Planning & Zoning Commission - Regular Meeting

Please stand and uh let's do the pledges of allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Honor flaggod one and indivisible. All right, we're now going to consider the items on the consent agenda approving the minutes and then there one, two, three, seven cases or so. Do I have a motion?

Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion to approve the consented items with one correction on the case file number 20 24 that next to the last line there supposed to be half a mile and they made half a mile one word. Okay. All right. Make that little correction. All right. I think I'm good for it. Is there a second? Second. All in favor say I.

I. Moving on now we are in the uh public hearing portion of the agenda. First matter is case file number 2025-05. Uh it says a open public hearing to consider approval of request of LCA on behalf of county as owner for original zoning request of light industrial upon annexation into seal limits for vacant land being 4.897 897 acres. Properties located in section 46, block 42, Township 1 South, Texas Pacific Railway Company Survey, generally located intersection of East Yukon Road and North Ectctor Avenue. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Commission members. Um the applicant LCA consultant county tech and extra county Texas owner is requesting an original zoning of light industrial upon annexation into the city limits to facilitate the development of the youth detention center. The annexation is in process with the city and like I mentioned the proposed development is a youth center detention center that will be located on this 4.897 acres. All the requested documents have been submitted and staff recommends approval of the original zoning of light industrial for a present jail youth detention center facility uh subject to the conditions A and B which are approval of the SUP and the landscape shall conform to the regulations set forth in article 10 of the city of Odessa uh code ordinances. I'm here for any questions.

Okay, anyone have questions for staff? If there are no questions of staff, then I would note that this is a public hearing. If there's anyone in the audience this afternoon that wishes to speak in favor of or in opposition to this matter, now would be the time to come forward. Seeing no one come forward, I will close public discussion and turn the commission for any other discussion or a motion. So move. A motion for approval. All in favor say I. I. I. Motion second by Gary.

Second cuz she didn't see that. Uh motion passes. Number 10 on the agenda. This is one where we're missing the the number. That's the answer. Yes. This is the extra sheet.

It's extra sheet. All right. Uh, it's open to public hearing to consider approval of of the request by Maverick Engineering for a zone change from future development to light industrial on 3.0 acre tract of land located section 25 block 42 T2S 10P Railway County survey. property is generally located on the south side of East Pearl Street and approximately 1665 ft west of Reed Avenue.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Commission members. There were five notices sent, zero protests, zero approvals, and zero returns. The applicant is Maverick Engineering. They're requesting a zone change from future development to light industrial zoning district for a three on a 3acre track located in the section 25 block 42 T2STMP railway company survey city of Odessa Ectctor County, Texas. Analysis of the request is that the property is located on the south side of East Pearl Street, approximately at 1,665 ft west of Reed Avenue, and it's currently uh originally zoned future development. Originally designated future development. It contains two buildings. Its surrounding land uses include industrial development to the north, east, and west with vacant land to the south. Um they are requesting a zone change to light industrial to allow for future development of workforce housing. This application pertains only to the zoning change. So this request is only for zoning at this time. It is important to note that the workforce housing is not by right use in light industrial district and is permitted only with approved specific use permit as request required by the city of Odessa zoning ordinance. A separate SUP application will be submitted following the zoning request to seek approval for the proposed workforce housing use. This request has been evaluated in the context of the city of Odessa's comprehensive plan using key planning priorities as follows. For comprehensiveness, the proposed zoning change is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The property is situated near other areas also zoned light industrial. The intended use aligns with the existing and planned industrial entes in the vicinity. For livability, the proposed light industrial zoning is not anticipated to have a negative impact on the site or surrounding properties. Workforce housing as a transitional land use is compatible with the area's current development patterns. For reasonleness,

the zone change represents a logical and reasonable transition between similar intensity land uses, and it will not disrupt the character of the area and is compatible with adjacent zoning and last land use patterns. Based on the analysis above, staff recommends approval of the zone change requests subject to the following conditions. Uh A, the property shall comply with applicable light industrial standards regulations as outlined in the city of Odza zoning ordinance. And B, workforce housing shall not be permitted on this site without the approval of the specific use permit as requested under section 14-2-7 G of the zoning ordinance. I'm here for any questions. Okay. Yeah. Anyone have questions?

