About this meeting
- Government Body
- 16 Budget and Finance Committee
- Meeting Type
- 16 Budget And Finance Committee
- Location
- Maui County, HI
- Meeting Date
- April 22, 2026
Transcript
2213 sections (from 2,551 segments)
That's pretty fast, Kate. Welcome to the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. Today is April 22. It is now 10:03 a. M. My name is Yuki Lei Sugimura. I'm the chair of this committee and I'd like to welcome everybody. This meeting is being conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law. As a reminder, when your name is called, if you're not in the council chamber, please identify by name who, if anyone is in the room with you, vehicle or workspace. Minors do not need to be identified. Good morning, Shirley.
Good morning. Looking forward to the meeting. Good
morning, Member Paulton.
Aloha kakai yako kako shinging lamenderic from the council chambers. Good morning. Good morning, Member Johnson.
Good morning, chair, council members, community members. I feel like Groundhog Day. Here we are again. Yeah. No testifiers at the Lanai District Office, and I'm here and ready to work. Thank you.
Alright. Thank you. Member Rollins Fernandez, good morning.
Happy to be here in person. No testifiers at the Monkai District Office. Mahalo, chair.
I guess Member Oh Jens is joining us as well as Member Cook. Member Sanancy, good morning.
Aloha ka ka yaka, everybody. Morning, chair.
Good morning. And Member Batangan. Okay. Thank you everybody last night. Thank you very much for working and having productive reviews of departments. I really appreciate Assisting us with today's meeting for BFED is our staff as well as budget director, deputy corp counsel Wigglesworth. And please see the last page of the agenda for information on meeting connectivity. Thank you members for attending today's BFED committee meeting. Meeting. We have one item on today's agenda which is BFED one proposed fiscal year twenty seven budget for the County Of Maui.
Members, I will be taking testimony after opening comments today. We don't have any opening comments. We're We'll start a discussion with the Department of Human Concerns and continue with Department of Management, Office of the Mayor, then Department of Parks and Recreation and Department of Police. And if you're following the guidelines, we're going in a little out of order as we took up the Department of EV Resources, Personnel Services, Planning and Transportation yesterday instead Department of Human Concerns, we're saving it for today. Staff, could you distribute Exhibit I?
Thank you. Exhibit I will tell you what work we have done up through yesterday and I'll give you a guideline guide of the work that we have done with the departments that we've gone through. Before we start our discussion, we will begin a look results you take a the results I'm Good morning, Member Cook.
Good morning, Chair. Good Good morning.
Testifiers wanting to provide testimony should sign up with the staff, join the online meeting with Teams link or call you need something? Sure. Oh, okay. Meeting via the teams link or call in to the phone number noted on today's agenda. Testimony on the budget is not limited to the department's schedule today.
Written testimony is encouraged and can be submitted via e comment link at mycounty.us agendas as well. Under the Sunshine Law, the chair will receive oral testimony for agenda items at the beginning of the meeting and as the item is called up. Individuals wishing to testify via Teams, please raise your hand by clicking on the raise your hand button. If calling in, please the testifiers list in order testifiers sign up or raise their hands. For those on Teams, staff will lower your hand once your name is added.
Staff will then call the name you have logged in on under or the last four digits of your phone number when it's your time to testify. At this time, staff will enable microphone and video. Please ensure your name appears on the Teams link as the name you prefer to be referred to or as anonymous if you wish to testify anonymously. If you're in person, please notify staff that you do not want to name yourself and you want to testify anonymously also. Otherwise, please state your name for the record at the beginning of your testimony.
Oral testimony is limited to three minutes and if you're not done, I'll give you another thirty seconds to complete and if you're still testifying beyond that. Once you're done testifying or if you do not wish to testify, you can view the meeting on Akaku Channel fifty three, Facebook Live, or mauicounty.us agendas. We will do our best to take each person up in an orderly fashion. We'll now call our first testifiers. Staff?
Thank you, Chair. The first testifier is Frank Barbosa, to be followed by Jennifer Gladwin.
Good morning. There.
Yep. Yeah. Good morning, good morning, staff and council members. My name is Frank Barbosa. I'm in the present location of Building 8th Floor.
Today, I'll be testifying under public public works, improvement on crosswalks and road etching. And if I cannot get done, I'll be back tomorrow the next day. First of all, you know, I know we have a lot of crosswalks out there for for an impaired person, and I'm not the only one out there that's impaired, but I kinda vocally speak out for those out there that that wanted me to be here. You know, I was looking at if there's any improvement with the sidewalks on the county of Maui, whether on the county roads and residential areas where we can install tactiles. Tactiles are little guide tiles for the vision visually impaired people that when you approach a a crosswalk, sometimes the crosswalk may not be straight, and it really helps the impaired impaired vision impaired crossing the street and not grazing the cars on public roads.
And, for example, if the city boss drops you off on South Key Road, and we all know there's no sidewalks. It's the oceanside, and there's a road and the residential. So with those those those tactiles at the crosswalk first of all, you have to find the crosswalk. And that's where I was getting at that, you know, these textured road curvings or edgings would help the the this the vision impaired find their way along the roadway, along with the tech tiles to find a crosswalk. And there's areas where no sidewalks are are are, you know, in the areas of Ookai Road where we walk on the road because there's overgrown on the side of the road.
Another good example is Kauahini. Kauahini is is fairly new, tactiles facing Kauahini Road. There's no sidewalks out there, but the that disability ramps have tactiles on them. If a visually impaired walk out there, they're actually walking straight out to Kauahini Road, and there's no sidewalks on the the crossing, streets. Another area that that we need them is this building down in the parking area on the bottom.
You know, about a year ago, I attended a MPO meeting. And in the MPO meeting, after MPO meeting, I walked up. I don't know what shit is this the street Wells, made my left into your guys' parking structure, tried to stay as close as I could to the curb. And a county vehicle electric vehicle was exiting the the parking structure. You know, I I I could hear them because you have to use your senses out there. And with that all said, I I made visual contact with me. I stopped. He stopped. I went. He went.
Next thing you know, my stick was under his car. My leg got gashed. But I had couple couple ladies was on their break. They showed me where the restroom was. I washed off. But I'm here today. I'm still doing good, but accidents like this can be prevented. Let's make it safe for everyone, not just the people that can see because someday in the future, everyone might need it. And just starting in starting using these tactiles or reflector crosswalks, not only for the blind, but at least for for the drivers so they can see who is in the crossroad crosswalk. But thank you again.
I'll be back another day to finish this up. Allah and mahalo for having me here today.
One second. We have questions for you. Thank you for testifying. Member Senanci.
Hello Mr. Barbosa, I appreciate you coming up to the chambers this morning for your testimony. You mentioned buses in Kihei. Has have they changed because of some of the construction that is going on or you have to go to another bus stop? I'm just curious if any of the construction has kind of altered either the bus routes or the scheduling?
Well, first of all, I haven't been catching that boss from my home. Council member Cook and his assistant. I took them on a on a cruise out there, Jared, out there. And the experience, how hard it is to travel with a blind glasses and cane. Mhmm. I and just making it from my home. There's there's a guideline with paratransit. Paratransit does not travel
Mhmm.
Three quarter miles out of your fixed bus route where I used to cross the main Highway, walked on Old Kai Road all the way to the bus stop. But being that some there might have to use their bus stop or other people, it needs to use the bus stop. Whether it's in Kihei, Wailuku, Waiheuhu, you know, I had noticed this their the areas is is very vague and just I can't. Yeah. Just said just said boss stop. No matter what, it's never changed. I I know right now they're doing clearance out there on the on the roadway, so I haven't been on the city bus for a while, but Okay. They need it out there.
I can check.
Yeah, they need it out there. The Crosswalks don't even have tech strips out there.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr.
Barbosa. Member Cook and Member Johnson.
Thank you, Mr. Barbosa. Is there an example someplace where tech tiles are currently being used on Maui so I could check it out? That's a good one.
It's not even in it's not even on the island. I think Japan has it. I know they're trying to move into Oahu's trying to try to put the I think there's a there's a bill for the blind that they're they're looking into it. As as being a re a retired res retired resident for the state of Hawaii, I've I've been in the system too. I try to keep Maui County up to par and check it out this improvement done while we we correcting our roads and sidewalks.
Thank you. They have the the little bumps that they have at us at at every street light. It's about three feet wide and about a foot long. It guides you and tells you how wide that street light that that area is, a walkway. Basically, it's the same thing, but it's on the outer outer edge of the crosswalk. So when you swing in your stick and you hit that that guide that guide bumps, you know you're in the crosswalk. And that'll that'll help.
Thanks. I'll look into it. It's a good suggestion. Thank you, sir.
Yes. Cheaper than a beaker light, sir.
Thank you. Member Johnson, you have a question.
Thank you, Mr. Barbosa, for your testimony. You know, I've heard your testimony a few times, and I really appreciate your lived experience dealing with our infrastructure for folks who are disabled. There's a commission that I used to sit on, the ADA, Americans with Disabilities Commission. I think your voice would be invaluable if you were ever to apply that position for that commission. I'm curious if you're you said you went to the MPO, you testify here, you testify at MPO. You you're involved. So have you ever considered going to the ADA ADA commission and being a a commissioner?
I don't know if they have one on the island, but I will I'll probably look up look up to it. I I am with recently with office with aging and persons with disability. I just got elected as councilor.
Yeah. I think we have council member Hodges in charge of the great committee. We put we put folks out on that commission. I would love to see your name on that list one of these days. So thanks for your testimony.
Yeah. Sure. Reach out. They got my number out there. Okay. But if anyone of you folks wanna take it, you know, on the council, wanna experience how it feels being impaired and walking the streets, I'm more than happy to have you guys as guests. I had mister Cook and his assistant out there. It was challenging for them. I'll give everybody a chance and anybody wants to do it. Contact Jaren. He has my number. Hello.
Jaren, you're from Tom Cook's staff. Okay. Member of Ramos Fernandez. Mister Barbosa for your testimony. One more question.
Oh, sorry.
Okay. I I, the tactile strips that you're talking about, those are the raised dots, and some have, like, the raised lines. Correct. I've seen those. And so I just I looked it up real quick. It I guess it's the crosswalk bumps, truncated domes, and they're it looks like they're, like, adhesive, and they're well, I use online on Google. It's, like, a $100 for a two by two mat or, you know, it's a it doesn't sound like it's that much.
No. So It's better than beaker lights, We need both of them out there.
I just wanted to make sure I was looking at the right thing. We can find out and maybe even have like a policy that requires this at all crosswalks, so that we have universal design for everyone. Mahalo, Mr. Barbosa. Mahalo.
Mahalo. Thank you. I see Member Cook has a question.
Thank you.
Just a second.
Frank, I just wanted to share with the colleagues. Our walk with you was a life changing experience. It was truly I mean, after ten minutes, I was just all angst, but then calmed down. We did it for about an hour, and I just wanna thank you. And it did. You've got somebody people on your side really want it to happen and we're going to keep working to get make these things happen. Thank you for your testimony.
Yeah. Thank you, folks. Yeah.
Yeah. Thank you, Mr.
Oh, and Chair point information. Actually, customer with Tonga is Chair of Great. It's Good
morning, Member Bappelbaum.
Good morning, Chair. Good morning, members.
Good morning. Okay. Thank you. Next testifier, please.
Thank you, Chair. The next testifier is Jennifer Cladwin, to be followed by Jim Langford.
Good morning. My name is Jennifer Gladwin. I'm the executive director for Kaleya Foundation. We are a nonprofit that initially in 2012 started as a recreation based nonprofit, supporting girls, women, and then in 2016, people with disabilities through sports. In the wake of wildfires, we took up New Kuliana to support wildfire survivors with disabilities.
That there's many hookahs to fill in that, area. And in 2023, at the end, we were able to secure a facility called HQ. And there, we support things like we just heard, rebuilding in a universal way. We also support wildfire survivors at an individual level. When the regular systems don't work, whether that's transportation, paratransit, or document replacement, or navigating FEMA, we spend a lot of time advocating for the most challenging cases and pushing through.
We've been able to solve a lot of really unique situations. In addition to that, one of the biggest, needs we saw was, medical equipment replacement. And so we established the Maui loan closet, and that receives donations from the community and then distributes to those in need. It started very small, and now it serves, probably 50 to 60 people a month, if not more. The loan closet as well as the advocacy as well as our collaborations within the community.
So we work hand in hand with, Hola Maui Kama, the long term recovery group. We work hand in hand with the state developmental disabilities council. Work with the Maui Wheelers. We work with, the office on aging, the county office on aging. We work with all of the disaster case management programs, both for the fire and now for the flood.
Our lease comes up in November, and we're seeking funding to help us to secure, the funding for next year to continue our space that helps us collaborate, brings community members together. Just like the testimony we heard, Those community members have a space in HQ with us so that we can all collaborate from the state level down to the grassroots. And that's really our, our mission and our style of moving through these these challenges that we face is to bring all the voices together and help bridge a lot of those gaps. Individuals come to, to do exercise classes. They do support groups, grassroots orgs that maybe don't have the capacity for a space that need a meeting space.
They use our our HQ. And so I've put in a request under the human, concerns for $70,000 to help us keep our doors open, our programs running.
That's my request. Thank you. So when you say HQ, that means your space that you're renting right Headquarters.
Yeah. Yeah. But where is it? It's at 111 Hana Highway in Kahului, very central. We actually share buildings with Maui Rapid Response, which is a really great collaboration. Our goal is to catch all the people falling through the cracks, and we find that visibility is excellent. Okay. Any other questions, members? Member Senensi.
Mahalo, Jennifer, for coming. No questions for Jennifer. Was chair.
I'm I'm sure if you
And And then to We've going to a get to of
I'm just curious how big an area is it? A
Ballpark. You're bringing me the numbers I didn't bring to the table. We have three spaces and they're open to all organizations and organizers to request use. We have one large room that's probably about a thousand square feet. Then we have two other rooms. One's a smaller talk story room. It's about 150 square feet. That's for people to use when they need, to have private conversations, whether that's with their DCM, their therapist. They can do telehealth as well because we know a lot of families sometimes you don't wanna talk to your doctor in your, like, house with 10 people. So we provide that space. Then we also have currently, it's a storage room, and it's about 200 square feet.
I saw. Thanks. I have a question. Yeah.
Okay. Good morning. First of all, welcome. Sorry I didn't, recognize you earlier.
Good morning. Thank you. Nice to see you again. How are you? You. Can you tell me about your loan closet and what you guys look for and, like, can people donate? This is one
of my favorite projects because it's shown such a big impact.
Okay. Basically, in the wake
of the fire, I was in the Mount War Memorial that first night, and I realized nothing was accessible in the shelter.
Mhmm.
And everyone had kupuna had lost their walkers, their wheelchairs, their bath chairs. And so we started to centralize the donations that were coming in, and then we put it up online. So all of our inventory is available online. We have over 53 providers who have access to that. It's password protected because it's on the Internet.
And then we also help people navigate the medical system through that connection. We were able to take in over 17,000 items like pieces that includes, things like adult diapers as well since the fire. Over that since the fire. We received three large shipments from, various, US organizations. We logged all of it, uploaded it, and now we are in a small warehouse we're sharing.
And we probably get around 200 donations of various equipment. We have everything from really high end pediatric electric wheelchairs to crutches, everything in between. We make sure we have a whole procedure to make sure everything works well. We also make sure that everyone knows it's a donation, and we're doing we're just doing the middleman work from community member to community member. And so it's a two two aspects. Right? Bringing in the donations and then getting them to the right people. And through that, we have connections with all the DCMs, all the different organizations working with, people with disabilities, Kupuna access and functional needs.
Thank you so much. Thanks for asking. Mhmm.
Thank you. Any more questions? Member Paulton?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, for your work in the community. Just checking. Have you received the County Of Maui grant before?
We have not. Most of our fundings come from Maui Strong Fund.
And, do you guys are a five zero one c three non profit that's compliant with the Hawaii Business Express? Yep. Have you attended the grant writing workshop? Twice. For the county? Yes. Okay. Thank you.
We've written grants, just haven't received them. Did you get feedback on why? I did not.
Oh. Yeah. Okay. That's all my questions. Thank you.
We're we're new to county grants. We've been a small organization. We grew extensively after the fire, obviously, and most of our support needed to be quite flexible. And so Hawaii Community Foundation, Center for Disaster Philanthropy, all of these nonprofits stepped into that initial capacity building. And now we're at capacity, like a strong capacity, and so we're, we're coming to the council for support.
On the feedback on why they didn't select you or award you, did you not ask or they just
To be completely transparent, the process itself, even for someone who was able to organize all of this, was, it felt relatively impossible. Sorry. To be so honest
heard that.
We've heard that. Yeah. I have quite a high capacity for paperwork. And when I went to turn it in Mhmm. It was completely wrong. And I was scrambling to, to make the right copies in the right way and get it to the right person, and I actually couldn't figure out who to
reach out to. The two grant workshops that you had attended didn't prepare you for what the actual process was? Not
well. Not for human concerns. Mhmm. And this was last year. And, also, you know, to give context, I was in the middle of responding to disaster.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
But overall
not just you. That's something we've we've heard consistently. But so but you didn't ask at the end of it, like, oh, any feedback or anything?
I didn't
Not that it's your fault, but I'm like, that's how you get better. If even if you didn't ask, they should, like, you know, try and help you for next time or something like that.
Again, total transparency, I didn't have access to anyone who I could ask those questions to in in what I understood.
So you just, like, turned it in submitted it online or something?
I know you cannot.
Oh, you can't
submit it online?
Submit it. So this was part of the problem was the system itself was just, a little bit chaotic and slightly archaic. I'm sorry.
No. No. Don't be sorry. It's you're not the only one that said that.
If we could find a way to submit it online, that way we can organize better, but everything had to be printed in in this right order and that order. And, I actually misread, which order it all had to be in, and that was what sent me scrambling at the end. And then there was no one to really there was no one to reach out to beyond that grant workshop, once I did submit.
So they don't, like, provide you a number for follow-up questions or anything?
Not not to my knowledge. Not in a way that was obvious to me.
Thank you. Thank you. Any more questions? Seeing none. Thank you very much for being here. Next testifier. Thank you so much. Have a great day.
Thank you, chair. The next testifier is Jim Langford to be followed by Travis Leggett.
Aloha Chair, Aloha Counsel. I am testifying today as cooler resident, and you're going to be discussing the police and the liquor commission.
I was
hoping just to protect and share some personal experience post wildfire of myself as a disabled person. I wasn't blessed enough to deal with the vast amount of paperwork Because I didn't get housing straight away and had to deal with. Some on blast behavior. I can share that I called the police from four different districts. To report different crimes I was experiencing.
When I was in Key A I reported on child and drug trafficking and I was met with. Getting physically attacked and having a false like, not not complete police report filed. I called from Kahului to report on project vision and how the folks there were coming out sicker and they were being drugged. The police asked me to leave. I called in by a.
About. I was at the beach seeing a lot of things going on I was met with the parts department coming and harassing me and so and then up in cooler I called about child trafficking when somebody pulled a gun on me. That actually got taken care of. I had to go out on the street for a month though so that. I guess it could get taken care of so.
I had to do some research on the types of software that the police are asking for in the companies and what their. What their ideas are and their culture. Palantir know woke people know aloha. Is. It's what they're requesting so if you guys could just take a peek at the the whoever's writing the softwares and.
Look at their culture. Before you spend money on it, it might violate our oath to Aloha. So the thing that kind of set this off that I had to talk to my doctor about was you when the police was you guys were joking around and I'm I'm maybe I'm being too serious but the whole like oh yeah I didn't want them to know we're going to prom together and all that like Having access to department has and you know is reasonable. And it should not endanger any of your careers because I talked to some. APAC lawyers in Las Vegas and you know people do anything to get a bigger budget and cooler toys.
So I just want to put a big hug around you guys and shield you from that type behavior. So I love you guys and you're doing a great job. I'm so everlastingly grateful for you. Thank you.
Thank you very much. Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you very much. Next testifier.
Chair, the next testifier is Travis Leggett, to be followed by Robin Danner.
Mr. Leggett?
Good morning, Chair and Counsel. A long time no see. You guys are such hard workers. It's amazing, your stamina, so great job. And, yeah, gonna try and testify every time. Kind of on a mission here because I'm fighting for my
life with
this stupid infectious process and I just don't want anyone else to experience it. And so again, I'm talking about disinfection and all the logic behind it. Just want to point out today is that I believe the last day of the seventh year since my first testimony when I came up here with that limu. And yeah, I'm still fighting for this sanitation thing. I just want to kind of tie it all together.
I put forth an amendment for advancing CBS eleven sixty nine for design work in Kahului And I just want to tie some things together, which is law enforcement, disabling conditions, mental health. All these things can be tied together in some cases by infectious processes that may never get detected. And furthermore, we're not monitoring what pathogens are going in there. And I submitted some testimony last night about how DOH and DEM appear to be making statements that disinfection is happening. It's kind of a perfect storm, and there's just a strong rationale for advancing that design work as soon as possible.
I've talked about the LIMO solution. I've made testimony that the LIMO can actually meet the TN requirements of the EMPDES permit in Lahaina. So you don't need to spend on litigation to fight that limit. I have a plan to privately fund the Ma'alei regional project. I think it's much more amenable to private funding down there.
And, yeah, it's just an elegant solution. It really makes a lot of sense to like for legal reasons make a strong case that even if the work does not advance next year that it's on the books. It shows that the county is making a due diligence effort to proceed with this without delay. Just think of the marketing. Maui County, the first municipality or island maybe in the nation to have 100% reef safe, human disinfection.
It's such a bragging point and such great marketing for tourism. And I just can't find a level in which sanitation does not make sense or any level in which delaying this further does make sense. And yeah, there may be actually significant liability with the way that things played out with the cessation of disinfection. And I testified about that. Not because I'm planning litigation, but because as a taxpayer, I do not want to pay for people getting sick on my dime.
And I think everyone agrees with that. But again, just gratitude for your tolerance for all my testimony. Not really sure how to check on amendments, but if anyone wants to give me a clue, you've already talked about this. I'm not a legislator, but just thanks for your hard work, and I'm always available for questions.
Thank you. Any questions for the testifier members? Seeing none. Thank you, Mr. Leggett. Thank you. Thank you. Next testifier, please.
Thank you, Chair. The next testifier is Robin Danner, to be followed by Cara Chao.
Aloha. I hope you can hear me. Yes. We can hear you. All right. Thank you. Chair and council members, my name is Robin Danner, and I'm a senior finance adviser for the nonprofit Homestead Community Development Corporation that is 17 years old. And with me is the executive director, miss Kara Chow. We are in attendance to support the funding request for the permanently affordable rental unit strategy or Paris, and to thank the county, over the the last three years, as well as to provide, the April '66 status report to county members that were emailed. So Kara and I are together.
Okay. Are you done?
Yes. We just wanted to support the thank the county for prior grant awards from the Affordable Housing Fund and also to support the request for 3,000,001 million dollars of which we would like to use to add ADUs on any of the existing Paris properties where it's possible. For example, there is one of the properties that has a, ADU reserve. We'd like to immediately build an ADU to add to the inventory. And then the other area of that $1,000,000 is that due to the federal policies on photovoltaic that have made it very, very difficult, they disincentivized, tax credits and whatnot for PV rooftop.
But what we've noticed is we need to add PV wherever we can on affordable housing structures because it is the second greatest way to support, county citizens with affordability to get their utility bills down and their disposable income up. And also, we just wanted to be available for any questions.
Thank you very much. Member Palton has a question for you.
Thank you. I didn't receive the update status report. Where did you send it to?
It went out very early this morning. Oh, It's it's four pages, council member. Essentially, I, care and I, provide, and this is something that we provide our board as well. Counts can someone get that to council member or should I email it?
One moment. So staff is saying that they received it, Or do you know?
Thank you, Jerry. Yes. It was received this morning and uploaded to e comments under today's meeting.
Okay. And then, one of the questions we had yesterday was, the director of housing mentioned that they sent out the request for proposals to all previous awardees and that they didn't receive an application from you folks.
Yes, it was during. Obviously Paris was something that we worked very, very, very closely with councilmember Tasha Kama. And that was just a tumultuous time for our beloved council member. So we did not get a submission in.
Okay. And then, so how many people are living in Paris units as of right now, the ones that you said? Remember Batanglan mentioned that there might have been some roof damage or something like that?
Yeah. Great. Great question. So the Paris units on the good think second And Two are vacant because we're renovating to get up to HUD standards so that we can now open the doors to even taking Section eight. Although Paris isn't a low income housing, it's an affordable housing program.
But of the seven that are not vacant, 100% of them are Maui wildfire households. So seven for seven are there and have been there, right? So we expect the two vacant units that two of them are these are houses, three bedroom, 1.5 bath with carports, washer dryer, furniture, etc. We expect them to be occupied this month actually and get back to 100%. How many units do you think you could provide
with the additional three mill? Yes.
So the 1,000,000 that we're asking for, is to add an ADU unit and to tackle this photovoltaic, situation, council member to get PV on top of the two the two Lahaina homes. There's actually three units in Lahaina that we have out of the nine. Three are in Lahaina. Three are in Kihei and three are in Wailuku. Those year nine.
The million is to make those improvements, roof improvements, ADU, and PV. 2,000,000 of the 3,000,000 is to continue the acquisition with leveraged capital. So not utilizing a 100% only county funds, but utilizing HCDC's, seventeen year history and its balance sheet to do a capital stack that includes the county's subsidy along with, philanthropy and, most importantly, I would say, with financial institution debt. Those three, those three sources of capital. Thank you.
So, you don't have an estimate as to how many Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't answer. Yes. Yeah. So our goal for the 2,000,000 is two to three, to be able to add two to three units, maybe four council member Paulton.
That depends on we're watching interest rate, measures because if interest rates get lower, then we could add increased debt capital to increase the number of acquisition. But the other variable that I thought I would share with you is over the last year, we have been tracking the market values of property on Maui. And interestingly, they're they're on a slide. We recently acquired, two units in Lahaina, at $300,000 less than appraised value. So that tells me there's a slide.
So this is an opportune time council member to be able to really maximize a a county investment as we watch the market. Interest rate and market values are the two main indicators, that present to us that this is a real that it's continuing to be successful, but it could be even more successful given those two things, interest rates and, valuations on Maui.
Sorry. I have two more questions. One is, are your property taxes manageable as these are rental affordable rentals in perpetuity? Has your property taxes been adjusted accordingly?
Yes. The Maui County has a wonderful process, a very comprehensive process to apply for tax exemptions based on the ordinance. So we have been following that process and submitting. So far we have not had any bumps.
Okay. And my second question is, as you're renting these affordably, are you aware of the ADU program that Charlie started that you can apply for a $100, in additional funding per ADU one per property? We
are aware of that. And what what we know, though, is that, it's a wonder program but it's targeted really for individual homeowners and so we wouldn't want. Our thinking I'm just sharing our thinking council member is that. It's highly competitive. It's very desirable. It's a very popular program is what we've been told, and, we didn't want to interrupt homeowners, local homeowners that could tap into that program to add an ADU. And that's why, because this is a rental program, we wanted to fold it into, the Paris and the affordable housing fund. Okay. Sorry. One That's a ration.
One more, question. Are you aware I don't know if the Lahaina houses are in the burn zone or outside of the burn zone, but inside of the burn zone act or bill fifth one of the bills allow for, factory built, and, HPM has a really nice, two bedroom ADU model. Model. So if if those Lahaina properties are in the burn zone, potentially, you could get the, they made a model just for Maui after the burn the fire that Hawaiian council utilized. It's there are a bunch right across of Lahaina Intermediate, that might be a fast way to put up a two bedroom if your Lahaina parcels are in the burn zone.
That's it. Thank you. I'll look for your I'll look for the report. Thank you.
You very much. No more questions. All right. Thank you. Next testifier, please.
Chair, the last individual signed up to testify is Kara Chao. Kara, you're unmuted on our end, so you would just have to go to the top right screen top right corner of your screen to unmute yourself.
Thank you so much. Can everyone hear me? We can hear you.
Aloha. Thank you, Council Chair Lee and Council Chair Vice Chair Sugimura and Council Members. Mahalo. I stand on Robin Danner's questions and testimony as referred to her as our senior advisor for HCDC. For supporting our Paris project and hearing us today. Thank you. Does anybody have more questions for them? Sounds looks like Ms. Dannock answered most of the questions. Thank you very much. Mahalo. Mahalo. Next testifier, please.
Chair of the next testifier is Christopher Salem.
Mister chair members of Maui County Council. My testimony this morning continues on the budget matters specifically that spires report that was referenced yesterday relating to fraud and nepotism. And the ongoing legal fees the county is expending defending director level decisions that are not grounded in law. I ask the council members to please review the written testimony submitted today. I direct my testimony to come council member Tom Cook.
Who has jurisdiction over the department of public works and representations made by director Jordan Molina. For the record Mister Cook your statements regarding director Molina's qualification require a bit of clarification. It's not a personal criticism it's just a fact and it matters on the from from the public's perspective. The position of director public works is currently held as an administrative one in nature it's not supported by credentials as a licensed professional engineer, nor by demonstrated qualifications as an expert in civil engineering, or environmental mitigations, or certainly SMA regulatory compliance. Turning to a declaration which you all have submitted by director Molina, which I state is outside of his authority and credentials, I'll read directly into the record that declaration.
The order of magnitude estimate portion of an SMA permit application has no bearing on public works determination of what subdivision improvements are required. The estimates represents cost the developer thinks public works might require, and subdivision approvals are interdependent of that estimate. Councilmember Cook is the chair of infrastructure. Can you help today and educate the council on how critical
and Mister Salem. Mister Salem.
Yes. This is the chair of the committee. Can you speak to me and not to Mr. Member Koch? Thank you.
Okay. Can you please put my time back on for that interruption?
Sure. We'll give
you Please. Ten
thirty seconds. Go ahead.
He is the chair of the matter at hand, and I think it's fair to ask him directly. No one else is qualified to do so, but I don't know where you come up with these limitations, but I'll respect your position and do so. You. The order magnitude valuation is not a guess and it's not a discretionary figure. It's prepared by licensed professionals and reflects the actual scope of required mitigations tied directly to public safety and environmental protection.
It's a basis upon which the county determines whether a project qualifies to deny citizens of public hearings on any proposed development, which the county has a due to promote duty to promote under the force of federal coast of zone management act. Corporation counsel's already taken the position that sole authority over SMA lies with planning. So the question becomes simple from an administrative position how can Molina cope. Claim authority to reinterpret or disregard the very condition that planning is legally required to enforce. The answer is they cannot.
And the record confirms why was this to declaration manufactured in the first place. Because it's established in in the county's own stipulation that planning. Is the authority all keep saying the same thing. But I'm not sure how much time I have left. But a public works is alleging they can erase SMA permit infrastructure and fire mitigations in the dark, and this council fails to investigate that statement, which is absolutely not true.
I'll finish. The investigation should center on those developers who are named in the fire litigation and how many times public works erased fire mitigations as was the case in Ouluwala. I won't speak to his name. I hope one of the council members would surely launch an investigation on this and uphold the laws that you create. Thank you.
Any questions for the testifier? Seeing none. Thank you. Next testifier, please.
Chair, that's all the individuals signed up to testify. Oh, I do see one individual approaching the podium. Thank
you, Jared. JC Long. I'll try to speak fast so you guys can get to work and the previous testifiers can have some of my time if I get cut off. So there's there's days when I have, like, clarity and I could see everything, you know, I have no what I'm gonna say. Today is not one of them.
The Hawaiian word of the day is ka ba'a. And the ka has the mekrono with a and ba'a is the okina in between the two a's. And the the Hawaiian dictionary says it me it says means canoe baler. And so if I put that in like a picture of us here in the big canoe here and even with the wood and all, it helps. So I'm kinda part of the reason I'm here is, like, I I volunteer to be the canoe bailer.
