City Council - Regular Meeting
The Lampasas City Council discussed amending a sign ordinance related to the proximity of tobacco and vape shops to schools, considering a change from 300 feet to 1,000 feet. They also approved several purchases, including flood site prototype testing and SCBA fill stations for the fire department, and discussed transitioning to a new phone system.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Council
- Meeting Type
- City Council
- Location
- Lampasas, TX
- Meeting Date
- August 10, 2026
Transcript
82 sections
The only thing that was requested by her was to change where it says $300.
I found out that the sign ordinance for state law is 1,000 feet. So I thought that if we align our ordinance with the state law sign ordinance, it would make sense.
And there's a rationale behind 1,000 foot versus when we number like 2,000 out of here. That was just my thoughts.
So we're just seeking guidance from council if you want us to come back with a modification of 1,000 feet from 300 feet.
I thought we were pretty hard on the 200 feet because we were really concerned about the location in relationship to the high school.
make sense that's just my thought essentially if you were to make this change in the ordinance you wouldn't be relying on staff to approve a permit that is in line with state
Can we maybe, because you know how y'all do a little circle thing with the 2,000 feet? Can we do the circle thing with the 1,000 feet and see if we can allow, what if we allow, what if we don't allow? You know, I'm not sure. She's in store to do that.
I'm sure everything's going to happen, so.
I mean, are you sure?
then it makes logical sense to me that we could apply that rule for footage from something. Because if they can't have a real sign, then why should they be out there?
They can have a sign that says, for example, vape shop, if that's what it's called. They can have a sign that says vape shop. It very simply just cannot have cartoon characters or vapes on the sign. Vervage-wise, it can say that.
But the cartoon characters or whatever all the time, getting themselves in all kinds of trouble.
Because the kids want to make sure they're going to get it.
Correct.
But they don't have to.
This is just a government overreach in the private business. We're trying to parent people.
I don't think it's overreaching if it's a line in the state law. Now I have to agree to two different laws. It's not a line in the state law.
It's two different laws.
You're talking about signing to the location.
Correct. I understand that. But there's a rationale between the signage state law and I believe that it makes
for location the rationale is about signage and if the state legislature had it about signage not location why are we changing that because i don't want it that close to the base there is an option if this is something that you're interested in there's
On this specific ordinance, it is smoking tobacco shops.
But that is a farther reach than just fake shops.
It could be jobs. There's a few things that fit into that category. But for the most part, they have to sell
I guess the question just is, what do we want for our kids? That's my question.
Daddy? Daddy?
Well, I know what I'll do with my child. I'll raise him the right way.
to use between that 300 foot and 999 foot buffer.
So if there's no cartoon created of characters, then they're within the 300 feet rule?
They would have to be outside of 300 feet. We would not allow a smoker tobacco shop inside 300 feet. Any signage. We're talking about location. And then from 301 feet to 999 feet, they can't use a cartoon character. And as soon as they hit 1,000 feet, they can use a cartoon character if they wanted to.
Unless they can have a fake shot at 300 feet. Correct. Or less. No, not or less. No, it has to be the least. Outside of 300 feet. It has to be outside of 300 feet. Okay, so 300 to... 999 is very...
Correct. Their signage would be restricted between 301 and 999. Stephen, if you'd like to come up, if council has questions for things specific to use of block fields. Thank you, council. During workshop, you had requested that we bring some park staff in to talk about sometimes the ball fields are locked up and unaccessible.
It's been working out.
The fee schedule that council has adopted does say that if a field is not subject to us about field usage in rental that way we can make sure there's not two teams showing up at the same time to have a competing practice at the same time that way we've ensured that field availability for those organizations.
I guess my concern was Sunday afternoon when I had to run through a ball at balls with my kids.
And I've gone past Turner, and I've gone past 580, and I have seen open fields.
So you don't want to have to deal with that. I mean, it's open field right now.
Mr. Pratt said to me, my kid's playing right now.
mayor and council i just wanted to let you guys know you'll recall earlier this year we were working with land passes trucking and ready mix to bring their economic development agreement into compliance they have submitted the required paperwork that indicates that they have employed the note on that handful. So it won't
All rise.
Father, we just thank you for this day. Thank you for the people who choose to be here tonight.
Mr. Kelly is receiving a certificate from Northwest Lyman College.
What happened?
This is combat.
