About this meeting
- Government Body
- Regular City Commission Meeting
- Meeting Type
- Regular City Commission Meeting
- Location
- Hollywood, FL
- Meeting Date
- May 20, 2026
Transcript
1324 sections (from 1,623 segments)
Alright. Welcome, everyone. Welcome to City Hall here in the city of Hollywood. Today is Wednesday, 05/20/2026. We are here for a regular city commission meeting, but as I always mention, meetings are never regular.
It's always important and interesting substance on the agenda. And today is no different. Let's please rise for a moment of silence, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, and think about loved ones who we may have lost or people that are notable in our lives. I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you.
Another important moment we take at each meeting is to recognize our veterans, active service personnel, and their families. So if you are a US veteran or a family member thereof or a service member, please rise. We'd love to recognize you. We do have some coasties here today, some guardsmen. Welcome. Roll call, please. Let me activate the mic real quick. I got to click six times. Go ahead.
Commissioner Schuham. Here. Commissioner Hernandez.
Here.
Vice Mayor Kalari? Here. Commissioner Gruber?
Here.
Commissioner Biederman?
Here.
Commissioner Cantana? Here. Mayor Levy?
Here. Thank you. Today's consent agenda includes items five through 15. If there these are items that don't usually require individual discussion. However, if there is a speaker card or a request from the dais to remove one for individual discussion, we're happy to do so. City clerk, are there any speaker cards on five through 15?
Item 10.
Item 10. Anything else from the body?
Motion to approve.
We have a motion from Vice Mayor Caleri and a second from Commissioner Quintana to approve DELL: the balance of the consent agenda, items five through 15, minus number 10. All those in favor, aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, those items will carry unanimously. We'll get to item 10 as quick as we can on the agenda. I know James Quinlan is here with the Rhythm Foundation, so we'll hear from James. Onward to our 1PM presentations, proclamations, and awards. I'm gonna I see a lot of folks here from Hollywood Fire Rescue and Beach Safety. Welcome, everyone.
I'll take it out of order because you all are here. And let's go ahead and invite chief Levy and company to present the and recognize the recipients of the crew accommodation award. Chief?
Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager. I'd like to ask chief Devlin, please chief, come join me, please. Today's recognition is not only for the fire department, also for the Hollywood Police Department. This particular incident, chief Mosier's gonna read the narrative on, was a catastrophic accident that happened a few probably a few months ago now, where a pedestrian was involved in a serious incident. As you'll hear in a few minutes, Hollywood police arrived on scene, started life saving actions, which eventually caused this individual to have somewhat of
a full
recovery and was able to be discharged from the hospital. But they are alive today, which is the most important thing. This patient, you'll hear shortly, received over 100 units of blood while in the Operating Room. That's a lot. They received one unit of blood on scene by fire rescue. But also due to the heroic actions of our Hollywood Police Department that this patient is alive. And we want to recognize these police officers and these firefighters.
Very nice.
Good afternoon, commission and city staff. I'm Mike Moser, deputy fire chief with Hollywood Fire Rescue. I'd like to begin by calling up the recipients of this award as I read the commendation, Officer Palacios, Officer Pierce, Lieutenant Fernandez, Firefighter Robinson, and Firefighter Lopez Cuto to the podium, please. On 02/20/2026, Rescue five responded to a report of a pedestrian versus a vehicle collision at 901 North Federal Highway. Upon arrival, crews encountered an adult male who had been struck while seated at a bus stop bench, resulting in catastrophic lower extremity injuries.
Hollywood Police Department officers arrived and made initial patient contact and immediately applied tourniquets to both lower extremities prior to EMS arrival. The tourniquets were documented as very effective and remained in place upon transfer of care. Early bleeding control was crucial intervention in this case. EMS assessment revealed a complete traumatic amputation below the right knee and a partial traumatic amputation below the left knee. The patient was awake, but in significant distress with hypotension and sighs of respiratory distress.
A level one trauma alert, the most serious patient category was activated. Cruz initiated spinal immobilization, established IVs, began fluid replacement, and provided advanced airway support. Diminished breath sounds on the right prompted a decompression effort, which was performed without complication. During transport, one unit of blood was administered while continuous monitoring and supportive care was maintained. The patient was transported to Memorial Regional Hospital and transferred directly to the trauma team.
Upon arrival, the patient remained hypotensive, however responsive. With tourniquets intact and active transfusion ongoing, hospital staff continued their resuscitation efforts in the trauma bay. The patient was stabilized and admitted to the trauma intensive care unit. This incident reflects effective interagency coordination and decisive life saving actions under extreme circumstances. Early bleeding control by law enforcement, rapid trauma system activation, and comprehensive pre hospital care contributed to the patient surviving the initial injuries and reaching that definitive care at the hospital.
This nomination recognizes the responding personnel for their skill, perseverance, and lifesaving performance during a highly complex and time critical emergency. Congratulations.
I'll tell you what. Memorial Regional Hospital had their Survivors' Day recognition, recognizing the different EMS units that operate in South Broward County, also, of course, recognizing the trauma doctors, the nurses that attend to the patients coming in, and really celebrating and highlighting the successes when it's a fortunate situation to be able to have someone survive a trauma. It's always a very heartwarming thing to see the survivors come in and speak after they've gone through the most difficult life threatening injuries. So pretty amazing. We're fortunate to have Memorial Regional Hospital and the trauma team here in Hollywood.
And thanks, of course, to EMS in Hollywood and our firefighting crew and Hollywood police as well for providing people with that opportunity. In the end, that's the biggest sense of pride that I think we can have as a community that entrusts and invests in the city of Hollywood. And through that, the public safety services that we provide, really, it really goes the longest way to give that sense of how important the professionalism and the funding that we invest into Hollywood Fire Rescue and Hollywood Police goes such a long way in the most important times for all of us. So thank you so much. All right.
Well, I don't think there's anything else keeping all of these public safety professionals here, chief. So if you are interested, you can stay until 7PM or 8PM. But otherwise, free to go if you like. All right. Let's go ahead and start with our proclamations then. We'll take them in order. National Public Works Week is this upcoming week or this week. And presenting the proclamation will be Commissioner Biederman. Accepting it will be Joseph Kroll and public works and the public works staff. Commissioner Beeterman, public works week. Go ahead.
Thank you, mayor. First, I'll start by saying how lucky we are to have such a qualified and exemplary public works team that make us all look good on a daily basis, lifting all the heavy lifting for us and repairing all that above ground infrastructure when our residents are concerned about it. So it's meaningful to proclaim, in recognition of National Public Works Week, May 2026, whereas in 1960, the American Public Works Association launched a national initiative to raise public awareness of the vital role public works plays in community life by establishing National Public Works Week, And whereas special highlights of National Public Works Week include the United States Senate affirming a resolution, letters of acknowledgment from President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Lyndon B. Johnson, a proclamation presented by President John F.
Kennedy in 1962, and whereas public works professionals focus on city's infrastructure, facilities, and services that are vital to building sustainable and resilient communities. They work diligently each day to maintain safe streets, reliable water and sewer systems, effective storm water management, sanitary services, traffic operations, public facilities, parks and green spaces. These essential efforts are fundamental to public health and safety and whereas public services are made possible through public works professionals including engineers, managers and essential first responders who work to build, improve and protect our community and whereas this year's theme, Rooted in Service, Powered by Community, reflects the deep commitment of public works employees in serving residents with integrity, reliability and pride. It emphasizes that the strength of public works lies not only in infrastructure and operations but in the relationships built with the community they serve. And whereas support, patience and understanding of our community indicate a shared appreciation for essential services provided by public works personnel who make a meaningful impact on daily lives of our residents.
Now, therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the city of Hollywood, Florida, and the Hollywood City Commission hereby recognize May 2026 as National Public Works Weeks in the City Of Hollywood. Thank you.
All right.
Mayor, Vice Mayor, Commissioners, I'm honored to stand here before you today as a representative recipient of this proclamation recognizing National Public Works Week. This acknowledgment highlights the essential role that public works professionals play in maintaining and improving our community's infrastructure and services. Our work ensures manicured landscaping, safe roads, clean beaches, vibrant public spaces, which enhance the quality of life for all of our residents. On behalf of myself and all the public works staff behind me and out there still working, we'd like to express our gratitude to you, mayor and commissioners, for this recognition. If not, it not only celebrates the dedication and hard work of our team, but also underscores the importance of continued investment in public works for a stronger, safer, and more resilient community.
Thank you for your support and partnership as we strive to serve the public with excellence.
Thank you, Joseph. Well, same same words of gratitude on the behalf of the city commission to everybody in public works. Your work is critical. It go it's far reaching, and it's so meaningful to keep a city that's clean and vibrant and functioning and resilient. So really, from all of us, thank you so much. In the same form, the investment in public works is a top priority, the same as others. And just as long as you guys tell Joseph what you need and he tells the city manager and she tells us, we got you. Let's come up for a photo, everybody.
Thank you so much, everybody.
All right. Next on our agenda is a proclamation recognizing safe boating week, which is this week, May 16 through the twenty second. I'll take the liberty and pleasure of presenting the proclamation. With us today is Neil Karitsky. He's the flotilla commander with the US Coast Guard Auxiliary.
From a flotilla, it says Dania Beach, but we all know it's in Hollywood. So let's go ahead then. A proclamation recognizing National Safe Boating Week, May 16 through the twenty second twenty twenty six, whereas Florida has 1,300 miles of coastline, 50,000 miles of rivers, streams, and canals, and 7,800 lakes for Florida residents and visitors to enjoy and for wildlife to inhabit. These areas are rated as best boating and the fishing capital of the world. And whereas millions of Americans take to the waterways enjoying time together, boating, sailing, paddle boarding, kayaking, and fishing, the city of Hollywood, Florida is fortunate to have the resources to accommodate these varieties of boating.
The US Coast Guard, the US Coast Guard Auxiliary, and its federal, state, and local partners encourage all boaters to explore and enjoy our beautiful waterways. And whereas Americans should take precautionary actions to ensure that everyone makes it home unharmed after a fun day on the water, inspecting your boat thoroughly, and participating in a free vessel safety check offered through the US Coast Guard can help ensure both you and your boat are ready for the water. And whereas boaters should also wear life jackets at all times and make sure there is always someone on board who is unimpaired and capable of operating the boat, the United States Coast Guard and its federal, state, and local partners estimate that avoiding alcohol and wearing a life jacket can prevent more than seventy five percent of boating fatalities. And whereas through basic safety procedures, such as carrying emergency distress and communication equipment, wearing life jackets, taking a safe boating class, getting a free boating safety check, getting an engine cutoff switch or lanyard, which is required for vessels under 26 feet, and staying sober while operating a vessel, we can ensure that boaters on our crowded inland and offshore waterways stay safe throughout the year.
And whereas knowledge and skills are important in reducing human error and improving judgment, that is why we must continue to pass the word about boating safety, not only during National Safe Boating Week, but throughout the entire year. Now therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the city of Hollywood, Florida, and the Hollywood City Commission, do hereby proclaim May 16 through the twenty two, twenty twenty six as National Safe Boating Week in the city of Hollywood, Florida. Thank you. Thank you, Commander.
Thank you, Mayor and Commissioners. As we all know, this year alone, we've had a number of accidents and many more people injured for the same time last year. There's a common misconception that boat owners and people who live near the water are the ones most affected and that is not correct. If we look at these statistics, it can happen to anyone, anywhere, anytime. The City of Hollywood has a special relationship with the Coast Guard because we've had an office here in the city for many years for recruiting And we hope to continue our relationship. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Please come on up for a photo. We'd love to spread the word. If you want to give a shout out to our Hollywood Police Marine Unit, Chief Devlin Marine Unit, I know it's going to be busy. I saw some of the public messaging that went out on social media about safe boating, especially during the Memorial Day weekend coming up, a long weekend.
Hopefully, it'll be nice weather, and people will enjoy the waterways and be safe in Hollywood and beyond. All right. Let's go ahead now to a proclamation recognizing Building Safety Month, ladies and gentlemen, which is also May 2026. Presenting the proclamation will be commissioner Hernandez, and I'll invite the department of development services, the building division, Andrea Winjid, the director, is here, along with Russell Long, our chief building official. I see Dan Quintana and company, Jim, and all the folks here from development services.
Please join the crew up here. It's been a more popular topic in the past few years, building safety, of course, with the county inspection program and what have you. Yes. I know the team has kept busy. Commissioner Hernandez, go ahead.
Thank you, mayor. And I got to tell you, this group never stops working. Because at any given time, I actually get a hold of them. We have a great deal of questions. And I thank you all for the help and for the service that you provide to our residents. And particularly, a pain in the butt and the commissioner that I am, or can be. Anyway, thank you all.
He wasn't kidding about 20 either.
No, no, I'm not. They know it.
I thought it was the other one.
Oh, boy. Proclamation City Of Hollywood, Florida, in recognition of Building Safety Month, May 2026. Whereas the City of Hollywood recognizes that strong, safe, and resilient buildings are vital to the well-being of our community, both in everyday life and during times of disaster. And whereas confidence in the resiliency of these buildings depends on the work of dedicated professional building safety and fire prevention officials, architects, engineers, builders, trades people, and other who ensure that structures are safe, sustainable, and code compliant. And whereas, through the International Code Council, local, state, and federal officials work together to develop, implement, and uphold modern building codes and standards that safeguard the public from natural disasters such as hurricanes, fires, flood, and earthquakes.
And whereas Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to highlight the essential role of unsung protectors of public safety. Our code officials who help ensure safe, resilient and sustainable buildings and recognize the many City of Hollywood employees, including police officers and first responders who put up their safety and their lives on the line in service to our residents. And whereas each year in observance of Building Safety Month, people all over the world are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety, resiliency and economic investment at home and in the community, and to acknowledge the essential service provided in protecting lives and property of the City Of Hollywood. Now therefore, Josh Levy, Mayor of the City Of Hollywood, Florida, and the City of Hollywood Commission, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2026 of Building Safety Month in the City Of Hollywood, Florida.
Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, city commissioners, commissioner. Andrea Winget, the director of development Services. And I'm honored to be standing here today. And I'm only standing here today before you because of the team that's standing behind me. You've read several really important proclamations today, recognizing a lot of important topics and initiatives. But this group behind me really is the silent group that is working 20 fourseven, day in and day out, as well, silently. They may not have the fancy lights or the big trucks. But as you read in the proclamation
You might have to have a word
with her. They
do play an important role and work hand in hand with our other emergency personnel in keeping structures safe, to limit fires within the community, to ensure that our community, our residents, our business structures can withstand the elements of nature as we move forward. And it's their hard work and dedication that helps to keep the community safe. And we've had a few additions to our team over the year. So if you can just entertain me for one minute, I would like as we all know, our building official, Russell Long, is here. And we do have three assistant building officials, Jim McGinnis, who is over our large development construction projects.
So the projects that really catch your eye when you're out in our community and seeing them, he oversees and manages those projects and the safe construction of those buildings, including the staging of equipment and the resources that are brought in. We have Sheila Oliver who has rejoined the city. She was here previously. Unfortunately, is not able to be here with us today. But she is overseeing our day to day permitting to help mostly our residents and some of our smaller businesses within the city to get their permits through the process and help educate them on the best way to do that.
And then we have Dan Quintana. And Dan is our assistant building official who is over building safety for the city. And with that, he has a few words he would like to say for us.
Sure.
Good
afternoon,
Mayor, Vice Mayor, Commissioners, and City Manager, I'm Daniel Quintana, proud assistant building official of the City of Hollywood. Today, I wanted to speak briefly about a simple but powerful idea. Stronger codes create real impact, And that impact is what creates safer buildings. Codes are more than rules written on paper. There are standards that shape how we build, work, and live.
Whether we talk about building codes, safety codes, ethical codes, or digital security codes, strong standards protect people, improve quality, and create trust. When codes are weak or ignored, the consequences can be serious unsafe buildings, data breaches, accidents, and loss of confidence. But when codes are strong and properly followed, they save lives, strengthen communities, and support innovation. Real impact happens when responsibility meets action. Engineers design safety structures. Businesses protect customer information. Organizations create ethical workplaces. Governments establish standards that serve the public good. Every strong code becomes a foundation for progress. But stronger codes are not only about compliance.
They are about commitment, a commitment to excellence, accountability, and the well-being of others. In the end, stronger codes do more than prevent problems. They build confidence, create resilience and make a lasting difference in people's lives. At this time, I'd to introduce the driving force behind development services and that is the group of professionals standing with me and before you today. Our structural chief is Tim Jones, who oversees, obviously, our structural plan reviewers and inspectors.
He's had loads of experience. He's done a fantastic job for us. He steps up whenever we ask him to do anything out of the norm, is pretty often. He never says no. Our next chief is John Bessou, mechanical.
He oversees a group of gentlemen that help keep us cool when it's really, really hot outside. They do a fantastic job. Shout out to Norm MacKinnon, by the way. Our Chief Electrical Inspector, James Stewart. Together with the staff of inspectors and plan reviewers, they oversee our electrical department.
They make sure that electrical installations are to code and safe. Next is Mr. James West, our Chief Plumbing Inspector. Along with his staff, he ensures that our sanitation systems in our buildings and homes are up to code and keep us healthy and safe and help us have really hot showers. Our manager, Christina Gordon.
Along with assistant PSR manager is Marlon Bautista. And our PSR III, Jessica Mesadieu. With this staff, they are the front line to our department. We cannot function without the role that they play for us. And they are just completely essential, every day, every day. Some tips and takeaways. Building safety is everyone's responsibility. Sorry. Continuous education and awareness. That is one thing that we are proud of, and we're happy that the city does provide opportunities for us to further our careers and our education.
Embrace building codes for a safer future. And thank you for your commitment to safety. And last but not least, this is since Building Safety Month. We were at Home Depot not too long ago. And this is just a little blurb that we put together.
You look real happy there, Dan.
I can be a little animated.
A little candy store there, right?
Yeah, can you play it? Good morning, y'all. I'm Daniel Gutano, assistant building official here at the city of Hollywood. We're here at the Home Depot at Oakwood Plaza. We're promoting building safety month for
the board of rules and appeals.
And we have hard hats. We have pens, pencils. We have some shovel ducks, some cars. We have some pamphlets, and we have our staff here. We have a computer. We can help you with permits if you have any questions. But, also, please come down and see us. We'll be here till 02:00 today.
Go Hollywood. Alright.
And along with approximately 85 staff, we do this every day, all day long, and even on weekends sometimes. So we're proud to serve the residents and business owners of the City Of Hollywood.
How many permits do you guys do every year? Because I don't think the average resident has a clue of how much work you guys do.
What have had so far?
We, on high end, 18,000, but we average out pretty much around 16,000 to 17,000 a year.
Thank you.
Well, I'll tell you what, everyone. It's been really a pleasure for all of us to support our investments in the building division and development services, beginning with the new workspace that I hope you all love and enjoy compared to what was there before. The 2nd Floor is beautiful and really offers the most modern space that any department has right now in the city of Hollywood. So I hope you're proud of the investment in the workspace. I hope you're proud of the investment in technology and the Acela system.
I know it's hard to switch gears, but, ultimately, I hope we hit that high gear in August when we hopefully convert all the different building, permit types to Acela and give you all a more, you know, a more consistent system to to work together and to crank out those permits as quickly as possible. Of course, upholding all the safety rules that you're entrusted to uphold. But at the same time, as we've said for years, to help facilitate that quick issuance and inspection of the building permits because all the dreams that we have for the city of Hollywood in terms of its growth or the investment that the average resident wants to make in their house or a small business in their business to an investor and developer that wants to build a new multifamily building in the city. It all and even our public facilities, they all need to flow through your desks. And so thank you for being that critical and that indispensable conduit that everything that we hope for in the city has to flow through.
So your efficiency and your productivity is something that we rely on. And we hope we've given you the tools that you need to be as productive as you can be with using technology and facilities and additional personnel. And like I suggested to public works, if you need something more, tell Russell, tell Dan, tell Jim, tell your fellow team members. They'll tell the city manager, and she'll tell us, and we'll make it happen. So thank you all so much. I appreciate all that you do. Thank you.
Thank you.
Come on up for a photo. All right. Thank you all so much. Let's go ahead now and shift gears to recognize National Historic Preservation Month, which is, May 2026, of course. I'd like to invite commissioner Shuhan to present the proclamation.
Andy Ruffner, please come on up. He's the executive director of the Hollywood Historical Society. I think you have some other folks here from the Historical Society that'll join you in accepting the proclamation. And I'd like to recognize commissioner Shuham to present. Go ahead, commissioner.
Thank you, mayor. National Historic Preservation Month, May 2026. Whereas historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth and sustainable development, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride, maintaining community character, and enhancing livability. And whereas the city of Hollywood's historic districts seek to preserve and maintain historically significant resources located within the city of Hollywood, keeping the city a unique and special place. Whereas historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds.
And whereas it's important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a people. And whereas the twenty twenty six National Historic Preservation Month theme is All People Are Created Equal, focusing on the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Organized by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the month emphasizes preserving diverse sites that tell the full American story, reflecting on founding ideals and promoting community revitalization. Now, therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the city of Hollywood, Florida, and the Hollywood City Commission, hereby proclaim May 2026 as National Historic Preservation Month. Congratulations.
You might need to click the bottom of the mic. Activate the mic.
Thank you so much, mayor and commissioners, for the proclamation. This is Danny Gallup. He is our board president now. He just took over this January from Clive. And we just hope for ongoing partnership with the city in preserving our historic heritage. We have a lot of great things here. And I think it's one of the top three assets that we have here in the city is our historic stock of buildings. And that if we preserve them, we're going to remain a really unique and special city in everybody's hearts. So thank you so much.
Picture, Andy?
Andy, you want to do the picture together with everyone that will be following? Let's hold, then. Let's invite Terry Cantrell. He's chair of the Historic Preservation Board, and we'd like to recognize May 2026 as historic, of course, preservation month. Also, he's going introduce yeah, let's do it together. Let's do it together once Terry finishes. The award recipients will join us together for the photo. I think it'll be nice that way.
Okay. All right.
Yeah. We'll do a
great Thank you very much, Mayor. So should I go? Am I good?
Yes, please.
All right. Thank you, everybody. Terry Cantrell, chair of your Historic Preservation Board. And our favorite time of year, May, for Historic Preservation Month. We have a bevy of awards. We have more awards this year than we've ever had. So hang on your hats. Here we go. It's going be interesting here. We're going to have a slideshow in just a second.
I know it'll come up. There's a couple of words here that are, I think, very special. As soon as we get the slide show up here, we'll be ready to go here. The first one is for, of all things, the Block 40 Great Southern Hotel Food Hall. Now, you all may remember the saga of the Great Southern Hotel.
I was very much involved in that way back in 2022, 'three, and 'four. And I think only Commissioner Hernandez was around back then on the P and D board when we approved the 1818 project, which is Block 40. And the goal was to save and preserve the Great Southern Hotel. Unfortunately, as we all know, it wasn't possible. There was long delays in the construction of the project.
So as a result, the building itself had deteriorated. But happily, we had a very cooperative developer who was willing to replicate the old hotel. And that's what we have now. So realizing that it's been open for a couple years now, we never really recognized this work of replicating and semi restoring Great Southern Hotel, which is probably one of the oldest structures in Hollywood. So we thought it was very appropriate to do that today with month, with this awards for this year. So I'm not sure if anybody's here from Block 40. But what we're going to do, rather than have everybody come up individually, I'm going to ask all the awardees to line up behind me. We'll give them their plaque. And we'll take a photograph when we're done with that. So Block 40.
So the next one in line, this is the Art and Culture Center at 1650 Harrison Street. What a project. Of course, General Obligation Bond Project. As chair of GOB advisory group, we were monitoring this project a lot. I know it took a little bit more extra money, but look what we got for it. We got one of the most beautiful projects of all the GOB. And I'm sure most all of us have been in the building. We've already held events there for the local civic association. And it just came out spectacular. The architect went above and beyond.
And thanks to DCM, Jose Cortez, and his group, this project came to fruition. And look what we have now. So this is an award, too. So whoever is going to accept that award, hopefully somebody from DCM can line up behind me, too. And we'll give them their plaque. The next award is a very special award. It recognizes we thought it was very important to recognize the one hundred year anniversary party that we had last year. And what a great job that C Med did organizing that, culminating in the incredible weekend event, party that we all had in November. So we thought it was more than appropriate. Again, we don't necessarily concentrate on projects per se.
It's anything involved with historic preservation and the history of Hollywood. And this one is absolutely in that category, too. So if anybody from SEMA is going to line up here behind me or stand get close to me. We'll give you your plaque. And now, of course, headed up by Joanne Hussey, doing a wonderful job.
A part of that one hundred year celebration was an effort by the Historical Society and Steve Sarsfield, longtime member and videographer here in Hollywood, has done some really, really great projects, too. And he put together, again, something that was shown at the November weekend party. And it was a one hundred year celebration, a centennial celebration of Hollywood, one hundred years. And Steve is also here to accept his award as well. And that's the type of film or project that will live forever.
We'll be looking at that ten, twenty, thirty years from now. And there's only going to be one 100 year anniversary, folks. And that was last year. So we're going to be able to watch that film that Steve Sarisfield made, All right? So thank you again, Steve, that.
Next project that we're going to award is an actual building project, an actual construction project here in Hollywood. And it was very special to me because this is not far from where I live in the lakes. I spent a lot of time walking around. Every morning. Lynn and I take our two mile hike. And we've always watched this. We've always liked this house, 1949 House on Van Buren Street. And it had a canvas awning. You can see the photo in the above shows a before photograph. And it was this ordinary looking green canvas awning that was in need of replacement, I guess.
And so the applicant is here now. And Diane did a wonderful job. It came before the preservation board. And I thought it was particularly special because it shows that you can take a small scale project it doesn't have to be a major infill housing project or anything and do something so special to the house and bring it back. And it's kind of thing that we encourage those type of projects in the historic neighborhood.
So Diane is also here for that award. And she'll be up here in just a second, too. That's 1133 Van Buren Street, Diane Plunkett. We have another word that the board thought was important to recognize. And that is there's a series of small scale two door apartment buildings that have been along Hollywood Beach, along Ocean Drive for quite a while.
And we thought it was important to recognize those because as we look towards more development on the beach, and we think it's important to recognize this, most of them were designed by the same architect. They've been there for quite a while. But they've been maintained beautifully so. And I I think Diana Pitarelli is here, is a beach resident and a preservation board member along with me. And she's going to accept this award, too. So we thought that was a very significant award to recognize, too, as we look forward to potentially developing more along the beach. This is the type of thing that kind of works low scale, eight, nine, 10 story apartment buildings with, in this case, a two door type style.
I think it's Eugene Bold who's here on behalf of the Hollywood Beach Civic Association. So Eugene, come on up.
Yeah. Great.
Line up.
Yeah, line up here, please, by me, if you would. And we also have an award finally, an award that the Historical Society asked us to present, which is a very worthy award. It's to Robert McCarthy, a Lakes resident, longtime Lakes resident here yes, thank you who did a lot to preserve downtown, some of the older downtown structures. We all remember Club M. It's been plaqued by the Historical Society. And we agreed 100% with the Historical Society that this was a very worthy award to give to the late Robert McCarthy. So we thank everybody for that. All right. That is basically the awards this year, seven of them. We did that in record time.
Congratulations, everybody. And thank you so much for all your respective contributions to preserving, celebrating, and investing in the historical properties and occasions in the city of Hollywood. Thank you so much. The work goes a long way. We know the historical properties tell the story of the city, And we're really fortunate to have people like yourselves who help tell the story and celebrate it and invest in it. Thank you so much.
Thank you very much. Come up for a photo.
It's okay. Okay. Trust me.
Ready right here.
Thank you, Randy.
All right. Moving right along, everyone. We are not done yet.
Yes.
Because Terry is here to present the annual report for the Historic Preservation Board, followed by the Sustainability Advisory Committee, the artwork selection committee. And then we'll talk community development and talk about the task force for ending homelessness. So a lot of good substance. And we'll turn it over to Terry now for the Historic Preservation Board annual report.
Thank you very much, mayor. Again, Terry Cantrell, chair of your Historic Preservation Board. And this is, again, our favorite time of year. We appreciate the fact that the city and you folks recognize our work and our effort to preserve historic properties in the three districts. You know, we have three districts.
We are a CLG, a certified local government, created in 1995. There's only about 45 or 50 of those in the state of Florida that allows us to have a historic district and a historic ordinance. And we take it very, very seriously. Our mission statement is well known. And we are obligated to review and consider projects of any size within a certain financial parameter, of course.
In the three historic districts, we have, of course, the Lakes Historic District, Downtown, and then the Beach Historic District. An This eye chart, but it will give you an idea of some of the areas, the three historic districts, the overlay districts. And also, we do have what we call historic property overlay sites. And there's about 23 or 24 of these sites all over the city, not just on the East side of town, that are specially designated by the city over the course of the year so that we've had the preservation ordinance. Those listed there.
And all this is available on the website, by the way. It's a lot easier to read there. That's for sure. Here's a project that we approved last year at 1929 Hollywood Boulevard. Again, we approved projects that involve changes in facades in downtown, which is very, very important. This particular project I happen to like, because I happen to like art deco and mid century modern type designs. And this is a good example of that as well. Here, of course, is a project that you folks were intimately involved with at 1317 Harrison Street, coming along very nicely. If you go down Harrison Street, you see how much work they're doing right now. That'll be the end product.
And I guarantee you, next year, that'll be an award for sure. And right across the street is another project that I believe Commissioner Gruber's brother is doing that's restoring another very old just as old as his house, too, which would really be nice, too. Interesting project here that we approved last fall. It was a lot that was And two modern that's based This show that it's just all about older historic Mediterranean revival. We also encourage and support this type of design because, as we know, fifty years from now, that'll be historic.
That's how you look at it now. So fifty years is the National Park Service's guideline for historic properties. Again, on the beach, 501 South Surf Road, a very interesting project, actually a four story project built by Wright, no variances, very interesting project, just a little south of Hollywood Boulevard on Surf Road. That was one of our approvals. Here's just a sample of some of the other projects. Of course, the restaurant is going to find that's Florio's, by the way. I think they came before you folks for something, too. So that's going to be a very interesting project. And that could very well get into war, too. And they were able to do that without having to raze the building, which is even more so amazing.
Again, a lot of people think a lot of people are afraid to come before the preservation board or apply for a preservation application because they think it's going to fail. It's going to take too much time. We actually do not deny anything. We rarely, if ever, deny anything. If we issue a denial, it's usually because staff recommends it.
What we tend to do is we tend to spend time, if needed, to work with the applicant to get them to change their design, to tweak the design. And we have a couple of very good architects that are very knowledgeable in historic preservation. More is much better to try to work with the applicant to get them to maybe alter something to make it a little more acceptable to the board. Do that. Rarely do we ask an applicant to come back before us.
That's a radical change we're asking for. Then we might want to see it again. But for the most part, we will approve projects conditionally with the applicant going back, working with staff to make the changes that we had recommended. So I think that's a very important part. We're very interested in getting these projects through and not delaying the applicant any way we can, too. So I think that's all I have. Oh, yes. This is just a review of some of our board members. Again, I thank you very much.
Thank you. Vice Mayor Caleri.
Great job, Terry, on the presentation and capturing all of that. I know we've talked about it many other times before. Watching these pictures and listening to the discussion, I know that there is a historical board overlay an area. But just on my travels in District 3, for example, on Park Road, right at the Y, the old Butler House, they have a vintage signage now that says the old Butler House. You go down Fillmore Street, the Coral Rock Houses.
I mean, there's just all these niches everywhere. And I don't know. I know I brought it up in the past. I don't know if we've gotten any legwork. But trying to preserve some of those homes throughout the entire city of Hollywood and almost like a tour of history that is available, I think would be so beneficial, especially with the growth that we have. We are developing areas and it kind of puts that change, but then to also bring back that old school feeling and history notability throughout the entire city. I don't know if you guys have made any progress or any direction that is available, but there are some really quaint areas and homes throughout the entire city that have so much history that it would be beneficial.
Well, there's nothing that we would like better. I know a person would like better than to see the historic districts expanded or at least overlay areas. And I'm so glad that you mentioned it too. Because in District 3, Commissioner, you have some of the most original mid century modern homes Charles Reed Homes, Claus Moorburg Homes. And those are just they're gems. They're spectacular. Clara is here tonight. I can tell you that she lives in one of those houses right in the Park East. So yes, there are areas. Parkside south of downtown is full of older Bay R.
Lukens design homes, homes that should be saved. I know Lynn Smith will be here later. But she lives in a very old 1925 home that and again, there's no historic district. There's really no protection for them. It's just up to the applicant for the ownership. If they want to make improvements, there's nothing that the preservation board, because it's not part of our district.
But perhaps you could provide some type of direction. Direction. And then also just thinking ahead WONG: of the future, like even the home at was it 1912, right? I think it was at the
JULIE Yes.
JULIE Yeah.
No, it was nineteen twenty something.
There's just so much history that's And I think because you are the historical board preservation, and we've talked about this I know we have about preserving those homes.
There are
some people who have already done that, some of the names that you've mentioned. But also providing we're a touristy area, providing that historical tour type of map or travel that people can actually see the history of Hollywood, where it was, where it is, and where it's going to be. So just I don't know if you can take that and run with it and create something that I think would be so valuable.
I think I see Commissioner Schuhem has chimed in here. She's probably going to talk about the historical survey that we commissioned some time ago. But go ahead.
Well, that. But I wasn't. But yes, so we identified a lot of those houses. And I couldn't agree with you more, Vice Mayor Calhary. But I see Dana Gallup here. And Dana, I know it's premature, and I don't want to put you on the spot. But the historical society is trying to encourage historic homeowners to have their homes declared historic. And Dana's been working with staff to try to come up with like a program so people know there is a way for them to protect their own house from future demolition. So I don't know, like I don't want to put you on the spot, but if you want to update us on your ideas and the incentives and where you guys are hoping to go with this.
Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner. Yeah, I'm trying to work with the city because, as you may know, there are state laws now that, in some instances, tie the city's hands in terms of what they can do to preserve historic structures. And one of them is a flood law that basically says that if you are a property in a flood zone, that the city is essentially powerless to stop the demolition of that property. And we've faced that with a number of homes last year and structures.
If you look at the law, the flood law, there's an exception. There's three exceptions, one of which is if a property already is on the national, state, or local designation prior to the passage of the law, 2022. That really only applies to very few properties here. The one that I'm focused on is that post 2022, even to today, this city can designate a property as historic. The catch is that unlike in the past, for that exception to apply, the property owner must consent or apply for historic designation.
So what we're trying to do with the Hollywood Historical Society in cooperation with the city, the city already has a historic designation program. It's already there. However, to my knowledge, it's not really publicized. It's not on the website conspicuously. And it's just not publicized. We want to get the word out with the city. Obviously, the Historic Society wants to do our part to let owners of historic properties know that they have an opportunity to protect their home from demolition in perpetuity in the future, right?
Are there property tax exemptions that they could be eligible for if they're designated historic? Are you aware?
I'm not aware, but that's something that should be talked about to It's not incentivize what because
already in
law. Yeah. Because one of the things
JOSHUA There should
JOSHUA
be. And there may be some hesitancy by certain owners. There's a perception I don't really agree with the perception that if you designate your home as historic and therefore exempt from demolition, that somehow that might reduce the property value. So it would be good to incentivize the current owners of those properties, give them something that runs with the home to pass on to future owners of that property. So I look forward to working with the city to try to publicize that program and get as many homes designated as possible within the historic district.
Because without that, as we've seen last year, properties have come before the Historic Preservation Board, in some instances, in front of the commission. And that's been the rub, that there's really no ability to stop demolition. The only thing really the historic preservation board can do and they've done a great job doing this, as Terry mentioned is once the home is demolished, seeing that the structure that replaces it is consistent with the neighborhood and so forth. But we would prefer to preserve the property in the first instance, especially when it is hopefully in relatively good shape and can be preserved.
I think we've been good stewards on making sure that that happens. History is, as we know, so important. So whatever we can do to help.
Yeah. And I'll just say that I think we had sent Andrea and I know, Danny, you've researched it. I've researched it like what other cities are doing as far as tax incentives or other incentives. So it's something we'll continue to work with planning and development on to see what we can come up with.
All right. Thank you all so much. Thank you. Appreciate it.
Thank you, everybody. And again, from your lips to staff's ears, that's what it's going take at this point. All All that right.
Sustainability Advisory Committee, ladies and gentlemen. Let's have Julia Politis come on up.
We're not taking a picture with him.
No. These are board reports. Julia, welcome.
Afternoon. Good afternoon, city mayor and commission. My name is Julia Polialis. I've served as chair for the last five years for the Sustainability Advisory Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to be here today, for your continued commitment to advancing sustainability within our city.
I would also like to recognize our staff liaisons, Elaine Franklin and Chris Roshchuk, along with our newest team member, Melissa Fostett, whose leadership and collaboration have been instrumental in moving our initiatives forward. Today I will be reviewing our accomplishments from the past year, as well as sharing the priorities and initiatives we will continue advancing moving forward. One of the key areas we focused on was micro transit connectivity. If you can go to the next slide, or is this, do I use this thing? Okay.
Wonderful. Oh, here's us at the appreciation evening. That was supposed to be there we go. These are some of the goals that we were working on for 2025, and this is what I'm going to be reviewing today. So moving on, one of the key areas we focused on was the micro transit connectivity referenced in the slide is the updated service area that has been implemented.
We had invited engineering staff to discuss gaps and east to west transportation access throughout the city. As a result, improvements were implemented to enhance connectivity for residents who need it most. Next, we invited public utility staff and representatives from CDM Smith to present the city's storm water management plan. The presentation was extremely comprehensive. I don't think, am I missing?
