Planning and Zoning - Regular Meeting

Do I have a second?

Second.

Well, all those in favor? All right. Thank you. I just have it. Now, do I have a motion to approve or disapprove the proposal that's set forth by Mr. Reda?

I would move that we approve the application submitted by Ray Reda for a special use permit to place a mobile home.

Second, second, second. Can we have a roll call vote on this, please?

Mr. Mike Sweeney. Yes, again in Santa. Yes, you saw Assad. Yes, Mr. Travis Regensburg, Mr. Oliver, Les Bruns. Yes, motion does carry very well. Chair, thank you.

Sir. Can I have a motion to open the second item on the agenda, which is conducting a public hearing? on an application submitted by Joseph Eugene Parson for a special use permit to place a mobile home as a single family dwelling on his premises at 209 Bib Industrial Drive. And then I will sort people in on this in just a moment.

Make a motion that we open discussion. Very well.

Can I have a second?

I'll second that motion.

All those in favor? Aye. Hearing is opened. Anyone who'd like to testify in this matter, including Mr. Parson, can you please stand? Is this where you're in? Do you solemnly swear that the testimony that you're about to give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

I do.

Thank you very much. Mr. Parsons, can you give us a synopsis on what you're trying to accomplish?

Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the board, director. We truly appreciate your time that you give to assist us in these needs, these matters. Purchased a piece of property from the city, 209 Dave Industrial, a few years back, about five, six years ago. And I did place a metal building out there for storage, equipment, materials, those kinds of things. And unfortunately, as Ray Arreta said, there's a lot of vandalism that goes on in there. And I've had to take a few measures, put a fence around the place, secure doors, those kinds of things. Had to keep people from vandalizing it. Well, it continues to happen. People trespass as they will. And so one of my employees was looking at purchasing a double-wide mobile home. And at one point there was a, I think it was a state police officer that had a trailer home up there. It's already present in the property. It's water. I had to pull electricity from a pole over to my building. and so um i told you i think it'd be a good idea if if you wish i told him what we'd have you there as uh uh you know to kind of help take care of the place you know uh in other words be the caretaker says no that that would be fine with me and so essentially um is we intended come before this board earlier but what happened is his uh the manufacturing of his mobile home was was um actually went forward faster than what he anticipated or when the company anticipated. So he did purchase the home, I guess, locally from Oakwood Mobile Homes. And we pulled it up there. At that point, I did get a hold of the city and let them know, hey, you know, this is what's going on. He has no place to put the mobile home. So we just put it up there, parked it. Hasn't been moved since. And as I mentioned, you know, we do need someone to Well, at least I need someone to take care of my place out there. And at the same time, you know, my employee can kind of keep over, watch over Oldwood, RV's place there. He does training there and other places. And Ray's right. You know, it's a hard place. I've called police out there several times. And he said, well, we'll try to come out more often. But I've been there nights working, doing whatever I need to do. And rarely do they they come out. I'm not dissing on a marine like that. But it is I know they're very busy and maybe limited in manpower. But it is hard for them to get out there. It's a lonely place. You know, I do have some lights around the building. But the fact is that anyone can come in, you know, jump the fence and help themselves if they if they wish. So I do ask that you consider some your request.

You are storing your equipment there. Yes. So basically conducting business. Yes.

We're there pretty much on a daily basis, even evenings, doing things inside the building. Or I do have some material outside, but more importantly, they don't take boulders. They don't take gravel. They don't take base course. That takes work. Yes. They're interested in just getting into the building and taking whatever tools they can or whatever they feel they can sell quickly.

So, again, so you'll be, this is going to be a bit of a caretaker situation as well?

Yes, yes. And he'll be there essentially pretty much every day.

Fantastic. Yeah.

Okay. And it's got a good view from on top, so you can see kind of far and wide, you know, all the way over to a raised area, you know, and RVs and. OLDWOOD AND TRAILER HOMES ACROSS THE STREET.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. PARSON? A COUPLE QUESTIONS. CURRENTLY DO YOU HAVE A LISTED BUSINESS LICENSE? IT WAS RECORDED WITH THE CITY?

YES.

I would refer to Charles, their business license.

Yes, if I may. I don't believe there is a recorded business license, Mr. Carson, on that address. Is that my home address then? It would have been. So the address on bib?

Yes.

Yes. I don't believe there's a recorded business license on that one.

Okay. I do have a business license, yes.

