Regular City Commission Meeting - Regular Meeting

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

About this meeting

Government Body
Regular City Commission Meeting
Meeting Type
Regular City Commission Meeting
Location
Hollywood, FL
Meeting Date
April 15, 2026

Transcript

1432 sections (from 1,696 segments)

9:59 – 10:19Speaker 1

Is livestreamed. And when the item that perhaps you wanna speak to comes up, you can come in beforehand because as the meeting proceeds, some folks will have had an opportunity to hear their item, participate, and then decide to go on about their day. And we are on the air. So thank you all. Today is 04/15/2026.

10:19 – 10:50Speaker 1

We are here at Hollywood City Hall for a regular city commission meeting. But as I always say, no meeting is ever regular because it's always important, and, interesting, substance to, take on as a city commission and as a community here today. So today is no different. We always begin with a moment of silence followed by a pledge of allegiance, And I'd like to extend a moment of privilege to vice mayor Coleri, would like to all of us to reflect on someone that our community lost just last night, vice mayor.

10:51Speaker 2

Thank you, mayor. Actually, I would like to invite chief Devlin.

10:56Speaker 3

Okay. Thank you, chief.

11:03 – 11:35Speaker 4

Thank you, Mayor, Vice Mayor, Commissioners. Yeah, obviously a fresh wound that cuts very deeply for us. And we're all still reeling here as we learned about this not even twenty four hours ago. But Scott Parden, the ultimate public servant with almost thirty five years of service to his community, started with his career at Pembroke Pines, came to Hollywood, served twenty nine years with us, rising to the rank of major, and finished his career with the Seminole Police Department. Scott was a humble servant, leadership style.

11:36 – 12:09Speaker 4

He cared more about his subordinates than any other supervisor I ever met or knew. He had the unique gift to identify someone's talents, foster those talents, and ensure that person had every resource they needed to rise to whatever professional goal that they had. Our department is filled with leadership roles and people because of Scott's mentorship, myself included. Scott was a great friend to many. He would always make you feel like a best friend of his every time you talk to him.

12:09 – 12:53Speaker 4

No matter how many times I would call him or the length of time in between those calls, Scott would always start the conversation about your family, identifying each one of them by names, how the wife is, and then circling back to his family. And by the time that was over with, I most of the time forgot what I was calling him about. And I just would make fun of his beloved Dallas Cowboys. He would make fun of my Giants. And we'd always hang up with a good laugh. So Scott was a devout family man, cared deeply about his wife, Maureen, his daughters, Lindsey, and Nicole. And I would like to let them know that the Hollywood Police Department will be with them not only today to help get them through this horrific time, but for the future to come. We will always be there for them. And they will always be part of the Hollywood Police Department family. Well, thank you, Mary, for that.

12:53 – 13:16Speaker 2

MARY Thank you, Chief. And if I could just add, he definitely was it's an honor and a privilege to have known him as well, being part of the police family, a lifelong service that he dedicated to policing. And it's a reminder to all of us to check on one another. Mental health affects everyone. There are no exceptions.

13:16 – 13:48Speaker 2

Not in law enforcement, not in fire rescue, not anywhere. Those who appear the strongest are often caring the most. We've lost a good one, someone who leaves behind two amazing daughters, as was mentioned, and a beautiful wife, Maureen, who is a friend of many. A family, lifelong friends are affected by this. So please, I encourage everyone to keep them in your thoughts and prayers. And just a reminder, a simple phone call, no matter if it's the strongest person that we know

13:48Speaker 5

or the weakest, can make a difference. Thank you.

13:52 – 14:54Speaker 1

Thank you, Vice Mayor Kalarian, Chief Devlin, and our condolences to Scott and his family. And let's all think of Scott and the life he led and his blessed memory as we rise for that moment of silence followed by the pledge. Thank you. Another important moment we take at each meeting is to recognize our veterans, active service personnel, and their families. So if you are a veteran of the US Armed Forces or a family member thereof or an active service member, please rise.

14:54 – 15:12Speaker 1

We'd like to recognize you. Thank you. Clerk, would you please call the roll?

15:12Speaker 6

Commissioner Gruber.

15:14Speaker 6

Commissioner Biederman.

15:16Speaker 6

Commissioner Quintana? Here. Commissioner Schuham? Here. Commissioner Hernandez?

15:22Speaker 6

Vice Mayor Clari? Here. Mayor Levy?

15:26 – 15:42Speaker 1

Here. Thank you. Items on consent today are items five through nine. These are items that don't usually require individual discussion. However, if there's a speaker card or request from the dais, we're happy to remove an item and hear it later in the meeting. Pat, are there any speaker cards on five through nine?

15:43Speaker 1

Is there a motion or a request from the dais?

15:46Speaker 2

Motion to approve. Second.

15:48Speaker 1

We have a motion from Vice Mayor Coleri, second from Commissioner Quintana to move the consent items five through nine. All those in favor say aye.

15:55 – 16:20Speaker 1

Any opposed? Hearing none, those items carry unanimously. On to our 1PM presentations, proclamations, and awards. We've got a full course of proclamations and presentations today. So let's go ahead and begin with our fire chief and the fire department. Chief Levy, please come on up. We'd love to recognize recipients of the Hollywood Fire Rescue Awards for 2025.

16:22 – 16:44Speaker 9

Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager, staff. Before we get started with the awards, I want to take a little bit of privilege here and recognize somebody that wasn't on the awards or a division that wasn't on the awards. I sent you all an email about this, about our fire prevention division. But I felt that it was worthy during this presentation to recognize them in public forum. So I want to take a moment to spotlight the remarkable progress within the fire prevention division.