Oh, that's that one. My apologies. The presentation was extremely comprehensive and we were quite pleased to see the extensive planning and long term strategies being developed to address flooding and resiliency throughout the city. We have also been working with public works on the city community composting pilot program to increase participation and ensure long term success. After evaluating community feedback, we were able to update the program to ensure accessibility.
The staff is working on finalizing the adjustments and we are optimistic that these changes, combined with expanded outreach efforts, will lead to measurable increases in participation in waste diversion over the coming year. Moving on, our coalition has significantly expanded to include municipalities across both Broward and Miami Dade Counties, we are proud to share we have now evolved to the Sustainability Advisory Committee Coalition of South Florida, bringing together the cities of Coral Springs, Davie, Plantation, Fort Lauderdale, Key Biscayne, Miami Beach, and Miami Shores. This expansion strengthens our ability to align policies, share resources, and implement cohesive sustainability strategies across jurisdictions. One of our coalition members even suggested creating an official logo for the coalition, which I've been working on and is displayed on the screen today. Key topics we are actively collaborating on with our coalition partners include several regional sustainability initiatives that many of our cities are currently facing together.
One of our major topics is fertilizer ordinance alignment to help protect water quality. Earlier this year, we submitted this recommendation to the City of Hollywood Commission. Similar ordinances have been adopted in cities such as Fort Lauderdale and Miami. And by aligning with neighboring municipalities, we can help reduce nutrient pollution entering our waterways during the rainy season, reduce unnecessary fertilizer waste, and support long term environmental and public health goals across our waterways. Another major focus has been organic waste diversion and composting programs.
Many cities are actively exploring sustainable alternatives to landfill disposal, as South Florida is facing a waste crisis. We are happy that the City of Hollywood is already in motion with our current pilot program. We have also continued discussions surrounding plastics and polyestering reduction policies where Hollywood has taken a leadership role by providing tools, resources, and guidance to neighboring municipalities. Elaine recently met with Fort Lauderdale Sustainability Advisory Committee, which is now pursuing similar recommendations for their own commission. And lastly, we have noticed we all would like to strengthen our communication and collaboration between city and staff and sustainability advisory committees to ensure environmental considerations are included earlier in the planning and decision making processes, instead of when plans are in their final stages.
Through this coalition, we are building a connection that was missing and sharing resources that support sustainability efforts across South Florida. One of our discussions that has also expanded regionally is the issue of artificial turf. Fort Lauderdale Sustainability Advisory Committee recently invited experts to their meeting who provided a detailed presentation on the environmental and public health impacts associated with plastic grass. If you recall, this is an issue I raised in last year's presentation. And after further research, expert discussions, reviewing lifestyle impacts, it became clear that many of the common claims supporting artificial turf are not the best decision for our community.
This is a multi layered issue impacting public health, environmental sustainability, storm water management, and long term financial planning. When evaluated over the full life cycle of the product, natural grass, in many cases, can be more cost effective while also providing significantly greater environmental and public health benefits. Artificial grass does not align with our broader sustainability goals to reduce plastics throughout our community. While we simultaneously replace natural landscapes with synthetic plastic materials on athletic fields and public spaces, this creates a disconnect within our own ordinances. While artificial turf can be used in certain circumstances at a small scale, it should not be viewed as a long term replacement for natural grass, which plays an important role in cooling urban environments, absorbing storm water, supporting biodiversity and helping mitigate flood impacts.
Our role is not simply to oppose solutions, but to support informed and balanced decision making that aligns with the city's environmental, financial and public health priorities. We are continuing to work on this with city staff to present a complete package. In the meantime, we recommend prioritizing natural and sustainable solutions whenever feasible and continuing to lead by example as a city. The decisions made at the municipal level influence community behavior and it is important that our actions reflect the sustainability values we promote. As we move forward, our committee will continue to focus on relaunching the composting program, developing a protocol to address water quality issues, reviewing procurement practices and vendor contracts to encourage stronger sustainability commitments from the companies serving our city, and continuing to advance recommendations related to fertilizer ordinances and artificial turf policies aligned with neighboring municipalities.
As you can see, our committee is actively working across multiple fronts to implement practical, forward thinking solutions that benefit both our residents and our environment. The decisions we make today will shape the future resilience, health, and sustainability of our city for generations to come. We appreciate your continued support and collaboration as we work together to build a stronger, more sustainable Hollywood for the future. Thank you for your time.
Thank you so much to everybody who's volunteering on the board. You guys Thank helped take us further, and we thank you.
Thank you. Thank you for all your commitments and the staff that we continue to grow.
Appreciate it. Thank you so much. Commissioner Schuham, real quick, go ahead.
Yeah, of course. I want to say thank you, Julia. But I really just don't want it to be lost. This idea of creating a regional group of cities is really fantastic. It always helps to collaborate, share ideas. And it's just another way I know our staff does it with their relationships with their peers in other cities. But for you to have that volunteer connection is great. And just ask you to share with us any good stuff that you hear.
Yes. It's been very instrumental and very resourceful for everybody. I have such great feedback from
the
logo. Thank you.
All
right. Let's go ahead now to the artwork selection committee. Is John McMillan here? There he is, McMillian. Welcome. Welcome, John.
You, honorable mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. John McMillian. I'm the chair for the art selection committee for the city of Hollywood. Our focus is on bringing art to the community. One of the things that we did this year that we're proud of is bringing back an official Hollywood art festival, which was held at the Young Circle Arts Park.
It was our first year. We learned a lot. We hope to grow and expand and ask for consideration for increased budget. One of the other things we're looking to do is bring art back to the Arts Park Building. June 11, we're going to be having a showcase of local artists. And we invite you all, please, to attend, six to nine. The city's been kind enough to sponsor the event. And one thing about Hollywood that I really love is I feel there's a great opportunity here. I've often gone to Fort Lauderdale and other cities for their art festivals. So I'm glad it's back, I guess, after an extended period of time.
And hopefully, one of the things I learned is to create a coalition with other interested minded people and organizations So it can be something premier to challenge that perhaps of Fort Lauderdale and other cities, because I believe there's a lot of talent here. And that's really all I have to say.
Thank you, John. Well, we love how art enriches our city and the downtown and even the halls here at City Hall. And so thank you for all your work of your committee. Looking forward to more. Commissioner Schuham?
Yes, sorry. John, I just want to say I was at this the art fest. And it didn't get a ton of publicity, but it was really beautiful. And the artwork there was great. And for the event that you're talking about on June 11, I don't know about the rest of the commission, but I don't see that on our calendar. So can you make sure that the details get sent to maybe Joanne Hussey or somebody that they can make sure we get it?
Yes, ma'am. And thank you.
Thank you. Thanks.
Thank you. All right, ladies and gentlemen. Let's invite Ryan Coot, Director of Housing and Community Development, to talk to us about the fiscal year twenty twenty five office overview. Your staff has been sitting here, I think, pretty patiently. Or is that financial services staff?
That's finance.
Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager, deputy city manager, city attorney, Ryan Coote, community development, sorry, housing and community development director. And I'm here to provide the commission with an overview of how we're leveraging not only the ILA, but our other dollars to make an impact in the city of Hollywood. So bear with me as I go through a few slides. I'll brief. I know we've a long day today, but I want to make sure you get to understand how your dollars are making an impact in this community.
So, our CDBG is the first one I want to talk about, and how we're leveraging those dollars to make improvements to city facilities, and also helping our non profit partners to be more impactful. One the things that we did this year, was provide the Boys and Girls Club at the Blvd Heights Center with $250,000 in CDBG dollars, to help them with their current expansion of the teen center. We're proud of this initiative because it provides teenagers with an access point where they can go learn, they can tutor and have different activities to help keep them engaged. We're also entertaining right now with them another offer because they've encountered some cost overruns that were unexpected in the construction and we do have additional CDBG dollars that we can help them to move this project forward, so they can complete their project in time. So, we'll be bringing that to the commission for consideration, as well, too.
We also supported initiative at Bob Butterworth Park, where we improved that park with CDBG dollars and also added a court memorial, as well, too. This is going to bring another level to the park, make it more a walking path, benches, a court memorial, make the park more conducive for people to use that park every day. We also work closely with Parks and Recreations and we provide them with over $400,000 to purchase much needed equipment, furniture and other resources for a lot of our LMI parks and community centers throughout the city Of Hollywood. And, we're currently working with our partners over at Public Works to do about 600,000 CDBG to purchase much needed street lights to replace broken street lights damaged, I'm sorry, damaged street lights and install new street lights in a lot of our LMI areas. So, you can see our CDBG dollars at work in this slide.
Now, I'm not going take too much time with this one, because you're going to be hearing from Mitch Anton in the next meeting, who is the chair of our CDAB board, really focused on our public services, but at a high level, we gave about $237,000 in public service dollars, a combination of CDBG and CD dollars, to various non profits in Hollywood that provide everything from food assistance, to essential services to people in need. But, you'll hear more from that when Mitch comes up next meeting, to discuss how they move those dollars forward and how we're impacting the city with those. Now, our rehab program. It's a pretty robust program. I'm proud to say that, with our neighborhood pride, and our federally funded and state funded rehab program, we accomplished 92 rehabs last year.
70% of which were ILA, at 64 of them. Eighty two were from the SHIP funded program. This year, we're in Right now, we're already at 49 this year. I don't think we're going quite get to 92, because we're way ahead by this We're about fifty six by this time last year, but we'll come very close to that number this year, which is a good, good thing for us, cause it shows that the program works and people are getting their houses repaired and we're doing what it's intended to do. We did about nine owner occup I'm sorry, nine first time home buyer purchases last year.
This year alone, we're already at eight. So, we definitely want to make sure we beat that goal, because that program is picking up steam once again. A lot of condos, we're going figure out some ways to get some more of these single family homes sold, we got to look at that a little bit deeper, but we are moving to beat that goal of nine last year and we will, because we already have three right now that are in the hopper. As they go through the process, hopefully, can be added to this list and we'll do a lot more with that program. Of course, our ILA, not only pays for affordable housing and rehab, but also infrastructure funding.
So, we work closely with engineering and public works to provide the dollars that they need to do sidewalk improvements, ADA, add ADA, accessible ramps within sidewalks, and also other things that are needed within our LMI communities to make sure people can traverse the communities safely. In addition to that, what you don't see here, is we also partner closely with C Med on the work skills portion. I'm proud to say that last cycle, they partnered with OIC, through the fiber optic program, and all residents that participated graduated with a certificate. And they're on pace this year. They've partnered with the Boys and Girls Club this year, they've partnered with OIC again, and they've also partnered with Junior Achievement to administer programs for people who want apprenticeships and job skill development.
So, that program is moving forward nicely as well. Of course, our affordable housing initiatives, this year, to date, we have approximately about eight sixty two affordable units that are coming, that are online or coming online for the city of Hollywood. We've expended about over $9,000,000 in gap financing to help bring much needed affordable housing to the city of Hollywood. And, of course, other things that you wouldn't know that we are doing in the city right now, with our home funding, we're actually partnered with planning right now and we're actually providing the resources for the housing needs assessment study. So, we're using home dollars to actually pay for that study, that will play a role in developing the comprehensive plan.
We also use our home dollars to provide tenant based rental assistance. That program is actually very important, because it's preventing people from becoming homeless, or entering into homelessness. So, we provide them with a subsidy for a couple months to get them situated. The nonprofit provides much more than just that, but wrap around services to make sure they're financially stable, where they have the skills and resources to become independent, once they're weaned off the program. In addition to that, we also have home ARP money, where we're partnering with the Task Force for Ending Homelessness, who are here right now, and they'll be presenting to you guys later on today, about an initiative that we had a couple weeks back, where we're on the street with Commissioner Hernandez, Gruber and Biederman, where you engage the population in Hollywood.
You'll hear more from Jacob on that in a few. But, what they do for us in a multi year contract, is they provide active street outreach. So, they're engaging people who are experienced, the unsheltered population, they're engaging them on the street to give them the resources and try to move them out of, try to effectively move them from homelessness to some kind of stable placement. So, we use home ARP money for that. We have a multi year agreement with them to provide these services. We also partner with the Broward Outreach Center, or the Care in Place, they're here, too, as well. I think Keith's back there right now. And we use home ARP dollars on a multi year contract, too, as well, for that. And we provide emergency shelter, case management, workforce development and housing placement. It's a full gamut of wrap around services.
On average, well, every quarter, they're providing about 30 households at that program with services. So, it's a lot going on with that program. And, that program, believe it or not, has both those programs have really organically worked to improve our community core initiative. You know, we received Department of Justice funding for our community core initiative. We're in the thirty year of a five year program and this program has really taken off and a lot of it has to do with the staff, Angela Blain, who works in the program.
As you can see, these numbers are very impressive, you know, 21 people have graduated and have attained some kind of housing. That's a big deal when it comes to somebody who's chronically homeless. You have over seven sixty two clients that are served in the program. So, why I say that is because the program is held in Broad Outreach Center right now. We have a natural relationship with them where somebody can go from community court into placement, but the task force is there as well, too, to connect them to all other services that are in the area.
If you've never been to the program, I urge you to come and take a look at the program. It's pretty dynamic how it works and you see where it's making an impact in the city. And, of course, everything we do here is these four pillars that we try to preserve and expand affordable housing, we want to improve neighborhood infrastructure, we want to support vulnerable populations. We want to enhance the overall community stability of community development. And with that, I know I was quick, but you've got long day today and these are just some highlights of what we've done last year. If there's any questions, I'm here to answer them.
So Ryan, thank you so much. We love the reach the number of programs that community development has been able to usher into the community. Just as it concerns us with regards to the Neighborhood Pride program and the ILA with the county, if there are categories of work or you think percentage thresholds that agreement might have not have contemplated when we first adopted it, I'd like to hear the feedback, really, of staff. If there are those areas where percentages, again, ought to be tweaked for the sake of maximizing the deployment of dollars without delay, let us know. We'd love to engage the county with that if necessary and help to keep things fluid if you find reason.
Absolutely. Well, the city manager's already asked us to look into these things, and we are actively working that with Deputy City Manager Reichbach and City Manager Stoehr. We can look at these things right now.
Right. Looking forward to hearing about that in the next meeting.
20%. Yes,
sir. You so much.
All right. Thank you, guys.
Appreciate it. Thank you. All right. Let's go ahead. Thank you for your patience, Mr. Jacob Torner, Vice President of Programs for the Task Force Reigning Homelessness and Finance. You guys are up next.
I was going say, I'm not here to represent finance. Mayor, vice mayor, members of the commission, thank you. Jacob Torner, vice president of programs at the task force for ending homelessness. Before I get into the data that we're going to share with you, I just want to take a moment to congratulate this body and all of your charter officers. As someone who grew up here and spends lots of time in Hollywood, downtown and on the beach, it's no surprise to anyone that each year, each day, Hollywood becomes more beautiful and more invested in the residents and the community.
And we heard that from all the presentations this morning. So I just want to thank you all. Today, I'm going to inform you about the Voices of the Street activity, which took place here in Hollywood on March 10. It was done as a collaborative effort. Voices of the Street is performed on years where the county board votes to not conduct a federal point in time count.
And the purpose of the Voices of the Street survey is to serve in lieu of that point in time count and offer municipalities an opportunity to have data on the people on the streets, but more importantly, to be able to leverage that data to drive solutions and strategies that clean up our streets and get people the help they need. As you see on your screen, just a couple of pictures from those who are involved in Voices of the Street. Hollywood Police Department and Hollywood Fire Rescue, brave men and women who protect our communities every day, made it a point to very much participate in this activity. Officer Chung, who I am sure is no stranger to this city, works tirelessly every day and has I think he's the longest standing homeless outreach officer in the entire county because he is so committed to this work and made this event a success. Similarly, you see your Department of Housing and Community Development, Ryan, Angela, and Sabrina, who also were instrumental in this.
And of course, can't forget the commissioner who's on our screen today, Commissioner Gruber. Thank you for being there. Similarly, thank you Commissioner Hernandez and Commissioner Biederman. As Ryan said, these commissioners were not just at the event, they were on the ground. If they were wearing shoes with white soles that day, those shoes left dirty because they really got into the trenches and we appreciate them for that. So a couple of things before we get into the data. We mentioned on the ground support from this commission. We had over 72 volunteers from this county come into Hollywood and support this initiative. In addition to our public safety partners, we had corporations like City National Bank send their staff. We had educational institutions like Nova Southeastern University, both their medical school and their public health school.
All volunteers received training, was conducted with our friends at the county commission chambers. We partnered with, very importantly, the Caring Place, who provided us with a headquarter location perfectly situated right there on Scott Street. And as you know, the Caring Place does so much for this community and its residents. So I just want to extend an appreciation to you, Keith, and your team. Laundry Spot, which actually provides laundry services to those who are experiencing homelessness on a recurring schedule, and many, many others. More than 100 hygiene kits were prepared. Yes, ma'am. That's correct. Thank you, Vice Mayor. It is Ms.
Vesey Einhorn's laundry. Over 100 hygiene kits were prepared by our NSU students and passed out. And we had some unintended or unexpected successes where we were actually able to get people off the street same day during the activity. So getting into the data, why you all are here, we collected two thirty one surveys on March 10. The number I want you all to focus on is 198 which were collected here in the city limits within the jurisdiction of Hollywood.
We conducted 95 interviews, which are long form interviews, and 136 short term or short form interviews, also known as observations. 33 responses were collected outside of Hollywood. However, that is significant and should be to this commission because we examined where those individuals were identified and they were directly on on your border with your neighboring jurisdictions. Getting into demographics, we saw that demographics in Hollywood similarly reflect the county wide demographics for those who experience homelessness. In age, we noticed a significant population of individuals who are over the age of 55.
And so what I like to say when I see that is that we have a graying and aging crisis of homelessness. I'm sure you all see as you travel the communities, people who are out there on the streets are using walkers. They're being pushed by someone in a wheelchair. Some of those people are actually younger, but many of them are aging and they're aging on the streets. We also had six honorable veterans who served our country and our community who are still living out there on the streets.
That's unacceptable. Fortunately, with our close partners at the Department of Veterans Affairs who were on the ground with us that day, we were able to connect veterans to support services. It was also notable that over thirty two percent of the respondents reported that they're struggling with mental health issues. Over twenty one respondents reported an alcohol and substance use disorder. A fifth with a physical health condition, and a quarter of the respondents with other chronic health conditions.
All very significant when you think about the strategies that we need to use to address homelessness. And we're going to talk about a summary of our findings and recommendations at the end. Where people were sleeping was also significant because, as you all know, Section 125.0231 Florida Statues created Florida's public camping law, which resulted from a previous state legislative session. And this municipality, along with every other one in this state, has an obligation to not allow regular overnight public camping. And so when we looked at where people were sleeping on the night that we surveyed, we found a large portion of respondents are sleeping in public spaces.
People sleeping on streets and sidewalks, in parks, forming outdoor encampments, at our bus benches and train stations, under bridges, and even some who are in their vehicles or on a boat. We also looked at whether or not this was the first time that person had experienced homelessness. And what we saw shockingly was that forty percent of the respondents had become homeless for the first time during that occurrence. Similarly, how long people have been experiencing homelessness was very interesting to collect in this community. What we found was that while there is a large number of people who have been experiencing homelessness for greater than thirty six months, there is, consistent with that observation in the previous question, a good amount of folks who have just become homeless.
And that represents what we call a front end crisis. We also looked at how long the people that we were surveying stayed in a shelter or somewhere other than on the streets over the last three years. And we found that some of them, 32% in particular, stayed off the streets for zero to three months. Employment was only at eleven percent. And we know that for people to be successful, they need to have income.
There needs to be economic prosperity and opportunities for the people that we serve. And so this directs our energy and our resources to ensuring that people do become employed, not just housed. People in Hollywood and whether or not they've been in Hollywood for a significant period of time was also something we assessed. More than 45 of the respondents had been in Hollywood for greater than three years. Common misconception I hear, I deal with probably more than a dozen municipalities each and every week, is that people come to my city to be homeless or someone sends the homeless to our community because we have great resources or we have lax policing.
But the reality is, Mr. Mayor, commissioners, a large portion of the people on your streets are actually Hollywood residents. And as you saw on the previous slide, a large amount of them have just become homeless. We also looked at whether or not folks are receiving disability benefits and nearly 70% of the people Hollywood experiencing homelessness are not receiving mainstream benefits. So to wrap things up, what we're seeing, Mr.
Mayor, commissioners, 46% of people are visible in our community at a minimum, meaning that they're living on streets and sidewalks and public spaces, which impacts community safety and quality of life. As I had mentioned, there is a front end crisis. And I'll be fair, this is not limited to Hollywood nor Broward County, and I know you all know that. Forty percent of people were first time homeless, eighteen percent within zero to three months, and that tells us that economic instability and the rising cost of housing is driving this crisis. We also know that needs are very complex.
We're not talking about a single need when we're talking about helping someone get off the streets. We're talking about health. We're talking about job training. We're talking about family support. We're talking about transportation barriers. The list goes on. But what we know for sure, based on the data that we've collected, is that a housing only approach is not effective. The approach that is proven to be most successful is an approach that involves wraparound support addressing the complex layer of needs that folks have. And so what must happen next? What can this commission do?
And how can you direct staff to continue making the great impact that you all have done? We need to act early to prevent homelessness. Some of those programs you heard Mr. Koot talking about, you all could consider, or that advisory board could consider looking at preventing homelessness for residents of Hollywood, ensuring that if someone's receiving an eviction notice in the city of Hollywood, that there's support, that there's interventions to determine how they got there in the first place, address those issues that led them there, and keep them in their house so that Hollywood doesn't have more people hitting the streets. Similarly, on the unsheltered side, we need to keep outreach strong and visible.
As Mr. Koo mentioned, our task force teams work on the streets seven days a week, engaging with people, responding to calls from business owners, calls from the city that receive complaints. And that is critical because these are the folks who are engaging them on the front lines and they're the ones building the trust and rapport necessary to motivate them to take the help that's there for them. We also are recommending to you formally that you consider a co response model. Earlier this year, the town of Davie Town Council, co response model, yes, Vice Mayor.
Earlier this year, the town of Davie Town Council unanimously approved and implemented a new program that we launched in collaboration with them, which places a trained recovery and housing specialist from the task force in a marked police car 40 a week. They're responding to calls for service. They're intervening in crisis situations. And very importantly and significantly, they've gotten more than a dozen people off the streets in just their first few months. And that's the town of Davie, which is pretty small with respect to this large city we're in today. So we do see that as a model to replicate. We also need to swiftly resolve encampments. I want to appreciate Mr. Koot, Ms. Blaine from the community development team.
The moment that a resident or a business owner reports an encampment or concerns at a public park, they immediately notify us of that. And our response time has been maintained at an average of forty two minutes to resolve those, ensuring that we're responding in person, addressing the complaint, whether that's helping that individual get into treatment or shelter or just empowering them to find somewhere that's a little bit better than staying in one of our public parks while they make that decision themselves. Third, balancing immediate responses with long term stability. This is the challenge. We know that the science to ending homelessness is pretty simple.
We need to have a greater outflow rate than we do inflow rate to lower our population and get to a place where it's a little bit more manageable. And you do that by long term strategies, getting people out of the system. But at the same time, we need to keep our streets and public spaces safe and clear. So that's where you balance the great investments you make, like at the Caring Place to ensure that there's shelter beds available for someone that day when they need them. And fourth is scaling clinical services.
Back to our previous slide on findings, these are complex needs. We can't just address them with housing or with case management. So what we've done since this, on March 10, is we've directed our behavioral health department, which is comprised of several licensed mental health professionals, to surge in the city of Hollywood. And so they're now also working on the streets more frequently in this community, consistent with what they're doing countywide. So with that, happy to take any questions. And I appreciate you all for your leadership to this community.
Thank you. Madam Vice Mayor.
So thank you for the presentation. It's very eye opening, obviously, for those who aren't aware of the homelessness issue that's going on. We did have, though, an officer a while back that was geared only towards homelessness. Thank you, Officer Chung, for everything you do. You're amazing.
But I know that the burnout rate is particularly high in that position. And in addition to that, I remember, and I don't know if things have changed, but the resource officer would go and try to get them out of their cars or get them in shelter. And there were a lot of obstacles. A, availability. B, if they were a lot of homeless have a pet with them and these facilities don't accept that. The willing with children, some weren't accepted. So there were so many challenges. Have we made any progress with those challenges? And if so, what could those be if you could enlighten us?
Thank you for the question, Vice Mayor. Quite a large question. But I would say, generally speaking, there's still a number of challenges with, if we wanted to say, how do we end homelessness today in the city of Hollywood? Primarily, we have a higher number of people than we do capacity for emergency interventions, shelters and transitional housing and treatment beds. So it starts there. It starts with ensuring that there's an adequate supply of stock, housing stock, emergency housing stock, for people to get off the streets. I do think we've made progress. Just in 2025, we released our annual report last week. Over 4,000 people have been assisted countywide in getting into shelter. A large percentage of that's right here in the city.
It's also thanks to this commission for funding the Caring Place directly. For many years that I worked in this community, they did not receive support, I believe, in this capacity from the city. And that's critical because our teams work side by side with them to ensure that if we find someone on the streets, we can get them into shelter. If the bed's full, Keith and his team do a great job of letting us know as soon as that bed's available so we can make connection. We've also expanded partnerships on the treatment side.
So that's another way, I think, that we've made improvements in that area, vice mayor, ensuring that with relationships at the Broward Addiction Recovery Center and other short term and long term residential programs, we're able to get people off the street same day. And then last, I'll just say to your point, the officers are definitely challenged. They work so hard. Their primary responsibility is to protect the community and they do that so well. And that's one of the reasons why we're recommending this particular model is because they no longer have to call for someone to come out, wait thirty minutes, wait an hour, wait a day.
They have to go to another call for service in that time. This allows the intervention to occur right away And it allows that knowledge to be there for not just that individual officer, but for the department and public safety as a whole.
Awesome. Thank you.
Thank you. Well, thank you. And thank you, Commissioner Gruber, for your work on the COC and working hand in hand with everyone regarding homelessness. It was kind of surprising, but not surprising, to see what I thought I saw, which was a statistic that seventy nine percent of the homeless folks who you've encountered have a mental health or a substance abuse issue. So that goes a long way to discussing what we as a society and as a country need to help to overcome and help with the years ahead, because that seems to be beyond the financial aspect that can cause homelessness, part of the reason why there is an inability to get out of it for those who don't have the mental capacity or perhaps have the dependency issues and addictions that are a problem.
But thanks to you, the task force. Thanks to the police department for doing their part. We want to make sure the streets are safe and the laws are enforced here in the city and that people get the help they need at the same time. So thank you so much.
Thank you.
All right. And shout out to the Caring Place, of course, Kevin and team. Thank you so much. You guys are an indispensable partner. Thank you so much. All right, finance team. And Mr. Quinlan, you'll be next, James. But let's go ahead first to a presentation by Moises Arisa. He's the partner with Hermes also with Hermes Garzon, who's our director of CBIZ, Inc. And they'll present the fiscal year twenty twenty five annual comprehensive financial report and the fiscal year audit results. And we, of course, have Ms. Stephanie Tinsley, our financial director right here in the city at the podium. Thank you. Stephanie.
Thank you, mayor. Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager, and staff. My name is Stephanie Tinsley. I'm the city so I was going to say city manager. Sorry, forgot to promote myself. Director of Financial Services.
She's not ready to retire yet, but thanks for letting us know you're interested.
Director of Financial Services for the City of Hollywood. I am pleased to present the FY 2025 ACFR. I just wanted to make a few comments before I turn it over to Hermes Garzone for his official presentation of the ACFR. Again, this year, we received an unmodified or clean opinion with no repeat findings or no findings at all. So that was a big one.
All of our major governmental and enterprise funds are in really good shape, either meeting or exceeding our fund balance policy minimums. So that was really a positive thing as well. The city expended approximately $50,000,000 in grant financing. And that also requires additional audit procedures. And with that, there were no compliance issues and no internal deficiencies or anything as well.
So we did very well with our expenditures there. We met all of our debt and investment policy requirements. And the ACFR this year was issued on May 5, which was three weeks earlier than last year. And it's been ten years since the city of Hollywood had issued the act for this early. And so I just like to recognize the Department of Financial Services staff because without their commitment, their work ethic, and their strong dedication with all the competing initiatives and priorities that they had this year, that would definitely not have been possible.
And I'd like to acknowledge the team. I asked them to come up to be up here so that they can be acknowledged and recognized for the hard work that they did.
Come on up, finance team. You've been sitting for two hours. Come on up. Such a patient group.
They're a shy group, just like we all are.
Come on up, stretch your legs, Coffee outside. Compliments of city manager Stephanie Tinsley. And
so this
JAMES Where's the coffee, HR? Tammy, where's that Cuban coffee, Tammy?
And so this is your finance team.
Thank Take you for keeping us in check, everybody. And according to our auditors, you guys are doing a great job. And please, if you recognize opportunities for the city to any department to be smarter or see opportunity in dollars that might be, quote unquote, sitting there, please let Ms. Tinsley know. She'll tell the city manager, and the city manager will tell us.
And it's a theme here, because we want to take advantage of all the opportunities to help every department and every aspect of the city move forward. And you all kind of probably see the bigger picture when looking at numbers than people that are necessarily working in the department sometimes. So please report up. Stephanie, of course, as your director, communicates that. And we hope to, again, put all the dollars to good work and keep, of course, the city functioning and appropriate accounting principles and what have you. So I think that's a great layup to our auditor, who found nothing. Go ahead. Come on up, auditor. We try to give you an interesting job, and it's Okay if it's boring, you know, because no news is good news when it comes to you, right?
SPEAKER Stephanie made my job very, very easy this time around. So I think she had a great summary. Just a very quick introduction. My name is Hermes Garzone. I'm a director for CBIPS, is external auditor of the city. So the only thing I would actually add to that, she's absolutely correct. As far as the financial statement opinion, we received an unmodified clean opinion. There were
no And you can stay standing, if you like. I mean, you probably want to stretch your legs. But if you want to sit, go ahead.
There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. The only thing I would highlight is there was a single audit that was performed. And the single audit is just triggered when the city expands more than $1,000,000 from federal awards or federal assistance and $750,000 on the state side. So we picked four programs in total. Those programs were the staffing for the Adequate Fire and Emergency Response, or SAFR grant, the ARPA funds,
so the
coronavirus state and local recovery funds. So those were the two federal. And then for the state side, we selected the drinking water facility construction program and the recently in Florida program. So nothing to report there as well, but just wanted to at least identify the actual programs that were tested. Okay. And that concludes my
whole Well, thank you so much. I know the ACFR is a full on book. And so this weekend, during Memorial Day, we know we're going to have nothing better to do but to read the financial report and ask Stephanie any questions we might have. Thank you all so much. All right. Appreciate it. All right. Thank you, finance team. Thank you. Let's get to item 10. Where's James Quinlan, another fellow who's been patiently waiting two hours? I see Adam here, folks from the Rhythm Foundation. Let's talk jazz. Item 10, I believe there was a speaker card the clerk had told me, and so that's what's kept us waiting. This, of course, is the resolution of the city commission authorizing the city to execute a concert agreement with Rhythm Foundation, Inc.
To provide producer services for the jazz festival concerts at the Arts Park in an amount up to $250,000 in accordance to the procurement court. COVID has the best interest. This will require a fiveseven vote, of course. And I know we've had a chance probably to talk about this item during our one on ones. Claire, come on up. Terry as well. They submitted the cards, but let's go ahead and have James present. But Claire and Terry and their desire to speak on this is what's kept you here for two hours. But that's Okay, because hopefully you've enjoyed sitting here and listening to the wheels of the city hall at play here at the city commission meeting. All right, James, Adam, take it away.
Thank you. Thank you very much, mayor and commission and esteemed administration here today. We are really, really proud to be in front of you today. This is the revival, if you would, of the historic jazz festival in Hollywood. A lot of people do remember that. That was the prior band shell to the amphitheater. And it ran for about twenty years, closed when the amphitheater was being built. And there's a groundswell that we've been feeling for bringing it back. And we've taken on the challenge. We have a new idea, though.
It's going to be a bit of a twist. It's going to be something that we think will really stand out in the marketplace and become not just a local and regional event, but something that is nationally recognized and celebrated. We're talking about the Hollywood Real Jazz Picnic. And that's the working title of the project that would have a culinary component. That's the picnic component.
We will be working with the local businesses to provide an opportunity to pre order a picnic that you will be able to pick up in the Arts Park on the day of the event, November 21 of this year. There will be a picnic provider, if you will, as well, helping with the setups and creating kind of a very interesting opportunity for people to be in the park in the afternoon and into the evening of Saturday. It's not going to be a late night show. It's not going be your typical concert. It's going to be a six hour presentation of six different groups, three from national and international recognition, and three local groups running continuously during that period, from 2PM to 8PM on the twenty first.
And one of the things we're really excited about that's going to make it a national project is the partnership affiliation that we have now verbally agreed with the SiriusXM satellite broadcaster, which is, as you know, not just The US, but it is all around the world, continuous signal that they provide. And through their real jazz channel, we'll have their personalities on-site, as well as a live transmission from Hollywood during the event, and use of the materials afterwards that they'll be recording. So that profile, we think, will really give us a great head start in establishing something that's new and special. It's going to be distinct, we think, from any other jazz offerings in the market. And we think it's going to have a really strong appeal to families and also be supporting the downtown businesses with the 8PM cutoff time.
We're going to encourage people to go into the downtown historic district and check out the fine dining opportunities. So we'll be interacting in a couple of ways with those businesses to try to also connect to this event. What else am I going to say? We really are very excited about the brand. We are bringing in people to support us, specific.
Once we get commitments here, we can go forward and really make it happen, we think, in a very established way and something that we can all celebrate and be proud of. My colleague Adam, the CEO of Rhythm Foundation. By the way, I'm James Quinlan. I don't think I introduced myself. For those of you that don't know me, I am the founder and now senior advisor of the Rhythm Foundation. We've been producing events in Florida since 1988.
JAMES And thank you, James. And again, thank you to our esteemed dais here. Two other things I'd like to add to James' statements. The jazz festival is actually a two day affair. It begins with the tree lighting ceremony on the Friday night.
So let's say, call it a day and a half. So we'll also have programming that is associated with the the tree lighting in the holiday market. And then Saturday is the is the two to six kind of full day experience. And by way of a proof of concept to gauge the local actual demand for jazz programming, we had a show on Saturday night at the Arts Park featuring kind of straight ahead real jazz talent. The vice mayor, we were happy to privileged to have her attendance to be able to oh, sorry, commissioner.
Excuse me. Pardon. Sorry. The commissioner was able to address the crowd. We had something like between 901,000 people there throughout the course of the night. The entire lawn was filled with lovely it was a very family friendly, a bit of an older, more mature crowd. So it was a lot of picnics and bottles of wine and little pieces of cheese. So it was a really lovely experience. I do want to give a chance for our other speakers to come up. Then I've got some other little notes.
All right. Let's go ahead and take public comment. Claire, come on up. Claire Garrett.
Thank you, mayor and commissioners. I'm here to speak in support of approval of the Jazz Festival agreement with the Rhythm Foundation. It was just a little over a year ago on 03/06/2025 that the PRCA Advisory Board sent you a letter recommending that the city bring back the beloved Hollywood Jazz Festival using new county grant funding available for cultural festivals. I'm also here to thank the mayor and thank the commissioners for giving serious consideration to the advisory board's recommendation and then for actually supporting it. This recommendation to bring back the Hollywood Jazz Festival met with strong support when it appeared for discussion two short weeks later on 03/19/2025 on the city commission agenda, which resulted in the city manager being given the direction to explore options and then to bring it back in a month to you for further discussion.
Parks director, Ricky Engel, and his city staff, they worked expeditiously to do that research in record time, gather the necessary information. And here we are, just one short year later, looking forward to the return of the Hollywood Jazz Festival. It is with great enthusiasm that I encourage approval today of the agreement with the Rhythm Foundation, which is is recognized as the foremost presenter of world music and cultural events in South Florida, with a long history of producing successful jazz concerts and festivals. Based on their extensive track record, I am confident that the Rhythm Foundation will produce a successful event that will not only be enjoyed by our local residents, but that will put Hollywood on the national map for jazz enthusiasts to come to visit Hollywood, specifically for the Jazz Festival. This type of marketing and economic benefit to the city is priceless.
In closing, I just want to also say how gratifying it is to me as an advisory board member to see that my service on an advisory board can result in something so positive for the city of Hollywood, such as the return of a festival like this. So thank you for the opportunity to serve on the PRCA advisory board.
Terry Cantrell.
Thank you very much, Mayor. Terry Cantrell. I'm an avid, avid jazz fan. I'm here to tell you I am proud to say that I attended every single Hollywood jazz festival in the '80s and the '90s. And even when they moved off-site to a different location, it was a partnership with the city. Parks and Rec and Doctor. Ron Weber formed a group called the South Florida Jazz Group. And he moved over to different areas when he left Hollywood. But I just returned from New York City over the weekend and went to two jazz shows, one at Disney's Jazz Club in Columbus Circle and then Birdland, famous Birdland in Broadway area. And they were jam packed both nights with that.
So I encourage and I'd also like to compliment Ricky Engel and his staff for including a couple of us residents in the early stages of the planning. Was happy to sit in and talk about the experiences that we had back in the '80s and '90s. I still have some brochures that I shared with them, some of the programs from back then, too. So this is an absolute home run for us. And there's nothing but positive that will come out of this show. I can't wait. Thank you.