And with that, I guess I would ask you with it to meet the standard that we just, we just said president with Mr. He has a business license that's active there for the storage units. Um, is it re is there a requirement that the business be listed there or re registered under 209 bid drive? To be compliant with the ordinance. Is my question.

I'm sorry.

So we just we just proved Mr. He has a business license on his property for the storage units, right? So is it. Within the charter, is it required that the business be listed or recorded with a city business licensure under 209 Biv Drive as an active business in industrial park to meet the same standard?

I would guess it should be because you have to have a business to have a caretaker dwelling on it. That's the way I would understand it. We could go through the ordinance a little bit further in detail if you guys would like that.

I would, just because Mr. Parsons, nothing personal, as a governing body here that makes recommendations, we're still to abide by the city charter and what's on the statute.

I understand. And if it requires me to, you know, get a business license. I mean, I already paid my $35 to the city to have my business license. It requires me to pay another $35 to list 209 Bib Industrial as doing business there, you know, because we are doing business out of there. I mean, we're there every day.

Yeah, no, I understand. I just, my concern is that I know, you know, we're here to find a solution to this and make it work. But down the line, someone else may come in and say, I want to put a double white there because Mr. Parson did it.

He didn't have a business license. I'd like to mention if that's required and we need to do it, I have no problem doing that.

And that's the question I have for... Can that be amended as part of Mr. Parson's business license or an appendix? an attachment to his business license doing business at?

So I think to do that, he would probably have to, he'd probably have to go through an amendment, but he'd also have to get a different business license altogether at that different address is the way I understand it. Because there is fire inspections that need to be done. Then that's what they would require at that time.

Okay.

Can we approve with that type of an amendment attached to the approval or would we have to table this until the said business license be taken care of? I think that would be at the leisure of the board. Okay. At least we will get Mr. Carson to have it. Conditionally, that's what you're saying. Yes, sir. To be able to approve it because his intention is the same. We're just trying to dot our I's and cross our T's. Yeah. That's all I'm saying. His intention is the same. He just have to go dot the I's and cross the T's in order for it to be totally finalized.

Can I ask another question? Yes, sir. Well, Is that at the mobile home you still have to go to MHD, get all your apartments and stuff like that? If this was, if we were to table this issue, would that hinder or? That was a big problem for you guys?

Yeah, we certainly like to get it done as soon as possible. I'd rather have somebody up there sooner rather than later. And in speaking with Charles, we can't really move forward until we're approved. I mean, yes, it has sewer, it has water, electricity can be pulled over. That's not a big deal. But I'd rather have somebody up there, like I said, sooner rather than later. I mean, things are happening and things are actually getting a little worse. And so, you know, I just don't want to get ripped off anymore.

Yeah, I understand. I just want to make sure that we're compliant.

Yeah, no, as I said, you know, if you want to set that condition, I can certainly pursue that.

Yeah, because, you know, we always have you know, people come in and say, oh, you did it for so-and-so, and you did it for so-and-so, and no one's the same. You know, I mean, and that's my concern is that, you know, we set a precedent for the future as a board, and sometimes, you know, like I know you very well, and you're good friends, and everybody's good friends, but when stuff like this comes up, it all staff in a predicament, some sort of. And the only thing we have is the city charter and the rules that we have to abide by. And we're here as appointed by the mayor in the city's interest so that we can make the right decisions.

So as I mentioned, we're willing to go through the amended process and so forth. Yeah, that's not a problem.

All right. Any other questions for Mr. Parson? Andrew?

Mr. Sweeney? No.

I'd like to find a way to help Mr. Parson move forward with this. And if there's a way we can have a motion. But it is up to... Yes, sir.

Do we have any input from the city as to what's...

In order for him to move on, I believe we'd have to make a conditional upon his getting his business permit to that address. Yes, sir. He says he has a business permit, but not at that address. Yes, sir. I don't know whatever is required to do that. If he's willing to go ahead with that.

Sounds like he is. And Mr. Marcus has given us a little guidance as to being able to approve something with a condition attached. Mr. Parson, thank you very much. No further questions for Mr. Parson? Okay. Mr. Parson, thank you so much. Mr. Marcus, do you have anything for Mr. Parson? No. Thank you, sir. Anyone else that wanted to testify in this matter?

No. I move that we close this hearing.

We have a motion to close the hearing on this matter. Can I have a second? Second. All those in favor?

All right.

Let's have it. Do I have a motion to approve with conditions or disapprove at this point in time?

I move that we approve with conditions. Very well.

And those conditions would be, Mr. Sweeney, can you?

