Planning Board - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Planning Board
Meeting Type
Planning Board
Location
Callaway, FL
Meeting Date
May 19, 2026

Transcript

157 sections

0:02 – 0:276

I'll do an invocation and Spring could lead us in the pledge. Lord, we are meeting today to protect matters of business, guide our hearts and our minds in the spirit of fairness, right thought and speech, impart your supreme wisdom upon our activities so that our affairs may reach a successful conclusion. Thank you for being our source of guidance today and

0:503

All right, Board Member Langston? Here. Board Member Conte?

0:543

Board Member Bobak? Here. Board Member Penning?

0:573

Vice Chair Overlake? Here. And Chairman Dugald? Here.

1:03 – 1:146

Okay, everyone had a chance to look over the minutes. Any questions, any issues with the minutes?

1:188

I'd like to make a motion to approve planning board meeting minutes for May 5th, 2026.

1:230

Second.

1:26 – 1:386

Approval of the minutes passes. To you Bill, what do we got going on?

2:405

and all the details that go into it.

3:36 – 11:542

Good evening. I was going to take longer so that he had an opportunity to show up, but I'll try and make it quick. My name is Norat Turan. I'm in Common Oak Engineering. And I'm here today for the Dos Brogues Coffee Shop and Firestone Complete Automotive Care projects that are located, as he said, at 535 North Tyndall, a site that's 2.19 acres. It will be subdivided into two lots. The Firestone would be a little bit larger. Can they see like a full screen? We'll see if they see a pair. So yeah, so that's the site. And so the individual lots would be, as I said, shared or split. And there'd be shared access from Tyndall in the middle is what we're proposing at this time. Obviously, it'll meet all the regulations, the LDR. So whatever happens next to the existing dominoes, that's there. So whatever off-site improvements are necessary, He will obviously comply at the time of engineering. Stormwater and parking will always be needed through the water management district, as well as the city. Yeah, so the variance, specifically for Dutch Bros, would be the indoor seating. So Dutch Bros has been around for 32 years, and 28 of those years they've had a drive-through concept. It's a small building, less than 1,000 square feet. It's basically an essential part of the business is to have a drive-through. So thus, it would contradict their drive-through and pedestrian-only experience. The other variance is that the main facade has to face Tyndall, and the way the layout But nonetheless, the architectural aesthetics, which we will show on the following slide, are pretty high quality. They're going to comply with whatever special overlay district requirements are necessary. This is pretty much their prototype. Sometimes they don't have that canopy, but that's where on the side facing Firestone would have the walk-up window, which is the bottom left. Dust Rose Operations is a coffee shop, but it has many, many options for the consumer. It has smoothies, freezes, teas, and energy drink. Their motto or their values are to have fast service, speed, quality, consumer experience. The walk-up window, again, will be there for anyone, but indoor seating is not their flagship. 40 employees per shop, so a lot of employment opportunities through their foundation. They have many give-back days as well as their Okay, moving on to Firestone. The variance here would be the vehicle repair use. It is a tire shop, basically, but they also do some minor services such as AC, brakes, alignments, things like that. Yeah, again, overlay district, high quality architectural facade. It's not really a repair shop, so that's why we're seeking the variance. Here we got the outdoor display. Yes, as you go to any tire care service, you will see tires outside, primarily because it gives people no hassle, no opportunity to just see options outside before they enter the sales area. So it's an essential retail component. The display is a branded rack, so it's uniform through every firestone. And it's quite small. It's six by seven, so the size of a person. They roll it out at the beginning of the day and roll it in at the end of the day. And it won't be located in any of the parking. So here we go. We have the elevations. Again, high quality materials. Many opportunities or benefits to entire care services. So you've got employment impact. They keep essential workers on the road, you and me. We're all essential, but first responders, delivery drivers, things of that nature. They have career opportunities development, so they have training. That's a nice one. Again, the essential community service, so public safety, first responders, preventative maintenance. We all are on the roads, so we want a safe vehicle. Again, they do minor stuff like oil changes and wheel alignments, fluid checks. Also, they have not a foundation, but they have opportunities to give back and they contribute to the Boys and Girls Club of America. The tire, the disposable tire area is where they, is also enclosed, probably seen on the elevations, is where they also recycle, so there's There's an environmental sustainability aspect to their business. And that's early support. During severe weather, they keep first responders going. And that's really it.

12:02 – 12:276

Okay, just so you know, we're not the final determinant. We recommend to the full commission, we give them recommendations. So that being said, I don't see anybody in the audience. Questions and comments from the board? Bill, is this commercial zoning or not?

