Local Planning Committee - meeting_emergency

Is that Eddie, by chance?

Good afternoon. Yes, that is me. I apologize. Yep, that is me.

That's okay. It just says name not available, and I thought maybe it was you. Thank you, Eddie.

Okay, apologies.

All right, let's go ahead and begin. We have eight voting members, so we have a quorum. We can do our meeting today. Welcome, everyone. This is Pinal County's third quarterly LEPC meeting for 2026, and we appreciate everyone who's here. Without you, we don't have the LEPC committee, so I appreciate everyone participating and being here.

Go ahead and take roll call.

We need eight. We have eight. If you want to call your name, please respond by saying here. Pinal County Recorder Dana Lewis. Here. One second. Thank you. Sorry, Dana. Dana is here. Deputy Fire Marshal Eddie Rodriguez.

Right here. Thank you.

Battalion Chief Jim Walter. Assistant Chief Richard Mooney. Here. Thank you. Emergency Manager Corey Redden.

Here.

Deputy Chief and LAPC Chairperson, Garrett Holderman. Here. Emergency Management Program Manager, Andy Brady. He's not here. He's on vacation. Public Health Director, Marissa Mendoza.

Here.

Assistant Chief, Ray Klein. Panella Central Reporter, Kim Lee Stager. Here. Lieutenant Colonel Alan Kirksey. Invenergy Manager and LEPC Vice Chairperson Kelly Zagrebski.

Here.

Senior Environmental Health Specialist Marty Moon. And CFO and Supervisor for Fire and Emergency Response Kirino Cabrera. Operations Manager, Fred Wingott. All right, a roll has been called. A quorum has been met with eight voting members present. The meeting is called to order at 3.07 PM. We have an unconfirmed, so I'll go ahead and admit them. All right, good afternoon. There's a couple of new people that joined online, if you can identify yourself. I don't have a name. If everyone, if the voting members are okay to move on to agenda item number three, we will. This is the approval of the May 7th, 2026 quarterly LEPC meeting minutes, our last quarterly meeting. If you didn't grab one, the meeting minutes are on the desk right over there where the sign-in sheet is. Do any of the voting members have questions, maybe corrections or additions to the meeting minutes from May? if not will a voting member make a motion to accept the meeting minutes as presented i'll make that motion the emotion was made by marissa thank you and this is eddie i'll second it thank you eddie eddie second the motion all right we will put the motion to accept the may 7th 2026 quarterly lapc meeting minutes as presented by conducting a roll call vote. Please state aye or nay when I call your name. Pinal County Recorder Dana Lewis. Aye. Deputy Fire Marshal Eddie Rodriguez.

Yes.

Italian Chief Jim Walter. Assistant Chief Richard Mooney.

Aye.

Emergency Manager Corey Redden. Yes. Deputy Chief and LAPC Chairperson Garrett Holderman.

Aye.

Public Health Director Marissa Mendoza.

Aye.

Assistant Chief Ray Klein. And all central reporter Kim Lee Steger.

Aye.

Lieutenant Colonel Alan Kirksey. Invenergy Manager and LEPC Vice Chairperson Kelly Zagrebski.

Aye.

Good afternoon, is anyone here?

Eurino Cabrera. Aye. Oh, aye, okay, perfect, thank you. Operations Manager Brad Lingard. The ayes have it, the motion is carried to approve the, there was nine votes. The ayes have it, the motion is carried to approve the May 7th, 2026 quarterly LAPC meeting minutes as presented. Moving on to agenda item number four. This is the approval of the May 20, 2026 tabletop exercise subcommittee meeting minutes that took place You know, obviously before our actual exercise, we didn't have a chance to meet again, but we need to approve those meeting minutes. We'd like to do that here now. If you have anyone have any changes or questions about those, please present those at this time. You should have a copy. I sent them out to everyone in the email that I sent out last week as well. If there are no questions or additions to those meeting minutes, will a voting member make a motion to accept them as presented?

This is Dana. I'll make a motion to accept as presented.

Thank you, Dana. Will another voting member second the motion? I'm sorry, who was that?

I'll second Holderman with the mute button.

All right. Thank you, Garrett, Garrett. Second, the motion. So we'll put the motion to accept the table that may 20, 20, 26 tabletop exercise subcommittee meeting minutes as presented by conducting the roll call vote. Please state iron a, when I call your name. So now County recorder, Dana Lewis, I deputy fire Marshall, Eddie Rodriguez.