That Mr. Parson makes sure that his business license that exists already gets transferred or moved to this address at Bib Industrial Park, Industrial Drive, 209.

Talking to the city, would he have to transfer his existing license or just establish a new license or establish an amendment to his existing license?

Establish a new license at that location since it is a different location.

We could restate that. Okay, so if I'm hearing the motion correctly, approval with the condition that a new license is established at 209 Bib Industrial. drive in order to move forward? Would that be correct, Mr. Sweeney? Yes, sir. Very well.

So I understand it, right? Can you rephrase it for the minutes the way you want it to be put on the minutes itself? Because we've had different, you know, we've had a letter.

The thing, Mr. Regensburg, as far as I've seen, he's only beginning to jump through the first hoop.

I understand that.

And it's not up to, we're just advising and it will be up to city council. We're not acting as board of adjustment. It's not a final say. It's going before city council. I don't know what they will say.

Oh, I understand that.

This is a board of adjustment.

Board of adjustment. This is a board of adjustment also. On this one? On this one, yes, sir. So the condition would be if you could just, if Mr. Regensburg just wanted a rephrase of the condition that he established a new business license at 209 Industrial.

Basically, so that we have a clear understanding on the minutes for the next meeting, because you made the motion, the chairman... you know, iterated on it. And you guys have gone back and forth so that they, so that we have a clear understanding of the minutes. Can you, all I'm asking is that you, you know, clarify your motion for the minutes. I'm not against or nothing. I'm just asking for a clarification on the motion.

Yeah.

If you could just restate the motions, restate the motion, how you want it on the minutes.

That's fine. Then on this application by Mr. Parson would, depend on his getting a new business license at 209 Viv, Viv Industrial Drive. Very well. Depending on that. Very well. Depending on his acquiring that business license at that.

So you were moving for an approval? Yes, sir. With that condition. Very well. Do I have a second on this?

I will second that.

Mr. Salazar, second. Can we please have a roll call vote?

Yes, Mr. Mike Sweeney. Yes. Mr. Andrew Salazar. Yes. Mr. Travis Ergensberg. Yes.

Mr. Gavin Serna. Yes. So moved. Thank you. Third item on the agenda is for Mr. Eugene Rudolph. Is Mr. Rudolph in here today? Yes, sir. Would you like to come forward, Mr. Rudolph? We're gonna open the hearing, then we'll sort you in. Okay, sir. Can I have a motion to open the hearing, to conduct a public hearing on applications submitted by Mr. Eugene Rudolph for a zone change from an R1 single family residence to an R2 multiple family residence, multi-family residence on this premises at 2121 7th Street.

I move to open this question.

Do I have a second?

I'll second that.

Very well. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. So moved. Hearing is now open. Anyone that would like to speak on this matter, can you please raise your right hand? Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

Yes.

Thank you very much. Rudolf, thank you for being here today.

Thank you for hearing my application.

It's nice being home. There you go. It's been decades. Where's your residence now, if you could state your address?

I'm Eugene Rudolph. I live in Albuquerque, New Mexico. My address here is 2121 7th Street, Las Vegas. So that home was built by my grandfather. So it's been something that's very, I guess you could say... It's just a structure, but it's very dear to the family. It has been for many years. I finally got around to taking my mom's clothes out of there after 40 years. I had to throw it away. I think the way you're raised, my mom was born and raised a Mora Ranger. My dad was born and raised a Rosiata Bobcat. I was very proud of that. and I was born and raised here in Las Vegas, but, uh, at some point, you know, you grow up in this area and you just, you know, you become part of it in so many different ways. But, uh, I think, uh, at this point, you know, it's better that, you know, uh, you know, I get this house, uh, reconditioned, which I have came out beautiful and, uh, and look at doing something else with it. But, uh, I came before the board to get it zoned from R1 to R2 because it's been R2 for the last probably decade as a, you know, as a duplex. It was kind of built like a duplex. And so it just seems like it should be a duplex. Realistically, it should probably even be zoned commercial because 70% or more of all the buildings like this one that face Seventh Street are all commercial. In fact, it has a Lutheran church right across the street, also next door has a Randy Garcia dental office across the street. And so, I mean, you go up and down Seventh Street and there's just absolutely no reason why this particular structure would be zoned anything less than an R2 and perhaps in the future, something different.

Are you looking to rent the home out? Are you looking to sell the home?

