About this meeting
- Government Body
- Planning Board
- Meeting Type
- Planning Board
- Location
- Westford, MA
- Meeting Date
- March 17, 2025
Transcript
65 sections
edition of your planning board um as you may know this meeting will be recorded maybe broadcasted or rebroadcast it on westf cat uh let you know we will take the administrative item first and then move on to the public hearing which will will open with open Forum Mr jitz you have something for us this Saturday Westford Academy at 9:00 am is annual town meeting um we can start checking in at 8:00 a.m. encourage you to to do so if you're planning to attend get there early get your parking space um Westburg Academy 9:00 a.m. is annual town meeting great thank you go to the board anything for open for NOP anybody in the audience anything for open Forum okay great so again we're going to pop right over to our uh General business item PB 2506 10 Liberty Way request for change views from business to professional office to light business or professional office to light industrial business or professional office I'm going to recuse myself as my wife's an employer at DCS thank you J sure uh just briefly um the applicant is here to answer any questions you all may have um speaking there are no changes in terms of any additions to the building the only change involves uh adding some overhead uh garage doors through the exterior uh otherwise um there no real changes here it's going from business professional office to business professional office with some light manufacturing uh involved with the company so again abkin is here I don't anything Jeff yeah and I think there's they're also proposing uh a tight tank or two to um address any concerns relative to septic so that'll all be addressed as part of uh the building permit process and be reviewed by the various departments I don't know if the applicant wants to chime in about anything uh certainly I'm happy to U my name's John
Cocker I'm with M Architects the architect for the project um and as you guys have said DCF is primarily an office user um the the red area that's the first floor is the high Bay Area um that is where the light manufacturing it's really you know first um low Vine protyping that they're doing in manufacturing so this is not a production facility where there's trucks coming in and out every day um what they do is work in the military so there's military vehicles that are coming into the building um generally they stay inside which is why we have large over doors occasionally they'll get shipped back and forth to devons for different uh maintenance things to be performed on them um and there's things that range from uh the chemical lab materials lab things like that which is why we have the tight tanks so that nothing's going to septic and other than that it's it's a machine shop and it's really wiring and things like that that we're producing it's it's all electronics are going on great thank you Jo any questions no no questions thank you you no just curiosity the the tight tanks are they going to be uh outside yeah in the parking lot underground so that they can be pumped once a mon under the interior of the building they'll be yeah they'll be on the outside so there's one there's one for the chem lab which is a a very small use um it's for us it's it's a 1500 foot room it's not it's not a very big lab the other is because we're driving vehicles in we have to have oil so there's a small T great thanks all right nothing else U Can I get a motion to approve the request of T can I question yes Emily teller Texas road if this is
is granted um and they leave does the granting stay light Industrial in this building uh or does somebody have to come to you so anytime um say they come in and they leave anyone coming in after them that would get reviewed by The Building Commissioner to determine if that is a change in use or not if it is I would find it unlikely that another tenant would be doing almost the exact same thing but if someone was doing the exact same thing thing um and that would not require any further review other than customary uh whatever they need to do with building or fire what if somebody came in with an assembly line or something like that someone that would be a different that would be a different use and that would get looked at and they have to go through the proper process thank you yeah okay motion to approve the request of change of use from business or professional office to light industrial business or professional office for 10 Lim way PB 2506 second all those in favor say I I thank you [Music] yeah okay so moving on to our public hearing for Pb 2505 under our mod for 37 Powers Road can I have a motion to open a public
hearing first all right uh motion to wave the public hearing notice second say I I motion will open a public hearing so Mo say I uh before we get begin Mr Moret yeah uh thank you Mr chair um just for the benefit of the board and the applicant as well as the folks uh watching here and at home this is the first formal MBTA communities application uh that we received under our new bylaw so we're asking for a little patience as we navigate this new process together uh tonight the applicant will provide an in-depth overview of the proposal and we're asking that the board also authorize the planning staff to consider establishing 53g accounts to conduct peer review services on behalf of the Town specifically we are looking for reviews relative to traffic civil and storm water and then consistency with the new bylaw particularly as it relates to design and or architectual standards so after the applicant concludes their presentation we hope that the board will Prov their initial feedback before you open this up to the public for comments and as you may recall the board only has 60 days to act on this application from the date that it is submitted um therefore we are requesting that the applicant Grant an extension of time for the board to take action so that everyone may have benefit of the results of that peer review process and to keep this process as efficient as possible our goal is to provide uh the board to provide the applicant with clear and meaningful Direction at the end of tonight hearing before continuing it to a future date we're happy to answer any questions throughout the process thank you Mr chair thank you good evening Mr chair uh members of the board my name is Melissa Robbins I'm from FN Robbins I'm here tonight for ZD Acquisitions LL LP um also with me tonight is Jim Dunlop and Chris
Copeland over they are the applicants uh we also have a team with us to give you a presentation Brian G an engineer from Hancock Associates uh Dan lasv traffic engineer from Vanessa Associates Ian Ramy our landscape architect from cople Wolf and Brian oconor our architect from Cube 3 as Jeff has pointed out we're here tonight for our initial meeting for the property of 37 Powers Road in accordance with the town of westford's MBTA communities multif family overlay district for the rest of the presentation I'm going to call that mcod not going to say that again I just again want to say congratulations to the town of Westford for being one of the first communities one of the first in 33 communities to be approved by eohc for MBTA communities and also hot off the presses within the last 4 days uh one of the first communities to receive MBTA community community Catalyst funds to support pedestrian amenities and other amenities uh to support their MBTA communities it's just amazing uh only other nine other communities got funds out of that application uh the site at 37 Powers Road is currently the location of Westford earth materials I think everybody who lives in Westford is very familiar with their ongoing uses out there um Brian when I turn over to him we'll talk about some of the existing uses on site today uh the proposal is going to create 530 very necessary units of rental housing in the town of Westford uh the units will be a mix of Studios one bedroom two bedroom and three bedroom units they'll be divided into five separate structures these are just the residential structures in addition to the five residential structures there'll also be two Community buildings or club houses whatever you prefer to call them uh six garages and there'll also be a structure over the wastewater treatment facility each of the residential structures I know this is going to be a question of the board will all have its own integrated trash and recycling system uh not do I also think that's important
for the town of Westford but I think people will recycle um if it's located within their building and they don't have to go outside to a dumpster or some other location uh for recycling uh we're proposing 8812 total parking spaces uh some of the visitor parking spaces towards the entrance of Powers Road will also be public parking spaces uh which is exciting to me because there's not much Public Access or public parking spaces to get to trails in the town of Westford and there will be a new Trail on the site uh that will run the entire perimeter of the site and be almost a mile long uh so that will allow for direct Public Access and public parking right on the site um in addition we've worked cooperatively with our butter B Westford who has also agreed to give us pedestrian access through their property which is amazing um in the scheme of things and um my landscape architect and architect will'll go through some of our open space amenities but it really means that we can get access directly through Bell up to the front of Littleton Road and get on to the LRTA which will help hopefully help us reduce our dependency on vehicles uh and get people on those sidewalks along Littleton Road into some of our Trail systems that go right off of power's Road uh Central mail is proposed at the front of the site and obviously that will be confirmed by the postmaster who gets to tell us exactly where our mail is delivered but right now we are proposing one Central mail location uh likewise we're going to propose one bus pickup which will also be towards the front of the site but again uh we propose these things but ultimately debus will tell us if our plan is good or bad uh 10% of the units that we're proposing of the 530 will be affordable in full conform with your regulations uh these units will be affordable to those families earning 80% or less of the area median income um these units as required will be
dispersed throughout all of the buildings evenly and through all of the number of bedrooms evenly uh that makes them in full conformance with eohc regulations which means you can count them all on your subsidized housing inventory um also I I'm sure the board knows this but I think it goes uh I think it should be said that 70% of those affordable units can have a local preference on them which means that they can be rented directly to town of Westford residents or employees of the town of Westford uh we've got some preliminary comments that the affordable housing trust and the Council on Aging would like to talk to us about um additional affordable units or some questions about uh reducing affordability so one of the things I will do after this meeting this evening is schedule some time with them to discuss some of their initiatives or plan some for some additional affordability um as to the open space this proposal is in Far excess of what's required under the MBTA communities um your own bylaw it'll create so much open space and amenities both P private and public uh a little later we'll go into more detail about that um but I will say that one of the reasons that we have this additional open space is because of our single special permit request before this board which is to increase the uh height of the structure to be five uh five stories tall uh I think that this actual increase will have little to no impact to our abing neighbors given the location and the existing uses on the site but the impact of being able to go up to five stories and actually giving give this open space to the community and the amenities to the residents there will be huge uh we've been actively working on the site design for some time uh so I think it goes without saying I think you saw maybe a single page or two pages a couple months ago and now our set is 66 or so pages long um we've had we
had a preliminary conceptual meeting with this board we've had an a Butters meeting uh we had a technical review meeting with your department heads we've met with the fire department we've had a preliminary discussion with the water department and have started our impact study uh with the water department we've met with Bel Westford um I know some of the the abuts that we talked to at the abutters meeting some of their biggest concerns are traffic and traffic impacts to this area uh we have our traffic engineer here tonight which will give an overview and I anticipate that this part this board will also send that out for thirdparty reviews so that all of those questions can be well examined to make sure that we don't have an impact on the area uh just uh permitting path it's up there on the board but in addition to this permit uh from the town of westf we ire a order of resource area delineation saying where the wetlands are that is coming um we're just about to file our notice of intent uh we also need permits for our wastewater treatment facility from DP we need a connection from National Grid and we also need an enf from meepa you're thinking Melissa this sounds like an awful lot but I will tell you we've already started all of this um so our timeline on here permits in 2025 we really mean it uh it's our anticipation that we will have permits all of these permits this year and we will start construction soon thereafter um before I turn over to Brian I just want to hit on something that Jeff just said I actually giggled a little bit when I saw the timeline and the staff report I know that that's not feasible uh so of course I I anticipate this going out for a third party review we'll give the board the necessary extensions of time uh so that we can get third party out and get third party back and make sure that we can have productive meeting on third party review um I think at that this point um what I would like to
