Aviation Board - Regular Meeting

Monday, April 6, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Aviation Board
Meeting Type
Aviation Board
Location
La Crosse, WI
Meeting Date
April 6, 2026

Transcript

107 sections (from 121 segments)

0:03 – 0:210

Good morning, everyone. Apologize for the delay. Thank you all for waiting. I'm gonna call this meeting to order at 10:08AM on 04/06/2026. All board of public work members are present and move to the approval of the minutes from 03/30/2026.

0:23 – 0:570

Motion made by council president Dickinson, second by director Trane. Any corrections or discussion? CNN, please vote. Do I do that first? No. Okay. Alright. Moving to our first agenda item twenty five one one seven three, bidders' proof of responsibility.

0:571

We have none today, mayor. Thanks.

0:590

Thank you. Moving to our next agenda item twenty five one four five six, street department updates.

1:061

They are busy cleaning up George Street and would like to go one week later. Since it's an update item, I don't think we have to make a motion to refer.

1:130

Alright. Councilmember Gallagher?

1:162

Do you mind if I just ask director Gallagher a question?

1:192

Is it just the Viaduct that they're working on?

1:221

I don't know. Thank you.

1:260

They're doing it all.

1:273

Primarily, yes. Yes.

1:31 – 1:420

Alright. Moving to our next agenda item, twenty six zero three three four, review of 2025 stormwater m s four annual report to Wisconsin DNR.

1:443

Yeah. Good morning. Can you guys hear me okay?

1:470

Yes. Who's speaking? This

1:503

is Claire, water coordinator. Sorry.

1:530

How are doing today? Good.

1:56 – 2:273

So, yeah, last week, our 2025 MS four report was submitted to the DNR. That just basically goes over a summary of everything that we were doing in the last year to comply with that permit. So this is just basically to give you guys a chance to review the document, make it publicly available, and answer any questions you might have. Next week, I'll be presenting my quarterly stormwater utility updates at the council meeting so I can go over some of it in more detail at that time, but I'm happy to answer any questions you have today as well. Thank

2:28 – 2:480

you. Any questions from board of public work members? Seeing none. We're this is a motion to approve and file or nothing?

2:493

It's already been submitted, so it's just a chance to re review it.

2:540

Okay. So you basically are putting this up to a notice and then allowing us to review it for your presentation next week?

3:03 – 3:160

Okay. Alright. So we're gonna make a motion to receive and file made by council member Goggins, second by director Gallagher. Any discussion? Seeing none, please vote.

3:200

And that motion passes unanimously.

3:261

Thank you.

3:28 – 3:440

Next agenda item twenty six zero three three six, construction contract change orders. How many do we have for Carol Park? Okay.

3:44 – 4:001

There are three mayor that are attached to the agenda. Change order number one for La Crosse Public Library furniture, change order number four for 2025 Carol Park improvements, and change order number one for Highway 16 Water Transmission Main South.

4:000

Thank you. Council president Dickinson.

4:054

I was just wondering if we could get an update on the Carol Park. It looks like it's overbid, so I would like to know some details. Thank you.

4:215

Could you repeat the specifics of that for me, please?

4:24 – 4:464

Yes. I know sometimes it's not clear in that part of the building. Just where are we now with construction? And it appears to be overbid. And so what's happening, or is there a resolution that might have addressed that issue?

4:47 – 5:295

There's still money left in the project. We used the contingency. But we knew going into this project that because of where it's located on a landfill in the flood, we knew there would be changes we had to make and these now should be the sum total of that. Once we set the building in place that we could get it to ADA compliant, so we've made everything accessible, which was that's a big part of all this concrete work we're doing and adding the railings. We had to shift some items. So, if the weather cooperates, it should be done here in the next four to six weeks.

5:294

Thank you very much. That is the information I was seeking.

5:335

You're welcome.

5:360

Thank you. Councilmember Gaga.

5:382

I have a question on the, library change order. Is there anyone to speak to it?

5:565

Hello? Can you hear me?

5:57 – 6:142

Hello. Hi. The contract states that we had $75,539 with a $9,461 contingency. We've increased this by $9,460 So is this it for change orders for that?

6:145

Yes. This will be the first and final for this contract. K. Thank you.

