the catch up adjustment, the additional 3% is that just for clarification, this is the expectation is it's a one time adjustment or should the expectation be if this were to pass that we would see something similar again in a year or two?
Well, I think I can answer that. And again, I want to be as clear as possible on this. When I say it's a one time adjustment, what I'm saying is it's a one time adjustment to the base salary of all current town staff. So it is one time and that it would be adjusted one time, but it would it would create the everyone's salary would go up 3% and that would be sort of a permanent a one time permanent adjustment. So we say one time, sometimes that sounds like we're just handing someone a bonus. This isn't a bonus. This is a one time 3% permanent increase to their base salary.
Right. So I'm sure. Called it catch up adjustment.
Right. But to second your part of your question, is this the kind of thing where we'd come back in one or two years and do it again? The answer to that is is that that's a policy question that I would want counsel to weigh in on. How frequently we do these sorts of surveys, this kind of class and comp study is really a function of whatever we believe to be the right sort of best practice for the town of Paradise Valley. We know that the current frequency is once every nineteen years.
So the answer right now based on our current frequency is the next council to see this would be in the year 2045 because that's our current frequency. If the frequency were to accelerate, if you were to ask me for instance, what do I think the best practice would be, I would say probably closer to five to seven years, not every two years. I think that's too fast. I think nineteen years is too long. Me, the sweet spot is probably five to seven years. But we wouldn't ask for another one because in two years because we wouldn't have the data set to justify it. We would catch up and then we would ask as we do on an annual basis COLA merit COLA merit, not the third leg or third bucket or whatever we called it.
Right. Okay. Thank you. And also I know that the part of that plan was to try and bridge the remaining gap. For instance, bringing the directors up to at least 10% of what the consultant had recommended. If I misunderstand, let me know, but that's how I understand it. And then would the expectation be that again the next year or the year after we try to bridge that gap or they two separate pieces or this is just sort of one project that there hasn't been discussion even if it's not here
Right.
About, hey, you know what, let's revisit that next year. We'll bring in front of next year's budget because yeah.
Yeah. Good point. As you recall from last time we talked about this two weeks ago, the directors and how they're affected by that they're generally 10% or more below the midpoint, which so the 3% wouldn't get them to the midpoint like the other positions. It would get them within 10% of the midpoint. Right. So that's the idea. So that's the ask. The ask is 3% knowing full well that we're not asking to move them up to the midpoint like we are with the other sort of levels of the organization, just the 3% to get them within 10%.
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. And then just two more quick questions, hope. Does anybody have any data on it? If you don't, that's fine. Do other municipalities do the same sort of 5% that we do with a COLA and a MERIT? Or is there a different type of process? I know like prior to this 5%, three and two, two and three, I did look back and I saw that those numbers were even higher that we were doing. And I I do understand that. And so going to this right here, know why we did it. I understand the town manager explained that you don't wanna create any kind of like, you know, well, he's friends with this one and she's yeah. I I get that. But is that a standard procedure in your experience?
Yes. And in fact
Okay.
It just so happens that this week of this meeting, I I had my monthly meeting. I meet with the the ten or 12 managers in the East Valley. So that includes Apache Junction, Chandler, Scottsdale, Mesa, Tempe, Guadalupe, Fountain Hills, Cave Creek. I'm probably missing one. Phoenix typically comes. Gilbert. Gilbert. Thank you. So we all got together this past Monday, and we talked and we shared sort of where we are looking at in terms of doing a what are you doing for a COLA? What are you doing for a merit increase?
And it varied somewhat, but pretty much everyone was within this year between 47%. So absent the catch up, we're right, we'd be five percent. We'd be right sort of in the wheelhouse of where everyone else is, which is good. It means that we're kind of remaining in the competitive set because a number of the cities that I mentioned, not all of them are in our competitive set that has been identified for quite a few years that PV compares itself to. And so therefore that makes sense. That sounded about right.
Okay. That's good information. Thank you. Then also just one more. Has it ever been floated and this is just coming from the world I used to come from because I can't even imagine. I was a flight attendant for thirty two years. I can't even imagine getting merit. You know, you handed out, you know, you know, four extra peanuts or sold seven drinks or whatever you did. I don't know. But but all all I know is that we did get seniority raises and cola raises. So do any municipalities or have we ever thought about doing seniority raises like the police department does? Right? And that's just part of how that works. And would that be beneficial at all? And and if it's not worth the conversation, you could just say no.
Because I I don't either. So I I just was curious about how that might look rather than everybody gets a merit pay pay. You know? I mean, for not for the bad reasons necessarily.
