Zoning Hearing Master - Regular Meeting

GOOD EVENING. COULD YOU PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. [PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE] THANK YOU. PLEASE HAVE A SEAT.

IGOOD EVENING, EVERYONE. I WANT TO WELCOME YOU TO THE APRIL 27th, 2026, ZONING HEARING MASTER HEARING. MY NAME IS SUSAN FINCH AND I'LL BEPRESIDING AS THE HEARING MASTER OVER TODAY'S CASES. LET ME START BY INTRODUCING MS. MICHELLE HEINRICH. SHE IS WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. SHE'LL INTRODUCE OTHER STAFF MEMBERS THAT WILL PARTICIPATE IN TONIGHT'S HEARING, AS WELL AS GO OVER ANY OFF THE AGENDA CHANGES. MS. HEINRICH. > GOOD EVENING, MICHELLE HEINRICH, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THE OTHER STAFF WE HAVE WITH US TONIGHT WITH THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WE HAVE MARY DORMAN AND JARED DELFINO AND WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION WE HAVE LILY LEINHARD AND ALSO WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN ADDITION TO MYSELF WE HAVE JAMES RATLIFF WITH TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND WE DO NOT HAVE ANY OFF THE AGENDA CHANGES OR WITHDRAWALS TO ANNOUNCE.

ALL RIHT, PERFECT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. LET ME START BY GOING OVER OUR PROCEDURES FOR STOONT'S HEARING. OUR HEARING TODAY CONSISTS OF AGENDA ITEMS THAT REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING BY A ZONING HEARING MASTER. I'LL CONDUCT A HEARING ON EACH AGENDA ITEM AND WILL FILE A RECOMMENDATION WITHIN 15 BUSINESS DAYS FOLLOWING TONIGHT'S HEARING. THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE THEN SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHROO WILL MAKE THE FINAL -- WHO WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION. OUR HEARING TONIGHT IS INFORMAL. I'LL ASK QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE SCOPE OF DIRECT TESTIMONY. I MAY CALL AND QUESTION WITNESSES AS I DEEM APPROPRIATE. AND I WILL DECIDE ALL QUESTIONS OF PROCEDURE. I'LL TAKE EVIDENCE BUT WILL EXCLUDE EVIDENCE THAT IS IRRELEVANT, IMMATERIAL, OR UNDULY REPETITIOUS. EVIDENCE MAY BE PRESENTED IN WRITTEN FORM, AND ALL TESTIMONY MUST BE UNDER OATH. HEARSAY EVIDENCE MAY BE USED TO SUPPLEMENT OR EXPLAIN OTHER EVIDENCE, BUT SHALL NOT BE SUFFICIENT ALONE TO SUPPORT A FINDING BY ME UNLESS IT WOULD BE ADMISSIBLE OVER OBJECTIONS IN A CIVIL ACTION. OUR ORDER OF PRESENTATION FOR TONIGHT'S HEARING IS AS FOLLOWS. MS. HEINRICH OF THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT WILL MAKE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION FOR EACH AGENDA ITEM. NEXT UP WOULD BE THE APPLICANT. THE APANT AND THEIR TEAM HAS A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION REGARDING THEIR CASE. THEN WE'LL TURN BACK TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT'S STAFF PLANNER THAT WAS ASSIGNED THE CASE TO GO OVER THE COUNTY'S FINDINGS. R FOR A -- FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE MINUTES. ALSO FIVE MINUTES NEXT IS THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILT HAVE THAT TIME TO PRESENT THEIR FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THEN WE'LL TURB TO PROPONENTS, ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AN APPLICATION. TOTAL PRESENTATION TIME IS 15 MINUTES. THE SAME IS TRUE NEXT WHEN WE GO TO OPPONENTS, ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AGAINST AN APPLICATION. ALSO EVERYONE COMBINED 15 MINUTES. WE'LL THEN CIRCLE BACK TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO SEE IF THEY HAVE ANY CHANGES OR COMMENTS BASED ON TONIGHT'S TESTIMONY, AND THEN THE LAST WORD IS HAD BY THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICANT HAS FIVE MINUTES

FOR REBUTTAL. REGARDING THAT TIME FOR PROPONENTS AND OPPONENTS, I DON'T THINK WE'LL HAVE THIS ISSUE BUT JUST IN CASE, WHEN WE GET TO THAT SECTION, I WILL ASK YOU TO RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK EITHER IN FAVOR OR AGAINST AN APPLICATION. WE HAVE PEOPLE IN THE ROOM, BUT WE ALSO HAVE PEOPLE PARTICIPATING VIRTUALLY, SO WE WILL GET A COUNT IN TOTAL OF HOW MANY PEOPLE WANT TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OR AGAINST AN APPLICATION, AND THEN WE WILL DIVIDE THAT 15 MINUTES AS EQUALLY AS POSSIBLE TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY HAS A FAIR SHOT. ALL RIGHT. WHEN YOU COME UP TO THE PODIUM OR Y ONLINE, WHEN YOU BEEN GOODO SPEAK, IF YOU COULD GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. WE ARE RECORDING THIS HEARING AND, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE YOUR INFORMATION CORRECT. IF YOU'RE IN THE ROOM AND YOU'RE DONE AT THE PODIUM WITH YOUR WORDS, THEN IF YOU COULD SEE ALLISON AND GERMANE, TH -- JERM, THEY ARE AT THE END OF THE DAYS, IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR HAND, AND SIGN IN. THEY ARE KEEPING A WRITTEN LOG ON TOP OF THE DAIS SO PLEASE SIGN IN WITH YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND THE APPLICATION NUMBER TO WHICH YOU SPOKE. ALL RIGHT. NOW WITH THAT LET ME TURN TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WHO WILL PROVIDE YOU THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, WHICH GOVERN YOUR PARTICIPATION AT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING. 72 GOOD EVENING, THIS IS MARY DORMAN FROM THE COARN'S OFFICE. TONIGHT -- COUNTY ATTORNEY'S TONIGHT'S PUBLIC HEARING IS A FIRST STEP OF A TWO-STEP REZONING PROCESS. THIS IS THE TIME FOR APPLICANTS AND INTERESTED PARTIES TO PRESENT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY. ANY EVIDENCE PRESENTED TONIGHT WILL BECOME PART OF THE COMPLETE FACTUAL RECORD OF EACH APPLICATION, AND NO ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE CAN BE INTRODUCED AFTER THE CLOSING OF EACH APPLICATION. THE SECOND STEP OF THE REZONING PROCESS IS A PUBLIC MEETING BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHERE THE BOARD WILL MAKE A DECISION ON EACH APPLICATION HEARD TONIGHT. TONIGHT'S APPLICATIONS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY THE BOARD AT ITS JUNE 9th, 2026, LAND USE MEETING. UNLESS A DIFFERENT DATE IS STATED BY STAFF. WHEN CONSIDERING APPLICATIONS THRKSZ BOARD WILL ONLY REVIEW úTE

RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE LAND USE HEARING OFFICER FOR EACH APPLICATION. THE LAND USE HEARING OFFICER WILL FILE A RECOMMENDATION FOR EACH APPLICATION HEARD TONIGHT ON MAY 18th, 2026. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HAS ESTABLISHED A POLICY THAT DIRECTS WHICH REZONING AND MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA OF THE BOARD'S LAND USE MEETING. THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS MAY NOT BE PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. APPLICATIONS THAT THE PROPOSE TO ADD DENSITY OUTSIDE THE URBAN SERVICE AREA, APPLICATIONS ON ROADWAYS WHICH A FAILING LEVEL OF SERVICE, APPLICATIONS THAT DO NOT HAVE CONSISTENT RECOMMENDATIONS OF APPROVAL, AND APPLICATIONS THAT HAVE HAD EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION PROVIDED TO THE RECORD BY NON-APPLICANT PARTIES OF RECORD EITHER PRIOR TO OR AT TONIGHT'S PUBLIC HEARING. THE BOARD WILL ALLOW TESTIMONY BY ANY PARTY OF RECORD AT ITS PUBLIC MEETING TO RECORD THE LAND USE HEARING OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY ITEM ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. TESTIMONY BY A PARTY OF RECORD SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARING OFFICER, UNLESS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE HAS BEEN FOUND ADMISSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.03.04D OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. A PARTY OF RECORD IS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO FITS INTO AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FOUR CATEGORIES. FIRST, SOMEONE WHO'S PRESENT TONIGHT AND PRESENTS TESTIMONY OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, SECOND, SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN CERTIFIED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AS HAVING BEEN MAILED NOTICE OF TONIGHT'S HEARING. THIRD, SOMEONE WHO SUBMITTED DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE MASTER FILE AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S HEARING. OR FOURTH, SOMEONE WHO SUBMITTED DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE BY PROXY AT TONIGHT'S HEARING. THE CONTENT OF ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE THE BOARD SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE CONTENT OF THE TESTIMONY AND OTHER EVIDENCE SUBMITTED VERBALLY E OR IN WRITG TO THE LAND USE HEARING OFFICER. IT IS THE ROLE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO ENSURE THAT ONLY INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE MET THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE ALLOWED

TO SPEAK BEFORE THE BOARD AND TO ENSURE THAT NO NEW EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY IS INTRODUCED OR ALLOWED AT THE BOARD'S PUBLIC MEETING. FOR THESE REASONS, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL INFORMATION YOU WISH THE BOARD TO CONSIDER AT ITS PUBLIC MEETING IS ENTERED INTONIGHT'S RECORD. THANK YOU, MS. DORMAN, I APPRECIATE IT. AS I MENTIONED, ALL TESTIMONY MUST BE UNDER OATH, SO IF YOU PLAN TO SPEAK TONIGHT, IF YOU COULD PLEASE STAND, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, AND I'LL SWEAR YOU IN. [SWEARING IN] THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLEASE HAVE A SEAT. ALL RIGHT, THEN WITH THAT, MS. HEINRICH, WE'RE READY TO CALL THE FIRST.

> OUR FIRST ITEM IS ITEM C.1, STANDARD REZONING 26-0310, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM RSC-6 TO CN(R). MICHELLE MONTALBANO WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HAS REVIEWED THIS AND WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT, IS THE APPLICANT -- THE APPLICANT IS ONLINE. IS THAT RIGHT? GOOD EVENING, DAVID WRIGHT WITH TSP COMPANIES. ADDRESS IS 8956 WESTERLAND DRIVE, LAND O' LAKES, 34637. I'VE REVIEWED THE STAFF REPORTS AND CONCLUDE AGREEMENT WITH THEM. DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO THE RECORD THAT IS NOT ALREADY COVERED IN THERE, SO I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.

NONE AT THIS TIME, BUT THANK YOU, SIR, I APPRECIATE IT. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE TWO PARCELS FROM RSC-6 TO CN(R). THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSED RESTRICTIONS TO LIMIT THE ALLOWABLE USES IN CN DISTRICT AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STYLE. THE PROPERTY'S IN THE EAST LAKE ORIENT PARK AREA ALONG EAST MLK BOULEVARD. IT ABUTS AN EQUIPMENT STORAGE SITE TO THE EAST AND A COMMERCIALLY ZONED PD TO THE WEST DUE TO THE SURROUNDING ZONING PATTERN AND THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AROUND EAST MLK BOULEVARD AND RESTRICTIONS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT, STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST SUPPORTABLE. I'M AVAILABLE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. NONE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU SOY MUCH. PLANNINGS -- SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILLY LIN00 WITH PLANNING COMMISSION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE COMMUNITY MIXED USE 12 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND IT'S IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE EAST LAKE ORIENT PARK COMMUNITY PLAN. WITH THE PROPOSE REZONING FROM RSC-6 TO COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESTRICTED. THE APPLICANT HAS VOLUNTARILY LIMITED THE RANGE OF PERMITTED USES TO A DEFINED SET OF LOW INTENSITY NEIGHBOR SERVING COMMERCIAL AND -- THESE ARE TO ENSURE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TYPICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH MORE INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USES. ADDITIONALLY THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY REFLECTS THE MIXES OF USES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ITSELF CONTAINS A VACANT LAND AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. TO THE EAST ARE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES, ALONG STATE ROAD 574 TO THE WEST ARE COMMERCIAL USES, AND TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE ARE ESTABLISHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. GIVEN THIS MIXTURE OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL USES THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING WITH RESTRICTED USES SERVES AS AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITIONAL USE. THE LIMIT -- NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING OF THE PROPOSED USE PROVIDES A BUNCH BETWEEN THE MORE INTENSIVE -- IT'S ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOAL OF THE EAST LAKE ORIENT PARK COMMUNITY PLAN AS IT PROVIDES OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL SCALE BUSINESS GROWTH AND JOB CREATION THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES ON AN UNDERUTILIZED SITE. THE PROPOSAL SUPPORTS THE PLAN'S BROADER STRATEGY OF ENCOURAGING APPROPRIATE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WHILE MAINTAINING COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SURROUNDING USES. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, AND THE FOLLOWING GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? NOBODY. ALL RIGHT. MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT, MR. RIGHT, YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD IF YOU WOULD LIKE IT, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT. NO, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, THEN WITH THAT WE'LL CLOSE REZONING 26-0310. AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE. OUR NEXT ITEM IS AGENDA ITEM C2, STANDARD REZONING 26-0541. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM ASC-1 TO MANUFACTURING RESTRICTED. SIERRA JAMES HAS REVIEWED THIS FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND I'LL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS ON HER BEHALF TONIGHT AFTER THE APPLICANT. ALL RIGHT, GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING. RYAN MANASSE IS JOHNSON POPE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. AGAIN WE'RE HERE TONIGHT REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM ASC-1 -- 6106 HARTFORD STREET. THIS IS A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD STANDARD REZONING TO ALIGN THE ZONING WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE. THERE ARE NO WAIVERS OR VARIATIONS BEING REQUESTED OBVIOUSLY THE ONLY CONDITION IS THE TRANSPORTATION DRIVEN SHARED ACCESS RESTRICTION WITH FLEXIBILITY THROUGH AN A, B, OR DUDE IF APPROVED AT TIME OF PERMITTING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES AND IT'S WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA WHERE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IS ANTICIPATED. IT HAS FRONTAGE ALONG HARTFORD STREET WHICH IS A COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAY. CURRENTLY THE SITE IS LIMITED TO A VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL UNDER THE PROPOSED MR ZONING, IT CAN ACHIEVE AN INDUSTRIAL TYPE USE DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LI DESIGNATION. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CARRIES A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE MANUFACTURING, WAREHOUSING, STORAGE, AND OTHER EMPLOYMENT GENERATING USES. THERE ARE NO INCIDENTAL USES. THEY ARE THE CORE AND INTENT OF THE LI CATEGORY. SPECIFICALLY UNDER FLU OBJECTIVE 2.2 AND POLICY 2.2.1 THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ESTABLISHES BOTH A ANGE OF PERMITTED USES AND INTENSITY FRAMEWORK FOR EACH CATEGORY. THE REQUESTED MR ZONING FALLS SQUARELY WITHIN THAT THE FRAMEWORK. ALLOWING THE SITE TO DEVELOP CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER AND INTENT OF THE LI DEEINGINATION. THIS ENSURES THAT THE DEVELOPMENT REMAINS WITHIN THE DOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LIMITS. AND YOUR STAFF IS GOING TO PRESENT, BUT PLANNING COMMISSION FOUND THE REQUEST CONSISTENT. AS WELL AS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOUND IT APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE TRANSPORTATION RELATED ACCESS CONDITION OR RESTRICTION. REGARDING THE SURROUNDING AREA, WHEN EVALUATING COMPATIBILITY, IT'S CRITICAL TO LOOK AT THE

ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERN ON THE GROUND NOT JUST THE ZONING LABELS. IN THIS CASE, THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PREDOMINANTLY CHARACTERIZED BY INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL AND OPEN STORAGE USES, INCLUDING TRUCK PARKING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THIS ESTABLISHES A CLEAR AND PREVAILING INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR ALONG HARTFORD STREET. WHILE THERE IS RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH, THE CONDITION IS TYPICAL OF TRANSITIONAL EDGES IN THE COUNTY. AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THOSE INTERFACES THROUGH REQUIRED UFFERING, SCREENING, AND SITE DESIGN CONTROLS. AS SUCH, THE REZONING DOES NOT INTRODUCE A NEW USE PATTERN, IT REINFORCES AND CONTINUES THE ESTABLISHED PATTERN ALREADY PRESENT IN THE AREA. AND REGARDING THE COMPATIBILITY, IT IS ONE OF THE CENTRAL CRRGZS IN ANY REZONAL AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVIDES VERY CLEAR DIRECTION TO HOW IT'S TO BE EVALUATED. UNDER FLU OBJECTIVE 3.1 AND POLICY 3.1.3, COMPATIBILITY IS NOT DEFINED AS SAME AS. IT'S DEFINED AS ABILITY OF DIFFERENT USES TO COEXIST IN A MANNER THAT MAINTAINS THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. HERE THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA IS ALREADY INDUSTRIAL IN NATURE WITH MANUFACTURING, OPEN STORAGE, AND COMMERCIAL USES LOCATED TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST. THE PROPOSED REZONING SIMPLY EXTENDS THE ESTABLISHED PATTERN ONTO A PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDERUTILIZED RELATIVE TO ITS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. POLICY 3.1.2 FURTHER EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF TRANSITIONS BETWEEN USES, WHICH ARE ACHIEVED THROUGH PROFESSIONAL SITE PLANNING, BUFFERING AND SCREENING, NOT THROUGH PREVENTING APPROPRIATE USES ALTOGETHER. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WILL OCCUR HERE. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WILL REQUIRE BUFFERING AND SCREENING ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE TO ENSURE A PROPER TRANSITION TO THE EXISTING HORSE ARENA. INALLY, FLU OBJECTIVE 4.4 AND POLICY 4.4.1 REINFORCE THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE INTEGRATED WITH SURROUNDING USES THROUGH COMPLEMENTARY LAND USES AND MITIGATION OF IMPACTS. GIVEN THAT THE PROPOSED USES ARE

ALREADY PRESENT IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY, AND THAT ALL THE APPLICABLE BUFFERING AND SITE ESIGN STANDARDS WILL BE MET, THIS REQUEST MEETS AND EXCEEDS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S COMPATIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. NOW, BACK TO THE TRANSPORTATION RESTRICTION. DUE TO THE LIMITED FRONTAGE AND SPACING REQUIREMENTS, TRANSPORTATION REQUIRES SHARED ACCESS, IMPORTANTLY THE CONDITION ALLOWS FLEXIBILITY THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE OR DESIGN EXCEPTION ENSURING THAT A WORKABLE SOLUTION AT PERMITTING CAN BE MADE. CODE COMPLIANCE, THIS IS NOT A NEGOTIATED PD. AGAIN THERE IS NO WAIVERS. THE PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES AT SITE DESIGN AND PERMITTING. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IN ADDITION TO THE LAND USE CONSISTENCY AND COMPATIBILITY, THIS REQUEST DIRECTLY ADVANCES THE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES. UNDER FLU OBJECTIVE 7.1, THE COUNTY'S DIRECTED TO PROMOTE TARGET INDUSTRIES AND SUPPORT EMPLOYMENT GENERATING USES THAT ENHANCE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS. INDUSTRIAL LAND IS A FINITE AND INCREASINGLY LIMITED RESOURCE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY. THIS REZONING PRESERVES AND ACTIVATES A LAND DESIGNATED FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, ENSURING IT CAN BE UTILIZED FOR JOB PRODUCING ACTIVITIES RATHER THAN REMAINING CONSTRAINED BY AN OUTDATED ZONING DISTRICT. THE PROPOSAL ALSO SUPPORTS JOBS -- JOBS AND HOUSING BALANCE BY PLACING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN PROXIMITY TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS, WHICH IS A KEY COMPONENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S LONG-TERM GROWTH STRATEGY. IN CONCLUSION THIS REQUEST IS NOT ASKING FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES. IT'S IMPLEMENTING IT. THE REZONING ALIGNS DIRECTLY WITH LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION, IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES, AND MAINTAINS COMPATIBILITY THROUGH ESTABLISHED CODE REQUIREMENTS AND IS SUPPORTED BY BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF. THIS IS A LOGICAL, ORDERLY EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN, AND REPRESENTS APPROPRIATE USE OF LAND WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA.

FOR THESE REASONS, WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL, THANK YOU, AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. JUST ONE FOR THE RECORD. TO CLARIFY THAT RESTRICTION THAT THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO WORK OUT THE ACCESS ISSUE, BUT IT'S A REQUIREMENT FOR A SHARED ACCESS IF NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS AVAILABLE. THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, YES. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IP. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

MICHELLE HEINRICH, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. STAFF REVIEWED A REZONING REQUEST FROM ASC-1 TO MANUFACTURING RESTRICTED LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HARTFORD STREET. THE SITE IS 2.3 ACRES IN SIZE, LOCATED WITHIN THE LI FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND LOCATED IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA. INDUSTRIAL USES ARE FOUND TO THE WEST, EAST, AND SOUTH. PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS ZONED ASC-1, AND WITH THE M ZONING DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBILITY MEASURES SUCH AS SETBACKS, HEIGHT, AND BUFFERING AND SCREENING. THE APPLICANT HAS OFFERED ONE RESTRICTION, WHICH RELATES TO ACCESS. DUE TO THE LOCATION OF NEARBY EXISTING ACCESS POINTS, UNLESS THERE IS ANY ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPROVED AT SITE DEVELOPMENT, THE, WE'LL HAVE TO BE AA SHARED ACCESS FACILITY FOR THIS PARCEL. STAFF RECEIVED NO OBJECTIONS FROM REVIEWING AGENCIES, AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED RESTRICTIONS.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

> LILLY LINEHAN, PLANNINGS COMMISSION. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PALM RIVER PROGRESS VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS FROM ASC-1 TO MANUFACTURING TO AOFFE. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED AS A SINGLE-FAMILY USE, SURROUNDING THEIR SITE THERE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE NORTH, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO THE EAST AND SOUTH, AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST. THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL PARCEL TO THE WEST IS CURRENTLY OPERATING AS AN AREA FOR SEMITRUCK PARKING, GIVEN THAT THE PREDOMINANT LAND USES IN THE VICINITY ARE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL IN NAICHTHER PROPOSE REZONING IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. ADDITIONALLY THE PROPOSED ROW ZONING SUPPORTS THE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES BY FACILITATING INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES THAT CONTRIBUTE TO JOB GROWTH AND ENHANCE THE COUNTY'S ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS WHILE REMAINING PRAWBLTIONIMATE TO THE LOCAL -- PROXIMATE TO THE LOCAL WORKFORCE REZONING SUPPORTS THE INTENT OF THE PALM RIVER PROGRESS VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN -- BY RE-- PROMOTING EMPLOYMENT AND GENERATING USES, AND PROVIDING A COMPATIBLE INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLAN COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED STANDARD REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? YES, MA'AM. WHILE YOU'RE COMING FORWARD, GO AHEAD AND COME UP, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? ALL RIGHT, SEEING NO ONE, IF YOU COULD GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.

