County Council - Session - Special Meeting

Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
County Council - Session
Meeting Type
County Council - Session
Location
Los Alamos County, NM
Meeting Date
April 28, 2026

Transcript

801 sections (from 910 segments)

0:02 – 0:250

Okay. I want to welcome everybody to the continuation of our special meeting on the budget hearings. So I think the first thing we'll do is we'll see if you're willing and able. We'll do the Pledge of Allegiance again tonight. I pledge allegiance to the flag of

0:251

The United States Of America

0:270

and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,

0:322

is invisible, with liberty and justice for all. So

0:42 – 1:020

let's see. I think we can do public comment next. So I think we might have some folks who want to make public comment tonight that are present. So come on up and we'll get, we'll have three minutes and just, if you want to state your name.

1:03 – 1:143

My name is Kyle Dickman and I'm here with the Tufts Ikes and we just wanted to say we're really pleased to see the bike park made it into the budget and we really hope that it stays there.

1:17 – 1:284

My name is Bridger Dickman, and I support keeping the bike park in the budget. My name is Tally Dickman, and I support keeping the bike park in the budget.

1:31 – 1:425

And I'm Terren Dickman. I also support keeping the bike park in the budget and really appreciate that you've taken into consideration the amazing process that brought it to where it is. Thank you.

1:42 – 1:560

Okay. Well, you all for being here. Do we have anyone else present in the chambers that not seeing anyone. Mr. Brielle, can you look online and see if there's anyone who wants to make public comment?

1:566

If you're online and you'd like to make a public comment, please raise your hand.

2:04 – 2:230

Not seeing any chair. Okay, thank you. And we did receive a couple of e comments supporting the bike park as well. So just want to make note of that. So I think now we're ready to engage. But before we start, I think there was something that Ms. Relenton wanted to bring to our attention that she passed out to the council.

2:23 – 3:007

Yes. Thank you, chair. I just wanted to say that we, on the yellow sheets in front of you, there were some question quite a few questions on different departments about the professional and contractual services kind of combined line items that included training and some other things. So we just went ahead and thank you, miss Mariano, for breaking it down for every single department so you can see the breakdown of those of that line item. And we also give this information to the clerk, there's also copies at the back of the room. And we're happy to forward it to the media as well. So thank you.

3:00 – 3:140

Okay. That'd be great if you could forward it to the media so they can see it too. Okay. So now I think we're ready to resume where we almost got to last night. I So think we have Community Services Department ready to make a presentation. Mr. Steyron.

3:29 – 3:571

So thank you, chair and counsel. Go ahead and go to the next slide. We're very excited to be here tonight and talk about accomplishments for this year and our plans for next year. I did wanna take a a quick minute to remind you in the bold. We've tried to link your strategic objectives, your strategic priorities, and then what's in our integrated master plan to show how those are all aligned.

3:57 – 4:291

So when you see operational excellence, effective, efficient, reliable services, and improve organizational outreach, You'll see those on all of our slides. So that'll show you how this links back to your overall objectives. Significantly last year for operational excellence, we were were a gold medal finalist for the National Parks and Recreation Association. It's his highest honor. And I have it on very good rumor that we were not that we have attained that status again this year.

4:29 – 4:511

So we'll be a finalist. We'll have some more official coming out in the next couple of weeks on that. And then we're working on our new library website that we actually implemented last year. Next slide. So we did several studies last year, and you'll see some of those come through as we talk about the budget.

4:52 – 5:271

We have the artificial turf study, the North Mesa recreation master plan, which the bike park consists of. We have the cemetery master plan where we have some allocation for funds this for the proposed budget. Our open space trails and management plan, we're already working on that with the Bio Canyon Trail conversation. So key renovations that we did this year is the East Park Basketball Court and North Mesa Pickleball Court. Every time I see someone that plays pickleball, they they still think those are the greatest things that we've done in this community in the past few years.

5:27 – 6:031

That's really, really great. We're still working on our athletic fields. And then we're also doing some work at Ashley Pond improving the sidewalks this year. Upcoming projects as of next week, they're really not coming anymore, but they'll be opening up next week. Our two playgrounds that we just completed at 37th And Pinon. Those are really exciting. I I think we've got some of the youth that we actually went out and talked to a couple of years ago that are actually going to be able to attend the opening at Pinion. So that'll be exciting.

6:050

Next slide.

6:10 – 6:541

So social services was really busy this year. They do they do so many different things. Just to highlight a couple of them, they worked with the coalition in the community about the weekend help campaign where they collected quite a bit of emergency food and distribution. They continue to do outreach through many of our programs and and integrate it through our events that we do, whether it's the concert series, farmers market, extended hours at the library, and then other community events. Been working hard to advance the comprehensive health plan.

6:55 – 7:191

We've got our program specialist on board who's already starting some outreach. And then again, we truly could not do it without so many of our partners. You heard the judge talk about Hawk Hangout last night with the partners that every anyone that has a relationship with the youth in our community participates in that, I think. And that's just really great. We've done some de escalation training.

7:20 – 7:531

And then we're also part of the group that's been doing the suicide prevention training, the ABCs that we've been supporting here. Next slide. Just some funky things. Last year at our July 4, we were able to be a part of the Guinness Book World Record for the drone show. The company Sky Elements, did 25 events in a twenty four hour period and got them in a and it was with the total number of drones.

7:53 – 8:201

So that was exciting. We've got a little certificate for that. Even with the aquatic center being considered for renovation this year. We're able to include some adult dive in movies, water volleyball, and we were able to extend the leisure lagoon hours. Our triathlon finally surpassed our pre COVID participant, And we added something new at our first downhill gravity car race similar to a soapbox derby.

8:22 – 9:111

Next page. So we've worked at enhancing our volunteer program on the parks open space side. They're working behind the scenes to get the trail program that was presented to you up and operational in a in a format that we can use. We continue to try to expand mental health resources through all of our partnerships. We actually thought a little outside the box, and we're now in our second cohort of providing nature based therapy training for our community with so much of our natural resource assets, forest bathing and and forest therapy, has shown some real results in having in helping people, create positive interactions using nature to reduce stress, improve spirituality.

9:12 – 9:421

So that's been a big improvement we've done this year. We also held a youth summit and are planning for the older adult summit this year. Next slide, please. We've continued our quest to include to make inclusivity for all. You'll notice that we did a really good job with the ADA part ADA considerations for 37th And Pinion Park.

9:43 – 10:151

We renovated the courtyard at the library to make that more accessible for a statue there. We started the Bio Canyon Trailhead in the well, the Mesa Trail is work we're working on that one in the demonstration garden, but we're just getting started. And we're looking to improve our sustainability. The robotic mowers were a huge hit that we've been out at the golf course in North Mesa. We found a little money at the end of the year, and we're gonna be adding some units down at Overlook Park here in the near future.

10:17 – 10:491

Next slide. So a few highlights as we're going forward. We wanna continue to implement our integrated master plan, and then we're gonna do the cemetery master plan as well. Part of this is getting the columbariums in place. We've got the San Ildefonso and Grand Canyon playgrounds that are under design right now.

10:50 – 11:271

We had a couple of really great meetings at Chimisa and Barranca Elementary's last week to get some youth feedback. You'll see as we look at the CIP later on that we do have funding for the norm some starter funding for the North Mesa Bike Park there. In the golf course, we finished the warranty work. And that project, we opened up the golf course on Thursday for the full 18 holes. And as CDD talked about last night, we're partnering with them on the Trans Rockies mountain bike race.

11:27 – 11:451

It's a three city Northern New Mexico event. We know the biggest and best will be up here in Los Alamos. Next slide. So we talked about the cemetery master plan, the columbarium. We have a we have a task order to get those designed.

11:46 – 12:321

I wanna give a shout out to our recreation superintendent, Katherine Hudspeth, for working with the community to find an alternate place for people to swim this summer when the pool was down. So we've got the Pinion Park down in White Rock Pool that we're cleaning up and hopefully be ready to go by Memorial Day or maybe a few days earlier. The library is working on their integrated library system with a with a new vendor that was just signed recently, and they're starting the migration now for this project. Next slide. We're looking to expand the outreach of our social our social services program specialists this year.

12:33 – 13:091

We continue to work with Public Works on the social services action center. And we've worked real hard to improve the harm reduction efforts, through more overdose response, suicide prevention trainings, expanding our naloxone access. And we've also had conversations with the medical center and our fire department on how can we serve our community better for those that are, in challenging moments. We continue to have success with our Unitus referral program. We've actually added two additional members this year.

13:09 – 13:411

Next slide. So this is this is a summary of the professional and contractual services by division. The professional and contractual services, as you see in your handout, covers about 16 different organizational line items. So these are just a summary of some of the contracts and big items in that heading in the budget book. Next slide.

13:44 – 14:401

And this is a continuation with our social services and cultural services, which both of these items are actually in your budget book with the breakout of our contracted services for each one of those as part of the budget process. Next slide. So as you can see, overall, through efforts this year, we have a minor reduction of 1%. I think one of the things to note as you as you look at this independently, we recently completed a compensation plan adjustment for our casual employees. So you'll see our casual employees as part of salaries will be higher because we have most of the casual people in that compensation plan really impacted to the positive of all those employees.

14:411

With that, I'll stand for any questions.

14:45 – 14:570

Okay. Thank you, Mr. Theron. Do we have any questions from counsel on presentation or the what's in the budget book? Counsel, we're here.

14:598

What is this program, Unite us? I probably had

15:010

a briefing out of it. I don't remember.

15:04 – 15:461

I'm chair and councilor. Unitas is a it's a single source platform that we use through a lot of our partners that are helping those that are facing challenges. And what it allows us is instead of somebody coming and having to tell stories to get utility assistance, food assistance, housing assistance, wherever they come in the door first, that person, as part of our network, captures all that information. And then from there, there's a single referral that goes out if they say they need these additional services. It goes directly to that provider, and then that provider, it's on them to contact that individual.

15:47 – 16:221

So it it helps people not have to tell their trauma story multiple times. We it gives us the referral instead of, well, you need to go see them on Tuesday. You need to go see them on Wednesday. It goes directly to that that individual for services. They make the contact out, and it really helps streamline the process and ensure that they're getting the services that they need. Plus, it provides a a database that we can see how many challenges these people have that we're trying to work through, to get them back to a point in society where they feel comfortable.

16:248

Does it include mental health, or is it just, financial assistance for utilities?

16:30 – 16:411

It's for a very broad range of issues. It covers mental health. It may cover it covers every potential need that they may have, and it gets documented in there.

16:430

Okay. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, Councilor. We have Councilor Huffman.

16:51 – 17:049

Pardon me. Thank you, Chair. My first question has to it's on page two forty three, I think. Yeah. Two forty three.

17:07 – 17:419

75 k is part of the revised budget for our current fiscal year for tree inventory of park and public spaces. This is on the small capital project spreadsheet. I guess I should have said that first, the CSD small capital projects page. And I was curious if that tree inventory has been completed and those funds expended. And then as a result of doing that inventory, will there be a need for some budget next year or the year after?

17:43 – 17:559

Because I've kinda had this thing about some of our dying trees, as some of you know. So I'm just wondering if, okay, we're gonna do this inventory. Now what are we doing with those results, and should we be budgeting to address that?

17:56 – 18:221

Thank you, chair and councilor. It's about 85% completed. We lost our arborist just before it was totally completed. The intent is to look at our overall inventory of trees and make sure that we have a good mix of species so that we don't have any issue any issues and and have a good diversity. But that is the next step once we get that completed.

18:239

But then what about part b of my question about the need for funds going forward if there's some findings that say we need to address some issues discovered?

18:32 – 18:441

Chair and council, right now, we've already come to council for a small amount of about 25,000, maybe in 2425 to do some tree replacement.

18:451

So if it's more significant, we may have to. But that that's kind of our plan

18:499

right Do you feel like that'll be sufficient? And then it pardon me for not knowing offhand. Do we have, funding for FTE for replacement arborist?

19:001

Chair and councilor, yes.

19:01 – 19:239

Okay. Wonderful. Thank you. Then on the same page, only because I'm curious because I think it's fun, bike maintenance stations is bundled with bear proof trash cans for who knows why. But I've seen bike maintenance stations in other communities, and I think they're fantastic. What is this about? Maybe maybe they're already here, I just haven't seen them.

19:23 – 20:041

So chair and councilor, yes, we already have several around the community. There's one in the portico over here at the library. We've got one at peak as well, and we've got one on a trailhead that escapes me right now. But this is to add some additional spaces. So tubular formation that has about a dozen different bike tools that are on the cable. There's a little pump there so you can pump it up, and it's all right there. It's got a little rack where you can hang your bike while you're working on it. But it's been something requested by our trail and open space group and some of our bikers that went around on trail and maybe need a tool that at least have a space to go to.

20:04 – 20:369

I love those and and feel bad I didn't know we had them already. So thank you. And then on the capital the CIP budget detail schedule and ten year forecast, this is where I think people are happy to see the North Mesa recreation master plan. And I assume that 500 K is includes the bike park at North Mesa. Is that correct, or is that in a different place?

20:371

You'll counselor and chair chair and counselor, you'll see at the bottom, there's actually two lines. There's a North Mesa recreation plan and a North Mesa bike park. Yep.

20:469

I highlighted it. You're right.

20:471

So both of those funds, based on your approval, would be used to help phase one.

20:54 – 21:219

Okay. So then my second part of that question is phase one five hundred ks, is that sufficient? Or if we were able to have a budget option to allocate more funding, could we get the bike part done more expeditiously? Or is there just too many things on the critical path that even if you threw a bunch of money at it, this just doesn't make sense for various reasons?

21:22 – 21:507

Chair Reidy, Counselor Haberman, I think we can probably look at that a little bit more when we look at the CIP plan. But it really is just about we would need time to go through a design process and everything else before we're ready to construct. So we were comfortable with this time frame was feasible and then balancing that with our fund balance in the CIP. So that's where we landed. But we cannot certainly, if you wanna exchange some priorities when we look at the whole entire CIP, we can look at that. But we would be looking for trade offs, not just move moving things forward.

21:50 – 22:339

Okay. Okay. And then the ice rink flooring and shade structure, 6,300,000 was allocated for the current fiscal year that we're in. Right? That's for the chiller. But then there's I guess where where but it says shades, so it's confusing. It says it says flooring and shade structure, parenthesis, chiller. So I was trying to understand I know the chiller's done. We approved installing a shade structure. And I just I'm curious about the timeline for that and the funding ability for that.

22:341

Chair and councilor, I'm gonna phone our friend, mister Martinez, and let him answer that question.

22:41 – 23:163

Mister chair, councilor Haberman, so that project was bundled altogether. The chiller is now complete, the portion of it. The re the funds that do remain right now are what we project to be sufficient for the replacement of the floor, which is a what we'll call, like, a radiant system type floor configuration and for installing a shade structure. We're currently in the process of assembling a scope of work to issue a design build RFP for that project, so it is in process currently.

23:179

Okay. And then I guess we can talk about that further when we go over the CIP as well. Okay. Thanks very much. That's all my questions, chair.

23:26 – 23:450

Thank you, councilor Abbott. Any other questions? No? Well, that was my question, but I think so we can have a design built for the shade structure. It seems like we could have a design built for the bike park. Is that correct?

23:461

Chair and councilor, is correct. That would be one path forward.

23:49 – 24:240

Okay. Because that was the comments we get were to design and build, not just design and then wait and then build. But, okay. So I did want to ask about the social services facilities. That's where the hub is located, correct? So am I it's always hard to make sure I'm looking at the right row. I believe that that's pushed out. Is that correct? Next year. Right?

24:24 – 25:077

Chair Reidy, we currently have 950,000 funding that is budget funded in this current budget that will continue for fiscal year and will continue forward into the future years. And then for fiscal year '28, '29, and '30, we have three years of funding. We certainly as we see how the GRT increment come additional increment comes in, we'll have a little more confidence if we can fund that sooner. But the way we looked at this budget model, it did not it was hard to fit in that large of a project. But we're also considering some other hybrid projects or maybe it's a series of different facilities.

25:077

So we're also in the process of considering if, you know, we don't know exactly how much funding we'll need depending on what the solution is.

25:15 – 25:270

Okay. So in the current budget, there's lease cost per year for the social services offices.

25:281

I'm sure that is correct.

25:29 – 25:440

But that's something on the order of, what, like $300,000 $400,000 Is that about right? So there's not much of a trade off there. If we had a different facility where they were located, that would only save us that amount of money per year. Is that right?

25:44 – 25:577

Chair, ballpark, you're correct. We currently have a three year lease that we just signed with two one year potential extensions depending on the timing of new new facilities being available.

25:570

Okay. And so we're spending down the $9.50 potentially this year on a design? Is that the idea?

26:067

Chair Reidy, that's correct. We were using that for to do kind of a siting analysis once we identify which sites we want to end the public process around evaluating those sites.

26:15 – 26:270

Okay. And then the size of the facility that is earmarked for the total cost over three years is about how many square feet? We have an idea.

26:297

I'll look to Mr. Miguel Jimenez because he's been working on it.

26:37 – 26:5610

Chair Reidy, counselors, what we have as of today is a list of requirements. And we have potential sites. So the actual square footage of the building will have to be determined based on Okay. The site available and our capacity to fund

26:560

the the project. Okay. Yeah. Okay.

26:5910

We we don't have a

27:010

set. Yeah. There's no there's no even approximate square footage at this point.

27:06 – 27:2010

Well, we know that the space that we are currently using for social services is roughly in the order of 14,000 square feet. So Okay. So but that's what we use right now.

27:20 – 27:320

Okay. So we'd be looking at potentially something larger if we have more needs. Budget, Lori. Yeah. Budget available. Okay. Okay. Thank you.

27:3211

Yes. Thank you.

27:35 – 27:490

So let's see. So the other thing that's come up lately, I'm glad to see, I think you have in here for the field improvements continuing. Is that correct? So continuing to work on the Yeah. So we yeah.

27:49 – 28:101

Yeah. We still have that agreement for those additional fields to be done. Had some planning issues last year. Spiro took longer to be done, so it's still out of commission. They're starting work on it next week. And then we have to finish sodding by Ryan before we can start into the phase two of that agreement.

28:100

Okay. And then among the things that are not in here, I don't see anything about turf. Is turf not in here currently?

28:22 – 28:521

Chair and and counsel, we we still need to have some more conversations with the school district about the turf. Also, when we were doing our priorities, it seemed like there was a larger community outcry and support for a bike park for that for those fundings. We we knew it was gonna be a tight year. So we made we made our priority based on the community feedback we got, and that's why the bike park's there and not artificial turf. Turf.

28:520

Okay. Thank you. I just wanted to clarify that. Ms. Lauren?

28:56 – 29:197

Chair Reidy, do want to note that we did put money in, ongoing money, for field maintenance and as well as ADA implementation and parks master plan. So it doesn't mean that there aren't some monies there that we could reallocate or prioritize based on where we wanna go with the future. We we did put in the past, haven't had those kind

29:197

ongoing routine replacement costs in our capital plan.