do is turn over to Brian G just to talk about some of the existing conditions and our proposed site work nice uh good evening so for the record Brian gadr with Hancock Associates where the civil engineers land surveyor and Wetland scientists on this project so the slide before you uh is just an overview of of the project site 37 Powers Road to give you some contacts of where we're located so 495 is at the page at the top of the page um 110 and 225 are the dash lines uh also at the top of the page and that dark line is is Powers Road so to the West we have uh our direct butter is Bell Apartments um kimal is all the way uh page left uh on 110 and then at the bottom of the page is Thea much much further down Powers Road the large uh kind of blank parcel located to the South is ideal block um and then to the east of the um project site we have residential PLS um directly across the road and then in in surrounding um neighborhoods next slide please so this is a blow up of the existing site um so as Melissa said this is Westford earth materials uh it's basically it's a gravel pit uh so they handle all kinds of of aggregate um ordinary borrow there is um bark mulch um being made and stored on site I mean it's 20 acres of the 35 acre parcel that is heavily heavily Disturbed so when we say it's a disturbed site it's it's basically compacted gravel for 2/3 of of the property um if we shift to the next slide please so the next slide is is pictures
of the active operations so at the bottom left you can see screening where they're just taking out large Stones um and processing the material the other three pictures are are really just snapshots of everyday activities so we're talking front end loaders um dump trucks uh 18 wheelers heavy heavy equipment running in day in and day out um next slide please and this this this slide is views of the of the parcel from po road so as you drive down Powers um there are existing tree lines there's an existing burm and there's kind of a snapshot of an entrance as well um so if you look at our proposed plans and and landscape and architecture we'll talk a little bit more in depth about how we're trying to maintain um kind of this view shed right right now they're trying to screen heavy equipment in a gravel operation and and kind of retain some of that vegetation we're going to be looking to retain the vegetation and kind of do the same thing to to hide some of the massing of the development in the buildings as well um next slide please so this is an overall uh picture of the parcel that highlights our resource areas so as Melissa uh indicated we were before the Conservation Commission with an ad anrad which is an abbreviated notice of resource area delineation so essentially we went out there we flagged all of the wetlands brought it to the Conservation Commission uh we had some discussions about what was jurisdictional and what was not that process is closed and an oad has been issued so the Wetland resource areas that we're showing on the plan have been codified by an oat uh next slide please and this is an overall uh kind of color coded uh picture of existing site development so when I talk about
20 acres of active Gravel Pit active Material Handling that's all of the yellow so that's the central portion of the site if you could shift to the next slide please this is that same slide uh overlaid by uh different zoning setbacks so our 20 acres goes down to about 18 buildable uh and then when we get into the proposed uh actually why don't we get into the proposed thank you so this is our proposed development now just at a high level uh oh I didn't tou anything J all right so back to our proposed plan we have the scroll okay thinking
all right so back to our our civil site plan uh I'm going to give you a very high level overview of the technical aspects of the site itself but uh we'll we'll be turning it over to architecture and Landscape to kind of talk about that that streets gave from Powers kind of the the the reason and the idea behind the layout itself um so what you see before you is uh the proposed development it's across five buildings there's going to be two clubhouses a small wastewater treatment facility as well as a number of parking um garages small uh single story parking garages scattered throughout the site um the 20 acres of disturbed area is going to be uh kind of redeveloped into this scheme now with this scheme 13 acres remains impervious so we went from 20 AC ACR of essentially impervious gravel down to 13 of pavement building and walkways that introduces an additional or seven acres of open skate of man manicured um landscaping and kind of passive Recreation amenities uh walking trails and and things like that uh at the northeastern portion of the site uh there we are proposing a Connect to Bell apartments and that's a pedestrian connection so and and Landscape will dive into this a little bit more but basically we have a looping uh walking trail around the entire perimeter on the Northern portion of it it's multimodal so it's intended to be bicycle as well as pedestrian and that continues from Power Road through the site on the the northern uh portion of the page uh to Bell uh Westward um
the there was uh excuse me so for utilities um we are proposing storm water management uh within the existing condition there really isn't storm water at all there's a a catch Basin located at the front that collects a little bit of runoff from the the paved area around the existing building and that's it there there were a number of gravel ponds which are essentially depression that that um collected sheet flow uh from the existing site um what we've done in in the proposed condition is we're now instituting storm water management so we have a number of underground systems scattered throughout the site um that provides the TSS removal the 90% TSS removal with the local regulation as well as 60% phosphorus our points of discharge are going to mirror kind of the exist existing patterns so we have Wetlands to the north and two Wetland complexes to the South uh we're trying to mirror the existing condition with those those discharges after we uh treat the storm water um as Melissa indicated uh we had a meeting with the fire department to kind of discuss the layout um from a first responder perspective so we took the ladder truck the largest uh piece of apparatus that the fire department has did a sweat path analysis went around the entirety of the site uh to make sure that it could maneuver in out uh and the fire chief was was satisfied with our current configuration um we had mentioned wastewater treatment facilities so there is a small wastewater treatment building at the lower right hand course portion of the page uh by our
secondary curb cut access now that that building itself um really just how how handles some of the Mechanicals in there it's not allowed or um smelly building if you will and with the AR the specific architecture it it really is going to look like um part of the development in itself now with respect to the location um kind of being up near pow Road uh it's not unique to the community uh the town of West if you look at Granville Woods up off North Main you drive into that development wastewater treatment is the first building you see on the left hand side and and you don't really even know it's there it's kind of it's tucked you can see the building but from a resident standpoint from a putting standpoint it's really um uh rather benign so the wastewater treatment facility the the underground leech fields are scattered um throughout the center portion of the site so they're underneath the green space in between buildings one and two they're underneath the parking lot the Center Drive aisle down that area um and then there's a a tank field also underground located uh behind the burm um at the front of the property um we met with the water department and there is a 12in water line within Powers Road there's also a 12in line on vet on um B Westford so what we're proposing as a part of this is to actually connect to um two main lines two 12in lines one from powers and one from bell bell right now is a dead end line and we're going to connect it into the main on PO Road um we' also met with national GD and they had confirmed that there was adequate uh Power infrastructure um for this project um so at
a high level uh we're bringing the site into storm water compliance we are reducing the amount of uh impervious area the gravel out there by about 7 Acres and um we have sufficient uh utilities for the area uh and with that I'm going to turn it over to Daniel lva with VII to speak about traffic thank you Brian uh for the record my name is Daniel lasa I'm a traffic engineer with finan and Associates we the traffic consultants for the project um we prepared a detailed Transportation impact assessment or a fancy word for a traffic study um in consultation with the town of Westford as well as with Mass DOT um that includes an assessment of vehicle pedestrian and bicycle volumes along the Power Road Powers Road quarter both with and without the project um to attempt to assess the uh impact of the project provide a series of recommendations as they relate to traffic um and see what if any uh traffic mitigation is necessary to accommodate the project next slide please the study area that we assessed as a part of our study um consisted of four uh signalized intersections um two of them along Littleton Road 110 up to the north uh those being the intersections with conquered Road and P Road uh then coming south along P Road the signal intersection of uh powers in conquered and then further south in Littleton the signalized intersection of Great Road and Powers Road um as well as looking at the um existing uh Westford uh earth materials driveway as well as both of our proposed access points can I just ask one question
on this slide because I had it when I saw it what time of day was this for so we looked at this just notional or one more time this just a notional diagram to explain how you did it or was there a specific time of day nope so so this is just um a a diagram to show what existing conditions are out there now so the intersections we looked at what the lane use how wide the lanes were where um sidewalks and crosswalk so this isn't so these aren't uh traffic volumes these units are in feet and turning radius yes okay that wasn't clear yes um we do have figures three and four show existing traffic SL actually show the numbers yeah but this was uh just to show what's out there geometrically next slide please to assess the impact of the project uh we used um statistics published by The Institute of Transportation Engineers or the it who are the um Nationwide uh uh use um when it comes to trip Generation Um the table you see here for the entire project uh both phases all 530 units um and there's a couple important things to note about these numbers up here um one these are vehicle trips so they're a one-way trip so when we look at that daily number um a a vehicle that leaves in the morning for work and arrives home in the evening counts as two trips so 2400 vehicle trips is around 1,200 vehicles uh same thing goes for the peak hours as well um which which is the peak hour in the morning and the uh evening your uh commuting Peaks when both the project and the roadway generate and carry the most amount of traffic um some other things to note are uh we
believe that this is a conservative estimate of traffic that is going to be generated by the uh project for a couple reasons um one to provide a conservative uh analysis and make sure that the um roadways and the uh intersections afford sufficient capacity we did not reduce these numbers to account for either people walking or biking or uh people um using the LRTA um with the connection to uh B Westford we do have um continuous connection up into uh 110 as well as to the uh LRTA uh stops up there furthermore uh these trips do not account for any additional traffic that's being generated by West earth materials as it currently stands we do obviously expect there to be an increase in general traffic uh post construction of the project but um we do expect uh that most if not all of the heavy vehicle traffic your tractor trailers or your dump trucks um will uh no longer be accessing the site going up and down P Road once again post construction of the project next slide please we then dis those trips within our study area uh with the majority approximately 45% we expect to go up to 110 um to the east towards uh U Min not's corner and the 495 ramps up there um with about 20 to 22% either getting on 110 and going west towards uh Littleton or going down into Littleton uh South on r Road and going towards Acton um acknowledging that uh the trip generation that's included as a part of the project we expect to be conservative in nature