12:275

Yeah, they're probably selling commercial.

12:297

Commercial, huh?

12:355

That's why y'all haven't seen a rezoning or anything prior to this. This is the first time it's been heard publicly.

13:12 – 15:029

Is that correct? Bay County. It's never been annexed into Callaway. Is that correct? Just a little square right here that's not in the city limits. OK. So those three already are nonconforming land use, grandfathered in. We can't do anything about them until they do whatever. The Bobcat sales section is also in that area. It too is a nonconforming land use that was grandfathered in. Now, I have a problem with drive-throughs simply because, as a motorcycle rider, I hate getting into the lane that's trying to turn into those places. Because on more than one occasion, I've been caught at that one in at the intersection of Tyndall and Cherry Street. And I've had to wait through at least one light, and sometimes two.

15:042

So Mr. Boyd, it would have an adequate parking so that you could park and then walk up to the window? Yeah, you might.

15:14 – 15:309

But that's still an issue if and when you get busy. You're not going to park while you're waiting for people to use the drive-through, unless you're going to have a big area.

15:302

I mean, we can go back to the site plan.

15:347

Yeah, I'm looking at it. OK. Is it going to be a turn lane there or not?

15:509

So I have an issue with that. Well, all along there's no left turn. I mean right turn. Pardon?

15:557

There's no right turn. No, there isn't. We've got cable going across there and tunnel lines and all that.

16:03 – 16:142

Yeah. Mr. Rock, again, the balance is for indoor seating, so are you thinking there's more parking? Pardon? Are you thinking more parking to alleviate?

16:14 – 16:399

No. My point But I'm also concerned about the fire stuff. That's a non-conforming issue. No, I don't. We got an ordinance. We either live with the ordinance or we don't.

16:392

Right. That's my point. And you're saying Pep Boys is not far away? Pardon? Are you saying Pep Boys and Parkway Times are not far away?

16:49 – 17:019

Yeah, Pep Boys on the same side of the street. Further down, closer towards the center part of the city, parkways on the opposite side.

17:086

My mechanic's Callaway Auto Repair Service cars, which is right across from City Hall. That's my guy, and he can do anything.

17:196

So, I mean.

17:209

But he's on State Road 22. I understand that.

17:246

I understand. But he's not far. Right.

17:279

So, you know, what do we mean?

17:32 – 17:482

That's my point. They see a need and they want to provide options for the consumer. So they're obviously not just doing it just because.

17:506

Not one person. Any other comments or questions?

17:57 – 18:090

The last few that come through in the overlay, we have not approved with reason. And they were still good.

18:11 – 18:551

Businesses and these would be great businesses, but somewhere else would be Right because I mean the citizens feel like we have enough coffee places Within the short period Calloway is not that big But do we need another tire repair place? Because again Calloway is not that big And, you know, people, the citizens are always asking for something different, not a gas station, car wash, repair place. And just, what, a week or so ago, another coffee place.

18:58 – 19:092

I drove downtown. I only saw, what was it, 7 Brewer? Is that, it's not familiar to anyone? Coffee? And human bean. And Starbucks. Starbucks.

19:090

Dunkin' Donuts.

19:122

There's four.

19:22 – 19:396

Ma'am, in the audience, are you here to speak on the variance exception? Okay. I just want to check on that. Any other comments or questions from the board? Can I get a motion?

19:42 – 19:549

Motion to approve the variance exception from the LDR, 535 North Campbell Parkway. I'll second. We'll call Ashley.

19:543

All right. Board Member Bohak?

19:583

Board Member Hennings?

20:003

Board Member Langston?

20:033

Board Member Conte? No. Vice Chair Overway? No. And Chairman Dula?

20:11 – 20:236

No. Motion does not pass. Thank you for coming.

20:269

Tell him what his option is. Oh, right.

20:306

Like I was saying before, we just recommend to the full commission what we think. And Bill, if you could tell me.

20:40 – 20:595

This will go to the commission next Tuesday night. This is an advisory board. It is their recommendation that the commission deny the variance, but the commission will make the final say so.

20:592

My feeling is without your support, it's less likely.

21:045

The commission takes the planning board's recommendation very seriously. Yeah, okay.

21:106

Thank you for coming. Bill?

21:210

We'll backtrack to item number one on the agenda tonight.

21:495

to change the future land use map. The request is to change

22:23 – 22:368

stated in their statement, this is consistent with the CalA comprehensive plan. But I don't understand how it's consistent with a comprehensive plan when the future land use map is part of the comprehensive plan.

