Ad Hoc Committee on Police and Community Relations - Regular Meeting
The Community Livability and Public Safety Committee conducted interviews for various advisory bodies, including the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Utility Advisory Committee (UAC), Planning Commission, and Heritage Commission. The committee made recommendations for appointments to these bodies, with some candidates being considered for multiple positions.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- Ad Hoc Committee on Police and Community Relations
- Meeting Type
- Ad Hoc Committee On Police And Community Relations
- Location
- Olympia, WA
- Meeting Date
- March 4, 2026
Transcript
995 sections (from 1,195 segments)
Alright. Hello, everybody. This is the community livability and public safety committee of the Olympia City Council. We have an evening ahead of us doing interviews of candidates for our advisory bodies. So few hours ahead of us of interviewing individual people for these positions both tonight and tomorrow night.
I am joined by my committee mate, Kelly Green, and Young Nguyen will be joining a little bit later this evening. In the first fifteen minutes here, we're just gonna be preparing for, the, first round of interviews with the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee. And so in that vein, just so everyone is aware, at the start of each interview, I will go ahead and, introduce, the, the committee members and also the chair just to so that we can do that quickly. And then we'll go straight into the interview with folks. You know, they'll know that we have all of their information, in front of us.
And so, we have three questions from the committee. I'll ask the first one, and Kelly will ask the next two until Ian is on the call. And then, Tom, you are here for bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee. So thanks so much for being here. At that point, you can ask the the question that is specific to the committee. And and there's one community there's one community member that's also interviewing for the planning commission, so I'll just jump in and ask the planning commission a specific question at that time. So, Tom, are you having some video issues? I noticed you looks like you were frozen for a bit.
Yep. I am. And let's see. I just installed Zoom on this new computer, and and the blur is messing up. So Oh. I'll see if I can get it fig figured out in next couple minutes.
Okay. Well, you know, see, we we've got the first interviews at actually, in ten minutes. So kind of a long fifteen minute period for for prepping. So so go ahead and take your time. And if ultimately it doesn't work, we can just share that with folks that you are here, just a disembodied voice.
Yep.
Kelly, did you have any questions?
No. Everything looks pretty well organized, which, speaking of that, I just wanna give some gratitude to Don. The the all of the communication about this, which is a very big and hefty process, have been so well organized and so clear. And even the the packets, like, I I could not feel more ready to go. So thank you, Dawn.
I will I do my best to mitigate. Yes. Yes. Of things going sideways one way or another, but that's just what it is. So you are welcome. And,
Tom, I see that you're there. Oh, you're moving now?
There we go. Okay. Climbing. Looks like I just need to use the the other camera. There we go.
Okay. But before you blurred, I saw that you were at the climbing gym, or is that just a a background that you use?
No. I have a climbing wall in my garage. So
Oh, well, that's super cool. Nice. Yep. Excellent. Well, we we can we do have ten minutes before our first interviewee is here with us. So if he pops on early, we can get started early with him. He's the one that has the additional question for the planning commission. Tom, do you have any questions?
Nope. I assume so I did this I was part of this process last year, and I assume it's gonna go fairly similar similarly. And, yep, it seems pretty straightforward.
Okay. Great. And we've got just two people to interview in this round. But yeah. Because one person couldn't make this time, So we have an additional person coming on at 08:30PM. I don't know if you wanna pop back on for that or just let us handle it. I
might be able to pop back on. Let me think for a minute.
You can think all night about it. And if we see you at 08:30, we'll know what your decision
is. Yeah.
There's a good chance, actually, I probably don't. I'm sorry. I'm just yeah. My kids got a thing, and I'm trying yeah. There's a good chance I'm not gonna be back at that time. So
Yeah. Well, you can you know, if if we see you, we see you. If not, then, you know, we can you know, we we we can handle it. But we can reserve with the two with the two folks that we have to interview now. There's actually kind of a gap between BPAC and the utility advisory commission committee.
Actually, I never know when's committee or commission. But but so we can have a little bit of time to discuss on your reflections on it. Yep. But as a committee, we probably won't dig in deeper into who it may be until later on in the evening till we can interview the final person. And because one person is interviewing for both BPAC and planning commission, we wanna go through the planning commission interviews. So
Yep.
And I see that we have we also have somebody who's interviewing for BPAC, but all but is also interviewing for utility advisory committee. So and it looks like they are first, actually, on that list. So I don't know if you wanted to hang around for that. There's, like, there's, like, a twenty five minute gap, and then Yep. That so so if you wanted to drop off, that's fine. But if you wanted to hang on and be able to do that interview too, you're you're welcome to.
Yeah. What time are they scheduled to start?
What's
They're scheduled for 05:20.
05:20?
Yeah. I might
be able to
do that.
Okay. Great. Yeah.
So Just a second here. I'll be right back.
Yep. Totally.
So camera angle is bugging me. There we
go. No worries. Yeah. So if you wanted to hang on for that other one, we'll probably take a little bit of a recess because there's the way that the scheduling happens here is, like, Don creates all the slots, and then there was one person who, like, didn't respond, and then another person who couldn't be there at that time. So now it's at the end. So there's, like, kind of a gap between the two. So we'll probably recess for a bit and come back together at around at 05:05 so that we can check-in with the committee care for utilities and talk through the process with her. I'll be having the same conversation all night. Be here all night. So but Kelly and Ian will be joining us later.
So so we'll probably recess for a bit, come back at 05:05, be talking with the chair of UAC, and then that first interview is at 05:20. And then that way, you can also have a perspective on that person as well and be able to ask the question from Deepak.
Yep. Sounds good.
Perfect. Well, I hope whatever family thing you have this evening is is a super fun thing. What are you doing?
Oh, my my kid's going to play at D and D over in Lacey. So
Oh, you're just the ride?
Yeah. Yeah.
Okay. I understood. That's great.
He's not quite able to make that, six mile, ride on his own yet. But
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Oh, so biking?
Yeah. Well, no. I mean, no. He's we're driving. He's like, school night, it's, he he's exhausted as it is on Thursdays.
Got it. So so kiddo old enough to drive, but maybe not that far at that time. No.
He's 13. So it's it's I drive him. Yeah. Yeah. So I was saying, like
I see.
Yeah. In the summer, my my goal is to be able to sort of send him off and say, go.
I see. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I'm picking up what you're putting Your child would be biking if it weren't, you know, winter and in the evening and on a school night.
Yep. Yep. Yeah.
Okay. And we still have another five minutes before the first interviewee is Justin Stang.
Justin available to be moved over for Australian land if you're
Oh, great. He said he's just there listening to us. Okay? Yeah. Actually, if let's go ahead and move him over, and then we can see if he's he he should be ready. You're ready. Right, Justin?
We'll find out. Oops. Hold on. Let me do it again. Let me get another he had declined the first one, so let me just do one more.
No. Don't decline, Justin. Come join us.
There he is coming in.
Hey, Justin.
Hey. Are you are you available to start a couple minutes early?
No. I am. I saw the instructions were to make sure I was on to get through any technical glitches, but, yeah, absolutely.
Okay. Excellent. Thank you so much. Yeah. Thanks for joining. Thanks for applying to serve on advisory bodies for the city, we're and considering you for both the bicycle pedestrian advisory committee and the planning commission. And so I'm joined by committee member Kelly Green and also Tom Dillon, who is the chair of BPAC. And we have some questions for you. It's a quick interview. We might have a couple extra minutes for you because we do have an extra question for the planning commission.
But our next person is scheduled at four. Sorry. Actually, we have a little bit of extra time because they are scheduled at 04:35. So we don't necessarily need to rush. We have some funny scheduling stuff in terms of, like, when somebody can't make it and needs to cancel or whatever. So but let's go ahead and get started. So, I'll ask the first question. Justin, what interests and excites you about joining the advisory body bodies that you have applied for?
Yeah. Thanks a lot. I appreciate that question. I think, you know, obviously, last year, I ran for city council, and, really, I found the the process, although not victorious, really transformative in the ability to make a difference in my community. And so I wanted to make sure that even though I didn't win the election, I thought that there are valuable ways that I can contribute, and it really excites me to be able to participate in a meaningful way.
I think that I'm now the Northwest Neighborhood Association's representative to the CNA, and we hosted that community priorities forum. And so I think getting feedback there you know, what really excites me about BPAC in particular is that people identified sidewalks and pedestrian safety as, like, one of their top concerns. So not only do I get to help in a meaningful way, but I get to help in a way that the community has identified as one of their most important focus areas. And I I think that's that's really exciting to make a difference that people will actually see and appreciate because they're asking for it, I think, a really a really cool opportunity. Obviously, from the planning commission side, I think that there is so much that goes into the work that you all do as city staff and as council members that is really impactful.
And and I think that that that commission has, you know, the input and the expertise to really advise in a way that shapes the future of our city. And I I think all of that's really, really exciting work.
Great. Thank you so much.
Yeah.
I'm gonna pass it over
to Kelly for the next two questions. Just gonna ask them all in once in one long run on sentence. No. I'm just kidding.
I just gave you a look. I know you did. But
so, Justin, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body or to these advisory bodies, let's say?
Yeah. I I mean, I think everybody has their sort of unique perspective, their lived experience, and I'm a longtime Olympian. I think, like, from the pedestrian side, from the BPAC side, right, like, aside from Paul Barron, I walked every nook and cranny, every single block. I'm very familiar with what it's like to be a pedestrian in every precinct of every neighborhood, and I think that's really valuable. I I have such a different appreciation having walked the entire city than I did driving around it.
You know, as I kind of had noted, I also have a brother-in-law that is he's wheelchair dependent, and he has some severe mobility issues. And so our family for the last eight years has really been understanding what the Americans with Disabilities Act actually means in practice. There are laws, and there are are and there are ways that people put that policy into action. But for the people that are out there every day interacting with that policy, it doesn't necessarily always line up. And and I think that that's that's given me a really a really interesting perspective on on on what it means to be trying to get around in areas where it's a little bit difficult or, where areas that people think are fine.
So we've got two things going on. Right? Like, the really challenging areas that we all can identify easily, and then the areas we think are pretty good that once you get into the the details, you realize they're not as good as as we thought they were. And part of that just comes from the understanding of the of the perspective of people that have different challenges. And so I I definitely think that, you know, I I have a you know, like I was saying before, you know, part of walking around in, every neighborhood is I also knocked on 5,000 doors,
and I
talked to a significant amount of people last year. And so I I also think that my perspectives gives me, the unique ability to to be able to not only have gotten out there and talk to folks, but but try to be sort of a a representative voice in the advisory space as opposed to in the council space.
Thank you. Yeah.
And, Justin, how might you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
Yeah. That's a good question too. I I'm a life lifelong learner. I come at everything with a sense of, like, real true curiosity. I think that there's always an opportunity for growth and improvement.
And so I I'd like to start just by listening and learning. You know, there's a a wealth of information in recorded meetings for the past five years that I could go back and start watching and and really getting a sense. And so I think really learning learning the the space that the advisory committees are in is is step one. And two, building relationships, getting to know the other advisory, members and and really learning about them and and where they are in their lives and what makes them tick, and I think is really helpful for any collaborative effort. You wanna get to know these folks that you're working with and understand what where they're coming from and and vice versa.
And, you know, I think listening, learning, you know, build build those relationships. And then, of course, I contribute wherever I can. You know, there's there's work to do and sleeves to roll up and and things to get after, and I'm excited to help in any way that I can. And I think that long as I stay true to those things, listen, learn, build relationships, do the work that you can whenever you can, good outcomes follow.
Thanks. Great. Thank you. Next question will come from Tom.
Alright. Hello. So my question, the question from the BPAC is how can Olympia develop and leverage its walking, biking, and rolling infrastructure become more of a people centered city?
Yeah. I was thinking a little bit about this after the, community priorities. And then even last night at the city council meeting when Daniel Garcia sort of presented on that community priorities. And I I think, like, when I was walking around and or when I go running in my own neighborhood, I think we've got really great stretches of safe, accessible areas where you can walk, bike, and roll. And then we've got these big stretches that could use some focus and attention. And I think, like, can you know, leveraging that that ability to connect those networks and expand them, I think, is is really, you know, something that I I would wanna look at first or or foremost. But I also think, like, the community priorities forum showed us that we have a
really
engaged community that it's, like, super passionate about some of these things. And I think, like, leveraging that enthusiasm and engagement from the from the public I mean, I love the sidewalk survey that's out now, and I think that, like, they know where the worst areas are. Like, all we've gotta do is ask them. Shoot. We could have a contest. Like, hey. Show us your top 10. And, like, then we we we very quickly have a priority. Like, hey. This intersection has been identified by multiple people as the the sort of tough spot. Like, let's let's look at what we can do about it. And, you know, I think listening to the community and leaning into their passion and engagement around the issue is, you know, I think the best way we can make it people centered.
You know? Right. And I'll take, the last question here. This is, focused on the planning commission. So how do you think that the Olympia Planning Commission supports this community, and what do you think it makes what do you think makes for a successful city?
Yeah. That that's a biggie. Like, what makes for a successful city? I think, like, last night at city council, there was a great example of this. Like, the synergy between what the city staff does, what the advisory folks are doing, what the council is doing, it it all works together in this, like, synergistic way.
There's give and take. There's this collaboration. There's this working together. And I think, like, when you have everybody kind of rowing the boat the same direction, that that's what leads to a successful city. And so I think, you know, from a planning commission standpoint, it's it's being that that first sort of hoop where you can vet projects and really engage with the public in a meaningful way so that by the time it gets to the council level, you've done a lot of, like, work with the staff and the advisory committee to to really sort of look at what the viability of certain projects is, what the desired outcome from the general public is.
And I think it just allows the city staff and the and the council to make a more informed decision because a lot of that work has has taken place up front. So I think, you know, it's it's all putting those dominoes in the right spot before you can knock them down. Or in this case, I think we wanna put the blocks in the right spot to build it up. But I think you you get the the analogy that I'm making there, which is, like, if we're all if we're all working together and have that shared common goal, then, you know, between between the different entities, you can really have a a successful model.
Great. Thank you so much, Justin. Yeah. That is all the questions that we have for you. So just looking forward looking to next steps. So sometime next week, you'll get an email from Dawn that you've been in touch with around this process already. And she'll let you know one way or another, you know, what it is that the committee is recommending. And then the the recommendations for all of our appointments for advisory bodies is gonna go to the council March 31, and the the council will make the final decision on it. So do you have any questions?
No. It seems super straightforward. I'm just exceptionally grateful for the opportunity to to to be considered, and, hopefully, I can help in in in a meaningful way.
Great. Well, thanks so much for joining us, Justin.
Yeah. No problem. I hope you all have a great day. Thanks for the time.
Yeah. Have a great night.
Okay. Yeah. You too. Bye.
And then okay. And so now, Tom, I was mentioning we have a a few awkward gaps just because of the nature of trying to schedule many short little interviews with lots of people. So our next person is on at 05:35. So, Dawn, have you been able to pull together a quick committee is in recess slide to be able to put on the screen?
I have. So so she'll be joining you said 05:35. She will be joining at 04:35.
That's what I meant. Yeah. No. No. We're not sitting here for an hour.
About But there's a real recess. Yes. I do have a little I do have a little slide that I can I have popped I can pop up?
Yeah. If you wanna pop that up and share it, that way we can, you know, do what we need to do in the in the background and come back, just before 04:35 and do the next interview. Alright. Great. Thanks so much, Don.
Hey. Look at us. We're all back. Kelly, thanks for being the first to turn your camera on. I'm just sitting here Yeah. Doing another thing.
I don't wanna be the first one. That's all I know.
And I see that we have, I I believe her name's Yelena, who is, in the waiting room. So we can go ahead and bring her in, and I will ask her to pronounce her make sure I'm pronouncing her name correctly when she comes over.
Elena, I believe you have received a notification to accept a panelist promotion. Please click on that link.
I wonder if she took a little break until the exact moment.
She had declined for a second, but I'm I'm sending another link.
Okay.
She's coming in now.
Yeah. Hi there. Hi, Elena. Hello?
Hello.
Yelena, could you tell me, for one, am I saying your first name right? And two, how, the pronunciation of your last name?
Yakashiva.
Excellent. Great. Thank you so much. And it's Yelena. That's how your first name is pronounced?
Elena.
Say that again?
Elena.
Elena. Okay. Why silent?
Not there.
Okay. Excellent. Thank you so much. Well, welcome, and thank you so much for applying to be on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. So my name is Danny Madrone, and I chair the Community Livability and Public Safety Committee. I'm joined by Kelly Green, who's one of our committee members, and also Tom Dillon, who chairs BPEC. And so we've got a quick interview for you. We've seen all of your materials in advance. So I'm gonna go ahead and just just kick us off. What interests and excites you about joining the advisory body that you've applied for?
Well okay. So I moved to Olympia about a year and a half ago, and I before I had been more, in when in California, I was a bit more involved in my community, and I really wanna get involved. And somebody posted on the bike, Bike Thurston that this position was available, and I kinda was like, oh, okay. I could I have the bandwidth to apply for this. I can somewhat represent Bike Thurston and also just be more involved in my community. And I just I moved here because I absolutely love this town, and I just wanna be part of it in any way that I would be useful.
Great. Thank you so much. I'm gonna pass it over to Kelly for our next couple of questions. Okay.
Alright. Hi, Elena. Thanks thanks for coming. So how would you describe, the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to BPAC?
Okay. So start off, I am a perennial bicyclist and bus door and bus rider and pedestrian. So, like, I really love the bus systems. I grew up riding a bus, and I want to keep doing that. And I walk everywhere as much as I can.
And then, in college, I minored in city planning, and I majored in landscape architecture. And so I have a bit of, like, an educational background in this. And now I'm a substitute teacher, and I try to get around town to all the different schools. And it's really interesting to me how some of the schools are really easy to get to, and some of the schools, it feels impossible to get to. So I really want to bring that perspective of, like, if it's hard for me to get to the school as a substitute teacher, what about the students of middle schoolers and high schoolers who wanna go hang out after school?
Maybe they wanna go see a movie or they wanna go to the library or they wanna go to the mall. Like, how do they have access to those things? And so, like, a a little bit of environmental studies, a little bit of environmental design, and then also, like, the users, are we serving? Especially the kids are gonna grow up using the system. The bus just went past my house. Are they are they able to use the system? Do they know how to use the system? Sorry. And I'm talking about buses, but I'm talking about, like, sidewalks. Like, do they have like, some some of them are served by buses, but they don't have sidewalks to the bus stop.