You guys keep paddling. You get a lot of criticism and stuff for, like, oh, the county's doing this and the county's doing that. But just try to be Pono and Ohio because when you have a canoe, you probably you usually like, I don't know how they did it back in Hawaiian days, but you gotta have somebody in the like, telling all the rest of the guys where to go and stuff. So yeah. Appreciate that. And that's about all I got. Oh, yeah. Wait. No. I got some more.
Let me know when I'm getting on the two two minute thirty second mark. I encourage everybody out there in TV land to watch the March 25 of the budget committee meeting because there was a really intelligent person from the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization relating to the county's and state's economic outlook, doctor Carl Bonham. And he said, if we keep on following the course, following the USS America, then there's gonna be some rough seas ahead. And if I got any time left, I'd just like to speak about the basic business application. I could be a canoe.
I can row too, but until I get some approval from the the people in charge because I they're gonna try to call the sheriff's office on me, so I need a witness. I talked to mister Leon, the governor's representative. Yes.
Haven't heard any of the testimony that relates to the agenda yet, and we're very patient with this gentleman. But I feel that he needs to be told when he comes to give testimony, it should be specific and focused on our agenda and our business.
Thank you. Finish
on the agenda. I guess so. Mr. Cook has spoken.
Thank you. All right. No questions for the testifier. Next testifier, please.
Chair, that's all the individuals signed up to testify. If anyone in the audience or on Teams would like to testify, please come up to the mic and begin your testimony. Or use the raise your hand on teams and staff who will mute you. Here's a brief countdown. Three, two, one. Seeing none, Chair, no one has indicated that they wish to testify. Thank you. Members, I'm
going to close public testimony and receive written testimony. Thank you. So we're going to proceed with the first department for today which is Department of Human Concerns. There are 19 priorities from members which I'm going to go through one by one and ask the member to explain your priority and then we'll take a vote. So the first person would be council member Batangan, county wide two for human concerns. In the spreadsheet that chair of my office
I just was wondering, now that we've heard from the parish, did you want to close-up that one and get it out of the way? That's
that priority would be for another department.
How's housing?
Yes, Sherry. It was for housing. I think member Palton's asking if you wanted to revisit business from yesterday before we move on to human concerns today or if you wanted to take that up later because we did put a pin in it yesterday.
Yeah, that would take us up. How is it?
But okay. Yeah. Up to you.
We can put a Why don't you do that then?
Okay.
If you remember, Paul. Was Wait, what page is it on our spreadsheet?
Hold on. I was not prepared for that. One minute.
I want to thank Jennifer from my office who took your priorities, put numbers on every page, and put the footnote on the bottom which says what department it is. Yeah, helpful. Yeah.
She was working to leave last night.
Yep. Yep. Okay. Housing starts on page nine on the priorities. It starts on nine, but I gotta find member Batangans.
Which I don't
see. Just to be clear, you're working off of the the sheet that was printed last night at 08:35PM?
I don't know whatever was given to me.
It doesn't have a time on it.
The priority one that we initially got. Not the one not the new
one. Yeah. Not the exhibit. Not the exhibit.
I call them. I I again was working off the wrong.
Don't see yours. 29?
That's
why it was the revolving fund.
Page 29. Oh, mine says police on it.
Okay. Thank you, I apologize. I was I was in a completely different mindset, ready to go for human concerns. Let's see. I moved to add on okay. This this is still the one that I need help with trying to figure out a vehicle for since there's no money left in the affordable housing fund.
Oh, okay.
I'm I'm guessing I'm just gonna make a motion to move to add money to the affordable housing fund. If we add money to supplement it, fine. If you guys tell me later, fine. But I'm just gonna make the motion as I under as as I initially prepared it because I I'm gonna need your help crafting this.
Okay.
So I moved to add a new condition for the to section d of the affordable housing fund, to add a new condition for Homestead Community Development Corporation for the Paris program, as follows. Up to $3,000,000 must be a grant to Homestead Community Development Corporation as a contribution to the capital stack for the purchase of single family or multifamily homes to be used as affordable rentals under the permanently affordable rental unit strategy program.
Second. Okay. A motion made by Member Patongian, second by Member Palton.
Thank you, Chair. And I do see Director popping on. If it would probably be helpful to hear from the administration before we continue in our deliberations.
Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor Rabbitoggin. Yeah, as we discussed last year, as much as possible, we really like to keep the affordable housing projects as the projects that went through the competitive process. So as this will necessitate an additional $3,000,000 in general fund anyway, The preference would be that it would be added as a line item under Department of Housing for the grant rather than under the affordable housing fund, but I defer to the body on what they ultimately decide. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. So in other words, we can do whatever we want. Is that what you're saying?
Thank you, budget director. If the body is agreeable, I'd like to accept that proposal as a friendly amendment. Or instead of adding into the affordable housing fund, we add this as a line item under the department.
Okay. I know the department was asking us the same thing last year, right? Keep the affordable housing fund clear or pure and
yeah. I think it's still like to have a conversation with the department about that especially since they are monopolizing the funds so that we can't add anything, but then they bring projects outside of the RFP process for our consideration.
Yeah.
But I think I'm getting a little off topic. So this is the project that I had brought up yesterday. It was explained to us in further detail by Ms. Danner. Member Palton was able to ask some questions that I found very helpful in making my determination. I don't know how much more information are you able to share with the body beyond that, but I'm happy to do my best if needed. Thank you, members.
And this is the organization that member Palton I'm sorry, member Kama, right? Brought forward in.
Yes. She worked with this organization to help bring this program forward.
Correct.
Your hand is up. Member Palton.
Thank you. I did, have a chance to read the e comments report, from the Teams, chat, and it satisfied all my questions. If if that had been from the start, then could have passed it yesterday. But, I think that the only I guess, the only one concern I have, and I don't think it should be a problem because it's embedded in the program, is not, using the affordable housing funds. I would like the same income restrictions and like that, but I think it's embedded in the program, so it doesn't necessarily need affordable housing money to ensure that it's affordably rented in perpetuity.
And so that resolves that issue for me. I'm supportive. It looks like they've leveraged, you know, quite a bit of private capital as well. They don't have issues with their property taxes. And, I mean, I can't ask for anything more than all fire survivors in those homes.
K. Thank you. Member Rollins Fernandez.
K. Mahalo. I'm supportive of the motion. I, wanted to also flag that this is a condition, from a revolving fund, and now we're making it a grant. So member baton gone will have three. No. That that didn't follow your process. I support it anyway, but I'm just flagging that it's not following the process that you asked us to do, which I didn't follow either.
So, is
that a screw you? Just saying. Yes. That's why I support it. Okay, members. Just remember that. Go ahead. Exactly. That's why kidding. That's why I was supporting it. Okay. Good problem. Anyway, so I I did review the, testimony as well, and I can get more details, from miss Downer later, because I don't really like how the information was presented. Number of units, three, Waileuku, eight bedrooms, four baths. I prefer each unit to be separated out so that I can see the details of it, but that's not gonna stop me from us voting for the motion today.
Like, I'm I'm fine. I can get that detail from her later. But in the future, I I I'd like that, even if it's just, like, to me as an individual council member because that's information that you'd prefer not to, you know, have public or something. And then I'd also like to, have, like, an an an amount or a range. I I know it says, like, the AMI for, income level, but I guess I'd like to also see the rent rates for the the units even if it's like a like a range or something.
So I have a a better idea of, you know, like, the the full impact because I think, you know, this is good work. I just like to see those, that that deep those details myself. Mahal Chern.
Thank you. Excuse me. Member, Oo Hutchins. And then Johnson next. Is that right?
Thank you, chair. I'm happy to support this motion. So that I understand it, so my notes are correct as we're going through this. So now we're not going to do the affordable housing. Instead, on page 10 of budget bill 55, we're adding a new item number six in, the b category for $3,000,000 for the Paris program. Confirmed? Yes? Yes. Okay.
Anybody else? Oh, Member Johnson.
Thank you, Chair. My question is for Councilmember Batanggan. Where do you plan to find the $3,000,000
Yeah, I haven't figured that out yet. My first attempt was to take from what I thought was available in the affordable housing fund. Yeah. This is kind of an evolving situation. I I haven't quite gotten there yet. Okay.
Good job. So Member Sannenci and okay, go ahead.
Thank you, Chair. And to Member of Batanggan, I can be supportive not under the affordable housing fund because it would take away from our project. And we've waited ten years for that project to come. So being the new guy, I just wanted to let you know the press the precedent set for that one. But my my quest I I guess to the director's point about and and we're not even talking about the affordable housing fund, as director Milner said they wanted to keep it.
They have a process, I guess. And so I just wanted to throw out there, but this is not part of the affordable housing fund.
I can support it. You're hanging on to yours, right?
Oh, yeah. Habitat.
Yeah. A lot of candies went into it.
I know you waited a long time. Maybe member Batangan when we do first reading maybe or you could ask them for that information as the members are asking in addition to what they've already submitted.
Thank you, chair. Yes, I'll have my staff reach out to the organization and ask that they provide that additional information. I also know that the program caters to Alice households per the council request from a previous year. I can ask them to include that data as well. So since, you know, I know that you were comfortable member Palton was comfortable, you know, supporting it even though it didn't have the restrictions of the affordable that come with affordable housing dollars or fund dollars. But it is, as she said, built into the program and then I can ask that they ensure that information is included too. Thank you, Chair.
Member Palton's dream come true, right? A lot of things with this project. So thank you. Okay, members. Ready for the vote. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahal, so just to clarify. On budget bill, page 10, under Department of Housing, pro a housing program, it would be so, Member Palton's, Lahaina Community Land Trust grant would be number six, and then this would be number seven, 3,000,000 for Paris. Is that is that what we're doing? Like that? I just want to make sure we're all on the same page and I know for sure what I'm voting for.
Sounds
chair. Yes. So the way staff has it noted right now is yes, it'd be a new line item, which would be the seventh line item entitled Grant to Homestead Community Development Corporation with a condition funds must be used as contribution to the capital stack for the purchase of single family or multifamily homes to be used as affordable rentals under the permanently affordable rental unit strategy program. Is that the intent?
Yep. Never batonking.
I think so. That's how I crafted it over the weekend. Ms. Danner did mention that there would be some improvements being made to additional
that
I might need a
Molokai brand. Mahalajar. Teamwork. Very good. Are you guys ready to vote? All in favor raise your hand and say aye. I think we're a nine. Nine ayes. Remember Cook, yeah? Okay, nine ayes motion carries. Thank you very much. Thank you. Okay. Now we'll start with human concerns. Okay. So with human concerns, it is Member Batangen.
Okay. Thank you, Chair. I guess before I start on human concerns, I'd like to make a disclaimer since there are a lot of programs within this department that affect my economic opportunity. As you know, my wife works there, so I do have conflicts with certain programs that they either are contract or grant recipients for administer the funds for. Those are the head start after school and summer program, and lands planning and coordinating council, Molokai suicide prevention, BEST, youth services on underage drinking prevention, and project graduation.
So if any of those comes up, I will be abstaining from discussion and from voting. The first amendment that I'd like to make would be to increase category b by a $150,000 and add a new condition for a special medical needs power supply program as follows. One, general. Two, up to $150,000 must be for a special needs power supply program.
Second. Second. Motion made by member Batonga, second by Chair Lee.
Thank you, members. So this is a proposal that came to me during one of my community outreach, events. A woman and her, son came up to me and explained the problem. You know, with the power shutoffs that occur whenever there's a red flag warning, her son who has special medical needs and is reliant on, you know, electronic devices has to go to the hospital anytime there's a planned power outage. And so we had initially tried to reach out to Hikko to try to find the solution.
Is there a way that they could not turn off this this household and therefore spare the family, you know, the the trip to the hospital? Hikko replied with a special medical needs rate for the family that doesn't really help because they still will turn off the power. And so I was thinking about how we could help solve this issue of any time there's an expected or so the solution I came up with would be to grant batteries to homes so that there would be a charge and they'd be able to remain in their house without having to take up space at the hospital. I figured it's a win for the families, it's a win for the community at large because it'll spare our hospital having to care for an influx of people at these times. And so that's what this proposal is.
I will note that I did reach out to the Department of Human Concerns to give them a heads up and they did seem supportive of the idea. I don't I mean, yep. So I just asked the members' support for this proposal.
Very good. Member Poulton.
So my question is being that this is a new program, did you create, like, a white paper on how you would like the department to roll it out and parameters of, like, who qualifies, how much per individual, and those types of scenarios. Because, in their feedback to our questions, they said, you know, they have limited staff, and then we, all the time, overload them on these kind of proposals. So did you have a white paper with the parameters and how you would like the program rolled out?
Chair. Yes. Thank you, Member Bolton. They indicated that they would like to work with my office on this. I did not put together a white paper but have been in communication. If it's the pleasure of this body, we can put something in writing. But I kind of just went off the conversations that I had.
You don't have a white paper like what is your intended, disbursement amount and what would qualify somebody like having a CPAP or like what what are what are those parameters?
I guess I had been thinking about people who have previously in the past gone to the hospital because they needed to maintain some kind of life support or they have special medical need that necessitated that visit. You know, I don't have the details work through with how you would prove a need before that. But you know, the general gist is life saving medical equipment rather than other, you know, medical support.
And will there be, like, a hardship factor? Like, I mean, what if Jeff Bezos has a hard time? You know, we we don't wanna just give this out to people that have the means. We wanna specifically support folks that may not have the means rate is is that part of your intention?
I had not considered that prior. But yes, I would be supportive of there being some kind of demonstrated need.
Okay. I'll yield the floor. Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions? Member Cook.
Thank you. Member, it sounds like this would be almost like a computer backup battery when the power goes down. You have access for a particular device. Would that be something like dialysis machine for be specific and possibly oxygen generator. Those are predict they have predictable amounts of electricity they need.
So anyway, I'm supportive and it seems that's mechanically, I mean, And do to to And 20 to able And that. Do And we're not only helpful for the people, the patients, but also takes the burden off the community in a big way, and it's a very good contribution. Thank you. Thank you, members.
Okay. Ready for the vote. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, chair. I think I have similar questions as Member Bolton. And that's the reason the Ag micro grant has such a long condition to give because this is something that's developed by a council member. And so the departments sometimes are a little reluctant. I mean, they'll work with us to try to develop the program.
But providing very as much detail and clear specifics as possible is helpful. That way there isn't any misunderstanding, and the department doesn't get blamed for not understanding correctly what you had intended. The the other thing, did did you have, like, an organization? Like, is this gonna go? Is it going to be a grant to like multiple organizations?
Or is this going to be managed? Do you intend for this to be managed internally by the department? And if so, does the department have the capacity to manage a new program to internally issue grants? Or are they buying these the batteries or backup power supply? Like, I guess, like that kind of detail. And if you don't have that details today, do you think you would have it by Friday or first reading so that we can include that?
Thank you, Member the think very very other important important
And And Chan Hodges and Stacy I Alapai have both been working on this with battery supplies, and they've been prioritizing those that are that have life sustaining equipment. And they had it during the Kuala Loho, and it already proved to help those with the equipment. Can get
extent extent
I know we Councilman Rollins Fernandez asked it but I didn't hear we don't have a name of a nonprofit for this just yet. So we will know that later.
Yeah, don't have that detail. Yeah, I had I can follow-up with the department and get more information on how they would like to administer this. I just had reached out and gotten general support for the proposal. Okay. And committed to ongoing conversations.
And we have director Milner coming on the call, so maybe she has something to add.
Director. Thank you. Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Johnson. Yeah, it's my understanding, you know, if an entity isn't named, we'll do a grant solicitation to select someone who could administer this program. So there's no need to name a specific entity if one who we don't know for sure has these capabilities has been identified. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Okay. Ready to vote. Members? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. This looks like a niner. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Thank you, members. Thank you. Next is Member Palton, your countywide two.
Thank you, chair. I move to add to budget bill number nine, B-nine, Department of Human Concerns, small B, Human Concerns Program, parent two, grants and disbursements for food, shelter, and safety, per an eye Maui mediation services to increase the existing appropriation and program by a 150,000 for a total appropriation of 285,000. Second. Okay. Motion made by member Paulson, second by chair Lee.
Thank you. This was one of the testifiers at the South Maui budget hearing. Beavan Borrowers runs this program, requested an increase because state legislature passed another act. I'm sorry. Forget what the number is, but that would require more increased mediation services. It doesn't necessarily solve the financial problems with eviction, but it makes it so that, you know, the tenant and landlord oftentimes don't wanna harm each other like they had previously had, you know, problems. So
that's my motion. Thank you. Anybody have questions? Member Batangan?
Oh, was second.
Oh, you're the second. Okay. That was Shirley. Okay.
Oh, sorry. Doesn't Share.
Share.
Oh,
No. I was doing the discussion for the motion.
Okay. Members, all in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. This looks
like a niner. Okay. Nine ayes. Motion carries. And and the offset was previously passed in EPNS, just as a reminder.
Very good. Council member Batangan, this is your county wide three increased Maui mediation service. He's withdrawing it because I just did it,
and he put his eagle scouts instead.
do this one, right? This is your one for Tutu and me. The next one.
Oh, thank you, Chair. I would like to add a proviso. So, I guess I would move to add to the, on page 10, number nine, Department of Human Concerns, three grants and distribution disbursements for early childhood. Five, Partners Development Foundation. A condition B, provided that the organization maintains existing operations at the six program sites in Maui County.
Okay. Based upon the discussion, yeah.
Yeah. Can I get a second?
Second by Member Ou Hodgins.
Thank you, Chair. Discussion? Thank
you. The Just a second. Corp. Counsel is saying something.
Thank you, Chair. I just wanted to make sure, are you planning to still include the other condition that there has to be partial county match of funds?
I was, but I'm open to taking it out if not. So let me explain my thinking. The the sorry. I got thrown off. So the the proposal the the organization asked for $1,200,000 to maintain operations in Maui County.
That's enough to support the four sites here in Maui. They are already planning to use their own money to maintain the two sites on Molokai. So my understanding was that those two the funding for those two sites are the organizations matched to the county funds. So they would would pay for the two sites on Molokai. Our additional funding would pay for the four sites on Maui, and then that would be the organization's demonstrated partial match. So I just wanted to make sure that a condition was added so that the county money is used to maintain this programming. It can't be used for any other purposes. If that is correct, then yes, I would like to keep the
first proviso. Think that's That's what they they told told us. Us, right? All right. You all motion made by Member Batang and second by Member Oh Hodgins for this additional condition. So you're keeping the first and you're just adding this one,
Yes. And I'm not changing the funding amount since the full cost to maintain the programming was included in the mayor's proposed budget. Okay.
All in favor, raise your hands. Go ahead. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Okay. I because it doesn't have a total. So are you increasing it by a million for 2,000,000? Sorry.
I'm No. He's not increasing. No. I'm adding condition.
Yes. I'm just adding the condition. So the $1,200,000
Okay, so
delete is the increase appropriation by $1,000,000
Yep.
And then just add a condition that the programs are
Correct. So the $1.2 that's already been appropriated, at least yesterday's from conversation, seems like it's enough to maintain the four sites here on Maui. There will be no closures to the two to me program on Maui or Molokai.
Four. So you're making it four programs on Maui Island?
I just said that that they need to maintain the operations at the six program sites in Maui County just so that money can't be moved around to be used for anything other than Maui and Molokai. My thinking was that this language allowed for the Molokai sites to be included in the matching funds.
Okay, Mahalo. Okay.
So we're good. All right. Any other questions? Seeing none. All in favor. Oh, Shirley.
I have a discussion. I plan to support this. My son, Gary, who is the superintendent of highways for Maui County and who has been with me throughout my entire career as a council member, has never advocated for anything except Tutu and me. Wow. So, I think take that seriously and I'm happy to support that. That's kind
of precious. Member of Batavia.
Sure. Since we're thinking about people who are guess I should have done this upfront. My daughter my younger daughter is enrolled in the program. I should have made that disclaimer upfront, I apologize members I had forgotten. I did check with board of ethics on this since I am not a board member and don't have therefore, don't have a fiduciary responsibility and because the program is free and open to the public, I do not have a financial interest in this. So I to my knowledge do not have an ethical conflict here.
Okay. Very good for the disclosure. Member Rollinsburg.
Mahalajar, I just wanted to thank the mayor for including this in his proposed budget. Mahalajar.
Okay. Any other comments? Member Cook.
I'm very supportive of this. I thought it was a very emotional, real sharing from all of the parents. I almost wish I had little kids again.
That's possible. Okay.
Okay. Chair correction for the record. Member Cook, it's tutu and me. The tutus are supposed to go with the grandchildren too and the parents.
So when your kids have kids, then you can go.
See? So you're not disqualified. Okay.
Your kids could still make you a tutu, Tom.
No. Alright. Or or great grandpa.
There you go.
Yeah. And you can go with a great grandpa.
Okay. All in favor. Aye. Aye. This nine ayes got to vote twice for Gary, Okay. Just joking. All right. Nine ayes. Motion carries. It's 11:30. I know we started at ten and we are only on the third priority. So we got to speak faster, maybe do your proposals, do it in one minute of your presentation. And then if we have questions, we can go faster. Member Batangan, you have this is for Kahului Honganji.
Thank you, chair. I move to add a new line item for Kahului Honganji under Department of Human Concerns B, Human Concerns Program three, grants and disbursements for early childhood to read as follows. Six, provided that the appropriation is for additional fencing for the childcare center.
Motion made by member Patongian, second by member Wu Hodgins.
Thank you, Members, as you may have heard, there was a lot of flooding that occurred at Kahului Hongwanji after the Kona lows. And so I reached out to the preschool to see what kind of needs they might have and how we might be able to assist. One thing that they did mention was the need for additional fencing. It's a childcare facility, and there are state rules and regulations as to, like, what the facility will need. And so this was the request. It
of we're that we're some get. Improvements to Pupuneni Avenue the and increased traffic along there and the increased flooding that may whatever. I don't want to speculate too much. This was the request and so I'd like to support them.
Thank you. Any more comments?
Member Ohajes. Thank you so much. Happy to support. As we all know, preschool's already super expensive. So I would rather we do this for our community so that the cost isn't passed over to the parents who I'm assuming is already hard to pay for. Preschool, it's about college tuition these days. So
thank you. Okay. Any more comments? Alright. So be a cost side.
So So we're Your grant one condition 188,000.
Okay. Move to condition seven house list programs to read as follows up to 01/8500 must be for Project Vision Hawaii to continue their street medicine and street based healthcare efforts. Second.
Motion made by Member Senesse, second by Member Johnson.
Follow chair. At the Kihei budget hearing, we heard some from Nurse Robin Garrison, who does the street medicine. So I think her testimony was very poignant and tearful testimony she offered. And what was interesting is that not just she also mentioned that the administration, Naomi, often calls her to help with with some of the, houseless individuals that Naomi often visits. And so she comes to their aid as well. So I ask for the members continued support. Thank you.
Thank you. Any other discussion? If not, all in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Very good. Next we have Member Rollins Fernandez, Countywide One.
Can you skip and go to Member Senensi and come back to me after him? Thanks.
Okay. The next one is yours, too. Okay. Senensi grant two.
Thank you, Jared. This is my second condition. Yeah. I moved to, condition add a new line item for Kilea Foundation for $70,000 to enable them to sustain their headquarters in Kahului. Second.
All right. Motion made by Member Senensi, second by member Johnson. Discussion.
Model chair, you heard from Jennifer Gladwin, this morning. She is requesting 70,000 to, support their community space that is headquartered in Kahului. Cleophonized Foundation supports long term recovery efforts from the 2023, wildfires, and assist patients with disabilities, kupuna and disaster survivors with transportation, educational programs and community training related to recovery. She mentioned that the hub also works closely with Aloha Independent Living, Hawaii Maui Akama, long term recovery group, Maui Wheelers, the state of Hawaii Developmental Disabilities Council, as well as the Maui Disability Alliance. Ask for your members support.
Thank you. Thank you, Chair.
Member Johnson.
I'm wondering if councilmember Senancy would consider a friendly amendment to increase the funding for Kaleya Foundation by $116,000 to a total of $186,000 to fund a full time advocate position that includes fringe. The recent flooding and all the things you just listed is just piling up and they need more help. I was wondering if you would consider increasing that to add another person.
Sure. If we can find the funding to cover it. Yeah.
Is that one of yours? You're adding on?
No. It's just friendly amendment. They sent out my team spoke with them. They sent out a sheet that said exactly what their needs their primary needs and their secondary priorities. So that would be, you know, it's only piling up the work. So that they were asking that and I wanted to see what the members felt about that.
Member Bolton.
I'm not clear if this is a county position or if it's for them. And if it's for them, we don't do, like, their fringe. Like, you're just talking about money for a position. That's right. Oh, okay. Yeah. I was confused because you said framed.
Well, yeah. That's okay.
Yeah. I was also confused about that point. So can you clarify the so what is the total amount, and then what's the breakdown? Sure.
The The total amount is $186,000 and the increase that I'm proposing is $116,000
Wow.
To fund the full time advocate position.
The it's 116,000 for the advocate position that's salary and fringe? Yes. Did they give a breakdown as to what that is in terms of salary and fringe?
45 an hour.
Thank you. I
am No objections if the members are okay
with it.
Know, out of respect, realize that this is the first time they're doing a grant with us. Appreciate the work that they're doing for the needs that they're fulfilling. But I think the 70,000, which will keep them going and then they can see as far as adding staff. Think organizations, you're going to have to figure out how to sustain yourself. And it cannot be through us. Okay.
If other members want to speak to it, I'm open to listening to what you guys would suggest.
Member Oo Hodgins.
Thank you. The 116 is quite a lot of money for the council for the county to fund a full time employee elsewhere.
Mhmm.
I could see if we kinda did some match fundings. And in this case, considering we're paying their rent, at 70,000, they can use that that I'm assuming they needed to get elsewhere to hopefully pay that person, and then they could figure that out. But for right now, I'm I'm cool with the 70.
Mhmm.
And I think that's what I'm comfortable with. I really like Jen. Don't get me wrong. I've known her for a while. She's awesome. But I don't know how that works because I don't even know if we can fund salaries completely like that. I'm not too sure. I know that when I was at least talking to somebody, I thought there was, like, a 20% cap on how much we can pay for somebody's salary. Did you check on that?
If you mean like an administrative
Yeah. Fee Yeah.
This is not bad. This is funding a position.
No, I get But
I don't know if there's
I get that.
That's my point. Right. Is that we put a cap on administration fees, but in this case, we would be paying for somebody's complete salary. And I know it's not the same, but for me, there's some likeness So I'm okay to do 70, but I wouldn't support the 1 80
6. Bill,
you know, I have more cuts than I did for asks. How about
Great. You put in 22,500,000.
And I cut a whole lot more. So But I guess I guess, you know Keeping track Getting the vibe from my council members. I don't want to jam up Councilmember Sinense's priorities. So how about I don't do a friendly amendment, just do an amendment? And we can all vote on the amendment. And then if that And you have a passed, he still gets to have his thing clean.
And are you saying
you're adding another priority to what I'm hearing
you say?
I'm amending his priority.
Uh-uh. That's gonna be
No. No. No. No.
That's slippery. That's slippery. Okay. Let's let's take member
What
do Nancy. Hey.
You're gonna What's good for one is good for others.
Right? No.
Yes. Gonna We're
do that. Yeah. And we cannot have people over doing it.
This is too fun. Okay. Member Soleynzi, I'm already set. Member Baton Gun. Go ahead.
Aye. Oh, you're voting. Okay. All in favor say aye for the 70,000.
Keep no. I move to amend. Second.
What are you doing now?
There's friendly amendment, so we're
gonna take two motions on
the floor. He's gonna move to amend.
The you're adding the 116?
No, I don't
want to.
Yes. You explain.
I move to amend councilmember Senensis' proposal by 116,000, totaling 186,000. That's the amendment.
Second.
I have a second, you can do that, ma'am.
Member
Bolton. Discussion. Well, Member Johnson already discussed. Go ahead.
I moved to amend that amount down to 63,000, so we're doing a 50%, what you call supplement of the position. To what? Chair.
I don't know what Rosenberg allows, but Roberts only allow two motions deep.
Chair? Rosenberg's allows three motions to be on the floor at one time. And because there's no friend need, there
are three right now. Would you look at that? I'm right in line with Rosenberg. We're
We're
We're We're 16,000. Right? That's what you're doing.
You know me. I just try to thread the needle.
Okay. Charlie, you're
high. I seconded the motion but my heart wasn't in it. I want to support the the first amendment. Thank you.
So when you say the first amendment, what is it? The 116? Yes. Yes. Yes, yes. In
other words, it was just for discussion. Mahalo, Charlie. Okay. So we are going to vote on the
member Palton's amendment for 63,000 add instead of the 160. Right. That's what you're okay. Okay. All in. That's what we're on now. 63,000 and now
Roll call, please, chair.
Roll call. Okay. Roll call.
Chair, proceeding with a roll call vote, council member Tom Cook? No. Council member Gabe Johnson? No. Council chair Alice Lee? No. Council member Tamara Poulton? Aye. Council member Keanu Rollins Fernandez? No. Council member Shane Senensi? No. Council member No.
So we're back to My amendment. Oh, go ahead. Yeah. Member Johnson's of adding one hundred and eighty one hundred and sixteen thousand. One and sixteen thousand, which would be 186
Okay.
So we're on that motion, which was made by you, seconded by Member Palton.
Let's I seconded. Oh, you seconded. And that's why we only go too deep. Then people start losing track.
Sounds like we're gonna do a
roll call chair. This roll call.
Is there any for roll call?
Yeah. Yeah.
Roll call. Chair proceeding with the roll call vote. Council member Tom Cook? No. Council Member Gabe Johnson? Yes. Council Chair Alice Lee?
Aye.
Council Member Tamar Palton? No. Council Member Keanu Rollins Fernandez? Aye. Council member Shane Senensi? Aye. Council member Nohei Uwajins? No. Committee vice chair Kuno Ibutangan? No. Committee chair Yukide Sugimura? No. Chair, that's four ayes.
Five no. Motion fails. Okay. So we're back to the original Back to the 4464 for the councilmember's senate. Okay. Any discussion? No?
I do have a last discussion. I think my cuts were over $3,000,000 so we have it. Thank you.
Good job, Member Johnson. Okay. All in favor for $70,000 for this, raise your hand. I think this is yeah. Okay, Nine eyes. Okay. Great discussion. Next we have Councilmember Johnson, Residency Area two, Lanai Kinaola Inc, dollars 425,000.
Chair. Okay.
Chair.
This is for Resident Resident Area 2 in Kina Inc. Kina Ola. I dollars moved to increase line item by $4,400 100 and and $255,000 dollars for a total of $600,000 and that's on page 11 of the budget ordinance. Can I get a second for explanation?
Second. Second, Member Johnson, second by Member Ou Hodgins. Thank you, Chair.
Every year we hear at the Lanai public hearings about the importance of the Lanai Kinah Ole for our community. Because we're such a rural, isolated, and aging community, supporting our health care providers is critically important. Lanai Kinah Ole has a $175,000 line item with the department, but in the last fiscal year they requested $600,000 to cover additional costs. The funding is needed to ensure they can retain staff, hire the contractors, need to run the current programs which include the Lanai Cancer Fund, chiropractic care, podiatry, massage therapy, physical therapy, language assistance, transportation, appointment assistance, speech therapy, and in home care. The funding also allows them to move ahead with hiring and training and building the adult daycare.
And my community came out and spoke on this. They do it quite often every year. But when we went to Councilmember Rollins Fernandez, they also her district, they also have very important health care for the kupuna. And that was very moving to me that it just seems that the really rural areas need that extra lift. So please members, I beg of you, I support my motion. Thank you.
Very passionate. All right. Any other discussion? Remember Cook?
I support this. I was really touched when I was, on Lanai, I think that this is money well spent and very much needed.
Okay. Any other discussion? None. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
Good. Mahalo members.
Yep. They're awesome. Yeah. Member of Ramos Fernandez, you wanna go, or shall we continue on with the list?
