Planning Board - Regular Meeting

26. I will start with a citizen's opinion as always. If you have anything to discuss legally, please raise your hand or come out in a group. I can't see anyone. You don't raise your hand in Zoom. All right. Then I'll move on to the case. First of all, I would like to inform you that there was a request for the removal of Maple Road 9. This request will affect the second half of the will. Is there anything else you would like to add? No. However, I will only tell you that it is here so that you can explain the problem when you need it. All right. Then shall we deal with it at the hearing? Or shall we deal with it now? It would be good to take action in advance before the hearing. All right. If you have anything to say, please let me know. I don't have anything to tell you in particular. I asked you to sign up during the revision of the plan. All right. Are you going to be back when you're ready? Yes, I'm going to be back when I'm ready. And can you tell me your name for the record? Oh, yes. I'm Patrick Perkins. Yes. This is JP Contracting. Good. Do you have any other questions at the board meeting? Or, if you're ready, would you like to tell me? I suggest that we approve the termination without prejudice at the board meeting. Apostrophe. I think it would be more appropriate to say that we approve the termination without prejudice. Request, proposal, and request have been completed. Do you have a discussion? No. Is there anyone who agrees? Yes. Is there anyone who disagrees? It has been passed as a full-fledged. All right. Next case. We need confirmation of Blanchard Road 18, 20, and 22. Christian, can you explain this case? Yes. This application is for ANR, construction, and re-evaluation. What I have reviewed includes all the elements necessary for the ANR plan, including the required front length. As far as I know, the applicant is here, so please explain the details. However, in my opinion, it seems that four or three notes are combined. And there is also a work to re-arrange the notes by changing the note boundary. I have reviewed all the rules and regulations, but the applicant will explain them in more detail. Yes, I see. The applicant seems to be online. I would appreciate it if you could hand over the microphone. Mr. Mulby. Yes, I'm sorry. It was muted. Thank you. Yes, we have owned Blanchard 22 for quite a long time. We have owned it for 25 years, and we have imported the 20th from the article a few years ago. Combined, the area is a little over 73,000 square feet. We, on the other hand, agreed to sell 7,300 square feet of land to us. Thanks to that, we were able to secure a little over 80,000 square feet of land that required 80,000 square feet to meet the regulations of No. 20 and No. 22. We hired a company called Peeling Associates to review the whole of the new land, including the wetlands. And we think we've met these requirements. As Christian mentioned, we've been very careful about the width and the distance. Yes, I am. Yes, that's right. Well, it seems that you filled in the necessary land area by combining the land you acquired from your home, a small land you acquired from your home and a small land you acquired from your neighbor's house. And everything else, including the roadside path and the entrance road, seems to be fine. It will be detailed in the memo of the city planning officer. Yes. I always thought that these small lands, especially due to this reason, are a bit strange how the law is composed, but in my opinion, this plan is very clear, so I don't think I need to touch it anymore. Yes. Honestly, I don't remember how the small land first came about and became a village property, but that's not important. Yes. Would you like to have a beer and talk later? There must be a story. Yes, yes, there is. Actually, there's a long story. Yes. All right. Do you have any other questions or concerns? I don't need approval from the board of directors. I suggest a case that recommends related paperwork to employees. I agree. There was a suggestion and agreement. Was there a discussion on this case? No. Is there anyone who agrees? Yes, yes. Is there anyone who disagrees? It has been passed. Thank you. Thank you for your time. All right. Let's move on to the next. This is another ANR application for Crosby Road 35. Yes, likewise, we reviewed the application for ANR, and it contains all the necessary elements and documents. The roadside road conditions are also sufficient. It is to divide one sign into two signs. The applicant is here. You can explain more details. If necessary, Mr. Mark Santora seems to be here to speak to the board. Yes, hello, Mark. Tell me, Mark. Hello, how are you? This is Mark Santora. Oh, this is the property owned by Adams Corporation, which used to be Grafton Merit. We have completed the mowing work on Merit. The part marked with the number 1 marker is a place where Merit operation is not carried out, and it will be separated from the main marker. The purpose of this plan is to separate the relevant part from the original document, and when this plan is approved and registered, the original document will be registered as the management document of the land. Then, a right of ownership restriction for the rest of the original document is set, which is a measure that announces that the relevant document is a permanent land. This is a procedure to be carried out in cooperation with the Department of Environmental Protection . When you look at it from the road, Meripji is a high hill with an air-conditioning light, and that part is a large field. This area is on the left side of the hill when you look at it from the