29:25 – 29:360

Okay. And so I guess also given the comments, you're we're comfortable with the amount of money we have in there for the field renovations? It seems like I ask you the same question every year.

29:36 – 30:231

Chair chair and council, we do. We actually if I'll take you back a minute, last year in February, we actually had three phases in our field renovation contract to totally do 11 fields over three years. So last year was our first one in that particular agreement. So we have those other two fields that are, positioned that we just need to to potentially issue a job order, and those could get started. But we're trying to balance keeping our youth and our our other players with a space to play while we take some out and renovate them and try to find those that happy balance between users and needs to and that's why I stretched over a three year period.

30:230

Okay. Thank you. Okay. I don't see any other questions. So thank you. So I think we're ready for a tentative motion.

30:46 – 31:0412

I move that council tentatively approve the proposed budget for the community services department in the amount of 33,000 I'm sorry. That's not right. Dollars 33,543,026. Second?

31:04 – 31:180

Okay. So, get back over here with microphone. So, we have a motion by Counselor Neil Clinton and a second by Counselor Herman. Not seeing any discussion, can the clerk please call the roll?

31:205

Counselor Roddy?

31:235

Counselor Rigor?

31:25 – 31:385

Councilor Hand? Yes. Councilor Cole? Yes. Councilor Haverman? Yes. Councilor Neil Clinton? Yes. Councilor Herman? Yes. Motion passes, seven zero.

31:390

Okay, I'll let the record show the motion passes unanimously. So, now we're on to the fire department.

31:58 – 32:1413

Good evening, chair, members of the council. Thanks for hearing us tonight. Of course, I've met you before. I'm Eric Lutzenberg. I have a partner who's going to be presenting with me, Javier Anderson, who is our administrative services manager.

32:15 – 32:5313

I'm going to do the first few sort of frame setting pieces, give a general overview of our accomplishments for the past year, and then I will hand it over to Javier to talk about our budgeting process and the nuts and bolts of our budget. So let's talk about first the accomplishments. I'm gonna talk first about an unprinted accomplishment, not in your budget book. It's not up on the screen. Los Alamos Fire Department consists of 176 individuals, and that's 40, at minimum, people who are on at any given point working out of five stations in the training center and the administration.

32:54 – 33:2913

And doing all kinds of calls in Los Alamos, in White Rock for the labs. That includes fire calls, structure fires, wildland fires, vehicle fires, whatever burns we go to. It includes technical rescue of all sorts. It includes hazardous materials. And of course, it includes emergency medical services, which is the vast number of calls that we do in terms of volume. Those are great people doing great work. And I think our number one accomplishment is the things we do every day. It's not just that response. It's everything that we do to get ready for response. It's everything we do to train our people.

33:29 – 33:5713

Right now, there are 13 cadets in our academy being trained by our people so they can be responders for a twenty twenty five year plus career here in Los Alamos. We do our own ongoing training. We do public education. We do inspections. We do mitigation. We do code enforcement. Just today, our fire marshal put out the restrictions. We're going to stage one restrictions. We do all the work to figure out when's the right time to start to be safer with the wildland issue. And, of course, that's today, ironically.

33:58 – 34:3513

But our number one accomplishment is doing that work day in, day out, 20 fourseven in this community and allowing our people to go home safely. So it's not printed, but there's accomplishment number one. Last year, our folks did that well. So the first accomplishment that we have on the board is that there was a transition in leadership. And fire departments are inherently social. We are a social business, a social profession. And any transition of command is a big deal for us. It sort of rocks the system a bit. This year, we sort of went through two. We had Chief Hughes leave, which was a big deal after twelve plus years.

34:35 – 35:1213

And Wendy Survi came in and she did a great job. She did a very good job of holding down Los Alamos for a year. And over that year, there was a selection process. I'm, of course, happy that I was selected, but it was a pretty in-depth process. And then so we went through another transition. And, with professionalism and grace, Los Alamos Fire Department handled two of these transitions and continued to do this service in a pretty astounding way. So that's accomplishment number one. Accomplishment number two is the accreditation. So there's really, there's sort of multiple groups that are always evaluating how well we do our business. Of course, the most important is our community.

35:12 – 35:4913

But there's two formal that are constantly evaluating that. One is ISO, Insurance Services Organization. And they give a rating somewhere from 10 to one, one being the best. Los Alamos is a one currently and we've already started doing our reevaluation, which will happen in this year. And we expect that we will once again be a one. But the other is an accreditation which comes from a body called CPSE. And it's a pretty involved process. Our divisions all go in and do an appraisal of the work that they're doing. They say what's going right, what can be done better, and they make a plan to improve that. A peer team comes in.

35:49 – 36:1413

Last year, the peer team came in and evaluated all of our programs, all of our appraisals, gave us recommendations on what we should do to move into the future. We prepare a report based on those recommendations. And then at the beginning of this year, we went and we did our hearing to get accredited for the sixth time, which puts Los Alamos an incredibly rare company in this nation. So again, quite an accomplishment that happened last year. Slide, please.

36:14 – 36:5713

The last accomplishment I'll talk about is about wild land. We're talking about that for two reasons. One is that, of course, it is on the minds of most of the people in the community. It's probably the number one thing I've heard both during the selection process and in the community meetings I've had since that the community is concerned about. The second part is we're doing it extraordinarily well. Los Alamos does the wild land thing well, which is good to know. In terms of specific accomplishments, we deployed six times in varying capacities. That's important for a number of reasons. One is because it gives our folks experience. Two is that it's paying things forward.

36:57 – 37:3213

It is going to communities at their time of need. And that's something that we not only hope folks will do for us, but we actually have experience having received those people multiple times. So it's the pay forward bit that's important. But it's not just operational success that we have. We've done some great mitigation work. We did 40 some acres, which included some work with robotic mastication, which is a really unique thing. It's cool that we were able to do it here in Los Alamos. We expect to do more mitigation in the coming years. It's a significant part of this budget. We do intend to do more robotic mastication.

37:32 – 37:4813

And in the future we intend to look at some more sort of tech forward ways that we're improving safety, not just in wild land but in other areas as well. So there's the general bit. I'll now turn it over to Javier to give you some specifics about process and the budget itself.

37:49 – 38:1414

Thanks, chief. So the slide in front of you basically shows our funds. We operate out of four specific funds. The largest what you what they call the fire cooperative agreement fund is fund six six four. What you guys see generally is all rolled up at the next level down, which is what we call our organizational budgets.

38:14 – 38:5914

And the fire department is part of their accreditation process actually takes that to a level even further. And we actually have program budgets, which all roll up into those specific organizational budgets. That's important to you guys because you guys only see a large summary sheet that's in front of you. And I know there's a lot of variances. A lot of those variances can be attributed to us programming all the way down at the individual program level. And what happens is we move money that meet the organizational needs based on annual program appraisals. That annual program appraisal process and I think whoever's got the slides can go to the next slide. It's just basically showing that we have, again, more program budgets that fall into each one

38:591

of those

38:59 – 39:1714

organizational budgets. Next slide. This is the process that we go through every single year to develop our budget. We actually took a very conscious minded approach to the budget this year. We know that council's guidance and the county manager's guidance was to cut 10%.

39:17 – 39:5114

We actually identified that 10% and put it on a shelf, so to speak. We were told that we should just program it because it is a contractual obligation as part of the cooperative agreement. So we we still did that. We still went through the exercise, and we actually went through the the entire process of being fiscally responsible and tightening our belt and looked at those areas where we could cut. In it was funny when county manager, Laurent, asked us, what are those things that are on that kind of chopping board?

39:51 – 40:2814

It's all stuff like supplies that such as first aid supplies that that we can kinda push to the end of the year or life packs that we can kinda push to the end of the year, which were large purchases. It was none none of the stuff that we wanted to push, but nevertheless, we went through that entire exercise. So again, that each program goes through that that exercise of looking at their budget, programming it where they need to, moving money, which is why you see some of those variances. We have a hearing in front of the fire chief, myself, and the deputy chief. And then that, after that, we prepare a budget and appear in front of the county manager.

40:28 – 41:2914

And then what you have before you is the result of the culmination of that entire exercise. So with our budget highlight, the biggest piece here is the vast majority of our budget personnel and benefits is all programmed as part of the cooperative agreement. The rest of the the what we call indirect or other direct costs are part of our county match, and that is programmed to the same letter of our contractual agreement that we have with the cooperative agreement. I believe with that, the basic use for it is firefighter protective person protective equipment, medical supplies, some of the contractual pieces that we have, our medical director, and I think that's all on the next slide, our professional and contractual services. Big one is software that we use for record keeping and training and development, medical director, pharmacists, medical medical supplies, and then the large one is our administrative office next door.

41:2914

With that, we'll stand for questions.

41:330

Okay. Thank you, Chief Wittenberg and Mr. Anderson. So do counsel have any questions about presentation or the budget book? Counselor Hand?

41:4315

I just have a comment.

41:440

Okay, sure.

41:45 – 41:5615

I just wanted to thank you. I heard on the news that Los Alamos County helped with the Espanola fire just a few days ago, and thank you for your service helping with that.

41:5913

Chair, councilor, thank you for that. Yeah. We had multiple crews that helped for three days. We're proud to not only serve our community but help others when needed. Thanks for the comment.

42:0816

I'll pass it on.

42:100

Okay. Thank you, Councillor Hannon. Any other Councillor Cope?

42:15 – 42:3216

Yeah. I'm curious about the FTEs by division. So emergency medical has three, but within, operations, you have folks that are, medically certified, right? I mean, it's not just three people.

42:32 – 42:4813

Yeah. Chair, counselor, that's correct. Those are people who are in charge of interactions licensure and training and supplies. All of our operational staff are certified to at least the EMT basic level and to one of three tiers up to paramedic.

42:4917

Thank you.

42:52 – 43:350

Okay. Any other questions? So you haven't heard me ask this question, but I ask it every year, too. So about wildland fire mitigation. So it's great what we're doing. And I always ask, is there an opportunity to do any more, if there was any more funding? Because I understand the budget constraint, but I think that people might understand if we're spending money to mitigate against fire risk. So I know that's maybe spur of the moment for you, but I just was curious about that and what if there were any cuts to the wild land part of your so no cuts? Okay. So could you use more money, though?

43:36 – 44:0613

Yeah. Chair, counselors, answer is we could always use more money. Could never mitigate enough. But we're doing a lot of creative things with the money we have. There's no cuts to it. Everybody, we're actually trying to engage more of the operational staff in understanding what mitigation is. Traditionally, in our business, you've been one or the other. We're doing a lot to bring those together. The robotic mastication was huge just because you can expand that at any point before, you know, more dollars being added into the pool. We're taught the mitigated work both on lab.

44:060

And then

44:0613

There are two main community number that are coming up.

44:0915

Approve the proposed Okay.

44:23 – 45:166

Good evening. I'd like to start out by thanking and recognizing the county manager for her continued support through this process. Also, Helen and her team, particularly Tara and Erica. My staff, my command staff, including the deputy chief, Rodriguez and Desiree Miranda, who's sitting behind me, who really did the heavy lifting this year with our budget and who is indispensable to the police department. Principally, the police department contribute the order that I want initiatives for to kinda echo when she gave her presentation, talked about some needs with respect to IPRA.

45:17 – 46:046

You know, that that affects us all countywide. I think in the last county manager's report or the one before that, I talked about IPRA specific to the police department over the last fiscal year, and it was over 14,000 records. I think nearly 15,000. And you have to understand a lot of our IPRA involves video, which is very time labor intensive to review and to redact. And so I I echo any any of those initiatives throughout the county that will help us because we were to play in terms of what that to continue to provide that our way through that.

46:05 – 46:526

And if you did, as so being accredited, we we were reaccredited for the third time, accepted that earlier in March in Tucson of this year, again, achieving a 100% compliance with our applicable standards. And, again, youth youth engagement. We just in August, we launched our inaugural youth cadet program. And just before this meeting tonight, I, attended their, graduation for that program and provided the, which is very important. This year, according to crime reported police, overall crime fell by 20%, which is significant.

46:54 – 47:296

Through the first quarter of this year, it's down again. And then also based on, council support, our newly designed, traffic unit in the '25 issued over 500 citations, including a 122 for speeds exceeding 26 miles an hour. Next slide. Budget slide. You will see an increase in police department budget, but I wanted to point out that we did meet guidance.

47:31 – 48:136

The increases you do see are principally salary and benefits, including contractual obligations. We did add a comp time payout and holiday pay issue into this budget, which hasn't hadn't been, I guess, appropriately budgeted in years past. So there was some increase there. And that increase was a grant funding that we received, a thousand of that increase. We had some increases in our IDCs and also the Axon platform that I spoke about earlier.

48:20 – 48:396

But with that, I consider our budget certainly sufficient to continue to provide the high level of service that, the community expects. I appreciate all of your support. And with that, I will stand for questions.

48:42 – 48:570

Okay. Thank you, Chief Scimbologne. Do we have any questions from counsel or on the presentation of the budget book materials? Thank

48:589

you, Chair. Chief, what is the jump of 121%

49:0418

under materials and supplies?

49:086

Are you looking at an overall or are you looking at a specific

49:1318

It's from fiscal year 'twenty six to 'twenty seven, and it says it's 121%

49:234

variance.

49:2718

It's on page 187

49:294

on the department budget there.

49:3518

What's that? 187C, Materials and Supplies.

49:456

Do you know, does there have something?

49:490

Sounds like we can

49:51 – 50:045

Chair Reidy and Councillor Herman, I can speak to that. That's primarily in our grants funding. So added additional they added additional budget for materials out of grants funding because it will be reimbursed by grants.

50:0418

Doctor. That's great. Thank you.

50:11 – 50:540

Okay. Do we have any other questions? Okay, not seeing any from anybody else. So I know we're going be getting a presentation about transportation kind of safety issues coming up in a couple weeks, three weeks maybe. So can you give us a preview of any of that information? Because you did have the data on the number of citations. Do you have a rough idea as to how many more citations were issued when we had the additional unit working?

50:55 – 51:306

Chair Reidy, I did put some of that information in one of the county managers' monthlies this year. But one thing I I wanted to promote those stats, and and they, you know, they were certainly being pressed to be out there and visible and engaged. But I also wanna mention that they do things like, you know, they'll follow we get a lot of complaints from the schools about people passing stop buses.

51:30 – 52:196

In fact, I think it was two two seasons ago, two school years ago, there was not a school day that passed that that we that did that did not get reported to us. So for example, this unit will go out and sit on those or follow those buses and and take enforcement action when that when necessary. Well, that doesn't always show up in the statistics, and there's other things that they do similarly that don't. So I'll be happy to on that on the twelfth or the seventh, whenever that that here that meeting is, I'll be happy to update you with statistics, but I just wanna really emphasize that it it's more than just what ends up on that page. That that unit was has really made a allowed us to make a make a substantial difference in in traffic safety, in my view.

52:19 – 52:380

Okay. And so we do get the the weekly crash reports. Yes, sir. And we can see from those which ones are wildlife related or other things that we've heard about. So you'll have that information compiled first too when we have that?

52:396

Yes, sir.

52:390

Okay. I'll

52:406

try to have as much traffic related data as I can. I should have a better understanding of where we're at on the speed camera project by then

52:50 – 53:046

Which it's also very close, the contract anyway. And, you know, anything else that you really wanted to know, just if you could let us know, we'll make sure we have that for you.

53:04 – 53:400

Okay. That'd be great to have that information. Because I guess it is kind of a system thing because you're tech dealing with the enforcement, but there's also the design. Right? So I think we have some places where there's been some road design, you know, things noted. We have the golf course with lots of deer. So whatever information we can have, I think would be great. And then we did get one question. I think I copied you and you got the response about the EOC. So I don't know if we're gonna I know we have a page on the EOC as a project.

53:40 – 54:080

So some of the information that was in the response might be worthwhile to have in the on the web page for the EOC, think, just to give some more information as to why we're doing it. So Yes, sir. So I think that would be worthwhile too. So well, that's not strictly related to the budget, but I think I think we do have it as a line item. Right? Yes. Project for this year. Correct?

54:096

It's in the top

54:11 – 54:380

Yeah. Five of that. It's in the top five, and we have it funded in '27. I'm seeing some heads shaking over there. Okay. I just wanna confirm that. I know we're gonna talk about it a lot later, but I think it's good to talk about some of the bigger ones as we go through the different departments. Okay. Well, I think that sounds like that's all the questions and comments. Sounds like we're ready for a tentative motion.

54:430

So Councilor Anderson making a motion. Councilor Han.

54:46 – 54:5815

Thank you, chair. I move that council tentatively approve the proposed budget for the police department in the amount of $20,113,136.

55:000

Second.

55:019

Second.

55:02 – 55:140

Okay. So we have a motion from councilor Hand, second by councilor Hafeman. Not seeing any discussion, can the clerk please call the roll?

55:155

Councilor Hand? Yes. Counselor Reidy?

55:215

Counselor Cole? Yes. Counselor Neil Clinton? Yes. Counselor Raygore?

55:305

Councilor Havamand? Yes. Councilor Herman? Yes. Motion passes, seven-zero.

55:3713

Thank you.

55:38 – 55:580

Okay. Thank you, chief. Let the record show the motion passes unanimously. So I think we're ready now for public works. So we're going to have a lot of different parts of public works that we have several people approaching. Support Mr. Martinez.

56:01 – 56:143

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Good evening, Chair Ide and members of council. I think I know everybody here in the room, but anybody online that may not know me, I'm Eric Martinez. I'm the public works director.

56:14 – 56:573

I'm joined here by deputy public works director Keith Wilson, James Varella, our transit manager, Miguel Jimenez, our manager of our capital projects team, and Josh Levings, our management analyst with environmental services. I'm also joined online by the remaining members of our public works management team. So a big shout out to them for helping us prepare this year's budget. So thanks to all of them. I would like to begin with a quick overview of department and how public works plays a role and contributes towards, council's strategic goals and priorities.

56:58 – 57:353

I won't go through each item listed, but we'll just point out that the department does support all five goals in various ways that are shown on this slide. As you know, public works is a big department consisting of nine divisions and broken down into two fund categories. We have six divisions classified as general fund, while the airport environmental services and transit divisions are classified as enterprise funds, which generate revenue through either fees and or grants. Next slide. These next few slides highlight the significant accomplishments of each of our nine divisions.

57:35 – 58:143

For the sake of time, I'll run quickly through them and highlight a few starting with our administration division. This division includes me, our deputy public works director, mister Wilson, miss Luis Romero, miss Rachel, Barela. Given the size of our department, mister Wilson and I split oversight of the divisions. He oversees airport, fleet, traffic and streets, transit, while I oversee administration, capital projects and facilities, custodial maintenance, engineering, and environmental services. We provide operational leadership to all divisions in the department, support the transportation board, and, of course, implement implementation of council goals.

58:15 – 58:473

Next slide. The airport is currently composed of one FTE, our airport manager. The sale and purchase of aviation associated with the fuel farm has been remarkable and supports medical flights and general aviation. Notably, we saw 3,365 takeoffs and landings in f y twenty five, while large community events at the airport have been extremely popular and helped showcase our airport. Next slide.