Duncan would all owe us the first round, I think, if that were the case. No, seniority based pay you know, maybe a generation or two ago in the public sector was more popular. Right now when I've seen it, it's typically confined to public safety. It's usually as a result of something that's been negotiated as part of an MOU, a city or town that has collective bargaining, meet and confer and we don't. So that's where you typically see it these days, at least in my experience.
It's not as popular as it used to be. It's a component of pay, right? You can call it any of a myriad of things. But the idea is I'm collectively bargaining on behalf of my group and I want to find a way to get them a little bit more money. The beauty of what we have here in Paradise Valley is as one group rises, so does everybody else.
With some exceptions, right? I mean, four and a half years ago, this town did a class in comp and it was directed at specific concerns you had in public safety about recruitment and retention. I get that. And I'm not in any way saying that there aren't times when you pull out a department and say, we have to specifically address that. The nice thing about this study is that it has sort of that broad base of everybody is going to where the ask is for everyone to get it because it makes sense and the data supports it. All
right. Well, Mr. Rush, unless you have more to present, I think that we've had a robust discussion and I would compliment staff, Leslie, you and the directors working together answering some of the questions that we posed in the last last meeting and I know that there were a lot of great updates tonight. I also heard a lot of questions that may still need to be answered and so I would ask if staff goes through this process if they can be very direct with the council on some of the answers so we have we have a I know we're getting closer and we got to be cognizant of the calendar of where we're going. I just don't want to get to a point where we're playing catch up and we're wondering.
So I think I heard and I won't recount all the questions, but I did hear quite a few about some details on the budget and the line item. I think we really did a good job tonight in explaining through the merit increase and the COLA and I think that is a good space, but there's still some questions there that we need to have answered. So I applaud my colleagues in pushing further to say, okay, give us the clarity that we need. So I think you've got a number of good questions on the different subjects. I do think the discussion bigger term on the enterprise funds, I don't expect that's coming up anytime immediate, but I know that we have to focus on the calendar of where we are in the process.
And so I'm going to ask Mr. Resch or the town manager to give us a quick recap of that. And then the other point I wanted to make was that I applaud and I'm fully supportive of these budget forums, these open houses that we're doing. I think it's the best thing that we could do to help explain where we are and why we are and I think that helps. I do now that I hear and think about it, you're right.
We shouldn't be rolling the scenarios out in that space. But I do think it's important to talk about the capabilities so that there's not a static picture and we say this is it, this is gospel, move on. I think we need to let the group know, Leslie, in your your eloquent style to say this is an example, it is a dynamic program that when we change something, it affects the bigger picture of the budget. I think that's critical. I agree not to create those scenarios because you might be here for days, what if and what if.
So I don't think that's a wise use of time. But I do think it's important statement to make sure that the audience, both that are hearing it or seeing it if it's live streamed, or seeing it on the recorded version, they hear that, that they understand that there is deeper dive because I understand and I know that historically we've had different elements of stress testing and I think it's a great value to what we need to accomplish. I think we just tell the group and let them know what we are capable of, where we're at. And I'm assuming then also for that budget session, we're going to do the same process where there are cards that are going to be handed out and they can come back with their questions and we're not giving names or affiliations. We're just saying this is a question and this is the question and then Leslie you and your team will answer accordingly. Is that correct?
Yeah. The format will stay the same in that sense.
Well, before we go to a potential adjournment, I just ask the town manager, is there anything you wanna recap or do you feel that you've got enough from this body tonight to move forward? No. I I appreciate. Do you wanna
What I was what Leslie just suggested is that, you know, if the council wants us to, we can because we build this into the calendar, we could have another study session on the twenty third, which would move the tentative adoption to the May 14. If that's something or not, I mean, that's up to you. Questions we heard tonight, I think are a little finer pointed type questions that I think we can get good answers to you between now and the twenty third. And whatever answer we give to one, we would give to everyone. We'd either publish it in the packet or we would send it by email, you know, per the rule that all said whenever you get what you heard here because we get the consensus that we were going to answer your questions.
So we can do that too. But I want to be sensitive to the fact that these kinds of conversations that we take them seriously, we wanna make sure we get good answers to you. So I that's the only thing I would ask is
Can you recap again the sort of the scale What
what I'm so I'm saying is is that, you know, we we attempted to answer some of the questions that we heard last time. Some new questions were raised. We can do one of two things. One would be we'd answer them and they would be provided to you in advance of the twenty third, which is our next meeting and that the tentative adoption will be on the twenty third. Conversely, we could schedule an additional budget session to answer questions for the twenty third and either subset A can have that be the same time in tentative or we just would push the tentative to the fourteenth. Fourteenth. As long as we adopt it prior to the end of the fiscal year, we're okay.
