About this meeting
- Government Body
- 16 Budget and Finance Committee
- Meeting Type
- 16 Budget And Finance Committee
- Location
- Maui County, HI
- Meeting Date
- April 23, 2026
Transcript
2179 sections (from 2,492 segments)
Welcome to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It is now 09:06 a. M. And we're on April, getting down to the crunch and countdown for this BFED committee. I'd like to welcome everybody. My name is Yuki Lei Sugimura. I'm the chair of this committee. This meeting is being conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law. If you are not in the chambers, it looks like everybody is here. If you do leave this and join our meeting again, please identify if there are any minors with you in your workspace and or people in your workspace, but minors do not need to be identified.
Good morning, Vice Chair Batangen. Aloha Kakahioca Chair members. Good morning. Member Cook, good morning.
Aloha, good morning, Chair.
Good morning, Mr. Johnson.
Good morning, Chair, Councilmembers, Committee members. There's no testifiers at the Lanai District Office. I'm here and ready to work. Thank you.
Chair Lee, good morning. Bonjour. I'm learning how to speak French. Good morning.
Member Palton.
Aloha and bonjour Kakou. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Day four of decisions week. No testifiers at the Molokai district office. Mahalojar.
Good morning, member Senensi.
Good
morning, member Oh Jens. Aloha, Bonjour, everyone. Good
morning. Assisting us with today's meeting is the BFED committee staff. Thank you very much. I'm not too sure what time you all slept last night but after we ended our meeting at about 09:00, they continued on working to get ready for today. We have also invited resource persons from the administration including budget director and deputy court counsel Wigglesworth.
Thank you for being with us. Please see the last page of the agenda for information on meeting connectivity. Thank you members for attending today's BFID committee meeting and we have one item on the agenda. It is BFED one proposed fiscal year twenty seven budget for the county of Maui. Today we will continue deliberations for the fiscal year twenty seven budget.
We will start our discussion by revisiting Department of Water Supply to correct two discrepancies and continue on with the office of the mayor followed by the Department of Police and works. Once we finish all departments, I would like to take up revisits, followed by countywide costs, general budget provisions, and additional legislation. I have asked staff to distribute exhibit one or provide a summary of where we are from our last few days of meetings. Would you like to give a summary, staff?
Yes, Chair. So just briefly, as the exhibit one's being passed out, I guess we just wanted to talk a little bit about, where the committee is in terms of, ads and cuts. So, by staff's current, calculations, you know, and this is just just to be, transparent. It's the these totals account for all cuts and all ads. So even those related to like the water fund that the committee did yesterday and bond fund, things like that.
So right now, the committee stands at just about $30,000,000 in cuts and just over $40,000,000 in ads. So about an $11,000,000 difference right there. But again, just so the committee is aware, it's that accounts for all funds. So there's still an imbalance in the general fund that the committee will need to address once well, depending on what the committee does today, get
that done. Done. Accompany it and more. So I am hopeful able that we're going to end up with a budget that's lower than the one proposed by the mayor as we go through all the departments. We still have not gone through all the departments. As you know today we're going to revisit Department of Water Supply and then continue on with Office of the Mayor followed by Department of Police and Public Works. So I'm going to open public testimony. Yes, Member Johnson.
Can I ask James if he has a general fund difference?
Yes, you can.
Yes, sure. So, admittedly, so staff does balance, every night, but just, you know, just to make sure that we still need to do like a final review once everything's said and done. But right now, our calculations is the committee is about $17 over in the general fund $17 $17,000,000 in the General Fund, sorry. Thank you. Okay.
So we have more work to do. I'm going to read the testimony instructions because I can see some of our friends in the chamber. So I'm assuming they're going to be have signed up for testimony. So testifiers wanting to provide testimony should sign up with staff and join the online meeting with the team's link or call in the phone number noted on today's agenda. Testimony is on the budget and is not limited to the departments that we have scheduled today.
Written testimony is encouraged and can be submitted via the e comment link at mauicounty.us/agendas as well. Under the sunshine law, the chair will receive oral testimony for agenda items at the beginning of the meeting. And for individuals wishing to testify via Teams, please raise your hand by clicking on the raise your hand button. If calling in, please follow the prompt via phone 5 to raise your hand or lower and 6 to mute and unmute. Staff will add names to the testifiers list and the order testifiers sign up or raise their hands.
For those on Teams, staff will lower your hand once your name is added. Staff will then call the name you're logged in under or the last four digits of your phone number when it is your time to testify. At this time, staff will also encourage you to enable your microphone and video. Please ensure your name appears on Microsoft Teams as the name you prefer to be referred to or as anonymous if you wish to testify anonymously. If you're in person, please notify staff that you would like to testify anonymously.
Otherwise, please state your name for the record at the beginning of your testimony. Oral testimony is limited to three minutes per item and if you are still testifying beyond the time, I will kindly ask you to complete your testimony. You'll be given another thirty seconds. We have one item on the agenda so you have three minutes to testify. Once you're done testifying or if you do not wish to testify, you can view also view the meeting on Akaku, Channel fifty three, Facebook Live, or maulicounty.us/agendas. We will do our best to take each person up in an orderly fashion and will now call on testifiers wishing to testify. Staff, please call the first testifier.
Chair, the first testifier is Peter Cannon to be followed by Tapani Viore.
Good morning, council.
Good morning.
My name is Peter Cannon. I was born in Pa'ia, raised in Malaya. I'm going to be 80 years old this year. Uh-huh. I'm a local Hawley. My mother and my father both graduated from Maui High. My grandmother, over a hundred years ago, was in the first graduating class of Maui High. I'm in generation five. I know a little bit about Maui. I wanna leave the wastewater testimony to my colleagues.
I wanna talk about the history of Malaya. After World War two, Iluka Sugar made maybe a dozen one acre lots down a dirt road in Malaya on sugarcane land that was too salty for cane. We had 10 houses there when I was a kid. My great grandmother lived four doors down. We had a grand uncle, grand aunt, and another grand aunt, three and two horses houses down. We had family there. Had We a beautiful home. My parents put two plantation houses, surplus houses from the camps together and made a nice three three bedroom home. Life was beautiful. We had sand on the beach.
We had all the limos you can you can think of. We had exotic corals. We had opi right on the shoreline in the in the in the limo. We had shells, baby fish, crabs, lobsters, octopus. We had sea life everywhere. Malaya was much better than a hee hee or Molokini because we had all the corals. We had a protected fish incubator there. What happened? Old decision makers, bad decisions. Admiral Cravaggio in the sixties wanted to build infrastructure for tourism.
Our property was his own apartment from being a home. So what happened? All the owners in Malay were taxed as if we had a resort on our property. Everybody in my life had two choices, sell or or build. They they they weren't building workforce housing. They weren't building millionaire homes. They were building infrastructure for tourism. They were building hotel rooms for the kitchen. We were taxed out of our home. The condos came.
Each had its own injection well wastewater system dictated by the county and the state, and injection well wastewater system. How does injection well work? At the time, this was high-tech. This was top of the line technology. In hindsight, it was a disaster. How does it work? The plant separates the solids from the liquids. The liquids get pumped on a hole. The hole's 80 feet, 60 feet from the from the ocean. Sewer water is going directly into Malaya Bay. Why did tourists come here? This is the economic engine of Maui. Why did tourists come? What do they do when they come here? Fixing this problem should be a very high priority for this council.
And one final thought, the condominiums of Malaya have all the permissions and permits that we need from the state of Hawaii to flush our toilets, human waste, into Malaya Bay for as long as we want via injection wells. Thirty seconds. We can flush all we want. We don't have to care. We prefer to do the right thing. The MVA and the regional wastewater system is the right thing. And we should have champions on this council to do the right thing. This is like getting rid of 600 cesspools. And what we've learned and the technology that we've come across can help eliminate cesspools all around Maui with small little regional systems. Work with us.
We can tell you how to fix Hailee'emaili and other places where there's clusters of homes. Thank you.
I have a question.
Thank you, Mr. Cannon. Member Coke has a question for you.
You, Mr. Cannon. A ballpark, how deep are the injection wells? I'm just curious.
They're into the groundwater, somewhere like 50 feet, 60 feet.
Yes. I mean, it's like so right now, for clarification, everything is technically legal as far as the State Department of Health is going.
We have no incentive to do anything but flush our toilets away. We're flushing it.
That's correct. Well, I wouldn't put you in that. We don't have any
The timeframe has been laid out by the MBA and their timeline there, but we're falling behind because of certain things happening that have been roadblocks for us. But the timeline is, I think, we could have a if we had all the permitting today, could be done in two years. We had a survey done and we learned that it was far cheaper to build a regional plant right there in Malaya than it was to take the water uphill to Wailuku, the Central Maui system is going to be. We have that study from 2014.
Thank you, sir. Any
other questions? Seeing none. Thank you. Nice
Thank seeing you, Greg.
Next testifier. Chair, the next testifier is Tapani Viore to be followed by David Whitney.
Morning. Honorable chair, vice chair, council members. My name is Tapanik Vouri. I'm the board member of Malay Village Association. Many of you may know me as the general manager of Mahoyalcen Center as well.
I actually have multiple roles in the community. I'm also the founder and president of MOC Marine Institute. I was very involved with the Mala Amauka trust land issue, which do own. And able to to part of the state of Hawaii coral reef task force. I'm currently working with TNC, the nature conservancy and the state of Hawaii, setting up parametric insurance policy for the state of Hawaii for the protection of coral reefs for the entire state.
I watched the video on the hearing on the twenty first and some of the things I wanted to clarify. Number one, this is a holistic ecosystem restoration project. Instead of transactional, very myopic solution, this is actually generational solution. It will benefit future generations and it addresses the entire ecosystem issues. Excessive sedimentation, excessive nutrients are the two main drivers for nearshore marine ecosystem degradation.
We have now addressed the excessive sedimentation. I had discussions with Doug Spencer when he owned the land and multiple conversations with Peter Martin when he owned the land. Gratefully, he decided to sell to Maui County through TPL and now it's under DOFA. So Scott and Lance are writing a restoration plan for that. So that's step number one. Step number two is addressing the excessive nutrients. SRF funding came up. We met with Mayor Victorino. He actually specifically asked us to forfeit our number six place on the SRF funding that the state of Hawaii and EPA provided for us for the Maui County to do the projects under SRF. That was $9,500,000 That is the commitment that Mayor Victorino did.
Mayor Bissen has committed to covering that on the budget line items. I realize it's up to the my county council of course to approve this if they see value in it. He put as we know 1,250,000 last year. And that along with the federal EPA grant of $1,000,000 with a private donation of quarter million dollars allows us to go shovel ready. That money has been delayed.
Actually that was voted last year. A month ago, we got the first tranche of $400,000 on that. So I will ask our wastewater engineer to talk a little bit more about that. Central Maui came up and we work with Shane on issues. I read the ten twenty four pages of EA recently and there is no conveyance coming to Malaya.
There is no R1 reuse water, which we are also providing. Plus we have been in discussions with the fire department and DOFA lands on managing the land. So we will have enough water to create a fire breaks and really have that more holistic solution. There's many, many things to add to that. So I yield my time back to the council.
Thank you.
Thank you. Any questions for Mr.
See none. You
the for work you do in the community as you mentioned.
Thank you. It's a community working together. Thank you.
Next is a choir.
Chair, the next testifier is David Whitney to be followed by Jeff Yoka.
Good morning. Thanks for having me.
Good morning.
I wrote my comments down because I tend to ramble. So my name is David Whitney. I'm a civil engineer. And my company, ECO Solutions, is based here on Maui. I've been working in wastewater, in the wastewater industry, over twenty five years.
I also teach two wastewater courses at Maui College. I've worked with the Ma'alai Village Association for approximately three years now on the Ma'alai Regional Wastewater Reclamation System, of the Directors It of currently has less than 5% living coral on its reef and the ecosystem is severely degraded. The primary stressors impacting the water quality within the bay are sentiment resulting from storm water runoff during rain events such as the recent Kona lows that we experienced, and nutrients. Nutrients such as nitrogen are found in the stormwater runoff and they flow on the ground surface. Additional sources of nutrients
sorry, additional sources of nutrients
are are found wastewater in groundwater. That groundwater also flows into the ocean. The primary sources of those nutrients are wastewater from injection wells and other disposal methods such as leach fields, cesspools,
We
have a significant significant significant impact impact on the achieved here in Hawaii or elsewhere in The US to my knowledge. DLNR's Division of Forestry and Wildlife is actively restoring the dry land forest on the Mauka side of the highway in their Pohoka restoration project. This helps to address much of the sediment that flows in storm water. Maui County is also working on the Cano Stream restoration on the Makai side of the highway, which would eliminate the concrete line channel that currently directly discharges storm water into the ocean. And instead, they would restore the historic natural flow path back to its previously existing discharge toward Calia Salt Pond.
Our wastewater project will eliminate the flow of wastewater into groundwater and repurpose it for irrigation to support a greenbelt and firebreak that will be planted with native plant species and can function as a riparian buffer to protect and enhance the redirected canal stream. Maatlaia is rated as one of the highest risk challenges do. A to the We're a we can optimize the orientation that of that basin challenges so that it can be accessed by helicopters fighting wildfires. And we plan to also add two dry hydrants so that the tanker trucks can utilize the water within the basin to fight fires. These combined efforts will not only help to regenerate Mauna Lai Bay, they'll also minimize the potential impacts from natural disasters and emergencies from occurring within the Mauna Lai community that would be similar to what we've witnessed from recent storm damage in Kihei and the devastating loss that was observed during the COVID-nineteen We're going continue see
COVID-nineteen the How's We're your relationship and their integration to into this? They're excellent. Yeah. We've had great communication, great overlap. Supportive. About the Department of Health? Permits and whatnot, have they been supportive? Are there any issues?
Department of Health is they're working with us. Nice.
Yeah. What's the current status of the project?
So as Tapani mentioned, we received our initial funding from last year's appropriation this March. We're currently working on the DOH permit plan set. We have a one year timeline for design and permitting and then a one year anticipate timeline for construction. That's all pending funding.
Thank you. You're welcome.
Any more questions? Member Paulton followed by Member Cook I'm sorry, Member Johnson then Rollins Fernandez.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you for your testimony. From Mayor Victorino and Mayor Bissing's commitment, I believe there's a gap in the funding. How do you propose to make up that gap?
Sure. So, you know, we actually have a frequently asked questions packet, that's available.
Did you turn that in as testimony?
No. I don't know how to do that, but I I have it and I can't
Maybe just try give it to that lady with the glasses.
Sure, I can leave it after I answer these. All right. So for just the financial status on the project, for clarity, the total cost is estimated to be between $12,480,000 and $16,140,000 So this is increased from the original SRF, which was $9,500,000 I watched yesterday's testimony and I agree that the longer that this project gets kicked out, the higher the project costs will be, which is part of our $2,500,000 ask, which is to purchase long lead equipment items so that we can we have a known cost now as opposed to waiting and purchasing that in the future. We have a breakout we're
question.
Then And with with dollars match from the donors. So that's $2,500,000 then We're asking for $2,500,000 which would be $5,000,000 And we also submitted a NIFWIP grant with other regional partners that addresses the holistic ecosystem restoration. We have $1,500,000 in there. So if I did my math right, we're at $6,500,000 So we are working with the EPA's COAG group, which is closing America's wastewater access gap. They are working with us to do a fiscal impact study, one, two, so that we can come up with a financial plan so that the cost that will be paid by the Ma'alai'a community members to operate the system in perpetuity is comparable to county costs for wastewater.
They are helping us to find finance funding through USDA and other federal grants. We're also pursuing additional private donations and other grants that come up. If you know of anything else.
And so you're leveraging the county's contribution with these other partners?
We have leveraged the initial $1,250,000 for the NIFWF grant. So Amy Hodges wrote a letter in support of this this morning where she acknowledges that in that NIFWF grant, the NIFWF grant, our partners are DOFA, Maui Nui Marine Resource Council, Hawaii Wildlife Foundation, MOCMI, and then Ma'a'a Village Association.
Thank you so much for your work.
You're welcome.
Thank you. Member Johnson followed by Member Rollins Fernandez.
Thank you, Chair. Thanks for your testimony. You seem very question. Question. Ir And that's that's
Feds use? Not necessarily. Okay.
So the NIFWIF is Fed money?
It is. So is the EPA. Right.
So you do have some Fed monies. Does that is there a season for that? Like I always thought October was the time the NIFWAF issues monies and accepts applications. Is there a season to the to when you can act get the money and access it?
I personally don't know. I mean, I'd have to rely on our coag counterparts, which they kind of direct
us and give
us a heads up. Yeah. Wish all of our budget times aligned. It would make it a little bit easier. Yeah. But I I it's hard to apply for one and you don't know because the timing is off on everything. So the total thing is between 12,000,000 and $16,000,000 and you're going to pass out the frequently asked questions. Forward look to that. Thanks for that. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Aloha, Ms. Whitney. Mahalo for your testimony and for whatever written Q and A you provided, to our staff for us to review later. I was the one that made the motion to remove the the funding, and, I'm happy to hear you share with us, exploring different funding pots. One of the things one of the reasons that I, moved to, remove the funding is because of the privatizing the profits and socializing the externalized cost to taxpayers.
So I guess to clarify, the 9,500,000 in SRF that mayor former mayor of Victorino asked that you not pursue, I guess when it was alluded to that, the full picture of it, it would need to be owned by the county, and then the county would pay the debt service on that. So it's not like it would have been cost that Ma'alaya Village Association and residents there or the property owners there would have paid themselves, correct?
My understanding and once again, I wasn't a part of the SRF funding award, but I came in at the tail end of it. My understanding was that Mayor Victorino was going to offer a grant in the amount in the equivalent amount to the SRF funding, which was $9,500,000 to Ma'alaya so that they could privately do the wastewater treatment.
Yes. So that would have still been taxpayer dollars, not the owners of the units paying for the cost of the conversion from injection injection wells, right? Okay. So you're supportive of increasing property tax rates to generate the revenue necessary to cover some of that cost?
A civil engineer testifying on how to address wastewater treatment.
Mahalo for your testimony. Mahalo, Jair.
Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none. Thank you very much for the education. So we look forward to your pass it on. Thank you. Next testifier.
Chair, the next testifier is Jeff Yoka. Will be followed by Kekai Robinson.
Good morning, everyone.
Good morning.
Keep it quick. I know you guys have a couple of things to do today. Jeff Uioca was kinda monitoring yesterday about Honani Village. Just wanted to clarify, the Honani Village perspective and the timing of everything. So, we're really hoping to get that water, system developed and brought up parts in existing well that we're hoping to convert. There's gonna be a lot of, you know, work and testing just to get the, you know, everything going. Then you gotta go to see worm. There's a whole bunch of steps. We're just hoping to start that process. As those guys mentioned, you know, anytime you need governmental approvals, you know, it takes time. The quick the sooner fact not
We're not to do going
that. Push do that back a little bit. The other to interesting thing about this system is the goal is to develop it with the county. So we're gonna hopefully get this grant, do a lot of the legwork, and then work with the Department of Water Supply to put it onto the county system. So even if for some horrible reason, Honani Village does not proceed, the county's 23 acres is right there, and this water system or this water source and storage and all that stuff and transmission lines eventually.
But this isn't for transmission lines. This is just for the source and the storage and the pumps and the brains that run the pumps. That would all be county assets. It would connect to the central system, and, you know, the Department of Water Supply could utilize the source and transmission. So so I wanted to clarify that for everybody.
Thank you. Any questions? Member Palton.
Have you begun, like, just clarifying, you said you hope to develop this project with the county as partners. Have you begun speaking with the Department of Housing as a partner?
The Department of Housing for this water system. We talked to the Department of Water Supply, and very high level, said, Sure, of course we'd be interested, but, we wanna see the numbers first, of course. And that's what we're hoping that this will help us get those numbers, design the whole system.
Very high level. I thought you spoke with DEM, and they had capacity, and then they told us yes the day before yesterday, there wasn't. So just So maybe talk holistically with everybody. But that's my thoughts on high level conversations.
I I guess, if I may respond. Respond. Sure. So I I would say DEM and DWS a little different. I'm fairly confident housing is always gonna tell me they would like workforce housing on the market. So I think we can work with them. I'm not really worried about the department of housing coming and telling me. No. We don't need anymore.
I think you should Of course. I'll be
Oh, okay. Sorry. And I mean
DM, I just in the details.
Yeah. I was I was listening yesterday and just there was comment and a letter submitted when we were in your committee from DEM. And I think consistent with the message, I think director testimony and in the letter to, your committee in response to the question was, in 2029 and 2030, they are anticipating central to be online. Once that happens, there's gonna be a lot of capacity. And then, therefore, we're supposed to be online in around late two thousand twenty nine, mid two thousand twenty nine for Honani Village for the first phase only. Right?
How often do we re do we hit our timelines, target timelines in in your experience?
I have no comment on that. No. Thank you. But I will say he also did comment in the letter that and I I have had discussions with people in DM that currently they're looking at other efficiencies at the colloid treatment plant. So there is the potential for an increase in capacity in the next few months. But no
one will give
me a rock solid answer on that until they have good data, and they are they're in the process of it right now. I think they're they're trying their best to make things happen. I truly believe that.
Oh, yeah, I agree. Thank you.
Thanks. Okay. Member Batang and then Lee.
Thank you, Chair. Mr. Ruoka, can I ask whether or not this water project is necessary for the subdivision of the TMK that Ho'angani has proposed to be built on impact first
see impact And transportation base yard is? So currently, the whole Nani village team is pursuing a large lot subdivision for those five lots, I believe. One belongs to a and b, which is like a basin. The county's 23 acres is in there. Khoenani Village is a 165 acres and Emio.
And then there's that you know what a sugar museum is? That's another condo unit. So it's all gonna be subdivided. This project, no, it has nothing to do with that large lot subdivision. If we were to try and get that large or we are trying to get that large lot subdivision, we're trying to work to defer the improvements because for the large lot subdivision, you just need to run utilities for one dwelling. And even though we could do that, it makes no sense because we're not going to build one dwelling on the 165 acres. And MEO already has their meter. So nothing to do with it. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, members. I don't think I made the connection between the projects and potential conflicts when we were discussing this yesterday. But based on the conversation we're just having now, I still don't think I have a conflict. I will ask my staff to reach out to Board of Ethics just to confirm that.
Okay. Shirley.
Hello, Mr. Uyoka. I'm wondering if you have time. I'm not sure when this is going to come up, but it would be helpful to have you in case we have any additional questions.
I can be available. I can't stay here all day,
though. Okay.
Well, you had your chance.
Thank you.
Well, if you can, I mean, you just monitor, I
mean Absolutely? I'll be available, but I got to go do some things.
Okay. Thank you. Else has questions? Member Rollins Fernandez. Chair, just a question for you. Hello for your testimony, mister Oyoka. But we haven't had resource folks just budget director. So if you're gonna open that door
That's true. That's true.
You can just text, Charlie.
Yeah. Like, the rest of
our resources do text us, and then we convey the information ourselves.
So we can text you.
That sounds perfect. Thank you all. Best of luck.
Go back to work. Any more questions? Seeing none. Next testifier.
Chair, the next testifier is Kekai Robinson, by Dean Callahan.
Morning,
Robinson, deputy OEV Resources. Here to testify in strong support of Makahiki and the funding request for Makahiki. Makahiki marks the time of year aligned with the rising of the Makali'i. It is traditionally a season dedicated to community recognition of peace and abundance. It also functions as something practical.
It organizes people. It activates space. And in with county support, it can also, be a driver for economic activity. Makahiki is a comprehensive cultural system encompassing spirituality, governance, environmental stewardship, and community cohesion. Makahiki is not a single event asking for funding.
It is an existing countywide seasonal opportunity that we can choose to support. The request is an opportunity for the county of Maui to support a cohesive Makahiki driven by community grants that celebrate and elevate Makahiki on all four of Maui Nui's islands. It is a direct investment into the community leaders who already conduct ceremony, education, and seasonal programs. The question, is it just games? Highlights a gap in understanding and exposes a common misconception that reduces Makahiki to its most visible components.
While the athletic competitions are often what people see today and enjoy and have fun with, they are only one part of a much larger, highly structured cultural, spiritual, and governance system. Makahiki historically governed cycles of resource management, tribute collection, collection, and accountability between leaders and community while reinforcing a reciprocal relationship with Aina. The celebrations are expression of discipline, preparedness, ancestral and environmental connection, and communal identity. I mahalo you folks for considering that.
Nice to see you here. Thank you for your testimony. Lovely see you all. Member Rollins Fernandez. Member Bolton.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Deputy Robinson. I just wanted to clarify because I think Makahiki season is under both the as well as your department budget. And I think we've left your department, but we may go back for corrections tomorrow. So the Makahiki season funding that you're specifically testifying about today is the one under the mayor's and not the one under yours? That's correct. The Makahiki appropriation under Department of Wavy Resources is, I believe, $20,000, and that is a a county employee celebration that we have on the lawn where the public is also invited if they so happen to be in
the area. But it's mostly to create cohesion amongst our our colleagues here at the county inviting everyone out of their offices and into the sunlight. The funding that I am referencing is for the office of the mayor. It is a larger approach to Mankahiki that we are working in collaboration with.
The one on the lawn in your department is only for the Waileuku employee?
Kinda sorta. But, you know, we had a winner from Molokai of the Kui contest. Shout
out. I shout out.
Yeah. Yeah. Molokai has been training for Makahiki for generations.
I I did see the the water department giving hard rubs.
Oh, yeah. Water department. Or if you had a rep, we'd like to see more of our council members out there, we appreciate you for its time. Everybody came out to celebrate. It was really nice. So, yes, it is in Wailuka. We hope that this larger approach to Makahiki will allow us to give community grants to folks that are celebrating Makahiki on all the islands, and if they're not, to help organize that on all of the islands and in a lot of our districts. Not just games. It will be ceremony as well, front end and back end.
And it's completely separate from anything the emerging schools do because we cannot mix random adults with other people's children. Separate. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions? Member Rollins Fernandez. Mahalo, chair. Mahalo, deputy director, for your your testimony this morning. So, it sounds like what you explained to us in your testimony, the lack of understanding of Makahiki is kinda underscores the necessity of the funding itself.
Correct. Yes. We very much believe that and look at this as an opportunity to educate our community on the movement of the seasons. Our traditional people here, our indigenous people, we move by those seasons. We live by those seasons.
We are directly connected to those. Being good observers of the environment can allow us to to be a better community altogether. You know, the accountability portion of leadership for Muckahiki is so it has been so important in the past as well, And the ceremonial recognition of that, the, you know, creating a specialness, a respect, and a sacredness of the season, of the acknowledgments, I think, you know, it will it will encourage that direction in our in our people. And so, you know, the county has this opportunity to, you know, provide for that cohesively and guide that, or we can, you know, continue to just leave it under resourced, and everybody's kinda doing their separate things. So Kaho'olawi has been celebrating Makahiki for years since the return of, Kaho'olawi and from before that.
Celebrations have been taking place on Molokai. Here in Wailuku in the valley, Makahiki season is opened and closed. I'd be happy to share some amazing stories about ways that have moved the guidance they have received during the season.
Mahalo for that. Mahalo for that mana'o. So important as we watch America bomb the Middle East and fund the bombing throughout that region. That what I understand you saying is that Hawaiian culture, culture is not just ornamental in the games that people see. That there is a deeper importance to it. Mahalo. Polalehiq. Mahalo, deputy director. Mahalo Jaram.
Thank you. Member Oo Hajans.
Aloha. Thank you for being with us. I'm looking at the answer that was requested, and I know it's not your guys' office, that we asked this to because you guys had the smaller budget. This is a million dollar budget. A 150 for marketing and then $8.50 for, I'm assuming, the events or whatever may come. If you can answer, I would appreciate it. If you cannot, that's okay. I didn't see where somebody was assuming it was just games. I think I was trying to figure out how this money was gonna be spent down. So do you know, like, what the $1.50 and if you don't, that's okay. We'll cover and then what the $8.50 will cover?
Mahalo for that question. Yes. I think that the office can probably answer better than I can. My understanding in our coordination work with the office, the mayor is that the 150 is for marketing and that the $8.50 would be distributed in the form of grant funding to community organizations that are conducting Makahiki and to grow that.
Okay. Do you know and I can ask, but do you know how many grants they're planning on doing with the eight I don't know. Okay. That's okay. Thank you.
Thank you. Any more questions? Seeing none. Thank you very much for being here. Appreciate Next testifier, please.
Chair, the next testifier is Dean Callahan to be followed by Travis Liggett.
Hello. Thank you. My name is Dean Callahan, and I'm coming to you from Baltimore, Maryland, of all places. And the reason for that is because of Travis Liggett, who, as it turns out, is coming on after me because, I guess, I was a little bit too eager to talk, which my friends will tell you is always the case. But what what I wanna talk about is is algae, or as I've heard from Travis, a lot of people call algae limu, a native term.
The kind I'm talking about is freshwater limu or algae. And what I really wanted to leave you with is sort of a feeling for what algae can do. I guess the main background for this is there's an industrial process that I call and many people call algal turf scrubbing, works great with nutrient rich water like R1 water. Algae a highly biodiverse classification of organisms. The ones I'm talking about are ubiquitous.
If you ever work outside in the sun with nutrient rich water, you'll know that algae are practically impossible to get rid of if that's what you want, which if you turn that around, algal turf scrubbing, which is my professional interest, is a way of capturing algae or freshwater limu in this case, the photosynthetic kind, keeping it trapped in place while it rapidly grows in the nutrient rich water. It's you can think of it as a solar powered bio filter, if you like. And I know many of you must know this. Travis has been working on this project for many years and has been trying to encourage people to adopt this technology. It's not radical.
It's not new. It's actually very low tech, very reliable. There are a few people queued up in the testifiers log who were my colleagues and have done actually much more than I have in this area. But essentially, algae their professional interest, if you want to put it that way, is they eat nutrients from water as fast as
they
can until there's essentially almost nothing left for them to eat. And so they can they can take your r one water down to extremely low concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus. In fact, my my last project, I I built a test system at a campus in Germany where we had essentially what you might call German R1 water. It's a secondary treated sewage and the algae just grow like like mad on this stuff and produce, you know, potentially useful, but not not required to be used. It could be just, you know, disposed of, but nontoxic solid waste biomass.
And so I'll also are going to talk about this. This is all Travis will probably explain this all as the next speaker. Thank you.
Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you very much. Next testifier, please. Thank
you. Chair, the next testifier is Travis Liggett, to be followed by Stevie Catherine Chung.
Hello, good morning chair and council members. Thank you for hearing me yet again. I brought some friends this time. And yeah, we're here representing LIMO. And yeah, I think it's really exciting because I just want you to know that these researchers in this field, it's not a high paying field. It's not the oil industry. It's LIMO. Patents have been just surrendered. It's closer to a social group and like people who are really into a certain organism and there's just a real counterpart to that in Hawaiian culture. And yeah, I frame it like well it's either algae getting or lemutopia.
You either get this process in the ocean or you do it in a controlled burn. That's the basic idea. And in nature, we have the freshwater limu onshore. And it's just a really elegant solution to the nitrogen, TN daily limit and the NPT ES permit. And just so people understand, what does that Supreme Court ruling say? It says if it goes in the ocean, it has to match the water quality standard of the ocean. That's it. And the ocean has very low nutrient standards. And I remember when I talked to Doctor. K Aloha, she gave me that MPDES permit.