YES. MY NAME IS SUSAN SWIFT, AICP. SWIFT AND GOLDEN, LLC, 3621 SOUTH -- STREET, TAMPA. AND I'M HERE REPRESENTING LEVI EQUINE HOLDINGS, LLC WHO OWN THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, SUBJECT PROPERTY IS HIGHLIGHTED. I'LL START WITH OUR ASK SINCE I TYPICALLY OVERSTATE MY THREE MINUTES. WE OPPOSE THE MANUFACTURING REZONING, THE DISTRICT FOR THE M OR M-R, WHICH -- OUR ASK IS WE PREFER CI ZONING OR A PD AND A 50-FOOT TYPE C BUFFER. WE HAVE REACHED OUT TO THE APPLICANT TO THEIR REPRESENTATIVE. THEY WERE NOT INCLINED TO CHANGE THE, THEIR REQUEST FOR EITHER OF THESE THINGS, SO I'LL GIVE YOU MY R REASONS, OUR REAENS. OUR CLIENTS HAVE NEARLY SEVEN ACRES WITH HORSES, STABLES, AND MANAGER'S RESIDENCE. THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE NOISE IMPACTS OF THE USES IN THE M DISTRICT, AND THE VISUAL WHICH IS THE REASON FOR THE REQUEST OF THE BUFFER IS FOR NOISE AND VISUAL CIRCUMSTANCES. AND THIS IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF YESTERDAY, SO IT LOOKS NOW OOKS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN THE AERIAL THAT YOU SAW. THEY'RE ALREADY BEING USED NOT ACCORDING TO A SARKS C1. WE REALIZE THAT THERE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE ON IT. THAT DOZEN MEAN THERE IS A

GUARANTEE -- DOESN'T MEAN THERE IS A GUARANTEE FOR THE HIGHEST REZONING. THERE IS STILL TRANSITION POLICIES THAT YOU HEARD ABOUT THAT I THINK COULD BE INTERPRETED DIFFERENTLY, AND COMPATIBILITY ISSUES. AS I SAID IN ADDITION, THE OWNERS ARE ALREADY USING IT DIFFERENTLY. THIS IS THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH, WHICH IS LOCATED ON 36th -- SOUTH 36th AVENUE. AND THIS IS THE FRONT OF THIS STABLES AND MY CLIENT'S PROPERTY, THEY DO BOARD HORSES THERE AND HAVE HORSES OF THEIR OWN. AGAIN, THE NOISE IS A BIG ISSUE. AND YOU CAN SEE THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY HAS TRAILERS AND SEMIIS ALREADY THERE. YOU CAN SEE HERE I'LL SHOW YOU SOME BETTER PICTURES, BUT THIS IS AN ACTIVE STABLE AND HOSE USE, AND THEY'RE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THESE USES. SOME OF WHICH IN THE M DISTRICT COULD BE A FIRING RANGE, MANUFACTURING WHICH IS VERY BROWARDLY -- BROADLY DEFINED, JUNKYARD, SLAUGHTERHOUSE, COMMUNITY DISPOSAL CENTER, ASSEMBLY, WHICH IS ALSO NOT DEFINED. THIS IS LOOKING FROM MY CLIENT'S PROPERTY WHERE YOU CAN SEE THEY HAVE A LOT OF INVESTMENT IN THIS PROPERTY, AND THEY'VE TRIED TO PUT THEIR OWN BUFFER IN FOR THE CARGO TRAILERS AND OTHER THINGS, AND IT ALSO LOOKS LIKE THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF FILL THAT'S BEEN DONE. I TRIED TO FIND PERMITS FOR THESE. AGAIN THIS IS FROM THE BACK OF THEIR PROPERTY. SO THERE IS, THERE IS A CONCERN WITH ADDITIONAL HEAVY USES IN ADDITION TO WHAT'S IT'S BEING USED FOR NOW. IN THE ASC-1 DISTRICT THAT IT

CURRENTLY HAS. SO WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT EITHER THE CLIENT, THE APPLICANT CHANGE TO A CI USE, WHICH WE'RE NOT TRYING TO PREVENT THEM FROM HAVING COMMERCIAL USES ON THEIR PROPERTY, BUT THESE ARE MORE ACCEPTABLE AND MORE COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SEVEN ACRES TO THE NORTH, AND THE USES THAT ARE ON THERE. AND A 50-FOOT BUFFER TO ALLOW SOME DISTANCE AND AGAIN, NOISE, IN ADDITION TO THE VISUAL, IT'S REALLY THE NOISE THAT WOULD BOTHER THE HORSES AND THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE. AND I WOULD ALSO ASK THE HEARING MASTER TO LOOK AT SOME OF THE REALLY THE AGAIN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. THERE IS A LINE THERE, BUT IT REALLY ONLY EXISTS FOR TWO MORE LOTS, SO THE AREA IS DEFINITELY TRANSITIONED, AND I THINK THE POLICIES AND HOW THEY'VE, THE TRANSITION POLICIES APPLY TO THIS REALLY NEED TO BE LOOKED AT AS WELL. THANK YOU.

LET ME ASK YOU, MS. SWIFT, DON'T LEAVE YET. LET ME ASK YOU A COUPLE QUESTIONS. SO IF YOU COULD PUT YOUR AERIAL BACK UP THAT YOU STARTED WITH, THE BLACK AND WHITE AERIAL THAT SHOWED SUBJECT PROPERTY AND YOUR CLIENT'S PROPERTY I BELIEVE TO THE NORTH. THERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT. APPROXIMATELY WHAT IS THE DATE OF THIS AERIAL? IT'S A COUPLE OF YEARS OLD. OKAY. AND -- THESE PHOTOS ARE CURRENT -- ARE VERY RECENT. YOUR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE. YES.

UNDERSTOOD. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, AND WE CAN HAVE PLANNING COMMISSION PUT THAT BACK UP OR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, EITHER ONE, IT'S A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THE PLAN CATEGORY TO THE SOUTH OF YOUR CLIENT, AND THEN ACCORDING TO THE STAFF REPORT, THE ZONING TO THE, LET ME FLIP BACK THERE, TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALREADY M. YES. RIGHT? AND TO THE EAST IS A PD WHICH THE STAFF HAS IT LABELED AS BEING USED FOR OPEN STORAGE. HOW LONG HAS YOUR CLIENT BEEN THERE? I BELIEVE SINCE 2017? OKAY.

NOT EXACTLY SURE. AND I DO HAVE A FOLLOW-UP ON THE PD. SURE. THE PD HAS A NUMBER OF 89, SO THAT PREDATES YOUR CLIENT ACCORDING TO THAT USE OF THE PROPERTY. AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALREADY ZONED M. SOY I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET TO BY GETTING TO GO ASK THEM TO GO TO CI.

WELL, THERE IS A CI I BELIEVE ONE OF THESE LOTS IS CI, AND I WOULD ASK YOU TO LOOK AT THE WORDING OF THE PD BECAUSE IT DID SAY, IT DID HAVE A CONDITION THAT LOOKED LIKE IT WOULD NO LONGER TAKE EFFECT, BUT IT LOOKED LIKE THAT WAS MORE OF THE OPEN SPACE ON THE SITE NOT THE USE OF THE PROPERTY, SO AGAIN THAT WAS MY INTERPRETATION, BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO ACTUALLY READ THE CONDITIONS OF THAT PD. I CERTAINLY WILL. I JUST WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT THAT PROPERTY WAS ZONED WELL BEFORE YOUR CLIENT CAME INTO OPERATION. AGREE.

AND I WOULD PRESUME, AND WE CAN ASK THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BUT I WOULD PRESUME THAT WAS ALREADY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IN THE PLAN PROBABLY. THAT I DIDN'T CHECK. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL FERRET THAT OUT. SO IS THAT THE END OF YOUR COMMENTS? THAT'S IT, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. S. APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT, SO SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION WE WILL CLOSE THAT SECTION OF TESTIMONY. WE WILL GO BACK TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. MS. HEINRICH CAN YOU TELL ME, IF YOU COULD PUT BACK THE ZONING MAP PERHAPS OR WE'LL GO BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ASK ABOUT THE EXTENT OF THAT LI PLAN CATEGORY. IF YOU WANT TO DO THE ZONING PIECE OR IF YOU HAVE IT READILY AVAILABLE THAT WE COULD PUT UP. THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL.

YOU WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE PD TO THE EAST? YES, AND LET'S JUST START WITH THAT AND IF YOU COULD TELL ME WHAT USES ARE PERMITTED IN THAT PD. SURE. I CAN LOOK THAT UP IF. WE'LL GO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND COME BACK. PERFECT. MS. LINEHAN, IF YOU COULD TELL ME IF YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION THE EXTENT OF THAT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND HOW LONG IT'S BEEN THERE. CURRENTLY FROM THE CURRENT MAPS I HAVE, THAT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ALL THE WAY TO THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AREAS TO THE SOUTH HAS BEEN EXISTING. THERE HAVEN'T BEEN ANY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS WITHIN THE AREA TO CHANGE THAT, SO IT'S BEEN EXISTING WITH OUR PLAN. SO BACK TO THE INCEPTION OF THE PLAN IN 1989?

I BELIEVE SO, UNLESS THERE WAS DISMNG IN THIS AREA THAT CHANGED IT IN A RECENT UPDATE, BUT USUALLY THOSE WOULD COME UP AS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERMITS. ALL RIGHT, PERFECT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE THAT. THAT DIDN'T GIVE YOU MUCH TIME, HEINRICH. NO, WE HAVE TO THE INTO THE ARCHIVES FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. BUT DID YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS YOU WANTED TO MAKE BEFORE I MOVE ON? NO, MA'AM. THEN WE WILL GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT WHO HAS TIME FOR REBUTTAL AND UNDERSTAND I JUST úT ZONING MAP.

ABSOLUTELY. RYAN MINASY FOR THE RECORD. I GUESS TO CORRECT THE RECORD FROM THE CURRENT OWNER IT PPEARED FROM MY RESEARCH THEY PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN 2020, AND ONE OF THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE OPPOSITION TALKED ABOUT US PROVIDING OR US HAVING FILL ON THE PROPERTY. NOW I DON'T KNOW THE OUTCOME OF THIS CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATION BUT ON THE OVERHEAD PROJECTION IN 2020, THEIR PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR BRINGING IN 100 LOADS OF DIRT AND FLOODING THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. AGAIN I DON'T KNOW WHAT REMEDY CAME OUT OF THIS BUT IT'S JUST SOMETHING I FOUND IN THE RECORD FOR THE PROPERTY. HAD PICTURES AND EPC FINDING AND SUCH, SO JUST INTERESTING THERE WAS A COMMENT MADE ABOUT FILL BEING BROUGHT IN. REGARDING NOISE, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ORDINANCES AS WELL AS EPC GOVERN THE NOISE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, SO THERE IS, EITHER DECIBEL OR IT'S UNREASONABLE, IT'S ADDRESSED THROUGH OUR EXISTING CODES AND ORDINANCES, SO AND THAT WOULD RELATE TO ANYBODY ALONG THIS CORRIDOR I WOULD IMAGINE AS WELL. I MEAN, THERE IS SOME HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USES JUST TO OUR WEST, IT LOOKS LIKE SOME TYPE OF RECYCLING OR DUMP FACILITY, ET CETERA. AS FAR AS THE BUFFERING, YOU KNOW, THE 50 FEET SEEMED UNREASONABLE. THERE IS A FEW FACTORS IN THAT. ONE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE THE SHARED ACCESS AT THE FRONT, WHICH EATS UP SOME OF OUR LOTS. AS WELL AS THE ADDITIONAL 20 FEET THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED THAT THAT WOULD ACTUALLY HELP WITH NOISE. AGAIN, NOISE IS ALREADY REGULATED, RIGHT? THAT ADDITIONAL 20 FEET IS JUST A RANDOM REQUEST. THERE IS NOTHING THAT SAYS THAT THAT WOULD PROVIDE ANY MORE NOISE MITIGATION OR ET CETERA. WE'RE ALREADY PROVIDING 30-FOOT TYPE C CODE THAT WE HAVE TO DO, AND THAT'S THE MOST STRICT BUFFERING REQUIREMENT THAT IT -- THE COUNTY HAS -- THAT ALSO ADDRESSES THE COMPATIBILITY CONCERNS. OUR LDC ADDRESSES THAT IN THE BUFFERING STANDARDS, RIGHT? AND YOU KNOW, HERE AGAIN THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH COULD CHANGE OWNERSHIPS TOMORROW AND THEY COULD CHANGE THEIR USE YOU KNOW RIGHT NOW IT'S FOR HORSES AND THEY'RE WORRIED ABOUT NOISE

BUT THAT WHOLE CORRIDOR OF HARTFORD IS MORE OR LESS INDUSTRIAL IN NATURE. AGAIN I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS ANY CODE VIOLATIONS ON OUR PROPERTY. I'M NOT FULLY AWARE OF THE CLIENT'S OPERATIONS STATUS, BUT AGAIN EVEN IF THERE WAS OR THERE WAS IN THE FUTURE THIS REZONING WOULD BE THE REMEDY FOR THAT. SO WITH THAT AGAIN, THAT WE WOULD JUST RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL. AALL RIGHT. I WILL NOTE THAT IN THE STAFF REPORT THERE IS A SECTION THAT THE STAFF HAS RECENTLY ADD TO ADDRESS CODE ENFORCEMENT VIOLATIONS, AND IT SAYS NONE UNDER THEIR RESEARCH. SO, AND ALSO FOR THE RECORD, UST TO STATE THAT YOU'RE NOT ASKING FOR A WAIVER OF ANY BUFFERING OR SCREENING STANDARDS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY CODE. THAT IS CORRECT. NO VARIATIONS, WAIVERS.

ALL RIGHT, IF YOU COULD JUST HANG TIGHT ONE SECOND WHILE I CONFIRM THAT INFORMATION WITH MS. HEINRICH. SURE. FOR WHICH, THE. THE 89 PD.

RIGHT, I PULLED THAT UP, AND IT SAYS HERE IN LOOKING THROUGH THAT IT'S LIMITED TO THE OPEN -- AN OPEN STORAGE YARD OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ONLY. NO MAJOR REPAIR OR SALES MATERIALS IS PERMITTED, BUT MAJOR REPAIR CAN OCCUR IF IT'S INSIDE AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE. AND THE SITE PLAN IN THE CONDITIONS IT REQUIRES A 20-FOOT BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH BUT THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MORE THAN 20 FEET BUT IT DOESN'T GIVE ME DIMENSION. SO IT COULD BE CORRECT, I IT COD BE 50 IF SHE MEASURED IT OUT, BUT I'M NOT ABLE TO DO THAT. RIGHT, UNDERSTOOD. ON THIS ONE.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I BELIEVE MR. MANASSE UNLESS YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE, I WILL ALWAYS GIVE YOU WHICH LAST WORD. RYAN MANASSE, NOTHING FURTHER. ALL RIGHT, PERFECT, THANK YOU THEN. WITH THAT WE WILL CLOSE REZONING 26-0541 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE. OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM C3, STANDARD REZONING 26-0609. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM BPO TO CG. LOGAN McCAGUE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS -- WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, ALEX SCHAILER, 400 NORTH ASHLEY DRIVE WITH GARDNER, BREWER, HUDSON. I HAVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION THIS EVENING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE IS LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE WAWRDZ AVENUE AND MANHATTAN INTERSECTION AND IT'S JUST OVER AN ACRE IN SIZE. CURRENTLY IT'S ZONED BPO. WE ARE PROPOSING A REZONING TO CG TO JUST BROADEN THAT MENU OF COMMERCIAL USES THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED ON THE SITE. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE SURROUNDING VICINITY, THERE IS IN VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL USES HERE. A COUPLE DIFFERENT RETAIL STRIP CENTERS, A TIRE STORE, WAREHOUSE, A FITNESS CENTER, AN AUTO REPAIR ESTABLISHMENT, AND IN FACT ALL OF THE USES THAT ARE SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS IT EXISTS TODAY ARE FOR COMMERCIAL USES, SO AS YOU CAN SEE THAT PRECEDENT IS ALREADY THERE ALONG THIS PORTION OF THE WATERS AVENUE CORRIDOR. PLANNING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOTH FOUND THE APPLICATION CONSISTENT AND APPROVABLE, AND WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY OBJECTIONS FROM ANY OTHER DEPARTMENTS, SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. 'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY UETIONS.

NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. BUT THANK YOU SO MUCH. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES? GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, LOGAN McCAGUE, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. APPLICATION 26-0609. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM BPO TO CG. PROPERTY IN QUESTION EXISTS LONG WARES AVENUE SURROUNDING TO THE EAST AND WEST A VARIETY OF USES IN VARYING INTENSITY. STAFF FINDS THAT POTENTIAL USES THAT CAN BE EXERCISED UNDER THE REQUESTED COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT DOES NOT DEVIATE FROM THE EXISTING CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE AREA. SITE WILL BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE DDRESSING ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES OR WETLANDS TO THE SOUTH. STAFF FINDS PROPOSED REZONING AVAILABLE AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. NONE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LIL HAN PLANNING COMMISSION. THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN RESIDENTIAL 9 AND RESIDENTIAL 12 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. IT ISIT IS NZ URBAN SERVICE ARE- PROPOSED REZONING IS FROM BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL. THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN CONSISTS OF A MIX OF VARYING USE -- WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, CHARACTERIZE SAID BOO IA RANGE OF INTENSITIES. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDINGSURROUNDING DEVELOPM. -- FLU POLICY 4.1.1 WHICH REQUIRE NEW DEVELOPMENT TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SUBJECT SITE ALSO SATISFIES THE COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA SET FORTH IN FLU'S OBJECTIVE 4.7. THE SUBJECT SITE FRONTS WEST WATERS AVENUE, WHICH IS CLASSIFIED AS A COUNTY ARTERIAL AND DESIGNATED AS A SUBURBAN TOWN ON THE CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION MAP. MORE THAN 50% OF THE SITE'S FRONTAGE LIES ALONG THIS ROADWAY, ADDITIONALLY, THE CLOSEST QUALIFYING INTERSECTION IS WEST WATERS AVENUE AND NORTH MANHATTAN AVENUE, A COUNTY COLLECTOR ROADWAY WHICH IS ABOUT 500 FEET FROM THE SUBJECT SITE. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED REZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? NO ONE. MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD, THE APPLICANT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE IT. NOTHING FURTHERERMENT THANK YOU. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. WITH THAT WE'LL CLOSE REZONING 26-0609 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D.1, PD REZONING 25-1061. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PD 05-1783 AND RSC-2 MH TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. CHRIS GRANDLIENARD WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, HEARING OFFICER, STAFF. TODD PRESSMAN, 200 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, NUMBER 451 IN ST. PETERSBURG. THIS IS PD 25-1061. 15.6 ACRES, IN THE GIBSONTON SOUTHSHORE AREA. SD SUPPORTS, PLAN COMMISSION SUPPORTS, NO AGENCY OBJECTIONS, COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMMUNITY PLAN PER THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS. LOCATED ON MAP AS SHOWN HERE IN SOUTH COUNTY. LOCATED ON SYMMES ROAD AT A SIGNIFICANT TECO EASEMENT AS YOU CAN SEE RUNNING ON THE MAPPING HERE. COMPOSED OF TWO PARCELS. YOU CAN SEE THE TECO EASEMENT AND SYMMES ROAD. CURRENT APPROVED PD IS 36 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES. WHAT'S AT ISSUE IS A 74-SPACE UPSCALE LUXURY RV RESORT LODGING USE AND AMENITIES WOULD HAVE HIGH AMENITY USES, CLUBHOUSE, POOL, PICKLEBALL, FULL EXERCISE FACILITY, SOCIAL ACTIVITIES, DOG PARK, BUSINESS CENTER, BILLIARDS LIBRARY, AND OTHER USES. JUST TO GIVE YOU ROUGH IDEA HOW THE RV PARKS WORK AND HOW THEY LOOK, IS A FEW PHOTOS, A FEW PICTURES WHICH WOULD BE ANALOGOUS TO WHAT'S PROPOSED HERE. ONE ELEMENT THAT STANDS OUT IS THE TECO EASEMENT, WHICH CONTAINS LARGE AREA AS YOU CAN SEE HERE. THE PROJECT IS SITE IS IN THE TWO PARCELS, 1 AND 2 SHOWN HERE. THERE WILL BE NO DEVELOPMENT IN THE TECO EASEMENT. TOWARDS THE FRONT ON SYMMES ROAD IS A U-HAUL FACILITY. JUST TO GIVE THE IDEA THE INTENSITY OF THE TECO SITE, THIS IS THE TECO SITE LOOKING FOR FROM SYMMES ROAD SO IT'S A MAJOR COMMCOMCOMPONENT OF NOT THE PROT BUT WHAT'S DRIVING THE PROJECT. SO THIS IS THE PD PLAN SHOWING THE TECO EASEMENT. THREE AREAS OF RVs WITH

AMENITIES SHOWN AS WELL. 25-FOOT FIVE-FOOT TYPE A SETBACK ALONG WITH THE SIX-FOOT FENCE. AND AMENITY AREA BUFFERING WOULD INCLUDE A FIVE-FOOT TYPE A BUFFER AS WELL. THE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION REPORT NOTES A REDUCTION OF TRIPS OF 508 TRIPS PER DAY, 28 TRIP REDUCTION IN THE A.M., 33 TRIP REDUCTION IN THE 3 P.M. WITH THS PROJECT. THE ZONING YOU'LL SEE IS MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL SIR OCCUPIEDING RVC2 -- SURROUNDING RSC-2, RSC-6, AND AR, PD TO THE SOUTH. FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IS R6, WHICH BY THE WAY WOULD ALLOW MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 187 UNITS. YOU LOOK IN THE VU SINTY USES TO THE NORTH, VACANT SINGLE-FAMILY, TO THE SOUTH IS COMMERCIAL, AND TECO EASEMENT AND SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE EAST IS SINGLE-FAMILY, TO THE WEST IS TECO. PLANNING COMMISSION NOTES AREA ISPRY DUM NAPTLY CHARACTERIZED BY SINGLE-FAMILY. AREA TRANSITIONS TO COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SOUTH. RV WRESORT IS RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE AND SHARES SIMILAR CHARACTERCHARACTERISTICS WITH SG MOBILE HOME USES AND IS COMPATIBLE AND COMPLEMENTARY. PLANNING COMMISSION NOTES THIS SITE AT 15.6 ACRES WOULD TYPICALLY ALLOW UP TO 93 DWELLING UNITS. THE PROPOSED 74RV SPACES REMAIN WELL BELOW MAXIMUM POTENTIAL. AND THEY NOTE IT IS CONSISTENT, WOULD IMPROVE THE NEIGHBORHOODS, IT WOULD INTRODUCE A BROADER RANGE OF HOUSING WHICH IS A MAJOR DIRECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. DSD NOTES THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING ZONING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA, SIMILAR IN SCALE AND INTENSITY O SURROUNDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND LOW INTENSITY USES, RV UNITS BEING SINGLE STORY IN NATURE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE HEIGHT AND SCALE OF THE NEARBY HOMES. WE DID NOTICE 39 PERSONS, SEVERAL TIMES SO WE HAD A TOTAL OF 156 NOTICES INCLUDING TWO HOAs.