Okay. If there no questions of staff, then I would again note this is public hearing. Is there anyone here today that wishes to speak in favor of or in opposition to this matter? Seeing no one come forward, I will close public portion. Is there a motion and second? I'll make a motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. A motion second. All in favor say I. I.

Any opposed? Same. Same. Going on to case file number 2025-22Z. Uh this involves a public hearing to consider approval of the request by Rampart Texas LLC owners Watermill Express as applicant to amend the site plan for plan development retail zoning district located on lot 7 block 27 North Country Club Estates uh fifth filing properties located northeast of intersection Loop 338 and East Ridge Road. Yes ma'am.

Thank you Mr. Chairman and members, the property involved in this request located on northeast corner of the intersection of East Rich Road and Loop 338. The site is currently designated plan development retail and is currently occupied by retail office trip center. Line use in the area consists of retail office development and apartments to the north, residential development to the south and east, and recreational open space that is UTPB to the west. The applicant Rampart Texas LLC owner is seeking to amend the existing site plan for the plan development uh retail in order to allow watermill structure to be located on the north elevation of the existing parking lot. The city council approved the plan development retail in August 1998 with the conditions that specific development standards uh and retail office uses be allowed on the property. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the site plan of the existing plan development retail to include as follows. A will allow a watermill structure to be located within the property. The other conditions of the plan development will not be affected by the proposed amendment. Planning staff analysis of the amendment request is that a watermill structure will meet the land use criteria of the city of Odessa for retail and service uses to be located on the intersection of a major highway and collector street. Staff is the opinion of the watermill structure is a compatible use for this location and has no objection to the request as presented. Based on the proceeding analysis, staff recommends approval of the request subject to conditions A through D.

Okay. There were no protests. There were the last time we had at this property there was it was a doughnut shop. We had a couple people. That one had a lot. Uh there were 23 notices sent, zero denials. There were two approvals and one return uh mail. Very good. All right. Thank you. Any other questions of staff? I'll close public portion. Turn to staff if uh have any discussion or a motion. Move for approval. Is there a second? I'll second. A motion second. All in favor say I.

Any opposed? Same size. Notice who was on council in 1998 for they are now. Oh, I'm sorry. That probably went nicer. All right, that brings us to number 12. Case file number 2025-04 SUP. Uh, this is public hearing to consider request by LCA applicant for a specific use permit to allow a youth detention center to be located on a 4.897 acre track of land in section 46, block 42, Township 1 South, Texas Pacific Railway Company survey. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Commission and uh members, there are four notices sent, one approval, zero protest, and zero returns, see staff analysis of this request, excuse me, is that Ectctor County is proposing uh the phase development of secure youth detention center purpose built to provide a safe, structured, and rehabilitative environment for juveniles under court jurisdiction. The facility is designed to meet the diverse needs of youth while emphasizing public safety, rehabilitation, and community re reintegration. The proposed center will feature individual sleeping rooms furnished with basic amenities and direct access to bathrooms. Day rooms will serve as supervised common areas for social interaction and recreational activities. The facility will also h house on-site educational classrooms, counseling and therapy rooms, and multi-purpose spaces for vocational training, life skills development, and structured group programs. Additional features include indooroutdoor recreation areas, multiple dining areas, medical clinic, and laundry services, ensuring that all daily needs are met within a secure setting. Administrative offices and staff support will ensure areas will ensure proper oversight and operational agencies efficiencies, I'm sorry, to minimize off-site transportation and enhance overall safety. The design also incorporates a secure on-site courtroom to accommodate certain juvenile hearings. The facility is planned for construction in four phases with a total estimated area of 62,436 ft. The site plan includes two main entrances along East Yukon Road, each monitored by a security kiosk. A total of 55 vehicle parking spaces are proposed for to accommodate staff, visitors, and service providers. An existing 25 ft easement will provide continued access to the adjacent detention center promoting operational continuity. The project, excuse me, the site will be