My goal is to sell the home. My goal is going to be to sell the home. In order to sell the home, it needs to be zoned correctly. And so I'm here today to ask the board to... to go ahead and approve the zoning from r1 to r2 which is what it is you say that it uh it's currently a duplex is it currently doesn't have and has it been i mean have residents lived there as a duplex yeah residents have lived there as a duplex i mean it goes back i mean it goes back decades because the way it was built originally was there's it's kind of built like two homes in one, you know, it was built so that one family could live on one side and the other family on the other side, but it could be separated or opened so that, you know, you know, like there was a time when my grandfather lived in one side and my mom and dad lived in the other, had their privacy. So it's kind of, you know, it's, it's a little ambiguous because it's kind of been a duplex. You

What kind of square footage are we talking about on each side?

I think it's in the paperwork I submitted, but I think it's 1,587, if I recall, square feet is what the total square footage of the house. Yeah, the studio apartment is probably about 550 square feet, and the house is a little over 1,000 square feet with a two-bedroom, one-bath. Okay. Yeah.

Do we have some questions for Mr. Rudolph? No. Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Rigginsworth.

I do have a question for the city. Very well. What's the impact between the R1 and R2 in this case?

You know, since you read the application. So with him changing to an R2 application, somebody if he does sell that property and somebody like wants to put a mobile home there they can't it's under uh especially expressly prohibited it's also you can't have any type of commercial use industrial use and then parking of any type of storage or or anything like that it's strictly going to be residential to match match the neighborhood as it as it is is there any other mobile homes or double wads in that area at the current currently no not that i've seen everything is our is R1. R1 or C1 or C2? R1 and then C3 on the opposite side because you're right off of 7th Street. So you have that Lutheran Church right across the street. And then you have Allslips right next to Mr. Rudolph as well. That's C3.

So basically to put a double Y there, they'd have to demolish the house.

No, they can't even. No, no. It says under our ordinance mobile homes aren't prohibited in that area.

We're asking to change it to an R2, right? Correct. But as an R2, it would qualify to put a double wide in that area or a single wide or whatever. No, that's prohibited.

That doesn't allow for that. And the R2s? Yes. As per ordinance. As per ordinance. It does say mobile homes. In that area. In that area for an R2.

For an R2 in that area. It's prohibited. Yes. Yeah, so basically what I'm getting to is I don't want to you know, I don't want to disrupt the 7th Street corridor by putting in single-wise or double-wise in that area in the future because that's our, you know, that's our footstool to the payment on the footprint. Yes, sir. On the residential area in that area, you know. Yes, sir.

And to reiterate what Mr. Rudolph had stated, he has renovated the home and So there's no intent. There's no, at this point in time, no intention of putting a double-wide or a single-wide.

It would be a shame to put a double-wide in that area. I think it would. Yeah, so now there's no intent. I don't think you can. You can't put a double-wide. Really, the biggest change from this is it's going to be reassessed at a higher property tax rate, and it's just going to continue being what it's been forever. Yeah. That's really what the end game of what this is going to do is. And it gives me the ability to sell it and a bank to approve a loan because it is what it is now. But it's never been a mobile home. There won't be a mobile home on that lot. And it would be a shame to put a mobile. I mean, the people behind me would. would be filling up the back of this room if that was a possibility.

Yeah, and that's my concern is that, okay, well, you're here, you're the owner, but once you sell it, my concern is that the future buyer invents an R2, make sure that it's double wide or single wide is prohibited on there under the R2. zoning you know I mean I'm not concerned with you I'm concerned with the future of Las Vegas and that's why I'm asking the question not for the present I mean you know you're pretty legitimate with what you want what you have but my question is if you sell it if you sell it can they put a double white on there under the R2 as per ordinance no that answers my question

Any other questions for Mr. Rudolph?

Not for Mr. Rudolph, but for Mr. Ortiz. Yes, sir. In the future, he sold the property to me, and it's a shame, but I knocked the house down. I put a double wide there. No one can stop me, or can they? Just say the order and answer that. That's all I'm asking. Can I be stopped? as a new owner.

Yes, I know that the zoning has been changed toward to yes, under uses expressly prohibited under an R2 zone. It does prohibit mobile homes in that area. They're they're not allowed to be there. Thank you for answering my question. Yes, sir, Mister Swinney.

Yes, sir, just for verification. We're talking about many about your home break.

Yes.

Because I think we've used mobile homes in quite some time for our audiences. Since 1973, they've been reestablished as manufactured homes. So mobile homes are going to use that. Legally, it's not going to stand because it's not as manufactured.