22:36 – 22:485

Yeah. There's mixed use in the area where it's not so out of whack that it's like, hey, no, it's about the only way I can explain that.

22:49 – 23:359

Go into a little further detail. To the north. Now, to the south, there are single family homes. To the east, there are single family homes. To the west, there are single family homes. What do you mean it's kind of mixed?

23:366

Well, there's a trailer park there, too, if I'm not mistaken. It's not too far away from there. Say again? There's a trailer park right real close.

23:449

Yeah, there is. Further on down. That's why I was asking.

24:118

OK. That makes sense.

24:135

That makes sense.

24:15 – 24:277

OK. All right. Thank you. Yes, sir. What's it going to do with the duplex, sir? What's it going to do with the duplex, sir? Well, that's only a little plan, a little allot there, huh?

24:270

See, I didn't even get it. OK, OK.

24:305

But yeah, the applicant understands that if this were to pass, the engineer who were hired, they're going to have to get

25:089

Answered my question.

25:12 – 25:267

Yep. So is that house on there, is that cut in half there or what? This is the duplex. Duplex, yeah, but. It's A and B. Yeah. Well, it looks like the water line is going right through the middle of the house there. Is that right?

25:280

I'm not sure where the water line is.

25:297

Well, what's that line there, the black line there?

25:327

No, that one over here next to the house. Through the house, Bill. Through the house there, right there. No. So.

25:515

This corner right here should probably be right there. Okay. See where the fence line is? Yeah. So it's off. They don't match.

25:587

Okay. What's on the other side there? Over here? Yeah, right there. Where's the property line? Right there? Along there?

26:045

I imagine this property line is supposed to be right here. That whole place there, huh? Should be right here.

26:127

But it got two different numbers on there. 618 and What's he on there? Is he on the whole thing there?

26:215

No, he only owns this one.

26:236

Right, which is what, .39 acres? 344, wasn't it? 344? Very small. Tiny.

26:559

So the issue is twofold, high density with modulars. Is that the request in number one?

27:075

Yeah, but we are on item number two already. So right now we're looking at the future land use.

27:158

So future land use, we're just changing it to multifamily.

27:217

Yeah. Or high density.

27:238

I'm sorry.

27:267

But we shouldn't be voting on the zoning on the future land use map vote well

27:528

Make sure we're voting for what we're voting for, not because down the road it might do this.

27:596

Well, the applicant wants R6M, correct? I thought that's what I saw in the papers.

28:087

He wants single houses now. He wants double houses. I mean, high density area.

28:141

He wants modular homes. Well, high density area.

28:167

No, just high density area. That's two stories. What is it zoned right now?

28:215

All right.

28:227

So it's residential multifamily.

28:249

Right.

28:25 – 29:065

Okay. But the only residential multifamily designation we have that allows mobile homes or modulars is high density. So he's required to change the density from medium to high and tag on that M. As a board member, we've got to kind of look at them together, even though we looked at one first and then the second one.

29:06 – 29:289

OK. So we need to agree on changing the comprehensive plan to reflect a high density. before we ever get to the second issue. That's what you're saying.

29:285

Yeah. I mean, we're going to look at both of them regardless.

29:339

Yeah, but before we tackle the critical issue, we need to take the first step.

29:446

That's correct. OK. Ma'am, in the public, are you here to speak on this?

29:52 – 31:154

Absolutely, please step up and state your name And I am trying to bring a new concept and the way it's going to happen is How bill is just explained? these are Homes that are, it's a new concept. These are going to be imported from China. And they're cheaper, they're modular, they're very nice to look at. It's a one of a kind housing. It's going to be something new here in Calaway. It's more or less experimental. They say they guarantee for 50 years. And it's newer, new kinds of material. It's going to be affordable and sturdier. We're going to have to make sure that the design is equally strong for hurricanes. And it's a new concept, basically, that I'm trying to bring in.

31:196

Bill, how many homes, how many modular homes do you want to put on this parcel?

31:24 – 31:564

So I would go for one, which will be in a T form, because there are requirements that has to be something square feet. And then if the zoning allows, If it's approved, then we will bring it. If two more are allowed, we'll bring two more. If one more is allowed, we'll bring one more.

31:566

I was going to ask, is that duplex that has the green roof, is that going to be torn down?

32:056

No, it's going to stay where it's at?

32:064

It's stable.

32:13 – 32:429

Okay. I want to get into that discussion. So let me make a recommendation, if I may, or make a motion that we approve the small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to 6122 Harvey Street, moving it from low-density residential to high-density residential. I'll second.

32:477

Ashley, roll call.