58:49 – 59:533

Capital projects and facilities continues to be one of our busiest divisions based on sheer volume of work and number of projects. The project management side oversees various phases of of a project from inception to completion, which can span several fiscal years. This group manages projects big and small, and on behalf of other departments like community services, community development, fire, police, and sustainability. This group actively man it's is managing over 30 projects, and I'm glad to mention several projects like the golf course improvements, little theater fire suppression system, the ice rink chiller, and the municipal building EV charging stations are some examples of are are are a sample of some projects that have been completed. In f y twenty five, to help improve customer service, our facility maintenance team completed the first phase of implementing a new asset management and work order system that consisted of inventory of our facilities and equipment.

59:54 – 1:00:513

This team receives a high volume of work orders each year, and I'm happy to this new work order system is fully in place to help manage the work ranging from simple issues like bulb and fixture replacement, clogged drains, to preventative maintenance, and more complex repairs of plumbing, electric, HVAC, and structural systems for our 47 county buildings. Next slide. Custo our custodial maintenance team is a model of consistency and excellent customer service by keeping our facilities clean for employee employees and customers alike, keeping Fuller Lodge in tip top shape and managing reservations and setups for about 3,000 events year after year. This past winter was less than ideal for snowfall, but our custodial crews are integral are an integral part of our snow removal team as shown on this slide. Next slide, please.

1:00:54 – 1:01:473

Our project management team and engineering oversaw the completion of several notable projects, including BP Road, Urban Trail, and the Bathtub Row, Peach, And Nectar Street reconstruction project. In late twenty five, the pedestrian master plan was near completion and subsequently adopted by council in early twenty six FY '26. The team continues to work hard applying for grants and has been successful with obtaining millions of dollars in state and federal grants and is managing a total of $12,000,000 of awarded grants currently. In addition to that, the county was also awarded four and a a 4 and a half million dollar grant grant for f y twenty seven and twenty eight to design and construct improvements to the Canela Del Boy Trail in White Rock. Next slide.

1:01:49 – 1:02:513

Another consistent performer is our environmental services team with its seven day a week operation and array of waste management and recycling programs for the community. In the '25, augmented curb curbside brush collection services were provided in response to elevated wildfire risk risks by offering additional weekly brush pickups and bulk collection to help residents clear flammable materials. Our team provided an an augmented bulk collection this year again given the the the dry dry conditions. Next slide. Our fleet division is what you may call an internal service, not necessarily public facing as other divisions, but supports all departments across the county by maintaining 675 light duty and heavy duty vehicles and pieces of equipment to ensure vehicles like our transit buses and waste collection vehicles are in good working order in service to the public while also keeping our fuel delivery systems up to date and maintained.

1:02:52 – 1:03:583

Our inventory of vehicles includes 12 EVs, three hybrids, and two forthcoming EV transit buses that we hope to put into service this fall. Our fleet manager continues to be on the forefront on the for at the forefront with EVs and actively participated on various county initiatives and programs, including the development of the fleet conversion plan, municipal building EV charging station project, Los Alamos Climate Action Plan, and the Atomic City Transit Zurich Mission transition plan to help expand our county fleet EV capabilities. Next slide. Our traffic and street streets team did a fantastic job constructing a new parking lot on the west side of the ice rink, continues to make progress with installing wayfinding signs throughout the county with about 18 signs installed to date, and continues to provide traffic management for various special events. This team also does a great job with snow snow removal and hope next winter snowfall is better than last.

1:03:59 – 1:04:423

Next slide. Our transit team introduced the ACT MyRide app, which is a great tool to book paratransit and on demand rides. They secured a $50,000 planning service grant to support the zero emission transition plan and have provided special transit service for various events for various events and continue to support Bandelier with shuttle shuttle service with a different model of service that you were updated about recently. Lastly, and I'm happy to report that ACT was recently awarded the 2025 Rural Transit System of the Year by the New Mexico Transit Authority and NMDOT. So kudos to them.

1:04:43 – 1:05:233

Next slide. So this slide and the following slides summarize some specific differences from last year's budget. We'll start with the airport. With the new fuel form complete and generating revenue, the proposed budget supports a half FTE to help with the extra work required for the fuel farm required for fuel farm operations, maintenance, and regulatory compliance. The budget for disposition is offset through fuel sales revenue With decreases on the nonlabor portion of the budget, the airport budget for FY '27 has an overall decrease compared to FY '26.

1:05:24 – 1:06:213

Next, the proposed FY twenty seven budget for environmental services reflects expected annual increases in professional and contractual services, particularly for waste and recycling hauling and landfill disposal costs. The good news so far is we're not projecting rate or tipping fee increases at this time, but we'll continue to monitor this given the potential for fuel surcharges. On the last bullet, the proposed budget for transit reflects the federal transit authority grant application process, that was initiated last year through council resolution twenty five twelve that was approved in the middle of last year. The overall budget increase for transit compared to f y twenty six is largely attributed attributed to increases in in inter fund charges. Next slide.

1:06:23 – 1:07:103

This first bullet notes a $400,000 decrease in equipment replacement expenditures compared to FY '26 and is largely due to heavy equipment replacements made during this fiscal year. So we had some expensive vehicles that we had to replace this year as compared to last or as compared to next. A healthy reserve balance or ending working capital is maintained for emergency losses and inflationary spikes, such as those that may be associated with increases in material and fuel costs. For this coming year, we plan to replace up to four vehicles with EVs. Next, we'll discuss the major facilities maintenance or MFM fund, which supports the maintenance and renovation of county facilities.

1:07:11 – 1:07:573

An increase was forecasted in in last year in FY twenty six to keep pace with maintenance and replacement of large mechanical HVAC systems based on their service life and the 2022 facility condition assessment. This also reflected this is also reflected in the proposed budget for f y twenty seven amongst other identified needs. Lastly, the proposed budget supports more investment investment in payment preservation as detailed at the newly developed five year pavement preservation program for maintenance of county roads and county parking lots. This will go a long way with supporting the county's overall payment condition index goal, which saw a decline in FY 'twenty five. So something we do not want to see.

1:07:59 – 1:08:503

In a couple more slides, I will speak a bit more regarding maintenance and the MFM and pavement preservation programs. Next slide. So this slide demonstrates the array of service contracts that each division utilizes to support day to day operations, like pest control, hauling of refuse and various recycling programs, storm water management, the upcoming design and installation of bollards at Ashley Pond, along with maintenance and repair of county facilities and roads. Next slide. And so speaking of maintenance, and I know this slide is hard to read, but the point of including these two table is to highlight a bit of a shift to provide additional investment into maintaining existing assets as noted by the county manager in her presentation yesterday.

1:08:52 – 1:09:263

We do this to the major facility maintenance and payment preservation programs that I mentioned previously. These schedules are found on pages two forty two and two forty five c of the budget book. I I would also like to mention that the pavement preservation table is a new schedule added to this year's budget to keep us on track with improving our pavement condition goal and is a five year forecast that aligns with our transportation CIP. Next slide. And if you can switch to the updated slide, mister Rael.

1:09:31 – 1:10:333

So this slide was updated to capture some additional numbers in the CIP row on this table. So I'd just like to mention that the proposed budget for public works continues to support each division's role with maintaining and improving our transportation and facility infrastructure or with providing essential services to the community. I will highlight a few notable deltas compared to last year. So let me draw your attention to the third column from the right showing the percent vary variances either plus or minus between f y twenty six and '27. Most notable is the increase in the MFM fund, a modest increase in traffic and streets, which is attributed to an increase in the pavement preservation fund, both of which I mentioned earlier, and a large decrease under capital under capital improvement projects.

1:10:34 – 1:10:543

Overall, the public works budget is down 77% as compared to 2026, largely due to CIP. But also thanks to our team with being able to trim non labor budget items without dim diminishing any service. Next slide.

1:11:017

Other one.

1:11:023

We can go to the next slide.

1:11:037

The other one.

1:11:16 – 1:12:043

There you go. Thank you, mister Rael. This slide shows our FTE count and a few changes consisting of shifting the location of two project manager positions and the addition of a half FTE for the airport as mentioned earlier. Next slide. Looking forward, we realize there is still a lot more to do, such as completing projects like Fire Station 4, Longview Drive realignment, the Community Health Action Center, and Manhattan Project dormitory re renovations, while also advancing sustainability efforts such as such as food waste composting, install and installing more EV charging stations while working to improve services to the community by performing a transit study to further evaluate the feasibility of Saturday service.

1:12:07 – 1:12:383

I would like to wrap up my presentation noting that National Public Works Week is in a few weeks with the theme being rooted in service powered by community. We celebrate the work we do is in service to the committee, and this theme is well represented by the Urban Trail Project as this video shows, not only because of the tremendous benefit it provides, but also how it all began through conversations and engagement with the community. Thank you, Mr. Chair and Counsel. That concludes my presentation, and stand for any questions.

1:12:390

Okay. Thank you, Ms. Martinez. Do we have any questions? Sir? Councillor Hin.

1:12:47 – 1:13:0515

Thank you, Chair. Can you please tell me where the NCRTDGRT shows up in this budget? Because I can't find it. I should have asked you earlier. I just started thinking about that. I don't know where it is.

1:13:05 – 1:13:213

Mister chair, counselor Han, thank you for that question. And give me a second, and I can I can tell you where that is? It shows up in one of our fund statements under transit. And

1:13:24 – 1:13:3715

I'm looking at 191 c. And you know if you look at transit, I'm just thinking that it's rolled up into the numbers there. Is that where it would show up?

1:13:395

Chair chair Reidy, counselors. I would refer to page 82 with the transit Okay.

1:13:4615

Let's see here.

1:13:47 – 1:14:163

Thank you, miss Marino. That's the right page. And so on that table, if you look down a couple lines, you'll see NCRTD regional grant, and that consists of about $1,800,000 that comes from the GRT that NCRTD receives through through the GRT collection, and that's provided to the county. And I'll ask

1:14:1617

And if I may

1:14:173

to correct me if I'm wrong.

1:14:19 – 1:14:5717

No. No. If I may, mister chair and Counselor Han, I just want to clarify that from my answer last night when Counselor Rieger asked the same question. So technically, that is not where it's receded. It's passed back through to us. So Mr. Martinez and I had a conversation after, and and and it was my fault for not realizing that that's how that sourcing comes in is I think that is what the intention is is that they use that portion of JRT to fund it back to us in in this arrangement, but it it is it is not directly receded here. We have to give it to them, pass it through to them, then they have to grant it back

1:14:5719

to us as

1:14:5815

a source. So we're giving them 350,000.

1:15:0217

On top of that. Yes. On

1:15:04 – 1:15:2115

top Well, they're they're giving us 350,000, and then through their GRT, we're getting 1,800,000 back to pay for atomic city transit, right? Basically, I mean simply.

1:15:223

Mr. Chair, Councilor Hannon.

1:15:2415

We were having a conversation in between discussions last night and I just wanted to clarify that and where it shows up in the document.

1:15:343

I I think you got that mostly correct.

1:15:3619

Mostly right.

1:15:378

Okay. I'll

1:15:373

just I'll just try to clarify a little bit.

1:15:413

the 350,000 that we provide to NCRTD, we do that, I think, every year at the beginning of each year.

1:15:503

And that goes towards helping NCRD NCRTD with grant matches and midday service and that sort

1:15:5817

of thing. Right.

1:16:003

So, yes, I think that captures most of it.

1:16:022

Well, I'll ask mister Bravo if

1:16:0317

that's Okay. Is that good?

1:16:05 – 1:16:2411

Yeah. That's correct. Chair Reidy and councilor Han. So we give 350,000 a year since 2006. We've given approximately $13,000,000 in in that time period. Currently, we're at $22,031,000 that we received back for regional services that are provided in Los Alamos to meet regional tracks and

1:16:240

services. Right.

1:16:2515

And that's this year?

1:16:2815

Yeah. Yes. Right.

1:16:2911

And so the 350,000 is to be part of the umbrella of the NCRTD

1:16:3311

And the GRT that mister Martinez just mentioned.

1:16:36 – 1:16:5115

I I think I understand what's going on here. I I was trying to explain it in between some of our discussions last night, and I just wanted to make sure that we had something concrete in our plan here that shows it.

1:16:537

Chair Ready, Counselor Hands, I just wanted to connect the funding with the sources because there's two different sources. The $350,000 is our county general fund

1:17:03 – 1:17:517

That we transfer into our regional fund that then we provide 350. So we budget that out of GRT that we receive into our general fund, and we transfer it to our regional fund. The dollars that come in as a GRT for regional transit that we are a fiscal agent that then goes to the NCRTD, there is a portion of that that comes back to us based on our approved service plan of eligible routes that are that meet the definition of regional that we are providing mostly, I believe, mister Barella, between White Rock and the town site. So the so the costs associated with those routes that meet their definite definition, we then, based on the service plan, get funding, because we have some services that count towards and are eligible for the that that type of regional funding.

1:17:5115

Okay. That's even clearer. Thank you.

1:17:560

Yeah, it's because it leaped the county.

1:17:590

Okay. Are there more questions? Councillor Cole?

1:18:0516

So, we have budgeted about almost 38 FTEs for transit. Where do we stand on vacancies?

1:18:173

Five vacancies here. Councilor Cole, five vacancies currently.

1:18:20 – 1:18:3316

So if we were fully staffed, how many more FTEs do you estimate it would take to run a a maybe in a Friday night from the bars and a Saturday transit?

1:18:343

I'll hand that one off to mister Barrella.

1:18:42 – 1:19:1611

Mister chair and counsel of the call. So that's why we're kinda going into the study to kinda model what it would take to realign all of our services to for late services if possible and even Saturday service. Just estimates, we would need at least three drivers on for Saturday service alone, and that's just an estimate, one supervisor, and a dispatcher. So you're looking at five employees. So that's just our model, but, you know, we're trying to bring some professional lens that that can help us model this house. Thank you.

1:19:16 – 1:19:3416

So five additional employees, but not but they would only be working Friday, Saturday or so, yeah, you'd have to shuffle people around and try and figure out, okay. As long as we're actively looking at it, I'm happy. Not that I need the transportation from the bars.

1:19:363

Good clarification.

1:19:3716

But I did have somebody raise that question. And then the food waste composting, where do we stand on that?

1:19:45 – 1:20:483

Mister chair, councilor Cole, so we're currently working on different fronts with that. We're actively working with EPA to try to receive a grant for food waste composting. We're currently working with NMED to renew our permit for operations of the of the transfer station at ECO to also include or add a portion to provide for an area for food waste composting. And so some of those regulatory hoops that that are in front of us, we're we're waiting to cross through those before we start really jumping deep into actively working through a food waste composting program. We had had since we're leasing the land from DOE at ECO, that required some conversations with them.

1:20:49 – 1:21:343

And one of their requirements is we is that we keep it in Vessel to avoid any order or other types of issues like that. So we think we can do that. We've looked at costs associated with that. We're prepared to go down that road and have other contingency models in place and that we're looking at just in case, but that's kinda where we stand. I know that's a big iffy answer, but we're we're trying to get our regulatory approvals in order so that we can actually pull the trigger and and actually get some funding for it through EPA if if if we can get over the hump there.

1:21:3516

Okay. Thank you.

1:21:370

That's okay. Thank you, councilor Call. Any other questions? Okay. Councilman Clinton.

1:21:4812

So hypothetically, if we we don't get the grants, then what's the path forward?

1:21:57 – 1:22:203

Mister chair, councilor Neil Clinton, what we'd would look at is what we have in ending working capital within the environmental services budget probably as a first stab at at seeing if we can afford that without, blowing our budget. It it it may be doable. I don't wanna get too far ahead, but that would kind of be our first our first look.

1:22:2112

Okay. Thank you.

1:22:24 – 1:22:410

Okay. Thank you, councilor. So I know we hadjust going further into the environmental services. So we had some discussion about waste diversion or other approaches. And those are, I guess, a more regional landfill.

1:22:42 – 1:23:210

So, I mean, there's, I guess, the carbon associated with trucking it, you know, maybe like 130 miles at some point pretty soon, right? But there's the cost. So are you starting to look at some of that and what the options are? And also just I mean, so I understand, you know, the food waste composting was one good suggestion that we had now a number of years ago discussion and, you know, we're pursuing it, but it seems like it's very slow. Are there any other options that we have that we can think of that would help us with any of the, you know, diverting waste?

1:23:21 – 1:23:430

I know we had it was great to have the program you mentioned for the brush cleanup. Is that something that we could still, you know, get some more, you know, people to divert materials and support also, you know, the fire safety we want? So you looking at some other things more generally besides just the food waste?

1:23:45 – 1:24:143

Mister chair, so, yes, food waste is one of them. We're currently trying to wrap up landfill feasibility study with through a partnership with the city of Espanola in Ria Riva County. We're getting close to that to see how feasible it would be to have a closer landfill for that. I know that doesn't answer the the question about waste diversion, but you brought it up. So I wanted just to address that.

1:24:15 – 1:25:013

And then we're also have been engaged with a west waste to energy company that wants to and I think we had a a presentation on that, you know, sometime recently. But that's another source of where we can kinda divert, you know, and and reduce the the hauling distance of what we take our our waste and recycling. Other programs, I can't think right now right now with brush collection, we actually get a significant amount of brush that we collect. It's it's almost to the point that we're we're find have to find sources to try to outlet the finished product, either compost or wood chips.

1:25:023

Right. So the the the participation in our brush program is pretty pretty high.

1:25:09 – 1:25:370

Yeah. Okay. So I guess, yeah, Friday night. Saturday's good, but I think people have wanted weekend service. So are we looking at that also? I mean, if we're gonna look at I mean, because people that don't have vehicles don't have a vehicle on Sunday either. So

1:25:38 – 1:25:533

Mister chair, we haven't looked at that model closely. It would require, you know Yeah. You know, staffing at some level to try to do a a brush pickup program during the weekend that's curbside, if you will.

1:25:530

Yeah. I was thinking about transit.

1:25:553

Oh, transit. I'm I'm sorry.

1:25:571

Very operating. You're operating. Yeah.

1:25:590

I know we I got you confused with my light logic. Was jumping ahead on you.

1:26:063

Switching gears on me.

1:26:07 – 1:26:390

Switching gears to transit, a different division. So, I know people have asked for seven day a week, right? So, just to put that out there, because, yeah, so people would not have vehicles any day of the week. And it was one of the things, I think, brought up by a lot of people. And then people were hoping that the pilot would lead to more opportunities for people that don't have vehicles.

1:26:40 – 1:27:110

And it's just something that seems like it's good to look at. I'm not sure you have to look at the feasibility. But so what we didn't look at was the large chunk of funding we get, which isn't the majority, but a mass minority of it is the federal funding, right? So between the federal funding and the funding we get for the regional, we get, I think, more than half, right? It's paid for, basically, via grants.

1:27:12 – 1:27:360

So, if we were to have service, the same kind of service on the weekends, we're not going be getting any more grants, right? I mean, there be more opportunities for grants if there was more service? Is one question. And then, is that about right that we get between the NCRTD funding, the regional and then the federal? Is that more than half?