Hi.

Italian Chief Jim Walter, Assistant Chief Richard Mooney.

Aye.

Emergency Manager Cori Redden.

Aye.

Deputy Chief and LAPC Chairperson Garrett Holderman.

Aye.

Public Health Director Marissa Mendoza.

Aye.

Assistant Chief Ray Kline. Sonal, central reporter, Kim Lee Stager.

Aye.

Lieutenant Colonel Alan Curtsy. Invenergy Manager and LAPC Vice Chairperson, Kelly Zagrebski.

Aye.

Senior Environmental Health Specialist, Marty Moon, are you on? Camino Cabrera, are you on? Okay, I'm sorry, you are on, thank you. And operations manager, Brad Lingard. All right, the ayes have it, a total of nine votes. The motion is approved or is carried to approve the May 20, 2026 Tabletop Exercise Subcommittee Meeting Minutes. Thank you, everyone. All right, moving on to agenda item number five. This is the approval of the June 25th, 2026 tabletop exercise meeting minutes, our actual exercise. If everyone's had a chance to look at those, it's just an overview of our exercise. Anyone have questions, additions or corrections to those meeting minutes? If not, will a voting member make a motion to accept the meeting minutes as presented?

I'll make a motion to, uh, accept this presented.

So, uh, a motion was made by Garrett Holderman. Thank you, Garrett. Well, another voting member second, the motion.

This is Dana. I'll second.

Thank you, Dana. We will put the tabletop meeting minutes or the tabletop exercise meeting minutes from June 25th, 2026 to a vote by conducting a roll call or motion to accept, sorry, motion to accept the meeting minutes from the tabletop exercise on June 25th, 2026. Please state aye or nay when I call your name. Kanawha County Recorder Dana Lewis.

Aye.

Thank you. Deputy Fire Marshal Eddie Rodriguez.

Aye.

Italian Chief, Jim Walter. Assistant Chief, Richard Mooney.

Aye.

Emergency Manager, Corey Reddin. Aye. Deputy Chief and LAPC Chairperson, Garrett Holderman. Aye. Public Health Director, Marissa Mendoza.

Aye.

Assistant Chief, Ray Klein. And all Central Reporter, Kim Lee Steger.

Aye.

Lieutenant Colonel Alan Kirksey, Inventor Manager and LAPC Vice Chairperson Kelly Zagrebski. Aye. Senior Environmental Health Specialist Marty Moon, CFO and Supervisor for Fire and Emergency Response Quirino Cabrera.

Aye.

Operations Manager Brad Van Gogh. All right, the ayes have it with nine votes. The motion is carried to approve the June 25th, 2026 tabletop exercise meeting minutes as presented.

Thank you everyone.

A lot of meeting minutes, but we made it through it. Next agenda item is unfinished business, which are none. So we will move on to new business, which is review of the tabletop exercise after action report. which will be led by Eliza Hull. She's gonna, I'm gonna turn the time over to her. You should have a, hopefully everyone has a copy of the after action report. Okay, I'm seeing heads saying yes. There she goes, okay.

Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for having me. So as Travis mentioned, my name is Eliza Call. I help to facilitate the June 25th LAPC Tabletop Exercise. which then resulted in the after action report that we'll talk about today. So I'll give us a brief overview of what we completed during the exercise. I'm going to plan on running us through some of the observed strengths and challenges and recommendations. And then I'll also give a quick overview of the document itself and give opportunity for any questions or comments. So we conducted the exercise again on June 25th. There were 32 participants, both in person and virtual. We did have a great turnout in person. And I'd like to, I guess, reiterate The value in especially these tabletop exercises taking place in person, there was really some great robust conversations. So the exercise met the requirement for the LEPC to test the emergency response plan at least every two years for a hazmat incident. And through the course of the discussions, we evaluated that emergency response plan as well as facility and organizational plans and response procedures. All of the exercise materials were developed to follow the FEMA Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program guidelines. Our exercise objectives, I'll run us through these, were first to discuss emergency recognition, alarm, and initial notifications following a hazardous materials release at Abbott Nutrition in Casa Grande. Identify initial responders, actions, and assessment upon arrival on scene. To evaluate the coordination across responders at municipal, county and state levels. To discuss the protection of residents and responders, including personal protective equipment, evacuation versus shelter in place decisions and other necessary protective measures. To evaluate public information and warning procedures and the ability to establish and maintain clear, consistent and accessible incident information. and to meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requirements to test the worst case scenario modeling for Abbott Nutrition Ammonia System in coordination with our Pinal County LEPC. So as I just stated from one of the objectives, Abbott Nutrition provided us in the planning team with their already developed worst case scenario modeling, which was used to drive the exercise discussions. So that consisted of a rupture in the high pressure receiver ammonia refrigeration system that resulted in the catastrophic release of 13,500 pounds of ammonia in 10 minutes, resulting in the 200 parts per million ground level ammonia concentration footprint. Based on the modeling provided, there was an impact zone of 3.15 square mile radius around that high pressure receiver. And the weather conditions that we were provided with were sunny, 119 degrees, 37% relative humidity, and winds of about five miles per hour from the west. So we started with that initial scenario, and then through the course of the afternoon, provided our participants with a series I'll run us through some of our identified strengths. So there was really, first of all, first, great robust conversations and participation by all of the entities there. Abbott Nutrition and Casa Grande Fire Department were our primary responders based on the scenario. They were well prepared, had detailed facility response plans and participant knowledge of their roles and responsibilities. Through their discussions demonstrated strong knowledge of incident command system and the ability to coordinate on scene and establish unified command. For all parties involved, there was effective communication and information sharing. From Pinal County, there was demonstrated support available for their local jurisdictions for communication, coordination and resources. Banner discussed their medical surge plans and ability to receive both injured and contaminated patients. We had great discussions from the American Red Cross and our community emergency response teams or CERT teams about their public and responder support that they may be able to provide. Public information staff discussed their capacity and capabilities, particularly around messaging the public and providing protective actions. And really for all of the entities involved, it was clear that there's been strong adoption of the National Incident Management System, Incident Command System, and cohesive response planning. A few areas for improvement that came out of the discussions, the need to refine guidance on subsequent notifications once the LEPC is notified of a reportable release. So the three requirements for notifications, one includes notifying the LEPC by contacting Pinal County Office of Emergency Management, but it wasn't really clear who then needs to be notified whether there's general notification that needs to go out to the LEPC or any other required communications other than for direct response. We also identified a few response partners in critical infrastructure that were not included in the emergency response plan or notification procedures like the National Weather Service. While Pinal County Office of Emergency Management discussed notifying the National Weather Service, it wasn't overtly stated in the plans. How we also discussed Union Pacific Railroad was in the footprint of the release zone and would need to be notified. So you'll see in the report, there's a recommendation for all facilities with hazardous materials to review your notification procedures for critical infrastructure within your footprint. There's also a requirement in the emergency response plan regarding submitting, reviewing, and approving a final written report for any release. And through our discussions, members weren't sure whether that was happening. So there's a recommendation to review that requirement and ensure that it's occurring. And then in general, there was strong knowledge about hazardous materials response for our primary responders, but there is some comments for additional need to build capacity, knowledge and training and procure equipment for monitoring for hazardous materials response. I'm going to run us through our recommendations and then I'll pause and bring up the report and ask for questions. But feel free if you have any comments about any of these bullets, please feel free to jump in. So a few recommendations for the LEPC. As I mentioned in that previous gap, looking at the notification procedures and which parties get notified once a facility advises of a hazardous materials release. Again, also reviewing the plan about those requirements to submit, review, and approve a final written report about a release. And so really the intention of these two are to make sure that if if the plan says the LEPC will do something, that it is being followed through on. There's also a recommendation to develop a quick reference guide or checklist of the roles and responsibilities within the emergency response plan for easier reference during an emergency event. And then a general recommendation to continue collaborative planning, training, and exercise activities. And then in general, for all of our facilities, even if you were not the lucky Abbott nutrition who had the release, we have the recommendation for all facilities with hazardous materials consistent with the SARA Title III planning requirements to review your emergency response plans and continue to prepare with the LEPC. that facilities with hazardous materials should ensure current property maps are available for first responders. Abbott did provide us with some great maps that enabled us to look at where that high pressure receiver was and enable Casa Grande Fire to talk about where they would stage and set up their decontamination areas. So making sure those current property maps are readily available in both hard and digital copies is important. There were also some discussions on which notifications laid within the responsibility of the dispatch center versus other response parties. So we recommend that all entities review protocols and notify, protocols to notify and share information with your response partners and to make sure that contact information is current, readily accessible and updated regularly. I typically recommend a quarterly update. It can be cumbersome, but at least bi-annually. And then it is the facility responsibility, the facility with the release to clean up and ensure proper environmental recovery. So we recommend that all facilities with hazardous materials review their plans to ensure that that is listed and that the procedures are documented to ensure that responsibility for cleanup following an incident. Then some other takeaways from the course of our discussions. was I think first and foremost to recognize the size of the geographic spread in the county. So from requesting resources both within county and outside of county up in Phoenix, some of the decontamination or hazardous materials response assets will take a long time, at least 45 minutes to an hour per day. So notifying any partners early in an event, even if it's just a standby or an FYI for your information early in an event, will enable your partners to start their activation procedures and prepare to respond. Travis joked that it was only 102 today, but based on that scenario of 119 or a day like today, 102, any responders working in personal protective equipment are going to need to be rotated out more quickly than in other cooler temperatures. So that will challenge our responders, require the need for rehab that we talked that American Red Cross or CERT can provide. So there are going to be some additional planning considerations when we have an incident during our extreme heat months. We talked about the need for evacuation or shelter in place in the surrounding area, and that our responders were able to talk through the actions, but needed to make sure that the plans were actually documented, especially regarding reentry. So allowing individuals back to their homes and making sure that anyone who's sheltered in place, especially during the hot temperatures, had a well check. And then finally, we talked about what that might look like for reunification if there is shelter operations needed or individuals are transported for medical care and the need for some additional local and county reunification planning and disaster assistance center planning. Okay, as I pull up, I'm gonna pull up our report and I'm gonna pause for any comments if those sound, in line with what you observed during the course of our discussions, or if there are any questions about any of those recommendations or observations. Hearing none, I'm going to scroll through and just orient you to the report in case you haven't had the chance to look at it, and then I'll pause again for more questions. So as I mentioned, this document is consistent with the framework that the Federal Emergency Management Agency requires for development, conduct, and evaluation of exercises. So you'll see, I'll try not to scroll too quickly, but an overview of the exercise, the date, location, the FEMA core capabilities and objectives that were exercised and our initial scenario. We also evaluate the completion or the meeting of these objectives. So you'll see here each exercise objective its associated FEMA core capability, and the rating that it was given. So P's are performed without challenge, S's performed with some challenges. And honestly, we should expect to identify some areas for improvement in any exercise. And that gives us the opportunity to continue to refine plans, identify additional training or equipment needs, and refine our processes. And then you'll see, oh, was there a comment?