road. Yes, that's right. So, when I'm standing on Cross B Road and looking at the entire area. The first note on the drawing is the closest to the leftmost part of the land, the Brigham Hill Road. Yes. Do you have any questions? I don't have any. The transfer process would have been interesting, but it's not something we're going to discuss right now, and it's not a problem to proceed with the NR land use plan. Do you have any other questions? Mark. To be clear, I think the number 1 sign can be used for other purposes. And like other lands on Crosby Road, is water supply supplied to Crosby Road? There is enough soil to install a purification system. Currently, there is no plan to build any buildings with Medoin, but I think it is reasonable to separate it from the main building. And it would be better to separate the document first before submitting any documents. Currently, the EPA is in the process of issuing the final proof of closure, and the next step is to submit the NOLO report on the document. Therefore, if you submit the NOLO first, someone will If you want to use the place that is marked with the number 1 mark, you will have to remove the mark. So, you have to submit the NOA first so that the number 1 mark can be freely used without any restrictions. Yes, I understand. The board decides that approval is not necessary and proposes a case to write related documents to the employee in charge. I agree. Propose and request. Was there a discussion on this case? No. Is there anyone who agrees? I agree. Is there anyone who disagrees? It has been passed in full. Thank you. Thank you. Have a good night, everyone. All right. Next is the decision draft for 41 Pleasant Street. Yes. This is a draft decision made after the approval of the ADO, which was used for protection in the last meeting. I wrote it down and added it to the meeting data. If you have any questions or corrections, I will tell you. Now we are ready to vote in the board meeting. Yes, there was no question. Is there anyone who has a question for Christian? All right. I will submit a consent form. The board will positively judge all the survey results and approve all the exemptions requested, and propose to approve the subpoena plan, including all conditions that can be corrected in the written content and the consent discussion. Request, consent and request. Was there a discussion on the consent form? No. Those who agree, those who disagree. It has been passed as a full-fledged agreement. All right. It's a new Dunkin sign. I'm going to remove it tonight. Well, I think we need a little more detailed explanation. This is a decision on the actual changes and subtle modifications to the 72nd Wooster Street building. Christian, would you like to speak first? Mr. Christian, would you like to go first? Yes, I'll tell you a few details and hand them over to the applicant. I submitted a remodeling plan for the exterior, branding, and signage at the Dunkin' Donuts store on 72nd Street, Worcester Street. We have discussed whether or not we need special permission for these changes in cooperation with the building inspector. Yes, this request is about all construction-related matters related to signage. This request is to determine whether or not the existing special permission and subordination plan should be revised according to the construction range. This building has a long history of special permission and revision. I took a lot of time to review the relevant documents. You can come to the office anytime and discuss with me. But this time, The limited content is a minor level compared to previous corrections. However, It is up to the committee to decide whether or not it needs to be corrected. The applicant is here to explain this part. Hello, I'm Sean Donahue. I am working at Sign Design Sign Design in New Bedford, Massachusetts. We are planning to make and install the limited signboard. The current location is the Dunkin' Refresh, Dunkin' Refresh store remodeling construction is underway. As you know, this is a Dunkin' Donuts store, and we are planning to maintain the Dunkin' Donuts brand. Our proposal is to design each signboard as follows. But that building... There are elements such as a large PVC cup icon. We are asking whether these things should be used as a signboard and whether they should be made with the same design as the existing signboard. In some cases, N is smaller than the existing design, and in some cases, N is slightly larger. But to be clear, we plan to adjust the signboard package as similar as possible to the existing design. There is a graphic on the car window, but when I talked to Christian, I didn't think I would see these things as a signboard. So we thought we might have to use a signboard. We also need a clearer direction. This request is about the car window, the signage on the outside wall of the building, and the drive-through menu. The signage related information is still under review and is in line with the signage request. Therefore, this external information is to confirm that there is no need to modify the existing special permission. Yes, then, is the information being reviewed here not related to the change in building area? Are there any changes to the entrance or other external elements? Basically, these are the changes to the external elements attached to the building. For example, the direction signboard will remain as it is and only the surface will be newly designed. It will be replaced with a new color. The drive-through order canopy and the height sensor of the entrance will also be newly decorated. The structure itself will be left as it is, painted in a new color, and new graphics will be added. However, in the lower part of the order canopy, the phrase will remain as it is. That's not going to happen. New paint will be painted, the outside will be painted white, and the order will be attached to the side. The height sensor is also in a similar situation. It says drive-through, but it's painted orange now. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm going to put a pink graphic on the white background. I'm going to erase the letter drive through and paste the three letters in pink. And I'm going to add a small medal-shaped sign with a car icon in the shape of a cup. It's not a word. I don't know what that means. Dave, stop talking. I'm sorry. Oh, it's okay. I don't know if I got it right, but if you combine the data and what you said, the height of the sound source and the height sensor will not be changed. Yes. It's the same as it is now, right? Yes, that's right. And the size, pillar, and installation position of the entrance and exit signs remain the same. Yes, only the lens with new graphics will be replaced. From what I've heard, and I don't think cars or canopies will be referred to as advertising signs, and so will car icons. In my opinion, it is closer to the purpose of inducing traffic flow. Since the menu board is not facing the road, you don't have to worry about the size or overall structure of the structure. I think it's almost the same size. Yes, I can't think of anything right now. What I'm curious about is the part where advertising signage-related regulations can be applied. That part is still under review. So that's not what we're looking at right now. Yes, there are things that are not related to the signboard, apart from the guest space. It's like a drive-through. We make and install it, but we didn't know how to apply to get permission. While reading the application, it was honestly a little interesting and ridiculous. Especially in 1993, when I saw the special permission application, it was even more so. Oh, 1993. No. After 1993. Yes, that's right. It was my second year at the board of directors and my first year as a secretary. I put a lot of effort into this. At that time, I remember that I was very sensitive to the location and color of the signboard. It's been over 30 years. I don't think it's going to change, and I don't know if we have the right to speak about the gap under the signboard. If there's no gap, it's not our problem, it's the business owner's problem. There's nothing better than now. What I'm saying is just inefficient. The other one is money. It says you have to keep the money under special conditions, but you're not touching it now. But when I'm sitting here, Rand Bachelet says, He claimed that there should be a dome to make a permit. Yes. And it's still there, and I want the dome to stay the same. When did you build the 별관? It's not 1993. 1993 was the original store, and it was built around 2013 or 2014. Yes. He must have done something. Yes. Yes. He built it to make the traffic flow smooth. Yes. It was a gas station between the 90s and the 93s. Was it a gas station? Or was it a gas station? Maybe. Yes. I think it was a gas station. Yes. Yes. I remember there was a gas station there before. Yes. And this is the improved part after construction. And later, I had to dig up the hill again to make the second lane. I watched all this process. In my opinion, this is not it. I think what's being discussed tonight seems to be a very clear minor amendment to me. So I agree. I request. I request. All right. I agreed and requested. Was there a debate on the case? No. Everyone who agrees. Yes, everyone who opposes. The first case won't be easy. Thank you all. Thank you for your time. Now, let's move on to the discussion. Could you explain a little more about MILUS? Yes, I know a little about this project. Uh, this is a major project, and we aim to integrate and adjust the overall goals of the region, which include the use of various types of land. We are making major efforts to create tools that can prioritize specific types of projects in various fields such as housing, energy, and environmental preservation. It is an interesting project. I have not been deeply involved in this project, but this discussion confirms that the CMRPC will hold a council meeting for all villages in the region. I think I can participate, too. And one member of the board of directors, a technical support agency, or another member of the board of directors is asking you to attend the meeting. Therefore, this discussion is to decide who wants to attend the board of directors. Now, is there anyone interested? When? When? I know there are two meetings in October and November. I'll check it out. It's okay if someone else does it. Yes, I don't know this topic very well. I've seen it mentioned a few times, but I think it's a topic that I should be interested in. Let's do that. Did I agree to join as a board member? Yes, there is. You don't need to make an agreement separately, do you? No, it's not necessary, but there's nothing bad about it. But there's no one else. If someone volunteers to participate, that's enough. Thank you for your support. Yes, I agree. Of course, I'm not the one who approves the agreement here. Yes, I think it's enough to participate in the resource. Then should we appoint Dave as a participant? There were two meetings, and Christian can provide you with information. Or I'll tell you about the Massachusetts land use strategy. All right. Yes. Yes. There are a few minutes left until the beginning of the public hearing. Let's deal with the general case. I think there are a few bills. I suggest that the bill be approved as it