And do they is like, so teenagers loiter. Like, hanging they hang out. They call it hanging out. We call it loitering. Like, are there places around town where the kids can access, but they're intended for loiter? Just making sure that all the different users and places are connected. And I feel like when a town serves its youth well, it serves everybody well because then, like, if if the new users are able to navigate around, then everyone can do it. And so that's my perspective.
Oh, thank you. And next question, how might you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
So I feel like I'm so starting of just using the different modes of transportation within the town as much as possible, but also, like, I've started kind of listening to what other people have to say. Like, I find the bus system really easy to use, but a lot of people don't. And so I'm talking to the different people at different schools of asking them about how they feel like they're being served just out of curiosity, but I am also, like, I wanna go to more city meetings. Like, I haven't actually gone in person to any council meetings, and I wanna get to know the council members a little bit more just going to council meetings and, like, seeing how they behave and what what are what the issues are. And, like, I know that there was a recent, like, city plan oh, I'm sorry.
I'm blanking on the word.
Comprehensive plan?
Yeah. The comprehensive plan. Like, I know there was a really big thing, and it was, like, it was wrapping up as I moved here, but, like, I kinda missed out on that and, like, just making sure I don't miss out on those kinds of things and involve myself more that way and just listening because I know the other members have a lot of perspective. And so I wanna whenever I'm new to something, it's important to listen to the people who know what's going on.
Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you. And Tom is gonna take the final question here.
Elena, so the question from the BPAC is, how can Olympia develop and leverage its walking, biking, and rolling infrastructure to become a more more of a people centered city?
I love the people centered city part of this because I've I've I'm really interested in the people centered movement around urban planning. One thing for walking, there's lots of great bus stops that don't have great pedestrian access, like Thurgood Marshall. Their city bus stop doesn't have a sidewalk to it from the middle school. And so you're walking on the road on this really steep hill. So things like that where there there's already some access, but there's just, these missing links between existing infrastructure and what the users need.
Same thing with bicycle infrastructure. Like, there's some really great bike routes, and then there's, like, these little pieces that are missing to so that it becomes hard to navigate just because, like, the people who are using it a lot know how to connect it, but then it doesn't act like, the when I'm new here and I don't see how it connects, so, like, making sure that there's either wayfinding or when we, like, repainting the sidewalk I mean, not the sidewalk, the road to connect these things. And then rowing rowing infrastructure, I'm I'm assuming that refers to wheelchair users and
Mobility devices.
Mobility devices. So yeah. And I I learned so much about wheelchair access and mobility devices of biking around because if a bike can't get over it, how is a wheelchair supposed to get over it? And so there's some places where it's like, there's continuous access, and in some places, there are these little gaps in access. And so biking around town, you really get to feel for where the wheelchair users and mobility device users will have trouble getting through.
And I've seen people who've had to get stuck who got stuck, like, on the road not being able to access the sidewalk because there wasn't a curb cut somewhere. So if you're, like, doing a survey or asking people for input, and I'm sure there have been efforts like that already, but to keep our ears open, I think it would really help to have some kind of, like, reporting app. I don't know if how these things are done, but my last city had an app where you could just take a picture and send it, and it the app would make sure the email went to the right person of if there was some kind of hazard in the road. So alright. I think I answered the question.
Yep. Yeah. Yeah. I think you did. Excellent. Thank you so much for joining us this evening. I know it's kind of like a quick and dirty interview, but we'll we'll be doing this all night with all of our advisory body kid fits. So yeah. Just so you know for next steps is that Dawn, who you've been engaged with in terms of, you know, getting this set up and all of that, You'll hear from her by next week, notified one way or the other what the committee will decide as a recommendation. And for all the advisory bodies, all the recommendations from the committee will go to the full city council on March 31 for approval. So you'll hear from Don by next week. Alright. Thank you. Yeah. Great. Thanks so much.
Thank you.
Okay. Great. So so here's where we have another long pause. And, Tom, you mentioned that you might wanna hang around for the oh, it's this. Don, I'm noticing something here where Audrey Perry is listed as the person who is also interviewing for UAC. But then when I look at UAC, it's listed as Maddie Haynes. So who is the person who is the I I'm gonna assume it's Audrey, but it's maybe listed in the wrong Audrey.
I apologize. That is a that
is a the it's Audrey. Okay. No worries.
That'd be a cut and paste thing. That's all it is. Yeah.
Yeah. No worries. So so, Tom, if you do want to hang around off screen until 05:20 to participate in that one as well, you're welcome to. And if you want if you're like, that's a long time to sit around and wait in my garage, you know, you can also drop off.
Can I can I pop off and get back in? Or
Yeah. Yeah. I think
you should be able to. Yeah.
Just use the same link. You'll be coming in you'd come in as a panelist, so let's forward.
Okay. Cool.
I'll see
if I can maybe troubleshoot my camera.
Well
Yeah. Well and, yeah, yeah, and if something happens and you're not able to make it back, I'll make sure that the question gets answered. But also because we have, like, one person who's interviewing during another time and then somebody else who's at the end of the day, We don't really have the chance to, like, hear your thoughts on everybody. So Yeah. I wonder if you wanna email us your thoughts as the case. Send them over to Don, you know, or whatever way is best for you. That way, can consider your thoughts on the candidates. Yeah.
So yeah. So I think I
should be able to make
it to the 05:20, and I think I can make it to the 08:30 as well. And then if I'm not around so you're gonna be interviewing after 08:30. Right? You've got a really long, really long
No. That's our last one of the day.
Okay. Yeah. So do you want me oh, we can talk about it after 08:30 too. And but if not, I'll plan on just emailing it to Don.
And Yeah. If you're able to make it to the 08:31, then we can debrief all of them with you after that. And if you're not able to, then, you know, I guess you'll miss that one, but you could at least send us your thoughts on the the the first three that you get to chat with.
Yep. I think I can probably pop on for
for a friend. For some reason, VPAC is, like, the most awkwardly scheduled ones. No.
It's it's fine. I've been on many, many interview panels, and and scheduling them is always it's it's a tough job. So
Yeah. Don's been saying it's it's not a perfect system, but it's the system we have. So
Hey. If it works, it works.
Okay. Great. So let's go ahead, Don, and get that, you know, that that slide back up, and we can plan to reconvene right before, 05:05, which is when Melissa Cover, who's the chair of utility advisory commission, will be joining us. Tom, you don't need to be back on until right before 05:20 because we're gonna have fifteen minutes to chat with Melissa about things.
Okay. Cool. Yeah. I will, yeah. I'll plan on popping back, like, 05:15 or so. And
Perfect. Yeah. Thank you so much for being flexible.
No problem.
Question, Danny? Yeah. So my schedule shows Melissa coming on at 04:55.
Oh, I worked with Don to have her bump because then there was a ten minute gap between our planning time with her and then Audrey coming on. So I asked if we could just have Melissa come at 05:05.
Beautiful. Just wanted to make sure I was there. Okay. I'll see you
at 05:05. Okay. Thank you. Thanks. Welcome back, Kelly.
And to you. Hi, Melissa. We haven't had a chance to meet yet. I'm Danny. I'm the chair of the ECLIPSE committee. Hi, Dani. I'm Kelly.
Hi, Kelly.
Guys are being community livability and public safety, in case that wasn't the obvious acronym.
Thanks. Yeah. This will be my first time outside of being an applicant sitting in on an interview.
So Okay. Cool. And we've got just two to get through for UAC. But and they they'll be pretty quick, but there's also a little bit of flex time here because after these two, we have, like, an extra ten minutes. And so if they go a little bit over the ten minute mark, we'll be fine. Okay. Cool. Yeah. And so you know? But but because they are relatively click, I'll just go ahead and introduce everybody instead of going around the Zoom room when folks come on.
And then Kelly and I have three questions that we're going to ask, and then you have yours from UAC. Mhmm. And for the first interview, that person is also interested in the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee. So Tom Dillon, the chair of that committee, is gonna come on and ask another question of that person. Okay. But only for the first person there. So Okay. Cool. Yeah. And afterwards let's see. Is there anybody yeah. No. It it's just these two candidates for UAC. So so afterwards, we can also take a little bit of time to debrief with you to just kinda get your sense of if you have a preferred candidate or if you just wanna share any reflections. So so there'll be that opportunity as well.
Wonderful. Thank you.
Great. And we have a whole fifteen minutes to prep, but I'm not sure that full fifteen minutes is needed. Yeah. Do you, is do you have any questions?
Not right now. I'm Okay. I wanna take this time to, I had sent something to Gary because I know we had gotten some applicants. I for some reason, I was assuming we had three three or four interviews. So
There was one person that didn't respond. Oh, really? Okay. Yeah. So, yeah, somebody didn't respond. So got an email. A reminder was sent. They never responded. So it's always a bummer when that happens. But yeah. So yeah. It happens, though. Yeah. K. Well, how how are things on the utility advisory committee?
They're great. They're great. We're working on the work the work plan, what we wanna do this upcoming year. And and we also, I think everybody got there was a presentation about maybe changing how the committees work with the city, so that's that's interesting. So dynamic.
Just got that presentation, what, two weeks ago or so? It was last week. Last week. Time is immaterial to me some days.
Yeah. On the clips committee, we talked about when we do the meeting with the chairs of all the advisory bodies, like, bring that like, that is what we're gonna talk about with you all. So
Cool.
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Everything's going great. We have our meeting tomorrow, so thank you for fitting us in today.
Oh, perfect. Okay. Good. Good. And is Gary your staff liaison? Yeah.
Okay. Right now. Mhmm.
Yeah. He's great
to work with. Yeah. It's wastewater Gary. I know him. He's a good dude.
Yeah. Wastewater Gary. Yeah. Good guy. Well, that's not that. Like, when I He used to be solid waste Gary. That was wastewater Gary. On solid waste.
He was, like, my staff point of contact. He was awesome. And then he changed roles, and maybe it's not wastewater. Maybe it's it's something water.
It well, now now he's my staff contact for a lot. So yeah. Yes. Yeah. He's he's he's been with the city for a long time and has come to the council many times talking about solid waste stuff, but is in his new role there. How long
have you guys been working here?
What is My I've started on council in 2020. Wow. Yeah. So which seems like a long time ago now.
Right? I've I just passed my one year mark.
Awesome. How do you like it?
Most days, I like it a lot.
Okay. Exactly. Well, that's great.
That's a good answer.
Yeah. No. I'm learning like, it's such a cool opportunity to learn and get involved with Citi stuff, and and the other council members have been, you know, incredibly helpful and supportive. So it's been a really good good journey so far.
That's wonderful. It's it makes such a difference. Right? Like, that support and the culture and stuff. Like, it's huge. That's great. Sorry. My dog's barking at my cat.
Yes. The the whole Zoom call. I think I saw your cat walking by earlier at one point too.
I know. I blurted. I'm trying to hide them away.
Well You know, they just
wanna be where you are.
Yes. We we we do not, shun the the the furry ones around here. So if they pop on the screen, then we're just like, oh, there's a cat. My my cat has this tendency to when I'm in a Zoom call, is kinda like a toddler, and then it's like, oh, mommy, I need your attention now. And she's, like, suddenly, like, right here. So she was here for the last interview, but she she's taken off since then. I moved around, disturbed her. But what's exciting about the the UAC work plan? Is there anything any particular topic that you're like, oh, I can't wait to dig into that?
You know, it's for me, it's always fun to look at the capital facilities projects and the plans that they have for that and the financing around it. There's a lot of stuff. Retrofits are always something that I'm interested in. So and because aren't we still doing the updating comprehensive plans?
That was done at the end of last year.
It was. Right? Okay. Yeah. Okay. So that one's done. But those are that the different chapters are really fun
to Yeah. And the utilities chapter was, like, really good. The staff work on that one in particular, like, the community engagement components of it and just the how they did they went through the update. Was just like, oh, man. Utilities were active.
The staff, phenomenal.
Yeah. Was Susan Clark the lead on that? I you know what?
I'm not sure. I can't think off the top of my head, but I think so.
Okay.
Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. I remember that one being particularly well done.
Yeah. I just love working with the city. Everybody is so nice and knowledgeable and just helpful. So great.
What do you do, Melissa?
I work I work for the division of child support, so I work with 11 of the tribal nations in the state.
Okay.
So that's so that's what I do. It's a lot of
Is that over at DSHS? Mhmm. Oh, yeah. Very cool. Very cool.
Yeah. Everybody's every every tribal nation is different. Right? So, like, the agreements that we have are different. So that's I really appreciate, like, being able to to work with each one individually with their the that community's needs, you know, and be able to tailor what we do for them. It's fantastic.
That's very cool. Yeah. I used to work for the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission. So Okay. Not all the tribes across the states, but the ones in the Puget Sound and coastal regions. Yeah. It's really fascinating to work with all these different sovereign nations and their different ways of doing things, their different priorities, very different communities.
Yeah. It's wonderful. I have my I have my question up perfect off the side of the screen so I won't forget it. Perfect. Nice.
Oh, man. I think Don will also drop it in the chat. So if you suddenly minimize a window and you're like, oh my god. Don will also have it up in the chat. Yeah.
Wonderful.
And I think I said this before, but we'll, me and Kelly will have three questions, and then we'll go to you for yours. And just for the first interviewee, the B PAC chair will ask a question as well. So Wonderful.
Yeah.
Wonderful. And how long have you been on UAC? Two years. Okay. Very cool. Awesome.
Time flies is what I'm figuring. I mean, I figured that out already, but, like, time man. Feels like yesterday, I was on the other side of these interviews. Okay. All nervous at 9PM. You know? Still all doll dolled up from the waist up waiting for my interview.
I got pajama pants on. And we did switch it this year. So we we started at four so that people not needing to interview past nine. I think our last one this evening's at 08:30.
It's a lot of interviews.
A lot
of Yes.
Hey, Stacy.
I'm sorry to interrupt. I'm just gonna pop on to say there's some similarity between one of your questions and the question that Melissa's prepared to ask.
Oh, okay.
So I don't know if we wanna maybe prioritize Oh, yeah.
It's the same as the first one there.
Yeah. So I'm wondering if maybe you wanna emphasize something different in your question, and then Melissa can follow-up with maybe the piece about being curious or if there just might be a slightly different take on it.
Yeah. Let me take a look at this real quick. I mean, I think we could also scrap that one at the very start, and then I'll just ask the second question. Kelly, you asked the third. And then and and then Melissa, you'll ask yours, and then Tom will ask because thank you for catching that. That's a little awkward when we ask the same question twice.
Yeah. So that gives a little opportunity for a little bit more conversation around the other one. So okay. Yeah. Alright.
Yeah. I I think the one thing is that we might not hear the same answer for BPAC, but I think Tom has a has a question specific to the that committee that, will, get what we need from them.
Yeah. Okay. Good Friday.
Thank you.
Okay. We've got about five minutes before that interview starts or until the the start time. So and if I see the person jump on early, we can we can pull them in here early, but we'll have to wait for Tom too.
Alright. I'm gonna take two seconds. Grab my water.
I see it. I'll be right back. Yeah. You go right ahead. Hi, Tom. Welcome back.
Hello. Long time.
I know. Right? We'll get to check-in with you throughout the evening, it sounds like. Yep. Great. And we have Melissa from UAC who's just grabbing some water real quick, and we're just waiting for our interviewee to pop on. And we'll do it the same as last time. We're gonna skip, one of our questions from the the council side because it's it's similar to the one Melissa has, but we'll go me, Kelly, Melissa, and then you for that final question.
K. Sounds good to me.
Great.
The applicant is, ready to come over or as an attendee.
Great. Awesome. Let's go ahead and, move her over to our side of the aisle here, and, we can get started. Hello, Audrey. Hello. Hi. Oh, I know you. I just saw your face, and I was like, oh, yes. What are prepping for? Oh, well, thank you. Yeah. Thank you so much for joining us this evening. We're interviewing you for both the utility advisory committee and the bicycle pedestrian advisory committee. You expressed an interest in both. And so you know me.
I'm Danny, and I chair the community livability and public safety committee. I'll and Kelly Green is one of our committee members. And we're also enjoined by the chair of the utility advisory committee, Melissa Cover, and the chair of BPAC, Tom. So you got the whole a whole slate here to chat with. Great. That being said, it's a pretty quick interview because we're we're interviewing for many of our advisory bodies this evening. So so we'll just get right to it. So I'll start. How do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to utility advisory committee or and or BPAC?
Okay. So I as far as the utility advisory committee is concerned, I think that utilities are foundational to public health, environmental protection, and economic stability. And I'm interested in how, you know, this how do cities balance the cost of paying for new infrastructure with rate rate payer affordability and climate resilience and regulatory compliance. My master's of environmental studies background in infrastructure and energy systems kinda gives me an appreciation for long term capital planning and life cycle analysis, particularly upstream and downstream costs of things such as, like, you know, like in the case of solar panels, for instance, you know, mining for raw materials and disposing of e waste. As far as BPAC is concerned, my master's thesis is actually in bicycle parking infrastructure, and I've been looking at, you know, how how do we go from, you know, assessing community needs to actually implementing and changing community built infrastructure.
And trying to map all of that out is a huge part of my my thesis and trying to collect that data and assess its or view it all spatially and assist different city and county agencies with putting all of that together and communicating it to different audiences.
Great. Thank you so much. Now next, we'll move on to Kelly Green.
Hi, Audrey. Thanks for being
here. Absolutely.
How might you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success? I
would do a lot of listening and learning. I wanna understand, you know, how how each body is approaching, you know, things like rate structures or, you know, interfacing with the public and with different city agencies. I mainly just want to take it in for those first six months. I would like to review capital improvement plans. I want to understand the norms, whichever committee it is that I'm on.
I wanna build those relationships up, meeting with city staff where appropriate and, you know, time permitting, understanding the regulatory constraints that are particular to each body, and understanding historical trends and, you know, how how each body has, traditionally undergone. I'm probably gonna be looking for those areas where, like, improvements could be made potentially. But, you know, until I you know, like, with I've been a teacher for twenty years, and, you know, it's it's hard to help students grow until you really can assess where they're at and how you can best meet their needs. And so that's kind of the philosophy that I would approach to being on whichever advisory board I'm on is just sort of, like, take it in and assess the situation. And then as I have a better understanding of, you know, what the organization's needs are and how I can move them forward or where I could potentially improve or or look for, you know, positive change, that's kind of where my mind is gonna be in those first six months.
Thank you. Great. Thank you. Go ahead, Melissa.
Can you tell us something you're curious about or excited for serving on the utility advisory committee?
Yeah. I'm really interested in how the city interfaces with private utilities and what it looks like when new policies are legislated. Most of my utility work for for environmental studies has been in energy. And I know, you know, we have p g and e or p g and e. Sorry.