Not a problem. Thank you for the clarity on that. Thank you. Yes, sir.

Yes. I had a question. This is more towards Charles. So in that area that he's talking about, is the majority of it R1 or R2?

Or is it mixed?

It's R1 right now.

So everything in that neighborhood is R1? Yeah.

But that's going down Lurie Lane, is that correct? Okay. But on 7th Street itself, most everything is R2, correct? And he is on 7th Street.

He's on 7th Street. Right next to Lurie Lane, that side where he's on is R1. Yes.

But we're not looking to rezone a whole neighborhood as... such as was proposed sometime back. We're just looking for one property.

Yes, just Mr. Eugene Roth's property.

Yes, and with some good intention involved here. Mr. Rigginsburg, you had another question?

I have one more question for you. Should we move to approve this? Can you attach the conditions of the part two in that area to the approval? or future reference? What condition? Double wider manufactured house cannot be placed in that area.

Mr. Ortiz has already stated that it would be prohibited.

Yeah, that it would be prohibited. I understand.

Without an attachment. It's already a city ordinance.

I understand that. But, you know, we're not going to be here forever. The next person that's sitting here, you know,

I can include something, Mr. Rigginsburg. Again, I had attached, I believe I did attach the ordinance. And if I didn't, I can include it within the packet for future filing. Yeah. For the record.

Okay, that'd be fine. If there are no further questions, do I have a motion to close this hearing?

I move.

So I just have another. Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, sir. Can you state your name, sir?

Yeah, I'm Mark. If I'm going to force me. are permitted. Not in this area.

But that's exactly... No, I understand. I'm just going off of what...

He is correct, but in this specific instance, the ordinance supersedes that by saying it is not allowed in that area.

There you go. Okay. And I understand what you're trying to do because right now you're R1. If you get... an offer on it and then appraiser goes out and they'll say it's a duplex, they'll stop the loan. So you have to have it as a R2. So when it does get sold, it'll go through the financing. So that's what we're doing.

So the ordinance does supersede the city ordinance from what I understand. It does supersede and would eliminate that concern, Mr. Wigginsburg. But if you'd like to make a motion with that concern or an attachment. Mr. Ortiz can include that in the PAC. Very well. No further questions. We are having a motion to close the hearing.

Make a motion we close the hearing. Do I have a second?

All those in favor? Aye. Very well. Thank you, Mr. Rudolph. Appreciate it. Can I please have a motion to either disapprove or approve straight up or with conditions?

I'm going to make a motion that we approve with the condition that the city attach the ordinance that prohibits mobile homes in that area for future reference for any parties concerned. Yes, sir. Okay.

Do I have a second to that motion?

I'll second that motion.

Thank you, Mr. Sweeney. Can we have a roll call vote, please? Mr. Travis Regensburg?

Yes. Mr. Mike Sweeney? Yes. Mr. Andrew Salazar? Yes. Mr. Gabe Antana? Yes. Mr. Oliver Lesbrons?

Yes. Okay, so moved. Thank you very much. Okay, can I please have a motion to open public hearing? on an application submitted by John Cordova for a variance on his premises located at 149 Independence Avenue for a 20 by 20 metal garage. Do I have a motion to open the hearing?

I'll move that we open the hearing on the application submitted by John Cordova for a variance. Do I have a second?

All those in favor? Aye. Thank you. Hearing so open. Mr. Cordova and anyone else that will be testifying in this matter? If you could please raise your right hand as I swear you. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you're about to give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Thank you very much. Mr. Cordova, thank you for being here. Thank you, sir. Sir, can you please give us a rundown on what's going on and what you're trying to accomplish?

Yes, sir. My name is John Cordova. I live at 149 Independence. I've been there approximately about nine years. Though, basically, sir, I put up a metal building, a 20 by 20 metal building, a little over two years ago, something like that. I do take full responsibility. I was not trying to do things illegally. I simply didn't get the permit. I'm asking for if you guys could overlook that mistake that I've done and Allow me to get the permit now, if possible, through the variants. Okay. I, like Mr. Art Gonzalez said, stated, I do, I did start using it as a storage. It kind of moved, you know, along from there. I do work out of it, you know. I'm not real good with words, sir. I really don't know what else to say. We might have questions for you.

So what kind of work do you do out of... I do paint and body, sir. Paint and body? Yes, sir. And I know we just went through this whole thing about a business license and conditions. Do you have a business license for your paint and body?