currently is. Request. Request and request completed. Do you have a discussion? No. They are all approved. Approved. Opposite. It has been passed in full. There is a meeting on August 24th. During the discussion of the meeting on August 24, 2026, we suggest that we approve the current draft by reflecting the modified information found. Request, proposal and request completed. Have you discussed the case? I didn't have anything to modify. I'm the same. It looks okay. Yes. Do you agree? Agree. Opposite. It has been passed as a perfect match. All right. Christian, please report the employee report. You shared one of the previous meeting materials. Please continue and let me know if you have any other materials. This is an employee report. I didn't see it myself at the last meeting. The main issue was that there was a request for a 1727 update. So Brennan Properties Development shared the relevant data for the board's review. Other updates I've heard are that she hired an employee named Katharine DeChali. She is a security and planning officer. If her name is mentioned in the future, it's her. She went to work on Tuesday, no, last Tuesday. So today is the second week. This is all the updates I've heard. All right. Do you have any other questions for Christian? No. When will it be finished? I'll tell you at the next meeting. Oh, I see. I want to hear it. Free parking. And another thing to pay attention to is Pine Street. Yes, there is that too. A few months before the MBTA overlay, maybe a few months before, we came back to ease the pressure on housing prices, and we discussed how to modify the original plan. I don't remember how much time was left, but I think we need to figure out that situation. It's on the hospital side, right? Yes, yes, I see. I'm curious about the progress of the Claremont project on the selection side. It's a project to cut down the mountain. Yes, yes. I've been in touch with you a few times, and it's even better in this society. If you want an official written response or update, you can be exempted. Approval I would appreciate it if you could let me know the end date. Yes, as you know, about 2 years ago, there was a constant activity around MBTA Station, especially 1727 Road, but there was no other news since then. So I'm a little curious about that part. I don't think it's urgent, but I'd like you to reflect on the employee report as soon as the information comes in. Yes. How is UPS going? How is the traffic light going? Yes. I went there to check the progress with Graves. The first time I visited was in June, and the second was at the end of August. This is a really amazing structure. The progress was really fast. We are converting to the stage where the applicant, i.e. the tenant, begins to enter the building. Overall, it is going well. The traffic light improvement construction is in charge of the engineering department with the support of VHP. Yes, this is the engineering team. Our engineering department. Yes, this is our engineering department. We haven't confirmed the construction progress yet, The most important thing is that the UPS nephrologist is burdening the entire cost. Yes, we need to make sure of that part. This is what I asked them before. Yes, we are currently in progress. Thank you. Yes, yes. Chris Jen, would you like to say something? Employee Report 1727 is really well written. Very good. Yes. In my opinion, or in your opinion, it's not necessary to ask for a general progress update. It's just that we don't have any news yet. We're still working on it. We submitted an approval letter. You just have to let us know what's going on. We don't want to distribute your resources too much. That's my point. So, it would be great if we had the same data we just received. You're welcome anytime. But the basic update, so simple additional information, can be said to be my standard line. Yes, that's no problem, and that's all I can see. It was just the data provided by the development team. As I said, it was perfect. I like it. It's longer than they expected. Yes, about the Claremont Project and the Eight Pine Project, I'll find out when the approval date is and let you know again. Thank you. Yes. Finally, have you seen any letters from other areas? It looked like lettuce from another village. Yes. Can we finish the report of the Town Committee and CMRPC representatives in two minutes? Is it too hasty? Let's get started. Is there anyone who would like to make a presentation? I attended the CMRPC meeting. It was mentioned in the meeting. They talked about the history of CMNPO. MPO is a higher institution than other institutions run by the Planning Committee and the Federal Reserve. I have been a member of the NPO for quite a long time as a representative of CMRPC. I don't know if it's well known, but there are five sub-regions, and representatives of NPO can be dispatched from each region. The committee of senators in each sub-region must gather to nominate a representative. I sent a notice to the pre-employment committee. Sometimes I don't think this procedure is properly followed. However, I saw one of the pre-employment committee members in our region attending the meeting, and I think he is also the representative. Anyway, there was a picture of me at an MPO meeting in 2003. I think it was a meeting that changed from a 4-member MPO to a 11-member MPO. I was wearing a shirt, a tie, and a jacket. I'll have to take it again. I think it was around 6 to 7.30. It ends at exactly 7.30. Yes. There is nothing to report on this item. Yes. Then, let's move on to the public hearing on the account of the data center-related request. Yes. I can't see the external parts