I'm from California. PSE is our local private utility, and I've been looking and studying at how, you know, different legislative policies have influenced the uptake of, you know, solar projects and renewable energy projects and how to move utilities toward, you know, advancing their renewable portfolio standards and things like that. But I know that, like, that's we have a a private utility here for electricity, and the public utilities are gonna be things like wastewater and, you know, solid waste and, you know, all all the other things that I pay for besides electricity and natural gas. And but, you know, obviously, you know, PSE is using a lot of public infrastructure. So I'm just curious what that looks like and how we interact with those public or private utilities.
And how quickly does it move when new policies are adopted? What is that what's the timeline on actually getting those things implemented? So that's that's where my curiosity lies.
Thank you, Adri. Now I'll pass it over to Tom.
Alright. How can Olympia develop and leverage its walking, biking, and rolling infrastructure to become more of a people centered city?
I think taking in a lot of feedback from the public is a a great first step. That's what I'm trying to accomplish with my master's project. I've got a survey out right now that is collecting data on where folks would like to see new and improved infrastructure around Thurston County, not just Olympia. It's mainly Olympia respondents who are getting back to me right now. So what I'm trying to do is to talk with folks in Lacey and Tumwater and unincorporated Thurston County, Rainier, Tenaino.
I've got all these email addresses and all of these different email threads that I'm tracking, trying to really push this survey to get it in the hands of folks who would be able to provide feedback on some of those areas where I'm just not getting as much coverage. So, you know, for the city of Olympia, I would take a similar approach. Like, what what parts of Olympia are responding the most? Why are we not getting more engagement from certain areas, and how can we get into those areas and and get that engagement? Is it a question of we don't have any needs here and we're happy with the way things are?
If so, tell us that. Or is it a case of we're just not hearing from folks because of a lack of access? And so that's, you know, how I would I would try to leverage those relationships and connection points where I can to just sort of collect that information and and make it a two way conversation as well as as well as hearing from them.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you.
And we had skipped our first question because it was similar to Melissa's, but I'll just since we have a couple extra minutes, I'll just ask, you know, the a similar question for BPAC in terms of what interests and excites you about it so you have the chance to answer that one as well. So specific for BPAC this time.
What interests and excites me about BPAC? Yeah. Well, I really enjoyed getting to know some of the folks at the city of Olympia in their transportation and, you know, like Michelle, for instance, I had a I had a nice Zoom meeting with Michelle Swanson a few weeks back. I I really like her personality. She's a fun person, and she's been incredibly helpful with my project, just offering connecting me with other people who are able to provide me with some spatial data to put into my GIS map that I'm creating.
And so I'm I'm just excited to make more of those connections because I'm really liking all of the folks that are situated in the city of Olympia that I've been able to get to know so far. So building on that is what I I'm really excited about doing.
Excellent. We also really like Michelle. So well, thank you so much, Audrey. I'm gonna talk through the next steps here, except I put them out right there. Okay.
And so, we'll we will make a decision in the next week in terms of what recommendations, the community livability and public safety committee will make to the full council. And so you'll hear from Don who you've been coordinating with for for this by sometime next week, and you'll be notified one way or the other. And then if if you are recommended, the final decision goes before council, March 31. And so not anything you need to attend, but just so you know the timeline for that. Do you have any questions?
I don't think so.
Okay. Excellent. Well, thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.
Thank you so much for your time. Take care.
Alright. Take it easy. Bye bye. Alright. Well, Tom, thank you so much for being here for this one, and you could drop off, and we will maybe see you at 08:30 for the final BTEC.
Yeah. I'll disappear, and I'll plan on seeing you again, yeah, at 08:25, 08:30.
Okay. Perfect. Thank you so much. Okay.
Alright. Find leave button. Alright.
Alright. And I don't see that our next person is on yet. So but they do have a couple minutes. It's always funny when you see somebody pop up on the screen. I'm like, oh, yeah. I met you at a Christmas party recently.
And Maddie is now in the attendee room. So if you would like to start a couple seconds early, we've we could we can do that.
Okay. Excellent. And we'll do the same thing of skipping that first question, and I won't need to circle back too because she's just interviewing for UAC. So, yeah, let's go ahead and promote her over to the panelist side, and we can get started. Hello, Maddie.
Hey. How are you doing?
Good. How are you doing?
Good. Sorry. I didn't mean to jump in early. I was trying to figure out how to get into the waiting room and didn't wanna lie through.
Oh, no. No. We we we asked you to come early. We just finished up with our previous interview. So that that was us inviting you over. Okay. Yeah. So my name is Danny. I chair the Community Livability and Public Safety Committee, and I'm joined by my committee mate, Kelly Green. And we also have the chair of the utility advisory committee, Melissa Covert, with us. And we just have a quick ten minutes for an interview, and so we've got three questions we're gonna ask you. And I'll go ahead and and kick us off. So, oops. Sorry. No worries. Brain, lots of papers here.
It's not.
So how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to the utility advisory committee?
Yeah. So I I come from the Midwest, so I have an experience with a different type of utilities. Just basically seeing the contrast, I really enjoy how Olympia processes everything. I love that we're a 100% groundwater and just how we can preserve that. Because coming from, you know, Kansas City where you've got basically everything's just, let's drain the Ogallala Aquifer.
It's a totally different experience. So I am very much a civilian on this front. I have a lot of interest in, like, city planning, growth, ex like, just how we experience life in Olympia since this is a place that I have chosen to live, chosen to be, and a little bit less of the, like, very in-depth knowledge of the specifics of how we do everything. I live downtown, so I get to hear and experience a lot of the different ways that we deal with things like the flood water and just the the rising water table and just interacting with people on the regular. I'm probably, again, probably this billion.
But I I just find it really interesting, and I love seeing that contrast and learning more about it. I was poking around on your website a little bit and just seeing both the combination of what y'all do with the resource stuff and also, like, I used to be a home brewer, so I loved seeing all of the resources that you had on what is in our water and how we deal with it, and what all that entails and how it kinda differs. Like, I loved seeing that map of the different different places and being able to specifically trace that. I'm really just kind of interested and would love to be involved, learn
more. Yeah.
Great. Thank you. Yep. We'll pass it to Kelly for the next question.
Yeah. Thanks, Maddie. So how might you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
Honestly, first six months at anything, I'm doing a lot of listening. I'm doing a lot of asking questions. I'm doing a lot of trying to get the lay of the land, understand what it is that people really want, what people really need, and just where the expertise that I do have fits in. So I, you know, I have a background in public administration and a background in dispute resolution. So I do a lot of, like, facilitating and a lot of listening. So I would probably focus on asking questions, probably some dumb questions, but I have learned that Questions.
Some of
those dumb questions are the best ones sometimes. And then as I kind of saw how I was able to contribute, just kinda slowly build up to where I could be the most use. Because honestly, I don't have an ego. I just wanna just wanna learn, wanna be useful, wanna see what's going on, and how best I can how best I can be of use.
Thank you. Alright. And Melissa, you can take us home here.
Alright. Hi, Maddie. Can you tell us something you are curious about or excited for serving on the utility advisory committee?
Yeah. I mean, like, there's a lot of things that I am excited, about. I love seeing how we basically steward our water, how we are looking to the future in terms of like, saw that there was a seismic thing that we're working on in terms of preparing the systems that we have, kind of repairing that aging infrastructure and being prepared for more growth. I did housing for a while as a focus both in grad school and as well as just kind of with eviction mediation. And one of the things that would always come up was, like, retrofitting old buildings that were not necessarily designed for human use or for, like, living purposes to accommodate that.
And one of the main things that always came up was how do you accommodate accommodate, excuse me, that amount of, like, initial additional load on the infrastructure and just kind of being very intentional about how we plan, how we grow, how we develop the systems that we have, both to maintain what is going on and to kinda look to the future to really make sure that we have a robust system that both plays with a greater greater plans both for the city and also for environmental concerns that we have going on and just how we can do the best by our community and our entire community and taking that to the future so that it's you know, we can have an awesome Olympia for as long as possible. Yeah. I'm just I'm kinda fascinated by it, honestly. Also, I love your cat. I've got mine here also helping out, trying to get in the way, so I appreciate that.
I was just telling Melissa that the the furry friends are welcome on screen. So excellent. Well, thank you so much, Maddie. Those are all the questions that we have. I wanna share the just the next steps with you.
So you'll hear from Don who you've been coordinating with on the in on the interview by next week, and and you'll be notified one way or the other. And the the committee the the the community livability and public safety committee will make a recommendation to the full council, and the council is slated to, make the final decision on March 31. So you'll hear from us next week, but it wouldn't be a final thing until the end of the month. Do you have any questions about that?
Nope. Not about that process. Just great to meet all of y'all and learn a little bit more about your committee and how all of that works. And, yeah,
great to
see y'all. Thank you.
You. Thank you so much. Have a good night.
You too. Bye bye.
Excellent. And so, Melissa, we have a few minutes here to debrief with you and and collect your thoughts. Kelly and I will probably decide talk later in the evening about who we might recommend or even tomorrow evening depending on how our time shakes out. But we'd love to get your thoughts while we've got you here.
I love both of them. I think that they brought two different right. We basically, different types of people. Right? Like, one is a community member that's super excited about utility advisory, and and one has a a deep educational background and is interested in that way. I I liked I liked them both.
Okay. Well, that's good to know. That's good to know. And as you think about, like, the composition of the UAC, like, do you think both of them would be, like, a great compliment compliment to to the the folks folks who who are are already already there? There?
I think so. I personally, I really liked Maddie because she came at it as just, like, somebody in the community that really loves the u that wants to learn more about the utilities. I also liked the first person as well. We have I think both of them would complement our committee in different ways. Right? Like
Okay. But, yeah, I like that. That's that's helpful. That's helpful to know. Mhmm. Okay. Great. So you have Yeah. Well, if, you know, you have any thoughts like I said, we may we may discuss this one later on in the evening once we get through the interviews, and it may be tomorrow evening. But if in the next couple hours, you're like, oh, wait. I have a thought, and you wanna shoot us an email, then we can, you know, keep an eye open for that. So Awesome. Really appreciate you joining us this evening and taking the extra time. It's always so helpful to have the committee chairs to be able to engage and bring your special question forward and, you know, get to meet the the the candidates. So thank you so much.
Yeah. Thank you. Have a great
night. You, Melissa. And, Kelly, we had, a planned catch up space in here, which I think was planned before, like, you know, people dropped off. But so we're scheduled to come back here at 05:50, which I guess is in just in ten minutes. So we can go ahead and take a ten minute break. I know I'm gonna go cram some food in my mouth. And I'm I'm also gonna let Young know that it's a time for her to jump in because we won't be mid interview. I'll let her know that 05:50 is a good time to jump on. So and we'll see you in a bit. Sounds good.
Thanks, Danny. And, Dawn, if we could get that thing up on screen so folks know we're yeah. Perfect. Thank you. Hello, Kelly.
How's your food shoveling go?
It's incomplete, but I'll I'll resume on our next break. Alright.
Sounds like mine will be ready on our next break.
Oh, nice. Lovely. My problem was I put it in the microwave too long, and then it was, like, too hot, and that screwed up my whole time line for the break.
That will get you.
Yeah. Dawn, I think we can go ahead and pull the okay. There we go. Pro Tim. Yes. Hello. Thanks for joining us.
Yeah.
And we've got Greg here with the planning commission as well.
So we have three interviews for this for the planning commission. And, Greg, just so you know, we also interviewed another candidate at the same time as VPAC because he was interested in both. That was Justin Stang. And I believe that is the only one that you won't have been a part of in terms of these interviews. And because these are quick ten minute interviews actually, let me look real quick to see if we have any gaps.
If we do, looks like the yeah. Yeah. There's a gap between the first person and the second person. And, Greg, just so you know, it just this just happens because our our staff tried to schedule a block of time, and then there was one person who we selected to interview, and they never responded. So so between the first and second interview, there's an extra ten minutes of space. So so, you know, if we if we we don't need to feel too rushed Yeah. On that one. But we have three questions as the committee. And, Kelly, you can pass one of yours off to Eun. Which which one do you favor?
I favor the third, so Eyoung can take the second.
Excellent. So so I'll ask the first. Eyoung, you ask the second. Kelly, you ask the third. I'll go ahead and introduce everybody here so that we can save time instead of going around the Zoom room. And then, Greg, after we ask our three, you've got your planning commission specific one. Yep. So we'll ask you to do that. And then I'll close this out by talking about next steps for for the candidate. Yeah. Any any questions? Nope. Okay. Pretty cut and dry. And I believe planning commission has oh, two vacancies. Okay.
Perfect. Can't keep people around. You know?
I know. I know. How are things on the planning? I miss you. I'm not on land use anymore. So here I am in my different committee role. At least I still get to see you here. How are things going?
Pretty good. It's been quiet so far. I think staff is chewing through the post comprehensive plan backlog and getting up to speed on stuff. So
Yeah. Okay. Okay. Cool. Did you get a chance to connect with Robert?
Yeah.
No. Good.
Got him in my crosshairs for bending his ear on planning commission stuff.
Yeah. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna point you at him now. So Kelly and Young, Greg is a very active chair, and he was, you know you we we had coffee many times while I was chairing the land use committee so that we could talk about our how our two work plans interact and just stay in touch during the comprehensive planning process. So, yeah, it was a lot of fun.
Yep. Sounds great. Great. I think I remember interviewing you when we were a general government, and I think, chair Madron was there too.
Oh, yeah. That's right. Yeah. So I'm glad
that you, yeah, that you're digging in. And then and also, you know, funny council member Vanderpool used to bend the council's ear any chance he got Yep. As a community member and then got on Deepak and then continued to do so. So not only is it good work happening between you and him, but also maybe a little karma. Yeah.
There you go.
I'll make sure he feels it a little bit. Yeah.
That's right. Now we also had Daniel Garcia in Castle Chambers last night. Is he still in the? Yep. Okay. Very cool. Yeah. He's been active with the neighborhood association stuff, and he presented on a community forum that the council neighborhood associations put on. So it was cool to see him in council chambers. And a lot a lot of folks have other advisory, not advisory committees, neighborhood associations as well. So that was fun.
Yeah. It seemed like that forum went pretty well from what I heard from of it. So
Yeah. I had to miss it myself, but, I know they plan on doing more, so that's exciting.
Yeah.
We've got a little bit of time, six zero five before the first interview. We got fifteen minutes to kind of, like, go through the run a show, but I feel like we've we've done all that. So we can, you know, feel free to chitchat for the next ten minutes. I'm gonna keep an eye open for the interviewee so that if they pop on early, we can pull them in early and get started.
You, Cher. Has there been time so so far, I guess, it's been VPAC and the utilities. So has there been time to check-in with the Chair just to get their, their thoughts on it?
Yeah. Yeah. So we had a chance to check-in with Melissa on the UAC, interviewees. We just had two people. And then Tom Dillon is such a sport because we had two BPAC interviews at during the block, and then we for that. And then he hung around for the utility advisory committee joint interview with somebody who was interested in both those. And then he's gonna come back at 08:30 because we had somebody who couldn't fit any fitted in their schedule, and we'll chat with him then. So but we did get a chance to check-in with Melissa.
Wonderful. Okay. Cool.
Yeah. Oh, and that's a good thing to talk about. So, Greg, after we go through these three interviews, we'll take some time, with you. We we won't have a whole ton of time. Our next, committee chair is coming on at 06:45, but we also don't actually need the full fifteen minutes to go through the run of show. So we can take a few minutes with you after these interviews and get any insights, you like to share, just debrief with you really quick. But the three of us will probably either either at the end of the evening or tomorrow evening, we'll we'll talk through, who we might wanna recommend to the council. But we'll take a moment to to gather to get your thoughts before we let you go.
Sounds great.
Awesome. Since we have a few extra minutes oh, go go ahead, Dawn.
Heidi is in the attendee side if you'd like me to promote them over to a panelist.
Yeah. Actually, are we ready to get started? Alright. Let's do it. Hi there, Heidi. How are you doing?
Hi. Doing good. Give me a second. Let me just go ahead and make sure this is working. Oh, there we go. Hi. Hi. Hi.
Hello. And is it is it Heidi? Am I saying your name right?
Yes. Yes.
is. Great. Excellent. Well, thanks so much for joining us and interviewing for the planning commission. My name is Danny, and I chair the community livability and public safety committee. That's the committee that will make the recommendation to counsel in terms of who we will appoint to our advisory bodies. And I am joined by committee members, Young Nguyen and Kelly Green, and also joined by Greg Quentin, who is the chair of the planning commission. And we'll each have a question for you. We've got ten minutes with a little bit of wiggle room if needed to go through the interview. So it's it's a it's a fast one, but I'm just gonna go ahead and get started.
Okay. Sure.
Sounds good.
Yeah. So tell me what interests and excites you about joining the planning commission?
Yes. So I am excited. Thank you again for everybody for giving me this opportunity to be interviewed to serve because I do care a lot about planning. Hence, I am currently a planner at Mason County government. And I think also that planning shapes strong and sustainable sustainable communities.
I did, like, a little note chart just you know, I am a planner again of what these great questions to ask. So, again, I do work as a planner as Mason County government. I do review land use proposals involving shoreline jurisdictions, regulations, critical areas, zoning compliance, all of that nature. Before moving to Washington, I was a planner for Henry County, Georgia, and that's a county position, so forth as well, where I did prepare staff reports and supported rezonings and public hearings as well. Serving on the Olympia's planning commission, would allow me to use my professional planning experience while contributing to the community and helping guide long term growth decisions.
Thank you. Mhmm. Now I will pass it over to Iom for the next question.
Yeah. Heidi, the next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body? So I know you shared a little bit just now, but if there's anything else you'd like to share.
Yeah. Sure. Thank you for the question. So I do bring both technical planning knowledge and experience working with the public and decision makers. In Mason County, I review development applications and environmental reports, which does require interpreting regulations and working with applicants and agencies.
As we all know, like ecology, fish and wildlife, army corps, etcetera. My previous work in Henry County also gave me experience presenting Sony cases, conditional uses, variances, special uses. I can go on and on a plethora of things. And it did really help me, I guess, guide policy discussions. Overall, I do bring a balanced perspective that considers environmental protection, which I am learning, still in the process. I am new to Washington, but I love to learn. Protection, like I said, for environment, community needs, and practical development realities,
basically.
Thank you. Thanks. Of course.
And I've got the next question, Heidi. So how would you approach your first six months as a new advisory, body member to set yourself up for success?
Of course. So, yes, I did think a lot about this because it's it's very nerve wracking. Right? The first six months, you don't know what to do, what to expect, and so forth. So in the first six months, I would focus on learning the Olympia's comprehensive plan and development regulations to better understand the city's priorities, what exactly is being focused, what's being prioritized, what's urgent, what's not so, and kind of, you know, just to see how things are being run when being presented with these cases in front of the board, right, or the commission.
