Board of Finance - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

The Board of Finance reviewed the financial report, discussed and approved various carryover requests, and held an extensive discussion on a proposed policy for the town's unassigned fund balance. Key carryover items included addressing issues with EOC blinds and firehouse stucco, with larger reallocations requiring a town meeting vote. The board also received updates on town projects and noted the retirement of the Board of Finance Clerk.

About this meeting

Government Body
Board of Finance
Meeting Type
Board Of Finance
Location
Old Lyme, CT
Meeting Date
August 18, 2026

Transcript

219 sections

0:00 – 2:00Speaker 4

Vaikunthiram raavile 7 mani kalinju 1 minitinna. Umm, nyan aadha aavarthichu kundu tudangam. Dave Kelsey will not be here tonight. He needs to sit with Fred. Um. Anyway, the first thing is to accept July 21st. Okay, move on. Is there any discussion? Any changes or changes? Nothing. Without listening, I will ask for a vote. Everyone agrees, I say. Everyone opposes, I say no. Leave anything. I accepted it as if I had drafted minutes. Thank you, Jasmine. Um, next to the financial report, I think it would be helpful if you could teach us as well as you can. Yes. Um, if you want to start, yes.

2:00 – 2:51Speaker 2

I am sorry for not sending the details. Since the old New Year is coming soon, do it a little later. Anyway, I would like you to start from the month of July. When you look at the month of July, you will notice that July is the month of July. But it is the last day to close on August 3. Mortgage companies received a $4.5 million cheque. It's not reflected here. It's not shown in August. But you can see it in August. Oh, I got it.

2:51Speaker 4

Then it will be visible in August.

2:53Speaker 2

In August, they made $9 million. Yes, that's why. But you can see it. Last year, they made $18.5 million.

2:58Speaker 3

This year, they made only $13 million.

3:06Speaker 4

Are you saying that we have earned 9 million in August so far? Oh, good. I was in Ohio. Yes.

3:12 – 3:43Speaker 2

Um, they are investigating the shortage of jobs, but they have decreased. The reason is that we did not show the income of the camp until August last year. But this year we are showing it in July. Um. Um, so the jobs have decreased by about 40,000. Some of them are related to how we came to know about it.

3:49 – 4:03Speaker 4

I wouldn't have been able to keep the average for a month. Okay, okay. If last year's total service was 137,000, this year's average is 196,000. That's right. But if you look at it, look at the parks and resorts. Last year, the parks and resorts were only $3,000. This year, it's 103,000. That's the difference of 1 lakh that day. Okay.

4:16Speaker 2

Even then, you know that the town clerk is usually 25,000. Yes, that's why we made her a permanent resident.

4:23 – 5:43Speaker 4

That's an ordinary thing. Last year, she was more than ordinary people. Yes, as you can see, yes, the wedding is over, yes, July is very high, that's good. Yes, there are no parking spaces, that's the reason. Since it is a month, you can see that all the cheques we receive in July are returned to June. So, because they receive it, they give us the cheque after that month. So, we have to go back to June to show that it is acceptable. Yes, but we are still good people. As far as Webster is concerned, the interest rate is slightly reduced, but that was to be expected. You will see interest rates, but even then, our savings show a lot of progress. So last year, we also added a card to our savings portfolio. And that's all about income. Do you have any other questions about income? So, how has the budget changed from the general fund? We have a CD for the budget. We have a budget for our budgets. This is an account with a card in it. A card in it? Yes.

5:43Speaker 2

The RASVAKALA budget fund is a part of the card. This is one of the most profitable options. This is one of the most profitable options for municipalities.

5:53Speaker 4

Municipalities. Can you say again that there is a abbreviation called STF?

5:56Speaker 2

That is STIS.

6:01 – 7:33Speaker 4

I think I haven't heard about it before. Okay. Spends and You can see that a large part of the fees under Assessor are being spent and a large part of it is being used for farming. Their fees are KMVQDS and DMVQ. Then this is the same for the Building Department. Their fees were spent by the Open Government. That is their permitting software. On the 9th page, there is a credit under it. It should be below that.

7:33 – 8:29Speaker 2

Excuse me, where are you? Below the 9th page, at the beginning, below the 2nd, it says M Vedanam, negative. It should not be, it should go, it is a mistake. It should go to the fire marshal. It was one of the journal entries that I had to give in the last two days of my salary. I charged it in the wrong account for one year. So when I entered the journal in one year, I went back to this. Even then, I have to change the journal entry to only $35. If you pay attention, look at page 10 below. In the second line, you can see that there are 337 fires below the fire marshal and PD fire. That should not be there. That is under admin. That should be there. That is the reason. All 305. Make it there. Okay.

8:29 – 9:07Speaker 4

Anyone about expenses or income? Any questions? But this is good. Another report was especially about revenue funds. I don't have any questions about them. Does anyone else have anything to remind me? That's right.

9:08Speaker 2

You took $1,00,000 and made it. It was the APA policy that we were allowed to submit to the general fund. That's me. You submitted it to the general fund.

9:16Speaker 4

It's under the page. Okay. How did it happen? I don't remember. Okay. What's that?

9:20Speaker 2

We were APA money. We are allowed to transfer that money to the general fund. Okay. Oh, policy. Where are you going to spend it?

9:25 – 10:01Speaker 4

That's... We are going to offset something to the public. Thank you. Thank you. Does anyone have any comments or questions about financial matters that I am asking again? Let's look at the carryovers. Okay. Again, I think it will be helpful if you support us through the carryovers.

10:01 – 14:37Speaker 2

Do you want me to give a report on what happened yesterday? So, last night, the Selection Board announced the carryovers. We voted for both of them to pass the carryovers. However, John Mishami had some concerns about the carryover in the line number 284284 on your first page. It is due to the U.C. issuance, because there is an obligation to pay $31900. And the reason is only a small explanation from Eric. There are two blinds in the main room of the operating center. They ordered from the marble shop. The material they chose is not so heavy. In addition, there is a mark laminated on the blind between the material and the blind. Because it is very heavy, the automatic roller will not work anymore. So, the Marvel shop is working with us to find a new material. They will cover the new motor and all that, but Dave found a new motor. So, they expect each of the two blinds to cost $1,000 each. NILAVIL AVA It is a mobile device. So, you can't see the outside of the window with the AVA. So, This is one part of the money they want to use. Then another. It was necessary to approve the use of the remaining waste. I have just read what he wrote for the EFS and EPUs of 1992. He was not present at the time of the construction of the EFCU. Based on the answer, he wants to need more weight. He wants to make a difference in his body. It will be less than $20,000. So we want to think about the reduction of $31,000. Then we are just below $29,000. When he gets a constant answer, he has to come when it is more than $20,000. Then he has to get three answers in a bid process to improve A10. That is the stucco area on the top of the firehouse. It is a concrete board. After that, they have put two sticks of the same stucco material in it. But it has been broken for years and some pieces have fallen. They said that it will last for about 25 years with the warranty of 15 years of construction. And they have another statement for that. This will come as a 7-year warranty on construction, which lasts for 10 years, and they quote me again. It is about 20,000 less, but half of the warranty is about 60% less. By reducing those costs, his high interest rate will be an option. This will pay off the city's debt. If the BOF and BS decide to pay the vendors with blind issues, they will say not to return the balance of the EOC and the EFS to the general fund. If the BOF decides to cancel the refund, The entire EIFS project is expected to cost about $48,000. So it will be acceptable. One year later, this will happen again, so it will be more. Now, the history of mining in these areas, which are 35 years old, is limited to cleaning and mining in small areas. That's why he's saying that Road Firehouse was completed in 2026, a year ago, and that's when it was completed. Now everything will be in the same order. So I think they are two different questions. One, do you want to do a job?

14:37Speaker 4

So, John's wish was that this job was not included in the EOC application.

14:51 – 15:45Speaker 2

So, instead of the extra money we earned from the project, is it right to deduct from this money? He said. But I started, so I agree. I am also asking for it. But I am also asking for my own thing. You are two times more useless than you are useless. Because of you. If it is transferred to the reserve fund, it has been deducted by Rs. 31,000. Okay, it's over there. But if it comes back and asks you for Rs. 40, you will deduct it from them again. Then, I didn't tell you that, but I thought about it when I couldn't sleep for 30 minutes after 11 pm last night. That's how I understood it. You know, I understood his desire. We didn't say that the outside of the wedding was good. But when we first started the project as an EOC, we didn't understand how bad the outside of the wedding was. Right?