um once we assign these trips to the uh study area um we still found that all of the movements at all of these uh signalized intersections were found to operate at a level of service of D or better um and those are essentially like school grades with a through f um level of service D is defined as the um limit of acceptable traffic operations within the area so uh with all movements operating at D or better um with the addition of project related traffic um we believe that there is sufficient capacity along these roadways along power's Road and at these uh intersections to accommodate the project not to say we aren't proposing any mitigation there however next slide please um in addition addition to the kind of summary that I just um ran through we also looked at motor vehicle crash data within the area um is maintained by mass doot and based on that review we found that there were no uh safety deficiencies noted at any of these intersections they all had uh crash rates per number of vehicles entering the uh intersection below uh the mass do average crash rates for this District um as well as lines of sight at the two uh intersections where the project is uh proposed to interface with Power Road we're kind to exceed the recommended uh distances for safe operation next slide um this I won't go through and bore everyone with but these are a bunch of recommendations as they relate to uh site access and circulation uh the width of driveways the uh distance behind parking things like that um which we provided and were included on the uh site plan that has been presented before you and then lastly uh
the proposed offsite recommendations um so as I had talked about uh briefly all of the uh study area intersections were found to operate within acceptable parameters however um acknowledging that uh the project does have the potential to change travel patterns in the area as well as volumes um we are proposing to retime five signals in total uh four of them along Littleton Road um the two that we studied within our traffic study as well as the two more to the West um which are all coordinated together so if you touch one you're in uh for um retiming and improving all the others um as well as the uh Powers Road conquered Road intersection and in addition to the vehicular uh signal timing improvements um as you've heard and will continue to here tonight um uh we are proposing a significant amount of uh pedestrian bicycle and possible Transit um improvements in the area as well um with the connection through Bell Westford um we can connect right up to 110 um and the sidewalk and uh pedestrian infrastructure that exists up there um furthermore we will work with the town um in an attempt to get additional grant money um to through uh Housing Works um to to construct uh further pedestrian and bicycle accommodations along Power Road and within the vicinity of the project site um and then our last recommendation was just to consult with the uh LRTA um see if they have any want to bring a uh a uh bus stop to the route 15 bus right uh to the project site um acknowledging that even if they don't want that we do still have pedestrian accommodations that can get you up to um and as Melissa mentioned we
are expecting to uh receive peer review to make sure that everything in the traffic study as well as everything that I just uh told you is up to scratch uh make sure everything is uh was done consistent with industry standards and with that I'm turning it over to I forget who but someone else Ian yeah and just quickly while Ian comes up I just want to point out the money that we would this is all mitigation that we already agreeing to do this will go out for your third party review the money that we'd like to work cooperatively with the town to go after is mass Works money okay the letter of interest is due this week we've already talked to staff about filing that letter of interest to go after Mass Works money for more infrastructure improvements on poers road Beyond this um and just for those of you that don't know those communities that are not in compliance with MBTA communities can no longer go after this Mass Works money but the 33 communities that are in compliance and some of the communities that are in semi compliance I will call them right now until June can go after Mass Works money uh so the town of Westford being in compliance and being really one of the leading communities for MBTA communities I think has a pretty good chance of getting uh some of this Mass Works money for some of these infrastructure improvements in poers Road beyond what we're proposing uh so we will be actively working with the town to go after those funds now I'll turn thanks Melissa for the record uh Ian Ry I'm a landscape architect with copy wolf in Boston I'm going to walk through the landscape design for the project uh so uh we have a tremendous opportunity here as you heard Brian mention this is a largely Disturbed and degraded site um and the big idea with the landscape really is to kind of heal the site and to restore it so we have an opportunity here to bring meaningful open space meaningful Green Space um and to deliver a more vibrant kind of public realm in terms of the residents uh access to open space as well as offering public benefit and connectivity from poers Road um through through
the Bell West Westford site and up to the 110 225 Littleton Road Corridor uh this is a look at our site plan so at a high level some of the metrics um as you heard Melissa mentioned we're uh providing more than two times the required open space so 63% of the site area is open space that's designed and managed uh we'll be uh planting more than 380 uh native trees and along with that about 180,000 Square ft of proposed native and AD Ed plants um and then what gets us excited about is 112,000 Ft or about 2 and A2 Acres of um active resident open space and uh organizationally you'll hear a little more from Brian the uh ok Conor the architect on how the buildings are masked but the idea is that we really wanted to kind of push the parking to the periphery of the site and use the buildings to create a connected uh Central Green Space that green space which we're going to look at in Greater detail in the coming slides but that has a lot of of programmed amenities uh that are part of it and it's all interconnected with a robust uh network of uh pedestrian paths all of which would be accessible um I think if we go to the next slide so this slide just talks about uh the street Edge as you heard pow road which is uh in the diagram is the dashed green uh dashed yellow uh line type we have significant existing Woodland mature trees that line uh the edge of P Road and really provide filtered views and and completely constructed views into the site uh we do have a few locations where we are proposing access into the site so that's indicated with the long purplish arrows uh there's two points of access and at those points of access there will be sight lines um into the project um the blue circles really are indicating kind of the key facades that you will see on the main entry so the first of which would be on the smaller building
the clubhouse um and then behind it the two uh res itial buildings as Brian will describe later uh the facades and scale of that is really being looked at carefully to make sure that the context of Westford is being met with the design of those buildings uh the green line you see there is an existing firm that has existing vegetation on it we're intending to preserve that uh so that the views are going to be blocked from Po's Road next slide this is a blowup of kind of what's happening on the pow Road Frontage uh so the first thing that uh we're doing is providing a new public sidewalk along the edge of power's Road that'll lie between the two entry points which you see at the top and bottom of the plan uh there'll be new Street trees it'll be an accessible concrete sidewalk um the burm will be maintained the vegetation on it will be maintained and then in areas where we do have some openings uh we will be planting approximately 50 new uh native trees that kind of bolster the existing Edge that's there um our plan for the landscape is to use a native meal planting in areas where we don't have Lawns so it's a little more uh ecologically stable and sensitive um and better for uh local um pollinators and so forth um and then as you'll see in upcoming slides there is uh a walking system a trail system that goes throughout the site that blue p is indicating about 10 uh public parking spaces that'll be open to the public uh so that the public can park and then they can uh partake in that Perimeter Loop next slide so this is a diagram that talks about uh The Pedestrian circulation and connectivity um as you heard mentioned before we have nearly a mile of a perimeter walking loop it's 085 miles um that's the blue dash that goes around the perimeter of the site uh part of that is the public sidewalk along po Road um part of it on the northern part from poers road to that
connection to Bell Westford would be a multi-use path so wide enough for bikes and pedestrians potentially have a different uh surface that makes that Mobility a little bit better and then the balance of the loop that goes around the site would be something like a stone dust or other type of sort of uh low impact development surface suitable for Walkers joggers strollers and the like um as you heard mentioned we have a really uh key connection to Bell Westford and uh North uh I guess it's the North West corner so that's going to allow uh connectivity from po Road through our site to B Westford through that system of existing walkways to get up to the corridor of and then within the interior of our site the red uh dotted lines talk about our sort of extensive system of walking paths that again link to the perimeter path but also linked to the active programming that we're proposing next slide so uh the next few slides just talk about Trail connections and really just to highlight that through our site from pow road we have access to the Bell Westford development and the other developments with then that sort of block that blue uh uh dash line will get you up to Littleton Road which then in turn gives you access all the way down to things like the Liberty trail Liberty Way Trails uh so we think it's a really good story this project is delivering sort of a critical uh Missing segment of overall greater connectivity uh so I think we're sort of in the spirit of the mbta's uh connectivity goals next slide can I just look say thing about the slide before you move it just being I I work right here I use this area all the time I always run down PW road so this is not that blue line is not just access that is paved access most of that is plowed and maintained year round their sidewalks run tight to their buildings this is actual access when you get up to Littleton Road we're not talking about running upon
Littleton Road we're actually on a sidewalk here that sidewalk on Littleton Road to a crosswalk runs all the way up to Powers Road now and the the sidewalk then turns and then you have an entrance to that Sugar Maple Lane and the Sugar Maple Lane has an entrance to the trail system that runs all the way out to Liberty Way which means now people that live in this development can get out of their cars could get on a bike or could go on a trail and walk all the way from the site to Whole Foods uh without once having to be on a roadway that doesn't have a sidewalk or going through a trail uh so really it's quite an amazing uh loop if you think about it how you can get through these accesses and actually use these Trail systems with just providing this level of access through Bell Westford as a Cooperative measure I'm sorry provide you access over to ngog yeah I mean it really does connect the site a couple more pieces here and I think we'll have some very you know coming down Powers Road and some of these other sites that may be looking for future development we're going to have some real connectivity throughout town for the entire Trail systems I'm sorry I didn't mean to interrupt excited about the trail system ins SC it's fantastic okay next slot do you want to say anything about this one as well no this is this actually just I'll stand over for Ian here for a second but this is what I was talking about I mean I think anybody that uses the trail systems in Westford uh can appreciate like I do that you actually have to leave West to park your car to get on some of these Trail systems uh so now you will actually have a location to park your car and can actually get on these trails and not Park illegally and run throughout town if you actually want to um and this actually shows the connectivity shows some of the connectivity that Bob was just talking about and I don't think we need to belor it anymore but I did make them put both slides in here because this is very exciting to me I think this is very uh much in line with the intent of uh MBTA communities which is not only to get pedestrian amenities up to grade but also to get people to the LRTA and if you really wanted
to you could go on three stops on the LRTA two of which here using the trail systems or going right to a sidewalk without again getting onto a public road that doesn't have sidewalk or accessibility okay so now we're going to dive in a little bit to the amenity distribution and the open space design so this is just a diagram that shows uh sort of a hierarchy of Open Spaces you can see that we have a centrally located sort of primary Green Space um but then being sensitive to the size of the site having smaller uh secondary and tertiary um green spaces that are sort of distributed throughout the entire site and the dash green um circulation just shows how those are all connected the two yellow circles talk about the club houses which you'll hear more about architecturally but that's really kind of the Hub of activity and it's sort of the arrival center for the site it's the first thing that you uh come up to when you enter the site um those will be the areas where most of the public kind of common uh resident uh activities will happen so that'll be where the pool is where the outdoor um cooking areas are where the lounges are it's sort of the Hub of activity for the residents next slide so now we we talk about the central Green Space as I mentioned this is the primary kind of heart of the development and so it all kind of stems from the clubhouse that you see on the right side you can get a sense of the kind of Meandering path that connect all these open spaces and what we're really looking to do is provide a rich sort of variation of outdoor activation for the residents so things like Bachi courts um having amenity Terraces with fire pits having a pool Terrace uh the idea uh potentially by building three of having what we're calling a Town Square so maybe having the ability to kind of do specialty pavement there maybe there's uh community events where that street could be shut down for food trucks or community events on special occasions uh really just to kind of foster a stronger sense of community of course we