We were like, does this insanely low limit come from? We didn't understand it. Had to back out the math. And we were like, Wow, the activists did it. Design flow times 8.34 times the ocean water quality standard. It's beautiful. It's just like you would model an organism when you're connecting two organs. If it's going into the liver, it has to match the liver. That's how an organism works. And so, yeah, a personal story. When I lost my best friend, twenty fifteen, there was really only one way to go but up. I called an old NASA colleague. I said there's gotta be a solution to this algae, this nutrient problem. Turn beyond deter scrubbers. I just called Dean, who you just heard from.
Didn't really tell him what was going on with me personally. It was just so emotionally weighty. And he was just the kindest person to me ever. He gave me all the time in the world. Had no idea what I was going through because it was a professional setting. It kind of saved my life. I haven't given up. That was 2015, and it was seven years ago today I marched up in here with that bottle of limu, which has now gone to Sandia. And you're gonna hear from, I believe, a Sandia researcher in the room. And, yeah, this project was grown under a Sandia contract in Ma'alaya.
We're now scaling it up to municipal scale. The work is already in play. So the seven year plan proposed in the PERC AF, P R C A F, in the motion that I have given in previous written testimony. It's just a seven year plan. It's very normal for municipalities to take that much time to implement a solution to a very stringent new limit, and it just meets the moment.
All these activists, they wanted to see innovation. Here's the innovation served up on a platter. You just have to, select to pursue it and take a little risk even though it may on paper in a spreadsheet increase theoretical exposure in other areas. It's just a way forward which is to solve it. Thank you.
You Mr. Leggett. Any questions? Seeing none. Thank you. Member Coke has a question for you. Mr. Leggett, are you still there?
Hi, Mr. Leggett. The the limo eats and digests nitrogen. What do you do with the limo? What hap I'm just curious what that cycle is. It's a great question.
Sandy, So, from the lab, yeah, very briefly, you can do almost anything with that biomass, including if you calculate how much wastewater is produced in the world, and you calculate how much nutrient pollution is ruining the environment, and you calculate how much biomass can be produced by that, it actually is a very significant source globally that could significantly take a bite out of the requirement or even interest in taking it out of the ground because fossil fuels is not dinosaurs. It's plant biomass and a specific type because of how it forms and deposits. I definitely believe it settles
bottom of
the water
I interrupt you, I don't have time for chemistry class.
You can replace the
I said briefly. His question.
I don't mean to be rude. I just I just a brief question. So does it go in the soil and the soil digested? Mean
That is one of the things that we can do in fact when I first started thinking about the greenbelt in Ma'alaya.
So Mr. Lee, let's talk to you. We'll have a future conversation. This is just a clarifying question. All my colleagues are encouraging me to call him. I'll talk to you later. Thank you.
Thank you. Next testifier.
Yes, Chair. The next testifier is Stevie Catherine Chung, to be followed by Peter May.
Aloha County Council. My name is Stevie Catherine Chung, and I am running for District Thirteen's County Council Chair in this twenty twenty six election. There have been a good number of people in our community who have reached out to me to express encouragement for the county to increase funding. Wait.
Just a second. One moment. One moment. We're we're county of Maui. We're talking about our budget. Yes. We're not
talking about running for office.
Not sure.
Of course. I'm following up with everything else. Yes. What is your So I will be speaking on two things. One is wastewater management and the other is the water lens in Haiku.
Okay. May I continue?
Yes, you may continue. Thank you.
Yes, mahalo.
You can
start the clock.
The first thing
is our wastewater management system here on Maui and how they are not disinfecting the effluent going into the ocean properly at any of our facilities. It has been mentioned time and time again quite simply that the lower the level of pathogen and nutrients in wastewater, the lower health risks there are for swimmers and the marine ecosystem. When pathogens in these wastewater systems are released into the ocean without the crucial step of UV disinfection, the water remains risky as the spread of bacteria and various diseases runs rapid in our shores, putting both the people and marine life at risk. The health of the people and the marine ecosystem should be our number one priority, and one cannot say that they care about making positively impactful changes until safety oversights like this are resolved, Especially since I can't think of a more common pastime in Maui than swimming in the ocean as a hobby of all ages from keiki to Kupuna. The second thing that I want to talk about is the Haiku water lens.
We don't know enough about the quality of the water you're trying to transport out of Haiku for the benefit of resorts and luxury estates south of the island. And in order to reinforce care about public health and safety, it only makes sense to allocate more resources to get the water research teams the deep water monitoring well that they ask for, not the next best thing. Because the next best thing is a well that doesn't test the water at the same depth that you plan on drilling the pipeline against the wishes of many the people in the very community of HYCU who we aim to advocate for as valuable members of our community. Of the different ways public safety can be elevated in priority, these two areas would be very ideal paths to take to enhance our unwavering care and concern for the well-being of the people and the environment. You have NASA scientists and research specialists sounding the alarms on issues that are not just about upgrades that would be nice to have.
No, no. On the contrary, these upgrades are necessary for protecting the health of the people and making sure that new projects and previous flawed infrastructure plans can be corrected and optimized in the ways that make the biggest impact moving into the future. Mahalo, I yield my time.
Thank you very much. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none, thank you for testifying. Next testifier, please. Chair,
the next testifier is Peter May to be followed by David Blersch. Peter, you have been promoted. You may need to unmute your camera and mic. If you see two icons in the top right hand corner, if they have a line through them, you'll have to click on it to unmute yourself.
Good afternoon. I'm, Doctor. Peter May, head of the Algal Ecotechnology Center at the University of Maryland, the flagship University of the State of Maryland. I've had the pleasure of visiting your islands and your state. It's a really wonderful place.
I lead the Algal Ecotechnology Center, which is academic unit that supports research and and supports the the use of algae in treating water and wastewater is one of them. I ran a project for about five years for the City Of New York's DEP on their Rockaway wastewater treatment plant using algal turf scrubbers to do some tertiary treatment. They're very effective. There's a long list dozens of peer reviewed research papers supporting it as an eco technology that works. It's low power.
It primarily uses the sun and algal photosynthesis to do the work. And it it's effective and very effective at shaving off very minute quantities of of water of wastewater nutrients, especially in wastewater. So I'm just here to advocate for for this eco technology that's being proposed as one of the solutions to to this problem. I'm currently working on a one acre algal turf scrubber system in outside of Washington DC with regional park system to help clean local waterways. I've done this many times in Baltimore City for the Port Of Baltimore as a method for them to improve their nutrient load reduction.
Spent three years with the U. S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program on an expert panel for this eco technology, and we had it approved by the EPA as a best management practice for use in the Chesapeake Bay. And and the state of Maryland has permitted it. It's a a well used and and well accepted in in this coast on this side of the world here. I believe it could most definitely apply especially with all the sunshine and warmth that you have out in your state. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Any questions for the testifier, Ms. Member Johnson?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Doctor. May for your testimony. Because of your expertise, have a quick question for you. Do you have a particular algae that does this job well? Because we have in our budget a lot of money for invasive species control. We don't want to import any kind of bad algae that's going to make the problem even worse.
Yeah, that's a great question. No, we let nature choose the algae. We let the whatever the algae that's inherent in the wastewater itself and the surrounding algae can be deposited by air spores, believe it or not. So it's algae that is in it. We do not introduce any new algaes. It's whatever happens to emerge from the system itself.
Thanks for that clarification. Thank you, Chair. Sure.
Thank you. No other questions. Next testifier, please.
Chair, the next test
Gazelka: Hello. Can you hear me? Doctor. Halena Yes. Doctor. Hello. Yeah, hello. It's a pleasure to talk to you. My name is Doctor. David Blerish, and I'm an associate professor of ecological engineering in the biosystems engineering department at Auburn University in Auburn, Alabama, where I also serve as the director of the Algae Systems and Ecological Engineering Laboratory.
And I'm here to also testify in scientific support of the proposed algal cultivation technologies, the LIMO, I think I've heard it termed, for the wastewater issue mentioned by the prior testifiers. Just so you know, I have over a decade of experience in conducting research in biologically based wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery systems with specific emphasis on engineered algal and algal microbial technologies. And my work spans fundamental process understanding, pilot scale demonstrations, and integration of these technologies into real world water and wastewater treatment applications. And a significant portion of my research is focused on these attached algae systems, like the algal turf scrubber and other flow way systems, as platforms for nitrogen and phosphorus removal and recovery from multiple waters and wastewaters. In both past and ongoing projects, my group has examined ATS performance across a range of nutrient loadings and hydraulic conditions in many different conditions and environments, including wastewater derived streams, agricultural effluents, and blended nutrient sources.
And this work has addressed nutrient uptake rates, biomass productivity, system stability, and linkages between the algae cultivation, the flow rates, and how to best optimize the process for a particular condition. So based on, you know, the body of my research, and the research of some of the other colleagues across the field, and the peer reviewed literature, I believe that algal turf scrubbers have a strong potential as a complementary technology in municipal wastewater treatment, particularly for pollutant nutrient recovery from waste streams. ATS systems offer these advantages, including robust nutrient assimilation, resilience to variable loading, low chemical input requirements, low power requirements, and the ability to convert dissolved nutrient pollution into a harvestable biomass that can support downstream valorization pathways. And so, I will note that while site specific design and integration are essential at this point, It's my professional assessment that a well designed algal turf scrubber system can perform reliably in many municipal contexts, especially where the facilities are interested in sustainable technologies and biological technologies for nutrient management. And so, the process would be continued deployment of a pilot and moving 30 to a full scale, and then but the underlying science supports algal turf scrubbers for nutrient recovery.
The science is pretty sound, it's continuing to advance on that.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you very much. Next testifier, please. Thanks.
Thank you. Chair, the next testifier is Robin Knox to be followed by Mark Suvinovich. Apologies if I mispronounced your name.
Doctor. Good morning, committee chair. Members. I am testifying in support of funding for the Ma'alaya Regional Wastewater Treatment System. This system is extremely important to improving quality in Ma'alaya Bay, which is an area that the Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Aquatic Resources has identified as the poster child for coral reef decline because so much rare and precious and abundant coral has been lost there.
One of the contributing factors is wastewater, which comes from more than a dozen small wastewater treatment units and shallow injection wells at condominiums located at Ma'alaya. These are systems that are operated by the condo associations. They are not state of the art. Many of them are aging, and they don't achieve, even on their best day, even when they're brand new, the level of treatment and nutrient removal that's really needed to protect water quality and support the health of coral reefs in the Bay. They Mr.
WARS, the Myalaya Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, will provide an advanced level of treatment with polishing to remove nutrients and will therefore provide the highest possible level of nutrient removal and support of attaining state water quality standards and supporting the health of coral reefs. So, is in the interests of the entire community, not only the folks that live in Mailea or who own properties there, but of the entire Maui County community and all of our visitors that water quality be improved there. It also is a chance to demonstrate technologies. The County Of Maui at its own wastewater treatment plants is now expected to meet these stringent water quality standards. And the Mr.
Wahrs plant would be a demonstration of technologies that are available to do that and meet those levels. I think that's all I wanted to say, but I'll just add that this comes from my experience of forty years as a water quality specialist who is trained at the graduate level in wastewater treatment system design and who is a former regulator who wrote NPDES permits that control the discharge of pollutants, including nutrients. Mahalo.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you very much, Mrs. Knox. Next testifier.
Chair, the next testifier and currently last person signed up is Mark Subinovich. Mark, you have been promoted. You may need to unmute your camera and mic on your end. They are located in the top right hand corner.
Sorry about that. My name is Mark Jovanovich. Our company has spent the last thirty years designing and operating attached algal treatment systems for nutrient removal. These systems are not theoretical. You can see behind me 10,000,000 gallon per day system that's operating in South Florida and it's been operating for fifteen years.
It's sister plant that's very similar to it located about 10 miles away. As others have described, these systems basically are attached to algae, native to the local area and that algae is going to remove nitrogen and phosphorus. As Travis had mentioned, the differences between whether or not that algae is going to grow in a controlled environment where you can produce products such as container media as a substitute. I know the question was what could you do with the product? And it's an outstanding USDA has shown that it actually exceeds peat moss as a container media.
And then there's all sorts of other opportunities for it. But in its simplest level, that's where you would probably go at a facility like this. The difference is very few technologies can treat down to these incredibly low levels that you're trying to achieve down to nitrogen below one milligram per liter. Other than reverse osmosis, there's no technology currently doing it. The facility that behind me, the starting concentration of nitrogen is often below one milligram per liter.
So this is a really unique application and a really unique opportunity for you to meet a goal that very few technologies can do. And so from an engineering standpoint, the key point is that this is a phased and testable pathway using pilot systems initially and then demonstrating performance before you move on to compliance. It's technically a plausible approach that can be evaluated without changing your underlying permits. And if anyone has any questions, I look forward to answering them.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none,
thank you very much for testifying. Next testifier, please. Chair, the next testifier is Christopher Salem to be followed by Jim Laneford.
Morning chair, just verifying the microphone is on.
Yes it is.
Morning chair and members of the Maui County Council. I want to start by thanking the council member for addressing the quote high level conversations referenced by the former court counsel attorney who now represents Greg Brown. Maybe those high level conversations should be conducted on the 45 foot tall hotel structure in Napili. Sorry for the visual. That said, my testimony this morning relates to the county budget, specifically capital improvement projects, and the continued awarding of contracts to unscrupulous private civil engineering firms.
Inspiring and intimidating to hear some of the amazing experts who have just spoken on previously during this testimony. But in response to the Spire Hawaii broad risk assessment, Managing director Josiah Noshida stated, we take this matter very seriously to ensure we maintain trust and integrity in government and properly protect the public's resources. You can't be serious. I ask you to measure that statement again. What is actually happening?
The county continues to award millions of dollars in contracts to engineering firms that have previously and purposely submitted silver engineering plans in violation of Maui County ordinances. Then the director approves them, and off we go down the street to citizens' complaints and the litigation trail. The engineer that caused the $20,000,000 debacle at Paloma Drive is the same engineering firm that was involved in Pu'u Kana subdivision involving Kent Smith, David Goode, and Michelle McLean. The project was ultimately denied by the Planning Commission, but only after I spent $50,000 in legal fees to help stop it. That is your system of preventing fraud.
The project moved a good move forward given the recent torrential rain events the consequences could have been catastrophic. And by the way. After the denial. Was implied in the I was sent implied death threat to cost me another thousand dollars in legal fees the police record reflects the history. It gets worse. The same firm you're awarding contracts you authored falsified order of magnitude valuations for SMA permits that is currently in litigation. How many other times have these engineers facilitated this fraud in the county? That's three strikes on the record. How about an investigation before we can grant them more government contracts? But the issue is is is really actually facilitated by public works.
Public works has acknowledged that these engineered submit engine of evaluations have not once been independently verified over twenty years. How many SMA permits and exemptions have been issued through fraud? What are the cumulative impacts on the coastal resources that we're speaking about today? It's massive. But there are solutions.
A simple mandatory review of developers' SMA permit valuations would slam the door on the fraud. But no one wants to hear the solutions because they expose the problems. That is the philosophy of I'll wrap it up. So I state for the record chair if you desire to climb the stairs of the county building to the 9th Floor maybe you should consider shifting your tone towards appreciation for the dedication of citizens who address fraud within the county. We're not your enemies. We're the ultimate public service for doing your job at an immense personal and public experience.
Thank you very much.
Thank you
for your time.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Next testifier, please.
Chair, the next testifier is Jim Laneford to be followed by Kaini Shiki.
Aloha, Chair. Aloha, Counsel. Oh, sorry, you guys are busy. I also have a bunch of PhDs in in computer software and Ivy League level super fancy. I don't want to sound like a bummer like the last guy because I was fascinated with all of the testimony this morning.
And I just have to get on the record in order to protect the community. You know, I've been auditing the software and how money has been spent. And and for the past, know, so we'll just say since the wildfire but much longer than that like I said my software since '98 is provided about $20,000,000. On average to you folks a year. So I'm calling from a guy that makes you money.
And I just want to say my experience. You know not quite as I'm not as targeted as the last testifier I don't know the guy. I don't want to make it personal like that and put you folks on your heels with defense. Because that's not. How we do things with the low but I noticed that a lot of my work.
That I publish publicly does show up as solutions with other organizations. Except when my audit showed. Why people weren't getting hired for example And slowdowns in certain departments. So I don't want to take offense you know I'm aware of how the world works the whole world The Japanese syndicate real estate syndicate the largest one in the world. Makes billions and billions of dollars with me.
With their software and they're wondering why I get treated differently. And I make you folks money so I I've sent a lot of proposals and I haven't heard back. I just want to inform you that those Japanese syndicate folks and some folks in Las Vegas are suggesting that maybe going through the courts as a you know and to define who's talking to whom about me and what they're saying. So the police station they've been filing and working with people and bad actors in the community pushing narratives that turn out not to be true at all, is gonna I ideally would hope that it doesn't get litigated and that I can take all my energy
Thirty seconds.
Put it into Protecting our community with the things I've experienced instead of calling out individuals for who they do business with and who their phones. Have talked to because I have access to all that with my awesome security software levels of being. So so I would love to hear back from one of my emails or or any of you folks that would like to work with me as on the solution side for our community to continue bringing in millions and billions of dollars that I
Thank you very much. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you very much. Next testifier.
Chair, the next testifier currently last individual signed up is Kainashiki.
Aloha Chair, committee members. I am testifying today about wastewater and recycled water opportunities. And a few months back, I was at Planning Commission and there was a SMA approval from the County Of Maui being considered for a sewer line upgrade between Sprinklesville and Kahului Wastewater Treatment Facility. And at that time, I suggested that since a new sewer line was being put in, and this is for folks who are just to orient you, this would be running from to the wastewater treatment facility, which is which runs on that back Stable Road area. And that why not take this opportunity to drop a R R1 distribution line in that same area and do R1 distribution.
And I understand there needs to be an upgrade at the Kahului treatment facility and run it back along Stable Road so that end users on that side could utilize that. It's 5,000,000 gallons a day are being injected at the Kahului treatment facility at this time and for years. Obviously we want that wastewater treatment well I want no wastewater treatment facility not to be on the shoreline where it is- however the county has other plans. And if they are going to continue to use that wastewater treatment facility and do the upgrade, put in the transmission line. And the reason why I bring this up is because the end user said that they would happily do a public private partnership to pay for a sizable amount of that line being run.
The county really needs to take advantage of these sorts of offers of partnering on one, getting 5,000,000 gallons a day of water that is much needed for agriculture. On the end user at Stable Road. Then that can also you know possibly help out other folks with potable water because our one usually displaces potable use. You know there are creative solutions happening or possible and with the wastewater treatment facility. I mean, come on, we know it's not going to happen by 2030.
You know, in Kahului. Sorry for my dog. So, you know, this is something that could be implemented much sooner and have a number of benefits. I just urge the council members to urge the administration to look at creative public private partnerships. And I have spoken to some council members about this and some within the administration and obviously the end user as well.
And so there's great opportunities. I think that we need to stop just thinking about like, hey, no, we already have plans for, you know, the Kahului treatment facility and like we don't want to deviate from that and all fine and dandy and still do the Kahului treatment facility. There will
So, to we're we're not not creating going more and more and more R1 that. Water. Member Palton.
Thank you, Chair. I just wanted to clarify, you're saying Stable Road is gonna get redone for water transmission and just to drop a r one line in there. But the wastewater treatment plant needs to be upgraded to produce R1 and then transport the R1.
Everything that you stated is correct except for that it's a new sewer line that's being dropped in. From SPREX to the wastewater treatment facility in Kahului. So just drop the hay, know, due to county's coming.
That's a county project. That's correct. Do you know what page it's on? Yeah. Or like this?
I am so sorry. I had I haven't been following along, with all of my budget papers. I'm so sorry.
Don't have to Oh, be right I mean, do
you know what the project is called or the title of the Let
me just go in my email. I have or if you want, I can email to the committee.
Yeah, that works. Or text me, either one. Thank you. Okay. Will do.
Thank you. Any more questions for Ms. Nishiki? Seeing none. Thank you. Next testifier. Have a great day. Same to you.
Chair, there is currently no one else who has signed up to testify. Would you like me to do a last call? Yes, please. Oh, I do see somebody approaching the podium.
Thank you, Clarissa. JC Law from Kulaoka. Ohio Luna, Ho'omolo, Kashiwa, Kimura, and Ke'a'a, Kei Kolana, and all the Maka'inana out there in TV land. So I'm a say all all the minutes I save for the Hawaiians, I'm gonna use a couple of them now. This is from the Internet.
Kaano e walk, w a l k. And I'm speaking about the budget of the, I heard the the mayor's office budget wants to cut that, makaiki stuff, the money for that. I don't I'm I'm opposed to that cut. The rising of Makali'i, the constellation Pleiades at sunset marks the beginning of the Hawaiian New Year known as Makihi. Makihi usually begins mid November and ends in late January or February, aligning with the rainy season.
It is a time set aside for tribute, harvest, sport, and play. The word makahiki can refer to a time of celebration, the ceremonies, activities observed during this particular time of year, or a complete calendar year. Traditionally for Hawaiians, our calendar year is divided into two seasons, kao, the dry season, and ho Ilo, the wet season. The month of Ikua, which means noisy, usually begins in September or October. This month is characterized by roaring surf, thunderstorms, rain.
This boisterous personality of Ikua signaled the approach of Makahiki. The roughly four month period of Makahiki was a time of peace and plenty, relaxation and games, and for harvest. It was also a time to honor the deity Lono, one of the four major deities recognized not only here in Hawaii but throughout the Pacific. His domain includes fertility, agriculture, and peace. During Muckahiki, the qualities of Lono were celebrated by feasting, competing in sport and games, hula, and storytelling.
War between the was forbidden. Some of the games that were enjoyed are heihei kukini racing, mokomoko boxing, koko, a wrestling style similar to sumo, Pu Hene Hene, a skilled game of deception. A lot of people in the county are good at that. And a ko nane, a board game most resembling chess. Makihi also signifies a time of rest and rejuvenation for both the land and the people.
This period served as an opportunity to both fortify existing bonds and forge new relationships. Aohau taxes, and ho'o kupu offering were collected during Makahiki. Each ahupua'a gathered its auhau to be given to the ali'i nui, the high chiefs of the island. The the Ali'i Nui yes. I got it.
The Ali'i Nui acted as the deputy to Lono. I that might be you guys, the Ali'i Nui, who was represented by the Akua Loa. The Akua Loa is a long staff with Lono carving at the peak and a crosspiece with pieces of polyfern, feather lay, and skins of the cow upu bird fastened near the top, from which also hung a square of white kappa. And, yeah, that's about it. I'll get the rest later on.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier?
Tune in next time.
See none.
Same time, same channel.
Thank you. Next testifier, please.
Chair, there's currently no one who signed up to testify. Would you like me to do a last call? Please. If somebody would like to testify in the chamber, please let staff know or Microsoft Teams, please raise your hand. This is final call. Three, two, one. Chair, it appears that nobody wishes testify. Thank you.
With your permission, I'm gonna close public testimony and receive written testimony. Members? Thank you. Okay. So I'm gonna start off with, revisits for Department of Water Supply, which we took up last night. And then we'll take a break. It's now 10:37. So I'm going to do this. So under the CIP budget bill, page 27, members there are two discrepancies flagged by staff and the budget director for two CIPs under the department. Please refer to Granicus 177, the department's amendment request correspondence.
So therefore, I move to amend Section four, J, one, A, two, two to change the project name from countywide upgrades and replacements to countywide facility improvements. Thank you.
Do you mind repeating the motion? I'm sorry. What? Do you mind repeating the motion?
I move to amend section four paren J, paren one, paren A, paren two to change the project name from countywide upgrades and replacements to countywide facility improvements.
Okay. Got it. So
motion made by me, second by Member Woo Hajans. Any more discussion? So what this does, it corrects the project under bill 55 to be consistent with bill 60, the state revolving loan fund for water supply projects. Okay. All in favor, raise
your No, I'm not ready to vote. Sure.
Okay. What page on the departmental request? Do you have that? On Granicus 155. 155? No, no. Granicus 177. 177 is the departmental request. What page, please?
Chair, it's on page three of the department request. It's the second entry from the bottom.
4J2A1I1A2. Well, that's the fourth item. Replacement to countywide facilities. Oh, I see. He said second from the top. Oh. Second from the bottom.
Yeah. Second from the bottom. Apologies.
Oh. Oh. Okay. Okay. Mahalo, Mr. Krueger. Suggest this item.
And I have another one.
That's the only item being affected right now by the motion. Yes.
Yeah. Okay. Okay. Any discussion? All in favor, raise your hands say, aye. Thank you. So this is member Cook. This is nine ayes. Yeah. Thank you. Member Palton? We're voting. Chair Lee? Everybody? Oh, you did. Okay. I didn't see. Nine ayes. Thank you. I have one more. So I move to amend Section 4J3A1 to change the funding type for Molokai reliable capacity from Water Fund, unrestricted to Water Fund restricted.
Chair, before you read the motion, can you tell us
I think it's the same. Granicus one 177.
Yeah. Isn't the item right under the one we just acted on?
Yeah. I think it was read before.
4J3A1? Yes. Section four.
Yes. This one was on
the email that we received last night. The 900,000.
Member Palton.
Think it was listed on the, paper from last night, but it wasn't listed as a motion, and didn't so I didn't make a motion because it was just reference. Director
Milner.
Aloha chair. Aloha council members. Yes, it was listed on the sheet last night to indicate that it is a project that is still being funded by restricted water funds, but there was a typo in the bill and it says unrestricted. The request is to update that to the correct funding source. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you.
Chair budget director, all three of the items that are were in the chart from the attachment last night?
Thank you, Chair. No, The only one
that needs corrected is Molokai Reliable Capacity. Mahalo. Mahalo, budget director. Any more questions? Seeing none.
Chair, apologies. Can we confirm the second for the motion?
Oh, sorry. Thank you. So I made the motion, and member Cook is the second. Thank you. Ready to vote? Member Cook.
Don't vote.
Oh, okay. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Okay. Very good. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Okay. So we're gonna stop then. I'm gonna take a ten minute break. Is that alright? Yeah. Yep. So we'll come back at well, let's come back at 10:55. Thank you.
Hey, welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It is now it is now what time is it? 11:05. And I have one more correction for Department of Water Supply. If you look at Ramseyer rates and fees on page 54 towards the top.
I move to amend Appendix B rates and fees account 3475 water service rates general water consumers by replacing the fourth fee range from greater than or equal to 35,000 gallons to read as 35,001 to 50,000 gallons and to replace the fifth fee range from greater than or equal to 50,000 gallons to greater than 50,000 gallons. Thank you. Motion made by me, second by Member Yes.
So it should be on the last year, it should be 50,001.
Okay. We forgot one. Forgot one. For finding that correction. No.
Shouldn't that be still 50,000? Because if the greater than sign is there, wouldn't that mean 50,000? Like point one and more?
Because it goes to If
it's thirty five zero one to 50,000
Chair, if you look at the previous tiers, they do have that one in there. I think for consistency's sake, we should have that little one gallon.
Yeah, but the previous tiers don't have the greater than signs in them.
Okay. I'm sorry, Chair. I think after
Member Antangon, what he just said, I think I agree with him.
Okay. So no one? Yeah, no going
We're correct. Able to We We're do need to update do do it because it's currently greater than or equal to. So now we just want it to be greater than.
Yeah.
So the way that you made your motion should be correct.
Okay. So greater than 50,000. Okay. Any discussion? We're to
half of to just a single number and it needs to be a range that can't overlap with the fifth line. So what we're doing is creating a range from $35.00 1 to $50,000 and then anything over $50,000 will be the next category.
Thank
you, Jared. Just we're that.
Able to greater than sign, I am happy to accept do the one. But either way, we cannot have a gap.
Corp Council. I guess what we're if you look at the example that we got, it has for the last year is greater than 50,000 gallons on the top two. So that's correct. So we're fine. Greater than 50,000. Okay. All in favor raise your hand and say aye.
So I
have eight ayes, one excused. Member Leonard have a
is with same thing has to be applied to that one as well.
Okay. So the water shortage rate, one, two, three for the fifth tier is to leave it greater than or is going to be consistent then? Yes. Okay. But that's what it says, greater than 50,000 on the sheet. Oh, the fourth tier, too. Okay. So for the fourth tier would be 35,000 gallons to read 35,001 to 50,000 gallons as well as the last tier which says greater than 50,000. That one is correct. So just correction of one, correct?
With adding the range. Got it.
I think so. So essentially we're doing the same thing under the next line for account 34.75. Is that correct?
Correct.
Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Any other that of we that Motion And carries eight lot ayes, one excused. Member Rollins Fernandez. Any more corrections? Court counsel, member
are you No, chair. Thank you.
Okay. So now we're going to go to the Office Of The Mayor. Just everybody after this we're going to do police, public works and then revisits ending with countywide. So the office of the mayor members priorities, we have 12. Three involve the department's revolving fund.
There are 12 total. Okay. So first we'll go down in the order that's in the matrix and we'll follow this order as it is with the budget bill. So starting with the first person is Member Senensi Countywide three to add 250,000 other one one do to we're going do discussion?
Yep. Thank you, Chair. This was, through the conservation committee. It seems like I keep putting it in every year. And it's always carried over. This was a request Chair. Of some of the
I'm sorry. Oh. We we've been ordered to evacuate the 9th Floor. I have to go. I'm sorry.
Yeah. Please go. Goodbye.
Where you going?
You have to evacuate the 9th Floor. What about us? We have not been asked.
Who's our
I'll text as soon as I have more information. Our our lights are going off. Sorry, chair. Oh. David.
Brian, what's going on?
Chair, can you call for a recess, please? Recess. Welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. We are back to starting the priority with Member Senensi for his to add $250,000 to administration program category B. Member Okay. Senensi made the motion and Member Woo Hodgins. Second. Go ahead.
As you know, I'm the council representative on the conservation planning committee. And so it seems like we've tried to put in the money before, but we're doing it again. Of course, we we are experiencing some quorum issues and haven't met in a while, but the board requested that we put it in the budget, so that we can, we have the funds, at our next meeting so we can vote for the green print. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Any other discussion? Member Bolton.
Do we know why what the reason is that the this wasn't put in, in the marriage proposal? Like, are they are they gonna do it? Are they not gonna do it? Like, I mean, I don't mind putting the money in if it's gonna get done, but I don't what has changed since last year when we put the money in that it's gonna get done, or is it gonna get done with the remainder of this fiscal year kind of thing? That's that's my question if you know the answer.
Members and then see.
Maybe, budget director because I I know the request was to wait and then maybe possibly come back with a budget amendment, but I'll refer to budget
director. Director, you're fine.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Baughton. I spoke to our Boards and Commissions Coordinator here in the Mayor's Office about this actually starting in last August when the commission was beginning to discuss going out to bid for the green print. And I told her at the time, you know, we're happy to support it. And if we need to, we'll come in for a budget amendment. And I haven't heard any updates or progress since last August. So nothing was included because my understanding is no progress has been made toward it by the commission. If the commission does vote to move forward, we are in support and we've utilized these funds for that RFP process. We're really just following the lead of the commission. Thank you, chair.
Oh, very good.
Can can you repeat that last part? If it moves forward, you would utilize member Sinensis funds or you have other funds source?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilor. We would utilize the 250,000 specifically earmarked for that purpose. By members in NC.
By council member Senensi. Okay. All right. Got it.
Thank you. Thank you. Any other discussion? All in favor raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
All over.
Next we have councilmember Uhu Hajens, countywide number one to increase three stewardship and maintenance of county owned lands by 400,000 and condition up to 50,000 for Namaka o Maliko. Member Ugul.
Is it second? So on page 14
Is it your second? Is this your motion?
Yeah. This is my motion. Do you want me to just second it? Did you make the motion?
Oh, no. You make motion.