I would also listen closely to the staff, of course, which, again, I am a planner. So that would that's my number one thing. And one thing that I did notice from my previous, jurisdiction in Henry County, Georgia is that a lot of our, members would come to face to face to, the planning, department, and they would not talk about the cases, but they were requests, like, for example, the reports, the site plans, all of that nature, all their corresponding documentation so we can get ahead of time and understand and analyze the cases that are going to be presented to the board just to kind of get more in-depth in there as well. And just kinda going back to the community aspect of things or the city's priorities, I was also considering of of listening to the community members, which is the public, to understand different perspectives. My goal would be to build a strong understanding of the city's planning framework so I can contribute thoughtfully to discussions and recommendations.
And when I'm talking about the public, I'm I'm just not just talking about the civilians. I'm talking about, of course, the consultants, the planning staff, the board members, so all of that compromise. And I know it's a lot. Sometimes you have to kinda give and take and have to listen to our perspectives, but you have to really analyze and research, I guess, the current, cases being brought to you in order to make the the best decision moving forward for that community, city, county, etcetera.
Thank you. Mhmm. Great. You wanna close us out?
Yeah. How do you think that the Olympia Planning Commission supports the community, and what do you think makes for a successful city?
So currently, I am a Olympian resident. I live nearby the Tumwater area. I believe that you guys, meaning the whole entire staff and planning process or department, is doing a wonderful job as when it comes to, you know, the comprehensive plan updates, making sure that everything is aligned. I'm not too I haven't read too deep into the development regulations code sections or anything of that nature, but I do realize and even just, you know, walking down the streets of Olympia, in general, the community, it's very vibrant. It's very, wouldn't say niche, but it's it feels very welcoming, and that's that's something that I would love to be a part of.
And I believe that the county, the staff, the city, everybody, the public, it just makes it very welcoming and great to be a part of that community. So I believe that that's something that I really look forward to if I am given the position to, of course, serve, the community and staff.
Thank you.
Mhmm. Yeah. Of course. Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you so much, Heidi. So those are the questions we have for you. Just a little bit information in terms of next steps. So sometime next week, you'll get an email from Dawn who you've been coordinating with on this interview, and she'll let you know what we're gonna be recommending as a committee. So she'll let you know one way or the other, and the final decision rests with the city council, and that is slated to come forward on March 31. So our committee will make a recommendation on appointments to advisory bodies, and then the council will make the fine final decision at the end of the month. But either way, you'll hear back from Dawn sometime next week.
Okay. Sounds good. Well, thank you everybody for letting me join here, and I hope you have a nice evening.
Thank you so much. You too. Mhmm. Bye bye. Bye.
Okay. And because we got an early start with Heidi and the next person again, there's a weird little thing with the schedule because of, you know, just how difficult it is to schedule many short interviews. We don't have our next one until 06:25, so that gives me an opportunity to finish my dinner. But we I'll ask Don to put back up the the thing that we've had, and we can all take a a quick break and come back on a little bit before 06:25, and then we can interview the the next person. See you in
a bit.
Oh, great. Looks like we're all back. And I see that Samir is here. So, if we're all ready are we good? Okay. Excellent. Let's go ahead and invite Samir over.
And, Danny, you're just gonna add on the Heritage Commission question. Yes?
That that's a mistake. Samir is only applying for the Planning Commission. Thanks for saying that. Yes. Sorry. I was triangulating with Don, during the break. Hello, Samir.
Hi. So sorry. I thought I was talking to y'all, but I realized I was being promoted to a panelist.
Oh, you were in limbo.
Yes. So
sorry. I saw y'all. I was talking, but nothing was coming across.
Yeah. And, Samir, I didn't wanna take a guess at how to pronounce your last name. Could you let me know so that I, make sure I can get it right?
Yeah. That's okay. It's, Ibrahimovic. Samir Ibrahimovic.
Okay. Excellent. Thank you so much. And thank you for applying for to for an appointment to our planning commission. My name is Danny Madrone, and I chair the Community Livability and Public Safety Committee for the city council. That's the committee that's gonna make the recommendation to council on who appoint to our advisory bodies. And I am joined by committee members Eunghuen and Kelly Green, and also Greg Quieton, is the chair of our planning commission. And we've got a quick ten minutes for this interview, so I'm just gonna jump right in if you don't mind.
Yeah. Thanks for the time tonight. I'm juggling floor debate on in the legislature right now at the same time, so I appreciate it. I know everyone's really busy.
Yep. I got a legislative day job too. I I totally get it. So here, what interests and excites you about joining the planning commission?
Yeah. So I have some notes if that helps just for me to organize my Yeah.
Yeah. Go right ahead. You're good.
Yeah. So I've been really fortunate to, be involved in developing the outcomes that a lot of planning commissions implement. I think a lot of times at the state level, just staffing a local government committee, I've seen how we often design policies to expand housing, reduce climate impacts, and make communities more resilient, but local planning bodies are where that work actually comes to life and understanding what implementation of those policies looks like through, permit review timeline, zoning reform, long range comprehensive planning. I think we talk about it a lot. We talk to cities, stakeholders.
They share their concerns. But actually being able to, I think, contribute to that work is something that feels really meaningful to me because it's one thing to talk about. It's the other thing to do it. Right? And so just living in Olympia, I've, it's been really interesting to me how quickly it felt like home, and I think that's because of how good of a job so far you've done, balancing housing needs, environmental protection.
It feels like a very livable community to live in, and I know there's a lot of work yet to do. And, also, in terms of your, twenty forty five comp plan, looking through that, I think when when I was reviewing that and comparing it to some other cities that I work with, I think you guys take very strong direction in terms of those values. So that's for the first question. I have a lot more to say, but I'll keep that to the first question.
K. Excellent. Thank you so much. And I'll pass it over to Young, the next question.
Perfect time to expand, Samir. The next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body?
Absolutely. So I regularly analyze and help develop, policies on, reducing parking mandates, supporting transit oriented development, converting existing homes or buildings into homes. And I think the intent behind a lot of those poll a lot of those policies was to help communities grow in ways that they could be more affordable and sustainable and connected. And I think, like I've said, I think that gives me a strong understanding for how cities can address housing shortages and reduce environmental impacts. I also have spent a lot of time reviewing development regulations and understanding how those planning tools would work in practice.
So I think the perspective I bring focuses not just on policy goals, but how that work translates translates into clear long term planning decisions. So I think one of the most important things or perspectives I'd like to bring is, the ability to listen. Just local governments, planners, residents, community orgs, a lot of them a lot of the planning decisions you make is collaborative, and successful policy really reflects, the needs and values of people who live in Olympia.
Thank you.
Thanks. Go ahead, Kelly.
Thanks, Samir. How would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success? Absolutely. So I think, initially, it
would be learning local contacts and building relationships with you all. I think I would need to take time to understand the city's planning framework a little more. I have looked at the comprehensive plan, for example. I've familiarized myself with some of the projects and decisions you guys have made, regarding projects in the mall area, Briggs housing, for example. But I think, first, I need to understand how everything works.
Right? Second, I think we I would need to listen carefully to you all, staff, and other local stakeholders just to better understand the challenges facing the city because, again, I hear about things in the news when the city of Olympia comes to testify, in committee, but I'm not aware of everything under the sun. So just unlearning that is, I think, one of the most important things to do. I recognize that planning decisions are gonna involve balancing a lot of people's priorities and understanding those perspectives so you guys make thoughtful recommendations. So I would hope that my experience I would look for opportunities where I can contribute my experience with state policy, mostly around adapting new housing, climate, and land use policies.
I think also, permit review timelines, how, cities make certain recommendations. And just wanna proactively be able to support the long term, community goals of Olympia. I think, cities cities are best when they plan in a in a community focused way. I I come from Spokane Valley, which has a very different planning perspective, and philosophy on local land use. So just being able to contribute to what I see as a very vibrant community here would be, the goal. So just a lot of listening and learning, which has been also mostly what I do at the legislature.
Yeah. And Greg, go ahead and take Us home.
How do you think the Olympia Planning Commission supports the community, and what do you think makes for a successful city?
Yeah. I think you guys review ideas on how Olympia grows fundamentally. So things like housing, transportation, environmental protection, where businesses or parks should go, then you make recommendations to the council. I think, again, a big part of that work is listening, making sure residents, businesses, community groups are being reached out to before those decisions or recommendations are made. It's how you honestly, I think, looking at your comp plan, I think it's how you guys got to a point where you weaved those, priorities in so well.
And it's also how you guys developed, I think, a vision that is really equitable for the future's commune or for the community's future needs. You guys have been involved in a lot of major projects that could reshape the city that are, again, the Capital Mall Triangle, having a dense, walkable neighborhood there, you know, housing, jobs, public spaces, green spaces, that's huge. That's the work at legislative level that we're really trying to get cities to adopt and implement. When it comes to zoning changes like Briggs Village, I think you guys are trying to balance that need for more housing with maintaining services and livability as well and also the local controversy as well. So there's a lot of feedback you guys are taking there.
And then beyond housing and land use, I think you guys do a really strong job of reviewing critical areas and environmental protections. So I know right now you guys are, I think, working on updates to the critical areas ordinance. I definitely love to learn more about that work. But together, I think that does a really good job of your overall planning efforts. Think build a city that works really well for people today. I wanna contribute to that work. I wanna learn from you all, and I also wanna be able to be proud of living here in in the future and, like, contribute to that vision.
So yeah.
And as an avid biker and walker here, this is the first city I've lived in where I can confidently feel like I could just live without a car, which is huge. And I think, you know, just from the public safety perspective, the negative externalities of, I think, card car dependence, it's a you guys provide another option as well, which is, again, coming from suburban sprawl USA, like so many of us do. You guys do a good job of balancing what's feasible for a lot of families, realizing that, you know, car dependence in the way we've planned and zoned is a necessity, but it doesn't always have to be that way. So yeah. Sorry. That's really quick. I know I'm trying to stuff so much information and views, so I'm sorry if it's all just conglomerating into repetitions.
Yeah. That's great. That that's our bad. We're we scheduled ten minute interviews, so we did that to you. So I'll just share a few next steps. So within within a week, you'll hear from Don who you've been coordinating with on, the interview process, and she will let you know one way or the other, what we decide. And, we, as a committee, are gonna make recommendations to the city council on who we think should be appointed to advisory bodies, and the council will make that decision, on March 31. So, not anything you need to plan to attend, you know, if you're if you are recommended, but just so you know the timeline. Do you have any questions about that?
No. Not off the top of my head.
Again, just Great.
There is a little scatterbrain just in the middle of jumping between calls, but thank you
so much for your
time, and I
Yeah. Hope Yeah.
Yeah. We'll let you get back to it. I know it's probably a busy evening for you, so appreciate you stepping away so you could chat with us.
Absolutely. Thank you all. Have a great night.
Yeah. You too. Bye. Bye. Okay. And I see we have our next interviewee who is Elle. Oh, what's that, Dawn?
Elle is is already in the attendee, so I can move her over whenever you're ready.
Great. Are we ready? Alright. Let's do it. Let's move Elle on over.
Hi, Al.
Hi. Let
me adjust my Zoom name here. It's set up for my neighborhood.
Oh, okay. Well, so thank you so much for joining us this evening and for, applying for an appointment to our planning commission. My name is Dani, and I serve as the chair of the community livability and advisory, community livability and public safety committee. Sorry. Too many words this evening. And, our committee will make a recommendation to the city council in terms of, appointments to our advisory bodies. I am joined by committee members, Ian Hwen and Kelly Green, and also joined by, Gray Queen, who is the chair of the planning commission. And we've got a quick ten minutes, with a few questions to ask you, so I'm just gonna get right to it. So could you tell me what interests and excites you about joining the planning commission?
Yeah. Absolutely. And just like to mirror, I took notes ahead of time.
Nice. Excellent.
So I have been very lucky to live in places where walkability was just a part of daily life. You know? Paris, Hokkaido, New Zealand, being able to step outside and just walk fifteen minutes to anywhere is just genuinely transformative, and it changes how you relate to your neighbors, your stress level. And I understand that that comes from good planning that is backed by data. And so I'm really interested in contributing to that work.
You know, I first moved to Olympia in 2011. We came back in 2024 because of the opportunities for the growth and community here. I think especially about moms, families, older residents, and people who either can't or don't thrive, you know, and so that's kind of something that's come naturally for me through my academics and through my experiences. My kids are gonna be coming of age here, and so that makes it personal. And I want to be helping to continue to build an Olympia that works for them and for everybody. Excellent.
Thank you. I'll pass it on over to Ian. Hi, Ian.
Also, your next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body? You've shared a little bit that if you'd like to elaborate. Sure.
Yeah. My first degree is in anthropology. So by the end of that, my thesis had zeroed in on something very specific, which is how people move and how the our city plans and our transit shape our daily life, including who feels safe and who doesn't. And so that's been a through line for me just ever since. You know, I have been a stay at home mom for the past decade, but I'm deeply involved in organizations, especially environmental organizations, organizations that are tight with the community, and that volunteering is basically what I've been able to do in order to stay active and engaged for the past ten years.
I've worked on a few boards now. My first one was with Intercity Transit. It was with the advisory board. It was just such a positive experience, and I really bring a lot from that. Yeah. Yes.
Awesome. Yep.
Thank you.
Well, thanks, Elle. How would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
Yeah. So this is something that I've built a real philosophy around, and it's for me, it's coming into a new board. Thing I have to do is watch and learn because I don't have the same context as the current members. And so it's really important to me that I respect that, ask questions, and learn that context. You know, still be trying to contribute meaningfully where I can, but the first six months really are learning and taking on as much information as possible.
Excellent. And, Greg, how about you?
How do you think that the Olympiad Planning Commission supports the community, and what do you think makes for a successful city?
My understanding is the Planning Commission supports the community by doing the research, reviewing data and information, and translating that into recommendations. So we're not really setting the policy, but we're doing the foundational work that's necessary to set the policy. Like I said, I worked before for the Intercity Transit Advisory Board on in my own neighborhood. I'm working on the bylaws subcommittee, which is also an advisory board that we've set up just hyper locally. So I do have a genuine feel for what it's like to work on an advisory board.
For a successful city, I think about this through the people in my own life because a successful city is one where my kids can grow up and have access to groceries, activities, community, and everything they need no matter what happens in their lives. Right? If they're never able to drive or even, you know, as teenagers before they come up age, the more independent they are, the better we've done at planning a city that's safe for them. And I also think about my mother-in-law who's aging, and so a successful city is one that where she can move in, get those connections, maintain her independence as she ages, and still be able to get to the doctor's appointments, grocery stores, and other economic activities as well. So a successful city takes care of its children, its parents, everyone in between, makes life safer for the one people who are most at risk, and it's designed to support its people.
Great. Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you so much. So I'll talk a little bit about next steps. In the next week or so, you'll get an email from Don who you've been coordinating with on this interview, And she'll let you know one way or the other what we decide to recommend. And and then that recommendation that we'll make as a committee will go to the city council, and a final decision is made by the council on March 31. It's nothing you need to plan to attend if you are recommended to move forward, but just so you know the the timeline that we're working with here. Do you do you have any questions on that?
No. No. No questions. Thank you so much for your time tonight.
Alright. Great. Thank you so much. Alright. Hi, Bill. Welcome. We're just finishing out the planning commission interview, so you just hang tight for a moment.
Sounds good.
Awesome. So, Greg, before we let you go, you know, there's one interview that you didn't, get to participate in because they also were with, BPAC, and, that was Justin Stang. But if do you have any thoughts you wanna share? Anything you'd like to debrief with us on so that we can have your perspective as we figure things out either later this evening or sometime tomorrow evening?
Yeah. I was I thought all the candidates seem pretty good, and both Samir and Elle's interviews stood out to me as as particularly insightful and a little more detailed than Heidi's. But that was that's my main takeaway.
Okay. Excellent. And when you think of, like, the composition of the planning commission and, like, you know, good good mix of folks, anything stand out to you there?
Yeah. I think from from this crew, it seems like a a good mix. It's it's interesting. I feel like the planning commission is very short on, older folks and retired folks now, which was not the case when I when I came aboard. But the the I don't think any of any of the candidates currently are are, up for that. But Yeah. There's some interesting change in the demographics.
Yeah. Go ahead, Kelly. Greg, I had a a question, and it came up for me when I read Samir's application. Of course, didn't know it was Samir. But with a day job that works with the legislature, how does the flow of the planning commission's work go? Like, if it's if if attendance is difficult in the first part of the year or in longer sessions, you know, a chunk of the year is like, would how would that work with your body's work?
Yeah. I haven't seen it be a problem. Daniel also has a bunch of of ledge commitments. And, honestly yeah. Right. And and my experience is actually that our our slowest time is kind of January, February, March, and then we pick up right when the sun comes back.
Okay. Thanks. Yeah.
Awesome. Well, Greg, we can go ahead and cut you loose. If in the next couple hours you have some epiphanies and you're like, wait. I need them to know this before they deliver it, feel free to shoot us an email.
Sounds good. Alright. Thank you. Best evening.
Yeah. You too. Bye. Okey dokey. Bill, hi.
Hey. How's it going?
Good. I don't know if we've had the chance to meet before. I'm Danny. It's great to meet you.
Good to meet you.
We've got Kelly and Ian here as well. I don't know if I pointed the right way just now because of the mirroring of Zoom, but they're both here with me. We've got well. Yeah. We've got a few minutes here just to kinda go through, like, run a show and make sure we're we we're all on the same page going into this.
We have three folks for the Heritage Commission, and I believe oh, and there's three vacancies. Okay. I think we had anticipated two more folks, but we had two people who didn't respond when Don reached out for an interview. So we have three vacancies and and three folks that we're interviewing. That being said, like, you know, if if if, you know, if we don't fill all the seats because we don't feel like we've got the right fit, that that that is an option.
So I don't need to feel cornered into to anything. Each interview is just ten minutes long, and they're back to back. So, we each have a question for the, from the committee, and then you have a question as well. I did notice that the question for the heritage commission is quite long. So
Yeah. It is.
Yeah. So I'm wondering if
I can try. Yeah. I was gonna say before we start, I can try to wordsmith it down and shorten it a little bit somehow.
Yeah. Yeah. If if you if if you can, if there's something that, like, feels natural to do that, I don't wanna, like, you know, hamper your you know, the the the information that you wanna get from from candidates here. And it is it is just three interviews. So if we go a little bit long on each one, it's not detrimental, and we're we're on time as it is. And we could even if somebody if the first person signs in a little bit early, we could even pull them in early and and get started a little early. So so no pressure. And do you have any questions, Bill?