15:45 – 15:57Speaker 4

Then I think we all shared the same question with you and John. If we have allowed 1.5 million dollars as the main source of income, can we use some of those funds for another purpose? Okay, that's up to you.

15:57 – 16:10Speaker 2

Because Jim and I voted for you to resign. Anitha, what is your opinion? There is only one way we can do it, and I will explain it in more detail.

16:33 – 16:49Speaker 4

We will have to go to a town meeting because an account is about to end. So, it will cost 20,000. So, since there are more than 20,000 people, we have to go to a town meeting. This is very easy. We will bring it to the town meeting and then vote on it. Yes, let the town decide. Let the town decide instead of returning the money to the fund.

16:57 – 17:15Speaker 2

We want to reinstate it. But we are asking for permission to do so at another Inamumayi town meeting. Because it is the same money that was stolen. This money is coming out of our funds. Last year's money is our right. So we want to reinstate it. I don't think people will have a problem. No, I don't think they will have a problem.

17:22Speaker 4

If we go to a town meeting after returning $31,000 to the general fund and ask if it is right to spend $31,000 on an ex-project? No. I will not go back to the state where I left it. No. He is talking about what I said.

17:30 – 17:59Speaker 2

Because, BJ, what I am saying is that until it goes to the budget in 2028, it will not return to it. So, that's why he says, if you invest now, we will include it as a full project, like a new expense. Let's count the rest of the money.

17:59Speaker 4

Otherwise, what I'm saying is, you will accept it as a car-over.

18:02 – 18:17Speaker 2

Continue to say, can we reuse this money for the purpose of bringing it to the town meeting? If they say no, it will be returned at the end of the year. Yes. They will understand.

18:17Speaker 4

Yes, I am sure they will understand. To be honest, I don't know what the law says about this. But I think it should be good if the city accepts it. Okay. The only reason I say that is because it is more than 20,000.

18:31Speaker 4

20,000 people are going to get their money back from one system to another. But that is also a return from one project to another, isn't it? If the city votes in favor, I think it should make it sustainable. Yes, I believe so. I agree. Then we have a $2000 blind event.

18:41 – 19:26Speaker 2

We have to vote in it, right? Both are different. No, we have to forgive it. We have to forgive it. 31. But... If you can take the blinds, I agree. Okay, let's go. Do you know what it is? If you don't pay from 31, if you put 38, if you take it, if you take it from this year's budget and when it is ready to be completed, it will be completed. That is your choice. But, what is the answer to not doing the marriage that I am aiming for? I mean that it should be done as well as Stuck-on should be done.

19:26Speaker 1

And one question is whether it will go to town or vote, isn't it?

19:37Speaker 2

What I mean is sending it to a town vote.

19:39 – 19:53Speaker 4

Okay, if we want to keep it, we can include it in next year's budget, is the answer. But Eric... It may not be necessary to change it, right? He thinks he will do it now. Okay, not him.

19:53 – 20:04Speaker 2

They are not in a hurry to complete it. That is, the contractor feels that our breath is not suffocating. But he wants to complete it. He has one answer. I want to make sure that he has three answers. But he is everything.

20:04Speaker 1

But he has money left from the project to do that. Then this is the reality. When we say okay, do we have to take that money and go for it?

20:18 – 20:43Speaker 4

Yes. The main question again is whether you want to complete the job or not. The answer is yes. I think Mike should do it for this need. I am a renter. I don't know if money is profitable. So, is there any expectation of going to a town meeting to rebuild it? So, how can I? I agree. Go ahead. Forgive me. Go ahead.

20:43 – 21:11Speaker 2

I was saying that I agree. And like you said, I think this should be completed. And if this project is not done for the sake of the surrounding funds, they may not have understood that this has to be resolved. So if we don't want to go to the town meeting, you can say that this is part of the EOC implementation. But anyway, I don't understand why we didn't just ask and clean it up because we're leaving. But, oh God, let's put it aside. I can't imagine anyone saying, don't make the marriage better. So,

21:20 – 21:34Speaker 3

I agree. I don't understand the logic behind it. But I think the rest is very big, and everyone knows that. So, will this go to the town vote next year or can we do it this year? No, the town votes will have to be moved to the next year, the carryover will have to be approved, and it will go to the carryover.

21:40 – 21:51Speaker 2

Will it be allowed again when we are in a carryover? I am saying that he is saying when we will get this town. We will get it in the next one or two months. It's not late. We can do it in September.

21:51 – 22:02Speaker 4

Then why don't we go to a town vote? Yes, the basic question is whether we will accept the carryover. Yes, we can decide whether the public can afford money by going to a town vote after the project.

22:10Speaker 1

Pudhiyadho Vyathesthamayadho Aaya Aavishingalku Anuvadhikamu Aadho Pinniyadu Thirichathi.

22:15Speaker 2

Ellathinam Pudhiyadho Pudhiyadho Aaya Oru Alokishin Aavishipedanamu Inna. Sheri. Sheri.

22:23Speaker 4

Panitha, Aviprayatine Arhade Ullamatteyatengilum Cariovergal Undo?

22:26 – 23:45Speaker 2

Ade, Sheri. Inni, Carioveril Ningalku Ayacha Onnu Kaanan Pogunnu. Pakshe, Peijinde Adiyil Oru Pudhiyahamb Unda. Ade. 308, 309, 310. No, no, there is nothing like you are sitting here. And you are going to see more lines like you are sitting here. I said it will help you improve. Because they came from the sound view. Frank took it. But you took the sound view. I'll send it to you later. That's to generate the generator. He doesn't have time, so take it. Oh, $44,351. Restroom facility engineer 20,000. This is two or more speed humps he wants to buy. Okay, Portland for one, three. Hartford for one. That's it, then Portland for one. He wanted to take her away. Most of it is according to the figures in August 18th. And that is part of the general election.

23:53Speaker 4

I have a question. Yes. Three high-speed pumps cost $15,000. Five for each.

23:57Speaker 2

Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each.

24:02Speaker 4

Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each.

24:07Speaker 2

Five thousand for each. Five thousand for each.

24:10Speaker 4

Five thousand for each.

24:23Speaker 2

She is standing next to me. Um, one person came and opened the doors. She plugged in. Okay, okay.

24:32Speaker 4

Then she has different habits. I understood the speed hump. She is 14 years old. She is at the same height as she is now.

24:40 – 24:57Speaker 2

If you go to Hartford Abbey now, it is exactly the same speed hump height. It is said that the speed of the Hartford and Swan in Portland continues to decrease in the winter. So she will be sure that there won't be beach days anymore. Thank you. So this is her.

24:57 – 25:13Speaker 4

The expenses we accepted in the previous budget year, they didn't spend money, did they? So we have to allow her to take it. Okay. So now this is the other one. Which number are you going back to?

25:23Speaker 2

If you go to line 305, the first vehicle to arrive is Atta Kuttapani. This is the one that came.

25:31Speaker 4

The one that goes back.

25:33 – 25:49Speaker 2

Oh, yes, yes, yes. Backhoe. Now, we got the invoice today. That is $31,000 instead of $36,485. But for me, it's 329. 32. Forgive me. 3. Wrong line. Forgive me.

25:49 – 26:29Speaker 4

Forgive me. It's 36,485. Yes, I was looking at the line. Where did you say it was 3645? 30. Like line 305. The answer was 32,921,118. The actual invoice is 36,485. Do you want to transfer it to a higher amount? I agree. That's right. I'm not going back on that. Our balance is 32,921. That's right. But because the bill is higher, we have to increase it. That's what I'm saying. Two different questions. Who are we going to vote for? Continue. If you look at the report on August 18, that's the reason. New numbers.

26:29Speaker 3

No, my thing is, if the balance is 329, then the vote to take is 329.

26:44Speaker 4

If you need $4,000 more to pay the bill, it's a special question, a special vote. I'm sure we'll accept it. No, no, because it's never changed to take it away.

26:54 – 27:09Speaker 2

Because I had to cancel it and add an over to Soundview. When Frank submitted it in the evening, he apologized. There was no sound view in her report. Because we did it in the evening.