I don't think so.

OK. So then you'll see the report is organized by core capability. So this first one being operational communication. You'll see the crosswalk objectives. And you'll see an analysis of activities based on this capability. So the first one is incident notifications. And you'll see a summary of the discussions, including strengths and challenges. And then you'll see identified recommendations. So I'm not going to go line by line through this. I'm just going to scan through and show you how the report is organized here. We looked at incident notifications. Ongoing operational communication and information sharing. The second capability is operational coordination, which is really the ability of the response partners to collaboratively respond with one another based on their plans. And we organize the analysis by Abbott Nutrition's initial on-scene response. First responder on-scene response. the operational coordination across responding entities, protecting the surrounding community, and medical response. And so for each one of these, again, there are identified recommendations, and those are all compiled at the end of this report in an improvement plan that I'll show you. The third capability tested was environmental response, health and safety. So our activities were to ensure the health and safety of responders and environmental recovery. Finally, we evaluated the core capability of public information and warning, and the activity was the use of a public information officer and joint information system. And then you'll see in Appendix A is our improvement plan. So we have taken each one of those activities, filed the corrective actions. And again, this is consistent with the FEMA guidance, identified the capability element around that, including planning, organization, equipment, training, or exercise. We assigned a primary party. and we identified a target date for completion. Some of these are ongoing, for example, updating contact information or participating in plan reviews and updates. But this will be a helpful roadmap for the LEPC as you look to update your emergency response plan and continue preparedness and mitigation activities. Appendix B lists our exercise participants. And Appendix C is a compilation of the participant feedback received. So we provided hard copy and electronic participant feedback forms. All of the responses were de-identified and compiled. And you can see here comments directly from the participants about the strengths, challenges, any equipment training policies, plans, procedures that should be reviewed and updated. additional comments and recommendations and feedback. So I'll pause now again and ask if there were any questions about the report or the exercise. If folks had additional comments or if you read the after action report and had edits, I welcome that from you.