Page 17. Same page, at the top. So this is my county wide, my first county wide. Okay. Department of human concerns, human concerns program to grants disbursement for food shelter. I moved to increase, county grant subsidy for the new grant program Hospice Maui carrying close to home and rural hospice and palliative care for Maui County by 750,000 for a total of 1,000,000 for the program. So it would read, I I up to 1,000,000 for hospice Maui's caring close to home and rural hospice and palliative care program. Second.
Okay. Motion made by Member Rollins Fernandez, second by Chair Lee. Discussion?
I think I'll echo the sentiment shared by Member Johnson in increasing the funding for. I don't know how many of you, took up the invitation for hospice Maui at their campus here. They do incredible work. Their facility here is like a home away from home. I've had multiple family members.
Yeah. Yeah. I'm so grateful for the work they do. Sorry. I didn't know I was gonna
thanks. Yeah.
On Molokai, we don't have a facility. And so they, are requesting additional funding for the rural areas. Again, I don't know if on Maui, you have a facility. On Molokai, we don't have a facility. And so, if family members have space for a hospital bed, then, you know, that's that's where the hospice care workers come and take care of your family member in their last, you know, moments in life.
So, yeah, just ask for your support, Paolo.
Shirley gave the second. Yeah. Any other discussion? Tom? Member Cook?
Thank you for making this proposal. I'm very supportive. My experience with hospice, as I call them, a flock of angels. Absolutely remarkable if I'm I'm
we share I know exactly how you're she feels. We share the same sentiments. We never wanna hear the words hospice, but, like everybody, we still gotta go through them. So speak in support.
Thank you. You. So true. Member Johnson? You raised your Okay.
Thank you, Chair. It's in this is really important stuff. A couple council members here from the rural districts, the canoe districts. We have to travel so far to visit our loved ones when they're in the hospice. So I totally support this and I support them expanding. Maybe in the next budget season they come back with a proposal. We can get someone on the council to champion that because we're only getting older. And there'll be a day when we have our really close loved ones that need it. We already have that according to Councilman Rollins Fernandez and the rest of us. We all have our experiences. Of Directors
the
Staff just wants to clarify. So for this item, $250,000 that already exists is in the grants and disbursements for food, shelter, and safety line item. So to clarify, the amendment would be to create an II number two line item, take 250,000 from the main grant spot, put it in there with the additional $7.50 ks for a $1,000,000 line item. Is that right?
Mahalo, Mr. Krueger. That's correct. Thank you. So that's the offset. Is that what you're saying?
It's yes, not an offset. It's $250,000 that was already in there, and I'm adding $750,000 to support our rural areas.
All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes. Okay. Very good. Member of Rollins Fernandez, your second one from Maui AIDS Foundation. Is that Yeah.
I don't have the updated one. I moved to amend Sure. Where did I put it?
Oh, it's right here.
Whoops. Maui AIDS Foundation by, 340,000 wherever it is. I don't know. Oh, Thanks. So when I had queen Kahou Kahoumanu Church and member Sugimura and I gave it up to member Cook to do, this is my replacement alternative one, and it's to add 340,000 to Maui AIDS Foundation under Department of Human Concerns, Human Concerns Program to grants disbursements for food, shelter, and safety.
There's currently oh, shoot. Where did that number go? Oh, 360,000 in that pot. It's not broken out, And I'm adding 340,000.
Chair, Member Rollins Fernandez and second by Member Cook.
Mahalo Chair. I think
we heard them at the South Maui team.
We absolutely did. And and they're always yeah. Yeah. Catch us in the fields. And they're doing such amazing work.
And we heard about I mean, so Hawaii in general is, like I'm hoping our delegation is really gonna be able to fight, some of the proposed deep cuts to Hawaii. And, we heard that they are losing one point potentially losing 1,500,000. And so this is to hope to offset that and to cover some of the costs for medication as we know that everything is just increasing for them and for everyone. All in
favor, raise your hand. Oh, you want to say something?
I just want to speak to the motion. I full support and thank Councilmember Rollins Fernandez for introducing this. I travel on the ferry quite often and I saw them on the ferry. And what were they doing? They were providing services to Lanai. And that's not cheap. That's not cheap. So I really appreciate that they're actually doing all that kinda outreach and going every nook and cranny. You know, you think AIDS is a big city thing. No. It's you know, STDs are something that rural folks suffer with as well. So we do we have to fund them. And to the beauty of having a target on their back is just such an insult for the work that they do. So I'm going to fiery raise my hand on this one.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you. All in favor, raise
your Really quick, I wanted to add to the cost because when we're at the Kihei hearing, a team of them were on Monokai.
Yeah. That's great.
And so, you know, and they were delayed by Mokudilele. And they made it in time, you know, some of the the the team made it in time to be able to testify. But when I was looking at flights today, one way, a $148. So on Moculet yes. Wow. Yeah. I I just this morning, I was looking at flights. And before, it was like the the the highest cost was a $124, and it's already starting. Dollars 148, one way. I wish that was first class and guaranteed on time.
And what was the final, the total? So there's 340,000 that was in the 360,000 that was in the mayor's budget, an addition of 340,000 for $700,000 Okay.
I'm sending a letter to Ellison to ask him to also fly to Molokai. I don't know how you guys deal with that. It's ridiculous. Go ahead.
Thank you, chair. Can I just make sure I understand the motion on the floor? So you're adding $3.40. $3.40. Is this a sec separate line or is this in addition to what was already in the proposal?
So I think we're doing the same thing that we did with hospice. We're pulling out the 360,000 that's part of that grouped funding under grants and disbursements for food, shelter, the year. Other a the
Are we all good? Raise your hand all in favor say lot aye Mr. Senensi. Aye Mr. Senensi. You got to go over there? Nine ayes, motion carries. Next we have Member Sanensi, Maui Family Support Services. Or I can go to Member Palton. Well, haven't finished with all of our priorities, we can go ahead. Thank
you, chair.
Move
to add a new line in department of human concerns for grants and disbursements for health, human services, and education to Maui Family Support Services Inc. For Hawaii Kaika Partnership for $199,202
I need a second. Second. Member Senensi, seconded by Member Johnson. Is the funding for?
You. Thank you, members. As a reminder, this is the agency that creates the Kalo Boy books and activity cards to promote their abuse prevention efforts to build strong Ohana values in Maui County. At their sixth annual Ohana festival entitled Eului, the mayor recognized month of April as child abuse prevention month that was organized by the Children's Justice Center of Maui. A whole Kaika partnerships for all these stewards, their guide by the side navigation services that support family access hygiene kits, Pampers and other essentials for Keiki.
And I ask for the member support. Thank you. Any other discussion?
None? Okay. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. Nine ayes.
Thank you.
Next, Member Palton. Countywide three, Maui Farm, Inc, 40,000.
I move in B9, Department of Human Concerns, small b, Human Concerns Program, paren four, grants and disbursements for health, human services, and education, for an x v I I to increase the category b appropriation by 40,000 for a total appropriation of $319,666.
Second.
Member Palton, second by, member Rollins Fernandez.
This is, what was requested, I believe, at Upcountry and South Maui an additional 40,000 due to the increased cost of living. That's it. That's my motion and discussion.
K. I went on a site visit for them, and they have this board. I wish I would have taken the picture and give it to you but they get other funding from other sources. So we're not the sole funding source which I appreciated seeing that.
Yeah. And they seem to support like a number of families and children, eggs. I was thinking maybe department of ag can hook up with them, and they can get some chickens to increase their egg production, potentially, you know, like, work together. I don't know. But maybe they can get the contract for the feral chicken removing and then bring their chickens to their farm or something. I don't know. But, you know, sounds like the, residents of the farm support each other, so it's really good to have a support network like that.
K. Thank you. Any more comments? Member Ramos Fernandez.
Mahalo, chair. That day that they invited us to visit was my first time there. You and I attended. Yes. And I got to see firsthand the amazing work that they're doing. This was one of my alternates, so mahalo Member Bolton for catching this one full support. Thank you. Also, when
we were there, we saw Mike White's his wife has that, you know, business and and whatever. They donated some mini donkeys. It was so cute as healing. Have ever seen that? Yeah.
Yeah. Cute.
I don't know if you guys are in Maui, but in Kona, if you they're called the Kona nightingales. Oh. Donkeys. Oh. I don't know why. But Okay. I guess you guys have upcountry nightingales.
They're at remember Yoo Jin's yard?
The nightingales?
Oh, no. That's peacocks. I mean, have four of them that I still take care of if that's what you're talking about. Wow. I'm talking about my children, not the
Four donkeys. I have one big donkey.
You are too funny. Okay. All in favor say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Okay. So we have one two three four five six seven more residency areas before we dig into the department. You wanna finish or you wanna go lunch? Lunch. People? Okay. You're fine. It is 12:07. You want to come back at 01:30? We're in recess to 01:30. When we come back we are going to do Member Rollins Fernandez, Molokai Rural Health Community and then your Molokai Community Health Center. Yeah. Both of them.
Unless there's, like, unanimous support, then I can just make the motion one time for both. Yeah. We heard that at your meeting. We sure did. Okay. I moved to Yeah. To add rural health for June, Molokai Rural Health Community Association, and to reinstate the 540,000 for Molokai Community Health Center. May or May? May and 600,000.
Second.
All
right. Motion made by Member of Los Angeles, second by Member Johnson. All in favor. I think we heard Aye. Okay. Raise your hand and say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Okay. Wow. That's good. Who's the next one? We might finish it that way too. Okay. Twelve is now 12:08.
We'll come back at 01:30. To the Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. We are back. It is now 01:37. So where we left off was we completed Member Rollins Fernandez on Residency Area one and two items, which that's where we left off. So we are now on Council Member Senensi, Countywide one, two, University of Hawaii Foundation Maui West project.
Mahalo, Chair. Move to add a new line under department of human concerns, grants and disbursements for health, human services and education, for University of Hawaii Foundation for the Maui. Well, I think I'm going to change that, the Maui wildfire exposure study, to Ho'ala Health Outreach.
Second. So this is completely different?
No, it's just a like part of the Maui West? West. Correct. This is their kind of their outreach program.
Oh, earlier. Yesterday. No. Monday. So that's part of this? The Ho'ala? So you you wanna add it after, foundation for Maui West?
Health. Ho'ala Health? I think it's Ho'ala Outreach and Aina based LifeCourse Alliance.
Life based. You got that?
Could we have that one more
time? Member San Nancy.
Hoala Health Outreach and Aina based LifeCourse Alliance. And it's like a subsidiary of the wildfire exposure study, cohort study.
So do we delete Maui WES or just leave it there at it before? I think he says part of, yeah? No.
Are you renaming it?
It's a subsidiary of the Maui wildfire exposure study.
Okay. Delete that then. Yep. Yep. Okay. Any discussion members?
Thank you, chair. Hoala Health outreach expands the preventative health care, mental health services, and early detection efforts with mobile clinics and telehealth services to multilingual communities so that residents are not only screened, but connected to follow-up care, specialty services, mental health support and community resources. Hoala Health outreach is an investment into the durable health infrastructure that improves access, strengthens coordination amongst health care providers and reduces overall health care costs. I ask for the members support. Members, heard from Doctor. Manakia and Mr. Juarez yesterday morning.
I need a second. You need a second. Okay. Oh, you did. Okay. Member Rollins Fernandez second and two members Senecchi. Okay. And that's your discussion. Anybody have anything else to add? All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye.
Aye.
Of the of Directors of dollars to include the MEO women's reintegration program to condition funding
for I'm hoping the members will support this. Unfortunately, women don't have as many programs as the men simply because and we're our nonprofit is guilty of that too, simply because it's way more expensive. And our nonprofit really doesn't have that kind of resources. But what what what's happened is over time, it's easier to provide services to the men because I'm joking, but a lot of them come out of jail and say they're single. They're not single.
So, but the women have to take care of the children. They have to find jobs. They have to find a place to live. So, this additional money will help the women's program because they have the added challenges of taking care of children. This could help pay for their house expenses, freeing up their monies to take care of childcare and other expenses.
So I'm hoping that you will, all of you will support this. This would be the best program, which is the reintegration program under Maui Economic Opportunity. And this would be part of the women's integration program adding $253,000 Okay.
I need a second. Okay. Member Johnson. All right. Motion made by Chair Lee and second by Member Johnson. I think you're going to say something, Member Watong Bin.
Yes, Chair. I'm going to recuse myself from discussion and then abstain from voting. Thank you.
Okay. Very good. I think Chair Lee gave her reasoning. We're fine. Oh, Tom Cook. Remember Cook.
I support this. Thank you for funding it.
Okay. Very good. Anything else? All in favor, raise your hand, say aye.
Chair. Chair. Sorry. Member. This is Leslie. Board director. Sorry.
I didn't see you.
Apologies for interrupting the vote. I just I did have a little bit of additional information from the department about the MEO BEST reintegration program. They've lapsed funding for the past three years, and they're on pace to lapse funds again this year. So I think the department's just concerned about their capacity to be able to take on this additional funding as they're not expending the funding they're currently receiving? Thank you, Chair.
Well, and that to me is a, you know, open to debate because in speaking to the person who handled that program at MEO is no longer there. And speaking with Debbie Gabibi, they are going to put more effort into the women's program. And in this case, we're also including childcare. It says here, childcare in addition to the rental assistance program. In the past, for some reason, they have had issues with I don't know why, they had issues with competing other funding programs.
And this led to them having difficulty using this program. But I don't think they're going to have that difficulty anymore. And we're opening the use of that money to childcare. Okay.
Thank you. Member Palton.
Can I ask Director Millner how much they lapsed it for, in fiscal year twenty five and twenty four? Director?
Thank you, chair. In fiscal year twenty four, they lapsed a $189,768 and in fiscal year '25, they lapsed $123,344
Thank you, Chair. Do you know the total of what the appropriation was?
348,000.
Oh, in the past fiscal years, I meant.
Director.
I can pull that up. I'll just need a moment, sure. Okay.
We're spending a lot of time on $348,000 and actually $253,000
Oh, okay. We were waiting for, Member Palatin's answer. Do you want to vote and come back to it, members? Are you almost there, Director?
Apologies, Chair. My computer just crashed, so, I'm gonna go pull the hard copies, and I'll be right back with you.
Okay. Okay. You wanna put this on the side before you go? Member Bolton? Or
Sure. Sure. She can do her, Lahaina resource and recovery one if she wants.
Okay. Next, we have Member Batangen, which is your Countywide three Boy Scouts or Scouting America.
Thank you, Chair.
There's a supplemental.
I know. I was thrown off to member Rollins Fernandez because I was going by the the big chart. But under department of human concerns, subjection b, human concerns program, six grants and disbursements for youth centers and programs. I propose to add a new appropriation and condition 15, Scouting America Aloha Chapter, provided that this grant is used for capital improvement to Camp Malahi'a in the amount of $500,000
Need a second? Second. Okay. Member Batangen and second by Member Woo Hodgins.
You, Chair. So this is an alternative proposal because Member Palton and I both had mob mediation services and that's why it's on the replacement priorities list rather than the matrix that Roland Fernandez and I had previously been looking at. I want to note that while Scouting America is in the program budget document as a possible recipient of a competitive grant on their youth programs. Would like to add this specific appropriation for capital work at Camp Malahi'a, which was requested by the testifiers yesterday. Thank you, members.
Thank you. Member Palton.
Do you have a, or can you get a scope of work and a budget?
Yes. I don't have it here with me. I do know that they had previously come to the county and we were given funds for demolition of the kitchen, which is is not operable. So the county has been supporting some of that. I purposefully left this as a broad appropriation so that they can use it where needed at the camp.
I think the testifiers yesterday mentioned some roadwork that needs to be done, some work to the pools, some works to the roof of some of the cabins, and in addition to the kitchen. And I just wanted to give them this general funding. I can get a more specific proposal if that's what you're asking for.
Yes, please. I won't preclude me supporting it today, but before we do the final, I think that was what the, department was asking for in their responses, that we're adding these things and it's not always clear to them. Just try not accommodate their requests.
Thank you, Member Pulton. And then so this would be documentation for the department. I wouldn't necessarily need to add it to the proviso.
Yeah. For I think that's what they asked for. Yeah.
Yeah. Not necessarily to the proviso in the budget document. Right, miss Milner?
Thank you, chair. If the body could provide some guidance in the line item, if they have a specifically legislative intent for those funds for the organization. For example, in previous years, we've had grants for water buffalo and things like that. So if that's made clear in the ordinance, that's fine, but we need the whole white paper in the ordinance. Yeah. And I do have some additional information on voice scouts whenever it's appropriate. Thank you, chair.
So he has provided that this grant is used for capital improvements to Kamalohia and then if he supplies like a scope and budget separately to the department, that should be fine enough.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilor Republicans. Yes.
I'm ready for the additional information if if anyone else is.
Yeah. Do do you have the additional information regarding the e Yes. Thank you, chair. I think this is the best program, but Scouting America.
Currently has I do have the best program information, but this is about Scouting America. They already they still have a CIP grant from fiscal year 'nineteen that we gave them for $500,000 that still has $273,612 available on it. So we just wanted to make you aware of that information as they still have outstanding available funding. That funding was also for capital. You, chair.
Thank you, chair. My staff also would like to me to note that, I misread. It should be aloha council rather than aloha chapter. So the the recipient should be scouting America aloha council. I wanna make sure that staff gets that.
Remember, Batanggan, were you aware of the previous 273,000?
I knew that they had gotten a previous appropriation. I did not know that there was outstanding, funds in there. But given the needs at the camp and the, benefits that the camp provides to the community, I would still be in support of, of this appropriation.
The full amount of five Yes. Okay.
Malitor. Okay. I'm supportive. I understand the need. I guess my concern is, like, the paperwork part, which is something that many organizations, can find challenging.
I've had a a couple of multi organizations that it took a while before they were able to receive new funding because they had to clear out all the old, like, commitments, deliverables, you know, clear that contract, do the you know? So I don't know if things have do you know if things have changed within their staffing or team to be able to clear out the 2019 funding, close everything out to be able to receive new funding?
Sure. So I do know that there has been changes in leadership. The testifiers who came before us yesterday both mentioned that they were newly elevated to their roles. I also would expect that the training programs that the Office of Economic Development is saying that they're rolling out to help grant recipients be able to navigate this process would be of benefit to this recipient as well. And so I'm hoping that between new leadership and new guidance that they would be able to encumber this money.
Mahalo for that response, Maributangan. So my understanding when they were before us is that moving forward, starting from fiscal year, there would be a the new procedure, but it wouldn't be retroactively applied to old grants. So whatever commitments were made during that time is what they would have to follow through on. And I understand that there's new leadership, but it wasn't clear to me if that leadership is the one are the are the ones that's gonna handle, the paperwork. Because if they were, it would have been it would have given me a little more confidence if they had indicated and disclosed that they had outstanding grants that they haven't closed out on because that's really important.
Otherwise, we're gonna, you know, put this in the budget and they're not gonna be able to apply for it. And I speak from experience. Nirav Bhatankar.
Thank you. I still would like to push for this appropriation. Okay.
recognize the challenges, but I also see the need and the impact that the camp had on my life and in this community.
Okay. Thank you. Okay. Ready for the vote. Is this a roll call vote? We're fine. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye.
Roll call.
Okay, roll call. Roll call. Chair proceeding with a roll call vote. Council member Tom Cook.
Aye.
Council member Gabe Johnson.
Aye.
Council chair Alice Lee? Aye. Council member Tamar Palton? Aye. Council member Keanu Rollins Fernandez? No. Council member Shane Senensi?
Aye.
Council member Nohei Uwajins? Aye. Committee vice chair Kunoye Batangan?
Aye.
Committee chair Yukile Sugimura. Aye. Chair, that's eight ayes, one no. Motion passes.
Okay. Motion passes. Next, we have council member Oh, jens, residency area.
Oh, chair. I think director Milner said she was ready for All of them. Chair Lee's one. The best.
Do you have that information, director Milner? So we can go back to that and vote.
Yes. Thank you, chair. For fiscal year twenty five, the funding for the BEST program was $320,865, and it was the same for fiscal year twenty four. And I also had a chance to speak to human concerns staff, while my camera was off, and, it was their understanding that the funding request of $5.15 plus was to support both the women's reintegration program and the existing reintegration program. Thank you, Chair.
That's right. And what wasn't said earlier and taken into consideration is the fact that we're including childcare, which we didn't in the last two years. So it's rental assistance and childcare. That's why we need more money. Thank you.
And so, Ms. Kabibe made a commitment that she was going to spend down the total amount. Okay. That, concludes my questions.
Okay. So you want to take a vote, members? This is on Chair Lee's priority. Okay. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. You cannot, so there's eight ayes. Yeah. Member Batangen is recused. All right, very good. Now we have member Woo Jin's, a residency area one to increase the Paya Youth Council Inc. By 200,000.
Thank 55, I move to insert more funding to increase the funding rather by $200,000 for the Youth Council. For your reference, it's in section six, XII. To increase it by 200, making the new total at $5.50. By second, if I have a second, I can explain.
Member Uhoch is seconded by Member Paltz. You. Discussion.
Thank you, Chair. We heard from a few testifiers that they are going to need a little bit more money to continue their operations. As we all know, life is extremely expensive. This is the only youth center we have in Paiia, and this is one of the few youth centers that are located right on the beach, and they do ocean activities with the kids. And I'm happy to be able to support them. I ask for the member's support of this motion. Thank you. Member Palta.
I'm supportive of this and I wanted to also mention that they're one of the few organizations outside of the county that, is leading the way in managed retreat, and they've worked, extensively to rebuild or not rebuild, but to build their clubhouse back from the ocean's edge. And so therefore leading the way for the rest of us. Yep. Okay.
All in favor? What? Any more discussion? Oh, member Cook, sorry.
Thank
government. We're doing
thing the work work with we're doing a
They have a very strong base. The youth
over to there are incredible. I'm really supportive. Thanks for doing this, Naughty.
Thank you. Okay. All in favor? Chair. Oh, director.
Sorry. Go ahead. My apologies. We would just ask for the body's consideration to add language to this that the funding is to be used for programmatic activities. Obviously, they're allowed to use up to a specific percent for the administrative cost, but they do have a very expensive executive contract right now with the MOA Family Services, and we like to make sure that this funding goes to their programmatic work rather than to any sort of executive contract. That's our only request. Thank you, chair.
I'm happy to do that. I heard that. That's cool with me.
That's interesting. Okay. That's fine. Good to add that. Yeah. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. So we got nine ayes. Very good. Shirley, Boys and Girls Club of Maui and for $280,000
I have to turn my mic on. Move to approve the additional money of $253,000 to the and I'm sorry, that was the previous one. Dollars 280,000 to the Boys and Girls Clubs of Maui for the Club on the Go program. And this program, as you might remember, is in addition to their permanent clubhouse program where they have, I think, six permanent clubhouses. And they have one RV and this is for the second RV so that they can add more locations to their overall program and see as many kids as possible.
Second. Second by Member Johnson. Motion made by Chair Lee. Think you Excuse my discussion already. Any more questions? Member Bolton.
I'll speak in support. After the fire when EPA was using the clubhouse, they did a mobile program for Lahaina. They spent some days at Napili Park. They spent some of at the hotels when all the survivors were still in the hotels. And it it provided, like, a little bit of normalcy when all the parents of the children were otherwise occupied with very serious stuff.
So, they make it happen, and I think we're gonna be very, sad to lose, the ED, but TJ Dia is more than capable of stepping up.
Yeah. He's good. Okay. Any other discussion? Seeing none. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. Okay. Nine ayes. All right. Are there any more? Representative Nancy.
Thank you, Chair. I had an alternate that I wanted to swap out with one of my district priorities. Okay. And it's and it falls under the department of, human concerns.
Okay. So what number are
you is
it written on?
No. It was an alternate, Hana Mama's maui hikina behavioral health.
What does that mean? Oh.
Oh, and I'm taking out we spoke with deputy director for the parks, and so I was gonna swap out my parks care taker position for the hana mamas.
Hanamamas. And
if I get a second, I can or
Okay. Second member of Palton.
Oh, my motion motion was to move to add a new line item under Department of Human Concerns grants and disbursements to Haulani Hana Inc, Hana Mama's Maui Ikina Behavioral Health.
What is the amount?
For $245,722.
200 wait. It's not on this list, Oh, very top. I see.
And I believe member Rollins Fernandez seconded. Okay.
Okay. Either one. Okay.
Okay. Thank you, chair. Again, the Hana Mamas is a district priority of mine. You heard several testimonies when we were in Hana from some of the mamas. The Hana Mamas is a grassroots effort by Hana moms that want to address the critical situation of trauma, substance addiction, and mental health needs in our rural community.
When the mayor came out, to Hana during his Holomua meetings, he I thing can thing that administration and from mental health care givers like Mona Recovery, Piha Wellness Center and Aloha House. Who have helped the mamas with mobile mental health services and who helped the planning for sober living housing options in Hana. Where patients who are exiting their programs can receive additional counseling and other services. As you can see, the Hana Mamas are requesting I don't know if I did see that, but there was a census that they wanted to fund, with some of the the rural communities, only because there's a lot of families that don't take the regular regular census. So, that was one of the, their mission statements was to create this one, census.
Also to acquire some temporary or rent some temporary space for sober living options for women first and with the intent to later house Connie patients. And then I do see some the other would be for support staff and cultural to kinda help run their programs, Chair. So this would be my alternate. Thank you.
The page that you say it's on, it's within human concerns?
Yeah. To add to their grants disbursements.
Okay. As another item. So it's brand new then? I'm sorry. It's brand new. You have an offset. Was curious since you're brand new.
I did.
I mean, I'm just wondering if there's a big pot you're taking it from, conditioning it.
Yep. I think we were gonna look at some
It's general fund. Right?
Yeah. Yeah.
It's not from a a pot. You're not pulling it
from No.
No. It's not a petit dish. Pot. Yeah.
Just adding a new item. Right.
Okay. Any discussion? Member Palton.
So Hohlani Hana is gonna be the fiscal sponsor of the Hana Mamas. And the Hana Mamas have been to a grant workshop or they will be submitting the grant. They know there's like paperwork involved.
Yeah. They've been to the workshops.
Okay. And
And important don't know how many people are gonna be hired as community data specialists. Is that 12 people? And they'll just work over sorry. Yeah. First page on the top one. They're gonna work just track their time, but no more than $24,000 worth of work there for over 12 people.
For the
Oh, the other side page. Yeah. On the top. Top one. Yeah.
Yeah. Yes. And they listed, all of the different, sorry, all the, the East Maui districts.
Okay. No, that's fine.
And their initial. Okay.
We're
And
collapsed a little bit? Because again, we're going funding somebody's entire salary and these are slightly more reasonable, I see.
Yep. And I did have a and that's why you're receiving a late, submission because I asked, it was a much larger ask and from our previous discussions, they've taken out a lot of, like you said, the fringe, the taxes and taking out all of that so that we're just kinda subsidizing some of their salaries and not the
whole thing.
We're subsidizing some of their salaries. This is not the entire thing is being paid for by Correct. Maui Okay.
Okay. Any more discussion? Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalo, Chair. So, Member Sinnency, I remember the testimony when we went to Hana about census, collection, and it looks like maybe they're calling it, these presidential members, the, community data gathering by Moko. So I think that when you're saying that they're gonna do, like, like, census work, I'm I'm thinking maybe that's the census work.
Yeah.
Yeah?
Yes.
So that's the 12 community data specialists, two per MOCU and the six MOCU, and then the one data analyst to do that work.
Yep.
And then you're and I'm what I remember from testimony at that hearing was that the expectation is that it would qualify some of the areas for more funding so that this would help to kind of generate more funding for East Maui.
Correct. And this Okay. Would The census would be one of their first things that they would do just to get a better, you know, data collection. Because they've seen that a lot of the local families don't do the regular census.
Oh, and they're doing, like, behavioral health and Ohana care Yeah. As
Okay. Member Palton.
I'm just, I just have a question. I'm not sure what the data collection because the census is done, like, every ten years, so 2020, 2030, and this being, like, going into fiscal year '27, will they then be, like, comparing or working for the 2030 census and, ensuring that the community data that they gather is included in the 2030 census so that, hopefully, we're under a different federal situationship at that time. But that this data is intended to go towards the 2030 census. And is there other census reasons that they would be gathering the data now?
I believe so. I don't have the paperwork, but they had this entire process what they're going to be doing. And of course, just keeping that data, know, not getting out or, you know, private. Private. Oh, They be they kinda would be kinda keeping some of it private, like not sharing a lot of the information. I can get that information from you. They had a whole list of how they were gonna conduct that census.
Oh, okay. Alright. Yeah.
I'll share that with you.
I'll stand by, but I'm ready to vote for this.
Okay. Member Browns Fernandez.
Maheshra, dovetailing off of, member Bolton's comments, I I think it would be good too if they're gonna be going and meeting with community members to help, like, educate them about the, you know, the decentennial every ten year. Thanks, guys. Yeah. But the the centennial census that happens. So that the families and the households all understand the importance of, completing the census when time comes. That would be good. Like they collect the data and also do some education at the same time if you can convey that.
Okay, I will. I think the last census, our community came up as a high earning because a lot of the local families didn't. And so it kind of put us above where we could even qualify for additional services. I think a lot of the temporary residents filled it out and those residents don't live in Hana the full time and so it looked like we were a well-to-do, wealthy community and whatnot. Skewed the data
and made
a lot of the communities ineligible for some of the funding, federal funding. Correct. It's inaccurate picture. And so and then the last time, it was 2020, and it was during the pandemic. So even more so, you know, folks Nobody. Were not really yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Okay. Social
do to first And half Okay. And Now we're done with all the priorities for human concerns.
Chair? Yes. Apologies to backtrack staff. Just wanted to confirm something with a priority the committee took up earlier. It was Councilmember Senensi's, $2,000,000 priority for Ho'ala Health. Staff has down as the recipient, University of Hawaii Foundation. We just wanted to confirm if doing And to doing
change. Thank you for that. If that's a proper name, that then more so important. Okay. Thank you. Any other okay. Now we're going to operating budget. For human concerns administrative program, Bill 55, look on page 10, are there any amendments for A or B? Looking? Member Poulton, Member Watangan.
Chair. Budget director has her video on, usually indicating that she has information to share. Maybe she has a cut for us to consider.
Director.
Muted.
Oh, can't hear you. Oh. She was unmuted. You're going off and on.
We cannot hear you. I I see that you're unmuted, but we cannot hear you for some reason. Director, we
cannot hear you. Oh. Now you're off. Director, we still cannot hear you. He does? Yep. We have we'll get back to director.
I'm ready to entertain you.
Okay. This is a substitute or something. Department
of Human Concerns, decreasing overall salaries on the A account. Under the Human Concerns program, the department has 30 vacancies, 11 in active recruitment, 20 have inactive status, 10 are grant funded, 10 are general fund. Eight of the 20 positions have been vacant for over two or more years between threetwentytwenty nine and threetwenty onetwenty four. In response to the HC-one, attachment one, sixteen of the 30 vacant positions were noted with an NA or a TBD as the anticipated start date. Reduce the funding for human conservatives program by $291,126 plus fringe.
Dollars 291,126 total salaries for seven positions that have been vacant for over two years. Since the department does still have vacancies, it has the flexibility to hire positions.
So, your total cut is $202,191,126.
Plus fringe. Plus fringe.
Okay. Okay. I think you described it, your description. Shirley.
Okay. Hope he
Oh, wait. Not
You have a second. Give me a second.
Anybody second?
A second. Okay. Second by Okay. My question is, I hope you're not including federal programs because that's not something you can cut. So you're making a distinction between the county is not funded
10 of them are grant funded and 10 of them are general fund. So, it's only cuts from the general fund.
Only the general fund. Okay. Okay. So, Member Batongen was the second for Member Cook.
Yeah. But mine was more for discussion purposes. You should go to member Palton.