No, sir. And that's the thing is I want to do what I mean, please, by all means, sir, point me in the right direction. I'll do whatever I need to do. I want to do this legitly. You know, I understand what I'm saying. Yes, sir. No, sir. I'm not trying to get over on nobody, Your Honor, sir. I just simply want to do this the right way. Exactly.

And sometimes it may be that having a business needs to be in a business area, such as the industrial park, you know, and so forth. Having said that, Mr. Ortiz?

For the record, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Oliver, We're zoned as a C1. C1. Neighborhood commercial zone. Okay.

And as a neighborhood commercial zone, what does that allow him to do or not do?

Can you clarify that? It doesn't specifically state that he is allowed to do any type of paint or body work within that area. As per the ordinance says, it doesn't state that. It doesn't state that. It just states automobile sales and services is what it states.

Automobile sales and services. And that's probably from the Dodge dealership that was across the street way back when. Having said that, one more thing before I ask you, Mr. Cordova. Yes. Our goal today, Mr. Ortiz, is it to... give Mr. Cordova the right to conduct business or simply the right to have the garage in place? Simply to have the garage in place where it does sit today. Okay. That has nothing to do with you conducting business, has nothing to do with spraying cars, sanding, you know, ventilation, all this kind of stuff. That would be code enforcement if I'm correct. And I think I And am I correct that there is a cease and desist order on business?

Since we came into contact with Mr. Cordova and they've actually been very compliant with the whole process. This is just a case from our point of view and what we observed is he just really didn't really have guidance on how to proceed with his business. And that's, I think, he's going through the process now. He's taking his steps to do what he needs to do.

So the business portion of it is a total separate entity. This is simply the garage. Okay. This is simply the garage.

Okay.

Having said that, I will turn it over to some of the board members and ask for questions and so forth.

Of course, I always have questions.

That's okay. Okay.

Yeah.

We love having you.

Based on Exhibit 5 that is on the packet over here, the warranty deed, we have the Africanist John Cordova, and I don't see a warranty deed with his name.

So, yes, Mr. Art Gonzalez, if that's correct, is the owner of the property, and he does rent it to Mr. Cordova.

We have a rental agreement on this packet. Okay. No, sir.

We've never had a rental agreement between us, sir.

So my concern here again is should the applicant be the owner of the property other than the renter or the rentee? Because the owner of the property, the owner of the building is actually the owner of the property, not the rentee. But here we have an application for a variance from the rentee without ownership of the property, which is not, in my opinion, is not correct. I mean, that's a big red flag for me. I mean, it in itself, I mean, we do have a- I believe that there's a,

That's a good catch here because legally any structures are the responsibility of the owner of the property, not the leasee or mentor.

It was a permitting for the business, for the erection of the building, everything falls under the warranty of the property owner under exhibit within the packet and not the

not the, well, certainly the structure, but the business itself, we're not even talking about that.

Yeah.

The structure should be the responsibility of the property owner. It is incorrect. I agree with you on that, Mr. Rigginsburg, because Ms. Cordova, you are not the legal owner of the property or the garage. At this point, I would like to see that we table this matter.

Or, well, let's close the hearing.

Yes, yes. Is there anyone else that needs to speak on this matter? Are there any other questions for Mr. Cordova? No. Yes, sir.

The property owner, would we need to refile an application for this matter?

I'm going to ask Mr. Ortiz, and I believe so, yes.

Do we have to re-file the short fees or would we, could we amend the current application to reflect that further?

I asked for your re-file. It wouldn't have to be a re-file for the re-file.

No problem, we'll take care of that.

Thank you, Mr. Cordova. Appreciate you. Thank you very much. I have a motion that we close the discussion on the matter. Do I have a second? Second. All those in favor?

Aye.

So moved. Again, I would like to, I think we should, unless city would like to give me any guidance on this, table this matter until the proper package is presented with the proper ownership.

Owner.

Can we make a motion for that?

I make a motion that we deny based on the package. The packet that's presented and the proper packaging be presented to the board at a later date.

Very well. With the correct owner and so forth.

Well, the correct owner and the proper packaging.

I mean, it's... Do I have a second? I'll second that.

Can we have a roll call vote, please? Mr. Travis Rigginsburg? Yes. Mr. McSweeney? Yes. Mr. Gannon-Sema? Yes. Mr. Andrew Salazar? Yes. Mr. Oliver Lesperance? Yes. Motion does vary, sir.

Very well. Do we have any other business today? And I have a motion for adjournment, please. Second. All those in favor? As have. Thank you very much. Thanks, everyone, for coming today and your testimony.