27:09Speaker 4

We did not talk about the sound view generator. What do you talk about the 3.308, 3.309 to 3.10? Actually, it is included in the request to be taken. I thought we were talking about the generator.

27:16 – 28:00Speaker 2

We do that. Reason? We are going to take the answer that we had. But when they got the Baco, they found something wrong in it and they had to fix it. To close the bills, it says that it will be increased to 36,485. There are two different lines. Is this the one above us? I said yes. There is another one that has been diluted today. Above that, there is a new number of 36,485. It is written on it that the tide is on August 18th, 2026. That's it. It's here. This is a new ocean.

28:00 – 28:20Speaker 4

But, help me. When we first talked about these tides, yes, we experienced a certain tide for this. That's right. It was 32,000. Right. Right. So, that's the evidence we have. We can take that much. But, this is me. Sound View Generator doesn't take over. No, that's right.

28:20Speaker 2

This has nothing to do with Sound View Generator.

28:22Speaker 4

Okay, they didn't add it.

28:23Speaker 2

Okay, no. Okay, but there's nothing in 36,000. I'm sorry.

28:26Speaker 4

The difference between 32 and 36 is an unrelated sheet. There are correct numbers in the new sheet you have in your hand.

28:32Speaker 2

Okay, I'm focusing on the question. The answer should be the same.

28:36Speaker 4

Was there $36,000 left to take at the end of the year?

28:47Speaker 2

That's another word. That's another word. That's another word. That's another word. That's another word. That's another word. That's another word. That's another word.

28:57 – 29:24Speaker 1

That's another word. It will cost more. So, we have to go to a town meeting to accept it.

29:24Speaker 4

Okay, that's great. At that time, he was fine.

29:28 – 30:13Speaker 2

But he used to go and buy gas to fill the tanks and do the usual things in June. But he completely forgot to take care of the money for the backup. So, he got one bill and two more bills. Nyangala avalai samadhani pichu, edin odu. Paranyu, avana marannu, pakshe naasha nashtam. Sambavichu, karanam oru maasam mumbu nyane uvide unda irunna pola, avane adistanaparamayi nallavan airikum. Randa, randu polum alla, irupadinairam dollarine irupadinairam tinumadi. It took a lot of time.

30:13 – 30:42Speaker 4

Yes, it's good to go to a town meeting. But I think there's a gap between the two. It's not a good thing. If you don't accept a project and complete it that year, We can take a lot of money. Moreover, even if the budget of the department is too expensive, two different questions do not mean that the fact that it is expensive is offsetting the carryover. You are still carryover.

30:44 – 30:56Speaker 2

That's right. The reason I changed the number of carryover is because we accepted the project. So, of course, we have to pay the entire invoice. Because, even if the quotation is less, we accepted the full project. So,

30:58Speaker 4

You can use another number. Because what you said is that we accepted the project. We accepted to go ahead with him.

31:03Speaker 2

Because at that time, we had earned about 4000 rupees. Not a small amount. What is the problem?

31:11Speaker 1

What is the difference in Tamil? Like their actual quotation, what they meant was, they examined the machine and made a statement.

31:20 – 31:40Speaker 2

I gave you a copy of it. I got it this morning. Okay. Today, Clark gave it to me. Yes. Quotation is in the pocket. That's why I, that's why I gave you both.

31:46Speaker 4

But that doesn't show the difference from the police. I didn't see 3500. That's why.

31:56 – 33:52Speaker 2

I can tell you what they did in it. What I meant, I think I'm looking at it. I think I'm not good at making any kind of use of it. I think I don't know a little wrong. Okay. The basement is empty. It's closed. They actually went to repair the floor, but when they went to inspect the brakes, the brakes were leaning forward. So, in the test, they had to raise the machine wave. When the transmission is in neutral, the four tires roll in reverse. So, when you put it on the throat later, it rolls faster in reverse. So, to repair. They removed the floor changes. They won't do anything at all to make it better. Go. Okay. Labor Transmissions, which are currently expected in Bavi, are 23,121,118. The core of 15 units was returned to us in many parts for $1,000. And it had a total of 10,300 labor costs. The first labor we did today was 871 rupees. That's all. But... Was it a happy job? Yes, you liked it. This is working. Do any of you remember that repairman gave us a warranty?

33:52Speaker 4

Yes, yes, there was a time limit. Yes, a warranty is going to be made.

33:56Speaker 2

Um, do you know? It was a very long period of time.

34:00Speaker 4

Yes, I think it was a good time to bring you to the next year. Oh, it's getting longer. It was like 5 or it was a good time. Yes, then there were no hours. There were no hours for it.

34:07Speaker 2

It was not an hour, but it was a time.

34:19Speaker 4

I think the original is very old.

34:23 – 35:16Speaker 2

Where is the answer? When things are more expensive than them, I hate it. Because they have a machine. They know what they are looking at. I don't think there is such a possibility. I don't think they are adding things because they have a machine. Oh, I'm not saying they're adding things. If anyone has a machine, they can look at it with a glance. If it's a possibility, the answer should be very accurate. That's why. No, Maria. After the initial meeting, they went to set it up. Oh, they were investigating everything that happened. They realized that it was something else that no one paid attention to. Okay, I may have made a mistake. I thought they were saying that. Double quote. We set it up. A machine was lifted up in the air. Double quote. May God bless him. If it's just a small expense, that's all. Remember, they came and took it and brought it back. Okay, they're working in Wallingford. No, it's a good job. Of course. What will they do with a fire truck? Yes.

35:23Speaker 4

That's very... Lift fire truck.

35:26Speaker 2

Yes, they do. Yes, they do. They do.

35:29Speaker 4

Are there two individual lifts on each floor? Yes.

35:35Speaker 2

Okay, today we learned something. Yes, about everything else.

35:44Speaker 4

More questions about carryovers or your opinions?

35:52 – 36:16Speaker 2

Very standard. Very standard. Um. Remind me in line 280. We are taking more than 5000 dollars to paint the police kit. Yes, it is a very good thing to paint. Two floors. It started two floors. It is still a big thing. I know what the money we gave to paint my house is. Yes, it was a lot more than that. Yes, one floor of a house will be enough to paint.

36:16Speaker 4

We were going to paint two floors, two floors.

36:18 – 37:33Speaker 2

That's why it's over two floors. But we have budgeted for the other two floors. So now the whole thing is going to be done in one go. If that's your price, I'll do it for four floors. Rs. 10000 for four floors, right? We have the money for that. But it is the cost of some of the things in my poverty. I think that's very little. On the 283rd line, we needed another police vest for a new policeman. Mom, for $1,800. That is, I think so. It shouldn't be a waste of money. But... When you see it, this is the reason. At the end, there were a few budgets. That's why they still have some small ones under the last year's budget and under this year's budget. We are avoiding them. That's why it's still like that. That's why... When you move forward, you say that you have transferred something that is not even worth a penny to their budget.

37:33Speaker 4

The worst. Yes, good news. Yes.

37:36Speaker 2

Exams are not worth a penny. Anyway, that's all I have. You know your studies well, Chuvappu.

37:49Speaker 4

I won't do it. I'm still thinking about the H2O carryover three years ago. What is it? Remind me what it is.

38:00Speaker 2

Which line are you on?

38:02Speaker 4

I am Sundari.

38:03Speaker 2

It's Mike. That's the inventory of the cells, isn't it? The H2O inventory that manages the fire. Yes. Yes.

38:14 – 39:23Speaker 4

Then we took over that project. The fire department took over that project. And, as you know from your records, I haven't done it the way I wanted to. And so, the person who started the project in May, I hired him in his office. So, if he does everything I need, it will be approved this year. Thank you. And I believe that the person in his office has not done anything wrong in the past few years. So, if it's a project that we accepted in 2023, isn't that right? It hasn't been fully spent so far. The project hasn't been fully completed. Right. Right. It will not take long for the regular leg work to be completed. Clearing out and spending money on certificates will not happen until all the leg work is completed. The leg work is not completed. Therefore, the fire department will take over the leg work. So, if they need money, you will give me the bills. We will code it and close it. Okay. Okay. Okay.

39:25Speaker 2

My guess is that we will have to get some benefits from this.