I'd be open for additional I do think that there are some good questions that should be answered. I think that sort of drives us to that point. We come to that meeting on the twenty third and if we're still asking questions then we could push to the next study session. Is that what you're saying?
Well, not exactly. What I'm saying is is that if you tell us and I'm trying to protect the sanity of our clerk at this late hour, is if you tell us today that you want to have another study session and you want to move the tentative adoption of the budget from the twenty third to the fourteenth, That's the consensus of the council, we would do that and we'd update the calendar to reflect that. If you didn't want to do that, but you want another study session, we would schedule a budget follow-up study session on the twenty third, which would be the same night as adoption of tentative budget. Budget. We can do that too.
What I didn't want is for the only option to be we'll send you a bunch of answers by email between now and then and that's and I would make the assumption that would be okay when maybe it's not okay because we're supposed to operate in public and that's not operating in public. Operating in public would be to have a study session and to talk about the answers to the questions in another one of these sessions preferably earlier in the day.
Customer pace.
And thank you for the mayor and for you Tom and I explained that. I mean I think we've been doing a lot of great dives and a lot of good dialogue, but I think as long as we have time built in, it would make sense to have one more study session and then do the vote for the tentative budget if it doesn't mess up things too much. I'm I'm
one person talking, talking, but
I think there's information that we've asked tonight on things. And if you're looking for us to make decisions and say, okay. Consensus is we go down the list or whatever that we agree on this or we don't agree. I think there's still some open loose ends right now that may get resolved a little more study session with more information and then that makes it cleaner by the time we go and vote as a council. Even if we disagree all of us on some points. I mean, I'm just if there's enough time, if you're really saying there's enough time built in. So that's I would suggest doing one more.
Other council member Leipman? Thank
you, mayor. I think we have plenty of time and I don't want to feel rushed. So I would prefer that we get we do it this publicly and we have the study session on the twenty third with the tentative adoption later because that gives us a chance to see the budget again based on discussions from the study session. So that's that's my feeling.
Thank you. Think council member states are saying the same thing.
Okay. Think yeah. Do you have a comment or thought? That's fine. Council member Andy Keller.
Council member? Okay. Vice member?
I I don't mind keeping the original schedule and and the reason why is because I think that and with no judgment whatsoever because I don't I don't even know where I'm landing right now because I can think about some things. But I think that the town managers has shared with us that this is something you believe in and you support and you support staff's decisions and and there are some of us that that feel the same way and there are some of us that probably aren't unless this substantially changes. And that's just based on what what I'm seeing and hearing. That's not you know, I don't I don't need a a magic ball for that. So I don't know that anything is gonna change by pushing it, but that's just my opinion.
So I think, you know, I don't know that we're gonna have consensus on this vote and and I do haven't talked to him. It's not any kind of a you know, something I it's just my gut is telling me. So pushing it off or not pushing it off if if the quest the same questions are the same questions, the same objections have been heard to me last week and this week. So unless something different is going to come in front of us and I'm not saying it should. I'm just saying that I don't see any reason to push, just like I feel about everything else. Why are we waiting thirty more days? Analysis paralysis. Let's just pull the band aid off and do what's gonna happen. Alright,
well with that I do support the idea that we should push forward. So if I are we clear as mud or
or A
little bit, but I but I but just hopefully this will help. Go ahead. Go ahead. I'm sorry. No. I changed
my mind.
But we're also talking. Yeah. You're
Okay. So Okay. Again, I see some heads nodding with the vice mayor and is that our heads nodding or are we seeing?
I think a study session on the twenty third followed by a vote on the twenty third might be a nice compromise. I'm pretty much comfortable with anything but I do a pre I don't think studying this over another two weeks is gonna change anything. So I think study session and then vote would be my fault.
As you're nodding, I think that's where we Yep,
I'm fine with that. Well said, Mike. Right.
I appreciate that, thank you.
All right, with that, unless there's anything else, I would ask that would complete the study session and, of course, the business meeting. I ask for a motion to adjourn.
So moved. So
moved. Moved. Seconded. Seconded. All in favor to adjourn?
Aye. Thanks,
everybody. Thanks, team. Thanks, staff. You can still make the late news. You can still watch the late news. Okay.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.