Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

canceling because she was sick or whatever.

You didn't have a ride. Really? We worked on it for about four or five minutes. And the color of Santa. Evaluated. invited they will be on next month um if you wouldn't mind going to ask um christy and josh they're on the other side i believe it went they voted to take it to plenary if they need everything all staff departments gotcha thank you yeah no problem He's going to be able to handle all 10 of these.

There was a meeting about that yesterday. We'll come to this meeting in the future.

We'll take one this fall. We'll take one this fall.

I'll call the meeting to order. Chair Williams will give her invocation. Dear God, thank you for this day and thank you for the beautiful weather. Dear God, just thank you for the blessings you bestow upon us. Please lead and guide us, dear God. Help us do all things in your will. What's best for the city, dear God. Just help us to know your will and give us the strength to do it. Please forgive us our sins. In Jesus' name, amen. Amen.

Please join me in the pledge of the flag. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, liberty and justice for all. Are there any public comments at this time? If there are none, any staff reports? None. Okay. Any committee reports? None. Any changes to the agenda?

No changes.

Okay. Approval of minutes for the meeting of June the 23rd. Motion to approve. Second. Motion is made and seconded to approve the minutes of June 23rd. Any discussion? If not, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Minutes are approved. July 21st.

Motion to approve.

Is there a second? Second. Motion is made and seconded to approve the minutes of July 21st in discussion. If not, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? The minutes are approved. The consent agenda.

There's two items on the consent agenda tonight. Item number one is request by SB Barton Village TN sub LLC for final approval for Barton Village Commercial Roads, a four lot subdivision on about 3.25 acres at unaddressed property on South Hartman Drive, zone Barton Village North specific plan in Ward 3. and consent agenda item number two is a request by dr horton inc for final plot approval for woodbridge glen phase four a 97 lot subdivision on about 24.12 acres and unaddressed property on woodbridge boulevard zoned rs6 and ward 4. are there any objections to these items remaining on the consent agenda

If there are none, we'll bring it to the Planning Commission. Motion to approve.

Second.

Motion's been made and seconded to approve the consent agenda. Any discussion? If not, all in favor say aye.

Aye.

All opposed? Consent agenda is approved. New business item number one.

New business item number one is a request by Lennar Homes of Tennessee, LLC, for final approval for Vineyard Grove 3D, a 71-lot subdivision, about 19.16 acres, an unaddressed property on Medina Lane, so in commercial mixed use in Ward 1. Some minor corrections are needed. there is one outstanding issue with the variance request dead end street shall not exceed 500 feet in length the stated hardship is the required regional sewer pump station and wetlands necessitated in this unique location necessitated the longer distance staff comments are that the dead end road is approximately 100 feet longer than is permissible the combination of locating a regional sewer pumps and the presence of wetlands are unique to this location staff recommends approval of this variance with the inclusion of an additional pedestrian connection between hazelton drive and chambers bay drive this has been provided and the stated hardship is valid it is unique to this location does not undermine the intent of the code staff recommends approval of the plat with the variance but i didn't want to speak to this item

Good evening, everyone. Kyle Griffin with CSDG, just here to answer any questions you might have about this request. Thank you.

TODD BANDUCCI- Anybody else want to speak? OK, we'll bring it to the Planning Commission.

TODD BANDUCCI- Motion to approve with staff recommendations.

Second. TODD BANDUCCI- Motion's been made, including the variance. Including their recommendations. TODD BANDUCCI- All right, good. Motion's made and seconded to approve this item with staff recommendations. Any discussion? If there's none, all in favor say aye. Aye. TODD BANDUCCI- All opposed? The motion is approved. New business item number two.

Maybe the side number two is a request by original acquisition fund LLC for site plan revision approval for meta side a 458 unit residential development about 100.16 acres at 2770 Tuckers Gap Road, its own suburban commercial in Ward four and staff has no remaining comments and staff recommends approval.

I want to speak to this.

Good evening, everyone.

Kyle Griffin, CSDG. As Josh mentioned, this has no additional staff comments for the plan. It's compliant with the regulations. I'm not quite sure why it got pulled off of the consent agenda, but here to answer any questions that you might have. Thank you.

I just want to speak.

derek dyson 106 chapman drive i'd intended to hurt all your feelings and only address chris crowell with regard to this but he's probably off somewhere projectile puking i'm going to ask some questions that do not need an answer first question is this is called meadow side should it not be called interstate side rather than meadow side there's blue lines on this property so i'm gonna guess that all that water will be taken care of in part by increasing the density on the acreage so i'm guessing it's somewhere around six houses an acre or more all said and done so i was wondering how many trees per acre there were going to be in this development my guess is about none then there's another property adjacent to this above it which will be developed in the future exactly like this i'm sure this property will be the first property on the interstate gateway going through lebanon tennessee that makes the city of lebanon look like you're going through new jersey this should have been an sp which was where i was going to have some fun with with chris because he at one time attempted that for me the good news is richland a company has this it says a revision of the site plan i don't know how it's a revision when it's new business and richland hasn't had it very long but i'm happy that richland has it rather than prior ownership anybody else want to speak if not we'll bring it to planning commission motion to approve second motion is made and seconded to approve any discussion

If not, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. The business item number three.