Thank you. Adam, you're welcome to close out.
Thank you very much. And so we have really exciting opportunity here to help pick up the torch and revive a long time festival. We have the pieces in place to position this as a nationally recognized festival, for it to become a destination for folks. Part of this program is about supporting the local businesses and the broader brand of Hollywood as a center of art and culture and a place with a really high level of quality of life. I also look forward to sitting down with each of you independently over the course of the next few weeks to lay out the broader vision for the management of the Arch Park and what that future looks like.
By way of a preview, we are working on a mix of various types of programs ranging from performances of showcases of locally based talent to larger cultural festivals. Like for instance, in late August, early September, we want to do an autumnal Asian festival called the Mooncake Festival, which we were very excited about, as well as things like Record Fair, so on and so forth, mixed in with larger, larger kind of big ticket marquee names that would be those would be ticketed concerts, while many of the other programs will remain free and open to the community as a way to attract more traffic to downtown and encourage downtown as a place where people can really can live, work and play. So I'll be reaching out to you all over the coming days to set up these times and look forward to that opportunity to sit down with you all.
Thank you, Adam. Do you expect the same older demographic that you saw this weekend at the Jazz Festival?
I anticipate that it'll be very similar per but since it's a daytime, we're hoping to create programs that will encourage more families to come as well.
All right. Well, if we know there's going be an older demographic, maybe as we contemplate kind of corresponding opportunities, advertisements of downtown, we take into consideration what the demographic is and tailor the ancillary opportunities to sharing with that demographic the opportunities that exist downtown and what they might enjoy. If it's wine, then we've got the vintage on Harrison as an example and different things like that. So different things. So let's go to Commissioner Quintana.
Thank you, Mayor. I just wanted to share my experience when I was there on Saturday. First of all, I haven't seen my husband that excited about singing live music since we moved to Florida twenty five years ago. He's a musician himself, and he was so very impressed with the quality of the performance. I mean, every time we've been down there, since Rhythm Foundation has been bringing acts, we've been very impressed.
All really great programs. And maybe because I'm an older demographic, but I didn't think it was really like that old. And one of the things my husband commented on was how wonderful it was that people brought children. Because otherwise, children might never be exposed to that kind of music. And to just see live music that's actually being played by people who have mastered their instrument is a special thing these days.
And then, to have I saw people of all ages there, but it was just such a great vibe. And then, the Dillard Center for the Arts Jazz Group. I mean, those kids, sophomores and juniors, totally blew everybody out. I mean, we were all so impressed. Amazing performances by local young people. I just and it was such a great feeling among the crowd. People were very friendly. And it's just like, I'm very excited about the jazz festival coming. I'm sorry, you called it the Jazz Picnic, was it?
That's correct, yes.
Yes. So looking forward to all the creative ideas that you guys have to really make sure that we involve the surrounding business community in this event. So just wanted to share that.
And thank you so much for joining us on Friday. Dillard is also slated to perform at the tree lighting ceremony as well.
So that should be really fun.
All right. Great segue to Vice Mayor Coleri. She's all about the tree lighting.
Yeah. Just out of curiosity, you said that you would, the timeframe would be closing early. Like what exactly timeframe is that?
Or for Saturday? So it'll run, the show is slated to run from two till 8PM.
So we talk about performances and how it benefits the downtown as well, brings up foot traffic in. So just out of thought, and you said you have Dillard Bands, and I know that probably the performers that are at the Jazz Festival are in high demand and costs. But perhaps coordinating with the Downtown Business Association, you could do jazz in the street that follows after the concert. And there could be performers in the street. And that way, it encourages that foot traffic to bleed into the downtown after dinner drinks and listen to some jazz so that many want to continue the excitement.
So jazz in the street, I think, would be something really exciting for the Downtown Business Association. So I don't know how we would coordinate that with the Rhythm Foundation just to kind of give them names or work together with them to promote that so that it just is a win win for everyone. Think it would be great.
That's fantastic idea. And I would love to be connected with them. And we have an associate producer that we've brought on to really help us with this. And they're the one that's out there pounding the pavement with those downtown Hollywood. Perfect. Fantastic. That's a great idea.
All right. Let's go to Commissioner Gruber. And at some point, let's make a motion to approve.
Thank you. And I reached out to James yesterday. Appreciate you talking to me. And I also I had reached out to Mark Rowe yesterday as well because I knew that we had done the jazz on Saturday night. And I'm all about activating the park. But one of the things I want to do, especially when we're using taxpayer dollars to up for our own shows, is make sure that there's an economic impact on the businesses downtown. And Marco did tell me there really wasn't much impact. It was a slow night. And James, you and I had a good conversation about it. And you told me what would be different with this jazz festival, the way you're going about it, engaging the business on a national scale, and that the music is is a little bit more mainstream, that type of thing.
So and everything you said, I I I appreciated it, you know, and I and I support it. So I appreciate that. Just to to go over Friday night and Saturday night. So Friday night so for our $250,000 does that include everything Friday night? Our tree lighting, our music? Is that maybe a Ricky question? Like, so
I mean, that's not the entire tree lighting event. But it is the music portion that will begin at, I think, 8PM. Right, Rick?
Mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager, city attorney, Rick Engle, Parks and Recreation Cultural Arts director. Yes, Friday night, the music for the tree lighting will start around 08:00. We have Santa in the Park and Lighting of the Tree Pryor. The jazz musicians will be playing some Christmas music, holiday music, to tie into the tree lighting event. But the only portion GREEN: coming out of this funding is the band portion. The rest of it, the other funding from the city will handle the rest of the tree lighting event.
We're just doing the same things last year, the snow
and
all Similar, that yeah.
A lot of the similar things with the snow and, you know, the bounce houses. The the sledding. Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That was very, very popular. So yeah.
And I
think I choked on a lot of that snow. Right? Yeah. Well, I do like it. I like the effect.
Artificial snow has definitely gone into people's throats and kind of made them cough. So you might want to reconsider what you do.
Is that the
Soapy snow? Snow machine?
The soapy snow that was up on the plaza. Yeah, we were talking MACHT: more about the sleigh riding stuff.
Sleigh riding, yeah.
Let's keep If that's a problem, we can eliminate the snow slow the soap snow.
So I just as someone who does shows, not as much as I'd like to these days because I'm busy with this the the $250,000 budget, I mean, I I expect some major talent on Saturday, like, that that would that would normally fill up 5,000 seats when you're selling tickets. Like, like, that's the type of money you spend for someone. So I'm leaving it to you guys. You know, I trust you guys and all that you've done and will do. So looking forward to it. And that's a motion to approve. Just we
have a motion to approve. But just a quick note, I know we designated a cap of $250,000 but it doesn't mean that we need to spend it all if because those dollars can go towards future concerts as well. So Ricky, it seems like you
want JACK to mention
just want to clarify on the budget. Dollars 200,000 was approved by the commission from the city. We're anticipating receiving the other $50,000 from a grant. We also applied for two other grants, one that we did not receive and another one that's pending. But we anticipate having at least $50,000 from grants, which makes up to 250,000.
Alright. Well, the resolution is an amount up to, and so we'll leave you, Ricky, to the being a good steward of grants and to with the foundation for being good stewards of the continuing relationship with the Arts Park to, be as efficient as we can with every dollar as if it's your own, because it's all of ours collective dollars to use throughout the year. Commissioner Hernandez.
Thank you, mayor. As I tell my friends, we're not always going to agree. I cannot and wholeheartedly vote for this. The amount of money that we're spending in, quite frankly, you can't business. I appreciate that when you actually said that you have people come in the park and have their cheese and have their wine. Well, we have ordinances that people are not supposed to be bringing alcohol into park. Whenever we have other events, we actually check their bags to make sure that they don't bring any coolers or anything like that. Yes, we're tolerating this here. We're competing. Now you want to do picnics.
We're competing with the brick and mortar restaurants that we have in the downtown. Why are we doing this? Why are we doing this? Ladies and gentlemen, with all due respect, we spend millions of dollars to bring people to the downtown. Yet, we pay other entities to rob those brick and mortar businesses that we expect survival to come and do these things. And we do it time and time again. I respectfully disagree. I'm listening to the business people that are actually in the downtown and see that this happened. By their own admission, they brought in 900 to a thousand people to a venue. That's okay.
We have other venues that brings thousands of people. They grovel to get $25,000 from Parks and Recs to be able to do those events. They get sponsors from other people to do those events. I'm not going to belabor this. I'm just not going to vote for it because the businesses that I represent in the downtown area do not support the event because this is counterproductive for what we've been trying to do for years and we spend millions of dollars doing it. I get it that it may be very nice and everything and it's enjoyable by some. I don't take that away from them. But we're hurting our downtown businesses. So there's no way that I can support that.
I just want to, I completely respect your, you know, statement. I just want to make sure that it's clear that I believe that the idea behind this picnic concept is to engage the downtown businesses to provide this. And to have them be the ones that are charging for it and reaping the benefit of providing it.
I heard what they said. And they said local businesses. They didn't say downtown businesses. And we just got an email from one of the downtown businesses. They have not been addressed when it comes to these things. I get what the concept may be. But it's already happening where people are bringing wine and cheese and what have you. And then we have people from the Downtown Business Association and from the Downtown Businesses themselves saying that these events don't bring anyone to the area. And I can see the local residents coming by with their picnic baskets and their bottles of wine and their cheese actually coming to lay on the lawn and listen to a great jazz festival. There's nothing wrong with that.
If that's what we're doing, that's peachy king and hunky dory. But should we be spending $250,000 or $200,000 in order to get this done when we have other events? They only require $25,000 from us and they got to gravel from everything else and pay for police and what have you. And when they cannot bring alcohol into the park and they bring thousands of people into the neighborhood. This is what we're comparing and seeing and what you were alluding to Commissioner Gruber is, what are we getting for our dollar?
I don't begrudge the event. God bless you. But I think that we can spend our money wiser when it comes to bringing people to the downtown, if that's what we want. If we want to have a special jazz festival, which is a great event for some, so be it. But I'm looking for my I'm looking after my business residents.
Thank you, Commissioner Ernesto.
Thank you.
Commissioner Schuham, then Biederman.
Yes, I support this. I think that it's not cheap, but it's the beginning of something very large. And we already are moving towards national recognition, which we don't have on our typical concerts. The one thing I would ask, really, of Rick is to get with Jennifer Homan. When we first talked about this with Claire and Terry, we talked about also activating other venues in the city.
Not that the Rhythm Foundation has to oversee it. But certainly at Cinema Paradiso, we could have documentaries of jazz musicians. At the Performing Arts Center, we could have some more local jazz events happening simultaneously or through the rest of the weekend. So I just want to make sure that we are taking advantage of this opportunity to also engage the Art and Culture Center. So thank you. And I did second the motion.
All right. Commissioner Biederman. So pick and choose and, you know, like different things. I also had concerns about the activation of downtown. I mean, I love the idea if you're gonna include those businesses to provide picnic lunches, that's great. If you're going to bring it in from somewhere else where people are going to bring their own picnic basket and not support those businesses, that's not great. I do have a question, though. When is Art Walk that weekend? Is that Saturday night? Somebody?
Art Walk, Vicki?
Normally, Walk is the third Saturday of each month.
So it's to be that
same Yeah. And it was
So competing past with our own events also now. So I have some concerns about that. Somebody said it's two to 6PM. Somebody said it's two to 8PM. I'd like to know what it is. So
Friday night, the concert would start around 08:00. And on Saturday, it'll run from 2PM to 8PM.
Okay. Just wanted to clarify that.
The Art Walk would be sort of like an after party kind of opportunity to kind of help tell people leaving the Jazz Fest, Art Walk continues till 10PM, scroll your way over to downtown?
Well, the one thing to bring up with the Art Walk is the Art Walk current contract expires the end of September. We're in the process of preparing an RFP. So we're going back out. So depending on how that RFP and how that changed, we may change the date. We have to see what we get when we come back out. The
idea JASS WALKER: at this
The idea that was brought up about jazz after GREEN: downtown, I think we can make that
I love that idea. GREEN: Strolling jazz musicians, even if it's the kids from Dillard. You know, I think that would be great. And then that would bring those same jazz lovers into downtown to go to the restaurants and spend money because that's what this is all about. And maybe even have like the jazz musicians a week or two ahead of time on a Saturday night or Friday night strolling in downtown to bring some life and some exposure to what's gonna happen. You had mentioned that you are going to set up meetings with us.
Yes, sir.
I think the time to set up those meetings were prior to tonight so that this wouldn't have been such a heavy discussion because I can't support this. I mean, up to today, I couldn't support it. Hearing how we're going to include those businesses in downtown kind of makes it more palatable. Dollars 2 and 50,000 is a lot of money. 200,000. I mean, in my notes, I had what's the county contributing? We talked about cultural arts division in the county should be giving some money. We talked about the TDC should be giving some money. I think those are all important factors before we approve $250,000
So if I may, the $50,000 grant, the county offers up to $50,000 grant. We feel we have a good shot at that, but application goes in June. So that's where we're on. Yeah. We won't go until after.
So what happens if we don't get the 50,000? Do we cut their budget by 50,000?
If we don't get the 50,000 in the grants, then our budget is 200,000. That's what the
city's And we could portion still make it work for that?
This project is new. And we are working at reverse engineering, if you would. So we haven't made commitments until we have commitments, in terms of signing commitments, right? The budget is something that we have to control based on what we work with.
So what happens if we only have 200? Or what happens if we cut it We to 150?
Won't be spending money we don't have.
GREGORY But what happens to the draw? I mean, already have I'm sure you have a list of musicians that you're trying to lock in dates, what their costs are. So let's say it's only $150,000 What has to be cut if we cut that $50,000 Is that extra advertising? Is that extra talent? I mean, where is this $250,000 being spent?
So let's say the instance that it does get cut down to $150,000 for whatever reason. What that means in practical terms would mean less artists because that's driving the bulk of the budget. And then less ancillary activations at the event, and then less marketing. That's basically where the money would come up.
And how much of this $2.50 is the overhead or profit margin MARTINEZ: of the Rhythm Foundation?
Less than 10%.
Okay. I'm Okay with that. I have a question. So we're talking about activating the downtown. We're talking about historical stuff we've used to do to promote downtown.
City manager, at one time, Lisa's not here, But at one time, the city the CRA used to do like CRA tokens that were had a dollar amount value to them that people would get at the Jazz Fest or at other events that they would be able to go into a restaurant or participate in a restaurant downtown and use that kind of as a coupon that the city would re or the CRA would reimburse the business for in order to encourage people to go in. Is that something that we can do especially for just this weekend, make it time sensitive that they could use it that night or within thirty days or something like that?
So I mean, I recall that time frame. And that was a way to drive business into the downtown. And I think we did it with parking. And we did it with some other things. So I think we can look at those kinds of opportunities.
I know that there's already been some discussion about offering coupons for a two for one drink or free dessert, free entree, those kinds of things. I understand that the businesses don't necessarily want to bear that expense. They would like to figure out a way for some help in incentivizing that. And we can explore that. I think we need to make sure that it's kosher with the regulations governing how CRA funds are allowed to be used. And we can take a look at those kinds of opportunities.
Well, maybe economic development has some funds that we could use for that, too. Because for $200,000 or $250,000 it takes like pulling fingernails out in order for us to give the salsa fest more money, which brings in 5,000 people. Or St. Patrick's Day to give the Iberians money to promote that or to promote FIFA or whatever it is. But yet, we're going to like easily hand over $250,000 to bring in some jazz musicians that is a very small segment of our population also.
I mean, jazz listeners. I mean, everybody has their own taste of what music they listen to. And as Commissioner Hernandez said, it's a much older demographic that might not spend that much money in downtown that listen to jazz. I need
to say nothing about age.
Takes one to know one, right?
He said peachy keen and hunky dory to everybody who's running ahead of the jazz at the park.
And I'm going to throw this out there that I think that if we did an '80s or a '90s retro event in downtown, that would bring out a different demographic that might spend more money in downtown. And it would fill the restaurants probably, too. So I'd love to hear something about that. And back to the meeting with us should have been done earlier I look forward to seeing what we're going to do and how it's going to make things better. But this is kind of like a one shot deal, in my opinion.
I won't be here for the next vote on this. But I'll be out there talking about it like some of the other people. If this fails or this doesn't bring in the amount of people or it doesn't bring in the amount of money to our restaurants, it's not happening again. I mean, I don't think anyway. And it might jeopardize the other concerts that Rhythm Foundation does. I mean, that's just a shot over the bow kind
of thing.
God, Kevin. Listen, we love the Rhythm Foundation. They've been putting on amazing shows for like more than ten years here.
I agree.
And they do some
good shows.
It's been superstar work. Yeah.
And I know you know you I know
And it's a lot of people. I agree that we're putting in way more All due respect. We're putting in way more dollars to this. And obviously, we're a little apprehensive about putting that much into one event. I think, originally, James, you yourself had a reaction that said, hey, wait a second.
If we're going to enter into this management agreement for the stage, maybe those dollars would be wise to invest throughout the year. And let's have the jazz test concert and kinda see where it goes there. And I know the momentum has been building with people that are impassioned about the jazz festival. But what the commissioners here are saying about investing this much money in this genre in one event, let's just say nothing really against the genre where some of us are a little apprehensive about. So maybe I know that you obviously are ready to produce this. But if you can give an honest figure, putting aside everybody that is dying to have this and those that are apprehensive, I mean
I have another question.
We're to look to you to give us we're looking to you to manage the amphitheater and to give us good advice and to do things. And so are we in the right direction here? Or would you say, gee, these guys, let's have two events with these dollars, three events with these dollars, and over months, as opposed to one Saturday? To me
No, exactly. And I think you're right here, because this is a new day in the Arts Park. This is a new time. We have the gates are up. So this is going to be a free but gated event. We are going to control how people come in. And we're putting effort into the seating and the arrangement. And there will be infrastructure spend that will be reused in other parts of the season. So in a sense, we're launching the new Arts Park with this event. This is a gate opener, if you will, of the gates that we now have.
So we see this as something that is actually good with the market right now. We see a resurgence of interest in jazz. We think we can do something different than other people have in other communities. It's going to stand out. It's going to be a national event. And it's going to give us a good impetus to move forward into the season ahead. Because we're essentially developing a new gated, ticketed facility in South Florida. And it's a long road we're going into. We know it's a multi year effort to build this into where we see it going. But this is a great way to really open the door.
We think it is a fit, multigenerational fit. We think it is something that's going to get recognized critically and popular in a popular way. And we think it is going to have we're going to take particular interest in connecting to the business community. That's built right into the plan here. We're stopping at 08:00. We want you to go right into the historic district and have dinner. We're not serving dinner. We're serving picnics here. So this is a calculated project to kick off the new era in the Arts Park.
So two things, mayor, real quick. Number one, maybe we should wait on this till they have more solid agreements with our restaurants that are going to do something and provide those picnic lunches available.
And they have to book the talent ahead of time.
And there's time. Two more questions. One is, how much did Saturday night cost us for the 1,000 people that showed up?
That was the budget for that was $50,000
Okay. I wasn't expecting that answer, but I thought it was going be a lot less. And then finally, the other question was, I remember we had Expose here. Was that Rhythm Foundation that did that? Or was that another group that did that? It was a long time ago, Rick. Expose? Way before your time.
I don't remember that. Yes.
They were
at the arts. I think they were one of the first shows that opened at the new theater, right? Or were they the last one at
the More old than ten years ago.
That was probably before our time.
No. No. It was since I've been
involved. Fifteen
years ago?
I was trying to remember if it was when the Arts Park Amphitheater was dedicated or
Expose everybody. Can you hear it? All right.
Or if it was for the city's ninetieth, but I think it was for the Arts Park Amphitheater dedication.
All right.
All
right, I'm fine.
Thank you. Thank you.
And if I may, we fully recognize and respect the concerns that Commissioner Hernandez and Biederman have brought forth. This is big investment and as commissioners, fiscal stewardship of public dollars are our main concern of this board. And so I completely appreciate and respect that concern. And I'm going to focus on using, there are some really interesting data systems that are available to be able to track. It's going to basically track people's movements into and out of Arts Park And it will tell us specifically where did they come from and where did they go afterwards.
I'm sorry. I was looking up history there. Obsessed.
So I remember when Commissioner Shuhan brought this up and Claire in regards to it. And my suggestion was start small and go big. I've suggested many times to have jazz in the park, meaning our small parks throughout the entire city, just to create that synergy and then bring it to the forefront. But we also have to remember that everyone has different genre likes. And we're such a culturally diverse city.
Young, old, rock, you name it, whatever we have, we're just very diverse. I would like to know how many of those residents of Hollywood attended the jazz festival that you had put on the other week, which we can't track now, because it's something in hindsight.
Maybe they did track it.
Did you?
No, we did not use that particular system that I described.
So here is a couple of my concerns. I actually am in favor of this, surprisingly, because you have to start somewhere. And new brings new to the like, if we don't try it, we'll never know. Although the funding is really, I guess, the biggest concern. And that was my concern that I brought up the last time we talked about this. But we have to be visionaries. And we have to say, this was something that was very promotional back in the day, and we're bringing it back. We just had our historical preservation board showing us. We talked about history. It's important.
Commissioner Quintana mentioned about bringing children so that they can be exposed. Dillard High School being there, on and on and on. My couple of requests are, one, Commissioner Shand brought up Cultural Arts Center and the Downtown Businesses. Before I could approve this, and I don't know if we have to put it in the motion to approve, but one, very important that you reach out to the Downtown Business Associations to create that connectivity, whatever it may be. From my understanding, the downtown was the slowest it was in Saturday nights that it's been for a long time.
Why is that? The only thing I could think of is that the parking was taken up to attend the events, perhaps. And then everyone left after the concert was over. What time did it end at? 11:10 or eleven By then, you're ready to go home.
And so that synergy did not create. And then it ultimately affected the downtown because people probably couldn't find parking and they went somewhere else. And that's just my analogy of it. So what I think would make this definitely a bang for our buck is the coordination with the downtown business associations. They are in cultural center, creating even with having detail, I'm thinking of detail and policing, because this is the biggest concern that we hear is if we have a crowd, have to provide safety.
That's a cost. But making sure that we have that adequate safety net that's there, that has to be worked out. And that should circumference the entire amount of money that we're investing. In addition to that, I think promoting the downtown some way. I don't know if the picnic thing is really the way to go, although I'm not a vendor of that sort.
I just think that puts a little bit more taxing problems on the businesses. They'll sit down, come into the restaurant and have dinner, not pack up a lunch and send it to the park. I think that's going to be very, very challenging. Perhaps booths, maybe, that they can set up downtown at the concert itself. But really and truly, if we don't start somewhere, and my idea was not incorporated, so here we are today with having a jazz festival at the Arts Park.
Again, it is something creative. It's something bringing back from the past. And it could be a win win for everyone. As long as that communication is open and we have the ability to know that they're involved and that we can create some type of connectivity from the Arts Park to the downtown. Because that's the whole purpose of doing all of these, correct?
So I don't know. Can we amend the motion to include the downtown and the art and cultural center to be involved, and also to make sure that the coverage of funding is not just for the performers, but for the bleed into the downtown of security purposes? I don't know. Anybody can answer that, if I could do that? Or could it be solely rectified under your permission of city manager?
I think we have heard the direction from the commission that you want very much to make sure that the downtown businesses are engaged in this, that the art and culture center is engaged in this, and that staff administer the event in that way to make sure that we are doing that. So I think that certainly we will count on the Rhythm Foundation to work with us on that. And we will be limiting the outside involvement of other vendors that are not downtown. I think that that is appropriate as it relates to this. But I don't think that we need you to work that into the motion.
Does that make sense?
Yeah. I think the 50,000 that we're getting from the county, if we were to get that, is acceptable. I just am concerned about the amount of money that's being spent. That really is a concern as far as what benefits are we going to reap from it. But I understand the want and the desire. I just don't know if the pull is worth.
I'll just say that while Joanne is here with C Med, since this would be a big investment on part of the city, we have to make sure to help promote it and maybe even put some outdoor banners and kind of really promote the jazz for the whole month of November leading up to this to kind of put some pole banners up in and around the downtown with a saxophone and kind of whatever the brand design of the jazz festival. If what we're seeing on this graphic is the design, we can bring this to the outdoor spaces and banners and what have you and kind of help pump it up, give businesses a flyer or an 18 by 12 kind of poster to put at the front of their business. And really, for the whole month of November, plaster all of downtown with jazz jazz. And to everybody's point, try to make it something that could be recurring and regionally and even, let's just say, nationally recognized that would be worthy of the investment of trying to make it happen and hopefully get that return to businesses and to the community. All right.
We've got Commissioners Hernandez, Quintana, and Gruber. And then hopefully we'll take a vote. Go ahead, Commissioner Hernandez.
Thank you, mayor. If we invest this kind of money into the sports tourism for the upcoming events that are taking place, we will have a 100 times the amount of attendance and we're not doing it. Come on people, let's realize this, that we are our own worst enemy when it comes to the downtown. I can't say it enough, okay. So, and I just, and I believe everything that we're doing, we're doing for the right reasons.
So I'm going to make a motion to amend this motion to make sure that they have street performance in the middle of the downtown. But street corner performance in the middle of the downtown. And no picnic and no alcohol in the park. This is how they disguise bringing in their wine and their cheese from home. They ain't buying that because there ain't no businesses in downtown that is going to be making picnic baskets.
This is a story that they want to sell and I'm not buying it. But in order for that to take place, need somebody to second my motion. Oh, yeah. If they want to sell alcohol, then they can sell alcohol. But we make sure that we have police on the gates make sure that there's no You outside alcohol coming support that? I'm good with that. Because at the end of the day, we're not spending the money we're spending in the downtown to allow for this to happen right under our eyes. And then they come in front of us, and no disrespect. But our businesses need to survive.
We're the ones who pushed it and asked them to do it.
DANIEL Hang on. But I
was think there's a cost
share on it that the city gets, right?
DANIEL MARTINEZ: do sell alcohol. And we would have concessions on the event. And then the revenue share portion of the Hollywood Arts Park is off of ticket sales, where the city gets a surcharge off of everything.
And this is a free event.
And this was a
Yeah. So I think that the has
to include the city gets a portion GREENE: of the alcohol sales.
wanted to add something, though, Commissioner Hernandez, along the lines of what you were thinking. Because it's true, when it's an ungated event, people bring in whatever they want.
We have police officers for that. We managed to do it in other events, where we actually have officers on the gate and anybody
Right. That wants So now we're talking about a gated event, which has a food and beverage program as a main core of its component.
Not according to emotion, sir. I'm eliminating that. And that's part of
what doing. We're talking about not bringing in from the outside. Everything that you work with here will be either pre ordered and ready for you at the event, or we'll have packaged things that will be there inside the event, but not bringing in from public.
With all due respect, with all due respect, you're asking us to pay you to compete with our own restaurants in the downtown.
No, we're doing that in conjunction with the restaurants here. And the difference is, excuse me, the are not really
It is my time.
Let the commissioner move forward.
It is my time. I get what you're trying to say. I haven't heard that you got a commitment from any of the restaurants in the downtown to prepare those picnic baskets. You may very well have local businesses preparing those baskets. And that's great for Hollywood. But if we spend $200,000 and we give $200,000 to the businesses in the downtown without having any events.
We want downtown.
Let me finish. If we just give out the money, just like we were giving them out to you. Let's say, hey, you know downtown businesses, here's $200,000 Fill the downtown with people. I'm willing to bet you that we will fill that park. We will be able to do other things for the residents of the City Of Hollywood to do it.
There's a value to what you're doing. I just don't believe that $200,000 is that value when we're actually encouraging you to compete with the brick and mortar restaurants in the downtown. You're telling me that those people are going to be able to pre order those picnic baskets and then you're going to be provided because you're going to have them there. Sir, unless you tell me you're buying it from any of the restaurants in the downtown, you're competing with those people. That's not the purpose of my spending the money
for And we
That's feel all I see. So you will have the time to respond to me. Just like I sat here patiently and I waited for all my colleagues talk. I represent the businesses in the downtown. And I respect my colleagues that feel otherwise. I don't have a problem with that. But we also have, and I'm looking at the city manager with this in our parks and recs. We also have other events in the downtown. They come to us and gravel to us for money. And they bring thousands and thousands of people to the downtown.
They spend a great deal of money to support those businesses in the downtown. What message are we sending to our downtown businesses when we allow something like this to happen that brings nothing to the downtown except a good experience for some? And the businesses that are there are suffering. I'm not the one just saying that. There's an email that says that. Some of my colleagues have brought that to the attention. I'm sorry? Well, know, but my point is this is something that we need to bring under control. I voted for you guys, by the way. I don't have a problem with that.
But when I see that it's counterproductive to what we've been trying to do for years with the downtown businesses, you need to adjust your program. Because we're paying you to do this. So when you say that you're going to have picnic baskets, no. I have a motion and I got a second to eliminate that. Because I don't want you to have those picnic baskets. Because that takes food away from those restaurants. Unless you say, we're going to have a contract with those restaurants, they're going to provide that. That's not what he's saying. With all due respect Which is what I'm lowering my ears.
We're ready to say that, sir. We only want businesses from downtown. We haven't secured them and solicited them as yet. Are working closely with the Downtown Business Association in the city to Okay, identify those
postpone this. We've got time between now and November. You have time,
we have time to do it.
Okay, let's postpone this. And you come with the businesses in the downtown that you're going to use for this. And I will support it 100%. And you do that, this is just a story that I would just quite frankly don't believe. I don't know many other businesses in downtown that will create those business baskets. So, with all due respect, we have a motion
to continue I just want to add one thing. No, no. In the past, we have if
you could just hang
on. Sorry.
We have a motion to continue from Commissioner Hernandez. Is there a second on that right now?
I'll second it for discussion.
Okay. We have a motion to continue the item. But let's continue discussion.
I like look, if you're going to do this, you will prove me wrong and I will be the first one to say, I'm wrong. I made a mistake. It's a great event. But until that happens, the experiences that we have had in the past that we have your event competing with the downtown businesses. I don't want to see that. You want us to continue to bring up the Jazz Festival. We want to be part of it. I like the street vendor idea. I like all those other things. Sit with the business owners. Have a plan and come back to us so they can support it. And this way I can support it. Otherwise, I cannot. Because it was brought to the attention that some of the businesses this last Friday or Saturday was some of the worst weekend they had. Yet, we had an event where you had a thousand people.
So, if the people that are coming are not local people and they're coming from somewhere else, they got to park somewhere. Now we're competing for parking spot. Let's all work together. We have the ability to do it. We seem to have the money. We seem to be able to have the grant from there. So I like to postpone this for two weeks if possible so that we can come back. Can we do the time certain?
So if we do continue the item, we would need to choose a time certain.
Okay.
Two weeks from now, would that be all right?
It's not a cause of judicial hearing or like
Yeah, know.
Have an idea.
Go ahead, I'd like to
hear your idea. We already had discussion on it. Well, they I would support, we already had discussion on it. I would support approving this today.
I can't
Based do on discussion, parliamentary procedure, you could reconsider your vote in two weeks at the next meeting, providing that they don't deliver on securing deals with downtown. I prefer that they I would support reconsideration.
No, no, no, I understand that. But in two weeks, then we're going to have all this thing again. I would just rather postpone this, have them talk to the businesses in the downtown, come back to us with a plan, and have their businesses in downtown says, you know what? They've committed to this. And let's do that. Because this way, the businesses in the downtown will feel that they're part of this.
Peter, I think you made your point well loud and clear. We understand it. There is a motion to continue on the floor. It's being discussed right now. And so why don't we go ahead and run through the queue?
And then hopefully we'll take care of the item. I don't think that the issue on continuance is that much of a problem if it has staff and really the foundation come back with a plan after they've met with the business association, got some businesses to be on board, maybe better explain to us how the picnic basket works with procuring the let's just call it the picnic items from the downtown businesses, who is gonna package it, maybe their vendor in the park, not expecting the businesses to put picnic baskets together. So everybody does what they're good at, which is one cooks food, the other one puts it in a package, situates it at the park, give us an impression about what the investment you wanna make in the park is to kind of show us how the money is being well invested in a new novel way to use the new and improved Arts Park area with the with the fence and what have you. And so I think it could be you could impress us more, but right now, realize the ask, and it's not your fault because we, on a whim, said, hey, let's approve $200,000 for a jazz festival, and we asked you to do that.
And you guys are saying, okay, well, I can do it. So I I guess we're second guessing ourselves, some of us a little bit on the dollar figure because it is more than we've ever spent on a free show. And so maybe even when you look at this, you say, well, gee whiz, city city Hollywood, we we can do this with a 150 and I'll be happy and have the same impact. And let's reserve the extra 50,000 for, another jazz or another music festival in December or in January or whatever. So we don't have to blow it all on Saturday just because we gave you a budget.
Maybe you can say, we don't need to put it all on Saturday because we're all here to work and promote events throughout the year, not just this one day. It's not a goodbye Rhythm Foundation one time. Let's spend it all on one day and keep it, and that's it. So I'm Okay with the continuance and then coming back, being developed a little further and presented with a little more detail, if that makes the commissioners feel better about it. Let's go to Commissioner Quintana, then Gruber, then Caleri.
Thank you, Mary. Yeah. So I certainly am in agreement of giving it more time to give it a little bit more concreteness. When I was there on Saturday, both James and Adam were talking to me about exactly what you all are asking for. They had told me about working with the downtown businesses and having them be the one who provide the food.
They talked to me about involving the art and culture center. Like, it sounded like that was already part of their thought. The thing they said is they didn't want to move forward with that until they knew that we were all right with them doing that. Like, that's why they hadn't reached out yet to try to work something out with the downtown businesses. Because they wanted to get past today before they went and did that kind of work.
So just assuming goodwill, I'm going to assume that. And I guess I just want us to consider that it is a startup venture that could potentially bring people from all over the country to come here. And you're absolutely right about, you know, each, there's different people with different preferences in music. And maybe some of you are not jazz fans, but there are, I mean, there is a market nationally for something like that, if I may just say. And my, so my experience is that eighty's music is plentiful in South Florida.
That often the concerts that come here from other parts of the world is from the eighty's and the ninety's. And that this is something different and unusual that we usually don't get here. And so, it would be a way to offer something that's unique. So, for me, it just seems like it depends, right? So, like, yeah, 50,000 for Saturday, but that's because you may not have ever heard of Joe Lovano.
But Joe Lovano has, he's Grammy winning saxophonist. He's won a Grammy in 14 nominations. He's taught jazz. I mean, since the 1970s, that guy has released 40 albums So as a jazz it's not like Joe Schmo from down the street who's local. This is a big name nationally, internationally known performer.
So what I'm saying is, we could be attracting people from outside the area for this event. It was a one time event to see whether that just they didn't do the kind of promotion that will be done for the jazz festival for this, for the jazz picnic or whatever it ends up being. So I just would like for us to consider that and to not necessarily assume ill will. And it's just communicating what we want.
Thank you. Let's go to Commissioner Gruber.
Yeah, thank You know, I I did reach out to James yesterday just because I was concerned about this. And I definitely made my opinion known that with especially with this, but even the other shows that we need major economic impact on the downtown businesses. And I and and James and I were on the same page. So that's why I was comfortable today going forward. With regards to the street performers, listen, the goal of what we want to do when we bring people to Arts Park is then bring those boots into downtown. What's that? That's the goal. Right. So knowing that we have Art Walk on the same night, usually that's from six to ten, I would suggest I mean,
the street performers are good,
but maybe in that budget that we're giving you, we do one of the semi headliners in that time frame that's after the festival. So that brings those boots. Somebody says, hey. Here's whatever band. You know? That that and and and some of that budget goes to that. And that means they have to walk through downtown. And even if they weren't gonna do anything, they may get an ice cream at one of our places. They'll see what's going on. So I think when I first heard that was gonna be the same night, I thought that was one of the dumbest things I ever heard. But now that I've processed it, I think, you know, we can we can use it to our advantage. So I I would like that if we go forward with this, and I and I'd like to go forward with this, that that stage, which is going to be there anyway, is activated with one of the talents that we're purchasing in that budget.
20th Street.
Yep. And that brings those people right through downtown. We're putting it on 19th still, Art Block? Is that?
Right? It's in the downtown on 19th. I thought it was on 20th.
I missed it the last couple of days, but now it's facing south, the stage, right, on 19th. It's no longer at the end of Harrison Street.
It's about Morningstar's.
Right. Right. Right. So, yeah. So I would suggest that. Just, you know, I want to micromanage your production, but I think that's a way to bring them through. And it was very clear when we were on the phone that whatever food program you and I agree with you. These brick and mortar restaurants aren't set up to be vendors at festivals. So you can't ask them to do that. But you had said you had an idea that you would create something that people are ordering and whatever. So again, as long as we're on the same page that you say, hey, we've engaged with these downtown restaurants and using them and we do it that way, again, I'm in favor of this.
Aren't you Okay with continuing it for the
We can bring it back in two weeks. But I can just tell you that that's probably we're going to need to make a decision then, because they get a good talent already. Half of them are probably gone. You had to book them a year in advance, usually.
Vice Mayor Caleri?
Curiosity, why are we not charging? Since we put the gate, the whole understanding is that once we put up the fence
GREGORY Oh, go ahead. Easier ticketing. GREGORY
we would be able to start ticketing. And if these are world renowned and people from all over the nation are going to come to hear jazz, why wouldn't they pay? I pay money to go to the Hard Rock to listen to a band that's not even as well renowned as you're stating. So why wouldn't we charge for this?
So Vice Mayor, the reason that this event is coming forward about a little over a year ago, the commission directed us to put together a free jazz festival. And we set the budget at that time at $200,000 to
do So well, ask James if he thinks he can charge a ticket cover here.
