Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

on Tuesday, September 1, 2026. My name is Donel White, and I am the chairman of the meeting tonight. For more details about the meeting process, please check the meeting document printed on both ends of the meeting hall. Mr. Kelly, please check your attendance.

Yes, I understand. White, I'm here. Hammer Schmitt, I'm here. Adams, I'm here. D.C. didn't attend the meeting. Mills, I'm here. Weatherby, I'm here. Lee, I'm here.

Norton, I'm here. Bassey, I'm here. Thank you. Kelly, I have a new case. First, you need to submit a consent form and ask someone to modify the proposal.

The case has been changed before the meeting began. Therefore, you can immediately submit the case as requested by the Registrar and Registrar. All right. Thank you. Would you agree to submit the case as requested by the Registrar?

Mr. Lee agreed. Mr. Weatherby requested it. If you agree, please say you agree. If you disagree, please say you agree. The agreement has been finalized. Can we get approval for the meeting approval on August 18, 2026? Mr. Adams agreed. Mr. Mills re-appointed. Is there anything to discuss about the meeting approval on August 18? If you agree, please say you agree. Do you have anyone who opposes? The consent has been approved. Next is the report of the City Planning Committee and the order of written communication. I'll start with the Kelly manager. On behalf of Leonard's manager, I would like to say that the city employees are continuing to review the evaluation proposal for the UDC account. The evaluation team is compressing the respondents, and will conduct an interview with two to three companies in mid-September. Please also check the email related to the workshop schedule sent to the committee. The goal of the meeting on October 13th is to focus on missing middle, missing middle, and housing issues, and we plan to look around the recently approved projects and the new developer signposts installed on the site. I hope you can include these three modules as much as possible. If possible, please send us an email. As I said, another item of the other cases has been added, and I would like to discuss the email I recently sent regarding the participation of the MAP Conference of the Michigan City Planning Association. Thank you. Mr. Kelly, do you have anything to report now from other members of the committee or those in charge of the committee? Thank you to Ms. Mills, who made a great presentation about the data center at the last workshop. Thank you very much for telling us. You can check the written message in today's packet. You can check it by accessing aegov.lestar.com. Click on the calendar. Click on the City Planning Committee. Click on Tuesday, September 1st, today. If you click on the case of today's meeting, you can see the application file for all the cases to be discussed. Now, I will move on to the 6th case, general opinion hearing. This time is an opportunity to speak individually for up to 3 minutes about a case that has not been designated as a public hearing or a separate opinion hearing. First, I will listen to the opinions of those who attended the meeting. Next, I will listen to the opinions of those who participated in earnest. Please use the hand up function when using the phone or when using Zoom. The phone number is 877-853-5247. Please enter the address of the meeting at 977-6634. The person in charge of the meeting will check the name of the three seats in the back seat of the phone number to nominate the speaker. If you are in the order of speech, a guide will come out. Please move to a quiet place and mute the background noise. Whether you are at the meeting hall or participating online, please tell us your name and address when you start speaking. Is there anyone who wants to speak at this time? Curly Manager, is there a full-time participant tonight? No. Then, after the general opinion hearing, I will move on to the communications of the members of the 7th case. By any chance... Yes, I have something to tell you in a very short time, so I'll take some time. Oh, that's us. Yes, I was in the package this evening. It was Seohan, who was sent to the SP-26's 000010 reservation at the Glazer Way Residence Association. Uh, there's something about Glazer Heights in 32420. Glazer Way. What I want to say is that the case hasn't come to our committee yet. Uh, it's on Steam. Maybe it's a stream. Thank you. Steam, stream, stream. So I think it's caught on our radar network. It could also be a notification level for the development project that is being carried out by the City Council. So I wanted to tell you a few things. First, if you are watching this video, please submit your proposal again when the case comes back to our committee. If it comes back to the committee a few weeks or months later, it may be difficult for us to remember the proposal we received today. Second, technical questions included in the proposal will not be covered by the committee, and the person in charge will be covered in the employee report. Therefore, we will rely on the employee report to solve such concerns. What I would like to say once again to help everyone understand is that you can request an area change that you think is appropriate for the real estate you are considering at any time. And, yes.