enclosed by six feet chain link fence and buffered by perimeter landscaping including trees to provide visual screening and a soften interface with adjacent properties. The planning department finds that the proposed youth detention center is an appropriate and compatible use for this site. The project is thoughtfully designed to meet the needs of extra county juvenile population while maintaining a secure and respectful presence with the surrounding areas. Staff believes that any potential adverse impacts to the adjacent properties can be mitigated through proper site design, operational controls, and adherence to the following conditions which are listed on the screen. That is one separation requirement. Minimum separation of 420 ft must be maintained between the jail detention facility and any single family dwelling, two family dwelling, three family and four family dwelling, multif family dwelling or residents home for the elderly elderly. Two, that the detailed site plan submission more detailed site plan shall be provided clearly illustrating all walkways, pedestrian access points, including a comprehensive legend classifying land uses and functional functional areas. Sign compliance that all sign associated with the facility must comply with the parking zone and sign sign signage regulations outlined in the Odessa zoning ordinance chapter 14 article 14-4 sign regulations and any relevant parking ordinances under chapter 14 article 14-3 off street parking and loading the light number four is light industrial district compliance they shall comply with all applicable standards and regulations for light industrial zoning including land use building setbacks Landscaping and operational standards, operational standards, fire and building codes. Full compliance with all applicable Odessa fire department regulations and building inspection codes. Site plan adoption. Formal adoption of the submitted site plan by the city

council is required and the project must adhere strictly to the approved plan. Permit review and revocation. This permit will be subject to the review upon receipt of neighborhood complaints. This is temporary. This is a temporary permit and the city council reserves a right to revoke permit for violations of its terms or a facility demonstrates a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood following a public hearing in accordance with Odessa zoning ordinance chapter 14 article 14-2 section 14-213 permit revocation and enforcement and I'm here for any questions are there any question could you get all I can do

I would note that the existing facility is about 50 years old. I was probation off Jupiter probation officer of Witchaw County and at one time when this was built it was kind of the prototype the example uh for other youth centers. But that's 50 years ago. Time for something new. And it's right next door, right? Yes.

Okay. Any any other question of staff? Uh this is still part of the public uh portion of our our meeting today. Uh is there anyone in the audience today that wishes to speak in favor of or in opposition to this matter? Seeing no one come forward, let's close the public portion. Turn the commission. Anybody got a motion or so move? Have a motion. Is there a second? Second. Second. Have a motion. Two seconds. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Same sign.

Okay. Now under subp part five of the agenda, miscellaneous, the first matter under that category number 13 is case file number 2025-94P. This involves a preliminary plat of Clyde A pool's second filing being a replat of the south 15.3 ft of lot 9 all block 10 saving except the east 20 ft of said tracks block one Clyde A pools 2acre tracks. Yes sir.

Thank you Mr. Chair. We're going to give Maria a bit of a break. Uh so uh the owner Golder Self Storage LLC and consultant SW Howal Inc. are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Uh staff does recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Clyde Aool's 2acre tracks uh subject to the conditions A through C uh which are a blanket refuge collection easement will be required. Any work in the right of way or easements will require a permit from the engineering division and must comply with current city ordinances and approval of the plat subject to all plat comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent uh city departments before filing for recordation. And I'm here if you have any questions. Are there any questions?

No questions. Any discussion or a motion? So move. I'll second. I have a motion. Second. All in favor say I. I. Any opposed? Same sign. Going on to case file number 2025-97P. Uh this involves a replat of armor of Christ edition being 3.352 acres of land out of the armor of Christ edition city as county property generally located northwest corner of the intersection of New Road and Brown Avenue. Yes, sir.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh the owner TH and Eh Holdings LLC and consultant Piper Surveying are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Uh staff does recommend approval of the plat subject to the following conditions. That ownership and tax certificates need to be submitted prior to filing the plat. Uh that the plat is located in a multif family 2 zoning district. Uh minimum lot width is 50 ft. Minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet for single family detached lots. And then we have given a few different options for how to remedy that. Uh next was that they need to remove the names under city signature blocks. Um then the title of the plat should be updated to the next filing of the armor of Christ edition. Uh for example, armor of Christ edition so and so filing. Uh drainage report needs to be submitted. The tract is not in a special flood hazard area. Water, sewer, paving, and drainage plans need to be submitted for review and acceptance. An improvements agreement will be required. Any works in or any work in the rightway or easements will require a permit from the engineering division and must comply with current city ordinances and policies. And finally, approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments before filing for recordation. And I'm here if you have any questions.