That's why it was a
free But free? When you say free for the public, this isn't free. This is $100
No, but we were told to do it as a free event to the public, not
I don't remember that Thank you. James, I'd like your opinion on the ticketing, on if ticketing this makes sense, and if that's secure, it's just enough, you know, the same.
JOSHUA We want to preregister. We do want people to register to come in to the park that day. We want to know they're coming. We will not charge them to come in. We have an area where you could be general admission. But we want them to engage in the hospitality amenities of the event. And that's really the mission here. Ticket is not A culinary component to a music festival. So how do you do that? You do that through a pre ordering of the food will not be free. But we're not making money on it. It's just going to be a pass through to the restaurants that provide the food.
I think that we're setting a very challenging precedent. Because if one venue is going to charge for food and so forth, we're going have to continue that. I don't think that that's the proper I mean, personally, I think my understanding when we put the fence because I was against the fence because it is a public park. So now we're blocking it and we're charging for events. And I understood that it was a revenue generating type of service.
And that's why we had to have the fence. If we have the fence, we charge for the concert. That covers the costs of the bands that are coming in. And then there's other ways to go about bringing that foot traffic in, which I still think needs to be promoted. But to lay out that amount of money to bring a free and I don't remember a free festival. But I could be completely wrong. And please forgive me for not remembering that. But a free festival at this amount I know that I spoke about it, that it was very large. I think it was $350,000 was the original ask. But I think we need to charge.
If we have the fence, we have to start somewhere. And this is the way we start. And then that way, it covers the costs, and not on the Cindy. And this way, we can bleed it into the downtown and promotionize it.
This is the challenge that we're working with. And we're trying to find a way to use the park in an upgraded amenity sense. So you will have a pre reserved plan what you're going to do when you come in. You're going to have an area that's a side to side for you with a picnic blanket. You're going to have a program of food and beverage that goes with that. And so to come up with that amenity, yet doing it as a free show, is the challenge that we've been faced with. So we were tasked with a free show. And that's how we're coming up with the idea. And we have different tiers that we're looking at. Some of it just seated, not necessarily a picnic area.
We also intend to bring in some folding chairs to the area and use it as a seated venue, as well. Because this music doesn't lend itself to sitting and listening. It's not the standing and dancing type of show. So we're looking to upgrade that level of service in the park. So we welcome the opportunity to have these discussions, and come back, hospitality amenity plans in more detail. Because we didn't come prepared for that today. But we can do that. And we have to do that. That's the work we have to do. That's the challenge of working with the park now as a gated facility. Yet, we were told this is a free event. So that's how we're approaching it.
So if we didn't tell you this would be a free event, do you feel like this is an event that's appropriate to charge a ticket for? Is that maybe when you come back in two weeks, you can tell us if you've looked at an alternative direction for the event that it could be if it were to be ticketed, and if that's a successful direction, if that's what you prefer, and propose something different than the picnic idea, then by all means, propose it. Don't want to tie your hands because you all are the producers that are going to be evaluated on the success of the event. And if we've given you parameters that you're trying to work with but you don't think are ideal, then I want to hear that. I don't want you to just do what we said because we thought it was a good idea.
JOSHUA In fact, we want to know who's coming. We want to be able to communicate with them in advance. Is it going to be a different way of using the park? Don't come with all of your packages and chairs and everything. We're going to be providing those things. So we do want a way to know who's coming and to engage them beforehand. So it's not just a walk up free event. So these are the challenges that we're
It seems beautiful, except that if we spend this much money and we don't have thousands of people, plural, which there won't be room if everybody's got a picnic blanket set up, then I'm afraid about how many people we'll be able to accommodate and not have room. And then we've spent $200,000 to have 400 people have a beautiful night. I don't know.
We're looking at all of the capacities in the different tiers that we can do. We think we can still do a great number of people in the thousands, for sure. And it's not going to be your highest capacity number ever, because that's a different type of setup. But we think this is where the arts park should be going now. As its gated venue, we want to be able to provide this higher level of experience and bring in these other genres that are more, I guess, more sophisticated.
I gotcha. All right. So we do have a motion to continue on the floor. June 3 and June 17 are our upcoming city commission meetings. Before I go to Commissioner Hernandez, city manager, is June 3 or seventeenth preferred by you? That's two weeks versus one month, Rhythm Foundation. What do you prefer? Happy to come back. May 3. Pick the date.
PRESENTER June 3.
Do want to be back in two weeks with the plan or in a month?
PRESENTER Two
weeks? All right. June 3 at 2PM is when it would be. Commissioner Hernandez, you have the floor.
PRESENTER Thank you, mayor. And for the record, I love jazz. I do jazz. Either jazz, I love jazz because it's good music and you can learn a great deal from just listening to the music. So this is not against the music. This is not against the Rhythm Foundation. This is against us giving more money for one music versus another when we're supposed to be even keeled when it comes to that. And if I heard you correctly, this is a free event, but you cannot come free at the door. Which means you got to pre register. Does people have to buy anything to pre register?
Can I just send, I'm going to come to the event? Or do I need to purchase a picnic and all that other stuff and what have you? No, you would No, on that record.
Well, is the question that we're struggling with. We had looked to do it as a free registration opportunity or the pre programmed opportunities.
Will wait to
Both a general admission area and a reserve area, where call you will have a plan. We're looking for a hybrid here.
So, exactly. I'm looking forward to see what you bring back in two weeks and the people that you're going to be talking to, the downtown and what have you because this is what some of the people are saying that they don't want. They don't want to do the haves and the haves not because we're paying for this. We're public funding for this. And yet, if you pay, you're going to have a picnic area. You're going to have your wine, your cheese and everything else. If you don't pay, you're going to be with a herd on the back. And we're paying for the whole thing. We're underwriting this. So I would love to hear more about when you come back in two weeks.
And please come back with the people that you're going to be working for with in the downtown. And a complete plan that we can actually approve and look forward to having a long term relationship with you. But at the end of the day, this is something that, it was, as some people say, half baked at this point. Because you yourself don't know. You have a concept that you want to follow, but you don't have a plan yet to that concept. So I'm looking forward to hearing them in two weeks. All
right. So we've got support for the continuance, and we'll take a vote on that for in two weeks on June 3. Let's close it out with commissioners Hernandez and Schuham on the continuance. Go ahead. Yeah, that's what's on the floor. Yeah, go ahead, Kevin.
Okay. So I think that some of this is good compromise, and this isn't the early 2000s anymore. I think a lot of our restaurants are prepared to do Uber Eats. And I think that would be a great concept as part of this. Maybe not Uber Eats, but Boucher Brothers, I don't know if they've talked to you guys about it, but they talked about doing something similar on the beach where people could order from an app and it gives their GPS location on the sand and they could deliver food.
I think that a similar concept could be done here. Whether they pre order or order at the time, they could order through an Arts Park app, bring your food from a certain restaurant, similar to the ship what's the alleyway that is the shipyard? Is that what it's called? Where people could order from three different places through an app or the food hall where you could order on the app. You could do it in an Arts park with participating restaurants.
Think you guys got two weeks to come up with this. And I know that pressure's on, but I think that some of the restaurants in downtown would be happy to compete with the food hall in Arts Park through an app like that.
All right. Commissioner Schumann, on the continuance?
Nothing on the continuance.
Okay. All right. All those in favor of continuing the resolution to our upcoming June 3 meeting at 2PM. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Thank you all. Appreciate it. And looking forward to you all coming back in two weeks. Go ahead, Commissioner Schimm.
Thank you. I just want to say that this is before us today because a year ago, this commission wanted to have the rebirth of the Hollywood Jazz Fest, which as I understand was always a free event. We did it for twenty years. It was nationally recognized. And that's kind of where we were going. It was a Jazz Fest that was famous in Hollywood. And we all agreed to revitalize it. And I think you're right, Commissioner Clari. You said, let's tone it down. And we did.
If you'll remember, it started with $500,000 because that was the budget that we had for the centennial. And we all scaled it back. So my concern is only that I don't want to cheap out here. I want to make sure that this is something that we're all proud of, that it's the first of something that's just going to grow and grow and grow, have national recognition. We already have Sirius on board. I understand your concerns, Commissioner Hernandez. But I thought the picnic thing was fabulous. Bring all of our downtown restaurants. You're going to tell them how to do it. We're going to make sure they don't have single use plastic.
We're going to have I mean, I grew up with this at Meriwether Park in time. So I just think that we shouldn't lose sight of the mandate that we gave to our parks department to put together a nationally recognized free jazz fest in our city. And I'm really excited to see what you guys come back with. So thank you.
All right. Thank you all. No one expected this to take this much discussion, but thank you for talking it out with us. All right, ladies and gentlemen, onto our regular agenda. We've got four items. It is surprisingly 04:20 almost. And so it looks like we'll take up the time. I thought we'd have a break. Alright. Let's go to resolution of the City Commission, City of Hollywood authorizing the city to accept the Florida Department of Environmental Protection twenty five twenty twenty six Land Water Conservation Fund program grant in the amount of $1,500,000 for the construction of Sunset Park authorizing the matching funds, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
We have motion from vice mayor Coleri, second from commissioner Hernandez. Are there any speaker cards on item 28? We do. Claire Garrett, come on up.
Hello again. I'm here to speak in favor of accepting the Florida Department of Environmental Protection twenty twenty five-twenty twenty six Land Water Conservation Fund program grant in the amount of 1 and onetwo million dollars for the construction of Sunset Park and authorizing the one to one matching funds that are required. Many members of the community, myself included, worked hard to campaign for the passage of the general obligation bond, which included funds sufficient to purchase this property, but insufficient for transformation into a new passive park for the enjoyment of all the residents. Many civic associations, including the Park East Civic Association, which I belong to, wrote support letters in October 2024 to accompany the application for this grant. The city has been working diligently to apply for all available grants, and it is so exciting to see some of the funding for construction starting to fall into place.
But it is bittersweet that local activist Karen Caputo is no longer here with us to celebrate this accomplishment. She devoted many years of her life to the Herculean effort to save this property from commercial development. I'm taking this opportunity to suggest that when all the necessary funding is acquired and the Passive Park is finally built, that Karen's name be remembered somewhere at this property. Thank you.
Thank you, Claire. We have a motion and a second to approve the item. Vice mayor?
No. I send a motion to approve.
All those in favor, aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries five-zero with Commissioners Peterman and Quintana away from the dais. They can enter their votes later if they wish. Item 29 is a resolution of the City Commission, City of Hollywood authorizing the appropriate city officials to issue a change order to blanket purchase agreement, PA six zero one one three two, with SFM Janitorial Services for janitorial services to increase the contract amount as provided on the agenda. I know this is an item that you probably reviewed with additional facilities that would be serviced for improved janitorial services.
Motion to approve.
We have a motion from Vice Mayor Caleri, second from Commissioner Gruber. No speaker cards on item 29. All those in favor, aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Commissioner Quintana, did you wanna register a vote for item 28 on the on Sunset? Is that a yes? Yes. Thank you.
Clerk, you have that. Item 30 is resolution of city commission city Hollywood authorizing the city to execute a memo of understanding with the city of Lauderhill should the city of Hollywood be awarded as a subrecipient of the twenty twenty six World Cup event funding facilitated by the county and the city of Lauderhill through their arrangement in an amount up to $65,000 authorizing the required one to one matching funds, etcetera. We have a motion of approval from Vice Mayor Coleri and a second from Commissioner Gruber. And no speaker cards on item 30. Pat? All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Commissioner Biederman, did you want to register a vote on the grant for sunset on item 28?
Yes and Yes and yes, Pat? It is 04:23. 5PM comments will be at 5PM. Let's go ahead to any comments by the city commission, city attorney, city manager, Commissioner Schuham. Go ahead.
Thank you, mayor. Really just wanted to reiterate to our team that the county has made available $20,000,000 in county resiliency grants. I know Vin and Tamara and Adam, you're all aware of it. But it's a great opportunity to take advantage and get some county money to do some of our work. And the only other thing is really for Jovan.
And that is we're getting emails from residents about overnight parking, that they used to be able to have it and that different parts of the city are being treated differently. And we just need some clarity. In my opinion, if parking is sitting empty overnight and someone has a city parking pass, I don't really see an issue with it. But it seems like in some places it's Okay. In some places it's not.
So we just need to get a better understanding as to the why when it's parking that's just sitting unused overnight. So, you know, I know whenever I get an email about it, it's been forwarded to you or Roger. Specifically on the Barrier Island, there are places where it says, you know, residents only overnight. And yet, in other areas, even residents can't use it. So if there's a need where the parking is being utilized for another purpose, like the problem we had at Keating, for example.
Something like that makes sense where we really had to crack down. But in areas where it's just empty, I would like us to take a look. And otherwise, that's really it. Thank you.
Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez.
Thank you, mayor. Summer is coming and the rains are coming with it, even though we've missed the rain because there's been a drought where we are. But if it's at all possible, if we could clean the drains and address That's pivotal for some of the issues that we're having. Because as soon as it starts draining, it's going to all happen at the same time. And if we don't have the drains, it's going to be harder to keep up with when it comes to something like that. Speed bumps. We've received emails of crashes on 24th Avenue, and particularly Van Buren Street. And I'd like to have an update at some point if we're doing something like this. It's been months that we talked about it. I've met with PD.
I've met with the engineering department. The residents are clamoring for some kind of updates, whether it's good, bad, just so they can know what's going on. Also on 22nd Avenue, we were supposed to be doing something with that. It doesn't have to be right now. Just get me the information so that I can provide that to the residents.
And just a comment about what we were discussing earlier today. It's hard for some of the businesses in the downtown to support events that garner this kind of expense. When they themselves put events, they bring in more and more people, not only to their businesses, but to all the other businesses around in the area. And they have to fight for the money to get. So if we can just have, and this is a great idea, but what I saw and heard today, it's something that they want us to give a blank check for a concept that they haven't really ironed out yet.
They have an idea and it's a great idea, but it's the same as somebody paying for it because if you're telling me that you're going to have a picnic area reserved for you because you bought a picnic, they called it an amenity, but let's call it a package. And you're going to be set aside and you're going to do this and you're going to have you. And if you didn't, you have to register to come in and then you would be in a different place. That to me is not what I consider the concept that we talked about a year ago of a free event. And call me novice.
I may be novice when it comes to this, but a free event is something that we said, this is happening, come enjoy it. And if you come in at the last minute because you didn't know that you were going to be in town or you're coming into town or something like that, that's what I envision when it comes to a free event. But when you have an event that you have to make arrangements to be there because by registering, and then if you purchase a package, you have the ability to have an exclusive area, I gather that. So we need to, you know, look at that idea. That is really what we want for something like this because the average folk in my district may not be able to afford that picnic package to come to their own park in their own backyard.
So we need to ask those questions within these two weeks and maybe talk to them and see what we can clear up in order to come up with something that we can all be proud of. I don't have anything against the event. I just don't want to be counterproductive to the money that we're spending in our downtown to bring people to the downtown so they can come to the businesses. That was my point. And thank you all for allowing these two weeks for those things to be cleared out.
Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Hernandez. I think it'll be a good use of the time to develop the concept further. Let's go ahead to Vice Mayor Colerri for any comments.
Thank you. I just wanted to touch base and let everyone know that after our last commission meeting when we recognized Jerry Christensen and we're going to be putting his name on the Powell Building. I went to work a couple days later. And I try not to I'm a nurse at night and a commissioner during the day. And a lot of people don't know, believe it or not, that I'm a commissioner. And one gentleman stopped me in the hallway. He's a respiratory therapist supervisor. And he said, I just want to thank the city of Hollywood for recognizing Jerry Christiansen. He was a vital role in his life. And he is where he is today.
And I said, oh, were you the story that he had mentioned when he was here before us about the young man putting me he said, no. He said, but every holiday, Jerry would come and he would give us a check or he would bring us a basket or he would always be willing to pick me up and take me somewhere. He even offered to take him and his brother to Japan one time on a family vacation with him and his wife. But he said he always thought the check came from the city of Hollywood because he worked at Powell and he was a police officer. But instead, he said he took one look at one of the checks one Christmas. And it was from him and his wife. And he said, you know, that guy is really, really special. And you guys are very, very blessed to have him in your city. And I can't thank you enough for doing what you guys did. It's really remarkable.
So when you hear not everybody watches the TV, and everyone hears all the bad that happens. But when you hear someone recognize the good that we do, it's really remarkable to hear that and to have him share a story. And he wants to be involved and actually be there the day that we put the name up. And I said, please share your story when you come. But I think that that was something positive to share with the commission of the good work that we do do, opposed to all of the negative.
In addition to that, I've had a lot of complaints about the school zone areas ticketing. And in some places, there are, prior to the school zone itself, flashing lights. And then in some areas, there's not. And the areas that are not receiving the flashing lights, they come upon the school zone, which I would argue you have to recognize the school zone areas and not speed. And we've seen, as we've been reported on, that there's been a decrease of injuries and so forth.
But if we're doing for one, we should do for all. And in these areas that don't have the flashing lights to pre warn individuals that they're coming up on a school zone, then we should implement them because we have them in some areas. So people rely on that as a, I guess, a safety break. Now my understanding is that the county has placed those flashing lights in certain areas where the schools zones are at and not in others. And individuals unfortunately are getting tickets that they wish they could contest because of the flashing lights.
So I don't know how we can work with the county by placing these flashing lights at all the school zone areas to pre alert, to make aware because it is actually beneficial because people are slowing down and they are stabilized. And then it would eliminate the ticketing to some extent or eliminate the flashing lights and people be aware of their school zones, which we all were prior. But we can't have for some and not for others. It's just not fair. And I think it makes it very challenging to force people to pay a ticket when some areas have it and some don't. And so this is a big concern that I've been brought to my attention. So I'm wondering if there's anybody to support the city looking into that and working with the county.
Sure. And maybe we city manager, we can get a report on that.
And then last thing that I have is we just talked about this jazz festival. The price tag is very high. We've all I've spoke about it at the last time a year ago when we mentioned it. I asked to go small. We didn't. And here we are today. But if we implement something, which is the gate to start charging for events, my understanding was once we have it, we need to incorporate that. Granted, it was said that it was a free concert, but I still feel that there is an opportunity for investment purposes. I feel like I'm the underdog on this, which is fine. And sometimes we have to take risks.
I'm getting text messages that jazz people don't like jazz. Jazz is an old thing, and nobody's coming. I'm also getting people saying, bring the '80s back. There's always a mix, right? But sometimes we have to take chances that are beneficial. And if it doesn't work out, lesson learned, we don't move forward. But I think that this is an opportunity that we have to bring something back that was very beneficial to the city. I just am concerned about the cost. So I agree with you, Commissioner Hernandez. And I am looking forward to them coming back and discussing that. And the last thing I have is Claire just mentioned about naming the park. I spoke with Patty Antrokin, who was one of Karen Caputo's best friends.
She mentioned an element at
the park. Had mentioned it, an element at the park. And I think that that's a really great idea to memorize, Karen, of all the hard work that she did to make sure that that came out along with North Central Civic Association. I think that that would be a benefit. In addition to that, the pickleball crew at the pickleball park also wants the opportunity to name courts after individuals who've provided.
When do you say enough is enough? By naming certain parks and places of things, I don't know. I think that should be a discussion maybe to be brought forth of how do we when you do too much of it, it gets lost. And the importance of it, I think, gets lost. But I'm looking for support to have them come back with the information about how do we go about naming and what the criteria should be since we've gone from someone who's passed to someone now who's maybe in their element age or have a crisis of some sort. And we're naming it so they can enjoy the recognition. But I think we need to vet that out a little bit more. Thank you. That's all I have. Thank you.
All right. Let's get to Commissioner Gruber then.
Just a couple of things. One, I saw an email from the president of Playland Estates. I think, Allison, we were looped in on it. The the wayfaring signs wayfaring signs, is that what they're called? Those those community signs. So apparently, Playland Estates was left off of there according to DCM because the sign they have was put there privately. It's the first I'm hearing of it. So if staff can get back to me to explain that to me, I don't know who's maintaining their sign. There's nobody there that's maintaining it. So I think if staff can look into that and let me know, because I'd like Playland to also get a sign when we finally get them.
And maybe someone can tell me when we are getting those signs, maybe before Commissioner Biederman and Kalaria. And then I did hear good news that the Sloan Stevens summer camp is happening at Driftwood. This is a free camp for kids. Has tennis, sports, tutoring, life skills. Really amazing.
So if Ricky or whoever on staff can just get us the information, all of us, so that we could spread the word so people can sign up. Cause it's already late in the game and a free camp for kids is really amazing. So if staff can get that information to all of us so we can spread the word. And that's all I have.
Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Gruber. Let's go to Commissioner Biederman.
So just real quick, just to not to beat a dead horse, but we spent $5,000 I think, for a concert out west. But we're going to spend $200,000 for the Arts Park if it makes economic development sense is the only reason I would support it. But I think it's unfair and it's not evenly distributed. And then we're talking about it's kind of like the haves and the have not kind of thing. I would say that probably 70% of our population can't afford a fancy wine and cheese box at the Arts Park and to pay for a square of a blanket or whatever it is.
So I think that we have to make sure, as Commissioner Hernandez said, that we have to make sure that it's even. And people of all means Joseph Young said Hollywood should be a place for everybody, whether it's the most opulent to the most humble of working class. We need to maintain that. That being said, we are all entitled to change our minds based on new information. We've heard that in the past from certain commissioners, oh, I just changed my mind. Well, I think we're all allowed to change our minds, not just one or two of us. So thank you very much.
Thank you. Commissioner Quintana.
I was actually going to wave, but I'm going to say something now. I totally agree. We are all entitled to change our minds. In fact, I think that when new information comes in, it is the wise thing to do to be open to changing our minds, as opposed to sticking with something, whether we've got new information or not. And then I will say, I'm assuming that the reason for the picnic basket idea was to bring in the businesses.
That was why that came up. Otherwise, it would have just been a free concert without any food, just what we typically do. So I think that was the intention. And then yeah, I guess that's all I'll say. Thank you.
Thank you, thank you. All right, well, I have some good news for everyone. I had reached out to the friend of Shelby Thomas that was sharing information about Shelby's condition. We all know that Shelby is the president of Ocean Rescue Alliance International. And we worked with her and her nonprofit to deploy our swim from shore reefs.
And she's been a real great person that we've all very much respected. She's a PhD in marine biology. She had a motorcycle accident not her fault some weeks ago. And the good news is that I got the chance to speak with her. It was a day after she was able to speak, after some medical devices were removed from her throat and things. And like you would expect from Shelby, besides thanking us for reaching out and caring about her, she started talking right away about DEP and her commitment to help us get through everything. And she had contacts in DC. And I was like, Shelby, slow down. You need to get better right now. And that's what we want for you right now.
But I just wanted to share to everyone this amazing person, Shelby, that we know we're always impressed with and that she automatically is thinking about her commitment to Hollywood and wanting to see these reefs continue to flourish. Talked about coral permits that she's received and wanting to support us and her team and offered that along the way. So our good wishes to Shelby, if you're watching out there for quick and speedy recovery, we know the road is still some some ways ahead. But hopefully, she's starting to heal quickly. And thankfully, she is she is not impacted in her in her professional capabilities already talking about DEP permits.
So feel better, Shelby. We're with you. I want to thank the city team and vice mayor Coleri specifically. Yesterday, we had the closing for Knights of Columbus building, everyone. Round of applause. So there is now more parking in the vicinity of the Skate Justice Skate Park and the pickleball courts in Stan Goldman Park. And I know we'll look forward to the city team's recommendation as to the utilization of the building. And of course, Javon, I can expect that the gates are open for parking right away, right? Absolutely, sir. We'll definitely charge.
Yeah. Look
at that. If we're not charging for a jazz concert, I don't think you're charging for asphalt. But now put some signage real quick, parking, so people know and then it's more orderly. That's great. Speaking of that park real quick didn't plan on mentioning it, but might as well.
So when you walk into the area in between the pickleball and the skate park, put a sign somewhere there that tells people what amenities are in the park, like dog park to the left, kids playground to the left, walking trail to the left, exercise park to the right, pickleball to the right, skate park a little menu of what there is because people might not realize all that there is. Even if they're right there 100 feet away, they might not understand. So let's share the wealth there. Yep. Yesterday, I did a public service announcement video with Memorial Regional Hospital's trauma unit for safety, for people who operate e scooters and electric bicycles and things.
There's a lot of activity at the trauma unit from people breaking ankles, hurting their head, when colliding either with a car or just crashing with those devices. So wear shoes and wear helmets. Doctor. Drew Rosenthal doesn't want to see you at the trauma ward, and I don't think you want to go there either. So hopefully I told him to collaborate, Joanne, with us when they put the video out.
And last, the state of Florida. The sustainability person, Julia, had mentioned synthetic turf. But the state of Florida had just passed their final rule. As you might know, there's a state law that allows for synthetic turf everywhere in the state of Florida on preempts cities from prohibiting it. There are standards that the household needs to conform to.
But synthetic turf is allowed on residential property less than one acre in size. So I asked, I'd forwarded the rule to staff and asked that they put together a guide sheet so residents know what the rules are. But otherwise, that they also have the opportunity to have synthetic turf, which I believe is very, very successful and helpful and also helps to conserve water. There's always pluses and minuses to everything, but I see a lot of great pluses for people who can't have or don't want to spend money maintaining and watering turf, you know, 20, three sixty five. Alright.
That's it for me. I want to wish everyone a safe Memorial Day. Chief, I know you're going to have your work cut out for you a little bit depending on the weather with the heavy volume of people we might have either on the beach, downtown, or on the waterways. So thanks to HPD and Fire Rescue for all the work that you're going to be doing this upcoming holiday weekend. Let's go to city attorney for announcements.
Thank you, mayor. One announcement today. Pursuant to Florida statutes twenty eight point six point zero one one subsection eight subsection A governing public meetings, I, as the attorney for the city of Hollywood, wish to inform the city during this public meeting that I desire to hold an executive session on Wednesday, 05/27/2026 at 04:30PM to seek advice concerning litigation styled in three cases Hollywood Park Apartment South LLC versus City of Hollywood, Hollywood Park Apartments West LLC versus City of Hollywood, and Marrone two thousand three hundred nineteen LLC versus the City of Hollywood. Invited to attend this session are the mayor and commissioners, city manager Raelyn Story, assistant city attorney Kendra Breeden, and myself.
Thank you. Let's go to city manager.
Just a few announcements. I want to make sure everyone knows that there is a Memorial Day concert at the Boulevard Heights Amphitheater. That is Friday night from six to 9PM. Thought you were going to mention it. You forgot, didn't you?
I'll react
to that.
Go ahead, Commissioner Beerman.
I didn't want to steal
this.
That's Okay. No, go. You'll do a great job announcing it.
JOSHUA BERNSTEIN: Free food for the first 150 people, barbecue. We're doing a tattered flag replacement. Bring in your old tattered flag. We'll give you a brand new flag in a package and we'll make sure that your old flag gets disposed of appropriately with the Boy Scouts. And I think they're going to have raffles also. Plenty and plenty listen, we're waiving parking prices for the day. It's free parking for the whole weekend.
And it's the Shane Duncan band, so high energy Yes. Country.
They are everything. They're very well versed. Everybody loves them when they come out. It was a good turnout last year. Hopefully, it'll be a better turnout this year. Thank you to my colleagues for supporting concerts out on the West Side and for Parks and Rec putting them together.
DELLEN: Really, I didn't mention. I just want to thank Chief Devlin. The police fallen police officer memorial yesterday was always important. And it's great to have the families come every year and to show the concern and the honor that we have for them year in and year out. And it was great to hear that all those fallen officers will be recognized in the new police headquarters. So thank you, chief and command staff and police department family.
6770 Garfield Street and Boulevard Heights.
Shane Duncan Bands, Saturday night, baby. Yep.
All right. Just a couple of
Friday night. Friday night.
Just Friday a couple of things to mention from the consent agenda that were approved that I think are noteworthy. The commission did approve a resolution related to some federal legislation that's pending that would further limit cities' abilities to have any regulatory authority over five gs antennas. Obviously, that's a concern that's come up a bit in our community. And we just want to emphasize that we don't support any additional limits on our ability to manage that. We also had a piggyback contract with Amazon Business.
Just like a lot of folks, we spend a lot of money with Amazon. And this allows us to take full advantage of a number of different business type services or business oriented services that they have and save money on the purchasing that we do through Amazon. And so it really is evidence of our performance and procurement and performance management group looking at additional ways to save funding. And then finally, we do receive we received approval to seek operational funding in a grant through the Department of Elder Affairs at the state. That funding flows through the Area Agency on Aging for the day care adult respite care for Alzheimer's that we are going to be operating at our Oak Lake Park once those renovations are complete there.
And so this is an important service to our residents right now. It's taking place in Pembroke Pines. But we'll be looking very much forward to moving it to the Oak Lake Park facility and being able to operate it out of that facility.
Thank you so much. So we will recess the meeting until 5PM for citizens' comments. Thank you.
Today to speak representing at least 48 residents, of which by next month I will have over 100. I can be guaranteed of that, and you can be guaranteed of that, regarding what is going on on Segment 3 on the beach. The 2007 Hollywood Beach Master Plan specifically emphasized preserving the character and the soul of the Hollywood Beach and the Broadwalk. That vision was built around walkability, open ocean views, tourism, pedestrian friendly walkways, and a unique beachfront experience that makes Hollywood Beach one of the Florida's most iconic beaches. Yet today, the very section of the beach most connected to that identity, segment three, directly along the Broadwalk And Historic District, is the section that we see the most aggressive Dune implementation.
And what makes it even weirder is that at the last meeting you guys had, that was recognized as the best beach, most stable beach for beach erosion. So this is concerning to the residents. We ask a very simple question. Why was the best and most economically important section of the beach selected for the most virtually intrusive and permanent impacts? Throughout this process, the segmentation, the vegetation standards, the dune elevations, and the implementation approach has changed constantly.
Some areas went forward without vegetation. Some areas were paused. Some areas had ropes and poles removed. Segment two was withdrawn because of additional resident business engagement problems. But segment three moved forward minus one business entity.
The inconsistency is exactly why residents feel not confident with this project reflecting the master plan and the balanced process for moving forward. Vice Mayor Kalari even mentioned she didn't understand why we had to do the Ray's Dune. She said we should do it at the grade level. Lee Gottlieb, who is your top South Florida environmentalist, said he believed that for long term growth, you really had to do it at the low level, and do it slowly. In the meantime, your beautiful trees that they mentioned, your Hollywood Beach, gorgeous trees that survived the palm blight and hurricanes, may die as a result of this.
You know, because Broward County wanted you to move this forward, you didn't have to do it with such inconsistency of what is happening now. This is also a public safety issue. You get these things raised high, nobody can see who's walking by and what's going on. I mean, is not just an environmental issue. This is an economic issue, a tourism issue, a historic preservation issue. You just did a thing today on historic preservation. A public access issue, and a safety issue. Residents also raise the concerns about possibly rodents. Rodents love to live in your dunes, folks. Are you going to exchange palm trees for rodents?
I ask you that. It'll be very interesting when Okay, I know my time's up. I've been here before, but I will be back next month. And believe me, this is not going away from the beach.
Drew Martin, followed by Pam Bourgio, then Ann Ralston.
Good evening, mayor and commissioners. Can you hear me?
Yes, sir. Drew Martin. Sierra Club.
I'm here from Palm Beach County. I came here to speak on a different item, but I got here early. So I'm going to speak on the general comments. I wanted to thank the commissioner who asked that they use not use single use plastics in your giveaway picnic. I think that's really important, that it be completely sustainable.
I'm glad to see you have a sustainability committee. And I was pleased to see that they have a lot of good things that they're recommending. But we really need to get away from any kind of single use plastics. So if you're handing away a bag, a picnic, make sure that you have either silverware that's made of metal that is going to be given back and washed, or you're going to be using some materials, you're not going to need silverware, and also no plastic cups, which I'm sure you won't have. I wanted to address the mayor's comments on the turf issue.
And he said that he thought it saved water if you used these plastic grasses. And you really don't save water. And it's really bad for the environment. So I hope the mayor will take a look at this and reevaluate his opinion. Because I think it's important when the mayor says, oh, it's fine
you use Astroturf. But it's really not. Astroturf,
first
of all, does not age well. It's generally impermeable, which means that any water hits it, it's not going to make it into your aquifer, which is bad for your water retention. It creates runoff, which can lead to flooding. And it creates microplastics in the environment. And microplastics are a huge issue.
Some of them are resulting in PFAS, which is causing cancer in some people. So we really don't want micro, you know, astroturf. We want people to use we don't want them to use turf. We don't want them to put in non sustainable grasses. What we want them to use are natural ground covers, natural ground covers that don't need to be watered. I don't water my yard, and it's fine. We have to get used to this. Florida never no one ever had sprinklers one hundred and fifty years ago. You talk about you want to go back in time and restore your buildings. Well, let's restore the process people used back then.
They didn't have sprinklers. They had natural water. They had cisterns. And they conserve their water. And that's what we want to do. We don't want to encourage Astroturf. And we don't want to convince tell people that they're conserving water by using Astroturf, which is really the wrong direction to go in. Thank you.
Thank you. And just for the record, the state of Florida prevents cities from prohibiting synthetic turf. And the DEP created standards. And that's what I was sharing. Pam Bourgio, followed by yeah, and I don't mind it. Pam Borgiou followed by Ann Ralston.
Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. I'm going to go all over tonight for citizen comments. First of all, I'd like to thank each and every one of you for your service to our community. I know you have our best interests at heart most of the time. I'll just leave it at that.
Safety issues I am out in my backyard every single night listening to the wonderful drag racing on Sheridan Street near my home, on Park Road where they're going in the opposite directions, low flying helicopters, low flying planes. So close to my house my gazebo shakes. So that's a concern for me. They are coming from Miami. They're coming from Perry Airport and Fort Lauderdale.
You all know where I live. So it's a concern. As our community continues to grow, there are going to be more and more safety hazards, as the police can tell you. I'm, at least once a week, sending in a notice saying they're speeding again. I'm on Facebook going, welcome to Hollywood.
And you can hear the drag racing. I'm not trying to do negative reporting, but we need to open up our eyes. We're getting bigger. So safety is an extremely important concern for me. City Hall, property, the new police department, which I'm excited hopefully to get a tour of, I'm thinking and really hoping that we can consolidate a lot of the city offices into one location, therefore opening up possibly this location to build.
As you know, I've been born and raised in Hollywood. I'm 60 years old. And change is not always great. I fight it, because I like our hometown. I love our hometown. But it's no longer a hometown feel. So what can we do to assure the long time residents, as yourselves you've been here twenty plus years to me, you're a long time resident. We need to find a compromise to work together and find the best direction in locations. Change is welcoming to most of us. It depends on where and what we're doing.
And I ask where we're going with these projects. And last but not least, real quick, David Park Tennis Courts. I think the city of Hollywood has a great opportunity to expand that and bring in a world class tennis tournament. We have the Hard Rock. We have Delray Beach tennis tournament. You have the Miami Open. So, let's utilize what we can in that area. You have the availability with the old police station to create a bigger section. Thank you.
Thank you, Pam. Anne Ralston, followed by Andre Brown, then Mr. Swan, Kevin Swan.
Thank you. As on my way here tonight, there was a sign on a new building that went up on Van Buren Street saying, two months free rent as an incentive to get people in there. With the circ being foreclosed on, it seems to me that there may be a change in atmosphere as to constantly putting up new buildings all over that I think Goya, something like that, on Fillmore And Taylor is going up, the one across the street. It concerns me if the Cirque had a lot of incentives, at least from a newspaper report. And I just don't want us to be holding the bag for it.
It seems to me that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again and expect different results. I'm not sure that this constant approval of building more and higher is going to be sustainable in the future. Also, according to the Miami Herald, there are 10 more schools expected to close. These are public schools, not private schools. So now that the private schools seem to be getting public money and the public schools are in financial straits, They're laying off employees. So there's supposed to be 10 more to close in 'twenty seven.
Thank you. Andre Brown, followed by Kevin Swan, then Jonathan Anderson. And the last two speakers will be Lynn Smith and Jesse.
Put that back on three. Yeah, there you go.
There we go. We got you.
Male commissioner, city manager, and to all my brothers and sisters, My name is Andre Brown. I had a meeting over there in Hollander. Very positive. Oh, was it a good meeting? It was a team of activists gathering over there to come together and making sure that everything goes right during these elections.
They're gonna be posted at every post, and they're make sure everything goes according to plan. Now, first of all, I wanna I wanna know how the police officer's doing who was injured in the accident. I hope he is well. I have that much respect to bring that up as well. So the topic back over to Hollandaire was, you know, Liberia, Hollandaire, Danny, West Park, and Primmbrook pie.
So we had a, just like I said, a good meeting, and I became a consultant. Nobody know that yet, but I am a consultant now. And thank you. So by being a consultant now, everybody know what consultants do. Okay?
So it's it's you know, you can look it up, but it'll tell you just what what it what it do, what a consultant do. It'll tell you. Also, Broward County has all that money. You mean to tell me they got billions and billions of dollars. How come none of that money don't come here? How come it don't come here to help with situation that we have in our communities? That's something to think about, ladies and gentlemen. Broward County got all that money. Why is it being held back? Who's holding it back?
Is it hold back for a ransom? Is it hold back for a ransom? Oh, you if you don't do what I say do, you ain't gonna get this here. I know what's going on up there in Broward County as well. I got inside connections. I got outside connections. So no nobody gonna pull I've been whole week before, so I know what time it is. I had them on me. Nobody gets away with murder with Andre Brown because there's a new sheriff in town, and that's Andre Brown. Remember that.