One more thing I would like to say about this is that the interest of the residents is very high, so we added the information about the site to the page of Engage-gv.org, and explained in detail how the application is going. Here are the area entry, area change, and the site plan. Therefore, there are several tabs containing more information than the general page with answers to the questions we received. There are many questions about procedures, schedule, and current progress. There was a resident participation meeting that seemed to have received information through the 아마이 meeting of the local residents. So, I wanted to point out this point. This content can be found at www.engage-gv.org/.2420-glazer-way. Thank you so much, Kelly Manager. Thank you. Do you have any other delivery information?

Good. Then, number 8, which is the next meeting, will move on to the public hearing scheduled for the next regular meeting. Do you have any? At 7 p.m. on September 15, 2026, a public opinion meeting and two public opinion meetings will be held at the City Planning Committee meeting, which will be held at this venue. This public opinion meeting is about the 3695 South State Street planning unit development area designation and site planning for the assembly meeting. This is a proposal to build a 4-story building with a 66-story low-cost house and a 66-story ground car parking lot by changing the area from a business area to a planned development area. The area of 1.4 acres is currently empty. This is located in Ward 4, District 4. This is for public opinion. 2285 West Liberty Street is a site plan for the adoption of the City Planning Committee. It is suggesting a residential facility for the 343rd generation of TC1 region. This place is scheduled to be supplied as a 100% affordable house with an average income of 60% of the local middle-income. The building was planned to be 12 floors high. The first to third floors of the ground floor are used as parking lots, On top of that, the 9th floor is made up of residential spaces. The building height is closer to the RZ area in the south, and the higher it gets, the lower it gets. The 1st floor will be provided with shared office and work space along the West Liberty. There will be an A-class bicycle parking lot on the 1st and 2nd floors. This is located in Ward 5, Area 5, and the department is recommended to be conditional. Lastly, it is the 811 North Main Gun. As an extension request for special exception for the use of the planning committee, it is a request for permission to be granted for the use of the Demacho supply center and retail store located on the 811 North Main Street. The original request was approved in 2018. New development was not limited. It is in the C1 area and is located in W1, and employees recommend using it. Thank you, Mr. Kelly Manager. Next, I will move on to the 9th unsolved case. There is no unsolved case. Now, I will move on to the 10A regular case. It is the 00001 case of 3500 Packard Road SP25. The location of the waste storage will be moved from the south to the north, and the city-level bicycle parking space will be added. The employees' recommendations are approved. First, the applicant will hear your opinion. The presentation time is up to 10 minutes. Then, we will hear from the employees. The action planner will make an employee announcement. After that, we will hold a public hearing on the problem and deal with the consent from the committee. After reading the consent form and discussing it, we will finally make a recommendation or vote. After telling you all the procedures, it would be nice if you were ready. Welcome. Hello. 7. Is there anything I should do separately to share the screen? Good evening, everyone. My name is Brandon Cheney. I am a member of Nafer Belt. We are in charge of land planning and land engineering of this project. I am Kyle Gonzales of Demian 8 Design Group. Let's get started. Yes, please. I see. This project may be familiar to some of you. We remember that Blue Apple was originally a gas station in 2018, but we came here to change it into a Demacho supply center. At that time, in the initial sub-planning, the area of the entire fire-fighting area was greatly reduced. In the process, there were occasional problems with the alone and the operation. So I came back to see if I could move the garbage collection storage. One is to clean up the front yard, and the other is to move it closer to where the employees throw away the trash. The employee area is located in the upper north of the street, so above. Previously, everything had to be taken to the front, but now the front space can be reused as an additional bicycle parking space. There are four C-class parking spaces there, and through this, we were able to create a small space for the lower station. In other words, if you look at the rest of the area except for the dark gray area of the parking lot in such a small area, if a box truck or a van comes in without a schedule, it will block two or three parking spaces at a time, or even if there is a seat, it will take at least one seat. So, it looks safer for everyone to have a dedicated space near the back door to receive delivery, and I think it will be more efficient in terms of vehicle flow and operation. Do you have anything more to add? Yes, it's the same for nearby companies. Over the past few years, I've been running it, and I've seen that the waste collection vehicle is shared with the nearby sub-district when using it to work at the existing garbage collection port. So there were many conflicts and interference in the route. So, if we move to the north end of the sub-district, that is, to the back of the building, and create a space for waste collection and garbage collection, I decided that the flow of vehicles in the sub-district would be greatly improved. Considering that, I don't think we need 10 minutes. All right. I won't force you. Thank you so much.