have the Great Lawn uh where you have any number of kind of activities that can happen there from sort of more active Recreation to just passive picnic on the park um and then trying to really demarcate uh entry from the parking areas into the Green Space by having richly landscaped sort of portals that come into the site next slide and then this is just a look and feel image of what that Central green Courtyard would look like so we're kind of right in the middle of that plan looking back towards po Road you get a sense of the scale of the architectural uh residential multif family buildings on the side and then you're looking at the Long View of the backs side of uh clubhouse a uh you can see the sort of richness of texture of the landscape that we're trying to propose again uh very heavy with the native plantings a lot of uh flowering material so that we can support pollinators and then having an open lawn that's really great for sort of flexible use for the residents and I think with that I'll hand it over to Brian Conor thank you thank you thanks Ian uh for the record Brian o'conor partner at cube3 and uh what we're going to do is just spend a few minutes um as I think it's been mentioned a number of times the full documentation set has been submitted we expect a robust peer review uh we're looking forward to that third party review but just at at a high level um Ian did a great job of sort of outlining what we were trying to do when we laid out the site and really this notion of a central green that all of the buildings tied to and connect to uh was was really the organizational structure we were thinking about and we were doing it with respect to sort of the visibility into the site and so from an organizational standpoint we sort of took the edge of poers Road looked at the view
Cards into the site and thought about what are you going to see and how do we manage scale mass and perception from the road and so Clubhouse a and Clubhouse B are both single story structures they're located towards the front of the site to create sort of a tiered layering system to the building forms that work with what you heard Ian describe as a real tiered sort of layering system to the landscape and the design of the landscape we also took buildings one 2 and four and really thought hard about the orientation of those buildings not only with respect to Sun Path and open space but really tried to turn these buildings so that they were end on to this Street and so you'll notice towards Powers Road in general other than the edge of building 2 which is behind a very very dense buffer we've really tried to orient these buildings to present themselves in in the best possible light go to the next slide please so what I what we did is we just cut two very quick sections to sort of illustrate that and if you look at the key in the upper right section A is sort of coming from Powers Road through the first Clubhouse to the residential building and what what we did is we just put a person out on the edge of P Road and what we really wanted to indicate is the depth of this development which is really really substantial the clubhouse itself at the closest point is 170 ft from the edge of the road and the first residential building the closest residential building we have uh is almost 400 ft it's 370 ft to the front corner from the edge of the road and that's that's the closest building at building one and if you look in the key you'll notice that all of the other buildings are set back beyond that the second section down below looks at building four which is over 500 feet from the edge of the road back
into the site and and down below you'll notice not only is it 500 feet back but there's grade change down into the site a substantial burm and as Ian was talking about not only fairly substantial existing tree cover along the edge of P road but the anticipation that will be substantially bolstered next slide please what we wanted to do rather than spend a lot of time walking through all of the buildings and knowing we're going to have a peer review we wanted to pause for a minute and sort of just articulate as clearly as we could what the design strategy was for these buildings and so we broke it down into sort of six fairly simple bullets and what we wanted to do is create buildings that had a a very clear Bay structure to them that was related to the units internal to the building so we're working hard to create sort of an architectural language that is a kit of Parts if you will and really designed to reflect what's going on inside the buildings rather than some of the other structures that you would normally see with multif family including Bell Westford which are just very long sort of uninterrupted facades and so we have a bay structure that we're then building on and what we're doing is we're taking those bays and we're actually pushing and pulling the building to create changes in plane which gives you Shadow lines and it gives you the ability to change material so we have a really rich tapestry of materials which we'll talk about on the next slide but those materials are carefully coordinated with this base structure the base structure also allows us to really create Variety in the roof form and the parapet up at the top of the building so we have this sort of stepping that's happening also in conjunction with the internal units and that serves visually to really break these things up when you look at them from a distance internally to the base structure and following sort of the development standards we thought a lot about how to create a vertical Rhythm that makes sense so you'll notice the
yellow lines are sort of framing these vertical elements that happen in the building where we're hanging uh Cal levered balconies with larger glass areas that create this vertical texture or Rhythm Within These Bay areas and then down at the ground floor we have a sort of very well defined ground level where the Landscaping intersects with the building we have outdoor patio areas we have main front doors and we often have a change of material that occurs between the first floor and the upper floors we jump to the next slide please what we tried to do is really think about the material pallet for these buildings and we try to approach it in a way that would really reflect nature around us by picking warm Grays and like different tones of brown so what we have is we have a dark darker wood tone panel that sits inset in some of these larger Bays we have a lighter wood tone panel that sort of frames the darker we have a base to the building that we think in in large parts will be a masonry and that'll be a light warm tone masonry and then a lighter siding and a darker siding and what we're trying to do here is make sure that we have enough material choices that are both different in texture and form but also not so many that it starts to feel clustered and they all need to really work together so you know one of the things that we'll be doing um as part of the building process and design process is building mockups on site and they'll be like really fine-tuned as we go but this is sort of the broad material pallet that we're after here next slide please uh this is just a typical plan again these are all in the package we're not going to spend uh waste a lot of your time going through all the plans the ground floor plan as you can see just shows primary entries stair course all of these floors are very straightforward they're very typical we have at least typical within this project we have Studio one two and three bed units
that are organized around a double loaded Corridor we have paid very very careful attention to the location and use of the patios and the balconies and how those coordinate with the Landscaping that Ian did such a great job of describing next slide please and then I think we're just going to end here here um and I'm sure Melissa has has more to say but I I think the one thing we wanted to really communicate with this slide is that the Landscaping the orientation and placement of the buildings the design of the buildings the materials all of these things have been kind of really working together and this image I think starts to give you a sense of what we're trying to accomplish from a field standpoint so and Mr chair I promise I know we've almost spoken hour so I won't be labor anything know that the board has a list of waivers in their package I'd like to not go through those this evening uh the reason for that is after going through a third party review maybe from board comments or butter comments there could be changes so waivers could be eliminated waivers could be added so I'd like to wait on the waivers at least for another meeting just to make sure that we have those nailed down I think staff's already pointed out one I've missed so I have to at least add that one um I will just say generally speaking as to the parking waiver I think that may many of you may have had that commented up in the staff comments as well but you can see that a lot went into the thought and design as to the parking location um and why they're put in particular locations and I'll be interested to hear what your Architectural Review consultant if the board goes out for Architectural Review has to say about uh General compliance with the bylaw itself um as for thirdparty review I think I've mentioned that the applicant is happy for this to go out to third party review I understand your engineering staff is uh very busy this spring so this will be going out for uh third party civil review as well which is fine uh so once we get those bids in we can get you the checks for uh the 53g uh the only thing that
I would like to ask is that uh you will see that there is a list of 22 waivers to your subdivision rules and reg regulations and it kind of hits you over the head when you read it in the staff report why so many I'll tell you why the bylaw reads that we have to comply with subdivision rules and regulations even if we're not building a road even if we're not creating a subdivision even if the roadways don't meet any Town standards we have to ask for a waiver from every section and we are doing just that we are not creating a subdivision we are not creating town roads uh so basically none of the sections are applicable to this project whatsoever uh I would request that you send those out to your T Town engineering staff uh just for them to say that they're not applicable um don't worry I've talked to town engineering staff and they have the capacity just to do that if there are any particular waivers that actually do need engineering review or the town staff deals that they are applicable and need to go out third party review then those waivers of course could go out to third party review uh so I would just ask that we take that section out and allow your uh town and staff to review those waivers just to find that they're not applicable uh with that I will stop talking I'm happy to hear the board uh questions and comments and hear about our comments as well and we're happy to answer any um initial questions you might have great thank you very much thank you everybody for the presentation what I think I'll do is go to the board uh and then we'll go to uh the audience and come back to the board we'll talk about the accounts and the next steps if that makes sense so I'll start with you Bob okay first off uh for the residents and attendance um The Briefing we just saw was made available to the planning board today and I've asked Joe and Jeff to get that up on the town website if you're not aware there is a repository already set up with all of the project documents out there as well as you can see what is in the packet tonight
on the planning board packet site so just want to let you know about that so first off to the team Melissa overall I really liked the facade design I liked the look the visual impact um so I want to as I start with my nitnoid comments I wanted to say that first um with respect to the facade I do want to jump down a little bit here then I want to jump back into to the site plan um I do appreciate the visibility that you're trying to protect in the viewshed from Powers Road um I guess my bigger concern though is it's probably more of a impact to Bell of Westford in Tech Park West and so there was a statement I think it was um on page 23 of your narrative responses document that you would um for rooftop equipment visible from P Road you'd use screens I would just like to add to that that you would use those screens as well for visibility from the other abing properties such as Bell of Westford Tech Park West or if it could be seen from conquered Road uh through that clearing because I I do think the Angles and the bming are going to block much of it from Powers but it's going to be very visible I think much more so maybe towards uh Littleton Road um overall site design uh first oh um you probably are aware of it but in the packet those buildings have been called the pool house and the clubhouse and I think it was pool SL Clubhouse based upon which subcontractor presented their package to us um it was also not clear until I saw the briefing tonight that you actually still appear to have two pools is that correct one for each pool house um from an overall site design I am going to ask that we pay attention into sidewalks and paths