Thank you, Andre. Mr. Swan, come on up. Kevin Swan, followed by Jonathan Anderson. Yeah.
Back again. My name is William Kevin Swan. I live at 3411 Grant Street. Been a resident of Hollywood for over seventy years, plus the five years my family came here with vacation before we moved here from Pennsylvania in 1956. Is the zoning lady here? Somebody representing the zoning department? Nobody? There you are. There was a meeting a couple months ago with the upstairs 2nd Floor of the library. And I wanted to single you out tonight.
I wanted to single you out tonight because who in their right mind would approve a parking lot in a residentially zoned area? Who? Did you get an extra bonus for that? Is that part of the package? And then, of course, we have your Vice Mayor, Tracy Kaleri, who represents my territory in Hollywood Hills, between Park And 35th and Garfield down to Johnson.
And she works for the hospital. My neighborhood has turned into Hiroshima and Nakasaki. Now it's not that way anymore because now it's just parking lots, paved parking lots. The vibration starts at 07:05 in the morning and goes until before I left the house tonight. And then once it's all done, I'll have all the cars coming in and going and slamming the doors and the fumes and the innocuousness.
And that's all due to you all. Now, as far as that lady over there who's passionate about her development of the beach, trust me, it's like baseball. They don't get it tonight, they'll get it again. Kill keep throwing the ball until they hit it. Because all the commissioners, pardon me, but you all are complicit in the degradation of this town. Where's your humanity? Where's your morality? Where's your rax monus? Where is it? I thought the other day that maybe I should recommend spending some money to put a confessional in the mayor's office, in the building someplace.
Rent a priest and a rabbi and a pastor once for a couple hours a month. But then again, you probably wouldn't go there because in your heart and soul, you have nothing to confess. Because this is what you do. You just constantly build. Don't think about anybody else but yourself. My pictures on my walls are askew. I can show you my phone a glass of water in my kitchen cabinets vibrating. That's what I have to live with every day for the last couple months. But you care? Of course you don't. Because all you care about is the development. And I'm not against the hospital. Don't get me wrong. Let's make that clear. Hospital does a good job.
But it's the management of the hospital. And what you've allowed them to do is criminal. You might even get some other people from the prisons to come and take your jobs, because they might do a better job.
Thank you, Mr. Swan. Jonathan Anderson, followed by Lynn Smith. And the last card is Jesse Hernandez.
Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, my commissioner, as well as my Holloway Hills alumni. It was so nice to have Adam to present the class of 'seventy six, fiftieth year proclamation. Thanks for recognizing the Spartan nation. I came out in 'seventy two as a rebel educator. I was called the N word by one of my math teachers, I got suspended, but that's the last time I got suspended.
And also to the city manager. Today is May 20. Do you all know what's significant in May 20? No? Say again?
Months before Juneteenth.
Well, yes, it's the Florida Emancipation Day, and the proclamation was read in Tallahassee by General Edward McCook in Tallahassee. And also today, they recognized Department of Justice in regards to the gentleman that was on the Humanitarian Mission Department at Freedom Statute. They're going after Raul Castro in regards to inhumane treatment, shooting down that plane. But I asked myself before I came here, what does emancipation mean? It means a sense of freedom from slavery.
But Abraham Lincoln created something in regards to 40 Acres and a Mule. And then when the seventeenth then when he got assassinated, the seventeenth president came in, Andrew Johnson. He made sure he erased that. He pardoned the confederate that succeeded from the nation. Florida was one of those succession states. We're the deep, Deep South. We ain't out of this. And I come speaking straight up. As a man, I have no fear of no men. I respect everybody.
I'm like Malcolm X. That was his celebration of life yesterday. At WD Boyce, they had a nice celebration with him, a rebel with a cause. I have a cause, too, to fight for justice. The fight for not be looking at us as a three fifth of a person, not be looking inhumane as though I'm savages. We know the history. That's why sometimes they're trying to erase the history because it says something about America she don't want to fess up to. If she can't negotiate and steal it, she'd go to war and try to take it. But bullies have that day coming. And I realize right now, as a retiree, I do have a little more time now.
So I can focus my attention in regards to making sure justice takes place within America. And I'll be coming back for some things, create that arrangement on Hollywood Beach, Because Hollywood can set an example in regards to reparation. Appreciate you all.
Thank you. Lynn Smith, followed by Jesse Hernandez.
Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners. Lynn Smith. I want to talk to you today about Orange Brook. And I was looking to have an event there because I love it still, even though it's old and eventually it's going to be demolished. We should be operationally using it for things. Claire showed me some pictures today of the mold at the front of the building and inside the building. And we want to do an event there for about 150 people. And I think we're looking for income producing issues. And Orangebrook, the views are still fabulous. The bar's beautiful.
That's the place I'd really like to do this event. So I don't know if there's any way of sending a crew over there to get it up and then get it so that other events can be happening. I don't know if we're just closing it down and not going to use it anymore. But it's still beautiful. And we should use it for some kind of income producing areas. So thank you very much.
JOSEPH Thank you. Jesse JOSEPH HARRISON: Hold on.
JOSEPH Hello, Vice Mayor
Kolosn. I'll have to recognize Commissioner Hernandez.
I spoke with the city attorney about this. I don't believe I have a reason to recuse myself, but my wife is going to ask for something. So being the fact that she's my wife, I'm just going GREGORY It's
not a vote.
Okay. Just wanted to make sure it's for hope and help.
Okay.
He does love you, though.
JESSICA Thank you. Thank you. My name, Jessie Hernandez. I'm the chair of the Hispanic Affairs Council. I'm here in behalf of the council seeking direct if you, the commissioners, can please give direction to the staff for we are ready to launch our celebration, Hispanic Heritage Celebration, on October 10.
And we need to send the invites. And we like to use the proper letterhead, city letterhead. So Peter suggests me. Then, of course, if you can please direct staff if they can approve the proper letterhead so we can start sending the invitations.
Yeah, of course. I don't think there's any issue with that. It's a city sanctioned opportunity to celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month. I don't see an issue with that.
Please save the date. October 10, our spark.
JACKIE Sounds good.
Thank JACKIE Thank Thank
FAHERTY: Michael Snyder, you had a last card. And that'll conclude Citizens' Comments. And then we'll recess until the 6PM item. Good evening, Mr. Snyder. Long time no see.
Yeah. Good evening, Mr. Mayor. I would apologize up front. Unfortunately, I only know two people on the dais here. And I haven't had the pleasure of meeting the other five. And I think this is only the second time I've ever appeared at a citizen's agenda to talk on an item. Because I really don't think it's a very effective way to advance a person's agenda or a group's agenda. But they have it. But I felt compelled to come tonight.
I've lived on the Hollywood Beach Broadwalk for almost thirty years. I actually had my admired misfits celebration at the old Hollywood Beach Hotel in 1965. And what drew me to Hollywood Beach was the beach. To me, it is the best kept beach in the area, bar none. It's magnificent.
It's, I think, the single most important asset that this city has. And if it's not the most important single asset, it's close on anybody else's agenda to the top. And what's going on with this new project with the Dunes, and by the way, Miss Vice Mayor, I commend you. I'm told you're the only one that voted against Dunes, is that I believe in environmental concerns. I believe in taking care of our assets and the beach.
But I walk through Broadwalk all the time. And I'm taller than most people. And, the few dunes that we've had over the years that have been there for years and years, you can't see the ocean when you walk. You can't see it. And what has this new project that's going on, I think is the worst decision I have ever seen in the city of Hollywood make.
And I have to tell you, I've been involved in politics my whole life. And commissions and councils and states, they can do and they can undo. Well, I'm telling you that when you go to put up campaign signs, the reason you do is you want people to see it. Well, you know what? When I walk on the broad walk, I want to see the ocean.
And with these dunes, you can't see the ocean. What have we done here? And then to have two classifications of residents versus commercial is unbelievable. So please undo what's been done because this is the single worst decision I've ever seen the city of Hollywood make. So thank you very much for listening to me.
Thank you, Michael. Alright. That concludes his comments, everyone. We're gonna recess until 6PM to hear item 32. Thank you.
Started here.
Alright, mayor. We're ready.
Alright. Thank you so much, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for being here at City Hall here in the city of Hollywood. We are resuming our meeting today, May 20. We have one remaining item on today's agenda, and, of course, it is a 6PM time certain item.
It's just after 6PM. Item 32 is a resolution of the city commission, the City Of Hollywood, Florida, approving and authorizing the appropriate city officials to execute the first amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement for the Development of Public and Private Facilities at 1301 South Ocean Drive between the City of Hollywood and PRH thirteen oh one South Ocean Drive LLC. This is an item from the Office of Communications, Marketing, and Economic Development focusing on our strategic plan area of economic vitality for the city Of Hollywood. At this time, I'd like to offer an opportunity for the city manager to introduce the staff and the item. Thank you. Raelyn.
Thank you, mayor, vice mayor, city commissioners. We're here today to consider an amendment to our comprehensive agreement with PRH thirteen oh one South Ocean Drive that allows this public private partnership to move ahead, incorporating additional public benefit in the form of hero housing by using the state's Live Local statute, if applicable. In most instances, Live Local preempts local discretion and control over land use. But the latest amendment actually offers more local control when it comes to Live Local projects on publicly owned land. That's because in Broward County, city land use regulations are superseded by the county.
And that's been a challenge in this particular case, where the city and county have had an ongoing conflict over the land use for this site. The latest amendment to live local, unless vetoed by the governor, would allow this to be decided by the city. And in this instance, you have a P3, which requires a public benefit. And we now have the addition of workforce housing at a time when affordability continues to be a critical concern in our community. We're in the budget planning process here at the city, as you know.
And it's a time when we are keenly aware of the necessity of balancing needs with resources, revenues with expenditures, where we give a lot of thought to our role as fiscal stewards and to the financial resiliency of the city overall. On today's agenda, funding for continued review of our utilities rates was one of the items because the commission, of course, is working very hard with our utilities department to figure out a way to provide storm water improvements and other critical utilities upgrades to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars without raising our utility rates so high that they become a real burden for our residents and businesses. We had funding today on the agenda for cleaning of city facilities, funding for special events like the Jazz Festival. Each year, our costs increase and we fund nearly half of our general fund budget through property tax revenue. In the city of Hollywood, we count on redevelopment and reinvestment in our community to continue to build our tax base.
Each commission meeting, we hear of the desires of our commission and residents for additional programs, services, and public improvements. We now have a nearly billion dollar overall budget, a big change from the financial urgency that gripped the city back during the Great Recession of two thousand and eight, 2009, where literally this city lost more than a third of its tax base. And it took us more than a decade to recover from that. And we still see the legacy impact of deferred maintenance and investments from that period. This one project doesn't ensure the city's financial future, but its significance and what it brings to the city cannot be dismissed.
And we have seen a decline in the growth rate of our taxable value each year for the past four years. For those of you who don't or for those individuals who don't think smart growth includes residential redevelopment on the beach, it's important to note this project is in a section of our beach, the area South Of Van Buren Street, that is characterized by mid and high rise condo development. The developed area of our beach represents just 2% of the city's overall land, but residential development on the beach represents $4,800,000,000 in taxable value. That's more than 17% of our overall tax base. To generate just the tax revenue that this project is projected to provide would require an increase of point one eight mills, bringing the city's overall millage rate to over eight.
If we wanted to generate that same revenue from the average single family home in Hollywood, it would take fifteen fifty seven single family homes requiring approximately 300 acres of land. That's land the city of Hollywood does not have. We've received emails questioning how this project could even be considered and the financial benefits along with the new oceanfront community center, a revitalized park with more green space, new parking, and no change to public beach access are the reasons this project was approved in 2022 and the commission and city continue to abide by the requirements of the comprehensive agreement, which is what you are here tonight to amend. Lisa Liotta, our real estate development officer, will be providing a presentation. Dave Keller, our special projects over finance, will be also adding some notes.
But first, our city attorney is going to address questions involving the charter and city ordinance requirements, as well as the revised reso that is on the dais.
Thank you very much, city manager. I received several questions regarding the applicability of the proposed charter amendment, which is on the November ballot for this year. I just wanted to very briefly go through the background with you all in the event that there was any confusion. This agreement was signed in May 2022. In 2024, the Charter Review Committee suggested placing a charter amendment on the ballot that would require certain properties, including properties East Of The Intercoastal City owned properties East Of The Intercoastal go through a referendum in order to be disposed of.
It would be a property similar to one like 1301. However, because this agreement was signed in 2022, the city has contractual obligations that we are already under. And any sort of ballot amendment would not apply to this contract, which was entered in 2022. So even though the proposed charter language did not go forward in 2024, the commission chose to
put an
ordinance assuming the same language that was in the charter amendment and voluntarily placing those constraints on themselves. However, that ordinance language did not affect contracts that had already been entered into, such as this one, And any proposed ballot amendments, such as the one going forward this November, would also not affect any contract into which the city had already entered, such as this in 2022. As to the item, the reso, that is on the dais before you, there is a small change to it in which we combined two of the whereas clauses after conferring further with outside counsel regarding the resolution. I determined that it was best to eliminate some of the duplicative language, which was in the resolution, and also tweak the language very slightly in a way that I felt better protected the city for the future.
And with that, I would like Lisa Liotta to come forward. And she has a brief presentation.
Welcome, Lisa. LEAS Good evening. For the record, Lisa LEAS Liota, development officer. Before delving into the details of the amendments, I would like to briefly walk through the timeline that led us to this point. On 01/21/2020, the developers submitted an unsolicited proposal to the city pursuant to Florida statutes.
Following that submission, on 06/23/2020, the city published a notice of its intent to receive, review, and evaluate proposals for the same project purpose, thereby opening a competitive process. On 09/28/2020, the developer submitted a timely response to the city's request for proposals. Seven other proposals were received. On 02/18/2021, the city selection committee determined that the developer's proposal best matched, best met the objectives outlined in the RFP. And recommended that the developer be designated as the winning applicant, and proceeded to contract negotiations with the city.
On 03/17/2021, the city commission accepted the selection committee's recommendation and directed staff to negotiate a comprehensive agreement. Shortly thereafter, on 05/05/2022, the City of Hollywood and PRH 1301 South Ocean Drive LLC entered into a comprehensive development agreement, which included a conceptual design consisting of 159 residential condominium units. Today, 05/20/2026, the first amendment to the comprehensive agreement is being presented to the city commission for consideration and approval. The amendment introduces the Live Local Act to the agreement. The Live Local Act, also known as Senate Bill 102, was enacted to address the growing need for affordable housing across Florida.
And officially took effect on 07/01/2023. This legislation was specifically designed to expand affordable housing opportunities for Florida residents, by encouraging the development of affordable rental apartments and mixed use communities. Under the act, developers are provided with several incentives, including tax benefits, increased building density, reduced parking requirements, and an expedited approval process. In return, at least 40% of the residential units must remain affordable for at least thirty years. It is also important to recognize that as a live local development, this project height may not be used as a comparator or benchmark for other live local developments.
By incorporating the Live Local Act into the agreement, the amendment supports efforts to increase the availability of quality, affordable housing, while promoting responsible and sustainable development within the community. The Live Local Act specifically targets what is often referred to as the missing middle workforce. This group includes essential working professionals. Such as teachers, nurses, police officers, and others who frequently earn too much to qualify for traditional housing assistance, yet still struggle to afford housing in the communities where they work. The update applies to households earning between 80120% of the local AMI.
To encourage the development of housing for these residents, the legislation provides developers with incentives. In exchange, the housing must comply with rent limits established by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, which are based on the multifamily tax subsidy projects income limits published by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The idea is to expand residential opportunities and strengthen its long term affordability throughout Florida communities. During this legislative session, another amendment, HB139, to the Live Local Act was approved and is awaiting the governor's signature. The amendment, among other things, requires counties and municipalities to authorize multi family developments on property owned by a county, municipality, or school district.
We have a chart for the 2026 income and rent limits. For 2026, the rent limits established for 120% of the AMI are $2,661 per month for a studio apartment, and $2,851 per month for a one bedroom. The corresponding income limits for households at 120% of the AMI are $106,000 annually for a one person household, and 121,680 annually for a two person household. These figures help define eligibility for workforce housing under the Live Local Act, and ensure that housing remains attainable for Florida's working residents. Now returning to the amendment, and starting with section 1.37, which defines private facilities.
Under the revised language, private facilities is defined as a luxury residential condominium development consisting of up to two ten dwelling units, including 126 market rate units and 84 affordable hero housing rental units. By comparison, the original agreement authorized a luxury residential condominium development with a maximum of 190 dwelling units. The amendment does not propose any changes to the associated parking or project amenities. Section 1.43 was also added and includes a definition of hero housing, which in summary refers to rental units reserved for households earning no more than 120 percent of Broward County's AMI, based on HUD income and rent limitations. And it gives priority for City of Hollywood police officers, firefighters, and city employees, than to local hospital workers and teachers who qualify under the income limits.
Section 3.7, under general terms, has been added and reads similarly to Section 1.43. And in summary, Section 3.7 states that the project includes at least 84 hero housing units reserved for the households earning 120% or less of Broward County's AMI. And that the developer must sign and record restrictive covenants in Broward County to enforce these affordability requirements for the legally required period. And these restrictions cannot be subordinated to third party mortgages or liens. It proceeds with rent limits being updated annually based on Broward County AMI, or a comparable replacement standard if Broward County AMI is not available.
Continuing with the general terms, section 3.8 clarifies that the market rate units will remain subject to all applicable city ad valorem taxes and assessments, and will not qualify for any exemption from those payments. And Section 5.5, under design review process, provides that, if authorized by law at the time of sign off submission, the project will be developed in accordance with the Live Local Act as set forth in section 166.04151 of the Florida statutes, including any amendments to the law. Section 5.6 is a bit lengthy and clarifies that the property is zoned for government use, also known as GU, which is a discretionary zoning designation where development standards such as height, setbacks, density, and building massing are determined through site specific city commission approval rather than standard zoning regulations. And that the project is being advanced as a negotiated public private partnership and additional development flexibility being granted, including increased building height is being provided in exchange for the public facilities and other community benefits included in the agreement. Importantly, the amendment also makes clear that these approvals are unique to the specific project and the GU framework and are not intended to create a precedent or establish development rights for other properties, including projects proposed under the Live Local Act or similar state legislation.
Section 5.6 concludes the amendment and confirms that nothing in the section shall limit or impair the city's contractual obligations to the developer granted under the original agreement, the amendments, or any future city approvals for the project. The business terms in the comprehensive agreement remain the same and include the initial rent, the base rent, the closing rent, the fee from the condo resale, the city retaining a fee simple ownership, the project being effectuated through a long term ninety nine year ground lease, the private facilities being owned by the developer for the duration of the lease, all land and public facilities being owned by the city, a new and upgraded community center and parking, upgrades and improvements to Harry Berry Park, no cost to the city for project utilities, infrastructure and utilities for the private facilities, and
commitment to achieve the standards of the Florida Green Building Coalition, or an equivalent or greater certification from the US Green Building Council. Now at this time, I would like to ask David Keller to review and explain the project's financial benefits.
Thank you, Lisa. Good afternoon, mayor, city commission, city manager, city attorney, and staff, and the public. So We're going to talk about a number of revenues that are identified in the agreements and go over how they're calculated and talk about what they would mean in terms of first year revenues to the city and projected revenues over the ninety nine years of the term of the agreement. So the first one we're going to talk about is the initial cash to the city from what is called in the agreement the closing rent. So there are included in the project 126 market rate units and 84 hero housing or affordable housing units.
The market rate units are expected to sell for $630,000,000 The agreement calls for the city to receive a closing rent of 14% of that amount, which is, as you can see at the top there, dollars 88,200,000. On the affordable or hero housing, those are expected to sell for $24,000,000 14% of that amount is $3,360,000 for a total between those two in closing rent of $91,560,000 Now there are two offsets against that. Right up front, the agreement calls for what is called an initial rent being paid to the city of $10,000,000 minus the payment to CBRE for a net of $9,039,399 Also, we would back out of that number the $20,000,000 that the developer will be spending up to $20,000,000 for the improvements and the construction of the new community center at the beach. That leaves a net of $62,520,601 working right down the right column here. Conservatively, the city is projecting to receive 75% of that in the first year, an amount of $46,900,000 with a balance of $15,600,000 coming in the second year.
The next revenue stream we want to talk about is the ad valorem taxes. You've heard a lot of people talking about what this might mean and what it might be. That would be based on a formula. At the top left, can see there's that $630,000,000 that we just discussed. In general, the property appraiser reduces the sale amount by 20% so that 80% of the sale value becomes taxable.
In this case, if we reduced it by 20%, we would have a taxable value on the market rate units of $5.00 $4,000,000 On the top right, you see the affordable housing. Now, this is a little different. We start off with the $24,000,000 that we just referenced on the previous slide. Reduce that by 20%, you end up with $19,200,000 However, for the Live Local Act, 75% of that would be exempt from taxation. So we're going to reduce the $19,200,000 by 75% and end up with taxable affordable housing of $4,800,000 Adding the $4,800,000 to the $5.00 $4,000,000 you see a total of $508,800,000 that would be taxable.
If you take that times the city's current this year millage rate, you would see a total ad valorem tax in the first year of $4,050,000 and change. There's another revenue stream identified in the agreements. It is identified in the agreements as the base rent, but you can also think of it as an annual lease payment. This is calculated at $0.85 per square foot of the 350,000 square feet of the market rate units. It is to be adjusted each year by CPI.
Just for your information, we're using a 3% CPI growth for all of these figures over the course of the ninety nine years. Actual CPI average over the last ninety nine years is 3.1%. So we're right on target with what actual experience has been. The $0.85 times the 350,000 square feet would be a first year payment of $297,500 If you take that out over ninety nine years with a 3% growth rate, would end up being $175,000,000 over the ninety nine years. The next kind of revenue identified is called a resale fee.
Now the resale talks about if those units are bought originally, and then after some period, they're sold to someone else. With that transaction, that second and every future sale after that, the city gets a fee on the transaction of the sale. That fee is based on a quarter of a percent. So the starting unit price of each of those units is just under $5,000,000 We're assuming six units per year sold. That's a total of $29,990,000 And times the 025%, that would result in $74,979 in the first year.
Again, looking at over ninety nine years, increasing by three percent would result in $44,134,000 over the ninety nine year period. The next revenue let me be help if I advance it is our fire fee. We have a fire non ad valorem assessment. In year one, that would be $77,910 to the city. Doing the same thing, assuming an increase of 3%, it would result in $45,860,000 over the ninety nine years.
So let's look at this comprehensively and what it would mean to the city. In the left, or the green column, you see what all of this would mean to the city in the first year that the project is on the tax rolls. I'm just going to go right down the column on the left hand side. That initial rent payment we discussed, net, would be $9,030,000 That closing rent, which is the 14% of the sales, would be $46,900,000 The first year's ad valorem taxes would be $4,000,000 The resale fees on those six units would be $75,000 The base rent would be 297,500 The fire non ad valorem assessment that we just looked at would be $77,910 And impact fees, which are a one time fee in the first year, would be $400,000 If you look over on the right hand side in the blue boxes, you'll see each of those projected out over the ninety nine year period. So again, I'll just summarize by going right down.
That initial payment is still $9,000,000 no change there. The closing rent payment, the total would be $62,520,000 Again, remember that's paid over the first two years as the units are initially sold. Ad valorem over ninety nine years would grow to $2,400,000,000 The resale fees, over ninety nine years, dollars 44,100,000. The base rent, 175,100,000. The fire fees, 45,900,000.
And those impact fees, again, that's a one time fee. So the ninety nine year total is the same as the first year total at $400,000 The total ninety nine year cumulative revenue to the city generated by this project is estimated to be $2,720,000,000 In addition to that, just as a reminder, you can see right at the very bottom note there, there's still also the $20,000,000 that the developer would spend to make the improvements to the community center itself. So that concludes the financial projections. I'm going to ask Lisa to step back up for a couple of closing slides. Thank you.
Thank you, Dave. I understand that there have been some questions regarding the design and the site plan. And the design and site plan are still being finalized. But essentially, the project has been redesigned to create a slender point tower massing, reducing the wall effect from A1A and the beach. The Aselia Terrace access is now maintained.
This preserves the coastal view corridors. Additionally, the building now has a sculptured facade and heavily naturalized podium, which establish a refined tropical modern aesthetic that embraces the beachfront environment, rather than imposing a harsh, hardscaped barrier. Here's another view looking from the west. The existing dunes are untouched. The community center fronts the ocean with expansive outdoor deck space.
There is both surface parking and garage parking within the first level of the parking garage to serve the public. Another view from the south. So what are our next steps? Our next steps are to finalize the design and site plan for formal submission. Address public outreach.
Finalize needed amendment and exhibits to the comprehensive agreement and ground lease in compliance with Florida state statutes. With that, we conclude this presentation, item number 32, a resolution approving the First Amendment to the comprehensive agreement, comprehensive development agreement between the City of Hollywood and PRH thirteen o one South Ocean Drive, LLC.
All right. Thank you, Lisa. Thank you, city manager. Thank you, David, for the presentation. It's certainly eye opening to see all of the details and the financial benefits that you outlined through this public private partnership.
One thing that just David didn't mention in his slides is while the city will be receiving a projected $4,000,000 a year initially in property taxes and growing from the project, roughly the same and separately would be generated and go toward the school district and the county as other taxing districts. We just presented the city portion. So public school funding and county priority and county operational funding will also be in a similar dollar figure depending on their millage rate, but roughly the same. So Pat, can I have the speaker cards, please? And if there are any questions to city staff at this time, I'll be happy to call one of my colleagues.
Otherwise, we'll go with public comment. Commissioner Schrum, did you want to do public comment first? Okay. All right, everybody. How many cards do we have, Pat?
Pat, do you know how many cards? Okay.
28 cards. All right. We have three minutes per speaker. So we have about an hour and a half. If you take up all of the three minutes of public speaking time, happy to hear your comments. If you're in the audience and you want to support someone who just spoke and you agree with what they said and you want show them support, the way to do that at these meetings without clapping and interrupting the meeting and interrupting the flow is to do what's called jazz hands. And we could see the jazz, all the jazz that you guys put out there. Alright. So let's begin. Speaking of jazz, we talked about jazz today, Terry Cantrell. Come on up, Terry Cantrell, followed by Claire Garrett.
All that jazz, Mara. Thank
you Terry very Cantrell. By the way, November 21, Downtown Hollywood, big jazz festival. Make sure to make plans.
We hope. From your lips to God's ears.
Might be scaled down, but it'll still happen.
Go ahead. I'm counting on us. JACK Joking. Terry Cantrell, a member, president of Hollywood Lakes Civic Association today, speaking on behalf of the HLCA. Yeah, we opposed this project beginning in 2001. And we continue to oppose it today. I was one of 100 people that spoke on 03/16/2022. You may most of all recall you were here. 90 of us spoke against, 10 spoke for. Those that spoke for the project were doing business with related, so obviously for that.
I mean, it is a little confusing how we could oppose live local and then embrace it so quickly after we won that lawsuit. I understand the logic behind that. However, live local is so new and so fresh. Legal? Are we going to be able to do that? The governor hasn't signed that in yet. So we don't even know if that's going to happen or not. And it could very well be a challenge. One thing, David's numbers are just dazzling. I mean, I won't kid you on that.
But it makes assumption that every single unit is sold right off the bat. And every single hero unit is rented right off the bat. So that may not be the case. It's a gamble. We're basically speculating on that. We know that Chip Able's vacation rental high rise is now in foreclosure downtown. And because they went condo, and that didn't work. So now they're in foreclosure. And there's, I guess, some rentals that are still vacant downtown and some of the newer projects, too. So there's a lot of assumption here that this is going to work.
And I had to laugh because the comparator clause that Lisa mentioned is also a little questionable for the sense that they may not a developer like related may look at another project two blocks down the road. And he may say, well, I just built a 30 story project there where you can't use that live local project that you already built. However, you guys can give them a P and D, a plan development. And they can build it as big as they want. So that whole comparative clause really doesn't work at all.
P and D would be the easy way to replace that and circumvent that. And I'm still not certain in how we confirm that 40% of these 84 units are actually going to stay at affordable rates. I don't know that mechanism. I guess, apparently, it is in place. Hopefully, the state did that. But I still haven't seen that anywhere. It might be good to explain that to people, too. But the bottom line is that the HLCA is still opposed to this project.
Thank you, Terry. Clari Garrett, followed by Lynn Smith.
Hello, mayor and commissioners. I'm here today to speak in opposition not only to this amendment, but to speak also in opposition to the stealthy way in which it was introduced by one of
the
commissioners in her commissioner comments at the end of the meeting when few people were still in attendance. It reminds us of the way that the pay raise action was rammed through late at night last year. Governing without transparency and governing without giving the public sufficient opportunity to participate in an open dialogue before final decisions are made on major issues just erodes the public's faith in and respect for their government. Harsh words perhaps, but a sentiment shared by many Hollywood residents who are deeply disappointed in how this commission has pushed this through. Getting back to the amendment itself, besides the fact that it will provide for a high rise building that is taller and denser than the original highly unpopular version, this amendment will now become a live local project, meaning that it will now bypass all county approvals and sustainability regulations.
The county requirements are there to protect people and to protect the sensitive Barrier Island environment. It is irresponsible to use Live Local to do an end run around these county protections, which are meant to be there for the public. So when the next one hundred year storm hits Hollywood Beach, the decision whether or not to bypass county requirements using this end run will take on greater significance in hindsight, won't it? History will judge the wisdom of your vote tonight.
Lynn Smith, followed by Michael Seltzer.
Good evening, everyone. Lynn Smith, president of Downtown Parkside Rural Poinciana Civic Association. And I'm here to say that we are not in favor of what's happening today. I sat here and listened to a presentation tonight of numbers. And I have lent, in my lifetime, billions of dollars and looked at all kinds of contracts. And I can tell you that I can't tell you anything that was said to me tonight. I don't understand the numbers. And we had a law. It was called Linney's Law. And if Linney didn't understand it and I understood a lot.
I've lent so much money in my life. This is just really mind boggling. And I can't believe that all of you guys can understand the numbers. And hoping, we go into this terrible economic plunge, which I believe we're going into, I have a feeling for that. And I've been through all kinds of cycles.
My concern is not so much about the things that we're talking about. But I keep going back to this idea where we had a contract with the summit and that this was left to the community. And there's something in writing where I hear and I don't know all the details, and I apologize for that that our city manager decided that we could go outside this contract and that we are really we're acting on this contract and we're giving something to the community. Well, a 30 story high rise for me is not giving something to community. That land belongs to everybody in this city, every resident of this city.
And we need to know we got as many people as we could today under short notice. We all ran around like a bunch of crazy people, because we want to let you know that we're not happy with this. And I don't believe I believe that it's I call them sneak attacks, because the thing with the salaries, this I mean, it just is all happening so fast. And excluding the county, which is making me really nervous, because there's not going to be any oversight, except you guys deciding that these numbers are beautiful. I could be sitting with them. And I think you need a degree in finance or something. And I've looked at a lot of projects. And this is very scary to me. So I know that you're going to vote. I know who's going to vote.
I can tell you right now who's going to vote for and who's going to vote against, because you've been doing the same thing. But all of you are going to have to live with this decision. And I hope that when you think today and you push the button for yes or no, that you remember that this belongs to us. And if I was an attorney and I wish I was I would be filing the lawsuit already against you because this initial contract did not mean that you could give this property to a developer to develop a high rise. And that's the end. And I hope that you'll be thinking about it and that you will well, you're going to vote your conscience, whatever that is.
All right. Michael Seltzer. Settle down, everybody. Jazz hands. Michael Seltzer followed by Dennis DeMartino.
The first thing I have oh, Michael Seltzer, 956 Hollywood Boulevard. The first thing I have to ask is, if this was signed in May 2022, why are we still talking about it four years later? And why didn't anything happen in those four years? Also, can't understand from the presentation that this is a sale or rental for the Live Local portion. And the assumption of $5,000,000 per each unit has to be wrong.
And I think we're getting hoodwinked. That being said, I am in favor of the Live Local Act. I am in favor of it being on the beach. God knows there's enough property on the beach that is probably should be knocked down. And I'm in favor of having it for renters that pay 120%.
But what about 8060%? Are they going to be included in this? Or is it just for the people making 120%? But when this PP three was made years ago, there was no mention of live local and this added bonus or whatever they're getting and maybe this PP three should be redone and bring in more developers now that it's a whole different project. It's not what it was when it was presented to these people years ago.
As for the height, As for the height of 30 stories, me personally, having moved from Bal Harbour where the traffic is horrendous, I think it's a little bit too high. But I guess I can live with it. So in conclusion, I think this PP3 should be redone and or the height be reduced and the apartments, whether they're for rental or sale, be made or developed on another piece of property on, I believe this is four acres. And what happens if all these numbers that we were just presented with that none of us saw before are wrong? What does the city end up getting?
The way it was presented, those numbers are fabulous. But I have a feeling they might be slightly exaggerated. Thank you.
Thank you, Michael. Let's go to Dennis DiMartino, followed by Melissa Sherman.
Esteemed commission members and I use that term for decorum purposes only concerned citizens and the rest of you. Here we are again, more than five years, we've been coming back and forth with this. The community has vocally, physically showed their dislike of this project. They brought up every possible opportunity to tell you how wrong it is. The county has agreed with us on most of them. You failed on the density and you went around that end. You failed on the zoning and you went out on that end. You failed on the mapping and you went around on that end. And now you're bringing in Live Local. I don't know how this idea came to be.
Did somebody just have a dream in the middle of the night that they decided to do Live Local? Or did somebody else ask them to speak for them and present it? Live local is not all that a great idea. It seems like a good idea, but you've got people making $100,000 that qualify for this affordable housing. It's not going to help the people that really need to be helped with housing. And there's a lot of development going on in the city right now. The Dixie Corridor, the 441, there's going to be buildings there, there's going to be property, there's going to be opportunities for people. There's some high vacancy rate, buildings are closing, People are not being able to rent out or sell units and we're going to provide more. Why? Because some realtor comes in and offers us a lot of money.
You got to remember, the money is going up year after year in value, the value of the money is going down and down after year. I don't know what else can be said. I just know that the land wasn't meant for that purpose. I know that the Barrier Island, the resiliency doesn't accommodate much more this density. I know that the people don't want it.
And I think we're working under a couple of very misleading assumptions here. One is that Live Local is gonna help out the people that need it and it doesn't. Another is gonna bring us a lot of money stretched out over a lot of years that goes down in value. I think the biggest misunderstanding and misassumption right now is that we're constituents and your representatives. Because you seem to represent a few people, some more than others. And the constituents, well, we don't know what we want.
Melissa Sherman followed by Pam Bourgio.
Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners. My name is Melissa Sherman. I'm a resident of Royal Poinciana. I'm also a public school teacher of twenty five years here in Broward County. I'm here tonight to ask you not to approve this project. Not because I oppose housing. Not because I oppose growth. Not because I believe Hollywood should pause while the rest of South Florida changes around us. I'm asking you to vote no because growth without trust is not planning. Growth without infrastructure is not vision.
Growth without neighborhood protection is not progress. It's just a high rise dropped from the sky and handed to residents like an invoice. I'm asking you to vote no because live local isn't what it sounds like. When the school board of Broward County makes its rough calculations about how much a teacher makes and how many teachers they can afford for this sum of money, the dollar amount they routinely use is about $75,000. Income and benefits.
With $75,000 a year, you can afford about $1,400 a month in rent. But the estimates that I'm hearing of $2,600 as being caps for what people can reasonably afford on a low income salary is just absurd.
And you don't have to be
a math teacher to be able to do those calculations, ladies and gentlemen. You just have to be able to sit in the audience and listen. The other reason I'm urging you to say no is because this isn't just any plot of land. This is a piece of land where the city has been rushing ahead with a vote that moves away from the purpose of the land without fully answering to the public. We deserve a clear explanation of how this project complies with the original terms.
What public benefit is being preserved? And why would you move forward before those questions are fully resolved? A land deal is not a suggestion scribbled in pencil. It's a public commitment. And before this commission takes any action, you should honor that commitment openly, carefully, and transparently. To residents, this does not feel like a fair process. It feels like the deck has been stacked before the public even reaches the microphone. This commission has the power to say no, not yet. Not this way. Not until the public feels like this is a public process again, and not ever for private developers on 1301 South Ocean Drive.
A no vote tonight is not anti housing. It is pro planning. It is pro resident. It is pro accountability. Please do not approve this project tonight. Say no to developing 1301 Ocean Drive.
Thank you, Pamela Bourgio, followed by Drew Martin.
Good evening. Pamela Bourgio, Hollywood Hills resident. I'm just going to speak my mind. This is absolutely, totally wrong. And if I can say the few words I want to say, but I'm not going to because I'm in public right now. I'm disgusted. We're here talking about private land for the public, if that makes any sense. It was deeded to the public. It needs to be voted on by the public. We voted you into office.
Yes, some of you are leaving, but that doesn't mean you should not be taking care of your responsibilities and your duties to us. We pay. And we're going to suffer. You're going to suffer because you're changing the outlook of Hollywood Beach. Not just that parcel, the entire beach. And this is what brings people to our community. What you're doing and how you're doing it is totally wrong. And I disrespect anybody who disagrees with me on that because you know it's wrong. Okay? And I'm getting heated over it.
I've controlled myself for so long. And to see the people that I once respected disrespect me, it has to work both ways. And what you did last year, when I wasn't even in the audience and found out after the fact of voting yourselves a raise, and voting yourself pensions, and health insurance, I don't know all of it, I wasn't here. That should have went to the public vote as well. This needs to go to the public vote as well.