1:27:38 – 1:28:073

Thank you, mister chair. I'll I'll let mister Burrilla address that question. I'll I'll address a little bit on the Saturday service, certainly or on the weekend service, Saturday and Sunday. Uh-huh. Certainly, we can have our consultant model that as well as in addition to the to the late night service that councilor Cole brought up. So I think that's relatively easy something easy to do that we can have our our consultant look at. But I'll turn it over to mister Barilla to talk about the federal funding part.

1:28:08 – 1:28:5311

Yeah. Thank you, chair Reidy. So and adding currently, we run till 09:00 at night on weekdays with my ride. On Friday nights, we run during concert service till 10:00. So but we could look at extending that model out later if needed. The funding source, you know, with our current funding that we apply for federal funding, through FTA, we could once this model's out, we could see what it models out for a cost, and we could just increase the amount that we originally asked in our original instead of seeking additional funding. But, yes, we could definitely look at different grants that are out there to help us bring new service in. And, but we would just probably add it to our existing formula funding when we apply each year.

1:28:530

Okay. Great. Thank you.

1:28:541

Yeah. Thank you.

1:29:020

Okay. You addressed the question about vacancies. But what are the overall vacancies for public works? Mr.

1:29:113

Chair, I believe we have about 15 vacancies in the entire department currently.

1:29:15 – 1:29:480

Okay. And then since we're talking about we're gonna talk about CIP again. But so I was noticing, Don, the unless I'm misreading this. So we have the traffic, the transportation related line item. So there we have FY 2027 is about $8,000,000 And then I was looking at the other items that you had.

1:29:49 – 1:30:050

So there are other projects that you're managing, like theso I think that's the other 6,000,000. So one of the bigger projects we haven't talked about yet is the Manhattan Project dorm. Is that right?

1:30:063

Correct.

1:30:060

And then the Betty Yahair renovations.

1:30:12 – 1:30:280

So is that the entire funding for the Manhattan Project dorm is funded in multiple years because there's already funding in the current year budget? So between those two items, that is the entire funding, Between '26 and '27?

1:30:293

Mr. Chair, yes, that's correct.

1:30:31 – 1:31:100

Okay. And then I was noticing, when you were flipping through your slides, was trying to reconcile the different numbers you had. So because the green sheet we had, at least the green sheet I have, maybe other people have a different green sheet. I have a green sheet with a total amount of $62,200,000. I think you had a number that was 64. Is that right? So which so before we have the motion, can so the number that we're actually going to be moving is other number you showed in the slides or

1:31:10 – 1:31:507

Chair Reidy, that's correct. We had an updated slide tonight and that primarily goes back to when we approved the Fire Station four funding and we had to redo an allocation of the different project timing, particularly better Betty Ehart. We had to switch the current funding from the current year a little bit into the next fiscal year because it worked fine with the timing of the project, and it allowed us to move more in this current year towards the award of the fire station four project. So what we did was we had the total number correct, but for some of the departments, we didn't update the amounts for the capital line items. So we wanted to make sure public works was tonight before you it was correct tonight before you made your motion. The

1:31:500

correct number is $2,000,000 more than this version.

1:31:573

And, mister chair, it's the yellow version of that sheet, one ninety one c two.

1:32:02 – 1:32:260

Uh-huh. That was the first thing I'd written down. I understand that we're working on improved bike and pedestrian facilities. Also, I guess, things for safety, transportation. So we're going to have the discussion at the work session coming up. So where in the budget would I find funding for those kinds of things?

1:32:27 – 1:33:013

Mister chair, it depends. For operational things like crosswalks and striping and signs, that would be in our traffic and streets operational budget. If it's a larger project, that's something that we'd have to program somewhere maybe in the CIP. We also have a a fund in our engineering division for transportation studies and and things of that sort. That's how we're funding the Ashley Pond Bollard design and installation.

1:33:01 – 1:33:143

So we have a couple of of funds to to choose from for that. But it really just depends the level of of of project or improvement that we're looking at.

1:33:14 – 1:33:460

Okay. Well, I suspect that the public might like to know, like, how we're prioritizing that with funding. So just for future reference, that might be something that, if it's possible, come up with something. And then, I guess, I asked about the Canyon Rim Trail every year or So it sounds like we're actually moving forward soon with, I guess, is it the design? So we're still looking to have to acquire the land to actually build the trail. Is that where we currently sit?

1:33:47 – 1:34:223

Mister chair, all the easements required that that are required for the project are in place. Design is substantially complete. We're just awaiting to perform a a study for the spotted owl in some of the easement that the DOE owns within the project area, and that's looking to occur happen in in August. So we're waiting for that to conclude, to wrap up the design, and then put the project out to bid. So, hopefully, we'll be out to bid late summer, early fall with and and eventually starting that project.

1:34:240

Next year?

1:34:253

This year.

1:34:273

year. Just depending on the season.

1:34:300

So Okay.

1:34:313

If we're into the winter months, they very well may not get started until next year.

1:34:380

Yeah. Well, the owls are not nesting in the winter. So

1:34:42 – 1:35:053

This August is we would put it out to bid. So the the the owl survey would be this August Yeah. Here in a few months. Yeah. Then we could wrap up, put the project out to bid this year, and potentially have a notice to proceed later this year.

1:35:050

If you do the project in the winter, the owls are not nesting. Just as a just as a piece of information.

1:35:123

Yeah. Okay. So if we have requirements for construction for the OWL, then we would have to take that into account. Yes.

1:35:21 – 1:35:380

Okay. Okay. I think I have no other questions. So I think we're ready for the tentative motion. And I guess I understand that'll be maybe augmented with a request for options for maybe weekend service.

1:35:3915

Weekend and late night.

1:35:410

Some counselors want a late night service in particular.

1:35:46 – 1:35:5717

So, Mr. Chair, if if if you're suggesting modifying the language, could could if if that's the if that's the we would want somebody to make that motion.

1:35:58 – 1:36:100

you. So is there a counselor that has the language they want to see or to have us discuss? Might actually have to discuss this one. Anyone got a motion?

1:36:10 – 1:36:3216

Councilor Cole? I don't have a I'm just curious why we would add something to this motion we know that they're working on it and it's going to probably be done in six months, give or take, and we'll hear kind of the results at that point. I don't know why we need to tell them they need to do what they're already doing. That's just my feeling on it.

1:36:32 – 1:36:530

Okay. Happy with just the motion? They're working on it? Okay. So is there a councilor interested in making the tentative motion as stated? You want to do it? Councillor Kaplan? Or did you write your hand? Councilor Okay, I'll do it.

1:36:5316

I haven't done one yet tonight. I'm just waiting

1:36:560

Councilor Kahl over here.

1:36:58 – 1:37:1316

Move that Council tentatively approve the proposed budget for the Public Works Department in the amount of $64,000,367.263 well, whatever. So $64,367,263

1:37:139

That's what you get.

1:37:140

Thank you, Councilor Cullen. Okay, do we have a second?

1:37:180

Okay, second by Councilor Havelman. Okay. So we don't need to have any further discussion. Is that right? Okay. Can the clerk please call the roll?

1:37:315

Councilor Havelman? Yes. Councilor Reitie?

1:37:375

Councilor Hand? Yes. Councilor Cull? Yes. Councilor Rigor?

1:37:445

Councilor Herman? Yes. Counselor Neil Clinton? Yes. Motion passes. Seven zero.

1:37:52 – 1:38:280

Okay. Thank you, Gutierrez, and everybody for being here. So let the record show the motion passes unanimously. So we have two more departments. Don't know how long they're gonna take. I know a non department won't take very long. I think we should probably go ahead and do the the Department of Public Utilities, even though it's core date. That's okay? Go ahead and do this one. Finish all finish all the departments. So we have mister Shelton, right, Chilby's manager.

1:38:29 – 1:38:452

Yeah. Good evening, chair and members of council. So I guess we we're ready. We'll we'll go to the next slide. Just wanted to provide some department highlights.

1:38:47 – 1:39:372

And last year, we went through an accreditation process with American Public Works Association, and, we got a 100% rating and full compliance in our application. And only DPU as a municipality has this designation in New Mexico and and as a federal agency. So we're the first two to do that accreditation process. We also got two awards through American Public Power Association, our customer satisfaction bronze level, and our excellence in communication award. You'll see a lot of that had to do with our marketing, and you'll see our Blinky logo up in the corner.

1:39:38 – 1:40:192

And then we had Mila and Mosley go to the youth rally that's sponsored through UAMPS, and that's our membership. And we actually are gonna send two people this year to that program, and and it's been a good program to engage youth about utilities and what they can do is and then they also have some leadership skills. They teach all the students. And after attending, they all get a $500 scholarship that they can take to college or vocational school, whatever career they choose afterwards. So it's a great program through our membership.

1:40:19 – 1:41:032

You know, we continue to, belong to UAMPs and most of our projects. While the CFPPs still being retired as far as closeout, the main projects we're participating in is geothermal energy. And one project started the pilot drilling, and so we're pretty excited by maybe bringing that technology in the future. And then there's a new program through PNM, and this has to do with our transmission. We we receive our transmission balancing services through PNM.

1:41:03 – 1:41:392

And a couple of our transmission lines that lead into our community are, you know, obviously, supplied and maintained by PNM. And, they have a program called public safety power shutoff. It's PSPS, and I always mix up, so I have to read it. We're actually doing a, emergency exercise tomorrow, with our emergency management, people about, you know, should should this happen? And if you recall, we had pretty, heavy winds, what, about a week ago.

1:41:40 – 1:42:422

And, you know, that that's what this concern is if you have brush below transmission lines and heavy winds setting off a fire from active electric lines. Then in other accomplishments in electric distribution, we finished our electric distribution and electrification study, and that identified a good thirty year plan for planning for our community to electrify as we move into more green and sustainable energy options. And I was gonna also mention that we do have a a tree trimming program, and we've been in coordination with the fire department, following up with, they did some work in White Rock with a burn bud. We're following up with some additional tree trimming around lines, so there is coordination. I know that was mentioned earlier.

1:42:42 – 1:43:232

Our budget's about 165,000 dedicated to tree trimming per year. And, also, we're hopefully getting the electric undergrounding grant with FEMA that will bury four and a half miles of overhead line that runs through the forest service. That's our highest risk item as far as overhead power lines in conflict with large ponderosa pine trees. And then Abby Hayward became a certified electric coach. There's some different programs for energy conservation.

1:43:24 – 1:44:092

We've been working pretty hard on also implementing the approved ordinance for time of use and demand charges and how to communicate that to the community. So you'll be seeing quite a bit coming up here shortly. The other, obviously, ribbon cutting for the EV chargers, and the utilization of that has improved since they went online the beginning of this year. Other accomplishments in the gas, we renewed the NEMEA agreement, and that provided savings through bulk purchases through through that agreement. It's 37% savings on monthly cost of gas.

1:44:10 – 1:44:592

And, then we have a survey and different focus groups in preparing, for pathways for zero and natural gas usage, and that report will come out a little later this year. Other accomplishments, and I'm switching the water production, is our bio booster tank received an award. And this is a 800,000 gallon tank that allows us to capture all the treated water from the Los Alamos plant so that we can use it for reclaimed water. Prior, we couldn't capture all the water treated per day because of the time. Wastewater plants typically peak at 10AM.

1:44:59 – 1:45:422

We need to be filling tanks well before that to be used, you know, early in the morning for irrigation. So there's a lag lag and a lead in in how you deliver reclaim water to the community. So that received an award. And then we did last spring do our reservoir grand opening and actually using that water to irrigate the golf course through this last month. And then in water distribution, big project along State Route 4 was replacing the 16 inch concrete cylinder pipe.

1:45:42 – 1:46:432

That was 18,000 feet of waterline that we had quite a few leaks and was difficult to repair that type of pipe. So it's been performing excellent and provides reliable water supply to White Rock primarily. And the crew GWS crew through the burn area projects in 2,000 time frame. The hardware just a specification issue with the hardware on the valve bonnets would corrode. And so we found through a series of breaks, and it started up in Kameson near our former county manager's home, it blew out the whole road because the bonnet came loose.

1:46:43 – 1:47:162

And we found that this was a recurring problem. And we didn't want any of that to obviously happen anytime, but also not in the winter because you can get materials to repair it. So the crew went out and proactively did 72 locations to replace hardware. We still have more to go, primarily along Arizona. And that area is the next phase that we'll be doing projects like that, proactive repair.

1:47:16 – 1:47:472

Likewise, fire hydrant testing, it was mentioned, the ISO rating. That's a partnership we have with the fire department to do testing of all the hydrants for pressure and flow. And we through that program, we identified 20 hydrants that need to be replaced. Majority have been replaced with the Trinity project. We're gonna have some done with that road improvement and or traffic calming projects.

1:47:47 – 1:48:332

So we'll stay on top of those replacements. And then we partnered with emergency management and social services for last summer to provide cooling stations around the county and promote that. Hopefully, we don't have as hot summer. Then on wastewater, we had the ribbon cutting for the wharf, which is a White Rock water resource facility. And pub the public has really enjoyed the tours.

1:48:33 – 1:48:502

We've held four last year. We think we had one already this year. We have three more scheduled. But it's a great way to educate the community on what we do there. Majority of that water is used at the overlook fields.

1:48:51 – 1:49:312

And at the Los Alamos plant, we finished that filtration system and the water is higher quality to class 1a effluent. And that can allow for us to expand some use or move the use around. If artificial turf fields go in, we can hopefully supply the schools with their irrigation for their turf, like at the middle school. And that should identify the wastewater accomplishments. And then other improvements in our customer care.

1:49:34 – 1:50:102

We listed out here how many utility bills are processed throughout the year. So, you know, we do all the billing for our gas, water, sewer, electric, and environmental services. So it's an accomplishment to to get that. And people like their bills in different manners, email here quite a bit, but then a lot want a mailed copy and enjoy a paper insert. So we're doing both, and we give people the option.

1:50:12 – 1:50:442

So and then utility assistance program. This program, we keep monitoring, and our community has done a lot of generous donations to help our customers in need. And I think we're gonna see additional need because the LAHE program with the federal government is gonna reduce the allocation to the state of New Mexico next year. So we'll see some strain there. We're gonna get continue to monitor that.

1:50:46 – 1:51:142

And other things are Los Alamos Now app. I use it every month to pay my utility bills. So you can actually go on to pay your bill or report an issue. And we're still working to try to promote that and get people using the app. But it's been an enhancement to that.

1:51:14 – 1:51:522

And I guess you'll see that we have other enhancements that are coming in. This year, we did the REPT program with a little AI person that can channel you to the right part of the county's web page, as well as any utility page. So what I would like next is I'm going to invite Joanne Gentry. This is her first year doing the budget presentation. And I guess we appreciate going towards the end this year.

1:51:52 – 1:52:232

Last year, Karen retired, and she was leaving before the end of the budget hearing process because we had it over two weeks. But this gives us a little time to prepare because we've been listening to the questions you've been asking, just trying to be ready to maybe answer those in advance and make this hearing go fairly efficiently. So I'm going to invite Joanne up to just go over lightly the summary of our budget.

1:52:27 – 1:53:0320

Good evening, chairwriting and counselors. I just want to mention I do have Richard Valerio here. He's my business operations manager and he's very helpful in helping me get this budget done this year. So right here we have our budget summary. And for fiscal year twenty twenty seven, our proposed budget is $94,688,744 And we are staying steady at a FTE count of one hundred and seven sixty five.

1:53:04 – 1:53:3520

Currently within our department, we have seven vacancies. Some have been there's been promotions, so we have other vacancies, so we're trying to fill those. In '28, our projected budget is $129,185,614 and staying steady with our 107.65 employees. The next page. Okay, so this is very similar.

1:53:35 – 1:54:2820

So we're proposing a 94,700,000 budget to you guys tonight. This is an overall of $14,100,000 lower than our adopted budget in 2026. There has been an increase in labor costs and benefits by 4%, which was based on county guidance of a 1% grade adjustment and up to 3% in performance. And And right now, all of our salaries are projected for non collective bargaining agreement employees. Some major contributions to our decrease in our budget is the cost of purchase power and capital expenditures.

1:54:32 – 1:55:1620

So these are our current rates. In 2027, in the next few months, I'll be presenting to you some new ordinances for our electric rate and I'm sorry, for our gas rate and our water rate. Currently, our electric rate and wastewater rate will run us through 2027. The electric distribution, we have an 8% for '27 starting in July. Gas, I know that number looks really high, twenty seven percent, and we'll go over that when we come through to the gas ordinance.

1:55:17 – 1:55:5920

Water is at, we're looking at 8% for '27 and then the wastewater was previously approved at 7%. So those are all projected in our revenues. In '28, we're projecting 7% for electric, 5% for gas, 8% for water, and 8% for wastewater. This is a typical bill that we present to our board with every budget. I'd like to note that for fiscal year 2018 through '26, we were calculating the gas at 75 75 therms per household.

1:56:00 – 1:56:3920

We recently, when we were doing our revenue projections, within the five years, we've noticed that that 75 therms per household has dropped to about 70 therms per household. So when we calculated FY '27 and '28, we used 70 therms. So prior to that, those calculations stayed the same at 75 therms. I think, so that's next one. So this is our budget option for '27.

1:56:39 – 1:56:5620

And I believe if I'm not, I might be incorrect, but I believe we go through this later on with the budget options with the other ones. Yes. Okay. But I'll talk about this now. So this is a joint utilities and public works through Fairview.

1:56:56 – 1:57:2820

So they would be doing some replacing roadway. And while they're replacing the roadway, we can replace some utility infrastructure. And so this is a revenue transfer, and this is something that it looks like we've been doing since FY20. And so, it's projected at 900,000. So these are our contractual and professional services.

1:57:29 – 1:58:2020

So with electric production, one of the biggest ones, and in the next page you'll see when you look at the professional and contractual services on each of ours, is we do have 22,000,000 in FY27 for vent shaft, which is for AbiQ. And then our purchased power for electric production accounts for about 52% of their contractual services costs. And this is kind of a breakdown for our two hydro plants. And you'll notice there's the vent shaft for FY twenty seven. Most of these are just our regular costs that we have, like Caymus Mountain Electric, septic pumping, our property taxes that we pay.

1:58:23 – 1:59:0120

Next page. Electric distribution. Had mentioned we have tree trimming, SCADA maintenance, uniforms, travel and maintenance. In gas distribution, we did have a decrease in our contractual and professional services from '26 to '27. In water production, we've also seen a decrease in our professional and contractual services between '26 and '27.

1:59:02 – 1:59:4420

In water distribution, some of the increase in our professional and contractual services is due to our capital projects or CIP. And then in wastewater, we're also seeing a decrease in professional and contractual services. As Philo mentioned, this was my first budget season, so we did when we were going through budget prepping, we did go through each kind of line item and expenses for FY '26 and tried to find things to cut back, like that we could cut out or change. So some of those decreases are due to that. And so I'm ready to stand for questions.