Business item number three is a request by Jamie Carfee for rezoning approval for about 0.32 acres at 222 Cumberland Drive from RD 9 to mixed housing in Ward 3. The properties to the north are zoned RD 9 mixed housing and university campus. To the east as RD 9 and suburban commercial. To the west as RD 9 and university campus. And to the south as suburban commercial and university campus. The properties to the north and east are indicated as mixed housing and to the south and west as mixed housing and university campus on the future land use plan. This property is indicated as mixed housing on the future land use plan, which would support this rezoning request. Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request as it follows the mixed housing future land use plan designation for this area. This is a recommendation to city council. The expected city council readings for this and all subsequent ordinances are as follows. First reading and public hearing are September 1st and second reading is September 15th. There is a scoring sheet in your packet for this item and this for the rezoning and it scored an 82. So that is basically because the proposed zoning is consistent with the surrounding area and the request follows the future land use plan.

I don't want to speak to this item.

Good evening, gentlemen. Jamie Carvey, 309 Carver Lane. Just here to answer questions if you have any.

Good. Anybody else want to speak? We'll bring it to Planning Commission. Motion for a positive recommendation of City Council.

Second. Motion is made and seconded for a positive recommendation of City Council.

Any discussion? If not, all in favor say aye.

Aye.

All opposed? Motion passes. Items four through six.

New business items number four through six are requests by Larry Bronza for plan of services, annexation, and zoning approval for about 4.84 acres at 6829 Lebanon Road to 6829 Lebanon Road tech-specific plan in Ward 6. The properties to the north and east are zoned as commercial mixed use and A1 in the county. to the south as R1 and C3 in the county, and to the west as an SP and A1 in the county. This property is indicated as CI, which is interchange commercial on the future land use plan, which would support this rezoning request. this is a request for annexation and to add 4.84 acres and zoning to 6829 lebanon road sp this request follows the future land use of ci interchange commercial and replicates the adjacent existing 6879 and 6905 lebanon road sp there are no future development plans for this parcel Staff recommends approval of this annexation request because it follows the future land use plan and creates a larger commercial district here with uses that will benefit the city and the surrounding neighborhood. This is a recommendation of city council. There is an SP form. that they filled out, it does follow the CI, the interchange commercial. It allows for financial consulting and administrative, food and beverage services, general business and communication services, general personal services, general retail trade, medical and professional services but they also prohibited the same uses as the adjacent sp so tattoo parlors convenience markets including gasoline sales any use not specifically allowed above drive-through restaurants are prohibited bail bonding tobacco products and shops liquor stores beer wine distilled alcohol beverage sales They also changed one of the bulk standards for maximum building height. They decreased it to three stories from five stories from the interchange commercial district. And there's also a scoring sheet for this and it scored a 75. And that's just due to the proposed zoning is consistent with the future land use plan and the commercial benefits would be welcome in this area.

I didn't want to speak to this. Not we'll bring it to the Planning Commission. Motion for a positive recommendation, City Council. Seconded for a positive recommendation, City Council in discussion. All in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. Item number seven.

Move aside. Number seven is a request by staff for a zoning code amendment approval to Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 3 and 4 to specify that garage setbacks from the front facade only applies to when the garage door is on the primary facade. This right now applies regardless of where the garage doors are, but this just specifies that it's only when they're on the primary facade, and that's a recommendation to City Council.

I don't want to speak to this. Planning Commission.

Motion for positive recommendation.

Second. Motion is made and seconded for positive recommendation of city council. Any discussion? If not, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. Number eight.

New business item number eight is a request by staff for zoning code amendment approval to Title 14, Chapter 5, Section 122822 to permit requests for single-family and two-family lots established prior to September 5, 2017, pushing to expand their driveways beyond 18 feet wide of the property line to be reviewed and approved administratively. Before that date, there was different rules regarding parking. A lot of the requests that the BZA is getting for driveway with extensions are coming from those developments that were approved before that date. They still have to ask for that. They will need their HOA to approve it first. Then they can go through a staff approval process instead of having to appeal to the board of zoning appeals to go beyond 18 feet wide. And that's a recommendation to city council.

Anybody want to speak? BRING IT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

MOTION FOR A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION OF CITY COUNCIL.

SECOND. SECONDED FOR A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION OF CITY COUNCIL. ANY DISCUSSION? NOT? OH, I'M SORRY.

JUST TO MAKE THE COMMISSION AWARE, THIS IS THESE smaller driveways is having an impact we're seeing a lot of these in city court and our advice at that place is to refer them over to bza and we've had several that have a family member that has a disability and we're advising them to file a request for reasonable accommodation so this should take the care of that and hopefully get a lot of those off the city court docket thank you okay now any further discussion all in favor of the motion say aye aye all opposed

Motion passes. Item number nine.

This I'm number 9 is request by staffers and in code amendment approval to add to 14 chapter 5 section 14 data centers and computer and data processing services to establish minimum requirements specific to these uses. Some background last year we define data centers in our code, but there were no specific regulations added at that time. It is right now just a conditional use within the aisle district. This will add some standards that they'd have to meet if one of those were to apply here in the city. That's a recommendation to City Council.

Anyone to speak? If not, we'll bring it to the Planning Commission.

Motion for a positive recommendation, City Council.

Second. Motion is made and seconded for a positive recommendation, City Council. Any discussion? If there's none, all in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. Staff comments? We are adjourned. Save it for next time. That may be the nicest thing you've ever said to me. Good to see you.

oh miss it um just a bit it's hard to fight me come off of there dude so this is the consent agenda that other meetings Basically, if they don't have any. So, the way we operate.