Okay. On page 14, number 12, small a number three, stewardship and maintenance of county owned land increased by $400,000 for a total of $700,000 and add a new condition to read as follows. Up to $50,000 must be for Namaka Omaliko for disposal, recycling, testing, and remediation of environmental contamination. If I have a second, can Mister Nancy, proceed.
Discussion.
Thank you very much. Please note that I'm increasing it by 400, but I'm only requesting 50 because there are so many county owned parcels that constantly have to come to us and ask for funding when we do some sort of agreement with them, like Ka'ehube, the next project I'm gonna discuss after, and this as well. So hopefully, this is a fund that more people can take advantage of, and so they don't have to constantly ask us for the money we're requesting them to do the work that we want them to do. That's the first thing. The second thing is Namaka o Maliko is made up of a bunch of Paiya and Kuau and Haiku residents and Maliko residents to clean up the bay and hopefully restore it to what it used to be used for.
There's a bunch of issues down there that I'm excited to see them cleaned up, and I ask for the member support of my motion. Thank you. Very good.
Member director. Budget director, then member Ros Fernandez after. Go ahead.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Hodgins. I'd like to ask, corporation counsel if they could weigh in on this because this is for stewardship and maintenance of county owned land. I don't know that we can name an entity to do it. I think it might need to be a contract that goes out for RFP. So it may be more appropriate to name a parcel, and then we can issue the RFP. But I'll defer to corporation counsel because there may be some nuance I'm missing here.
Thank you, chair. Thank you. I'm happy to the parcel. If you give me a minute, I can find that information if that's required for sure.
Court counsel.
If it's county yes. Thank you, chair. If it's county owned land that normally the county would, take care of, it would need to be contracted out, that service.
Okay. And if we have they have a lease with us, how does that work? Like, they have a lease with us, Ka'ehu has a lease with us, or a right of entry, how does that work? For the same parcel of land? For different parcels. This happens all the time.
You'd have to look at the specific document that you're talking about the lease and who's responsible for what because each lease is different.
Okay. If we do an RFP, let me think about if I want to do an RFP with a contract because then I can't guarantee that these are the people who's gonna get the monies and that the vision is going to be carried out in the way that I expressed.
You wanna pause?
I'm okay to put a pin in it right now. Okay. And that's gonna be the same thing for my next one as well. So we'll put a pin in this so I can figure
to time be do that.
Thank you, I'm sorry. Point And of order. Yes. Do we have a motion on the floor?
We did, but I don't know
if I got a second. Yeah. You got a second.
Oh, okay. So I wanna withdraw that? I'll withdraw my motion. Okay. Thank you.
Okay.
Okay. So right now, then we're on my my third one because I'm four in a row. On page 12, no. I'm sorry. Page 14. 12, Office of the Mayor, small c, grants, division program. I move to insert a new line entitled Adaptations Dance Theater for $90,000 Okay. Motion made by member Woo and second by member Cook. Thank you very much. This has been one of my priorities for a couple of years.
This helps support the bring it home program, where we have Maui trained dancers that live throughout the world come home and help the new and up and coming dancers and train them and put on performances. Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none,
all in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Eight nine ayes. Motion carries.
Do you want me to do my offset by reducing the small grants right now, or we'll come back
to that later? So you don't need to
do that now. Okay. Sounds good. Then I'm I'm up again. Next page. Page 15. Number 12 again, office of the mayor, small c again, grants division program. Number 22 in small grants, I moved to add a condition to small grants to read as follows. Up to $25,000 must be a grant for the Poya Hawaiian Protestant Church for repair and maintenance to the steeple and the church.
Oh, very good. Is there a second? Member Cook, second. Member Guhajes and second by, member Cook.
You, members. So this is a well, they celebrated a 145 years last year. So now it's a 146 year old church. It's one of the mainstays of Poya Town, and the steeple is not structurally sound, and parts of the church are obviously, as I just described, quite old and need, support, and they need maintenance. Thank you, members.
Very good. Member of Bronze Fernandez has a question.
No. Discussion. Okay. I support the motion, and, I think a lot of our older Hawaiian churches, need need help because they're really old. So I'm very supportive of this. And then, was this the church that had the hundred year time capsule?
It's not, but, that one was the holy rosary church that's across of Paya school. And, but what I will say is there's so many churches in Paya, and they have such a cute relationship. They're all very supportive of each other, like the church I was talking about yesterday, this church, the holy rosary church. There's so many, and
it's so cute. Thank you for has a a church row Oh, we don't. In Kalama'u. It's beautiful.
I love to see it.
All denominations in one row playing well, playing nice together. Support the motion. Mahalo member Uhaja's. Any more discussion? Seeing none. All in favor say aye.
Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Next is cheerlead grant two to add a new condition under three, grant of Festivals of Aloha Inc. For Maui County Fair of up to 54,000 to be used for the creation of Maui County Fair book. Moved. Is there a second?
Second. Member Oh Hodgins, cheerleader. Discussion? Well, I think, everybody's aware of how popular the Maui County Fair is and, how it's, you it's really part of our community and culture. By having a book, it'll memorialize a lot of the history. Yeah, I agree. Thank you. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, Chair. Question for Charlie. How did you come up with the 54,000?
I don't know, actually. That was part of the request to me. So I don't know how that person came up with 50%.
Someone who's going to do the book Yes. Gave you that quote.
The Festivals of Aloha Inc.
Okay. Darrell Fujiwara. Was it mister Fujiwara? Do you know how many books will be produced?
No. I don't. We can find out.
Do you White paper.
White paper coming up.
Okay. Very good.
Yeah.
All right. Any more discussion? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. This is nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Great idea. Next one is council member Cook Countywide 2 to insert a new line item in the amount of 1,500,000 and condition it for the Kahumana Church for its restoration project. That's your motion.
Yeah. Can I get a second? Second.
Second by Member Woo Hajans. Kate?
Thank you, members. So this is 12, office and the mayor, item D, economic development program. Insert a new line item in the amount of $1,500 and add a condition to read as follows up to $1,500 must be a grant to Kahumanu Church for its restoration project. Testimony was provided at the BFED South Maui very we've world. Rest with Compound of Keikahiki Lee, thank you.
And, anyway, it's an ongoing project. Across the street. We all love it. And I hope to ask the members for your support.
Do I move to amend his motion to say $1,500,000
Yes, 1,500,000.
What did I say? You said $1,500 Oh, welcome
and appreciate
that. Okay. Thank you. Go ahead. Oh, Director Millner.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Cook. Just a request that this go under the Grants Division instead of under the Office of Economic Development. We think it more correctly fits there. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. You're fine. Member Cook.
So fine. So, staff can keep track of that?
He accepts Ms. Milner's suggestion as a friendly amendment, as do I to my
amendment. So, apologies to interject. So, staff's going to interpret this as a new line item under the grants division. Under the grants division program, it's going to be grant to Kahumanu Church for and underneath we'll put a condition up to $1,500,000 must be for its restoration project.
Yes. Thank you. Yes. Okay. Any more discussion? All in favor raise your hands say aye.
Aye.
Member Senanci yes. Nine ayes. Motion carries. One more. Council member Ron Fernandez, county wide number three to lot of
COVID-nineteen
the
And seeing five up to $250,000 for film production and promotion in Maui County. I up to $50,000 must be for film production and promotion on Molokai. Second.
Okay. Motion made by member Rollins Fernandez, second by Shirley. Any more discussion? Mahalo,
Chair. At the Molokai hearing, you heard from Mr. Matt Yamashita on, the progress of the pilot pilot program, that we started on Molokai, with the new film commissioner, Brian Cohen, who I guess he's still new. But one of, the visions that he shared with me was, investing in our in in the, smaller projects because that's more of the bread and butter, more of what is sustainable, rather than huge, productions that we don't have enough staff and equipment for. And, for the $50,000, film project that, we piloted on Molokai.
It was to help community organizations, like, tell the story of the work that's being done, just whether it's the legacy of the place or the progress they're making toward improving something, that it would be a grant to our film producers the working
on half 20. Member Johnson followed by Merrim the Gold.
Thank you, Chair. I rise in full support of this motion. I often say that I quote a stat. Every dollar spent from federal funds into the arts is $9 economic activity given back to the community. I don't know any studies that do it for a local level, but definitely the money you put in for arts and film creates a clean industry, you know, and that's and that's really important to diversify our economy with clean options and filming being one of those. So thank you for that, and I rise in full support. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Member Bolton. Oh. And
just needed to clarify that the pilot was for Molokai, and so as you heard when I asked mister Yamashita about whether it's ready to expand to all of Maui County, and he said yes. And so that's the intention. And then like we heard from member Paulton about Lahaina right oh, okay. Sorry. No. No. Go ahead.
Okay. Member Paulton. Thank you. I speak in full support, strong support of this motion. One of the films that we funded last fiscal year on just the finishing up of their work that they had fronted the money themselves, went out, begged, borrow, steal from others, themselves is now being shown at the United Nations.
And this is right in alignment with our current NACO president, JB Clark's, theme for his, year of presidency, which is, county storytelling. And so, you know, the rising from the ashes film that we funded last year, we will be showing it, at the weir, because even though they have limited audiences because they're, in line for film festival awards, awards. They are partnered with a project impact where they wanna show that film specifically to decision makers. So as, the recipient of them being able to show that film to where, it just shows, like, what a little bit of kick start or finish funding can do for our local storytellers. Thank you.
Yeah. I heard it on the radio this morning too. Good job. Alright. Any more discussion? All in favor, your hand and say aye.
Chair, if I could if I can do a add a condition to this, add 30,000 to it and have that 30,000 go to Lanai in addition for the film, filmmaking. Second.
Okay. So the total would be 280,000.
There there are
Are we allowed to
do that? Okay.
We're adding to a condition. I think that happened yesterday, and
I got a complaint from somebody. It's our point of order. We're the body that makes the decisions on our rules, so it's up to us how we wanna proceed. Think we had said that we would have a certain amount of conditions and priorities I
mean priorities and adds. And so this was being perceived as being another one. And so yesterday I got a concern. I just want to be consistent with the other members.
And Chair, I flagged that concern when we added a third grant item for Member of Batanggan, and I said I supported that as long as we're going to be equitable about being flexible on the rules.
And Chair, I did not submit two conditions.
Okay. Are you all fine? You're all fine. Okay. Go ahead.
That
was you're adding $30,000 for Lanai.
And member of And I second that motion. Okay. All in favor, say aye.
Chair apologies. Could staff just clarify it? So the line item would be up to $30,000 must be for film production and promotion on Lanai?
And changes the total amount to $280,000
Okay.
And the purpose, members, is, because, as we know, it's hard for, the smaller community to compete. I want Maui to have a good amount because I know there's more filmmakers on Maui Island than, Lanai and Molokai. And so by having pots of money for them to be able to, have a chance at, some of the funding to tell the stories of our of our places, just giving our, rural communities more of a chance. Okay.
Chair, can can I just clarify since it was taken up as a motion and then a second, we are only voting on the amendment to add Lanai, correct?
Right. And then we'll go on the motion as amended. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Then we vote main motion as amended. It will now be 280 Aye. That's nine ayes. Mahalo members. Good idea. Okay. Now we're going to take up the OED conditions. If you look at the spreadsheet that was given to you, look on page 24, residency area conditions and it has all of your residency area conditions that you put in and submitted. So I think does it all look agreeable to you?
These are your residency area conditions, Istar. Yours is agreeable? Okay. Have a question, Chair.
For Member Lee's a condition, area council member must be consulted. Is that language we need to add to every, residency area?
Oh, yes.
I guess that's my first question. Then two, is it are we able to change it from consultation to review and approval?
I think it was whatever you put in as your
No. No. I mean Oh. Does the budget ordinance allow point. Point.
That's that's I about that? You know, reason we started putting that in is because OED would take whatever was in the buckets and if it was not allocated, it would start granting it out. So we put that in so that the member would be consulted to be sure that it's used appropriately.
Shirley? The director is on the call. Oh, I think she wants to say something. Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmembers. Yes, I will defer to Corporation Counsel or Mr. Hernanno. The language included here, the Residence Area Councilmember must be consulted before any changes or request for use of the funds, is what was agreed upon with the attorneys over the last few years. Review and approval, I don't believe, is allowable language due to the charter restrictions on council members making requirements of the administration. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. So has the consultation been interpreted to mean that the administration just needs to tell us what's going to be done with any unconditioned money within that pot?
Can I answer? From my experience and probably the experience of most of the members, if not all, it's it has been a a mutual agreement, and it's it's worked. They they let us know. And if and if we don't like it, they generally, you know, abide by our wishes.
Thank you, chair. I I guess I'm asking because I did not condition very much of my pot, and so I would like that language added to mine. I think it would probably be prudent to add it to every single one of the residency areas, but I'll defer to the body. Chair.
Very good. Member Cook and member Rollins for now.
The reason that I did that was because I didn't allocate a major percentage of my allocations. And it was basically for the ir think
question. That's question. If it's not on all, then it's kind of hard for the administration to track which one had the requirement. In my experience, as Chair Lee explained, it's been a good working relationship with administration in using the funds, in the way that, we have heard from the communities. I don't know if that was member Cook's, experience, but for me and sometimes so my office, we track these funds very, very carefully, because in the past, some of the organizations didn't apply for it or then they changed their name.
And then we have to do a budget amendment to change the fiscal sponsor. So there's just a lot that goes on because these are, like, community nonprofits and community organizations. It would behoove all council members to track it very carefully as well to ensure that it's used, that it's applied for, and then it's, the the the grant contract is executed, reporting and reimbursements are done, it really is a lot of handholding if you want it to be used in the way that you intend it to and not just because of the administration. It's because community groups are may be small and may not have the experience to apply for the funding. And starting July 1, I understand that the administration for $20,000 and less grants has a more streamlined approach and process for this, which I'm really looking forward to so that maybe there would be less handholding with our organizations to ensure that all the funding is expended in the way that we intend when we pass the budget.
Mahalo chair.
Thank you. Member Paul Tin.
I experienced similar. That's why I'm only doing this one on my residency area. And, I mean, I I would wanna know who they give the money out, and I would like them to kinda spread it around in the community, not giving it to the same people. But, you know, if they don't, I'll live. The question I had was, I think the total amount is for 140,000. And so if the amount, is over $140,000, how do they interpret that?
What what are you saying? In other words, the member allocated more than the 140,000? Is that what you're saying? Who interpret Yes. Is that a court counsel?
I see one for a 100
of information. 100,000. So, last Friday, member Batanggan chaired the meeting. And I asked for us to have the discussion, but that would have been controversial. So we did not have the discussion. And I would like to have that discussion because I would like for all of our residency areas to have the 200,000. So if that requires a motion, I move that $200,000 be allocated for each residency area for this pot of funding.
We need a cut. Right? It's not only add, it's cut
No, it's not just cut. Some of the offsets do say raise property taxes in specific areas.
That's up to the members. It sure is. Members, you heard the motion. You want to increase the pot to 200,000.
As it was last year.
And that was my first time. Member Senancy.
Thank you, Chair. I had additional requests even though mine has a lot of smaller grants, not the larger grants, but I did have additional requests. I think these are the for my community anyway, these are the the small the community people that are in our community doing all of the this work. So in anticipation of a lot of the federal cuts that we've been seeing, they're they're feeling it too. Part of the reason why I asked the administration for a budget amendment with some of the funds, last year that wasn't being used or couldn't be used to go back into the East Maui community.
So, I would I would be supportive of the additional funds here. Just having it even, a little extra so that if people did come and needed some emergency funds, whether it be for travel, with anticipating gas prices, travel prices, we have that for our community. Thank you.
Thank you. Any other discussion on the motion? Okay. So Member Senensi made the second. So Member Rollins Fernandez made the motion, second by Member Senensi. So the motion is to increase the residency area funds from 140, which is what's in the budget, and increase it to 200,000. Member Woo Hodgins.
Thank you, Chair. I understand how Member Rollins Fernandez feels and Member Sonensi feels. I'm okay with that being at $1.40, although probably I could find ways to spend money. I'm really good at that. With the new as you said, with the new section of the small grants, I'm hoping that's kinda where some other people may pull out some monies that they may need.
I'm okay with, like, increasing it to maybe one fifty, but probably that's all I'm okay with. This morning, we heard we added already $11,000,000 to the budget. So, I'd be okay with $1.50, not 200, but I'm also okay with leaving it at $1.40. But, also, can I have a request even though I know we're in the middle of a motion? I have to leave at lunch, and I would like to quickly talk to corp control about my last two things that I couldn't do. If we could maybe take this up, and then I could have a two minute recess before I have to leave and pick up my kids so I can kinda confer, I would appreciate it Yeah. If that's okay
with the members after this, obviously. Okay. Sounds good. Member Ramos Fernandez. Sure.
I I would be okay with withdrawing the motion. We can have the discussion after lunch. Maybe I'll be less hungry.
Girl, please
do us
a piece.
Okay. So you're withdrawing your motion, member Sannensi.
Okay. Yeah. We'll just clear. Yeah. Yeah. And then we can take it up.
So member Fu Hajans, you're gonna go talk to court counsel. If I may. Okay. So it's 11:48. You guys wanna just take lunch that you can talk to? Is that what you at lunch,
so can I work around this
for about five minutes and then come in
and do these? But then Sorry. I will put the mic on for everybody else even though we're all in the room. I have to leave lunch at because I have to pick up my kids. My husband's working today. And, when we get back in, when this body gets back in, typically about 01:30, Playa School doesn't have great service. Baldwin Avenue doesn't have great service. And so by the time I log on, it's about an hour. I mean, I'm sorry. Half an hour ish, forty five minutes is after you guys have already been in session as we experienced on Thursday. So I don't wanna have to come back to all of this just because I didn't have time. So can I please have just a couple minutes and we can come in and we can do this and then maybe you folks can go to lunch?
So what she's saying is five minutes and be So in your this. I'm not seeing I wanna eat So
it's gonna be 11:55. Sure. Yeah.
Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you, I appreciate your me some time.
Welcome back to budget finance economic development committee. It is now 12:08. Thanks for the brief recess. So member Oh Jins, you gotta leave at 01:00. And so therefore, members, is it okay if we revisit what we passed over earlier, which was her amendments that she wanted to make?
Is she ready?
Yeah. Now she's ready. And then we can go back to the, the residency area pots. Thanks.
Member Oh. You, chair. And then considering the discussion we had before recess, I might have other changes from our residency area, but I'll save down on this side. But before I begin, thank you so much members for allowing me the time to figure this out before I need to pick up my children. So I'll collapse the two conditions into one to make it a little bit easier if that's okay with all you folks.
But if you want me to separate it out, I'm happy to do so. So on page 14, number 12, small a parent three stewardship and maintenance of county owned land, I would like to insert two conditions. One, for TMK two dash seven zero zero four dash zero two seven for disposal, recycling, testing, and remediation of environmental contamination to through the practice of aloha aina. That's the first one. The second one is two, oh, and that one is for $50.
The second one is for to restore native species to Hamokualoa Open Space Preserve by reducing invasive plants guided by lineal descendants, cultural practitioners, and dedicated volunteers, and the TMKs, there are five of them, read as follows. 27007005 and 27007079 and 27007081 and 27007082 and lastly, 27007083. And this condition is for $80,000 Okay. Is there a second?
Second. Second. Alright. Member Uhlja, second by Shirley. Discussion?
Thank you, chair. For my discussion, this is open this is county owned properties that have either, or both have right of entries that need, work done. And I can provide the TMKs for at least the second one to OCS so that they didn't have to write as fast as I was talking. I described it earlier, though, before we before I was told I couldn't do the way I
was doing it. Okay. Any more discussion? Member Ramos Fernandez.
Mahalo, is there a way we can get that in writing? Like, I is it still under the stewardship and maintenance of county owned land? And it's gonna be a contract? Yes.
Yes. Do
you want me to write it out? What's the difference from what we received? Like, is it that's in the
In the matrix.
The difference is is, one, I couldn't do it as a grant. So I did try to rewrite what the intention of Oh, just the language?
Like, so it's still gonna say a and it's gonna say a contract?
Yes. Okay. It has to be
done again? To a grant. Not, just the beginning part.
Up to $500,000 must be for disposal recycling testing and remediation of environmental contamination to the practice of aloha aina. That's the first condition. And then the second condition is up to $80,000 must be for the restoration of native species to Hamakoaloa open space preserved by reducing invasive plants guided by lineal descendants, cultural practitioners, and dedicated volunteers.
For the 50,000
Yep.
How do you ensure that it gets to Maliko area? Oh,
because I added the TMK. Oh, okay. Okay. The TMK for the Maliko area is 2Dash7004027. It's 1.4 acres owned by the county of Maui.
Okay. And
then the other one for Hamokoaloa is those five parcels. The first parcel is 48 acres. The second and some change is more like 48.7. The second parcel is 182.4. The third parcel is 33.8 acres. The fourth parcel is 37.9 acres. And the fifth parcel is 13.5. And this is all previously East Haiku or Haiku Sugar East subdivision Lots 316134, And
5, respectively. Okay. Yeah. Mahalo, member. So, if members will recall, the stewardship and maintenance of county owned land was, my priority from last year.
I had initially, proposed, this new pot of funding for 1,000,000 which got, whittled down to, I think, dollars 300,000 by the time we passed the budget. And the intention of my proposal last year was to do exactly what member Uhu Hajjens stated, which is which was to create a streamlined process for the organizations that we regularly put funding into the budget for so that they don't have to come to the council every year to advocate for funding for the program that, you know, they're doing on county owned land. And I would be supportive of this, like, not in my priority proposal from last year. Okay. I get that we the process that we create for ourselves as a council is restrictive so that we end up looking for pots of money that aren't already line item to a specific organization, and then we condition our priorities under And, and so my priority from last year is now being used in a way that wasn't my intention last year.
Yeah. Can I can I add that? Can I add something? Yeah.
And and it and it's just because of this process to try to avoid, you know, increasing the budget, which,
you know, gets under did say in the beginning that I realized after you said that that I didn't say when we came back into recess that I was gonna add a 130,000 to your to this pot of money so that I wasn't really touching the 300,000. It is now gonna be at $4.30. And I I'm you're right. I didn't make that clear. I made it clear in the first one, and then I had just assumed everybody could read my mind on the second
one. So that's part of the motion?
Yeah. Can we make that part of the motion? It was part of my first motion. Initially, I had moved to add it add 400,000 so that more people could benefit from this pot. And then because we couldn't do grants and we needed to do RFPs, I just wanted to recognize the two, contracts that I was trying to work with. And so you're right. I didn't say it on the second time that I would like to add. I moved to add a $130,000 with the first one being up to 50 and the second being up to 80 to make the new amount of that pot at $4.30.
But if we make them separate lines instead of adding to the pot and conditioning it, I'm okay with that if everyone else is okay with it.
I mean, I'd assumed it would go like I I well, I and I I because it's it's part of that, but it was just adding more money and then putting it in there. But we can
do whatever. And if you take it out of there, then you could put the organization name. I would support that.
I thought I we couldn't because it's Yeah.
No. It's Contract.
If you take it out of that pot. I I what I understood was you make it its own line item, and if you did that, then it you you can put the organization name.
Oh. I support that. Don't know if that's what I was told because if it's on county land, then we can't do grants.
So we so just be because of, the pot that you are conditioning these two items under is the why the restriction? Because we have given grants to Malama Hamakua law.
Oh, I know. I asked that exact question. Oh, I know. I asked the exact question of the. Uh-huh. I asked that exact question. Okay. Uh-huh. No.
No. We're not doing that anymore.
No. That's why I'm doing this. That's why I needed a recess.
Have corp council educate us. Yeah.
This is why Good. That's you. Real quick. This is exactly why we took a recess.
Okay. I
know it's a little confusing because we're trying to implement a new strategy that the whole county can use to decipher what should be a grant and what should be a contract and then the procurement code. And it's based on several factors, but there is a grant readiness checklist that we provided this year to try to help everyone understand and go through there. And if any of those questions are answered yes, then it goes to corp council to really look at the situation because it does depend on the situation. Guess that's what I'm going to say. Doesn't matter what pots have restrictions, but it does matter.
There's those factors that are listed in that checklist that are really what to focus on. In this case, it's county owned land being maintained and it falls under the procurement code.
So you're saying it doesn't matter if, it doesn't say county owned land in the pot itself, that if what section of the code are you or is it just procurement? The procurement code.
And this is a new opinion? In 01/2003.
This is a new opinion.
With the increase in grant funding for the county, this is something that we felt was necessary to standardize and make sure we comply with the law.
Okay.
So going back to Member of who
asked So like me to help you what you were saying, KAEHU will probably contract as well. And then this is why we had to take the recess. So, member, Alex Fernandez, I tried to do something similar before you added this condition and add a requirement in our open space funds, right, for maintenance. Couldn't do that. And then you did this super great, and we still have people trying to advocate for themselves as we see.
And as I was telling, our lovely corp council during break, they still have a very difficult time trying to even get their grants. So I was trying to figure out the easiest way possible for all of us, and that's why we're here where we are today. Do you want a minute with that? Or if not No.
This doesn't answer my question. Okay. We
did have this conversation over resets.
Can you get yours? Okay.
Get your stuff. Are you doing it?
Yeah. We're doing it now. I think I'm I made my motion, to be fair, it was a lot of words, and I can always restate it so I can make it very clear. But I think member Rollins Fernandez is trying to help, but
it's I'm so it's not your motion, and I and I support both. It's the new opinion that we're getting from court counsel. Is that in writing somewhere? Like, can we have that in writing? I don't want the guidelines. I want the analysis on why we're doing this new process.
There is a response from corporation counsel on Gradacus. I'm sorry. Don't know the number at the moment, but I can find it that was asked regarding how we are analyzing what should be a grant, what should be a contract, and why.
Yeah. Because before we put a pin in it, I tried to make it, a condition and originally a grant and then about face, and now we're back in this conversation.
Right. Because my understanding of procurement or how it is explained is, like, procurement is supposed to, you know, make sure that it's not being, like, political favor. It's not, like, a totally politicized, like, type of, funding being directed at your friends, family. That, it by going through our process, which is open to the public and anyone can provide us feedback when we're directing funds that satisfied the procurement law. That's a summary.
I'm not like citing anything specifically. That was my understanding of why it worked and why it didn't violate, procurement laws in the past and why we were doing it all the way up until this year. So that's what I'm asking for. So if in corp counsel's response to us that I'm looking for right now in Granicus, it has that analysis, then that is what I'm looking for.
Your mic. Thank you. And so earlier when we were looking through DEM and they had a grant to Malama Hamakua, but before ten minutes ago, I didn't realize I couldn't do this. I removed it so I could put it in here so that their funds could just be in one area because they had a difficult they had some difficulties, trying to figure it out with EPNS. But if I didn't remove their grant from EP and S, would they still need a contract? Because it it was originally in the budget as a grant. Can I just can I just go and up their grant and revisit what
I did? So with this new process, if there's the checklist, if any of those questions are answered yes, then you should seek consultation from corporation counsel because it does depend on a lot of different factors. And so obviously, Corp Council always wants to work with everyone to make sure that we get we reduce our risk for audits and things like that. But we also try to help the community as much as possible because it's needed.
Okay. Yeah. I think it's it's just confusing because it's a new process. So I'm on I know she has her own concerns, but I'm just to figure out how I can best serve, the people who, as you know, do such good work. And I know you're trying to figure it out too. So I'm okay to do whatever I need to do to ensure that my community is served in the way that that I'm requesting it to be served, however it needs to be done, is fine with me. Thank you.
Yeah. Chair, I have a question for thank you, chair. So was the mayor's proposed budget scrutinized to ensure that all of the grants and contracts presented to us met the standards? So if member, Jin, like to her previous question about a grant previously being awarded to this organization in EP and S met the muster of this new standard, she could conceivably add funding to that pot of money as a grant, correct?
Yes, that's possible if it was analyzed and determined that it did meet the guess
oh, sorry. Requirements
of Part of my question was, was the budget scrutinized to ensure that all of the grants and contracts met this new going sure make able to
that
applications yet. So some of that information has not been scrutinized.
I see.
But that's why we have a process in place.
Okay. So we can't just assume that everything in the proposed ordinance bill does meet programs. And if you're cleaning, like, sidewalks and roads and, you know, whatnot, I I'm assuming that these are also probably should be contracts anyway. But I I guess I started down this rabbit hole thinking if it was presented to us, you know, by people who understood this process, you know, this distinction that we should just add money to the pot in the way that it was originally presented. But I I I actually don't know that answer anymore.
I can answer the Aegion question because we went down this one before when we were when this was first kinda brought up a while ago, and then I wasn't sure where I was gonna go after this. For that one in particular, because it's a little bit of both. Both county and both private land is being serviced by that one grant. It could remain a grant.
I guess we have it on the county website as a county program. Like, Maui County Clean and Safe is a county program. So Yeah. Anyway.
Yeah. But I'm that was just the determination a while ago. But it it we I don't know if member Rollins Fernandez wants some time, or what, but we do have a motion on the floor. And then if we need to, I do have to leave in, like, twenty minutes so I could pick up Ehukai and the rest of everybody that I gotta pick up. But then I'll be back in front of this com my computer. This computer. Oh, you can be at home?
Yes. Yeah. Thank you. Kids.
Chair. Yes. Remember, Oh Jin's, I I support it either way.
Sure. Sure. But I know clarity
is Oh. And process. So I I prefer to take our lunch now and, not vote on it. I will vote on whichever the language ends up being, but I would like a little time to understand this new process that we are being asked to follow.
That's totally fine with me because this is gonna impact so many things. Not a problem. And I do appreciate your support and the members' future support. I really do. But I'm happy to, let this be the catalyst for all discussion we need to have to figure out how we're gonna make this all make sense with all the new changes. That's totally cool with me.
Okay.
So So she's gonna withdraw her motion Yeah. And then withdraw the second? Okay. I got a proposal for our residency area funds.
Okay. So shift gears. We'll we'll revisit yours.
Yeah. So well, before member Ohajin's leave. Right? So it has been, proposed, informally to increase each pot by 60,000. Not everybody has an additional 60,000 of need, but I would love to accommodate the members that have additional need in a one time if you have a named, group that you want to let them condition it out of the mayor's small grants pot, and leave the funds out out the of year.
To then
allocations. We just approve all of that. And whatever they're named today, additional is, I have no problem with them naming it and conditioning it out of the mayor's small grand spot if it's 25,000 or less. Okay. Is that a second? Okay. That's my motion.
I'll second.
Okay.
Wait. I I don't think that's an actual motion. That sounds like a process, and they I don't think that they know what names that they wanna do right now.
They got to know what names they have in mind right now.
And the
amount. Okay. Motion made
by Member Paulton, second by Member Johnson. Discussion.
When we get to it, in the small grants, I have language to increase that $25,000 to $40,000 for the small grants. That might I just want to let you know I'm not on that discussion yet, but that would be my language when we get to it.
Interesting. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, Chair. My motion before we took a recess was to increase all residency areas, to 200,000.
That's my, counter proposal because I don't
Right.
Right. So I'm okay with the proposal. I support the proposal. I'm not prepared to, do that right now. I don't have a, like, a a $60,000 grant or I don't know. It's it's gonna be messy. My counterproposal because I have a 50,001. I don't know what member Sonnenci has, but that would be an easier move. So if, we could make it $150,000 that would be better. And then we can make the if we agree on doing that, then we can make the motions when we get to small grants after.
So, the motion on the floor is to increase this up to 200 or is it one hundred forty? One and fifty. 150. But
also to Member Paltons, if you went over 150 like both member Rollins Fernandez and I did, then we can do a condition of the small grants in the mayors?
Yes. That's right. That would
be my motion. And so that we can release member Oh Jin's to go pick up her son. Oh, okay. Like, I I I see that you have multiple small grants, so I don't know if Member Senanci, you're ready to make the full motion of which grants would go under small grants at this moment. But I'd prefer to make that motion when we get back from
lunch. Yeah.