Anybody got questions? Move for approval. Okay, I've got a motion, a second. All in favor say I. I. Any oppose? Same sign. Moving on. Now we're at uh case file number 2025-101P. This involves the preliminary plat of law enforcement center. Second filing being a replace of lot one block one law enforcement center generally located on the east side of South Crane Avenue and 150 ft south of South Interstate Highway 20 frontage road. Yes, sir.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh the owner Ector County and consultant LCA are seeking approval of a plat for a cemetery. Uh staff does recommend approval of the replat of the law enforcement center second filing subject to the conditions A through C. That being the replat should be filed prior to filing ETR County Cemetery South. That's an upcoming plat you'll see in a couple of cases. Uh access requirements from texttop must be met for access to the Interstate 20 frontage and Crane Avenue connector road. Uh, and that approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments. And I'm here if you have any questions. Any questions?

Oh, here comes trouble. It's not a public hearing. Yes. Okay. If there no uh question staff, then I'd stand for a motion. I'll make a motion to approve. I second. Motion second. All in favor say I. I. Motion passes. We just voted on 101. So, uh, they sorry, back there that we're talking, they already received the drainage and all the improvements. So, it allows them to move forward as a reflex. Do we need to take it back then?

Resend. It's going to cost you. So, it's not in a flood zone. Is that what you said? No, no, no. Um I don't know. Your mom can talk. So, usually um reflex are not allowed if they have drainage or or public improvements that need to be addressed. Oh, I see. Okay. But they have that addressed. Okay. Um and so that's why it qualifies now to move as a replay. If it proceeds as a preliminary, then it has to come back for a final. This way with a replat, this is the last time you'll see it and they can move on. Yes. Okay. A motion to reconsider.

So do motion to reconsider. I'll make a motion to reconsider. I'll second. All in favor say I. I. I. So now we're going to reconsider cash file number 2025-101p as a replat. Is that right? Instead of a preliminary plat. Uh staff wants us to consider this to be a replat of lot one block four. Anybody have any questions? Uh should we strike through some of the recommendations that have already is that part of that? Is that one of them? The conditions is a uh no that that should still remain.

Yeah. Yeah. All the conditions should still stay. Okay. Okay. So, as far as um approving this case file as a replat, do I have a motion for approval? So, move second. Have a motion. Second. All in favor say I. Any opposed? Same sign. Uh may we now proceed with case file number 2025-104P. Right. This this is a preliminary plaid workforce housing uh being three acres of land located section 25 block 22 D2S 10P railway company survey property's generally located on the south side of East Pearl Street and west of Reed.

Great. Sounds familiar. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh so the owner Amitgar uh and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plat with one lot for uh development purposes. Staff does recommend approval of the preliminary plat uh subject to the conditions A through C. That the E-CUD block needs to be removed. That the ETJ review block needs to be removed. And the approval of the flat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all city departments. And with that, I'm here for any questions. All right. Somebody's throwing the curveball. We got a difficult question.

I I was thinking on uh workforce housing. Is it like a five-year deal or is it a permanent deal? So, with workforce housing, they're going to be required to get an SUP. That's going to come to you at a later date. They have not requested that yet. Um, but they will do that. It will also be there'll be a site plan approval involved with that. So, they they'll have to go through all of that. Okay. All right. I'm I'm a step ahead. All right. Okay. Any other questions of staff? No questions. Uh, do I have other discussion or a motion? Motion to approve. I'll second. And a motion second. All in favor say I. I. I note that we're now at halftime. We're halfway through. 30 items on the agenda. Do we get intermission or popcorn?