I'll call you back when I have any questions. Thank you. Yes, thank you. Now, I'm going to listen to the announcement and report of your staff.

There is not much to add separately. In 2018, when the proposal was first received, we discussed keeping the applicants and garbage collection at the current limited location, and it seemed that doing so at the time would be better for remote operation, so our employees are in favor. Thank you. Is there anyone who wants to comment on this case? Are there still no original participants?

There is no one who raised their hand.

Oh, there's a full-time participant. Welcome. Thank you for participating. I'll be waiting for a moment. Let's continue Lee's spirit. I'll finish the public hearing and read the consent form. The Enabershi City Planning Committee approves the 3,000-year-old Packard Street site plan version 2, which was written on August 10, 2026, in order to prevent the increase in garbage numbers. Add a lower car space and add four C-class bicycle parking spaces. The D.C. committee proposed and the Weatherby committee re-appointed. Now let's start the debate. Who will start first? Mr. Weatherby. Yes, I was here when the first gun was uploaded in 2018, but at that time, NDJ Apostro PS was still before opening the door. So we didn't know the delicious fun that would come soon. As far as I remember, I remember that one of the neighbors was very angry about the problem with the building. I'm really glad everything went well. It seems to be a better situation now, and it seems that everyone is satisfied with the good fence between this building and the next building. Thanks to this, we were able to enjoy delicious donuts and things to be next to him. Yes, so this proposal seems to be in a good direction, and I think that these plans show that they are not impossible to change. As you know, we can review these cases and improve them in a better way. Thank you for your effort to improve. Thank you. Mr. Lobby, you're going to choose the title of the article about donuts and delicious things. Are there any other members? Oh, I'm sorry. Mr. Mills. Yes, thank you. I have a question. There is an employee report, no, even the content of adding a spare vehicle. Can you show me where it is and whether it is included in the calculation? Yes, it is marked with a hatching pattern. You need to use a microphone. I'm sorry. There is a hatching pattern on the north side. I can't point it out right here. Yes, let's move on to the next page. Actually, I'm on this page right now. Can I get close? Yes, please. This part is fixed. I see.

Now, for those who can't see this, and even for those who are on the other side, this is the northernmost part of Saebujie. Can I look at it like that? Yes, yes. Good. Excellent. I think I can see the cursor on the screen. Yes, I can see it.

Well done.

What is the difference between the parking space and the parking space? One of the reasons I ask is that there is a limit to the number of parking spaces. That's a question for the staff to answer. Yes, how is that processed and how is it stopped? And... It's not a traditional parking space, but the vehicle can park for the lower station. Yes, the garbage collection gate, that is, the waste storage gate, must be emptied. Yes, I'm not going to mark it as a parking space. Yes, we discussed it with our employees, and the planning manager said it was okay to use it as an empty space. However, the owners, that is, the owners who were delivered by the applicant, should understand that it is not another space where they can simply park. If you've ever been there, you've probably seen a small security vehicle. I don't know if he's still there, but I saw him several times on the way to this bakery. They tend to stay near the garbage dump, but you can do that in the future. You can move there, but you can't use it as a regular parking space for anyone who comes to the site by drawing a line. I see. Do you have any plans to draw a line?