We may not agree on the project, but this project should not be at this property. Period. Stay with the law. Stay with what you did in the master plan. Our ordinances, our laws, everything says no. The county says no. All these numbers are an assumption. Guess what? When we assume. Okay? It's an opportunity for money. It's not a guarantee. And commissioner, years ago we had a conversation about the Margaritaville project. And you said then, I wish I didn't vote for it. Learn.
Realize that there's a process that was put in place by this commission and former commissioners and prior staff, and you're going against those rules and regulations for the public. It's wrong and I'm mad. And everybody behind me, listening, wherever you're at, and I know you're not even paying attention to me because you're not looking at me. And I'm looking at each and every one of you. Vote the right way.
Drew Martin, followed by Ann Ralston. After Ann will be Donna Green.
Drew Martin. I'm here on behalf of the Sierra Club. I came a long way. I came from Palm Beach County. I prefer not to drive on I-ninety 5 to get here. Okay, I'm sorry. I came down here to oppose this project because it's just wrong. Everything about it is wrong. I don't think it will benefit anybody. I don't think the Live Local, it's just a loophole for developers.
That's all Live Local is. They can get out of meeting all the requirements. They don't have to meet their sustainable requirements. They don't have to meet the environmental requirements. You don't have to listen to the county, and, you know, I don't think it's going to produce the numbers that you think it is.
Now, I saw a scientific presentation and the assumption is in 40 Broward County it's going to be underwater. And I don't that's not a financial term, that's a physical term. And certainly, although we hope that's not the case, this project is in the worst place to be built when you're talking about sea level rise, storm surge, hurricanes. The higher a project is, the more windstorm damage there is. And I can tell you the financial benefit of a project that's wiped out by a hurricane is zero.
So you're looking at zero financial benefit if this project were destroyed. And that's not completely an unrealistic possibility because if we look at storm surge and the flooding and the fact that the coastline is receding inland, it's very likely that this project may be on very soft ground. And it may not be there in forty or fifty years. These numbers depend on the project lasting ninety nine years. So if it doesn't, that reduces significantly the county's income.
So you need to consider that when you make this vote today. Now, everybody knows that the public is not in favor of this. And so, you know, the irony is, you know, in a democratic country, we are faced with the fact that our representatives often are not listening to us. And I think this will those who vote for this are basically not listening to the public because not one person has stood up here and asked you to move forward with this project. So it's definitely not the public's in the public interest. Thank you.
And Ralston, followed by Donna Green, then Andre Brown. I think I see Andre.
Thank you for at least holding the meeting at six where people could come. The dates that Lisa went through all were when COVID was happening and there weren't public meetings. Don't know how they were done. This P3 came through in January 2020 and March 2021, and it got signed in 'twenty two, I think, when City Hall. So the public is not really being able to come in attendance.
That's number one. Raelin, you said something about the last four years, the tax base did something. Didn't catch it. But the tax rate or the tax base in Broward County has been increasing, not like before. Live local happened after this contract was signed. That shouldn't have any bearing on this particular contract. There no offense to Mr. Bush, god rest his soul those are George Bush numbers. That is a projection. That means nothing but a piece of paper.
I can sit there and say, yeah, my checkbook has $2,000,000 in it. That doesn't make it so. And how are you going to guarantee taxes if the state gets rid of a state income tax? Then you're going to have to depend on us buying something. And guess what?
When you start out pricing certain things, we're going to stop buying because we can't afford it. So that wasn't brought up at all about what happens if the state gets rid of income tax I mean, property tax. Sorry, thank you for the correction. We are paying for the new community center. I guess that's our benefit, because I know I'm not going to be living 99 from now to see that 90 projected million dollars or whatever we're supposed to be getting.
When a property gets assessed on a sale price, it's usually 10%, not 20%, David. I'm sorry, but I work there. Did it include homesteaded properties? Assuming these luxury apartments or condos, are they going to be homesteaded? Is that projected in those fancy figures? I didn't hear it. So these are questions just sitting there, not lawyer. And then one other question I have, which bothered me, in the comprehensive plan, they list the properties that are affected by this agreement. There is one folio number in here that doesn't exist. Why?
I can't find it anywhere. I've called the property appraiser's office to research, to see if it was split or combined from another property. You can still get that record. To my knowledge, and from what I found out at BCPA, this property does not exist. I don't know why it's there.
Thank you. And Donna Green, followed by Andre Brown. Is Andre here? I don't think he's here. So Mark Ross will follow Donna.
Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners. My name is Donna Green, five twenty six North Rainbow Drive. I've lived in Hollywood more than thirty five years. And I'm here also representing many other people who can't be here. They say insanity is doing something over and over and expecting different results. So, I must be crazy because I have been here many times speaking against this project. And I guess I'm here because I'm an optimist. And I believe you all love Hollywood. What we are. What we have always loved about our city and about our beach in particular.
So, I am an optimist. I believe you all care what we think. What the residents think. What the residents want. And as you can see, we're all speaking up to preserve this piece of the beach that we love and that we want to protect from a new sham, which is the live local.
This, to me, is another trick and a gimmick to take away control from the residents who deserve to have a voice. We haven't been able to vote on this. And we've come many times, explained how we feel, explained why this is important, explained the value of the character of the beach and why We are marketable because of our charm. That's why we get on all of the best of lists. The charm, the character, the small town feel.
I know it's not going to last forever in some parts of the beach. But this is the land that belongs to the city. The deed that said it should be for public use has been talked about. And people try to use gymnastics to talk around how it doesn't count. That we can still use it for a private high rise.
It is wrong. That is not public. Unless someone invites me on their balcony to watch the fireworks because it's public. I do not believe this is a public property. You're putting a private building on our public land. So please, please consider the long term impact of what this will do to the trust of the residents, what we believe about our commission, and what you do to represent us. Please keep the trust. We need that. Thank you.
Thank you, Donna. Mark Ross, followed by I think it's Patty DiBiase.
Hi. How are you doing? I've been here before. It seems like five years doing the same damn thing. No, no, no. Everybody's saying the same thing over and over again. It's not your property to give it away. It's not. It was deeded to be given to the people of the city. It's a beautiful little place. The building's not falling apart. It's a tilt wall building. It's solid concrete. And what said, they should make a dam a rescue place for it. There's no place for people to get off the beach here if there is this bad storm. There's no country boys or airboats out there to come and save people. They don't do that anymore. They're not gonna get off. These people, as I talk to people, I know people, they're not gonna leave their building. They're not gonna leave it.
They're gonna be stuck out there. How are you gonna get two of them? They can't drive a truck out there. It's flooded. It's full of water. The ocean is gonna come up into there. It's gonna happen. My parents were here in the night My grandparents were here in the nineteen twenty six hurricane. And they held hands from a woodhouse and then went to a concrete building. That's why they survived. And it can be hell. We're supposed to get Andrew and they decided to go to Miami. So nobody knows where they're gonna go. And that's gonna happen. The building we have there right now, the community center, it's a tilt wall building, a solid concrete with T beam roof.
I build buildings. I did the Diplomat, all the windows at the Diplomat. And I also did Espirito Santo in Downtown Miami when Wilma hit. The contract for our glass was $23,000,000 The Four Seasons blew the glass out of those Four Seasons to hit my building. 03/2006 360 pieces of glass and fenestration, aluminum fenestration had to be replaced. We fixed it for $80,000,000. So the repair after a hurricane is ridiculous on these buildings. But either way, that building right now can be used as a place to get people out of here. Could be that the building is big enough for two helicopter pads for rescue. Where else are they gonna land?
It's at least one way you can get people out of the area. Otherwise, people are gonna die from a hurricane here. It's that simple. It's gonna happen. It's happened before. I was here in '63. Cleo went through, you know, and it was nice. We had trees in the backyard two and a half foot diameter, 10 foot above the ground, snapped them in half like toothpicks. Know, it's it happens, you know. And I I can't believe I'm looking at you guys even going through this again. And why are you fighting it so bad? I can't believe that's I hate to say corrupt, but it doesn't make any sense to you that you want to do this. It doesn't make any damn sense. I see you and I talk to you people for five years have been doing this. Same thing, everybody's doing the thing.
You're sitting there smiling, I'm like, I don't have much respect for you. You told me, no, they're going to dump it. It's never going to happen. Yeah, it goes both ways. Remind me of Foghorn Leghorn. Thanks, Mark. Bye.
Patty DiBiase, you'll correct me if I'm wrong on the pronunciation. Rick Goldman, you're next.
Patty DiBiase, 2020 Tyler Street.
Hello, Patty DiBiase.
Good afternoon, commissioners. I mean, good evening.
I've been here well.
This is not the first time I've been here to speak on behalf of saving our public beachfront. We have seen the Broward Planning Council recommendation not to build on this parcel that is still community land. It is my understanding back in 1980, it was ceded to the city for open space, recreation, public and municipal purposes forever. Families have enjoyed this beach for years, but now, the battle continues. The language of the deed never intended to permit privately owned condominiums, apartments, rental, or any other form of private residential development.
The financial revenue should not overwrite the original deed. Finding a loophole, like live local, and have a percentage affordable housing still does not make this right. There are many empty units throughout the city. There are even foreclosures. Why not open those to affordable homes? They will be better centralized for families that also need public transportations. They can walk, use buses, trains. This would make better financial sense. Putting them on the beach where you need a car and even with gas so high now, driving back to the mainland is a hardship. This is bad financial deal to use as a loophole just so you can build there.
Is it really for the working class? Why not protect the beautiful piece of beach property for all the working class? In addition to what I just stated, let's look at the environmental consequences to our fragile barrier island. Affordable or not, we are still going to have mandatory hurricane evacuation. The zone will flood with salt water intrusion. Is this a smart place to build more homes? More families that will need help during the storm evacuation and rebuilding if we get hit by a major storm. Just like the West Coast. There are people in Fort Myers still waiting to rebuild, waiting for insurance claims. Who is going to help to rebuild?
We, the tax payers, are the real working class. I beg all of you to please consider the recommendation of the Planning Council to preserve this unique oceanfront property for public use. Allowing private high density development would fundamentally change both the character and the intent use that the property was deed to us forever. Thank you.
Thank you. Stephanie Burns, followed by Scott Evans, then Sylvia Meyer. Stephanie Burns.
Did I
skip Rick Goldman? Rick Goldman, come on up. My apologies. I moved the car too quickly. Thank you.
The land we're talking about still has a deed restriction on it that says the land must be used as open space, such as a public park or some other purpose. And for the past fifty years, everyone understood what the words public purpose meant. However, today, we're supposed to believe that selling our land on a ninety nine year lease so it becomes a privately owned condo is a public purpose. If this is such a great opportunity for us, I don't know why you won't let us vote on it. But more than that, we heard about how we're going to get millions and millions of dollars if we just wait a century.
But when my parents moved to South Florida and bought their first brand new three bedroom home, it was less than a century ago, and it cost $11,000 And two parents working full time struggled to pay on that $11,000 house. But eight years later, they wanted a different three bedroom house, And that three bedroom cost an outrageous $23,000 in just eight years how much it changed. But my dad said, we'll keep the windows open. He wasn't going to pay the extra 1,500 to get central air. It was too much.
Okay, one summer is all it took, and he bought the central air later. But in more recent history, forty years ago, I moved into South Lake, and I paid an outrageous amount. I paid $109,000 to live half a mile from the ocean in South Lake. Today, Zillow says my house is worth 1,000,000 point dollars So if you think about it, in just forty years, what a dollar used to buy then is now like $0.08 $09 something like that. So when we hear about the millions and millions we're getting, it's like we're getting paid in monopoly money, if the building is even standing that long, because sometimes they don't.
And when we hear that this affordable housing, imagine the waitresses on the beach could pay only $2,600 a month and they'll get a studio. I don't think they're going to be standing in line for that. This is outrageous. It needs to stop. We've been against it for the past five years. Why not listen to us? Or at least let us vote on it.
Stephanie Burns, followed by Scott Evans. Scott, come on up. I guess Stephanie Burns might not be here. Barnes? I can't hear you. Stephanie Barnes.
Can't say me.
Kathy? No. No. Kathy. No. Unless you wanna be Stephanie Barnes today. I thought you were Kathy Dibona. We'll call you up. Scott, come on up.
I'll be Stephanie Bona. Yes. Scott Evans, Park East. Love the speculative financial benefits we get. Commissioners, commissioners, mayors, I know you all by first names, so we'll dispense with formalities.
Happy Emancipation Day to everyone today, May 20. Thirteen 01, public oceanfront open space that is deeded for recreation. Period. Live Local was formed by lobbyists supporting big developers to bypass city and county authority. I thought Home Rule was something the entire Hollywood Commission stood for.
That's what I thought, anyway. There was a letter sent to you guys by Robert Garcia, and I read it, and I thought he had a lot of good points. He wrote, The legal fifty year lease ordinance and vote, historical, environmental, and factual basis supporting the denial of this Live Local application has already been thoroughly established through the extensive review and finding of qualified professionals, city records, and the property's long recognized deed restrictions. I ask that you follow the recommendations and concerns made by your Hollywood and Broward County constituents and the overwhelming public response opposing this proposal with limited support in favor of it. I think there was one or two people that did favor this last time I was here, and they were both realtors.
I was one of the 250 people lined up outside City hall during COVID to speak to the commission against this sweetheart deal, and present when Carol eviscerated the proposal related group submitted, many of you on the commission were ready to already rubber stamp it, which I'm shocked. We're a republic. I think you all know what that is. A form of government in which the power belongs to a body of citizens entitled to vote and their voice is exercised by their electric lead elected leaders. The citizens own this land.
Let us vote November 3, and the people will decide. Further efforts to usurp the power of the people is a giant red flag to me. And I suggest we need to dig deeper and, as they say, follow the money.
Sylvia Meyer followed by Tim McVeigh.
Hard act to follow over there. I need my glasses. So pushing this through I thought I was there I am. Okay, pushing this through with affordable housing does not make it more palpable when there are so many other options around the city that can and should be redeveloped. The only reason that affordable rentals are being considered, even though they don't seem very affordable to the people who they're supposed to reach, is just to bypass the county vote, which at this time seems unfavorable to the developer and the city.
Since this contract was passed in 'twenty two, I wonder if you've examined related as your partners in affordable housing. They're famous for their poor door because they don't want They're famous for their poor door. They're famous for amenity charges, separate amenities for affordable housing, or none at all. It was related that it's called the SET in Manhattan, which explicitly forbid rooftop access for affordable renters. Separate addresses, separate entrances, all sorts of ways to keep certain residents in their place and out of others' spaces.
That's your partner in getting this built with affordable housing. The fact remains that this is being slated to be built where it does not belong. This land belongs to Hollywood residents. And we deserve a vote on it. The utter hypocrisy from certain commission members who rail against losing hometown rule to Tallahassee to push this forward against residents' outcry is offensive at the least.
And since we cannot vote on social media unfortunately, not everybody comes out to speak. But they rail against this project on social media. And they call for you guys to be voted out. So some of you are terming out. Since you can't be voted out, I ask everybody in the audience and who's listening to think about who the commissioners who are going to vote yes to this are supporting and really examine those candidates and reject them.
You don't want the same reckless decision making that bypasses the support of residents. No private condo belongs on this public land. And wait until they come for a public park near you.
Tim McVeigh, followed by Jeffrey Pearson.
Good evening. Tim McVeigh, 4316 I have been asked by a long term resident, Robert A. Gyasson, 3400 North 37th Street, to read the following statement into the record regarding the agenda item being considered. His statement in its entirety has been provided to the city clerk. He writes, Dear City Commissioners, as a lifelong resident of Hollywood, Florida since 1939, I respectfully and strongly urge you to reject the latest Live Local proposal and the proposed thirteen oh one condominium development concerning the property located at 1301 South Ocean Drive in Hollywood.
In my opinion, the legal, historical and factual basis supporting the denial of this application has already been thoroughly established through the extensive review and findings of qualified professionals, city records, and the property's long recognized deed restrictions. More importantly, I possess firsthand knowledge of the original intent surrounding the city's acceptance of this property. Fifty two years ago, I served as one of five members on the city committee that determined the acceptance of this property from the owner through then Chief Financial Officer Frank Stephens. The conveyance was accepted subject to explicit deed restrictions, limiting the properties used to open space, park, recreational, and other public and municipal purposes. That language has never intended to permit privately owned condominiums, apartment rentals, or any form of private residential development.
Municipal purposes refer to legitimate public uses such as police, fire, and civic facilities, not private high density residential properties operated for private gain. At that time, Mr. Steffens and owner, Mr. Mailman made unmistakably clear that the donor's intent and expectations were that unique oceanfront property would remain in perpetual use for the benefit of the citizens of Hollywood. For more than five decades, that de restricted public use has remained uninterrupted and honored.
This property is not simply another development site. It is unique and irreplaceable public trust asset whose historic purpose and protected status should be preserved exactly as intended by its owners and accepted by the city. Allowing residential development on this property would permanently alter its character, undermine the original deed restrictions, and weaken public confidence in the city's commitment to honoring donor intent and protecting public land. In closing, I respectfully ask that you follow the recommendations and concern expressed by your constituents from throughout the city of Hollywood. The overwhelming public response has been strongly opposed to this public, with very limited support for Please preserve this project for the public purposes for which it was entrusted to the city over fifty years ago.
Respectfully submitted Robert A. Giveson. Thank you.
Good timing. Jeffrey Pearson, Jeffrey Pearson, followed by Kat Uden.
Mr. Mayor, commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to speak. I'll be brief. I'm sorry. So many will say more eloquently and succinctly than I am able to. So I'll move this right along. Thank you for doing something. Many of you were involved during the city of Hollywood financial downfall period, and you rescued us from it. But what you're planning here is not the proper way to do this. You need to rework the analysis for worst case scenario, not best case scenario.
Let's not have another Margaritaville. Not that you're involved in it, but the problem with Margaritaville was that so much was left on the table. Period. That's all there is to it, Okay? I have two forty five story buildings about to be constructed with a broken ground across the street from me. A lot more ad valorem is going to come out of those two buildings than will ever come out of anything built on 1301. Find a better way to do this, a better way to get out of this contract and produce income. And thank you.
Thank you, Jeffrey. Kat Udin, followed by Siobhan McLaughlin.
Kat Udin, this is not the same project as it was when it was voted on in 2022. It was different in December of last year when you voted on the land use amendment. And it has changed quite significantly again since December. We should be asking our city attorney if the changes are so significant, could we consider a new contract with the new numbers and details? If so, our current ordinance regarding leases of fifty years or more going to a vote of the people of Hollywood should be honored.
Residents are questioning how making so many units to be affordable rentals with live local tax breaks will result in the same financial benefit to the city. The city also seemed to agree that nice hotels would benefit the beach more so than condo towers. While most local governments are fighting live local mandates, our city has now decided to force a live local project on its own constituents. Even more puzzling, the city just spent a great deal of resources, time and taxpayer money fighting a Live Local lawsuit on our beach a few blocks down so that we could keep the low rise character of our beach. And we won the lawsuit about a month ago.
Why are we now turning around and doing it to ourselves? None of this makes any sense. The whole point of ruining this special locals area of our beach with a private tower was revenue. How can the revenue be the same if 40% of the units are affordable rentals? And speaking of affordability, a realistic view of what Broward teachers make is needed. I was a Broward teacher for fifteen years. And at the end of fifteen years, I made about $60,000 Not even remotely close to probably 80 percent of the annual median income in Broward. It's an insult to teachers to use us to sell this project. I'm a hero who believes in preserving this special spot. So let's not kid ourselves that these units will actually be affordable.
And more on the way. Oh, I'm sorry. We also have many empty units available downtown and more on the way. This project is not necessary, especially in this location. This is not smart planning. This is a mandatory hurricane evacuation zone. Sheridan Street and Hollywood Boulevard have been impassable during a regular rainstorm. A1A is a mess and the Barrier Island will continue to have major challenges far into the future as it floods with salt water on a sunny day. Scientists predict a possible two to seven feet of sea level rise by 2100. This project will block the sun and lock us into a legal relationship with an unknown condo association for ninety nine years.
This is public land deeded to the city for parks, recreation, open space and public purpose. A private condo tower is not public. This project will, will, will affect public access because spaces will likely be taken by residents and their guests just like what happened at Magnolia Terrace. I'm no longer able to park at Keating Park with my annual resident parking pass because too many condo owners were parking there. This is exactly what will happen at Azalea Terrace. Thank you to the residents who showed up to speak, even though we know that they'll be voting against us.
Siobhan McLaughlin, followed by jazz hands, guys. Siobhan McLaughlin, followed by Drew Carriaso.
Siobhan McLaughlin, 1409 Rodman Street. I sent you an email earlier today about a quote, but I'd like to add another one to it. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. I am truly disappointed that the city staff gives you such an optimistic view of the finances and the revenue, but there is no downside to it. Once again, I feel that the city staff, perhaps because the city manager answers to you, and then the managers of the various departments answer to the city manager.
We are not getting a complete and honest picture of what could be happening. And I think that is unfortunate. This project has been opposed by multiple, multiple people, organizations. It is just troubling that you continue to ask the residents to trust you when the trust has been betrayed. And I ask you tonight to vote no on the live local. It is not something that the residents want. It is beneath your dignity to actually go ahead and do this when so many people have questions about the fidelity, the honesty of the project. So I thank you very much.
Thank you, Drew Cariaso, followed by Tess Youngish.
Commissioners and mayor, my name's Drew Cariaso, Hollywood, Florida. I don't normally come up and speak. I usually write to you. But this time, I don't know if you've read my either I don't know if you've actually read what I've written previously, so I felt that I need to come and speak in person. Here we are again.
Five years, and many residents, including myself, remain strongly opposed proposal. When this first started, Commissioner Schuhem, who holds a law degree, a civil engineer, provided detailed concerns regarding why this proposal may not be in Hollywood's long term interest. I like Margaritaville, so I know some people don't. But I recall Commissioner Hernandez you surprised me at one of the previous commission meetings and mentioned that Margaritaville's plans were not fully reviewed and that because of an oversight, you would not have supported the project if you were serving on the commission. And that was because the concern of the city lost a valuable opportunity in a parking garage.
And that oversight was missed by staff. And it really impressed me. I was like, you know what? I like that project, but you're right. We're losing that revenue because we didn't fully vet that project. Now, we're facing another major public land proposal where the plans and even the benefits to the city still do not appear clear. Floor space is being shifted. Square footage calculations continue to change. And the contract terms appear tied to the development's footage calculations. They continue to change.
The size, everything keeps changing. Even our benefits, the long term revenue to the city, is still not completely clear. We have proposals. We have an idea. But I love spreadsheets, but I don't see where those numbers we're going to get those numbers.
At the last minute, the add in live local provision for only a small number of units and only for a limited thirty years. I'm losing my time. We also watched major developments in stability across South Florida, including projects such as Circotel, which is now going into bankruptcy. Thankfully, that's not a city property. That would be a great live local.
I mean, why not shift and use that? Use our places that are empty, not build something that we, the residents, have been against for five years. I remain strongly opposed to the proposed condominium development, 1301. Even the addition of a small number of affordable housing units that appear designed to make the project more publicly palatable.
Thank you, Drew. Thank you.
Vote no, please.
Thank you. Tess Youngish, followed by Dan Lacy. Is Tess here? All right. So we'll hear from Dan Lacey, followed by Anne Castaneda.
Evening, everybody. Thanks a lot. Appreciate you all taking the time. Dan Lacey, 1324 Arthur Street for twenty four years. It seems like we're back for Groundhog Day again. I remember standing here, I don't know, five years ago and hearing these same conversations over and over again about this project. The one thing that I can see as constant thread throughout these discussions has been, please put this to a vote for the citizens by the citizens of Hollywood. Everybody's asking for that. And yet, year after year, month after month, it has never been put up for a vote. I've yet to hear one good thing about this project.
This is a horrible contract. The city of Hollywood becomes a landlord for a hundred years and we are on the hook to collect rents. The only people who benefit from this are the developers. They get their money up front, they walk away. We're on the hook for one hundred years. Everybody in this room will be dead before that city, before that lease is up. Anything, any liability on that property, any surfside towers collapse, any kind of storm damage, we are on the hook for. We are liable for that. This is not the goose that's laying the golden egg. The goose that's laying the golden egg is the property we have.
Public land on beachfront is so rare in Florida, I could probably count on one hand in this area where those instances exist. This is a terrible deal. And you're going to vote how you're going to vote, but that's your legacy. Now, the one thing I do have to say, and I only had a few seconds to see it, but in the numbers, the financial projections, which were all, I admit, quite rosy looking, I did see that the developer is committed to $20,000,000 in improvements on public property, which sounds great. But if you read the fine print that was up there for just a couple of seconds, that 20,000,000 is backed out of our first year's rent.
So it's very disingenuous to say that, to say that they're putting this money up to improve on the property, when actually, no they're not, we are. And that's right up there. I just saw that in a couple of seconds. What else is in there that we're not seeing? I do this for a living for a big old healthcare system down the road. And if I can see that in a couple of seconds, I want to know what else is in this contract. This is a bad deal. The city's on the hook. The liability and exposure window is out is crazy on this. Please vote your conscience. This is not good for the city. Thank you very much for listening. Appreciate
it. Thank you, Dan. Anne Castaneda, followed by Rachel Mazer, then Monica Palver, then Glenn Margolis, and Bea Castaneda.
Yes. Welcome. Hello. This is my first time doing this, so I
don't know
what I'm supposed to say. Hi. I live here. I love living here. I live. I work here. My husband lives and works here. My daughter lives and works and goes to school here. So I live local, you could say. Actually, I live hyper local. I don't have a car. I ride a bicycle. So if it's not in Hollywood, I'm not going. See my point? Okay. So, I don't know why you guys are building another luxury condo. The infrastructure, the traffic, you're taking away stuff from the community, it's really crazy. Then you guys started putting these things up. So before I came here, like, didn't have your numbers. The way that this Live Local Act came to be, you guys are dirty, dirty politicians.
This is a dirty, dirty, dirty, tricky, tricky thing that you did and you should be ashamed of yourself. You couldn't get it one way, then you tried another way, you couldn't get it that way. So then what did you do? You figured out how to get it. This is a toddler having a temper tantrum saying, mommy, mommy, please. Mommy said no. You went to daddy and daddy said yes. Okay. You're only guaranteeing affordable housing for thirty years. K. And I was like, all on board, then I heard the thirty years thing, and then you put up your numbers. Your affordable housing hold on. You guys said and she went so they went so fast. $26.61 a month for a studio. $28.91, I think it was, for one bedroom.
What's a $2.02? Because I have a kid. How much is a $2.02? 3,500? What planet are you living on that you think that $3,500 is an affordable rent for a family who lives hyper local, lives, works, goes to school in our city? You guys, this is a joke. This is all a joke. And then I heard it was a related group. Hi, Eric. Sorry. I'm not surprised you guys are in bed with the related group.
God, had so much more
to say. But like, I got so heated. It's really sad that you you wanna do to this beautiful beach. The part of the charm of Hollywood is that we don't have skyscrapers shooting up into the sky. We actually have sun. It's ironic, Sunny Isles is named Sunny Isles. One of the things that I love most about this place is the old architecture, the buildings, the cool places that you get to see. We don't want a modern skyscraper. Like, what is that? Really think about what you're doing because this is not the way to grow Hollywood. You don't need to grow vertically to grow as a city. We don't need to go up. You guys can fix other things, mister mayor. There's a lot of stuff you can fix downtown. Maybe you can occupy your time with that.
You guys could all put your minds together and figure out a way how to bring back historic downtown instead of building another high rise. That might make you more likable. It might. Thank you so much for your time. But you guys, you have to vote no on this. Use your brains. Goodbye.
Thank you. She lives in Radius. She lives in Radius. Rachel Mazer. I don't know if you could follow Anne, Rachel, but welcome.
Hi. Thank you. Thank you.
Good evening, everyone. Going to read.
MICHAEL Monica Palmer is next.
I am here tonight to go on the record against this proposal to incorporate the Live Local Act into the agreement for 1301. This is a new law, the ramifications of which are not yet understood. And as new as it is, the city has already been in a lawsuit connected with this law. The term p three refers to public private partnership. As our elected officials who are elected to represent the public, I would hope that our own city government would not support a p three project that the public is so firmly against.
The city has done a good job growing the tax base with the addition of several buildings that provide tax revenue and housing opportunities without financial liability for the city to maintain them and without costing the city public land. Four years ago, when this project was initially approved by the city, and again tonight, it was clear that the financial aspect of this project has not been reviewed. The city is focused specifically and solely on gross revenue and has not considered at all what it would cost the city each year and over ninety nine years of waterfront existence to keep this building structurally sound and in good condition. I mean, consider what we have seen with beachfront buildings when people did not want to spend the money needed to shore them up over time. The city will not have a choice.
It will have to spend whatever is needed over the ninety nine years to keep this building safe in the face of years of saltwater and wind battery on the beach. We are talking about a 400 foot building. This is completely uncharted territory for our city. So we are basically committing to spend unknown millions of dollars to protect this building. This is a commitment to write a blank check, blank checks of taxpayer money for the next ninety nine years.
In addition to the prod in addition, the project has been redesigned causing a need to reconsider how this redesign impacts the city's responsibilities and expenses for maintenance. It would be completely irresponsible to push this project forward without taking time to thoroughly examine and make transparent to the public all financial aspects that could harm our city and to commit the city to a brand new law before we can truly understand how this new law could impact our future residents over the next ninety nine years. Just as we endeavor to make our parents proud, even after they have passed, we have a duty to our grandchildren and future generations that we that will ultimately form our legacy. In the city, if the City Of New York had ninety nine year land leased Central Park, how would that have changed the city? What would people think of their legacy?
When you consider your vote, please think of the priceless value of what this park brings to our city. Think of the recent article published in Parade Magazine and what makes Hollywood special. Please model our future and your legacy after Delray Beach. Let's not turn Hollywood into the next Sunny Isles. Thank you.
Monica Pulver, followed by Glenn Margolis, then Kathy DeBona.
Good evening, commissioners.
Hi, Monica.
Hi. I don't normally come to these meetings, but I felt compelled for this one. Sorry, I'm a bit soft spoken when I'm not angry. My concern here is really with the fruit of the poison tree, going back to the deed. The original intent of that deed and those people who gave that property to the people of this city.
That's the biggest concern. Because what we've done is circumvented their wishes. And that's not legal, because they put it in a legal document. So I'm not sure how the commissioners can go ahead with a project that, at first light looks illegal to do. So that's my first concern.
I mean, I'm the trustee on my grandmother's estate. If I don't follow her wishes with her money, my fiduciary duties have been lost. So that's the one thing. The second thing is that the gentleman here talked about putting certain things as restricted covenants. Which makes me laugh because the original owners did the same thing.
Restrictive covenants. But it was circumvented by a lease. Because they weren't smart enough or slick enough at the time to say, wait a minute, sell or lease prohibition. Because they weren't thinking like that. They didn't think that they'd be trade like that. So he talks about something in a restrictive covenant. It doesn't mean anything anymore, does it? If you talk about where we're coming from to where we're going. Developers always get their money up front. We all know that. So since you guys know for five years, you've been listening to everybody say no. My question is, why are you doing it? Mayor?
Mayor?
Why? Why lead this? If the money isn't really solid, and you can't honestly say this will benefit the residents of our city, then there's another reason. And that's what all of you have to figure out for yourselves. What is the real reason? Because it doesn't look like you're benefiting us. So are you benefiting you? Thank you very much for your time.
Thank you. One would think that all the slides shown by the staff show the public benefit, but hey. Glenn Margolis, followed by Kathy DeBona.
Good evening, mayor and commissioners. I'm Glenn Margolis and a long term Hollywood resident. I've been an AICP certified planner for almost fifty years. I've studied cities. I've studied development, transportation, and emergency management.
And my first concern and it's already been covered is what about the evacuation is going to take place here? This is a mandatory evacuation zone. So now you have more people that have to evacuate. You have more shelters that have to be added. And that's something that will never be addressed because you're dealing with the devil with this new law.
Live Local will probably come back and bite you, and you will find out. If I was the developer and I was doing a Live Local deal with you, I would say, as soon as you sign that, I'm just going to design it how I want. I'll show you a few things, but I'm going to change them. And you have no ability to do anything because it takes the power away from the county, sure. But it takes the power away from the city.
You will not have the ability to manage this. You cannot write a local contract that will oversee, that will overarch the powers that the developer gets by going in on this live local law. Think this is a really there's so many things. I mean, I'm just sitting here listening. And the people here have brought up tremendous amount of downside to this.
The rosy projection figures, I haven't heard anything about how much is it going to cost. You don't just develop, millions of dollars of revenue by adding a 30 story building without cost. How many additional firefighters, special fire equipment will you have to purchase? How much, you know, is that all going to what are all these costs going to be? This is really not a very, you know, detailed project.
And by going with this live local, you're really cutting off any control that the city has. You really don't want to go this way. I mean, aside from it being a bad project for all these other reasons, you don't want to do this live local. You really, really need to think about this. If you really want to go forward, try to find another way.
But don't get into a way where the developer runs everything. You'll find that your contract and agreement will be easily overthrown in court. I mean, courts these days, they go with the big money people. And the developers are the ones that have the big money. The city, you're worried about making some revenue here. Think the downside is going to be very bad.
Thank you. Kathy DeBona, followed by Steve Welsh, then Gladys Wood.
Hello, each and every one of you. Kathy DeBona, and I'm here today as the president of the Hollywood Beach Civic Association, as well as a fifty three year resident of this city. Proud resident of this city. Each one of you know that. I picked this up today. You probably have seen this. This is the Dania Beach Press latest edition. And on it, it shows how many more people we're going to have on our streets and how many more people are going to be coming into all of these big buildings and condos that are being built. Two eight story buildings will join. Second 101 apartment building due to open 2026.
We're being squashed in. The traffic has been horrendous anyway. I think you and I spoke about this recently, Josh, that there are some days where it's like fourth of July down on the beach. You can't move. I can't get out to get into the street to get on A1A. It's just incredible. As far as 1301 is concerned, these fine people, your constituents, these highly intelligent people have spoken about all of this for five years over and over again. They know the numbers. I'm not a number person. You know that about me already.
Can't even balance my own checkbook. I'm a person that talks from the heart. And my heart says that right now, on this day, this D day, this is the day where you prove to us, our people, your people, whether or not you're going to break trust. Because this is an open trust issue. We have trusted you.
You've been elected to represent us, to represent what we wish, what the majority wish. Over and over and over and over, over the years, we come before you. I'm here begging at this point because I know what today means. I'm here pleading for the people that have, I can't tell you in the last couple of days and nights, how many people have either called me, emailed me, text me, stopped me. They're scared.
They don't want to lose this. Today you gave the awards for the preservation awards for the awardees. And I wasn't able to be here because I had to sit in the DMV to get my license renewed. But we had our representatives here. And I'm very proud to be on the preservation board.
1301 is right next to those same buildings that we just got a preservation award for, Those Tudor buildings. That area, to me, should be under the overlay for preservation, including 1301. It wasn't included when we did the GO Bond. But right after the GO bond was implemented, then we heard, oh, there's big problems at 1301. Why wasn't it included then to be fixed? Okay, is that it? Thank you, though, for listening.
Steve Welsh, followed by Gladys Wood. Then the last three speakers will be Isabel Barney, Gadijay Ajei, and Claudia Herzog.
Good evening. My name is Steve Welsh. I am here to urge a no vote on Item 23. To understand why this Live Local pivot is so fundamentally misguided, we must look at the history of the developer, Jorge Perez, CEO of the Related Group. He built his immense success on the foundations of genuine, affordable housing.
After earning his degree, he began his career as city planner, city of Miami. He created neighborhood programs and neighborhoods that actually worked for lower income people. He successfully utilized federal subsidies to build a multibillion dollar portfolio before expanding into luxury coastal high rises. Mr. Perez knows firsthand how affordable housing is to work.
It is therefore beyond comprehension why Related Group is choosing to compromise its corporate legacy by working with Mayor Levy to strip Hollywood citizens of its property. This land was explicitly and legally deeded to the citizens of Hollywood. Not to Jorge Perez, not to you, and not to you, to us. There is a viable transformative solution that would protect public assets and serve as a monumental boon to Mr. Perez's sons, John Paul and Nick, who now manage the firm's housing pipeline.
If affordable housing is truly the driving spirit behind this pivot, not just a convenient legal shield, I challenge the developer and the city to redirect these resources where they're actually needed. I propose comprehensive alternatives, transfer the development rights away from our irreplaceable beachfront, take the $365,000,000 related plan to spend on a highly disruptive Barrier Island high rise, and deploy those funds toward true equitable housing along Hollywood's primary transportation corridors, Federal Highway, Dixie Highway and State Route 441. Focusing on sensitive, considered infill in these inland neighborhoods would address Hollywood's actual workforce housing deficiencies without suffocating our Barrier Island. Finally, because the commission appears intent on rushing this vote to ignore the public's desire to wait for a November referendum, I am also formally submitting the attached 119 public record requests to the city clerk to ensure complete transparency throughout this process. Please vote no on item 23.
32.
Gladys Wood. Followed by Isabel Barney.
GLODY Good evening. I'm also opposed to building a high rise condo on the 1301 Property, one of the last remaining locations with open space on Hollywood Beach. This project has faced significant opposition, and for many valid reasons, in the past. And it's shameful that the Live Local law is now being considered as a method to push it through. I ask that you listen to the voices of the community, the taxpayers and residents who want to preserve and protect our barrier island and beautiful beach from overdevelopment, increased traffic, and greater density.