within the site I appreciate the Meandering path for um exercise around the site but within the site one of the things that I noted was between Clubhouse a and Clubhouse B I expect you could have a large event where you're going to have um um employees of the um um zom unit um or event staff or even patrons from outside trying to make the way between the two clubhouses and I suggest that you have a direct path between them with a um appropriate marked crosswalk it's the crosswalk I'm most concerned about so that there is a protection for those people trying to cross that parking lot because it's not shown on this plan but there's another print that shows it's a significant diff PL uh distance right now to get to a crosswalk Crossing to support that kind of traffic and as we know people take the most straight line especially if it's cold or inclement weather so um I do ask for that um I'm kind of on the fence on this next comment I'm looking at the site I appreciate today seeing the the the perspective of what the common green area would look like between buildings one and two and it left me thinking that the residents of building one and two have it have it nice and and will live large and the residents in building five won't have such ready access to that nice space I just didn't know if you had other Alternatives you might have looked at for how the buildings were laid out around that common space so that more residents kind of took advantage of that Central communal field um I did not appreciate until the presentation tonight that you also have the town square up at building three and I appreciate that um so that's good and I appreciate when you talked about the food trucks one suggestion there
is I know that uh Bell of Westward does a lot of activities for their residents it would be nice if in the future U Bell of West and this development got together and kind of made um joint notices so that they could each of their residents um populations could take advantage of those kind of activities um it's kind of a you know six for one kills kills a dozen because you're going to get the benefits for both of those communities which are pretty sub stantial I've been up to Bell of Westward when they've done some of the food trucks and I think that's a big plus if you could share in those activities uh and make that available to both um uh am going to ask this I see Tom in the audience specialty electrical code where do you f if if that were to be realized does this development account for um complying with the new specialty electrical code Cally energ CG energy code he says yes okay just wanted to wanted to ask because people are probably going to ask us at town meeting I just wanted to get your opinion on that um the Waterman connection I appreciated that discussion tonight uh one question it seems to me it's a probe this might offer a bypass for existing customers along power's Road having you know water supply come from different directions so um is is that in fact going to be realized with the new water main connections that you're putting in Mr chair if I may we are just right now starting the water impact analysis study with the Water Commission we actually just filed the paperwork today um it's our understanding
that Ty and bond will probably be hired by the Water Commission to make sure that those types of questions are answered so as soon as we have them we'll make sure we report them to just that that occurred to me tonight um looking at on this plan here on the slide I believe that's Quality Automotive that is is down there um slight concern about safety of small kids that might decide to to to take a running start from this site go onto that site and just wanted to ask about if there's going to be any kind of fencing or impediments to people kind of coming off of this site getting into that industrial commercial area definitely yeah ideal block is back there and they're further down I thought that was ideal at first and I realized it's Quality Automotive espe and just Mr chair if I may just especially along those points when we go to more detail on those Trails we're going to have to think about um not just fencing but signage and um limitations for entry into those other properties so that people don't wer yes yeah um you mentioned trash and recycling uh on the buildings my one question was um are you going to denote on here where the the large receptacles would be placed for pickup by the trucks so that we can look at the traffic flow with respect to large trash removal trucks yeah we can put generally where we're going to put our larger receptacles because there will be one basically behind each building because each building will have unified trash and recy and then a generalized area for it to be picked up at each structure so we can generally identify those on the plan yes um you did make a note in the package that there's going to be a school bus waiting area um but I could not find its location you also indicated this kind of like
a kiss and ride area for parent pickup I didn't see that either right and um one request would be that for the uh waiting area for the kids is that there' be some kind of open shelter if possible yeah we're happy to accommodate that on the plan what we've been using largely is an open gazebo or something of the like if children actually leave the minivan or the van before the bus comes you can see them generally out in that area we did put one out at Sugar Maple and some of the children actually use it there uh so uh we can identify an area on the plan and again my caveat is subject to if the bus is actually going to come in and be subject to the approval of debus we assume they're going to pick up along Powers Road but that will be confirmed once we have or pull off into that maybe you might be able to work pull off into that Loop right the clubhouse hopefully we do have an easy Loop Road for them to come in and out of I mean the question will be will debus come in but we would certainly accommodate it if they would you mentioned um I had a question already written down but you mentioned now that you're going to have some kind of a common mail pickup area yes is this going to be a separate building um I I don't know it it it has a lot to do with the post post Master what's accept acceptable if a common location is acceptable it'll be an independent building not in the clubhouse or something like that but they might also require each building just to have the boxes for those residents so we'll just have to work out I guess looking at the lessons from from Bell I think Bell was able to put in a common uh parcel uh building and it's not just mail it's you know nowadays it's Amazon and all these uh delivery comp companies um and how do you secure those packages mail is small letters are easy you can put them in the the lock boxes but for larger Parcels I would suggest and that is going to drive traffic on the site
of how these deliveries are going to come in we we'll definitely organize that that's a that's a common issue we uh we end up with large package rooms and and the technology to it so that guy can get in and out and Resident can get in and out without having somebody else you and also have it be secure yeah I I would suggest looking at Bell because I know they did something like that with a separate building and we can identify that on the plan as well as the bus General bus pickup area yeah and and you and and part of that it would also require um setting aside some parking spaces so that those delivery vehicles aren't blocking um the path um bottom line is what I'm thinking about is keeping everything safe and accessible in the event there is incident on site with an ambulance for example you don't want the delivery van blocking it because they don't have a place to park did want to ask um are you off are pets allowed or not yes yeah they will be allowed definitely need to do that okay lots of people have pets it's it's a big deal yeah just yeah small pets I understand yeah the breeds and the size and everything is controlled but pets would be allowed um oh the largest comment I have you mention it in the briefing the affordable housing there is not one mention of affordable housing in the application I want to I'd like to know what the dis the distribution of unit sizes is going to be distribution amongst buildings well I don't think we would have put that in anyway because it's just known that the 10% affordable is distributed through the unit mix and through the buildings and through the floors of the building I'll I'll one step further than that it's in the briefing yes it needs to be in the package sure
let me just talk a little bit about how how it all plays out at the end game um so we will we're obviously going to comply with the affordable housing requirement 10% of the units or 53 units have to be affordable what happens is after you approve uh Jeff and I will actually have to apply to the state for our local action application um and it's very similar to a 40b application almost all of the information is the same as part of that we actually have to then formulate a lottery plan and within the lottery plan our Lottery agent will also designate those unit locations throughout the development for where the affordable units are located that entire packet after the select board approves it is then it's submitted to eohc they bless our Lottery plan they'll bless our unit locations to make sure that the concerns you're raising right now are adequate then everything will come back to the town and to the applicant the regulatory agreement is then signed uh sometime sometimes not the affordable units are located on the regulatory agreement but they'll be known at that point and then the town and the applicant will know their location the regulatory agreement is signed and put on record that happens any has to happen before occupancy so um all that being said yeah we'll put it on the drawing you know for sure that it's it's like not in the I I did a keyword search on affordable and I was like where are they 100% compliant with your regulations and we'll make sure that it's all done and we have a already have great conditions that we could uh use in this decision to make sure that we're in compliance after fact and just to chime in sometimes uh as part of this early part of the process or even as you wind down like sometimes we don't always want to call out and specifically know which are the affordable units um but it is a requirement in order for them to count on the subsidized housing inventory so it does get taken care of when I say distribution I don't care where they are as much as what type what
sizes well they they they do care at the state so they make sure that it is spread out that if there are say nuisances potential nuisances that they're not disproportionately affected then you know the market rate units they want to make sure that the one-bedrooms and even the three you know it's all proportional so that it's it's the same and it's spread throughout the project so it it has to uh meet your intent what you're looking for before uh it can get approved by the state but we'll add it we'll do a we'll just this just Aid comment because I you you answered my question with the briefing um I was asking the question about the floor plans what about the other three floors in each building but on the briefing you did label that one is for floors two to five and one of them is for the first floor that's not the way that wasn't the way it was in the prints in the package it it said floor one floor two and I was like where are the other three floors yes this is probably as much to the um third party review as well as the the applicant team do want to understand forecast for infrastructure requirements that includes water electricity would like to understand what the estimate is for school agent children coming from the development one other thing I noted um was talking about on-site amenities um I don't see any besides the outside exercise Trails or the pool is there anything I'm missing about other amenities being offered to the residents at the site uh yeah there there'll be we're still
working on you know Mak sense um and you're talking about outdoor amenities well I saw the outdoor amenities I mean but you know you're not you're not have a cafe or The Clubhouse is all amenities and you know that's where they off typic yeah I mean it's the clubhouse A is probably 15,000 feet and it'll have a clubhouse and it'll have indoor dining you know demonstration kitchen and'll have uh good size Fitness possibly um a theater maybe it depends and we're still working on what amenities make sense for this demographic but there's been some study and thought put into it and we just need to design it so that the in inside of the clubhouse and the outside of the clubhouse you know outdoor pool Grill outdoor dining you know all that matches up with indoor amenities and they kind of coexist but the clubhouse will also have management office and Leasing and not a not not a maintenance shed but a maintenance you know office you know for uh but in terms of those communal meeting spaces they're all in the clubhouse none of those they won't be any of those in any of the residential buildings we will probably do remote like building three is a little far from the clubhouse we will do some remote uh amenities maybe a smaller fitness center there Fitness is Big with there was fitness center in the club houses yes for sure yeah and and we do these days we do a lot of uh co-working um we we'll do offices private offices to rent conference rooms you know Services uh a lot a lot of times these days we'll do a podcasting room um that's kind of soundproof and has all all that goes with pod I don't have a podcast myself but you know I hear they need to be soundproof um but we do we commonly do a a podcast