AND WE DID DO A COMMUNITY MEETING OUT AT THE COMMUNITY WHERE WE HAD A FAIR AMOUNT OF RESIDENTS COME BY, WHICH IS QUITE A FEW MONTHS AGO. SO WITH THAT WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS YOU MIGHT HAVE. I JUST WANT TO VERIFY FOR THE RECORD THAT ACCESS POINT THROUGH THE TECO EASEMENT APPEARS TO BE YOUR ONLY OPPORTUNITY FOR ACCESS BASED ON THE PROPERTY CONFIGURATION, BUT I JUST WANT MAKE SURE ON THE RECORD THAT THAT IS PERMISSIBLE. WE'LL HAVE JEREMY COME UP AND ANSWER THE QUESTION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN. GOOD EVENING.

> GOOD EVENING, HEARING OFFICER FINCH. JEREMY COUCH WITH TAMPA CIVIL. 1793700 HUNTING BOW CIRCLE. YES, MA'AM, THAT IS OUR ONLY ACCESS IS THROUGH THE EASEMENT. ALL RIGHT AND THAT IS PERMISSIBLE? YES, THERE WAS A SUBDIVISION THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY FULLY ENTITLED, PERMITTED FOR CONSTRUCTION. WE DID HAVE A FULL APPROVAL FROM TECO FOR THAT ACCESS. AFTER THE ZONING WHEN WE REDESIGN FOR THE RV PARK WE WILL GO BACK AND UPDATE THAT ACCESS WITH THE NEW DESIGN. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOUR TESTIMONY. ALL RIGHT THEN WITH THAT WE WILL GO TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING NCHTS CHRIS GRAND LINARD, PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HERE TO PRESENT PD 25-1061 REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.6 ACRES ALONG SYMMES ROAD FROM THE EXISTING PD AND RSC-2 DISTRICTS TO A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALLOWING 74 SPACE RV RESORT WITH ASSOCIATED AMENITIES. THE SITE CURRENTLY IS APPROVED FOR 36 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REZONING TO CHANGE THE EXISTING ENTITLEMENTS AND REPLACE THE CURRENT RESIDENTIAL APPROVAL WITH A 74-SPACE RV RESORT USE. THE EXISTING ON-SITE WETLAND AREA IS SHOWN TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED AS PART OF THE SUBMITTED PLAN. THE SURROUNDING AREA INCLUDES SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO THE NORTH AND THE EAST. TECO EASEMENT TO THE WEST, AND A COMBINATION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE SOUTH. ALONG SYMMES ROAD. THE PLAN INCLUDES 25-FOOT BUILDING SETBACKS ALONGS THE NORTH AND EAST BOUNDARIES ALONG WITH A 5-FOOT TYPE A BUFFER, A TECO EASEMENT ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE PROVIDES ADDITIONAL SEPARATION. NO IMPACTS ARE PROPOSED ON THE ON-SITE WETLANDS. STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE REZONING REQUEST TO BE COMPATIBLE, AND FOUND IT PPROVABLE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. I'M GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

NONE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. PLANNING COMMISSION. LILYANN LINEHAN.

IT IS IN THE RESIDENTIAL 6 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. IT SAID IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE GIBSONTON COMMUNITY PLAN AND SOUTHSHORE AREA-WIDE SYSTEMS PLAN. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR 74 SPACES OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLE RESORT. THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN SURROUNDING THE SUBJECT SITE IS PREDOMINANTLY CHARACTERIZED BY SINGLE-FAMILY MOBILE HOME USES WHICH ARE LOCATED TO THE NORTH, EAST, AND WE WEST INCLUDING ARES ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS CENTER. THE PLUPODESSED RV RESORT IS RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE AND SHARES SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS WITH THE SURROUNDING MOBILE HOME -- TO FURTHER ENSURE COMPATIBILITY AND MINIMIZE ADDITIONAL IMPACTS TO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THE SITE DESIGN INCORPORATES BUFFERING BETWEEN THE AMENITY AREA AND THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES. SPECIFICALLY A FIVE-FOOT TYPE A BUFFER IS PROVIDED ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AND A 20-FOOT TYPE B BUFFER IS PROVIDED ALONG NORTH AND EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. THESE BUFFERING MEASURES ENHANCE VISUAL SCREENING AND PROVIDE SEPARATION, THEREBY REINFORCING COMPATIBILITY WITH THE ESTABLISHED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH GOAL 2 OF THE GIBSONTON COMMUNITY PLAN WHICH SEEKS TO IMPROVE AND ENHANCE NEIGHBORHOODS THROUGH REVITALIZATION AND THE INTRODUCTION OF A BROADER RANGE OF HOUSING OPTIONS. THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN RV RE SORF RESIDENTIAL USE THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE BOTH SHORT-TERM AND LONGER TERM OCCUPANTS, THEREBY SUPPORTING THE PLAN'S OBJECTIVE AND INCORPORATING NEW RENTAL AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, BLANKING COMMISSION STAFF -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE úPROP- CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH S. THERE ANYONE IN PERSON OR ONLINE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPE SPEAK IN SUPP? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN UP OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST? NO ONE -- ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU, THEN WITH THAT WE WILL CLOSE REZONING 25-01061 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

> OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D.2, MAJOR MOD 25-1415. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PD 00-0533. TIM LAMPKIN WITH DEVELOPMENTED SERVICES HAS REVIEWED THIS FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND WILL PROVIDE 12 STAFF FINDINGS.

GOOD EVENING AGAIN, HEARING OFFICER, STAFF. TODD PRESSMAN, 200 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, NUMBER 451 IN ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA. THIS IS MM25-1415. JUST A NOTE THAT COMPANION COMP PLAN HAS BEEN WORKING ITS WAY THROUGH WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. DSD SUPPORTS, PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORTS, MEETS LOCATIONAL CRITERIA, NO AGENCY OBJECTIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION NOTES IS COMPATM COMPATIBLE WHE COMMUNITY PLAN. THIS IS FOR -- WITH THE TWO COMMUNITY PLAN. THIS IS FOR 2.43 ACRES. -- 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL GENERAL WITH SOME RESTRICTIONS, AND 100 SQUARE FOOT LEASING OFFICE. RESTRICTED USES PRIMARILY A CAR WASH, I'LL COME BACK AND EXPLAIN WHY THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED, MAJOR MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR, ADULT USES, USE WITH DRIVE-THRU SERVICES, LANES, BUS TERMINALS, GAS STATIONS, BARS, AND TAVERNS. SO WE'RE LOCATED IN THE GREATER PALM RIVER PROGRESS VILLAGE AREA. AND CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD IS RUNNING EAST-WEST, 78th IS RUNNING NORTH-SOUTH, AND YOU CAN SEE THE PARCEL INDICATED BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER AGAIN, 2.3 ACRES OF TWO PARCELS. THE VICINITY USES TO THE NORTH IS A C STORE, SINGLE-FAMILY, CHURCH, AND CHURCH ACROSS THE STREET. AND YOU'LL SEE I'M NOTING IN THE SMALLER PARCEL OF THE PROJECT WAS A CAR -- WAS A CAR WASH USE. AND LOOKING TO THE NORTH IS ZONED FOR BUSINESS, OFFICE ZONING. THERE'S A GOOD BUFFER IN THE REAR AND A CHURCH AND SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH. AND THAT'S REFLECTED OF COURSE IN THE ZONING BPO TO THE NORTH, CN WHICH IS THE C STORE, AND ASC-1, THE USES TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST. SO THE CURRENT ENTITLEMENT OF

00-053 IS A CAR WASH WITH FOUR BAYS AND ANCILLARY AS CN AND BPO AT TWO STORIES SO EXISTING PD HAS THE BPO LAID OUT AND A CAR WASH TO THE SOUTH WHICH CRITICALLY ABUTS A RESIDENTIAL USE, AND THAT'S WHY I HIGHLIGHTED I THINK ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS OF THE ZONING IS THAT WE ARE REMOVING THE CAR WASH USE, WHICH WOULD BE ABUTTING THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. AND THIS IS JUST TO SHOW YOU THE POSITIONING BETWEEN THE TWO YOU CAN SEE IT'S QUITE IMPACTING TO THE RESIDENTIAL ON THE SOUTH. INPROPOSED PD PLAN -- THE PROPOSED PD PLAN IS LAID OUT HERE AND HIGHLIGHTED CG USES TO THE FRONT, RESIDENTIAL, AND OFFICE SPACE IN THE MIDDLE AND RESIDENTIAL TO THE REAR AND AND A POND IN THE FAR REAR. ABUTTING TO THE REAR IS A 30-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. UNDER THE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION REPORT, IT SHOWS A REDUCTION OF 103 TRIPS ON THE 24-HOUR, AND REDUCTION OF 21 OR AN INCREASE OF 21 IN A.M. AND A REDUCTION OF 5 ON THE P.M. THE REQUEST DOES REASK RE-- DOES ASK RELIEF OF THE ADDITIONAL SETBACK OF TWO FOOT FOR EVERY TWO FOOT OVER 20 FEET TO ALLOW PROPOSED 40-FOOT MULTIFAMILY BUILDING HEIGHT. SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTHWEST IS NOT IMPACTED, ADDITIONAL SETBACK IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CHURCH USES. THEY ARE REAR USES OF THE CHURCH. ANCILLARY FOR PROPERTY CLEANING AND STORAGE. COMPATIBLE WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY, BOTH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE DSD SUPPORT THE REQUEST FOR RELIEF. ALSO TO REDUCE THE 20-FOOT WIDE TYPE B BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE TO 5-FOOT BUFFER, BPO IS LOCATED TO THE NORTH, AS A LESS ACTIVE PARKING AREA AND IS A VACANT FORESTED AREA CURRENTLY ADDITIONALLY THE AREA NORTHWEST ADJACENT, THE COMMERCIAL POCKET DOES NOT REQUIRE BUFFER. AND TWO, NOT PROVIDE AN INTERNAL 20-FOOT WIDE BUFFER WITH B TYPE SCREENING BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL USE AND THE MULTIFAMILY, THAT

WOULD BE AN INTERNAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE OWNER HIMSELF AND ALSO NOTES THAT THERE'S PROBABLY 60 FEET APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET BETWEEN THE PROPOSED USES ANYWAYS. THIS IS THE EXISTING CAR WASH USE. THIS IS SOME OF THE REMAINING ELEMENTS THAT'LL BE CLEANED UP. THIS IS THE ABUTTING C STORE TO THE NORTH THAT ABUTS. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF NOTES IT WOULD BE SIMILAR AND COMPATIBLE TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS. DENSITY IS COMPATIBLE. WE DID NOTICE 41 PERSONS, AND ONE HOA. SO WITH THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR ATTENTION AND CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES? GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, TIM LAMPKIN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. AS THE APPLICANT STATED, THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AN APPROXIMATELY 2.3-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH 78th STREET APPROXIMATELY 230 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF 24th AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 78th STREET. WHEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY A MIX OF USES, INCLUDING COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTHWEST, VACANT BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE, PREDOMINATES TO THE IMMEDIATE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL POCKET. THE APPLICANT DOES PROPOSE REQUEST RELIEF FROM THE ADDITIONAL SETBACK OF TWO FEET FOR EVERY FOOT OVER 20 FEET TO ALLOWED THE PROPOSED 40-FOOT MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE THMPLET APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION INCLUDES IT'S A SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE SOUTHWEST IS NOT IMPACTED. AS THE COMMERCIAL POCKET BUILDING MAXIMUM IS ONLY 20 FEET SO THE THEREFORE NOT SUBJECTED O THE TW TWO FOR OE. AS THE APPLICANT WENT OVERX THEY ARE REQUESTING TWO VARIATIONS TO 6.06.06 BUFFERING AND SCREENING THE FIRST ONE IS THE 20-FOOT WIDE BUFFER WITH TYPE B REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY AND THEY'RE REQUESTING TO REDUCE IT TO A FIVE-FOOT BUFFER WITH TYPE A SCREENING. AND THE SECOND IS TO NOT PROVIDE THE INTERNAL 20-FOOT WIDE BUFFER WITH TYPE B SCREENING BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY POCKET. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE JUSTIFICATION AND SUBMITTED AND FINDS THAT THEY MEET THE GENERAL CRITERIA. AND TO FURTHER MITIGATE POTENTIAL IMPACTS, THE APPLICANT PROPOSE AS CONDITION REQUIRING AN ENHANCED 20-FOOT BUFFER WITH TYPE B SCREENING ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY

ADJACENT TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME IN THE SOUTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY. TYPE B SCREENING REQUIRES A RODE ROW OF EVERGREEN SHADE TREES WHICH ARE NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. AND SO IT'S A SLIGHTLY ABOVE THE LDC WOULD REQUIRE NINE SHADE TREES, WHEREAS THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING 12 SHADE TREES IN THAT LOCATION. AND THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUESTING ANY OTHER VARIATIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND BASED UPON THE ABOVE STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST SUPPORTABLE. KEN HAGAN: THANK YOU SO MUCH. NO QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. PLANNIPLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LINEHAN, PLANNING COMMISSION. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 6 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PALM RIVER PROGRESS VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN. THE REQUEST IS A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -- A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW, TO CHANGE THE USES ALLOWABLE USES FROM CAR WASH AND OFFICE TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY OFFICE AND CG USES. THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO RESTRICT THE FOLLOWING USES FROM THE SITE, CAR WASH, MAJOR MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR, ADULT USES, USES WITH DRIVE-THRU SERVICES AND LANES, BUS TERMINAL, GAS STATIONS, AND BARS AND TAVERNS. INAPPLICANT HAS ALSO AGREED TO INCREASE THE SCREENING BEYOND THE REQUIRED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ABUTTING THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE RESIDENTIAL HOME TO THE SOUTH AND GIVEN THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT EXISTS MAINLY OF RESIDENTIAL WITH LIGHTER COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES THRKSZ APPLICANT'S RESTRICTION OF USES AND THE ORIENTATION OF THE COMMERCIAL USES TO FRONT ALONG 78th STREET WITH APPROPRIATE BUFFERING AND SCREENING FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES. THE PROPOSED REZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER. ADDITIONALLY THE SUBJECT SITE MEETS COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA AS THE SITE HAS MORE THAN 50% FRONTAGE ALONG 78th STREET, WHICH IS A ROADWAY, HAS A ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION OF URBAN GENERAL. AND THE MAJOR MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH MULTIFAMILY USES PROVIDES ADDITIONAL HOUSING TYPES IN A COMPATIBLE PATTERN IN A LARGELY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA. THIS WILL PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING TYPES AS ENCOURAGED BY GOAL 2 STRATEGY 16 OF THE PALM RIVER PROGRESS VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFS FINDS THE PROPOSED MAJOR MODIFICATION CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE H COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? NO ONE. MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT, MS. PRESSMAN, YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD IF YOU WOULD LIKE IT. MR. PRESSMAN? YEAH. YOU'RE GOOD? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. úTHEN WITH THATR MODIFICATION 25-1415 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D.3, MAJOR MOD APPLICATION 26-0215. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR MODIFICATION. THE CHRIS GRAND LIN GRANDLIENARS REVIEWED THIS AND WILL PROVIDE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AFTER APPLICANT PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU. ISABELLE ALBERT WITH HALF' F, 1,000 NORTH ASHDRY DRIVE. AS YOU HEARD THIS IS A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING SCHOOL SITE. THIS WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN 2014 WHEN THEY APPLIED FOR A SPECIAL USE, AND THEN IN 2018, THEY REZONED IT OO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. AND WE ARE TODAY EXPANDING THE SCHOOL. -FACIE WHAT IT WAS APPROVE -- PHYSICALLY WHEN IT WAS APPROVED THEY HAD TWO SITES, PARCEL A WAS FOR 650 STUDENTS, AND PARCEL B WAS FOR AN ALF FOR FREQUENTLY 330 BEDS. WHEN THERE IS OVERALL FIVE ACCESSES THAT WERE CURRENTLY APPROVED, NOW WE'RE GOING THROUGH THE ROW ZONING AND THE REQUEST IS TO REPLACE THE ALF WITH THE EXPANSION OF THE SCHOOL. HONESTLY WE'RE ELIMINATING SOME OF THOSE ACCESSES, SO BASICALLY IT WAS JUST THE REQUEST SIMPLE IS JUST TO THE EXPANSION OF THE SCHOOL. AND THAT REALLY KIND OF CONCLUDES. WE ALSO HAVE THE QUEUING THAT WE WORKED WITH STAFF AND THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. SO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FOUND IT CONSISTENT, AND THERE IS NO OBJECTIONS FROM REVIEWING AGENCIES. SO THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION UNLESS YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS. AS YOU KNOW, YOU'RE AWARE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LETTERS IN THE FILE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS, MAINLY PERTAINING TO THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL REQUEST. BUT MY QUESTIONS ARE MORE POINTED TO COUNTY STAFF OR YOUR TRANSPORTATION EXPERT IF THAT BECOMES APPROPRIATE. MR. HENRY, STEVE HENRY IS HERE 72 I D. I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT. WE DID LOOK AT THAT. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. PLEASE SIGN IN. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

CHRIS GRANDLIENARD, PLANNER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HERE TO PRESENT MAJOR MODIFICATION 26-0215. A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A PD FOR A 42.84-ACRE SITE LOCATED 85585 EAST COUNTY LINE ROAD. THE REQUEST SEEKS TO ELIMINATE THE FORMER PARCEL A AND PARCEL B STRUCTURE AND CONSAWIDATE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY INTAA SINGLE UNIFIED PRIVATE SCHOOL CAMPUS UNDER THE CURRENT APPROVAL, PARCEL A IS PERMITTED A K-12 SCHOOL WITH 650 STUDENTS AND 125,000 SQUARE FEET. WHILE PARCEL B ALLOWED UP TO 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF DMURSING HOME -- NURSING HOME, MEDICAL OFFICE, AND ADULT CARE U.S.ES. THE MODIFICATION PROPOSES TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SCHOOL BUILDING AREA FROM 125,000 TO 135,000 SQUARE FEET AND INCREASE ENROLLMENT FROM 650 TO 1100 STUDENTS INCLUDING 250 CHILD CARE, 375 ELEMENTARY, 200 MIDDLE, AND 275 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PRIMARILY COMPOSED OF SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS WITH PD APPROVED OFFICE ZONING TO THE NORTH AD TAMPA BAY WATER UTILITY LAND TO THE EAST. THE SCHOOL HAS LONG BEEN ESTABLISHED AT THIS LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED EXPANSION REPRESENTS A NATURAL CONTINUATION OF THAT EDUCATIONAL USE. CONSOLIDATING THE SITE UNDER THE APPROVED SCHOOL PROGRAM MAINTAINS THE ESTABLISHED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND CONTINUES TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY'S EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AS THE USE IS LONG-STANDING, THE SCHOOL SERVES NEARBY NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THE EXPANSION DOES NOT INTRODUCE NEW OR MORE INTENSIVE USE TYPES BEYOND THE EXISTING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM. STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST APPROVABLE SUBJECT TO THE

CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT. BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. NONE FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF, BUT I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR MR. RATLIFF IF IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME TO GO OVER THAT BEFORE WE GO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONI. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT, MR. RATLIFF, AS YOU HEARD AND I'M SURE YOU'VE SEEN, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LETTERS FILED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE GIST OF THEM, ONE SEEM TO BE THE SAME LETTER MANY TIMES OVER. ASKING ABOUT OO TRAFFIC LIGHT AT ROYAL HAMPTON. AND I SEE THAT ON THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS, I BELIEVE IT'S 4.2, TALKS ABOUT ANALYSIS IN THE FUTURE IF THIS WERE TO BE APPROVED FOR A TO DETERMINE IF A SIGNAL WOULD BE WARRANTED AT THE PROJECT ACCESS, AND NOT DOESN'T CALL OUT ROYAL TAMPTON, IT WOULD BE THE -- HAMPTON, IT WOULD BE THE PROJECT ACCESS FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SO TELL ME FOR THE RECORD HOW THAT WORKS, IF THIS WERE TO BE APPROVED WHEN WOULD THAT ANALYSIS TAKE PLACE.