of the online. Is there anything else you'd like to say before we start the public hearing? These are the two main contents, i.e. changes in definition and usage, and now we have to officially start the public hearing. Oh, I see. The legal document was not included in the meeting data, do you have any related data? Yes, that's good. Oh, Mr. Clark, please do that. The law enforcement officer is in front of you. Yes, that's why I wasn't sure. Thank you. According to Article 5 of the Constitutional Law of Massachusetts, The Graffiturn Planning Committee will hold a meeting at the Graffiturn Convention Center Conference Room A on September 14, 2026, at 7.30 p.m. on Monday, September 14, 2026. The purpose of this meeting is to provide you with an opportunity to present your opinions on the Graffiturn Convention Registration Act submitted to the Year-End Town Meeting in the fall of 2026. Next, we will update the ZBL 2.1 and 3.2.3 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 and ZBL 2026-01 The official account of Grafton Group is located in the Planning Committee Office of the Grafton Memorial Implementation Center in Paunseo-gi, and you can contact us during the normal work hours. If you need special convenience when attending the meeting, please contact us at 508-839-5325-41400. Thank you. Now we will start the meeting. Um, so... Where was I? What I'm saying is that these are the things we discussed and reviewed, and there are two parts. Um, this case includes a summary, right? Actually, I don't know this part very well. Who is writing the summary? Are we submitting it? Or are the people running the town council writing it? In general, the town administration and its staff are working with the financial committee and fill out the case summary. The financial committee usually presents a proposal with an explanation. I see. Yes, the reason I asked this is because I want to hear other people's thoughts. If you know well how these two things are related, you can clearly see that this action does not allow data centers anywhere in the village. Well, depending on how clear the summary is, there may be confusion at the actual resident meeting. Well, I don't think we have to announce anything, but should we wait in preparation for someone to ask a question? And if there is a question for a clear explanation, I am ready to answer it. You or him, or both. Yes. Well, 제가 잘 모르는 게 있는데요. 음, 우리가 기억할 수도 있겠지만, 어디에 적어야 할지 모르겠지만, 우리가 선출위원회와 만났을 때, 제 기억으로는 그들이 일종의 유예 조치를 상당히 강력하게 지지하는 것 같았습니다. 그리고 우리는 지금으로서는 이 법을 통과시키는 것이 가장 확실한 방법이라고 결론네. Yes, this problem. It's very variable, and the main government and the federal government are taking different measures, and we know everything we can do. Yes, but. No one. When considering the fact that they did not oppose or agree to the data center, this is our judgment. We think this is our best strategy. Yes, yes. When there is a discussion about the draft at the town council, we prepare information so that the participants can take it and read it. And of course, we have to write a report on the official planning committee that contains recommendations on this matter. After the meeting is over, you can give the plan manager the authority to write a report reflecting the opinion of the committee. After the meeting is over, if the committee decides to support this, you can proceed as follows. I've heard enough of all the opinions that will come out of this public hearing, so I suggest we end the public hearing. I agree. Request and request. Is there a debate? No. All those who agree. Yes. All those who disagree. All right. We'll end the public hearing. And. We can officially submit a consent form, or the board members can agree to submit a report that the employees will submit to the resident council. We generally review and approve the report before the resident council. We still think this is the right thing to do until the hearing is over. Yes, yes, I think we should say that somehow. Yes, I agree that we are still confident. Agree. Agree and request. Was there a discussion about this? No? Do you all agree? Yes. Is there anyone against? We are still confident. Yes, so? After reviewing the report, I think Dave's idea is good. It's about making very concise information. In the current situation, it may take one or two meetings to find a very clear explanation of the meaning of the data center and the reason why it is not allowed technically. Oh, and as you know, the general purpose is that someone will be able to get permission to proceed with the project in the construction and construction area, but they will not be blocked by the construction site. On the other hand, it is different from saying that it is not allowed unconditionally to meet the conditions defined by us as a data center. Yes, I think this part can be explained relatively easily if you focus on what role it plays. Yes. In the current district setting, I think there may be an argument that it is not allowed in the construction industry area. Is that right? That's what we're talking about right now. Because the demonstration was not clearly defined, it was said that it was not technically allowed anywhere. Yes. But I think we all agree that it is dangerous to just leave it open without clarifying it like this. So that we don't know what is allowed and what is not allowed by external parties. That's why it's so important to define and include it in the user's list. And that's why it's much clearer. But that's just a simple explanation. That's why the violation of the law doesn't make sense. The violation of the law is actually prohibiting what is not allowed. It becomes very clear that it is