remember these days so with with the co-working spes um my final comment has to do with the experience of tech Park West 20 some years ago they had a gravel wash basin up at the corner of pow Road and conquered Road up at the intersection and that impinged upon the design of the site because it got classified as a potential Turtle breeding habit that so I just caution you I don't know what's going to happen with the state review of the gravel Pond we're all we're all over all that they already for many months yeah I think I know the the Vernal pool you're talking about could talk for hours on it yeah it was it was it was a non-improved area it's become more Vernal now but back then it was just gravel washing and we've been talking about this gravel Pond you see there and another gravel Pond and all the weapons um they they've been fully vetted this point lastly in terms of cleaning up the existing site how long do you think that's going to take and are there any contamination issues you're going to have to address no no contamination from the operation there there there are two underground storage tanks petroleum that we're going remove probably in the next few months and that the the site is very good soil very good uh as far as environmental issues go there's no no contamination no issues it's it's really quite a good so with that I'll turn it over to the next course thank you um first of all I'd like to say thank you for this briefing because this did help and answer a lot of the concerns that I had some of the questions I had I know that um Jeff and Joe are kind enough to send you my comments
ahead of time um last week and some of them I know are very detailed as a you know a applies to the plans because this is basically what we had to review um again my first big concern like Bobs was on the affordable units where were they um and you know understand the whole the process etc etc so you know I knew they would be there just trying to understand where they were and hope that they were in the package um question on senior units are you proposing any senior units and are there any 80 to 100% or 120 Ami units proposed these are just there's just the affordable units and then market rate units here so none between 80 and 100 um and as for senior unit senior units there'll be no separate designated senior units but obviously these are all single floor living with an elevator uh so to the extent that that that allows for accessibility in single floor living uh 55 and over certainly uh those will all be available but uh like I mentioned I know that there was some other comments about additional affordable units or partnering with the West for to do some other ideas so I think I'm we'll definitely schedule some time with the affordable housing trust to discuss if there's some other options over and above the 10% which is something the trust would definitely like yes okay you know to at least be able to talk about it so okay good um my big concern honestly and I know it's the scale of the project and I know it's a huge project but I was very bothered I guess by there was like no roadway and and I understand that you know have these buildings you have parking but when you first look at it it looks like an apartment complex with parking so I don't know what the thought process was to not have some type of like Central roadway um you know with buildings with parking behind which was kind of the whole
intent of the mpta community and what we really you know worked on and tried to convey in in the bylaw so you know something you know maybe you have thoughts on um you know I think it we could we could probably have Ian and Brian talk about it as well but the it's it comes down to the the site plan and the experience of the resident and you know where and where they live and how they Park and how they get to the clubhouse and um if we if we had a road there would be road traffic if we had a road it didn't have parking and the parking was all behind the distance from the parking space to the to the resident home would be longer and um this is this is not unusual for an apartment uh site plan um to disperse the parking it's really dispersing the parking so that people can get to their apartment easier and faster and and Par closer closer to the front door really what it was can I just also add we did look at some other site designs where we had dead ends and that was a big problem especially uh for fire and site design is that we have to try to get as to many sides of the building as possible without creating a dead end and I think even our our first plan we might have shown to this board had a couple of dead ends so to try to take out the dead ends and make sure that there was really good circulation throughout the site uh we went with a design and layout that allowed for accessibility all around the site and then you don't have massive parking lots which actually from a livability standpoint if you have all of the parking in one area behind the buildings what you have is a green space in front and then a massive parking lot in the rear and that's just really not a design that allows for a community layout so when we're trying to build this community layout with an interior open space that's why we backed away from that and I think
if we go through the design build standards and like the form based zoning that's in the actual uh zoning bylaw when the Architectural Review comes out I think that we will find that these buildings are in compliance and some of the parking in front of uh the buildings yes but I think it's necessary um in order to make sure that this layout stays in place and that people just don't have massive parking lots just one big massive parking lot behind their building it take did not to look like a hotel or a commercial area yeah understood but from the town's perspective right and and I I I apologize I know it's going to sound bad but this is exactly what we told the town we would not do so that's the my concern is you know we were looking for the the street with the you know the buildings with you know hidden parking so that is why I I am a little concerned about you know the overall concept and how it how it looks overall um if I can just say one more thing about but that statement just I think this is in conformance with your bylaw I think this is exactly what you Town tell the town to do um I think from an overall eagley standpoint it is a lot to take in with the parking around the buildings and I think perhaps um we have a couple street renderings from a couple of the locations maybe some more cut cut renderings from within the development itself so you can see what these parking spaces look like with the Landscaping you could see the amount of landscaping that's coming into the site it's tremendous 180,000 square feet uh that's a huge amount of planting so these are not going to be open parked uh paved areas you can see that there's Landscaping even throughout uh the the parking areas to try to break it up but and then along the buildings themselves just really Hardy landscaped areas along the buildings to the entrances so I think maybe some I call them streetscape for lack of a better term but internal
uh viewsheds renderings could help follow that concern so you're not just looking at the flat site picture here with just pavement buildings and Landscaping I I don't know all the sites in in westwards NBTA plan but I think this is probably unique it's like one of it's big it's big you know it has the opportunity to provide the number because of its size and and its location and you know I guess I was not thinking about the view from B um and I've met Bell out at Bell looking back at the site and they they had a lot of nice things to say um but from Powers Road and driving up and down Powers Road as much as I've done now um it it's not going to be visually impactful it's the opportunity to provide housing in a big chunk without the visual or otherwise and it will probably be a visibly positive upgrade for Bell since they're looking at the big mountains of dirt right now that's right and trucks and dust and yeah and and just to just to go just one more step to the extent that we have to ask for a waiver this board can still say no so if there is an area we're not in compliance even with parking that you're we're asking for a waiver and it's something that this board thinks is a design error they can say that they're not going to allow the waiver and we would have to redesign those components so once we get to that point of review it is something we'll definitely have to look at yeah okay and my another thought was what are or what is your thought between or to have two clubhouses oh yeah so um the plan is a 530 unit project right but you have to have a backup depending on the market the idea is U the
clubhouse A is designed to be big enough for 530 units uh or uh retooled if buildings one two if the market is such that bu buildings one two and three 330 units might be a phase with a clubhouse and then a second phase starting you know thereafter of 200 units in with buildings four and five in a small clubhouse as a as kind of a backup so I feel pretty strongly that there there's a need for housing there's a big need for housing and the supply of new housing is is about to take a take a dip in that 530 units will be absorbed uh at that time we'll figure out do we even need the second Clubhouse B and maybe we don't build it or maybe we build it into something else you know but you know Clubhouse a can handle um all the amenities for 530 units so it's it's kind of building in a a plan B could have an adult pool on a kitty pool yeah makes sense okay another concern was building five is relatively close to Ideal block um which I know it's a very noisy I'm more concerned about noise it it is and it isn't building four is the one to oh four to worry about or maybe that's what you meant yeah yeah um yeah we need to buffer that's why we put the garage buildings there and we need to buffer landscape wise there's a burm there now um you can see where it goes onto ideal blocks right below the left garage right that that's not on our property so that's going to stay there there there's a burm there um we just have to augment what's
there and um yeah and and put a we'll have to fence that's really the only area that I'm on the property line um having having a fence and making sure there's no cross traffic okay good um see sorry um again I know you have my written comments so I'm just trying to hit the big points here um the sewage this one does not show the sewage treatment plant when you first enter on the south entrance pump house that's the pump house pump house and uh there's on on the plan there shows there's tanks underground that's all underground okay that's what I that's what I was asking okay and now you said there's no you expect no odor from The Pump House correct but from experience what I did pump if there was storage pumps there is odor so I you you feel comfortable you can do something to be sure there no don't either yeah no I I mean I know I mean this is will be a state-ofthe-art facility and all that will take to be taken to consideration there'll be a management uh company that comes in and just maintains this pump house and again I know Brian said it but if you go into Grille Woods the first building you run into on their main road and the left- hand side it looks like a big barn but that's actually their wastewater treatment facility it's next to their community area it's right next to housing um it's properly mitigated it's a state-of-the-art system it's constantly managed and this will be exactly the same way and it'll be designed in in looking just like our building so you won't even know that it's a Wastewater Treatment Facility in that structure okay okay um and um bicycle Lanes within the development I wasn't quite sure cuz I know you
have a you know a great sidewalk network but I didn't really see anything that were like bike Lanes is it just the outside you're expecting to be bicycle lane or not you're talking internal internal yeah like someone comes into someone rides their bike from their apartment um how are they going to get back to building one are they riding on sidewalks are they just going to ride there's there's sidewalks and there's internal paths and um through throughout um between the buildings in connection to the perimeter path um I think there was um a slide that showed that showed all that and you're expecting it to be wide enough for a bikeing people walking okay um will it be lit the property will be the the parking and paths you know site will be lit yeah um couple questions on I I saw when I was looking at the I ities um outdoor amenities I saw there was one playground but I didn't see any others was that just because we're not at that stage yet we're not at that stage you know we think you know it'll be needed and wanted um but uh we need to test that a little B more okay um again I was concerned about fire trucks making some of those turns but if you do the SWAT path that's fine snow storage I was kind of concerned about snow storage and where you're going to put Snow from from these parking areas I think we show some limited locations within the Civil site drawing and that will certainly be reviewed by the third party consultant to make sure there's more than adequate snow storage on the site yeah just because again we didn't want snow storage on side blocks right okay I did have some nit comments on utilities but I'm not going to bother anybody with that because you can obviously read them um underground electric