I think the only real question that I have is when will when will you all throw it to my question? Will I be the last question, or what's the order? Okay. Cool.
Yeah. Yeah. I'll I'll start. Ian will go next, then Kelly, and then and then we'll we'll close out with your question. Okay.
Great. Yeah. That sounds good. I'm trying to shorten the question a little bit. I think I can cut it down pretty easy.
Yeah. Well, like I said, no pressure. Yeah. And then when we complete the three interviews, we have, like, a ten minute gap before the next committee chair comes on. So a little bit more space then between you and the planning commission. Then we have funny little gaps here and there throughout the whole two evenings of this just because of the difficult nature of scheduling many short interviews with lots of people. So so we'll have ten minutes until the next committee chair jumps on, and we would love to just kinda get your thoughts, so that as we deliberate, either later this evening or tomorrow evening, we we know, how you're feeling about the applicants and, you know, who's a good fit and all that.
Sounds great.
Alright. Excellent. And the next person is slated to come on in fourteen minutes, thirteen minutes. So, committee members, do you do you need a break? Do you wanna step away for a moment?
Sure. Okay. Great. Dawn, could you go ahead and put up the yep. You're already on it. And let's plan to come back at, just before seven. Let let's let's see for a couple minutes before seven. And then if one person's on early, we can pull them over. So thank y'all.
Good.
Hello. Hi. Oh, hi, James. Hello. You can feel free to listen in on this next one. Your committee is up at 07:40.
Oh, 07:40. It changed a little bit maybe because I had seven.
Oh, okay. I've got you down for 07:40. Does that still work for you?
Sure. I can be in at 07:40. I got other things to do.
Okay. Excellent. Okay. We will see you then. And we'll just I see that our interviewee is here, but we'll give Kelly the time she needs to jump back on. How are things going on the Heritage Commission bill?
They're going pretty good. Burner, our current chair, is stepping down in April, and he's been on the commission for a really long time. So there's some some historical knowledge that we're kind of losing, so I think we're all trying to soak up as much as we can before he leaves.
Okay. Alright. Well, it's always sad when long standing people move on. Okay. Hi, Kelly. Alright. We're all here, so I think we can go ahead and get started. Dawn, would you like to promote Keegan over?
Hello.
Hi, Keegan. Am I saying your name right?
Yes. Correct.
Excellent. Thank you so much for joining us, and thank you for applying to serve on our heritage commission. My name is Danny Madrone, and I, service the chair of the community livability and public safety committee, which is a committee of the city council. We'll be making recommendations to the city council in terms of appointments to our advisory bodies. And I am joined by, my committee mates, Young Hwan and Kelly Green. And I also have Bill Cotter, who is, our, chair for the Heritage Commission. Oh, wait. Maybe you're not chair. Are you chair?
I'm the incoming chair after
Incoming chair. Okay. Yes. And we've got a quick ten minutes for this interview, so I'm gonna go ahead and jump in. What interests you and excites you about joining the Heritage Commission?
Yeah. Absolutely. Honestly, it's just the prospect of being a part of helping to educate the community on the history of the area and the cultures that have existed here for thousands of years, and being a part of, you know, helping to kind of, like, preserve it and also learn more about it myself in the process.
Excellent. Great. Thank you. I'll pass it on to Eang for the next question.
Thank you, Cher. The next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body?
Yeah. So as a current Evergreen student, I think I come with a perspective of, like, being a part of a very diverse community currently. And, you know, just a little bit of insights on some of the cultural heritage of the community. I mean, I've experienced the longhouse on campus a few times. I've had a passion for history and just, an eagerness to learn for most of my life. Yeah. Just kind of a willingness to learn, to listen, to learn.
Thank you. Thank you, Kelly.
I've got the next question. So how would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
I would probably take it pretty slow, honestly. For the first six months, I would just kind of learn and listen and kind of watch how the process goes and, you know, communicate and connect to the other members on the advisory body. See, yeah, see what I can learn from them.
Thanks.
K. And we'll ask Bill to to to take the final question here.
Awesome. Thanks. So heritage commissioners work in three main areas. One of them is providing community education about historic preservation here in Olympia. Another is actually advising the city government on things like planning and code. And then a third is reviewing development projects that are affecting historic properties. So I'm just curious which of those areas interest you most, and how might you envision contributing to those areas as part of the commission?
Yeah. Primarily, it's the educate educating the community on the history of Olympia and the area. One one thing that I would love to kind of work towards is, you know, implementing, like, different signs and, like, plaques in places like Squaxin Park that help to share the history of the area. I mean, Squaxin Park originally was a location for burials, and later it became a location where they built a mission on it. And then eventually became the park that we know it as today.
But oftentimes, that history isn't well known by the people of this. I'd love to, like, be a part of implementing a process to where when people go and visit, they can learn about it.
So thank you.
Great. Well, thank you so much, Keegan. I'm gonna share some of the the next steps with you. In the next week or so, you'll get an email from Dawn who you've been communicating with to coordinate this interview, and she will let you know one way or the other what we decide. And our role as a committee is to make recommendations to the city council, and the city council will make the final decision on who the appointees are on March 31. But you'll hear, from Don in the next week on in terms of, what we decide as a committee for our recommendations.
Brilliant. Alright. Thank you so much for having me. I look forward to hearing from Don.
Alright. Thanks so much. Have a good night, Keegan. Have a good night. Alright. And I see we have our next person here. I'm gonna go ahead and just get my next piece of paper ready. Hey. Are we ready for the next one? Okay. Excellent. Let's go ahead and bring Kyle on over.
Alright. Can you hear me?
Yeah. Yeah. Hi, Kyle. Welcome. Hello. Thank you for spending some time with us this evening, and thank you for applying to be on the Heritage Commission. My name is Danny, and I serve as the chair of the council's community livability and public safety committee. And we are charged with making recommendations to the council on who we should appoint to our advisory bodies. I am joined by committee members Ian Hwen and Kelly Green, and also Bill Cotter, the incoming chair of the Heritage Commission. And we've got a little bit of time here, so I'm just gonna get right to it. The first question is, what interests and excites you about joining the Heritage Commission?
Yeah. I mean, I I love this town. I'm active locally, so I volunteer with OFS. I spend a bunch of time at community print. I attend city council meetings, etcetera. One of the things that I love most about Olympia is the timelessness. Like, there's a distinct visual aesthetic that stands, I think, in stark contrast to sort of the copy paste square boxes and urban sprawl that larger cities have allowed themselves to become, and it's one that I think is worth protecting. So being able to play a role in the preservation of Olympia's cultural and architectural heritage is to me, part of the commitment that I made to embracing OLE as home when I first moved here, and this just sort of seems like a natural evolution of my investment into my home.
Excellent. Thank you. Go ahead, Ian.
So the next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, and experience you would bring to this?
Yeah. So I moved to OLE in the March, 2024, so after about years in the EU practicing immigration and refugee law. And currently, I lead a 40 plus person work group for the joint transportation committee fixing the state's special license plate problems. So given that, I I feel like I'm rapidly able to parse and synthesize complex regulatory frameworks across a wide set of jurisdictions. And I've also lived and worked in cities, are successfully navigating the complex dynamic between the development and preservation of cultural heritage.
So I I did my legal specialization in Amsterdam and then thereafter moved to Warsaw. In Amsterdam's case, there's very little more important to residents than the look and feel of the city. They have some of the most restrictive development laws in Europe, and yet they're still managing to build housing, mixed use communities, to meet the needs of a growing population. And then in Warsaw, I mean, the entire city was leveled in World War two. So they very intentionally rebuilt things to where you've got this appearance of sort of, like, late eighteen hundreds architecture, but then you have cutting edge transportation systems. So I think that exposure to places where the same questions that Olympia is being asked are being successfully handled in conjunction with my legal experience, I feel gives me the perspective necessary to do good work.
I'm very curious about license plate problems, but we'll talk about that another time.
Various and sundry license plate issues.
And Kelly's got our next question.
Yeah. Hi, Kyle.
How would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body, member and to set yourself up for success?
Yeah. I mean, my approach to any new, team based role is really to drink in as much as I can, and then observe the dynamics at play. It's like, I'm not driven by ego. I have no ambition in that regard. I have no interest in subjecting anyone to my ideas as to how things should be, especially not when I have no idea how things are now.
So I'd like to get a sense of the workflow, see how the relationship dynamics function, and then educate myself, especially on the technical aspects of the role. So building a familiarity with municipal and state code, governing historic sites, how that interacts with development efforts. That's an extracurricular activity that I actually enjoy and one I also have a lot of adjacent experience with. So, rapidly getting up to speed and then serving as a resource for the commission, that would be an immediate goal.
Awesome. Thank you.
Mhmm.
Alright. And Bill's gonna take us home.
Awesome. Good to meet you. So heritage commissioners work in three main areas. One of those is that we provide a lot of community education around, issues related to historic preservation here in Olympia. Another is we advise the city government on various aspects related to city planning and city code. And then we also review development projects here in the city that actually affect historic properties in Olympia. So I'm just curious which of those areas interest you most, and how might you envision contributing to any of those areas?
Yeah. I mean, while all three of them are really interesting, I think educating the community about preserving and celebrating local history is just something I consider it as my duty as an Olympian to carry out in the course of my normal personal life. I'm very lucky to be friends with Emmett O'Connell. You may know he writes extensively about OLE history. So learning and then disseminating that information is just a welcome facet of my life in the day to day.
As for the rest, you know, the review of development projects, and evaluating preservation efforts in the context of municipal planning and code, that's something that scratches the puzzle solving itch that I became an attorney to address. So I love, like, needle in a haystack research projects, digging through ancient tomes, you know, Byzantine legal texts, to find forgotten data that carries, I would say, significant weight in the now. There's really there's something about burying my head in a project and coming up with, like, a novel solution to a complicated problem that gives me life. And I also love the interplay between those research projects and then people projects, you know, where you have a lot of stakeholders with competing interests. So I hope that helps answer the question.
Yeah. That's great. Thank you so much.
Mhmm. Absolutely. Well, I'm gonna share a little bit of information on on next steps. So in the next week, you will hear from Don, who you've been coordinating with, to schedule this interview. And she'll let you know one way or the other, the recommendation that the the committee will be making to the city council. And so our role as as a committee is to make a recommendation. The city council makes a decision at the March. March 31 is when that is scheduled for the the council. Not anything you need to put on your calendar, but I just want you to be aware of the timeline. But, but you will hear from Don in the next week or so. So do you have any questions on that?
No. That's all great. Thank you all so much for taking the time. Have a great rest of your night.
Great. Thank you. Bye. Have a good day. So funny enough, that is the second time in my day that Emmett O'Connell has come up in a completely different space. I was in a a salmon legislative policy meeting, and somebody shared a blog post, and I, like, clicked on it. I was like, that's Emmett's blog. And so twice today in very random ways has Emmett, you know, has he come up for me.
Looks like that's
a sign that you should reach out to him.
I was texting with him earlier. I was like, the governor's office just shared your blog post in this meeting. Excellent. We've got a little bit of time. Let's see. Our we're running ahead of it. Here I am, Bill, making you shorten your question a little bit just to just to be safe, and we're we're ahead of schedule. So
It's all good. It's all good.
Yeah. So we've got the next interview is at 07:20. And I think we should just hang around in case that person jumps on early, and then it'll give us a a little bit more time to debrief at the end.
That's good.
I'm staying by my computer, but I gotta stand up and stretch.
Yeah. You go ahead. We're just, like, awkwardly sitting on Zoom here. I feel great. What's that?
I I was just remarking to your offer. I was like, I feel great.
Bill, I really feel for the Heritage Commission with Garner. I mean, I think, you know, things will continue on, hopefully, with all of the new folks and kind of getting things reenergized. But I also think about doctor Stacy Hicks as well.
Yeah. And
and that loss that was just, you know, been tough time for folks.
Yeah. It has. It's I mean, obviously, Stacy's passing is incredibly sad. I didn't, you know, I didn't have a chance to know her super well personally, but, you know, we did overlap for, I think, over a year on the commission, and she was she was so great. Like, I think we were all just, like, so completely shocked when that happened. And, yeah, and then Garner decided to step down. He he mentioned it to us at the retreat that we had not too long ago, and, you know, he he's I don't know how long he's been on it. I think he's been on the commission for almost a decade. He's been on it for a really long time. So it's gonna be it's gonna be, like, a transition time, but but, yeah, I'm excited about it, and I'm excited that there's gonna be, you know, potentially three new folks joining as well.
I think that'll be really exciting and yeah. But it's definitely gonna be it's gonna be a little bit weird, you know, kind of losing garner and just with everything that's going on.
Yeah. Absolutely. Have you been enjoying your time on the commission?
Yeah. I have. I think it's a really great group of folks. Also, Britney, you know, the heritage preservation officer, she's great. So I think it's it's been really good. I feel like over the last year, we were able to accomplish a lot of stuff, and we had a really good retreat. And we're we talked a lot about, like, stuff that we would be interested in, you know, potentially pursuing. I think one thing that one thing that's been, I guess, a a little bit challenging, and it's just something that I think about a lot because I was a federal employee for quite a while. Like, with all the changes at the federal level, some of the funding sources that could potentially be leveraged for heritage commission projects if we were trying to like, external grant funding or something. Some of those funding sources have really dried up. So that's a little bit challenging. But, yeah, I've really enjoyed it.
Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. Some of the most innovative, creative things come from, you know, not a whole lot of resources. So Yeah. I hope.
Yeah. Yeah. But, I mean, you know, we've been able to do some really cool stuff. Like, I know that we had some we had some good workshops over the last year, especially. I wasn't able to attend it, but we held a workshop on, like, historic window preservation, which was one of the first things I received, like, a very long PDF when I joined the commission about historic windows. And then somebody coming in, I was like, I I don't know if I need like, I don't know what my stance is on historic windows, but I'm prepared to learn.
Mhmm. But
yeah. Are they energy efficient?
I think that they can be pretty energy efficient if you install an additional storm window on the other side of them. But I think that I think they're a hard sell for people sometimes.
Yeah. That's the update part.
Yeah. It's the update part. And my understanding is there's not a lot of there's not a lot of companies that deal with restoring them. So it's a pretty specialized thing, and I think it's pretty expensive pretty quickly.
Yeah. Yeah.
I'm just excited to see the the different perspectives that some of the folks that we're interviewing are bringing. And I don't know. I think we already have a pretty, like, diverse group of folks in terms of background, so excited for that to continue.
Oh, totally. Yeah. Even candidates one and two so far, totally different.
Yeah. Totally different. Mhmm. I think one thing that we talked about some with Garner leaving, you know, Garner's an architect. I mean, he's the only architect that we have on the commission. So that's something that's gonna be a little interesting to navigate with him transitioning off. But Melissa, one of the other commissioners, she is really interested in kind of the architecture side of things. So she's been, I think, doing a lot of the same stuff that Garner does and, like, watching how he does it, which is great.
Very cool.
Yeah.
Oh, I just saw Stephanie pop on. Alright. Are we ready for our final interview for the Heritage Commission? Yep. Alright. Let's do it. Let's bring Stephanie over to this side. Hi, Stephanie.
Hi there.
Oh, and hello, Stephanie's cat. Yes.
I wanted to join, like, last minute. I'm sitting here, and he's like, you can't be without me.
Yes. Yes. Well, thank you so much for joining us this evening, and thank you so much for your interest in the Heritage Commission. Yeah. My name is Danny, and I chair the community livability and public safety committee of the city council, and we will be making recommendations to the council for all our advisory body, appointees. And I am joined by committee mates Yan Huynh and Kelly Green, and also Bill Cotter, the incoming chair of the Heritage Commission. And this is gonna be happening for, the next text ten minutes, I assume. Probably. Yeah. And we just got a short amount of time, so I'm gonna go ahead and jump right on in and ask you what interests and excites you about joining the Heritage Commission.
I've always been interested in history. I have a bachelor's degree in history and English, and I I could never get enough of history either just reading independently or history classes. I would run out of room to sign up and then sit outside classrooms in between other classes just so I could, like, listen and learn about the classes that I couldn't enroll in. So academically, it's important to me. I still read independently a lot about history.
I've been doing actually a lot of ancestral research lately. Found out I'm Canadian. Oh, it's interesting. And then on a personal level, I grew up on century farm. So my family had a up until recently, a farm in the family for over a hundred years.
And so that connection to, history is also personally important to me. And if you look behind me, I actually have furniture that is over a 100 years old and paintings, oil paintings that are over a 100 years old. Can't show you the rest of my dining room, but there's also other old food tips. I I have, this is all from my family that came from Boston and was shipped around, South America and brought up to Portland when my family moved, to, the Pacific Coast. And so it stayed in the family, and no one else was interested in it when it was time to inherit except for me.
So, again, it's it's just reinforcing, like, how important heritage and our history is important to me. And I also restore, I won't show you my garage, but there's also some antique furniture in there because people, you know, they don't think, you know, our history is important to us. And but these are pieces of us. These are pieces of our our, where we came from. And it's just, to me, it's so important. And so I restore these pieces. And then, I mean, I do sell them. I don't give them away. But, you know, it's important because then people are like, oh, wow. That actually looks really nice now because it was old and decrepit and falling apart and had water damage.
And now it's, like, brand new and shiny and restored, and people are then thus interested in it. So academically, personally, and then professionally, it's important to me because I work in risk management, and then I also work in public records. Public records, records management is incredibly important because we, when it comes to, state records, those are the people's records. Those are you know, there's a responsibility being a state employee and ensuring that our records are preserved per their retention schedule and held on, as long as, the retention period requires and then potentially preserved historically. I'm actually involved.
I'm the subject matter expert for a bill that's going through the legislature right now for preserving historical records at Lakeland Village. And so we are apparently gonna be partnering with the University of Washington for a preservation of of those records that someone just happened to come across in storage room about a decade ago and didn't know what to do with. So be a very interesting project.
Great. Thank you. I'll pass it on to Ian.
Alright. So your next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body? So if you wanna expand on some of those things, now would be the time to do so.
Yeah. I'll expand a little bit more into my records experience. So I've been working for the state for about thirteen thirteen ish years at this point, and I was brought I normally worked in risk management, but I was brought into the public records aspect of it because people saw I was constantly questioning, what are we supposed to do with these records over here? There was always, like, these drawers and drawers and drawers full of records. And I'm like, well, what are the requirements?
Because I also really like the law. Like, what are the legal requirements for keeping these records? And so I've expanded from just being a public records coordinator to actually being the public records officer for at the county level in my last job. And then now I'm a director of risk management, which oversees, litigation to our claims, public records, discovery subpoena, etcetera. So I have kind of a broad overview of the law of requirements for preservation, as it comes to records.