Do we get snacks? All right, everybody ready to go on? All right, let's go. Case number 2025-109P. This involves the preliminary plat of Ector County Cemetery South uh being 19497 acres out of lot three, block one, law enforcement center. Second file. Any tricks on this one?

No, Mr. Chair. Uh, the owner Ectctor County and consultant LCA are seeking approval of the plat for a cemetery. Uh, staff recommends approval of the plat. Uh, this will be a replplot as well um for ETR County Cemetery South subjects to the conditions uh A through C, which is a replat of law enforcement center should be uh filed prior to filing this plat. This is the one that we saw just two cases ago. Uh access requirements from texttop must be met for access to the interstate 20 frontage and crane avenue connector road. Uh and approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments. I'm here cemetery.

It's the same one. So what they're doing is that first one was to separate it out and the second one was to do a replat. All right. Yeah. Any other questions? Anybody got a motion? Move for approval. I'll second and motion second. All in favor say I. Any oppose? Same sign. Uh moving on to case file number 2025-93P. This property is in ETJ. It involves the preliminary plat of Krasco subdivision first filing being 5.90 acres of land in section 16 block 42 T3 STP Railway Company survey. Yes sir.

Thank you Mr. Chair. Uh so the applicant SW Howal and Luis Krasco are seeking approval of a plat to create one lot for ownership purposes. Staff recommends approval of the plat of uh Krasco subdivision subject to conditions A through D. Uh one that the tract is not in the ECUD uh service area block should be removed. Uh B contact for access availability. Uh C access to US 385 will be coordinated and permitted by Tex dot. developer should apply for a driveway with text dot. Uh under current access management standards, the minimum spacing of access on this segment roadway is 425 ft. So a need for uh evaluation on existing driveways to determine the most uh appropriate location will be required. Uh and then approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments. That I'm here for any questions.

Any questions? If there are no questions, then let's talk about it or have a motion. So move. All right. No talk. Motion. Is there a second? Second. All in favor say I. Any oppos? Same time. Moving on. Case file number 2025-98 Propy again in the ETJ. Another preliminary plat. This is of Chaparel Estate Six filing which is a replat of lots 8 and 9 block 16 Chapel Estate 6 filing and the north 18 ft of lot one block 13 chapel states fifth filing. Yes sir.

Thank you Mr. Chair. So the owner Jose A. Dominguez and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Chapparella State 6th filing subject to conditions A through G. Uh, A that lot 8A should be changed to the next available number in block 16. B, current conditions should be removed from the face of the plat prior to filing. C, remainder of lot 1, block 13 looks to be under common ownership. If so, include remainder uh to create a new lot rather than leaving a portion of the lot remaining. D. Some sort of access easement between proposed lot 8A and remainder of lot one, block 13 might be considered and uh to maintain existing access to driveway. E. Development note number three needs to be removed. F uh use next available lot number for block 16. And G, approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments. And I'm here if you have any questions.

All right. Questions? All right. Uh discussion or a motion? I'll make a motion to approve. Got a motion to approve. Have a motion. Second. All in favor say I. Any opposed? Same sign. We're now number 20, case file number 2025-9P. Continuing in the ETJ. There's another preliminary plat. This involves Knox Village Ranchettes phase three being a replat of lot six and seven, lot five, Knox Ranch Ranchett phase two. Yes, sir.

Apologies about the uh presentation. It looks like there's some technical difficulties with some of the slides sinking over. Um, so I don't think we have this case up on the uh the screen.

Um, but the owner of Lojac Holdings and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Uh, staff does recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Knox Village Ranchettes phase 3 subject to conditions A through H. Uh, current conditions should be removed from the phase of the plat prior to filing. Uh, easements for pipelines should be shown if existing or dedicated on the plat. Uh, if e-cut water is available and intended to be used, add an e-cud block. If not, add a note stating that the intended water source is groundwater. Uh, D, drainage report needs to be submitted. E, platis is in the ETJ. Uh, correct the signature blocks. F, label lot as lot 14, block 5. G, uh, remove the block for the county judge. and H approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments uh before being filed for recordation with the county clerk of Ector County, Texas. With that, I'm here for any questions.