I didn't see anything in these drawings yet on electric um I'm not sure I don't think weend to have that on on civil drawings no the the actual construction drawings the building permit the actual construction drawing sorry those will have yes no we're saying the same thing as okay yeah um and and again thank you on the briefing for showing I did see a lot of those nice landscape um and outdoor features but was trying to find on the drawing so these the braing has been very helpful great thanks um I'll start with uh the same compliments that my peers gave I mean I think it was very comprehensive packet uh love the architecture by the way I think that looks great I think the landscape design is quite sound as well I don't have any problems with the amenities the trails all that stuff looks great um I have significant concerns with regard to the traffic increase and the degradation of the level of service to the um surrounding um infrastructure you know the different uh traffic lights and stuff that your traffic consultant spoke to I'd like to hear more than just a a promise to work with the town to Shore that up so that we can not have three or four street lights go to a level of service grade D um while that you know some of us probably skated through college with some D's that still is not exactly an outstanding r or Mark so I'd like to see an actual plan to make sure that we can bolst the surrounding signal uh signals to deal with some of the traffic it's not really a question you need to answer but if you would like to say sure um I I will just say what we're proposing to work through with the town is for specific non vehicle pedestrian bicycle uh infrastructure what we're recommending being done as a part of the project prior to a CFO is essentially what
you're describing retiming of five signals within the area four of them being um interconnected to make sure that exactly what you're describing so I I'll be looking to see in the peer review from the traffic analysis perspective whether or not they agree with that assessment that simply changing the timing of the signals is going to bring the quality of service up somewhere well north of D or whether other recommendations such as adding an additional Lane to facilitate like right-and turns where that may not exist today or other things you can do in a traffic intersection would be required to bring that up and I would expect that you know some of those costs to do that might be subsidized by this project um I also kind of have a concern with the two points of egis being so close on pow Road um and that's because uh attorney Robbins I actually agree with Joanie that I think you have a site circulation traffic circulation issue with the layout right now um if you look down so first of all let me make an a statement I assume you can't drive over the Town Square that's not a driveable space right the Town Square as envisioned in front of building three it to be yeah no you can drive over it you can drive over that it would just be treated differently so it could be shut then perhaps that addresses some of my concern I'm sorry I misunderstood what you were looking at yeah yeah yeah the square area so you can drive over that it's it's different pavement okay circulation it's just a yeah different pavement okay so that would be closed when when they'd have like a street party or something yes they have they would close it down but other than that it would be open for traffic but if you look at somebody who's parked like to the extreme I guess West behind building 5 the sheer distance that that person has to go behind building three or I guess they could go over the the again that sort of town square and then down the long Pavement in between buildings one and four so what if there's an accident 7 o'clock in the morning actually coming out of one of these points of egis and now you have to have all of the traffic exit
from one point of the site so one thing I'd be interested in seeing is how you envision traffic moving through the site cuz I didn't see that in the packet so so I'd love to see how you expect traffic to circulate through this um CU I see a few scenarios especially if you happen to have one of those two points of egis like not available on one morning for whatever reason you could have Panic on the Titanic people are like all backed up through the front of the site in that kind of horseshoe thing trying to get one way I mean to me like the smallest thing is off and all of a sudden you have a a traffic circulation issue okay didn't know that you could drive over the town common I guess that helps a little bit but I do think Joan's point about like maybe something more like a clear like actual egis way that's meant just for driving because even the amount of driving in between other people's parking areas on a morning even again if I take that example of I'm way down in this southwest corner of the site behind building 5 I'm driving past a lot of other people's parked cars to make my way out of the site and again busy morning parents are getting kids into cars or whatever they're getting you know you're GNA have a lot of pedestrian traffic getting to vehicles and it's just a long way to go I assume in a parking area this large you're G to have some sort of speed mitigation in place in the parking lot or is that not planned speed mitigation like a mon or I mean that's generally what I run over okay um and just to address some of those concerns what we could do is we can prepare and exhibit like a pedestrian and traffic exhibit just showing the uh especially interconnected like you pointed out where the conflicts are so you can see them yeah that would be great yes um I had snow storage on my list as well so I guess you've heard that one already and yeah those are those are my primary issues I think Jo and Bob covered a lot of ground so I'm good can I add one thing please please also are you looking at all at the 2A and and I know it's in Littleton but that 2A intersection because if you have a large volume that intersection already can be problematic uh yes that that was something
that uh we looked at I'm acknowledging that it is also in uh Litton and it was also found to um operate operate within acceptable Norms we thought that there was no um improvements necessary for this project so one follow up on that and that is in parallel with this is King Street crossing King Street crossing is going to be a massive development at that intersection and so the two of these together could have some impact on that King Street and the Littleton Road Corridor going down past uh Bell of Westford so I don't want I'm I'm going to have to task you know the T our town to try to factor that in when we do the third party peer review sorry that is the salapi project at the corner on the IBM property the garage uh structures so what is the garage philosophy is that like uh certain units have a garage or all residents can op to pay for service a couple hundred doll or whatever to put your you know it's it's like a typical residential garage how many uh parking spaces do you envision in all of the garages in total 70 or 72 yeah something like that okay so fairly small so that's like about 10% of the required parking for the whole Space do you think is that about what you see in your other projects or uh yeah well I mean we don't always do garages like this that is what B Westford has I just G to ask if how that compares to Bell westford's it's almost exactly the same as it turns out I mean I I continue to think I've been a broken record on this a slightly larger and even like a twostory or a three-story parking garage could help you eliminate some of the some of the asphalt and make it a little bit easier and be an amenity that more residents would be able to enjoy how you wanted to charge for that is obviously up to you guys but um yeah okay thanks before before just want to jump in on one thing
Dylan said because it's the only concern I have if you're looking you're pulling in on the North side and say you want to go all the way around to the end of building three or coming out that way in the morning I it just me reminds me of you know trying to get by a Viva with all the cars coming in out and there you know what I mean it just take so just that that's my only thought I'm sorry yeah and and also the large pickup trucks that extend out past the edge of the spaces what are you saying about I'm saying that's that's going we combine a spine road with with a um parking lot that's the challenge and that also can affect safety with fir truck and ambulance access so that's the one drawback to this using the parking lot as the roadway system yes s yeah no good good points I was going to say the same thing the traffic uh third party in addition to the external really looking at the internal flow I think um even if you could widen that Loop so the sort of our you know kind of the loop it goes around to make that wider to you know make that a little easier for to get around as opposed to having to wait for people backing in and out you know I I have the same thing I I Envision going through corstone and you know could take 20 minutes to get from here to there so um and part of that is oneway versus two-way it wasn't clear yet if it's going to be and I I think um the third party also just you know compliance with the mcod you know I think there was a comment about parking and the layout and everything like that I think that's all covered there that'll be covered there too but I appreciate the Landscaping looks great I think the storm water attention is going to be you know Improvement there um my only concern really is the look you know the the huge amount of parking spaces and
the kind of the flow but all right can I you at any point look at parking on uh not really now I mean like the whole parking structure idea is as far as parking goes is a fine idea but it it would kill the project it just you just can't afford the structure um and that's this this is what makes sense in this kind of a setting and this kind of a location so that's that's what we designed I would just add Mike too in the as we look at that flow and everything I mean all five buildings are proposed to be five stories so even if maybe two of those were four stories would have less parking space requirements so maybe could use up that flow a little bit just something to consider when we get the third party review I guess all right great so we'll open it up for comments and questions from the audience um we do know that this will be continued public hearing so you don't you have something that comes up in the future you can always come back up to us but uh please come up to the microphone state your name and your address and direct your questions to the Emily teller nine Texas Road um I'm surprised that I like this as much as I do I think the architecture really had a lot had a lot to do with it um I've looked at buildings down by the Route 128 train station and stuff and I thought please don't bring those to Westford so I like this um and I don't feel like the five stories is intimidating um I am thrilled about the trees I am a tree person in Westford and Westford knows that and and I'm just worried about the viability of the trees because lots of trees get planted and then they get ignored and they don't Thrive and
I'm concerned about that here and I also hope that the trees will not be seedlings and tiny little things I hope there's a mix so that when people move into this they feel like they're moving into a place that is already alive and I love the native plants I think all that's great um I'm concerned about lighting I'm also a big lighting person when we moved here 42 years ago I could see the Milky Way from our yard and we live in Parker Village which this is part of so I'm really pleading for full shielded cut off everywhere um and low lighting maybe on the um paths that are completely shielded also um so that's a concern on the buildings you know no glare but also shielded so that the skies remain as St as possible for our Aven friends um I also am on the board of the rail trail and I don't know if you all know I happen to bring some audio visual aids for you to take home about the rail trail this is the largest in Eastern Massachusetts and um it will go from L I think there's some it will go from L to um rout N9 in Framingham and it will be connected to the mass Central Trail so bicycling is becoming a really big deal here and I think I heard you say that stone dust is the material for the outer loop that's not ADA Compliant in terms of wheelchairs or bikes um so I just want to throw that out for hopefully some improvement and I also noticed if you come out from this view there are wooded there's a big wooded Chunk on the top and a big wooded Chunk on the bottom and I'm just wondering about kids playing in the woods or walking in the woods or I mean I assume there won't be fencing around everything but I sort of think that's a good thing to have access and I don't know that it's all Wetlands but from the whole view of
the parcel there were two big wooded sections and I hope somehow they'll be available to the residents somehow viewing wise or whatever um and I think this time that's all I have in mind and thank you all for all of your questions they're fabulous and thank you Bob for running again for another five years by the way there's a lighting plan in the package tonight so you can evaluate see what they Pro uh project for the dispersion of light emission and maybe timing light too you know turning lights down after midnight or something like that you know that would be helpful we have that in town for all of our street lights so and not doing it not lighting it concentrically either as um I think net Scout did theirs concentrically so you should have been able to but they did anyway you guys know about that thank you thank you and on the lighting uh Westford is trying to support dark sky with hyack Observer atory which is in the north part of westro but there's 400 Acres of town land that is also not lit in Parker Village so close to this and you know the EMT land and all that we do have connected places that it would be good to keep them as dark as possible okay any other questions comments Tom teller also nine Texas Road uh I had a question I think it probably is in the package but I haven't had the access the opportunity to review the package uh is the project all electric that