1:59:490

Okay, thank you very much. So do we have any questions on presentation or the materials in the budget book from any counselors? Councillor Wrigger?

2:00:01 – 2:00:138

Thank you, chair. Well, so I was trying to find we had this large payment from our electric provider that pulled out a few years ago. And where is that in all of the fund statements?

2:00:1620

Give me one second.

2:00:20 – 2:00:422

Chair and councilor Rieger, it'll be in our ten year fund statements towards the end of this budget presentation. We list our cash reserves, operating expenses, Oh, jeez. It's gonna be towards the back section of the book. I don't know the page number.

2:00:4217

I think this is

2:00:4413

Three eighty.

2:00:4520

380. 380.

2:00:528

Oh, there's another packet here.

2:00:56 – 2:01:2217

Or or it's also in page 86 if you wanna look at it at a higher level, and it's in your revenues in the electric utilities sub fund. And it is in our f y twenty four actuals. So that would be line settlements when you start with your beginning working capital in f y twenty four.

2:01:228

What page are you on? What page?

2:01:23 – 2:02:0017

Sorry. Page 86. So let's get to 86. And if you if you look at your f y twenty four actual column, it's the first one on your left. If you scroll down to revenues, the large settlement of 58,100,000, that is where it was accounted for. And then it has since been restricted and and put into investments and into cash. And and that's in the fund flows and the schedule of of yeah. The schedule of funds. Thank you. In more detail.

2:02:04 – 2:02:322

Chair and councilor Don't Rieger see it. Use that investment return for funding our capital improvements in our electric distribution fund. If you'll go through our schedule of funds, we essentially get 2,000,000 a year interest revenues that are directed into the electric distribution capital improvements.

2:02:428

Yeah, no, I can't find what you were talking about. But where is it in should be in the electric fund, right?

2:02:5120

It will be in electric Or it

2:02:5317

wouldn't be

2:02:53 – 2:03:208

an expense. So it would be revenue in the electric fund? There's, a $60,000,000 line item. Is that the one you're referring to under in 2024? Correct. Okay. And will that eventually go for the new electric project with the solar panels? Is that the idea?

2:03:21 – 2:03:402

No. That is a power the Foxtail Flats project is a power purchase agreement. So we actually pay the vendor for the energy that's produced as it's produced. It's not a county owned project. So Yeah.

2:03:448

So the the obligation we have is as they build up the project, we have to buy, like, a 100 megawatts of power from them. Right?

2:03:54 – 2:04:072

Right. The the ultimate build out of the project's a 170 megawatts of solar Uh-huh. With a 120 megawatt hours of battery energy storage.

2:04:08 – 2:04:378

Yeah. But but in reality, to provide for the town or if you have a 100 megawatt array, then you need more like a billion watt hours of storage to collect all of that energy, and that would be, like, $500,000,000 in expenses. So how would you what do you do with all that electricity? Is that gonna be used at night through a battery or not?

2:04:39 – 2:04:518

Is that another huge what I'm saying is that there should be a huge bill for electric storage if you're putting that system together, or there's a separate bill to buy nighttime electricity. I don't know what what's the plan.

2:04:52 – 2:05:292

So it's it's gonna be a combination. So with the Foxtail Flats, the project is coupled to have energy storage with the solar generation. And, essentially, it's gonna be used for what we call peak shaving. You know, with the time of use rates that's coming online, it costs a little more to supply energy from five to 11PM at night. That battery will be discharged during that time period Yeah. To supply the community. It does not do all

2:05:29 – 2:06:092

the energy we need. That's why we're pursuing other projects like the geothermal I mentioned earlier. Yeah. But we are the offtakers for the project that we are negotiating with the laboratory with the energy coordination agreement, and it also includes Sandia Kirtland. They're gonna take about 25% of of the load for for their use as well. So what we're trying to do by having other partners is spread out that risk. So, yeah, you know, we're base essentially three off takers right now and maybe a fourth down the road.

2:06:098

But you'll still have, like, a 100 megawatts of power that you have to cast to go somewhere. We anticipate to put in batteries.

2:06:18 – 2:06:292

Right. We anticipate about 50 megawatts of the solar that we need to find another offtaker for out of the Then what do we do? What do

2:06:298

we if we're not gonna store it ourselves, which would be very expensive, hundreds of millions of dollars, then who's that customer?

2:06:38 – 2:06:562

That's part of our business plan that we're gonna present to the board of public utilities. It's we have a couple ideas of other partners. One is the city of Farmington is interested in some. Maybe a a few partners.

2:06:58 – 2:07:228

But in the deficit to our utility program will be hundreds of millions of dollars, right, if we don't find you know, you're there's a customer there for that, but maybe you're gonna run out of them quickly. And then we have to pay for all that electricity. Right? And we don't or we have to pay for storage for it. The question is what's the plan?

2:07:222

Yeah. Where does it go? Right.

2:07:248

Oh, it's complete yet is what you're saying?

2:07:272

It's not completed yet. So I'm happy to invite you to that presentation when we have that later this year.

2:07:388

It seems like the deficit we would run-in this could be hundreds of millions of dollars that would cost us.

2:07:45 – 2:08:112

I chair and councilor Rieger, that's the purpose of the business plan is to show that we can sell that. We have access of 50 megawatts of solar. We're just looking to for customers that can take that portion. The majority of the project will be utilized between Lantel, Sandia Kirtland, and the county.

2:08:118

So Lantel's agreed to take how many megawatts?

2:08:17 – 2:09:002

So what we have paired together in our plan, and I don't have the plan for the remaining 50, is to use a 120, megawatts for the solar and battery storage that's coupled together. That will be used between the three of us completely. The additional 50 megawatts of solar could be a combination of other offtakers, private. City of Farmington could be additional needs from the lab or Sandia as well. There there's there's a lot of options for that 50 megawatts of solar.

2:09:008

But if you don't sell it, then that's a vast amount.

2:09:032

Buy it. That's that I understand your point. You're right.

2:09:068

Thought we'd go completely bankrupt.

2:09:07 – 2:09:262

Right? The risk that we gotta figure off taker out for that. We the the advantage of this contract that council and board entered into is that it's a fixed price for twenty years. So we have it doesn't escalate in cost. So

2:09:2617

Mhmm. Mhmm.

2:09:272

As each year goes on, usually, the costs go up. So I think it will be a a valuable resource as we move forward.

2:09:388

Well, if you could store it or sell it or do something with it. But yeah.

2:09:458

And then within the picture of the of the plan, what do we do for electricity at night?

2:09:54 – 2:10:112

So we have a you know, battery, we can discharge. There'll be a portion available from battery discharge and then additional power purchases. And that's what we're looking at. The geothermal is to round out that time period.

2:10:12 – 2:10:368

Yeah. Geothermal from Idaho or Here? Utah. Utah. I think you need your win your night electricity off the grid, won't you? That's where you'll get it. Mhmm. You'll be buying whatever's available. Right?

2:10:362

The grid with a PNN in the state? Our statewide grid system.

2:10:428

Yeah. We'll be paying for that all night, and we might not have a source of money to pay for it. I'm saying, what's the plan? How is it all gonna work out?

2:10:53 – 2:11:102

Yeah. When it comes to energy resource and presentation, I'd like to invite you to to those meetings, but it's not part of the budgeting process. But if you wanna understand how we're gonna supply energy

2:11:108

Plus an obligation that's enough to kinda bankrupt the county. Right? I mean, that's It's it's not going to.

2:11:172

We have plans for selling that energy.

2:11:228

And then having enough funds from that to pay for our our nighttime use.

2:11:308

And we're not gonna see any of that because that's you consider that not part of the budget process.

2:11:36 – 2:11:582

The Foxtail Flats project, you know, your budget tonight is for 2027. Actually, only a small portion of it will be supplied in that fiscal year. It's the majority of it's gonna be the following fiscal year. It's gonna come online a year next summer.

2:12:018

Okay. Well, that's set up for my questions for now. Thank you.

2:12:042

Thank you.

2:12:050

Okay. Thank you, councilor Rieger. Do we have any other questions?

2:12:13 – 2:12:389

Thank you, chair. I wanted to just better understand what you talked about in one of your earlier slides about thedid I hear you say a potential 28% increase in our gas rate being proposed for FY first starting sometime this calendar year or FY '27, like July 1?

2:12:39 – 2:13:0720

Charity, counselor Haberman. Yes. We will be bringing that next month for introduction. It is a 27% increase in our fixed rate, not the variable, because we we have two components to our gas, which is fixed and variable, and then we have our service charge. So to our fixed rate, we are looking at increasing that about 27%, and I I don't have the number.

2:13:07 – 2:13:3320

I'm sorry. I should have brought that with me. And it's what we're trying to do is we've our gas fund is low. Our revenues that we projected for this current fiscal year are gonna be really short. And so we're trying to recover some of those costs because we still have costs that are associated, salaries, benefits, you know

2:13:349

Just the the overhead that we need to kinda keep our baseline

2:13:3720

Right. Going.

2:13:381

So we're

2:13:38 – 2:14:1620

trying to kind of bring that up a little bit because the last few years, our revenues for gas have just not hit the target. And what we did with this current fiscal year to kinda get a better idea of where our revenues would hit, we did a five year the previous five year project, like, what we sold and kinda came up with a better number to kinda see where we would hit more and be able to kind of adjust our budget to that amount. But we're still starting out lower than we had anticipated. So that's where this is kinda coming in.

2:14:17 – 2:14:329

So do I see that? Would would we all be able to see that, like, on your just the gas distribution spreadsheet for FY '27 and '28? In our book, at least, it's page three twenty two. Do you

2:14:3220

mean the the Three twenty two. Okay.

2:14:389

Is that where you know, because I do see where revenue is projected to be down from the adopted budget of '26.

2:14:469

The projected budget for '26 is really down. And maybe that's what you're talking about?

2:14:5120

Yes. That's what

2:14:519

And that's down because the average therm usage is closer to that 70 per household, not 75?

2:14:5920

That's part of it. There's been less usage, but we've also had a very warm winter.

2:15:039

Less usage.

2:15:040

Usage. This is

2:15:049

for carbon emission and footprint, but to Exactly. Cover your fixed Okay.

2:15:08 – 2:15:4820

So just kind of a little preview. Overall, it would bring our fixed rate from 34¢ to 48¢, which is kinda what we were discussing earlier. And then it would still be a 9% increase to our service fee. So it'd be from $14.25 to $15.53. So the biggest jump would be with our fixed rate, which is covering those fixed costs. And so, like I said, it's it we're proposing 34¢ to 48¢ for that. And then the variable rate is dependent on the cost of gas.

2:15:489

Wait. So now so when you first said it, that use about a dollar increase, then it sounds like it's only about 10¢. Which one is it for the average for the average household? What will the bill

2:15:572

difference be?

2:16:01 – 2:16:4320

Can I hand that right back to you? Thank you. Let me pull. So looking at our typical monthly bill, from '26 to 20 '7, the bill is going from $71.25 to $78.53. Now keep in mind, there's five extra therms in '26. So give or take a couple of dollars there. So it's it's that's where the where the increase is right there is this fixed cost. So it's about, I'd say, about $8.

2:16:44 – 2:16:599

On average for the average household, average bill payer. Right. This portion of the bill will go up about $8. But and that's coming to that's coming to us as an ordinance introduction next month, I think.

2:16:5920

I believe in May. Yes. And then I I think, I'll do the presentation in early June.

2:17:049

And it's already been to BPU, I take it?

2:17:0520

It has. Yes. We did an introduction, and then, we also took it back for approval.

2:17:119

Okay. Yes. And then so so our residents are gonna see that. They're gonna see the increase in electric, increase in wastewater

2:17:189

For all the things.

2:17:2020

Yeah. And and generally, do have

2:17:229

a you're programming some increases in for the subsequent years, but at least in FY 'twenty eight, it won't be as high as this year, at least in the gas category.

2:17:2920

Exactly. You're right. Thank you. Yes.

2:17:349

All right. Okay. Well, that helps at least me understand it better. Thank you.

2:17:3720

Doctor. You're welcome.

2:17:38 – 2:17:590

Doctor. Okay. Thank you, Counselor Haberman. Any other questions? Because I did want to so when you're talking about the gas being 70 therms per customer per month, that's average. So wouldn't it be fair to say that most of the gas is used in the winter?

2:18:00 – 2:18:220

So the 70 is really much larger for, what, five months or so, right, with a peak. I mean, it's not even. So so when somebody gets a bill, their their bill is gonna be not, you know, $342. In the winter, it's gonna be much higher. Right?

2:18:2212

Correct.

2:18:23 – 2:18:500

Okay. So I think that's important. And I think the other thing I was looking at is your utility assistance payment. If I was doing the numbers roughly, it looked like was would there be, like, $2,000 per household? Because you had, I think, $24,000 in basics households.

2:18:50 – 2:19:300

Maybe I didn't do the math right. But that if I take that number, and it's like, that doesn't cover a year of of the current costs. So when people get the utility assessments payments, how are those structured for what can somebody be eligible for? And I do like to always I wonder, is there like a stigma associated with trying to apply for these and, you know, the information somebody has to disclose? So do we know that that's all the people that really would benefit from utility assistance even with the current rates? Do we know much about that in terms of that program?

2:19:30 – 2:19:5520

Yeah, I can explain a little bit more on the utility assistance program. So there's three ways to three options to get utility assistance. We have year round assistance for eligible residents that are 65 years or older or are on social security. So they so they they qualify twelve months out of every year. They just reapply every twelve months.

2:19:55 – 2:20:2420

Our other option is for our lower income residents and it's for six month period for the winter months. And then we also have a one time assistance. So those are for people that maybe lost their job or got decreased hours in their job or received a medical bill that they weren't anticipating. So they can, and that will help up to $350 Okay. And so there's so there's a few options.

2:20:26 – 2:20:5820

They do the 350 up to 350 is is in our rules and regulations. The year round and our winter assistance, we take last year's winter average for that household, and we we calculate it and give them 30%. So we if their bill is a $100 a month, we give them $30 for that winter or for the full twelve months. So it's 30% of their winter usage. Okay. The previous winter usage.

2:20:59 – 2:21:2320

And and as far as the stigma, it's all online. We really encourage it. We do have you know, if somebody calls customer care and is unable to pay, we we give this option to them. And it's it's a simple form online that they fill out. The information is handled by my customer service supervisor, and she processes those very quickly.

2:21:24 – 2:21:350

Okay. But you mentioned LIHEAP. So some customers may qualify for that currently. And then they won't be available.

2:21:35 – 2:21:5620

Right. LawHeap, I believe, is one time a year. But if they get LawHeap, they automatically qualify for our winter assistance. So if they qualify for law heap, all they have to do is give us a law heap letter. We don't need any income or anything like that. That automatically calls qualifies them for winter assistance.

2:21:56 – 2:22:150

Okay. Well and I appreciate when somebody gets their bill, it includes refuse on it. But that's what they would see the county charging them. So it's good. I mean, so in terms of the bill, they're gonna see that. I don't think we're talking about raising refuse rates.

2:22:1520

Well, refuse is not part of our

2:22:18 – 2:22:410

budgetary I understand, but it's part of somebody's bill. They're going get the bill. They're going to look at it and say, I'm getting a bill for $500 Right? And it's going to include the gas in the wintertime and all the other stuff. So that's what people are going to comment to us about is what their total bill is. I understand your part is that part. We're only raising certain parts of it. But it's good to clarify that I was concerned about that percentage, too.

2:22:4120

Just to be clear, the winterthe utility assistance does not the 30 okay. Percent is I just wanna make sure

2:22:470

that everything Doesn't cover the whole bill. And so but some people may wonder about that too.

2:22:53 – 2:23:190

So I think because I think there's it seems like there's more households than that that might need assistance, and especially if the rates are going up by that much, especially like in the wintertime, they're, you know because it's gonna have to be, you know, the $506,100 dollar bill would be not uncommon, Right? Mean, it depends on what the commodity price is. We had that big issue, what, four years ago. Right? Three years ago now.

2:23:20 – 2:23:480

So anyway, enough about that. I would just like to make sure that we are sensitive to that. Okay. And I was so appreciate the clarification on the settlement payment. So the settlement payment, that was part of then some discussions with the BPU when we received the funding and that you're going to just basically kind of canutize it for that particular purpose.

2:23:48 – 2:24:060

So we have that in perpetuity for that as opposed to using it some other way, like, to defray some of these costs we're seeing now. Right? So that was the discussion. Were there other alternatives discussed about, like, not, like, annuitizing it like that?

2:24:072

Chair, there's there the settlement did two things. It funded our reserve requirements that's required in the county charter.

2:24:18 – 2:24:402

So we got that reserve we met those reserve requirements. The electric fund is the most expensive part of our operation. Right. So but then, you know, we're trying to maintain those reserves so that we can use the interest revenues that we have to invest back into electric distribution system.

2:24:41 – 2:25:082

it's kinda like our cap permanent capital fund that you're gonna see next. Yeah. It it electric doesn't have the grants like we have for water and wastewater. We have almost zero percent zero point zero one five interest on loans. But this is kind of our way to fund some capital in the electric distribution.

2:25:08 – 2:25:200

Okay. And so I'm just I'm I'm trying to recall because I don't remember, like, actively, like, voting on that. So that was something that the board voted on. Right? And there wasn't a it was a financial policy for the

2:25:202

We did investment.

2:25:230

Yeah. Okay.

2:25:25 – 2:25:362

I guess I I should ask miss Doudsey because she did the we did the presentation last summer about how we do the investments. So it's part of the county's investment pool.

2:25:37 – 2:25:4819

And, chair Reidy and counselors, we we did a presentation, but it was not formally adopted or accepted by the council. Right. It was just a plan.

2:25:49 – 2:26:080

Okay. Okay. So, out of curiosity, so what other options did the board look at when you constructed your budget? Were there any other scenarios in terms of rate increases or anything else? I understand the gas fund is in very poor shape.

2:26:09 – 2:26:372

Chair, we looked at three different options for the gas rate increase. And, you know, it was mentioned earlier by miss Gentry that we didn't sell a lot of gas. Our winter on average is about 10 degrees warmer. We sold 20% less gas. Therefore, we didn't get the revenue for our operation and maintenance, and so we have to catch up.

2:26:37 – 2:27:052

The board decided to go with a little more aggressive increase upfront so that we could catch up and get to the operational reserve requirements we need within five to six actually, I think it's six years is when we're able to meet start meeting some positive cash flow. We our reserves are not pretty much nonexistent right now for the gas fund.

2:27:072

So yeah. Yeah. We had three options for that.

2:27:100

Okay. And that's what we're gonna see soon.

2:27:152

And what we're gonna present is the option that's in the ordinance is the one that the board selected.

2:27:23 – 2:27:510

Okay. Okay. Any other questions? I think we will have a budget option here as for the transfer. Right? So can we get the tentative motion up? Okay. There a councilor interested in making the motion for utilities? Councilman New Clinton? I

2:27:52 – 2:28:1112

move that council tentatively approve the proposed budget for the Public Utilities Department in the amount of $94,688,744 and the budget option in the amount of $900,000 That's an extra that's a couple of zeros.