All right, somebody. All right, no questions. Stand ready for motion. So, so move motion to approve. Is there a second? I second. All in favor say I. Any oppos? same sign. All right. Case file number 2025-102P. This is is in the ETJ. It involves a preliminary plat of Octia Park fifth filing being a replace lots one and two block 33 Octia Park fifth filing. Generally located on south side West 16th and near North Roando.

All right. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh the owners Aurora Munoz uh Gutierrez and Juan Gutierrez Martinez and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Uh staff recommends approval of the preliminary flight of Okato Park fifth filing subject to conditions A through E. The title needs to be the next filing in Okato Park rather than listing it as the reflight of lots one and two. Uh lot should be the next four numbers in block 33 rather than 2A through 2D. Uh private street needs to be dedicated separately. uh e-cut signature block must be added and approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all city part departments and with that I'm here for any questions

any questions those are 1acre lots I believe they are showing is just over half an acre yeah half an acre so half an acre do we need e-ut water anything under an acre requires e-cut water okay and they have that available I believe it is available in the area. Yes. Okay. Yes. All right. Move for approval. Is there a second? Second. I'll second. Motion second. All in favor say I. I. I. Motion passes. We're

now at case file number 2025-03P. Still in the ETJ and uh working with preliminary plat. This one is on Westmore acres. Second filing being 2.45 acres of land out of lots seven and eight. block four west acres uh generally located south side of West 29th Street and 2200 ft east of North Alurus.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. So, the owner Manuel Dominguez and consultant Enrito are seeking approval of the plat for development purposes. Uh staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions. Uh county requirements for access must be met for all lots that an e-cut signature block must be added and approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments before being filed. With that, I'm here for any questions. Anybody got questions? If sewer is not available, they'll be responsible for that. Uh yes. So in the ETJ, it's usually septic. EA does not offer septic or sorry doesn't offer sewer. No question. Okay. Uh

I move to approve. Have a motion for approval. Is there a second? A second. All in favor say I. Any opposed? Same sign. Uh number 23 on the agenda involves case file number 2025-105p continuing in the ETJ. This is a preliminary plat of circle 7 estates. Fifth filing being a repat blocks five and six block six circle seven estates. Uh section two property generally located on the east side western drive and 450 ft south of East Poppy Drive. Yes, sir.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh this one's also not going to be up on the screen due to some of the issues. Um however, uh the owners L'Vor and Sandra Williams and consultant Piper Surveying are seeking approval of a plat for development purposes. Uh staff recommends approval of the plat um with one condition that the approval of the plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all city departments before being filed. I'm here if you have any questions.

He'd like to make a comment. It's not public. Uh find out what his issue is.

You got preliminary. Two lots, same driveway. You He did. Do you ever hear this case again at the end at the end?

No, you just kind of see what's going on. Why is your first Okay. I we discussed with engineering um Yervond and he he hasn't received that report. Um because the drainage report is still required, it still has to go through preliminary process.

Okay. Um as a preliminary and then a final. Okay. Unless the applicant wants to pull the item and they figure it out and then we bring it up. But you're going to be doing the same thing. And but I won't pay two fees. Oh, no. That's fine if that's But we submitted the drainage report on this and the uh subdivision. um that's in our department and our engineers they're here and they don't have it. So those are the options that we can give you. Do you want to pull your item or Okay. So he wants to pull it has to be pulled. Okay. So we're going to pull the item. So there's no action item.

So nothing that we nothing that we do. We don't take we don't worry about it. It's pulled and we're going to move on. Okay. While they figure it out.

Okay. We are now skipping case file number 205-105P. Moving on to case file number 2025-106P. Um, and this one is a motion involving preliminary plat of Eagle subdivision being 5 acres of land in section 43 block 43 T2 West 10P road company survey properties generally located on the north side of Interstate Highway 20 frontage road and approximately 550 ft west of South Knox Avenue. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members. I did have to make a correction. Originally, when we uh did the cover page or the agenda for this one, we had a caption that indicated it was uh see that it was uh Ectric County Youth Center at the subdivision. However, it is Eagle Subdivision. I just wanted to make that clear, that correction.