I can be ready.
Okay. So motion on the floor is to increase the 140,000 residency area to 140,000 to 150,000
And the remaining $50,000 for the Hana residency area and the Molokai residency area to small grants. Okay.
Apparently. Whoever has need For
whichever residency area, will be moved to small grants.
Okay. So it's 150. All in favor say aye. Aye. Okay.
Motion carries. Let's take lunch. Right? You guys need to do the assessment of whatever. So do you wanna come back in one hour? 01:30? 01:45? It's 11234.
I'd like to ask home.
I'm sorry.
It's for the 145. 145?
If if it's okay, though, because I think we left on unless you guys wanna do more things, but we left on my motion. But I won't be back ready to participate until about 02:15. Okay.
So we didn't finish your motion. Yeah. We didn't finish yours. No. Because The new
The new version of what we gotta do at County Lands. But I won't be at home until about 02:15. But I don't have to leave for another twenty minutes, but I know we're all getting fussy, so I
can do whatever. Okay. Member Valles Fernandez.
So there's the two proposals for the county owned land grants and then the residency area grants, member also has, that. I I would be open to, tabling that discussion or revisiting that. Maybe just we'll just say, like, either, like, at the end of this department after we finish and or at 02:15 or 02:30 when member, Uhu Hajins, is settled at her
next destination. Okay. Sounds good. So 01:45, back for lunch. Look at the time.
You guys are fine? Okay. Welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It is now 01:52 and we're going to continue where we left off. We were talking about the residency area conditions which is on page 24 of your of the handout that was given to everybody on priorities.
Maybe we could move on from that because remember, Uhu Hajins did have things to do, and she's not back yet. So maybe we can go on to the next thing.
Okay. Is that what you all wanna do? We'll come back
to this? Or I mean We'll come back to she's not here, and she's indicated she had changed. That was
my request before we,
resist. Okay. So where we, are gonna pick up. So let's talk let's continue on with open space, natural resources, cultural resources and scenic views preservation fund, page 56 on the budget bill. And these are the continuation of your conditions. Chair, before we move
on, on page 15 I did have to change the name of one of the grant recipients.
Okay.
Under two grants and dis disbursements for business development and technology, item two, counseling for native Hawaiian advancement of a
we're to going able All in favor, make raise your hand and say aye. One, two, three, four, five, six, member Cook, and seven. Okay. Seven and excuses. Member Oh, Jensen. Motion carries. Anything else? Member Batongen?
I fulfilled my kuleana. Thank you.
Okay.
So on this condition, is which Councilmember Cook Revolving Fund one to add a new condition for up to $3,400,000 for the acquisition of 14 acre parcel on Alahele Place. Member Cook.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, members. This is my proposal for South Maui from Open Space, Natural the one.
Page 35 on the priority matrix for those of you that aren't there yet.
Thank you, Member Palta. Thank you very much, Member Palta.
Second?
Discussion.
Okay. I made a motion. Does somebody have a second?
Yeah. I said second.
Thank you. Is a 14 acre parcel.
Moved by Member Cook, seconded by Rollins Fernandez.
This request is for a 14 acre parcel on all the Hilli place in Kihei. Tax map key print 23Dash9017O34 to be used for the southern terminus of the North South Collector Road and flood control. This property is on the Makai side of the Peelani Highway, right before the Maui police South Maui Police Department's traffic light. It is It's an interesting piece of property. It's extremely inexpensive for the cost.
The owner is 85 years old, bought it several years ago, And able do that. Able able to And
that. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, chair. I'm supportive of the effort. I know it's we've been working on this for a long time. My question is, regarding the, funding source. Is this going to be part of the North South Collector Road? Yes. You're like, you're gonna pave over it and make it a road?
No. No. Okay. The North South Collector Road goes on the western edge of it.
First quarter
we quarter
it is it's going be for flood mitigation and open space.
Okay. Thank you, director. Budget director.
Comments? Thank you, chair.
Thank you, members. Yeah. I wanted to raise a similar concern as Councilmember Rollins Fernandez. If we know at this time that a portion of the property will not be used as open space in line with the code requirement, I would request that we at least carve out that portion and purchase it with a different source of funding. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Member Rollins Fernandez. Mahalo,
Does budget director have a recommendation on which funding? And then that way we don't have to guess.
Go ahead. Thank you, chair. It will be used for the North South Collectorate. It may be possible to bond fund it under a CIP under Department of Public Works.
Thank you. Friendly amendment?
Works for me. A friendly amendment.
Works for me as the secondary. Okay. Any more discussion? Member Senancy, welcome. Member Patonga knows MPO.
So yes. Have a question. If if part of it is gonna be used to support, the drainage, there's, 5,000,000 from prior year appropriations. So any part of it that's being used for the North South Collector Road, I think the bond funding thing is appropriate. But maybe if part of it is going to be used to support drainage, can come out of the 5,000,000 prior year's appropriation because that's what that was for. Right?
Thank you for the proposal. The reason that I didn't opt for that is because there's several properties that are like actually in the drainage basins, the more active. Or you
have other plans for that money?
I think that other not within this budget right now, but I think that that money needs to be stay there and add to it slightly for some of the other negotiated parcels. Okay. And and if I may, also the fact that this is gonna be a kind of a dual use. It's the drainage and the future road easement. The problem that we're having in South Maui with the North South Collector Road is they're having to go through imminent domain at the very last minute, and I just vehemently, adamantly don't wanna do that. This is gonna be the last section.
You already have a willing seller.
The county will own it, and we won't have any problems. Okay.
Thank
you. Alright. Member Batangan. Question. Oh, sorry. Member Batangan. And then member
Yeah. I had a similar concern with the use of the open space fund for this purpose. I guess my recommendation would have been something similar, to what budget director said. Bond fund the purchase of the entire parcel, since we can attribute that that to the CIP project itself. And then if there's a portion that doesn't need to go towards the road, and this is a part where I have a question for the budget director, would we be able to have public works then pay back the or have the open space fund pay back public works for that portion that's not needed for the roadway project?
We've done that before. Member I mean, Director Billner.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Betongen. Yes, I think there's an opportunity. You can see in the open space fund, there are already some conditions where we're paying debt service. If we did buy this property with bond funds and we were able to allocate which portion of the debt service was going to become open space and which portion is actually going to be used for the CIP, very point.
Thank you. So we would still be point. Doing it now, but we would address that. You'll address it internally. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. Member Rollins Fernandez. Member Cook, do we have an appraisal for this?
Appraisal. Believe the appraisal was 3.6.
Okay. And the administration has it?
Yes.
Okay. Okay. Any more discussion?
Chair? Yes. Apologies to interject. Staff just needs clarification on where this is going. So, we have noted, the Councilmember Cook made the motion to put a condition under the open space fund, 3,400,000 for the acquisition, and then a friendly amendment was accepted to put it under public works for bond fund. Is that the entire thing would be a bond fund under our public works now?
Yes. And after the they internally figure out which portion would be eligible for open space, open space would pay the debt service off that bond.
And then, Chair, to there is an existing CIP called NSS Collector Road, Waipu'ilani Street to Ko'onolulu Street under the Department of Public Works. Is that the CIP, the 3,400,000, would go under? No. It would be a separate one.
It's separate.
Because it's brand new.
Okay. Thank you. So, then staff will create a I'll put in a new line item for a new CIP, perhaps acquisition of TaxMap key and the TaxMap key and then with an Appendix C with the description that was put in the open that was suggested for the open space fund condition as the Appendix C description. I guess if it's okay, staff does have a question as to what kind of project we would consider that. Would that since it's acquisition, would it just be other projects?
It's gonna be open space for I mean, not open space. It would be acquisition for maybe the budget director can help, but Was principally for open flood mitigation, open space future road. What would you call that?
Was this gonna be used for North Salt Collector Road? The portion portion of it, right? And then that director Molina was supportive. Public works.
Also, as far as this price, the department will negotiate with the owner and do that. This isn't up to amount. It isn't like it's basically that.
Okay. Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, we do have categories for both drainage and for road improvements. I won't read the whole paragraph that goes along with that. So I think it could go into road improvements or if we want, we can put it under other projects to sort of cast that broad umbrella to catch all of the possible uses of the property. Maybe other projects would be the wisest at this point. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Member Betoncan.
Thank you. Member Cook, have you discussed this with the department? I just wanna make sure that, because the project is eligible for federal funding. We don't and I just wanna make sure that your plans for acquisition are built into their overall plans for the project because they're this is on the tip and the step, and I just wanna make sure that it hasn't already been accounted for.
My understanding talking with Director Molina, this is something that they wanted and needed and they haven't secured it. You. Member Cook. That's helpful.
Okay. So no more discussion. Call for the motion. Okay. Great. Eight ayes, one excused, which is Member Ohajans. Thank you, members. Next we have Member Senancy revolving fund number one to add a new condition for up to $3,000,000 for Kao Hai Lei. Go
ahead. Second.
Member Senancy, second by Member Paul. Discussion?
Member Senancy. Mahalo members, this is my revolving fund condition and we heard from the members of Kao Halei at the Hana budget meeting.
They
currently have a willing seller in the 115.56 acres and a willing holder in Hawaii Islands land trust for this conservation easement. Members in the past, these properties were marketed for luxury home developments. And Keoghali'i has worked to protect these important cultural lands, which includes burials and hayao to put into conservation. And there are funding available in the open space fund and has been good managers of these land management open spaces. And I ask for your Support.
Support. Thank you.
I move to amend the motion. Proceed. To include the deletion on page 57 of number six up to 600,000, must be for a grant to for the purchase of 9.78 acres located at for their testimony also. And I also moved to delete number five up to 1.3 for the acquisition of property located at 131 Shaw Street in Lahaina, Maui. The reasoning for the first one, mister Crawford mentioned in testimony that they won't be going forward with that one.
And number five, I believe we had heard from the managing director sometime over the past year that the Salvation Army doesn't want money. They want land to relocate. So we can free up another 1.9 mil in that way with this one motion. Second.
Very good.
Okay. Can you read me? What? Sorry. What page?
Page 57 of special purpose revenues.
And then it's number Five and six. Five and six.
To remove those.
Understood. Thank you.
And I think members in NC said he accepted it as a friendly motion. One vote.
Yes.
You're fine? Okay. Same Any more discussion? Member Johnson.
All in favor?
Aye. Oh, he was not gonna talk. Oh, you're bully. All in favor. So eight ayes, one excused. Member Ohajans. Follow. All right. Next one is member Senensi again for Kipahulu Community Association. 59,000.
Mahalo, chair. The move to add a new condition under the open space preservation fund. Up to 59,000 must be a grant to the Kipuulu Community Association for the purchase of approximately 2.64 acres in Kipuulu. TMK parent two one dash six -seven thousand and eight for conservation.
Okay. Second.
Me. Motion made by Member Senensi, second by Member Polton. Discussion.
You, Chair. We also heard from several testifiers at the Hana community budget meeting. This was, it seemed like an easy consideration for the price that they're getting two acres in Kipaulo Maui for 55,000 and an additional 4,000 towards their closing costs.
Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none. Aye. All in favor say aye. Aye. Eight ayes. One excused member, Oho Hodges.
Thank you, ma'am.
Yay. Very good.
Yes. I have one more. Can ask the budget director to come back online? On page 57, the second condition under prior year's appropriations. Had met I did I understand you correctly that you were going to transmit a budget amendment to this body to delete number two of the grants that had previously been appropriated for Malama Kakanilua.
Director? Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Batanggan. Yes, I need to confirm because I think there were a couple from Alamakukanalua, and we were talking about one that was under the economic development and cultural programs revolving fund. I will confirm that we've drafted an amendment for this one as well.
Okay. Because yeah. Let us know because if we can just take it up as a part of this, then you don't have to go and transmit a separate item given that the open space fund appropriations don't lapse. We can clean it up while we're on the matter. Thank you.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember. Yes. If we could just go ahead and do it for FY twenty seven, that would probably be the cleanest. Thank you. Very good.
Okay. I guess then, members, I would move to strike item two under prior year appropriations. I would read up to $500,000 must be from Malama Kakane Lua for safety and security for the Barren Culture Preserve, the county owned lands at Waiale.
Member Patonga, second by Chair Lee. You. Next
question? Members, this is one that Member Senanti and I have been reaching out to the administration for trying to help the applicants be able to move forward with their application. But given the new guidance on what can be a grant and what can be a contract. We were advised that they cannot issue a grant for this as directed under the open space fund and that a budget amendment would be prepared and transmitted to us. So this strike would just save us that effort in the future.
Member Senancy, you're fine. Sounds like both of you. Okay. So roll call.
Yeah, the director's coming back on. I would prefer to leave it, but if they're going to transmit a budget amendment anyway, figured it'd be easier. Okay. Director.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member. I guess I'm just trying to clarify. Are we deleting the condition in its entirety or are we just deleting Malama Kakane Lua?
Oh, I mean
So that
the funds would still be appropriate for safety and security for burial cultural preserve. It just wouldn't specifically name Malama Kakanilua.
Thank you, director. I would prefer to do what she just said so that the money can still be used for that purpose. So I guess if the chair is willing to allow for that amendment, I would amend the motion to just strike the grant recipient named in the ordinance.
Okay.
Agree. Member Asenancy.
Thank you, chair. Just for clarification. Bo, if the budget director is still there, so for the funding, it would go out
Director. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Senecchi. Yes, it would go out to bid
that's And
about this, I can withdraw the motion and then they can transmit the budget amendment so that we can take it up at a later date and then you can have time to think about it with your staff and then to discuss it with the organization as well.
Only because for me Malama Kakane Lua has expertise in protections of Ivikupuna. And so I would want to put more protections as who if should it go out. Okay. I understand. Be able to.
Okay. So that's just the case. I'll withdraw the motion. And then when the when the administration transmits the budget amendment, can have that conversation. Thank you. Okay.
You withdrawing this. Any others? None. Okay. So what I do have here is department cuts on fiscal neutral requests under Granicus. That's the department request. Reduce economic development program category B operations and equipment by 50,000. Justification department's request for the public information and communication specialist and website design team for Maui Nui Strong. So moved. Okay. That was good. Second. Okay. Member Paul Ten, second by Charity. Discussion.
Department. Repairs. Department.
All in favor.
Oh. Okay. Gonna move forward. Member Senensi? Yes. Eight ayes, one excused. Member Ohadges. The next one is, department request again, reduce the economic development program under grant and disbursements for business development and technology by 150,000 in Category B operations and equipment for the professional golfers association for the century tournament.
So moved. Member Spalton. Second.
Second by Cherni and justification as PGA for century tournament based first
able
And Aye. The
Great.
This is eight ayes, one excuse. Motion carried. Now we're going to go into the operating budget administration program. Chair, did we take up all of the department requests?
No. We didn't do the middle one, which was an increase. Correct. I don't know if somebody wants to do it on their behalf, but Sure. We're in cut mode.
Yeah. We're in cut mode.
Sorry. That's why we we skipped over it is because we're cutting first. Cutting. No. I just was Just on the page.
I guess she didn't have the appetite for it, maybe.
I don't know.
Or did you intentionally miss it?
Are you I'm there.
Cut the way. Did you intentionally miss it or inadvertently miss it? I have intentionally missed it. Oh, she intentionally missed it.
Chair, are we not doing the process where we do priorities and then we do cuts and then we take up departmental requests? Because, you know, going all over places like
We did priorities. Right? We did that this morning before lunch. And then we just went into the discussion about
So process was our cut and then departmental requests, but I don't know.
This this was my cut. What is your cut? The department's request.
Oh, see.
All right. Justification. So members priorities, they were 12. We went through that.
Go B, and the mayor's office, and then go down the budget bill. Okay. That's what I'm trying to do.
Okay. So let me just proceed then. Administration program budget bill 55, page 14. Are there any cuts or amendments to A or B? Member Palton.
B12, small A paren one, category A, I move to decrease the appropriation by, 120,000.
Okay. Second.
Motion made by a member of Palton, second by member senate seat discussion.
Category A. This decrease is based on historical carryover and historically regardless of who is in the mayor during an election year, they have a hard time to fill political appointee vacancies because of the uncertainty. That's why I'm proposing a 120,000
cut. Cut. Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none, all in favor, raise your hand. Say aye.
Actually Oh,
Member Betzhakar.
Yeah, I do have a discussion. I guess I'm supportive. Is there I so when I did my review of the of the mayor's budget, I didn't go by by funds. I just looked at the department as a whole. Can I ask member Palton if she's proposing cuts to
other one? Yeah. My category c and d or small c, small d cuts are gonna be a little bit less because I've been informed that they have, or are hiring, grants people. And, you know, with all the grants we just added, I don't wanna slow down the disbursement of the money that we put in to be to be dispersed. So I'm decreasing those as indicated in my original.
But those are my next motions because we're going by By by category. Yeah. By category. Yeah. So you're you're proposing to decrease
sorry. Can you repeat
the motion again? For this category, small a, I'm proposing a $120,000 decrease.
So from the admin program, yeah?
From the admin program. Okay. And then I'll lessen my grants and economic development decrease.
But the totals that you had previously indicated, like, the totality of it all is gonna remain the same?
I think I'm gonna do the grants, 20,000 decrease in economic development, a 20,000 decrease in light of that they're interviewing and all the money that we put in for them to disperse. We need to make sure that they have the staff to disperse them.
Okay.
Okay. But for this motion is 120,000.
Thank you. I guess I just hadn't broken down my evaluation of the mayor's office into into specific funds. I guess I'll speak
Okay.
Now
Discussion.
Yeah. So when I saw the proposed increases for salary and wages for the office and the mayor as a whole, I think I was a little surprised. They're asking for a roughly 12 percent increase in salaries and wages, but not asking for a single additional employee. And I thought that was a little excessive, especially when they're proposing to give four of those employees director level salaries. And I think it still feels disingenuous to me that the explanation for those largest increases was pay parity between the have civil service protection.
And I do think that the office is doing good work. But roughly 12% increase is a little steep. And that's roughly four times what some of our first responders just got. So if my back of the napkin math is correct from what Member Palton just said, you know, that would still give the office of the mayor roughly double what some of our first responders got. I feel like that's fairer.
And so I will be supportive of this motion and the next few that she indicated are coming. Thank you, chair.
Member Bolton.
I guess, for my second and final, if you average it out because I think SHOPO got, like, a 5% or something more, which I don't know why they're Different. Treating our I think that all of our first responders, even emergency service dispatch and ocean safety, who I consider all first responders, should be treated all similarly. But just pointing that out, not all the fir first responders got junk deals.
Yeah. Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none. All in favor, raise your hand, say aye. This is eight ayes. One excused member, member Yeah. Okay. Member Hodgins. Okay. Member Bolton.
Thank you. My next one will be in small c paragraph or sorry. Parentheses one category a to decrease that appropriation by 20,000.
Okay. Second is my representative. Okay. So c category.
What did you say? C category. A. A.
And I will note that my initial one was 50,000, but I was told that they're interviewing or are in the process of hiring several grants managers. And given all the money we just put in, I I would like to get that money out the door. And so I I would like them to hire those folks so that the money can get out the door more expeditious ly than they did this year than it did this year.
Okay. So a second. All in favor? Well, I get a second? Sorry, I missed it. Member of the senate seat. Any more discussion? Seeing none. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Eight ayes. Member Woo Hajans, one excused.
In category a of small d, same section, I moved to reduce the appropriation by 20,000. Proceed. Move. By member Palatin, second by chair Lee. Uh-huh. Seeing discussion as previous mobs. Shame. K.
All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Okay. Eight ayes. One excused. Motion carries. Next.
I will yield the floor to my colleagues. Any more?
Okay. Thank you. So any Member Johnson, are you coming down with
Yeah. Have cuts.
Okay. My turn?
Yes. Your turn. All
right. Thank you, Chair. So
Directors of of of
thousand dollars for an appropriation of $300,000
Is there a second? You. Kemper, bottom of page 15 on the budget bill. Second. Okay. Member Johnson, seconded by Member Poulton. Go ahead.
Thank you, Chair. Dollars 150,000 is allocated for the women's tournament and that's an OM-two. Reduction allows for the same amount to be used for the Maui Invitational Administration may come for a budget amendment if funds are needed. That's my discussion. Okay. I see Director Milner on. You have something to add? Director.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Johnson. So 250,000 of this is for the men's Maui Invitational and 250,000 will continue to be used for the Maui Invitational. So this would reduce the amount available for the women's invitational to 50,000, which means most likely that event will not occur this year. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. All right. I'm going to remove that then.
Okay. You withdrawing?
Yeah. I'll withdraw it.
Okay. Both withdraw.
Kate. Okay. I have a second one. Kate, go ahead. This is economic development, page 15 in the budgets. I moved to reduce category B by $50,000 leaving a total appropriation of $680,221 If I can get a second, I can explain.
Second, November, Paulton. Go ahead.
Thank you, Jared. So reduction in 9,030,039, B as in Bravo,-six thousand three hundred and seventeen County grant subsidy funding for marketing and guidelines related to the Makaiki season line item. This is for marketing guidelines. 50,000. Page 15, and it's it's in the right. There's still a $100 for marketing. If director Milner has anything to add for that, I'd like to hear.
She didn't pop up.
Okay. She didn't pop
up. Oh,
yes. Page 16, number eight. Makahiki has 850,000. I think O'Evie has another one. That's why. Is that why?
Right. So that's
maybe director can explain. There's two pots.
I can explain. OIV has 20,000 for employee Makahiki games. Administration has 850,000 for Makahiki season that the understanding is will be distributed through grant process and a 150,000 additional is gonna be used for marketing and advertisement. So he's proposing to reduce marketing and advertisement by 50,000 so that there is still a 100,000 for marketing and advertisement.
Great discussion. Alright. Member, Johnson, are you fine? Yeah.
A 100. I'm ready for the question.
Okay. Anybody else? Member, Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, chair. We heard from deputy director, Robinson this morning, explaining. And I know it's really hard to put things in in two words, and I assume that they have kind of a plan, which is why they proposed the budget they did. So I will be voting against this. Okay. Roll call. Anybody else have discussion?
Seeing none. Roll call, please.
Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote, Councilmember Tom Cook? Aye. Councilmember Gabe Johnson? Yes. Councilmember Chair Alice Lee? Aye. Councilmember Tamar Fulton? Aye. House member Keanu Rollins Fernandez. No. House member Shane Senensi.
No. House
member Noehua Hajans excused. Committee vice you I'm
at look I'm
I will move to this is again the Page 16 in the budget bill parentheses eight, the makihi season, and I move to reduce the appropriation by $250,000 for a remaining total of approximately $600,000
Yes.
If I can get a second, I can explain.
I'll second. Okay. Member Johnson, second by Member Poulton.
Members, I'm going to call a spade a spade. I sometimes feel that this administration is not getting its grant process correct and there's been a lot of money left on the table. I feel like this is really they haven't administered these grants very well, and I think it's biting off more than they can chew. So that is, my I wanted to speak about the the process doesn't seem to be going very well, but I do support I do support Makiki. It's just a matter of can they do it? Is my question. And that's that's my explanation. Thank you, chair.
Okay. Is this budget director?
Ms. You're muted. Ms.
I didn't hear my hit
my mute button. Apologize. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Yeah, I think Deputy Director Robinson spoke to this pretty well this morning. I think we feel this funding is important and important at the level that it's at to really try and launch this with a really strong first year. I think we've had a lot of conversations around our grants and our grant processes, so I don't feel the need to really delve into that right now. We're making a strong effort to standardize and really make it smoother for our grantees. And it's possible some of the applicants for this Makahiki funding will fall into that $25,000 bucket, but we can have that conversation at another date.
I know we don't need to
get into the weeds today. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Any other discussion? Member Rollins Fernandez.
I speak in strong opposition to this motion. This is the first time that they've done this. And anything to uplift some of the culture that's been erased through colonization, I'm going to support. And I'm going to help them to make it successful and not just cut them off at
the knees. Mahalajar. Thank you. Any other discussion? Member Batangan. Thank you, chair.
Had deputy director not come to testify before us for on this line item specifically, I probably would have been open. But it sounds like this is a priority for the administration and that they have a plan in place. Yeah. I'm comfortable cutting the advertising budget, but I think I would like to leave the programmatic budget in place. You know, we'll see how it goes this year, whether or not they're able to utilize all $850,000, and then I might be open in the future to adjustments. But I do want Deputy Director to know that I did hear her and
strong
strong relationship relationship with with support the Makahiki the Board program. Of the thing is, the thing is, we know throughout the year, we we have an inordinate amount of amendments And they seem to always have additional funding, extra funding, carryover savings from where we don't know. And so there's an abundance of money within the totality of the budget that they can draw upon for this program if needed. Thank you.
Chair, I want to jump in here real quick. I think this budget has been going pretty well in a give and take relationship. I don't want to pour salt on anyone. I'm going to withdraw my emotion. I don't want the why that we have been having, the harmony that we've been having. So I'm going to withdraw my motion. Thank you.
Mahalo Member Johnson.
All right. Member Senanci, who is?
Thank you, Chair. And as I mentioned, my reduction moved to reduce Office of the Mayor Economic Development Program General B account by 50,000.
Okay.
And that was the same as the the request from the mayor, it looks like.
Yeah. I think we did it. I have
another one. Oh, you'd you'd Yeah. Oh, wait. The departmental request? Was a departmental request, but I thought, member Johnson was going after the the, Makahiki. Yeah. No. The 50,000. Yeah. They did. Was that his? Yeah. That was different, right, from this one?
Just the that report. This 50,000 is the motion carried. So
Oh, is The rest this is the same?
No, I just withdrew. He withdrew that.
This is category b.
The first cut we made when we came back from lunch was the 50,000 in economic development program. That was The mayor's one? Yeah. Oh, okay. So we we did that. Okay. We can't cut it twice because it's already cut.
I do have another cut, though.
Well, unless you wanna Well,
I did have two conditions from from our priorities.
We we were waiting for, member Oh Jinx to come back. We're gonna do it, but Okay. We wanna wait for her to come.
Thank you.
Member Johnson. Alright.
So this is page 16. Three grants and disbursements for the visitor industry. I, tourism management grant fund, and I move to reduce appropriation by 300,000 for a remaining total appropriation of 150,000, but I'm open to a different number if someone wants to talk.
I moved up that to 450,000.
For So
leaving 50,000 in there?
Leaving nothing in there.
Oh, so
Delete it. Okay.
Yeah.
Alright. Well, let's have that talk.
Do you
have a second? I I Second. My my motion is for 300,000, but I I'd like to hear what the members are gonna speak on this.
Their Member Bolton.
Sure. Their management always turns into advertisement and there's no management. Like, member Cook and myself live in probably member San Nancy, live in areas that endure the the impacts of the revenue that we enjoy. And there's no managing it. Like, you can give people money and they can see they're managing it or they're doing this and it's gonna manage it.
It doesn't manage it to the the worst of the aggressions residents encounter with tourists acting badly. In my opinion, there is no amount of money that you can throw at anything that will mitigate tourists acting badly. And that's not to say that not that all tourists act badly, but the tourism management fund, I think, is not just to, whatever. It's the problem is the worst of the worst, the tourists that act badly, that don't have respect, that go walk into people's burnt down lives and do whatever they want. And there's no amount of money that you can throw at that problem that's gonna fix it.
Either they're gonna do the right thing or they're not gonna do the right thing. And so that's that's my discussion is there's a lot of great tourists. There's tourists that are good people. There's tourists that are helpful. There's tourists that volunteer, donate, whatever. And this is not about them. It's about the tourists mitigating the harmful actions of tourists that member Senanci's district, member Cook's district, my district see the most. And there's no amount of money that you can throw at that problem that's gonna mitigate the worst of the worst or even the bad. Because they come here with the entitled attitude of this is America. I can do whatever I want.
It's land of the free, and that's me, and I'm gonna do what I want. So we're looking for cuts. 450,000 and a lot of money. I'm not impressed with who the money has been given out before and the results. I mean, with the exception of the engage summit because that was a specific thing. But, as they're dispersed these grants, I'm not impressed. Thank you.
Chair Lee and then Member Senancy. Sorry, was looking this way.
So we need to be clear on what the motion is.
The motion is I move to cut 300,000 of the 450,000 pots. So leaving 150,000 in there.
Okay. So you didn't say that you're open to an amendment from Member Poten?
I am, but I also want to hear what other members are saying because as soon as she said cut it, I saw Council Member Cookshake and said no. So, again, in spirit of harmony come on. This
is not a harmonious subject. So, let's expect reality here. My reality is we should leave money in the budget for tourism, education, and information, and promotion the way it should be promoted. And in order to do a good job, a amount of money needs to be left there for that purpose. So that's why I would be voting against your motion and the and a motion to delete all of it. Thank you.
All right. Okay. Member Senecchi.
Thank you, Chair. I do agree with Chair Lee, but I mean I wish some of the money would go to when you come down the stairs at the Kahului Airport, maybe talk about invasive species or put some kind of eye on some how to act when you're as a visitor. You know, but I don't see any, you know, instead I see these huge signs, three stories tall about the helicopter or or something commercial. So I wish the funding would go to more education about our pristine waters, beaches, freshwater streams, all of these things to be respectful on our island as a visitor. And I I know that two of our council members will be kind of paneling a discussion on this topic.
And so Oh, that's WIR. I don't know if I don't know if zeroing out the entire thing might or or, you know, I I don't know how that that discussion may go, but I'll leave it up if if Thank you.
Okay. Member Ramos Fernandez. Mahalo chair. So I
looked up the correspondence from mayor. And for 2026, it says the funding, were awarded to Maui County Visitor Association for Hele Mai Maui. I don't know what that is. And Kolea Leia Retreat Center of Maui LLC for resilient community demonstrations and eco tours. So I would be supportive of Member Bolton's proposal.
I think on the floor I think it's Member Johnson, right? Your motion is for $3.50. 300,000. 300,000.
But this is a debate I'd like to hear from some other members as well because I'm willing to move on that number. Hijab.
Okay. Member Batangan then Chair Lee spoke. Member Batangan?
Thank you, Chair. I guess this is one where I could use some context. Who does this money normally go to and what does it normally use? Yeah. But so I guess but that doesn't have to be the case rate because, like, recipient isn't named.
So, I mean, I support the idea of tourism management. Each island has a destination management plan, and that doesn't sound like it's being funded through this. You know, I somewhat agree with member Palton that the worst of the worst, you know, you're probably not gonna change their minds. But I do also think that there are people who would like to do well here and would just need some guidance. If the money can be used to help change the minds of those who are amenable, I think it'd be a worthwhile investment. I just don't have a whole lot of context. I see the budget director popping on and maybe she can speak to some of the questions that I just brought
up. Director.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmembers. Yes, as you all know, tourism is one of our economic drivers, which is why funding was left in the budget for this in order for the county to continue to participate in the process. We are completely open to the Councilmembers adding conditional language here to add some legislative intent for the use of the fund, if there are specific directions they would like to see it go. So I just wanted to add that to that conversation. Thank you, Chair. Thank you. Who else?
Amber Cook.
Thank you, Chair. I'm okay with cutting $150,000 I hear from my colleagues the issue. I think I look in this in a more of a positive light as an opportunity to basically have a voice, the county to have a voice to mitigate some of the problems that my colleague has described. I don't think not funding it at all is what thing.
I think that's
are going
And And
neighborhood.
The
hotels at all, but restaurants and stores. The messaging can be positive and useful and I'd like to keep the funding. I agree that this is an area that can be cut. So if you'd have a $150,000 cut, I'd be very, very supportive and willing to support it.