> SURE, FOR THE RECORD, JAMES RATLIFF. SO HOW THAT WORKS IS IF YOU KNOW WHEN THIS COMES IN FOR SITE SUBDIVISION, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AND ASK THEM TO LIKELY DO WHAT WE CALL A MINI WARRANT ANALYSIS JUST TO SEE IF IT'S APPROACHING THE THRESHOLD WHERE IT COULD BE WARRANTED AND THEN IF SO, YOU KNOW, DO THE FULL WARRANT ANALYSIS AND SEE IF A SIGNAL IS WARRANTED AT THEIR PROJECT SIGNAL. BUT THAT YOU'RE CORRECT, THAT IS FOR THEIR ACCESS AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER ACCESS CONNECTIONS. AND SO IF, AND I'M JUST GETTING AHEAD OF PERHAPS PEOPLE THAT WOULD SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO ASK YOU THE QUESTION, IF THEY WERE INTERESTED, IF THE CITIZENS WERE INTERESTED IN GETTING THE ANALYSIS DONE FOR A SIGNAL AT ROYAL HAMPTON, HO WOULD THAT AOCCUR?

YES ACTUALLY AND I PUT THAT IN MY STAFF REPORT, THERE IS A LINK TO OUR SERVICE NOW WEB SITE, AND I SPOKE WITH SOMEBODY ON THE PHONE. IT DOES SOUND LIKE THIS IS THE ITIZENS ARE EXPRESSING CONCERN WITH EXISTING CONDITION THERE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THIS PROJECT OCCU AS OR NOT SO WE WOD INCAN -- OCCURS OR NOT -- TO TAKE A LOOK AT WHETHER CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED FROM WHEN THAT HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY PREVIOUSLOOKED AT -- PREVIOUSLYD AT AT THAT PARTICULAR INTERSECTION. WHEN THEIR PROJECT WAS REVIEW FORKED FOR APPROVAL. YES. UNDERSTOOD.

SO AGAIN THE CURRENT SYSTEM THAT WE HAVE, THE OLD SYSTEM MANY YEARS AGO WHERE WE WOULD LOOK UP TO FIVE MILES OUT AND LOOK AT INTERSECTIONS IN THAT IS E TO YOU KNOW CERTAIN CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE. SO WE REVIEWED THAT UNDER THE YOU KNOW, THE CURRENT REGIME AND THE RULES THAT WE HAVE IN EFFECT TODAY. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. I APPRECIATE IT. AALALL RIGHT, WE'LL TURN BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LINEHAN, PLAN COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE -- IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND NOT WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ANY COMMUNITY PLN. THE REQUEST IS A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO INCREASE THE APPROVED SCHOOL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO 135,000 SQUARE FEET WITH A MAXIMUM OF 1,100 STUDENTS FROM PRE-K-12th GRADE. THE EXISTING USE ON THE SITE IS CURRENTLY A K-12 PRIVATE SCHOOL DESIGNATED AS A PUBLIC QUASI-PUBLIC LAND THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BORDER WITH PASCO COUNTY TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE, ACROSS EAST COUNTY LINE ROAD. THERE ARE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC QUASI-PUBLIC USES SURROUNDING THE SITE TO THE WEST, SOUTH, AND EAST. ALSO TO THE EAST IS THE LAKE BRIDGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND TO THE SOUTH AND EAST THE PROPERTY'S OWNED BY THE GRAND HAMPTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THERE ARE ALSO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES AND HOA/COMMON PROPERTY SURROUNDING THE SITE WITH MULTIFAMILY USES FURTHER EAST. ACCORDING TO FLU'S POLICY 2.3.9 THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE LAND DENSITY CALCULATION DENSITY AND FAR CALCULATIONS FOR PROPERTIES THAT INCLUDE MORE THAN 25% OF WETLANDS WILL COMPLY WITH THE CALCULATIONS AND REQUIRE IM-- FOR DETERMINING INTENSITY AND DENSITY THE SITE OF HAVING A TOTAL OF 27% WETLANDS AND TOTAL OF 31.0 23450EU7B UPLAND ACRES THE TOTAL NONRESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PURPOSED ON THE SITE IS 592,497 SQUARE FEET. THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FRUPOSED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT WITH THE EXPANSION IS 135,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS WELL WITHIN THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED INTENSITY FOR THE SITE. FLU'S OBJECTIVE 4.2 STATES THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT IN THE MIXED USE CATEGORY SHALL BE INTEGRATED AND INTERCONNECTED TO EACH OTHER, SPECIFICALLY FLU'S POLICY 4.2.1 DECLARES THAT PROJECTS PROPOSED IN ALL MIXED USE PLAN CATEGORIES ARE REQUIRED TO DEVELOP WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO LAND USES WITHIN A SINGLE BUILDING OR WITHIN SINGLE PROJECT IN SEPARATE BUILDINGS. REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO LAND USES WILL APPLY TO PROPERTIES 20 ACRES OR GREATER IN THE SPU6 AND NMU4 LAND USE CATEGORIES. WHILE THE REQUEST IS ELIMINATING THE ORIGINAL SECONDARY USES ON

THE SITE A MIX OF USES IS BEING ATISFIED BY PROPOSING THE K2 SCHOOL AS WELL AS THE CHILD DAY CARE CENTER AND IS THEREFORE MEET THIS REQUIREMENT FOR THE MIXED USE POLICY. ON THE SUBJECT SITE THERE ARE WETLANDS AND SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITATS. IT'S ALSO WITHIN THE WELLHEAD RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA ZONE 2% AS WELL AS PARTIALLY WITHIN THE SURFACE WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA. THE REQUESTED MAJOR MODIFICATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY MULTIPLE AGENCIES INCLUDING THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION, AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION, AFTER SEVERAL OF THE AGENCY'S COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANTS, THE THERE WEO OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUEST. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED MAJOR MODIFICATION CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN OPPOSITION THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS? I BELIEVE WE DO HAVE ONE PEN PERSON ONLINE. I DON'T SEE ANYONE IN THE R5078, SO IS THAT MR. BERKMAN? YES, THAT IS CORRECT. CAN YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. SAMUEL BERKMAN, 27478 NEEDLE -- DRIVE. IF YOU COULD ACTIVATE YOUR CAMERA AS WELL. YES, SURE, SEE IF I CAN GET THIS WORKING. OKAY, LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE ME.

ALL RIGHT, WE SEE YOU. GO AHEAD. GREAT. OKAY. EVERYCON CA STILL SEE ME? -- EVERYONE CAN STILL SEE ME? I CAN, YES.

OKAY. GREAT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE, I'M HERE TO EXPRESS MY OPPOSITION TO THIS DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT THE SPECIFIED PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS THAT I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH. SO I'M, THESE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ALONG THE PROJECT 41 FRONTAGE AND A PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK BETWEEN ROYAL HAMPTON AND NORTHWOOD LAKES AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AT THE SIGNAL AT NORTHWOOD LAKES. SO I'LL GO THOU THE REASONING THEN I'LL GO BACK TO MY ARGUMENT. SO PER THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 60302 REQUIRES SIDEWALKS WHERE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. ALSO REQUIRES SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IT REQUIRES THAT THEY BE CONTINUOUS AND LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR WITHIN A EDICATED EASEMENT. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ALONG COUNTY LINE ROADS ARE SOMEWHAT CONCERNING. THERE CURRENTLY EXIST AS GAP IN SIDEWALK BETWEEN ROYAL TAMP ON N AND NORTHWOOD LAKES. THERE IS PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY PRESENT ALONG THERE AS SHOWN IN THE TRAFFIC COUNTS AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND THE LAST FIVE YEARS THERE HAVE BEEN TWO PEDESTRIAN CRASHES IN THE AREA WHERE THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SIDEWALK, INCLUDING ONE INCAPACITATING PEDESTRIAN CRASH THAT RESULTED IN A COMA I BELIEVE. THERE IS ALSO ONE BICYCLE CRASH. THESE WERE ALL PEDESTRIANS OR BICYCLES ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE ROADS WHERE THE SIDEWALK IS BEING REQUESTED: THE BICYCLE CRASH ACTUALLY WAS A PERSON STRUCK BY THE MIRROR OF A VEHICLE, SO THEY WERE RIDING ALONG THE SHOULDER WHERE THEY HAVE TO BECAUSE THERE IS NO PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AND STRUCK BY A VEHICLE. THESE CRASHES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ROADWAY THAT LACKS PROPER PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES AND

CIRCULATION. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL GENERATE ADDITIONAL TRIPS INCLUDING PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. IT IS A SCHOOL. PEOPLE DO WALK TO SCHOOL. ONE THING I DID NOTICE IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS FLDZ NO MULTIMODAL TRIP -- THERE IS NO MULTIMODAL TRIP GENERATION WHICH IS SURPRISING TO SEE. I'M NOT SURE HOW THAT WAS ACCEPTED WITHOUT THAT. IT, THE TIS ALSO DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AS FAR AS I CAN TELL. OR DICUSS ANY ADDITIONAL MULTIMODAL ACCESS CONCERNS. IT ADDRESSES THE VEHICLE TRAFFIC NOT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. AS AN ASIDE, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ANALYSIS FOR THE QUEUE LENGTH IS EXTREMELY POOR. IT DOESN'T ACCOUNT FOR ANY ACTUAL REAL WORLD ANALYSIS, IT JUST TAKES THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES AND DIVIDES IT BY ESTIMATED CYCLE LENGTH OF 120 SECONDS AND ASSUMES THAT ALL THE VEHICLES WILL CLEAR IN THAT. IT DOESN'T ACCOUNT FOR ANY RANDOM AAL FROM THE WEST AT ALL. I WOULD REQUEST AN ACTUAL HCM ANALYSIS OR A MICROSIMULATION ANALYSIS LIKE SIM TRAVEL BE DONE FOR THAT BECAUSE THAT -- TRAFFIC BE DONE FOR THAT BECAUSE THAT IS VERY CONCERNING WHEN YOU HAVE VEHICLES STOPPED IN THE LEFT TURN LANE CN'T THROUGH WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO GET THROUGH. ADDITIONALLY, THE CODE REQUIRES SIDEWALKS WHERE NEEDED FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. THE CRASH HISTORY CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THE NEED FOR THAT IMPROVEMENT IN THUS AREA. THE CODE REQUIRES CONTINUOUS SIDEWALK ALONG THE FRONTAGE. I THINK THAT IS A REALLY NOT REALLY A WAY TO ARGUE AGAINST THAT. IT'S VERY CLEARLY IN THE CODES. AND ALSO I SEE THE COUNTY HAS MADE COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF FILLING THESE SIDEWALK GAPS. I'M NOT SURE WHAT HAS BECOME OF THAT. I HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOST RECENT SUBMITTAL COMMENTS. THAT WAS THE SUBMITTAL COMMENTS BACK IN EARLIER IN MARCH. THE CODE ALSO REQUIRES SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE CONNECTIONS FOR

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, WHICH IN THIS CASE I WOULD VIEW AS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ROYAL HAMPTON AND NORTHWOOD LAKES, AND A SIGNALIZED CROSSING FOR PEDESTRIANS FROM THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF COUNTY LINE TO THE NORTHERN SIDE. GIVEN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE OR ON THE COUNTY LINE ROAD IT'S APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET, THIS PROVIDES AMPLE ROOM FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIDEWALK. ALSO CITY OF TAMPA OWNS THE SOUTHERN SIDES OF THAT ROAD SO I'M SURE THEY'D BE WILLING TO HELP OUT IF IT CAME TO KEEPING PEDESTRIANS SAFE ALONG THERE. SO IN SUMMARY, THIS DEVELOPMENT IS PRODUCING SIGNIFICANT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OR IS PROBABLY GOING TO PRODUCE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, AND SOME OF THOSE PEDESTRIANS MAY BE COMING FROM THE EAST. THERE ALREADY ARE KIDS THAT WALK TO AND FROM THE SCHOOL FROM THE EAST AND I THINK WE SHOULD, YOU LOOKING TO KEEP THOSE KIDS SAFE WHEN THEY GET TO SCHOOL: AS I SEE IT, THIS CURRENT DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODES, AND FOR THAT REASON I AM IN OPPOSITION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT UNLESS THERE ARE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS MADE.

MR. BERKMAN, DOES NAT COMPLETE YOUR COMMENTS? YES. ALL RIGHT, LET ME ASK YOU A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS JUST REAL QUICK BEFORE YOU GO. DO YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF DUCATION OR PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND IN TRANSPORTATION? YES. I'M A. TRANSPORTATION FIELD. YES. I'M A TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEWER FOR THE D.O.T. CAN YOU SAY THAT AGAIN, I'M ú. I'M A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVIEWER FOR THE D.O.T. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND IT SEEMS JUST TO SUMMARIZE YOUR COMMENTS, YOUR MAIN CONCERN IS THE PEDESTRIAN IMPACT OF THIS PROJECT, AND THE LACK OF, THE GAPS OF SIDEWALKS IN THE AREA? CORRECT. YES.

AND YOU POINTED TO GAPS BETWEEN ROYAL HAMPTON AND NORTHWOOD PALMS BIEWFNGD, -- BOULEVARD S THAT CORRECT? CORRECT, AND THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH I BELIEVE THEY'LL HAVE TO INCLUDE SIDEWALKS ON. AND SIGNALIZED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT NORTHWOOD LAKES BOULEVARD. OKAY. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT. THOSE ARE MY ONLY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR LOGGING IN. úI APP. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION, JUST WANT MIKE SURE THAT THERE'S FO-- MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NO ONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION BEFORE I MOVE ON. I DON'T SEE ANYONE. WE'LL CLOSE THAT PORTION OF THE HEARING. WE'LL GO BACK TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. R. RATLIFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS BASED ON MR. BERKMAN'S PRESENTATION.

SURE. YEAH. HE SPOKE ABOUT THE LACK OF MULTIMODAL TRIP GENERATION IN OUR STUDY. THAT IS NOT A PART OF OUR METHODOLOGY. WE DON'T ROUTINELY STUDY FOR THAT, SO YOU KNOW THIS STUDY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES MANUAL. THERE WAS A CONDITION THAT I PUT IN THERE TO ADDRESS THE SIDEWALK GAP ALONG THE PROJECT'S FRONTAGE THAT WILL NEED TO BE FILLED IN EITHER WITH THE SIDEWALK OR BOARDWALK DEPENDING ON HOW THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHAKES OUT. AND WHAT THE COUNTY'S WILLING TO APPROVE BUT THERE WILL NEED TO BE SOME KIND OF A PEDESTRIAN FACILITY THERE ALONG THEIR FRONT EDGE. THE CODE IS VERY CLEAR THOUGH THAT A DEVELOPER'S REQUIREMENT TO INSTALL SIDEWALK IS ONLY ALONG THEIR PROJECT FRONTAGE. THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT THERE AREN'T GAPS, AND THAT YOU KNOW, THOSE GAPS SHOULDN'T BE FILLED IN AT THAT POINT, BUT THE, THE SUBSTANDARD ROAD DOES NOT, YOU KNOW, BASED ON HOW WE INTERPRET THE CODE, SUBSTANDARD ROAD REFEOFFERS TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE ROADWAY, THE ABILITY TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALKS CERTAINLY, BUT NOT THE DEVELOPER'S REQUIREMENT TO DO THEM EXCEPT ALONG THEIR FRONTAGE. SO IN THIS CASE, THE ROAD WAS CONSIDERED SUBSTANDARD, BUT THE COUNTY ENGINEER FOUND IT ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE APPROVABLE, AND SO AGAIN, BUT JUST TO MAKE IT CLEAR, THE LACK OF SIDEWALKS IS NOT SOMETHING IN AND OF ITSELF THAT WOULD MAKE A ROAD SUBSTANDARD BECAUSE THAT'S ADDRESSED ELSEWHERE IN THE CODE. SO THAT'S HOW WE LOOK AT THAT.

THANK YOU, AND JUST TO FURTHER THAT POINT, YOUR QUESTION, OR YOUR RESPONSE TO IT RATHER, IS THEY HAVE THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS CONTROL OVER THEIR PROPERTY BUT NOT OFFSITE IN TERMS OF THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS AND SO FORTH. CORRECT, AND EVEN IF THERE WAS SUFFICIENT RIGHT-OF-WAY TO INSTALL THAT, THE CODE IS CLEAR ABOUT WHERE THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY LIES. SO IF ANYBODY WANTS TO BUILD MORE SIDEWALK, WE'RE ALWAYS HAPPY TO TAKE THAT, BUT IN TERMS OF WHAT WE CAN REQUIRE, YOU KNOW, WE GO BY WHAT THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SAYS WHICH IS BOUNDARY TO BOUNDARY ALONG THE FRONTAGE -- ON THEIR PROPERTY FRONTAGE.

CORRECT AND THEN LAST BUT NOT LEAST, I WOULD SAY I THINK THE SPEAKER HAD, YOU KNOW, DISCUSSED ABOUT THE QUEUE LENGTH. THAT FORMULA THAT'S IN PLACE IS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THAT WAS DEVELOPED. WE DO APPLY THAT TO L SCHOOLS IN THE SAME -- ALL SCHOOLS IN THE SAME MANNER FOR PRIVATE OR CHARTER SCHOOLS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. SO I WASN'T EXACTLY SURE WHAT THE CONCERN WITH THE QUEUE FORMULA WAS, BUT I WOULD POINT OUT THAT'S HOW WE CONSISTENTLY APPLY THAT FORMULA TO ALL SCHOOLS. AND THE QUEUING STUDY THAT'S BEEN SUBMITTED IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT FORMULA? COLLECT. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. MS. RINERIC, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? -- HEINRICH, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS. NEE, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH. THEN WE WILL GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT FOR REBUTTAL.

THANK YOU. BASICALLY MR. RATLIFF ANSWERED ALL OF THE QUESTIONS WE NEEDED ANSWERED THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BUILDING OUR SIDEWALK ON OUR PROPERTY PER THE CODE, AND SO THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING THAT. AGAIN I HAVE MR. STEVE HENRY WITH ME IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS. YOLK SO WITH YOUR TESTIMONY THAT THAT, THAT SIDEWALK ON YOUR PROPERTY WILL BE CONTINUOUS. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT, THAT WAS IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT THEN WITH THAT WE WILL CLOSE MAJOR MODIFICATION 26-0215 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS D.4, PD REZONING 26-0328. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM CN TOEN TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SAM BALL WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HAS REVIEWED THIS AND WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT, IS THE APPLICANT HERE? GOOD EVENING.

> GOOD EVENING, ZONING MASTER FINCH. MY NAME'S ACOY MORGAN, REPRESENTING ROCK SOLID CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IN REGARDS TO PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOWLT SIDE OF R. MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD BETWEEN NORTH 58th STREET AND CARROLL WAY. COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR ADDRESS, PEASE, FOR THE RECORD. THE ADDRESS IN SPECIFIC IS 5600 AND 5602 EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING BOULEVARD. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

SO THIS PROPERTY SITS IN THE DELICIOUS GUMBO OF ELEMENTS WHICH IS COMPRIPRISED OF CHURCH, SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, DUPLEXES, McDONALD'S, CRAB HUT SEA-FOOD SMOKED MULLET, INDUSTRIAL AS WELL AS AN ACTUAL TIRE SHOP. THIS COMMUNITY HAS BEEN ABSENT OF DEVELOPMENT OF NEW FAMILY HOMES FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY. THIS PROPERTY REPRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO DEVELOP ON THESE TWO PARCELS WHICH COMPRISE OF 0.514 ACRES, THREE BEAUTIFUL TOWNHOMES ON EACH SIDE WHICH WOULD TOTAL A TOTAL OF SIX UNITS. WHICH IS DESPERATELY NEEDED IN THIS COMMUNITY THAT HAS BEEN BLIGHTED AND UNDERSERVED FOR QUITE A LONG TIME. OUR GOAL IS TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE FROM A CN USE TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHICH WOULD GIVE US THIS OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE THIS FOR THIS WELL DESERVED COMMUNITY.