That's my professional background coming into this. But from my personal background and from my educational background, there's the furniture aspect, but then there's the the house aspect of as well, our historical structures. One of the things that was my most favorite thing when I worked at Grays Harbor County, I don't know if y'all have been to Monteceno, but they have the most beautiful courthouse, the most it's absolutely beautiful, and it's a it's a historical piece. And one of the projects we worked on when I was there, they have an old historical jail that they don't use anymore, but there are records all over that jail. And so we worked on a historical project to preserve those records, what we could to ensure that we're being good stewards to the people of Washington State.
Other professional experience I have, one of the facilities I oversee right now is Western State Hospital, and we're going through building a new forensic hospital. Well, the building, the old Western State Hospital building, there's all of these beautiful features, these historical aspects, like just even the bricks and, like, being involved in repurposing the bricks so that it's like or the wood, the trees. They unfortunately had to cut down some of the trees. And so utilizing that wood and bringing it in as a historical aspect into the new building to show, like, we're still part of our history even though we're building this new building. So things like that.
I love being involved in projects like that because we're we're still giving showing pride in where we we come from and not losing that history of who we once were and and what we once had. So
yeah. Thanks, Stephanie. And we've got a couple more questions and only a couple more minutes. Okay. So I'm gonna pass it off to Kelly. No. You're good. You're obviously very passionate. A little bit.
So, Stephanie, a little bit more on how you would approach this work. How would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success? I would need to do a lot of learning.
I need I would need to look go through past minutes, really educate myself on the historical aspect of where you guys have been, and just, you know, educate myself, like, you know, what what project have you guys been working on? What is the process of those projects? You know, go into, like, an in in in-depth research of just where we are, what we've done in the past, and so that I can set myself up for success moving forward with future projects. So I have a good understanding of how it all works so I can give meaningful feedback and be a good member of this team. That was probably the shortest answer I could give.
And Bill's gonna go ahead and take us home.
Awesome. So heritage commissioners work in three big areas. One of those is community education around areas related to historic preservation. A second is advising the city government on things like planning and municipal code. And then the third area is reviewing actual development projects that affect historic properties. And I'm just curious which of those areas might interest you most and how you might envision contributing to one or many of those areas.
I love the law, so I would love to do the legal research and contribute that way. I also have to read I would think the planning part of it as well. I shouldn't say I have to read. I have the opportunity at work to have to read through. Like, we are like, we do tons of revisions and plannings, like building a new hospital and everything like that. So I I do enjoy doing my research, but the the legal aspect is definitely my favorite part.
Awesome. Great. Thank you so much, Stephanie.
Yeah. It's nice to meet you.
Yeah. Yeah. Really great to meet you and to hear your passion for this kind of work. A couple of things on next steps. In the next week or so, you'll get an email from Don who you've been coordinating with on this interview, and she'll let you know one way or the other what what what we recommend in terms of an appointment for the Heritage Commission for you. And that's just one step in the process, the committee making a recommendation. The the council will make a final decision on all of the advisory body appointees on March 31. Not anything you need to throw on your calendar, but I'm just letting you know how how the process works out. But either way, you'll hear from Don in the next week.
I appreciate it. Thank you, everyone.
Excellent. Thank you so much. Have a great night. You too. Snuggle your cat. Yep. Thank you. Alright. Well, Bill, it would be lovely. We've got some time here. Actually, I'm looking at my thing right now. Yeah. We've got about a an a a free ten minutes here to, you know, kinda debrief with you and see what your thoughts are. As a committee, we'll talk either, like, later this evening or it might get pushed into tomorrow evening just depending on things. But we would love to hear your takeaways, your thoughts, any anything you'd like to share for us to, have in our minds as we're deliberating?
Yeah. I mean, I think, you know, all three of them, I think, could be great for different reasons. I think Keegan's Keegan's a really awesome candidate because he's an Evergreen student, and I think that that that brings, you know, a different perspective, I think, to the commission than we have right now. You know? Like, I don't we don't I don't think we have any current current students on the commission, so it's really cool that he wants to be a part of it and is really interested. I thought it was really interesting that he mentioned signage. That's one of the things that we were actually talking about at the retreat recently. So that's something that the commission's actually thinking about, and and we're interested in exploring, you know, projects we might be able to do around signage. So that's really cool. Kyle, you know, I was really surprised.
Kyle seems incredibly plugged into what's happening in the city, and he mentioned he's only been here since 2024. So he seems really eager, really motivated. It's also really interesting both he and Stephanie have kind of, like, a legal perspective coming at it, I think, from slightly different angles. So I think that they all bring, yeah, a really cool experience. I I don't see any you know, I would have no issue with having all three of them on the commission. So we've got three open seats. So, yeah, everybody seemed really great, and and I'm excited about the different perspectives they bring.
Awesome. Oh, go ahead.
I was just gonna add one thing. I don't think it's an issue, but I'm just gonna mention it because I heard you all ask the previous person that was on this question when I joined. I noticed that it sounds like Stephanie is a state employee, and she mentioned being a subject matter expert for legislation. I didn't get the impression that her job was closely tied to the legislative session. Our meetings are at 05:30 in the in the evening on Wednesdays. I don't really think it'll be an issue, but, you know, just much
Oh, yeah. And she mentioned being, like, a subject matter expert. So it might just be, like, their legislative person was like, who's the smartest person on this particular bill? And she gets pulled in as needed. That's that's kinda what I heard there.
K. Cool.
Anne or Kelly, anything you wanna extract out of Bill before we cut him loose?
No. I appreciate that feedback. It's good to know that, you know, it sounds like the option is there if we wanna fill all three slots, and you could have a full commission.
Yep. Yeah. No. I don't think so. Thanks so much, Bill. I appreciate you joining us and then also everything you shared.
Yeah. Of course. Thank you so much for having
Thanks for giving some of your time to hang out with us this evening. It's good to meet you.
Yeah. Good to meet you too. It's great seeing you all.
Yep. Bye.
Cool. Have a good night.
We've got three more interviews total this evening, two for, OMPB, and then one is a BPAC person who couldn't make the regular time. But it looks like we've got, about seven minutes until, James Reddick is gonna come on and join us and support the OMPB one. So how about we go ahead and take another break? Put that put that thing up so people know we're on break, and I will see you all in a couple minutes. Here.
Yes. Sorry. Maybe you're seeing something behind the scenes that I'm not seeing, but isn't James coming on, like, in a minute?
07:40, and it's 07:34.
Oh, my city computer IT did this to me. They have it going five minutes faster.
Okay. Dude, mine is fifteen minutes fast, and it has been for years. And I just don't wanna, like, mess with it at all. So yeah. K. Got
it. We'll see you
in a sec. Okay. Welcome back.
My fellow clippers. We should get jacket.
Oh, yes. Agreed. Dawn, you do you understand how confusing that
is for me working at a school where our name is the Clippers?
I know.
I did not know that about SPSCC.
I went to SPS.
Oh, that's so you know.
So what is a Clipper? What's your mascot?
Those so those are two different questions. The clipper is like a boat, like a clipper ship. Got it. So we used to have this mascot that was, the only way to describe it is, like, colonial sea captain. Right? Like, white wig sea captain with anyway, students at hand, like, a number of years ago said, we don't love that our mascot's a boat. It's uninteresting. Can we change our mascot? And we said, yes. But, it's, like, on stop. Like, the gym floor should be really expensive, but you can come up with a character mascot. So they went through, like, a two year process to develop a character mascot. So Percy the Kraken is our, like, mascot that shows up at stuff, but, officially, we are the Clippers.
Perfect. I learned something about SPSCC just now.
Like, gooey ducks versus greener's.
Exactly. Ours is much less suggestive.
Hi, James. Welcome back. We've got a few minutes, actually, about fifteen minutes or so to get oriented. We have two folks that are interviewing for the OMPD, and you've got one vacancy. And so the way that we've been doing the interviews is that we've got just ten minutes for each person, and each of us will have a question. So I'll start off. Ian will ask a question. Kelly will ask a question. And then you have one for that is specific to the committee. And, James, like, do do you know everybody here? I haven't even really introduced myself. Hi. I'm Danny.
Think so. Yeah. Yeah.
Okay. I'm I'm Kelly.
Hey, James. I'm Ian. Thanks for joining us.
Yeah. Three times today.
Yeah. And and, James, you charmed me a little bit when you said, well, I've
got other things to do. Yeah. So we'll we'll just for the sake of expediency, I'll introduce everybody on the committee so we don't have to go around the Zoom room for each of the interviews. And then we'll just go right into it and ask the four questions we have, and then I'll walk them through next steps.
Did you
send out the questions?
Yeah. Yeah. Everyone received oh, do wait. Did you get them?
Who who sent them out?
Don Carvalho sent them But she's also gonna stick them in the chat here, so, you may not have to look too far.
James, I will send it to you in the chat. Okay. Have it as a quick quick reference here.
I've got so many emails going on right now that I get lost. Oh, here, I bet this is where it is. I got the general questions or this And
then advisory body questions. Yep.
Okay. Yeah. Got those.
So do you have your question? I see it that it's what is your okay. You've got that? Okay. Excellent. Great. So, yeah, so with the three general questions, I'll take one. Ian will take one. Kelly will take one, and then you'll close us out with that final question. And then after we can conduct the two interviews and folks leave the room, we can chat about your your reflections, you know, debrief with you a bit. And then the three of us are gonna deliberate on all of the appointments either later this evening or later tomorrow evening, but we wanna have your thoughts before we cut you loose for the evening.
Okay.
Excellent. And let's see here. We do have about ten minutes before the interview starts. So I'm gonna keep my eye on the participant list in case somebody in case the next person jumps on early and we can get started early. But, otherwise, James, I'd love to know how things are going with OMPD. How are you enjoying your your time there?
You know, OMP is pretty well established now. So there isn't a whole lot to do, but yearly makes sure that everybody's doing what they're supposed to be doing.
That's why that's why we have you there. Keep us accountable.
So, you know, it's I think the first couple of years going through the agreement and making some changes for clarification really helped. And now I think we're pretty much it's just you guys are doing your part, and we're doing our part. We do get a few people commenting. It's usually Bob and Karen.
Oh, we know those those folks well. Yes. They comment on all sorts of things.
Yeah. But, you know, but they're always good and helpful, so, you know, from that standpoint. But people have to realize that the MPD is not the park and and rec or prac advisory thing. It's totally different. So
Yeah. Yeah. So Well, Karen and Bob are are great resources, both of them formally serving on the council. And there's actually quite a few former council members that we that we hear from throughout our our business. So it's nice to see people stay engaged.
I think we have one that's coming on our board for the Park Foundation.
Oh, who's that?
Oh, okay. Oh, I I know that guy. Good to know that he doesn't sit still for very long.
No. It's it's good to have him there. So and we just hired a new CEO, our first one this year. So it's interesting going through all the changes.
Oh, well, that's exciting, though.
Yeah. It is because it's helping to get us better organized.
Yeah. You're like a real organization now. You got the executive director. Right?
Yeah. But that's about all we're gonna have for a long time.
Yeah.
Because we don't we don't need a whole staff like a lot of nonprofits do. So
Yeah. Absolutely. You know, I was just walking over by Capitol Mall, and I walked in on this area of sidewalk that's, like, gosh, where Italia used to be. Do you know what I'm talking about? Yeah. And I saw all the tiles there with all the handprints, and I was like, oh my gosh. I've never walked this area of sidewalk before. What is this? And it was a Park Foundation project.
Yeah.
That was really cool to see.
Yep. We did that. We're we've got a lot going on. We're working with all all the pretty much all the cities now. We're working on a project to get a trail from Dakota to Tenaino.
So people Very cool.
Walk and don't have to cross the railroad track and then be on the busy street if they wanna bicycle to Tenaino for, you know, the pool and stuff like that.
So That's very cool. Is that part of the regional trails plan?
Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Very cool. Yeah. So I serve on the Thurston Regional Planning Council, so I've been I've reviewed that plan at one point.
Yeah. It's time for that one to come. It it needs to be there because it connects to communities together and keeps kids and bicyclers safer, you know, from that and walkers safer.
Very cool. Excellent.
And I hope you've all gone down to Arbutus and taken the Tenaino stone carving classes.
Oh, I haven't. You know, the the class the only class I've done at Arbutus is was on mosaics, which was really fun. And that was me pushing my edge. I am not a very artsy person, so I was like, I'm gonna do something that is totally new for me, but maybe I'll go try that one too. That was a
while ago.
Stone carving is interesting. It's it's we're trying to preserve it so it doesn't get lost.
Okay. Very cool. I know there's a lot of Tenano Pride around that. So
Yes. There are. Yep. Yep.
I'm curious about OMPD. I'm sure we were showing this at some point, but I'm seeing that we're looking at one vacancy tonight. And there are a few people whose term ends this March. And so am I to understand that they're all going to be re upping?
I haven't talked to Savannah about that. I know they're I said I would, but I'll have to talk to her about that.
Oh, okay.
Yeah. I do see that. Because
I was with the original group that worked on the MOU too. So
Yeah. Yeah. That's great. Dawn, are you aware if Jamie, Randy, and Caroline are gonna be coming back to OMPD?
Yes. They are. They're both three. They're re upping, so they're this term is ending, and they're re upping.
Oh, all three of them are?
Let me just double check.
Probably just two of three. Otherwise, we wouldn't need to do any interviews. Three.
Yep. Oh, okay. Yeah. Thanks. Yep.
Okay. I'm gonna I am gonna I have to press one more time. Don, do you know which one is leaving? Because they got different backwards.
No. James? Moment. I can tell you.
Well, Roger left. You know?
Ugh. Gagger, James. Yes. Yes. I miss Roger all the time.
So do we. It was a great he had a lot of good thoughts and understanding and and could analyze stuff. But right at the end, he he said, you know, I just can't remember like I used to. So
You know, longtime service to the city too, beyond OMPD.
Oh, yeah. Yeah.
Mhmm. The individual
Planning commission. You know, he was on that for a long
time. Yeah.
The individual that is stepping down is, last name military.
Oh, okay. Thank you.
You're welcome.
Maybe I should have tried to recruit Paul since he lives in Olympia, but, has his job in Tumwater now.
That would have been so funny. I bet he is a little bit busy. Yeah. Of
course, their their park director out there has got the Taj Mahal now. The he they bought the day care?
Yeah.
So it's really nice building. That's where his office is gonna be.
Nice. Yeah. I don't think I've ever heard anyone call it that.
It's a
very nice building.
Yeah. Absolutely.
I just tease him about it. You know? I can get away with it because I'm a cougar. So Yeah. And he's a cougar. So
Yeah. Cougars get away with a lot, James.
That's right. You know? We don't have to worry about UW anymore. They're gone.
No. James, they're still around. But the the the kooks, you know, I will say, though, that I am not one. But WSU has just the most camaraderie that I've that I have seen. Yeah. By and far, yeah, in Washington state. I feel like I feel like cougs are like iPhones. You know? You're always gonna know. They'll tell you.
Keeping an eye for our interviewee. We're about one minute out from scheduled time.
The panel the individual has joined.
Oh, excellent. Thanks. I looked down for one second, and they popped on. Let's go ahead and bring them on, and we can go ahead and start the interview. Hi, Corey.
Hi, everybody. Hello.
Thanks for joining us towards the end of the evening here. We've had we've been here all night interviewing candidates for our various advisory boards. And so I
bet you guys are exhausted. It's late in the evening.
Oh, we'll we'll be doing it again tomorrow too. But you know what? It comes with a job.
Absolutely. Well, thank you for having me.
Yeah. And thanks for joining us, and thanks for your interest in the, in the OMPD, the Olympia Metropolitan Parks District. And so I'm Danny. I serve as the chair of the community lit and livable community livability and public safety committee, sorry, too many words tonight, of the Olympia City Council, and we make recommendations to the full council on who to appoint to our various advisory bodies. I'm joined by a committee member, Ian Hwen and Kelly Green, and also by James Reddick, is the chair of the OMPD. And we've got just ten minutes, so I'm gonna go ahead and just dive right in with you. So the first question is what interests and excites you about joining the OMPD board?
Well, I mean, I guess the very first thing is, as soon as I moved to Olympia, I I just became unbelievably intrigued by the amount of opportunities there were for, like, parks and public space. And, I mean, I literally just, like, walked down my new neighborhood and discover a park or move, you know, to another part of town and discover a park. And so I just I became extremely interested in, in in the parks and opportunities that are available here. But, also, I, you know, I I was a a government teacher for a decade, and, I taught my students to get, you know, engaged civically. And and I'm at a point in my life where I have an opportunity to do the the same thing, to practice what I preached, and, Olympia is just an amazing place to do that because there's so much, there's so much activist, interest in in our not just our parks, but everything that our city or downtown does.
So, I just wanna play a role.
Great. Thank you. Pass it on over to Ian.
Corey, the next question is how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experience you would bring to this advisory body?
Well, I've been an educator for twenty plus years. I've been running or assisting in running schools and districts for the last dozen years. And so I have a ton of experience with, budgeting and with capital expenditure accountants and with opening new programs where with data analysis for opportunity for opportunity to create new things. And so, like, it depends on if you're building something from scratch. I I've I've opened multiple schools, and I've, helped actually even helped start a a district, that did not exist in the past.
And so I have a lot of experience just in the the budget analysis and the budget allocation element of things. And so this kinda seemed a little bit right on my alley combined with the, you know, with the my sort of love for the nature and, that Olympia provides. And and so it seemed to fit, really well. And and, I mean, that there's a lot longer answer, but, you know, perspectives wise,
I've never lived anywhere where I felt like I wanted to contribute as much as I do to this area. And, and so this it's just a really special place in my heart. So just wanted to join some something that was doing something to make it better.
Thanks, Corey.
So, Corey, how would you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
Probably the same way that I've gone into new schools where I've been brought in. I've been a director of operations, a district director, a head of schools, a principal. And all I wanna do in the beginning is learn and try to understand how everything works before before offering opinions or ideas or changes or anything like that. So I would, attend as many meetings as I could as I was allowed to actually on Saturday. This last Saturday, I sat in on the senate session for two hours and just watched the legislation in practice, and that was really, really interesting.
There was a couple bills. Well, a lot of bills that were were discussed during those two hours. I would I would whatever the committee, purview was, I would ask to be able to see and read and learn as much as possible about it. That's what intrigues me about my job, has intrigued me as a school leader and as a district leader, and I would take those same, interests and kind of apply it as a newbie in an area that I haven't spent a lot of time in. I mean, I know about the government from a teaching perspective, but I don't know about the government from internal operations perspective. But I know about operations from my jobs, and so I would just like to learn how it all connects.