6:210

Thank you. Director Gallagher.

6:24 – 6:451

Sure. Sorry. I I tried to hit my button before Jim left. This isn't for Evan, but I for Carol Park, I just wanted to make sure because I I know these have gone through finance and everything's probably fine. But if there's a way we can update the paperwork to show that we're not actually over contract plus contingency, like, there's change order to deduct out original contract work.

6:45 – 7:121

Because the way it looks now, I think this might be what council president Dickinson was saying, is that the contract plus contingency was about five seventy five, and we're coming in now at about five ninety four. So that's what's kind of not making sense. If there was other stuff that hasn't been shown as deducted or saved, or maybe if there was a resolution to add additional funds, the math isn't working out, at least on this form. So I'm wondering if something's missing.

7:140

Can anybody speak to that?

7:30 – 7:495

In working with finance on this, and I could go back to them and get you the numbers. Yes. We did, the contingency is gone. So we've been using or we are just with this change order using the funds that are in the project. So there's still money there. It's not on our contract.

7:520

Is there Yeah.

7:53 – 8:311

Well, I was gonna say I I get that, but my question is if depending on how it's bid, like, it's a lump sum or if it's quantities, usually, to keep your bottom line, you know, at or below the funding available, you'd need to show a deduct from a previous obligation to show that you can cover this additional work. I I'm not doubting it's there. It's just that the the numbers maybe need to be updated a bit to show how it's fitting within that original $500,000 bid. Usually, you'd have to show some paperwork that you've got a deduct and then you're adding it back another way. It's just it's not really clear on this form. That's all.

8:325

So I'll work with finance. We'll get it put together.

8:35 – 8:461

Okay. Yeah. I mean, it that that's alright. It's we just need to make sure whatever we file in the record shows, you know, the paper trail that holds up to an audit. That's all. Thank you. Sounds good. Thank you.

8:460

Thank you. Council member Goggin?

8:49 – 9:202

I guess that was my same question for the Highway 16 contract change order. We don't I maybe I just don't understand how these work, but my logical brain tells me that the contract contingency, the changes should reflect at the end. So I don't see where the contingency is when we use it that it's deducted so that we know what the con the final contract numbers are. So, again, what is what is this telling me?

9:226

Could you repeat the question

9:231

on that?

9:24 – 10:032

Yep. So kinda going back to what Matt was just saying about Carole Park. So I'm looking at the contract for Highway 16, and I understand, you know, what we're eliminating and then what we're adding. The contract was for $5,174,219.92. The contingency is $7,776,132.98. And then it says we're gonna increase by additions of 20,904 thousand $66. So then the revised contract becomes 5,000,971. So I'm like okay. Matt can speak to that.

10:040

Director Gallagher.

10:052

Thank you, Matt.

10:07 – 10:481

I'll just pretend to speak, and maybe people online won't know what's happening. So we can update the form to show when an amount is retaken out of contingency. You know, the quick math you'd have to do is the contract plus contingency minus your net additions has to still fit within your available funds. And if that's not entirely clear on here, we can certainly update that to show it better. Because the at this point, for example, on on the Highway 161, there there's net additions of $20,009.00 $4.66, but no previous change orders.

10:48 – 11:051

So this would come out of that $776,132.98 amount leaving, you know, approximately 756,000 still in place. So we certainly can update the form to more clearly reflect the math if that would help. So

11:06 – 11:262

I and, again, I'm just asking if it's logical then after that the contingency on the form be reduced by the 20,946 or 9 $20,904.66 so that we can see the contingency lowering, you know, that the that fund is less. Thank you.

11:271

Yeah. Yeah. There are two ways to do it. We we can show the the original contingency and subtract off of it or show, like, a remaining contingency just to show the change. Yeah. Yeah.

11:38 – 11:522

And I'm not just picking on this one. I'm just saying on all change orders, I would I would like to see the contingency. When a contingency is tapped, we need to see the remaining contingency. Thank you.

11:530

And is that a directive to finance, or is that to each department that's bringing that forward?

11:581

No. That's just

11:595

to us.

11:59 – 12:131

As the keepers of the contract documents, we can revise that form to show that. Once upon a time, we didn't even show contingency. I mean, that's why we went through having finance check and approved that the money was there, but we can spell it out in a better way here. Okay. Thank you.