I don't think you have to mark the parking area as a prohibited area. Would you like to speak on the microphone? We didn't intend to do that, but if you want to draw a line in the prohibited area, the other side could mean a parking area. So we could have marked the whole area as a prohibited area, but in my opinion, I don't think it's necessary unless people come and just park their cars. I see. Yes, the intention is to reflect the expected lower area of the site plan, not to actually draw a line. And one more thing about parking problems. You can't zoom in, but there's a series of areas. If someone tries to park in that area, there will always be a base under it, so you can't get rid of it. Yes, I see. The space will remain as it is, as you know. So, um... You can't park in that area. Basically, if you don't cross the line... Yes, in my opinion, if you use the N-control key and the mouse wheel, you can actually zoom in.

Would you like to try it? It's done.

Look at the magic. So this curve section is a part of the planning sensitivity of the parking maximum by discussing with the city. Yes, I understand. And I agree that there is no need to add a signboard where parking is prohibited.

And if you look at our standards, there is no limit to the maximum traffic area here. There is also a clear reason to limit the maximum number of parking spaces. This is partly to reduce the area of traffic and to encourage other means of transportation. So I was wondering how we were considering this situation. Anyway, you can't park in front of the fence, right? Yes, and if it wasn't marked as a lower area, I wouldn't have even thought about it. Yes, so I think this is reasonable. There may not be anyone watching, but considering the effort, those who are watching now or those who are watching online, or for those who will watch the video later, I would like to say that if there are 10 cars in such places, this should not be used in this way. Please refer to that. All right. Thank you, Mr. Mills. Are there any other members? Yes, I agree to approve this. I have a question for the employee. I know the answer, but I want to hear the answer. Why didn't this case come up to us and wasn't it an administrative decision that the planner or staff could make?

It's because it's a change in the vehicle use area. I see. It's not adding parking space, but it's adding an area of fire protection and moving the trash collection location, so it's beyond the minimum standard that should be reported to the members.

Can't we raise the minimum standard so that it doesn't come to us and be dealt with administratively? We can consider that.

How can we review it? We are working on it.

It will be included in the rewriting process of UDC.

This has been dealt with as a task to increase the number of plans that can be officially approved on the roadmap of the planning committee and the council meeting for a long time. So we are fully aware of this point. In fact, when the case came up, I asked Mr. Daecheol the same question. I said, why is this a technical requirement? We are also watching. Thank you. Thank you. All right. Mr. Lee, if my memory serves me right, especially regarding the subject, I think it was about 300 square feet or 1,000 square feet.

How much is that about the Bluetooth area?

I don't know exactly right now, but yes, there is a fee. I see. They met that standard.

That number should only be adjusted. Yes. I have a practical question.

Yes. Will the size of the garbage collection be larger this time? Yes, that's right. Yes. So it will be changed from a single garbage collection storage to a double storage. I see.

That's just to meet the new high-end waste standard. Yes. I see. Good. And the cooperation between the two buildings. So, is there a contract for several real estate owners to use the facility together? The reason I'm asking you is because I'm curious if it's efficient in terms of operation. If you increase the collection capacity, it will reduce the collection frequency and reduce the number of operations. That's what I thought from that point of view. You're talking about the investment part. Yes. They are currently using half of each for waste and recycling. Yes, so if the capacity doubles, it will be easy to reduce the number of collections. I see. But I don't think there's any agreement between the real estate industry. You're asking that, right? Yes, I see. Yes, yes. It was just a simple curiosity. Yes, that's enough.

Thank you. All right. Is there anyone else? Are you ready to vote? Mr. Kelly Manager, please give your name.