We deserve to be heard. Before moving forward with any application of the Live Local Law for this project, this very controversial project, the community should be allowed the opportunity to vote on it in a public referendum. Thank you.
Thank you. Isabel Barney, followed by Gadisai or Gadiyaji, you'll tell us, Mr. Aju. But go ahead, Isabel.
Yeah, good evening. I was going to speak for my three minutes and then decided that everything I was going to say has been said. And my only request is that you do not vote tonight, but think about everything that has been said today. And from my heart, I hope that something moves you. Because sometimes I feel like nothing we say moves you because you sit here and it seems like you already made your minds.
And so many times I've said what I was going to say. It's not the first time. And we're all human beings. We all make mistakes. We all have passions. But there is always one right thing. And I think the right thing is to say no to this project. And there are so many other options. So just put your hand in your heart and think with your heart instead of whatever else has been driving you until now. Because there is more than just this next project to us all. We have to move on. Thank you.
Thank you. Gadisai Agu. He's going to tell me if I pronounced it correctly. And then final speaker will be Claudia Herzog.
Good evening, everyone. Thank you very much. I'm so proud to have such a great, brilliant neighbors. I'm not going to be as brilliant as everybody else. I don't think I need to say no to our government. I think you know what to do. I saw some posters. And I was speaking for a few years to the people. I said, what is this? And everybody was explaining a little bit. And I trust you guys. I said, this thing is not going to happen at all. This is just common sense. And I never heard, not even one person, who was in favor of this. Never, never.
So I thought this is my first time engaging into this. I never thought this is going to be even this far. Today is my first time, and I'm very surprised. Before Margaritaville, before I was hanging out every weekend over there, And because of the project, I was not involved. But I needed to move to Freedom Street together with the dogs. It's Okay. I'm with my kids. But because of this project, I think I'm going to need to move even north there. Don't know. But I think it's going to change my habits with my family as well. So thank you very much. You know what to do, I'm sure. And thank you.
Concludes public comment. Appreciate everybody that came out. Alright. Now we'll have an opportunity for the city commission to ask any questions of the city staff or just discuss the item. Ultimately, a motion will be made, and we will take a vote on this resolution. And that will end the meeting since this is the last item on today's agenda. Let's begin with commissioner Schuham.
Thank you, mayor. First, I just want to thank all the residents that came out tonight. You've touched on so many of the issues that I have in my notes as well. And so I really just want to thank you for your ongoing dedication to making sure the city is doing what's right. So thank you.
Lisa, my first question is for you. And one of the speakers mentioned poor doors. And for those that don't know, in buildings in other cities we've never had anything like this in Hollywood before when housing that's affordable is built within a condominium or other market building, oftentimes the developer will have separate entrances for people that are on the lower income. Or they won't be allowed to use the amenities in the building. Or they have to have amenity fees.
Do we know in this particular project if there's assurances that all amenities will be available to all residents, and that there will be no distinct entrance, and that the condos and apartments will be evenly distributed throughout the building.
Either to Lisa or city manager, whoever. I mean, haven't As
I mentioned earlier, the design has not been submitted. There have been some preliminary discussions.
Guys, please don't interrupt. Please jazz hands or maybe like this. I don't know.
There have been some preliminary discussions about the design, but nothing has been formally submitted in regard to the design. The amenities, I understand there will be amenities for both the condos as well as the rentals.
Separate amenities. It really hasn't been discussed
great detail. So until really they submit a plan and a design, we don't have all the answers.
Thank you. I'm going to get back to that. I think, mayor, in the interest of time, I am going to start with my objections to the resolution. And then what I would like to conclude with is, if you guys are going to pass this resolution because I will not be supporting it my suggested changes to it to avoid things just talking about, corridors and things like that. Which actually I had submitted to staff about a year ago, the Bell Harbor ordinance, that bans those.
But we haven't gotten around to passing that yet. So I'll come back to that. So my first comment is, we should not be invoking the Live Local Act as a municipality in the state of Florida. And I cannot support the way we are proceeding. Are we, as a commission dedicated to fighting home rule, really going to invoke this Live Local Act?
All to circumvent what was legally and contractually required and anticipated when this agreement was signed. City and county review were a part of this contract. So, the Live Local Act can be used to create affordable housing in appropriate locations. As many of these residents said, it should be near appropriate infrastructure, like public schools, where we have none of those on the Barrier Island. The Live Local Act is a huge erosion of the ability of Florida cities and counties to govern themselves.
And the use of it, by our commission as a tool to undermine home rule anywhere, is a slap in the face. And contrary to the objectives of the Florida League of Cities, our neighboring Florida cities, and our counties. But no more, especially here in Hollywood. Where together, the seven of us, with our staff and our outside counsel, have thus far defeated the improper use of the Live Local Act. It is a huge mistake to support this coercive action with unknown, absolutely unknown, and permanent ramifications.
Once this building is built, that piece of public open space is gone. And to be the first city to sacrifice community park and open space pursuant to the Live Local Act is shockingly wrong. Don't do it. And then really, a huge question. How, Damaris, can we have a resolution tonight based on a law that does not even exist?
Guys, please do the jazz hands, please.
Yes, please.
The way that the resolution is drafted, it allows the use of Live Local to the extent that that use is applicable to the contract. If there is no if this is not signed into law by the governor, then Live Local would not be allowable
No, GREGORY we're for talking about it tonight. It's not even even if the governor approves it, it doesn't go into effect until July 1.
That's correct.
Secondly, adding density. Notwithstanding of how we got here tonight, which is simply to avoid the ordinary and anticipated county oversight of any project in this city, and especially those in fragile environments, my concerns throughout this review process remain. It is a terrible location to add increased density. We are doubling the density that this commission approved less than six months ago, when we approved 25 units per acre for a grand total of 111 units. This is an at risk area for climate catastrophe and for sea level rise.
It is a barrier island and a hurricane evacuation zone. To add 200 and is at least a two ten units, the proposal before us adding another 100 units from what we just decided in January, makes these concerns even more alarming. And that's on top of what these residents have talked about forever. The original deed restrictions, which we stretched to get this far. And also, it's truly, really a proper P3, which is something that includes publicly available benefits.
These private condos and these rental units will not be available to the public. Under the current please do not make any noise. Under the current comprehensive development agreement, rentals are expressly barred. The original P3 approval was critically based on the inclusion of only luxury condominiums and no rentals. And contrary to the erroneous assertion in tonight's draft resolution, the CDA, which is the Comprehensive Development Agreement, as signed, precludes rentals.
It says, in the event that the developer determines that despite the developer's best commercially reasonable efforts, The private facilities cannot be developed as a condominium within the agreed timeframes. The developer shall have the right to convert the private development to a rental project. And that is it. And not only hasn't that been done, this developer, along with its partner at the city, has done nothing for five years to try to get the project that is originally set forth in the CDA approved. They submitted a joint application with the city years ago, let it expire, and has done nothing since.
There's nothing pending before the county at all right now. That has to do with the original plans, other than the map change. Adding 40% rental units after a contract that doesn't allow rentals is a profound change to the original development agreement, as stated, 100% luxury condos. It also takes away the city and county approvals that were legally and contractually required. And, like I said, the Live Local preemption has not even been approved yet.
And not only that, the Live Local Act did not even exist when this P3 was brought to our attention. To amend this agreement in a way that is presented to us tonight is tantamount, in my opinion and I've only been doing construction law for thirty five years tantamount to a cardinal change. It is material and it is so profound that it falls outside of our original contract. Increasing the density, relying on a statutory scheme that didn't exist at the time of the agreement, or that the lease was signed, adding rental units, constitutes a new agreement. And as such, the ordinance that this commission agreed to in October of 'twenty four requiring any lease of this property for fifty years or more, it must be approved by the majority vote of the city electors voting on such proposal.
This commission and God bless all of you we did the right thing in October of 'twenty four. And that was Commissioner Kalari. It was the right thing to do. The charter vote had gotten screwed up. And we self imposed on ourselves the botched charter language with this new ordinance.
Any agreement that we reach to add rental units under the Live Local Act at this density has to go to a vote of our residents. And the good news is that per our city clerk, we have sufficient time to get it on the ballot for November. I believe she said that June 8 is the deadline. Should we ignore our own law that we put in place in October of 'twenty four, any taxpaying resident will likely be able to follow suit to properly enforce our ordinance. The financial backup.
And David, you know how much I love you. It is sorely, sorely lacking. The deal presented to us tonight has no real backup other than $1,800 a square foot for these units. And it is absolutely a fantasy and unrealistic. Forgive my skepticism, but in December and I mean December of 'twenty five, when we sat here, the financial overview of this project without an affordable housing component projected $1,830,000,000 over the life of the project.
I have that. That was from December. That has increased by a billion dollars since December.
It's
impossible. Additionally, there has not been a single sale on the Barrier Island for $1,800 a square foot ever. You all recall that the driving issue for this P3 is generating revenue. When we first listened to these proposals, we spent hours and hours analyzing the value. Why aren't we demanding that now?
What is the rush? Get us a true valuation. Bring in an independent entity to value this. We would be breaching our duty to vote on this today. The P3 statute, 255,060 five(five) requires that the city perform an independent analysis of a proposed P3, which demonstrates cost effectiveness and overall public benefit before the contract is awarded.
And as a commission, with the magnitude of the changes today, we must demand that same exact level of analysis. The rise and fall of this city does not depend on a single project. This city has a lot of needs. It always has. We always figure out a way to get the most important ones done.
But to sell our recreation and commercial space when things get tight is a terrible solution. Whoever here said, you are selling the golden goose, is correct. We've done it to Margaritaville. We're going to do it here. It'll be Garfield next.
And whoever said, be careful, they're coming to your district next. Because as soon as we run out of beachfront property, well, the beach is going to be coming to District 2 and then District 3. So those will be Beachfront 2. We cannot sell our open space to make up what we see as shortfalls that we know because we have the most amazing budget staff. We meet it every single year.
And it is disingenuous for this commission to suggest to the public that we have to do this. We do not have to do this. Where is the draft amendment to the lease? And I'm going back to why in God's name are we doing this two years after the idea popped up. The original ninety nine year lease is completely structured around luxury condos.
It says, the tenant intends to develop private facilities of the project into a condominium, and upon completion, transfer the individual condominium units to condominium owners. After recording the condominium declaration, tenant shall assign the lease to the condominium association, which will assume all rights and obligations of the tenant. The documents define a residential building as a luxury residential building. The ability to sublease by the tenant, which is, in essence, a related group, is allowed only to the extent those subtenants are consistent with a luxury condominium. The comprehensive development agreement defines private facilities as luxury rental condominium.
This proposed amendment, again, changes all of it. And this is a profound change that requires a voter referendum. This amendment is missing crucial details. And here are just a few. And honestly, I got a lot going on right now and have not had a chance to go through all of this.
But who is going to be the landlord to these 84 units? Per section two fifty five-sixty five-seven(seven), the rights and responsibilities of the parties to a P3 in the course of the project operation have to be identified in the agreement. There is no identification in the agreement as to who is going to be responsible for these rental units. Who is actually physically going to maintain the live local apartments? We have had so many concerns about condo associations when we initially considered this.
We were so worried. How is this condo association going to take care of our precious beachfront? And now we're injecting a second entity, a landlord of LIVE Local Apartments. There's no discussion of short term vacation rentals, which is a huge discussion. The lease currently prohibits rental of any unit for less than six months.
How does that work with 84 rental units? We do not, as a city of Hollywood, which I am so deeply proud to sit here and serve with you guys, we never needed a local Live Local agreement to build affordable housing here in Hollywood. We've done it. We've done it time and again on our own with creative financing. And at every step, people have come to us.
Commissioner Gruber, you suggested it on several projects. And we did it. If you need any evidence that this is simply a workaround to avoid local oversight, just look at Orange Brook, another P3 where we put in, on our own, a demand for affordable housing. If we wanted affordable housing at this site, we could have gotten it without any loss of home rule, without any tax incentives, without any financial sacrifice, or strings attached as they are to a Live Local project. But we didn't because we wanted luxury condominiums in that location.
So let's not be disingenuous. The need for affordable housing and hero housing, whatever we call it, is great. But it has nothing to do with why we're here today. We just added 8,000 units along Federal Highway and four thousand three hundred to four forty one. And what I think has not been discussed at all, if anyone falls into this 80% to 120% AMI, please come live on the Barrier Island.
Because if you search today to rent anything on the Barrier Island under $2,600 a month, you will find 100 units available today. So why are we building for that bracket of income? It's not needed. It's there. Over 100 units.
And all of them are larger than the 500 square feet micro units that are proposed today. And none of them, I assure you, have poor doors or separate entities, and they let all of their residents come through the same door and use the same pool. The real need in Hollywood and I'm going to ask Pat Kris to put up the slide. The real need, if we want to address a need for affordable housing on this island, if we really want to be productive and follow through with the suggestions that we've often heard here, is make that housing available for the lowest of income who actually work on the island. Cooks, waiters, hostesses, housekeepers, all of that.
This is a go to the rental page. One is owner. Yes. This slide come from Broward County. It was prepared by FIU's Urban and Metropolitan Studies Department, but this is the document that's used in the county. And you will see in the category of
80%
to 100% medium income, we have a surplus in the city of Hollywood of 2,500 units. But you look at extremely low income, that's where the need is. 6,800 units. And it's been discussed on dais. If we really wanted to do something incredible, let's allow the cooks, the maids, the waitresses to give up their cars and live on the Barrier Island. But that's not what we're doing,
because that's not really, really the concern. Island.
I said proper affordable housing, especially hero housing, should be near all the things that are important transportation, medical, schools, etcetera. That is not the case here. If we do move forward, I hope you demand that the resolution is fixed. And this is what I'm coming back to. Because I have been on this dais too many times trying to convey that this is not a good deal for the city of Hollywood.
The dollars are unrealistic. Like I said, the $1,800 is not real. It's not real. Six months ago, we looked at $1,800,000,000 And today, it's whatever it was. It's so fantastical.
But if this commission does decide to move forward, I suggest one, two, three, four, five changes to the current resolution. And I'm very serious about this. And I hope, if you guys vote, that you will put these changes in there. The first is get rid of the 80 to 120 AMI and make it under the 30%. There's plenty of units on the island under $2,600 or at $2,600 and they're available right now.
Make the threshold for those people that really need it, where there's a very serious deficit in Hollywood. Number two, stop the delay tactics. As I mentioned, nothing has happened on this project for years except talk, talk, talk. The amendment must expressly state that there will no longer be any statutory tolling for, quote, emergency orders issued due to hurricanes in other parts of the state. This project could have been built by now.
But because the developer has taken advantage of delays, because a typical requirement in an agreement like this was inadvertently omitted from the original agreement, we have been taken advantage of. All we have to say is no statutory delays. It has to be true force majeure, where the developer's ability to proceed is physically hampered by the city or by mother nature. It has to be fixed. Otherwise, there's going to be three more hurricanes. Nothing's going to happen in Hollywood. And you're going to lose another four years. I'm serious. This is a critical amendment. So number one, lower the AMI percentage.
Number two, stop the delayed tactics. Number three, please do not proceed with this amendment to the Comprehensive Development Agreement without making sure that disgraceful, poor door policies are barred. I don't think any of you want to be known as the poor door landlord, implying that our heroes or our busboys aren't fit to walk through the same lobby or swim in the same pool as the wealthier residents. No segregation, no separate amenities. All residents in any city building get to use the same amenities, Demand that the affordable units are distributed throughout the building, no segregation.
Four, reclaim the unencumbered parcels. So if you'll recall the original agreement, there was no density allowed at the community center. So the developer asked, and the city agreed, to bring in surrounding partials that we could transfer that density from to get to what then became 111 units when we passed the LUPA in December. If you proceed under the Live Local Act, all of the density that we gave to the project should be returned to the city in this amendment. Get rid of it.
If you are getting your density under the Live Local, which for those that don't know, allows the highest density anywhere in this city to be used on our barrier island, then none of the additional parcels that were referenced in the comprehensive development agreement are needed any longer. And we should take them out so they're available for the future to the city, unencumbered. And then finally, this was one that I just picked up during the presentation. On slide 12 of Lisa's presentation, there was a comment in the amendment that was a one way slide 12. Nothing in this section shall limit or impair the city's contractual obligations to the developer granted under the original agreement, the First Amendment, or any subsequent city approvals.
I would ask Damaris, unless there's some good reason otherwise, that this be mutual. That none of the developer's contractual obligations are impacted or impaired either. So that's my one, two, three, four, fifth suggestion that if you're going to proceed with this, make sure these five changes are in. So we are home rule heroes. And that means we don't support or invoke state laws like the Live Local Act that undermine our ability to control our destiny by home rule.
And that should apply whether it's Hollywood, Broward County, or any other Florida municipality or county. Let the comprehensive development agreement as we agreed to in 2022 just run its course with the current scope of work and the 25 units per acre that you just approved in December. Tell the developer that per the contract, as required, they must make at least a reasonable commercial effort to satisfy the comprehensive development agreement in its current form. That is what Hollywood and related agreed to. And the Live Local Act will be here.
It's not going away. We know it's getting worse every year. It will be here if for some reason the county does not grant the density change. Then proceed with Live Local if that's what we choose to do. But why would we do it now? Why would we do it now? Otherwise, please just send it to the voters. It's a great opportunity to do what is right for our engaged, intelligent, and concerned residents. If both parties agree that the Live Local Act is the way to go, send it to the voters. As I mentioned, I believe June 8 is the deadline to get it on the ballot.
And I think, as I mentioned, that regardless of what we decide, that it absolutely will be subject to the ordinance that we enacted in October 24. Because to convert this from a straight P3 with all 100% luxury condos, to now 40% apartments under a law that didn't exist, creates a profoundly different project. And it is subject to the laws that we imposed on ourselves. So that's it. I hope, if nothing else, that at least these changes get put into the amendment if you choose to vote on it.
But I ask that you just let the document, as it stands, run its
course. Thank you.
Thank you.
Raelin, during the presentation, staff had pointed out that the next step in this process is for the staff to work with council and amend the comprehensive development agreement and the ground lease. And it may include subjects that commissioner Shuham had had brought up today. I don't feel like it's appropriate in this resolution to get into the details of what would be deeper analysis into the amendments that need to be made to the CDA and the lease agreement. So I don't see a reason
to But mayor, why would you agree to something before you know the impact to everything? Why? What is
the All this guys, all this resolution is doing is expressing the city commission's agreement and intent to be willing to use a Live Local Act subject to this coming back.
Where does it say subject to it says we're letting them proceed under Live Local. What am I missing?
But, Raelin, why don't you go ahead with regards to what's next in the process?
Yes. So there is the ability to proceed under Live Local for the issue of the density. But the comprehensive agreement, governs our business arrangement and the ground lease, have to be modified. And so those will come back with the opportunity to adjust terms in any way the commission Why would
are we breaking it into pieces like that? Why shouldn't this commission have the opportunity to see every change that's needed before Live Local becomes a part of this deal?
We're happy to do it afterwards. In other words, this is just to express the intent and then see the details. And We need to give them
GREGORY will suggest a sixth change to the amendment, and that is that it does not go into effect until the comprehensive development agreement and the lease are properly amended to accommodate it. In other words, you're biting off pieces before you know what you're eating.
That's the practical impact of this anyway. Nothing happens without an amendment
No, it city isn't, mayor. You're giving the developer the opportunity to build a Live Local Act under the ordinance. That cannot happen without city approval. And tonight, we would be giving city approval for a Live Local Act on our property.
Except that the difference is and I'll pass it on to Commissioner Biederman next except that the difference is, in this case, we are the property owner. We are a party to a P3. It's not some live local act on private property that runs its own course under the statute. Here, we are the landlord. Here, we get to approve the design, the site plan, and the terms of our lease agreement. So I disagree respectfully with
the concern. Once this is agreed to tonight, there is no taking back the ability for this project to be a Live Local Act project.
I'm fine with that. Let's go to Commissioner Biederman.
We have the people.
Let's go. Commissioner Biederman, please don't.
I thought there were people in front of me, but Okay. So it was addressed about the parking. And can somebody clarify how many parking spaces we're going to have? Because with more units, you need more parking spaces. But somebody said something about we're not having more parking space. By the way, it's the same amount of parking spaces as the original agreement.
Just to be clear, the actual design and site plan are not before you tonight. And the, you know, that has not been determined yet. So the amount of parking spaces that would be required are not, have not been, you know, determined at this point in time. So that would be something that could be negotiated if there's a concern that the parking is deficient.
So I have a problem with that. Because we need to make sure there's a surplus of parking above what there is now, right? That's we promising. Now we are getting an additional 84 units without 84 and a half more parking spaces. Am I right?
There isn't a finalized design and site plan yet. Is your request to have additional parking for the live local units, is that what you're asking for?
So if the parking calculation is one and a half parking spaces per unit, then we need 122 more parking spaces above what was already promised, right?
Yes. Yes.
Okay. So we're not giving up that opportunity by approving this amendment about requiring more parking because the Live Local doesn't give up that requirement of so many parking spaces per unit. The
terms of our agreement would control the approval of the site plan and that through the ground lease and the development agreement, right?
Right. Yes. Think So we would have to agree to I whatever think is the design and site plan process will determine the level of parking that is required for Approving the
a Live Local doesn't give up our ability as a legislative body to approve the site plan and that stuff?
That's correct. There are some
Andrea Winget, Director of Development Service. I just wanted to add to what the city manager was saying is that you're not in a regulatory capacity tonight approving a Live Local. You're in your landlord tenant being asked to approve concepts of adding affordable housing and adding another tool to the contract, which includes Live Local. And I'm not sure if that helps with some of the conversation.
Just an expression of intent.
It doesn't. But I believe that the way I understand this, the fact that we're the landlord gives us more power than a typical Live Local Act landlord.
JULIE That's correct.
JULIE And we're not giving up any of that landlord right tonight.
JULIE The only thing that you are allowing tonight is the use of the Live Local Act to provide density through the provision of 40% of the units for affordable or workforce housing.
But by doing that, we're not giving up any legislative powers? That's my question, I guess.
I'm sorry. I had to the What's going on?
Landlord's approval of doing a Live Local project, what powers are we stripping of the legislative body?
It's not really the legislative. It's really the contract. We're under contract with the P3 partner. And that contract determines our relationship and what we are authorized to approve and what to review. And that's the full scope of a site plan and design and everything else.
And by doing this, we are reclaiming our home rule by taking the home rule local as opposed to giving it to the county or allowing the county to control what we do locally.
In this case, the way that Live Local works when it is municipally owned or government owned property, you're wearing essentially two hats. And you don't cede any of the rights that you have as a owner of the property. You, in this case, are regaining the right to control the residential density on the site, which in Broward County is controlled by the county. And so in this case, Live Local brings that back to you as a landlord.
Okay. And like Commissioner Quintana, I love the idea of mixed use housing, mixed income housing, where we have different income levels living in the same concept. And we've talked about that in other buildings. So I agree with Commissioner Cantona on that. It was said earlier about that this building isn't going to be sustainable because it's live local. Is that true? I mean, we're going to be still living by the Florida code and
all those things, right? Absolutely. All of the requirements that are currently in the comprehensive agreement stay there, with the exception of the provisions that are being amended tonight. And those relate to the number of units being provided and the type of unit, with the 84 units being the live local units or hero housing.
Okay. So the live local doesn't allow them to skip our local building codes or requirements like our green building codes and stuff like that?
That's correct.
And they're going to be South Florida building standards, normal FEMA, floor elevation. KAUFMAN:
JOANNE Right. All of those things
remain
So when other buildings are knocked down by a hurricane, theoretically, building is still going to be standing because it is built better, more modern? Okay.
Yes.
It was said earlier about how the taxpayers should decide. But the last time I checked, seven of us live in Hollywood. We all pay taxes in Hollywood. I believe we all own homes and we pay our property taxes anyway. And it's hard to believe that residents would criticize our staff, that we don't know what that our staff doesn't know what we're talking about.
But yet the staff member, singular, at the South Florida Planning Council or Broward County Planning Council knows better than what our staff knows. I didn't interrupt you all. Don't interrupt me, please. So it's kind of hypocritical to tell our staff how much we appreciate them and then say, You don't know what you're talking about. Back the bus up over them.
And I spoke to Bob Giacen multiple times over the years. I know him better than probably everybody in this room. Maybe not everybody. And I spoke to him on 04/26/2021 when this first became a thing but there was no opposition to it yet. And Bob told me some of the stuff that's in the letter.
The only thing that was said today and the only thing that I saw in the letter online that he said for sure was the fact that they're not making more green space. But what he did tell me at the time and which was confirmed in the minutes that were read at the last couple of hearings is that the deed was written to be vague and the minutes that were read at the meeting said that the commission could do with what they want with this property. That's what was in the minutes and that's what Bob Giacen told me on 04/26/2021 at 2PM. I know it's hard to believe I know the date and time but I looked up my notes. And I spoke to Bob Gaiason two nights ago after I saw the letter and we discussed it.
And he said, Oh, I sent that letter to the Broward County. I didn't expect everybody to see what it said in it. So I would love to see Bob Gaiason tell all of us what was written in the letter because I don't know that it wasn't prompted by somebody because some of what's written in the letter isn't factual And I'm gonna end with this. And I'm gonna agree with Donna Green. I prefer to be an optimist and believe that the numbers that staff gave us are gonna pan out to be accurate.
And the residents twenty years from now, five years from now, fifty years from now are gonna remember the five commissioners or six commissioners that vote yes on this and that make this go forward are going to believe that we did the right thing because they're gonna benefit from the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars that are gonna improve every neighborhood from Liberia to Hillcrest to Beverly Park to Driftwood Boulevard Heights and Playland Estates because those are the neighborhoods that need improvements. The beach has 400 some odd million dollars worth of improvements over the last thirty years. It's time the rest of the city gets improvements. Thank you.
Thank you.
Could could the sergeant in honor please remove him? Please remove him. Let's go ahead now to commissioner Quintana. Thank
you, mayor. Raelyn, when we started the discussion, can you clarify for me? You said the latest amendment to the Live Local Act allows cities to determine. Could you just clarify that for me?
The latest amendment to the Live Local Act includes government owned lands as places where live local developments can be built. And so in this particular case, because this is government owned property, it now allows live local to give us control over the density issue. And as the owner of the property, the landlord, we have ultimate control over design, site plan, and what goes on our property through the business agreements, the comprehensive agreement that we have. Now we have an existing comprehensive agreement. So that is at base what we've already agreed to.
And there are aspects of that that need to be modified in order to address this. And we are fully committed to working to bring those modifications forward. But there is an agreement that's already in place.
Okay. So is that latest version of the Live Local, is that the same thing I'm looking at, Adam, the House Bill thirteen eighty nine? Is that the same thing that Raelynn is referring to?
That's correct.
Okay. So here's I'm just going to read a couple of lines from the beginning. And my I'm not an attorney. Let me just say that. But it says, it's an act relating to affordable housing, amending state statute 125 blah blah blah and 166 blah blah blah, requiring requiring that counties and municipalities authorize multi family and mixed use residential uses and allowable uses.
So, it means that the city cannot say no, correct, because we're required to authorize mixed use and multifamily development, correct? The word says requires.
Sorry. So the city, you know, there's multiple layers of approvals in these projects. And Live Local addresses where residential development can go in areas that don't typically have that land use or zoning that would allow multifamily or mixed use residential development. And so in order to promote affordable housing and allow it in more places than local regulations might typically allow it. That's what Live Local is.
So there's a difference between allow and require for You know, like that means different things to me. When it says requires that municipalities allow it on their property, that's what it says. And then, further down, it says that this new version prohibits municipalities from restricting the height or restricting the through other the height, or blah blah blah. Dimensional means requiring certain setbacks. So, we can't control the setbacks.
We can't control the setbacks. This new bill says that. That cities We're the landlord. But so, how is that different? Somebody help me understand.
Because we're the landlord, but we're also municipality, and the municipality can't control So, then, it says further, that's in here, but then that's the House bill. Then, the Senate bill, nine sixty two, it limits the city's ability to restrict height, density or design. Hello, design. So, I'm wondering, the changes that have happened to the design I mean, I think the new design for this project is so much better than what we got the first time around, I have to say. I agree that it's much better.
But if this Senate Bill nine sixty two, which I guess is that Adam please tell me if I'm wrong.
JAMES Sure, if I could. So ultimately, both the Senate and the House approved House Bill thirteen eighty nine. Nine sixty two was substituted for thirteen eighty nine. So that is the bill that currently has been approved by the legislature and is awaiting governor action.
Which one? The thirteen eighty nine, not nine sixty two?
That's correct. So the enrolled
bill So we would still be able to control design?
As long as the bill doesn't state that, then yes.
But we would still have restrictions DELL: on controlling height setbacks or step backs?
GREGORY Correct.
So the city wouldn't be able to control that stuff with the new Live Local version.
Yes. And it follows House Bill thirteen eighty nine, the language that's spelled out there, would be the Okay. Better
you for clarifying that. I totally I wrote down, Raelynn, at your introduction when you talked about the challenges that we have with having to upgrade our utilities. And it's one of the things that I've been losing sleep over and the cost of that and how much of a hardship it's going to be on our residents. And the idea that bringing in this money could help offset that hardship, you knew that I was going to hear that, that's why you said it. I yeah.
So, I just made note of it. Then, the next thing I wrote down was you said there was a decline in the growth of our tax rate over the last I didn't catch the number of years. Can you tell me what that means?
So the rate of increase in our overall taxable value has gone down each year. We were seeing a steady increase of our taxable value. One year might be 7%. Next year, it was 8%. And we were in double digits for a while. For the past four years, that rate of increase has declined.
So you're referring to like when Marty Care comes and does his
Yes.
Okay. So what happens if, David, you spent so much time with me helping me understand those numbers? I wish that we would have had enough time to really do that with our residents, so that it wasn't, because the slides did go by really fast. And I, as a resident, would not have been able to understand that without the ability to sit down with you. And even then, you know, it's not an easy thing to grasp if it's not your every day.
But, I mean, what if, one of the questions I ask myself is like, what if the values go down and the projections that we're making is not what it ends up being. And to what extent do we have assurances from the developer that the city won't end up losing that, you know, and losing what we're counting on to make this worth it. Because if we're gonna I mean, that's the thing I've said. If we're gonna do this, where we're going to give up this public land, then we have to be really in a good place about knowing we're gonna we're it's gonna be worthwhile to make this sacrifice. And so, you know, what provisions are are we putting in place so that the developer is making our city whole should something change in the conditions?
Raelin, maybe you could talk about the minimum guarantees. And even if this were a lesser dollar per square foot, you know, if $1,800 were unachievable and it's $1,200 a square foot, which Hollywood Beach is getting all day long, It's still $60,000,000 on the top side. I mean, even if you reduce the assumption at $1,800 which pushes the needle for luxury, but nonetheless, looking forward four years from now is probably a fair figure. But even if it were not to materialize, you're still at the first year, 14% of gross sales being at $60,000,000 range. And then subtract from that the cost of the community center, the public community center.
And so you're still you still have a high figure. And the agreement itself, the original agreement, I believe, has a minimum 35 as a floor. But we're all day long going to be at 50 plus, even in a worst case scenario, in my mind.
The mayor's correct. He's remembering that the terms in the comprehensive agreement where we did set a floor of $35,000,000 So that that is the minimum that we would be achieving in the upfront years in that initial rent, in those initial payments, the $35,000,000 is the floor there. And then, like anything, the tax revenue will be based on the value of the property. So the tax revenue typically has increased over the years. And that is why Dave figured that at 3%, because that's typically what we've seen in terms of growth.
Right.
To add to that, excuse me, and to answer your question specifically, as Raelyn said and the mayor said, there is a floor of 35,000,000. So we did take a look and said, what would happen if that 1,800 didn't materialize? And we ran the numbers at 1,200, significantly lower. And it still generates, over the first year, that closing number, instead of being $98,000,000 would be $62,000,000 at $1,200
a square foot.
The And
2,700,000,000 number would change to $1,900,000,000 if all of those rental costs and sale costs came down to 1,200 square foot instead of 1,800 square foot. And 1,200, we think, is very low, very conservative. So even if it dropped all the way to that, we're still talking about $1,900,000,000 coming to the city based on the 126 and the 84 units.
Okay. Thank you.
So I do think it's important, if we have information about how the 84 units are going to be maintained, To share that information, I think as much as we can share, we should.
I expect those terms would be in the modified agreement.
Absolutely. So the ground lease, the comprehensive agreement, governs and is the controlling document during the entitlement and development construction phase, essentially. And then at that point, the ground lease kicks in and governs the remainder of the term of the agreement and kind of becomes the controlling document. So the ground lease will have to be modified. I believe the plan for and it's interesting to me because when this was originally proposed as a rental, Their original proposal was a rental.
And it was a luxury rental. And when it switched to a condominium, then the concerns started to be raised. Well, how will we possibly work with a condominium association versus, at least with a rental, you have one management company managing all of the rental units. And so we're only in business essentially with one entity that's managing all the rental units. And how will we handle that in a condominium?
And now that we've added the rental back in, that concern is sort of flipping on its head. So in reality, the rental unit, very similar to how we did at University Station with the public parking garage and the Berry University piece that is a retail component, we condo ed out our public portion of the parking garage. So just like you can have a residential condominium unit, you can turn into a condo unit those 84 hero housing units. And then they will be sold as a unit, the 84 individual units sold as one unit to a company. And it will likely be a related company.
They have an affordable division. And so it will likely go to that division to be managed like they manage hundreds really thousands of other affordable housing units across South Florida, Texas, Arizona, I mean, New York.
The affordable housing units will be kept at the affordable rate for thirty years, correct? That's correct?
Yes. So
the lease is for ninety nine years. So what happens to those 84 units at the end of thirty years?
We would have the opportunity as the landlord at that time, provided that some legislation hasn't changed, we haven't extended Live Local, to negotiate what we would like to have happen to those units at that point in time.
Who would we be negotiating with?
The company that owns those units at that point. Whether they would stay as affordable or and we control that. If we would like right now, at least will call for them to be managed as affordable. But all of that would be governed in the lease. And we
But if tend right to now, the commitment is just for thirty years.
Well, right now thirty years. Yes. Under Live Local, that's what the entitlement is Minimum of
thirty years. Live Local's the affordable housing is for a minimum of thirty years.
That's correct.
Because there's lots of places in Broward County where it's fifty.
Yes, they are getting, anyone who develops under Live Local is getting a benefit. And in order to get that benefit to be able to use Live Local, they must maintain that affordability for the thirty years.
Right. So at the end of thirty years, then the entity that owns the 84 units would then either choose to, depending on how negotiations go with us, either choose to keep it rental or choose to make them market rate units?
They will do whatever is required by us as the landlord in the ground lease. And we can discern that now. And we could amend that in the future. But they would be required to manage those units in the way that is provided for within the ground lease. Not now, but in the amendment to the ground lease.
Okay. I just have to say, I mean, it's hard for me to I will absolutely, under no circumstances, approve anything that has separate entrances for people who are in the affordable units. Absolutely under no circumstances will my name go on anything of the sort. And Commissioner Schuhann said a couple of the things that I had written down because a lot of the we have an excess of projects built at 120%. I do get to speak, right?
I do have time. I can speak? It's okay? All right. So, we have an excess of 120%.
What we don't have is for 60 and below. And so, when I look at the chart that shows what the 80 to 120% is for a single person, that's between 71 and $106,000 Our teachers make $51,000 as starters. Our police officers would be, I believe, at this oh my gosh, where is that post it note where I had that? Yeah, I think they would be yeah, 65. And so, lot of our city employees would not, they don't make the 80%.
They would not be able to afford these units. I have the categories here somewhere in my notes. But a lot of our professional people would not be able to. So I would request that the AMI be lowered. And so as it stands right now, and without knowing the answers to some of the questions that we had about what will be in the comprehensive agreement, I'm not going to be approving this. I'm not going to vote yes for this either, until that stuff is clear for me.
Thank you, Commissioner Quintana. Let's go to Commissioner Gruber.
Thank you. Just to touch on the if it was 120% AMI, correct. If it was a single income person, one teacher, single income, they wouldn't be in that bracket. But if it was a police officer, the teacher, couple parents, then they would be exactly in that bracket. So it does get into there. And the 30% to 120% AMI is not something that the city of Hollywood decides. That's federal, HUD, and the state. And they decide it's a quantitative, objective thing. And those things qualify. So it's not us putting it out there saying that this is what it is.
That comes from above us. And we don't have a say in that formula. Wanted to city attorney, if you could just read I just want to digress for a second. I think it's important. Can you read the deed restriction, please? I think it's 10 words. Yep.
Sorry. I just need to find that.
No worries.
Happy to read it.
JOSHUA So I don't know the exact words offhand. I think it's community space community, open space, parks, and
JOSHUA To the other municipal municipal purposes. Municipal purposes or
public purposes. Right,
any public or municipal purposes.
JOSHUA And case law would say that the use of leasing public property, even if that use is to lease it for private purpose, may still qualify and does still qualify as municipal purpose. And in this case, there is the community center that was the initial public purpose that the city was obtaining.
The former that used to be the sales center for the building that they built next door to 27 story towers.
I'm talking about the community center that is proposed under the P3.
Got
it. That's a public purpose, certainly, that the city has received.
Got it. Got it. So I just want to go back because if you had tuned into this when we started at 06:00 and never really paid attention to any of this, one would think that we are taking away the park, the community center, the parking, the public beach, and just putting a tower. Right? I see, Steve, you're shaking your head yes. Right? But see, that's not the case. And I'll tell you, I go to that beach more often as much if not more often than anyone in this room, that's the beach I go to. I've been going there for fifty years. I surf there. I go there with my family. I go there with my friends. And I know what's there. There's an old community center. We did our diamond service awards in there a few weeks ago.