12:17 – 12:300

Thank you, Evan. Motion to approve by director Trane, second by director Gallagher. I forgot we had to approve this. Any other discussion? Seeing none, please vote.

12:390

And that motion passes unanimously. Alright. For the next set of agenda items before going to charter.

12:53 – 13:080

yeah. My bad. Next item twenty six zero three five two, review of 2nd Street and King Street intersection closure. Who's speaking to the okay. Jamie.

13:15 – 13:456

Morning, members of the board. This is being brought because we're looking to close the intersection of 2nd And King, in the downtown area. This, is needed to do a sanitary connection that is in the middle of the intersection. And with doing said work, we will be unable to keep, the public, safe if we were to allow traffic to continue. The closure we are hoping will be minimal.

13:46 – 14:116

It will be weather dependent, but try to limit it to a couple weeks. Basically, get in there one week to do the work, prep, and pour concrete back, and then the remaining time would be allowed for curing and get the concrete up to strength to allow traffic on it. So it'd be a onetime closure in and out as fast as we physically can.

14:120

Alright. Director Gallagher.

14:151

Jamie, for those here that don't know, this is part of the the neighborhood Greenway extension, right, on King Street?

14:22 – 14:346

Correct. Yep. With that, we are updating some existing utilities, and there was a stub out done, but it was not brought out far enough and we have to get back to that.

14:370

And in terms of I know you don't necessarily know the length of time would you like getting in and out as fast. What's like the expectation in terms of is it a couple weeks? Is it

14:486

I mean, right now, my like I said, it's biggest thing is gonna be the weather.

14:54 – 15:056

If it stays cool like this, I would suspect two and a half to three weeks. If we do get a little bit of a warm up, it doesn't have to be much. Okay. But it could drop as low as two weeks.

15:06 – 15:236

A biggest thing the weather is dependent on is that curing of the concrete. If it's too cold, it's gonna stifle. It's gonna be very slow to happen. But, otherwise, in terms of the actual underground work, that and the prep probably within a week will be have everything ready to go for concrete

15:246

I suspect. Because the pipe will only take probably a day to get in.

15:290

So I already I know the answer to this, but publicly, just so we have it. Mhmm. Those businesses around that area will be notified of everything. And Correct. Okay.

15:39 – 15:546

Yep. They were notified of the project last year and early this year, and the contractor dropped off actual notices to start last week. Okay. So they know it is officially starting this week at some point.

15:550

Thank you. Any other questions? Seeing none, thank you very much.

16:006

Thank you.

16:02 – 16:390

Is there a motion? Motion to approve by council member Goggin and second by director Gallagher. Seeing no other discussion, please vote. Alright. For the next set of items one second. I would like to move to unanimous consent to approve all of these Excel Street privileges together.

16:45 – 17:260

we do we have unanimous consent for that? Okay. Good to go. Alright. So now here's the fun part for me anyway. So this is agenda item twenty six zero three five six Excel Energy Street privilege permit request to renew gas and right of way along East West Avenue. Excuse me. Yep. Right of way along East West Of Quickship Way. And then 260357 Xcel Energy Street privilege permit request to renew existing gas and right of way from Glendale Avenue to Chase Street.

17:26 – 18:280

And then 260358 Xcel Energy Street privilege permit request to bore two two five 225 feet along west right of way of Pine Street and West Avenue North to 420 Street 12th Street North. 260359, Xcel Energy Street privilege permit request to install 40 feet lift pole and alley behind 1408 And 1402 Liberty Street. 260360XcelStreet privilege permit request to replace three phase transformer near J Street and 5th Avenue South. 260361, Excel Street privilege Excel Energy Street privilege permit request to replace three phase transformer and vault near 321 Main Street. 2600362 Excel Energy Street privilege permit request to renew existing gas main and services from Farnam Street to Green Bay Street.

18:36 – 19:140

There's a gap. Alright. 260 thank you all. 260369 Excel Energy Street privilege permit require request to change service from overheads, underground on north, east, and west side Of 807 East Avenue South. Alright. Motion to approve by council member Goggin. Second by director Gallagher. This individual, do do they wish to speak? They don't have to. No. Okay. Okay. Just here for questions. Alright. Seeing no other discussion, please vote.