2:28:110

Might be an extra zero.

2:28:1612

Think it's 900

2:28:182

It's okay.

2:28:2017

We're good.

2:28:220

I think we have the right number read. Correct? So I think we're good on the motion.

2:28:290

Second? Who said the second?

2:28:3317

Oh. What?

2:28:34 – 2:28:500

Okay. Cancel there. It's like I turned away and I couldn't tell who said that. Okay. We have motion by Councillor Newkland, second by Councillor Herrmann. Okay. Seeing no more discussion, can we have a roll call, please?

2:28:545

Counselor Cole? Yes. Counselor Raygorn?

2:29:005

Counselor Hand? Yes. Counselor Haverman?

2:29:055

Counselor Herman? Yes. Councilor Neil Clinton? Yes. Councilor Reidy?

2:29:135

Motion passes. Six one with Councilor Rieger voting against.

2:29:18 – 2:29:410

Okay. For the virtue of the motion passes. Six one with Councilor Rieger opposed. I think we have we'll do the thank you very much for being here and answering questions. Appreciate it. So we'll do the interdepartmental, think. That'll be pretty Corey, do you want to take a break? People are asking for a break. Okay. So we'll take a break for about ten minutes.

2:41:13 – 2:43:190

Hello? Okay. So, we're back in session. And I think we had non departmental as the next item.

2:43:27 – 2:44:2819

Yes. So chair ID and counselors, I'm happy to present the nondepartmental, proposed budget for 2027 of $8,200,000 It does include our twenty two thousand eight debt issuance and also the subsequent 2013 refunding of that bond. And that payment is about $4,500,000, And we do have two more years on that one, and then it will be paid off in 2028. It does also include our 26 GRT debt service of that issuance that we just issued for $40,000,000 for broadband and then also proposed, amount for our '27 issuance for the remaining $35,000,000. So that brings our total to 1 point or $8,200,000, And it is a little about $1,600,000 less than our adopted '26 budget, and that is because we did push out that issuance of the 35,000,000.

2:44:2919

And with that, I'll stand for any questions.

2:44:32 – 2:44:460

Okay. This is pretty straightforward. Is there any questions? I think we've already kind of approved this functionally. So if there's no questions, then we can have the tentative motion.

2:44:520

Okay, Councilor, are interested in making a motion on this one? Councilor Cole?

2:44:5916

I move that council tentatively approve the proposed budget for the non departmental in the amount of $8,179,409

2:45:09 – 2:45:220

Thank you. Second? Second. So we have a motion by Councilor Cole. Second by Councilor Neil Clinton. Okay. Seeing no discussion, can the clerk please call the roll?

2:45:255

Councilor Herman?

2:45:285

Councilor Haberman?

2:45:315

Councilor Cole? Yes. Councilor Regor? Yes. Councilor Neil Clinton? Yes. Councilor Reidy?

2:45:405

Councilor Hand? Yes. Motion passes, seven zero.

2:45:45 – 2:45:570

Okay. Let the record show the motion passes unanimously. So I think we have which order are we gonna do the parking lot fast? Which order do wanna do?

2:45:587

I was planning on doing CIP next.

2:46:000

Oh, CIP. Okay. Yeah,

2:46:04 – 2:47:167

please. Chair writing council, I'm gonna walk through just some high level highlights. And starting with this is a capital improvement fund balance our ten year projection forecast. We'll focus on fiscal year twenty seven proposed, and we'll start at the top with revenues. And this is where we take into account anticipated recurring or grants or federal or state grants or other revenues from debt from the GRC revenue bonds and either from the 35,000,000 we're anticipating issuing in in the fall of this year or the broadband debt proceeds that we sold just this last February.

2:47:17 – 2:47:417

So that's where we account for the revenue. So when you see the different projects, it might be funded by debt service. It might be funded by grants. It might be funded by a transfer, which is the next section is transfers from the general fund and from the CIP permanent fund. All of those revenue sources get distributed to the projects that they're associated with.

2:47:41 – 2:48:237

So they could come from any one of those or a combination. So we anticipate 33,700,000 new funds revenue funds revenue sources, excuse me, coming in this for the fiscal year '27. And we have this organized, and you've heard a lot about a lot of these capital projects through the different department summaries because we do break it down by department and include it in those tentative approvals. So you won't need to do a tentative approval for the CIP fund, but we wanna walk through just in terms of seeing it, altogether. So in the administrative services department, we, you heard about technology projects.

2:48:23 – 2:48:527

They're expensive. That's why we budget them here. We, have been caring given the volatility in the market, whether it's tariffs, whether it's just, you know, the bidding lack of staff, contractors and competing for that. We've been holding money in a reserve to handle some overages when we bid projects. And and then, of course, we didn't have to budget any additional funds for the broadband project because we had had budgeted that that in 2026.

2:48:53 – 2:49:317

For public works, these are just the more the building projects, not the road projects. We you'll see that we've added some additional funds to the Manhattan dorm project that chair Reidy mentioned earlier because we anticipate what we had previously budget wasn't adequate, so we're proposing to add money to that project. We are there's several projects there that are already funded that we are working that we haven't completed yet. And then there's the million dollars of in sustainability enhancement, CP ten eleven. We've been carrying that for a couple years.

2:49:31 – 2:50:317

We just recently allocated the the fiscal year $26 to the Fire Station 4 project because that those bids came in high and because there were significant sustainability enhancements to that project with the electrification, EV chargers, and solar panels. And then with the Betty Ehart renovations, I just wanna make sure that you're on the 246 c page because initially when we published the proposed budget, we had the Betty e Hart renovations fully funded in 2026 because of moving funds around to be able to award the Fire Station 4 project after we published the draft budget. We split the, fundings into the two fiscal years because it didn't impact the timing of the Better eHeart HVAC renovation project and other renovations. Let's see. I'm going down to community development.

2:50:35 – 2:51:327

We are adding money, and you heard a presentation at your joint meeting with the schools about the North Mesa housing project and the associated infrastructure study that was done. There were several levels of infrastructure that was needed that was a little confusing in that study. Some of it was infrastructure that the utilities department needed to fund as a replacement, and that what you heard about the downspouts, the wastewater downspouts that were Swiss cheese. You heard about improvements that were related to the Arbolada development housing development, which is a private project, and those associated costs. And then there's the pub the infrastructure in the right of way, the public right of ways, and then the infrastructure that was actually on the parcel itself should the North Mesa housing project on the middle school property, which is to further east, be developed for housing in the future.

2:51:33 – 2:52:357

This portion here is the funding in the public right of way that we would fund as a public works project that we would design it, build, and have the contract for construction. The utilities and our infrastructure needed for on-site is actually allocated in the economic development fund because that would be done in partnership with some private developer, and that would be our contribution to the development. And I will move on to two forty eight, two forty nine c and public works. You see a large increase, and you heard mister Martinez talk about the streets CIP and increasing some of the expenditures on some of the projects there and the costs. And no additional funding needed for the ongoing projects.

2:52:35 – 2:53:317

And then community services, you heard a lot about the making sure we maintain funding for CSD infrastructure for the ADA and the integrated master plan, as well as the athletic court renovations, North Mesa recreation plan, the bike park. And then also, would real we really focused on out years on some of those plans, plugging in the funding that we would need in out years to be able to continue to make progress on those plans. And so I'll just look at the what I wanted to show is just the ending fund balances. And you see in the out years, there's just not a lot of capacity as you look on the out years to do very large new projects. So what that means is we'll be looking for if revenues come in JRT revenues come in above where we anticipate, we would wanna kind of keep those aside, come back to council.

2:53:31 – 2:54:017

We'll talk about the policy in a little bit, how we would wanna have a conversation with council about where you wanna prioritize that money. But unless there's additional revenues coming in, there's not a lot of capacity unless we maybe have a grant funding or some other outside funding source to be able to do new initiatives. Did I miss anything? Mrs. Dodsey, do you want to add anything? Okay. Well, that will stand for any questions.

2:54:030

So just to clarify, there's also so the economic development fund projects are not here, right?

2:54:127

That is correct.

2:54:13 – 2:54:380

Yeah. So those are in addition to this. And so also just to clarify that so I guess that's in the main budget, but the the reserve number is at 25% starting July 1. Is that right? That's the target? We look at the calculations.

2:54:387

Vaidy, Ms. Pralio is going to cover that under the fiscal policy and long range financial plan. We'll go back and look at that during that discussion.

2:54:48 – 2:55:020

So it seemed like there was some interest in the bike park. So when you'd indicated that in order for that so that's why I asked about the percentage. So.

2:55:03 – 2:55:177

We would need an additional transfer or we would need to move something out to move. But I think the 500,000 would get us at least started. Mean, maybe Mr. Styron wants to come up and just refresh us on how much we could do for 500,000.

2:55:28 – 2:55:561

Thank you, chair and counsel. When we looked at phase one with our estimates, it was 3,400,000, which is primarily the bike track and some infrastructure around that area. This project would lend itself to a design build process, which I think some of the proponents of this project have have suggested. That way we bring a bicycle. We could start the design early.

2:55:58 – 2:56:391

You know, if we if this was a go, we could start with the process in July, probably have somebody midwinter. It would if we got into that project, we would have to be thinking about the additional funds for next year. So it'd be almost do we hit the pause button and lose momentum, or do we need additional funding in the 2028 by budget to actually complete the project similar to what we talked about with a couple of other projects here? The Betty A Hart renovation was similar. So that's just something you would we can get moving forward with this.

2:56:39 – 2:56:521

We can get the process going, but there would be an additional ask next year with the budget process for for additional funds for the next steps within that project.

2:56:540

So there's between the two years, there's $2,000,000. Right?

2:57:00 – 2:57:237

So, Chair Ruddy, I just had a thought. CP 9,007 in ASD as a cost increase for all categories is pretty close to 1.5. So should council wanna move this forward and try to fund it sooner, we that would be that could be a fund we tapped into that to cover that cost to move that piece forward sooner.

2:57:23 – 2:57:511

And and share and and manager, we've also highlighted at least three potential grant opportunities that we could use to also kinda offset some of those costs as well that we're preparing to go after. It'll be later this late summer or fall, but it's potentially between 500,000 to maybe 1,000,000 and a quarter that we can potentially go after from three different sources to also defray those costs.

2:57:53 – 2:58:200

Okay. So there's so it sounds like if there the project's gonna be more than what's allocated between the two years, there's grants. So chances are it might come in. You might have funding then to actually do the first phase. Or then you'd have to come up with more money then at that point if you didn't get grants.

2:58:20 – 2:58:311

Just, you know, full disclosure to let you know that there would be another ask next year for a new project that might be a little more than the current placeholder.

2:58:31 – 2:58:430

Okay. So I didn't wanna derail the questions from counsel, but I remember we had that one on the list. So is there anyone want to follow-up on that? Or counselor Atman?

2:58:43 – 2:59:099

I'd like to. Thank you, chair. Well, then two thoughts come to mind. Manager LaRent, could you explain what the downside would be or the risk would be in reallocating CP '9 thousand and 7, which is called the cost increase for all categories, about 1 and a half million dollars. What would happen if we reallocated that to the bike park CIP line item?

2:59:127

Chair Reidy, councilor Heffman, it would just it wouldn't change the total. It would just the department allocation would change a little bit, but it it wouldn't change anything overall.

2:59:219

Which department gets hurt? Does any department get hurt

2:59:247

by the time? It's an administrative services as a placeholder to transfer to a project in need. So if if this is your determined park project in need, it's available.

2:59:34 – 2:59:489

But so the downside could be that we there could be an unanticipated need that comes up. Correct. And That we don't maybe don't have a in that but then you could argue that's what our 25% reserve is for, possibly.

2:59:48 – 3:00:047

Correct. If we had some other line item, like the dormitory project that exceeded when we bid it exceeds what we have available, we would be looking for any source we could to try to pull into that project just like we did with for the fire station station.

3:00:04 – 3:00:189

Yep. Okay. And then I know that's it's a recommended policy to change our reserve fund. What's this correct term? Unassigned reserve fund? Is that correct term?

3:00:1817

Targeted reserves.

3:00:19 – 3:00:439

Thank you. Yes. Targeted reserve has been 20% for at least four or five years now. You're recommending we bump it to 25 because of anticipated volatility. Some people have been here long enough to remember when we had volatility a dozen or so years ago, and it was painful, and you want to offset that.

3:00:43 – 3:01:189

It seems like the governmental officers, financial officers association, GFOA, is that what they're called? They recommend having reserve balances in the 15 to 25% range, or is it 20 to 25 now? They kinda bumped it recently. I guess I'm just try trying to say, like, you know, do we have to go to 25, or could we do 24? And then would a percentage point help us expedite some of these important projects to the community that have been in waiting for a long time?

3:01:18 – 3:01:309

It's not like this just came up as a new shiny object this year, and we're overreacting. I think it's been something that's been asked for for a long, long, long, long time. So I'm just trying to think of other ways we could support it.

3:01:30 – 3:01:437

So, chair Reidy, councilor Heavenman, if you would like, I could turn it over to miss Pralio who could talk about the financial policy a little bit that then may inform how you wanna direct we can come back to CIP.

3:01:4317

Yeah. Chair Reidy, if if if that would be appropriate, I think it would really correlate to this discussion. Uh-huh. And I can just Yeah. I have cover those two topics and then

3:01:520

question yesterday.

3:01:5217

Flip back before we

3:01:5420

if that works.

3:01:54 – 3:02:1517

And that's a good timing. So if we can, we'll let's jump back to the slides on and we'll start with the long range financial projection starting with financial policies that are being proposed. Let's see here if we can have that shared. I'll let that get pulled up, and then we'll we'll jump between the two. No worries.

3:02:21 – 3:02:5517

Are you sharing, Juan? Okay. So two things we're going to cover with what we are proposing to amend or red line what's different this year on our financial policies, and a preview to that was provided. But we really are looking at increasing the target reserve from 20% to 25%. There's there's several reasons for that.

3:02:56 – 3:03:3617

You know, overall, it it strengthens our our fiscal stability. And and one of the things that is precisely looked at and evaluated during our bond rating discussions with bond raters and potential underwriters of our debt is absolutely that, our long range financial plan and how we balance what are any excess revenues over expenditures, and we save for a rainy day fund perhaps. The other thing is that we know that there's inflationary pressures that that have been coming every year. And so maintaining our ongoing support of essential services costs more. Our overhead is up.

3:03:36 – 3:04:2117

We know that things cost more. We see that. We can see that even with just what we project in any CIP project and what the bids come back at. And and we're always seeing that there's inflation. And so there's inflationary pressures that we wanna be able to manage so that you have that flexibility to make those decisions on those key projects as well. And then for the key essential services that you wanna keep funding. The other thing is that we still have a certain amount of volatility related to our GRT. So even though we feel like we have a pretty solid projection, we really cannot have a a finger on the absolute prediction of what economic activity may drive our GRT. So that's always something that we're looking at and always balancing. So those are some of the things.

3:04:21 – 3:05:1517

And one of the, you know, historic approaches when we started considering a GRT increase just for historic purposes, we thought that it would be really beneficial to the county to look at increasing our target reserves to coincide with the timing of that GRT increase for all of those reasons. And then the the other piece to that is that we've added additional language in our financial policies that in the event that we have set aside an excess a decent excess outside of that reserves that accounts for, you know, maintaining business overhead charges volatility, then that would give the council the ability to discuss those priorities during budget hearings. And we added the area of affordable housing. Economic development was always there, and then maybe furthering capital projects. So that's what we've actually proposed in the red line.

3:05:15 – 3:05:3717

Those are the the key changes. So they basically, they hit on resiliency and then adding flexibility for you all or future councils to consider to meet the strategic goals. And then one thing I want to note. So I'm going to share my screen for a minute so I can just show you it's it's worth understanding the wording because it will explain it. So let me share my screen really quickly.

3:05:38 – 3:06:0717

And I'm just going to pull up that red line so that we can we can show you exactly what we mean. It's good on a bullet, but sometimes red lines are much easier to to to digest. So right now, we have the target amount to be maintained in the general fund. Unassigned fine fund balance is is 20% currently. So we're just proposing a 5% increase, and that's over the calculated on our general actual revenues.

3:06:07 – 3:06:2717

Now this is not required by law. We do have cash reserve requirements by law. This is by policy, and this is for sound fiscal management. And, yes, best practices as well. And and so, yes, GFOA would recommend a minimum of 15, but if you can afford 25, it only helps in all of the things I just mentioned.

3:06:28 – 3:06:5917

Resiliency, strong credit ratings, ability to have flexible decisions. And also, when we are when we are tied to this is a big risk that comes out in all of our bond discussions. We are tied so economically dependent on what happens at the lab that we are literally considered a one horse town. So we have we know we have a recognized volatility there. So strengthening those reserves helps us to mitigate what could be potential downgrades in our ratings having that financial dependency.

3:07:00 – 3:07:4117

So this is the timing for us to consider given the way that we've proposed your budget is is is a is a good time to look at it, and we've modeled it so we can show you that. Now the next thing is that what's really important to know is that this is not set in stone and you are locked into 25%. Right now, you could you could have reserves of 20% and you don't have to take action until it falls under 15%. So there's already a buffer of 5% within your targeted reserves for you to make any kind of budget decision on. So it doesn't lock you in where you'd have to take counsel action to to to change that reserve.

3:07:41 – 3:08:2417

So there's a 5% buffer. Now we're saying, we will target 25%, but only until you were to fall under 20 does counsel need to take action. So at that point, you could do a couple things. You have a couple options. One, you could decide to lower your targeted reserves by policy. You could do that. Or you would look at reductions in expenditures so that you would meet your target, or you'd look at other revenue sources. So those are the things. It's best for me to just illustrate that in our model, and I think that will help tie in the capital discussion, and then it would, you know, close a deal for some of the parking lot items. But but that's basically what we're doing for the 25%.

3:08:25 – 3:09:3017

The other thing is it we did add in the language. After a lot of the discussion that we talked about, you know, part of the whole GRT increment, we wanted to make sure there was a place in policy that we called out, you know, this commitment per se, where we've added so the balance in our ED fund, including any interest earnings, it can be used for providing initial capital for economic development projects, loans, housing rehab loans, land development, and we've added affordable housing initiatives, called that out. And then we've also said in the event that the county realizes excess fund balance over that 25% reserve target, county management will engage with the council during budget hearings to consider increasing funding for these priorities. So just just so that we can clearly understand exactly what the summary that was provided by Councillor Haberman, that is what we're proposing. We've also proposed that language in our fund balance assigned for capital projects so that that's exactly the same wording.

3:09:30 – 3:10:0617

So if we we go over the reserves, it gives you the opportunity and flexibility to add those excess funds. And given any year, then you have more data at that time to fund one time versus non one time. Okay. So with that, I'm gonna flip back to this the next slide, which is the long range financial projection. And let me I can just pull this up, Juan. Don't worry. Because I'm gonna pull up the spreadsheet and show you the model, and it's the best if I if I illustrate it. So let me do that really quickly. Where's my well, said I would do it. Let's share screen.