ALL RIGHT. DOES NAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION? IT DOES. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE. THANK YOU. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING. SAM BALL WITH HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE 0.514 ACRES FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO TRIPLEX BUILDINGS WHICH WOULD CONSIST OF SIX MULL FAMILY UNITS -- MULTIFAMILY UNITS. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE ADRIGHT-OF-WAY PETITION B26-000 FORECAST 4 ON APRIL 7th WHICH ELIMINATED AN INTERNAL ALLEY WITHIN THE SITE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET WEST OF EAST DR. MARTIN LUTHER DING, JR. BOULEVARD AND THE I-4 INTERSECTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF EAST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD ARE DEVELOPED FOR A UNION HALL AND AUTO SALES, REPAIR AND CUSTOMIZIZATION BUSINESS AND A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OPEN STORAGE. THE PROPERTIES IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY TO THE EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH ARE PRIMARILY DEVELOPED FOR SINGLE-FAMILY USE. HOWEVER, THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH INCLUDE VACANT LAND FOR OPEN STORAGE AND A DUPLEX. OUR USES IN THE AREA INCLUDE WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION CENTER TO THE EAST AND WEST, A 9.4-ACRE CEMETERY, A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION, A HOTEL, AND A QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU FACILITIES. STAFF FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL USES LESS INTENSE THAT THE PERMITTED COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT AND THE MULTIFAMILY USE PROVIDES A TRANSITION BETWEEN COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTH OF DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST. THE PROPOSED -- PROPOSAL DOES NOT EXCEED THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND LANLT DWED CODE. REQUIRED BUFFERING AND SCREEN -- THE APPROVED PD WOULD ALLOW US

TO SIX MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS AT A DENSITY OF 11.67 UNITS PER ACRE. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 30 FEET IS LOWER THAN PERMITTED IN SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT PERMITTING A DENSITY OF 12 UNITS OR LESS. AND THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH THE TWO TO ONE SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS OVER 20 FEET TALL. BASED ON THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA, STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED INFILL USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS COMPATIBLE WITH SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION TO CONFIRM THE HEIGHT. THE CONDITIONS THAT I SEE STATE 35, BUT THE YOUR STAFF REPORT NARRATIVE AND THE SITE PLAN SAY 30. SO I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT. 30. 30 FEET FOR THE HEIGHT. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT. > I BELIEVE THE SITE PLAN HAS 30 FEET ON THE HEIGHT. IT DOES. IT DOES. BUT THE CONDITIONS THAT I'M LOOKLOOKING AT ON PAGE 9 OF 13 E 35. THAT SHOULD BE 30. IT SHOULD BE 30. OKAY. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT. THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LIL HAN WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 12 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, IT IS IN THE WURBZ WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE EAST LAKE RIENT PARK COMMUNITY PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP SIX DWELLING UNITS. THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA IS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BEING HEAVILY PROMINENT. THE REQUEST TO DEVELOP SIX MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOMES ON THIS SIDE WOULD MAINTAIN THE RESIDENTIAL PATTERN THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE. THE SITE IS SURROUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY THE RESIDENTIAL 12 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND ONLY ABUTS RESIDENTIAL USES AND ROADWAYS. THE ROADWAY SEGMENT BETWEEN NORTH 50th STREET AND THE I-4 EXCHANGE LOCATED SOUTH OF EAST MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BOULEVARD IS ESPECIALLY RESIDENTIAL IN NATURE. GIVEN THE SITE'S LOCATION WITHIN THIS ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL AREA, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF SIX TOWNHOME UNITS ALIGNS WITH AND COMPLEMENTS THE SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN. THE EAST LAE ORIENT PARK COMMUNITY PLAN HAS A GOAL THAT FOCUSES ON CREATING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. THE PLAN SUPPORTS AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES THAT ACCOMMODATE A DIVERSE POPULATION AND INCOME LEVELS AND PROMOTE HOME OWNERSHIP. WHILE THE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BEING PROPOSED ON THIS SITE ARE NOT DESIGNATED OFFICIALLY AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THEY STILL BRING OPPORTUNITIES FOR A DIVERSITY OF HOME OPTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE NINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION? NO ONE. ALL RIGHT. MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. SIR, IF Y YOU HAVE THE LAST D IF YOU WOULD LIKE T BUT YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU FOR THAT. I APPRECIATE IT. THEN WE WILL CLOSE REZONING PD 26-0328 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D.5, PD 26-0349 MENTD THE0349. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING REZONE FROM AR25-0371 TO A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. JAREN FOLEN WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENINGX CAM KAMI CORBET WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL WARD AND HENDERSON 101 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD SUITE 3700. THIS PD IS ALTHOUGH IT'S A NEW PD BECAUSE WE'RE ADDING PROPERTY IT IS ACTUALLY A PD YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE IT'S KNOWN AS THE COUNCIL GROWERS PD OR THAT'S WHAT IT WAS CALLED PREVIOUSLY SO WE CEP THAT NAME. ESSENTIALLY -- KEPT THAT NAME. ESSENTIALLY IT'S LOCATED IN WIMAUMA. IT WAS FORMERLY WVR-2 AND REZONED UNDER THAT LAND USE CATEGORY SUBSEXNTLY -- SUBSEQUENT CHANGED TO RESIDENTIAL 4 AND NOW REZONED BASED ON THE RESIDENTIAL 4. AGAIN THIS WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER 2025. WE AMENDED IN NOVEMBER AND WE'RE AMENDING NOW TO ADD PROPERTY WHICH YOU CAN SEEOON THIS SLIDE. WE ARE ADDING TWO PARCELS THAT WERE IN WHAT WAS KIND OF A NOTCH THAT WAS THERE BEFORE THAT WAS OUT, ALWAYS OUTSIDE OF THE WVR-2 AND SO IT DIDN'T GET INCLUDED IN ANY OF OUR APPLICATIONS AND BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER WVR-2 IT DIDN'T GET ININCLUDED IN THE COUNTY'S APPLICATIONS SO WE HAD TO FILE FOR CA COMPREHENSIVE PLN AMENDMENT TO CHANGES THOSE PARCELS TO RES-4 AND THEN ACTUALLY THE COUNTY HAS UNDERTAKEN A PUBLICLY INITIATED AMENDMENT TO GET THE OTHER PARCELS INTO THE URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY AND MAKE THEM RES-4 BUT WE ARE NOT INCREASING THE ENTITLEMENTS OR CHANGING THE DENSITY AS A RESULT. AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THIS IS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. IT'S KIND OF WHAT I JUST WENT OVER. THIS IS THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WE STILL HAVE THE MULTIUSE TRAIL, WE STILL HAVE THE 10-FOOT SIDEWALK, WE STILL HAVE THE 14-ACRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. STILL DOING THE ROUNDABOUTS. AND STILL DOING THE REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS. THIS IS AN EXHIBIT THAT WE SHOW BASED ON THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT, AND WE ARE REVISING SOME OF THE CONDITIONS AND ESSENTIALLY THEY'RE ALL JUST CLARIFICATION CONDITIONS. THEY DON'T MATERIALLY CHANGE WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AND STEVE HENRY IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING ANY OF THOSE CHANGES AND CONDITIONS RELATEDDED TO TRANSPORTATION.

WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS FROM ANY REVIEWING AGENCIES AND EVERYONE HAS FOUND US CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLEPATIBLE AND I'M HERE O ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY. NO QUESTIONS. APPRECIATE IT. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING.

72 GOOD EVENING, GERRED FALLEN WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 648.8 ACRES FROM . THE CONDITIONS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN PRS25-1373 WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THIS NEW PD BUT WITH AMENDMENTS TO TRANSPORTATION'S CONDITIONS. THE ADDED AREA INCLUDES TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS ADJACENT TO THE SOUTH AND A LONG NARROW STRIP LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE. THE ADDITION OF LAND TO THE PD ALLOWS A NORTHERN AND SOWRP DEVELOPMENT AREAS TO BE JOINED TOGETHER AS A RESULT THE CONFIGURATION OF INTERNAL ROADWAYS OF THE SITE HAVE BEEN MODIFIED. THESE CHANGES INCLUDE A NEW NORTH-SOUTH COLLECTOR ROAD, WHICH DIRECTLY CONNECTS SAF-FOLD ROAD TO THE BARRY ROAD EXTENSION AND A ROUNDABOUT HAS BEEN ADDED AT THIS INTERSECTION POINT. OTHER CHANGES INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL ACCESS CONNECTION ALONG THE WESTERN PD BOUNDARY. ADDITIONALLY NEW AND REVISED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS REQUESTS HAVE BEEN COMTED. AND LASTLY, GIVEN THE PROPOSED COMBINATION OF A NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT AREAS, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO MODIFY CERTAIN PHASING REQUIREMENTS, WHICH GOVERN WHEN CERTAIN IMPIEWSSMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED -- IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED. MORE INFORMATION ON THESE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND IN TRANSPORTATION STAFF REPORT. STAFF DOES NOT HAVE ANY COMPATIBILITY CONCERNS WITH THE PROPOSAL AND FINDS THE PROPOSALB APPROVABLE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILLY LINEHAN, PLAN COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL 4 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE SOUTHSHORE AREA-WIDE SYSTEMS PLAN AND WIMAUMA VILLAGE COMMUNITY PLAN. THE REQUEST IS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL 13.1 ACRES TO AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WITH NO CHANGES TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OPTIONS AND NO INCREASE IN DENSITY OR INTENSITY. THE CURRENT AREA IS LARGELY RESIDENTIAL WITH NATURAL AND AGRICULTURAL USES TO THE EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH OF THE SITE. THE RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ALL SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING WITHIN A PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL AREA. THE ADDITION OF HOMES WITHIN THE AREA AND THE PLACEMENT OF THE TOWNHOME STYLE HOMES NORTH AWAY FROM THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND EXISTING AGRICULTURAL USES PROVIDES A GRADUAL TRANSITION OF DENSITY AND INTENSITY WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA. ADDITIONALLY THE PROPOSED ROAD PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CONNECTIVITY IN THE AREA WHILE ALSO PRESERVING THE EXISTING WETLANDS AND NATURAL SURFACE WATERS LOCATED ON THE SITE. THE PROPOSED REZONING INCREASES THE TYPE OF HOUSING ALLOWED ON THE SUBJECT SITE AS WELL AS ALLOWS FOR HOUSING ON A SMALLER LOT SIZE, WHICH CAN BE MORE AFFORDABLE FOR THE RESIDENTS IN THE WIMAUMA VILLAGE AREA AND CLUSTERS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LAND SUIT NL FORRABLE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT IMPACTING THE EXISTING NATURAL AND AGRICULTURAL USES IN THE AREA. THIPROPOSED AMENDMENT -- OR THIS PROPOSED REZONING MEETS THE INTENT OF THE SOUTHSHORE AREA-WIDE SYSTEMS PLAN GOAL 1 -- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION? NO ONE. MS. HI HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. MS. CORBETT, LAST WORD. ALL RIGHT. THEN WITH THAT, WE'LL CLOSE REZONING PD 26-0349 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE. > OUR NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D.6, PD 26-0431. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM PD 20-0102 AND RDC-12 TO A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. JARED FOLLIN WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS AFTER THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION.

GOOD EVENING TREMHAM LAW REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT TONIGHT. TONIGHT WE ARE REQUESTING A SMALL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF 16 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND 3500 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. THE PROPERTY IS A 2.25 VACANT PARCEL IN SOUTH OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, WEST OF LEMON AVENUE. COMBINED PD AND RDC-12 AND IN THE RES-9 FUTURE LAND USE. WE HAVE A CONCURRENT PRS BEFORE THE BOARD AND I'LL EXPLAIN ABOUT THAT. SO JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BACKGROUND, INITIALLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH WERE OWNED BY THE SAME OWNER. THE OWNER SOLD THE PARCELS TO THE NORTH FOR RETAIL DEVELOPMENT IN 2018, 2021 FOR A WAWA AND ALDEN STORE AND THE SERIOUSLY RESTAINED THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FOR SOME REASON, I DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY, THE SELLER ALLOWED THE ALDI TO USE HALF AN ACRE FOR ACCESS. AND THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY WAS CLUDINCLUDED IN THE 2020 ZONINGT WAS DONE FOR THE GROCERY STORE. THE ACCESS RIGHTS WHICH WERE MEMORIALIZED IN PRIVATE CROSS-ACCESS AGREEMENTS WERE ALSO PUT INTO THE PD. THE ALDI DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED THE ROADWAY BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES AS PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT. THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY PUT ANY SIDEWALKS TO THE WEST SIDE WHICH IS SOMETHING WE'RE DOING NOW. BUT WHEN THE SELLER SOLD THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO MY CLIENT, WE REALIZED KIND OF THE DIFFICULTY CREATED BY THE SITUATION. ALTHOUGH WE WERE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE ACCESS, SO THAT EVERYONE COULD USE IT, WE COULDN'T COUNT THE ACREAGE WHICH IS BASICALLY THE AREA IN YELLOW TOWARDS THE DENSITY AND F.A.R. NEEDED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT SINCE IT WAS IN ANOTHER PD AND YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DOUBLE DIP.

SO FORTUNATELY, THE ACREAGE OF THE YELLOW AREA DID NOT AFFECT THE ALDI DEVELOPMENT. THEY DIDN'T NEED THAT FOR THEIR F.A.R. SO THEY WERE AGREEABLE TO US MOVING IT OUT OF THE PD. SO WE HAVE SIMULTANEOUS PRS RUNNING TO MOVE THE PROPERTY FROM THAT PD TO THIS PD. AND THIS PD NOW PROVIDES CONDITIONS TO ENSURE THAT ACCESS CONTINUES. BUT IT ALLOWS THE TWO PROPERTIES TO CONTINUE TO DEVELOP ON THEIR OWN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE WHILE SHARING THE BENEFIT OF THE ACCESS AND THE BUFFERING. SO THIS REZONING WILL THEN COVER THAT WHOLE AREA, THE PART THAT WAS THE RDC-12 AND THE PART IN YELLOW WHICH WAS CURRENTLY AND WILL HOPEFULLY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE PD TO THE NORTH. AGAIN, THERE ARE MULTIPLE ACCESS EASEMENTS AND OTHER EASEMENTS BETWEEN THE PROPERTY. AND THIS PD WILL ADD A SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY TO THE WEST. AND THE SIDEWALK ITSELF IS KIND OF A TRICKY ISSUE DUE TO THE SITE CONDITIONS. SO WE ARE REQUESTING A VARIATION TO ALLOW A 5-FOOT SIDEWALK WITHIN THAT 20-FOOT NORTHERN BUFFER THAT WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THE OTHER PD AND WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS ONE. AGAIN, THERE IS NO EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY TO THE WEST. BUT BECAUSE OF THE TERRAIN THERE, THERE IS NO REAL OTHER OPTION FOR THE SIDEWALK. IF YOU LOOK AT THAT AERIAL, YOU CAN SEE THE ROAD. AND BASICALLY ON ALL SIDES OF IT ARE DEEP DEPRESSIONS, STEEP SLOPES FOR STORMWATER PONDS. AND BECAUSE THE ROAD WAS BUILT WHERE IT WAS AND THERE'S REALLY NO EXTRA ROOM OTHER THAN IN THAT LANDSCAPE BUFFER, THAT'S WHERE WE NEED TO PUT IT. FORTUNATELY, NO NEGATIVE IMPACTS. WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE REQUIRED

LANDSCAPING IN IT ANYWAY. AND THE COUNTY HAS ASKED FOR A MINIMUM 10-FOOT AREA TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM TO PUT THAT LANDSCAPING IN. AND THAT'S A CONDITION OF THE APPROVAL, WHICH WE'RE AGREEABLE TO. COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA, IT REALLY IS LIKE A SMALL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT MEETS THE INFILL INTENT OF THE COMP PLAN. IT'S TUCKED IN BETWEEN A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE SOUTH AND THE OFFICE AND RETAIL TO THE NORTH. PLANNING COMMISSION AGREES THAT IT IS COMPATIBLE AND, IN FACT, IS ONE OF THE BEST PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTS I THINK I'VE EVER GOTTEN SO I'M VERY HAPPY WITH IT. BUT SO TOED OR THE NORTH IS THE ALDI AND THE WAWA AND WE HAVE THAT CROSS-ACCESS. THE NORTHWEST IS AN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ZONED BPO TO THE SOUTH IS THE APARTMENTS. AND REALLY, THIS WILL PROVIDE LIKE A STEP-DOWN IN INTENSITY BETWEEN THE APARTMENTS AND THE COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH BECAUSE WE PUT THE RESIDENTIAL CLOSER TO THE APARTMENTS AND THE OFFICES CLOSER TO THE COMMERCIAL. LEMON AVENUE DEAD ENDS AT OUR PROPERTY SO TRAFFIC FROM OUR DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT CONTINUE FURTHER TOWARDS THOSE APARTMENTS OR THE SINGLE-FAMILY THAT YOU CAN SEE IN THE SOUTHEAST SIDE. THERE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY PARCEL TO THE EAST, BUT WE WILL BE PROVIDING BUFFERING TO CODE. NO ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS OR WETLANDS. AND WE THINK THIS REALLY PROVIDES A GOOD RESIDENTIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE USE THAT WILL BENEFIT EVERYBODY IN THE AREA. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN. AS I SAID, THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGREES IT MEETS

COMMERCIAL LOCATIONAL CRITERIA. IT MEETS THE SEFFNER-MNN POLICIS AND IS ENSURING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY WITH THE SIDEWALKS. LASTLY, TRANSPORTATION REALLY SHOULDN'T BE A LARGE TRIP INCREASE WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE THE ACCESS VI N ADMINISE VARIANCE GIVEN THAT THE EXISTING ROAD THAT WE ARE NOT CHANGING IS TOO CLOSE TO THE SMALL RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE STREET ON LEMON. BUT COUNTY HAS FOUND IT ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE. SO WITH THAT, WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU. I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. IN MY REVIEWING THIS IN ANTICIPATION OF THE HEARING, WHAT WOULD SEEM LIKE A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST IS VERY COMPLICATED BY THIS ACCESS, THIS SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT AND SO FORTH. SO I APPRECIATE THE BACKGROUND OF GOING THROUGH THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. AND SO LET ME JUST CONFIRM. LET ME GO THROUGH THE STEPS. LET ME CONFIRM THE VARIATION. THE VARIATION IS TO PUT A SIDEWALK IN A BUFFER. THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE ASKING? THAT'S CORRECT.

HEARING MASTER: AND I THINK WHAT TOOK ME A WHILE TO FIGURE OUT WAS THAT THE BUFFER ISN'T LABELED ON YOUR SITE PLAN THAT I COULD TELL. AND SO IT TOOK ME A MINUTE TO FIND THE SHARED ACCESS FACILITY OBVIOUSLY THAT'S THERE. AND THEN THESE EASEMENTS ARE LABELED BY NUMBERS. IT LOOKS LIKE 303 AND 301 AND THAT THE SIDEWALK WILL ACTUALLY GO THROUGH 303.

SO THAT'S A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. IT'S ALL WITHIN THE SAME DOCUMENT. IT'S ALL WITHIN THE SAME EASEMENT THAT'S BEEN RECORDED. AND THERE IS A LEGEND ON THE SITE PLAN. BUT THAT NUMBER IS A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT THAT WAS REQUIRED BECAUSE, AS PART OF THE 2020 ZONING, THEY WERE REQUIRED TO PUT IN THE LANDSCAPING. AND SO, THEREFORE, THERE NEEDED TO BE AN EASEMENT TO ENSURE THAT THE OWNER OF OUR PROPERTY WOULD MAINTAIN THE EXISTENCE OF THAT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADJUST ON THE PRIVATE SIDE ONCE THIS GETS APPROVED. HEARING MASTER: OKAY. THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR.

HEARING MASTER: BUT THE GENESIS OF THAT IS THE PD FROM THE NORTH. UH-HUH. HEARING MASTER: THAT'S HOW THIS ALL STARTED. YEAH. HEARING MASTER: I DO SEE NOTE 23 ON YOUR PLAN THAT TALKS ABOUT THE 5-FOOT SIDEWALK AND SO FORTH. I BELIEVE WITH THAT, THAT'S THE END OF MY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

GOOD EVENING AGAIN, JARED FOLLIN WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE A SITE FROM RDC-12 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW 16 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS AT NINE DWELLING UNITS PER UNIT AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES EQUATING TO FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .14. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN AN AREA BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES AND IS ADJACENT TO A GROCERY STORE AN CONVENIENCE STORE TO THE NORTH AND A MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT TO THE SOUTH. A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ALSO EXISTS TO THE WEST ACROSS LEMON AVENUE. I'M SORRY, THAT'S SOUTHEAST. THE SITE PLAN DEPICTS THE MULTI-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE PROPERTY AND THE OFFICE USES TO THE NORTH PORTION. THE MAX HEIGHT OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE 30 FEET AND IT HAS BEEN REQUESTED THAT A TWO-TO-ONE SETBACK REQUIREMENT NOT BE APPLIED. STAFF FINDS NO ISSUE WITH THIS REQUEST AS THE MULTI-FAMILY TO THE SOUTH IS A HIGHER DENSITY AND ALLOWED A HEIGHT OF 35 FEET BUT ALSO IS NOT REQUIRED TO ABIDE BY THE TWO-TO-ONE SETBACK. REQUIRED BUFFERING AND SCREENING IS REQUIRED ON THE SITE. THIS INCLUDES A 20-FOOT TYPE "E" BUFFER WHICH WILL RUN ALONG THE SHARED ACCESS DRIVE WHICH RUNS ALONG THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED A VARIATION TO ALLOW 5-FOOT SIDEWALK TO BE BUILT PARALLEL WITH THIS BUFFER AREA. STAFF SUPPORTS THIS VARIATION AS IT WILL ALLOW SIDEWALKS TO BE BUILT ALONG THE SHARED ACCESS DRIVE, ADDITIONALLY A CONDITION THAT'S INCLUDED TO REQUIRE AT LEAST 10 FEET OF THE BUFFER AREA TO BE UNINTERRUPTED FOR REQUIRED PLANTINGS. OVERALL WE FIND THIS PROPOSAL TO BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE AND FIND IT APPROVABLE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

HEARING MASTER: NONE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LINEHAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS IN THE RESIDENTIAL 9 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE SEFFNER-MANGO COMMUNITY PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW 16 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND APPROXIMATELY 3,500 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA WHERE PURSUANT TO OBJECTIVE 1.1 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE SECTION A MINIMUM OF 80% OF THE COUNTY'S POPULATION GROWTH IS INTENDED TO BE DIRECTED. THE PURPOSE OF CONCENTRATING GROWTH WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA IS FROM AN EFFICIENT PROVISION OF SERVICES AND ENCOURAGE COMPACT DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS AND DISCOURAGE URBAN UN SPRAWL. THIS REPRESENTS EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES. THE SURROUNDING AREA EXHIBITS A MIX OF USES INCLUDING COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THIS MIX OF USES ESTABLISHES A DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT SUPPORTS LIMITED MIXED USE AND TRANSITIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS THAT PROPOSED. AND THE SEFFNER-MANGO COMMUNITY PLAN PROMOTES REDEVELOPMENT AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER WITH A HOMETOWN ATMOSPHERE. IT DIRECTS COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO MAJOR CORRIDORS SUCH AS U.S. 92 AND MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD. THE SUBJECT IS LOCATED ALONG DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD WITHIN THE TARGETED CORRIDOR BETWEEN INTERSTATE 75 AND COUNTY ROAD 579 ALSO KNOWN AS MANGO ROAD. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNUNINCORPORATED COMPREHENSIVE TO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? NO ONE. ANYONE IN OPPOSITION? MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING?