If I can respond, Chair. I'm trying to find that balance that we as a body have. Because some of you folks don't wanna raise property taxes. And I don't really like cutting programs, if that's what you know, I'm not afraid to raise property taxes on the wealthy, on non owner occupied, on the wealthy, on the folks who don't live here, on the folks with $3,000,000 homes and higher. I'm there for that. But some folks aren't. But this is where you I'm trying to meet you where you're at. And if you folks don't wanna cut the things that I'm proposing, then I'll see you in property tax time. And that's when it we're gonna it it ends up it's I'm trying to have a little harmony. We've been really good.
You're getting my attention.
So alright.
You hear where I'm coming from. Those are my things. Cherry, you raise your hand, I call on you. Go ahead, Cherry.
Good job, member Johnson.
I can be amenable to 300,000 in the
I spirit of want a little history. Visitor industry, we used to give them millions of dollars at one point and went to the Buy Visitors Bureau or Buy Hotel and Lodging Association. They're an advocacy group. But last year I think it was three fifty or whatever. It went to a wedding organization and 300 to the one And that's who got the money and it's part of their industry.
I support the visitor industry because they're our economic driver. As much as people I read about, hate it, whatever it is, they are the ones that are bringing in new money and helping our economy. And it's important, right? And I believe that by us giving some money that we'll have some voice in this to be able to say this is what we want. This is not like what HTA does or what the state does because they give way more.
I know that and I believe that they have their destination management groups that have gone to different communities. I've participated in that with MEDB. It's not perfect. Nothing is ever perfect. So I actually don't want to cut anything to leave it as is, but I'll go we'll vote and I'll there will be a roll call vote. Member Rollins Fernandez?
Member Poulton had her hand up, but I wanted to also flag that member O'Hodgins is online now if you want to
get her disclaimer. Oh, very good. Welcome. Member?
Thank you. Thank you, chair. I'm at my private residence right now, and I have, two minors and a cat. Sorry it was a little bit long. I was following a bus home, so my drive took a little bit longer.
Welcome. Very good. Member
For context of last year, there was 450,000 and we conditioned $300,000 of that $450,000 for the Engage Summit. And to remember Sugimura's context, I think, you know, in the past, we've given them, like, 3,000,000, 4,000,000, $5,000,000 to the Maui visitors, and no other be of
do And
we're
to association. They relied on the overall overarching one, Hawaii Tourism Authority. When we came on, that was, like, one of the first cuts when I when I came on was the 3,000,000 or however much to the visitors association. And then COVID hit. Mhmm.
And then, like, you know, the state shut down regardless of if you wanted tourists or not. They because of the COVID situation. And then when the restrictions were lifted because of COVID or when the COVID restrictions were lifted, we couldn't keep up with the tourists that came in because the rental car industry had shipped off all their cars. Workers weren't back at work. And this is all without any promotion money.
And when we initially cut the 3,000,000 amount, we said we'd like to transition from telling promotion, telling people to come to educating them and telling them how to be good visitors. And what we were told by the visitors association at that time is, no. We don't do that. We only promote and we tell people to come. And so I'm going off of what they told me.
I don't I'm not, I'm not supportive of the way that the money has been spent. I think if we are gonna leave a 150,000 in there, I would I I would put it in educational educational about specifically about what to do during disasters because of all the short term rental entities that still exist ir lives. Think, I So if we're leaving any kind of money in there, I think it the language should be like informational, educational, not just like management, but informational and educational. My preference is disaster, but it could be any range of informational and educational. Like, you know, the Hawaii pledge, I think, is one.
We we put a lot of that information into the WEIR documents, the the booklet, the Maui County pledge, and things like that. So that would be my preference if and I can I can live with a $300,000 cut, but that's just the background for member Batonga because he said he didn't he he didn't know the full history, but they're gonna come? They're gonna come whether you're ready or not. They're gonna come whether whatever. You know? And there's no stopping them.
Okay, chair. Mary Johnson. I'm gonna amend my number. And if folks wanna add conditional language on the remaining pot, feel free in a different motion. I'll be open ears. But I'm gonna move to amend my proposal to reduce of a 150,000, leaving 300,000 in the pot. Can I get a second?
A second and a friendly amendment if we can condition the language just for education and not enlightenment, but
Okay. Information and education.
Information and education. There, it isn't so much for I just share. It isn't so much for promotion because they're going to be here. It's for the And do
somebody with a voice can kind of tune them up to
to behave. So, And staff, did you see
the It's
motion made by Member Johnson, second by Member Cook. And it is now you're reducing it. It's 300,000.
300,000 remaining in pot with additional conditional language that I hope the staff got. I think the discussion's been long enough on this fund, so I'm here and ready to vote. Sure.
Okay. Sure. Member Senancy?
Member Cook would be amenable, just as friendly amendments to also include disaster information, invasive species when traveling and what else we said? Just basic etiquette when visiting our parks and public spaces. Something like that. Okay. Shirley.
Would the body consider cultural orientation as well? As
the maker of the motion, I consider that a friendly amendment. As long as staff is getting these conditions, I'm here and ready to vote. Let's go.
Okay. I'm oh, go ahead, Amber Okay. So I just want you to know, roll call, I want to keep the $450,000,000 intact because I think that it should be way more. But I like all the conditional lag. I can tell I'm going to lose but it is probably going to be what Member Johnson is recommending and all the amendments in terms of the educational everything. That's all good too. Go ahead.
Chair, apologies just for staff to clarify. So, there was originally a motion by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Member Palton to reduce the fund by $300,000 and then there was a motion to amend Councilmember Johnson, Councilmember Cook second to change the amount to reduce to 150,000 and with friendly amendments to include a condition for funds to be used for information and education, including disaster preparedness, invasive species, etiquette in public spaces and parks, and cultural information or cultural practices. Excellent.
Mr. Krueger, on the disaster preparedness, can you note specifically while visiting? Because we have a of lot disaster preparedness for residents. It's for visitors. Like, kind of targeting it towards, I'd say more so the short term rental visitors because the resorts do take care of their visitors during a disaster. They even take care of some of our residents. So if the disaster preparedness portion of the sentence can see targeted towards short term rental visitors.
Got that? Okay. Yeah.
Okay. Alright. Roll call.
Chair, appreciate you with the roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook?
Aye.
Councilmember Gabe Johnson? Yes. Councilmember Alice Lee? Aye. Council member Tamar Palton. Aye. Council member Kanye Rollins Fernandez. Aye. Council member Shane Senensi.
Aye.
Council member Noheiwu Hajins. Aye. Committee vice chair Kuonoye Batangen. Aye. Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura.
No. Mahalo members.
Okay. Chair, that's eight ayes. One no motion passes.
Okay. Any more? Yes, Member. So
staff interpreted that as a motion to amend a main motion on the floor. So I think the committee just needs to vote one more time. Apologies.
The main motion as amended. Member Johnson. Main motion as amended. Motion as amended. It's your first. I think we discussed it already. Before you make the motion. Okay. No.
She wants to vote. Roll call. Yeah.
Same. Chair, proceed with the roll call vote. Councilor Thom Cook.
Aye.
Councilor Gabe Johnson. Yes. Councilor Charlie Lee. Aye. Councilor Tomar Poulton. Aye. Councilor Keanu Rollins Fernandez. Aye. Aye. Committee vice chair Kunue Batangian.
Aye.
Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura. No. Chair, that's eight ayes. One no motion passes.
Okay. Thank you.
Chair, now that member Oh James is here at any time, we can go into those items that we put off.
Okay. I think member Cook has something. Yeah. I have one more good
that's that's I I'm
floor.
At I'm Yeah. Because it was canceled, blah
blah blah. Okay. That's already under, departmental requests.
Okay. Anything else, members? Shirley, you have your hand up.
We take up member Ugu Hajin's item. Could we take up mine that we tabled yesterday? Okay. Because hers and mine go together.
Okay. I think we did yours. Did we do yours before the break and we're getting the text map key numbers, did we not finish it? Member Oh Jin's.
Thank you, chair. During our lunch recess, my pro bono councilmember slash attorney helped figure out what we can do, for this information. So we actually didn't take a vote. Okay. And I know Charlie, has a priority that we didn't do yet, which I'm happy to take up as well.
It's in, the revolving funds, but the other stuff we didn't do either. And I think the residency conditions we didn't do either. Yeah.
We were waiting for you to come back on that, the residency.
You so much for everybody's patience.
So you wanna take up yours? Office of the mayor and the office. Yeah.
I think it begins, unless I missed it, when I was driving with corp counsel
Oh, contract person.
Giving us some direction. Giving me, rather, some direction. Thank you.
Okay. Corp counsel. This is about contracts or grants, right? Is that the discussion?
Yes, I think about thank you, Chair. I think specifically about these two conditions. I think the advice is to move if the body would like to move forward with this vote and then I'll do with additional information, we can provide more advice by first reading.
So member Ohanjins, you're fine with the discussion you had with court counsel?
Yes. Okay. Again, majority of the conversation was handled through my pro bono attorney. But the information that I was provided is that I can continue as I originally intended was to give, and Malama Hamukua Maui grants. So if I may right now, I will make my motion.
Okay. So on page 14, number 12, office of the mayor, small a, paragraph three, in stewardship and maintenance of county owned lands Mhmm. I move to add $130,000 for two conditions. The first condition reads, don't mind the chicken. He's voting in support. Up to $50,000 must be for Namaka Omoliko for disposal, recycling, testing, and remediation of environmental contamination. And two, up to $80,000 must be for Malama Hamakua, Maui. Second.
Motion made by member Uhajan, second by was that member Ron Fernandez? Yeah. Discussion?
Thank you, chair. Both of these community groups, the first Namakau Maliko, as I described before we went into my first recess before lunch, plan to help bring back Maliko Bay and do a bunch of, as I described earlier, disposal, recycling, and testing remediation of that area. And Malama Hamokua Maui has been doing terrific work, tremendous work, and I hope to continue to support them. And, we are going to be doubling what the mayor had put in there, per their request. They suffered a lot of, trespassers, I guess we're gonna call it, during the floods that kind of ruined all the good work they had been doing.
So they I feel so terrible for them. But they gotta kinda redo what they've been doing, and I would just love to support them as they continue to do all the things they have been doing. Thank you so much, chair and members, and thank you for your patience and support.
Okay. Thank you. Member Rollins Fernandez. Mahalo clarify, about the motion. Does it include the, increase of a 100 30,000?
Yes. This time, I did remember to do that. Okay. I went
through it. Figured I missed it. Fully support, the good work, all the work that our, community members, community organizations do. Mahalo to, deputy corp council Wrigglesworth for spending her lunch, as well as mister Hanano, looking through, state statutes and, trying to figure out, the best way to move forward today. And we decided that having a little more time to make sure everything is, good and not just in the hot spot, would be best for everybody. And then we'll have a decision by first reading. So mahalo,
miss Frigglesworth. Mahalo, Jerry. Okay. Thank you. Anybody else have discussion? Did you get this? James and Kirsten. Okay. So when you first talked about this member, Oh, Hodgins, you had the whole tax map key and you were taking it in another category. But now you're very similar to what you had proposed initially in terms of naming the organizations.
Yes. So initially, as it reads on our priorities, we put it as a grant as we had been doing for a very long time. While the Maka Omoliko is a new entity and a new grantee, Malamohamoko Maui is not, and they are both on county owned lands. However, with some changes that, we've been doing with our grants, they had opined differently than what we have been doing in that perhaps county owned properties may need a RFP and a contract and not necessarily a grant. Over lunch, member Rollins Fernandez and, corporation counsel kinda well, I sat there and listened.
Kinda worked out how maybe we can do this better, especially to support the continued work of the people who've already been stewarding the lands. We see this in many places like teams on call, Malamahamokua, Maui, like a bunch of places, and it would kinda mess up the flow of things. So we figured out how to make it work. I think that's why we're gonna get an opinion from them. When I was making my motion the second time is when I was trying to figure out how we can do the RFP with the contract, but it was a little messy.
And so now we're back to original plan as proposed in doing the grant. I know it's been, like, a big mess, but thank you. Thank you. Important discussion. I'll member Ramos Fernandez.
Mahalo chair and member U'Hajans won't have to worry about this next budget, session because the the lease to Malama Hamakua Loa should be executed before then. I'm gonna manifest that. Okay.
Okay. Ready for vote? Oh, remember Cook. Oh, you're voting. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. So we have nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Yay. Figured that out. Alright. So oh, Charlie. Go ahead.
I'm going to need the assistance of Member of Uguhajans as the chair of the, HLU committee. She's way more familiar with the project than I am. Do have So, So, not
development project for well and water system improvements, infrastructure, and connections. Oh, member Hodgins?
I need a second. Thank you, chair. If you don't mind me taking it away now. It's actually 13,000,000, but there was a 3 in there for sure. So I moved to and I'll explain in a bit.
On page 52 of the GET tax fund, GE tax fund, reduce don't panic, Leslie. Number one, the 75,000,000 or central Maui regional wastewater reclamation facility, reduce it by 9,500,000. And on the page before that, in page 51, in letter f, insert a condition under the countywide sewer capital improvement reserve fund, which is what we created this fund for. Make a condition up to 9,500,000 must be used for Central Maui Regional Reclamation Facility, RWWRF, Waikapu under the department of environmental management. So copying that first language in one, pasting it in language in f, which leaves now $18,951,919 surplus GET unused tax funds.
And would like to add a number five condition to $13,000,000 for the Ho'onani Village mixed use water development project for well and water systems improvements, infrastructure, and connections.
K. Second.
You said the page, but, what document was it again?
Oh, 55.
Oh, bill 55. Okay. But I but I see budget director. Budget director.
That's a motion. Is that a motion? If it is, I second it.
Okay. So Yes. I said I moved to I will. Was a lot numbers. Go
ahead. Go
ahead. Aloha, chair. So the Sewer Capital Reserve Fund was really created to be an emergency fund specifically for sewer. So I just wanted to mention that by by using that fund, we're not leaving any funds if an emergency happens down the road. I also do have concerns about using GET.
I understand that the intent is to ultimately deed whatever is built over to the county. But when it's initially built, it won't be county. And my understanding from talking to deputy director Landgraf this morning is that the deeding is a like three to five years in the future. So I I just am not sure this is the right use of the funding. I do know that there are some conversations happening literally right now about Ohonani villages. So
if I
could ask the body's consideration to maybe table this for the moment until I have some more information from the water department and can come back to you, I would really appreciate it. Thank you, chair. Okay.
Okay. That's okay with me. This will be the second time. And, you know, we have a couple days, so no rush, but hurry up. But I can wait. That's fine. Okay. If that's okay with the body, of course, and chair. Sorry. I I spoke out of turn.
Do you want us to withdraw the motion or table the motion?
Good job. Because it might be a different motion.
I can withdraw. Okay. Okay. Then we can continue to move on with other things.
I'll withdraw in a second. Okay. Thank you. Good.
And then director will find out more information that we may need.
Let's do the residency area ones now. Yeah.
So is that oops. The residency area one, I think, is on page is it 27 or 24?
Chair, I believe, is on page 24.
Yeah. Page 24. Okay. So page 24. Chair Lee is first.
Okay. Wailuku, Waihee, Oikapu.
Sorry. You're fine with this? Mhmm.
Okay. Yeah. I mean, these are these are, proposals that I have I have done before last year, you know, both to Waikapu Community Association, Keikula Opie Ilani, and e Eao Community Cemetery. So I would have, let's see, one about 15,000 not earmarked. Mhmm. I'm leaving that open and that's why I'm asking for the condition, the residency area. Council member must be consulted before any changes or requests for use of the funds.
Okay. Fine.
And so that's my
Member, Chair Lee and second by Member Paulton. Any more discussion? Think you said it All in favor raise your hands say aye. Motion carries. There's nine ayes. Okay. Next is Member Paulton. Thank you.
I would also like to add I move to add the residency area council member must be consulted before any changes or requests for use of funds. And I put 40,000 for Aloha Amplify for Lights for Lahaina event. I know we talked about an additional 10,000. I do not need it, and I'm okay with it not being equal for the members that need an additional 10,000. I'm okay with that.
And that's my motion. Okay. Second by Chair Lee. Member Paulson Chair Lee. All in favor, raise your hand. Aye. Member Cook? Aye. Yeah. So nine ayes. Motion carries. Next, Lanai.
Well, since everybody seems to be doing the residency area, councilmember must be consulted before any changes or requests for these funds. I don't mind putting that in mind as well. So and then everything else is just I can read it in the record if you like. Up to 20,000 for Hawaii Bicycle League from Maui Bicycling League, up to 30,000 for the Lanai Cat Sanctuary for veterinary service. We still don't have a a permanent veterinarian on the island. Up to 25,000 for Hawaii Farmers Union United for the Lanai chapter, up to 40,000 for the Lanai Community Association for Pineapples Festival.
Okay, great. Motion made by Member Johnson, second by Member Rollins Fernandez. Any discussion? None. All in favor, your hand and say aye. Aye. All right, nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Next, Member of Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, Chair. If the budget director needs consistency of the language so that no one has to guess which, residency area requested that verbiage or not, I am fine with that, but, I don't wait for them to consult me. I bother them constantly about it. So I'm not worried at all. And there won't be any extra funds because I have it all appropriated.
20,000 for Molokai, Art Center Inc, OEV Arts, 30,000 or or up to for all of them. Dollars 20,000 for Waipilihoa Inc. DBA, 30,000 for Hui Wa'ao Molokai, dollars 50,000 for Molokai Canoe Club, and that's the $150,000 and up to $50,000 for Aina Momona under small grants. That's my motion.
Is there a second? Second? Okay. Member Johnson. So Member Ron Fernandez and Member Johnson May 2. Discussion?
Yes. I have a question. Just because of the way we took this up, do we need to move to increase the funding for the residency area and then change the language for the small grants at the same time?
I think member Paulson had a thought.
We did that already. Don't think we did.
We already increased we already voted on the motion to increase all residency areas to 150,000 before we took the lunch recess. Member Palton included in her motion to not include the additional 10,000 for West Maui. So by default, all the residency areas have one hundred and fifty thousand first quarter to of the Owens.
And Mahalo Member Batanggan. Okay. Any more discussion? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye.
Aye.
Nine ayes. Motion carries. Next, South Maui.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, members. My residence area funds, A, as we stated, the resident area councilmember must be consulted before any changes or requests for use of the funds. I have two, up to $40,000 for Kihei Fourth Friday, up to $20,000 for veterans of foreign wars of the United States, Wilbert, Hua, Hutong, Post 03/1950.
Okay. Member, Member Cook, second by Member, Poulton. Discussion?
Aye. Oh,
okay. All in favor? Aye.
Aye.
All right. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Next, member Ou Hodgins.
Thank you, chair. For my residency area funds, I would like to condition up to $65,000 for the Maui Economic Development Board Incorporated Inc for the mau Makua Rodeo Parade, Makua Town Celebration two thousand twenty six, Halloween Boon Boo Bash two thousand twenty six, Length of Town Event twenty twenty six, and Chinese New Year twenty twenty seven as listed on our residency area funds except I increased it by 10 to accommodate our additional 10. B, up to $10,000 for High School Foundation for fundraising events. C, up to $50,000 for Upcountry Strong Inc. For food distribution events. And d, up to $25,000 for the Aloha Classic.
Second. Member Uhujans. Second by member Polston. Any more discussion? Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo chair. Member Uhujans, did you have one to put under the small grants?
I was gonna move either Aloha Classic or the fundraising events, but that's okay. There I I the one fifty kinda covered all the things. That's okay. If if people do come to me, though, and need grants, I'm gonna usher them in the small grants way. Okay. I just wanted to make sure we got it all.
Okay. Thank you. Okay. Very good. So oops. Aye. Sorry. Sorry. All favor. Raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Okay. Next, Member Sunetsi.
Follow chair. I too would, include the wording. Residency area council member must be consulted for any changes or request use of the funds. Up to 15,000 for the festivals of Aloha Inc. For the Hana events, as you know, our Aloha Festival runs an entire week.
Up to 10,000 for the Hana Business Council Inc, up to 10,000 for Hana Canoe Club, up to 10,000 for Kipulu Ohana Inc, up to 20,000 for Makahana Kaike building program for Mahele Farm, up to 10,000 for Namoko Aupuni our proud We in
team. Have
a vendor to be announced, but maybe first reading, I'll have the vendor. Okay. But I'll change the language to Kaumano statue maintenance. And then up to 10,000 for Kao Hali'i. And then condition to the small grants would be up to 30,000 for Hana Arts, cultural and arts program. If I get a second.
Member Senancy, second by Member Cook. The small grants, I think it has to be up to 25,000 was the category.
Oh, not 50? I think it's 25.
Anybody has a correction?
I don't know.
But that was my question when we took when we first started moving stuff over, and I thought it was explained that we we did that.
Okay. We'll get that clarification. All in favor? Aye. Fine. Okay. Aye. So that's nine ayes. Yeah? Okay. Member Batongan.
Thank you, chair. I move to add, language stating that the residency future. I'm
about
the
I'm Okay. Member Batongen, second by Chair the Lee. To Any discussion? No. Okay. Very good. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Okay. Mine is last. So I will be adding that phrase also.
What's in my pot is 10,000 for Kekaliki High School Foundation for their annual festival that they have and up to 10,000 for Pukulani Community Association for the Pukalani holiday fair and electric golf cart parade, up to 25,000 for Lokahi Pacific for Maui Chinese New Year's, up to 25,000 for Keokao Homestead, farm lots Association for Keokao Haulauea. This is because I promised Member Kamae would do that. Up to 15,000 for youth sports and school activities, up to 10,000 for Keke Kaliki High School Music Program, up to 30,000 for Malama Kula, and up to 15,000 for Faoua Economic Development Board for engineering, math, automotive programs for upcountry schools. And I think this member, Hodgins and I share these upcountry schools. I'm going to increase this by 10 to take us to 150.
Second.
Thank you. Member Sanenci, second. All in favor, raise your hand say aye. You, members.
Very I have small arrive, language changes.
Okay. For these? Residence area?
No, for, the small grants
in the OE. Oh, okay. Wait. I'll put
this away. Sorry, thought you were done with small grants that we were just discussing. It's on page five seventy three of the proposed budget. And right now it basically states that funding for grants up to $25,000 I would move to change that number. So I moved for it to state funding for grants up to $40,000 Just widening the pot because as you know, price of everything is going up and I think it's we wanna make it easier for these small grant guys and 40,000 is the number I came up with.
Thank you.
Okay. Sure. Where are we?
I don't see it in the ordinance itself.
Okay. It's on page five seven three of the program budget is where I'm going.
Oh, you're
looking the budget. My understanding is that we don't actually amend the program budget.
Only I'm amend the ordinance, sorry. We're working on Bill 55.
We don't end up with that. The narrative doesn't get adopted to law, so we don't make amendments to it.
So it's on page 15 about Sure.
Page 16 in the budget bill 55.
Yeah. So I see small grants as number 12 in the budget bill. It's XVI. Thank you for that.
So that's my motion. If I can get a second.
Okay. Did member Johnson who second this to increase it to? Second by member Senensi. Okay. Council Member Johnson, second by Member Senensi. So this is now increasing small grants to be 40 up to 40,000, correct? Not 25.
That's correct.
Chair, sorry.
Go ahead.
I'm still trying to find Borret. I see the small grants line item as number 22 on page 15 of I the don't budget see anything on 16 under XVI.
Chair? Yeah.
So You're 1522.
Yeah. Great. Chair.
Mr. Krueger. Apologies to interject. So the way staff's interpreting this motion made by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Senensi, is that number 22 small grants line item on page 15 of the budget ordinance, we're interpreting it as a condition that it would be each grant may be up to $40,000 But would that perhaps satisfy what Councilmember Johnson said?
Yes. Use that as a condition.
Steph, was that
going to to other
first
And And we're going then
a 30 and a 20, and I think the 50 into her residency area one and problem solved.
Wouldn't it be easier just to make the condition, that up to those small the small
Small grants.
Grants can be up to 50?
Think, And
challenges they're having in this special small grants program. I'm not supportive of this because I want to hold them accountable and I don't want to change their structure and impact what they're doing. And they're trying to keep it small to keep it simple. So anyway, feel that we should enable them to do what they're doing and then hold them accountable rather than change their structure. Anyway.
Okay. If I could just give you a little point of information. The small grants process is you know, two page grant application is is what they're proposing. And I I think that's the way for small, for small grants to have we don't wanna have our grantees run through the ringer just to get something that might cost them a lot of money to even apply for. Right?
They if some folks have to get audited and pay for their accounting, and by the time you're paying for all these services to apply for a grant, it's not worth it. So I like the idea of of boosting it up a bit, and I like the idea that the administration has come up with a page grant application. So I propose that we could increase that. If the body's thinking 50, then I'm here for it. But my general proposal was for 40. Thank you, Chair.
Thank
you, Chair.
This would affect all small grants. So then just as the council knows that there's a lot more money that's going to be at risk potentially, right, with this small grant program when you up the amount.
Well, okay. The folks that are doing the I don't I don't wanna look at them as, like, you know, they're the ones helping us. A lot of the folks who are applying for grants and nonprofits, they're doing work county should be were doing. So I I wanna make it easier for them. I don't think that, there's this nefariousness with our nonprofits. You know, there's a few rotten apples, that don't spoil the bunch. Thank you, chair.
How do you feel about $30? Remember Cook?
I'm not so much hung on the amount. It's the process of making a change to their program that they have all set
thousand? Is there a reason or? I personally was not there in those meetings, but I know that the amount is lower because the requirements are less strict for these grants. So there's gonna be less oversight and less documentation required for this money. So to
go to 30 or 40 or 50, it doesn't matter then? It's just 25 is what they
selected? Yes, because of the less stringent requirements than the possibility of the funds being used and maybe not for the third purpose. Thank you.
Member Ohajes and Member Batangen. Sorry.
Thank you, chair. If I could just quickly chime in. I'm comfortable leaving it at 25 because they've figured out a process. But I was going to make a motion to cut this amount so we could see what the grants actually, their small their small grants process looks like. And so, in my head, I kind of figured it out.
Like, right now, if we leave it at 25,000, that's 70 small grants, which is a lot. But if I I was hoping to cut it. So, if you make it, which I don't I wouldn't support any more than that, then the amount of grants are less. But I think they've come up with that $25,000 process to expedite it, so I'm comfortable leaving it as is. Thank you, chair.
Member Patangan.
Thank you, chair. After hearing this discussion, I probably would not support the motion on the floor. I was until, you know, we had some dialogue on it would instead be supportive of the proposal from member Palton to move smaller grants over and instead of the larger one that we had.
Member Coke.
Thank you, Chair. I also was an advocate of reducing the size of the instead of 1,750,000, 1,750,000. And this is my point. There are my concern. They're lowering these grant amounts to make it easier for the grant for the government.
And think, government. Accountability the and, know, And being able to be responsive for it. So that's one thing I don't understand. And then, as, my colleague said, they're gonna have all of these I mean, that's a lot of money and a lot of grants. So if you had $500,000 or $25,000 apiece for the smaller grants, and that this year they had the opportunity to actually demonstrate that they have the capacity to simplify this process for the smaller grant applicants, I would be I'm super supportive.
I just don't want to tie up that much money and have it I'm not sold yet.
Okay. I see director on the call, but I will say that members, lot of our nonprofits, they're coming before us. They tell us the prices are going up. They're telling that the process that the administration has is not good. You saw the survey that we we I went and had them fill out. They're not happy with it, and they're doing great work. And I don't wanna be a gatekeeper, so that's why I wanted to try to make it a little bit easier for them. But let's hear what Director, Mellner has to say. Thank you,
Chair. Director.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmembers. Yes, I just wanted to provide a little more information, around this discussion. We arrived at the amount for the small grants pot by looking at how many grants we've received that are under 25,000. And we reduced some of our other competitive pots to take out those funds that have been awarded at 25,000 or less and move them into the small grants pot while also increasing it a bit.
So if the body is interested in moving it up to 50, don't think what's in there is going to be sufficient funding. So I just wanted to add that to the conversation. As has been discussed, this is our pilot year with it. So I'm not saying we wouldn't be open to it at some point. I just feel that we need time to get this process started and see what the workload is at 25,000 before we double that. Thank you, chair.
Okay. Thank you. Member, and then chair Lee.
Director, so even at 30,000, was there, like, the number of ones at 30,000 or 25,000 was the average? Like, I mean, not average, but the the mode or whatever.
Thank
you, chair. Thank you, council member Paul. Yeah, we we arrived at 25. We were just sort of looking at significant numbers that we got. You know, if the body does want to raise it to 30, that seems a little more feasible than 40 or 50. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Yeah. And that's the reason why our budget director, I wanted to ask you how much money was left over in that account at the end of the well, it's not quite the end of the year, but is there going to be, you know, savings in that account? To where that so that we know that not all x numbers were loaned out, you know, the capacity?
Director. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Chair Lee. This is a new funding source for fiscal '27, so I don't have a way to provide you with that information at this time. Thank you, Chair.
Well, it would make sense that if there was leftover money, that means thereis room to move the limit to 30,000, letis say. 30,000 because prices have gone up, you know. Gas prices, all kinds of prices. So at least that would at least cover some of the inflation. So how would we know if thatis reasonable or thereis an overage of applicants that they couldn't handle?
Director.
Thank you, Chair Lee. We're happy to provide a report to the council as fiscal year twenty seven progresses with status of the fund and the awards given. Okay. Thank you.
I'm Chairman Johnson.
I'm a amend my number. I move for the language to say funding for grants up to $30,000. Second. 30,000 Okay. I withdraw my first motion if the seconder would allow me to withdraw. Withdrawing.
Go ahead.
So I move to change the language small grants, funding for grants up to 30,000 for county based.
Second. My new motion on the floor.
Discussion has been a dead horse. I'm ready to move on and vote for this.
Okay. So now the motion is for 30,000, not 25.
That's correct.
Member Johnson and Member Paul Tunday the second. Any more discussion?
Probably roll call.
It's a roll call? Okay. Roll call.
Chair proceeding with the roll call vote, Councilmember Tom Cook. No. Chair, that's six ayes, two noes, one excused. Motion passes. Okay.
Mahalo, members.
Okay. Very good. Member, Paul Tan.
Shall we, reconsider reconsider Molokai's to put the Oh.
Oh, because of the think,
member O'Hadgins had an additional cut and she was, absent when we were I mean, not absent. She was driving in low frequency areas when we were doing the cuts.
Okay. Member, do you have
Sure, chair. Thank you. I have to just quickly redo my math. So, I moved to cut 250,000 on page 15 in small grants, leaving 1,500,000, which would equal about 60 grants of $30,000
Is there a second? Second. Second. Member Ohajes and second by member, Poulton. Discussion.
Thank you. So, we all heard that it takes so much effort for our grantees to get their grants, and we have so many issues with it. I'm super supportive of our grantees. And as I was explaining, like, after years and years and years, still have difficulties getting their grants. And I'm excited that they're creating a new process, except I want them to have a better trial number to figure out this process, and I'm happy to see it expand. But for right now, at least that's what I'm comfortable with, but I'll leave it up to the body, obviously. Thank you. I don't think Okay. I don't think I need to do any more discussion. We kinda beat that
horse earlier. Okay. Anybody else have any discussion? Member of Palton?
Just that I I think our other missing members should come back before we take this vote, And I wouldn't mind to have a pause for the cause either. Okay. So we'll do a recess and not take this vote until everybody comes back. Chair?
Yes. I'm not trying to vote. I'm trying to discuss. Okay. So I I can be supportive of the motion, but I also want to acknowledge what we had discussed earlier, which was moving the funds, our compromise with the rural, with the residency area funds to move the 50,000 from Molokai, 50,000 from Hana. So, if during the recess, member, Oh Jin can consider, 1.6 do to So,
condition of one more grant
under the that.