32:493

Board Member Hiddings?

32:523

Board Member Langston? No. Board Member Conte?

32:573

Board Member Bohak?

33:003

Vice Chair Overway? No. And Chairman Dougal?

33:083

The others split three and three, so that means the motion fails.

33:136

That's correct. Three to three the motion fails.

33:59 – 34:355

from residential multifamily medium density, which it is currently now. It is conforming as it sits today, but with the plan that the applicant has, he needs to change it. So he has requested that the change be to residential multifamily high density, which is the only multifamily So he's requesting that we increase the density and also allow mobile homes or modulars.

34:374

Modular, I'm not for mobile homes.

34:395

And his intent, obviously, is to do the modular with the groceries attached.

34:47 – 35:436

Well, I understand that as people get older, I'll be honest with you. I regret the square footage of my house. I'm getting older. It's hard to keep clean. I wish it was smaller. I Kind of like the idea of I've never really seen one. I've you know up close and personal I seen the pictures I did try to look up this company online that you had in the I'll just say I do like the idea of modular homes. People are looking for smaller homes. Like I was saying, I'm getting older. I kind of regret having a large square footage home.

35:43 – 36:104

It's hard to keep clean. They're affordable. They're sturdy. They are very modern. It's a modern style. And of course, we're going to make sure they're equally attractive. We're going to make sure they're stronger. And it's a new concept, though.

36:138

I like the looks of them. I'd like to live in one. Then family wouldn't visit. That'd be great.

36:177

They've got a module home down on 10th and 14th. Ace Hardware, freaking Ace Hardware, those are mobile homes over there. Those are module homes. That's part of the complex there.

36:27 – 37:069

But here's the issue. We don't have any provisions for modular homes except through our current... provisions for mobile homes. That was one of the issues that I raised with Bill earlier. Now, there are certain requirements for mobile homes. And those requirements are not going to accommodate a modular structure on this property. It ain't happening.

37:088

If we approve R6M, it doesn't have to be modular.

37:146

That's what I was thinking as well. I had the same question.

37:168

We don't have the option of R6MO or whatever. Right, yeah, right.

37:24 – 38:249

So you might like that, but this isn't the place to think about it in context of what is approved So here again, if we're going to have an ordinance, we have a responsibility to abide by it. Or we change it. Now, I'm not prepared to change it willy-nilly. And in this instance, piece of property under these circumstances, it does not make sense to move forward, in my opinion. But I'm just one person. Any other questions, comments from the board?

38:24 – 38:510

I have a comment. With the plans and everything that's in there, I don't have issue with the ideal of it. The location It might not be the best, but I do think it's a good idea, a good concept. I agree with that. I just don't agree with that area. Because that's not what it's not zoned for.

38:52 – 39:101

And I agree. It's a good concept or a different concept, but he said it was experimental. Do we want to open the door to something experimental? especially with no provisions like, you know, that was brought up.

39:11 – 39:220

Would it require the same wind certificate that other tiny homes and mobile homes require?

39:225

We haven't even gotten to the building department yet, but it was required for the building to go.

39:29 – 39:404

Currently there are a lot of hurdles. that I'm trying to do to see how it fares.

39:436

Any other questions or comments? Can I get a motion on rezoning?

39:53 – 40:138

I'll make a motion to approve rezoning of . 6-1-2-2-R-E. Second. Roll call.

40:143

Board Member Langston? No. Board Member Conte?

40:183

Board Member Bohak? No. Board Member Hennings?

40:233

Vice Chair Overway? No. And Chairman Dougal?

40:34 – 40:596

Right. Like I was saying, we hand our, you know, this goes to, you know, I'm taxing you. Right. We give a recommendation to the full commission. So if, you know, if you want to, Bill, if he wants to bring this up in front of the full commission, he can.

40:59 – 41:105

This will be a in the same place. They take the planning board's recommendation seriously, but they do make the final decision.

41:136

Thank you for coming. Thank you. Thank you most, Mr. Czar.

41:160

Is that all we have?

41:216

Feel as though we got.

41:225

That's all we got for tonight.

41:246

Anything new going on that we should know about?

41:298

Before we adjourn, can I ask a quick question?

41:313

Yes, sir.

41:328

Are we able to table anything when something comes to the board?

41:38 – 41:573

Since y'all aren't doing a final decision. Y'all aren't making a final decision. I've never heard of an advisory committee tabling something, but if you want to give me a couple days, let me look into that. I've just never heard of an advisory board tabling something.

41:576

Okay. And can I get a second? I'm adjourning.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.