39:29 – 40:11Speaker 4

If there is a fire in Swagari Swath, we are trying to bring about a big change in the NFPA, which is now required by the property owner, to use those fires. Therefore, only if ISO, the insurance rating company for fire insurance in the city, is certified and used, will the fire return well. There is now a good part of the private property that is not allowed to be used by us. So if we go to use it, it will create a small problem for the property owner. So I would like to ask about it. I understand that we are now living in a very legal world. But a fire is going on in the next house. Someone is going to oppose their use of their water. They can't do it legally.

40:21Speaker 1

What I mean is, I'm afraid they'll say the same thing, but I don't think they've ever been allowed to do so before. After that.

40:28 – 40:50Speaker 4

They came back, it was confirmed, it was mandatory, it was confirmed, you know, but they've never asked me before. Blah, blah, blah. We had allowed them to do so one or two years ago. This is a part of the money you're talking about. Yes. One part of the money in our budget had to be used to complete the signage, right?

40:50 – 41:09Speaker 2

Yes, it was completed that year, but this is an effort to get all the certifications and permits. If you need any help in legal documentation, we can give you a legal form. Then you can increase the prices and fees. Isn't that the only thing people can do?

41:09Speaker 4

Yes. If you need anything, I can give you a link.

41:11Speaker 2

Let's continue sending them.

41:17Speaker 1

They are praying for us to agree.

41:19 – 41:32Speaker 4

Yes, we will try to make it as simple as possible. They are hoping that they won't read too much in it. Yes, but it would be nice if ISO could give us a little more numbers to show more things in town. So we can talk. We can draw anything. That boy next to Anaket.

41:32Speaker 2

Is he a part of this project? No, the boy who was there to stop the fire was there. I understood that.

41:47Speaker 4

Yes, we understood that. We weren't sure if anyone had ever testified that it was there.

42:12Speaker 3

It was like it was there. In reality, no one knew about it.

42:14 – 42:27Speaker 4

So, there was no connection to the film as a certification. It was just an advertisement. Firewall flow rates and everything that was shown were all firewalls. It was an ISO firewall.

42:28Speaker 4

There was a boy there with the intention of advertising the end of the fire. There was no connection to it as a certification.

42:32 – 43:04Speaker 2

So, do you need anyone to get the boy back? We know. I will work with you on it. I have connections. I think you will have to ask Deep who Deep is because he is angry. Okay, it was there. I know. But Deep didn't know about this before. Okay. They were so disappointed in the name of things I knew. They never said boo. I know. Anyway, I don't want to reverse the conversation. But, okay, we can. Don't put anything on tape. They can do that. Yes, yes.

43:11 – 43:33Speaker 4

I need to go back to the police station quickly. You may think that I need $10000 for both sides. Yes. It will be $20. I need $5000 for both things and another $10000 for another experiment. Okay. Both answers are 10. It's a small thing, but we're all the same. That's right, Sreeni.

43:33Speaker 2

It's more visible. Yes.

43:34 – 43:50Speaker 4

You're saying that a police station costs $10,000 a year. Yes. If you check it, we have two answers in our package. It seems to be higher. A police station costs 40,000 a year, and a prayer for a year. Okay. Only for two years. For the other two years, it's 10,000. That's what I said. Then let's change it to 5000 for four years. Let's change it to 5000. Yes.

43:50Speaker 1

For the project.

44:00Speaker 4

Agya project irubadana.

44:01Speaker 2

Illa, adhi chayyan pogannathinu mumbu, adhi chayithu vondirinnathinal, adhini shesham, adhi kuranyavannu nyan karuthunnu. Nyan adhi parishodhikendadhu nda.

44:11Speaker 4

Oru podhu chodhiyam, Martin Dess elayipozhum karar chayyapidhuna painter ana. Adhayadhu, adheham nyangalude priyapettu chithrakaran ana. Nyangalku adhehavumayi nallabandham unda.

44:20 – 44:32Speaker 2

Irubadhu vaishinu thalhe, adhinal adhehathinu bidu avishimilla. Adheham irubadhu vaishinu thalhe ana. Ningal bidu chayyan pogendadhilla. Pakshayi kettidam. Samayam aagum pol bidu chiyan poogum. Ade.

44:32 – 45:01Speaker 4

Sheri. Ende swandham anubavam painter maaril ninna vaivithya maarna vilanarnayam unda. Enikku nooru shadamanam vedyanam labichu. Ningal kariyamo, ningal kariyamo, nalla joli ki naalpatin aayramum, irupatin aayramum aana. Adhinal, ada. Shraddha arhikunnu. We can move on to our discussion about the funds that are not in the form. Let me ask Candace to discuss.

45:01 – 45:33Speaker 2

Okay, who do you want to vote for? Who do we want to vote for? No, not the town meeting. Next 4-1-6, you will get all those papers. The average cost of a car over is Rs. 5,05,11,804. That includes the old year, the new year, all the years, and everything else. The remaining $9 goes up to Rs. 8,092. What is Rs. 5,05,118? It is 483.21.

45:48 – 46:19Speaker 4

No, the number on the bottom right corner of the second page of the latest sheet is 505. Yes, this is the old sheet I was looking at, but she passed it. So what I also understand now is that we have examined all the carryovers, and it is advisable to approve all the carryovers listed at 5,5118. Will that be the deal? Yes, I think so.

46:19Speaker 2

50,518.4 cents. Yes, don't forget the cents. But will anyone approve the deal? Of course.

46:22Speaker 4

I will approve the deal to remove the carryovers. Approve the 50,51,804 carryovers.

46:27Speaker 1

11,804. Forgive me. Okay. I'll approve it. Is there more discussion? Everyone agrees. I... Is there anything left?

46:47 – 49:22Speaker 4

Everyone agrees with the elephant. Yes. Okay, now this. Yes. As you may know, a committee was formed to discuss an unsigned fund. On June 18th, we discussed a series of opinions on our policy. We discussed it in the board meeting in June. We included those opinions in a draft that was signed on July 7th, and we found that there were not enough people to conduct a strong discussion here. That's why we... That discussion lasted until the August meeting. That's why I waited for a long time to discuss this matter. A week ago, I sent the group a clean document, a thorough document. I hope you will be able to take a look at it. And I agree that we are losing a few people here today. We all know that Um and Andy were part of the group that helped make this happen. So, his opinion and David and Kim's opinion are valid. But, Um, I am happy to start the discussion. Yes. Let me say that I don't want to make the discussion more in the name of Abba. People have been aware of this for a short time. But I do not intend to approve it or vote for it. Instead, we will take an agreement from the Finance Board that we think is right, and then we will hand it over to the Selectmen Board, and we will need to re-apply to the Selectmen Board, and we will need to re-apply to their opinions. We may or may not continue to accept it. Is that what you mean, Martha?

49:22Speaker 2

Yes, I think it's right if you like our opinion. But I think you can make your own rules in the world of the wealth board. Okay, I think we can do that if they are completely financial accounts.

49:32 – 50:18Speaker 4

The love of this rule may be partly true. The most important thing in this process is the amount of money spent on the fund. I think this is a very important issue for the city and its representatives. At least we need to hear the opinion of the Select Man Board. That is, it is a true and reasonable thing. Oh, we would be happy if we could do it. The Thursday after the business day in September, that is, we will do it in our first meeting. That is fine. If that is good, Candace, if you think we are good, we can move forward with the things next to you.

50:18 – 50:33Speaker 2

Don't let anything happen again. I like it. Okay, then you can vote. So, if you want to discuss anything tonight, please wait for our comments on the 4th issue. Continue to do everything together. Okay, I think we should send it to you with our goodwill. Okay. And I will repeat what Kaam said now.

50:34 – 52:22Speaker 4

The changes in the Mark Copie document are being reflected. Mainly, it is from the draft that we first announced. So this is not new, but we haven't spent much time talking about the target fund for understated funds or unsigned funds. I don't remember that. So I have to plan it again tonight. So he calls in five or six sections. You can see that um above 5a is 7 and 17 percent lower. I don't know which word to use, but we call our Auditing Report. We also choose a number that we use as a denominator. Okay, let me explain what the auditors are saying to us. What is the percentage of our unsigned funds? That is the denominator they use. You can use it in a different way. You know that you can play with it, right? Many people use it in a different way. Yes. Yes, yes, yes, but this is what our people are using. As they say, this is very close to government jobs. Yes, this is a shame that people can't understand without any reason. I'm not like that, I'm not like that. I don't want to talk about which denominator to use as long as we all use the same. Exactly. That's not really a problem. Anyway, Section 5A requires the city to be less than 17%.