I have a, this is Stuart Bremer. I have one kind of small question. Is there a inventory, I guess, listed anywhere with the LEPC as to, you know, in this case ammonia, you know, do we know how much quantity is in the county?

Travis, would you like to field that?

DEFER TO EXPERT? WE HAVE TIER 2 REPORTS. WE HAVE TIER 2 REPORTS. THAT'S CORRECT. IS IT TIER 2? YEAH, WE DO HAVE TIER 2 REPORTS. THANK YOU.

YEAH, THOSE THAT PARTICIPATE HAVE TIER 2 REPORTS, BUT AS FAR AS AN OVERALL QUANTITY WITHIN THE COUNTY, I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THAT, UNLESS SOMEONE CAN DO A RESEARCH TO FIND OUT HOW MUCH EACH JURISDICTION HAS.

Okay, I was just curious. I just didn't know if that was somewhat readily available.

That's a great question. While I have you there, I had one question also too. We spoke about during the after action about the Automatic aid versus mutual aid? I don't think we got in depth into that as far as the response capabilities for other jurisdictions responding to the incident as far as the notification. Automatic aid, when the incident calls out, it would automatically dispatch so many jurisdictions to the incident, depending on how large it may be. our local surrounding areas have mutual only. So someone will have to notify and contact other jurisdictions to assist with the incident. So that kind of raises questions. How are we with mutual versus ? Something to look at, I guess.

That's a good question. So we did in our discussions clarify and feel free, Garrett, or if somebody from Casa Grande fires on jump in, that the request would have to go through mutually that it is not automatic aid, correct? If you're requesting support from another jurisdiction?

Correct, that would be mutual. uh eddie are you guys on uh auto aid for anybody casagrande are you on the like the phoenix system we are on the phoenix system so we have we have plenty of support on for the maricopa area but i don't know if casagrande has that or any other i'm pretty sure they they they're self-dispatched and they just have mutually they might have auto aid agreements with like eloy but i i honestly don't know how far that reaches okay because the calsec system is a much it's it's a big machine you know in the valley and the phoenix areas you know they they got they got that stuff dialed in where it's all automatic if it's you know you got chief mooney on here he could have a call in his western jurisdiction but a mesa engine responding because they're the closest unit so it's a little i think it's a little bit different now we don't we don't have that kind of resources down there

Well, that's up to the research. See what we can do with that, how we can improve that. Liza, I guess.

So I'm hearing perhaps I could include a recommendation under the first responder activity to determine which jurisdictions have automatic aid versus mutual aid agreements.

Correct. Perfect.

This is Cori. I think that probably what would be best served in an exercise like this is to include your dispatch centers because they are the ones that would know exactly where to pull from.

That's a great recommendation, and I can also include that in that same section to consider including dispatch center staff in future exercises.

Yes, because even when we have areas that are unincorporated, Casa Grande is one of them that has an area with industrial supply and they, and our PSAP will have to contact various fire departments to respond to that area. It's not automatic aid and there is a lack of mutual aid in that area. And again, it's, I don't think the onus is strictly on LAPC. It's not strictly on emergency management. It has to be responders as well and what other higher levels of authority can agree upon on what needs to happen in those other areas where there is neither mutual or automatic aid.

Yeah, that's a good point too because there are areas south west of Casagrande, kind of like in a Stanfield area. That's just outside of Casagrande's jurisdiction. And most of the time, because they're busy, they don't go. And I don't blame them because it's a city department and they have limited resources. But most of the mutual aid agreements, like say if we were to go to somewhere in an unincorporated area that we normally don't serve, but we're the only department that is willing to go, I guess, we have to be on scene uh to mutual aid another agency and you know vice versa like uh what's that department out by you eddie is it thunderbird correct yeah same with them they're volunteer fire departments so stanfield and thunderbird are volunteers but typically like in order for them to kind of the mutual aid to kind of get kicked into gear the units have to be on scene like another agency has to be on scene asking for help otherwise that jurisdiction would just handle the call if that makes sense yeah yeah so there's a little bit of politics involved there's a little bit of municipal unincorporated nobody no man's land type of thing because i mean even rural metro doesn't we don't we don't service every unincorporated area in the state like not even close. So there's just some no man's lands out and it's unfortunate, but it is what it is.

Yeah. So bottom line is, yeah, automatic aid, you're going to get resources. Mutual aid is just a courtesy that they'll respond and may not respond. So that's something to look into.