I was in there. There's no windows. I felt like I was in a one star rehab facility for seniors. That's my opinion of it and that's what a lot of my friends and family feel about it. It's been there. It served a great purpose. It's been amazing. There's a playground there. I don't take my nieces and nephews there. It's it's, you know, long overdue for some repairs.
The bathrooms when we're at the beach and one of us need to go there, we just go home, you know. It's like there there those need to be repaired as well and there's a surface parking lot. And when this was first proposed, if you were to tell me we were getting rid of all of that and just putting a high rise, I would have said absolutely not. And when the deed restriction was explained to me, I said, what are we getting to replace what's there? Can someone pull up the slide of the picture of the proposal of the project? It's in here somewhere. So I'm passionate about this beach as well. This is this is where I go. Okay. You all can laugh.
It says more about you. That's fine. You know, you can laugh. This is I'm glad I made you laugh. Lebanese good, right? Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. It's one of the few places I can surf so I'm stuck going there. Do you
have the picture? Yeah, we'll bring it up.
Okay. Well, anyway, until we get to the picture. So my question was, what are we going to do to replace these which were given to us and with that deed restriction? So what do we have there? The new community center, which from what I understand and someone can correct me if I'm wrong, this is the only thing I'll accept is now much larger. It's got ceiling to floor glass two stories high overlooking the ocean. Is that correct? I don't know if the Eric, you wanna tell me that or
Image is in Lisa's presentation.
It was it Lisa's presentation. It's it's it's important, I think, that that we take a look at this because really, had you just come to this for the first time and watch these last three hours, that's really what you would think, that we're just replacing all these things with a high rise and not and not keeping the public amenities.
Just wait a minute for the
I'll wait
for it.
Yep. Well, it's up?
That's not it. It's a picture of
No, it's
a picture of rendering. Come on.
Sorry.
I know. It's important. Just wait. There
we go. No. No. Next one. There you go. Okay. So I'm sure all of you in this room are extremely familiar with what's there now. Right? So the community center is that front building. That's not for just the new residents. That's going to be for the community. That will be the nicest municipal community center in all of South Florida. Okay? I'm the commissioner for District 4. We don't have a community center. My my residents and I I know there's none of you here. There was one. He had to leave. You know, our our majority of them are in favor of this. They are.
You guys can say nobody wants it, but they are in favor. And they've come to past meetings and spoken. And they've been jeered at by you guys just like you do to me. But that's fine. I'm an elected official. You can do it to me. But I tell them, don't worry. You don't have to come here. You just tell me what you want and I'll it. Okay? Because is there anyone here from District 4 right now? Raise your hand if you are. From
District 5.
There's yeah. Anyway. Anyway. Anyway. So that's the new community center. I view that as as excuse me?
We have
to talk to you, Commissioner.
Nobody in there. Let's not have a back and forth from the audience.
Trust me about what? I'm saying that's the new community center. I view that as a significant improvement to the public. Right? If you look to the right, Harry Berry Park correct me if I'm wrong, but is that slated to be increased in green space when they remove the surface parking lot and put those parking spaces in the garage?
Yes. So there will be more green space.
Increasing green space, right? Parking garage will now encompass the public parking that we had, correct?
That's, well, between the parking garage and the surface parking that will be along Azalea Street and Surf Road, you will have
that. All together.
MARY
The total parking.
MARY So it's my interpretation that the public square footage available after this project is built will be significantly increased between the community center, the park. The green space will be increased because that condo building is going in the air on top of the parking garage. So it's not taking any available square footage. We've now increased by doubling the height of the community center, the community center space, now that it's got views of the ocean and we have the park. Now, I'm sorry, but I I respect all of you for coming out here.
But the fact that you need to vilify me for thinking that I like that, it it it's concerning, you know, but that's okay. You you know, you can have your opinion. I voted on this project before this phase of affordable housing came into it. And for those of you who don't know, I'm on the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. And we do have a housing crisis. So as far as if we're able to add some 84 units of 120% AMI and a teacher and a police officer can move there, I'm Okay with it. I actually see an improvement to the project. And No. I'm gonna listen a little more.
Yeah.
Alright. Thank you so much. I can't afford
it, Kat.
Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you, commissioner Gruber.
Two people making that money. Yes. Look.
All right.
Two incomes.
I have commissioners I have Commissioner Vice Mayor Caleri in the queue. And then I'll give an opportunity to Commissioner Hernandez who hasn't spoken. And then those that already spoke will have an opportunity. Let's go to Commissioner Vice Mayor Caleri.
So first, I feel obligated to set the record straight. Steve Walsh, it's not the mayor who suggested it. Was me to put Live Local on this to be for discussion. And it was seconded. You pointed out the mayor. We're not going go back and forth. I am putting it on the record that it was
It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. It's Okay.
I'm the one.
What does it matter? Just come on. Tracy, it's Okay. Excuse me. Okay. Then let the record speak. It's fine.
So I'm the one who suggested this to come forward for discussion. Me and me alone. Claire Garrett, you're 100% correct. I have been true. I have sat up on this dais for almost fourteen years. I have been true to the residents of the City Of Hollywood, not District 3, and not against anyone. We have hard facts that we've been faced with. And how this discussion came about was, for the past couple of commission meetings, we have talked about a $2,000,000,000 storm water master plan. We've talked about how we're going to increase everybody's water bills to pay for septic to sewer. Who aren't gonna get it for almost thirty years.
Donna, you and I, we're not gonna get septic. We're not gonna get sewer for thirty years, but we're gonna pay $200 more a month for that. We have seniors, over 3,000 seniors who have lived in this city and paid their bills and are living paycheck to paycheck. And we're gonna force them out if they are not the special ones who have a trust or a financially sound income. And believe you me, I know a lot of them who do not have the money to afford to have this increase.
We are an old city. We are forced to make these hard decisions to help move the city forward. We're state mandated by some of this stuff, such as septic to sewer. Some of the things are out of our control, and some of the things are in our control. How this came about?
Years ago, we brought in CBRE because of me again. I suggested sell City Hall. Sell the circle, redevelop it, and let's make it something great so that we can generate funding to come into this city. What that caused is we have to look at everything because we are I guess you would say, we have to be fair across the board. And what that did is turned into a workshop.
And we looked at all the properties that we have in the City Of Hollywood that we own, that can be redeveloped. And we were given a perfect scenario of what this would look like, what that would look like. You can redevelop this area. You can redevelop that area. And the top one was 1301. Was number one Pam, you could shake your head. No. But that was the number one presentation. And unfortunately, as which was stated today, people can change their minds. But at that time and Commissioner Quintana was not here.
I don't think Commissioner Gruber was here at the time. But at that time and I'm bringing up people could change their mind. And that's the right we have. Commissioner Shuyam said, Super Bowl of Super Bowls. We thought it was going be great. We're going have a great community center. We're going to be able to do it. But that was a development on that site. Today, we hear a lot of conflicting. Don't touch it at all. Don't do anything. Leave our community center as it is. But prior, we had, yeah, we can generate funding. We could do something better for the community. We can make it better.
And this is what it's evolved to. That shows that it's liquid and it's fluid. And decisions are constantly being made. This project definitely signifies Home Rule. And I have been a home rule hero for over thirteen years. I go to state. I fight. I try to make sure that vacation rentals don't affect us, along with Commissioner Shuham, along with everybody else here. I actually said, we all need to go. Because one voice isn't enough.
We need all of our voices. And there are a lot of problems that we have that we're faced with in the city. And what got me into this job, which let me tell you, six months is looking really good after tonight. But what got me into this job is the financial urgency that this city and the prior leaders set forth. We were faced with losing our fire department, our police department, our general employees were leaving by the drones, our city wasn't safe.
We were a financial urgency of $34,000,000. And if anybody doesn't know, because I'm sure everybody does their homework, I'm married to a cop, thirty year veteran. It was devastating. And when you talk to the individuals, the firefighters, the police officers, the general employees, they were devastated. And those are by decisions that were made by the city.
And I swore to get up here and make sure to make it right. I swore to get up here and be the voice of the people. I didn't promise anybody anything, contrary to what anybody thinks, that I promised the police the world, Feldman. All the statements that were made. What I promised was to be educated, to learn, and to do what's best for all. Not for some. And what I heard today, and the emails that I've gotten. I've had people tell me on the email. Do you think that a multi million dollar individual wants to live with a Rufus with a dirty shirt? Do you think that's appropriate?
That's so not right. And I will tell you, I am the core of epitome of being right for people. We talk about infrastructure and flooding, Kat. You've got to do something. We can't get the money from mid air.
And I've to sit on my hands so that my hands don't misconstrue the middle finger that everyone thinks that now is like a joke in the city of Hollywood. But it takes a leader to be able to sit up here, to be able to take the emails, listen to all sides, and make a decision to move us forward. This is definitely home rule. What we did today, or what we plan on doing, or what I did, and what everyone agreed to, is being able to put the ball in our court. For us to make a decision as a city of Hollywood for our residents, all of our residents, to be able to make decisions.
And as you heard today, we're talking about being a landlord. We get to make those decisions, not the county and not the state. Even though the state now is mandated, live local. We're taking that before it gets any worse. And we're making a decision that makes us better. The county has made some really challenging decisions in the years past. E nine eleven, to this day, I still get calls. I get emails. How terrible it is. I was the only no vote on that decision.
But the difference of opinions. Here we are with 911, with all the issues that we still face. The tower, Commissioner Schuhem and I, it was a joke. We were Thelma and Louise fighting not to put the tower in Westlake Village. The county won on that one. Is the tower there? Yes. Is it going to cause? We don't know what the future holds. Everyone said it would cause problems.
Now we're talking about five gs. We talk about all of these things that what we're faced with today, and what the future holds, none of us will know. We don't have a crystal ball. But we are presented with the opportunity to protect Home Rule, to make decisions, and really have the wherewithal and the leadership to make sure that we're financially sound. Now, I agree.
Shockingly, the numbers may be a little inflated. Okay? But let's go. Let's just ignore the presentation I was giving as far as the numbers being inflated. When this deal was struck back in 2022, we had the same people here yelling at us not to make this decision. The decision was made. Why? Not because my pocket's getting aligned or anybody else's pocket is getting aligned. It's because we have to worry about our legacy and our future. And you may say, giving away the beach is going to ruin your legacy.
And I'm going to be the worst commissioner ever Hollywood has seen. Well, I don't have a crystal ball. Maybe that's going to be true. Maybe that's not. But if you can see the presentation and thank you, Commissioner Gruber, for bringing it up. We now have become competitive with other cities for people to come to Hollywood, to enjoy our community center, to enjoy our park, to enjoy our beach. And it's almost shocking for me today to even be sitting up here, because I hate this. And usually I'm like the crying commissioner. I get all emotional and upset, because I have empathy and I care. But what I will say is, today we were talking, we had a workshop.
We've been here since 09:00 this morning. We had a workshop today talking about the SWA. Does anybody know what the SWA is out there? By a show of hands? Okay. We had to sit here and talk about the SWA. 28 cities have to join. And a lot of the cities are not joining because of the fear factor. Commissioner Shuam is on the SWA board. She spoke in positivity of it.
But I will tell you, that even in itself is a scary risk. But we're taking hopefully, I agree, we're going to take the risk of the unknown. But we're putting the city with SWA at risk as well, if we make that jump. I don't have anybody out here saying, don't do it. You're leaving it on our backs. Why? Because we know the financials of the city. We know the future burdens that we are causing. But we have to come up with a way to pay for all of that. So we're in the position where we have to make these tough decisions.
And to villainize us and tell us that we're wrong, we've tried to come out creative. And come up with different ways, like selling City Hall. Like, or re ninety nine year leasing City Hall. And this 1301 came about. And the deal was, we want a community center, we want green space, and we want to protect our beach.
And that is exactly what's happening. In addition, we're getting more housing to fill the needs and the demands that our county is seeing. Whoever keeps speaking I think it's Siobhan by saying it under your breath, please respect the process. Speaking out loud is so disrespectful. And again, we've asked you not to say it.
We've asked you not to keep repeating yourself. And Siobhan, out of all the respect you know I have for you, it's wrong to keep jumping out. The vote was made for this project in 2022. It does not constitute to be placed for a vote. And to be quite honest, I'm not in favor of that.
Because guess what? If the city of Hollywood falls on hard times in the future, we are handcuffed. But because I do value respect of our City Of Hollywood residents, I'm the one who said, the mess up happened. Let's enact it for the next two years until it does go to a vote. So this project is not going for a vote, because it has already been voted on.
And I believe that that will create a legal issue. And I'm not willing to go down another legal battle. Anyways, I'm not here to make enemies. I'm not here to pick sides. What I think myself and every commissioner up here feels is that we have to do what's best for the city so that we don't ever find ourselves and say, damn it, shoulda, woulda, coulda.
It may not be the best, but we are getting a darn good project that's checking all the boxes, with the exception of the affordable housing. But we have to generate funding. And that's where we went with it. So I hope that you respect that. It is not to damn anyone or to say, I got you, or to be disrespectful, or to pull the wool over your eyes. It's about how do we move the city forward, and how do we do it financially and economically, and being a leader, and making these tough decisions. That's all I have. Thank you.
Thank you. Let's see. Everyone has spoken except Commissioner Hernandez. So before I call others, I'll call on you, Commissioner Hernandez.
Thank you, mayor. I want to thank all of the residents that are still here. Because quite a few of you no, quite a few of you come. They say what you have to say. And when it comes time for us to deliberate, you get up and leave. And then they wonder, they claim that we don't listen to them, when in fact they just get the information when they actually see it on the video, on the TV, because they don't want to stay. Yet, we have to stay. I'd like to ask the city attorney a couple of questions. And Commissioner Gruber asked you to get what the wording on that thing says. I'd like to go back to that.
Do you have them, by any chance? Please?
Yes, I do, Commissioner.
Okay.
This conveyance is for open space, park, recreational, and other public and municipal purposes. Now, did respond to Commissioner Gruber.
I heard respond, but my question is, is the income that this building would generate covers the latter of what you just read?
Yes, public and municipal purposes are considered very broad under the Florida statutes. And case law has shown that leasing of public property
Thank constitutes a municipal or public property. You. And this is the reason that I wanted to go. Could you please go to slide number 13? Okay, let's go to 14 then. There we go. If I go through these numbers as rosy as they may be by some of you guys standards, by the way, I'm okay with something like that. Can I ask you another question? How many votes do you need for this resolution? Four or five?
Four, okay. Deduction from gross amount, developer contribution community center. That's $20,000,000 that would come of our income. Is that correct? Somebody just answer me. Not from today, it's just somebody from staff, if you don't mind. I just want the people to realize this. Does that money come from our income?
It's my understanding that it does, yes.
Okay. David, can you okay. Let the record reflect that Mr. Keller is saying yes, that comes from our income. And initial rent to the CBRE payment is $9,000,000 Is that correct? Marilyn?
Yes. So the initial rent is $10,000,000 and then he netted out the commission that's owed to CBRE and that gives you the 9,039,000
So when this deal closes, CBRE will be getting $9,000,000
No, no, no. We will
be getting $9,039,399 They will be getting just a little over $900,000 I believe.
Okay, so they get 10%. Okay, so
it's built, we get the 10%.
Correct. That was some of my question. By the way, here is where I'm going to disagree with some of my colleagues in the day is please don't get mad at me if the income of that property lives up to what the deed restriction that you have, I want the $20,000,000 for Sunset, I want the $20,000,000 for a community center in my district or in District 4 that doesn't have one. District 1 already has multiple community centers. And they don't want the building anyway.
So why should we reward them? No disrespect to you guys. No matter what we do or what we say, you're going to agree. So I prefer to have that $20,000,000 to go to a community center in District 4, District 2, or for us to be able to develop Sunset Golf Course. Please, and this is where you and I may disagree on some of this thing, but we have better use of that money than to continue to give a community center to the people that don't want the development.
And no matter what happens, they're not going to want that development. Can we go back to picture 21, if you don't mind? Because I've been out, by the way. Drew, you were 100% correct. But I was here with Margaritaville. I voted no at the time and I highlighted because I read all the pages of the contract and I highlighted the shortcomings. And by the way, the Margaritaville was a request for proposal that went to no loan, no money. Then it went to a $10,000,000 loan. And then it went to a $10,000,000 giveaway. And it wound up being a $28,000,000 giveaway without ever going to a referendum.
And the same people right here, now that are opposing this were jumping up and down for the Margaritaville. They thought it was the best thing ever because it was a developer that they liked. And I'm okay, I'm putting that behind me. But at the end of the day, these are the same people that are here that were jumping up and down for Margaritaville. Well, I'm just saying. Not Not all because some of you were not here, but they were jumping up and down from Margaritaville and they weren't listening to anything against it. This development, this developer listened to the people and says, we don't want you to encumber the park. And I wasn't here at the time. I did not vote for this, just by the way. So I can go either way on this, but I want the $20,000,000 for somewhere else.
You guys don't want the development anyway. We should not reward people that are not willing to take a settlement. This is a settlement. It's an agreement. Maybe a bad agreement to some of you, but it's the best agreement that we can come up with under the conditions that the city is when it comes to finances. We need $2,000,000,000 We're getting people that cannot afford their water bill because of the rates that are currently are right now. And by the way, just news flash to everybody. The water bill over the next five years is going up 125% because of the needs that we have. Just so that you know, because I want you guys to hear from me. I'm the bad guy today.
I'm going to keep it real. Am I crazy about the Live Local agreement? No. Would I change some of this all resolution? I would make it simple. Simple. Good enough for everybody to understand and for it to cover the legal ground. I would say the city commission is willing to entertain the Live Local Act for this development agreement modifying the terms. In other words, we're not getting into an agreement right now. We entertaining the getting into that agreement.
And that would satisfy everything that I've heard here so far today. And it will keep us in the up and up with you guys, the resident. But if the developer agreed not to encumber the park, which the original drawing did, the developer also agreed not to shade the beach. The developer also agreed, yes, with our money to do a community center so that the use can still be on that site. The developer has bent over backwards. Are they going to make money? Yes. That's their business. Their business is to make money. Our business as commissioners is to do what we feel is best for all of the city of Hollywood.
And for some of you guys that demand respect, but yet treat other peoples without any dignity. I don't know why you feel that you can receive what you don't give. All of us here do not agree on everything. I love my wife, I don't always agree with her. I love my daughter, I don't always agree with But we have to treat each other with a level of dignity because we're colleagues and we expect certain professionalism.
The same thing with staff. I don't always agree with our city attorney and she will tell you. I do not always agree with the city manager and she will tell you. All of our staff, they will tell you that when I don't agree with them, just like I'm speaking to you right now, I speak to them. We don't have to agree, but we have to respect each other.
And we have to agree to disagree. You may not agree with what I'm asking, but I am telling this commission, we have better use of that $20,000,000 than what you see right there. Because the people that are voting, which is us, we're not ever going to please these people, ever. So if you guys don't mind, please oblige me and use those $20,000,000 which are going to be used for public purpose, for Sunset Golf Course, that we don't continue to hang on to try to see how we're going to be able to do that. And let's make Karen Caputo proud to be able to give her the park that she was looking for and she was trying to do.
That's 40 acres of development of green space. Every one of these people here said they want the green space. That's keeping green space with that $20,000,000 that is being generated out of that parcel. And whether we get $1,900,000,000 or we get $1,000,000,000 or we get $750,000,000 which is lower and lower and lower. It's more than what we're going to get for that parcel if we sell it today.
And by the way, regarding the nine year lease. You're looking at the individual who was the chair for the, not only the developing review more years ago, but for the charter review committee that drove the ballot language that we're looking to put on the ballot this November, so that we no longer have ninety nine year lease. So any of you that think that what I'm coming is the left field, no. I do not like ninety nine year lease. I did not vote for this.
But yet I can recognize that it's a good deal, good business deal. Unlike the other deal that it was ninety nine years that I didn't think was a good deal. We're getting the revenue out of this parking. Whatever parking, public parking revenue generates, we're getting it. We're not getting it out of the other ninety nine year lease. The question came up today, how many parking spaces are going to be up because of the 84 live local workforce housing. We don't know that. I was told that we're going to generate whatever it requires plus whatever we have. That's what I was told by the developer. The developers are listening to what we have to say.
I'm being told by our attorney I don't know if you want to come up, Keith, say anything or not. But I had a meeting. Go ahead.
I do. Keith Pollakoff for the applicant. While the site plan is not completed, it's being worked on. We are providing more parking than that's there today. Right now, it's approximately 131 spaces. I think there's 80 something spaces there today. The live local units are parked within the garage just like the condo units. So the garage floor plate is bigger because of the live local units. It does not impact in any way the public's parking spots, which the city will control. That's more than required by the agreement, that surface spots outside of the existing building. So that does not change at all. Those are the city's controlled parking spots.
Thank you. And that's what I wanted the residents to know, that at least when I had a meeting with them, which wasn't face to face, it was virtual, I asked those questions. Because in the downtown, parking is at a premium. Just like how it is on the beach. And I'm trying to see if we can, in Keaton Park, see if we can do another level of surface, couple of level of surface for the residents that need parking, overnight parking to be able to park there.
I'm trying to work at what the residents But sometimes it's hard to fulfill those needs. Number one, when we don't have the money. And number two, when we have to fight for everything that we need in order to get it. So I will begrudgingly, and I would ask you, know, the commission to consider removing those $20,000,000 for that community center so that we can use it for Sunset Park, so that we can use it on District 4 that doesn't have one. And we can use it with people that would actually appreciate it.
So if this, and I will vote for this, but I want you guys to just consider that because that's not something that is on the table today. But it's something that it's on my mind because I don't foresee us having to bond $2,000,000,000 for septic to sewer. Having to bond $2,000,000,000 for storm water retention and storm water drains. And doubling the prices of the water and sewer rates of our residents and finding the money to do something with Sunset Park. And it would be a shame to have that place lay there for the next twenty years because we don't have the money when we actually have it here right now.
And if the developer wants to do something like that as an amenity for those residents, so be it. Do it on your dime. But don't do it with the rest of the cities when we have needs, real needs. And these people, they have two community centers that we spend good money right now to do. That's where I want to go with that money. And I don't have to agree with you guys. You don't have to agree with me. But that's where I really prefer that those $20,000,000 go.
I gotcha. So look, I just think it represents a legal question that I think staff will and the city attorney will have to come back to us as to whether or not the public purpose of the P3 is sufficient, would sufficiently be covered if we were to remove the community center element, suffice it with the park, or integrate the community center into a different layout of the building and preserve dollars to be invested, for example, in Sunset and not invest $20,000,000 in what we see in front of us, but rather a different integrated community center within if the building footprint were to change and maybe get the best of both worlds. I mean, could do anything with the property, I mean, in terms of how you can architecturally design it. But we're not deciding that today. And I think we need some guidance as to what the parameters might be.
Yeah. Oh, I know you were still not on. Hold on. Go ahead, Peter.
Thank you. And that's the reason that I asked you at the beginning if the rent of that building constitute a public purpose. And she answered yes. Do we need more in writing? You said that just by leasing it, it's sufficient. So go ahead.
So what I spoke about was what constitutes a municipal purpose. That's a different question from what would constitute a new project under the P3. And it would require more research.
No, the P3 had nothing to do with public purpose. The public purpose is whether we are getting income and you said leasing would cover that. And that's okay. If you need to back pedal, that's fine. But at the end of the day, that's how I started my question before I made my statement. And if we are able to lease the land and that income that defines as a public purpose under that particular restriction, then we'll cover that. We don't have to build that. And by the way, we don't have to have that kind of elaborate thing. And maybe the developer would be saying, we're willing to throw that in. And we can use that $20,000,000 somewhere else. The fact is, we need that money for something different.
I mean, could increase the parking, increase the size of the amenity deck, integrate the community
into that. Correct. There would more money.
But dollars left over, yeah.
Correct. So that's my point. My point is, and that's something that we haven't looked at, but we as a commission need to entertain that. Quite frankly, there's other needs in the city of Hollywood and they need to be addressed. We're not ever gonna please the people that came in front of us.
So is that a motion to approve the current resolution for now? Peter?
For now it is.
Alright, we have a motion. Can I have a second, please? I have a motion and a second. Let's go for second round comments, and then we'll take a vote on the motion. Commissioner Schuhem.
I lost my hang on, I just have to open this sheet. I was hoping, Commissioner Hernandez, you would what you had said about considering Live Local. Because as I read the amendment, it says and I've lost it on my computer here. But it says, we are authorizing the developer to proceed under Live Local, period. That's it. So, I was going to suggest, because I certainly
And by the way, I don't have a problem with amending my motion to the city commission is willing to entertain the Live Local Act for this modification for this development agreement modification and if it becomes law. I'm okay with something like that because it moves the project forward. And if it doesn't become law, we don't have a binding commitment. But by the way, one of the things that you talked about, and by the way, I apologize because I know it's your time, was that this developer has done nothing. This developer has done nothing because number one, county administration well, there's a legal word.
They recanted their letter of approval triggering other maneuvering that had to do with the development from the developer. And it's like a chess game. Everybody thinks they're going to win and they move their pieces. You move your horse, you move your tower, you move your bishop. So while the county was doing their movement in chess game, so were they. They went to Tallahassee and changed the law. And now, it appears that the chess game is in their favor. And this is what I see happening when it comes to this development. And no, I was not here at the time, but I keep an eye on what happens in the city commission. I have for the last forty years, long before I was a commissioner.
Why? Because the devil is on the detail. And this is the reason I asked my question before I made my statement. At the end of the day, if it's okay with second of the motion to do something like this, this part that I just read doesn't do anything any different than all of this other stuff comes in here. And that is that the city commission is willing to entertain the Live Local Act for this development agreement modification and if and and it becomes law. I don't know, You may want to weigh in on something like this, or we can just go like this. Okay, you said no. No, no, don't withdraw. I was just asking if you're willing
Well, me just tell you what the language is that we'd be inserting into the agreement under this First Amendment basically says it would says verbatim design review process, section 5.5 on page three. Notwithstanding anything with the contrary contained herein, meaning the rest of the development agreement, if authorized by law at the time of sign off submission, the parties agree to develop the project in conformity with section 166.04151 Florida statutes, the Live Local Act, as may be amended from time to time.
So if is the operative word. I believe that's what the issue is. If it's already in there.
If authorized by
law. Go ahead. I stand by my motion.
Thank you. Carol, go ahead if you like.
Well, I mean, I was going to suggest
Yeah, Tracy.
Motion on the table. It would be my recommendation that we propose a time certain to have a real legal analysis, a real financial analysis, and a proposed amendment that were it to go forward with an affordable housing component, that it not have poor doors, not be segregated, that we get rid of the ability to have statutory delays. I mean, I really don't think we have enough information to vote on this.
GREGORY But we're not voting on a complete amendment right now, just
amendment I'm not understanding saying anything to the contrary contained herein. If authorized by law at the time of sign off submission, that just means DeSantis signed it. That's it, which we know is probably going to happen, right? So if there is a Live Local Act at that time, then the parties have agreed to develop it per the Live Local Act. So it's not iffy. It's not iffy.
But we still have to amend the agreement.
JAMES What
is the amendment to the agreement?
I don't
whether there's going to be another Raelin, go ahead and talk about the other amendment again.
JAMES DAY: There absolutely will be another amendment to the agreement, because there are several provisions that will need to be modified to the comprehensive agreement and the ground lease. And the development team fully anticipates that and expects that. They are seeking certainty tonight from you all that they can use the density through the Live Local statute in order to proceed with finalizing their plans, moving the project forward, negotiating the ground lease changes and the comprehensive development agreement changes, which we are the landlord.
I understand, Raelynn. But once you sign this, right, then the next go round, where we're asking for very reasonable things to be put into the comprehensive development agreement, we have already agreed that the project can proceed per the Live Local Act. So when the developer comes and says, hey, you guys, I have to have separate entrances. I have to keep these apartments separate. We are not going to have any leverage because we've already agreed that the building can be developed per the Live Local Act.
My point is, let's just postpone this to a time certain so that we have one amendment to the comprehensive development agreement. Let's make sure all of us understand what it is that we're agreeing to. That's what I'm saying. Yes, I hear you. This clearly isn't enough.
Because it doesn't we end up in a position that conflicts with our contract right now, which says no rental. So obviously there's a lot of things in these documents that have to be corrected. And the question is, once you agree to one thing, you lose the ability to negotiate these future things. So what I would suggest is that we postpone this until a time certain when counsel has time to do a full legal analysis on whether or not the magnitude of these changes aren't, in fact, a whole new agreement because the Live Local Act didn't even exist when the contract was signed. That staff has an independent financial analysis, not pulling $1,800 first.
It's never happened on the Barrier Island before. And not a billion dollars more than they presented to us six months ago. Personally, I do not feel comfortable at all that this commission has accurate or sufficient information to decide whether it should or should not agree that this should be a Live Local Act project. That's all I'm saying. I would say
Well, look,
you're give yourself the opportunity to see all the information.
So the city manager is correct that given the evolving nature of the current project, another amendment would be required. And at that time, once there is some idea of what the project would look like, the proposed project, then there would need to be amendments to the CDA in order to make that something that we're able to move forward with.
Why don't we have the P3 partner state their agreement to that understanding on the record?
Mayor Keith Policup again for the P3 partner. There's no doubt that the final site plan has to come back before this commission. There was a long discussion probably an hour ago about whether or not state law would allow the developer to do everything, anything they would want under Live Local statute. Yes, if it wasn't city land, that would be correct. You're the owner of the land. You guys dictate what is built there.
So you agree that there needs to be a second amendment to the CDA and the ground lease?
100% there has to be the final site plan, which will be within the amendment, needs to come before you. The design needs to come before you to make sure that it can be built as we've desired.
ANNETTE But if you answer my questions straightforwardly,
So I'm sorry, Mr. Polakoff. Does the developer agree that there will be one entrance for all residents in this building and one set of amendments?
I'm not agreeing to that.
Listen, there are buildings all over The United States. You go to hotels everywhere. There's an entrance to the Tower Club.
Not owned by this city. Not owned by this city.
And there is condo entrance and apartment entrance in a, b, c, and d. Let's not let's not get over ourselves too much. Alright. All right. Have a motion and a second. Commissioner Schuham feels differently. Who's next in the queue? Commissioner Biederman.
So I kind of agree with Commissioner Schuham about the dual entrance, unless it's not like obviously dual. Know, I mean So
So it is then fine.
That's gonna come back. Commissioner Schuham talks about how, you know, what the delays are but yet she wants to delay the process even more. So, I don't get it. Let's vote on it today. Let everybody go home. We're going to have another meeting. Everybody's going to come out and be against the project again. That's just the way it is. Cat, it's ten to ten. Timestamp for when you go to do a video clip of what I'm gonna say because I know that's coming.
Can you put up the chart that Commissioner Schuham called for earlier? Ten to ten. That's respect. I'm letting her know this is the time to start recording. Mutual respect, you too, buddy. I've seen what you've written. Please,
please, please. Enough.
All
right. So I understand, you know, I had an interview with the Sun Sentinel three and a half years ago. And I tried to explain why I believe that this project is good for affordable housing. Believe it or not, it's coming right back full circle. So, we have a housing shortage. It's all about supply and demand. You give more supply, demand to cover the demand, the prices come down a little bit. And it's a trickle down. You create $4,000,000 condos, somebody that could afford it is gonna buy that instead of a $3,000,000 condo, human nature. And it goes down the line.
By not providing more luxury housing, it takes away moderate priced housing or market rate housing. Same thing with this. Maybe we have a surplus of moderate income renter housing of 2,500 and we have a need for the extremely low. But if we create more moderate income housing, then it's gonna take people away from some of the extremely low or the very low that will free up that property for somebody that can only afford that. That's what I believe.
That's what the statistics show. You create more. You move people up the line. Everybody wants the next best thing. They want better what they could afford. And you're going to move people up the line freeing up cheaper housing for people that could afford debt. That being said, of all, thank you for commissioner, for vice mayor for being a leader, not a follower. I'm sure your residents appreciate that as well as many other residents. We had a meeting at Driftwood Community Center last night. For those of you that keep saying, Everybody in the city is against this.
I asked the fifteen, twenty people that were there, Is there anybody against thirteen oh one? I had to go and explain a little bit what's going on today. One person in the room said, She's against it because she wants more information about it. Nobody else in the room was against it. So it's very disingenuous to say everybody in the city is against it.
The majority of residents is against it. The majority of the people in this room that are residents of Hollywood may be against it. And that might even be pushing the line. So I'm supporting this. I'm okay with the whole, as Commissioner Xuan put it, the four door entrance because I think that it should be one entrance. But I'm ready to vote on it today. Let's move this forward. Let's get some housing built and let's improve the community center. Let's improve the city because we keep hearing the city is, you know, dilapidated. The city's falling apart.
You know, there's too much of that. Let's improve the city. We've got to improve the city. And there's plenty of money there to build a community center and Sunset Park because there's at least $60,000,000 coming in. If we're spending 20,000,000 on a community center, there's gonna be money left over to build out Sunset Park and a community center.
All right. Let's hear final comments by Commissioners Gruber, Vice Mayor Caleri, Commissioner Hernandez, if any. And we'll take a vote. Okay. Vice Mayor, anything else?
Yes. Yes, mayor. I just wanted to also highlight, we went to a meeting the other day that was here on the 2nd Floor. And it was about development and what's happening and the demands. And Sandra Eisenhorn really made a great and I thought that's where you were going with this slide.
You have the multimillion dollar apartments. But those individuals have demands for hairdressers, mechanics, waiters, waitresses, and the list goes on and on. And to create a community, that's basically what this is. You're going to have your multimillionaires buying these homes. Maybe they're not living there. Maybe they're just renting. But when they come into town, they're going to need a nurse. They're going to need a police officer. They're going to need a hairdresser. They're going to need a housekeeper.
They're going to need every average to medium service income bearing person. And so when we talked to, or when we listened the other day, there is a demand and a need for high end living. And there's also a demand and need for affordable living. And then there's that thing in between. And really and truly, we're meeting we're checking the box on all of them.
So how this has formulated into just a high rise that everybody didn't want, I don't agree with getting rid of the community center. Because that's part of how we push this project forward. And now we're going to take something away. I'd rather give than take away. And yes, Commissioner Biederman, the generated funding, I had suggested that the generated funding go towards septic to sewer, go towards infrastructure, all the storm water drainage, and help burden the costs that are going to be increased to our residents who can't afford it, instead of pushing them out.
But in negotiations, I would like to also add one caveat. And now I'm going to change it up. We're talking about affordable housing. I have been a strong proponent for senior living and veterans, mainly seniors. Is there a way we can carve out a certain amount, 10%, 15% of the affordable living to help meet senior housing and then maybe 10% for veterans.
Is that something we can negotiate into it? You have seniors that possibly could fit in that. But I would rather see a senior citizen who's worked their entire life, who are now getting pushed out because of our increase in prices, be able to live on the beach and see the sunrise and see the sunset and be able to co mingle with individuals. And they possibly may make that AMI because they're affording their own home, and possibly they sell their home. But also, the veterans, I don't know how we can arrange to meet that.
And I don't know the developers here, but we talk about the demands and needs. And here is a project that's supposed to be community based. Let's make it community based then. If we're going to go to a live local, let's address 10% to the veterans, 10% to the seniors. Then we're really checking the boxes.
Yeah. Well, look, if that's permissible under the law, when this comes back under the Second Amendment and we have the terms of the agreement in writing, then let's staff bring us options on, if we can, dictate allocations of the workforce units by age or by veteran status and what have you. Let us know what the options are between now and then. All right. Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez to close, and we'll take a vote.
Thank you, Mayor. You guys are going to make me vote against my own motion. Wasn't kidding when I'm saying that that $20,000,000 could be used somewhere else. I'm not talking about rewarding bad behavior. I'm talking about real needs somewhere else for that $20,000,000 Commissioner Biederman, you talked about the other $60,000,000 The other $60,000,000 are going to serve a public purpose, which is going to be help some of the bonds that we're going to need for the septic to sewer conversion throughout the city of Hollywood and the storm drainage.
You know, if you guys are hell bent on spending those $20,000,000 for that particular luxury community center
doesn't seem
to make a difference what it's been promised when there's other needs. They don't care for you promise. They don't think that you're doing the right thing.
We task staff with showing us a and the developer showing us a site plan that has a reduced cost integrated community center with an expanded in the expanded amenity deck and parking garage that they might be willing to pay for the expanded facilities for the project.
I'm willing to entertain that. But I'm just saying, please don't zero out my idea. Because this is the ability that we're going to have probably within the next ten to fifteen years before we can get any money yet to do anything for the parks that we actually need in the community center. I'm not just talking about myself. District 4 doesn't have one. I have one. Fred Lippman Multipurpose Center, as in when it was closed. Armory. You know, the armory is in District 3. But it is.
But at the end of the day, we have Punceyanna Park that has the ability to do it. We don't have to buy the land. We just have to allocate the money. There is a need in different communities that will be grateful and very appreciative of something like that happening when somebody else is getting millions of dollars who's saying, don't do it.
So let's see that option. Let's see that option on what that looks like to help reduce the cost or eliminate it. The developer might be eager to, you know, get a get, you know, a larger footprint on the property for for the project. All those in favor of
the income that you were expecting to generate by having a first class venue on that one.
You guys don't want it anyway.
All those in favor of the resolution say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Opposed. Show the a resolution passing five two. That concludes our meeting today. Thank you all. This meeting is adjourned to be continued.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.