52:35Speaker 2

This is what GFO does best, not G. So I don't think there is much room to talk about that particular organization. To put it clearly, it comes from 17% in two months, right?

52:45 – 53:05Speaker 4

Yes, and that's what people say. You should have at least two months' worth of income. GFOA is a government fund. Is this a connect ticket or a national fund?

53:05Speaker 2

Government Financial Offices Association. There is a national fund at the moment. So? We are moving forward with this GFOA.

53:14Speaker 4

We have a goal to select these funds. So, it is a GFOA that includes GFOA Subhash Connect Ticket or Association or the entire GFOA. Reason?

53:27Speaker 2

I believe they should enter the country. Because they...

53:30Speaker 4

I didn't know this when I looked at this record after three years. I don't know. There is a question.

53:35 – 56:17Speaker 3

Does anyone else think this is not necessary? As someone who is financially responsible, I think we are very important. Does anyone else think so? I don't know. There are also some positive uses for this. These are things to be used. I don't know if this is really necessary. I think this is the best. But I don't know if this is the only thing we need. We made it work. I strongly believe this is one of the things we need. Because at the end of the budget season, we usually have a discussion every year. Moreover, it often happens in a biased way. We go back and forth about how much we will take from the understated fund. Offset and Mill Rate This year we reached 1.2 million. It was not much in one way. It felt a little unique to me. Secondly, that fund is only doing very little to change the lives of our legislators. 1.2 billion, as you know, is being distributed throughout the city to the legislators without any difference. In addition, we can see that it has only done very little to reduce our unsigned fund. Our unsigned fund is growing. Usually, at the end of the financial year, we haven't conducted that return from the unsigned fund for the past two years, because we haven't had to do it. The funds that have not been submitted are increasing. Now it is up to 35-37%. I don't think our city is in the top 10 cities with the most unsigned funds in the country. I understand that it is intellectual, and that it is physically and financially responsible, and that it makes us feel safe. But from my perspective, it is the money of the investors, and we want to return it to them, or we want to give them something in return. But it is not right to allow it to be in the unsigned fund itself, because it is their money. Yes, as a result, without the investors' input, when they accept the budget, we save dollars in a savings account every year.

56:26 – 57:13Speaker 4

I will say it briefly, what should it be every year? The question is raised in the board of directors, how much should it be? The directors ask the directors, how much should it be? Double quote. Instead of trying to rebuild the Chakra every year, instead of finding different answers every year, I mean to say that you can bring a law using proper recommendations and standardize it. The law is not very strict. In other words, this is our goal. These are the reasons why we can move away from our goal. Therefore, I appeal to you. I don't want to stop us, but I think we can change it in the context of the opinions of our own people or the public that we should be able to bring a union.

57:21 – 59:26Speaker 2

Okay, move forward. That's a very important thing, I was about to say. BJ, I know that David was very disappointed in his email. This has never happened before, but we have had a discussion. It can happen in a positive way. This is not something that should actually be done in a positive way. So, I think it is possible to change this by giving a small direction to everyone moving forward, by making it less of a national need, and by making it possible to change it at all times. This is a lifesaver. So, if within 10 years another board says that these unions are no longer right, they should call another small committee and say that it is right. Okay, what's good for us? Is there a more clear direction for spending money in a special way? Do you know that now there is no need for any special document to keep a specific piece of land in the back of the city and each independent authority? But it can be changed within 10 or 15 years. If the time of return is more important, then we say, good, we want to save a certain amount of dollars. We use this money. That's how we want to spend it. Do you know what I mean? We can never see it. That's why even if we spend this amount of money locally, it allows the wealthy board to change it. Do you know why we are doing this or why we are doing this? I want to pay attention to what David said. This is also found in many other cities. We examined other cities. Do you know their rules? Among them, what we liked the most is to find out what will happen to the old palace. That's why it didn't come out of nowhere. And this is one of the things we really liked. So what I'm trying to say is that these are the cities that are close to us. These are the cities that are doing the same things. I agree that this is the money of the legislators. I think that it is very wrong to keep saving money in a savings account and keep saving money in the budget line. So I think this is very wrong. If the legislators ask us a question about this, we will allow them to show us what we are doing and why we are doing this.

59:37 – 1:03:46Speaker 4

Yes, I agree with all those statements. There is always a discussion about what we should do in the past three years of my budget process. What should we do? I think it is good to have this big discussion. What do we need from this understated fund to overcome our understated conditions? What do you need? Therefore, it is good to think ahead of getting a good direction when it comes to the budget process. Oh, we have a certain amount of money, we can take it out, or we should be at this level, you know. So, I think it is important for new people to learn what is happening, to continue for years, and to have this history for the new people who come to the board. So, I have verified that we have the resources to make the rest, for the rest of the years. It has grown. It has reached a level that we really need. We need to find a place that says this level will not go up and agree to it. I think this is useful for that. I would like it if the document was a little lighter. In my view, this is a little long. But you know that it is smaller than the other ones we have examined. I can say that anyway. Yes. Me too. I think it's worth it to have a fence. I am a new face in this institution. I have tested many different budgets, but in a city, Since business is important, it is decided that your budget will be distributed and the demand will be met. But if you are in this government, as I have seen in other places in the Deep River, there will be a gap. Why didn't you withdraw more money this year? Or when are you withdrawing money? Why didn't you cut our expenses by taking part of the fund that you did not pay? I think they should be able to explain. You need to be able to answer the question of why do we use a code, but why do we not use such a complex one? It is that you are blocking it too much due to the lack of any kind of law. Therefore, take advantage of that situation. This feels like a code. A trigger feels very meaningful when you do things when they are very little or very much. But a rich board, whether it's us or the rich, will still sit and discuss about it, will still vote on it. But I think that the economic points are the trigger points. When you do things, when it's very low, it will be very high. Another argument that comes up against a non-profit fund continuing, is whether it's bad or the situation is bad. I took some time in the past few months to investigate 21 cities and Sandy Hook in New Jersey, and I didn't find out what happened there, and I didn't even find out what the unresolved funds were. What was written in the paper was Fema Vibes. No matter if it is 30, 40, 50, or 60 percent, the financial experience of a disaster like Sandy Hook will not fade away. Do you know? Some of the highlights I saw in those cities can be given to you. Some of them were cities with 8,000 people like us, and some were big. One of the top five property tax institutions in New Jersey, like Connecticut. New Jersey is the highest in the average population. That is why I am trying to find out what the response to that request is. From there, only the funds that have not been registered have been proven to be the ones that have been registered. Also, if this problem is well solved and we are able to pay a large sum of funds, it will be a two-month income without the government's interference. These funds are actually spent for the destruction and rehabilitation of those cities and those cities. Therefore, I am contributing to this, because I am trying to become the witness of the devil in this matter. Therefore, I believe that this is a valid framework and a trigger point. I believe that this is a process that can be explained to us by the executive.

1:03:53 – 1:04:55Speaker 2

Therefore, the general rule No. 19-77 is a rule that is approved by the Municipal Regulatory Board and the National Resilience Reserve Fund. Therefore, if we decide that we want to keep some money for ensuring the protection of the National Republic, there is a obligation to do so. We can say that as long as we have the courage to speak out to the dissidents, we will take it. This city called Braffold has done the same. And it has been included in the special agreement between Public Act 19-77. And that is, I mean, this is what we do to use the money of the taxpayers. It's not just that we can do this or we can't do this. Instead, I mean, it's a good way. He was my advisor. Jim Jim Bradford No, that's a useful description.