NO, MA'AM. HEARING MASTER: MS. POLLOCK, THE LAST WORD. WITH THAT WE WILL CLOSE. WE HAVE SEVERAL CASES TO GO, I'M GOING TO TAKE A BREAK A LITTLE EARLY TO SPLIT THIS UP. IF YOU CAN, BY THE CLOCK ON THE WALL JUST TAKE FIVE MINUTES. IF YOU COULD BE BACK AT 7:50 WE'LL SAY JUST TO MAKE A ROUND NUMBER. WE'LL ADJOURN FOR FIVE MINUTES.

THANK YOU.

[RECESS]

HEARING MASTER: WELCOME BACK, EVERYONE. WE ARE READY TO RESUME THE APRIG HEARING MASTER HEARING. SO WE LEFT OFF WITH AGENDA ITEM D-7, SO MS. HEINRICH, IF YOU COULD CALL THE NEXT CASE. SURE, NEXT APPLICATION IS ITEM D-7, MAJOR MOD 26-0432. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PD 21-0701. JAMES BAKER WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HAS REVIEWED THIS AND WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS.

HEARING MASTER: ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. BEFORE YOU START, I NEGLECTED TO SAY, IT APPEARS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAVE WALKED INTO THE ROOM. IS TO LET ME -- IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN SWORN IN AND YOU PLAN TO SPEAK TONIGHT, IF YOU COULD PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. AND LET ME SWEAR YOU IN, EITHER FOR THIS CASE OR THE REST OF THE AGENDA. DO YOU SOLEMNLY SWEAR THE AGENDA YOU ARE ABOUT TO PROVIDE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APOLOGIZE. PLEASE CONTINUE.

GOOD EVENING, JUSTINA GAYLE WITH FORWARD PLANNING AND DESIGN AND MY ADDRESS IS DUNEDIN, FLORIDA. THE PROJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 2.53 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WALKER ROAD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 301. THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IS RESIDENTIAL 4. AND IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE MOST RECENTLY MODIFIED MODIFICATION DONE IN 2023. THE CURRENT APPROVAL IS PD AND THE MODIFICATION ALLOWED FOR TWO OPTIONS. OPTION ONE WAS 8,500 SQUARE FEET FOR A HEALTH PRACTITIONER'S OFFICE AND OPTION TWO WAS 12,200 SQUARE FEET FOR HEALTH PRACTITIONER OFFICE AND 6,300 SQUARE FEET FOR A DAY CARE. THE PROPOSED REQUEST IS TO MODIFY THE EXISTING PD. THE PROPOSED USE IS TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 17,650 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES WHICH WILL INCLUDE UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE CLINIC. AND THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION INCLUDE TO REDUCE THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE TO 17,650 SQUARE FEET, TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED USES TO ALLOW FOR RESTRICTED BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND MEDICAL OFFICE CLINIC USES. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS PROPOSED AT 20 FEET WITH THE ENTRY FEATURE TO HAVE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 26 FEET. THE ADJACENT USES CONSIST OF A CEMETERY, MOBILE HOME PARK,

COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. TO THE NORTHEAST IS COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE IS AR LOCATED TO THE EAST AND WEST. AND TO THE NORTH IS BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. IN CONCLUSION, THE PROPOSED PD IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN OF THE AREA. AND THE RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS. THANK YOU. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU SO MUCH. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING. JAMES BAKER, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THIS CASE IS MAJOR MODIFICATION 26-432. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MAJOR MODIFICATION 23-0269 THAT ACCOMMODATED TWO ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS. THE CURRENT PROJECT PROPOSAL IS TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING UP TO 17,650 SQUARE FEET BUILDING OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES INCLUDING UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE CLINIC USE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WALKER ROAD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 301 INTERSECTION. EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE AREA INCLUDE A CEMETERY TO THE IMMEDIATE SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND A MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE SITE. ADDITIONAL USES NEARBY INCLUDE COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CN ABUTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTHEAST ACROSS WALKER ROAD, AGRICULTURAL RURAL AR IS LOCATED EAST AND WEST. NORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 31 IS BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ALSO KNOWN AS BPO. PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONS REGARDING COMPATIBILITY, HOURS OF OPERATION, ENHANCED SCREENING AND DRIVE-THRUS WILL REMAIN. ALSO, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED TO RESTRICT CERTAIN USES PERMITTED IN THE BPO DISTRICT. BASED ON THE ADJACENT ZONINGS AND USES IDENTIFIED BELOW IN THE REPORT, STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PD ZONING DISTRICT COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA. BASED UPON THE CONSIDERATIONS, STAFF FINDS THE CONDITIONS APPROVABLE AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU, SIR. I APPRECIATE IT. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILYANN LINEHAN WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 4 FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. IT IS IN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE THONOTOSASSA COMMUNITY PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO MODIFY THE PROPOSED USES TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF UP TO 17,650 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES INCLUDING UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE OR CLINIC WITH RESTRICTIONS. THE SURROUNDING LAND USES EXHIBIT A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. TO THE EAST ARE VACANT LANDS, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES WITH TWO-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED TO THE SOUTHEAST. ADDITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES ARE LOCATED TO THE SOUTH AND WEST OF THE SITE. MOBILE HOME PARKS ARE PRESENT TO THE WEST, NORTH AND FURTHER EAST ACROSS WILLIAMS ROAD. THIS MIX OF LAND USE DEMONSTRATES VARIED AND COMPLEMENTARY LAND USE IN THE AREA. THE SUBJECT SITE SATISFIES THE LOCATIONAL CRITERIA SET FORTH IN F.L.U. OBJECTIVE. IT IS CLASSIFIED AS A STATE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL AND DESIGNATED AS SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL ROADWAY ON THE CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION MAP. MORE THAN 50% OF THE SITE'S FRONTAGE LIES ALONG THIS ROADWAY. OBJECTIVE 4.4 REQUIRE NEW DEVELOPMENT TO THE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND REDEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT LAND USES. THE PROJECT INCLUDES A TYPE "B" BUFFER AND 8-FOOT BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN BOUNDARIES. IN ADDITION, THE PLAN PROVIDES FOR BUILDING SETBACKS OF 30 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN SIDES AND 20 FEET ALONG THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN SIDE. THE SUBJECT SITE LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE THONOTOSASSA COMMUNITY PLAN, HOWEVER, THE PLAN DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SPECIFIC GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPOSED REQUEST. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING

COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED MAJOR MODIFICATION CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION? ANYONE IN FAVOR? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? NO ONE. ALL RIGHT. MS. HEINRICH, ANYTHING ELSE? NO, MA'AM. HEARING MASTER: GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT, YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD IF YOU'D LIKE IT. OKAY, THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'LL CLOSE MAJOR MODIFICATION 26-0432 AND GO TO THE NEXT CASE.

OUR NEXT IS D8, PD 26-0431, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REZONING FROM A.I., M., TO A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. SAM BALL WAS REVIEWED FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND WILL PROVIDE STAFF FINDINGS. ALSO TO NOTE THIS IS A COMPANION, TRAVELING WITH A COMPANION CPA. WE WERE NOTIFIED TODAY THAT THAT CPA DATE MAY BE CHANGED. SO WE JUST WANTED TO LET ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE KNOW ABOUT THAT AND, OF COURSE, THE CLERK WILL SEND OUT REQUIRED NOTICES TO THAT HEARING FOR ALL PARTIES OF RECORD. SO THEY WILL BE AWARE OF IT. HEARING MASTER: ARE YOU AWARE OF THAT REVISED DATE? I HAVE NOT BEEN TOLD YET, NO.

HEARING MASTER: BUT THAT DOESN'T AFFECT THE DATE OF MY RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS ZONING MATTER? NO, MA'AM. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE I. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, HEARING MASTER FINCH. VANNETTE WITH STEARNS WEAVER MILLER, 401 EAST JACKSON STREET FOR THE APPLICANT, MOSAIC COMPANY. A COUPLE OF HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. WE TRIED TO FILE DOCUMENTS FRIDAY AND MISSED THE DEADLINE THURSDAY. WE HAVE A NARRATIVE TO REFLECT THE ACREAGE ALIGNS WITH WHAT STAFF HAS IN THE STAFF REPORT. THEN I ALSO WILL PUT THE RESUMES IN FOR EXPERTS WE'LL BE HEARING FROM TONIGHT. WE HAVE THREE EXPERTS. WE THINK WE HAVE ABOUT 20 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION. IT IS FOR SIGNIFICANT AREA AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE CONTEXT.

HEARING MASTER: I'LL ALLOW ADDITIONAL TIME. IF YOU CAN KEEP IT TO 15, THAT WOULD BE BONUS POINTS. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. OKAY. I'LL GO AHEAD AND START. SO THE REQUEST IS FOR A REZONING OF 1412 ACRES TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE ALREADY A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE ADDING A TOTAL OF I THINK 129.7 ACRES TO THE BOUNDARY OF THE EXISTING PD. BECAUSE OF THE SCOPE OF THAT. THIS REQUIRES US TO DO A NEW PD APPLICATION. APPROXIMATELY 50 ACRES OF THAT 129.7 ACRES ARE BIRD AND SUNKEN ISLANDS THAT YOU WILL SEE HERE IN THE BAY TO THE WEST OF THERE OF THE PROJECT SITE. THE EAST STACK EXTENSION SITE AND EAST ARE EAST OF U.S. 41 ON THE FIGURE IN FRONT OF YOU. AS MENTIONED BY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, THERE ARE SEVERAL APPLICATIONS TRAVELING WITH THIS REZONING REQUEST AND YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR SOME FROM OUR EXPERTS ON THESE SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE I JUST POINT THIS OUT. IT'S IN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' APPLICATION. IT'S IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. BUT WE HAVE AMENDMENTS TO TWO DRIs TRAVELING WITH THIS, 242 APPLIES TO THAT EAST STACK EXTENSION AND THE PROPERTY EAST OF 41. IT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE FIRST PD CONDITION IS FOR STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THAT DRI. SO YOU'LL HAVE SOME DISCUSSION FROM ONE OF OUR EXPERTS ON THAT POINT. ALSO, A COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BIRD AND SUNKEN ISLANDS TO GO TO NATURAL PRESERVATION IS TRAVELING WITH THIS. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JUST REFERENCED THERE WILL BE A DATE IDENTIFIED FOR THAT HEARING. WE ALSO HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATIONS BEING PROPOSED FOR JENSEN AND BROOKS ROAD THAT ARE BEING INCORPORATED INTO THE PD. NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED TO SITE ACCESS. NO CHANGES TO TRAFFIC. BUT AS PROPERTY IS BEING INCORPORATED IN THE PD, WE ARE TAKING CARE OF THOSE VACATION ISSUES.

YOU'RE GOING TO BE HEARING FROM THREE EXPERTS TONIGHT. SHELLEY THORNTON DIRECTOR OF LAND USE. TINA WHO IS MOSAIC SENIOR DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL. AND FINALLY FROM TINA EKBLAD WHO IS OUR PLANNING EXPERT. AND WITH THAT, I WILL ALLOW SHELLEY TO COME ON UP. WE HAVE SEVERAL OTHERS TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU SO MUCH. DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, HEARING MASTER FINCH. MY NAME IS SHELLEY THORNTON, THE DIRECTOR OF LAND USE PERMITTING FOR MOSAIC. AND MY BUSINESS ADDRESS IS 13830 CIRCA CROSSING DRIVE, LITHIA FLORIDA, 33547. SO MOSAIC IS A FORTUNE 500 COMPANY HEADQUARTERED IN TAMPA. 2025 PHOSPHATES WITH A CRITICAL MINERAL. IT IDENTIFIES MINERALS ESSENTIAL FOR ECONOMIC SECURITY, SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCY AND PHOSPHATE WAS SPECIFICALLY LISTED DUE TO THE IMPORTANCE FOR FOOD SECURITY AND MOSAIC IS THE UNITED STATES LARGEST SUPPLIER OF PHOSPHATE CROP NUTRIENTS SUPPLYING APPROXIMATELY 48% OF THE COUNTRY'S ANNUAL REQUIREMENTS. PHOSPHATE CROB NUTRIENTS ARE CROQUET TO ACHIEVE THE CROP YIELDS TO MEET NATIONAL AND GLOBAL DEMANDS. RIVERVIEW PRODUCES APPROXIMATELY 18% OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER IN THE NORTH AMERICAN MARKET. OUR RIVERVIEW FACILITY HAS APPROXIMATELY 350 AND 3,000 IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. THE RIVERVIEW FACILITY OPENED IN 1924 AND SHOWN HERE ON THE MAP -- THANK YOU. THE RIVERVIEW PLAN IS SHOWN IN BLUE. OUR CLOSED STACK IS TO THE NORTH OF THAT IN THE GRAY AND NO LONGER ACCEPTS GYPSUM. AND WE HAVE THE EAST STACK ON HIGHWAY 41. WE USE PIPELINES UNDER 41 TO TRANSPORT MATERIALS FROM THE PLANTS AND THE EAST STACK AND WE ARE NOT REQUESTING ANY CHANGES TO THAT EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. WE ARE REQUESTING A PD REZONING TO LATERALLY EXTEND THE EAST STACK TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STORAGE OF GYPSUM FOR APPROXIMATELY 16 YEARS TO CONTINUE OUR PLANT OPERATIONS THERE. WE ARE REQUESTING TO ADD APPROXIMATELY 127 ACRES TO THE PD BOUNDARY FOR A TOTAL PD

ACREAGE OF JUST OVER 1400 ACRES. THE ESE, EAST STACK EXTENSION INCLUDES 178.5 OF NEW LAND DISTURBANCE ON TO THE EXISTING EAST STACK. WITH THAT, WE WILL BE INCORPORATING APPROXIMATELY 160 ACRES OF THE EXISTING STACK INTO THAT PROJECT AREA. AND BY INCORPORATING THAT EXISTING STACK, IT ALLOWS US TO GET THE 16 ADDITIONAL YEARS OF STORAGE WITHOUT -- IF WE DID THE STAND-ALONE STACK, IT WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 350 ACRES. SO THE AREA CURRENTLY IS HIGHLY DEVELOPED AND THE LAND IS LARGELY CONVERTED TO INDUSTRIAL, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AS WELL AS THE RACING FACILITIES AND AUTO SALVAGE YARDS. THE ESE WILL IMPACT APPROXIMATELY 29.5 LOW-QUALITY WETLANDS AND TREATMENTS AND THE IMPACTS WILL BE COMPENSATED THROUGH THE PURCHASE OF MITIGATION BANK CREDITS WHICH IS A COMMONLY ACCEPTED FORM OF COMPENSATORY. WE DID AN EXTENSIVE REVIEW OF SEVERAL OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. WE FOUND SEVEN POSSIBLE LOCATIONS AND THE ANALYSIS INCLUDED COMPARISON OF WETLANDS, STREAMS, LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE. AND NONE OF THOSE WERE ABLE TO MEET OUR STORAGE REQUIREMENTS OF 16 YEARS. THE AREA SURROUNDING THE EAST STACK ON THE EAST AND SOUTH SIDE ARE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS. AND BECAUSE OF THAT AND OTHER LOGISTICAL CONCERNS, WE ARE NOT ABLE TO MOVE THE EAST STACK LATERAL EXTENSION TO THOSE AREAS. SO THESE IMAGES HERE REPRESENT EXAMPLES OF THE TYPICAL AQUATIC SYSTEMS THAT ARE GOING TO BE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. WHAT YOU'LL NOTICE IS THESE SYSTEMS DO NOT RESEMBLE NATURAL FUNCTIONING STREAMS OR WETLANDS. THE HYDROLOGY HAS BEEN ALTERED. VEGETATION IS LIMITED. AND THE CONNECTIVITY TO THE

SURROUNDING HABITAT IS POOR. WHILE THESE FEATURES MEET REGULATORY DEFINITIONS, THERE IS VERY LITTLE RESILIENCY OR FUNCTIONAL VALUE WRAIJ IN THESE AREAS. NORTH ARCHIE CREEK IS SHOWN HERE AND IT IS DITCHED AND HAS BEEN DITCHED SINCE THE MID 1900s. IT WAS ORIGINALLY REROUTED IN 1984 AND THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO MAKE GREATER IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT SYSTEM BASED ON THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY. AND IT WILL BE PROTECTED IN PERPETUITY WITH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. HABITAT QUALITY IS LOW DUE TO THE UNSTABLE BANKS AND CHANNEL. THERE'S A LACK OF A FLOODPLAIN AND LOTS OF INVASIVE SPECIES. THE CREEK HAS AN EXISTING HABITAT ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 70 OUT OF 160 WHICH MEANS IT'S FUNCTIONING AT AN APPROXIMATE 48% LEVEL. THE ENGINEERED REDESIGN WHICH IS SHOWN HERE WILL ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE CONVEYANCE WITH THE ADDITION OF FRESH WATER WETLANDS ON EACH SIDE OF THE BANK FOLD CHANNEL THAT WILL HELP PROVIDE HABITAT AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL WATER QUALITY IN THE STREAM ITSELF. THE GOAL HERE ISN'T JUST REPLACEMENT, BUT ALSO IMPROVEMENT. THIS RESOURCE STREAM IS EXPECTED TO PROVIDE GREATER HABITAT VALUE, BETTER HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION AND LONG-TERM FUNCTION THAN THE FEATURES BEING IMPACTED. SO WE ARE ALSO PROPOSING TO UTILIZE THE FLEX PROVISION OF THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY FOR APPROXIMATELY 19.3 ACRES. AND THEREFORE, MENDING THE STACK BUFFER RESTRICTIONS. THOSE TWO AREAS ARE OUTLINED IN BLACK ALONG THAT LINE THERE. WE ARE PROPOSING TO REPLACE THIS 19.3 ACRES WITHIN THE DOR WITH APPROXIMATELY 347 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY MOSAIC SOUTH OF THE ALAFIA RIVER WITH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. AND ALL OF THIS IS REFLECTED IN PD CONDITION 19. THIS EXHIBIT SHOWS THE LOCATION

OF THAT CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SO SOUTH OF OUR PLANT SITE, SOUTH OF THE ALAFIA RIVER BUT IT DOES BORDER THE BAY AND IT'S TO THE EAST OF SUNKEN AND BIRD ISLANDS. THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT WILL PERMANENTLY PROTECT APPROXIMATELY 347 ACRES. IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO PAY OUR CONSERVATION EASEMENTS WITH MITIGATION AREAS. SINCE THE RESOURCES BEING IMPACTED AS PART OF THIS REQUEST ARE ALREADY DEGRADED AND LIMITED IN ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION, THE MITIGATION STRATEGY IS INTENTIONALLY ROBUST AND MULTI-LAYERED. WE VIEWED IT AS A WHOLE AND THIS APPROACH SIMPLY DOESN'T REPLACE THE IMPACTS OF THE WETLANDS THAT WERE IMPACTED. IT RESULTS IN A STRONGER, MORE RESILIENT ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM PERMANENTLY PROTECTED. THANK YOU.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU. PLEASE SIGN IN. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM HEARING MAVERICKS. MY NAME IS SANTINO PROVEENZO WITH MOSAIC. MY BUSINESS ADDRESS IS CIRCA CROSSING DRIVE. I'D LIKE TO PRESENT SOME INFORMATION TONIGHT REGARDING PHOSPHATE GYPSUM MANAGEMENT, SPECIFICALLY REGULATION AND HOW THOSE REGULATIONS RELATE TO HOW THE SYSTEM IS OPERATED AND THE OVERSIGHT THAT THESE AGENCIES CONDUCT ON THOSE OPERATIONS. SO AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, WE HAVE A COUPLE OF LEVELS OF REGULATION THAT ARE I THINK IMPORTANT AND RELEVANT. THE FIRST THAT I WANTED TO POINT OUT IS WHAT IS REFERRED TO AS THE NICHE APP. I THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT POINT TO MAKE AS THE NISH APP IS THE DRIVER REGULATION THAT REQUIRES THE STACKING OF F PHOSPHOGYPSUM, WE ARE UNDER FEDERAL LAW TO STORE IN A STACK SYSTEM. BEYOND THE FEDERAL LEVEL, AT THE STATE LEVEL, THERE ARE MULTIPLE RULES GOVERNING THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION OF THE SYSTEMS, SPECIFICALLY THE FHOTPHOGYPSUM RULE. ALSO THE SUPPORTING RULES AT DEP REGARDING TECHNICAL STANDARDS AROUND DAMS AND DIKES, GROUNDWATER STANDARDS, SURFACE WATER STANDARDS AND OTHER STANDARDS RELATED TO WASTEWATER AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DURING AND AFTER OPERATION OF THE STACK. AND THEN FINALLY, ADDITIONAL OVERLAP IN THE FORM OF COUNTY REGULATION THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 242 WHICH COVERS THE STACK OPERATIONS. THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT 68 WHICH COVERS THE PLANT OPERATIONS AND THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING THAT WE ARE

DISCUSSING TONIGHT. SO DIGGING A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN INTO THE DETAILS, I WANTED TO JUST HIGHLIGHT MAYBE SOME OF THE SCOPE OF EACH OF THOSE REGULATIONS, THE CONTROLS THAT ARE USED TO MEET THOSE REGULATIONS AND SOME OF THE ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES THAT HAPPEN BOTH INTERNALLY AT MOSAIC AND BY THE REGULATORS. FIRST ON THE CORE FDEP PHOSPHOGYPSUM PROGRAM, YOU'LL NOTE HERE THAT THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND PROFESSIONAL DESIGN OVERSIGHT OF THE DESIGN, OPERATIONS AND INSPECTIONS OF THOSE SYSTEMS. ALRETHERE ARE NUMEROUS TECH STANDARDS IN THAT ROLE IN THE ELEMENTS OF THE DESIGN INCLUDING LINERS, LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS AND STORMWATER CONTROLS. FINALLY, THE PHOSPHOGYPSUM RULE ALSO HAS ROBUST STANDARDS FOR INSPECTIONS. MOSAIC IS OBLIGATED UNDER THOSE RULES TO INSPECT THE FACILITY ON A DAILY BASIS AND WE DO ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS WITH OUR CIVIL ENGINEERING STAFF ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AN ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER INSPECTION. MOVING ON TO SOME OF THE SUPPORTING REGULATIONS, JUST HIGHLIGHTING AGAIN THOSE THIRD-PARTY INSPECTIONS OF THE DIKE SYSTEM, THE LINERS. AND IN ADDITION, THE MAINTENANCE OF WHAT WE CALL MINIMUM FREE BOARD AND SURGE CAPACITY IN THE SYSTEM. SO THE REGULATIONS FOR GYP STACK REQUIRE US TO MONITOR AND MAINTAIN SURGE CAPACITY SO IT WILL BE REGULATED DURING RAINFALL EVENTS AND TROPICAL STORMS. FINALLY AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, POINTING OUT HERE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNED

DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL PROCEED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DRI 242. AND WHAT THE DRI DOES, IT TAKES A LOT OF THOSE STATE REQUIREMENTS AND INCORPORATES THOSE INTO THE DRI, MEANING THAT THE COUNTY WILL HAVE DIRECT REGULATORY OVERSIGHT AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER THE ONGOING OPERATION OF THE STACK. TINA. HEARING MASTER: DON'T FORGET TO SIGN IN. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM HEARING MASTER. TINA EKBLAD, I'M A PRINCIPAL AT SAGE AND TUTTLEMAN. I'M IN PANAMA CITY BEACH, FLORIDA. I HAVE HU HEARD FROM MS. THORNTN ABOUT THE FUTURE LAND USE FLEX. I WANT TO START THERE WITH SOME OF THE PLANNING RELATED DETAILS. WE ARE SEEKING TO TAKE THE EXISTING LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUURE LAND USE AND KIND OF SPREAD IT OVER THE EXISTING NATURAL PRESERVATION AREAS FOR APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES. THIS IS TO ALLOW THOSE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING USES TO OCCUR AND HAVE APPROVALS FROM THE COUNTY PRIOR TO THE AGENCY PERMITS THAT WOULD APPROVE THOSE IMPACTS AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION. WE DO AGREE WITH THE CONDITIONS SET SO FORTH BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORTING THIS FLEX WHICH INCLUDES THAT, AS YOU HAVE HEARD, THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL PROCEED.