And then I think to circle back to your first question about whether we have a full situational awareness of the chemicals on site. So there's the tier two reports, but are those individual by facility? And what I'm hearing is there's not one spreadsheet of all of the reports, or is that something that is an easily visible

This is Travis. I'll look into it to see if I, I'll ask some questions with my contacts to see if that is a list or something that's available or something that can be compiled, but I don't know the answer.

Okay. The good news is, is most of those facilities are in somebody's first due and they will have a PEP or pre-incident plan of that building with that number that you're looking at. I just don't think we have a total for the whole county.

And that's correct.

So I can add a recommendation, too, for the LAPC coordinator to discuss compiling a full spreadsheet of all of the submitted Tier 2 reports.

Travis, Michelle, Martinez could help you with that.

Right. Yeah. That's my contact.

Perfect.

Okay. I'm just making these notes. Any other suggestions, edits, requests, recommendations?

Man, appreciate your hard work. It was a good exercise.

Excellent. So let me just see our Our next steps, so I'll make those edits that we just came up with. We'll go ahead and we'll finalize the after action report and improvement plan. For Travis, there will be a vote on that in the next LEPC meeting. And then I appreciate everyone's participation and I would say exercises, keep everyone nimble and remind us what our plans say and what your responsibilities are and always bring up one or two things that we can work on. I recommend you continue to work on training and exercises together. And it doesn't necessarily have to be led by the LEPC. If there's an individual organization conducting their own exercise, you can always consider inviting your response partners or your neighboring organizations or businesses. So you could always use either Travis or Pinal County Office of Emergency Management as a conduit if you're looking to invite people to your exercises or find evaluators or participants.

I did have one, a couple of things actually. On the very last page for the feedback, it says on the second bullet point of the last additional feedback, should be done annually and not once every year as a minimum requirement i'm not sure if that is accurate because that says the same thing so i think we have a two-year requirement for exercising so perhaps that might be what they meant but that would probably need a little bit of clarification And also, too, because Abbott Nutrition approached us to utilize their facility and exercise to be conducted by the LEPC, we want to make sure that Abbott Nutrition is good with this and this produces a product that they can utilize and meets their objectives and expectations as well.

Thank you, Cori.

Thank you. I included people's comments as is, but I might just, I'll just eliminate that second part and just say should be done annually.

Our requirement is every two years. That is our LEPC.

And we do try to do annually just to make sure that we keep up.

So it's fine to make the recommendation.

Yeah, to be done annually.

That's great. That'll work. And I will defer to you. I didn't want to edit people's comments. So if there are any edits that you would like to make, please feel free to let me know and I can change them. But these are the people's comments as they were. Okay, if there are no other comments, I welcome if there's probably, I don't know, Travis, if you want to give, maybe we'll follow up directly with Abbott to make sure that they confirm that they've had the opportunity to review this. And maybe if folks want to take until mid of next week or end of next week with any other feedback, but otherwise we'll go ahead and we'll close this out and I will yield the floor.

Thank you, Eliza. Absolutely. So we will present it to Abbott. I'll make contact with Marty Moon. He's not here today. Not sure why it happened, but we'll do that. And yes, please, if anyone else has other comments or suggestions or they can submit those to me or to our mailbox, sorry, our Office of Emergency Management mailbox. Okay. Thanks, Eliza.

Thank you.

Okay, let's move on. We just have a few more items on our agenda, future agenda items. Are there any items the voting members would like to add to the next quarterly meeting agenda? We will have the after action report on that agenda. We'll need to approve those recommendations But besides the after action report, are there any other things that you'd like to bring forward at the next meeting? I think the after action report will give us enough to talk about it. Okay, if there are no additional items to add. Next agenda item is individual voting member announcements. So this is the time for any, voting members to address the committee with information related to their organizations. Does anyone have any announcements? I'm sure. Okay, thank you. Our next agenda item is call to the public. So time for any non-voting members, including members of the public, to address the committee on matters related to the LEPC. Any members of the public? Non-voting members? OK, let's move on. Last agenda item is our next meeting date and location, which is our quarterly meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 5, 2026, from 3 to 4 PM, right here in the Pinal County EOC or, as always, on Google Meet. And this meeting is adjourned, everyone, at 3.52 p.m. Thank you, everyone. Yeah, thanks, guys. Great afternoon. You too. Thank you. Take care.

I know I have to stop.