Thank you. Have a good evening. Now, let's move on to the 11a, other tasks, and parliamentary policy cases. This includes a presentation by Kelly's planning manager. I don't think I'll read it because I think you'll explain it. If you're ready, please start. Yes, you can read it if you want.

You like to read long documents written by employees.

I know this is going on every year. There is a place called the Political Committee Committee, and it helps to decide the ranking of the lobbyists first. You can explain it in more detail. It is mainly used to decide what the lobbyists will do for, and how the committee and board will get what they want. They ask the committee's opinion and decide the priority of the initiative. So, I signed a case to deliver feedback to the committee. I will share whatever you give me. I will deliver it to the meeting room so that it can be reviewed by the committee. It was written on the basis of the last year's policy will, and the 25-year version of the included data is included. Previously, there were topics that understood certain policies and legislation changes that were more interested in or wanted to change as a support request or institution for various cases.

All right. Is there any opinion from the committee? Let's start with Mr. Adams. Please give us your opinion on this matter. Yes. First of all, the city is generally opposed to the government's efforts to limit the authority and capacity of the local authorities to make policy decisions in various places. It seems that the city has already officially expressed its support for the housing law in Goryeo. I think we need to adjust the text so that it does not collide with the support position. There is another opportunity to agree on the opinion. The text contains the content that the housing crisis is a major problem. Therefore, it is easy to separate the area setting separately from the general opposition to the main-level measures that use this phrase to limit local control. In other words, there is already a basis for why the area setting and land use are different and why the housing problem is special, so all we have to do is make these two things go well together. Well, there are a few other things that are worth including in the economic development resolution, but in my opinion, even though it is a policy establishment document that is only two years old, it does not seem to be included here. So I confirmed that the concept of tax-based protection is missing. And well, In other words, we need to lean in a more inclusive direction than less inclusive in the way of interpreting the rules when reviewing the standards we have. The concept was not included, but this is an important policy and is one of the four policy declarations published in the Economic Development Report in April 2024. Therefore, it seems that the concept of tax-based protection and the optional approval interpretation rule should probably be included. There may be other parts that I missed, but this is my opinion. Thank you. Mr. Adams. Do you have any opinions among other members? Mr. Mills. Well, I confess that I didn't even think about the things to be excluded, but the suggestion I want to include is that when we look at our comprehensive land use plan, goal 22 is actually to support county and major-level policies and laws. Well, 2.2.1 is the content of the main level reform of the property tax. So, this is different, but I think that the same purpose is to remove the barriers so that new users can easily supply their homes and reduce the size of their residents and remain in the local society. And 2.2.2 is to adopt a regional policy to prevent migration and to promote county and state-level reform that will support this. So I don't want to modify the text because I think this is something we need to do. I don't know what it will look like. We need to consider it. But what includes it is... our... Even if it's not our opinion, it's included in the plan we just passed or proposed. Thank you. Mr. Mills, are you okay with your manager's speed? Yes, I understand. Thank you. Other members, Mr. D.C. There is one question. I don't understand.

I'm sure you've read it before, but to be honest, I don't fully understand the division tax, so I'd appreciate it if someone who understands it could explain it. The division tax is known to pay taxes on empty land and occupied land in different ways.

For example, if there is a person living in an empty land in the city, the building can be calculated to apply a rate higher than the case. Therefore, this is particularly useful in an area society where land speculation is severe. Thank you. It's helpful. Yes, and that's true. When real estate is traded, taxes rise, which can be a factor that pushes people away, so I think this is also related to migration prevention measures. And... Yes, I've seen an interesting policy report on the time of division. I'll look it up and share it with the committee. You can also add it to the committee's packet. How about the other members? In my case, we raise our voices so that we can keep our feet on the IBC. We are still lagging behind other states in the Middle East, which is because it affects development, safety, and other considerations. Are there any other members? I agree with Mr. Adams' opinion. In particular, it is the opinion that it should be separated from the part that seems to collide with the economic development document related to regional control in the section dealing with area setting and land development. Therefore, it is necessary to separate such matters and include them in the content of confirming that this is a problem in the residential area. If changes are made in the residential area, it will be helpful in the regional area as well.