So, Right.
So just the funding right now.
Okay.
Okay. Member Batangan is back. Heard you
guys say my name from when I was in the bathroom. Can you fill me in on what I missed?
We wrote recorded your vote as yes. So this is
member Oh Hodgins' vote. She's I mean, her motion. You want to explain? Member Oh Hodgins for but you know what? Member Cook is not here. We need him here. Somebody
can explain to him when Done. When he's walking in. So I made a motion decrease the small grants by two fifty, but in conversation with the other members, I'm reducing my reduction by 150, making the total I'm sorry, by 100, making my motion to reduce by one fifty in the small grants, leaving it at 1, million 600,000. Okay.
So that was the motion. And member, Cook is not here. So we still cannot vote? Or is that does member
Cook He's here now.
Okay. Oh,
good. He's got ears now. Now I've got ears.
this is a small grant. Is proposing for it to be 1,600,000. Yeah. From one yeah. Okay.
Everybody's here. Aye. All in favor? Okay. Nine ayes. Right. Motion carries. Thank you. We got that done. You want to take a break, you guys? Oh, sure. I just this real
quick before the break? I wanted to add one more line item to my district funds for LAPA. LAPA has been really great. They're asking for $10,000 and they just sent me an email and I wanted to accommodate them. You guys know LAPA Dela Nay is performing arts guys for my residency. Second.
It's just $10,000
I think it'll thank be a quick you.
You got that. Kirsten and James. Member senancy. Oh, you're voting. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Did we even make a second? Member Rollins Fernandez, you got a second.
Mahalo members.
I did make the second. Aye.
Member Johnson, second by Member Rollins Fernandez, all in favor say aye, nine, aye, z aye.
Aye again.
Aye again. Okay. We're gonna take a break. So it's 03:47, and we'll come back at 03:55. Welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. Is now 04:10. We are on the mayor, Department of the mayor, and Member Senensi has an
good that's
question. Question.
Mayor state. Of
Actually, it was under small business, promotion, I think I'll switch it to the, small grants, page 15.
Okay.
And it was, 30,000 to Kilea condition, 30,000 to Kilau foundation. That was the offset to my priority.
Okay. Second, somebody? Second. Member Paulsen second Member Senecchi. Kate, you already explained it. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye.
Aye.
Who is Member? Woo Jin. Oh, Okay. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
Very good. Thank you.
Any other amendments to mayor? Are we done? Member Rollins Fernandez?
I'll have amendments, but I'll do all my revisits tomorrow.
Okay. That's it then for mayor. We are done. There's no CIP. Appendix A Part one grants budget bill page 42. I guess no amendments as well as Appendix A Part two special purpose Revenues, Economic Development Cultural Program Revolving Fund, page 51 Emergency Fund, 51 Open Space Natural Resource Cultural Reserve and Scenic Views Preservation Fund 56. There are no amendments. Anybody's not. No rates and fees. We are done with mayors. Okay. Now it's either police or public works next.
Chair, director Millner is checking on something for my cuts for public works. Okay. So if we could give her the time to do police now Okay. Because that would
be my preference. Okay. Remember Johnson? That's okay. Because he asked if because
I did ask, but I didn't know that we're working on something. Again So you're fine. To have harmony. I'm willing
to Yay.
Okay. So we are gonna take up police. Police has one priority and it is member Rollins Fernandez grant two to condition 30,000 for the Molokai youth leadership program.
Discussion.
Okay. Member Rollins Finance, second by Member Senensi. We heard this at Yeah. The residency area meeting. No. It's police. Yeah. What are you talking about? Yeah. Molokai Youth Leadership
30,000. Molokai Youth Leadership Program condition under administration service other services or whatever. And chief said whatever Molokai needs. Okay.
All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Member Uhajinsky, nine ayes. Motion carries. Department, anybody else? There's no other priorities. So department cuts or fiscal neutral requests under and one seventy seven, reduce the department's CIP radio system facility upgrades, bond funding by $14,860,000 There's an extra zero here. Page 24, budget bill per department request. So moved. Okay. So Member Palton and Member Senensi second. Any more discussion? All in favor raise your hands Could you and
repeat that?
Yeah. First is from the I communication believe because they are not ready for it, Joe.
Yeah. They're not going to be able to execute it soon. Is that the deal?
To be and to I'll defer to the director.
Director.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Cook. Yes. After the budget was submitted, we had further communication with the Department of Police, and they won't be able to utilize this funding in fiscal year twenty seven. Due to significant damage to the Haleakala Radio Tower, they've reprioritized, and they really want to focus on that in fiscal year twenty seven. They've informed the budget office that for fiscal year twenty seven, they need $600,000 to focus on that. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Thank you for the clarification.
Thank you. And the number that they are is like $14,860,000 Yeah? And And budget bill, page 17. Anyone has amendments for A or B? Member Palton.
Thank you, chair. In big B 17, department of police, little b, per n one, category a, investigative services, I moved to decrease the appropriation by $82,000.16. And if I get a second, I'll explain.
82,016. Okay. Second by member Johnson.
Discussion. Okay. Discussion is my original, had been to decrease the appropriation by 848,000. And then I read a little closer and realized that they did not restore my $800,000 cuts from last year. And so I just defunded the uncreated position eighty two thousand sixteen here.
At the appropriate time, though, I was informed by the budget director that, the associated fringe that was cut last year wasn't restored. So, given that the police commission asked them not to restore the council cut from last year, I'm decreasing my cut from $848,188. I'm gonna instead decrease it by $82,016 because there's already a 100 800 something. Okay. You got that?
Yeah. Okay.
Okay.
Thank you, member Paulton, and second by member Cook. I think it no. Wait. Member Paulton, second by Member Johnson. The same nation.
The same Yeah, we were in discussion already. About
that. Okay. Any more discussion? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Okay. Motion carries nine ayes.
In, my next motion? Yes. In category small c paren one category a, I move to decrease sorry. Sorry.
Member Palton, second by Member Senensi. Oh, sorry I
I'm did the discussion but that amount is 29,984.
Any more discussion? All in favor raise your hand. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
And, similar discussion. Oh, before I make the discussion, seeing, department small d paren one, I moved to decrease the appropriation by $48,264 Decrease 48,000. 160
The Equal Support Services, right? Bureau. Yes. Okay. Member Senancy second.
Okay. And for my discussion on this, they did not restore the cut of $600,000 from last year. This is mostly expansion position cut that I'm doing. And it's kind of difficult because they created a new bureau program, organizational development bureau program. So that 48,000 kinda straddles both.
But if the director wants it in one or the other, I just chose d. But, I'm my cut in those two categories is not as significant as I originally had planned because they did not restore the $600,000 cut from last year. But, similarly, I would ask us to look back to the fringe cut from last year because that was not taken out. So when we get to fringe, we might be able to find an extra 1.4 or something million. So you got that to check out when we
go to county wide. Okay. Any more discussion? All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. That'll be nine ayes. Motion carries.
For my next, in big B17, Department of Police, little b, investigative services bureau program, paren one category big B and c, I moved to decrease the amount by a 150,000.
That I'm
sorry. I Fulton. Now you're starting to You lost me now. Can I ask what page you're on?
17. Page 17.
K. Where's the big b?
It's, b 17. Like, a is council services for legislative branch, and b is the administrative. K. That's the big b. Seventeen is the department. Small b is investigative services. Then category b c decreased by a 150,000.
Okay. Any discussion? All in favor oh, go ahead.
Just they have a lot of vacancies, like, you know, in detectives and like that. And so I just decreased it by a 150,000, and they can choose, how to absorb that. Okay. All in favor? Account b category b. BC. Okay.
Member county residents.
Okay. Mahalo, for the clarification, BC, BC operating, and equipment. Correct. But so when you say vacancies, you just mean like the positions that don't need, equipment and,
the same kind of B? And whatever in category b c, they wanna decrease by a 150,000, I'm leaving it to their, discretion. This, category usually has, let's see. In 2024
And I and I was just asking how it relates to the vacancies that, because that was what you said, which is why I asked the question.
Oh. Yeah.
Just, you know, if there are so many vacancies, do they need that much operational and equipment money is the way I look at it, I guess. And I'm open to, budget amendments if I was too aggressive. During the year, I'm open to budget amendments. And I encourage them if I was if I've been too aggressive, but I I work really hard not to be too aggressive.
Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none, all in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
Member, Paul, do you have more?
For police, I don't have more. And, director Milner just got back to me with the information for public works. I'll be working on that while you guys do your cuts. Okay. But I'll also
listen. Remember what time again?
Yeah. It might be a turn because I wasn't gonna propose a cut. I was gonna ask for a condition.
Okay.
Yep. So under 17, Department of Police E, Organizational Development Bureau Program, I move to add a second condition that reads up to 100,000 Must be for a four by four vehicle dedicated to the critical outreach and response through education program.
Okay. I need a second. Second. Chair Lee second. So Member Batongan and Chair Lee second. Proceed.
You. Members. So this had originally been one of my alternates, but I have free condition slots, I'd like to move it there. Since member Palton helped me find how much carryover savings that they've had in equipment over the last few years. It was brought to my attention that if the police department really wanted to purchase the core four by four vehicle that member comma had been fighting for, they they could have. They just hadn't. And so I'd like to help urge them along to do so by adding the condition but not necessarily adding the funding since we know that they have it in carryover or have historically had it in carryover. Thank you.
Member Member Bolton.
Oh, I thought that they got a donated via four by four from Say your Human concerns. Say your foundation was to the fire department.
Oh, that's right.
But I thought I read in one of the responses that they got a donation truck.
Yes. So slightly different truck from what they were talking about. That one is an unmarked vehicle. The history behind this is member, and Naomi from the mayor's office accompanied member of the core team to do a site visit that was not just off the side of the road, but a little further inland. They utilized that donated vehicle, but because it was unmarked, it really freaked out the unsheltered population. They thought there was a raid happening because the uniformed officer came out of an unmarked team.
we're to to
member comma had pushed for a dedicated core four by four vehicle that would allow for the department to do outreach to our unsheltered populations and pain that was a little less traumatic for them and would still allow them to do enforcement as needed. That had been, you know, her intent in the past. And I think the and can start carryover savings is probably why it was able sure
sure and Member Johnson.
Mahalo, chair. My I'm supportive. My question is, regarding where the condition where your proposal Because mine was the only one on the matrix.
Yes. Because it was
so Alternate where
no. I have the alternates. It's not one of the alternates that I received.
Yeah. And it's because
And to we'll time going just put in for the Condition.
Put in for the condition. I don't have the matrix in front of me. But the thing that I had submitted was it would be under item 17, Department of Police E, Organizational Development Bureau Program, and then a second condition underneath the first for disbursement of salaries.
So you didn't get it in by the deadline?
No, I did. I don't know where in the various that we have, but it was originally submitted as my second alternate and it was for to add $100,000 I'm on the fly making it so that it's just a condition rather than adding the money.
Okay. Your second alternate
My first alternate was the, the Kamaugiha program.
What Okay. So you had two items that overlapped with other council members? Or how how are you using
think, I And
Member Johnson.
I'd like to hear from Director Milner. Her camera popped on and I'm curious if she had something to add.
I don't see her. Director, are you there? There. Hi.
Thank you, Chair. Yes. No, Council Council Member Member Paltin made my point, that one of the letters, but, it sounds like this would be for a different type of vehicle. Thank you, Chair.
All right. Thank you. Thank you.
Any other discussion? All in favor, raise your hand, say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Any others? Very good. So we also have Uniform Patrol Service Bureau Program on page 17, technical support services bureau program on page 17, organizational development program budget bill page 17. Anybody have any amendments A or B? None?
Next we have CIP members. Are there any proposed amendments to Department of Police CIP? I see none. Appendix A Part one grants budget page 43. Are there any proposed amendments? See none. Appendix A Part two special purpose revenues. As a reminder, this has alarm system revolving fund on page 50. Are there any more amendments members? Seeing none. Appendix b, rates and fees. There are no proposed, rate changes from the administration. And I guess you don't have any either. Yeah? Okay. Oh, we finished police.
Hallelujah.
Hallelujah.
Okay. Now Is budget director ready for public works?
Director Milner. Chief budget director.
Thank you, chair. Yes, absolutely. Just waiting for a a little math from Councilmember Paulson, but she can do math on the fly. So I will defer to
the body if they choose to proceed. Thank you, Chair. Okay. Okay. So Chair, we have some priorities for public works anyway, that should give a little more
time for math. So Department of Public Works, there are two member priorities. Member Johnson, Residency Area 1, to add an additional Public Works Highway Utility Worker for Road Maintenance Lanai with eight months funding.
Thank you. Thank you, Chair. I move to add one additional EP for Public Works Highway Utility Worker for Road Maintenance Lanai, eight months funding including fringe. That's on page 18 of Bill 55.
Okay. Member Chair Lee is the second. So Member Johnson made the motion. Chair Lee second. One new EP.
You Chair. Funding in the matrix was calculated using BC-ten with added fringe adjusted for eight months. Without fringe for eight months, the total is 50,472. I welcome the budget director and committee staff to verify that math, and funding would have will have to be added to the highway fund supplemental transfer since the road maintenance program is funded by the highway fund. Members, public works Lanai already needs this position under the current workload.
With the possible upcoming management of the cemetery and the growth of the city from the affordable housing projects, we don't want to leave them understaffed. This provides great opportunity for someone from Lanai to work for the county, the public and let me just stop right there. You know, we have the largest employer, which is a hotel working for the company. A lot of folks don't wanna go that route. They wanna work for the government. They never short on applicants when a a county position opens up on Lanai. Wanna make that point. The pro this provides great op okay. The public works Lanai district supervisor told me that they could actually use two of these workers, but for this year, I'm just asking for one. Thank you, chair.
I ask for your full support. Very good discussion. Member Rollins Fernandez
then followed I'm by Paul supportive. How far along in the description or is the department with this EP? Because you know how long it takes.
I could, ask, maybe, director on that because they were saying the the manager for Lanay was like, we need this job yesterday. But I
don't know. Difference between need and then, like, actually taking the action.
You your mic.
I'm I'm just seeing if member Rollins Fernandez question could be if the creation of the position requires a reorganization and union consultation because that significantly adds to the amount of time it takes to create a position. Maybe director Miller
can And they also have to do the, job description, position description, and that also takes time. Definitely not eight months of funding. Budget director? Budget director.
Thank you, chair. As this wouldn't be a supervisory position, I don't think that it would trigger a reorganization, or union consultation. But, I just confirmed with the department it would not. And we do have a lot of highway utility workers, so the position description already exists. But I will defer to the body on how much funding they want to provide. Thank you,
Chair. Okay. Member Johnson?
Well, you heard there. I think that, you know, they got a lot of workers at the form the it's all set up. We just need the money.
Have you, spoken to the director, the deputy that they're willing to put in the work to create the position? I know the Lanai Supervisor is, but I don't know if he can do it and create the position. So if if they're if if they're in favor and willing to do the work, I'm supportive.
If you guys recall, I asked the director on the floor and he said yes. I know he was here before us when he said it. I didn't get it in writing, he did say it on the floor.
I'm good to support. Okay. Any other discussion?
Seeing none. Oh, sorry, Nohe. Hi, Nohe. Hi.
Thank you. I'm I'm super happy to support. But just FYI, they had, looks like they had $1,700,000 worth of carryover savings. I'm wondering if they could absorb the $64,000 because it's I'm happy to support, but it looks like they had some carryover. If you wanna just create the EP looks I don't know. Maybe member Palton's about to speak. She'd know better.
That's what I was recalculating my cuts on, for, I guess, for discussion on this. Similar to police, which program was this under? Remember?
Public works road bridge and drainage maintenance program, highway fund?
In, their road bridge maintenance and drainage highway fund program, they maintained my $100,000 cut, or I don't know if it was my hour, $100,000 cut from last year similar to police. I have more cuts, but I, I did try to offset it, by taking that into account. My assumption is that, they didn't, keep the fringe cut for that, which maybe we can pick up some on that end, but I'll defer to the director. Director Milner. Thank
you, chair. Thank you, council members. I just heard from public works, and they are a little short staffed in their HR department, so they would feel more comfortable with six months of funding for this position. Thank you, Chair.
Support.
That's a friendly amendment for me. I don't mind changing it to six months.
Okay. Thank you.
All right.
So six months and any questions? No? Okay. All in favor? Chair? Yes.
Apologies. I guess staff just needs to know how much the six months funding change would be.
I can I can do that math if you tell me how much you, allocated for it?
So for eight months, the total was 50,472. That's without fringe.
37,854.
Okay.
I can try to do it again. You said 50,050
thousand 472, and I see director Milner doing the math, so I see the challenge.
Let's see if he's
gonna win here.
It's okay. Yeah.
I I also have 37854.
Alright.
Do we vote? All in favor say aye. Aye. Member Batangen. Yeah. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Follow members. The Board Directors
Thank you, Chair. I move to, increase appropriation by 1,000,000 for a total amount of $5,300,000 under Appendix C and add a new condition to read as follows. $1,000,000 must be used to continue work related to flood mitigation to support the Kihei Drainage Master Plan.
Second. Member Nancy is second, discussion. Or was that your discussion?
Pardon?
Just just more discussion?
Nope. Just asking for everybody's support.
Okay. All in favor, raise your hand.
Oh, go ahead. I just have a question. Did you discuss with this with public works and they're supportive?
Yes. In fact, this is the well, I'm talking really loud. Is the third year that we've been supporting this, and they've been making really excellent time with their engineering flooding to map and document all of the areas. So I'm really excited about the it's very worthwhile. Supportive.
Pardon? Funding?
It's funding from the countywide drainage, general fund, I, countywide bridge and drainage program.
Oh, it's general fund.
Okay.
I have a question.
Yes. Remember.
You said you've been doing this, like, year after year for now. Is there a reason the department hasn't just put in for this money? Never mind. I heard heard Charlie side, so let's take the vote. What
what this is? I'm basically allocating from their program each year. Increasing it for this particular purpose to make sure that the flooding, flood mitigation gets worked on prioritizing
so, to we're that. Oh. So the funding do that you put in
last year is gonna lapse? Or, like, what happened to the funding for that? Or is it
They used it. They're using it.
Oh, okay. Okay. That's all. But it says drainage master plan.
It's an ongoing process for their drainage master plan. Changing the work. Okay.
Okay. Are good? We Oh, we Yes. Okay. Good. We voted. All member Oh, Hutchins. Okay.
Thank you. Is this on county property, member Cook?
Yes. County property by a county engineer doing a county project.
Yeah. No. That's what I figured. Can we put it in GET?
I think GET is for Water and wastewater.
For Department of Public Works and Environmental Management. So this is I don't think it's applicable for GET.
For all of other companies, it's applicable. But because Maui jumped on the boat late, they limited us to water and wastewater.
Yeah. We can't do roads.
Not water from the skies. Blame Hokama.
I generally do
Just double checking. I'm sure you thought of it, just wanted to double triple check. Thank you.
All right. So we voted. We're good, right? All right. And the rest of the departments. So administration, general fund, budget bill on page 18. Anyone have any amendments to a or b? Member Palton, did you raise your hand?
Here we go. Buckle up. Okay. In b administration program 19, department of public works, small b, engineering program, I'm gonna move to decrease little b per n one category a by $87,669 and if I get a second I'll explain.
Okay. Second by member Patongian.
Go ahead. So I did recall that they maintained the cuts from last year of a $100. And so this 175,339 was me decreasing a 100% of their f y twenty seven expansions. But, being that they maintain cuts from last year, I gave them half their money back. So, instead of a 100% of the f y twenty seven expansions being cut, I cut half of that, out of the goodness of my heart.
And, when the time comes, I would like to reinstate the fringe cuts from last year. So that 'll give us a little extra. And then the fringe from this 87,669. So that's my discussion. Good job. Good job.
K. Member. Okay. Member Sanancy.
Just a question. Were these all the positions listed on the list?
These are half the funding for the all of the fiscal year twenty seven expansions.
The expansions. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. No more discussion. All in favor raise your hand say aye.
Aye.
Nine ayes. Motion carries.
Okay. Moving right along. Small c per n one category a is the special maintenance program. Similar I'm going to decrease category a by I moved to decrease category a by a $155,426.
K. Second.
Member Paulson made the motion second by member Sanenzi.
For my discussion, at at at
going the
numbers. Okay. Any discussions? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
Okay. Moving right along to small f in the same section per n one category a. Initially, I was going to cut, 450,000, but this is in a similar situation. So I moved to cut 350,000, which will be inclusive of fringe and decrease the highway fund inter trans inter fund decrease the transfer by 350,000 total, which would, encompass both the position amount and the fringe because they maintained 100,000 of the cut from fiscal year twenty six. Oh, shoot.
That was motion and discussion at the same time. Sorry.
It's late. I'll second pause the second one member
And then I have
a question.
This is the road bridge and drainage maintenance program.
Correct.
Did we just do something to this program?
Yeah. We added six months of funding for member Johnson's, Lanai position.
So we added funding previously, and then now we're cutting but from different positions. Just off the top. Oh, okay.
Okay. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Nine aye? Nine ayes. Motion carries.
For my next one, in category small g per n one of the same area, I move to decrease the amount by 50,000 inclusive of fringe k. And then, decrease the transfer from the general fund to the highway fund by 50,000. Okay. Member Senanci Young?
Okay. Second discussion. You did it.
And this is, I mean, off the top, however, they wanna apply it. But my justification or suggestion is because there's a been a land use and building plans examiner position that is an inactive vacancy, and it's been vacant for over two years.
May let the chair? Oh, yes. Member Batonga.
I mean, at this point, I'm just going off a trust. But can that can you explain what the difference in your cuts are when you are doing it inclusive of fringe and when we have to revisit fringe? What's the rationale for doing for taking fringe out of this one now?
Because the department in these other funds like highway funds, sewer fund, wastewater fund, they, they pay the fringe out of the fund.
I see.
Where are
the other ones? Okay.
Because I'm decreasing the the transfer from the general fund to the, highway fund, I'm including the fringe because I wanna decrease both sides and that's of the transfer.
Thank you, Member Wong. Okay. Any more discussion? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes, motion carries. Kate?
I'm done. I yield the floor.
You're done? Member Johnson and then Member Senanci next.
Thank you, Chair. Okay. So again, this is in public works. This is a cut, a reduction. Department of Public Works B, Government Facilities I, General Fund Countywide DPW Baseyard Facilities Program and that's at page 25 of the budget bill. I move to reduce the appropriation by $550,000 for a remaining total appropriation of $6,600,000
Are you in CIP?
No. Page 25. I don't think it's CIP. No.
Okay. Go ahead. Go. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
And if I get a second, I can explain.
I will second.
Oh, he's
a funny head. Yeah.
Oh, it is CIPs? Yeah. It is CIP. Okay. Yes. I beg your pardon. Okay. So Member Batongen is your second.
Cherry entertaining it at this time or is Member Johnson withdrawing at this time?
Need Go ahead. I need a second for discussion.
Member Batongen
did Oh, you didn't. Okay. So this is a reduction appropriation by $5.50 for the remaining of 6,600,000 and it's the least critical projects for the departments are those in the countywide DPW base yard facilities and that's in PW1. But before we get to which ones, I want to ask Director Milner, does that leave enough for the multi base yard? Director.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, it does. Director,
can I add? Yes. So my understanding was that this was what the department said was at least, you know, like, their lowest priority project. And if we needed to find cuts, this is where we would go. I think the will of the body is to maintain the Molokai one, which is why member Johnson had asked. Can I ask what the allocation for the Molokai Bay Shard was?
Thank you, chair. It it was part of the larger overall countywide. I'll see if the department has a a ballpark number for what specifically. They're saying about 750,000.
Okay. Thank you. I guess and you couldn't hear, but from all the way on the other side of the the aisle member Senancy. Senancy was wondering if there are any HANA projects included in this fund before we take the vote.
Yes. There are HANA projects included in this fund.
Will the remaining balance be enough for you to continue moving forward with HANA based year projects?
The HANA projects will not be cut by this 550,000. Thank
you, director.
Thank you.
Okay.
So, Ember Johnson.
Well, after hearing that, I be amenable to increasing it to 1,500,000 if the body would like that. But I'm gonna that's where I'm at, is the minus 550,000. But if budget director thinks we could go minus 1,500,000, I would be doing that. But I'd like to hear from director Miller.
Director.
Thank you, Chair. I don't believe I said 1,500,000. Sorry. No. They can live with $550,000 though.
Okay. They can live with it and I'm not going to push it members. All Thank you.
All right. So this will be a decrease of $5.50 for CIP. Is there a number that we should reference or does do you guys have it?
I think it's on page 25 of the budget bill. Yeah. Under g, Department of Public Works, small b, government facilities, one general fund, one county wide DPW base rent facilities program. Is that correct, Member Johnson? That is correct. And then the motion on the floor is to reduce by 550,000.
Yes. Okay. All in favor say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
All members. Very
good. Member Senansi.
Think, member Paul Dan cut from the engineering program.
Oh, I cut You did. $87,669.
I wasn't sure if it included a couple of the cuts that I found. It wasn't on your list. P32804 and P32805.
I think that was absorbed in the $100,000 that they maintained from fiscal year twenty six. The cuts we did in fiscal year twenty six, they didn't reinstate 100,000 of that. And, I'm assuming that's from those positions. Okay. So what I did was just take all the fiscal year twenty seven expansion positions and half them across the board.
Okay. And that's that was the two of my proposed cuts and then the other one was p 30 p twenty seven five zero seven, the civil engineer five.
In engineering? In engineering? Yeah.
That was part of the
The the same cuts that they didn't reinstate from last year. Okay.
And I just went off the list as well, too. So alright. Thank you, Chuck.
So you're fine. Okay. Okay. Any other amendments? So, we did highways, traffic management. Anybody have anything with traffic management on page 18? Roads, bridges, did highway administration program on page 18 also.
I didn't, make any cuts from there, but if anyone wants to, I mean Okay. I think that.
To to
that.
Appendix A Part II Special Purpose Revenue. The following funds is under this department plan review, permitting, processing and inspection revolving fund on page 53. Are there any amendments? Seeing none. Appendix B, Rates and Fees, which is a ram's eared version on page 37 to 51. Are there any amendments? There's no proposed amendments. Does anybody have any? None. Okay.
Chair? Go
ahead. Apologies. As it relates to Appendix B, staff just we're 20 then, tax. But it's just because the clerk's office is preparing to their public hearing notices. So if there are any changes, we need to be aware of it. So we just wanted to confirm with the body there's no changes for either.
Fuel tax. He said fuel and what?
Yes, the fuel tax and then the motor vehicle weight tax. And apologies again. The the weight tax is technically a finance tax, but we forgot to raise that issue
Okay. Earlier in the week. Okay. No changes? Question And
the first
to 19, For weight
tax, there appear to be no changes. Same for fuel tax.
Okay. So no changes? No changes from last year of Easter. Okay. Very good. So I got everything, right, for public works. You got all the categories. Yeah. So we're done with public works. Okay.
Wait now. Wait now. I have revisits. I know. We need you.
Okay. We did all the revisits. You guys wanna take a little break?
So, can we revisit legislative branch big a?
Okay. Big a. Okay. I don't have that on this list. What is it?
Legislative branch in the bud bill 55. Oh, that's us. Yeah. All of the legislative branch. Under a, I move to collapse a, b, and c.
Second. Second. Okay. Okay. Thought it was already.
You have to do
it every year. Oh, every year. Okay. Any discussion? All in fair.
In Maybe the budget director would like to weigh in.
Oh, she wants us to do it for the whole county. Just kidding.
No. Not kidding. Maybe not this year, but I'd really like the body's consideration for discussion for future fiscal years of eliminating this if we're going to continue eliminating it for the legislative branch.
Thank you chair. You want same, same. Thank you.
Okay. All in favor. For clarification, are you saying everybody or just the mayor?
Thank you, chair. I'm saying everybody.
Okay. We'll consider it heavily.
I know that's a bigger conversation. I just wanted to throw it out there.
Thank you, Chair. Popped up at the right time. All in favor, raise your hand say aye.
Oh, apologies. Just for clarity. So would this so typically the language that's included in the budget bill for this is that the appropriations would not be restricted by Section seven. Yeah. Does that apply only to office to the council services program, or is that intended to also to apply to county clerk program and county auditor program? Yes.
All, you read my mind, all of it, with that language.
Thank you.
Okay. All of you. Since I think they're doing this. And And why think why
that's
motion on the floor. Can't get
after I'm done. Okay. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. So this would be nine ayes. Okay. K. Any other revisits I have?
I Remember Batanga not gonna make his motion?
Oh, I thought he was joking.
I was just joking. I know it really, made them mad, so I wanted to go poke him again.
Okay. So on the revisits, do you want us to go in the alphabetical order or what's the process? Because I know some people really care about that.
So this is what I got from staff. Right? I'll just read the headings and then you guys can let's talk about it. So office of council services is one. Department of Agriculture is another, Department of Fire and Public Safety, Liquor Control, and Department of Management. So, this is in alpha order according to Bill 55.
Did I miss Connie White? Are we taking that up after We're our going
to take up last.
Okay. So hold on. Thank you.
Not yet.
Okay. Under agriculture, I moved to condition oh, page two of the operating budget section three b one a paren three paren I to put up to $140,000 must be for Maui farmer support network for the farmer navigational coaching program.
Okay. It's a okay. Member Paulsen and second by Member Senensi.
This was a departmental request to, reflect, miscommunication.
K. Anything else for can you okay. I'm gonna go down my list then. Yeah? Remember Did we vote
on that, though? Oh, sorry. Let's vote on it before we go Yeah. Move on to something else.
Sorry. Is this a item?
If it's, on departmental request page one.
So must be We
never did it.
I I thought we did all of those. Yeah.
Thought we put her in.
I thought we I thought Did we Budget director helped us through the budget request before it was transferred.
No. We didn't we didn't add it in. So this would
be I think, somebody got huffy, and we didn't do it. And so now we're doing it because we're all fed and happy.
Yeah. I thought thought remember Johnson did it
on Monday? Tried to. He tried to. Oh. Okay. Okay. I
Okay. So nine eyes. K. You know what? I'm gonna ask to take a short visit. Let me get this organized, to come back at 05:15. Is that right? K. Welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It's now 05:29.
I have some revisits and I would like to propose this. Department of Ag members, I'd like to ask staff to please confirm the conditional language for the Lanai Food Stimulus Program grant condition.
Yes, sir. So we just wanted to raise when the committee acted on this, there was talk of kupuna meaning 55 years old and up. So we just want to confirm with the committee that staff's under the impression that it means 60 years old and up and ensure the committee's okay with that.
Member Johnson. Yes, Chair.
And I think the in addition to do half
that.
And going able to foundation our business. For business. A 60 children or members of a household with seniors aged 60 or children. That's we took out the term kupuna and we've said the proper age that MEO uses for what a senior is. Thank you, Chair.
Got it.
Yes, sure. Maybe if the committee could just do a motion and a vote on that real quick just to confirm. I
move that to
I what I just second that what he just said. Okay. Member Johnson, second by Member Palton. Any discussion?
The discuss was already discussed. The discussion was already discussed. Thank you.
Right. All in favor raise your hand and say aye. Chair Lee and Chair Lee, so that's eight ayes.
Thank you.
Department of Fire and Public Safety. Members, I we are have one thing to say. Okay, you can say it.
Okay. I just wanted to make note that I supported a lot of brand new programs and priorities with the understanding that we would have the white paper at a certain time. And I think we said first reading. But because we're going through revisits now, I wanted to reserve the right to change my vote because I haven't seen the details. Like, I was willing to give folks the benefit of the doubt, but I would need to see the white paper to make my final decision.