not allowed to do this. The danger I'm worried about is that if something is not specifically mentioned, there is an objection to find the most similar use in the law. If that happens, there could be a problem, but it would be better not to make such a problem. Yes, we all agree. I think it's over now. We're still convinced. I'm sorry, Michael. I'll give you a quick question. There was a discussion about making a simple input for town council members. I think I would be satisfied if the planning office cooperates with the technical manager, TA, and the social worker to include the information in the regular data. Is that enough? Or do you think you need a separate input? We have to submit a report to the town council according to the order. One of the submitted documents is the town council report. In the past, one of us stood up and read a report at a village meeting. But in the last few years, one of the previous planning managers probably pressed us to change it to a written report. As far as I remember, it was enough to provide a written report so that the town council members could read it, and it was concluded that one of us should stand up and say that the planning committee approved or supported it. Yes, without reading the entire report. I've read the report a long time ago, so I've read it myself. Yes, Michael, as you said. In my opinion, it would be sufficient to check if the summary part was very clearly written in cooperation with the TA office. You may not need a separate paper. Yes. Anyway, the official report of the Planning Committee will be printed and provided to the TA office. All right. If you don't need anything else, I'll stop doing anything. In my opinion, I don't think it's going to be hard for this case to pass. I think I don't have to worry about it. I'm not worried about it passing. However, I don't know if the distribution data is a legal requirement or a regulation. Well, I think we can proceed as we have done so far. Yes, as someone said, I think this case will be passed as long as the content is clear. It also matches the opinions I've heard from the villagers so far. And I... You can check if the data you are preparing is enough to submit to the board of directors in cooperation with the TA office, whether it should be included in the report or should be added according to what is allowed. You can prepare anything you need. I think it's okay to send me the data you're working on, but I don't think it's necessary. I think people are worried more than necessary, so you can send it. But you can send it anytime. Thank you for working hard. I believe you will solve it well. Yes, please continue to do so. All right. Yes. All right. Yes. Lastly, if you have any questions when you cooperate with the PA office, please let us know how we can respond. I think it's a good idea to deal with me together. Please let us know how to do it best. Yes. All right. All right. Yes. Yes. We can do it. In my opinion, I think the selection committee is now handling most of the cases. This case is... Yes, the selection committee has handled all the cases except for the citizens. The selection committee has read all the cases except for the citizens. Bob, you may remember, but there was a time when the committee that submitted the cases read them themselves. Oh, yes. 제가 제 몫을 많이 읽었기 때문에 최대한 빨리 읽었죠 왜냐하면 모두 집에 가고 싶어 했거든요 이제는 그렇게 하지 않습니다 옳든 그르든 이제는 그렇게 하지 않아요 그럼 저희는 TA 사무실의 연락을 기다리겠습니다 감사합니다 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다 좋습니다 Then the village meeting preparation is all over. The next meeting was a filed case. Is there any other case to be filed in front of us legally? Did we vote? This is classified as a special hearing. Do we have to vote? As we mentioned at the top of the menu, they filed the 9th Maple application. Yes, I know. I filed it. We agreed to allow the filing through voting. So there's no public hearing now? This is a good question. This must have been the first public hearing. Yes, I don't know how it went in the past, but to put it bluntly, we withdrew the application without prejudice. The public hearing announcement was released. So, in order to make everything clear, we started the hearing, read the announcement of the public hearing, and announced that the applicant had withdrawn the application, and ended the public hearing. So I agreed. Yes, I agree. Thank you. I don't have an announcement of the hearing. I'll look for it. 여기 있었나요? 만약 자료에 있다면 제가 찾아볼 수 있지만 저는 찾지 못했습니다. 회의 자료에 있었을 텐데요. 보통 청문회 회의 자료에 있죠. 어디 보자. 공고 자료 3번입니다. 네. 있네요. 네. 그렇다면 제가 찾아보겠습니다. 감사합니다. It's my fault. It's okay. I had a seat and only handled what was in the red folder. I didn't bring any other data. Thank you. Yes. According to the 1.3.3 and 5.13 of the Grafton Town Act, The Planning Committee is scheduled to hold an open hearing on September 14, 2026, at 7.30 p.m. on Monday. At the Graffiton Memorial Inspection Center 30 Providence Road Conference Room A, the Graffiton Emotional Evaluation List 34, and the MAPE Road AV, which is marked on page 42, will hold a public hearing to request approval for the construction of the ADO, a protected residential area for the MAPE Road AV. The site is located in the R20, a medium-density residential area. The applicant is John Basho, owner of JEP Contracting No. 2. Thank you. All right. As I said before, the application has been withdrawn. I will agree to terminate the public hearing. I agreed and re-appointed. Is there anything to discuss? No. Are you in favor? Yes. Are you against? I propose a disqualification. I re-appointed. Oh, no other opinions? Yes. There is no room for debate. Are you in favor? Yes. I disqualify. Thank you. 네.