K. Member Palton.
I thought that they were moving some of the federal grant, funded positions in this fiscal year to county grant funded positions because they anticipated not receiving that federal money. So, I would like clarification for the positions that are vacant that have warm bodies, that they're gonna transition the federal into, I guess, starting July 1 or something. Okay. I guess we can ask,
budget director.
Ask bud yeah. Budget
director. Director Milner. Thank
you, chair. I am restarting my laptop as we speak, so I am on my phone. I know that they did keep that funding out of concern of possible loss of federal funds. There are people in grant funded positions where if that funding is lost they will need to move them Into general fund positions if we want the program to continue. I know for this fiscal year.
We have a reallocated position sorry I'm just looking through really fast. To try and find the there we go. It's on page 12 dash nine of the budget details. Four of the expansion positions are twelve months funding as those are transferring over from the a d r c grant due to a reduction in funding. We haven't been informed of any additional decreases at this point, but I will say human concerns runs a pretty lean ship.
So I am concerned, particularly in light of the significant number of grants that have been added to their portfolio as of today. Happy to provide additional information. Thank you, Chair.
Member Johnson, are Okay.
I'll ask Director Milner, is there a number that you feel comfortable with?
Thank you, chair. I am communicating with the department right now, and I will get back to you ASAP. And I'm also almost back online on my laptop.
Thank you,
Chair. I would be willing to reduce the cut down to $150,000
150,000
for the consideration.
that's not talking to me. Okay. Charlie.
Yep. Speaking from experience, that department doesn't have a lot of fat. Not like m m d's office or the mayor's office or you know, they have a lot of cushions. Other one just has benches. Hey. Thank
you. Benches. Never cook.
I'm very supportive of the department. I know that they have a new director. And I also know that they do a lot of important work. This is basically just if there's additional funding that is not being used, going do that. And And so,
we're
Correct.
So I guess I just want for members, situational awareness. The unspent category a appropriations for FY '25 for human concerns is a little over more than 1,100,000. If you reduce it to, you know, that's a little over 10% or something like that. Can I hear the explanation again? Because it all sounded great as you're reading it, but it still feels like a lot. And I I wanna make sure I understand the proposal before us. Really? The the basins The basis is 30 vacancies, 11 in active recoupment.
20 are in inactive status, 10 grant, 10 general. Eight of the 20 positions have been vacant for two or more years between threethirty onetwenty twenty four. So that's a big part of it. These ones have been vacant for a long time. In response to the HC1
That's a different conversation.
I guess, member Cook. So the inactive vacancies, are the do you have the total for those positions? Do you have do you have it broken down or do you have it all in aggregate because that's how you initially crafted the position or the the I have a ball in aggregate. Okay.
You wanna hear from budget?
Yeah. It sounds like she's conversing with the director and deputy from human concerns. If they have input, I would love to hear it.
Director Milner. Almost there.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilor. They're asking for new positions so they can catch up with workload increases in recent years. If there's a cut to salaries, it hurts their ability to recruit and hire the staff they need. I struggled this year with delayed recruitments due to the cuts to the a budget this year and the grant reductions, so it's not sustainable to keep cutting the a budget while we continue to increase their workload. Thank you, chair.
Chair? Member Cook?
In support of the department, I will withdraw my cut. Oh, you are. I will hope that they can fill these and move forward.
Okay.
The only reason to cut is if there's going to remain unspent funds. But in support of the department, I withdraw my motion.
Okay. Member A'ulhajans.
Thank you, Chair. I'm happy to support Member Cook in whatever he wants to do. I will say we've heard that before. And then every time they come back and we have a huge, carryover savings in salaries, we've heard that from several departments every time we try to do this. And I get it. But then next year, I wanna see a $0 balance then.
Okay. Member Bolton. We
won't see it until next next year because that's how the carryovers work. Just just the point. Like, I would like to see it next year too, but
that's not gonna
be added.
It's a aim for zero balance then in '28.
Member Koch.
Thank you. Yeah, it really is. And I'm hoping management and everybody hears it. The cuts aren't to undermine the department. The cuts are not to be ending up with these unfunded positions in prolonged periods of time. If that's a statement they're making, I'll accept it. But similar to my colleagues, it needs to stop. Thank you.
Okay. Very good. So I'm going to move forward. Member Palton, we have something else.
On page 10 of the operating budget, section three, big b nine small b paren one, I moved to increase human concerns program by $3,336.
Where did you find it on page 10?
Read it out again. Page 10 of the operating budget section three b nine small b paren one.
She's reading off, bill 55.
I'm, I moved to increase human concerns program by 3,336, category b. And if I get a second, I'll explain.
Second by member Rollins Fernandez.
This is a department request for leased equipment that was inadvertently admit omitted. Page 12 dash 42 of budget details 925007CDash7105.
Okay. Any any further discussion?
I guess, if it's already leased,
I might have a contract or something. Okay. All in favor or more discussion, all in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Nine ayes. You got that? Okay. Any more? Seeing none. Okay. Next. Human concerns program, pages 10 to 13. Any amendments to salaries or category A or B? This is human concerns program. Page 10 to 13.
All good?
Chair? Yes. Staff has noted down one proposed offset for human concerns program for council member Senensi tied to his Kilea Foundation, priority. It's a $45,000 reduction to human concerns program category B. Okay.
Thank you, Chair. We spoke with the director or council on aging director and that would greatly affect her funding. We're So going to move our offset to the office of the mayor for 50,000.
Okay. So we'll can you
So we won't be doing that offset.
Thank you.
But we have another one. Okay.
So we're going to move off from that then. CIP. There's one CIP for the Department of Human Concerns but it is funded by FEMA Public Assistance funds. Are there any proposed amendments to the Department of Human Concerns, CIP? I see none. Okay. I'm going to move on. Appendix A part one grants. Are there any proposed amendments to grants for the department? Seeing none.
Appendix A part two special purpose revenues. As a reminder, the following funds under this department, Immigrant Services Division, United States Passport Application Acceptance Facility Revolving Fund on page 54, Conoa Senior Services Leisure Program Activities on page 54. Are there any proposed amendments to the special purpose funds? Seeing none. Okay.
Next, Appendix B, rates and fees on the Ramziar's version is on page 20. We're do to do we to do is that.
That.
And only thing So, ir And And own. To wanna take a break. It's gonna be one hour, but oh, you want a
break? Sure.
So two 02:40. Welcome back to Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It is now 02:48PM. We are in management. We have changed department. Members priorities, I said we have 11 of them. One is a replacement and five are for the department's revolving fund. There are 11 priorities for the department of management. One is I just said that. And five involve the Department's revolving fund.
We will go down the list in the order shown in matrix which follows the order used in the budget bill. Shirley, you're first. Thank you.
All right. So my proposal is to use up to $250,000 for feasibility study to acquire the parcels comprising Wailuku Plantation in Piihana, Wailuku. Now this is the infamous area Yeah. Where we have fires every other day practically, and nothing has been done to substantially stop that. Although, the fire department and possibly the police department have installed cameras, which is a big help.
But that doesn't necessarily prevent anything. It helps to understand who's causing the fires. But because we can't seem to oh yeah, I'm going into discussion. Sorry. So I'm I'm moving to do make that using 250,000 from the Department of Management as
Second my member Cook. So, can you leave me the motion and Yeah.
And just to continue on my discussion. The thing is apparently issuing violations and penalties hasn't been working. So it's quite possible that the better long term solution is to acquire the property and to for the safety of all the residents because this could impact not only Pihana but you know White. The Hawaiian homes and other properties nearby, Happy Valley, etcetera. So this is a very, I don't know, potentially dangerous situation.
That if the county had control over it, then we could possibly turn it into, some good housing areas for the people and not a fire trap. Thank you.
Thank you. So second was from top member cook. You have a discussion too, also.
I'll speak. I'm supportive of it. Think there's a lot of frustration. The police and the fire department are there all the time. I kind of looked at a prosecutor's office of why somebody could be this irresponsible with their property that is causing this extent of danger to the community. So I'm supportive of doing this and also I just like to hold people accountable for their property when they're allowing stuff like this happen.
But I'm
supportive of Chair Lee's proposal.
Thank you. Member Johnson.
You, Chair. Chair Lee, I have a question. Why not just buy it outright then do a feasibility study? That feasibility study may take a year or two.
Well, I think we need to find out the extent of the problems before we actually buy the property. We don't know everything about it. I we I heard that this was originally a project district Oh. That we that I passed back in the nineties when this was owned by Guiluku Agribusiness. Okay.
Didn't they buy it off different buyers?
And then a certain person bought it maybe within the last fifteen years or so, maybe twenty years. And has been selling it off.
That's right. And correct me if I'm wrong. This is the parcel with the bridge.
Yeah. Near the bridge.
Okay. And that bridge was a big pickle. Right?
Yeah. One of the conditions to developing this property was to replace the bridge and create the new road off of Kahikili so that it would bypass Happy Valley. Right. And there would be a road behind Saint Anthony's. It was a, you know so all of the different things all these conditions were never met.
Right. Okay. That's a good answer for why we need a feasibility study because there's not just, oh, there's a parcel land. Come buy it. Get rid of you know, fix it up nice because it's all these situations. Thank you. Thank
you, chair.
Any more discussion? Member Oh Hodgins.
Thank you, chair. I'm happy to support this too. I had this I had a similar conversation with fire as they're always going there. It's one of their notorious places. And then I had this conversation with Josiah about what it would look like, to answer member Johnson's question too, because I I agree with you, what would it look like to eminent domain?
And unfortunately, because it's zoned to do something but just never happened, that market rate is not what it represents. And so technically, we would have to pay that, or we would have to figure out how to bring down that existing zoning and pay what is actually there. Because what's there is not necessarily what meets the eye. As we know, the entitlements to something we discussed yesterday are really expensive. They're just not being utilized at all.
So, I mean, I don't know how much studies cost. I don't always love doing studies. I wish, like member Johnson said, we could just buy and fix it, but I think we should probably look into all the things we're gonna have to do once we acquire it and what kind of liability we're gonna be taking in as well.
Thank you. Okay. Thank you. Member Sanancy.
Thank you, chair. I'm supportive as well for the reason that the bridge is an Emikala Street as a possible another access point and an evacuation route from way outside. So I'm supportive of that.
Very good. Okay. Ready for the vote. Member Bolton.
I thought I saw that in fire's, response, FSO two, that they were, if the violation is not, if they get the same violation that they were going to pursue criminal charges. Is that did anyone else read that? And then, so I guess my question would be, what is what are we studying on the feasibility? Because every time the county try or not every time, but the the last time when the county tried to reduce or mitigate the fire risk on county owned land, which which I did support because, look, after the rain, all those lithium ion batteries would have been soaked. But it kinda turns into a thing, like, we're displacing people.
But it's, like, really, to me, it's mitigating the risk. People in Wailuku have had to evacuate, more than once because of the fire. People have complained about the chemical smell, that is coming into their homes. And I would just say, like, you know, I'm I'm in support of purchasing the property. I don't know specifically what twenty fifty thousand feasibility would do, but just, be prepared if the county owns it and the county has to clean it up, that there will be pushback as there is every time the county tries to mitigate fire risk.
And I don't know if after Okumehame, they've developed a better strategy or if with our new director of human concerns, there's a better strategy. But that's just my statement. If we purchase it and we try to clean it up, which I do think needs to be done because of all the illegal activity happening there, if we purchase it, it's gonna be illegal more illegal activity on county owned lands. That's just my statement.
K. Ready for the vote? Okay. Ready? Cheerly, your camera's on. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine I. 9 i's. Okay. Motion carries. Thank you. Yeah. Such a big problem area. The next item is line next the question comes from upcountry wildfire rebuild and flood recovery and mitigation.
So moved. Thank you. Second. Thank you. Moved by Chair Lee and seconded by Member Rollins Fernandez.
I want to explain this. In this August 3 wildfire, we had big residents that were impacted as well as rentals. But our number is not like Lahaina and we fortunately didn't have a loss of lives. I will tell you that I tried to arrange a meeting for the Upcountry residents that wanted to just recently like two weeks ago, three weeks ago and Koneo one and two happened. The meeting I tried to set up with the administration, they basically said, Oh we cannot show up because we're busy now doing Kone 100 and storm.
So I had the meeting anyway. It ended up to be mostly about Kula Hospital. But I wanted the office of recovery to come and tell the residents of country what kind of resources are available to them. And I will tell you that a lot of them feel like it's hard. Here we have this $1,600,000,000 that we always hear about it, read about it in the news and upcountry is like okay soul and I was trying to answer that soul. Never happened. So therefore I decided to do this in a budget. I look forward to hearing what you may have to say. But this is $3,000,000 and Tamara's going to say, well, do you have a white paper on it? I do not.
But I will create one just so that officer recovery will have a better understanding of what this could be. And I'm gonna reach out to the residents as to what they may need. So I look for your support. Any discussion? Member Rollins Fernandez.
I look forward to the white paper. I seconded it because I think we I would I I was very interested to hear where you're going with it because Molokai also got hit hard. And, there's, you know, some homestead areas that DHHL is taking steps with flood mitigation and drainage improvements and all of that. Lucky. We've also had some discussion now with the storm and vegetation growth, we talked about that becoming a fire, you know, fuel for future fires when the rain stops and taking a more proactive approach in managing that vegetation when it dries up.
So in choosing 3,000,000, was that like an arbitrary number? Or did you have like some kind of formula behind it or some kind of thought process? Or how did you come to $3,000,000
So by just listening to some of the testifiers at the residency area meeting where they said, to do, I think it was Lahaina. If you're gonna rebuild, it's gonna cost x amount. Right? So I just thought, okay. It's not gonna be 500,000 for, you know, every home, but at least it'll be something. And so that's really where I got that from the thought from, as well as, the anguish that I'm hearing from my community, which is real.
So when you say rebuild, you mean houses? Yeah.
And flood recovery, right?
Because some of the rebuild I mean, any of the rebuild that's happening in Lahaina, like if it's like GAAP funding for like insurance and then whatever is necessary to complete the construction, There's, like, Lahaina Community Land Trust, which is kind of managing that funds and, putting safeguards on some of those homes to keep them in community hands. And so I guess I would be supportive of, like, that kind of an approach to it. Yeah. I I guess this is, like, super broad, and I I I didn't understand what rebuild, means. So if when you develop your, new details in your white paper, if it could you know, like, if it was gonna go to an organization or if it's supposed to be managed internally and grants be given and how the disbursement would happen and just all of that.
You know, same thing that we're doing with, like, Lahaina. We'll do that. Member Johnson?
Director Milner's on the call.
Oh. Hello, budget director.
Aloha, chair. Thank you. Yes. I was just, speaking with deputy director, and there are some concerns that if we condition this funding for flood recovery and mitigation, it could make folks ineligible for FEMA reimbursement or HMGP funds because they look at the totality of our budget in a whole. So there's just some concern that this could impact FEMA eligibility for flood recovery. We've already submitted our wildfire costs, so I think we're okay there, but there are concerns about impacts to flood recovery reimbursements. Thank you, Chair.
I need to understand that.
Chair, can I ask Budget Director to explain a
little Member bit Batonga has the same question?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Batonga. Yes, the government, when they're considering what is going to be eligible for reimbursement, they look at the totality of our budget and other funding. If they see we've allocated funding similar to CDBG Doctor, where if we've allocated our funding to cover these costs already, then those costs won't be eligible for reimbursement. Whereas unanticipated costs that we had to expend out of our budget as we already have from the emergency fund and elsewhere, those costs are eligible because it was an unanticipated expense.
Director Milner, so you're saying she should just make it say up country wildfire rebuild and leave off the flood recovery and mitigation part of it. Is that your direction?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilmember Paulson. Yes. I would just leave off flood recovery and mitigation. And if we're not doing flood recovery and mitigation, is the 3,000,000 number still appropriate? Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Yes. Thank you. Members? Miller Palton. All her.
Yeah. I'm I can be supportive of this. The main thing is that we're not helping somebody rebuild, then they're gonna flip it for a big amount. As we've seen in Lahaina, you know, a lot of their houses just to rebuild whatever you had before is over a million dollars. And then when you resell it, you can sell it for much more than what you actually built it for.
So, I'm all in support of helping folks rebuild. I don't know if there's gonna be an income criteria. I'm kind of opposed to income criterias on the rebuild because this is not anybody's fault, and people who, have good jobs are hit just as hard. The only thing I would ask is that there since there is this assistance that there be, like you know, if you if you are gonna sell it in the future because you receive tax money to do it, like, either sell it affordably or, you know, something like that to the next person, like a pay it forward, program. Not that you get, like, however much you get, you rebuild your house.
Like, whatever your equity that you bring into it is your equity. But the portion portion that you get from taxpayer funded, if you're gonna sell it, that portion should not be going into your pocket. It should be a pay it forward amount.
Okay. Is that what you do in Lahaina?
In Lahaina, it's, restricted in perpetuity, with, I think I think it's 1.5% appreciation on the portion that is funded. Your equity is your equity that you come into it. And every year the the, other portion of it, you get a 1.5 appreciation and that if that percentage is correct is to keep it under just under wage growth of your average jobs so that over time it becomes more affordable instead of less affordable like everything else.
So we'll find it in the in the report that we got from, miss Ness.
I'm not sure if the exact formula is, but if you, reach out to them, they'll they'll give you the exact formula. They have a lot of, data on it, and they hired, consultants that have a combined experience of like 100 dealing with like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, but I'm sure they will be more than happy to share any information with you. Thank you. The main concern that I have is this doesn't turn into a cash windfall for based on, taxpayer dollars. Like, I'm all for helping people rebuild, but if they're gonna ever sell it in the future, there needs to be some guardrails.
Okay. Thank you. Any other discussion? Charlie? I support the motion and I also believe that it's hard to be specific because you're not getting any specific answers from the administration for one. And it's we know that the damage is so extensive upcountry that 3,000,000 is just a starting point. And so at least you'll have some say in the budget, 3,000,000 worth in the budget as we move forward and work together in the future with the administration as more specific information comes up. Thank you. And I also want to
say that meeting that I talked about Kula Hospital, was grateful that Deputy Director Wade and John Smith came. Not the whole entourage that they were going to provide because it got diminished to probably the top two people but I appreciate them for showing up. At this time then, take a vote.
Chair? Oh. Apologies. Staff just wants to clarify to make sure we understand. So, the condition will now just say up to $3,000,000 must be for a country wildfire rebuild period? Yeah. Can we confirm that chair?
Is it called recovery and mitigation? Is complete the sentence?
Chair, I prefer to revisit this later. I mean, I'm supportive of this, but the reason that what Member Palatin described works is because there's an organization that's doing the work. So, if if there isn't, like, someone ready to receive this funding and, like, do that work, I don't I'm not I'm waiting to see your white paper to understand how this would be implemented. But
that's gonna delay this from taking action then
so Unless if I I wouldn't support it without without the safeguards that, that I spoke about member Bolton spoke about because, same concern as member Bolton.
Okay.
But I'm one person. I'm one person.
Want me to try and reach out to the land trust and see if they can administer your program?
I wanted to be a upcountry somebody. I would figure out somebody else.
No. Some of our team is upcountry. Oh, no offense. I just wanted to be Marina is a fire survivor from upcountry and she's on the land trust team. But if you don't want to, that's I'm sure they're overloaded anyway. So I'll take that as a no and move on.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. If you guys don't wanna take this up then I'm I'm good. I do I am not gonna give this up, though, just so you know.
Tara, I I I said I don't so I said I support it. I'm just waiting for your details. Okay. For me, I'm not ready to vote on it until I get those So this is
what I would like to propose is that based upon the discussion, because really this is a brand new idea which I want to do a brand new idea for Upcountry. Upcountry is you too, by the way, right? So both of us. Is that I want to propose something. I will research it more and find a nonprofit who can administer it because office Recovery is too busy.
So I'll do my homework for it and have some paper so that the Office of Recovery then agrees to it and has some guidance, guardrails as you guys call it. And I agree with that too, you know, since this is taxpayer dollars and I'm pretty protective about that anyway. But this is a brand new thought for upcountry and our rebuild. I mean, we're like 2023. I mean, we're I mean, it's it's been going on for a while and struggling through our little community meetings that our community is having.
Thank you very much for respecting that. And I would like to take a vote and I will produce the paperwork that you want for first reading when we are before Chair Lee. Is that right? Is that right? Are you guys fine?
Chair, apologies. I think we're still unclear on the condition language. Okay. So right now what we have is Up to $3,000,000 must be for upcountry wildfire rebuild period. And then, in this certain situation, Shirley was to move on. If that's correct and that's your intention, maybe if Shirley could confirm that as a friendly amendment.
Since you're the proposer, did you want to leave the language link as that? Or you wanted to put in and flood recovery Well, I
think I think they're according to what budget director said, she was probably talking to deputy director, deputy managing director, take off the word flood. So upcountry wildfire rebuild recovery and mitigation.
Okay. And Okay. Just Yeah. Because we want to be So, wording actually the wording is up to $3,000,000 must be for upcountry, wildfire rebuild and recovery and mitigation.
Comma, recovery and mitigation, yeah. Okay. Yeah. Is that okay, James?
Yeah. Yes. Up to $3,000,000 must be for upcountry wildfire rebuild, recovery, and mitigation.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
And then you're gonna give us the details.
Yeah. I'll give you the details. Okay. I'm gonna take a vote. So all in favor or is this a Roll call. This roll call? Okay.
I can support it later on, but I want to see the details first.
Roll call. Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote, council member Tom Cook? Johnson?
Yes.
House member Tomar Poulton? Aye. House member Kenny Rollins Fernandez? No. House member Shane Senensi?
Aye.
Committee Vice Chair Kunoye Batangan.
Aye.
Committee Chair Yukile Sugimura. Aye. Chair, that's
eight ayes. One, no motion passes. Thank you, everybody. Okay. Great discussion, and I will get working on this. Next is councilmember Paulton, Residence Area 2, to insert a new line for a grant to Ho'olala. Did I say it right?
Maui, comma, disaster long term recovery group. I move, on page 13, b 11, department of management, small c, office of recovery. I moved to insert a new line item grant to Houola, Yamawiakama disaster long term recovery group in the amount of 1,000,000.
I need a second. Second. Second is member Johnson.
Members, I sent to be fed the scope of work as well as fiscal year twenty six proposed budget as a template for the continuation of work that they will be doing in fiscal year twenty seven. They I put this under this section because they had a $500,000 grant in fiscal year twenty six. In speaking to Rhonda Alexander Munkers, they put in a application in August. And they were told to hold off because office of recovery was in the thick of the Ho'okumu Hou and the CDBG Doctor. They have resubmitted when the office said they were ready, they're working together, on getting that money dispersed.
This is part of a network of organizations, each one doing what they do best, to get, our families home. And Maui, LTRG's specialty is, construction contractor oversight and disaster case management. Lahaina Community Land Trust sometimes comes in with the gap funding and the protections of the properties that get rebuilt in long term perpetuity and and that kind of management. And Hawaii community lending comes in to vet, the applicants, financial financial status and to know which buckets of resources they are eligible for. So those three organizations together are working to get keep Lahaina home and get more of our Lahaina long term residents into housing.
So this is, the second, leg of the tripod, I guess. And I don't know if you guys had a chance to read the scope or the budget, but those are, like, my white papers.
K. Is there a that was a second. Johnson. K. Any more discussion? President, all in favor, raise your hand and say aye. I guess we have Member Cook. Nine ayes. No. Member Batang is not there.
Eight ayes. Next, we have Councilmember Cook, Resonance Area two, to increase office and recovery programs category B by $2,000,000 to be a condition that amount for South Maui residents and small business sorry, relief. Member Cook? So, this might get sideways with the recovery effort from the
storms. Put this in for to assist residents and small businesses to sustain property damage and the impact of the Kona low storms, principally for mold mitigation. One of the legacy problems that we're going to have able
side do
And
so, to people world. And think, think, the professional help because I think in the long run, it's going to save everybody a lot of headaches and money. Guess Ms. Melder, if she's still on, from what I just heard, it sounds like it's gonna be very similar conflict.
No, but I think if you just change the wording, like, I mean, immediate health concerns or something, would that be okay, miss Milner? Because, I mean, he's talking about mold, and we can't wait for for FEMA reimbursement on that. Like, if you live with mold, you'll get sick. So it means to be if he doesn't put Kona low storm, if he puts, like, you know, flooding, immediate health concerns from mold or something like that.
But is that covered under
Do have some verbal advice?
Thank Thank you, Councilmember Cook and Councilmember Cotton. Yeah, I think the concern, this could be covered under certain reimbursements. Maybe we
could
do South Maui residents and small businesses for, right on, South Miami residents and small businesses to four. Sorry. Let me think about it for one second.
Oh, sorry, Member Seneschi. I didn't see your hand
director. They have the recovers program, recovers.org. If you received any damage, from the storms, you can you can apply for for some additional help. Is this part of that process or or is it taken is it in the same pot?
Tom, member Cook. You can speak in your mic.
This it's my attempt to focus it for the South Maui community. Is it that the office of recovery is busy as they are? This is a directed issue. They're probably gonna do it. My concern, and we'll hear from the director soon, is how promptly and quickly are they going to be able to start addressing this. If it's already in the queue and they've got it lined up and it's gonna happen, then that's fine. I was just trying to focus to ensure that it happens soon.
Director Milner.
You, Chair. Yes. So, condition for South Maui residents and small businesses to address environmental health impacts.
What's your definition of a small business?
Shave ice, ABC store.
ABC store
is a small business? Oh, yeah.
No. It's the old soda store Oh, in North is located? When I mean, it's really those businesses in North Kihei, which is a handful. It's a bakery, the old soda store, the shave ice, ir
And
that. And
we're to able
to we're clear on the intent. Right. And I understand putting it in writing so that it can be addressed and executed because I don't want it to be slow.
Right. It's a good point because longs is I mean, when I think small business, you're thinking small, not like a massive. But longs is CVS, which is national. So I don't know. I wanted to hear your clarity on that. Thanks. Local small business. Oh, now. Okay. We'll put that one.
Thank you, chair. I guess, for member Cook, I think there might be a federal definition for small businesses from my yeah. From, you know, my time doing federal grants, a lot of it had to do with the number of employees that the business owns. But I also so I guess that would be the direction that I would, you know, steer you in. But I have a question for the budget only thing can is that.
And that's only that do do
I I that's that's
able
to to we're becomes ineligible, but I also don't want us to do forego, our opportunity to set policy direction either. And so would you help me better understand, what the restrictions are when we approach disaster recovery?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor Obatoggan. Yes, I think because the storms are so recent, the concern is that anything specifically allocated for storm recovery outside of the emergency fund may jeopardize our ability to get any of those funds reimbursed. I'm certainly not saying the council can't add the funds, they can. I just wanted to make them aware of that concern that we wouldn't be able to seek reimbursement on any of those funds. Obviously, as we said, we've put in all our reimbursement requests for wildfires. So any sort of disaster recovery related to the wildfire is not a concern. Thank you, Chair.
So if we wanted to direct certain types of behavior, you know, like helping mitigate mold or, you know, helping people to be able to rebuild a home, how would you recommend we go about doing that through this process without jeopardizing the administration's ability to seek reimbursement?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmember Botoggen. Yeah, and I did just want to clarify that it's not just the administration's ability, it's also the individual constituent's ability to seek reimbursement as well. And I think that's sort of the process we're working through now. Rather than saying this is definitively solely for recovery from Kona storms, it's for to address environmental health impacts, which obviously would include mold, and other concerns arising from the storms, but it doesn't limit that that amount is solely due to the impacts of the storm.
Understood. Thank you, director.
Are we okay. Member Bolton. Oh, I need a second on this, by the way.
Surely. Okay. Member Cook, I thought I had heard you say, Kihei Youth Center.
And I don't know if they're a little higher. I know that every it floods all the way around them. I don't think the building flooded. I'm just saying wet in the close proximity. And I found out that small business in Hawaii is 500 employees or less.
And I'm not sure if the youth center is considered a business, but was the intention to include like community organizations and should that be spelled out?
That's fine with me. I don't know if the county would also have their own integrated well, it's not a county facility. Anyway, I don't mind adding.
I just was trying to clarify your intent. Don't know. Well, my
my intent was principally the residences all along the road. The handful of businesses in North Keyhey. They got, like, pounded. The ABC store that used to be Sudas, which is a very popular local spot, and there's also the farmer's market right there, they've been, like, literally every single year, once or twice a year, sandbags, plywood on the doors, and closed for three weeks. Cleaning.
What about, like, other organizations, like, the canoe club right there or the other things? So then if that is your, intent, I would just add community organizations as well.
I accept that, and thank you for pointing that out because that would be part of the population that should be able to benefit from it.
Okay. I guess he's taking my friendly amendment. Okay.
Okay. So we we talked about molds specifically. And so if we're doing, like, health, then I don't know how limiting that work would be. And then, 2,000,000 sounds like a lot of money until everyone, you know, submits their need. And suddenly, that's not enough to go around.
And so I think, I know you said you'll also do a white paper. And to be fair to member Sugimura, I'm gonna vote no until I get the details on yours too. So I guess two questions. I guess one for budget director Milner. If we're putting health, I don't I don't know what other okay. Maybe for member Cook first. So basically changing Outside of mold.
To assist residents and small businesses to address environmental health impact concerns and including community organizations. It'll generally, for the mold part of it, it's gonna be about $2,000 for residents. If you have a house, a slab on grade for them to come in and cut the drywall back and do the drying it out and stuff like that. It's gonna be about 2,000 or $2,500. So that's just it's not gonna cure it for everybody, but $2,000,000 should and and I hope and believe that the office of recovery is going to also be addressing these issues down there through the federal through the other money and mitigation.
This potentially could be a little bit of catchall for to assist in that. So it's just I'm trying to assist my community in addressing these issues. I think the mold is something that
be going able to do
And
And
we're that. That. And And But were there things outside of mold is what I was asking.
It'd be actually, when they go in and do that, it would be, like, the removal of baseboards or removal of drywall, the removal of the carpets and stuff.
This is associated with mold, though. Right? Pardon? It's associated with the mold?
Yep. That you have to remove that stuff.
So outside of mold remediation?
Would be that kind of the labor to actually address this. Not that's question. I
think think
hire somebody, what that aspect of it would be.
Okay. So just mold. Is it for just mold then? It's complicated
because No.
No. No. I understand not the, like, the specs. I understand everything that's associated with mold remediation.
My my main focus is the health issues, and so changing this is very accurate to address environmental health and concerns is accurate. Okay. Alright. Got it.
Until
you white paper. To be fair to members of Cuba. Okay.
You want
to say something, court counsel? Thank you, chair. I just if it's a service that I don't know if you've talked to the department about this yet. Okay. Because they might have to contract out if it's a service they're providing instead of a grant. So I just wanted to put that out there if they're okay with that.
Well, it would be independent people contracting it out instead of you saying a grant would yeah, okay.
The department might have to request bids for a contract for this work.
I would that's what I would expect. I don't expect to give a homeowner $2,500 to do it. It would be somebody to go do it professionally. Thank you for pointing that out.
Very good. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Okay. And then we did get the individual assistance from the federal declaration. A lot of the mold remediation is already being done on Molokai. All of that work, cutting the floorboards and the sheetrock and all that stuff. So Who's doing Companies?
Well, Red Lightning is one of them that's helping those that qualify. And they have they work with that one specialist who also does smoke remediation, which is that one chemical difference than mold. And so, you know, we got some grant funding for that person to be able to go in, test it, and then test it to to confirm that everything is all the mold's gone. So we are getting that officially done, for those that qualify that don't have home insurance. And then those that do have home insurance, the home insurance would cover some of that work.
And then for those that may not have enough insurance, they may qualify for individual assistance under FEMA. So I think, like, with all those layers, I think that's why deputy corp counsel had asked if you worked with administration because some of that work's already kind of being done and may be covered from other funding.
Corp counsel. I was just pointing out that it might not be a grant funding grant.