Thank you. Excellent. And James has got the final question for us.
What is your experience with development or analysts of other of either operating budgets or capital facility budgets?
Yeah. So operating budgets, I've been, actually twenty plus years, of op of working, on operating budgets. But in the last ten, I've been in charge of them. And so as a, an early educator, I was in a a brand new, school that started in the state of Nevada that didn't exist before. And the state really didn't want us to exist, but there were some laws that allowed us to.
And we had to operate we operated with this, shared leadership model where even as a brand new first year teacher, I was I was on a committee that was essentially trying to work with the state government to keep the school the charter school, operational. And we I was on a budget committee. Fast forward ten years, and I start, as an assistant principal. And today, I'm currently ahead of schools, but I worked as a district director and as a principal. And all of that includes not just operational budgeting, but in CapEx budgeting.
And so especially with starting a brand new school, when you have all those first time fees, you take a, you know, building that exists, and you have to convert it into a school, and you have to figure out how, you know, all of the costs for that and then all the costs for the technology startups and all the costs for you know? So CapEx budgeting is a normal thing that I've done both with starting programs, but then with just the major renovations and the major, expenditures that you have on an annual basis whenever you're leading a program or leading a district. And so I think that really would apply, pretty easily, to this position, although I don't know what the budget allocation is for this particular committee. You know, I I'm dealt with, you know, $4,050,000,000 dollar budgets, in my my districts, or as little as $10,000,000 annual budgets in some of the, single operational schools. So I think it it's possible that it could be in the same realm, but, I don't know.
You know? I don't know how much it is, but I think the concept's the same. Right? You know? You're you're you're looking at the opportunity to best, spend the money and where you're gonna get the most reward for what you spend it on and whether it's starting something new from scratch or upgrading something that exists. It's all stuff that I've done before.
Thank you. Definitely not $4,050,000,000. I could tell you that. Okay. Yeah. Great. Well, those are the questions that we have for you. So I wanna share a little bit about next steps. Okay. In the next week or week or so, you'll hear from Dawn who you've been coordinating with to schedule this interview, And she'll let you know one way or another what we're gonna recommend as a committee. And then and as as a committee, our our we we make a recommendation to the city council, and that final decision is made at the end of the month. March 31 is when the council will make a final decision. But you'll know in the next week or so whether we'll be recommending for you for appointment.
Okay. Yeah.
And how many positions are you guys looking for?
Right now, we are recruiting for one position for the one PD. Yeah. Yeah.
Okay. Can I ask a question? Sure. Do you understand what the committee is function is? We're a little bit different in some committees.
Yeah. Well, from what I understand, it was, you know, budgeting and allocation for, you know, municipal parks, city parks, and, from that's what I could gather from the statement on the website.
Can I go into that a little bit?
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Go ahead, Jamie.
Great. We've had some the the community has been very, very appreciative for parks and have come through on some taxing that was specific to parks and rec. And this community came from the community. It was a it's an agreement between the community of the folks who helped to get the tax for the Metropolitan Park District and the city. And our job is specifically to review whether the city is complying with the the issues that they agreed to on this memo of understanding.
So we don't look too much into the budget as much as saying, okay. Is this being spent? And, is it all going where it's supposed to as in the parks and not going into something else in the city? And, you know, as far as few years ago, I think we had a cutback where, they had to take money out of parks to help on some of the other areas. And that was a very much a concern of this committee that park money needs to stay with parks.
Yeah. Well, I hope it does. That's one of my favorite parts about the state and the and the city in particular. And, and I appreciate you explaining a little bit more. That's quite a bit more context than what you would find on the the committee website, on the Olympia government page. But, I I do appreciate that. And that sounds even better than what I was kind of imagining. Right? Because that you know, it's for all the the right reasons, and that's exciting.
Good one. Thanks for that add on, James. Really appreciate it.
Mhmm.
So so like I said, Don will be in touch in the next week or so, and we really appreciate you spending some time with us this evening.
Alright. Thanks, everybody.
Have a great night.
Bye bye.
So our next person is scheduled at 08:05, and I do not see
They had popped in, and then they popped out. So I'm hoping that they are popping back in shortly. Okay.
Well, we can give her some time. Mhmm. And I do see we have her phone number here. So
Yep. Margot
Yep. What's that? Margot was on it. Oh, thanks, Margot. So good.
Look at y'all. Oh oh, there she is. Yay. Excellent. And we do have a little bit of flex in the schedule too, so we can, we can accommodate the full ten minutes.
So let's go ahead and promote her over. There she is. Hello, Marcella. Oh, you're muted. Here
we go. I joined early, and I think I popped into someone else's meeting. So I Yeah. I moved out of it twice. I'm like, oh, no. Oh, no. So sorry about that.
No. No. You're fine. And I actually wonder what that experience is like for people, like, popping on and somebody else is finishing up their interview. But because we have our full committee here, we have to meet in an open public meeting. So anybody has come, welcome again. And, Watson, you didn't interrupt anything.
Okay. Perfect.
And then we got concerned because you left, and we're like, oh, no. Ready to go.
I know. I was like, oh, I don't wanna I don't wanna be in someone else's meeting. So
Oh, you're good. You're good. So so thank you so much for spending some time with us this evening and for your interest in the, Olympian Municipal Parks District. Sorry. It's getting late. Words are getting My name is Danny, and I chair the council's community livability and public safety committee. And I've got my committee mates here with me, Ian Hwen and Kelly Green. And we also have James Reddick, who is the chair of the OMPB advisory committee. And since we we've got about ten minutes here, so I'm just gonna jump right into it. Alright. What interests and excites you about joining this advisory body?
Well, I spend a lot of time outdoors all the time at the parks, state parks, all the parks, like the national parks. So when I saw this opportunity, I thought it was great. I'm like, I'm already doing a lot outside. I'm doing a lot in my neighborhood, just being involved, listening to my neighbors, and trying to figure out what it what the need is in the area. So some of the things I've been working on in our neighborhood too with with our parks is trying to find different options for food.
Food. There's, like, very there's a big need for bridging a gap of food insecurity. And so just noticing around, you know, Olympia, all the different parks, some of them have, fruits, some of them don't. And just like I said, they're I think they're super important. They offer a space that is free. You're able to gather with your community and meet your neighbors. So just I think it's super important.
Thank you so much. Ian's got the next question for you.
The next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, or experiences you would bring to this advisory body?
Okay. So, again, a couple of different experience. I work for the state. I work for the Department of Health, and previously, I worked for the health care authority. I was a fiscal analyst over at the health care authority.
So I would bring that knowledge of knowing how there's money that we need to spend and how it's important to make sure it's spent accordingly and to consider things like our public community and their needs along with just everyone else weighing in. On top of that, I where did I go? I switched you out of my window. I I'm on my cell phone. So Okay. We can still hear you. So Okay. Perfect. So on top of that, as at DOH, I work with data. And we use that data to make informed decisions.
And where that data comes from is from real people. So just having those two areas along with being in the outdoors, working with my community right now. I'm over in Swona. So like I said, I'm sure a lot of you are familiar with some of the stuff we're doing over here in Swona with food access and just trying to be more conscious about that.
Marcella, you're you're singing Danny's song anytime you talk about food access and
food systems.
I know. It's so important. We we have people always like, we have a pantry in front of our house, and people rely on it that we had someone knock on our door yesterday saying, hey. When do you put food in there? So I I made made a run to the store and filled it up again. So, yeah, it's super important.
Wow. It's very kind. But next question, how might you approach your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
I would talk to all of you and listen and just see the back end of how everything works. Right now, I like I said, I I work for the state, but in different areas. So I'd have to learn something new and just listen to all of your guys' experience, listen to the community, and use of use all of that time to be more informed, get some research together, and see what it what what are the plans that you have you guys have going forward and see what it is that we could do to get the ball rolling on any other projects that are new and need to be worked on.
What is your experience with development or analysts of either operating budgets or capital facility budgets?
So, again, I used to be a fiscal analyst. Sorry. I'm, like, overheating. If you can't tell from my face, I have a heater going in my room. So I work with OFM and has spent lots of time during legislature looking at bills, providing them with data and projections, forecasting, to so showing them where we are at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year and using data to drive decisions along with taking community input.
Great. Thank you so much, Marcella. I've got some I just reorganized all my papers here. Okay. Here's my next steps. Okay.
You're fine.
Yeah. Well, thanks again for taking time to chat with us this evening. We really appreciate it. We appreciate your interest in the city. Of course. And I personally appreciate your interest in food access. Yeah. We all do. So the next steps oh, yeah. Go ahead, James.
I I don't know whether you understand the real focus of this committee. It's very different than most committee.
Mhmm.
This the city of Olympia and the community have been very supportive of parks and when it comes to public taxing.
Mhmm.
And this committee came about between the citizens who worked to get the Metropolitan Park District and the city to put together an agreement that would allow a group to make sure that the city is following through on what they have committed to in the agreement and meeting those things. We really don't get into telling people how to budget or anything or what needs to be changed. It's pretty set looking at what the city's done and then saying, okay. That meets the agreement, and we're in you're in compliance. So we're kind of a accountability.
Oh, great. Yeah. So, I'll bring up my position over at the health care authority. I was an inpatient program manager. Nothing with the parks, of course, but part of that position would I would have to go through rat wax and RCWs and make sure that we're actually following all of the services correctly.
And anytime there's a change, I would have to make sure, okay. We're making the change also. So just being on top of everything and make making sure it's consistent across the board. So I I could see how it would be very relatable even though it's the parks. Just making sure that, yeah, there is follow through on what was committed to.
Excellent. Thanks for that follow-up, James. So, Marcella, next steps. In the next week or so, you'll get an email from Don who you've been coordinating with to get this interview scheduled. And she'll let you know one way or another what we decide as a committee. And, again, this committee's role is that we make recommendations to the city council. And so we'll do that sometime in the next week. We'll we'll you'll be notified if if we recommend for you to be appointed to the OMPD advisory committee. Okay. And the city will make a final decision on that March 31. So I just want you to be aware of the timeline there.
Okay. Alright. Sounds good. Great. Thank you so much. Yeah. Of course. Alright. Have a good night.
Yeah. You too. Bye.
Alright. James, while we still got you here, I would love to hear your insights, any reflections you have so that we can have that on our mind as we deliberate on this later on.
Well, I think they're both good because they're more in the area of analytic and looking at counting holding holding the city accountable, yeah, from that standpoint. In the past, I've seen some people come up and they were looking more at wanting they really wanted to be on the park a prac and not on this committee. This is not a real hands on type of thing because we're just reviewing and making sure it's right. And I think either one of them could do it, so I don't see a problem there. I think they both have that type of background that I'd be looking for.
Okay. Great. Ian or Kelly, any any questions for James before we cut him loose for the evening?
For me, it was nice to meet you, James.
Nice meeting you.
Yeah. Great to meet you. Thanks again for your time and supporting these interviews.
Okay. We'll let you go.
Alright. See you later.
Bye bye.
Okey dokey. We have one more interview this evening. Let's see. It is 08:20 now. That interview is at 08:30. So we could either take a quick break, or we could work on some deliberation until we see folks sign on. Tom Dillon is planning to rejoin us. He's the b pack chair to be able to tune in on this final interview here. So if you guys want, we can take a quick break and come back, or we can start some deliberation until we see folks start logging on, and I can keep an eye on that. What would you all prefer?
I saw a thumbs up from Young about deliberation.
Yeah. It's still you. Yeah.
I'm, yeah, I'm fine. We've we've had, like, several breaks throughout the evening because of because of funky scheduling due to the nature of this work. So well, we aren't quite ready for VPAC. And because we're not quite ready for VPAC, we're not quite ready for UAC because there was one candidate there that is a candidate for both. So how about we start with the planning commission? We have two vacancies there. Oh, you know what? We kinda need to pause on this one too because there is a BPAC planning commission person. Okay. Let's start with Heritage. Let's start there. Yes, Ian.
We start with the last one.
Oh, sure. Yeah.
Just because it's just one vacancy, and I I feel pretty clear. I mean, I guess I could be moved by what one of you say.
But, yeah, what are you thinking?
Marcel. Yeah? I think I think they could both because I agree with James. I think they could both do it. And Marcela added something that I felt like we just got to see a little bit more of, like, the person. You know? Yeah. And and seeing how things might connect holistically. And and I really hear with the first candidate that they care a lot, but I didn't really know, like, why. You know?
And so but so their thing was that they have extensive budgeting experience, which is wonderful. And I looked up, and it sounds like they have done some really impressive things. And so when you pair the the budgeting and, you know, analyzing numbers experience, and then Marcela also has that. And then I just feel like Marcela's interview took it over the top for me. Love to hear what you two think.
Yeah. I would support Marcela as well. I mean, I'm similarly and to what James said, like, think either could do it. They both clearly have some capabilities, you know, professionally. But, yeah, I felt like Marcella was a little, just clearer on why that one was of interest to her and kind of a little bit more direct line from professional experience to the, you know, sort of unique compliance function of of OMPD. So Okay.
Yeah. No. That sounds that sounds good to me also. So great. Check OMPB. And I'm realizing you probably need to take formal action, but I think we can do that altogether tomorrow evening when we're fully done.
She's about to tell us whether that's true or Yes.
I did I did drop the staff report in such a way that you could take formal action tonight because, so it's up to you, or I think you could do you can do them all tomorrow night if you want to.
Do we wanna do it all as one action or just go, check them off as we go? Do you guys have a preference?
I think if we're settled on the ones today, you know, after the last interview, let let's just do the ones we have today at the end of today. And
Excellent. Well, then I'd entertain a motion.
We can do them one at a time.
Oh, is that is that wait. Sorry. That that was my question. Is that okay. Oh, you you do it all in one at the end of today. Okay. Great. Sorry. My question was do we go one by one or do them all in one big batch? So so you you kind of answer in, like, a middle ground area that I wasn't comprehending.
Yeah. Yeah. We could
do could do a batch today and a batch tomorrow or a big batch tomorrow. Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, let's we well, we we'll we'll put this one in the you know, to be to be voted on, and we can do that this evening once we go through other ones. I did see Katie jump on as an attendee, and then she dropped off. I wonder if the same thing happened with her with Marcello where she's like, oh gosh. Something else is happening, and I shouldn't be here. So that's probably confusing for folks, but so it goes.
Also, oh, thanks, Margo. I appreciate that. Heritage, commission, three appointees, three vacancy oh, sorry. Three interviewees, three vacancies. Curious to hear your all stats.
I have thoughts, but I'll look first and last then.
Okay. I like hearing
your thoughts first. I'll I mean, I'll go. Not knowing, you know, in-depth what this commission does, the only I'm hesitant on the first of the three. Keegan only from a like, I love that he he wants to get involved, but I don't know what level of knowledge they need to have going in. But I think if if there's not a a a real need for knowledge or specific experience, certainly, he seems excited to engage and excited to participate, which is awesome. But I felt like the other two demonstrated a little stronger, just connection or or specific, skill set, I guess.
Yeah.
Yeah. So so candidate two, I guess. Mhmm. That's the cat. Like, it was just it was wonderful.
And then the third candidate well, there was a rather long thing going on about antique furniture. There was a lot of other really wonderful applicable you know, I I the passion was clear, and I I do see a connection from, you know, being a steward of public records to, to heritage. The first one, I I really struggle when the responses are so brief. Honestly, so brief that I'm not sure it answers the question. So if I had any hang ups, it would be the it would be the first candidate.
Although, you know, something, that I also value is getting people that are not you know, don't traditionally do this type of thing. Right? And so so for for heritage, I don't think we necessarily need historians. For planning commission, like, we have planners at the city. We don't need them to be planners. You know? So, so, honestly, I'm kinda fifty fifty on that one. Yeah. The but yeah. I I also hear was it oh,
Bill.
That, you know, they're they'd be excited to have a a a full commission. And yeah. But that that would be my hang up is the the first candidate. Not sure about that.
Yeah. And so I'm having that same, like, second and third candidate. Yep. Obviously, very passionate. They're they're gonna dig right in. I love the connection of public records to historic preservation. I had like, I was like, that is of course. Of course. The one area for the heritage commission that I gives me some pause on the first candidate is regulating historic properties through the review of develop through review of development projects. And so that one to me speaks to, like, needing to think about heritage pretty broadly.
And like you said, Ian, like, the with the the short answers that were given, it's kind of like, you know, is this an area where, this person will engage? And maybe they will, but we don't really have enough information to know. And that's a pretty important part of the role of the Heritage Commission. I mean, that goes a little bit beyond advising. Mhmm. Yeah. Go ahead.
My way, Amber, I I would feel comfortable, and I'd be curious what you two think about moving for at this moment, moving forward with the two candidates that we're feeling sure about, and then just holding open that, you know, tomorrow is a new day, and we have other people. And even if they didn't say that they're interested in heritage, they're a lot of times through interviews, there are people that we kind of think, oh, even though they interviewed for arts, they might be interested in heritage and, you know, and could could offer that. So that that's something that I'd I'd be open to. And if we
don't feel it, we don't feel it.
We can hold the vote on that one for tomorrow.
Yeah.
Mhmm. Comfortable with that.
Okay. I'm looking at the time. And I see we've got Tom here, and our next interview is in a minute. Margo, did you hear back from Katie? Oh, there she is. Yay. Hi, Tom. Welcome back.
Hello.
Thank you so much for your flexibility and, like, how BPAC has been sorted throughout the evening. Appreciate it. We're still here. Last interview of the evening. And you've got your stuff in front of you. Are you ready to go?
Yep. I'm good to go.
Okay. Excellent. Let's go ahead and bring Katie over onto the panelist side of things. Hi, Katie. Hi. Hi. Thanks so much for joining us. I really appreciate, you spending some time with us and, and your interest in the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee.
I really appreciate you doing a late night interview. Thank you so much for your flexibility.
Yeah. Yeah. No no worries. We we're happy to to accommodate where we can. So and we've been you know, you're our last one of the evening, so we'll wrap up after this. But my name is Danny, and I serve as the chair of the council's community livability and public safety committee. And our committee is charged with making recommendations to the council on who to appoint to our various advisory bodies. I'm joined by Ian Hwen, who is a member of the committee, and Kelly Green, also a member of the committee, and Tom Dillon, who is the chair of BPAC. So Awesome. We're we've got about a ten minute interview here and four questions, so I'm just gonna jump right in.
What interests and excites you about joining the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee?
Yeah. As I mentioned in my application, I believe that the higher the bikeability and walkability score of a city, the higher the quality of life for all of its citizens. And I'm very excited to go from being a citizen that hopes her city will improve to being an active member of a group that makes those improvements happen. I'm excited to be part of a group that can take real action to lower our city's carbon footprint and make Olympia a more equitable city.