And I think it's a problem with housing availability. If we think from the perspective of people living in neighboring areas, we cannot control the policies of neighboring cities, but we must ensure that not only the child welfare law but also the child welfare housing near them are sufficiently supplied. That's right. So I think that the content is mentioned in various ways throughout the comprehensive plan. Then I will summarize. Currently, on the one hand, we are opposed to the main government violating the right to live in the province, but in some areas related to the housing crisis, we are concerned about the tension in supporting the main government's legislation and intervention. Therefore, we need to adjust in more detail in that area. In addition, in relation to the approval of tax-based insurance and land development approval, we would like to issue a policy statement in the second round of economic development resolution to support such detailed adjustments. And according to the opinion of the Secretary of State, we would like to support the major reform of the property tax and the removal of housing supply barriers by issuing Goals 2.2.1 and 2.2.1 in the comprehensive plan. We will provide you with a detailed overview of the specific items. And we will adjust it so that it fits better with the international architecture law to match the support from the Middle East and the surrounding areas. Do you all agree with the summary? Is there anything you want to add?

Good. I don't think we need to vote for this. If I submit it to the Seogi office, it will be shared with the committee. Thank you so much for posting it as a case. Also, you added a case for the planning committee of the 2026 General Assembly of the Michigan Planning Association. It is an event held in Kalamazoo from September 26 to October 2. Yes, that's right. So... Our budget is... You can apply for travel expenses and accommodation expenses for one member of the committee to attend the time plan conference. Recently, we are trying to support those who have not had such opportunities from employers or cities. Therefore, if you want to attend, you can vote as you decide tonight. You can apply to attend the committee with the fund of the City Planning Committee, that is, the lifelong education fund. However, if necessary, you may postpone it to the next item. Then, let's check who wants to go to the conference. It's a great conference. I'm going to go.

You have to go, too. But in my case, it's a lot of money. Are you interested? Because there's a time zone.

There are also training courses for new planners. This is a very difficult situation. This is the last time I'm a doctor, so I have to fully focus on research right now. I understand. I still want to go.

So, um... Can I apply for it tonight?

Oh, what I was going to say is, I'll apply for it tonight, and if you want to refuse later... It means you can refuse. I think that's a possible option. Um, so just, uh...

I think we're all cooperating very well. So if you want, you can just decide that one member of the committee will be admitted. I think there's a committee member. Mr. Lee received an email that he was interested in attending. But I've already been supported recently, so I'd like to give Mr. Basuny the opportunity first. But if you don't have time, please know that Mr. Lee is also interested.

I don't think there's a better conflict of opinion than this. So what I'm trying to say is, in fact, to Mr. Lee, I think I can go next year. Um, yeah, so that's... This is an annual budget item.

There is a budget of $1,000 to $1,500 to support members' lifelong education. In the past, it was supported by several participants, but when I discussed it with Mr. Leonard, it was the opinion that it would be the easiest for one person to receive the transfer support. Yes, it makes sense.

In my opinion, yes, let's send one member and discuss it later. I'm kidding. Let's look at the will. He has to go. He really has to go.

It's a very good conference. Yes, I recommended that the consent of one of the members who are interested in Kelly's management be approved. Mr. Mill proposed and Mr. Adams re-appointed. Is there anyone who would like to discuss this consent? Mr. Lee, I recommend Mr. Basun. All right.

I will accept with gratitude. Thank you. Yes, that's great.

Then, it seems that Mr. Basun is going to approve this year. If you refuse, please let us know and we will take care of it as needed. All right. You are the best. Thank you. Yes. Do you have any additional discussion? Mr. Weatherby, are you okay? Yes, it's okay. All right. Is it okay to proceed with this in 9 votes?