19:19 – 19:340

That motion passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Excel. I'm going to also move for unanimous consent to approve all of the Charter Communications Street privileges together. We're all good on that.

19:34 – 20:070

Okay. Well, let's start the reading. 260363 Charter Communications Street privilege permit requested communications and right of way near 22231 Enterprise Avenue. 260364, charter communication street privilege permit request for communications and right of way near 1014 Pine Street. 260365, charter Communication street privilege permit request for communications and right of way near 12th Street North and Badger Street.

20:08 – 20:470

260366, charter communication street privilege permit request for communications in right of way near Monitor Street and Milwaukee Street. 260367, charter communication street privilege permit request to place new power supply cabinet at 2202 Mississippi Street. 260368, charter communication Street privilege permit request to hand dig from poll to place new power supply cabinet. And that is all. Motion approved by council member Goggins, second by director Trane.

20:47 – 21:290

Any discussion? Seeing none, please vote. That motion passes unanimously. Alright. Moving to our next agenda item since it will yeah. We'll just list them all. Let's just go through them. 260370BrightsBreedOfWisconsinLLCStreet privileged permit request for communications on right of way near 1120 Dash 1138 Maple Street. Motion to approve by director Gallagher, second by council president Dickinson. Any discussion?

21:29 – 21:570

Seeing none, please vote. Next item, 260371. Bright Speed of Wisconsin LLC. Street privilege permit request for communication and right of way near 2135 Avenue. Motion to approve by director Gallagher, second by council president Dickinson.

21:58 – 22:300

Seeing no other discussion, please vote. Oh, my it it went too fast. Moved by director Trane, second by council member Gaga. And that motion passes unanimously. Next agenda item twenty six zero three seven two Metro Fiber Net LLC Street Privilege Permit request for communications and right of way near 3000 South Avenue.

22:32 – 23:130

Motion to approve by council president Dickinson, second by director Trane. Please vote. Next agenda item, twenty six zero three seven three, Wynn LLC Street Privilege Permit request for communication and right of way beginning 43 feet west of 26th Street going east 302 feet with South Row. Motion to approve by director Chang, second by director Gallagher. I just have one question. Who is Wynn LLC?

23:161

They do work for various agencies, state agencies.

23:200

Okay. Wisconsin Independent possibly Wisconsin Independent Network. I don't wanna quote you wrong. Alright. Okay.

23:32 – 24:060

Motion to approve by director Trane, second by director Gallagher. Please vote. And the last one, 260374, Bright Speed of Wisconsin LSC Street privilege permit request for communication and right of way near 3118 Lauderdale Place. Motion to approve by council president Dickinson, second by director Tray. Before we approve this, I just have a question for you, director Gallagher.

24:06 – 24:180

Can you, I guess, speak to when these street privilege permits happen, what's kind of the request that we have of these companies for cleanup and stuff?

24:191

For cleanup?

24:200

Yeah. Or just in general.

24:24 – 25:311

So when when permits like this are taken out by utilities, private utilities like those presented today, Excel, Charter, Brightspeed, Metronet, and Wynn, etcetera, they are essentially utilizing the street privilege permit process as a design review to search for conflicts with existing infrastructure or utilities with the city of La Crosse. And so this is a way for us to document or memorialize their request for work and to highlight any changes that need to be made to accommodate them since they have the right to be in the right of way but can be there at our direction. And so the expectation with them is the same as with any other permit in the right of way that they are responsible for replacing in kind whatever they do. That would be disruption to boulevards, hardscape like curb and gutter or sidewalk, or restoration to private property when they're within an easement, but this process covers the work within the right of way. So we, as the caretakers of the public space, have to chase up every single one of these in the field typically.

25:31 – 25:501

That's what street department and engineering staff do throughout the summer is we have to check on these various sites. Sites. Typically complaint driven. The the residents and businesses are very good about keeping an eye on the utilities that are out there doing this work, and so then we have to follow-up to see that all the restoration is done properly throughout the year. Year.

25:51 – 26:110

Thank you very much. Seeing no other discussion, please vote. And that motion passes unanimously. Alright, folks. Happy Monday. Thank you all for being here today, and

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.