Okay, corrections noted. Um what else do we need to know about this? Okay. So, the owner Jose Mendula and consultant SW Hal are seeking approval of a plat for development purpose. This request has been routed to all respective departments for internal internal review and comments. Uh subject staff subject I'm sorry staff recommends approval of the prelim preliminary plat of the Eagle subdivision subject to condition A with the approval of this PL subject to all PL comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments before filing for recordation with the county clerk of Ector County, Texas. And I'm here for any questions. Anybody got questions?

All right, there's no questions. Can I stand ready for a motion? I move to approve. Have a motion for approval. Is there a second? I second. Have a motion second. All in favor, please say I. I. Any opposed? Same sign. Matter passes. We're now at case file number 2025-107P staying in the ETJ. Another preliminary plat. This now this one is of the youth, correct? Eric County Youth Center being 4.897 acres of land uh at section 46 block 42. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members. The owner Ector County and consultant LCA are seeking approval of a plat for a youth detention facility. The request has been routed to all respective departments for internal review and comments. The staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Vector County Youth Center subject to conditions A through G. A that improvements agreement will be required. Uh B blanket refuge collection easement agreement will be required. Drainage port needs to be submitted. The tract is not in special flood hazard area. Uh D is to extend the 8 inch water and 6-in sewer line to the east side of the property. E is to submit water and sewer plans for review and acceptance. F to ensure compliance with sections 14-211 of the city of Odessa ordinance with required separation from residential uses. Uh G is approval of this plot is subject to uh all PL comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by a pertinent city permanent city department before filing for accreditation with the city with the county clerk of Ector County, Texas. And I'm here for any questions.

Are there any questions? Move for approval. Is there a second? Second. Second. Say I. Any opposed? Motion passes. Case file number 2025-110P property in ETJ uh preliminary plat of southwest industrial sites being a re plat of lots 19 and 20 block 5 Southwest Industrial Sites County, Texas. This property is generally located on the west side of West County Road and 250 ft north of West McCord. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members. The owners Charlie D. Prior and Johnny and Sander Hernandez and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plot to create one lot for development purposes. This request has been routed to respective departments for internal review and comments. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Southeast edition subject to conditions A through D. A. Ector County Public Works signature block is needed. Uh B to remove development notes number two and three. C use next available lot number for block five. Indeed, approval of this plat is subject to all PL plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments before filing for recordation with the city with the county clerk of Ector County, Texas. And I'm here for any questions.

Have any questions? No questions. Then again, stand ready for another motion. I'll make a motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. All in favor say I. Any oppose? Same sign. Home stretch. Case file number 2025-11P. Uh the preliminary plaid of West Ridge subdivision fourth filing which is a replat of the north five acres of lot one block 5 Westidge subdivision. Property journey located on the southeast corner of the intersection of West 42nd and North Mall. Yes ma'am.

Thank you Mr. Chairman and members. The owner is Dino Truck and Car Wash LLC and consultant is Maverick Engineering. They are seeking approval of a plot to create two lots for development purposes. The request has been routed to our respective departments for internal review and comments. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of the Westridge subdivision. Fourth filing subject to conditions A through B. Development notes number two and three need to be removed from the plat. B. The approval of this ply is subject to all plaque comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all perturton city departments before filing for recordation with the county court, Texas. I'm here for any questions. Any questions? Move for approval. Is there a second? Second.

Have a motion. Second. All in favor say I. I. Any oppose? Same sign. Motion passes. We're now at case file number 2025-112P. Uh this is another preliminary plat. This is a ranch acres subdivision 7 filing which is a replat of the north 209.5 ft of lot 7 block 7 ranch acres subdivision first filing. Yes ma'am.

Thank you Mr. Chairman and members. The owners Sigala and Martha Netto and consultant SW How are seeking approval of a plat to create one lot for development purposes. This request has been routed to our respective departments for internal review and comments. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Ranchacre subdivision. Just a second ranch acre subdivision 7th filing subject to condition A. That the approval of this PL subject to all PL comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all print city departments before filing for recommendation with the ectctor county clerk uh county clerk of ectctor county, Texas here for questions.