3:10:08 – 3:10:3217

Okay. Do I have it? Yes. No. If you can I thought I had it up? Juan, can you share the next slide, please? We'll tag team for a minute. We'll talk a little bit about the long range financial projection. So, you know, we we have a healthy projected ending fund balance. So that's good news, 70,400,000.

3:10:32 – 3:10:5717

We do we are projecting a shortfall of about 23,000,000, and that's what our CFO, missus Dodzi, had alluded to in the beginning. So refresh your memory when we go through the model, that we're dipping into those reserves. That's what happens in times that we don't have the revenue we projected. We're dipping in to the tune of 23,000,000. And then our proposed ending fund balance with the budget that's that's at hand is about 72,000,000.

3:10:57 – 3:11:3217

So we're we're kinda staying pretty steady, pretty even kill to where we project ending and a slight operating surplus. Now the budget that we have proposed for you all, I'll that it's it stands in it's financially viable. So it sustains that recommended 25% reserve. The it it sustains current baseline, and then it essentially allows for flexibility when considering those one time investments. And and and and that's what the so the target reserves coincides with that.

3:11:32 – 3:11:5117

So now I'll share the model, and we'll just walk through it really quickly because it's it's best if I if I demonstrate it. Share. And then I can I can kind of illustrate an example of what we're talking about when we're talking about use of reserves versus versus not? Let's see.

3:11:5119

Do you see? Let's see.

3:11:52 – 3:12:2717

Okay. How do I get rid of this little thing? Okay. So here here we have the proposed budget for f y twenty seven. Everything you've heard tonight, what you've considered outside of the budget options that are not in here yet, we'll plug them in. But we start with a healthy fund balance. Again, just to remind everybody, 70,300,000. We we we program our our sources of funds. That's that's all of our revenues. So, like, our this is our income statement.

3:12:27 – 3:12:5217

Looking at our revenues and then looking at all of our expenditures and transfers. Now we'll talk about anything that may be on the parking lot or, you know, the tentative budget options. I'll plug those in so we can consider those. And then we're talking about how we end some things that we don't have control over non spendable. This is our legal cash requirement, which is only one twelfth of our cash.

3:12:52 – 3:13:2117

So that's the by law, you have one month's worth of cash reserve required to to set aside and restrict. And then we have other restricted and assigned mostly tied to to whatever our obligations are by action or law. And then unassigned. So that's your discretionary amount of of fund balance. Our our operating shortfall or surplus, that is, you know, your sources, your revenues over your expenditures.

3:13:22 – 3:14:0217

And then we end up with our target. So what we have is right now, the way that the the budget is proposed, we end with a projected $34,000,000 target. That's just the way this played out with everything that we've plugged in. So that that's that's well above 25%. And we we've often seen that in the last many years, actually. We've often been high over our our target. But I will illustrate. So just give me one second so that I can show you the example. If we were to make I'm gonna show you two examples. One, we're just gonna use a hypothetical 5,000,000.

3:14:02 – 3:14:4117

It's not earmarked. It's just for purposes of of of demonstrating. If we made a one time, let's just say it was any type of budget option or anything else of $5,000,000 we wanted to add to our budget, you can see that now we project a shortfall, not huge, but it's a shortfall in '27, but we're still well within 25% ending target. We're still 4,000,000 over our targeted reserves. But then if you look at '28 and then '29 and then '30, it actually puts us under that recommended 25% target.

3:14:42 – 3:15:0517

However, that is actually okay, and that is still within your policy because you still have that five percent buffer. You'd be alright. That would be okay. You could make those decisions, and and and it would only be if it fell under 20% that you'd have to take action. Now the other example I wanna show you is that if you were to consider recurring, and I'm just gonna use the same 5,000,000.

3:15:05 – 3:15:3617

I know it's gonna feel a little drastic. And I'll show you. You know, it looks like at the end of ten years, we're we're doing really well. We have sufficient reserves and way over our target. But once you plug in a $5,000,000 recurring consideration in this given year and you build in the inflation, that now drops you to where you would have to consider action in 2028 per your policy.

3:15:36 – 3:16:1217

So you would have to take action because you're gonna fall below 20%. And then you fall, you know, even your your you know, you fall even below 15 and you end up not meeting your targeted reserves. So you you you know, there's still that that's just to illustrate that that this is a it it it does add for flexibility. You still have you can work within that model, but it is really a good demonstration to show when when when there's requests or when you are trying to consider recurring versus one time. It makes a huge difference in the long range financial plan.

3:16:12 – 3:16:3817

So now is there capacity? Those are the things that we look at about, you know, modeling that. The discussion on the the x the cost increase category would not have anything to do with this because we balance that within our CIP fund. If there was anything added additionally, that's how we would look at modeling that out and seeing, does that make sense? But but hopefully, that can demonstrate that it is a it it's a it's a recommendation.

3:16:39 – 3:17:0317

You you we can live well within that. It's a it's a fiscally sound budget that's proposed today, and it still allows for you to have that flexibility for any of those future considerations. And you may have a onetime cost that you're going to be looking to those 25% reserves. So that just gives you that flexibility. So are there any questions on that before we turn it back to CIP?

3:17:06 – 3:17:170

So but we only have, like, $15,000 and we've proved so far in a parking lot, right? Because the $900,000 is really not it's not affecting any of this.

3:17:1717

Correct. This is that's because it's not generally funded.

3:17:190

Yeah. Because it's we're giving money to utilities back that they already had.

3:17:2314

Correct.

3:17:240

So the only is that the only budget option we approved was the 15,000? I

3:17:2717

think it's the parking lot. The parking lot has 37, isn't it?

3:17:3119

county council.

3:17:324

Yeah. So

3:17:320

not talking 5,000,000. We're talking At all. 50,000. Right.

3:17:370

So to me so but so let me ask a clarifying question about the policy.

3:17:41 – 3:18:210

So are we saying that we would if we adopt the policy as the changed and we have this budget, We will wait until the end of this coming next year and say, oh, well, yeah, this projection was correct. And we have like $10,000,000 more than 25% that could be spent then the next year on something. But isn't that true now? You know, we have monies right now above that number that you could spend on things now? Chair, we wait for next year to spend the money if there was something like, whatever it is, the coast overruns for the projects or something else?

3:18:227

Chair Brady, correct. However, if you look at the ten year, it doesn't stay at that level. Right. Because of increasing costs of just operations.

3:18:320

Yeah. Because

3:18:33 – 3:19:327

And we we're coming off of two years where we've had to significantly dip into reserves because the revenues didn't come through. And I don't think the policy would prevent us, like, if in six months, we have a really cool plan for transit and we wanna the council wants to authorize a budget op revision to fund additional transit service, implementing that based on the plan, we would have potentially two quarters or at least a quarter of the new year of seeing how the GRT comes in at the new revenues, and it would give us some confidence that we're on the track. But if we get to that point and we see that it's not coming in as we were projected, it would be a little bit like, well, we're not we're not seeing the revenues we had we hoped we would see. And and that's the prob that's kind of the challenge we're in right now is I think there's some uncertainty that we have to be I when we when I put this budget together, I still have caution that we don't know if the revenues are gonna realize the way we hope.

3:19:32 – 3:20:100

Okay. Well, I'm gonna go make this comment before we go further. So my my thinking on when we adopted the the point 625% GRT increase, Part of the rationale was the other's cost increases. But also, there were things like housing, like workforce housing that I think we are funding right now. But if we put in, not 5,000,000, but if you put some amount of money into that this year, which because we do have up above the 25%, it's like it's not you're don't you're not committing to spending it.

3:20:10 – 3:20:500

It's just that we are indicating it's a priority, and that is one of the uses we are we are planning on for that additional monies that we're getting. So part of it's covering costs. And my thinking was part of it was gonna hopefully cover some long term, you know, funding available for affordable housing. We don't know if that's in perpetuity or what. But that was just my thinking that and so I like having affordable housing on the list, but without actually putting any number in there into the budget.

3:20:51 – 3:21:140

It seems like we're not fulfilling on at least what I thought we were hoping to do with yeah. So in a year or so, I guess there's different approaches. The approach you have is very conservative, right? But there's also the opportunities we might miss by not having funding available for economic development or housing.

3:21:14 – 3:21:317

So Chair Roddy, point well taken. I think what I want to add though is the significant increase in this budget to the economic development fund based on affordable housing projects and economic development projects that we know

3:21:32 – 3:21:587

Are in the pipeline or might be in the pipeline, there was a significant increase in this budget that was accounted for putting a priority there. Maybe we can you know, certainly, that's an option to transfer more of that revenues into that fund. And I can tell you that, you know, there's likely some LEDA or MRA requests that if they all get funded, they would need to do additional transfers anyway

3:21:583

transfers.

3:21:587

Right. When we know those realized. And that certainly, I wouldn't say, would have to wait till the end of the year.

3:22:05 – 3:22:330

Yeah. I'm just trying to clarify what the policy is really telling us. It's like, because we're well above the 25% right now. So, if you look back and if we had it up, we already have 20%. So, we're all above that. So, in theory, we already could be funding projects, but it's a matter of the one time project. One time funding versus non recurring, the one time has less of an effect on that long term projection, right, than the recurring.

3:22:33 – 3:23:1817

And if I may, Chair Reddy, I would just emphasize that, you know, it doesn't mean that you're limited to only looking at it at that time of year. It's just that we're showing that that's the intent of increasing the reserve. It is making sure that you prioritize what that looks like. But but just as as county manager Laurent mentioned, you can consider any of those throughout the year. You could consider any one time influx, and you do have that cushion, and we do know that your reserves are there. So it doesn't prevent for prevent you from taking that action. We'll just be looking at it. It just gives a more standardized process to emphasize the reason for the change to the 25%.

3:23:180

Okay. So yeah. Councilor Evan, I'll I'll I'll stop asking questions now so other councilors can have their turn.

3:23:26 – 3:24:109

Thank you. No. Good questions. So one one question. Do you know offhand, like, what the fiscal cost is? It's redundant. What the cost would be to us, to the county, if we had an only, like, an a rating when we went out for bond revenue versus an A plus rating. Because that is one of the reasons to keep a 25% reserve. But if we said, you know what? But the opportunity cost is too high because we're missing out on opportunities by being so conservative and having such a high reserve. But one of the reasons to have a high reserve is because you save money when you get a better bond rating. But are we talking like a ton of money? Are we talking just a skosh? Do you have a sense?

3:24:10 – 3:24:3117

I don't have it. So chair Reddy and counselor Haberman, I don't have the exact amount, but we did we did have this conversation with our investment I mean, with our financial advisers. And and, you know, it was anywhere to the tune of, you know, 2 to $5,000,000 that you could save over the life of debt by having a lower interest rate. Having life? Yes.

3:24:3117

So, you know, 2 to $5,000,000 if you had

3:24:3415

Over life.

3:24:359

Over over, like, a thirty year?

3:24:3717

A twenty year is what we did. Okay. Reason why I say that is because, no, we didn't have the exact amount that your your credit score will cost you.

3:24:45 – 3:25:0617

But if we had looked at higher interest rates, you know, by even just a few basis points, then that's what we had considered. So I I would imagine that a and I could be wrong, but I would imagine that a poor rating would would definitely add basis points to what it's gonna cost for somebody to for us to pay to invest in us.

3:25:069

Yeah. Which makes sense. I mean, that's a big plus.

3:25:1017

It could be more.

3:25:119

Yeah. Okay.

3:25:1217

Yeah. We do. Yes.

3:25:16 – 3:25:529

I just think that's a a factor to consider. To me, that doesn't seem really high as a percentage of our total budget, especially when it's amortized over twenty years. Secondly, the opportunity cost point I wanted to make, but I think I kind of made it. Third, whatis there some happy medium where we could do 23%? Or do you have to be at 25 to get that A plus rating?

3:25:53 – 3:26:129

And because it feels like 23 helps us achieve the goals of being less vulnerable to volatility in our GRT revenue, which really is based on what's going on with the laboratory, and how their expenditures can be categorized and exempted or not exempted. But what if we did 23?

3:26:12 – 3:26:4217

Doctor. So to answer that, Chair Reddy and counselor Haberman, I I think it's important to clarify that that is not the sole purpose at all. It's just an added benefit. So we still have high ratings at a 20% target. That's fine. So it's important to clarify that. It's it's more for those things you don't wanna fund with debt. The one time having that available. You may which would save you all the interest. So so it gives you that flexibility by having it in the reserves.

3:26:42 – 3:27:0717

And typically, have funded our capital that way where we have not issued debt because we'd have we had sufficient reserves. So and so and then to be more specific is that you wouldn't have to you wouldn't have to change anything that you adopted with the way the policy is written. You could still fall within 5%. So it doesn't have to be locked in at '25 or '23 or '22. Honestly, it can

3:27:07 – 3:27:2717

preference. We just we don't recommend going under 20, but it still gives you that flexibility to have any year where you've went between 25 to 20%. So you could essentially still achieve that, but the 25% just sets that tone. That that's what we calculate and that's how we show you to to long term plan.

3:27:27 – 3:28:089

So the target gets we could change the target from 20 increase it from the current 20 to 25%. And we could be sit we could hover around 22, 23 and still be within our guidelines. Correct. Because we're not below that 5% thing where and even then, it's not like all the red alarms go off. It just means we need to have a conversation. Correct. Okay. Then my net little question, if you did the one time thing in that little modeling you were doing on a CIP project, What if the one time thing was okay. Let's just say 5,000,000, but there's operating costs that go into perpetuity that are recurring. Does the model build that in already?

3:28:09 – 3:28:269

Because because nothing's really one time. Right? If the big capital part is one time. Right? Mhmm. The design build. But then if we do this big bar bike park on North Mesa, then there's gonna be more burden on CSD to maintain it and fix things when they break.

3:28:26 – 3:28:5517

So we would have to do that. We'll have to add that in into the model. So we you know, you're right. One time is not just a set flat amount one time. We do consider that. That is something that we will take into consider into consideration, and we build that out in our recurring. So when we used to have which we don't have here this year, when we used to have the the budget options where we would consider one time versus recurring, we would also consider that recurring cost for the one time. We we do that do that in a model.

3:28:569

Okay. But thank you. I appreciate the time.

3:29:000

Okay. Thank you, Councilor Haffman. Any other questions or comments, Councilor Haffman?

3:29:07 – 3:29:5216

So just lookingthis is not going to be a popular thingbut just looking at some of the things that our FY 2026 projected, there are several items that I'm pretty sure have not really begun, one being the emergency operations center. Another potentially is Finch Street, other than maybe design. Is it possible for us to rethink some of the items that are under the FY 2026 projected that have not actually been started, or where we haven't gotten funding from the state, or whatever, and reallocate those funds to other projects?

3:29:55 – 3:30:147

Chair Reidy, Counselor Cole, if there's not a contractual obligation, yes, those are options. I think with the Fin Street, we do have some sort of agreement for Finn Street with the medical center. So we'd have to look at that. But I don't know that it obligates us to move forward. It's just if we move forward, there's a process. Well, that was

3:30:1416

just a pet peeve of mine.

3:30:16 – 3:30:277

And yes, we've already committed to the design of the emergency operations center. We are actively looking for, asking for federal funding for that, since we did not get state funding.

3:30:2916

How likely are we to get federal funding for that?

3:30:327

I don't have that answer. I'm sorry. And I would say it's, you know, sometimes those take a while, too, so

3:30:3916

So it's not going to happen in FY '26, obviously.

3:30:437

Not unless we fund it out of our CIP. Yeah.

3:30:45 – 3:31:1717

But just for a point of clarification, counselor Cole, one thing is that this is how we project a long range financial CIP because it's life to date. So so it may not actually tie in with we know we're gonna have everything on our plate completed, but it's just a mechanism for us to to show you what has been committed life to date. So we often project that so that we know what we have available for fund balance and what we need for future sources. So it's it's one of the the ways that we do the accounting for it just on that technicality. Sure.

3:31:1716

K. I understand that. I mean

3:31:197

And and so should a project come in front of council and it doesn't get approved, like a construction contract or something, that money just then moves to fund balance anyway and gets reallocated.

3:31:2716

Okay. Okay, thank you.

3:31:32 – 3:31:510

Thank you, Councillor Culp. Any other comments about the I guess we had the discussion about the financial policy and the CIP without taking any action on either one per se. But there I think we've already technically approved all

3:31:51 – 3:32:270

CIPs unless we wanted to actually have the bike park be moved mean, the funding be available. We don't know when it's gonna really be completed. But if the funding was available in this coming year, then it could be completed whenever whenever it can be completed. Right? So I think that's the only difference. Because right now, there's only there's $2,000,000 in there, but it's not it's not a $2,000,000 project from our understanding.

3:32:27 – 3:33:117

And I I would still recommend if you wanna make it available to move as forward as quickly as possible. I think there's still gonna be some capacity and process constraints with how quickly it can move forward. But if you wanna make sure it's funded and has the ability to move forward, I still would recommend moving it from that administrative services line to there. And and then just making a decision on how you wanna show if you wanna show it at a future general fund fund balance at 25 or if you'd prefer to show it as available fund that you want to as project you know, direct us to, you know, move forward with these initiatives as they come up as opportunities. Counsel will make those decision.

3:33:11 – 3:33:327

What I the the purpose of making sure they were in fund balance or reserves is because we didn't want to give the indication they're available for ongoing operations. We don't have a lot of money based on our projections for ongoing. We do have some capacity, we think, if revenues come in for onetime investments.

3:33:32 – 3:33:440

Okay. So does that mean that some motion has been made regarding the bike park if we were wanting to move forward? Is that what we would have to

3:33:457

We could just put that on the parking lot where you can Okay. Give us some

3:33:50 – 3:34:040

Now we have a second item on the parking lot. Right. Okay. So when we have the final motion, I believe it just approves the financial policies as revised. Right?

3:34:04 – 3:34:500

So, we're 100% happy with the financial policies as revised or happy enough with them, then we won't do anything make any changes. Right? So, basically, it is going from the 15 to 20 to 20 to 25 for the reasons stated, up to the council to make those allocations at whatever time was appropriate. Okay?

3:34:51 – 3:35:0317

And if we needed to, we could just add some wording to to attachment n is where we're talking about this red line as well. So we did add it as a separate attachment that would be included in your final motion.

3:35:03 – 3:35:370

Right. So that's where part of the final motion approval. Okay. So I think we're we're done with all that. So it was the only thing left, the parking lot. So we're going right back to the item we just I guess we can go well, maybe we should go to them in order, right, because we had the yeah, budget option for travel. So I believe that Counselor Cull may have asked for this in the end. Did you want to discuss this one?

3:35:39 – 3:36:1616

Well, yeah. I mean, preference would be for us to put a little more control over travel and try to understand what benefit that travel is bringing back to our community before we increase or double more than double our budget for travel. I understand we are spending a little bit more this year than we had budgeted, but again, I just to be fiscally responsible, I would think if we're going to spend the money, there should be some kind of benefit to the community from this travel.