No, no, no. Wasn't responding to what you said to Member Cook. It's regarding the work that I've been doing in my community after the flood. So I already have been working with my community on, like, that stuff, on, you know, mold remediation because it's really bad there too.
Okay. Paula? Member Paulton. Thank you. Member Cook, Red Lightning is headquartered right off of South Kihei Road. Would you like me to, give you the CEO's number?
Please.
Okay. And, Chair, they're already doing work in South Maui.
Yeah. They're they're, I think, Waipuilani and South Kihei Road or something. I'm I'm not sure if their house got flooded, but
It did a little bit.
Michael? They live right next to my husband, Jack's wife.
Yeah. Yeah.
when we went over for dinner.
Yeah. So they they dispatched their volunteers in South Maui before they came to Molokai.
So they're doing it for free?
For those who qualify. For those who qualify.
Okay.
Yeah. They they have a process, a priority process that they go through, and it's, like, displaced first and then seniors and, those with disabilities, etcetera. Okay.
I'm gonna take the vote. Oh, yes.
I'm sorry, chair. We if we could just get a clarification on exactly what the condition is. I think we have up to 2,000,000 must be used to assist South Maui residents, small businesses, and community organizations to address environmental to impacts? Is it environmental health impacts or just environmental impacts?
Environmental and health impacts. Okay.
So that's the motion. I'm gonna any more discussion? Take the vote. Roll call.
Chair proceeding with the roll call vote. Council member Tom Cook?
Aye.
Council Member Gabe Johnson?
Yes.
Council Chair Alice Lee? Aye. Sorry, I couldn't Aye. Member Nohei Ohajans. Aye. Committee Vice Chair Kunoye Batangen. Excused. Committee Chair Yukilei Sugimori. Aye. Chair, that's seven ayes, one no one excused. Motion passes.
Right. You. You.
So next, again, Councilmember Cook Countywide one to increase ITS program category B by $500,000 and to condition that amount for an RFP for an enterprise GIS system. That's your motion.
That's my motion. Is there Second.
Second. Okay.
So I did speak with IT department, and they have a sort of a work in progress. It's something I feel strongly about, but it's only going to be effective if the department is receptive.
And they said yes.
Can you tell us what answers?
I'm digesting the conversation. They basically they have something work in progress. This would be not in parallel with it. And so I don't want to cram it down their throats. I feel we're we're able
going able to that Replacement to countywide number three to add a new line item for yeah, Ei, no, Nakia Ei, 0 Maui, in the amount of $250,000 and conditioned to funds for Lahaina resource and recovery center operations.
Okay, I move to increase a new line item for Na Kia'i 0 Maui in the amount of $250,000 and add a new condition to read as follows. Up to $250,000 must be used for the continuation of the Lahaina resource and recovery center operation in Kahului. Second. Okay. This funding request will support the continuation of the good work that the Lahaina resource and recovery center is doing currently. Okay.
Member Bolton. And I just wanted to clarify. Auntie Nettie is from Lahaina, but this is a countywide request because she helps, you know countywide. I mean, a lot of the fire survivors from Lahaina had relocated to other places in the county. So I don't know if that makes it countywide, but she also is going to be helping folks, you know, with the same kind of resources that she had that are recovering from the flood. And so that's what makes it countywide because it doesn't matter where you're living. She'll help you. And I don't believe it's located in Lahaina either. So the Lahaina part of the Lahaina resource and recovery center is actually Auntie Neri. Okay.
In Kagului.
Yeah. Okay. No more discussion. I'll take a vote. All in favor raise your hand. Okay. Aye. Thank you. So who is missing is just member of Buttonkin. Yeah.
So that's eight ayes, one excused. Moving to revolving fund, we have four priorities under the general excise tax fund, page 52 budget bill and this is Member Johnson. Revolving fund number one to add a new condition of up to $1,000,000 is for the collection of airborne electromagnetic data to characterize groundwater aquifer in West Maui. Shall we come back? Revolving fund. We have four priorities. So as he's looking
Apologies, chair. Oh,
here's member budget director. Sorry.
Sorry to interrupt, Chair. I know you guys are moving over to the revolving fund. I just did want to make a brief comment on Councilmember Cook's withdrawn priority. I did have a conversation with ITS today. I don't think it would be a situation of shoving it down their throat. It's just that we already have county wide GIS software. Additional funding would assist with expanding support for that to areas like public works. And so it's not that additional funding wouldn't be appreciated. Think just a rewording of the condition would allow ITS to continue to support what's already happening as well as expanding it and providing additional resources to the departments. But that's up for the body's consideration. I just wanted you to have that information.
Well, I thank you so much. And I know that that was kind of I think that when I expressed it that way, it was out of a lot of support for the department because I do have confidence in their moving forward. With the body's permission, maybe revisit that and just revert reword it.
Member Johnson is still looking for his. I'm ready. You're ready. We'll come back to yours. All
right. Are you guys done or should I go?
You go.
Okay. As in general excise tax funds, chapter three point one hundred Maui County Code, new revolving fund condition to read, so I move for the condition to read number five, up to $11,800,000 must be to fund the collection of airborne electromagnetic or AEM data to characterize the groundwater aquifers of West Maui to analyze and develop two- and three d mapping and moduling of the aquifers to estimate sustainable yield in order to plan for long term future water source and county water supply infrastructure development to further the creation of West Maui projects transfer the Department of Water Supply. Can I get a second?
Second. You.
Member Cook, second by Member Palton. I'm sorry. Member Johnson.
Yeah. Thank you. Was as members of my Adept Committee and other members may have noticed that this was presented in our Adept Committee, so we have white papers and a presentation on file. This is a joint project between Maui County Department of Water Supply, University of Hawaii, United States Geological Survey, the USGS, and the State of Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management. It was proposed by Doctor. John Haley, a member of our Board of Water Supply. AEM is like an MRI for our aquifers. It models and characterizes our aquifers so we can create two d and three d maps to accurately show how much and what type of water is available. It shows brackish saltwater freshwater. This technology is successfully used in other places such as Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.
Right now, our models still refer to a study from 1942. As we heard in testimony, this project will help us effectively plan long term future water source and county water supply infrastructure development to further the creation of West Maui housing projects. This is just for West Maui, and I just want to make that clear. I hope you
think it's a good idea but I'm not planning to support this motion because I really believe that the water department should have made this recommendation. They're in the process of possibly buying and spending $30,000,000 or so to buy a system from Maui Land and Pine and Oluwala. And yeah, Oluwala Peter Martin. So since they have their plans in motion, that's the reason why I don't think we should impose additional work for them which may not be part of their long term plan. Thank you.
If I could respond, Chair. I know Director Stuffabin is on the call but we he supported it. And I know that means something. When we put money in, we want the department to support it. He said that in our meeting many times. Thank you.
You. Why Thank didn't he propose it in his budget?
Well, it that's a good question. We could maybe ask him on it could be because they want to cost share with the state. But do you to wait for the state? We've heard them say that, but I don't feel like our affordable housing projects in West Maui should wait for the state to come in and kick in money when we have a 1,600,000,000 budget. Thank you very much.
Member Palton, do you have your hand up to speak? I
was seconding, but I'm supportive as the seconder. Do see Director Stuffel being joining the call, and to me, that indicates his support even if we can't, talk to him. I spoke a little bit to, Bill Tam, the, former he he basically wrote a lot of the water code anyway. And what he was saying is, you know, we did fund this isn't what he was saying, but synergizing what he was saying. We did fund a deep water monitoring well.
And this, in combination with that information, will give us a more accurate, picture of what we're dealing with. You know, just in in watching the century tournament pull out of Hawaii as a state, there's so much speculation and blame to, taro farmers, which is ridiculous because there's a whole lot of other global factors and debt, and it involves The UAE and golfing and like this. Like, the best thing we can do right now is get accurate data. And, this in combination with the other things that we're doing will give us a more clear picture of what our aquifer sustainable yield is. So many people have no idea, like, how complex water is.
And, you know, you hear so much people saying, like, oh, what happened to all the water? Because we don't have, the plantations anymore. It's like, well, you think tourism is a, not a thirsty crop? You know? Like, how many bathtubs does one hotel building have? You know? How many Jacuzzi tubs? So I just think it will help, everyone to have scientific data to know exactly how much water we have for all the things, for our stream flow, for our aquatic life, for our people, for our golf courses. You can't really do much if you don't know.
I think knowing is half the battle.
GA, Joe. The it is it's gonna prove to us where to build the wells. We know the cost of building new finding new source, building new source. We've seen folks that have built a well only for the water to come up brackish, and that's such a terrible cost that you just you gotta clean that water now. So this will show that where to focus our efforts on new source. I think that is the logjam that stops affordable housing on West Maui. So that's my one more point I wanted to bring up.
Okay. Member Cook, Member U Hodgins and Senensi. Oh, sorry. And Chair Lee.
Thank you. I'm supportive of this. I'm curious as to how big an area they're going to be able to map for this. It's like 10% of a well is supposedly a production well is like $18,000,000 Part of the challenge with drilling wells is the risk factor, whether there's water or not. I think something like this, if it works, it's going to really help serve our community because a lot of the back and forth about the extent
able
going able do
do And question. Question. That. And phase one would be I don't really want to call it phase one, but the first year would be West Maui, this project. And then next year we'll get that done for Haleakala to see that aquifer because they're separate, right?
Corp. Council wants to comment.
You, Chair. Just to ensure that this is allowable under to use the GET fund, it has to be connected to the county infrastructure. So I think that language would have to be added and that would have to happen.
I'm glad you brought that up because some members might have wanted to look at that. So we Okay. Well, I have it here that one of the uses of the general of the GE tax is studies. Studies for our infrastructure. This is a study. So that I think is a and we I've asked OCS on that and if you guys wanna speak with the other lawyers, can even read number four in let me see here. If you guys want to change the language to include it, I'm okay with it. But that's one of the discussions we had is this proper use of the funds, it does say studies.
God. I wish you could hear from director Stuffovine, but, who's next?
But if you open that door, chair. Yeah.
Can hear Budget from director.
Budget director. But that was gonna be my question is if, this was covered because I know you said studies, but it and I guess that's the tangible aspect is whatever this would produce, but it doesn't say studies in this little write up. Would you mind reading for me, that studies portion, member Johnson? I was trying to look for it, I couldn't find the conditions that we agreed
to. When you're ready.
Okay. It's number four. It says up to $11,500,000 must be to fund the acquisition to include repairs, maintenance, studies, appraisals, and other related costs of private water systems and wells to align with the Department of Water Supply's vision to integrate public and private water systems and develop a municipal water system transfer to the Department of Water Supply. That's number four in the in I'll have find that page.
It says study of private water systems and wells.
It says $11,000,000 must be used to fund the acquisition to include repairs, maintenance, studies. Etc.
think just one of the differences I wanted to point out is this is for the study for the acquisition of the infrastructure, which falls more in line under the definition of if it was just a study to find water as opposed to buying infrastructure is what the mayor's is for.
Oh, so it cannot be just study.
Remember it. Would say that if we have this data, it would tell the county better where to drill our wells. Right? I mean, so isn't that the fund infrastructure part of it? Like, we have the data of the aquifers where the fresh water is, where the brackish water is, where the super salty water is Mhmm.
That would that would, guide the department on where they shouldn't drill their wells and where they should Just through. Drill their wells. And if it's the other thing, that mister Tam was saying was, the well distribution as well. Like, if you have a lot of wells close together, that's probably not the most accurate or the best way to get water. So, like, not just where to drill the wells, but where to drill the wells in proximity to other wells.
And if we're talking about acquiring all of Maui land and pineapples systems, I believe that includes wells that they have already drilled. So we wanna know Right. If those wells that they have already drilled, like, I guess, you know, the sustainable yield and if the distribution is beneficial or good or not. So it it would help to inform, I guess, potentially our negotiations and our, where we put not only that, but where we put our own infrastructure in the future. Would that cover the what you had mentioned?
Thank you, Chair. I think you have to make sure that the wording's in there that it will be attached to the infrastructure of the county. Because that's a definition that's used in the code.
So to to fund the collection of airborne electromagnetic data to characterize the groundwater aquifers of West Maui to analyze and develop two d and three d mapping and modeling of the aquifers to stain estimate sustainable yield in order to plan for the long term future water source of the county.
What I suggested was the project must support the planning and design of water related systems that connect to county infrastructure for West Maui housing?
Totally am okay with We're okay with those words. Yeah, corporation counsel being corporation y, go for it.
And here's budget director. Being all counsel With her hand up too.
Thank you, Chair. I'm trying to be a little less interrupt y. Thank you. I mean, think I said, you know, how we felt about it. Know, we prefer the state to take the lead, but I understand that there are concerns about that. I think right now my concern is the use of GET funds. That's very specific that it needs to be for projects that tie into county infrastructure. This AEM will be for the entirety of West Maui, including the East Side of the mountain. And There's no way to guarantee that what is found will be able to tie into the county system. So I just I don't feel that this is the appropriate funding source for this type of work. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Hear you. Any more? Oh, all of you wanted to say something.
I would allow corporation counsel to amend what I just said so staff can get that. And staff, did you understand the language that they just mentioned?
Chair, apologies. If it's okay, could we have it repeated one more time and just where in context of
the condition it would be?
So it was I think I revised the condition. So the first part is is exactly the same. And then at the end, the second paragraph says the project must support planning and design of water and related systems that connect to county infrastructure for West Maui housing consistent with Maui County code three point one zero zero point zero four zero subsection eight definition of housing infrastructure.
Okay. I consider that a friendly amendment.
Anything else? Member Senensi, Member Wu Hodgins, I think I saw your hands up.
I'm not in supportive of this project. I disagree with budget director that I don't know if this is the place to go. When we were voting on this, it seemed more like the funds were used for tangible infrastructure directly related to affordable housing. I completely understand the benefits of the water and supporting how we find water to support affordable housing, but it doesn't seem as, tangible as it belongs in the interest, in the GET. I'm trying to find it. I've been having difficulties finding it. I could support it elsewhere. I just don't know if it belongs in this, place.
If Oh, go ahead. Oh, sorry.
No, no. Go ahead.
Sher. I'm supportive of the airborne electromagnetic data collection, especially if the department will be expanding and acquiring all of these different systems. Moving forward in West Maui, we definitely need additional tools. But if it's not in the GET, I'm not sure, but I'm supportive of the proposal chair.
Okay, chair, I can amend this to make it in the general funds. I was just trying to get creative with our G so many Gs, general excise tax, right? So if the body would prefer and make it I can get support, well, is what I'm hearing, then yeah, we'll do general excise. Again, have larger, I'm sorry, general funds. I'm getting with it.
I'll put it in general funds because I do have cuts, so I just was trying to make stay within the rules of what we have decided as a body, but I will I know. I I okay. I don't wanna bring up that point. I'm I'm trying to just tell you that if we wanted in general funds, I'm here for it. So I would consider that another friendly amendment.
Okay. Member Ujkad, anybody else wanna say something? Member Rollins Fernandez.
Mahalatar, can support you bending the rules that member Sugimura imposed upon us. Where did you get 1,800,000 from? Or if you said it earlier, missed it. If you can say it again. Okay.
Yes. During committee, I have a white paper. It's a lot of the flights, though. West Maui flights. There was a presentation.
Helicopter with this apparatus is not a and it's a big x-ray machine or, you know,
a Very big.
AEM machine. I'm sorry. I'm not too science y, but basically it's a helicopter with an apparatus that's and that's the cost of it. It goes
size of the football field.
Yeah. It's a big heavy machine that they're gonna fly around over West Maui. I have the white paper here if you'd like to look at it. But they said it wasn't my idea. I didn't come up with it out of
Okay.
That was my question. Where did it come from? And that was their recommendation. So first year on the council, USGS completed and published its, Central Mount Central Molokai groundwater study, and the study hadn't the last time they did a study was in 1947. So, like, in the forties, like you're saying, do we know if USGS or anyone else is doing something for Maui or for the district?
USGS has offered some unspecified portion of their existing cooperative agreement with to provide support. So some.
Okay. Because USGS conducted this. So they would provide potential funding or something. Okay. Yep.
Let's take a two minute recess. Four.
Four. Anyway, I had not to be here till midnight.
My god. Welcome back to Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. Sorry that was a long two minutes. It is now 04:28 and we are back. We are on Member Johnson's priority and you wanted to ask the question.
Yes, Chair. I think I've sort out a more simple way to fund the AEM. So if Director Miller is on the call, but I think what we plan to first
good
question.
That's that's
gritty. Director I Milner, was this your idea?
Thank you, Chair. You, Councilmember Johnson. Yes, we can't use general fund as this is going to be a water department project and they're enterprise funded. I did check with Director Stuffelbine, and they have an additional $1,800,000 that could be recognized in carryover savings to fund this. So it would be increased estimated revenues carryover savings by $1,800,000 and add a condition under Department of Water Supply Water Administration for AEM data to characterize the ground
And
I going
get
And able to that.
We'll
understanding is that we'll add be do 1,800,000 to estimated revenues from water supply carryover savings. And then we'll recognize the appropriation under the Department of Water Supply Administration Program Water Fund. So question is if the language would be either A, a condition under Administration Program Water Fund one general or B, be a separate line item number 11 for this maybe entitled like airborne electromagnetic data collection or something along those
acceptable in this situation, but let's do it as a stand alone item just to be clean. Thank you, Chair.
Okay, members. Heard the discussion. I hope everybody's ready to vote on it because it sounds like she's going to be putting the time crunch on us.
Yes, you got that. Can you read what we're going to finally do?
Yes, sure. So our understanding is that so Councilmember Johnson is accepting a friendly amendment to his motion on the floor. So now the motion would be to recognize the water supply carryover savings and appropriate it for under the water supply administration program. A new line item entitled airborne electromagnetic data collection for West Maya aquifers with a condition And
And
very aquifers to estimate sustainable yield in order to important plan for long term future water source and county water supply infrastructure development to further the creation of West Maui housing projects. I couldn't have said it better.
Wow. Good job. Okay. Members, I think we got it right. Director. So the department is fine with this and they would actually do this, right? I think that's the next question. You found the money source. Would the department actually do this? Implement it.
Thank you, Chair. I do just want to restate we do have concerns that the state should be taking the lead on this and we worry it's setting a precedent that will lead to the county fully funding this project over the next several years. That said, I have talked to Director Stuffelbien, and yes, he will move forward with this project for fiscal year twenty seven. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. Thank you. And I will commit to trying to work the state with director. Great. Shirley, you have your hand up. I'm scratching your nose. Okay. Members, is this No.
Directors of
friendly amendment after sustainable Board yield to add the words including oh, shoot. I just blanked it. Wait. Hold on. Let me write it down.
Sustainable yield, including traditional and cultural practices in order to plan for long term water sources? And the reason I'm asking for that, Member Johnson, is because the sustainable yield does not include TNC practices. And I don't know if it's been updated to even include climate change and the prolonged droughts we've been experiencing. So sustainable yield makes me nervous.
Yeah. I would support the friendly amendment.
Mahalo. I support this motion. Mahalo, sir.
Is that allowed? Can. Okay. Any other questions?
Shirley? Can somebody state the motion again? The full motion. Here we go James.
All right. James, you're up. So the motion on the floor, which was made by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember ir going make able to are future. To to must be used to fund the the the collection of airborne electromagnetic or AEM data to characterize the groundwater aquifers of West Maui to analyze and develop two d and three d mapping and modeling of the aquifers to estimate sustainable yield, including traditional and cultural practices, in order to plan for long term make we're sure we're
to Charlie, good, right? Okay. Is this a roll call vote? No. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Okay. So this is nine ayes. Thank you. Mahalo, members. Next, we have Member Cook going back to yours. Member Cook. This is regarding your $500,000 to condition amount of for an RFP for an enterprise GIS system.
Yes. Thank you, Chair. Thank you, body members, for indulging me. After hearing from the department, and the used for the expansion of the Maui County GIS system.
Director
Milner, is that broad enough from what you said earlier? 500,000.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, that should allow the department to do the necessary work to assist additional departments. Okay. Thank you, Chair. Thank you,
Member that was Member Cook, and it was seconded by Alice or Chair Lee before. I need a second.
Second.
Okay. Thank you. Member Woo Hodgins, second. And I guess we heard the discussion. Ready to vote? Members? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye.
Aye.
Roll call, please. Okay.
Roll call.
Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote, council member Tom Cook.
Aye. Council
member Gabe Johnson? Yes. Council chair Alice Lee? Aye. Council member Tamara
Pulton? No.
Council member Keanu Rollins Fernandez?
Pass. That means no. Yeah.
Council member Chainsidenency. Aye. Council member Nohe Uwajins. Aye. Committee vice chair Unoi Batangan.
Aye. Committee
chair Yuki Desugimura. Aye. Back to council member Ramos Fernandez.
Member Ramos Fernandez. Yeah. We went back to it. Is
this the one I voted no on? We're voting on this again.
Oh, he he withdrew it, he's brought it back. He made it more general based upon member Sorry. I thought
you were talking about the white company. Did I vote yes on it? No. You withdrew it. Don't know which one we're on right now.
We're on. Does anyone know which one we're on?
Chair.
Two GIS. Oh, the one that you didn't want to shove down anyone's throat. Got it. Okay. Yes.
And I wish I never said that. Right.
Okay. Chair.
Go ahead. Chair, that's eight ayes, one no, votes or passes.
Was that Shirley?
Go ahead. Okay. So no. I'm on something else.
Yes. Okay. We already did the vote.
All right. Okay. So I just wanna say, I'm supposed to come up after member Uhu Hajens. I'd like to take up my item tomorrow if it's not if it's okay.
Okay. Great. Next we have council member Cook revolving fund two to add a new condition to up to $500,000 for the design and permitting of a private wastewater treatment facility for Waikapu Country Town. Councilmember Cook.
Okay, Jared.
Okay. Go ahead. I'm up. Go ahead.
Okay. This is a condition. It's general excise tax fund chapter three point one hundred, Maui County code. The proposal add a new condition to read as follows: Up to 500,000 must be used for the design and permitting of a private wastewater treatment facility to serve at the portion of the Waikapu Country Town, $500,000. With the uncertainty of the Central Maui You guys supposed to listen. With the uncertainty of the Central Maui waste water reclamation facilities completion in 2030, this would allow the project to continue moving forward and some of the housing to not be delayed.
Okay. Motion made by Member Cook. Is there a second? I second. Okay. Member Uhajans. Any discussion?
I have a question.
Member Kuh. Okay, sure. You have discussion first.
Director Milner is on the call.
Director Milner. Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilmembers. Yeah, we previously discussed on the last item, if this will not connect to county infrastructure, this is not an allowable use of the GET fund. Thank you, chair.
Member
Cookie, withdraw. Withdraw. Nixon.
Sounds like it's not going to work. Let's move on.
Next member, Uh-huh. Revolving fund number two to add a new condition for up to $1,000,000 for the Ho'onani Development LLC to design and construct a sewer connection.
Page 52, add a new condition to read as follows. Up to $1,000,000 must be for Ho'onani Development LLC to design and construct a sewer connection to the county sewer system lying on Pokokala Street for the first phase of the Ho'onani Village development on TMK. Do I need to read the rest? That's
No. No.
And then I have more information if I get a second.
Second. Second. Member, Woo Hodges. Second by cheerlead. Thank you. Okay.
As a reminder, this, will the first phase will have 268 units, households whose gross annual, sorry, family income is not more than 140% of AMI as established by HUD. This is not the whole cost of the sewer construction requirement to do all of this, but it's part of it. So that's what we're gonna assist to subsidize. And, again, it is gonna be connected to
the county sewer system. Okay. Any questions? Any more discussion? Ready for a vote? Oh, here's director. Here's Ms. Popup.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council members. I spoke to Department of Environmental Management about this the other day, and you don't currently have capacity to support the Hohenani Development LLC. So once the Central Maui wastewater facility is further along, we think there may be an opportunity for them to connect to the system. But I don't think that's something that could be encumbered in the next eighteen months. So I just wanted to raise that concern. Thank you, Chair.
Withdrawal one.
Okay. Remember Batonga.
Thank you, Chair. Well, the appropriations for design and construction, would it be appropriate to revise it for just design so we can help move the project forward?
Oh, because it's for the central model one
I don't know. I get I'd like direction from the
Oh, sorry. Councilmember O'Hajins was, proposing funding design to the existing wastewater treatment facility in Kana'a, director Miller said that's overcapacity and suggested the one that's to be built, but that hasn't been built yet. 2029. Is that what so how are you going to design something to something that hasn't been built yet? So we can move on?
See. So there's no opportunity to amend this so that we can help the project continue?
Director Milner, there's no way we can connect then for Honani, is what you're saying?
Thank you, Chair. Not at this time, no. I can talk to the Department of Environmental Management about at what point it would be appropriate to consider this.
Thank you, Director.
That's fine. I will withdraw this and then when Charity needs to figure out her $30,000,000 there's another million in the GET fund to play with Okay.
So you're withdrawing this for now. And then Charity is withdrawing. I mean, she's holding hers and talking about it tomorrow. Yeah. Okay. Next is the last priority is under the managed retreat revolving fund page 55 of the budget bill. Councilmember Woo Jin's revolving fund number one is to add a new condition for up to $2,000,000 for a grant to Mantokuchi Mission in Pai'ia, Maui for shoreline restoration and rehabilitation. Mantokuchi. Wrong.
Yes, chair. Thank you. Page 54 sorry. I didn't know it was me yet. Feel like Member Cook. Let me get organized. Okay. Page 54. Manage retreat revolving fund. Yeah. Up to 2,500,000 must, be a grant for Montoco G Mission of Paiya for shoreline restoration and oh, no. I'm sorry. Hold on. I have the newest language. I'm sorry.
Scratch that. Let me start this all over again. Okay. Up to 2,500,000 must be a grant to Montokuji Mission of Pai'o Maui for shoreline restoration and rehabilitation consistent with subsections 3.9702 A1 through A3 Maui County Code of property owned by Montokoji Mission of Paiia Maui that fronts Montokoji Bay. Okay. Is there a second? Second.
Okay. Very good. Member, Woo Hajens and second by Shirley. Proceed. Thank you. So members, I
know we heard about this the other day. We did get some e comments as well for mister Ken Chung. And this is a long term plan that it's definitely still in the conceptual stage, but it does involve two elements. And I'm I'm just paraphrasing his email or his e comment. So dune restoration via beach nourishment to stabilize the eroding, escarpment and restore a sandy beach.
The erosion is currently causing red clay soil to discharge into the ocean, causing chronic severe turbidity and damaging that wildlife. Two is wave dissipation by building an offshore artificial reef structure, also referred to as living breakwater, and this will reduce the amount of wave energy reaching the shore and removing the sand. Currently, I know we heard this yesterday, they are in compliant when federal, state, and county regulations. The last time we talked about this, members, we talked about oh, do I have
time limit? I I said we should time our presentation.
Okay. Good. Only have one more, like, thirty seconds to, like, testify our style to wrap up. Back in the day, the county pumped the sand from Paya to make kahului increments. You're welcome, member Patongaan. And we help expedite the damage there. And I do think we should attempt, to restore what we took. And I know that this is a pilot project, but Paiute catches cracks during the winter. You know, cracks. We are known for wind and surf cracks.
And it is eroding extremely quickly, and it did not help that the county was mining sand there.
Thank you. Okay. Second by chair lead. Any other discussion? Member Palton.
I I do have concern that this wasn't in alignment with what the fund was created for. Fund is created to, move structures back from the shore line or, you know, like, in emergency cases, like their crematorium thing to take it out of the shore line. I think parks also took whole Baldwin Pavilion and bathrooms and shower and old lifeguard storage out of there. I don't know that this aligns with what it is. Like, it's the managed retreat fund wasn't meant to be like a shoreline restoration fund.
Believe this is in alignment with the purpose of that fund. Can we ask corp council?
Corp council.
Thank you. I was able to look at this and I wasn't sure exactly what work was gonna be done, but that's why we added in the language that it has to comply with this specific, uses of the fund in the It
won't be released if it doesn't match. Because the other thing, I mean, Kahana sunset, which building f is, what is that called? When you can't use it, condemned. One of the owners wanted to do an offshore re fake reef project also, and that requires, like, so many permits from the state. It's not within an hour.
And so, like, I mean, I am not opposed to them doing what they want to do, but how long do we hold this money if there's another emergency? Because, I mean, permits for on land in the county are one thing. Permits for in the ocean from the state are a whole completely other thing. So, I'm okay with it. But if we revisit it next year and main thing, it's in alignment with the purposes of the fund, which I kind of don't believe it is because I created the fund.
Okay. Go ahead. Corporal council. And then member Ronaldisman.
There's also a need for a two thirds resolution vote on this as well under the code.
Super majority. Go ahead. Member Rollins Fernandez.
Yeah. So the the purpose of the managed retreat fund revolving fund is established to for the purpose of optimizing opportunities for shifting development inland from the coast through the physical movement of existing structures by funding shoreline safety improvements, including mitigation or removal of hazardous conditions due to shoreline erosion. Two, removal or relocation of structures or infrastructure that pose a threat to public health or safety or the environment. Three, programs and permitting inclusive of environmental assessments relating to the purpose of this chapter. Four, leveraging funds provided by federal state nonprofit for profit organization and other non county entities to further the purpose identified in this chapter five equivalent personnel and admin costs.
And then I think the resolution that you're referring to is C, the revenues in this fund must not be used for the purchase acquisition or rehabilitation of privately owned property unless approved by affirmative vote of two third of the members of the council by resolution.
Okay. Shirley.
Why don't you just take it from the GET?
Because it's water wastewater. Because it's not a county I mean, so primarily well, the GET, as we discussed, is for, like, tangible infrastructure for affordable housing primarily conditions. So I I would have if I could have. So for member Osprenajis, I don't I don't necessarily disagree. So what we're going with is number one and number three, the shoreline safety improvements, including the mitigation and, due to the mitigation or removal of hazardous conditions to shoreline erosion.
So because there's no beach, because the county decided the sand was too wonderful and they needed to have some of it, it created the condition and expedited the shoreline erosion. And I know that the Montokuji is the purse the entity that we're working with, but as we all know, it's it's a public beach. And it's the bones were, the bones that are in, like, the first wave of the what's touching the shoreline is now gone, but there's about 400 graves there. And so, the first few layers of what was has been dealt with and exhumed, but the rest of the graves are still there. And I know that we heard yesterday that, you know, what their primary concern is.
My primary concern is the the bones, like the 400 something bones there. And what it is now may not is is gone. And then eventually, the next row of bones will be exposed, then the next row and the next row and the next row, unless we're gonna make mass graves. I don't know.
Okay. Anymore, mavermapulting? So, I guess, you know, the cost of the bones and moving it inland or to a more appropriate place, I think, would be covered by managed retreat. The cost of taking the existing structure and moving it inland would be covered by managed retreat, but shoreline fortification, shoreline hardening is not it's fundamentally the opposite of managed retreat. And, you know so to me, I I guess I wouldn't support it because it doesn't meet the fund that I created, what it created it for.
I don't know if the SMA fund might be a better fit. I remember once did their own project of sand restoration, and the very next week, there was a swell, and it's, like, a million dollars out to sea with all that sand being removed. Wow. So it it's it's only a temporary measure for a permanent problem. So I I guess I ultimately, I won't be supporting this.
Okay. Anybody else? Member Johnson and then member Rollins Fernandez.
Thank you, chair. You know, we just kinda had a discussion previously about what is the proper use of a of a specific fund. Maybe you could table this now and maybe come back with it and find a different pot of money to use it on because it does sound like a little bit not the proper use of that particular fund. But if you're I'm I'm I'm willing to, you know Sure. Hear you out if you got a different proposed idea on this. Thank you, chairman.
Sure. We did work with corp corp council and OCS. So did you, and I hear you. I can try to find someplace else. If this doesn't happen now, then we'll probably need to figure out where they can move the building, if they can move the building, if that's even possible.