So I know we're going through corrections today. I wanna reserve my right to change my vote if either the white paper doesn't materialize or I don't agree with it. But we don't I didn't make that clear at the time, and we're on corrections today and tomorrow. So I don't know what the process is gonna be if a white paper doesn't materialize by first reading or how to do that. But this isn't in regards to existing programs because they already know how existing programs are run.
It's in regards to brand new programs about how they disperse their money or what because that's a big component of it. And so, you know, I was willing to, say yes at that time then wait for the details and then make my final decision. I don't know how to do that being that we didn't. I don't know if you meant to text me, but you texted me. But but
Who retired?
But, yeah, that's that's my disclaimer statement on revisits and corrections is, I reserve my right to change the vote if the white paper never materializes for brand new stuff or if I don't agree with it. That's I don't know how we're gonna go about it. Okay.
We hear you. Member Batonga. Looking at chair.
Vote that we just took, you know, the motion made by member Johnson. Can I ask that the body revote and allow me to abstain?
Oh, okay.
Sorry. I wasn't quick enough to catch that one.
I move to reconsider the last vote.
Second. Second. Okay. All in favor. For the reconsideration. Aye. Aye. So it would remember oh, there's Charley. She's let's see. So that's eight seven seven ayes. Okay. Reconsider.
And all think I
question. So it would be eight ayes, one excused.
No, not excused. No, I'm sorry.
One recused. Thank you.
Thank you, members.
Okay. Now, Department of Fire and Public Safety, we are revisiting the fire and public safety raises and rates and fees under Appendix B for Councilmember Senensi, your explosive materials fee amendment on page 18.
Thank you, Chair. We spoke with the department and it looks like the $100 fee is sufficient at this point because it's just and maybe corporation counsel can chime in but it's just for the holding of the explosives and chief said that they're gonna come and I'll leave it to corporation counsel to explain.
Thank
you, chair. So, and I actually received this new permitting program for actual blasting events, which will take more time and can be charged more fees, but they're not quite that
we're seeing seeing question line a think is of exceed the sum of $5,000 I need a second.
I'll second. But Chair, can you what page are you
So this is appendix b account. Oh. Let me let me
I just was checking if we're going in order or jumping around. This is alpha order. Okay. I had one for housing. Sorry. Okay.
Liquor. I'm talking about liquor. Will you let me finish mine? Or you wanna you wanna go?
You have a motion on the floor.
Yeah, you have a motion.
We finish this? Yeah. Can you also help me figure out where we're at?
Okay.
The In Appendix B.
James or Kirsten. Or what document are you referencing? Because it's not in the depart mental request.
Apologies, Chair. So this one is a staff identified discrepancy in the Department of Liquor Control. Apologies, the committee did discuss it when it brought up liquor control a couple of days ago. But the motion, staff's records indicate that the committee corrected one discrepancy relating to missing classes in the liquor control fees, but not this one. It's just that the law says it can go it's
get to
right time
we're then, be we'll do
I believe when the committee did discuss that. It, the budget director confirmed that the change to $5,000 the department had no issues with that. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Okay. I had it in my notes as we did it already.
Sorry. So, Mr. Kruger explained Okay. These discrepancies. So these discrepancies came from OCS staff as they were listening to all of our motions. So they're bringing up and trying to clean up. That's where this is coming from. Okay. So all in favor any questions on this? All in favor, raise your hands.
Aye. So it was under 3763, you said?
3763 and 3768. Okay.
Got it. Both.
Any any questions? Okay. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Thank you. Okay. You want to do yours? Member Bolton?
Sure. Thank you. On page 41 of the operating budget, appendix a part one five a small a under department of housing, reduce the appropriation for community development block grant program by $269,935.
Okay. Motion made by Member Paulton, second by Member Senecchi.
This was a departmental request.
You got that? Okay. In? All in?
Before we vote from the budget directors
Oh, sorry. Seeking Budget Director? Mahalo Chair, sorry. I don't
want to delay the proceedings. Just, as you know, when we prepare the budget, we don't have the official award letter. It was received in the interim, so that's the reason for this requested adjustment. Thank you, Chair.
We like awards of grants. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Okay. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Anything else, Member Bolton?
We can go back to environmental management. Okay. What
page?
On page nine of rates and fees of the Ramseyer version, I move to add account 3429 for Molokai landfill green waste disposal fee is $40. Add that. Add account. I moved to add account 3429 for Molokai landfill green waste disposal fees $40. I just I'm reading the department request per EMO two response.
Okay. So motion made by members Paulsen, second by members Senensi.
You're done? I think member Woo Jin has her hand up.
Oh, sorry. Member Woo Jin.
Thank you. Thank you, member Park Jin. Did you say 3429?
Yes.
Oh, that one is used for fees and recycling surcharge with the tipping fee surcharge of 11 per ton. Is but then, there's a Molokai landfill and Lanai landfill, which, of course, they don't have one, and that one is already, $40 for Molokai.
Think I'm gonna,
like, to
call a resource in director Milner because this is a request.
Director. You.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council members. I am just confirming from the letter that we transposed the number correctly. Apologies. If you want to
take up something else, I'm happy to text Council Member Paulton. Okay. I'll withdraw that at this time if members are okay with it. Okay. Withdrawal.
Shall I move on to, the next one? Sure. Okay. On page 35 of rates and fees of the Ramseyer version, I move to add all other permits or reviews for which no public hearing is required unless otherwise specified herein, including special management area assessments for exemptions, minor permits comma not including special management area emergency permits period. Second.
Okay. Motion made by member Palton, second by member Johnson. Oh, I'm sorry. Permits in parentheses period, if if you wanna be exact.
Okay. I I have a question on
that one. Member Batongan.
Is a special management area emergency permit, like a proper noun? I don't I don't think I've ever heard of one of those.
Proper noun is not my specialty. Math major. Math major, not English.
There's the emergency permit right above that one, but they call it the emergency SMA permit at 6 eighty eight.
Yeah. Can I budget director, can I just confirm that the language that we're adding is for an actual permit type?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Patonga. Yes, this language was provided by the planning department. So this is the type of permit that they issue.
Okay. Ready?
I am.
Okay. All in so we have your motion and second by Member Johnson. Okay. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye.
Nine ayes, motion carries. Okay. Have one more. Are you Just
the environmental management one. And, I did receive member O'Hodgins Maliko. So I got that white paper, and I'm looking it over. I did also just receive the text that 3429 is the the And I the
can then do the And that discussion. Okay. Member Member Palton, second by Member Rollins Fernandez.
For discussion, this was on page six of the department requests based on EMO2 response. Okay. Member Ros Hernandez.
Mahalo. And I have EM2 response. For account 3433, Molokai Landfill, please explain why Molokai is subject to a $40 green waste disposal. The $40 green waste disposal fee is a per ton fee that commercial haulers pay to Molokai Landfill. The revenue collected for Molokai Landfill green waste should be applied to the solid waste fund and be listed the I thing can can
And Oh, maybe. I don't I don't have it in my notes, but I'm my understanding was that we're just adding the account number to the line, not that we're changing the or adding the not adding the fee. I think we're just adding the account number to the line in the
Yes. And so that's that's what I said because it was 3433, and they're asking to change it to 3429. And I remember asking budget director about the green waste fee because we don't pay a fee as residents. And she clarified that it's for commercial.
Okay. Did we do it already?
Would you like to add No. No.
I mean, they know what they're doing.
Oh, okay. Yeah. Yeah. Oops.
I'm ready to vote. Aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Okay. Anything else? We're done? Okay. Department of Management, Chair Lee, Revolving Fund number one is to add a new condition for up to $13,000,000 for Ho'onani Village mixed use development for well and water system improvements under the general excise tax.
Yes. And my colleague, member Uhu Hodgins, will discuss that.
Okay. Tag team.
Thank you, Chair. I think right now we're still trying to work it out with budget director. So if you don't mind giving me a moment, we're figuring out specific language or maybe she can magically appear again, and she can tell you we spoke during one of the recesses. So we're gonna give me a moment, please, if you don't mind Okay. To figure it out, but she can confirm.
I did receive, member U'U Hajins, Nam, white paper. K.
Member, Jin's, do you all want a break for dinner? Yep. Then you can come back to this. Are you almost done? Remember Oh Jins?
You're in consultation. I'm for this one, I'm okay with the with what I'm trying to propose. Okay. I still need a minute. I'll be honest to convince budget director that I'm correct.
Okay. So
I'm not too sure if that's gonna happen over dinner or if I'm gonna need a little bit.
Oh, okay. Member Batangen. Thank you, chair.
I was not able to connect with the, director of the board of ethics. I have honest I don't understand the proposal, but I don't know if I am conflicted or not. It sounds like this is a project, on the same TMK as the Maui MEO Transportation Base Yard. Based on representations from, mister Uyoka, it should not. The subdivision? I don't know, and I would rather just be safe.
Yeah. It's okay. You recuse. Yes. Thank you. Okay. Remember, just what would you like to do? Take a dinner? I would
like, budget director to tell me I'm correct, but
I don't think I'm
gonna get that. So I'm willing to talk stories with her. Is this the last thing we're gonna do for today? And okay. Then would we would you mind if, we discuss this maybe tomorrow? Okay. If that's okay? Yeah. It's okay, members. If that's alright with everyone, I would appreciate it. I know this is like the fifteenth time I've done this,
but I would appreciate it. Thank you. Okay. So revisit tomorrow. Okay. That's good. Then just so you know, we're gonna take a dinner break. General additional bills that we have to talk about. So it is now June I'm sorry. $5.50. Yes.
Do you want me to finish my residency area conditions before we break? I will I'm just gonna read it, and then I already emailed it to committee. So that okay. Residency area condition, 20,000 Molokai Arts for Oui V Arts, 60,000 for Aina Momona, 20,000 Wai Pilihoa Inc, DBA Kahele Monokai, 50,000 for Molokai Kuna Club under small grants. Now that we increased it to 30,000, 30,000 for Hui Wa'au Monokai, 20,000 Ma'ali'i. And staff, I just emailed it to them so that they have the exact language.
Okay. Very good. That's your motion. Is there a second? Second is Member Johnson. Any more discussion? No discussion. Okay. All in favor, raise your hand say aye. Aye. Very good. So all the residents area meetings are done. Yeah? Okay. We're still fussing with it. Alright. So I'm gonna take a dinner break, and can we come back, like, at 06:50? 06:50? Six five It's 05:51. Hour.
One And we have dinner, our office bought dinner, which is arriving at six. So then we'll come back to do general budget provisions and additional legislative or additional bills and then countywide, which is a biggie. Right? Alright, members. So we are coming back at 06:50.
Welcome back, everybody. It is now 07:09, and, this is the budget finance economic development committee. I am going to start with a revisit. Member Cook.
Okay. I proposed up to $500,000 to be used for the design and permitting of a private wastewater treatment facility to serve a portion of Wailuku Country Town. The justification of the need is with the uncertainty of the Central Maui wastewater reclamation facility's completion in 2030. This would allow the project to continue and move forward. I just want to share with my colleagues that the yeah. That's my motion.
Shirley, somebody able
that. To to do
talking about Waikapu Country Town? Yes. Oh, okay.
What is this?
I thought it was like some other project I never heard of.
Sorry. No. Waikapu Country Town. Waikapu Country I'm sorry. Apologize. I'm tired. Thank you very much for your patience.
Anything I know what you're
talking about.
Yeah. It's important. Waikapu Country Town. And basically, the school, the affordable housing, all of the different the entire new project. And the wastewater plant was supposed to be done in '27, '29, now it's '30 and it's maybe '31. So, this $500,000 is the developer group wanting to do design and permitting, which would be working with the government. So
Okay. Member Oh, yes.
Thank you, Chair. I apologize for interrupting. We were hoping we could ask where this appropriation should be placed into the budget bill.
Oh, okay.
And is this an alternate priority? Or
Oh, think chair, it's on page 34 under special purpose revenues. This is Oh. This was slated for the GET fund. And last night when it was proposed, budget directors said that this, fund cannot be used, and I believe it was, like, for a private wastewater treatment facility or just it couldn't use that fund.
Yeah.
So, what is the difference between what you proposed last night and what you're proposing?
Difference is I'm asking my colleagues to find out if there's another fund that can be used besides the GET. Yeah. Mostly, too, I want people to be aware of this. That's why I'm bringing it up. I'm making it I let people to be aware of it. If anybody has any other ideas to facilitate this, I welcome it. So that's I'm putting it out there in this motion asking for assistance. What's the
total ask? 13? 500,500
thousand dollars Okay.
If we were to revert our property taxes to last year's property taxes, I think that's $12,000,000 on the table.
Thank you, sir. I don't think it's a matter of funding. It's a mechanism of how do we use county funds for a private project. It was not applicable in GE. Maybe Ms. Miller Director Miller? Director can inform us if there's another avenue.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, council members. Is the intent that this would be a grant to Waikoo Country Town for this? Yes. Maybe? Okay. So, we would put that under maybe housing. I'll text Remy.
If you guys don't mind, I have a question that I I don't understand, if I can ask. I mean, I can ask the question to help me understand what's going on. Is this, wastewater reclamation facility gonna be the same as the central Maui wastewater reclamation facility or it's something different?
Different. It's gonna be a small private package plant that won't replace the county one. It will enable a portion of the property to be built.
They can
be the last 500,000? No, no. This is for design and permitting.
Okay. So it's a private wastewater treatment packing plant for design and permitting. And they think they can do this side plant faster than the Central Maui plant. But we wouldn't own it. And then what happens once the Central Maui plant comes online?
I don't have all the answers. We could condition no, we can condition this with questions or whatnot. I've been asked by the developer because they're stressed.
Atkinson or Yeah. I mean, I kind of I just off the top of my head, I think that really pushing for the existing plans to move forward faster would be
more important really tired of hearing from
me. Oh, okay. Not my table partner, but my neighbor said housing fund. I don't know. That's Our housing department. Director?
Sorry, chair. Yes. After we're thought. I think this probably makes more sense under DEM, similar to what we did with Ma'alaya Village Association, since it's for a wastewater system.
I'm the going take a quick recess and ask Michelle.
For your recess, John. Yeah. Can budget director consider language of a loan? And then we can take a recess so we can all think about that.
Don't like a long That's term up to the body. There is I a mechanism to mean, we have done I don't know that DEM has, but as you know, housing has. And I'm sure Corporation Council would be happy to work with DEM to execute it as a loan rather than a grant.
Yeah. Thank you, Chair. Okay.
Mark Cook, are they offering more affordable housing in exchange for assistance on this or no? No.
Oh, okay. Just just checking. 07/20. K. Welcome back to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee, 07/25. We are back in business. Member cook.
Thank you, chair. I propose to do a zero interest loan up to $500,000 to do the design and permitting for a private wastewater treatment facility to serve a portion of Wailukapoo Country town. And I propose to fund that by department of parks and recreation, countywide parks and recreation, general fund, countywide parks, decrease the department
we're And to so,
so,
to board.
And that.
And
I do Withdraw. I'll withdraw mine. Tom can withdraw his. Go ahead. Blessing director.
Oh. Thank you, chair. So, I had a chance to touch base with the department during recess, and the last they had heard was that Atherton's team was against having their own treatment plant. The department has no awareness of this, so I think they're just a little confused about where this is coming from because this isn't what they've heard from the project. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you.
Oh, and I'd like to reiterate, I'd really prefer no more cuts from Parks at this point, but I'll just leave that. Thank you, Chair. It's coming.
Well, that's my proposal. Think we've talked about it enough. I don't really know what to do besides
Propose it.
Besides proposing it. We can vote it up and deal with it. We can vote it down, but I want to move on.
Okay. Member Ron is Fernandez.
Rollins, sorry. Budget director, will you clarify again for me who said they knew nothing about it? Wastewater? Thank you, chair.
The director of environmental management. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay.
And then this is something that, mister Coach guys are doing? Mr. Atherton is requesting?
Via Jeff Huioca, the attorney for their group. They are requesting this because they want to move forward with some of the project.
And then Member Poulton's question about how long would this take to build? Because you said the Central Maui Landfill ir
And
you said, how long the project would take?
I've been told two years. It's a different animal, the package plant. I am super supportive of the environmental of the county's wastewater plant. My preference would be pedal to the metal, make that happen. The concern is that if it's delayed and delayed and delayed, that project is hemorrhaging and we need the affordable housing in the school and everything. Now, this package plan is not going to enable all of that to happen, but it would enable some of the housing to occur.
Okay. And then last question. Would Mr. Uyoka and Mr. Atherton be supportive of a zero interest loan?
I was told yes. I asked.
Mahalo for, your responses. Okay. Charlie.
since you're kind of the resource, member of Ron Fernandez, maybe a different department like housing. What do you think?
Mahalo Charlie. I think the recommendation was to, well, it's wastewater. Have have we funded wastewater facility construction design permitting under affordable housing fund before?
I think we have funded various types of infrastructure for housing projects.
Member Woo Hodges has her hand up too. Member Woo Hodges.
Sorry. I didn't mean to interrupt. I just didn't want to be forgotten about because I'm the only person online. But it's for, as I understand, in member Cook's language write up, design and permitting. And as I understand it, and member Cook can correct me if I'm wrong, but this will help push through the affordable or the workforce single family portion of the Waipupu country town.
And if not, then that's held up until the Central Maui, wastewater facility treatment plan and the whole acronyms that come along with it, it couldn't start that portion. So, this will help enable it to move through. And, I guess, best case scenario, the Central Valley facility comes online as planned. But as member Paul then said, let's not get our hopes up. So, I guess this is a contingency plan, on their end.
And on our end, this is, again, to help the workforce housing come through on a project that has you know, we've been discussing this project for the better part of, I don't know, twenty something years. I don't know. Remember, Shirley can probably tell us the origins. The whole whole whole twenty years. Twenty. Only twenty years. Only twenty years. K. Good. I was graduating high school about that time. So or
yeah. Okay.
Anyways, that's my thoughts. But I don't think I'm okay to just put it in as a line item, zero interest loan if that's what we're gonna do on page six, under the Ma'alaya treatment plant, but I wouldn't probably be supporting a cut to parks at this point, and that's all.
Thank
you. Okay. Member Palton.
Can we put it in, with no money? And then, when the carryover savings starts rolling in, say that it has first dibs? Is that a possibility?
Do we ask that question to? Michelle. Maybe I know Michelle. Maybe Mr. Hanado, Corp Counsel.
That's a I
think budget with no question. Real money and when the carryover savings starts rolling in, he gets first dibs. Go ahead, director.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Pauline. I'm I'm not aware of that happening before. I don't know if, director Ross is still around. He definitely has, better historical knowledge than I do. I don't know if there was a way to put in something that takes the form of an urging resolution. If you get my meaning, no funding, but put a condition that the body urges the Department of Environmental Management, if sufficient carryover savings are available, to prioritize a 0% loan for design and permitting of a private wastewater treatment facility to serve a portion of Waikapoo Country Town?
It's like we share a brain. That's exactly what I was thinking.
Sounds good. All right. Got it. Ditto. Okay. Never done before, sounds like. All right. So, member Batongen.
Yeah. To corporation counsel's point about putting in a line item with no money in it, I feel like we would have to put, like, a dollar or something. Otherwise, there's no point to putting a line in the budget. So I guess I would just add that for discussion. But I also really like this train of thought about conditioning carryover savings. I'm not in a good place to be
I'll give you a dollar. Without I got a dollar.
I I I do think that we need to amend the motion to so that the thing can have a line in the budget. Okay. That's good.
Second, the motion
proposal to put the line in the budget with a nominal amount of money knowing what it's gonna be. Okay. If that's if if that's acceptable, I think we've Solved the problem. It's an accomplishment. Okay.
Budget director.
Thank you, chair. I just want to make it really clear, we can't condition money we don't have. So, I just kind of need to say that for the record. I don't think it's an issue to say, you know, what I said before and add $500,000 to that, but we can't condition money we don't have. So I just and it's urging, so we'll do our best. But I just want the body to consider that
when they finalize the language. Thank you, Chair. Member Oh, I'm
enjoying my pretzel. Wishing you was something else. I don't have anything to add.
Too funny. Oh, tried bitcoin. Okay.
I I really wanna move on. I think that, can we table this? Yeah. That's I propose that I withdraw my motion for right now. Or do I
And we visit. Yeah.
I withdraw my motion. Everybody every everybody will dream about it tonight We talked about it so much. Before this is over, maybe the beginning of the week we'll be able
to Actually, the reason why we probably need to solve it soon is because we're trying to complete all this money stuff so that we can do RPT tomorrow and close this out, have revisits next week Monday and Tuesday. If if you don't do Corrections on Monday. Corrections on Monday and Tuesday. Right? So James
I I
lot lot
of of
Board of of proposal, and and making adjustments in in case depending on its RPT proposal. And then, once that's complete, then typically the committee recesses till Monday for for and just in case there's any corrections that need to be made. Okay.
So do you see any ideas as to where we can do this for half $1,000,000? With your years of experience, I think you probably have ideas.
Apologies, Chair. Think as staff, we don't have anything really to offer right now. Only thing that we guess our note was the motion that was on the floor was that to put in that condition that the budget director said under the Department of Environmental Management Administration program. But I think that was withdrawn. I think for the time being, Steph doesn't have anything to offer.
Oh, who? I'm sorry. Chair. Remember what's happening? Cook, would
you be open to withdrawing your motion and ins okay. And instead drafting a rezzle urging the administration to create this with the money that we do not yet have but know is coming.
Current carryover savings. Through
carryover savings.
And Thank you. I I think that's an appropriate thing. Also, environmental management Okay. Needs be engaged in Thank you all for your patience. And
Ugh. Wish we found a solution.
We'll move on.
Because we're gonna do a rezo and ask the and ask the administration to do this, and we can if we found money. But okay.
Non owner occupied. Real r RPT. There you go. There's other options. This is options you don't want to support.
That's also true. We don't have to be. Yep. We we shouldn't have
to Okay.
Let's move on. Go to go.
I just made a pot in the budget because there's so much fat there. All right. So next. General general budget provisions is what we
I'm sorry, chair. Can I interrupt you for a hot second? Yes. Thank you.
Yes.
Before we move on, during our dinner recess, I had a minute to talk to director, Milner. And is it okay if right now I make a quick change even though we took, like, 15 recesses for us to get to this point, and I gotta walk half of it back?
Okay. Go
ahead. Okay. Thank you. And now member Rollins Fernandez, thank you so much again in advance for your help with navigating this. And then I realized some of it was right on my end, and some of it wasn't right on my end.
So I move on page 14 when I added in money for well, I guess I'll do this part and then I'll move. On page 14, I added in money, $50,000 for Namaka Omoliko in the office of the mayor under paragraph three, stewardship and maintenance of county owned land. So they're actually gonna move. So I move to reduce the addition from $1.30 to $80,000 leaving Malama Hamakua and reducing it by 50. So just reducing it. I won't add anything. And instead shocks. Where did I go? Sorry. One second.
I had it here. Okay. And instead, adding a condition to DEM sorry, baby. I'm in the middle of something I'm gonna have to. Can you give me a minute? Oh, here. You can have my pencil. And adding in $50,000 under environmental protection grants for Namaka up to $50,000 for Namaka 0 Maliko.
Second.
Correct.
Okay. Any more discussion? This is about grants or
I think we'd also have to move to increase general fund transfer to EPNS because I took out $50 first.
Okay. There's a place. Okay. Friendly and then have that make that emotions, but happy to do whatever makes sense.
That's
totally cool. Thank you. Friendly. Okay. Super friendly. Thank you.
Got it. All in favor?
Chair. Yes. Apologies. Just to confirm. So the the condition under environmental protection grants for Namako Omoliko, it it has the remaining information too for Namako Maliko for disposal, recycling, testing, remediation of environmental contamination.
Yes, please. I just didn't wanna say all of that. But, yes, James, you got it. Thank you.
Any
more discussion? Yay, solved this. All in favor, that's nine ayes. Congratulations, good teamwork and persistence. General budget provisions.
I know that we talked about in committees. All of you would have gotten a copy of the ramzied version that was passed out to everybody. We would like to do as members on Granicus' 01/2020 with track changes, document was transmitted to show the changes made in the general budget provisions for fiscal year twenty six-twenty seven. The changes are highlighted in yellow with deleted material in strike through text and new material is underlined as usual. Are there any amendments to this?
Or I need a motion to accept. Chair Lee. Sure. Five minute recess. So 07:48.
Welcome back to the budget finance economic development committee. It is now 07:48. So we're looking at the budget, general budget provisions. And, I'd like to make a motion to delete in the first paragraph where it says general excise tax. It's highlighted, which is an ad. I want to delete this. I need a second. Second. Okay. Thank you.
And then at the very end of this document, has in the last page, within forty five days after the end of each quarter, the managing director must submit to the council a report of all capital improvement projects for which an appropriation has been made. And then what was deleted, I want to add back in. It's you know that highlighted and it's crossed off. Has been made, for each project the following, put that back in. Yeah.
So, everything is trying to be deleted to add back in.
Okay. And then, chair, the other thing about so you explained that's that portion. Yeah. But the other portion, I believe you're asking to delete. Yeah. Because currently, what they do now and what they're required to do now is any general excise tax revenues collected in excess of the estimated budget is not necessarily transferred directly into the general excise tax fund because they have to come in to us to do an amendment. So, they're trying to not have that step. Right. That's what we're trying to put it back in. So, that's the reason for striking that paragraph. Very good.
Mr. Hanado, do you have any comments?
Chair, I just
wanted to, clarify that we're talking about the first as far as the First Amendment. Mhmm. That was section 15 Great. On Special purpose revenues. Thirty two and thirty three of Bill 55, general budget provisions. Oh. Section I lost my place Section 19, Sub H, on page 35 for the second amendment. So
do we have the Director on line? I think we do. She can comment.
Director Miller.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Charlie. The purpose of this section is absolutely not to avoid coming to the council for an amendment. If we need to recognize general excise tax funds during the fiscal year, we will come to the council amendment to recognize those funds and appropriate them accordingly. The purpose of this is in the fiscal year process.
Previously, we recognized general excise tax additional revenues collected as part of the general fund carryover savings and then appropriated them in the transfer to GET and transfer to GET DHHL line items in the countywide costs. That was a really messy process for the finance department and for the budget office. This seems cleaner to just recognize it directly in the general excise tax fund without adding all of that unnecessarily. I will say if the body does choose to proceed with this, that is absolutely their choice. But I would then you will need to make those amendments to the operating budget as well.
You will need to increase general fund carryover savings and you will need to increase the transfer of the general excise tax fund and the general excise tax fund Department of Hawaiian Homelands. I'm happy to provide that information to OCS if that's how the body chooses to proceed. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. I'd like to respond to that. But by striking this paragraph, wouldn't it provide more transparency so we can see what is moved, when it's moved and why it's moved.
Director? Thank you, Chair Lee. You see the balance of the general excise tax revenues including any revenues collected in excess when we submit the fiscal year budget every year. And if any revenues need to be recognized outside of that, we would come to you for an amendment in order to be transparent about the availability of those funds.
Yeah. Well, you know, we have so many amendments throughout the year. So, the timing of when monies are available, we have no idea. That's held. That money is held. Any extra money is held until you guys are ready to spend it someplace. To me, the more transparency for us and for the public is more preferable. Thank you. Okay.
Thank you. Member Bolton and then Member Rollins Hernandez.
Thank you, Chair. Director Milner, what if we amended the language to say, general excise tax revenues collected in excess of the estimated budget will be transferred directly into the general excise tax fund or the general excise tax fund department of Hawaiian homelands per the distribution percentages in chapter 3.1 Maui County code and county communication will be sent immediately notifying the council when that occurs.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor. Yes, that's fine. I will just add that we don't usually add those additional revenues to the fund except for if there's a need to utilize them when we come to you for amendment or when we submit the fiscal year budget. But I'm happy to provide that information and I can work with Department of Finance when the act first time to submit a separate communication specifically communicating the excess general excise excise tax revenue collected for that fiscal year. Thank you, chair.
Just to follow-up, I think it's not only the general excise tax revenue. I think that members are concerned with all of the carryover savings that are available when it is known by the administration that it becomes available. We would also like to know, I mean even though we can't propose budget amendments.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilor. Administration, finds out at the same time as the council when the annual aquifer is completed.
Items that have been budgeted for are no longer needed to kinda wanna know when you know, but I'll yield the floor.
Member Rollins Fernandez followed by member Johnson.
Mahalo, chair. I'm looking at county communication 40 b oh, 43 dash 26 dated 02/11/2026. It has estimate. F y twenty six amended estimate. Collected to date, budget over or under, percentage collected. We get this quarterly report. It we And in to so the
date, dollars 43,000,883
information thousand seven hundred and thirty four. Budget over or under, it's under $26,116,266 We've collected 63% of what we estimated to collect. You want the information. It's right there already. I I don't understand. Like, I support, like, making it easier, more streamlined, and less work for our our departments. I I mean, I I be more efficient. Right? That's what we want all of us to do. Right?
So I don't support the motion. Would I support the the second part of the motion if you wanna split it, but I don't support striking GET, that section, because it's very clear to me what is trying to be achieved, and we already have the information that you want. And what was said is this would still require a budget amendment. This is not removing the requirement of a budget amendment.
We would still have to do that.
Mamadur? Thank you. Mamadur Johnson.
Okay, Chair and members, it's eight and it's getting late. And this kind of stuff, not only is it complicated comp complicated, it's contentious, and I don't feel like this is very we're not working on our a game right now when we're this late, and I got a lot of Panda Express in my belly. I'm kinda sleepy, and I'm kinda slow. So I'm I'm curious. Are we gonna end at nine? Because I don't think we're gonna get to where we wanna go by nine. So if we're not, I might just
Don't leave. Leave. Don't leave.
Don't and see you tomorrow because what's we're not gonna go all day tomorrow. Tomorrow's a brand new day, fresh start, new beginnings. I don't mind leaving this on the table till tomorrow. We will. Why do we gotta go till nine?
So withdraw. Whoever second withdraw. We can talk about this later. We have, more importantly, the countywide, and then we have the additional bills which we can pass.
For my bills, I'm not looking to pass tonight. Looking have a
discussion, which is, again Don't waste your time.
I just wanna do it with a sharp sharp mind and sharp talk.
Okay. So if we talk about this the bills tomorrow, are you guys fine? I
I have one, bill I would like to work on tonight.
Work on tonight. So pass tonight? Sure. We don't have to pass. Just discuss. We don't have to pass. Just discuss. Go ahead, Member Bolton.
I move to amend a bill for an ordinance amending section 3.38.
What bill is it? It's Bill 61, 62, 63, 64, 66 is Gabe, and 67 is Gabe's. He's gonna
Did we skip countywide?
No. Countywide is last.
Oh, okay.
It's bill 63. Okay, go ahead. I move to amend bill 63 to say a bill for an ordinance amending sections three point three eight point zero one zero and three point three eight point zero two zero Maui County code on renaming the Hawaiian Cultural Restoration Revolving Fund and using the land the fund to expand the Rural Haina. Lahaina Royal Complex area as opposed to Royal Lahaina Complex area.
Second.
May by member Paul to sec second by member.
Ronis This, change in bill title was recommended or requested by corporation counsel. Okay.
Okay. All in favor? Any discussion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Motion carries. So bill 63 is amended. Okay. Any other discussions on the bills? Seeing none. Okay. We can continue that. The last thing is the important thing, member, Palton, which is a countywide
Chair, I I had some bills.
Are you I said I thought you said you're not gonna take it up. Take No. It up. Okay. Go ahead.