1:04:55 – 1:07:11Speaker 4

I think it's a good thing if we have a real desire for protection. I suggest we do that. What can the city do? How much will it cost? If we want to do that, we have to think about starting to transfer money. So, I have previously pointed you to Section 5A, which we have reduced to 70%. Section 5B states that the city must maintain a preferred lecture training between 25 and 30, and that it can certainly be discussed. And we can talk about whether we like those agreements. I think that we have already told this student that the income of an undecided fund of 30% will be reduced. So, when it comes to bonding, they say 30% is enough. But when you go up to 3.2, 3.5, 3.7, your qualities decrease. That is why we have reached 25 to 30. We have 5 fingers and we have done a good job. Um. Then, um. There are a lot of suggestions about how to bring money back to lakhs of dollars, as shown by Bria Chundi. Um. I know that there are a lot of ideas about how to distribute this money to everyone on this table. That will be a discussion for another day. That's why I want to be a member of the committee. Go ahead. Then 17 is a triad trigger point. The committee will help me understand why I chose 25 or 30 instead of 25 to 30. What is your opinion on that? So, you are asking why the trigger point was selected as one instead of the other. Yes. That's what I think.

1:07:11 – 1:08:13Speaker 2

When we get to the replenishment and reconstruction, it will become more clear. Okay. But, there will be a discussion and discussion at a higher level. It is not a strict application of this as a regular application. When we look at section 10, which deals with replenishment and reconstruction, If the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, or that type of balance, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of the balance that we have, and the target is below 25% of But when you were 17 years old, you were the only one who had teeth in one way or another.

1:08:13 – 1:09:12Speaker 4

You're right. Right. I remember it now. Right. Um, I have some numbers here. This is it. This is it. This is it. This is it. This is it. This is it. This is it. This is it. But it increased. Yes. For the last financial year. Yes.

1:09:12 – 1:09:24Speaker 2

For 2024. Yes. The unsigned fund was 50,5984. Forgive me. Can you hear 15 or 50? 15. Okay. I know. Did I hear it right? Okay. No. Yes. Definitely. Okay. 155,9984. And the total was 36.1%.

1:09:39 – 1:09:57Speaker 3

That's three years of income. That's 2,425 years of income. Reason. If we accept this law, we can tell you that we have some expenses to do. I have some good news. Then I think there is a good news for Anitha and me.

1:10:10 – 1:10:30Speaker 4

Okay, what I meant was that you will spend without any meaning, but you meant to reduce the number. You are reducing the amount by offsetting the expenses to be paid in the coming year. Isn't it? We can go back to work and start a new job. You can go back to work. You are doing that too.

1:10:30 – 1:11:55Speaker 2

That is the reason. They will help you for years, because they will not leave you alone. Yes. Yes. If they know that the Board of Selectmen is raising an understated fund and if they know that they will have to do something using it, we would like to include this in the budget in a meeting to look at the projects that they are trying to implement within the next two years. We are making a small move to include this in the budget meeting. For example, like White Sands Gazebo, this is not a big deal, but hey, we would like to use the understated fund for this. If there is more, can we complete this project completely? I think that this project will really help the city. Whether things are updated or improved, do it. Otherwise, you know, if you look at this, you will have the ability to say that we have more. We are very happy to be able to do what we want to do. You know, we have to know that there are a lot of reasons for the senior center to be opened. We earned money from it, but we could have paid for it. You know, if we were like this, we would actually look at this. We are in a good state. We are in a good place. We can still do it in all our terms and conditions.

1:11:55 – 1:12:50Speaker 4

So I think it would be really good for the city. If that's what it means, I think it's really helpful. Okay, that's useful to me. In other words, this tells the Selection Board and the Finance Board about our desire to take on a new project. And how will our savings account be? Do you know? Is it in decline? Is it in decline? If there is a new project that we have to take on for a short period of time, it tells us about taking care of the money in the unsigned fund and reserve fund for providing financial assistance to a new project. So, what I'm trying to say is, usually, we use bonds as a fund. That's how we should normally do it. If that's a special thing for us, that money is a better way to keep it.

1:12:54 – 1:13:27Speaker 2

But we can decide to deposit that money from the unsighted fund to the borrowed fund. We know that this project is coming, so we can change it now. We have it, so we can do it. So, instead of saying that we are going to withdraw from the people you know, let's work and work. We can play these games so that people don't get addicted to it alone. We are keeping it in a good condition because that's what we like to do. But when we look at it, oh, we have too much. Let's put it there. Then next year we don't have to get addicted to it. If you say that, that's the same thing. I think this is done in a slightly better way.

1:13:27 – 1:14:12Speaker 4

So, what is everyone's opinion on these ideas? I would like to find out if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like to take regarding these conditions and if there are any other measures that you would like

1:14:13 – 1:14:37Speaker 2

That is what is going to stop our range. It is to stop it close to the 30 range. That was one of the reasons for it to stop. Then there were other independent policies that we implemented here. According to the standard and report, even though Anitha and I agreed, Jack gave us a lot of points. Yes, because of that and because of that.

1:14:37 – 1:15:04Speaker 4

It is clear to us that going up to 35 is not going to do us any good. It is a good idea to say that 30-30 is good. And that's where AAA will be decided. Do you know that your policies and everyone else pay attention to it financially? Do you know? These are the infinite questions they ask. That is what they really believe in. Certainly, if you are 25 years old, you will start taking a hit.

1:15:04Speaker 2

You can go up or you can go down a little. So, to show that you are more than 30 years old, you may want to be a little higher.

1:15:10 – 1:15:58Speaker 4

I did not take any kind of scientific evidence, but I have heard different answers from different bonds. Our bond agent is in the senior center deal. 30% is amazing, I thought. I said, okay, if we reduce it by 25%, will it lower our rating? Not at all. Then, you know, this is a law, but it's more than 30%. I'm working with Anitha and Candace to make sure that you don't have to increase your rating. To tell you the truth, we got the highest rating, didn't we? Then, we got more than 30% of it.

1:15:59 – 1:16:31Speaker 2

BJ, the fact that you are going to a very high level does not seem to be the best in reality, said the auditor. The reason is that you don't seem to be making money in real life. You are a shareholder. Then she said, you know, that means your budgeting and your spending are different in Tamil. That's why she mentioned it. If there is no reason for it, she said that no one should go above it. She said that it does not mean that everything is always good. Double Quote.

1:16:33 – 1:17:03Speaker 4

If our unsigned fund is very high, I think we will be excluded from many questions, even if it is not the criticism of the judges. Why are they asking? We cannot give them a good answer to that question. I have a question. Do you want to do this legally to make sure that everyone's eyes have been pierced and that they have passed away? Of course, I want to do this legally. But... I don't know where it is.

1:17:03 – 1:17:38Speaker 2

If we get a certificate of good housekeeping from Selectman... We can do it legally, right? Okay. Yes. I know that Borders will be one of the questions raised in Lightning. Have you seen this legally? So I'm not sure if you should do it or not, because I'll leave it to you. You know more about the board than anyone else. I don't mind running a legal trial, but I doubt that there are any legal problems.

1:17:39 – 1:18:02Speaker 4

But I doubt that it is a good question if our accountants know about the Board of Finance. If so, if they have seen other town policies, we would like our auditors to review them before accepting them. They will be here on Monday. I will talk to them next. Thank you. Okay.

1:18:02Speaker 2

I think the reason is that this is a more economical mechanical thing than a legal problem. Municipal law as part of the Municipal Council.

1:18:10 – 1:18:43Speaker 4

No, that's not wrong. Apostle Gang, I have one more comment. Have we not finished talking about the shrines? I don't know yet. And I just know one thing about the reconstruction in a comment section on the page. Okay, let me take the right section here. This is section 10. The reconstruction process through Rega, which is 10 years old, is point 4.

1:18:43Speaker 1

Am I saying that right? 104.

1:18:54 – 1:19:50Speaker 4

Yes, that's right. Then? We did an operational reconstruction plan. The boards will be prepared in one way. Then two board members will be prepared and voted in the vote. Then we will go to the inspection. But we lost a piece. I wrote to the board to give it to the boss. So, the fund needs to be rebuilt in this way, and the financial board has prepared this reconstruction plan. So, is it our share or not? Do you have to inform the selection board about the recovery plan? What is the relationship? I think that there is a word here that says that the selection board will report on the rate of understated fund balance and recovery in each budget cycle. If you don't want to implement the recovery plan, then which department are you helping me in? Then you can go from 4 to 1. Okay, okay.

1:20:03Speaker 2

It would be easy to read a clean copy.

1:20:04 – 1:20:49Speaker 4

Yes, I think I'm 104 years old. I can't fix it. Okay. Order a resolution report on the balance of the monthly fund and the recovery of the monthly fund. Okay. It is our responsibility to rebuild it. We can't do that. We have to report them to the sector. I want to make sure. Yes. We have the responsibility and responsibility to do so.