I don't think they have space on their existing property, because, again, it's not the biggest property, and there's 400 bones. So I don't know how this would work, but I can put a pin in it for now, and I can attempt because to be honest, I will just lay this out on the table. We would need five now, right, in budget, and then I'd need six later. So there's no point of, like, putting the funds in if when I need a resolution, we don't have six.
Change language to comply to the fund. Maybe they don't get
the text. I don't know if that's possible. That's why. No, and I hear you. I just don't think they have space to move the building unless they have another parcel to move to in Playa. There's it's quite a beautiful church that would need to be removed, and I don't think they have this space. Okay. Okay. But I can try to find someplace Okay.
So, Shirley, you have something?
Yeah. I agree. And I appreciate you, you know, agreeing to look for another and not a controversial source of funding. Yeah. Because I think everybody agrees that we wanna help. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
I wanna I'm gonna take a brief recess, a minute, and JC Law. Back to Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It is now 05:10. Sorry for that two minute break. Kidding. Nohay, do you have something?
Yes, chair. Thank you. Budget guru, Michelle Yoshimura, helped me figure this out. Okay. So I will explain why I'm doing it, but I'll make my motion first.
So I move to reduce, number 15 on page nine, transfer to the managed retreat revolving fund by $1,200,000 and move it into page 58 e e special management error revolving fund about whether 1,200,000, putting making it a total of $2,500,000 and some change. To do what I said earlier, for 2.5 up to $2,500,000 must be for a grant to Mantoukouji Mission of Pai'o Maui for the shoreline restoration and rehabilitation consistent with, and I'm happy to wordsmith this, of 3.9 Maui County Code. If I get a second, then I can explain why I can move those funds. Second. Thank you.
Where is it? Okay. Ordinance five six six seven, bill number 78. We actually suspended the managed retreat revolving fund up until next year, and we did put the $3,000,000 in there, there, but we don't have to put it in there. I know it's by code that we did that, but we suspended that fund up until next year. I my proposal is to move 1.2 and leave 1.8. And then I'm pretty sure we had kind of the discussion earlier, so, that was my motion and then my discussion after Shirley seconded. Shirley, you wanna say anything?
No. I yield to her. You know, she could have my time.
Okay.
Are you Hawaiian? Yeah.
Member Bolton.
I have no problem with the move. I just would like before, first reading or before we even get to first reading, coordination with planning if they will approve this because it they oversee that fund. And so I can support today. I just white paper and then, what is that called? That planning supports it.
Sure. I can do that. I can I can excuse me? I'm not gonna lie. I can have my staff reach out to planning.
Would be in
here for a couple of months. Susan. Uh-huh. And, get some information for sure.
If it's okay for us to take out the references to subsections 3.97 or subsection 3.97. So maybe it would just read up to 1,200,000 must be for a grant to Montokuji Mission of Maui for shoreline restoration and rehabilitation of property owned by Montokuji Mission of Pai'i Maui that France Montokuji be?
Yeah. It will be chapter 3.49 of Maui County code because the 3.97 was for, the other stuff for managed retreat funds. And I am super happy for you guys to wordsmith whatever you need to wordsmith, however you feel appropriate. Thank
you so much. Okay. Thank you.
Is this a member of Rollins Fernandez? Mahalo, sir. Mahalo member, Uh-huh. I support this effort, not in a mandatory treaty fund. I would support it in general fund, honestly. I think, you know, I think a long term plan would have to be made, because that's a lot of money for one year. And there's like member Poulton said, there's no telling how long I mean, one storm and it gone. All that sand. And, so a long term plan, you know, should be developed. During the last, Konawa when Molokai got hit really hard and, over two hundred graves sunk.
That was one of the reason Kapaaakea Graveyard is one of the reasons that I put, funding in for a climate action plan. A lot of things are not, on anyone's radar until it has to be until it's, like, in your face. And then and then this is like, well, where are you gonna get the money? There was no plans. There's no land, which is why, like, I like to plan, like, in advance.
Get it on everyone's radar now because the sea la sea will likely, you know, take away that graveyard too, and other graveyards that's along the shoreline. And so, you know, like for all of those, there needs to be a plan, long term plan. And for, you know, that don't have marked graves, lineal descendants, some allow the process of Kanaloa to take EV kupuna. And then some, you know, like like, will, you know, move MoCA and then reinterse, you know, somewhere, you know. Okay.
Purpose of the managed retreat fund was what I read and what supported and not this effort. So I would support it
in general fund. Thank you. Mahajar. Okay. So So I'll
be voting no because it's in a managed retreat fund. So roll call. We're gonna do roll call.
Oh, you moved it to to general fund?
Oh, oh, I hear what you're saying. I support all the money going to mandatory treat fund as possible.
Yeah. Okay. Roll call.
Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote, council member Tom Cook.
Aye.
Councilor Raeb Johnson.
Yes.
Councilor Chair Alice Lee. Aye. Council member Channing Arlitsch. Arlitsch. Aye. Aye. Channing Arlitsch. Member Nohei O'Hodgins. Aye. Committee Vice Chair Kunohi Batangen. Aye. Committee Chair Yukilei Sugimura. Aye. Chair, that's eight ayes, one no. Motion passes.
Okay. Thank you. You. Now, department cuts or fiscal neutral requests reduced category A salaries by 48,417 for the Board of Ethics program. Justification, it's an 11,091 reduction to the position P-thirty 4 300 60 eight, Executive Director position, and a 37,326 reduction for the P-thirty 4,003 and 73 investigator V position as its half time. So I need a motion.
Care. I don't know what you're talking about. This is Reduction part.
Mental request. I was wondering if we wanted to do it after our cuts because these may be absorbed Okay. We can do in our cuts. So if if you
go to, like, me. Okay. Go to you. So we are now on
Did did somebody make a motion and need to withdraw? Withdraw. Withdraw.
Withdraw. Chair may request, like, better narration so that we can all follow along. And then when we do, like, revisits, like, how we went to, like, page 18 on the priorities and then back back to, like, page thirty four and thirty five. I think some of my colleagues thought they were voting on what I thought they were voting what what member could move for the 500,000, which was the 500,000 for GIS. So, just just a little better flow.
Then anything that is not, like, you know, going with us, like asking member Batanggan to, you know, do something from a department housing from yesterday when we're prepared to go to human concerns. So all of those, like, just, like, save them for the end of department, so that we can have a good flow again. K.
So next, we're doing So
right now, we're doing our cuts of cuts
it.
way
In b 11 department of management, small a management program paren one, I moved to decrease category A appropriation by 52,966
Second.
Okay. Member Paulson, second by Member Senecze. Go ahead. These are fiscal year twenty six and twenty seven expansion positions not yet created is my recommendation. But of course, they can apply it as they would like. Okay. Any other discussion?
All in favor?
What numbers?
What numbers? So we're reducing category A, 52,966.
And we'll get to the fringe at Cosmo IT. Category A. Category A management program. Okay. Okay.
Any others? Discussion. You have a question, James? Okay. All in favor, raise your hand, say
aye. Aye.
Okay. Nine ayes. Next.
I move to decrease category a of small b information technology services program per n one by a $100,000. Second.
Second. Member Rollins Fernandez. Go ahead.
Moved by member Pauline, second by Rollins Fernandez. My discussion is, this is based on historical, carryover savings, that they have. Oh, shoot. On my paper, said 300,000, but on the worksheet that was distributed, it says a 100,000. So my my cut, sorry, if I can, amend my myself, supposed to be 300,000. Okay.
300,000 and that was member Bronze Fernandez as a second.
Yeah. Go ahead. And this is based on historically IT having a million plus in carryover savings. You know, I really wanna support them, but every year they say, you know, deletion of this position is gonna cause these big problems. But if you're not gonna fill the position, I mean, I I'd rather have the position filled than cut the money. But if the position's not gonna get filled, this is the what we're left with.
Okay. Any discussion? Member, Batanken.
Thank you, Chair. Member Walton, can I ask where you're seeing the, million dollars plus in carryover savings for ITS? Because I'm only seeing management in the aggregate, and I have not seen where you're how you're getting that information for, IT line item. Did you have to calculate it yourself?
I didn't calculate it, to the dollar, but I estimated the cost of the vacancies in the IT, division as, cross reference from budget details as well as, their vacancy report. Okay. So it was an estimate. It wasn't I mean, I I could do the math, I think it was late by the time I got here to the m.
Oh, okay. Thank you.
Okay. You're fine. Ready to vote? All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Next.
I believe my next cuts for management are in the B category. Did you want me to yield if in case anyone else has A cuts?
Member, Hodgins, do you have more A cuts?
I do chair. Okay. And this is going to be on page 13 for the office of recovery program. Salary a, reduced by $1.20, 120,000. If I get a second, I can explain why.
Second. Okay. Second by Charlie. Thank you. So
between seven people, there is a $198,000 proposed raise. So I reduced it by 120, leaving them $78,000 to share amongst seven, which would be about $11,000 a person for a raise. But I did reduce. That's where I took that money.
Okay. Very good. Charlie, do the second. Any discussion? Member Batongen.
Yes. Chair. So, Member O'Hodgins, can I just confirm that because not everybody in, office of recovery is a political appointee? Some of them have civil service status. Are we did you ensure that there's enough to cover the step increases? I
did leave a bunch. So this was just for seven people. Only the seven people in the raise, and there's 11. But I I can I'm pretty sure somebody else did, but I can double check. Unless you want me to just remove it by a 100,000, but that is a significant raise per person person and considering, people who run into burning buildings only got a 3% raise, seems like about what the step raise would look like, if I'm being extremely generous.
I see the budget director popping Can I ask,
please, director Miller?
Would like to weigh in on?
Thank you, chair. Yes, I just checked. None of these are appointed positions.
So this is this was in their contract to get these raises? Who determined these raises?
Yeah. I believe it's set by the executive order.
What executive order? What do you mean executive order?
Executive order 2020 five-two. That one?
The one that we don't need to approve funding for staff members?
Oh, wait. Okay. Yes, Charlie.
If that's the case, that's fine. I will remove this motion.
Actually, before you do, I Yeah. Can we continue discussion?
Surely. Okay. Yes. I did have a question for the budget director. So are these positions, salaries subject to collective bargaining?
No. Thank you,
Chair Lee. Yes, the EM scales are influenced by the collective bargaining agreements.
Okay. Influenced. Influenced. So okay. But these excluded management folks, are they do they supervise, you know, like an office or a group of people? A
program?
Thank you, Chair. I don't have the exact positions in front of me, but some of them are supervisory, but not all of them. Thank you.
Thanks. Wait, I have question. One of them is in EA two, and the salary proposed increase just this year is $55,000. That's within that's that's normal. That's a
step raise. Thank
you, Chair. As with the other departments, there were no increases included in the fiscal year twenty six budget, so that's an increase over two years. It may also have to do with the W IRP.
Member Batangen.
Thank you, Chair. For the budget director. So my understanding from the EO was that the the mayor had full discretion to set adjustments for the office of the mayor, that for every other department, the director of personnel services needed to certify that this the adjustments were made in accordance with the scale. Can I confirm that happened?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Council Member Betongian. Yeah, these followed the standard process increases for EM positions.
Okay. And so Director of Personnel Services signed off on all of the proposed adjustments outside of the office of the mayor.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, I don't know that she does it position by position. But yes, she approved the EM scale and the increases. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you, Director.
After this is withdrawn, I I found another cut for category a, but when you guys pop.
Can I ask just one more question?
Okay. Member Ohajans.
Okay. Thank you. Because I don't wanna have this conversation again. Is that gonna be the same thing for the mayor's office and the administration for their EAs? Oh, where did the budget director go?
There she is.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, councilmember Houjens. The mayor has the discretion to set the salary for the employees in the office of the mayor per the executive order.
Thank you. Okay. Member Ramos Fernandez.
Mahalo, chair. For, budget director sorry. I was trying to Google it. I can't find it. What does WIRP stand for?
Oh, okay.
Okay. I'm sorry, chair. It's escaping
me at the moment. Can I text you, councilmember Rollins Fernandez? Within range of progression or something like that?
Yeah. Thank you. Okay. Mahalo.
So, where are we on this? Remember, Oh, hot jens?
Looks like we don't have any oh, wait. Hold on. It's green. I don't think I can make those changes.
Okay, we're having technology. Yeah, absolutely. Technological problems. Is it working? I think so.
We should, yeah, get from across the street.
Oh, look at that. We're all green. It's
So so, chair, it's a local issue. I I seem we're still on Teams for the time being. It looks like on my on my computer Teams, we're still fine. But that so that seems to be a computer issue.
So that means we should
Well and for us to fix it, well, I think we'll need a recess.
But the alright. Oh, you have to You we have to take a recess?
If if you wanna fix this, yes. I think we'll need a brief recess.
Okay. So 05:36.
We don't need to fix it. I don't care if we see ourselves.
Okay. Look, it's resolving. So only we cannot see each other. Okay. We're fine then. But we
got Did that last one get withdrawn or did everyone ask their questions? You're withdrawing.
Okay. Next. So we're gonna we're gonna withdraw that one.
I move in 11 small d paren one category a to reduce the board of ethics salaries by $48,417. Executive director and investigator five is reduction as the position is half time. It's not reducing the EP as a full time position. Maybe necessary in the future but what they hired in this case was a half timer.
Okay. So your total deduction is how much?
48,417. That's exactly what
I was going to do. Good. Any second? Second. Chair Lee. Oh no, that was Member Sorensen. Further discussion? All in favor raise your hand say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Next.
Okay. I move in page 13 of the operating budget section three b 11 c paren one to increase office of recovery program category a by nineteen thousand one hundred twenty three dollars.
19,000.
How much? Chair. Here's Sorry. Milner. Apologies for interrupting. I've spoken to the department, and and they can absorb this cost. We'll just update it in the budget details.
I withdraw. So we wanna
make you aware. Thank you, chair.
Okay. You withdraw that.
I withdraw. Okay. Can we go on
to category b? Anybody else have oh, member Johnson, you have something?
Mine's b.
I have a. I'm sorry. A is done and category b, right?
Well, Councilmember Poulton's on a roll so I leave this over to you.
Okay.
Okay. For page 13 of the budget section 11 c paren three, I move to decrease category b by $180,000. Okay.
Member Poulton, second by member Senese. Thank you.
Is money towards Huiwa'a O'Kalua which they decided ultimately to leave in OEV resources and take out from the mayor. Decrease of $180,000.
It's been seconded by member Senensi, but any more discussion?
Yes, chair.
Member Botongan.
Sorry. I thought from our conversations with OAB resources and the department of Management that these were two separate appropriations. Am I am I wrong?
You may or may not be, but this is a department or request to decrease. So All right.
Sounds great.
Okay. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. Nine ayes, nine ayes. Motion carries.
Fourteen-three.
Okay, next. So members this one is on page thirteen-eleven, small a, decreased category b, and I had initially put 400,000 and then there was, like, less for member Johnson and then there was less when it was $2.60. But I did oh, I'm going into discussion. I moved to decrease the amount $50,000 and then Okay.
Motion made by member Paul to second by member Rollins Fernandez.
So we we learned that the screen prep machines cost for folks coming from Oahu, I believe, is 50,000, and the security guard cost is 210,000. And then from reading the e comment, testimony from our, custodial staff, they don't feel safe in some of the nooks and crannies where they have to go in and clean, defecation and stuff like that. And so they're asking for, additional security. So instead of having the security man, the screening machines, I think the request is for the security to, you know, stop people from defecating around the buildings instead. As it was mentioned that Mr.
Martins, our ambassador is kind of serving double duty for the entirety of the campus. So this was kind of at the request of Charlie.
Thank you. Any other
So the decrease went from 400,000, which was my estimation, 300 something, which was member Johnson's estimation, 260,000, which was the machine and the security guards to just decreasing the machine, which is 50,000. I think it's the prep and the bringing the people from Oahu. The security guards were 210,000. So repurposing the security guards to not watch the machine but to watch the campus.
Okay. So the the alright. The it's to deduct 50,000
Yeah. Decrease. Okay. Because, you know, we love our custodians. They do such a great job, and we we wanna keep them safe. K. Any other comments? Any other discussion members?
Okay. Let's vote. All in favor? Raise your hand. Say aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Yay. Chair Lee was Go ahead.
Do you want me to go again? Sure. I move on page 13 of the operating budget, section 3B11C1 to decrease office of recovery program by 200,000 operations and equipment and instead add a line item for MEO Inc. For final support implementation of projects developed through the economic recovery commission program.
Second.
Second by made by Member Bolton, second by Member Johnson for my discussion. This is per additional guidance from corp council.
Chair, I will be abstaining from discussion and voting on this one.
Okay. What is the dollar ball?
It's a move. It's wording change kind of and moving money because it's not operations and equipment. It's a line item for MEO Inc for final support implementation of projects developed through the ERC program.
Oh, okay. I see. This is a $200,000 Yes. It's going to be used by Departmental request. Okay. So on this one, if you could add in the motion and the verbiage so that they also do coordination implementation and coordination. Is that okay? I know that you've reviewed this to make sure it's not a grant or contract. This is the economic recovery one.
I think that would be okay. Just know there's a lot of partners involved and so there'll be some coordination for some of
the projects but not all of them because there's 11 projects involved. There's 11 of them. Thank you. Economic Recovery Commission.
Is this the MEDV or MEDV?
This is actually that is being School
Rashmissing. Yeah. They're called SR Partners now. SR Partners. Yeah. Two hundred thousand.
Maui Economic Recovery opportunity. Is that wrong? And you said Maui?
Yes. MEO is the nonprofit.
Okay. But it says Maui Economic Recovery Opportunity?
So Is that this is part of the ERC, right? Economic Recovery Yeah,
understand that part. That's not my question. It's on page five sixteen. And it says Maui Economic Recovery Opportunity Inc. So I'm just making sure that that's a typo and that that's not like a different organization. And then it does say to support the expectations of deliverables related to the economic recovery commission program. Don't see Budget director?
I don't see the 500, page 500.
It's page five sixteen in the program. Budget director, is that a typo, Maui Economic Recovery Opportunity Inc? Is it just supposed to be MEO?
Thank you, chair. Yes. I think, we got our wires crossed with a different organization. Yes, MEO.
Mahalo, budget director. I'm supportive. Very good. Any more discussion?
Please repeat the motion. Not Member Bolton. Staff.
Chair, the motion on the floor made by Council Member Bolton, seconded by Council Member Johnson is to amend the Department of Management Office of Recovery Program by reducing Category B by $200,000 and by creating a new line item, to be entitled MEO Inc. For final support implementation of projects developed through the Economic Recovery Commission program in the amount of $200,000
Mahalo, Mr. Krueger. I'm ready to vote.
When you read off what you just read, can you add the word coordination? I think what they do is coordination and assist with the I think there's 11 ERC groups. Implementation and coordination.
It doesn't say implementation. It says support the expectations of deliverables related to the ERC program.
Yeah, there's corp council.
Okay. So the then if it's then the new line item would be Maui Economic Opportunity, Inc. For final the
point. I
because I'm such a friendly person. Thank you. Very that's good. Okay. All in favor,
raise your
hand and
say aye. Okay. Nine ayes. Oh, not nine aye. It's eight ayes and one recused. Right? Okay. Next.
Chair, at this time, I'd like to yield to my table partner member Johnson who has given me some of his desk space that I took with no asking.
Sharing, Okay.
Alright, members. I'm on page 13 of the budget bill, of course. Department of Management, Office of Recovery Program category b. I moved to reduce the condition by 3,000,000, but originally doing hoop 2.4, but we'll go to three seeing that everybody has all these big ass conditioned by 3,000,000 to read parenthesis two up to uh-oh. Now I gotta do the math again. Minus let's see. So add 600. Okay. We'll get to that. We'll let James do that. Must be for Lahaina Restoration Foundation to rebuild the old Lahaina Courthouse, the old Lahaina Prison, page 13 in budget bill 55. If I can get a second, I'll explain a little bit more.
Second live member Senensi. Go ahead.
All right. So at the April 8 BFED meeting, the Office of Recovery indicated that restoration work may face delays. We know that other restoration projects are facing delays and warrants further discussion. Absent a response to MD2 about phasing and guidance from the department, this proposes to reduce the appropriation to leave the organization flexibility with the remaining funds. Administration may return with budget amendment during the fiscal year if they need more.
And members of Guelph's group here, you know, I love a good steak and I love a good restoration project, but sometimes you gotta trim that fat and you gotta cook it. So I think this this big project needs it has a little fat on it, needs to be trimmed, and needs to be cooked. So that's my Remind me of the Okay.
2.4. 2.4.
I would I was originally gonna cut 2.4, but I we'll go to cut to three. So 3,000,000 from the From the nine.
9.7, and that's really the total.
So it it would be 6.79. Yeah. Got You it. 6,790,000. Thank you.
You got that number? Okay. Okay. Motion made by Member Johnson, second by Member Sanenzi. Here's budget director.
Thank you, Chair. Apologies. Could I just get clarification? We're reducing the condition by $3,000,000 but are you also reducing the overall B account by 3,000,000
Is that your suggestion?
I'm just trying to figure out the body's intent. If they want to Yes. Cut 3,000,000 in general fund, then we need to reduce the b account as well.
Yes, please.
Okay. Mahalo. Okay. Any other discussion? All in favor, raise your hand, say aye. Okay. Nine ayes.
Else? That was
it? Okay. So that's it. Okay. You're done.
Member of Palton, I confirm that all of the departmental requests have been addressed? I don't have it in front of me.
Yeah. Because they withdrew one.
Okay. Thank you.
Members, now I'm going to go into the operating budget under management, information technology services, office of recovery program, blah blah blah. So we're done with all of these priorities and these deducts. We're going to finish with management and then we'll talk about what next.
Is GET under management?
It is.
We have more. In that case I lied, so I remember but I'm
It's Appendix A Part two.
They have some GET question. I a
question. Amendments to A or B? That's No? Information Technology Services, ITS program, page 13 of the budget bill. Anybody have any amendments to category A or B?
I'm sorry, chair. This was in their request. Think it was in the answers. On page 13, 11c per one per n I v, I moved to amend the language to say up to 700 must be for Hawaiian Council for Workforce Development and Resiliency Hub operations. Okay.
Say it again.
I move to amend 11 do to to that. Operations.
I'm
changed their name.
That's why.
Yeah. They just I didn't change their name. No. They changed name.
Okay. So that's a correction. Any question? So motion made by Jamari Palton and second by Member Senesse. Any discussion?
I guess for discussion would be they changed their own name. So I'm changing the name to reflect what they changed their name to. Yes.
All in favor raise your hand and say aye.
The other one in the budget Kawanoi asked about I think. That's his kuleana.
Next.
Chair, may I ask a question of the administration? Probably transmitted this, but I missed it. What were the what was the grant for the J. Walter and Cameron Center in West Maui and the Ikane O'Maui Inc. For?
G. Walter Cameron.
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor Obatanga. Yes, that was transmitted this afternoon. I'm just pulling it up. Apologies. I can tell you Cameron Center. That's for Cameron Center West. It's to help them start building their capital stack to build a new facility on the West Side. So, here we go. Na'aikane O Maui, helps with burial councils, researching land titles for families, cultural monitoring, and running workshops.
They're helping the county to guide Lahaina's future generations with traditional knowledge and practices. The grant is specifically for cultural education, cultural monitoring activities, and support as the county continues And the in
And Oh, does the department feel the need to have those clarified in the ordinance?
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Batonga. We can work with OCS staff to add a little more information if the body would
It would be my preference. Members, would you be amenable to adding the scope that Director Milner just added to the budget ordinance?
Sure. Yes.
Thank you, members.
So Director, can you work with OCS staff to add that?
Thank you, chair. Yes, the descriptions were transmitted in MD3, but I'm happy to work with them if we feel like those descriptions are too extensive to include, although basing it on the agriculture micro grants program, nothing is too extensive to include Thank in the budget
you, Chair. OCS staff, you want to work with director on that? Okay.
Yeah. Guess if OCS staff feel the need to reach out, then I would encourage them to do so. But otherwise, we're leaning on you. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. Anything else?
Amber Palton, you made a comment about something I was supposed to do. Can you can you remind me what that was?
Shucks, you know, when I read things, I don't remember where they were that I read. I might just remember what I read, and I thought you had asked also if the name should be changed in another department because I I read it, and I was like, I thought I asked that question. And then when I got this answer, then I was like, oh, I asked it here, so he must ask it somewhere else. And maybe miss Milner knows because she knows where I read stuff at.
Direct. Thank you, chair. I believe it was o m two. It's under office of the mayor, grants and disbursements for business development, sub object, I I. Thank you, chair.
We're doing mirror next. Okay.
What about lunch or dinner?
Oh, yeah. Wait. Let's just finish all this and then we can talk about it. Anything else?
Were we going to the GET budget. Or oh, you were just seeing if anyone had any other things?
Any more. And then we can finish this department. I think we're ending up staying for dinner or taking a dinner break. I did ask my staff to look into it. Here comes Michelle. So you want to finish this or you want to talk about dinner? Take a
break. Okay.
Operating budget under management program.
Be working.
Okay. Yeah. Pizza.
Michelle,
can you order pizza? Take a recess. Three minute recess to figure out dinner. Welcome back to Budget Finance Economic Development Committee. It's now 05:59.
We took a little break to figure out what about dinner. Before we proceed on with Department of Management, I just wanted to talk to the members on what we have before us. We need to figure out finish off department of management, which is a few more. And then office of the mayor, which is a big department, department of public works, water, and then county wide. We are going to have time to take up your motion, yeah, whatever you deferred and take it up.
And then of course we have to balance, right? So today is Wednesday. Tomorrow is Thursday. I hope we can finish with the departments. And then Friday we can go into the balancing or see where we are with everything else. There are other bills that we need to take up besides 55 and the main ones. So we have the member Johnson's bills also to take up after we finish the departments. So today what I want to know is what is your interest to I have an interest. Okay. Wait.
So we're gonna finish off management and then do you want to take up mayor or do you want to take mayor tomorrow? But tonight, finish off. We still have parks and police also for today. Member bronze Fernandez.
Not mayor tonight. Yeah. Tomorrow. Parks. Police.
Pow. Are you guys that'll be good.
Tonight. Tonight. Because we're getting the pizza, we need to earn
the pizza. Can we do the police tomorrow? Because I got so many questions on
the Public works. Okay. Public works. Maybe water. So Oh, water. Yeah. Water. Parks, water. I think those are easy enough because yeah. I think That park's water works. Is going a little downhill. Okay. So
water then. And then we definitely will go back to yours, the priority. All right. So we're going to continue on with this. And then thanks, Michelle and staff for buying the pizzas. So we took our little break. Any more amendments to A and B?
The And
technology services, there's office of recovery, budget bill on page 13 of which we already covered some. Board of ethics program on page number 13 in the budget bill, capital improvements. Members, are there any amendments to CIP for this? None. Grants.
There's no proposed grants for the department as well as a part two special purpose revenues. As a reminder, the following funds are under the department. General excise tax fund on page 52, general excise tax fund, Department of Hawaiian Homelands on page 52. Managed Retreat Revolving Fund, page 55. Are there any proposed amendments? Seeing none. Rates and fees B, rates and fees Ramseyer version is on page 25. There's no proposed rate changes from the administration. Do you have any amendments for this? Seeing none. I think we are done with management. Revolving fund.
Yeah. That was where we left off when we recessed for two minutes.
Okay. Have amendments. I'm on page 52 of the appendix. Go ahead. Yeah. Appendix a part two. My bad. Sorry. I'd like to add three conditional languages under m, general excise tax fund dash department of Hawaiian homelands. Chapter 3.1, Maui County Code.
My first motion is to add a one to say up to 10,000,000 must be for an intergovernmental agreement with the state of Hawaii for permanent water system improvements for the Kala'iola temporary housing project and future DHHL housing projects. The release of funds is conditioned upon execution of the memorandum of agreement, DIRF and DHHL. Do you want me to sit dwelling unit revolving fund and department of Hawaiian homelands funding for Wahikuli improvements, villages of Le'ali'i tri party agreement which provides for the transfer of the remaining undeveloped Le'ali'i lands being a portion of TMK Paren 24 Dash 5 Dash 021 Colon 021 approximately 03/1932 acres from the Hawaii Housing Finance Development Corporation to DHHL subject to a reservation of the right to retain portions needed for HHFDC's permanent affordable housing project, approximately 31 acres.
Second. Motion made by Member Poulton, second by Member Rollins Fernandez. Discussion? This is the
fund that member Kama created to put 20% of our GET revenue towards DHHL infrastructure. And, I believe this will facilitate the development of Lele A1b residential homes. Oh shoot. Should I recuse myself? Why? My husband has a paper lease.
I think you need to. Oh, maybe court counsel can answer.
He has a piece of paper.
Thank you, chair. If you have a financial interest in what we're voting on, then yes, you should recuse yourself.
Mayor Rollins Fernandez can take the motion. I'll make
the second. She said what I said, and she said what she said, and I'm out.
Okay. Okay. Member Rollins Fernandez and, member Ou Hodgins. Okay. I think you explained it.
Lorna, can you repeat the motion, please? Do
you have it, James? So, Chair,
Charlie, this was a motion that I made last year. This is included in the FY twenty six budget, the 10,000,000. This is the same, because it'll it'll lapse, after June 30. So remember when we were gonna release this funding for the pipeline, for the temporary housing because HHFDC promised DHHL and the homesteaders that it would convey that land to DHHL. I remember.
Right. So remember Uwa Haagen remembers this from last year. And they said they had an agreement, and then they never followed through to get a legally binding agreement. So this will enable the fund this will enable them to have a little more time.
Talk about when you said they?
Yes. Yes. They only have an MOU, which is not legally binding. And they they made this commitment, and we need it to be legally binding so that we make good on that promise to our homesteaders in West Maui. And we need to force CHHL to do that, and they want this money.
So they need to go and get a legally binding contract to ensure that this promise isn't kept to the homesteaders on that side. So I'll you want me to read it again? Because last year when I made that condition, it wasn't as detailed. And so, this has the specificity to ensure that what we intend is seen through because it's very clear. Wait. Just one second. Go ahead.
Because I had this concern about my proposal as well. When we added the provision on the GET surcharge to provide 20% to the Hawaiian homelands, I didn't think that we had the right to direct where that money went. That they they would get the 20% and they would decide where to apply that. So, are you saying that we have that right to direct where where they have to spend the money?
They want this 10,000,000. I'm not imposing it upon them. Answer
the question, though.
That is the answer to the question. No. No. No.
So, why are they asking? Why don't they just spend it?
Because of the condition that I put on it last year for f y twenty six. Because they didn't get the legally binding contract to so if the if this land isn't conveyed, TMK245021021 is not conveyed to DHHL, it
it's going
to violate the rules for this DHHL GET surcharge.
Okay. So, anyway, they want this to happen and it's not a matter of the county telling them where they have to spend the money.
Correct. Yes. Yeah. So, HHSDC developed on seized lands and said they would convey that land to DHHL, which would make it homestead land. And if they don't, then they're using the 10,000,000 for land that is not DHHL land. And so HHFDC would then violate our rules because then this 10,000,000 for infrastructure would be not be serving homestead land, which was the intention.
Okay. Thanks. But but you understand my question, which is a little different from what you're saying.
Yes. Yes. They were
not telling them where to buy or apply the land. Here's budget direct purchase.
Thank you, Shirley. I just want to reiterate for the record, these funds are not appropriated without consultation with DHL. They are directing how they want to use these funds. We just can't give them all at the same time without an identified project. So that's why we're doing it condition by condition. But they have requested it for these projects, and they have agreed to the conditional language as worded. Thank you, chair.
Yeah. My my question wasn't about consultation. It was about approval by DHHL, and which you are confirming. Thank you. And I'm not on the screen because my my contraption is dead. Oh. Oh, you wanna have a driver's license? Okay. Okay, chair. Okay. I'll try to
give more.
