Design Review Board - Regular Meeting
The Design Review Board meeting was adjourned due to a lack of quorum, as only three of the required four members were present. Consequently, item DRB-2026-011 (Subtext Acquisitions, LLC) was deferred to the next meeting, while other single-family home applications will proceed with staff recommendations.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Design Review Board
- Meeting Type
- Design Review Board
- Location
- South Miami, FL
- Meeting Date
- June 16, 2026
Transcript
43 sections
on a two-story house that referenced 25 feet. And they said, no, I have been changed to 30 in the new ordinance. But I've never. And they said they were going to send it to me.
Good morning. We are live and recording in the chambers. Can you hear me? Yes, we hear you. OK. We have Mariano Corral. We have Javier Bainer. We have Rick Urban. Right now, we do not have a quorum. We need one more member to join. I did get emails from Angel Lopez and one other person that they weren't going to be able to attend.
So how long do we wait?
Subrata is the only one that gets in. Okay, so he was the other one. I couldn't remember who was the other person.
Rick, if you want to email me on that question, just email me on the site and we can sort that out.
Perfect. I appreciate it. Thank you.
So is it up to us to wait more time?
Mr. Chair, it's your discretion how long you want to wait and at what point you want to just call it and say there was no quorum.
Okay, let's wait a couple of minutes. It's 8.35. It's already five minutes. So let's just give it another two minutes. And if not, then we'll just close the meeting. Understood. Thank you.
It feels good that I'm not the only old, I have to be very careful how I say this, the old man of the house.
Hi, Alex. We have one of the applicants is in the chambers and they flew in from out of town. Is there any way we can give it a little bit more time?
Up to the chair. The chair can make that call and understands that there are applicants from out of town. So up to the chair. Yeah.
We can wait until 8.40. I think that's 10 minutes. Do you think 10 minutes is good? I think 10 minutes would be fair to wait.
That's fine. If anybody has contact information for any of the board members wants to go ahead and confirm attendance, that would also be okay. City staff or board members, that's perfectly fine.
You know, with all due respect to everyone, but if we have people that are coming in from out of town and they're making a special trip to be here, the least we could do is all of us be here.
Well, I don't think that the board members that are not here knew this.
No, I have a feeling that they're on vacation.
Let's see.
No way we could twist the law and let three board members review the plans?
I apologize, but no. I wish, but no. No, at that point, if there's no quorum, staff has certain recommendations already. However... You know, the code requires comments be made within 60 days. So we would look at whether these will get pushed to the next meeting. And anyone that is hitting the 60 days would move forward with whatever staff comments are there. That's what the code provides for. So ideally, we would have our quorum today, but that's going to depend on the fellow board members.
Okay. Just wait a little bit more. Sure.
Alex, I don't have to wait the 60 days, though. Don't I have authority as a development services director to approve?
So the request for the single-family homes, yes. And for the... Architectural conditions review here on DRB 2026, number 11. They're not requesting any sort of exception or variance, correct? Correct. It's just review?
They're just coming back for the second. You don't have to come before or after commission. Correct. And I believe for the finishes on the exterior.
Right. This is limited only to, it's something that we've already reviewed and you're looking at the exterior only. Correct. I'm pulling up the code right now just so that I don't say anything that is completely out of line. So give me one second. Let me pull up that section.
OK. Really quick, the city clerk just came in and she said that we're not going to have quorum. Danny Guerra, Christian Rodriguez, and and Angel, they all sent correspondence to the clerk saying that they weren't going to be able to attend.
Okay, give me give me Yeah, give me give me just two minutes. Let me look up exactly what what the procedure is for this. And I will go for the next steps for this application. Let me go ahead and give me one second for that.
Well, as you're doing that, Alex, as you're doing that, let me just ask us tsunami and make it on the record for the board that we should go back to the three more member as a quorum. And this got changed to four. And I think we should go back to the three member quorum because here we are, we have three. And I'm kind of, I feel bad for the folks that flew in specifically for this. they would like to have heard what needed to be heard and stated. And so unfortunately now we can't give them our opinion, what we see or what was approved by commission.
So my understanding is that the quorum is set by the number of members on the board and not an arbitrarily set number. So if you have seven members, a quorum is four. You can't say it's three. I understand that.
But it wasn't that way before. It was always three no matter what. Even when we had nine, that's what I was saying going back to the old days. Again, it's your call. You're the boss.
I think it's Alex because I think it's a legal issue It's not something that we see that it's that quorum is defined as that but I'll let him out Quorum is quorum is set by code at four members and it was raised.
I want to say I don't know if it was eight nine months ago. It was it was raised So give me one second
And so the rest of the other, I guess it says no quorum, all the rest of the other applicants also get approved today, correct?
I believe so.
Or it's left up to staff to review and do what they have to do. I got you. Bye.
Board members, and Surami, so the directive from the commission just confirmed was that this item be heard for the exterior changes to the facade by this board. That said, what we're going to do is this item is going to come back at the next DRB meeting, and we will hear it at that point.
OK. All right?
On the single-family homes, those will go with, because those do not have the same kind of directive from the commission and because single-family homes, again, are a different type of review to the non-single-family homes, those can go with staff's recommendations and go continue through the process. However, the subtext item A on your agenda is going to come back.
Okay. To the next meeting.
Correct.
Understood. Okay. Well, it's 8.43 now, so I guess if we have no forum, we should just close this meeting.
And the next date, the next board meeting is going to be...
I believe is... July 7th. July 7th. July 7th at 8.30. all right very good okay thank you all for uh all of you that showed up appreciate it hopefully we'll have a quarter next time thank you very much thank you bye-bye have a good day bye-bye thank you everybody
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.