1:20:49 – 1:21:32Speaker 3

But I think it is our responsibility to take part in the selection process with the selection board. We usually do that. We don't want to listen to what you say, we just say it to the mass in a very rude way, right? Then it's a small city, we work with them. So, from the moment we create a reform plan, we announce the select plan to the board. We continue to report. So, I didn't see it for the first time. Yes, there is only one word in the dictionary. In terms of changes, it is referred to as an unsigned fund as an undecided fund.

1:21:38Speaker 2

Okay, I'll change it. That's it.

1:21:40 – 1:22:56Speaker 4

Can I give you an editing suggestion when it comes to things? Then, Section 10. Number 1. Disease Control. This is the first line that returns to the 25% threshold set by the unsigned fund balance target. I suggest 25 to 30%. Okay, that can be 17. Then, I understood the same thing. Okay, I will say that I want to return to the rate targeted by the unsigned fund balance, because the rate targeted is one of three different factors. Do you have any other opinions? I assume that people in this rate are in good health from silence. 28 to 32 is for me to rise a little. That will stop us in that 30% of the momentum itself. Because... Oh! Oh, right! In a way, if I say so, the more I am on the board, the more the momentum will be distributed. I don't know what Dev and Randy will say to this, but I know that they have risen a little. That is,

1:23:10 – 1:23:40Speaker 2

This is 17% of what we need. If we reach 32%, that's a lot, right? You are encouraging me to do that again. How do you justify that? What is the need to make Shubhasha double? Well, as part of my justification for this, we can cut it down in different ways. But if we have a big undated fund, we need a Resiliency Fund to make it easier. I'm not sure. Let's see what happens if we stop it from 25 to 30.

1:23:40 – 1:24:39Speaker 4

But when the unsigned fund is given, some of the money becomes a resiliency fund. I said it will be used. Yes. Resiliency became the foundation of the fund. That is, up to 25-30%, Fred is worth 1 lakh and it is not the responsibility of the financial board to manage it, I will say again. If it is actually 32%, we can use it there itself. Yes, that's one thing. But no, it should be reduced to 30. Yes, when we have that discussion, it will become old again. How much is the budget? I just think, yes, we are talking about these numbers. If it is more than 30, we can reduce it to 30. No, there is no question. I'm not going to do it every year. We haven't used it for a year out of all the years I've been here.

1:24:39 – 1:24:53Speaker 2

What haven't you used? What did you add to your budget? You know, we've never used it. We put it back because we're really good at it. That is, the fund is growing. Jim Lambeau says it's cheaper than he thought.

1:24:53 – 1:26:23Speaker 4

But that's true for David Kelsey's main squeeze point. We have to wait for years to come. And try to understand what our assets or other needs are. Until we are able to do it, we will be able to implement it properly. It is only known at one time what the final fund should be. What I have to say is that in such a situation where there are so many expenses, 30% of a year may not be enough. My personal wish is that some of the bad things that may happen in the future should be done as soon as possible. That is my personal wish. Now, when you are at 25%, you have to start thinking about what you are going to do when you reach 30. You have to turn that around. No, no, it's only as far as 17 is concerned. 17, yes, 25 to 30. It's a waypoint, but not a necessity. I can read a book. The city will continue to be a favorite destination from 25 to 30. Okay. But it's a strain. Okay. This is again a guide. Yes.

1:26:23Speaker 2

Okay. Okay. We can do a few things.

1:26:24Speaker 4

You will get feedback from you. Auditors will get feedback from you. You will get legal feedback. I agree with that.

1:26:34Speaker 2

Two. Okay. But it's a little more. Okay.

1:26:53 – 1:27:04Speaker 4

In my opinion, it is not right to vote for one thing. I think there is enough time to pass it tonight. Okay, but before we do that, does anyone else have any opinions about the department? That... I'm not giving you any answers right now, but if you do, let us know.

1:27:15Speaker 2

I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application.

1:27:27Speaker 1

I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application. I don't think I'm happy with the 4th application.

1:27:43 – 1:29:25Speaker 2

It was standard. It was just a standard language. This is what you are allowed to use legally. Okay, that's why I agree. This is a bit of a strange one. But if we have enough money to spend on it, we can do it easily. You know, it would be nice to be able to tell the investors. We are doing this in this way. Anyway, you have to close it. Anyway, this is a non-dollar money. Since you can't do this outside the budget cycle, we are paying a small amount, right? We are not going to use the understated fund. If it is more than $20,000, we will have to go to the town meeting to use it. This allows us to say that this period has passed in the budget cycle. This is an affordable cost. That is, we did not just bring her and Reggie. Candace made sure that it was fair to investigate the matter over a long period of time. We acted as if nothing had happened. You know, she's the only one. She investigated the laws to ensure that she was the only one. These are some of the examples that you can use to get back at Maria. Remember that our annual budget for the law is only 80,000. So if you have more than one case a year, it won't affect them. Then again, yes, thank you for reminding me. Yes, what you said is right. I don't have time to make it. Okay, do you know? BJ, I have a thought. So everyone involved in this, including Candace and the committee,

1:29:39 – 1:30:09Speaker 4

It may be a valuable thought. Moreover, before the selectmen board reads it, before the accountants, the interpreters, and the public find out why this is so important. Therefore, this is a comedy. We, Ksenam Patanengal, are investigating. We are using GFO. It is not the matter of the book that is being published, Do you know, since there were so many references after the first chapter of the document, you are saying that it is interesting.

1:30:10 – 1:31:23Speaker 4

She was a scientist. It is really strange. There were some people who wanted to make it small. That's right. Yes, I'm not saying that this should be a proper book. But if I can complete it, but... You made it a standard. Okay, no, no. I think it will work well for a new reader who understands this, right? The question is, where does this come from? Can you actually write one or two sentences about the background of the committee discussed by the Board of Directors? Oh, blah blah. I mean, what happened in the development of this and how you say it. If so, would it be an experience? I think this is not part of the action. Yes, yes, but this is more than a cover letter. Because the cover letter is separated from it. I will never see it again. I think this is a strange thing that I don't know. Because no one will ever find a cover letter to explain why this is so important. Think about it. So I want Martha to have a chance to speak. Because I know that she is making a book about the police. If you look at the book about the police, many other police officers don't have that much power.

1:31:35 – 1:33:24Speaker 2

First of all, I don't want this to be a strange orphanage. I want to see it as part of the book. It may not be different, but I don't think it will be the same because it is very new and new. One of our rights is our business and other rights. That is very standard. So I don't have to explain how it happened, because it is one that is used in all cities. And we can come up with another law. I think that there are laws about what they are doing in the office of the councillor or what they are doing as a recording. They are not going to change. This is not one of the laws that we legislate. So how do we do it? This is what we do in a way that everyone knows. But I think this is the only one we have created. So I think it is difficult to say how it was created and how it happened, because it is history. But I would like to tell a group of people who are not an act of action or an act of action. Wait a minute, this has been curated as a set. If we want to change it, it should not be like that. I don't want anyone to read that 25% or 17% or anything. It should be like this because that's what they said. Let me say that people in front of us who are sitting in our seats should not think legally about the things that happen to them and the things that happen to them, or that they should not make any mistakes or make any decisions about anything that may happen to them. Okay, so that's why the ordinances that are issued every four years, right? Okay, that's what I think.

1:33:24 – 1:33:43Speaker 4

It says that it will be issued every four years. That's it. Then there should be a language that makes it clear. Yes, I want that. Isn't that what I meant? Okay, no, you need that. If you think that the current language is not as strong as it should be, you don't have to do it right now. Yes, add more language. But it's true. What you're saying is absolutely right that it shouldn't be so harsh.