I'll repeat the the motion for you.
No. No. I know the motion. Are you
still gonna Can repeat it me then?
Okay, I will repeat it for your desk partner. Okay. Up to $10,000,000 must be for an intergovernmental agreement with the state of Hawaii permanent water system improvement for the Kala Kala'iola temporary housing project and the future DHHL housing projects. The release of funds is conditioned upon execution of a memorandum out of agreement, DIRF and DHHL funding for Wahikuli Improvement Improvement Villages of Leali'i Tri Party Agreement, which provides for the transfer of the remaining undeveloped Leali'i lands being a portion of TMK 2,450,210 thousand 201 approximately three thirty two acres from the Hawaii Housing Finance Development Corporation, HHFDC, to DHHL subject to a reservation of the right to retain portions needed for the HHFDC's permanent affordable housing project, approximately 31 acres.
Okay. Okay. That's the motion.
Second. Oh, wait.
Never mind. Yeah. It's already been. Yeah.
And so, chair, I just in in the, October 2023 Hawaiian Homes Commission meeting, item E, to authorize the chairman to negotiate and execute the transfer of approximately four zero three acres, including various improvements within the villages of Leiali from, Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation to the Department of Hawaiian Homelands, various tax map key parcels, Waikiki, Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii. And so that was in 2023. And then in April 2122, 2025, item J6, Michele Tonkayo, Leiali concerns, Ms. Tonkayo testified in support of completing the transfer of 400 plus acres of Leiali in Lahaina to DHHL as approved by the commission in October 2023, but paused by the state in December 2023 to house Lahaina fire survivors. She expressed concern about whether the state would follow through despite promises that FEMA and DHH infrastructure would be included, potentially reducing wait times by seventeen years.
She listed multiple ongoing housing efforts for fire survivors such as modular units, temporary housing, and major rebuilds across Lahaina and emphasized that survivors were being supported by federal, state, and county resources, she urged the commission to hold the state accountable to its 2022 promise to transfer all 400 plus acres once recovery was underway, stressing the need to reduce the DHHL waitlist and ensure native Hawaiians remain in Hawaii. And so that's what we're doing.
Anybody have any questions before the vote? Uh-huh. Okay. Motion made by member Rollins Fernandez and second by Wu Hodgins is what it changed to. All right. All in favor raise your hand and say aye. Member Palton is recused. Aye. Eight ayes. Motion carries.
Mahalo members.
Or anything else on revolving funds?
Okay.
We're done then, right, management? Okay.
Okay.
See director Milner on the call.
There's director Milner. Director, you have something to say? Thank
you, dear. I think council member Paulton and council member Rollins Fernandez were probably just talking about what I'm about to say. There was a request for three conditions under the general excise tax Department of Hawaiian Homeland Fund, the 11,000,000 from last fiscal year, and then a third one for Ka'olu'olana'i. Thank you, chair.
For Olana'i.
You know what mean? I just do both one time. Oh. Okay. Okay. I'm gonna make the motion one time because I don't expect any opposition. Okay.
Woah. Is that a trick?
Up to eleven minutes must be for an intergovernmental agreement with the state of Hawaii for the development of an off-site water project, including a 16 inch transmission line from the Lahaina Civic Center pump, station to Waikikiuli reservoir tank to support broader department of Hawaiian homelands infrastructure and future housing projects. The release of funds is conditioned upon execution of the memorandum of agreement, DIRF, and DHHL funding for Waikikiuli Improvement Villages of Leali'i Tri Party Agreement, which provides for the transfer of the remaining undeveloped Leali'i lands being a portion of TMK 2,450,210 thousand 201,
Board Board pleased to
of Directors 31 acres and three up to $8,316,961 for an intergovernmental agreement with the state of Hawaii for shared off-site infrastructure for the Ka'o'ula'nai project and DHHL future housing projects.
Second.
Said everything, and we all support the project on Lanai. Right?
Okay. Member Cook.
I just I'm really excited that this is happening, that the DHHL money is being utilized in the GE fund. There's discussion about that. And this is really exciting that this pipeline in the water is going. I'm just I was real supportive when member Kamala wanted to do this. And I think the 20% is appropriate because that's a big part of our community. Thank you, Chair.
Member Johnson?
I'll also add that when the Lanai project goes with combination with DHHL and the housing project, we will have eliminated the list for our island. That's a goal that every island needs to achieve. I know we're small but we're mighty. Thank you,
chair. Anybody else? Member Senanci.
Honor Chair, was supportive. But to Member Johnson's point, when they didn't have Hawaiian homes, so when they eventually opened it up, a lot of the Lanai residents weren't signed up. So if they had opened it up, there there wouldn't be any residents that had already signed up on the list that were already at the top of the list. So this historic, so in support.
Very good. Member Brales Fernandez. I forgot that member Bolton, is recusing herself. I'd, like to request to, separate my motion into two votes votes for number two and then number three for the Kaio Oluo Lanai so that Member Palton can vote on the Lanai condition.
Okay. No opposition. Okay. So we're going to split it. We're going to first vote on Lanai so member Palton can vote. What? You wanna join us? Just
take them in order while she was up there. K. 11,000,000 for the Lely. Oh, Lely. Okay. Whatever. Oh, you sit there when you recuse yourself. She doesn't need to go in the gallery. Double standards here. Kidding.
I thought you walked away. Remember Batangen. Kate, go ahead.
Okay. For for Lana e then.
Yep. We're doing Lanai. All in favor of Lanai. Aye. Nine. Okay. Ayes.
Okay. Anle Ali'i now.
Mahalo, members.
Aye. Eight ayes and Member Paltzon is recused. All right. Anything else for the special purpose fund? None.
Now for real, we're done with management, right? Oh, you have more? Well,
I was
gonna do Shirley's one, but not right now. Tomorrow.
Shirley, are you
No. No. I I'll
work with her very much. Yeah. Okay. That's what I thought. So I am gonna start with a new department, Parks. We have one priority for Parks, which is council member Sanenci. Oh, withdrew it? Yeah. Of first to salaries, or B? Member Palton.
Thank you. I move on B14, Department of Parks and Recreation Small a, administrative program administration program, paren one, category a, shoot. I didn't do the math. I had my other paper there. Five seventy three, that one? Yeah. It's I might have to do it twice because I had another one that so the first one is to decrease it by $573,816 Okay.
Second. Okay. Member, Laura Poulton by member Vos Fernandez.
The majority of this is the park security officer, positions that are vacant. The director did say that he wanted to reorg this into something that will work. I was never really supportive of the park security officers having worked in the parks for, like, twenty years, when it was proposed under director Peters. And I think think that, you know, we've given it a good try, but I'm I'm ready to be done, with it.
Okay. Anybody else have discussion? Seeing none. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye.
Oh, how about you, Member Johnson? Yes? Is this nine? Nine? Okay. Next.
Shoot. There was one more position. I found it. Sorry. I moved to decrease the same category by $43,272.
Second. Who did the second? Member Cook. Second by Member Cook.
This
is a senior clerk PDash33942. I think it's been vacant since like 2019 or something. Okay. Any more discussion?
Seeing none. All in favor raise your hand and say aye.
Nine ayes. Oh, remember? Okay. Nine ayes. Go ahead. Oh, page 16. Okay. Now in the parks program, small b per n one category a, I moved to reduce appropriation by $199,764.
Okay. Discussion. Oh, Member Palton made the motion and Member Senancy second. Is that right? Mr. Senancia? Discussion.
These are for expansion positions not yet created. I'm halving the amount of months and also reinstating FY 26 council cuts.
Okay. Any more discussion? Seeing none. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Thank you. Nine ayes. Motion carries. So
now same on page small c recreation and support services program per N1 category A. Move to cut or reduce the amount by 250,000.
Okay. Second by member Senancy. Member Paulson and Senancy.
This is my recommendation based on historical carryover savings in this category.
Okay. Any discussion? Seeing none. All in favor raise your hand say aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries.
I'll yield to my colleagues at this point. That's my, conclusion of category As. Do you have any category Bs? I believe other people had. Oh, okay. Anybody else have category a cuts?
I don't see any.
Member Poulton?
You want me to do the department request on category b? Sure. On page 17 of the operating budget section three b 14 small b, I moved to increase parks program by $5,200 category B.
$5,200 Yep. Okay. Member Palton, second by Second. Member Rollins Fernandez.
This is, per their response, in PR two, page 17 dash 24 of budget details, for water delivery charges.
Okay. Any discussion? Seeing none, all in favor raise your hand and say aye.
Okay. Next. Also on page 17 of operating budget section 3B14 small c, I moved to increase the recreation and support services program by 118,000 in category B.
Second. Member Paul to second by member Rollins Fernandez.
This is also based on their PR to response for water delivery charges, page 17 dash 59 of budget details, in the amount of 39,000 and page 17 dash 53 of budget details, amount of
79,039 thousand.
Yeah. That's what it is. What is the amount?
79 and 39 for 118,000.
Yeah. 79,000 and sorry, 79,000 was in the seventeen five nine and thirty nine thousand was in the 17 dash 53 page.
Okay.
Okay. You got that. Any more disc any more discussion? Not for me. Okay. All in favor, raise your hands and say aye. Nine ayes. Is that
it? I think somebody else had some bees. No? I know there were CIP cuts.
Anyone else for bees? Member Cook has for CIP.
And I have something for rates and fees.
You have rates and fees?
Okay. Is that it? Member Palton? Yeah. I'm done. I'll yield the floor to my colleague.
Okay. So, member Cook, did you say you have something?
Not till CIP. So if you wanna, like, run through and just check them off your list.
Okay. Parks program bill, page 17 in the budget bill. Anybody have any category A or B amendments? See none. Recreation Services Program, budget bill, page 17. Any amendments to category A or B? See none. Here you go, Member Cook. CIP, page 23 to 24.
Some of my offsets. E, department of parks and recreation, one countywide, a, parks and recreation, one general fund, v, countywide park facilities, decreased department of parks and recreation, CIP, CBS 4,581, countywide parks facilities by $1,000,000 Amend appendix C accordingly. This is part of their contingency.
Okay.
They have 7 plus million dollars for contingency, and this is my first one of $2,000,000 deductions.
Okay. So this is for a member quote followed second by member Ola Hutchins.
For discussion. Discussion. Ahead. Done with discussion. Discussion. Any questions?
Chair, I see director Milner on for discussion.
Director. Oh, and after Take it, chair. Member Batange. Four five eight one.
I have a lot of concerns about the proposed cuts to the park CIPs. These are some pretty significant cuts for a department that's been doing a lot of really great work around the county, especially in the area of CIPs. I understand this is a contingency fund, I also understand that it makes an appealing target for cuts because I looked at it as well when I was trying to reduce the budget. I pulled the data for the last few years, and they've almost completely expended the CBS over the last few years. As the council's aware, construction costs have been going up exponentially, and this represents a fund that allows them to not have to continually come back to the council and ask for more money.
They're able to use this to cover those increasing costs. So I'm just worried about, cutting into it, but I understand that the body is looking for offsets. Thank you, chair.
I have a recommendation for member Cook. What about CBS nine four nine six?
Nine four nine six. Where can I
go in?
Can I ask what the CBS numbers are? Are you looking at the budget ordinance as well, or are you in the details now?
That's, under programs and things or the CIP bills. Appendix c, is it?
Yeah. If you go appendix c, page seven, county wide fencing improvements, $5,000,000.
Fencing. I know. Remember Yes. Had a fencing issue. Batongan.
I guess so I'm not clear on where in the budget details or in the ordinance you guys are looking, but I was actually Go gonna to bill five.
Scroll all the way to the bottom, and then it's page two zero six in the PDF document itself. Okay.
Or you can look at program budget page I guess 920 that
I was also going to cut from the parks CIP budget. Mine were specifically to fencing and court improvements. And my office actually reached out to leadership at Parks to see if this would be a big deal and was told no. I got different information from what budget director Milner is saying and that's why I was going to propose some similar cuts
to She was saying the contingency fund.
Oh, am targeting a different one? I remember Fernandez told me that we're talking about the $5,000,000 for for fencing.
Member Cook wanting to cut from the contingency fund. And so then I suggested maybe he looked at fencing instead because the contingency fund when they do their CIP and it comes in over budget, then they can pull from
the I see. Okay. Fine. Oh.
So if you already have a cut for fencing, maybe member Cook should withdraw. I
like this. This. This. Just don't want this discussion.
Discuss your motion. Your motion's on the floor.
Did research this. As a contractor, I totally understand contingency and the necessity. This is from general funds general funds. In the past, it was like 500,000 a year, 500,000 a year, 1,000 a year, and then it bumped up to like $31.50 a year. Generally, it's about 10% of their projects.
Don't have any problem. I understand they want to be funded and they need elasticity. They came back for $5,000,000 a few months ago for war memorial and some other things. So I don't feel that the and I don't think that there's ever any objection from us if they do a budget amendment from the administration to address issues for shortages, and they should have enough visibility and foresight to understand when they're going to need that. So I don't want to jam them up because I really want them to be able to perform.
I just feel that having $7,150,000 sitting there for contingency because there may be price increases and whatnot is excessive. And I needed a cut for a couple of very valid issues. And I felt that this was an appropriate way to do it. That wouldn't take away from, courts, fees, and other
Specifics.
And other things that are budgeted to actually be done. This is a contingency fund. I felt it was fat, and I'm cutting
it. Okay.
That's member Cook's motion and, any more discussion? So he wants to, delete $1,000,000 from the contingency fund, which is CVS four five eight one. Yeah? Okay.
Oh, sure.
Oh, member Senecchi.
Oh, he's not taking it from the fencing?
No. He's talking to I
will speak against it only because we've finally, after seven years, gotten some CIP projects and and then normally anticipating construction in Hana. Our our project would probably go over because of the the rural nature and and the distance out there. I won't be voting for that.
Okay. Thank you.
Alright. Chair, may I? Yeah. Yes. They'll still have over $5,000,000,000 in their contingency when I'm done with it.
Okay. Member Palton.
I also will be, not supporting it because they have been doing really good on their CIP projects, and we're not the easiest to get on our agenda all the time. And, I wanna take, like, a full month for South Maui community plan and other things. And then, you know, how the new guy doesn't like to do committee work on the council floor, so I won't be supporting it.
Okay. Alright. Any more discussion before the vote? Member Rollins Fernandez. Mahalo, chair. And mahalo,
member Cook, and for sharing your, experience. Same. Molokai, as I explained with the Puko'o Fire Station relocation, the cost just escalated with the cost of oil. We're just talking about aggregate, just all the costs. And I really want to support our parks because this is for the parks are for our families or for our children.
And I and I am also, I guess, a little concerned about, like, what happened to some of the parks with the flood. I know, like, on Molokai, there's, like, you know, some work that needed to be done because of the floods, the damage to it. So I yeah. Member, not member. Sorry.
Budget director said that, they've been good about spending down this CBS. So if there was, like, a lot of carryover savings, then I I would probably be supportive. But since, you know, they're they're good about, using the funding that's allocated and have even had to come back and get a budget amendment mid fiscal year to support those to completion of those projects, then I won't be supporting the motion. Okay. Director. Could I ask Director Miller first? Director Miller, she popped up.
Thank you, Chair. I know you're getting ready to take a vote, I can save this for a little bit later. But the department did have a proposal for cuts totaling $4,500,000 which is what's currently proposed to be cut from the Countywide Parks facilities, I believe, for some projects that may have less public impact or may not be ready to go out to bid yet. So maybe we could come in later in the year when they're ready to go out for bid, but you could could take it out of the budget now. Know you're in the middle of a motion, but I just wanted to put that on the floor. Thank you, Chair.
Thank you. Member Johnson, did you want to say something?
Chair, if I can ask clarification because a couple of members are asking. Yeah, what is the number? I'm seeing E1A number five, But what's the CBS number?
Maybe that might help. 4581. Budget director, where Suggesting you were just something to take the $4,000,000 from? What CBS number?
Thank you, Chair. I wasn't going to get into details because you're in the middle of the motion. I just wanted to let you know that we had an alternative proposal I can give you the project names, Canoleo and Kalama Grease Traps, Lanai Fieldhouse, the Park Adaptation Plan for 500,000, Kamaole 1 Malka parking lot and restrooms, which would be 3,500,000. Thank you, Chair.
Mahalo, budget director. Member Johnson, you have a comment. We're
not doing the Lennon EZO House right
now.
We're still on mine? Yes.
Yeah. Yes. Hey.
If I may Go ahead. I just would've this is my second and final for this, or third and final. The million dollars was an offset for the million dollars that I'm putting into the Department of Public Works, countywide drainage, general fund, countywide bridge and drainage program. A million dollars must be used to continue work related to flood mitigation to support the Kihei drainage master plan. So, my million dollar cut from this parks, contingency was my offset for my million dollars in that. So I'm just clarifying. So you can go to down, but that was what it was for.
Oh, chair, if I may. Yeah. Can you go a little lower than 1,000,000? How about, like, 500,000 or 250,000? Because there's other there's other fat to trim. Right? But it sounds like a lot of members aren't really feeling that. And I know you could make it up another way. I'm just trying to work with you, Calvin. But
that's your offset, right?
Yeah. If thousand $5 would pass, but I don't think that's going to pass either, really, so I don't know.
Okay. Let's vote on your
If if if I don't have the votes, I'll just withdraw it.
Yeah. Okay. I'm gonna
make a proposal for 250,000.
So Okay. Beverly Johnson. Remember, let's vote let's just vote on yours.
Okay. The
$1,000,000 from CVS four five eight one contingency.
Roll call.
Okay. Yes. As much as I love member Cook, I'm not gonna be supporting this either because, Hokiwa bathrooms need to be fixed, and this is the kind of stuff that they draw down from. And so I love you, sir, but it's gonna be a no for me.
Okay.
I know I have one
vote. Garen Mulberry.
I'll vote with you. That's two.
Okay.
Go ahead. Just so we can move forward.
Okay. Let's do a roll call. Roll call. Quick. Okay.
Chair proceeding with a roll call vote, council member Tom Ku.
Aye.
Council member Gabe Johnson.
No.
really like you, but no.
Council member Tamara Fulton?
I don't care. No.
Council member Kiani Robles Fernandez? No. Council member Shane Sanansi.
No. Sorry.
Council member Nohae Woohae Jin. No. Thank you. Committee vice chair Kunoi Batangen.
A ole.
Committee chair Yukilei Sugimura.
Stick with my friend. Support you.
Chair, that's two ayes. Seven oaths motion fails. Next.
Member Woo
Thank you, chair. For on page 16, for the advent program in B, and I'm happy to take direction from budget director too. We have currently, and I'll explain, and then I'll make my motion, 100 and, 87,000 and some change for, mobile trailer offices for the, memorial gym, but it should be done soon. So my proposal, I moved to cut that in half, so reduce it by $93,600 to fund the mobile trailer offices until the end of the year.
Okay. Member, Wuhan, second by member Ron Fernandez. So what is the dollar amount? Sorry.
No. That's okay. 90 I propose I move to deduct, from b and administration program 93,000 oh, wait. Hold on. We got budget director. I'll finish my thought, and then we can go Yeah. $93,600, to accommodate the Straight. The rental for the mobile trailer office, but I do see budget there appearing like a genie. Sometimes of bad news and sometimes of good news, but we see what you are today. Derek.
You, chair. Thank you, Yeah. The department needs the trailer funding to keep the folks in there and to facilitate the move back in before we can return the trailers. We do anticipate this is the last year we'll need
the trailer funding. Thank you, chair. Okay. If the renovations are supposed to be done at the end of this calendar year, you're gonna need all that one eighty seven up until fiscal year of next July. Yeah. If so, okay. Is that right, Dore?
I guess. Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Bladman. Yes. My understanding is that the funding that's included is just for the duration that they will need the trailers, not necessarily for the full calendar year. Okay. Or for the full fiscal year. My apologies. Okay. It's $15,630.40 a month for five trailers.
Oh my god. I think we're all in the wrong business. That's a lot.
Okay. So you're withdrawing? Sure. Okay. Kate, Member Johnson.
Thank you, Chairs. So this is going to be on page 23 of the Bill 55. And I'll start with my first one going. Departments of Park and Rec, one countywide A Parks and Recreation, one general fund, two countywide court improvements, the courts. Reduce appropriation by 250,000 for a remaining total of approximately 4,750,000. And if I get a second, I can get Kate, remember Bonangan is your second. Department had more than $3,000,000 in carryover savings in FY '26. If needed, department the can come for a budget amendment if they need to. $2.50.
That's what I got. Okay. Member Batongan.
Thank you, chair. So this is also one of the cuts I was going to propose. Mine was going to be $500,000 cut and I did reach out to the department to ask if they could realistically do $5,000,000 worth of fencing improvements and courts improvements. They said probably not. And I asked if it would be an issue if I proposed a cut of 500,000 off of each of those. They said it'd be no big deal. So I if member Johnson is agreeable, I would like to up that cut.
So you can withdraw yours then?
No. No. No. We can work.
I would totally do that, but let's hear from director Milner and depending on what she says. Okay, Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Was just going to provide a list of the courts that are currently slated for countywide court improvements for resurfacing in fiscal year twenty seven.
Before you start,
can I guess, are they all in Kahului and Lanai now?
No. At least one's in Hana. Fukulani Park, Kalama Park, Hali'i Male, Lahaina Civic, Hana Park, Editham, if there's sufficient funding, basketball, Kalama, Wells Park, Lower Pai'ia, Hana Park, and Wailuku Gym. So I just wanted the body to have that information.
But And so that's
the full list
of of of facilities on the docket. How far would 90% of your budget get you, and how far does the department realistically think they're gonna go?
I would say they're gonna do Lahaina Civic because the invitational, for sure. Sure.
I don't think that was on a list. Thank
you, chair. I'm not sure, who council member Batonga has been talking to at the parks department, but, you know, if it's leadership, I don't wanna contradict them. Lennet Ecourts were done in the past year, so that they're not on the list for cuts.
I will fall
on the sword.
But, yeah. I mean, if if someone in the department told you they can live with it, that's fine. I just wanted to let you know what the current list is that I received. Thank you, chair.
That that's very important information. So members, it's it's your decision on the yes or no. I'm gonna propose 250,000, and that's my discussion.
Okay. I'll be supporting 250,000 because, you know, Lahaina hosts the Maui Invitational. Just saying.
Okay. I'm gonna go Ohajans.
I may be able to support the five, but can I talk to, director again? Can we get our good news? Milner. Can we get our news genie back? Thank you, director Milner. I thought now the Pollo Park the Lower Pollo Park, that probably would eat up some money because it's an SMA issue. But for Eddy Tam, I saw that they might be pow. Do you know the status of that? And if that's the case, then I could support five. But if not, I will do two fifty because I pick up my kids every day from over there.
Oh, sorry. Can hear you.
Budget director, you're muted. You're muted.
I can't hear my good news.
Sorry. I'm checking on the status of the Eddy Tam resurfacing right now, and I'll let you know ASAP.
Thank you.
Members, if you're agreeable to two fifty, I'm happy to support two fifty. We can leave the motion as it is, and we can move on.
Okay. You're all fine. All in favor, raise your hand. Say aye. Oh, roll call. Okay, roll call.
Chair, please proceed with a roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook?
Aye.
Councilor Rugabe Johnson? Yes. Councilor Chair Eilishman? Aye. Aye. Vice chair Konoe Batangan. Aye. Committee chair Yukile Suigi Murak. Aye. Here's a seven ayes, two nos. Motion passes.
Thank you, Gabe. Thank you, member Bhatakan.
I have another cut, chair. Okay. Same page, same section, a few numbers down. Alright. This is, department of parks and rec one, countywide a, parks and rec one, general fund b, countywide parks facilities. That's the reduction appropriate by $250,000 for the remaining total of $6,900,000 Oh my goodness. So can I get a second?
Member second buy. Member Batangen.
Alright, members. So this department had more than $3,000,000 in carryover savings in FY '26, and if needed, department can come for a budget amendment. That's my discussion, and that's my proposal.
Can I ask a question? Is this the same pot that member Cook tried to cut just a different It is.
It is because many of us have you know, we don't know what other guys are trying to cut, and this is what my proposal was for 250,000.
Chair, be
voting no again. Mahal Chair. Okay. Any other discussion? Roll call.
Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook?
Yes.
Councilmember Yeeb Johnson? Yes. Council chair Alice Lee? Yes. Member Tamara Palton? No. Council member Keanu Rollins Fernandez? No. Council member Shane Senensi? No. Council member Nohei Uwajins? No. Committee Vice Chair Kunoye Batangen? No. Committee Chair Yukilei Sugimura? Yes. Chair, that's four ayes. Six no, the motion fails.
And I have one last cut
in this department. Okay.
Wait, that's still 10 members.
Sorry, four yes, five I. I mean, four I, five no.
Correct, sorry. That's okay.
I have one more, members. All right. So, again, same same page. Number three at the bottom. Kihei, McKenna, Community Plan Area one, General Fund three, Canoleo and Kalama Park grease trap replacements. That's page 23 in the bill. And I move to remove 200,000. If I get a second, I can explain.
Member Bolton is second. Member Johnson's motion.
Okay members, the reason why, if you noted in the PR1, it is their lowest priority CIP. And that's my reasoning.
Do I see Director Milner pop up? No? Okay. All in favor oh, member of Patongian.
Budget director. Was this one of the projects that you said was that could be delayed? You gave us a list of several projects that may not be as shovel ready or as high of a priority. Can I confirm that this is one of
them? Thank
you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor River Batonghan. Yes, you are correct.
Thank you.
Okay. All right. So the motion is to deduct the $200,000 correct, Member Johnson?
I'm sorry, you said it was 200,000 for the grease trap at Coloma Park and Canoleo Park.
Member Uwe Hodgins. Thank you.
I have a question for our budget director.
If she can pop up, please. Budget director.
Yeah.
I can rub well, I couldn't rub anything. Anyways Machine here. It's too early, and I'm too sober for that. Can I ask, budget director, how come Park says replacing grease trap? Because typically that's, DEM issue. Community center kitchens. Community center kitchen for the grease trap. Oh, got it. Lowest priority. Okay. Thank you. Sorry. They answered my question. Member Cook.
Well, director's still here. Welcome back. Boring. Boring. Okay. I'm curious how replacing grease traps at two different parks could be a low priority. It's usually due to corrosion or some some issue of why they would replace it. These aren't new grease traps.
Going we're sense
able own. Own.
Point. To
a good I point. Think good
Aye. Aye. No. Aye. Chair, that's four ayes, five noes. Motion fails.
Okay, members. That's my cut side. Yield to, the new guy. Thank you.
Sorry. Chair, I apologize. I just got some additional information from director McCall. They believe they can cover the grease trap replacement in their maintenance budget. That's why it was their lowest priority. Thank you, chair. I apologize that I did not have the information two minutes ago.
So they don't need the money at all?
Money. They're gonna do
it now. Thank you, chair. They believe they can cover it from elsewhere.
Okay. I move to reconsider. We should reconsider and
cut it. Second.
Yeah. Okay. Alright. I'll motion to reconsider. Aye. Aye. Alright. Passes. Go ahead. We'll re vote again. Take the vote. Okay. Aye. All in favor.
Aye.
Okay. Yay. Teamwork. Thank you, director Milner. Update the information. Anything else? Member Batongen.
Thank you, chair. On page 23 of the budget ordinance under department of parks and recreation one county wide, a parks recreation, three, I think. The fencing.
Oh, yeah.
Gabe, we did the we did the court improvements or we did fencing with you.
Court.
Court. Okay. So on yes. Under fencing, I moved to reduce that by $500,000. Second. Thank you, member Paul Tim.
Member Batonga and second by
Paul Tim.
I I I've stated this a few times. I did reach out to the department to ask if it was realistic for them to spend all five the deputy director. I I did reach out to leadership and asked if it was realistic for them to spend all $5,000,000 for quarter improvements and fencing and was told that this is an area that they'd be okay if we cut. And Okay.
So I So you're deducting
how much? $500,000.
Okay.
So 10% from the fencing improvement, line item. Thank you.
Okay. Any discussion? See none. All in
favor? The deputy said.
Guess they can come back for a bunch of amendments.
Nine ayes. Motion carries. Anything else? Member Palton.
Page 23. E one a. IV, I moved to, reduce the amount by 200,000. For the ADA?
Dollars 200,000.
The
second
Oh. I didn't realize that there were two until you said that.
Yeah. The second IV is Countywide Parks Americans with Disabilities Act, ADA improvements. 200,000. Okay. Is there a second?
I'll second it for discussion.
Okay. So member Paulton seconded by member Batangian.
We're still making progress,
and
they recently installed a ramp, a weird really weird ramp at Napili Park that I've never seen anybody use. So, like, if we're talking about community impact, but, also, I don't think this federal government would sue us for decreasing the amount 200,000, and picking it up next year. But, I mean, I'm not decreasing it a 100%. Okay. Do we see And the the way they designed the ramp in Napili Park, like, there there's there's guardrails, but there's a big puka at one point, which doesn't make any sense, and it doesn't seem very safe.
So I think they should kind of a little bit take this time to relook at their designing of how it works because I'm not sure if they intend for people to walk through the ramp, and that's why there's no rails on there. But, also, the runoff from the dirt, there's no, like, rails on the side. And so the dirt kinda goes into it, and then it's kind of just being used as, a skateboard ramp right now. So, I mean, I think they need to, like, relook at how the design is gonna end up because I I guess I just look at it and it doesn't make sense. K. Napili Park.
Member Johnson and then member Rollins Fernandez.
Thank you, chair. I appreciate, everybody working together, but this is, one cut I can't support. If you guys recall when Parks came before us, it was mister Marvel, and I asked him about this pot of money. I said, can we use it for parks that don't have bathrooms? He said, no.
This money is specifically for existing bathrooms that or existing ADA. Existing buildings that need to be ADA compliant. So if you look around some of our facilities, they need this. And I would assume that money would be bigger for all the places that need to be ADA compliant. I appreciate, you know, we're all trying to get some funds cut, not for this. Thank you, Jane. Here's director Milner.
Thank you, chair. Yeah. As you know, this is, to meet federal guidelines. I I understand there may not be concerns with the current administration, but I will say that parks did say they are amenable to cutting the countywide park adaptation project in its entirety, 500,000, if that could be considered as an alternative. Thank you, chair. Okay.
I'll take that as a friendly amendment. That's the first IV. That's the first IV. Okay. And then if we cut that out completely, then we don't have to worry about any first, second IVs.
Correct. Okay. So I guess the motion is yours and second is member Batangen. Yeah. Okay. So the motion is to deduct the $500,000 from the Countywide Park Adaptation Project and it is the first four, Roma Nouveau four. Yeah, including the robe and no row. All in favor, raise your hand and say aye.
I have my hand up for discussion. Oh, sorry. Go ahead. Okay. So this work may include relocation of paths or facilities, dune restoration, shoreline hardening where appropriate. I don't support that. Vegetation buffers, drainage, upgrades. It'll also develop site specific adaptation concept aligned with the county's sea level rise exposure area maps and state guidelines. So I don't know. I think that's kind of important.
Yeah. For all the parks that are along the the shoreline. Can we ask the budget director if it's because they don't have a planner? That would that work happen under another CBS, another project fund? And then maybe I would support it.
Budget Director? There is Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. I believe this was included because it's not ready to go out to bid yet, so the funds aren't needed immediately on July 1.
Mahalo Budget Director, I'll be supporting the motion.
Good. Okay, so we're deducting from the first Roman numeral four Countywide Parks Adaptation Project. All in favor raise your hands. Aye. Aye. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Okay. Any more members? Oh, Member Batangen.
Thank you, Chair. Budget Director, can I ask that you come back online? There are a series of projects that you said the department would be open to cutting. Can you repeat those without the Lanai one included?
I was gonna ask council member Johnson to cover his ears, but, I will leave that out. Yes. We've already taken out the grease trap. Oh, thank skipping that one. The park adaptation plan, and the last one was the Kamaole 1 Malka parking lot and restroom at 3 and a half million. They're still waiting on some permitting for that. Thank you, chair.