Excellent. Thank you. Ewing's got the next question for you.
Katie, the next question is, how do you describe the perspectives, knowledge, and experiences you would bring to this advisory body?
Yeah. So my time as an educator has provided me with insights on what different cross sections of a community needs, the challenges that people face in different socioeconomic statuses, including those involving transportation and essential services. My work in climate change grounds me in my understanding of how this work that the committee does, works towards climate mitigation for Olympia. As a product manager, I gained skills needed to see a project through, including effective communication, managing complicated timelines. And then I've also been a very active member in this committee through different forms of volunteering.
I've worked on a regenerative farm. I've been a salmon steward with Stream Team. I was newly appointed to the Thurston Climate Mitigation Collaboration Community Advisory Workgroup. What a mouthful. I participated in lobby days as part of Wabikes and Washington Conservation Action. I've worked on city council campaigns, volunteered at Thurston County Food Bank, and much more. I also play on the Olympia, club Frisbee team. So I've tried to be fully immersed in this community and that I which I really love, and I think that brings value to this advisory body.
Thanks, Katie. I've got the next question. So how would you approach, your first six months as a new advisory body member to set yourself up for success?
I see my approach to the first six months broken into two different parts. The first being an informed advisory member, which entails attending meetings, reading the capital facilities plan to understand previous work that was done, revisiting and reviewing ongoing, past and ongoing projects like the downtown corridor bike project. The second part being further viewing my community from the lens of a member of this advisory body. This includes biking and walking different routes around the city with a lens thinking about improvements and then starting to organically seek community feedback about the experience of pedestrians, rollers, and bikers.
Thank you. Alright. And Tom's gonna close us out with the final question.
How can Olympia develop and leverage its walking, biking, and rolling infrastructure to become more of a people centered city?
So first off, I think one thing we should definitely do is learn from transitions that other cities have gone through. I think that transitioning streets to be more friendly for walking, biking, and rolling is a really creative and exciting space. We can look towards examples from all over the world or even our neighboring cities. Bike Thurston does a really great job of highlighting examples on their social media to learn from. I also think we need to transition to changing the way we plan so that pedestrians and cyclists are always prioritized in the planning of future transportation infrastructure projects.
They should never be an afterthought. An example of this is the senate bill five five eight one, the safe systems approach, though I don't know if that's gonna make it through the house rules committee in time. But regardless, I want this advisory body to always push other groups like the planning commission to prioritize prioritize pedestrians and bikers and rollers. I also strongly believe that we should always push for projects that provide exceptional equity and safety, going beyond painted sections of the road if we want the city to be truly people centered. Alright.
Well, thank you so much, Katie. Super efficient. I appreciate that. Yeah. No problem. I'm gonna, share a little bit about next steps with you. So within the next week, you'll hear from Dawn who you've been coordinating with to schedule this interview, and she'll let you know one way or the other if we decide to recommend you as an for an appointment for BPAC. And so so we as a we as a committee will make those recommendations to the city council. You'll you'll hear from Don within the next week, and the city council will act on those recommendations on March 31. So just to give you a sense of the timeline, but the big next thing is you'll hear from Don soon. Great. Awesome. Great. Great. Well, thank you so
much. Hi.
We made
it you joining us.
Have a great night.
Good night. Bye. Well, Tom, I'll say it again. Thanks for being a champ.
Well, I had needs your night than you did. I don't know. Yeah. Three three hours of interviewing, and I I think my well, brain's fried. Or in the past when I've done it, I haven't done it recently, thankfully. So Yeah. I guess it's four hours for you. Right? Yeah. So
Yeah. Yeah.
It all blends together.
About that. Yeah.
Yeah.
So we have three four applicants, sorry, for VPAC. Sorry. Got this one in this pile. And, Ian, you've only been able to join for this last one. But before we cut Tom loose for the evening, Tom, we're curious to hear your your insights, you know, the things that you that that you heard, you know, the things you want us to be considering as we deliberate on a recommendation for this. So
Yeah. So, I think, I mean, all four candidates were strong. And when we did the application review, that was we had sort of, the challenge of a lot of strong candidates to go through. Sometimes it quickly sorts itself out. This was not one of those cases where there's a lot of deliberation.
So, the first candidate, I, I really appreciated that, that he talked about having walked pretty much every sidewalk in Olympia, and I think that's good experience. I but what I really what really struck me about him was talking about having the brother-in-law who was the wheelchair user. Because as the second candidate, mentioned, you know, they talked about about, you know, getting some insight into wheelchair use from riding a bike, but I think that it's you can get something from that, but it's the reality of the situation is is very, very different. Like, if I run to an obstacle on my bike, I can get off my bike and and walk over the obstacle, or someone who is using a wheelchair or other mobility device, they don't have an option. And so, so I really appreciated that.
And in in his application materials, he talked about using it in, I think it was called attendant mode, which one of our one of the VPAC members is a PowerChair user and talked about how that's, like, that's, like, twice as difficult as actually just piloting a wheelchair because you're, like, looking down on the screen and the controls are not great. And so it really gives you a lot of insight into what works and what doesn't. So I like that a lot. And I liked, you know, the discussion about, sidewalk survey. I imagine, I mean, I I think the the big question about sidewalk survey is is really the policy question of, you know, whether the city is responsible for it or property owners, which none of the candidates really got into nor did I expect them to.
So I I thought candidate one was strong. Candidate two, sound like, they were very immersed. I really appreciated the their view, being a substitute teacher and traveling around to all the schools. I I like that. And, you know, as a as a parent, one of the things that I that really strikes me is is often the most dangerous parts of of our city to walk and bike are right by our schools because that's where the most dangerous driving takes place.
I've seen more I mean, I I watch people run stop sign in front of Roosevelt every Friday when I go to the bakery with my kid. Like, watch city employees, cops, everyone do it. It's just like, why have it? So, like, seeing that stuff, I think that that think that it's incumbent upon the city to protect the those most vulnerable among us, which I think, you know, often translates to schools and hospitals and
such.
So I really like that, and I really liked the focus on gaps and network because I think that's a really important part of of looking at a transportation system. Like, if it's only as good as the network, and it's sort of the weakest link. You know? If you got a sidewalk most of the way and you've got a gap, then that's not really good. So, I I was impressed by candidate number two. Candidate number three, was also talking about the, it was the, utilities commission, I believe. Right? And Yeah. I felt like they were a much stronger candidate for the utilities commission. That seemed to be that or that was my impression.
I was a little bit concerned, and this is a concern I have about pretty much all of the candidates, about their focus was really on, like, interacting with the public, collecting data. And I think I think of the role of the B PAC, currently as being you know, we're not so much decision makers. We're more of providing lived experience to the people making the decisions, to the council and to the staff who are who are doing this, doing the work. And, so I, you know, I don't really view us as, like, directing what happens and where a bike lane gets built or whatever, but more like, you know, when when the city does a project, being able to give feedback of, hey. This work, this didn't, you know, and be able to allow that to be an iterative process.
And and then also saying you know, raising concerns about, like, you know, we've got this project coming up. Here's here's our thoughts on it, rather than, as I said, telling the city what to do. And so I I think a lot of times when we see the applicants I've seen for the BPAC, I I always have concerns that there's gonna be a mismatch of expectations of them expecting the, the committee to have more agency than it actually does. It's an advisory committee more than a commission or decision making committee. And so I was just a little bit concerned about that with, candidate three.
I still think they'd be perfectly they'd be great. I just felt like they were stronger with the utility stuff. It sounded like, you know, a lot of their, maybe graduate work, had focused on that. And, they their answers seem to be more in-depth in on those subjects than with, bicycle and pedestrian stuff. And then the fourth candidate who we just heard from, I I liked, I liked what they were saying.
I liked the talking about being an educator and interacting with a broad cross section of, the community. Like, I think, again, if if my view of what the role of the BPAC is, if if our goal is to provide perspective to counsel and staff, then having, having as varied and diverse of a perspective as possible is going to be to our benefit and to the city's benefit. So I like, personally, I worked for the library, and I got to watch got to interact with a lot of people who or I used to work for the library. I got to interact with a lot of people who are, you know, transit dependent or unhoused or, you know, all sorts of things going on and gave me an appreciation for the ways that transportation impacts people's daily lives and especially people who do not have the option to drive. And so yeah.
I I like that. And I the way that the fourth count was talking, I think, like, a lot of our biggest impact, on BPAC is, you know, in providing commentary to staff on things like the CFP and the comp plan and the transportation master plan. And I feel like our relationship with staff in those in that that working relationship is very productive, and I feel like we get a lot of it. And I I I like to think that staff gets a lot out of it too, but I'm clearly biased. So so, yeah, I I believe we have three vacancies if I'm not mistaken. Right?
Correct.
Yeah.
So if I had to pick, I'd pick candidates one, two, and four, but, I don't think we could go wrong with any of them. So Oh. I hope that is helpful.
Super helpful. Extremely. Great. Alright. Cool. Well, thanks so much. We'll go ahead and cut you loose. We appreciate your, your time this evening and your support for these interviews. It's really, really helpful.
Yeah. Well, likewise. I hope you all have good day.
Oh, pardon?
I didn't realize you were a fellow Roosevelt parent, so I'll keep my eyes out for you.
Yeah. Well, I'm a I'm a Reeves parent now. But
Oh, okay.
But every Friday, we ride over to we we started the tradition every Friday of going over to San Francisco Street Bakery and getting a pastry to celebrate the end of the week. And so Oh,
that's cool.
And Reeves is so close that we it continues. The the pastries
are Nice. Pastries great tradition.
Help Morell improves. So alright. Have a evening, everyone. Thank you so much. Night. Find the leave button. Alright.
Okay. So I think I so we have three committees that we're looking at that all kind of, like, connect to each other because there's people being considered for for there's overlapping consideration there, and that is BPAC utility advisory and planning. So and I think we went through all the other ones already. Right? Yes.
So I think it might be easiest to start. We can start with utility advisory, you know, which had two candidates for it, and that could be informative for BPAC. We can start with BPAC. That could be informative for utility advisory and for planning commission. I actually feel most clear on the planning commission, so maybe we start there. How about that? Now that I've verbally processed all that with you. So we had three folks for that one. Well, no. Four considering the the candidate that interviewed with BPAC as well.
So, I'd be, I'd love to hear what, what your your guys' thoughts are on this one, Ian, knowing that you, only heard from, three of the four.
Yes. Only or I did hear from three of the four. Yes. Cher, you said you feel the most clear. You wanna start us off?
Yeah. Absolutely. So, I thought that the first candidate, is probably extremely knowledgeable, on planning stuff, but I felt her answers were very high level and what I what I would expect of a professional planner. So and I'm not entirely sure that that's what we need on the planning commission, somebody who knows the nuts and bolts. I think we're we're looking for, like, the the community feedback and that that lived experience, actually, what Tom was just talking about.
And her answers were so very technical that it was hard to tell, like, how she would engage on a personal level with the issues that come before the planning commission. Samir was very, very passionate and knowledgeable, and I appreciated his his desire to, like, make the connections that he of the things that he works on in his day to day life with how that carries out at the local level. And I, appreciated how, like, he had already done a lot of work to get himself acquainted, with our comprehensive plan and all the accolades that he'd had for it. I thought Elle, our the third candidate, I thought her quite her responses were quite short, but they actually really got to the point in terms of the kinds of experiences, the kinds of perspectives, and the the type of experiences in our community that she's gonna be thinking about from her decision making. And I appreciate that she has experience on an advisory board with inner city transit.
And the fourth candidate we heard from for BPAC, and I actually just thought he inter I I think he could do both very well, but I thought he interviewed much stronger for BPAC. Like, I could see the passion. Like, planning commission to him was interesting, but p BPAC, he's like, I have walked all of these sidewalks. You know? Like and so his passion came out more around BPAC. So so my recommendation would be for Samir and Al to fill the fill these two vacancies. That's where I'm at.
Completely agree with Danny's assessment. I'm at the same place of yeah. I mean, I thought, yeah. The the candidate that was for this and BPAC, same thing. Like, I think I I really wanna see him on one of the two because, he is just such an engaged community member and wants to engage deeper, but I felt like BPAC, he just has a skill set for that that or a perspective that would be really valuable.
And yeah. I mean, honestly, I thought any any of the other three could do it, but I had the same concern with Heidi just with the with it also being a professional day job. I think that's gonna bring a very operational lens, which certainly that knowledge is helpful, but not you know? Yeah. Like you said, the city's got folks who are experts in that, and so what they need is is is this additional perspective. So yep.
Great. Okay. Well, I feel really good about the two folks that you all are recommending.
Okay. Yeah.
They also really I they I mean, they clearly prepared, although, just, strong succinct answers. You know? And that is such a skill.
Yeah. I don't know that Sameer was so succinct, but he's very passionate. He got through a lot
in a short amount of time.
He did. He did. I know. And I I could tell he was also watching the clock for head when he had to run back out to yeah. So okay. Great. Sounds like we have concurrence on that. So we have wait. What are we doing here? Sorry. I'm planning. Papers all over the place. So we have two candidates for utility advisory committee, and it may be easier to do that and circle back to Oh, sorry. I just saw that my Internet connection is unstable. Did you guys hear what I just said?
No? Okay. Sorry. I'm back now. I think that we could look at utility advisory committee next since we just have two folks to consider there and then finish up with BPACs. That sound good? Mhmm.
Okay. Fair?
So that was me and Kelly who were in on this what? Go ahead.
You might wanna you know what I'd turn off consider turning off your camera or doing doing something because you did cut out again.
Yeah. Yeah. You know, I'm noticing that this happens when the microwave is going in my house. I don't know if that's a coincidence, but, like, this this, like, several times now. So how many more minutes you got there? Two more minutes. Okay. I'm gonna go off camera for two minutes to help stabilize that, and we can con conversation. And but I'm reviews were between Kelly and myself. And, Ian, for your context, the the took over the chair said that she would be good with either of them. So, Kelly, what were your thoughts here?
Yeah. I mean, another scenario where I think either could do it. I do think the first candidate, Audrey, had a little just stronger grounding in some of it. And since I'm trying to remember if we have not made a decision about BPAC. Anyway, I feel like, again, I would like to see her on one of them, and so this feels like a better fit than than BPAC.
Yeah. Yeah. I feel the same. And Tom obviously does too. I think she interviewed way stronger for UAC. Again, it was the kind of same kind of thing that I I felt with with Justin, where it's like, you know, I've got an interest in this one thing, but I'm super passionate about this other. So, yeah, that's that would be my recommendation as well, Audrey, for that seat. So Mhmm. Yang, I know you didn't get to participate in those interviews, but, you have looked at the packets. So do you have a thought?
I disagree with both of you wholeheartedly.
Fine. Okay.
Great. Overruled. I'm not oh oh, did she say disagree? Oh, wait. What? Did I did I miss something?
I should mess with you when you're having unstable Internet. Sorry.
I'm good. I I just kinda I I kind of assume like, I thought I heard disagree, but then I was like, no. She must have said just agree.
Oh, she
but She said disagree. Yeah.
Yeah. I
never agree. Whatever.
I'm good. I'm good. Overruled.
Okay. And finally, we have a BPAC here. And, yeah, I'm in concurrence with what the the chair of the committee recommended, actually, which I think is what we have, with Audrey over at UAC. So, Kelly or Eun?
I agree with your recommendation.
Okay. Excellent.
Oh. I'm good with that.
The microwave stopped. Let's see if my my bandwidth is better now. This is more an experiment at this point to just see if that improves things. I know, not to use the microwave on in a meeting. Okay. Great. It sounds like we have, come in. Yeah. Go ahead.
Chair, I just wanna, highlight that per BPAC, you do have, two three year terms and one one year term, so you'll you'll wanna, in this case, assign terms.
Okay. That's very helpful. So you said two, three year terms and one, three years. Wait. What I'm sorry. One year and two, three. I see it right there. Yeah. Okay. Well, I didn't think with that level of depth from this recommendation yet. So if somebody else has an opinion before I do, please chime in.
I would here's the I do not feel strongly about this, but I would say potentially Elena for the one year term. To it'll be a new, level of engagement for her and and may just give her a good feel for whether, you know, she likes engaging on that level or not. Whereas I think the other two have a pretty clear picture of what, you know, what this kind of service would look like. But, again, I don't feel strongly.
I think that makes sense.
I think it is. Yeah.
Yeah. And now I'm looking back at all these. Okay. That was the only one that had different term lengths except for Heritage Commission. So so that's the only one we need to make that consideration for.
Which which also, chair, if I might add, Don Don was kind enough to remind that if Heritage if for some reason you don't see another candidate tomorrow night, there is a one year term available with those so that the the third candidate that maybe had less experience maybe could be slotted in for the one year term.
I, you know, I just I just looked at that and had the same exact thought, but I think we could revisit that tomorrow. Okay. Well, do we want to go ahead and take a vote on the ones where we have reached concurrence this evening, or do we wanna do it as one big batch tomorrow?
I'm happy to make a motion for tonight. Go ahead. I would move that for bicycle pedestrian advisory committee, we appoint Justin Stang and Katie Wellington to three year terms and Elena Miyakasheva, I think I
was close, to one year term.
For utility advisory committee, we appoint Audrey Perry. For planning commission, we appoint Samir Ebrahimovic and El Berger. And for OMPD, we appoint Marcella Volpentesta. Excellent.
And I'll just clarify. Make a recommendation on an appointment since That's what I meant. Listening in, and I just wanna make sure everything is crystal clear.
What I said. I'm recommending
these. I recommend that
you recommend these to counsel. Yes.
Thank god. Heard you say.
Where is my whistle for this dispute? The second. You up. Second.
Alright. Excellent. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Excellent. Okay, y'all. Good work this evening. I'll see you yeah. I feel the same way, Kelly. I'll see you all, this time tomorrow, Same bat time, same bat channel, and we'll go through it all again. I will note that tomorrow, there are less, like, little incidental breaks throughout the evening. So, so we had, like, space for, like, taking lots of breaks and, like, letting a person or two go along, but that wasn't a major problem. But just wanna highlight there's there's a little bit less of that. Actually, a lot of bit less of that tomorrow. So I'll be running as tight of a ship as I can. So there we go.
Well, Stacy and Don and Margo, thanks for hanging in with us too.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Don, did you pop off pop on the camera to say something, or you just say goodnight?
I was just gonna thank you guys for the evening, and I'm just gonna just wait to shut us down. So
Okay. Excellent. Well, thank you all so much.
Thank you.
See you tomorrow. Alright. Good night.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.