And in another week or so, the whole thing was built. Another list. I'm not making this personal. I'm making this for our own town. We need code enforcement. We need a building official, which I know y'all are working on all of that. But we need to get serious about it. Our town's going to grow up. It's going to turn into Leanne.
Mayor, can you make sure that staff receives a copy of that, please? Can you make sure that staff receives a copy of that, please?
I don't know what he's referring to. He said he had a memorandum.
citizens come in and citizens who desire to address the city council on a matter of that is included on the agenda and that will take this to the public hearing to receive citizens comment hearing council this was denied at pnc on thursday if you remove this from One, discussion of possible action regarding the approval of amendments on record meeting held on July 27, 2026. Discussion of possible action to approve the second reading of an ordinance to modify the city land passage program ordinance. After 82, utilities article two, water division one, generally, and division three, conservation. 2.3, discussion of possible action Regarding equipment of alternative members for all municipal boards, commissions, and committees. 3.4, discussion of possible action regarding the second reading of the ordinance amending the city of Lancaster's code of ordinance. The only one that we have right here that I know of that's posted is August 24, 2026 at 5.30 p.m. It's our next city council meeting. New business, 4.1, discussion of possible actions regarding approval or denial of approval modification or request to rezone from single-family residential 10,
Thank you.
the year beginning of October 1st,
website for public consideration.
Average on year 250,000? Yes. So at our So currently, at the 33.99, your city taxes are $849 a year. That's assuming $849.99. That's assuming no exceptions. At the 35.9, it's $897. So if the does not include any it's just under fifty dollars for the year on a two hundred fifty thousand dollar amount and and when when your budget comes to you for formal approval that would be Any questions?
Council Member Price?
Aye.
Council Member Campbell?
Aye.
Council Member Morris? Aye. Mayor Peirce? Aye. Council Member Keating?
Mayor and council, this item is to schedule a public hearing for the proposed tax rate. In the past, the city of Land Pass has had a public hearing in one week and the adoption of the tax rate the next week. State law does not preclude you from having a public hearing and voting on the tax rate
I move to schedule one public hearing on the proposed tax rate, and the meeting to vote on the tax rate will be Monday, September 14, 2026, at 5.30 p.m. Second.
Any discussion? All in favor?
Aye.
4.5, a discussion to consider the selection of the winner of the city flood site prototype test.
for the total of $25,720 due to the eight to 12 week turnaround, when everyone else was 12 weeks or more.
What causes, between 2A and 2B, what causes the ?
There are two different brands of pumps, just represented by one company.
OK. Is this a budget requirement? It is not. and purchasing laws were required to do.
in the amount of $25,720. Second.
Any other discussion or questions? All in favor? Aye.
Thank you.
4.7, a discussion of possible action according to the purchase of the SCBA film stations for a prior department in the amount of $52,165. Good evening, Mayor and Council. This was a budget item for this year. I'll just need your approval to go ahead and do this. So moved. Second. Any discussion? All in favor?
Aye. Stay till the end.
You didn't even stay till they were done.
Discussion of possible action for approval and transition to a
Mayor and Council, you may or may not recall last year's staff had come to you and kind of giving a heads up that the project may be on the pipeline because copper lines, copper flow lines are going away. And in fact, AT&T has notified us that by June of cell phones since that time so this city has seen some savings in salary items and while this is not a budgeted project it was in the proposed amended budget that i brought to you a little while back and it got tabled until we got some room to fit in and things like that and so while we have the funds we would like to transition to the white phone which is a savings of about, honestly, it ranges with AT&T. I've not seen a bill lower than $1,600 and sometimes they're over $1,900 a month. So we're looking at potentially a $300 a month savings on AT&T services. And we're looking at a different system that was a little fancier than what we I have transitioned to another municipality and it costs significantly more than this. Just the phone is a loan over $55,000 with a similar monthly cost. Do we have other folks? No, we solely went with this one because it is a DIR contract, so the state has approved it as a little bid.
So it would be voice over internet, so it would be integrated into the network, but we haven't been in bandwidth with that now.
We have a dedicated circuit, a wired circuit on the top of our network anyway.
I believe that it was more expensive than it was.
It was at least twice the price, if I recall. And last year, when we started looking at this, I had the company that did our transition to Brady, to Voigt Lines, look at the pricing, and they came in and
easier transition to go from our AT&T to the AT&T product. But we have demoed both of their products.
Okay. We're going to transition to the office of AT&T's HVAC system and . Second.
Any other discussion?
I guess we have the calls above there. I need to put that in motion.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.