HEARING MASTER: THAT IS THE END OF 15 MINUTES. SO IF WE COULD HOLD TO YOUR 20 TO WRAP THIS UP, THAT WOULD BE PERFECT. PLEASE CONTINUE.

OKAY. WE DO AGREE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONS WHICH INCLUDES, AS YOU HAVE HEARD, MAINTAINING STRICT COMPLIANCE OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER AS WELL AS THE GENERAL SITE PLAN AND LND USE CONDITIONS. YOU HAVE HEARD ABOUT THE DEDICATION OF THE OFF-SITE LANDS, THE 300 ACRES UNDER CONSERVATION EASEMENT. BUT ALSO, WE DO AGREE TO FILING A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO ADDRESS THESE AREAS WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE LAST PERMIT APPROVAL AND THEN RECORDING THAT AMENDED DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS. WE HAVE MET THE REQUIRED FINDINGS OF POLICY 2.2.23 FOR THE FLEX TO OCCUR. THIS AREA IS OBVIOUSLY PART OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. IT IS NOT GREATER THAN 500 FEET FROM THE EXISTING LAND USE BOUNDARY. IT HAS NOT BEEN PART OF A FLEX PREVIOUSLY AND IS NOT PROHIBITED BY ANY APPLICABLE COMMUNITY PLANS. BECAUSE THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, THERE IS NO DENSITY INCREASE NOTICE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA AND THE EXTENSION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE REQUEST. FINALLY, THIS PARTICULAR AREA IS NOT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL OR COMMUNITY FACILITIES. WITH REGARD TO COMPATIBILITY, AS MS. THORNTON EXPLAINED, THE EXTENSION IS ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE EXISTING STACK WHICH IS ADJACENT TO EXISTING INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING USES. THERE WAS A VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT COMPLETED AND IS PART OF THE RECORD DEMONSTRATING THAT THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EXISTING HEIGHT STANDARDS AND THE VIEW FROM THESE EXISTING SURROUNDING USES WILL NOT BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED. THERE WILL BE A PLANTING PLAN AND OTHER VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES. THEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH, THERE IS AN EXISTING STACK BUFFER THAT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE. THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES AREAS WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE THE VIEW OF THAT MATURE LANDSCAPING THAT WAS PLANTED EITHER 30 OR MORE YEARS AGO WITH THE INITIAL CONDITION OR THERE WAS ENHANCED PLANTINGS DONE IN 2003.

THERE IS A MANAGEMENT REPORT THAT IS FILED ANNUALLY REGARDING THE VISUAL PERSPECTIVE FROM 24 KEY AREAS. THAT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THIS YEAR AND IN THE FUTURE NOTES THAT THE MATURE LANDSCAPING WILL EFFECTIVELY SCREEN AND IMPROVE THE VISUAL LANDSCAPE. WE DID HAVE A VARIATION THAT WAS FILED FOR THE ENHANCED BUFFER. TYPICALLY IN AN INDUSTRIAL SITE, A 30-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH A WALL IS REQUIRED. WE ARE EXCEEDING THAT DIMENSION. WE HAVE ASKED TO ELIMINATE THE WALL AGAIN DUE TO THAT MATURE LANDSCAPING. AND WE HAVE INCORPORATED THAT BUFFER INTO THE GENERAL SITE PLAN ENSURING THAT REMAINS IN THE FUTURE. AND THEN WITH REGARD TO THE EAST STACK EXTENSION, THE NORTH ARCHIE CREEK REROUTE WILL PROVIDE ENHANCED MANAGEMENT AND 100-FOOT SEPARATION. SO IN CONCLUSION, WE BELIEVE THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIFICALLY THE EAST STACK EXTENSION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE COMPANION AMENDMENTS AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS ALONG WITH THE GENERAL SITE PLAN WILL MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FLEX MEETS THE REQUIRED FINDINGS AND SUPPORTS THE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED AGENCY PERMITS. AND THEN THE EXTENSION OCCURRING ALONG THE WEST STACK BOUNDARY PROXIMATE TO INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING USES IS APPROPRIATE. THE MATURE ESTABLISHED BUFFERS WILL CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THAT VISUAL SCREENING AND SEPARATION. AND THE NORTH ARCHIE CREEK REROUTE WILL PROVIDE SEPARATION. THAT CONCLUDES OUR PRESENTATION IN CHIEF. WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

HEARING MASTER: I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS AND SEVERAL HAVE BEEN ANSWERED BY YOUR PRESENTATION. I APPRECIATE THAT. ONE WAS WHERE IS THE FLEX. AND YOU ILLUSTRATED THAT. AND TWO IS WHERE IS THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT SOUTH OF THE ALAFIA. SO YOU HAVE ANSWERED THOSE IN YOUR GRAPHIC, SO THANK YOU. THE QUESTION PERTAIN -- MY QUESTION PER TAPES TO THE VARIATION THAT REFERENCES THE VISUAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. IN MY READING, IT TALKED ABOUT 18 VIEWPOINTS. AND MY QUESTION WAS, IS THAT THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL? AND IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO MAINTAIN? BUT I JUST SAW IN ONE OF YOUR GRAPHICS IT TALKS ABOUT 24. SO WAS THAT INCREASED AS A PART OF THIS REQUEST TO EXPAND THE STACK?

YOU WANT TO TAKE IT? THE 18 POINTS THAT STAFF HAS COVERED IN THE SITE PLAN, WE HAVE A FIGURE ON PAGE 4 OF THE SITE PLAN WHICH NOW IDENTIFIES THE 18 LOCATIONS FROM WHICH THAT MONITORING PLAN WILL BE CONDUCTED ANNUALLY. THE ANNUAL REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED. SO IS THE QUESTION THEN -- I WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M ANSWERING THE QUESTION THAT YOU HAVE, MS. FINCH, ABOUT THE CONTINUATION OF THAT MONITORING AND THE LOCATIONS OF THAT. HEARING MASTER: THE QUESTION PERTAINS TO THE NUMBER OF THE VIEWPOINTS. WAS IT 18 PRIOR TO THIS APPLICATION? OR IS IT INCREASED BECAUSE OF THIS APPLICATION?

IT IS 18 INCREASED BECAUSE WE TRIED TO BE RESPONSIVE TO THE LOCATIONS THAT WE KNEW STAFF WOULD BE INTERESTED IN MAKING SURE THAT WE INSURED. SO IT WAS 14 BEFORE IN THE OLD PD AND WE HAVE NOW RAISED THAT TO 18. HEARING MASTER: THAT WAS MY QUESTION. YES. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE IT. AND I BELIEVE THAT'S THE END OF MY QUESTIONS BECAUSE, AS I SAID, YOU HAVE ANSWERED THEM IN YOUR PRESENTATION. THANK YOU SO MUCH. DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION? PERFECT. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING AGAIN.

GOOD EVENING, SAM BALL, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE 1,412.4 ACRES WHICH INCLUDES PD 99-1153 IN ADDITION TO 20 OTHER PROPERTIES TO ALLOW FOR THE PROPOSED PHOSPHOGYPSUM STACK TO BE EXTENDED TO THE WEST AND NORTHWEST. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 99-1153 WAS APPROVED IN 2000 AND MOST RECENTLY MODIFIED BY PRS 26-055 FOR A PHOSPHOGYPSUM STACK AT A MAXIMUM TEMPORARY HEIGHT OF 275 FEET AND FINAL SETTLED HEIGHT OF 250 FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 2.2 SQUARE MILES THAT ABUT SEVERAL PROPERTIES IN DIFFERING USES FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HEAVY MANUFACTURING. THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH HAVE ROUGHLY 1,000 TO 1900 FEET OF SEPARATION WHICH INCLUDES AN EXPANSIVE DENSE VEGETATION THAT RANGES FROM 650 TO 1,000 FEET WIDE. THE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE EXPANSION AREA ARE ZONED AND DEVELOPED FOR MANUFACTURING AND AGRICULTURAL USE, EXCEPT FOR ONE RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PROPERTY WHICH IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE APPLICANT. THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH INCLUDE VACANT LANDS ON A PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATION SITE. AND DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE WOULD BE SEPARATED FROM THE EXPANSION AREA BY THE EXISTING STACK SYSTEM AND BUFFERING AND SCREENING PROVIDED BY THE EXISTING VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. THE STACK EXTENSION WOULD BE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY REGULATIONS, INCLUDING ANY AGENCY SPECIFIC PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE GYPSUM STACK SYSTEM. THE COMPONENTS OF THE STACK SYSTEM INCLUDE THE PHOSPHOGYPSUM STACK TOGETHER WITH ALL THE PUMPS, PIPING, DITCHES, DRAINAGE, CONVEYANCES, WATER CONTROL DEVICES, CLLECTION POOLS, COOLING PONDS, SURGE PONDS, AUXILIARY HOLDING PONDS, REGIONAL HOLDING PONDS AND ANY OTHER COLLECTION OR CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSPORT OF THE PHOSPHOGYPSUM FROM THE PLANT TO THE STACK AND ITS MANAGEMENT OF THE STACK AND THE PROCESSES -- PROCESS WATER AND WASTEWATER RETURN TO THE PRODUCTION AND OTHER PROCESSES. FDEP REGULATES THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND CLOSURE AND LONG-TERM CARE OF THE SYSTEM. AND IF APPROVED, THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL INCLUDE A REQUIREMENT THAT THE PD MUST ALSO COMPLY WITH THE DRI. IN LIEU OF THE LDC BUFFERING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS BY THE LDC, THE CURRENT STACK BUFFERING AND SCREENING IS PROVIDED THROUGH A VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM THAT SURROUNDS THE PROPERTY ON THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND A PORTION OF THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THIS MANAGEMENT -- VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM INCLUDES 11 ON-SITE AND SEVEN OFF-SITE ENHANCED PLANTING AREAS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONTINUE WITH THIS VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF THE PRO STACK IN LIEU OF COMPLYING WITH THE BUFFERING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS OF THE LDC. AS PROPOSED, THE BUFFERS WOULD EXCEED THE WIDTH OF ALL REQUIRED BUFFERS AND THE EXISTING VEGETATION EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUFFERS WITH THE EXCEPTION -- COUNEXCUSE ME, MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENTS AND SCREENING

REQUIREMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE MASONRY WALL WHERE TYPE "C" SCREENING WOULD BE REQUIRED. BASED ON THE EXISTING BUFFERING AND SCREENING AND THE MATURE SCREENING FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES, THE AMOUNT OF SEPARATION FROM THE PERMITTED STACK AREA TO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES, THE STACK FOOTPRINT WOULD BE EXTENDED TO THE WEST-NORTHWEST OF THE STACK TOWARDS THE INDUSTRIAL ZONED DEVELOPED PROPERTIES AND REQUIREMENTS TO MONITOR AND MAINTAIN THE VISUAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, STAFF FINDS THE MASONRY WALL WILL HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON THE AREA AND THAT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A VARIATION TO BUFFERING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS WOULD MEET OR EXCEED THE INTENT OF THE LDC. 275-FOOT TEMPORARY MAXIMUM STACK HEIGHT AND 250-FOOT FINAL SETTLED HEIGHT WOULD BE THE SAME AS WHAT IS CURRENTLY ALLOWED. BASED ON THESE FACTORS, STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PD REZONING COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IN THE AREA AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

HEARING MASTER: NONE AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU SO MUCH. PLANNING COMMISSION.

LILY LINEHAN WITH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE SUBJECT SITE IS WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA, EXCEPT FOR BIRD ISLAND AND SUNKEN ISLAND WHICH ARE IN THE RURAL AREA AND DO NOT HAVE A DESIGNATED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY. THERE IS A CORRESPONDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT HC/CPA 26-04 REQUESTING THE NATURAL PRESERVATION FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY FOR THE TWO ISLANDS. THE SITE IS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE RIVERVIEW GIBSONTON AND GREATER PALM RIVER COMMUNITY PLANS AS WELL AS THE SOUTHSHORE AREAWIDE SYSTEMS PLAN. THE INTENT OF THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IS FOR CONCENTRATED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT INVOLVES PROCESSING OF NON-HAZARDOUS AND NON-TOXIC MATERIALS AND CREATES A MINIMAL DEGREE OF IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT. THE NATURAL PRESERVATION CATEGORY IS CONSIDERED FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE LANDS SET ASIDE PRIMARILY FOR CONSERVATION PURPOSES. A FLEX OF APPROXIMATELY 19.3 ACRES TO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY IS REQUESTED TO ACCOMMODATE THE ESE FOOTPRINT. THE APPLICANT IS COMMITTING TO A CONDITION AS PART OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STATING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PD DISTRICT SHALL PROCEED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER, THE GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE LAND USE CONDITIONS. THIS CONDITION IS INTEGRAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'S FINDING OF CONSISTENCY. TO HELP OFFSET THE FLEX REQUEST OVERLYING NATURAL PRESERVATION, THE APPLICANT HAS COMMITTED TO DEDICATING LAND TO OFF SITE AS NATURAL PRESERVATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER MUST EXECUTE AND THE STACK BUFFER AND APPLY FOR FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT TO RECLASSIFY THE PROPERTY BEING DEDICATED TO THE NATURAL PRESERVATION CATEGORY. THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH F.L.U. OBJECTIVE 3.1 AND ASSOCIATED POLICIES ON COMPATIBILITY AS THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN AND SURROUNDING THE SITE AND INCORPORATES SUBSTANTIAL

MITIGATION MEASURES. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HEARING MASTER: MS. LYNN HAN, LET ME ASK YOU FOR CLARIFICATIO. THE AGENDA SHOWS THE PLANNING CATEGORIES AT RES-6, A.I. AND N. I DON'T SEE RES-6 ANYWHERE. THERE SHOULD NOT BE RES-6. HEARING MASTER: IT'S ONLY ON THE AGENDA IT'S THAT. THAT'S AN ERROR. YES. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, I APPRECIATE IT. WE WILL ASK FOR ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT EITHER IN THE ROOM OR ONLINE. HOW MANY PEOPLE, IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT? I BELIEVE WE HAVE ONE ONLINE AS WELL.

HEARING MASTER: ONE ONLINE. HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE ROOM? GO AHEAD AND COME FORWARD IF YOU ARE IN SUPPORT. ANYBODY ELSE? SO WE HAVE TWO. IT'S 15 MINUTES TOTAL. WE'LL GO WITH THE PERSON IN THE ROOM FIRST. GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING, MY NAIL IS MARLIS TOLBERT JONES. MY ADDRESS IS TAMPA, FLORIDA. I AM A LIFE-LONG RESIDENT OF PROGRESS VILLAGE. I AM THE PROGRESS VILLAGE SPECIFIC COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT. I AM A MEMBER OF VICTORY AME CHURCH IN PROGRESS VILLAGE AND BEEN THERE ALL MY LIFE. I'LL BE 62 ON THURSDAY. AND DON'T INTEND TO GO ANYWHERE. AS LONG AS I'VE BEEN KNOWING ABOUT A JOB, OR HEARING ABOUT WORKING, MY FATHER ALWAYS SPOKE ABOUT THE CHEMICAL PLANT WHICH IS WHERE HE WORKED AND RETIRED FROM. HE RAISED SEVEN CHILDREN AND MY MOM OFF THE SALARY AT MOSAIC THAT IS NOW MOSAIC. AND MY HUSBAND ALSO WORKED THERE. A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE VILLAGE AND COMMUNITY WORK THERE. OVER THE YEARS, I HAVE SEEN A LOT OF GRO GROWTH WITH MOSAIC AD NOTICED A LOT OF CHANGES. THEY ARE ALWAYS FINDING WAYS TO HELP THE COMMUNITY AND NOT JUST

THE LOCAL COMMUNITY, BUT THE SURROUNDING AREA, MAKING THINGS BETTER FOR THE WORLD. I MEAN, LIKE I SAID, I HAVEN'T SEEN THINGS CHANGE OVER A PERIOD OF TIME. I REMEMBER WRITE USED TO BE KIND OF AFRAID OF THE AIR QUALITY, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE PUT THINGS IN YOUR HEAD, AND YOU THINK YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, UNTIL YOU ACTUALLY GO AND LISTEN TO AND GET KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THINGS, AS A PLATTER OF FACT, ON OUR LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING, LAST MONDAY NIGHT, I BROUGHT THIS ISSUE UP, BECAUSE I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE COMMUNITY THOUGHT ABOUT THE EXPANSION. THERE WAS NO COMPLAINTS. THERE WASN'T ANYONE THAT WAS AGAINST IT. THEY ARE AWARE OF ALL THE STACKS. AND LIKE I SAID, OVER THE YEARS, I NOTICED A CHANGE NOT JUST IN THE VISUAL CHANGE, BUT ALSO IN THE QUALITY OF AIR AND EVERYTHING ELSE. I AM IN SUPPORT OF THEM DOING IT. DOING THE EXPANSION. NO ONE COERCED ME, ASKED ME TO COME TO THIS, IT'S JUST BASED ON WHAT I'VE LEARNED OVER THE YEARS AND LISTENING AN JUST BEING A PART OF, AND SEEING HOW THEY TAKE THE TIME OUT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE INFORMED ON EVERYTHING THAT'S GOING ON, AND ALSO, TO ENSURE OUR SAFETY. THANK YOU.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN. IF YOU COULD SIGN IN WITH THE CLERK'S OFF. WE'LL GO TO THE PERSON IN SUPPORT ONLINE. CHRISTOPHER OAKS, COULD YOU PLEASE. OH, PERFECT, WE SEE YOU.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM HEARING MASTER, I'M A RESIDENT THE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, TAMPA NATIVE AND LONG TIME EMPLOYEE OF MOS MOSAIC. TONIGHT THE RIVERVIEW FACILITY IS ON A TURNAROUND AT MOSAIC, IT'S A PROACTIVE SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE MEASURE, THAT ALL OF OUR MINING AND MANUFACTURING FACILITIES TAKE AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR. THEY COULDN'T JOIN US TONIGHT. BUT OUR CURRENT SITE BASED EMPLOYEES CERTAINLY WANTED TO BE HERE, AND THAT IS IN MY CURRENT ROLE, LEADING MAINTENANCE EFFORTS AT MOSAIC, I WANTED TO RAISE MY HAND AND VOLLEN FUNTEE THEIR BEHALF. HAVING MARKED MORE THAN A CENTURY OF OPERATION ON TAMPA BAY, IT'S A CENTRAL FIGURE IN THE GIBSONTON/RIVERVIEW AND PROGRESS NEIGHBORHOODS. SOME OF OUR EMPLOYEES CALL PROGRESS VILLAGE HOME. SOME HAVE PARENTS AND GRANDPARENTS WHO WORKED AT THE SITE. WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE FATHER/DAUGHTER ON THE SITE RIGHT NOW. WE VOLUNTEER IN THE AREA WITH EVERYTHING FROM HUNGER RELIEF TO CLOTHING DRIVES, TO THE SHERIFF'S SUMMER SERIAL DRIVE HOPING OUR LOCAL DEPUTIES WIN. SEVERAL FOLKS SIT ON THE MOSAIC RIVERVIEW ADVISORY PANEL. I MYSELF SAT ON THAT PANEL FOR MANY YEARS, THIS GROUP OF FOLKS IS COMPOSED AT ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO MEET AT LEAST NINE TIMES A YEAR, OFTEN TOURING DIFFERENT MOSAIC SITES AND FACILITIES. WE ARE PROUD TO PULL THE CURTAIN BACK UP FOR THEM, THESE ARE OUR NEIGHBORS, OUR FRIENDS, AND AT RIVERVIEW, WE CONSIDER IT IMPERATIVE WHERE WE REMAIN INVOLVED IN OUR COMMUNITY. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

BEFORE YOU LEAVE, COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? MY BUSINESS ADDRESS IS 13830, CIRCLE CROSSING DRIVE, LITHIA. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU, SIR, I APPRECIATE IT. SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN SUPPORT, WE'LL CALL FOR ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. IF YOU COULD RAISE YOUR HAND. GO AHEAD AND COME FORWARD. WHILE SE'S COMING UP, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? RAISE YOUR HAND, AND NO ONE ONLINE, I PRESUME, CORRECT? THERE IS NO ONE ONLINE.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. IT'S 15 MINUTES TOTAL, IF WE COULD GIVE THE SPEAKERS 7 1/2 MINUTES EACH.