I wanna
discuss the bill. Okay.
Go. Bills. Bills.
Then Not make a motion.
And not make a motion. That's what we're
doing for all of Go ahead. Yeah.
Alright. Members, there's bill 66 and bill 67. Both bills essentially do the same thing. They set aside 20% of our county transient accommodation tax to fund actions and strategies that support the county's climate action and resiliency play on the CARP. Bill 66 separates creates climate action resiliency revolving fund for these revenues.
And Bill 67 funnels the revenues into the existing environmental protection and sustainability fund. And I'm totally open to the body's preference. I will note that Director Milner last week said for tracking purposes, a new revolving fund, which is Bill 66, might be cleaner and easier. My intent is that this would not impact FY '27 budget, but would be implemented for the FY '28 budget, proposed budget proposal. By passing this sooner rather than later, the mayor can plan for this while doing the budget outreach for f y twenty eight.
Establishing a free based program for visitors to Maui, a fee based program for visitors to Maui County so the fee can support climate action and resiliency programs is an action identified in the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan, which I'll remind you members is officially codified under Maui County Code in chapter 20.44. This chapter also requires regular updates to the plan and progress tracking via a dashboard. Establishing dedicated funding tied to a plan and requiring the of climate change in these chambers, fires, drought, water availability, heat waves, sea level rise, unprecedented storms, and floods. How we play our part as a community to mitigate climate change and how we adapt to become more resilient is a matter deserving of our dedicated attention and funding. I often talk about untangling knots of the past and this members is probably one of the most important knots we can untie to leave a better, safer, more resilient community for our children and future generations.
COP, we're at we're the do We're to that. We're construction and demolition waste diversion programs, environmental going education, workforce development, internship programs, micro grants to help needy constituent transition to renewable energy, community garden programs, mental and physical health programs for folks implement impacted by climate change disasters. Identifying, managing, and possibly relocating culturally sensitive areas that are at risk due to climate change. Evaluate evacuation routes and planning aligned with areas that are vulnerable due to climate change impacts like flooding, fire, and sea level rise, storm and cyclone readiness programs, nature based shoreline solutions, wetland management, ungulate removal and fencing, all of this is tied. This is a long list, members.
In short, we know the visitor industry and transient accommodations have profited in our special climate, culture, and environment for decades. We know that this increased traffic and human presence disrupts our natural ecosystems and that we, the people who live here and whose livelihoods depend on the land, are left with a bill and negative impacts. They have privatized the gains and socialized the losses. At the end of the day, the TAT is a targeted tax for our tourism industry to offset their impacts. Sending aside a portion of these revenues to implement the CARP ensures our TAT's use is accountable for this purpose.
So members, this these two bills don't affect us this year, but I wanted to kinda show it to you and think about moving forward. This could be a revenue source. And there's two paths here on how you wanna do it. And that's my discussion. And I I would hope I know it's late, but I hope you guys were able to hear some of that. Maybe you can lead me on where you wanna go with this. But that's my proposal to the body. Thank you, chair.
Good job. Okay. Member Bolton.
I think that's a good idea, personally, because we're already funding a lot of things that fall in that, alignment. For me, I like the rollout of it that we don't make a decision. You're not proposing we make a decision during this budget process. Just consider it? Or
I mean, there's several paths. If someone says, hey, I want this in my committee and let's talk about it. If someone says, let's do a charter amendment or someone says, let's pass it today, just make it it happens effect doesn't take effect till next year's budget. Those are all I'm all open to all those.
So so for me, my preference was, with DEM taking recycling back to solid waste, it a little bit leaves the rest of EPNS dangling in environmental management because that's where they ended up at the time when the charter created them. And then when you look at the EP and S grants and you look at the OEV, natural resources grants, it's really similar. And OEV resources was created by a charter. Right? And EPNS was created by a charter, and they're they're super similar.
And so, like, for me, I'd like to smush them together, because wastewater and solid waste is full of engineers. And they're just built different engineers in the way they think about things and like that. And so it's like you got EPNS in here with all these engineers, and it it seems like the fit of EPNS would be better in OEV resources because natural resources, environmental protection, and sustainability are, like, who does it best. Right. You know?
And and that's the original cultures or the host cultures because, You know, they lived it for how much, generations. And so, if we're just having a discussion, that would be, for me, my preference on the path forward is, now that solid waste has taken up recycling because it fits together. And then you have wastewater and then you have EPNS, and nothing against the director and deputy of, environmental management. But I can see wastewater and solid waste. I can see even wastewater and water together.
But EPNS just feels more of a fit under, environmental protection and sustainability, natural culture resources, OEV resources. It feels like a better fit to me. And you can kinda see in the grants that are distributed, we could have put in a in EPNS because they have Maui County Wetlands, or we could put in OUV resources because it's a better fit. So my preference on the pathway forward would be to take EPNS that's remaining after recycling goes to solid waste, move it under EPNS, and then do this to, OUV resources, natural cultural resources, environmental protection, and sustainability? That would be my discussion.
Thank you.
Well, thanks for that discussion, Sheriff. I'll just respond in one paragraph, one little sentence here. So in Bill 67, it's creating the sustainable fund. It has a section in there that says number two, ensure sustainable and informed disbursement of such funds through required consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Division, the Department of OVEV Resources, and the Department of Agriculture. So in the bill it says they all have to sit down and sort out where the money should go and talk about it with them with themselves.
So I I was hearing where you're coming from, and I think we're trying to do that, you know, you know, not the way as specific as you said, but I wasn't trying to get to the way you were talking about. So just wanted to throw that out there. Anybody else
I don't mind the consultation with ag. I just want to take out that step where EPNS is OUV Resources, but that's just my 2¢.
Thank you. Chair Lee, then Member Batangia.
I think this is an interesting proposition but it, of course, lacks the community input. And we need to have more, you know, more participation from the public and many other people besides ourselves. And, you know, we're focused right now on the budget and this is probably better dealt with in committee in another committee. Thank you.
Thank you. Member Batongen.
Thank you, chair. And thank you, member Johnson, for bringing this proposal forward. Can I ask for those talking points or what you had read? Admittedly, I'm not at my best right now, and, would love to be able to review that again with some fresh eyes. If I'm understanding your proposal, at least the broad strokes of it. It's essentially creating, like, a green fee or, like, a green fund, by carving out a piece of the TAT, and I'm open. I just wanna let you know that I'm just not in a good place to be making to to be tackling that at the moment. Thank you.
Okay. Member Rollins for now.
Malachar. And so and that's why member Johnson is just explaining his bills tonight and not asking anyone to vote on it because it's 08:12PM. And just to flag because I made this mistake in my first year, don't give any other council member your notes if you don't want that to be posted publicly. Because I did that and I had, like, some typos and stuff, and then it just was, like, on Granicus for everybody to see all my notes and typos, handwritten stuff.
Understood. I'll look for the rec I'll I'll look for the transcript.
Okay. Good. Okay. Thank you very much. Oh, sorry. Member Senancy.
Hello, Chair. And thank you, Member Johnson, that. I guess going back to the CARP and looking at some of the the goals and objectives that we set for ourselves prior. Just while you were speaking, just thinking about all the discussions we had in the last couple days, chair. Yeah.
I mean, it seems like wastewater, all of these projects was kinda taken was was at the top of our discussion. So, while we it's I think it's a good pivotal point to we even had all these scientists even though it was above our heads today, this morning. But they kind of presented a different a different idea. And so, I mean, I don't understand it as much as they do, but but when you think about moving forward and how we should, you know, for like member Paulton said, maybe re rethink our strategies moving forward. Maybe this is the time that we should start, you know, actually looking at those, goals that we set for ourselves and maybe putting the monies now investing.
A lot of the county workers have shared that they don't wanna, after the corner storms, they don't wanna increase, you know, yeah, we can build more houses for ourselves, but actually we got to start putting our money into the infrastructure first before we even think about increasing the population. And so they want to focus on infrastructure. And this kind of discussion, we should I think we should be considering all ideas that are coming to us during this process. So mahalo for that. That was kinda refreshing
a little bit. Well, you imagine all the members prior or not all of it, so many of our priorities, we could use this money. You know, like, we were just talking about customer cooks wastewater plant. This would have helped. This is where you could get that money. Right? So a lot of our priorities, a lot of things we've been discussing where we could scratch and how we're gonna get this money, we could have gotten it through this on many of these things. But I just wanted to bring that up. And maybe charter amendment, here we go, but we'll see what happens. Thank you, members, for the discussion. Don't wanna let
Just to add, the charter amendment would, as, chair Lee said, bring in the public input.
And and as well as taking it to committee, we'll we could allow some discussions there.
But thank you.
Thank you, members.
Very good. Okay. What an awesome team. Member Cook.
I'll try and be brief because I know everybody's tired. Interesting what you're saying and stoked. I just wanna kinda weigh in the the, engineer this morning, the guy, David Whitney. He is I think he represents I don't know him well, but I've talked to him before. He represents there's a new breed of young, progressive, engineers bringing, the And going that.
To the new
question. A think to continue to work on it. Thanks.
Thank you, Chair. Announcement prevention is worth a pound a cure.
Okay. So thank you very much. I'm gonna put all these bills aside. Is that okay, James and Kirsten? I wanna get to the county wide.
So this is the last thing we're gonna do tonight. So we have on pages eight and nine of bill 55, we have one member priority and this is mine, is to move to increase fringe benefits by $750,000 and to insert a new condition to read as follows. Up to $750,000 must be for bargaining unit eleven, bargaining unit for their supplemental agreement for additional cost items. That's my motion. I think we also want to include the, bargaining unit for the lifeguards. I don't know what their bargaining unit was.
Chair, before you guys get into discussion, I'm gonna recuse myself. Right. K. Can I ask for advice? I I can turn off my camera. I don't know what to do while I'm, online.
Do you wanna vote on the, lifeguard one, though? Yeah. Can you tell us what their bargaining unit is?
Can I? Can
It's, bargaining unit fifteen. 15. And the cut I previously made with Fringe should be 247,545. So I took that from their a account to move it to, countywide Fringe with member Sugimura's for bargaining unit 15. So I don't know if you wanna do that first or us to call you when we get to that problem.
Can we just put it in one motion? No.
Because she has to recuse herself. Oh, okay. Okay.
I see what you're saying. We can do a separate
Well, member Sung Ji Mora just made her, so I'll just I'll
text you when to come
back on. Do that one first. Yeah. Thank Okay.
Thank you. So on this, the planned off set is to reduce countywide parks facilities by $750,000 Countywide parks facilities is CBS 4,581, page 23 of the budget bill and page nine thirty three of the program budget.
Chair, isn't that the fund that we keep reading?
Think you
Is that the one they keep asking us not to digging into?
I need a second.
I'll give you the yeah.
Myself and me by Member of Batangen for a second. Yes.
Your motion includes both? No. It's gonna
be just one. Just By new 11.
Okay. Not not the offset. By
both, I think she meant the add and that's
question.
I I
think that's 50,000 and to insert a new condition to read as follows. Up to 750 must be for bargaining unit 11, bargaining u for bargaining unit supplemental agreement for additional cost items.
You said reduce. You mean increase?
This is to increase fringe benefits. Okay. Not reduce. Yeah. You said reduce.
Okay. Second by Member Patangan. Discussion. So this is for as you know, we passed the bargaining unit at the last council meeting. We approved it, the resolution. And in anticipation of the day that all the contracts are done and our firefighters then can have received a supplemental agreement, which only the mayor can do, we cannot do, so we couldn't change that agreement. I just wanted to prepare us so that we have money in the budget so that the firefighters can have this. That was my intention. Budget Director.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Council Members. I've discussed this with the Managing Director, and we feel we have sufficient funds in the budget already. We're not opposed if the Council would like to add this. I just wanted to state that for the record and also reiterate, please don't cut parks anymore.
Thank you, chair. So, the bargaining unit director. Can you come back? Okay. All right. So for bargaining unit eleven, we wanted to put this money in for if in case that day comes. So you're saying you have enough money for this as well as whatever is decided for the, contract?
Thank you, sir. Yes, we feel we have enough funds in this account to cover that.
Including for the lifeguards?
Yes, including ocean safety.
Members, your call. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo chair. So you read the offset, as if that was something that was gonna actually offset this. It's not. So this would actually be an ad, and then you would it would we'd have to figure out tomorrow how where to increase property taxes to cover the $6.07 50, thousand. So Since budget directors said they have planned for it, I'm okay with letting them cover that. Otherwise, tomorrow, I guess you're going to be supporting some of the increases to RPT.
Okay. Member Palton.
Thank you, chair. Can, the budget director explain is it possible to explain how they, plan to supplement, firefighter and ocean safety both under Maui Fire department Department of Fire and Public Safety, how what the supplemental agreement would look like so that we, I guess, you know, the thing I don't wanna happen because I get stopped at Costco gas station Mhmm. Is, like, they're like, oh, yeah. The supplemental agreement was junk and whatever. So, like, can you share how it's structured or you cannot share because ocean safety didn't get their contract yet?
Or how does that work?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Council Member Pauldin. No, because negotiations are ongoing, I can't really share right now. I can just tell you, that talks are happening, between several various parties. And as we have more information, we will share that with the body when we're able. Thank you, Chair.
And the negotiations that are ongoing are for bargaining unit fifteen that you're referring
to? Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor Yes. Because I believe ocean safety hasn't concluded their agreement yet, we can't enter into supplemental negotiations until that's complete.
Until everybody is power with their negotiation. But from what I understood from the sixth floor, is it stalled? Bargaining Unit 15 stalled? So how does it un stall?
Thank you, Chair. I believe DPS and admin are working on that together to try and move things forward. I will have to defer to them on the current status of anything, any discussions.
And, your plan with the money that you have set aside, on your opinion, you think that the fire department will be happy with it based on you know, know,
account for the current, binding arbitration as well as any supplemental agreements that have currently been discussed. Okay.
The ones that currently been discussed, who have you been discussing them with? Anyone from the fire department?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Botton. I will have to defer to managing director and the director of DPS as to who they've been discussing them with.
Would it be okay for any of the eight of us to talk with them offline confidentially, like executive session one on one?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member. I'm sure they'd be happy to take your call. I don't know what they're currently allowed to discuss, even private one on one. So I'll have to, let them make that decision once they speak to you.
Who is the person that we should call that they would take our call? Josiah?
Managing director is always happy to take your call.
She's standing next to Leslie smiling.
Everybody's really happy to take my call, but is that the correct person?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Pelton. Yes, I'd start with managing director. If he thinks you need to talk to someone else, he'll
let you know. Okay. Thank you. I'm ready to move on. So
I got my answer. So, I want to move to increase fringe benefits by $750,000 and to insert a new condition to read as follows, which I've already read. Up to $750 must be for Bargaining Unit 11, Bargaining Unit Supplemental Agreement for additional costs. And I got my answer. They don't need any money. Right? Because they already have it covered. But I want this in there so that the at the time when the bargaining units are contract is finalized, that our firefighters are gonna have money in there for the supplemental agreement.
No, don't do that because up to your capping it at $7.50. If For supplemental agreement? Yeah, What if what they have in the plans is more? Then they can give them more. That's not the definition of up to.
I have said I moved to increase fringe benefits benefits by $7.50 0 and to insert a new condition to read as follows. Up to $7.50 0 must be for Bargain Unit 11. Each
lit Up to me it's
no more than $7.50 0.
Or how
about is the ceiling not a floor?
At least. At least? Okay. How about at least? I like that.
Can we condition that if we're not party to the negotiations?
Well, at some point when that happens
I I don't know.
They're gonna have to come back to the budget bill to get money.
Chair. I I mean
Tell her in Illinois.
I Here comes here comes
last budget director. She has more
this fiscal year. We had a condition in there for hazard payments for the fire department and the ultimate payment ended up being higher. We had to come in for a budget amendment to change that. I will defer to OCS and Corporation. I don't believe we've had an at least condition before.
I will say, for purposes of our financial system, we will still only put the amount listed in there. But maybe having that at last language in there will give us the flexibility to tap on other index codes. The other option is to not put a dollar amount and just say, you know, to say funding must be used if supplemental agreements are reached with the HFFA and Ocean Safety Bargaining Units, funds must be used to support those agreements. Okay.
Chair, if I had a union, I'd like to call my union rep and go home. I don't know how fruitful this discussion is going. I would really like to just end the meeting and go
home.
Do we have any more countywide
costs? I have a countywide, cut in the, in the emergency fund, but that's I I can wait till tomorrow. I'm in no rush.
Whatever you're looking You're to finalize a budget tonight, right? James and Kirsten?
Chair, we'll balance up to the point that we can. And I will just, whatever remains if anything remains undone, we'll just ask for the committee's grace in needing just a bit of time to ensure we rebalance if needed.
I can be really fast if the members can be really fast. I'll talk a little bit.
Okay. I'm just gonna welcome. Okay. Go ahead.
Okay. So we're in the emergency fund countywide special purpose. I move to reduce emergency fund by $2,400,000 and transfer it to the EPNS fund. That's on page 51 of the budget bill 55.
Discussion.
Thank you. For the second, the project this is for the funding of the Nohulu Cloud Bridge and the project will reduce extreme weather events such as drought, flooding, and fire. I think Director Millner suggested that this cut when I asked her where to find funding, so we can bring up Director Millner if she likes. Putting money into EP and S funds may may help them will help the Nohua Cloud Bridge. And once again, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If you look at the number in on page 55 of how much we have in the emergency fund, I think we could take some of that for future to help prevent emergencies down the road. Thank you, chair.
Okay. Anybody else for discussion? Member Batongen.
Thank you, chair. I take issue I I don't know how much local projects are going to solve the global, issue of climate change. So I do have some angst, but I would like to hear but you mentioning that the budget director direct, suggested this cut does make me open to consideration. Can I ask how much is currently in the emergency fund?
It's a big number, 117,000,000 members. And we're talking about $2,400,000 I mean,
Is that inclusive of the money that we've used this year?
We'll ask director on that one.
Thank you, Council Member Johnson. No, I don't believe that is. The body has not made the amendment to reduce the estimated revenues as of sixthirtytwenty six. So, it would be $117,000,000 minus 2,000,000 that's available.
Oh, maybe we should make that motion sometime tonight because it's an easy one and it's not controversial. 32,000,000, we gotta subtract?
From the estimated balance. Yes. Thank you, Chair.
Shirley. I
think we should have a more more brisk and thorough discussion on the Johnson proposal.
Okay. You're mic.
Let's talk about his proposal tomorrow.
Maybe we can speak to the staff and say put that 2,400,000 in parentheses when you're doing the budget so we don't jam them up.
If he's gonna withdraw his motion, I would like to make a motion to decrease the, total for FY '27 by 32,000,000, that we
able 're
we're of can get a a second.
Okay. Hold on. I have a motion on the floor. And I'm looking around. You guys want me to withdraw. Okay. I'll withdraw my motion if who's my seconder? I'll withdraw my seconder. Thank you. The floor is clear. Okay.
Okay. I moved to, reduce the emergency fund by 32,000,000 because we already did that in reality. So the new, total would be $85,851,900. Okay. Charlie, second. I guess we've discussed it. Well, it's not controversial because we already did it.
Yep. Can I just confirm that the number is budget director wasn't giving us, like, a rough estimate on how much we had appropriated? It was it was a clean number.
You can confirm it, but not with me because that's what my
Yeah. Budget director?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Betonga. Yes, the bill for an ordinance is up for second reading on May 1 to raise the amount from 12,000,000 to 32,000,000. Thank you, chair.
Thank you, budget director. I'm happy to support the motion.
Okay. All in favor say aye. Eight ayes. Oh, nine ayes. Motion passes. Okay. Anything else for Countywide?
Yes, Chair. On page three of the budget ordinance, I'm sorry, of Appendix B, I moved to create an idle fee. So at the end of the proposed rates and fees for the EV chargers, I'd like to add an idle fee of $1 per minute applied five minutes after charging ends until vehicle leaves charging stall.
Oh, wow. Okay. Is there a second? Second.
I don't have any
Thank you Member Bolton for the second. Member Cook, I'll speak closer into the mic. I apologize. So a lot of charging stations have the capability to allow for a idle fee to be assessed. So if you park in the stall and plug in the car, you can stay as long as you're charging, but you cannot continue to stay in the stall after your car is fully charged. So the idle fee would apply a dollar per minute starting five minutes after your car is fully charged until you are until you vacate the stall.
Miss Pepper Palton.
Would the motion maker, support fifteen minutes? Because, you know, like, what if you're a new mom or with kids or something like that? It always takes longer to drag your kids out of whatever you're doing to move your car. So, like, would you support ten or fifteen minutes?
Can we split the difference single 10?
Okay. Friendly amendment. Thank you, Member Bolton.
Okay. So, Member Cook? I remember Followed by Member Rawlsford.
Ahead. What page is
of the, fees for economy wide EV charging stations. No. It's on three starts
we'll
to we're
make that
that's a point. Good
And I for me. I I mean, if you get I I don't know And if that's something that I would wanna support. It's not about the. Right. It's about you staying there for ten minutes and, I mean Not leaving Life is life. And sometimes, like you say, I'm late ten minutes and I'm getting charged. Would you owe us a fee? A dollar a minute?
Ten minutes.
A dollar a minute starting after ten minutes. Yeah. That's that's too micromanaging for me. Okay.
Chair, I'm supportive of this. As someone who owns an EV, we charge at home. But this type our society is learning to basically manage this. We don't have enough charging stations in general. And this, I believe, makes a lot of sense because it's an incentive for people to pay attention and not just be going like all mine and the mine, I'm shopping and let's oh, by the way, let's go have a couple beers and then we'll come back. It'll it and you don't have to wait till your car is 100%. If you come out and, like, 95%, you're not gonna wait. You're gonna go. So I think it's a practical, prudent thing. My brother used to work for Department of Transportation, I think.
Member Rollins Fernandez filed by Paul Tim.
Mahalo, sir. Two things. One, where were you planning to position it? Because there's the regular speed charger and the fast speed charger. So if it would be both. And then two, where are the because this is only for county owned EV charging stations. I I know we have one out here at the service center. Is that it?
At the community center.
There's one in Kulu. Lahaina Aquatic Center has. Okay. Yeah. There's actually lots.
Okay. And then so the there's an idle fee, but then if you remove the the charger and you're just parked there because you're trying to move them out of the way. That's the point. Right? And so if the charge if the charger's not in there, there's not gonna be a fee, and they're still they're it's not achieving your point.
Then you get a ticket.
Oh, sorry. Member Senecchi, I didn't see you. Go ahead. Who
gives who gives you the ticket?
I was I was working on that legislation for, like, years. It felt like I can't even remember if it passed or not. Like, about, like, you know, if you're parking in the EV thing and you're not actually charging, trying to make it, like, if you're parking in a differently abled stall and you're not actually differently abled. But I can't remember if I passed it because it was so like
extra. I
just wanted to add, our gas prices went up to $88 a gallon in East Maui. I just wanted to
Oh, our gas price went down.
You went down? Yeah. Oh.
$6.90. You wanna pull
the I
think I'm sure that's relevant.
Okay. It's all for the question.
Oh, wait. I I I speak in support of this because I can totally see a lot of West Maui people. Like, you know, the EV chargers are front row. You know? And I can totally see people, like, wanting to park in the front row and being like, oh, I'm charging however long it takes to charge and not leave, like I'm telling you, choke West Maui people will do that because I live in West Maui, and I I see it happen. And it'll well, I mean, I guess that's not county charges. That's but so member Batanggan, did you say that this is
to to
And
that. To
Member And Johnson. Sorry. You guys you're fine. Member Johnson.
Councilmember Betongaan, in your experience in the past in transportation and all that, isn't there federal grants that build EV chargers for
require an EV charging station at facilities that have a certain amount of stalls. Okay.
That's all I'm saying is that would be something I'd be in support of is going out and getting that federal monies to build more. But this is micromanaging and punitive. It's not my style of government. Don't like when government does this to our people. I'm not gonna support it. Thank you, Chair.
Chair Lee's gonna leave. So yeah. Let's lot other we're to doing the doing is
if you insist So you would have that traffic.
Under both
Oh, I don't care. I'm gonna vote against and this.
The the regular speed charger.
And I don't really well, mean, whatever. But, I I just don't see cops going into, like, parking lot to do this because chief Pelletier said that they fight crime and not so much, like, monitor EV charging stations. Mahalochur.
Thank you. Roll call. Okay. I'm gonna take Oh, wait. I just wanted to clarify. Like, what part don't you cops are involved in the
Oh, member Cook told me that you get a ticket if you don't put the charger in your charger thing.
Oh, okay. Yeah. So my money collection doesn't involve police, though. Right? You know?
Well, the whole point of an idling fee is to make people move along. And so then I said, well, what if you don't even have the charger plugged into the car? And then member Cook said that there would be a police that would come and give you ticket. And so then I said that police don't really monitor Okay. I get it. EV charging stations. So it's not a high priority.
Got it. The other clarification is do we need a number here instead of the x x x x for I guess the budget director?
Chair, I think bill 64 which is part of the budget bills is the one that addresses the fee. Okay. I think that's why it's
It'll address the XXXX. Right. Okay. Thank you. All my questions have been answered. Okay. Good.
Roll call.
Chair proceeding with the roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook?
Yes.
Councilmember Gabe Johnson?
EA. No.
EA. That was no, correct?
That was no. Council chair Alice Lee, excuse me.
Yes. She's here. She's here.
Yes. Oh.
Council member Zamora Palton?
Yes.
Council member Keanu Rolins Fernandez? No. Council member Shane Senenzi? No. Council member Nohei Uwajins? Yes. Committee vice chair Kunohe Batangen?
Yes.
Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura?
Yes.
Chair, six ayes, three nos motion passes. K.
Very good. Anything else for countywide? If
director Milner can assist OCS staff with the cuts that had been sustained or carried over for police and public works, I believe, in letting letting them know what the fringe was that was cut in fiscal year twenty six so that they can have it for the calculations so that when we come in in the morning, we can have, like, a big fat fringe bonus
of cuts.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilor. We've actually already been texting about it, so absolutely.
Thank you.
Cool. I think my, fire cuts, I included the fringe anticipation. So I don't know how that works, but, thank you. K. Any other countywide?
Okay. So this is it. Are you fine, James and Kirsten? So now the important thing is that OCS staff are gonna take all our numbers and tomorrow morning look at well we got FN the questions regarding real property tax, FN nine response, and FN 11 responses. That's gonna help you, right, with
the calculation? I'll get started. For that, it's primarily for the members. It's FN09 and FN11. Those are the letters we sent get to that team. We're
for the RPT, basically. Okay. And then you all are you going to send us the Excel spreadsheet to use for calculations?
Yes. We can provide an Excel template for members for their needs.
Okay. So tomorrow, you will have the Excel spreadsheet to use for calculations for RPT. Congratulations. We have accomplished a lot. We got kind of fussy at the end, but it is end of the evening. Oh, sorry, member. Go ahead.
Chair, I'd like to make a request if that's okay with you. Considering we're asking OCS to do all of this work, and it's 09:48 oh, I'm sorry. 08:48 in the PMs, in the dark. Can we start at ten tomorrow and give us a minute to sleep and give them like, James sounds like I did, and I
feel bad for him. He's not feeling well.
Yeah. No nobody is. Yeah. K.
Do you mind if we start at ten if we did all of this and tomorrow we're doing our PT stuff? Is is that okay with you so we can be kinder
Yes. Happier? So, yes, we want everybody to be happy. So we have posted for 09:00 tomorrow. I'll come, start the meeting, and then recess, and you all can come in
at what time? I can be on my phone. Do
four of us need to be online for you to be able to gabble in? What is the
what yeah. I think so.
Yes. So Thank you, chair. The company will need a quorum for that that recess for enable to do that recess, basically, from that I
volunteer the folks that live closest.
Sorry. I will
join online and the folks that live close.
Yeah. Thanks for everybody working hard.
Remember I can be here at mine.
Okay.
I know
you'd like to be here first.
I'll be here in this two.
Remember, Sonny, you're be here? I make no promises.
The Okay. Shirt
looks kinda good. It's gonna be good shirt in the morning.
I need four. Right? So I don't know who else. Yeah. I I will
I'll be online, Cher. I can join online.
You could be online. Okay. Good. So one, two I just don't
wanna be in town at nine. Yeah. But I can be at home at nine.
Okay. Thank you. So is is would it is that enough time? 10:00? Or you wanna go eleven?
Oh oh, yeah. The whatever the committee wants to do, Charlie.
Because you folks are doing the hard work. You gotta crunch the numbers so that Oh,
well, since the committee's gonna be recess for Exactly. We'll be here at nine to help the committee recess. Aw.
And I hope you feel better. Okay. So that's what we'll do then. We'll start the meeting at, 10:00 okay or you want eleven? I mean, you know, the recess meeting.
Oh, whatever the committee decides, chair. We're we're gonna be working tonight anyway. Yeah.
Okay. What time do you guys want? I'm gonna come in at nine. We'll have four of us online. I mean, five of us online or whatever. But Just start time. You want ten, eleven? Ten. Ten.
I don't wanna go this
late. Yeah. I think
I have a flight at 07:45 so I can finally see my family again.
Aw. Thank you for being here.
Do you remember
It's so much better to have you guys here in person.
I don't I don't think they remember what I look like. Aw. Okay. Yes.
If we recess Sure.
That's what we've done in the past.
And leave our stuff here. Right?
Yeah. We've done that in
the past. If we recess.
Mike, we'll recess this meeting and come back at ten.
Okay. Yeah. Welcome.
So,
chair, that that would mean that we would we would cancel the 09:00AM meeting, and the committee would just resist this meeting from from now till 10AM tomorrow. Right? Is that what's being discussed?
Don't do that. Okay. Don't do that. Wisdom has come in and don't do that.
Chair, can I ask that we take a recess while we figure out what the plan is for tomorrow? So
it's eight. So go ahead. August 08:55. Economic development committee. It is now 08:58 and we are talking about how we're handling tomorrow. So I would like to adjourn tonight and then come back tomorrow at nine to start the meeting.
Director. Into the mic. Oh, I gonna hear can hear you, but when I'm online and you don't speak into the mic, I
cannot hear you. Okay. Just like, go ahead.
Thank you, Chair. Appreciate the committee members and staff working so hard and so late tonight. Just want to keep things simple procedurally. What you just announced would be workable. So you would need quorum of five members tomorrow to convene. You can start late if we don't have five members right at nine a. M. The Office of Information Practices has told us it's okay to start late. You just need to communicate with any members of the public who show up at nine to let them know you're waiting on quorum. You just need five to convene and take testimony.
So you wouldn't need all nine members. If you want to work out an arrangement among the committee members who can plan to come in later, You know, if you want to have a plan to take testimony and then recess and really not begin deliberations until 10:00. But you have a lot of options under the sunshine law. I'm just I'm really thinking about members of the public who might show up at nine tomorrow morning expecting to testify and just make sure we do our best to communicate with them what the plan is. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Okay. So we will adjourn tonight. I'll be back tomorrow at nine with at least five of us or more. We'll take public testimony because I'm sure there will be. And we'll just see how many members are here and then we can start the meeting appropriately. Right? That's what you're saying?
Yes. Thank you, Chair. Okay.
And in the meantime, OCS is going to be crunching our numbers and working hard and then therefore you will send over to us the Excel spreadsheet that we will use for calculation of RPT. Is that correct? And we can look FN10 and FN9, nine and eleven, okay, FN9 and 11 to see the range and whatever finances answered our letter as a basis. Okay. Any questions? Oh, wonderful. Okay. Okay. Let's go. Thank you everybody for working hard.
It is now 09:00. Perfect. This meeting is adjourned.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.