1:33:50 – 1:35:36Speaker 2

From 2018 onwards, there was a rule for this. All that was handed over to Elina, right? That's what I'm saying. At that time, it was a pleasure for it to happen. It's moving forward. At that time, it was in the form of a draft. You changed it. As you know. We have a Google Drive that is completely correct. I said it's completely the same. Then I'm sure I can add it together. I'll do it. As a reference, I just turned it over through other buttons that we had used, and no one knows where their numbers came from or why they did it. That's their way. So what I meant was, I don't think we're rebuilding a circle. I think it's just a way and it can be changed. I think it is important for those who update this document to go and check the status and conduct a new survey. Maria, I know where you are coming from. But as we had a lot of information about where each of these things are, people did not like it. At that time, I feel that this is a 22nd view. One book, one book, one book, one book, the second scope, it is described there. One book, it is published. We have to make sure that it is published under the Connecticut General Statute. This is created using the GAP, GFOA and other cities. That's all. I don't think there should be a proper backup as we all have seen. Because the next time we look at it, I expect that someone will conduct a new investigation on what the different predictions are and what the different expectations are. Yes, but you know for sure. But now we have a very limited audience of selectmen board, auditors, and lecturers.

1:35:51Speaker 4

Today, I don't think it's a decision to include it in the document. Rather, I think it's a decision to help these people understand where it came from and to include it in the event.

1:36:03 – 1:36:41Speaker 2

It can go with the document or not. But if you can give 10-15 words, I can do it. Or 20. I am happy. Then on Monday, Anitha, if you can do it before Monday, she will use it for auditors. Otherwise, when we get it, we will email it to them. It's not a big deal. I will tell you. I will tell you that you know everything. I know. Yes. Do you know? I don't know. I will say that she is Bahumathi that she got from Leslie. We don't have to point the auditor to GFOA. No, they know. They know better than me. What does that mean? Because I have read a lot of this recently. No, they know. Because that's all. What the auditors agreed on is there. GFOA, all this is a fact. So they know. Yes.

1:36:52Speaker 4

Apart from that, if you want to send Candace to the Board of Selectmen meeting or if you are there, you have to ask Martha if you know how to answer those questions. Oh, no. I can take Candace. She is the one who will be assigned. Yes.

1:37:05 – 1:37:22Speaker 2

But what I mean is, if you want two of you, that's fine too. Candace will give you a salary increase. How much? 25% or 30% will be given. Take it from Anson. That's it.

1:37:22Speaker 4

I need one percent.

1:37:25 – 1:37:45Speaker 2

September 8th. Oh, that's a bad date. Yes. Is that so? That's my mother's horoscope. Oh. Maybe Anna will come or someone you think will come. We can find someone. What's the date? You can do it. You are a moderator. You can do it.

1:37:46Speaker 4

At what time? You are a certified moderator.

1:37:58 – 1:38:36Speaker 2

You just said what I meant. No, I can do it. I can be there. Candace, if we decide, we have to do it that night. Yes, if you want. We can move it to the second meeting of the month. It will be on the 14th and 21st. That would be good. I think you should be there as I wish. I think your Board of Finance meeting will take place on the 22nd. That's a great time. You can do whatever you want. I'll do it. Special guests always choose to come to the agenda meetings. Okay. I think I'm an idiot, but that doesn't suit me.

1:38:36Speaker 4

That doesn't work either. So, I have a question or something to ask you. Do you need any guidance on where to take the numbers to calculate this? Yes, that's it. In front of the document, that's it.

1:38:46 – 1:39:39Speaker 2

Audit shows the total losses. There's a reference there. I didn't say that. Yes, there was a question. Does it indicate where the funds came from? Just like how the Kandais took the people you know from somewhere. So that's what Section 5A says. Yes. And, as shown in the latest annual audit financial statements, the actual total expenses, expenses and other financial aid used for the general fund of the city. We continue to say that all of these are completely natural uses. If this is next to you, that number. Page 46. Yes, then it comes from that order.

1:39:40Speaker 4

It was standing in that order. Which page? 46. 46 is a lot of books in it.

1:39:47Speaker 2

The total cost is Rs. 3.4 billion. The total cost and other expenses are Rs. 431,49,059. Thank you. Okay, we have completed that. Are we busy with other things now? Is there anything else?

1:40:17Speaker 4

Yes, that's one. It's a select-women report.

1:40:22Speaker 2

Ask Mike. Are you staying in a common house?

1:40:26Speaker 4

No, I was here for any questions about my reason.

1:40:29 – 1:44:46Speaker 2

I was worried when I saw you sitting here as a commoner. That's the reason. It's a common place. Okay, I'll do it quickly. Oh, as you know, the gazebo on the beach in Vidand has been completed. Although the beamings inside the contractor ceiling have been restored, it is said that 7 by 8 has been completed. They can't do it in advance. They will come back. They will cut all the bolts to make sure that everything is fine by the end of the year. The road and surveyors of Um Hall are working on their surveys. Um had to investigate their last report this week. He will continue to prepare his draft design. All of this will continue to go to the meeting of the Hallinder Roadside Walk Committee in September. Um-Grassy Hill Bridge. We completed both the easements completely. The third one is in Panipura. It is a little more difficult because there is a constant gap. The other one is temporary. At that time, we have completed all the arrangements and are waiting for the legal approval. I am doing the carpet project. I think it will go to RFP this week, only for you to know. And when we looked at it, we decided that it would go more than 20. We need the bidding to go to RFP. At that time, we went and imagined it. Last week, when I went, the wind and the rain were in it. We did it in advance, made some changes, and it will go out on Friday. Then, on September 18, the bids will open, we expect. There will be more options in the bid for tickets. Because of the previous tickets, some of them were lost, we noticed. At some point, someone cut off one part of it because it was being sprayed. If so, but that is an option. No matter where it comes from financially, it will be how it will be. Then, the construction work has to start only when it touches the business day in Tirupati. Most of us will start at 156 first, because DOT construction will stop on December 1, because asphalt plants will be closed. Therefore, they will find what they can do when they walk through 156. Then we will get updates. I will try to say that all construction schedules are on my side. Old Colony, Old Colony, Old Loras, Miami, each project is on a different schedule for their individual projects, so I will have to post it in my office to let people know where and what is happening. Then there is a shared infrastructure with three parts as a base. Vioxide station, pump station, etc. It is going to be misunderstood, of course. I think it's right. The right time. Then it starts. I will try to add something to update the people. I think we should continue to pay attention to BJ. Michelle Rajivachathai and Jasmine Michelle said that they will take over Chumadhala. Please let everyone know. But Michelle decided. What is it after about 30 years? I think 32. 32. I think it's been 32 years since she decided that Wednesday nights would be her again. So, especially in the budget time, especially in the budget season. So, Michelle Bould of Finance Clark left the position as an employee. Still, she is responsible for helping to prepare the agenda and pockets in the job description of Town Hall's admin. Also, we will leave all those gaps out. You will still get everything on time. Anitha and I will work together. That's all.

1:44:48 – 1:45:07Speaker 4

Okay. For that, first of all, I, Jasmine, thank you for coming here and accepting this job without fear. But we need to accept a promise. We need to think about how to say it. We need to thank the Board for the service of Michelle's 10 years. On one hand, at the town meeting, yes, you can recognize her.

1:45:09Speaker 2

We can do that too.

1:45:15 – 1:45:29Speaker 1

If there is something special in your doctor, is it for you or for others? What are we? What do they have to accept? If BJ says that you and Anitha can say it to the public, you can do it.

1:45:37 – 1:46:56Speaker 4

Okay, I am going to make a statement from the tradition. That is, the Board of Directors is very grateful to the wonderful service of Michelle Hayes for the last ten years. Second, is everything okay? Okay, for me, I would like to say another opinion that has nothing to do with it. In a one-man audience, The next two shopping centers in the city were sold to developers who wanted to save money and make them rich. I don't know if all of you know this, but I think that these wealthy businessmen have the ability to justify their savings as they are a successful business and a successful business. It is said that the Marthas' system is to adapt to their planning and design. If all they bring is the best, it uses the most of the city's properties. What will happen will be interesting to see. I wish you to know that I did not know that the shopping mall was sold.

1:46:56 – 1:47:41Speaker 2

You read it the other day. Yes. Elizabeth Regan called me as an example. She said, what are you thinking? I asked, I came back from the cemetery. What happened? Then she said, oh, it's gone. Actually, no. Usually, when I record here, I get a notice from the assessor or from the town clerk's office, but no one ever told me about it. So I don't know anything about them. I am saying this based on what you all have read or observed. We can expect that it will be good for us to show our positive faces and what they are doing. Yes, we need it. Okay, we are ready to adjust.

1:47:41Speaker 4

Go and change it. We have completed it. Thank you.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.