MY NAME IS THERESA CORDON, I LIVE HERE. I ACTUALLY LIVE IN BRANDON, I GREW UP IN LUTZ, I'VE BEEN HERE MY WHOLE LIFE. I'M HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST THE MOSAIC STANDING OF THE STACK IN THE RIVERVIEW AREA. I AM AWARE THAT FLORIDA PROVIDES COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS AND 60% DOMESTICALLY. I DO KNOW THAT THERE ARE OTHER SOURCES OF PHOSPHATE IN THE WORLD, THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT PRODUCE IT, CHINA IS THE NUMBER ONE PRODUCER, MOROCCO ALSO HAS LARGE RESERVES AND RUSSIA DOES AS WELL. SO THAT BEING SAID, I DO NOT THINK THAT IT IS THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SUPPLY THE COUNTRY OR THE ENTIRE WORLD'S INSATIABLE OR UNSUSTAINABLE APPETITE FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS MADE FROM MINED PHOSPHATE, ESPECIALLY IF SUPPLYING THAT DEMAND I DETRIMENTAL TO THIS STAE, THE TOWN AND THE RESIDENTS. THERE ARE AT LEAST 25 GYM SUM STACKS THROUGHOUT THE STATE, MOST OF THEM ARE 200 FEET HIGH, THEY COVER HUNDREDS OF ACRES, COLLECTIVELY, THE STACKS STORE TONS OF PHOSPHOGYPSUM, SEALED IN A TOMB. THAT BEING THE ONLY THING SEPARATING IT FROM OUR DRINKING WATER. THESE LEAKS DO HAPPEN. THERE ARE WELL DOCUMENTED CASES IN OUR STATE. I THINK THE PINEY POINT STACK IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE. IN 2021, STRUCTURAL FAILURES

FORCED THE RELEASE OF 215 MILLION GALLONS OF TOXIC WASTEWATER INTO TAMPA BAY. I'M SURE A LOT OF YOU GUYS REMEMBER THERE WAS THE WORST RED TIDE BLOOM IN HISTORY RIGHT AFTER THATTING AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF STUDIES LINKING THE LEAK OF ALL OF THAT WATER INTO THE BAY TO THE BLOOM. THIS WAS ALSO NOT THE FIRST TIME. IN 2011, 170 MILLION GALLONS WERE RELEASED INTO THE WATER OF TAMPA BAY. THAT GOT THE 2021 INCIDENT GOT THE STATE'S ATTENTION, THAT'S PINEY POINT IS ACTUALLY CURRENTLY, IT WAS ORDERED TO CLOSE. SO $185 MILLION AND FIVE YEARS LATER, THE SITE IS STILL NOT COMPLETELY SHUT DOWN. REMEDIATION EFFORTS ARE STILL ON GOING. AND WHERE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PINEY POINT STACK. IT'S THE MULL BURY CORPORATION, THEY'RE BANKRUPT, SO BASICALLY THE TAXPAYERS OF THE STATE AND COUNTY ARE LEFT HOLDING THE BAG. THE NEW WHALES FACILITY HAD A NEW SINKHOLE OPEN UNDERNEATH IT IN 2016, 215 MILLION GALLONS OF CONTAMINATED WATER RELEASED INTO THE AQUIFER. IN 2020 ANOTHER TEAR WAS DETECTED. GOING BACK IN '97, THERE WAS A MULBERRY PLANT THAT SPILLED INTO THE ALAFIA RIVR. OUR WATERWAYS ARE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO BE SO FORGIVING. WE'RE A STATE THAT DEPENDS ON TOURISM, PEOPLE COME FAR AND WIDE TO SEE OUR BEAUTIFUL BEACHES, FORESTS AND NATURAL SPRINGS. THERE IS NO OTHER PLACE LIKE FLORIDA. WE NEED TO START ACTING LIKE IT, AND ALLOWING MOSAIC TO EXPAND THEIR ACTIVE ADVERTISE, AND WE NEED TO PRESERVE THINGS THAT MAKE OUR STATE UNIQUE.

THEY'RE ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS WAITING TO HAPPEN, THEY EMIT RAY DON GAS, KNOWN CARCINOGEN LINKED TO LUNG CANCER. WE CANNOT CONTINUE TO MORTGAGE THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN AND STATE FOR THE SHORT TERM PROFITS OF A BILLION DOLLAR CHEMICAL COMPANY BEING MOSAIC. AND I DID HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A FORUM TO BE ABLE TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS. HEARING MASTER: WHAT YOU CAN DO IS ASK YOUR QUESTIONS, AND THEN ON REBUTTAL THEY CAN ADDRESS THAT.

OKAY. I DO HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS. THE BURDEN SUNKEN ISLANDS, ACCORDING TO THE REZONING REQUEST, THEY WANT TO MAKE THEM A CONSERVATION SPACE. I'M WONDERING, CAN THAT NOT HAPPEN WITHOUT THE STACK -- CAN ALL OF THE ECOLOGICAL THINGS THEY'RE PROPOSING TO DO, LIKE SETTING ASIDE EASEMENTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THE ARCHIE CREEK THING, IS THAT POSSIBLE WITHOUT -- SINCE IT'S THEIR LAND, I'M ASSUMING, COULDN'T THEY DO THAT WITHOUT EXPANDING THE STACK. IS ALL OF IT CONTINGENT ON EXPANDING THE STACK. AND HOW MANY OF THE 3,000 EMPLOYEES ARE ACTUALLY RELATED TO THE PHOSPHATE MINING ACTIVITIES AT THIS PLANT. I SAW SHE MENTIONED THERE WERE 3,000 EMPLOYEES, I WAS CURIOUS, HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE AFFECTED ECONOMICALLY. I DID HEAR THE WOMAN WHO JUST CAME UP AND SPOKE VERY HIGHLY OF HER FATHER'S EXPERIENCE WORKING FOR THEM. SO IT'S NEVER MY INTENTION TO PUT PEOPLE WITHOUT A JOB, BUT I'M WONDERING, ARE THERE OTHER THINGS THAT THEY COULD DO, LIKE DO WE HAVE TO CONTINUE -- HOW MANY OF THOSE JOBS ARE ACTUALLY RELATED TO THE MINING ACTIVITIES -- THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS, THIS IS GOING -- THIS EXPANSION IS GOING TO BE GOOD FOR 16 YEARS, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN 16 YEARS? WHAT ARE WE GOING T DO? I FEEL LIKE WE'RE KICKING THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD HERE. YOU KNOW, MOSAIC IS AT THE END OF THE DAY, A BILLION DOLAR COMPANY, THEY HAVE TONS OF MONEY, I'M SURE THAT THEY COULD DO A LOT OF THINGS. MAYBE THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING. I WONDER, IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO MINE THE PHOSPHATE?

ARE THERE ALTERNATIVES TO USING THE FOSS FACE AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE? LET ME MAKE SURE I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE. I HAVE A QUESTION -- THAT REPORT -- THERE WAS A REPORT THAT WAS MENTIONED ABOUT SOME BORDER REQUIREMENTS, SOME TREES, MATURE TREES TEY PUT UP. THEY SAID THEY DO A REPORT EVERY YEAR, I WAS WONDERING IF I COULD GET A PICTURE OF THOSE TREES THEY PLANTED 30 YEARS AGO, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE NOW. THAT'S IT FOR ME. THANK YOU.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND COMING DOWN. IF YOU COULD PLEASE SIGN IN. SIR, IF YOU WANT TO COME FORWARD. JERMAINE, IF YOU CAN RESET THAT TO 7 1/2 MINUTES.

REX HUGGINS, 6522 0 441 HIGHWAY RIVERVIEW. MY COMMENTS WILL BE BRIEF, THE YOUNG LADY COVERED THE MAJORITY OF THEM, I THINK THE BIGGEST THING I WANTED TO SAY, MOSAIC MAY PASS ALL THE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS TO STAND THE STACKS, THE HISTORY PRETTY MUCH SNEAKS FOR ITSELF. WHAT WILL CHANGE? I MEAN, THERE'S QUITE THE HISTORY OF MOSAIC VIOLATIONS, AND ENFORCEABLE ACTIONS THAT'S HAPPENED OVER THE YEARS. THE YOUNG LADY MENTIONED SEVERAL OF THEM, BECAUSE THEY MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODES, DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEY WON'T CONTINUE THE ACTIONS THEY HAVE IN THE PAST. THANK YOU.

HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU, SIR, IF YOU COULD PLEASE SIGN IN. THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN. SEEING NO ONE ELSE IN OPPOSITION, WE'LL CLOSE THAT HE PERIOD IN THE HEARING, AND GO BACK TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. MISS HEINRICH ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO ADD? NOTHING FOR ME. HEARING MASTER: WE'LL GO BACK TO THE APPLICANT FOR REBUTTAL. I'LL GIVE YOU FIVE MINUTES. YOU CAN TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF YOU WANT, IF YOU COULD ADDRESS THE COMMENT, THE QUESTIONS, AND WHATEVER ELSE YOU WANT TO ADDRESS.

THANK YOU, MISS FINCH. I THINK THERE SEEMS TO BE A BIT OF CONFUSION, THERE WERE REFERENCES TO THE PHOSPHATE MINING PROCESS. I KNOW OFTEN FOLKS COMBINE THE TWO PROCESSIONS, WHAT HAPPENS AT RIVERVIEW, AND THE GYPSUM STACKS IS NOT PHOSPHATE MINING AT ALL. IT'S A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PROCESS, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. I JUST WANTED TO -- WE'RE -- WE'RE GOING TO BE HAPPY TO TALK TO MISS CORDON TO EXPLAIN THAT OFF RECORD OF COURSE, TO EXPLAIN HOW THOSE THINGS WORK TOGETHER. AS FAR AS THE 350 JOBS, I THINK THERE ARE MULTIPLE REPORTS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF THE JOBS THAT ARE DRIVEN BY THE PHOSPHATE INDUSTRY, WITH THE 350 JOBS MENTIONED, WITH SPECIFICALLY EMPLOYMENT AT MOSAIC AT THE RIVERVIEW PLANT. IT DOESN'T SPEAK TO ANY OF THE COLLATERAL JOBS FROM CONTRACTORS AT ALL THAT SUPPORT THE INDUSTRY. THE EXTENSION IS GOOD FOR 16 YEARS, THAT'S THE SCOPE OF THE APPLICATION. AND IN THE FUTURE, THERE WAS TO BE MORE, WE WOULD SUBMIT A SEPARATE -- TO DO THAT. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF, WE WERE ASKED TO DESIGNATE THOSE ISLANDS, THAT'S WHY WE'RE DOING THAT. YOU WOULDN'T REROUTE THE CREEK IF YOU DIDN'T CONSTRUCT THE STACK, THOSE THINGS ARE HAND IN HAND, AND ARE CONTINGENT ON THE APPLICATION. I THINK MR. PROVENZANO'S SLIDES ARE GOOD TO EXPLAIN THE PROCESS

AND THE REGULATIONS THAT REQUIRE US TO DO THE WORK THE WAY IT IS DONE. THE STACKING, THE REQUIREMENTS THAT DEAL WITH ALL OF THAT COME FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE STATE GOVERNMENT, AND THEN ALSO FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. AND SO WE COMPLY WITH THOSE REGULATIONS, WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH THOSE REGULATIONS, WE CONTINUE TO DO SO, AND RIVERVIEW, IN COMBINATION WITH THE GRI, THIS PD IS LOOKING AT THE CONTINUATION OF WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE GOOD AND SAFE OPERATIONS AT RIVERVIEW. THE PLANT HAS BEEN IN OPERATION SINCE 1924, THIS IS NOT NEW, THIS IS A TENSION, AND I THINK WE DEMONSTRATED THAT WE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS I HEARD

HEARING MASTER: SHE HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE TREES, IF YOU HAVE -- THE TREES, THERE IS IN THE APPLICATION, I'D BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE THAT TO HER. WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE 14 AND 15 LOCATIONS, THERE IS A FULL REPORT WITH DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF HOW IT'S BEEN FILED NOW SINCE 2001, 2002, WE HAVE ABOUT TWO DECADES OF PHOTOGRAPHY THAT SHOWS HOW THOSE BUFFERS AND TREES HAVE GROWN IN OVER TIME. I'D BE HAPPY TO SHARE THAT. IT IS IN THE APPLICATION MATERIALS WHICH ARE PUBLIC. BUT SEPARATELY, I'D BE HAPPY TO SHARE THAT WITH HER AS WELL. HEARING MASTER: DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR REBUTTAL? IT DOES.

HEARING MASTER: WITH THAT, WE WILL CLOSE REZONING 26-0436 AND GO TO THE LAST CASE.

MAJOR MOD 26-0441. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PD00-0047, TANYA CHAPELLA HASRY VIEWED THIS FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, AT THE BEGINNING OF THE HEARING, WE PROVIDED YOU WITH A REVISED STAFF REPORT TO ADD IN SOME INFORMATION THAT THE APPLICANT BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THIS MORNING, WHICH IS THE PROPOSAL THAT IS FOR THIS POD, IF IT DOES NOT HAPPEN, WOULD RESTRICT THEIR EXISTING USE AS A DAY CARE. SO WE HAVE PUT THAT IN THERE TO RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING USE IN ADDITION TO THIS ONE AS OPTION TWO.

UNDERSTOOD. AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT ALSO HAS OTHER CHANGES TO ENTER JUST FOR GEE GRAPH IF I PURPOSES, I JUST ASKED HER TO PUT THOSE ON THE RECORD TONIGHT VERBALLY, AND WE'LL ADD THEM TO THE REPORT.

GOOD EVENING, KAMI CORBETT AGAIN, WITH THE LAW FIRM OF HILL, WARD AND HENDERSON. I REPRESENT THE RIVERVIEW MONTESSORI SCORE AT RIVERCREST, THIS IS ALONG SIMMS ROAD, YOU HAVE THE VICINITY MAP ON THE RIGHT SIDE, YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SCHOOL AND DAY CARE, AND THEN THE PARKING THAT IS UTILIZED FOR IT. THIS IS A REALLY LARGE PD CALLED RIVERCREST, IT'S HARD TO SEE ON THIS SLIDE. WE'RE ONLY MODIFYING A SMALL PORTION OF THAT PD. AND THAT'S THAT AREA BLOWN UP, YOU CAN SEE IT IN PURPLE. YOU CAN SEE TWO SECTIONS OF M ON THE SITE PLAN, AND THAT'S THE CLARIFICATION I'M GOING TO BE SEEKING IN THE STAFF REPORT, IT'S INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN, THAT THE SCHOOL IS LOCATED ON THE WESTERN MOST PORTION OF M, AND A LITTLE BIT OF L, YOU CAN SEE THE PARKING AREA IS IN POD L, AND THEN THEY'RE ON THE EASTERN SIDE, THERE'S ALSO A DAY CARE, THAT'S UNRELATED AND UNAFFECTED BY THAT. THE CHANGES I ASKED MICHELLE TO MAKE ARE GEOGRAPHICAL CHANGES TO INDICATE WHERE THE LOCATIONS ARE. ON THE RIGHT, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. AND THEN WE ARE -- THIS IS -- IN THE SITE PLAN ACTIVITY, WE HAVE THE CUEING AND SPECIAL EVENT PARKING DETAIL AS WELL. AND ESSENTIALLY WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS IN OPTION 2, THE CHILDREN AT THE DAY CARE AND THE 50 STUDENTS FOR THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. STAFF HAS FOUND THIS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE.

HEARING MASTER: TO VERIFY, I WENT BACK AND LOOKED AT THE ORIGINAL PD, 00-47. IT LOOKED LIKE YOU BACKED INTO HOW MANY STUDENTS WERE APPROVED BASED ON A TRIP COUNT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THERE IS. I'LL ASK MICHAEL YATES TO COME UP, HE DID THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND CAME UP WITH THE MATH. THIS WAS APPROVED FOR A DAY CARE, THRE IS ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTION PLANS THAT WERE APPROVED THAT SAID SCHOOLS -- OUR CLIENT DIDN'T REALIZE THERE WAS ANY ISSUE WITH THE REZONING, AS SOON AS HE FIGURED IT OUT THERE WAS AN ISSUE, HE ASKED US TO COME IN AND MAKE IT RIGHT.

IT NEVER -- JUST BEFORE YOU GO, THE ORIGINATING ZONING NEVER SPECIFIED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CHILDREN, IT DIDN'T APPEAR? CORRECT. HEARING MASTER: GOOD EVENING. MICHAEL YATES, WITH PALM TRAFFIC, I'VE BEEN SWORN. IT DID NOT FROM ANYTHING I'VE READ. THERE WERE TWO PARCELS THERE, THAT THE DAY CARE GOT SPLIT. THERE IS ANOTHER DAY CARE TO THE EAST, THERE WAS NOT ANYTHING IN THERE IN THE ZONING THAT SPECIFIED THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS, BUT IT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS, THAT IS WHERE THE 110 COMES FROM. HEARING MASTER: BUT NOW THE COMMITMENT IS 80 FOR THE DAY CARE, AND 50 FOR THE SCHOOL?

CORRECT, FOR A TOTAL OF 130. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU. THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. DOES THAT COMPLETE YOUR PRESENTATION? YES, IT'S BEEN OPERATING THE AREA FOR QUITE SOME TIME, AND THERE AREN'T ANY ISSUES. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU SO MUCH. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES?

TANYA CHAPELLA, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PD00-0047 AS MOST RECENTLY MODIFIED IS A 459 ACRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVED FOR A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND SUPPORTING COMMERCIAL USES. THE CURRENT REQUEST APPLIES TO PLOOT M, WHICH IS APPROVED FOR DAY CARE USES, THE SLIDE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED, AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE USE OF A PRIVATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, UP TO 50 STUDENTS, WHILE MAINTAINING A MAXIMUM OF 80 DAY CARE CHILDREN. THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PD ZONING DISTRICT, IN TERMS OF USE AND INTENSITY, THE AREA IS DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, A PUBLIC PARK AND SCHOOL. WHICH REFLECTS A CONSISTENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. NO EXPANSION OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT OR CHANGES PROPOSED. THE REQUEST IS LIMITED TO ADDING A LOW INTENSITY EDUCATION USE WITHIN THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. PARKING WILL BE ACCOMMODATED THROUGH EXISTING SPACES, ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING, AND WITHIN THE CDD AMENITY AREA. BASED ON THE PROPOSED ENROLLMENT AND CLASSROOM COUNT, THE APPLICANT HAS DEMONSTRATED ADEQUATE PARKING. BASED ON THE ABOVE -- STAFF FINDS THE REQUEST COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND CONSISTENT WITH ESTABLISHED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, AND THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

HEARING MASTER: NO QUESTIONS AT THERE TIME.

LILY LINEHAN, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. THE AREA IS WITHIN THE SOUTH SHORE WIDE SYSTEMS PLAN. THE REQUEST IS FOR A MAJOR MODIFICATION, TO ALLOW SCHOOL AS A PERMITTED USE, ALONG WITH A DAY CARE, TO ALLOW UP TO 130 CHILDREN TOTAL. THE SURROUNDING AREA CONSISTS OF A MIX OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL USES. TO THE WEST IS AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TO THE EAST THERE ARE ADDITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND ANOTHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITY. CREATIVE WORLD SCHOOL RIVERVIEW. PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND THE RIVERCREST DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN THIS ESTABLISHED PATTERN OF RESIDENTIAL AND EDUCATIONAL USES, THE ADDITION OF THE DAY CARE FACILITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CONTRACTS, AND REPRESENTS A LOGICAL USE OF THE INSTITUTIONAL USES WITHIN THE AREA. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH RIVERVIEW GOAL 10. GOAL 10 SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGES THE EXPANSION OF AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS, THE PROMOTION OF EDUCATIONAL DIVERSITY TO SERVE INDIVIDUALS OF VARYING AGES AND NEEDS, AND COLLABORATION WITH EDUCATION PROVIDERS WITHIN THE RIVERVIEW COMMUNITY. THE PROPOSED FACILITY, INTRODUCES A COMBINATION OF DAY CARE AND ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, THERE BY BROADENING THE RANGE OF EDUCATIONALYIES FO RESIDENTS. BASED UPON THE ABOVE CONSIDERATIONS, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED MININGER MODIFICATION CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS,

OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HEARING MASTER: THANK YOU. ANYONE IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? SEEING NO ONE, ANYONE IN OPPOSITION? ANYTHING FURTHER? NO, MA'AM. HEARING MASTER: WITH THAT, WE'LL CLOSE MM26-0441 AND ADJOURN THE HEARING, THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME AND TESTIMONY.