Public opinion, approval, no, consent, approval, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,

Now, I missed the number. Wait a minute. Give me a minute. Oh, technically, it was 11B, so it's still 12. Let's get started. Let's move on to number 12. This is the public opinion hearing. This is the second and last chance to talk about all the problems for up to three minutes. First, I will listen to the opinions of those in the meeting room, and then I will listen to the opinions of the original participants. If you want to speak in earnest, please press the star 9 when using the phone or use the hand raise function when using the zoom zoom. Call 877-853-5247. Please enter the meeting ID 977634-1216. Viewers will check the sender with the number 3 at the back of the phone or the name of the Zoom user. When it's time to speak, a guide broadcast will come out. Please check if you are in a quiet place and mute the background noise. Everyone who attended, whether you are on site or participating online, please tell us your name and address before you start speaking. Kind person, will you tell us? Good. Thank you. I'm glad you came tonight. Kelly manager.

There is one person who is remotely connected. It's good. Timothy Rose.

You can speak for three minutes at the planning committee. Rose. Yes, hello.

I am the team Rose who lives on South First Street 448. I will tell you about the document on the policy of the case. A few months ago, I talked about how to activate the housing cycle in relation to the tax problems that people who want to dispose of old homes and reduce their size are facing. I moved to a smaller house, but the tax only goes up. The solution I suggested at the time was to change the policy in the parking lot and reduce the size so that we could maintain a kind of headly discount. For example, if a 55-year-old or older person moves to a new house, the low rent can be transferred to a new house, leading to housing circulation. If that happens, instead of two people living in a big house, the big houses will be able to be supplied to young families. I still think it's a good idea, and I think this Politburo and you are discussing it, so I think the document is the best opportunity to review the proposal of the Planning Committee. Thank you. Thank you. No one has raised their hand anymore. Let's wait a moment. There are no more connected senders. Then I won't wait.

After the public comment, I will move on to Article 13, the proposal of the committee. Mr. Mills, do you have any opinions? It's not a proposal of the committee, but I'd like to thank the person who just made a comment. I think the content you said could be included in the 2.2.1 item.

I think that's exactly what I meant. It's not the only solution. I didn't mention it temporarily, but I think it's a well-considered idea. Thank you for calling and thank you for keeping an eye on our crisis.

Please confirm that you can attend the Kelly Managing Director's meeting on October 13th. It takes a long time to prepare for the Dovo Tour. And you have to make a notice when you invite the host. Since it is a meeting of the City Planning Committee, the general public must be able to participate. Depending on the weather, you may have to wear boots or bring disposable gloves. Because it's orange. You may have to clean the drain while you're walking. It's really a full service. It's a very solid full service. I'm sorry. Do you have any questions or special requests for the date? Please tell me. Do you have a fixed route? Or if you have an opinion, should I keep sending it?

You can send us your opinion anytime. If you send us anything, we'll try to match it as much as possible. Don't expect too much. It may be difficult to reflect all opinions. We have to meet a few tricky conditions. It has to end at a place where you can enjoy chicken, so it has to start and end near a public building that can open until late that day. So the first thing you have to do is to let us know if you haven't told us yet. I've been contacted by six people at the moment. I'm waiting for the rest of you to contact me. And the location of the missing middle housing case sent by the Mills Committee is already being considered. Yes, you took a lot of pictures. We are reviewing them.

If you have sent another case, you can send it again, and you are welcome anytime. I see. Good.

I want to see a new development site like the concept I thought of today.

I think it would be really good to pass a new development guide. I don't know if it's possible, but it's an area that we're trying to include. All right.

That's great. Great. Do you have any other opinions on the 13th of October meeting? If you don't have any, we'll ask for your approval. This is a proposal from Mr. Weatherby. This is a request from Mr. Mills. Please say yes if you agree. Yes. Is there anyone against it? The meeting is over.