Anybody got questions? If no questions, stand ready for a motion. Motion to approve. Is there a second? Second. A motion second. All in favor, please say I. I. Same sign. All right. One more preliminary plat. This 2025-113. Okay. Okay. So, we did receive um before we start, we did receive the re the drainage report for that previous uh plot. We can go ahead and uh take it to the end when bring it back on the at the end of this of the which one now? The one we skipped 23. 23. We have two more. So that's three more. Okay.

113. What? The one we pulled. The one we pulled was 23. 105. Okay. This one. Okay. Who's on first? Okay. So for this uh for this plat 113

so for this plot that she's about to present it was coming in as a preliminary in based on the agenda now the drainage report and everything has been settled so it qualifies to be a replat. So this one instead of being a preliminary will now be a replat. Well, excuse me. We are now on case file number 2025-113P. Property in ETJ. We are to consider the re replat of lot 3, block 13, Gardell subdivision being 1.79 acres of land in section one, block 42 P1S 10P railway county survey property is in Ector County, generally located south side of East Morning Glory Road and 600 feet east of North Garden. Yes, ma'am. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members. The owner, Granada Family Ventures and Consultant Piper Surveying Company are seeking approval of a plat to create two lots for development purposes. The request has been routed to our respective departments for internal review and comments. Staff recommends approval of the replat of the replat of lot 3, block 13, Gardenale subdivision, subject to conditions A through C. Um that the signature block for Ector County Public Works is required. Plat name should be next in next the next filing of Gardenale subdivision. Approval of this PL is subject to all PL comments conditions and requirements being satisfied by all printton city departments before filing for recordation with the county clerk of Ector County, Texas. And I'm here for any questions.

I have words for anybody who has any questions. [Applause] If there are no questions, I make a motion to approve. And and you're approving this replat to replat to replat. I think in the actual packet it does say replat. It's just in the Yes. Okay. Uh yes. Motion to approve and second. I second. Have a motion second. All in favor please say I. Please say I. Any opposed?

See none opposed. We're going to move on now. Number 30, which is a record is case file number 20 25-100P. Gary, help me out. I can't read. I'm tired. Okay. This is a replat of last subdivision. Third filing being a replat of lots 13 through 23. Block three. Replad of last year subdivision first filing and lot 25 block three. Replat of blaster lacier subdivision second filing. And it is city of Odesser County, Texas. This property generally located on the west side of Edison Avenue and about 200 feet southwest 3rd Street. Yes, ma'am.

Thank you, Mr. Commissioner. Members, the owner, HC services and consultant Maverick Engineering are seeking approval of a plot for development purposes. This the request has been routed to all respective departments for internal review and comments. Uh staff recommends approval of the replot of lacier subdivision third filing subject to conditions 8 through actually 8 through g.

Yes. So A is platted building setback lines are recommended to be applied to all frontages or be removed. Lot is located within the city limits. E could block needs to be removed. Development note three should be removed. A blanket refuge collection easement agreement will be required for lot 27. This is a currently developed property with multiple driveways onto U business 20. If there is a significant change in us or traffic to from the site, access should be reevaluate re-evaluated to potentially consolidate access points. City of Odessa's permitting authority for access to uh business I20. Approval approval of this plat is subject to all plat comments, conditions, and requirements being satisfied by all pertinent city departments before filing for recordation with the county clerk of Victor County, Texas. I'm here for any questions.

I got questions. I have a question. All right. What's that little property that's left over there? Is that an easement to the See? Yeah, it's like something's there. There's a little structure there, but I can't tell. Who owns that? Just right there in the drawing. It's like I guess that's east of it. Looks like a lot 13. Yeah. Yeah, that is a separate owner. Um

Okay. That Yes, that portion has a separate owner. Sure as to who that is though. I was just wondering who owned that but okay. No further question yet. No further questions. All right. This witness. Any other questions? Move for approval. Is there a second? I second. Second. All in favor say I. I. Is there a motion to adjurnn? So move. All right. Thank you. Drinks on me at Berry.