planed okay and here the project being planned passive house that's undecided thank you and noler 89 set Lane um I have a couple comments or questions so you've made a strong emphasis about the benefits of the access to the LRTA on Route 110 and the potential of the adjustment to Route 15 going down to your facility do you know is there a study of how many people from B Westford use the L RTA do you know those numbers because I question how many people are going to walk through the woods up to the LRTA and I'd like to know how many people from fell West use the LRTA yeah we can find out okay I think we Mr chair if I may I know that I should direct the questions to you but this is the entire part of the intent of the MBTA communities is to get people out of their cars getting on the LRTA or other forms of transportation getting to the commuter rail and getting into the City without having to create all of the housing in the city so that is one of the reasons we're trying to help fulfill the intent by making the access way to Bell to get directly to LRTA and we're actually lucky uh that there's actually a stop right there today uh it would be lovely if LRTA would come down pow Road and come into our site from the frontage but we're not sure yet if we'll have the right ability that they'll actually create a new stop that's completely up to the LRTA uh but we're very excited to be able to get to the access so regardless of what bell has Bell is a 40b uh not created under MBTA communities it's part of our intent to get there and hopefully our residents will use it because we're going to make it very accessible to them hopefully too if you increase the number of users you can increase the frequency of service yes I appreciate question Westford is rather I can't hear I
said I appreciate the effort to get people to use public transit but Westford is a fairly was fair Rural and a lot of people go to Boston and I just I question if they would really use the LRTA but I appreciate the efforts to get people there my other question well I have two more well traffic's a major concern for me which I guess is not yet ready to be addressed but I have a don't understand the water situation you're going to bring a pipe down from 110 and then connect it off so basically at the intersection of 225 and Powers Road so I think all that has to be determined by the Water Department they're just making some suggestions so water department would make the decision on the best it's GNA be the same pipe going down P road to service those 530 units that currently Services everybody else they're not adding an additional pipe so again that's all going to be all up to the water department P service thank you you're welcome uh Jim Hunter 7 Nonet Lane I assume this has an irrigation system the grass and but that'll be used in town water right uh probably we'll use well you're oh so you're going to put in a separate well for I didn't read that in any of the plants I was just curious about that because we're having water bands on a regular basis now so to keep all that courtyard nice and green and all the trees is going to take a good amount of water um the pump house that is basically a surge treatment facility right so that's going to have sludge in tanks the sludge the solid waste is going to accumulate and be put in tanks how often is that going to have to be emptied like big trucks I'm
worried about the neighbors across the street smell big trucks is that going to be I mean I see numbers of 50,000 gallons a day is going to be processed up to 89,000 gallons a day so that's 20 million gallons a year so I'm just curious how often that's going to have to be empty I answer for that I'll will tell you just just personal experience that I never realized where Prim roll places where the car wash is y they have a facility there for all that whole area right um and it was pretty amazing that you don't smell anything over there I mean I I don't know how often they have to pump it out it's obvious not going to be this big but the the question that people were asking when they saw the sewage facility I think they're all over the place you just don't know about same thing for Bella Westford no I understand that but it's not 530 Bella Westford is larger huh Bell of West I believe is larger correct Bell is 402 units yeah the two Bell properties combined I believe are 420 units um and the one immediate to this is 240 unit so I don't have an answer to your question how often will be pumped just it's interesting that you don't think about it until you think about it so this is the largest apartment complex in the area W not just west then we have Littleton maybe another thousand units is being proposed down road so traffic is going to be a major concern and pedestrian traffic is going to be a major concern people 530 Apartments where are they going to go to a variety store pick up a gallon of milk it's the end of power's Road and how they going to get there all right let's cck the discussion to the board please okay so there is no walkway from Power Road to
that convenience that road is dangerous to walk on period so if I if I may um that's where the cut through to Bell of Westford would be able to get you up to but you got to walk through the the technology that's like going a big round circle people won't do it big r it's it's direct no it isn't it goes around through Bell then you got to go up all the way up the road L please don't okay audience please don't talk if you're at the microphone you can speak yeah so it's a long way around you're talking about you're talking about Apple Market yes that's the only Market in the area and people are 530 units ran out of milk um an opinion 530 Apartments I don't know how many children there's going to be well I guess there's ways there numbers out there somewhere that you can figure this out if this was 530 homes being built in Westford in a development it be a playground it' be a soccer field it' be a baseball field somewhere for the kids to kick a ball around or play catch or hit I don't see that here it seems like we've maximized the number of units over space for play for kids and there's going to be a lot of kids um traffic study I really think you should include how many deliveries they going to be a day in 530 units Amazon deliveries UPS I'm guessing that's going to be a good big number based on how many deliveries just come into our vinebrook development every day this is going to be huge that's all I got great
you know we'll uh we'll suggest that that's part of the peerreview in the traffic study it's a good point anybody else all right I have just one comment to add sorry about that to Trail sideway I have a question about the amount of parking lots so 530 units it's about 1.7 average cars in Massachusetts per household from R&B it's more in by the way in marak valy so because it's higher population so this has less parking lots than amount of units multiplied by the average for Massachusetts um and this excludes all the maintenance people all the guests and deliveries and so on so I don't know how it will contain all the parking so the parking is based upon our our regulations that require parking per unit um it just how much that was it 1.5 1.5 with some allowance for guest regulations aside reality is reality so we need to look at that right and then if this is completely detached from everything there's not another way to park around so if you go above your regulations inside the town you can park on the side streets and so on here the only side streets are the residential people side stre so I would be careful about it I'll go above the regulations even if it cuts into profits or amount of units maybe reducing the amount of FL to four is the solution here m right that's one two it's more of a remark than a question is the water quality most of the residential people here
are on the water well well water so I I'm curious what will happen to the quality of the water and the creation of that especially with all that loan and all the pesticides that going into the loan care and I'm I'm sure the water will deteriorate the question is how much great thank you very much delayed reaction sorry about Diane wood2 um prior to the actual design and plan was there considering the fact that we're talking about the location and and we know this is a little removed from um for corers was there any discussion about mixed use and having um uh some type of commercial establishment on the first floor such as a place where you can buy milk and Gad and and things like that was that ever discussed or was that ever put on the table so it's not like we would have any any say in what they propose right that's up to them to do that's their business project you can questions to them considering where the location is I in contrast to the Regency and and development there we you're so close to um you know the the shopping center there this this location is removed and we're all discussing about walking here and walking there and um cutting through and going up the hill and to Grandma's house robt so my input thank you yes Mr chair I mean we not considering a mixed use development out here it's residential the amenities will be for just um the residents of the site and I correct me if I'm wrong Jeff but I think if we were going to propose a mixed use development that's actually an additional special permanent not allowed uh by um actually there I think there are some uses that are allowed as right
they're called out and some by special perment but no Mr chair at this point this is purely a residential development with the amenities to accommodate uh the residential development anybody else okay so uh back to uh Mr Moret should we call out what we want for the 53g accounts we would appreciate it um we've had two uh proposals so far uh relative civil include storm water would that be civil and storm storm water would be paired up together uh traffic I think primary importance and also that I mean high level you have 530 units you know stuff internal to the site may may change it won't necessarily have a big effect on you know um the overall analysis but obviously we've heard the message loud and clear the the internal site circulation is just as important to the board um so we do have an estimate for um traffic peer review we also have an estimate uh for someone to do a review for compliance and consistency with the bylaw reviewing the architectural design standards we have heard a lot of perhaps some subjectivity I think would be best to have an unbiased opinion from the outside um and we expect to have a third U proposal shortly relative to the civil and storm water we do actually concur with the applicant on this point I think the storm water is the aspect of the project that's most subject to change as you work through the site and design issues so we would encourage uh peer review of those other matters immediately uh because they could further inform this board and the applicant as far as potential changes but we would ask to maybe delay the storm water because that is the one most uh I'd say subject to change we want to establish that now we would ask that you authorize staff to establish uh these peer review accounts
um staff can work uh with the professionals and the applicant if the applicant is not satisfied with any of these proposals they're free um to ask for others and come back to the board if they have an issue with that so they would have that opportunity so do uh we vote on you want us to vote on that now specifically for those we would love that all right so a motion to establish 53g for civil which is storm water um and civil engineering uh 53g for traffic uh 53g for compliance and architecture yes sir make that motion second all those in favor say I I all right with that what would be appropriate to continue this public hearing to U Mr chair I would I would suggest not going to the next meeting uh just because we don't even have third party reviewers so the chance of getting third party review and a good response back for the seven is probably not likely uh the 22nd might just even still be pushing it but perhaps we go to the 22nd uh for now and then if we don't get things timely back from the consultant then we can push to the first meeting but I would suggest was going to suggest maybe even we go on the 22nd if we haven't have the peer review we wouldn't have to bring your full team but if you wanted to come just answer some questions you know you have to pay all the experts to be here but if the uh yes yeah why don't we do that then so the 22nd would be great so we've request special Tuesday edition yes ail 2 April 22nd all right so uh can I get a motion to continue the public hearing to Tuesday April 22nd 7 o'clock in this room so move second all those in favor say I I just uh to note uh we will be putting some additional materials on the town's website so you can go there uh we will put the presentation that was here tonight up there and As We Gather additional information we'll we'll provide it there as well thank you very much thank you wa a minute to
[Music] clear St Patrick's Day okay oh yeah thanks that's okay don't worry that's okay don't worry I could ask folks to move out we going to continue this meeting I just wanted to introduce myself Tom got one I graduated law school like I'm okay continuing on we have the meeting need minutes to review from February 18th I can get a motion to approve the minutes uh any discussion no good all those in favor say I I and I don't believe we had any correspondents see unless anybody has anything else Mr Moret Mr jtz Sir motion to adjourn so moved second all those in favor say I I
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.