I move to cut that last thing that she just said.
Second. Okay. So what project was that? What are you doing? Kama Kamaole? And what is the cut for how much? 3 All
of it. 3,500,000. For Kamaole, parking lot, and restroom. They're not ready. It's not shovel ready.
Wait. Budget director, I'm seeing that as 1,700,000. I don't understand how you got 3 and a half.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Batongan. My apologies. 1,800,000 of the total is from the park assessment fund. The other part is from the bond fund. So I don't know that that will assist the body in what it's trying to accomplish at this moment.
I'm actually comfortable still cutting it if they're not able to move forward with But it's still Yeah. I would still rather cut it now if we're not gonna be moving forward with it.
Okay. So that's 1.7?
It's 1.7. So page 24 at the top under two under two bond fund. I, comma, ole, one local parking lot and restroom for $1,700,000.
Okay.
Is bonding, but it's still I still would prefer that we didn't appropriate things. She said 1.8, but it's in the it's on my paper at 1.7.
And it's in here for 1.7.
Oh, are you gonna do the data 25? Are you
gonna do the workbooks here?
Oh, yes. I would do the whole thing. I don't know where else to
3.5.
Oh, I see it I see it under underneath three park assessment fund I. So then, yeah, I would cut the project from both the bonding and the park assessment fund. Yeah.
Okay. So 3.5.
Thank you, budget director.
Okay. So we are motion made by Member Batanggan, second by who? Member Ron Fernandez. Okay. All in favor? Aye. Say aye. Aye.
Pizza's getting cold.
Yeah. Aye. K. This is nine eyes. The last fold, member talk member Cook was not in the seat. So that one is eight eight eyes, but it passed. Okay. Any more? Dinner's waiting.
I have rates and fees. I don't have cuts, but do you wanna wait? Recess. Okay. I don't mind waiting. Okay.
You guys wanna break for so we'll come back at what time? At 07:40? Thirty. Half an hour? Yeah. 07:30? You guys can eat that fast?
07:45.
07:45? Welcome back. It's 07:52 p. M. And we are in Parks and Recreation. Member Patongian has a reconsideration. Member Johnson has rates and fees. And we have another one. What is the other thing we have for parks? Was it parks? Oh, yeah. Okay. Thank you. Member Batongen.
Thank you, chair. I move to reconsider the cut we made to the parks and recreation general fund county wide
not you're
to able the department and did not get the department's blessing to cut from this particular line item. So I would like to ask that we reconsider that motion. Okay.
Reconsideration vote. Oh, no. Discussion. We have discussion. Go ahead.
My preference would be to leave the cut to fencing and if anything, restore the cut to court improvements. Okay. This is on reconsideration. Yes. I'm
not gonna vote Yes. To reconsider and then because she wants to keep the cut where where it is.
Okay. Charity, we're gonna vote for reconsideration. Okay.
Roll call, please, chair.
Reconsider yeah. Please. Roll call.
Proceeding with the roll call vote, council member Tom Cook?
Just for reconsideration.
Just reconsideration of?
Member Betzungans. Vote.
Vote for reconsideration. I'll agree.
Okay. That's a yes.
Councilmember Gabe Johnson? Yes. Council Chancellor Chancellor.
Aye.
Councilmember Tamar Poulton? No. Councilmember Kelly Rollins Fernandez? Aye. Councilor Shane Senensi.
Aye.
Councilor Nohe Uguhajans. Aye. Committee vice chair Bunoye Batangen.
Aye.
Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura. Aye. Chair, there's eight ayes, one no. Motion passes. Okay. Member Batonga.
Thank you, chair. So, you guys, can you help me through the motions here? So now that reconsideration is open, the action that I would need to take would be to restore the cuts. Is that correct?
No. Chair, take the vote that you want. After the reconsideration motion passes, then it brings us back to the point right before we voted on the motion.
That being the case, I would like to withdraw my motion, but I recognize that member Paulton has discussions she would like to have. I wanna Who would like
to vote
now? Okay. So I would like to withdraw my motion
Okay.
Because that's easiest for me to understand than how to proceed. Yeah. That's that's the problem. I know that a motion has to be on the floor for her to discuss, but then I don't know what to do. Okay.
So you want the So the motion on
the floor, guess so if we're back to the point right before we took the vote, then we the motion on the floor is to cut 500,000 from the parks fencing improvements Okay. Line you, Thank you, member Ramos Fernandez.
And that's the vote that you don't want to do, right? That's why you wanted to reconsider?
Yes. I misunderstood what was being conveyed and should not have moved to take away that money. Thank you, Chair.
Okay. I move to reconsider the vote on countywide courts.
Oh, wait. His motion is on the floor.
I thought he withdrew it.
Left I left it on the table so that you could have discussion about keeping the fencing cuts. But if you're agreeable, then I will happily withdraw the motion.
I, I guess my discussion is I would love to keep the fencing cuts and restore the court improvements. Our kids play on the courts, and, I could deal with a little less fences.
Okay. So you are that's making a motion?
I thought there was a motion on the floor. That's why I was discussing. Okay. I wasn't
just talking Yes, chair. I apologize. I may have confused the body. No. I definitely confused the body. So the motion on the floor is still to cut the $50,000 or the $500,000 from the fencing improvements. I would still like to I will be voting against that even as the maker of the motion. I I would prefer to withdraw, but I think she wanted the opportunity to. Okay. Then I'll withdraw and yield the floor.
I move to reconsider the court improvement vote.
Second. I think that may have been the 250,000.
The countywide court improvements.
Yeah. We reduced it by 250,000. Yeah. I voted against that. So, second.
Okay. Member Paulsen, second by member Bronice Fernandez, and it's due to decrease the court, appropriation by 250 or five.
I'll be, moving to amend the motion to restore no. I'll be voting against the court yard improvement cuts because, I rather have courts than fences.
Chair. Member Patokin.
Thank you. Since I did not get guidance from I think the impression I got from budget director was that the department did not want us to cut the funding for fencing. So I would even if we reconsider the cuts to the court, I will still be opposing the any cuts to the fencing improvement for whatever that's worth to the rest of the members.
Okay. Yeah. You are you withdrew that. So now we
you have considering putting back the court improvements by voting no?
Budget director is online. She might be able to help clarify the Hi. Preferences of the
Thank you, chair. To be perfectly transparent, the department originally requested $10,000,000 for this. That's how much work there is to do around the county. They agreed to cut it back by half so that we could balance the budget. So as much funding as can be given for this and for that's also true for fencing. Thank you for that reconsideration. There's a lot of work to do around the county and they feel they can get it done in the next eighteen months or at least in comfort. Thank you, chair.
So what does the department think about this courts? Well, right now the move is to return the money by voting no. Right? If we vote no, we'll return the money.
Apologies. Staff's understanding right now is that the reconsideration vote Oh. Or the reconsideration motion on the county wide court improvements, that motion is still on
Oh, we're still reconsidering. That's
point.
Council chair Anasti?
Actually, really don't care. No. No.
Council member Tamar Fulton? Chair Konohi Batangen.
Aye.
Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura. Aye. Chair, that's seven ayes, two noes. Motion passes. Okay.
So now a no vote would restore the court improvements. Okay. Am I Yeah. Mr. Krueger?
That's correct, sir. So the the motion on the floor now is to reduce the countywide court improvements, CIP, by $250,000 made by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Patungun. Okay.
All in favor, is this a roll call?
It's a roll call.
It's a roll call.
Yeah. Roll call. So to clarify, the motion is to reduce courts by 250,000. So if you don't want to reduce it, then you vote no. If you want to reduce it, then you vote yes. No.
Next? Chair proceeding with the roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook. Oh, one early. No. Councilor Gabe Johnson. Yes.
Because I'm trying to make room, and so we don't have to raise taxes. Thank you.
Council chair, I would say Yes. Field House. Okay. Councilor Rutomark Hall No. House over County Rollins Fernandez.
No.
House over Shane Senensi. No. House over No Hengmu Hajins. No. Committee vice chair Kunoye Batangen.
Yes.
Committee chair Yuki Lei Sugimura. Yes. Chair, that's four ayes. Five noes. Motion fails.
The court stay
Four ayes. Five. Yes. Oh, okay. Sorry.
I moved to cut, countywide fencing by 250,000.
Is there a second? Oh, Member Sanenzi. Member Baltaz, Member Sanenzi's discussion.
If you're gonna call for the question, I'd like to ask for roll call.
If you, want discussion, I I thought I already mentioned that I'd rather have courts than fences. And they told member Batang on either or, not both.
I I
And they told him, like, 500,000. So this is, like, half, and it's fences, not quartz. That's my discussion. Okay. Roll call.
Chair, proceeding with the roll call vote, council member Tom Cook?
Yes.
Councilor Reagan Johnson?
Yes.
Council chair Alice Lee? Yes. House of mayor Tamar Palton?
Yes.
House of mayor Kenny Rollins Fernandez? No. House of mayor Shane Senensi?
Aye.
Chair Yuki Lei Sugimura. No. Chair that's six ayes, four noes. Motion passes. That's five and four. Sorry. Five four. Motion passes. Okay.
Okay. Anything else? Do we have anything else?
Rates and fees from member Johnson.
Oh, I still do that. Chair?
Yes. Apologies. Staff does have a couple of offsets very important
So, that's
total for CIP that. Jim.
And Does it have to be the total?
I think they're not gonna build it for a while. So that's why we thought that we they don't need it today. But would you like to have a comment? You gotta make the motion first. No. Budget director. Budget director.
Thank you, chair. For the 2,500,000 offset, there is a departmental request from the Department of Police to reduce a bond funded project by over $14,000,000. So I'd like the body's consideration for that as an alternative rather than South Maui Park. They've already completed phase one. They're ready to move forward on phase two. And they will encumber these funds by December 2027. They're ready to get moving on it. Thank you, chair. Saved your park.
No we didn't. That's why it's being brought up now against that Cove Park project. Okay. I'll withdraw that then and we'll wait for police.
Anything else? Chair, yes. There's one more offset tied to Chair your countywide number one, the Lokahi Pacific Animal Feed Crop Pilot Program. This offset is relating to the Waikawa Gym improvements.
So the Waikawa Gym, which you may know the reason why I'm using it, it was damaged by the Konolu storm one. The roof kind of is falling apart. Unfortunately, the gym floor is also damaged. And so the renovation, which that money was for, cannot be done for a while. And it's historic, so there's a lot of complications just for that. That's why we're using it.
Chair, can we hear from the director?
Director Milner.
Thank you, Chair. Yes, in the Department of Requests, there is a request to change the description for this so that it can be used toward the damage. They've also been informed by the Office of Recovery that there's a high likelihood they're going to be receiving federal funds for this project as well, so it will be able to proceed in spite of the significant damage. Thank you, chair.
When is it gonna be proceeding?
There's a departmental request for word change to change the scope of the project.
Thank you, sir. Yes. It will be able to move forward in this fiscal year twenty seven, eighteen month project period. Thank you. Oh,
that's good news.
I move to amend page nine of appendix c under Makawao Pukalani Kula community plan area.
Second.
CBS 2329 Waikua Gym improvement change project description as follows. This project funds the assessment, planning, and design for repairs and or replacement of Wyakawa Gym which sustained significant damage during the March twenty twenty six Kona low storm event. Work will include structural and site evaluations, development of repair or replacement alternatives, cost estimating and preparation of construction documents. The scope may also incorporate code compliance upgrades, resilience measures, and improvements to support the facility's use as a community and emergency resource. Just a description.
Motion made by member Palton, second by Fernandez. Discussion. This is per the department's request. Okay.
So they're they're asking to keep it whole, basically, to move it forward. This to is
I'm I'm
of the historic nature of the building and what it has to do in order to proceed, I was told that it's over that 50 year old threshold. So there's complications to move it forward. Yeah.
Thank you, Chair. No, the building's not on the registry, so I don't believe it falls under the complications that we often run into with those historic structures. The department just received notification of the federal funding today, so I don't have the exact source, but they do anticipate that work is going to begin this fiscal year the coming fiscal year. Thank New you, information.
Thank you. Motion carried motion. All in favor? Anything else?
That's it.
Okay. Rates and fees. Gabe.
Okay, chair. In the Department of Parks and Recreation, rates and fees, appendix b as in bravo, page 27 in the appendix, you'll see a chart of all the fees. So if you notice on the chart, at the very bottom of the second chart, there's a bunch of asterisks. And we're gonna add another asterisk. And it's basically well, let me let me get a motion on and then I get a second and I explain. So I moved to add additional language just believe just beneath that third asterisk. For the County Lanai Farmers Market, there shall not be any fees or deposits assessed.
And if I can. Second. All
right. So thank you for that discussion. Basically, we have right now is the Department of Agriculture paying the Department of Parks to have the permits and the fees to have the farmers market on county owned parks. So it doesn't make any sense for Peter to pay Peter. So I wanna just eliminate that fee so that the Department of Ag doesn't have to pay Department of Parks. Thank you, chair.
Okay. Any more member of Buttockett? Thank
you, chair. I just wanna make sure that have we talked to the departments about this? Because if one
and and they're okay with it? Yes. They are okay with it, and I did talk to them.
Oh, okay. Well, then you're okay then.
Member of Ohojens.
I support this in theory, but I probably won't be supporting this today because we do a lot of interfund payments, one. Two, so the Department of Ag pays parks. And who pays the Department of Ag? Do you guys get does it get grants, how does this work?
I don't. Fund.
General Yeah. Then are you a vendor at this farmer's market?
I am a vendor. I I do not participate in anything else except for just being there. Like, I don't take the the box or the pro I don't participate in the MEL program.
I am a vendor there.
You can still make this motion. You can still do this.
How about
Sorry. I think I would actually defer to the board of ethics on this question. But if there could be, a financial interest in the event that is being
voted I'll repeat on myself.
That's fine.
Okay. I'll make the motion mindshare.
Okay. Yeah. That would be better. That would be better. I
don't wanna Dipperdise.
Step on I don't wanna create an issue, but I just wanna make sure we're all good. I don't know how I feel about this only because we have to spend so much money all the time for, like, housing issues, and it's big dollars, every time we try to make a department whole. And I don't how much is the fee for?
$343.
Yeah.
$342. Yes. No. Per per event.
Per so every month?
Which they're it's every month now. They're trying to do every twice a month.
Twice a month. Okay. So $600 and change times 12 and such. But we pay like, we give our grantees money, and then they have to pay police upwards of $25,000 for Securitas at events. And then we have to do the water. We do so much money like that. And this isn't gonna make or break anybody's budget at 300 something dollars. So while I'm with you on this, like, I get your concept. If that's the case, we should do that for everybody because we are just shifting funds.
Okay. Vamil Bautongen.
Thank you, chair. Yeah. I was yeah. I'm still not comfortable with the concept. I think it would make things easier, but I don't think it's good accounting practice. I think you gotta recognize the expenses where they occur, and I would prefer and and I agree with member about us standardizing this, and I would prefer to keep the system in place as it is. So I will not be supporting this motion.
Thank you.
Discussion. Oh, just member Paulson. Can the motion be repeated? Because I don't I didn't get it the first time.
Okay.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
Department of Parks and Recreation rates and fees, appendix b, page 27 for the county, Lennet E Farmers Market, there shall not be any fees or deposits assessed.
Okay. So my first question is, I thought we had heard at one point that the Department of Ag was sponsoring it for two, three years and then they thought it could stand up on its own. So the question is, are we waiving the fees for the Department of Ag or in perpetuity after it stands it up on its own based on the language? You can't speak. Memorandum Fernandez.
It's up to you guys.
I have a lot of answers for you guys, Leah Li'i, but I had to
Yeah. Okay. Ask your question again. Sorry. Could you distract me? So is would this language extend it? So budget director said that anytime we the council adds, add our priorities, they do a clean slate for the most part and return it to us without our priorities from the prior fiscal year.
we would have to put this back in And even if it did come with this line, we could delete it.
Okay. For me, I'm okay with it because we just did the same thing for housing on affordable housing. We waived the fees that come out of general fund to support, housing. We didn't waive the water ones because water is an enterprise fund. We didn't do any of the hard stuff, but we need housing so bad, especially workforce res affordable housing that we said if it's a general fund the department fee, we're gonna waive it because the benefit of having more workforce or affordable housing faster and less money is worth the waiving of fees.
A 100% for a 100% AMI and below and 50% for a 100% AMI above and two one twenty. And so this is, in my opinion, a similar concept. When it gets to next year or when the department of ag is no longer the one paying the fee, we can revisit. I'll be supporting the motion.
Mahalo. We hear from budget director, please?
Budget director.
Sorry, chair. I just accidentally put my view into together mode. I don't know if you guys have done that lately. Yes. Sorry. For rates and fees, we don't always remove them every single year. So I just ask if the body's intent is that this is a one time fee for this year until we know if ag will be continuing. If you could just make that clear on the record today, and we
will make that note for the fiscal year twenty eight budget. Thank you, chair. Member member Johnson is walking away. Yeah. Shirley?
Oh, no. It will be interesting if member Ron Fernandez has to answer this question. But do the vendors on Lanai pay this fee and also sell their products? So is this like a business venture for the vendors or do they just give away their tomatoes and stuff?
They said for now, the department is supporting the event a few years until they they're able to stand it up on their own. So I think the vendors are making their money and they're not paying into it until Department of Ag steps back and like, you know, you start give something a kick start and then, like, you expect them to stand up on their own.
And if you remember when we went to Lanai for the hearing, we heard that both the vendors the farmers sell their products. And then they also have the program that Member Johnson started what is it called again?
The voucher program?
The MEO So, to ir
we're
we're eventually, like, they're they're gonna be, like, so profitable. Do They're going gonna be paying, you know, whatever small fee as part of the contribution for the Farmers Market.
I'd like to move to amend the motion to, have it be waived waived as long as the Department of Ag is the one paying
for Will you second my motion first?
Oh, sure. Second. Thank you. I was
just about to say I could support it if it's a year by year waiver.
It's a friendly amendment.
For the year that department of ag pays for it.
For FY27, the county Lanai Farm's market shall not be any fees or deposit assessed.
Okay. Sounds good. I
already made the motion and Member Pelton seconded it.
I think we might need a roll call though.
Any other discussion? Okay. Roll call.
Have discussion if there wasn't any other discussion. Real quick. So one year I got a tax return for, like, $2, and I'm sure it probably cost, like, way more in, like, administration, like $2.
Two two
Tattoo? You got a tattoo?
No. I got $2
Oh, tax? And tax return. I the check and the the postage probably cost that much. So, you know, I I did the math on it, and I know, so it's, like, 3 if it was, like, $360 a month, like, how much does it cost for our county to process it from ag and then, like, pay it to, parks? Like, does it cost more than $360 We may even be saving ourselves money by not assessing this fee. That's my discussion. Mahalo Chair, I'm ready for the vote.
Is roll call.
Chair proceeding with the roll call vote. Councilmember Tom Cook.
Aye.
Alder Reid Johnson. Recused. Recused. Council Chair Alice Lee. Aye. Council Member Tamar Felton. Aye. Council member Keanu Rollins Fernandez? Aye. Council member Shane Senensi?
Aye.
Council member Noe Uwu Hajens? No. Committee vice chair Kuhnohi Batangen.
No.
Committee chair, Yuki Suki Muru. Aye. I'm I'm sorry. No. So Five ayes, three nos, one excused. Motion passes. One recused. K. I call him Mike one recused. Thank you. Any more?
Yes,
sir. Member Batongan.
Can I ask that the budget director come back online? Page 31, MIL fees. I think when we were in Hana, we heard that there were issues with distribute distributing the Maui interscholastic league fees fund. Can I ask if the department can weigh in on that? Because if that's if they can't figure out how to tap into it, I would like to direct the money to go to a funding source that they can utilize so that we can get the kids buses and boats so that they can attend their events.
So this is a very complicated matter, but let's hear what the director will say. He's been here for years.
Oh, I'm sorry. It's new to me. Yeah. It is.
Thank you, chair. Thank you, council member Betongen. Yes. This was in one of the PR responses. It was either PR two or three. I think it was three. But, anyway, yes. So there are 14 different schools that are in the MIL. No one has come up with an equitable way to distribute them as it's mostly the larger schools who are no longer traveling to the remote areas that contribute the majority of the funds that go into the fund. One suggestion that I have is just grant the money back to MIL, let them figure out how to distribute it, and close the fund after that grant is issued and expended.
Because we now have the funding sources for Hana youth travel and Molokai and Lanai student and youth travel that I'm hoping are starting to cover those needs. But if the body would like to keep trying to work at using the fund, I know the Parks Department is open to any suggestions they have on how to properly distribute those funds. Thank you, Chair.
Yeah, it's too complicated for this time of the night. Never mind. But
it is something worthwhile to look at and I think it requires DOE and MIL and an audit of their funds.
It's very complicated. Never. Rollins Fernandez. So, on page 55, section W, it's the MIL fee fund balance is only $115,000 so it's not like millions of dollars. So, you know, it's not gonna buy a bus, which is, you know, what Molokai and Ohana and probably Lanai would definitely could use. And then as, budget director stated, I think when we heard some of what the testifier in Hana was talking about, it was about the travel, the student and use travel that Member Johnson and I developed a a few years ago.
Member Patangan, are you safe? You're fine. Okay. So let's move on. Anything else? Members, are we done with parks, Rates and fees? We're done. I'm done with parks. Okay. We are done with parks. So good job, everybody. It is now 08:26. I'm wondering if you would like to start with police or you wanted to Water. Tomorrow. Oh water. I'm sorry. Water. Water. Department of Water Supply. There's one priority which is mine and it is to add 450,000.
This is the Kula Community Watershed Alliance in the amount of 450,000. Need a second. Second. Thank you. So the Kula my discussion is this is 08/08/2023 wildfire where the Kula Watershed Alliance has helped with the restoration of the impacted areas of country in the Kula area. And they're also planting trees and they're trying to restore. This money is what they asked for. I think they wanted a total of 700,000. I'm appropriating asking for $4.50 for them. Thank you.
Sure. Kyle Ellison Folks? I'm sorry. What? Is this Kyle Ellison Folks? No.
This is Sarah Tekula. Kyle Ellison is Malone. Full us apart.
Member Bolton. I just was wondering how you're gonna get the money because isn't the water department self funded? Oh, I'm sorry.
So the water department gave them a $250,000. You know what their grants that they do
for water? They
were given 250,000 in the watershed grants.
But you said you're gonna add $4.04 50? Yeah. To get them to their 700. So my question is, are you gonna transfer general funds to the water fund? Because the water department is self funded.
Chair? Yes. Apologies. Staff will just note there are offsets. There are two offsets proposed alongside this priority. One, to reduce countywide watershed protection by 250,000 and another to decrease water operations program salaries by $200,000 to arrive at the $450,000 needed for this line item.
That'll get them there.
I have a question for, budget director. Director? Okay. Because I'm trying to type it up and trying to look at the answer for myself. But because it's taking the $2.50 off the top for the watershed protection. Is that competitive or is it already appropriated or earmarked for an organization?
Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Councilor Morales Fernandez. Yes, in the program budget, page eight twenty five, 250,000 of this is for the Kula Community Watershed Alliance. So I guess if I should just could get some clarification, is the intent for 700,000 total or $450,000 total? $4.50.
Okay. So in that case, I guess one option would be to increase well, I guess you can pull the two fifty out of, countywide watershed protection, add another 200, to add a line item specifically for, Kula Community Watershed Alliance. And then I would just ask for the a budget cut, because that also has fringe costs associated. Maybe it doesn't need to be the full 200,000. It can be whatever the amount needs to be plus fringe to come to 200,000 if that's okay with the body.
How do you make a motion like that, though?
Staff, you got that?
So staff's understanding then, it it would still be to reduce or or separate out from county wide watershed protection, dollars 250,000. And then to cut water operations program, we're gonna have to mess around with the numbers, but it'll be salaries plus fringe to equal 250,000 the remaining $200,000 So just that means the other effective line items would be admin overhead charges and then the OPEB and employees benefits line items.
Got it, Mr. Krueger.
That would likely to the $4.50.
You. Okay. Any more questions? Ready to vote? Okay. All in favor raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Member Palton?
If it helps the staff, 65.76 is the fringe for water. Aye. Very good. Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay. Motion carries.
Then Okay. I'm ready. Anybody else? What do you have?
I'm so sorry, Chair. But just to clarify, so that motion did include the appropriate reductions. Apologies. When we started, it was just the add, but it did include the appropriate reductions, right?
Yes. Yes. No objections. We'll get there.
Thank you.
It included whatever you said, Mr. Krueger.
Okay. Member Bolton, what do
you have? On page 16 of appendix C under countywide, I moved to change project title and project description for letter small e, acquisition of Maui land and pineapple, land and water system assets, acquisition of water system assets to include repairs, maintenance, studies, appraisals, and other related costs of Maui land and pineapple water system, assets to align with the Department of Water Supply's vision to integrate and consolidate private water systems and develop a municipal water system, land acquisition to support department operational readiness.
Second. Departmental request. One seventy seven on Granicus.
Moved by member Pauline, second by member Rollins Fernandez. My discussion is that is a department request. And what what is the total amount? It's words. Words changed.
Director.
The department. Thank you, Thank you, councilor chair. Rupaulin. Yes. This was a departmental request. So, when we were initially submitted this, our understanding was that they were only willing to sell, the water system assets, but it appears through negotiations that it may be possible for the department to acquire some land as part of this agreement as well. So we just want to ensure the language is in there so that we can pivot however negotiations go. And as always, for any acquisitions, we will be coming back to the council for approval resolution. Thank you, chair.
So there's no dollar amount in this. It's just verbiage for negotiation.
Thank you, chair.
Also How is everybody else? Okay. Oh, did we vote on that? We didn't get there yet.
But can it can I make sure I understand? Yes. So, member Palton, are you going off of the, departmental transmittal for changes. What what page are you on for that?
Branicus one seventy seven departmental request. Page seven.
Sorry. I was looking at the
Page seven.
I was looking at the page three where they had their capital improvement ones. I had the wrong I had the wrong requested amendment in front of me.
So, chair, it just adds the word land and and it adds of water system assets and then it adds land acquisition to support water department operational readiness. That's it.
Members, any discussion?
Shirley, you're fine.
Okay.
All in favor raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Okay. Nine ayes. Know I think the department has more. Oh. Go ahead.
Page 27 of the budget bill. Let's see. I'd like to reduce estimated revenues for ir own.
Then the other to
point nine. Second. So on page 27 where are you?
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Chair. What's an administrative oversight regarding the specific eligibility of restricted cash, the Department of Water Supply is revising the FY27 CIP program. While current records show a restricted cash balance of $21,800,000 this total includes customer deposits which are not allowed for CIP purposes. Total restricted cash available for CIP purposes is 13,000,000 derived from 1,900,000 water system development fees. In addition, the department has 11,100,000 available in the upcountry water system expansion capital improvement reserve revolving fund.
As the current budget utilizes 15,900,000 of water restricted funds, the department is proposing the following to ensure fiscal compliance. Reduce estimated revenues of the special assessments by 13,900,000 by removing CBS 7,253 upcountry reliable capacity department of land and natural resources well. So remove this CIP project from page 27 of the budget bill.
It's 12,000,000.
Reduce project cost by 900,000 from 12,000,000 to 11,100,000 and add an appropriation to appendix a part two upcountry water system expansion capital improvement reserve revolving fund. That's my motion.
Second. Okay. I'm gonna call a recess because I want more information.
You want more information? Yeah. And give me A
time of 08:40. 08:40. The motion made by Member Paulton, second by Member Rollins Fernandez. We got the handout which is on Granicus, I guess, somewhere. It was emailed to us, Chair. It should be on Granicus for the general public. Yeah. Okay. And this was their correction. Wow. Okay. Readyville, all in favor, raise your hand and say aye. Aye. Okay. Motion carries nine oh, eight eight and one excuse. That's water. Anything else with water?
Did you also want me to remove, I moved to remove 500,000 of water restricted funding from countywide water system modification?
Second.
Okay. Member Paulsen, second by Member Rollins Fernandez.
Discussion per department's request.
Okay. Anything,
anybody, member Batangan is coming.
Just vote yes.
Aye. All in favor say aye. Okay. Nine eyes. Or is it eight eyes? Nine eyes?
Yeah.
Okay. Next. Also on page 27, letter j, capital improvement. Number two, a, I mean small a, paren one, paren I, I would like to remove upcountry reliable capacity for 1,500,000 and read letter ii to become I.
Second.
I thought they just used that in this correction.
Motion made by Member Pauline, second by Member Rollins Fernandez. We'll be deferring this project to fiscal year twenty eight.
Member Hodgins.
Thank you. Is this in this page that I'm looking at?
Yeah. It's right above the chart. CBS seven eight eight seven.
For whatever reason, my eyes went straight to the box at the bottom.
It's right above the box at the bottom. Thank you. So they are The other one that I did with the Upcountry was The one above? Yeah. The one below. Okay. The DLNR. Will I reduced that one by 900,000, remember?
Yeah. So all of the the that spreadsheet or the the information sheet, you're you're actually cleaning up all the things that they just said.
K. I'm doing it because Dana can. Only I can.
All a favor. Bye. Never cook. The died. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Director Milner.
Aloha, Chair. My apologies. I thought this was included in the departmental request, but it was not. My sincere apologies. Last CIP request, West Maui reliable capacity for 900,000. They have received grant funding for this, so this is no longer needed. So we would like to request the deletion of that 900,000. And the addition of upcountry reliable capacity, Haiku Aquifer Source, and USGS Monitor Well for 1,000,000, and that will rebalance the water fund. Thank you, chair.
So moved. Second. Yay. Okay. So is it member who who who did the vote? Member
Paul Tame Moovie?
Second by member Allen Spernades. Okay. All in favor? Aye.
Aye. Okay. Nine ayes. Motion carries. Are we done? Yes. Okay. So that was CIPs and everything else. Grants on page 45, there's no more any more amendments. Water fund, is there any amendments which is on Bill 55 page 20? A or B category? Seeing none. Operating budget, water fund, page 19. A or B, amendments? Nope. So we're done, right? James Pearson, we're done with water?
Apologies. I'm just double checking to make sure I didn't see any offsets. Yes, from our understanding, there's nothing else.
Okay. We did appendix A part two.
Apologies, Chair. Staff is flagging a couple of discrepancies.
We're not 09:00 yet. One second.
Oh, apologies, chair. We're just
Last year people were kinda grouchy. At least everybody is still laughing today. What do we find James?
Apologies, Chair. I can't identify them right now. If they're significant, we'll flag it for the committee tomorrow.
Okay. So water will still cover in case we find any discrepancies. So parks, water.
Oh, do we need to recognize that 900,000 in page 45?
I thought we did that.
What they found? They said they found 900,000 for the West Maui.
Did that.
We did it. Thank council member. That was added by a budget amendment for fiscal year twenty six, so no need to add to fiscal year twenty seven.
Okay. Thank you.
So I guess we're gonna have some major cuts when we get into police. Is that what director said? Anyway, that's tomorrow.
No. Me, I asked for it tomorrow because I'm still working on the discrepancies in positions vacant or otherwise. Okay.
So tomorrow, we're gonna do police, mayor, and whatever mister Kruger comes across with for water in case we have to revisit it. So we'll be open for that in case. Yeah. Because we haven't we haven't closed any of the departments, so we
can still talk about it. So
we are Can you confirm? So tomorrow it's police, mayor, and any revisits we may need to meet to Waters. That correct?
Public works.
And public works.
And countywide. Yeah.
Mayor, police, public works. And we get to Don't forget pop police. He didn't say police.
And we gotta take up the bills.
Right? Whatever bills. And general budget provisions and countywide.
We gotta do countywide less. Okay, everybody. Thank you very much. We're gonna defer this, and we will see you tomorrow at 09:00.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.