3:36:19 – 3:36:570

Well, I guess my personal opinion is that, I mean, counselors should be reporting back on the trips they take. And we have, obviously, the federal advocacy trip, we have a report on that. I try to prepare reports on all the things I go to. So that's not a requirement. That's a different discussion. If you wanted to make it a rule or just say, That's the understanding. If we approve travel, then there's a report back. Yeah. I don't know. Further than that, I mean, that would be one way of getting, you know.

3:36:5716

Well, not just a report back, but a justification prior to approval of the funds to send somebody on travel.

3:37:05 – 3:37:210

Yeah. And some of the as we discussed, some of the Energy Community Alliance actually pays for some of the travel. So there'll still be a justification for whatever the expense is.

3:37:23 – 3:38:0016

Well, you just mentioned the two things that are probably easy to prove that they have some benefit directly to us. It's the, you know, it's the Mexico Counties, it's NACO, I mean, all the conferences that we send people to that I think have could potentially have some benefit to the community, but I don't think we've ever really shown that. And I just I think we need, before we increase double double our budget, that we should have some understanding of what the benefit is to the community for that.

3:38:06 – 3:38:599

And I agree with counselor Cole's thoughts. And I also even if it were justified and there could be benefit back to the community and sometimes the benefit back to the community is really hard to quantify because sometimes it just maybe makes us a more productive, effective, smarter counselor, thereby representing, you know, our community better or more effectively. But, and and it might help create partnerships and new ideas or thinking outside the box type stuff. But I think then we could think a little bit more conservatively about maybe the number of counselors who go to any one of these things. So maybe a certain conference is justified, but maybe it's really only one counselor who needs to go, not two or three, which seems to be kind of what's been the standard operating procedure, at least as far as being allowed.

3:38:59 – 3:39:159

It doesn't always happen. Mhmm. So I don't know what the right budget amount is then for that or what the right increase is, but I know when I first saw it, when we got these books a month ago, I was surprised by that high dollar amount For some of the same reasons councilor Cole just said, and my thoughts just now.

3:39:17 – 3:40:040

So I do know for NACO, which I think before, I guess, we had an intercultural amount of fears, but I'm not gonna blame her for any of this, but it was just we didn't really go much to NACO. And like, I know Socorro or Sandoval County, they send basically all their commissioners to the legislative conference and to the annual conference. So that's, you know, that's probably not quite the number we're talking about per counselor, but that's like just two NACO meetings. But they don't think they send them to a lot of other things. And they do have and every county has representatives in Nexo Counties that some of the travel isn't covered.

3:40:04 – 3:40:310

And so there's kind of like the overlap between Nexo Counties and then NACo and being on the policy committees. So, but the justification is that I think in general that if you're on the policy committee, only meet in person two times a year at those conferences. And so that's your opportunity to engage with the other people on policy committee. You bring policy resolutions, which I've done, you know. And so, I don't know, that's kind of like how I look at it.

3:40:31 – 3:40:550

And you kind of don't know the benefit until you go and see, like, is there a benefit or not? And it's different for different people. But there's, I think, a dozen policy committees covering a lot of subjects. Then there was also Main Street. I think Main Street wanted to have counselorsomebody go to represent, which I think we've had one person go one time, maybe? Yeah.

3:40:559

I attended that last year. But no, we didn't have anyone go this year.

3:41:00 – 3:41:360

So, yeah, you can argue about that it's too much, or that I think in other cases, are getting requests from Main Street to be there to support them and understand what other communities are doing. I think that is kind of the reason. So, yeah. And I haven't and there's also a National League of Cities, which is a whole another thing. That's the problem of being a city and a county combined. So, there's opportunities. And then, Energy Community Alliance, were kind of one of the founding members of. So, I think we're kind of expected to have somebody go. But, yeah, I think you're right about the number of people to go could be different. Yeah. Councilor Rieger?

3:41:36 – 3:41:518

Is there anybody going to the National League of Cities events this year? I'm not. Who is going? So we we actually have a membership and no one even, you know, going to that. And then Yeah. A few of us are going to NACO, and that's there's a lot

3:41:510

of Well, and our our I I was just looking at the dues. Our our largest dues are actually to the Mexican Municipal League for $75,000

3:42:018

Does anybody go to that?

3:42:02 – 3:42:440

So if we don't go to the meetings, then I'm not sure that we're maximizing that membership. But, yeah, I agree with the point. But it's never been so It's kind of evolved to more people going without much of a plan, right? So, I think having more of a plan and being targeted and if there's different counselors interested in going, it's good to have people, you know, go and say something and then somebody else go. Other people get something out of it. I think when you go to the same conference multiple years in a row, you don't always get as much each time you go. Counselor Hannon.

3:42:45 – 3:43:2515

Thank you, Chair. I just wanted to mention, as a follow-up to what councilor Reagor was talking about regarding the the National League of Cities that's gonna be held November 18 through the twenty first in Nashville, Tennessee, but it is also conflicting with our strategic planning session on the nineteenth. So anybody who would go to that, you know, would miss out on our strategic planning at least on-site. They could attend remotely. You know, I had mentioned at one point that that I would volunteer to go if nobody else wanted to go during that timeframe.

3:43:27 – 3:43:5415

But, you know, it takes them away from the strategic planning, which I think is even more important than the NLC. Yeah. Thank you. You know, and then there are there are other things that are coming up like the NMML annual conference in Las Cruces. That's September.

3:43:55 – 3:44:4515

And I don't know who who is planning on going on that, but I had also put that on my calendar as a tentative if nobody else was going. So I don't know. I guess we need to determine whether or not we need somebody to represent Los Alamos County at all these different events. And I'm I'm I have a lot of, similar feelings about, you know, how we want to, really, you know, try to be cost efficient with our travel, especially now when we're asking every other department to cut. And yet here we're at, you know, we're doubling our travel budget.

3:44:46 – 3:45:1015

I mean, you know, so it's I don't know if it's sending a good message. The optics, I think, is not good. So, you know, I just you know, if we if we had, more money, you know, available, then maybe that's when we increase our travel. But, you know, it's just bad optics. Thank you.

3:45:10 – 3:45:210

Well, it stays in the parking lot unless somebody wants to remove it from there. So I guess we can just leave it. Because right now, it it's just as it is. Right? The budget's not.

3:45:21 – 3:45:4217

So we actually have a a proposed tentative motion. So it it can either be removed or or and we also have the question on the reallocation of the of the CP for the cost category increase if you wanted to do the full amount. So we could modify that tentative motion. We'll have miss Mariano pull it up real quickly.

3:45:420

I'm not hearing a lot of

3:45:458

interest in How much did we run over this year? I'm I'm don't recall. What was that number? Haven't run over yet.

3:45:540

Yeah. We heard the number. I think we're gonna be maybe 5 ish, maybe a little bit less thousand.

3:46:0112

Chair, that's correct. I I would estimate about $5,000 over.

3:46:060

Yeah. We're not we're not we're not at double the budget. We're at, like, 15%. Yeah.

3:46:148

I don't I would say we don't need to do anything with that. It's just note a note for the future.

3:46:25 – 3:46:540

So just leave the budget as it was? No? Okay. Okay, so then we have the other one. So there's one that's still, I think, there is some interest in doing. Is that right? Looks like, yes. So for the bike park.

3:46:5417

So do you wanna flip that up, Tara? And and we'll look at what amount you'd like to do. I think that's what we just need clarity on is is

3:47:060

Whether we're reallocating the whole amount or not.

3:47:0912

So I have a quick question.

3:47:12 – 3:47:4412

I I'm slightly confused because I know that the money can be reallocated. And I know that we shifted some monies from the senior center to fire station four. So the money's still there, it's just where is it? So my question is if we focus on the bike park, how does that affect the senior center?

3:47:44 – 3:48:247

Thank you, Chair Reidy, Councilor Nayar Clinton. Good news, no effect. What we did think of it like I thought about it as as like a box move between fiscal year our current fiscal year twenty six and fiscal year twenty seven when we move money to fund in this fiscal year the entire amount for to award the fire station for. And so all we did, because we hadn't moved forward or awarded the Betty E. Hart Center, and we were gonna do that later in the summer, we were able to keep partial funding in this year that was already funded and move it and reallocate that same amount that we took out this year and next year to keep it whole.

3:48:267

Really really all we're doing is taking money that's a placeholder and putting it into the bike park so that it's fully or we hope fully funded.

3:48:3512

Okay. So that's so that's so that's again for the bike park. But, is the money still available for the senior center? Correct. Perfect. Okay. Good.

3:48:47 – 3:49:060

Okay. So, I think we're down to this. So, does that So, the question was, so we could have a motion, so the counselor could make a motion. So, I think is the motion saying to reallocate with no number? Just reallocate the entire amount? Or

3:49:06 – 3:49:2217

We could do either. Chair Reddy, Tara's gonna flip it up, and we could we could put the full dollar amount if you'd like. Or if anybody would like to propose a different amount, that's fine too. But we can put the actual $1,000,004.47 $1.76 if you would like.

3:49:260

Okay. So it was more digits than I thought. Yeah.

3:49:3217

$1.76. Sorry. $1,000,004.04 $7.01 76. There you go. Okay.

3:49:409

Okay. Question. Question.

3:49:420

Do you want to ask questions about this first?

3:49:44 – 3:50:179

have a question. Then that would bump up the FY twenty seven proposed budget for the bike park to roughly 1.9 and a half million. Then would we keep the 1,500,000 in the FY twenty eight projected to be just I I would I think I would prefer that, unless there was a reason to not do that. I just wanna make sure that we're not So I just wanna clarify that.

3:50:177

Chair Reidy, counselor Haberman, as if you're comfortable allocating that, I would leave it for now until we know more because, again, we we're we budgeted this project based on that study.

3:50:277

There's a lot of time and a lot of additional development of those designs in phases that it would not hurt to keep that money there for now.

3:50:359

Good. Thank you.

3:50:390

Okay. Councilor Kotler, did you want to

3:50:4017

make a motion?

3:50:410

you want to

3:50:41 – 3:51:1516

ask mean, a can, but I was just going to make a comment. I mean, the only problem with doing this is I didn't hear Corey say he knew he would need this in FY 'twenty seven. He said he would be making some progress and then hopefully starting and would want to come back and ask for more money. I mean, I'm okay with doing it. It's just if we if we need this money for something else late at some point during the year, I'm a little nervous about allocating all of it.

3:51:16 – 3:51:501

Chair and counsel. So there's probably several ways we can do this. One, status quo. We could come back with a budget adjustment later in this fiscal year for a better price point because we'd actually have a bid that we could say this is not to exceed. Then you can make this motion and say we would like to take whatever that number is away from from that particular fund, and we could do it at that point.

3:51:51 – 3:52:181

Probably, realistically, it would be something that we would probably come back to you with mid to late fall. By the time we got the bid process out, got our respondents, came back to you, so maybe even December. So we'd have a real number. We'd also have an additional six months of GRT to see have a little bit better footing at. So we could do that.

3:52:18 – 3:52:391

You could do this tonight. Think it's just whatever whatever you feel comfortable with. But I think the prudent one would be, we've got money to move forward and then just we would come back at some point and say, here's a better number. What do you think? To continue it on. So

3:52:3916

So you're suggesting go ahead and and transfer this money. And then

3:52:430

I keep saying, no. Don't do it.

3:52:4416

Or don't do it. Okay.

3:52:45 – 3:53:011

No. Chair and counselor, no. I would I would say you have a lot of options, and I don't think you need to do this tonight because we could actually do what we've done before, come back to you and say, we need a budget adjustment, and you could we could talk about where it comes from. It might there might be other places it could come

3:53:010

from at that point in time.

3:53:0312

Thank you for that. I like the bird in the hand versus the two in the bush much better. Thank you.

3:53:10 – 3:53:550

So I guess I'll make a comment that I think the comments we're getting are for design build. And we just had an example. It was design build. I don't know why conceptually this is different. It's like, we don't know exactly what the cost is. We're doing a design, but we'll know what the cost is after that. It's probably gonna be pretty close to the the three numbers added together. Right? So or a little bit more than there was a whole discussion about grants. So it's a matter of the intention. It's like I said about putting money into affordable housing on a continuing basis. The intention is we really wanna find fund the design bill, not just through the design because it might be more efficient to do it that way. Right? Than to be parsling it up into little tiny chunks conceptually. So

3:53:56 – 3:54:161

Chair and counsel, at the time of award, it would come back to the design build would be the process that we would bring back to you. It wouldn't be just design. It would be the entire package that you would have a real number with some contingency just like we would with any other project.

3:54:16 – 3:54:490

Yeah. And it'll be much different than this number probably. I I just the intention is like, if we're really intending to do a design build or do the project, then we should just put put money in to to make it happen. Then there will have to be budget adjustments probably happening during the course of the year. But I just had two little children here. We don't want them to wait until they're not little children anymore, like all the other people that came about the bike park and the ice rink and everything else. Consolator Hema.

3:54:49 – 3:55:209

Thank you. I mean, two children times a thousand in older kids and teenagers, too, and grandkids and people visiting. So I would rather see the funds earmarked and designated. And I just feel like when we do the approach of, well, we'll come back, well, then it's got to get on the agenda, well, it's got get on the ticker, it's got to get on the agenda. Then, you know, there could be things that interrupt that and it just inherently, there could be some more delays.

3:55:20 – 3:55:549

I'd rather see the funds there and that puts some fire in the belly and funding can't be in a reason to not accelerate this. And if if it costs a lot different than what these three numbers total up to, it's 2,000,000 plus this transfer, So 3,400,000 or 9,000,000 or something. If it's too much, then it's too much. And if it's too little, you'll come back for an adjustment. And then counsel can decide how much of that adjustment is worthwhile to invest in.

3:55:55 – 3:56:279

And I also would like to just I just wanna make sure that it's done. And, we have the funds. We're still gonna be well over our reserve targets. There could be grant funding. And then I feel like then you've got to issue a budget and you could maybe that helps secure grant funding. I just I don't wanna kick the can down the road on this. I'd like to see us fund it fully and know that that's there and feel happy about that.

3:56:290

Chair, councilor Nicklin?

3:56:30 – 3:57:1112

Last time I'm gonna speak tonight, I promise, because it's late and I'm tired and getting grumpy. So I agree. Normally, agree with Councilwoman Haverman. I just think that this economy is so unstable and so uncertain. Yes. I know we have the money. Yes. I know we're over our target. I know that we are well within it. And yet, at the same time, anything could happen between now and then. Yes, I want my children, my grandchildren, their children to have the bike parks and get outside like we did back in the day. And that that's my take. So

3:57:13 – 3:57:320

that's it. Okay. Thank you. I don't see any other. So is anyone interested in making a motion? I guess the motion went away from the screen. Yeah. Councilor Hannon.

3:57:32 – 3:57:549

Thank you, chair. I move that council tentatively approve the reallocation of $1,447,183 of C P 9007 to the North Mesa Bike Park item number C p 70 x two. Second.

3:57:55 – 3:58:080

Okay. So we have a motion by Counselor Hepburn, seconded by Counselor Herman. I don't think there's any more discussion on this one. So, can the clerk please call the roll?

3:58:125

Counselor Neil Clinton. No. Counselor Hand. Yes. Counselor Herman. Yes. Counselor Reidy.

3:58:235

Counselor Raybor.

3:58:265

Councilor Haberman?

3:58:295

Councilor Call? No. Motion passes five two with counselors Neil Clinton and Cole voting against.

3:58:38 – 3:58:540

Okay. Let the record show the motion passes five two with counselors Cole and Neil Clinton in opposition. Okay. So I think we're ready then. Well, I guess I think ready. We should okay.

3:58:54 – 3:59:0717

If just for sake of planning the next if we wanna stay for about fifteen more minutes, if we could just take maybe ten minutes, if you would wanna recess for us to just compile everything to to to give you the Okay.

3:59:070

Me final options. Make sure that people

3:59:0917

If you want to do that.

3:59:10 – 3:59:270

Don't want and so the option is to wait about fifteen minutes and finish tonight or recess until tomorrow for this one item to read the full motion, which will take a few minutes, five minutes. Okay. We do it tonight? Okay. If

3:59:289

Theresa can, we all can.

3:59:29 – 4:05:150

Okay. So we're going to take a recess for about ten minutes. Great to have audio. That helps, doesn't it? Okay, so we're back in session.

4:05:16 – 4:05:470

And I think we have the information checked. And we're trying to get the information up on the screen. Okay.

4:05:472

so sorry.

4:06:2717

Okay. Here here we go. We'll we'll flip up the motion.

4:06:420

no running.

4:06:510

Okay. So Oh.

4:06:5619

I'm Oh, can I take it from you? What happened?

4:07:0117

Did you take it, Tara? It's late for us too. Sorry. Apologies. Okay.

4:07:10 – 4:07:250

So let's see. So we'll have to have a counselor. Whoever volunteers will read have to read the whole thing. So who would like to read the motion this year? Counselor Nunquint, did you want read it?

4:07:32 – 4:08:1812

I move that counsel adopt the FY twenty twenty seven budget in the amount of $350,220,288 as described in the attachment B, summary of changes from proposed to adopted budget as amended at the budget hearings. I further move that council approve the following items related to the adoption of the FY2027 budget. Number one, long range financial projection in attachment C. Number two, equipment replacement schedule in attachment F. Number three, summary of pension fund administrative costs in attachment G.

4:08:18 – 4:08:5912

Number four, recurring grants schedule in attachment H. Number five, schedule of appropriations for salary adjustments in attachment I. Number six, FY2027, Department of Public Utilities, schedule of funds in attachment J. Number seven, continuing appropriations in the FY2027 budget from the FY2026 budget for the items listed on attachment L and number eight, financial policies revised in attachment N.

4:08:59 – 4:09:130

Okay, thank you very much. Is there a second? Second. Think that was Counselor Cook got the second. Okay. So I will see if there anyone has any discussion. Is there any discussion on the motion? Councilor Rieger?

4:09:14 – 4:09:378

Yeah. No. I think the utilities part of the budget is taking us off of financial cliff in the future, so I can't support this. And, also, we never really went over the some of these capital projects like the I don't understand the justification for the EOC at all. So I I wish we had more discussion on those topics, so I will not be voting in favor of this.

4:09:39 – 4:10:090

Okay. Any other comments from counselors? I guess not seeing any. So I want to thank everybody, all the staff that worked on the budget. And county the manager gave guidance to everybody. I think everybody followed the guidance pretty closely. I think the budget follows what guidance council has been giving as a body. So I appreciate all the hard work on it. So I think with that, we'll call for the count the clerk of the call

4:10:115

Counselor Reidy?

4:10:129

Yes. Counselor Rigor?

4:10:15 – 4:10:325

No. Counselor Han? Yes. Counselor Cull? Yes. Counselor Hafferman? Yes. Counselor Neil Clinton? Yes. Counselor Herman? Yes. Motion passes six one with counselor Rieger opposing.

4:10:33 – 4:10:460

Okay. Motion passed six-one with Councillor Riegor opposed. So I think with that, then the budget hearings are concluded, and we will not be having a meeting tomorrow night. Thank you, everybody.

4:10:497

Thank you, counsel.

4:11:4419

Congratulations.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.