16:45 – 17:21Speaker 9

Thanks to the outstanding leadership of Chief Lucas and Deputy Fire Marshal Chief Hoffel, the open plan review aging list has been reduced to just thirteen calendar days and eight working days. This is a significant improvement compared to June, when the list stood at thirty five calendar days and twenty working days, a situation that required heavy reliance on overtime and expedited plan review fees. This achievement is a testament to the commitment and professionalism of our plan reviewers, who have truly thrived under their effective guidance. Their dedication, coupled with strong leadership, has been the driving force behind these improvements. Furthermore, as we finalize our quarterly performance measures, there's even more good news to share.

17:21 – 18:01Speaker 9

For the first time in both Q1 and Q2 of this year, the Fire Prevention Division has not only met but surpassed the target for high hazard fire inspection completions for commercial properties. This year to date target for Q2 is set at 32.5%, while the actual completion rate has exceeded 52%. If we maintain this momentum, we're well positioned to achieve 100% completion for the first time by the end of Q4. These accomplishments are the result of having a fully staffed fire prevention division and ensuring proper oversight. I want to express my gratitude to city hall, the commission, city manager, and staff, which have been instrumental in the driving force for these positive changes. We're truly moving forward in the right direction.

18:01 – 18:42Speaker 1

So I'd like to Round the applause for that. Chief, I just want to mention, thank Fire Marshal Lucas and the team that's fire prevention. And that's especially with plan review. It's been a real big problem for the city for many years. And with this new team, as you've pointed out, chief, the plan review times have come into a manageable and a lot more effective period for everybody who lives, invests, and works, and builds business here in Hollywood. So thank you so much to all of you. I really appreciate the effort because we hear less of the issues that we used to hear on an ongoing basis. So thank you so much.

18:42 – 19:14Speaker 9

Thank you. So what we're here for today is the recognition of our members of the Fire Rescue and Beach Safety Division, whose initiatives and leadership and commitment to excellence have distinguished them throughout the year. These twenty twenty five awards highlight the individuals who have gone above and beyond their roles, strengthening our organization, and elevating the service we provide to the community. You're going to hear about several medical emergency medical emergencies in which our crews acted decisively in critical moments, ultimately saving lives. These stories reflect only a small portion of the remarkable work happening every day.

19:14 – 19:30Speaker 9

I'm grateful for the opportunity to share just how dedicated our team is and how tirelessly they serve on behalf of the residents and visitors of the city of Hollywood. At this point, I want to call up our PIO, Shay, to come read the awards. And I'm going to call up Chief Zadie and Chief Moshe to help me give out the awards, please.

19:34Speaker 10

afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city managers, assistant city managers,

19:41 – 19:59Speaker 10

I am Shay Kaufman. I'm the Public Information Manager for Hollywood Fire Rescue. All right. I'll begin by calling up each recipient to receive their awards. For the Civilian Employee of the Year 2025 award, will Anthony Lobaldo please come forward.

20:05 – 20:54Speaker 10

Anthony Lobaldo has proven to be an invaluable member of our department. Working in consistently busy environments, he plays a critical role in maintaining and repairing our entire fleet, including fire apparatus, rescue trucks, assigned staff vehicles, and ocean rescue equipment, such as their ATVs and jet skis. Anthony is frequently called upon after hours and is always willing to respond, ensuring that our men and women on the front lines have the reliable equipment they need to do their job safely and effectively. No matter the situation, he approaches his work with a positive can do attitude and the willingness to help making him a pleasure to work with and a trusted resource for the entire department. Beyond his technical experience, Anthony takes pride in representing the department in the community.

20:54 – 21:15Speaker 10

He regularly attends events showcasing our historic Old Betsy, the fire truck, ensuring that it is always in top condition and ready for display. Anthony's dedication, professionalism, and exceptional mechanical knowledge are vital to the success of our operations, make him truly deserving of this recognition. Congratulations. Tony,

21:20 – 21:32Speaker 1

it sounds like the department can't run without you, so thank you so much, And thank you for keeping all that machinery working. We know that's a very important skill here, and appreciate your commitment. Thank you.

21:32Speaker 2

Yes, thank you.

21:36 – 22:25Speaker 10

For the next award, there are two recipients of our Meritorious Service Award. Will Captain Sonia Camacho please come forward? On 03/14/2025, Captain Sonia Camacho demonstrated exceptional courage, leadership, and technical experience oh, expertise, excuse me during a high risk apartment fire. Upon arrival, Captain Camacho immediately assessed rapidly deteriorating conditions and established command presence. During a precise and aggressive response to contain the advancing fire, recognizing the extreme hazards, she initiated vent enter search vest operations under high heat and zero visibility conditions, entering the structure alongside a firefighter to perform a thorough search of the affected apartment.

22:25 – 23:08Speaker 10

Her decisive actions stabilized and repeatedly evolving scene and prevented further fire extension, reflecting her unwavering commitment and operational excellence. Beyond her personal bravery, Captain Camacho exemplified outstanding leadership and mentorship. She coordinated the fire attack, conducted a rapid three sixty degree assessment to identify critical entry points, and guided a rookie firefighter through complex, high pressure operations. Her advanced training, technical proficiency, and ability to make critical decisions under intense conditions demonstrated the highest standards of a fire service. Captain Sonia Camacho is highly deserving of this Mayor Tory Service Award.

23:08 – 24:05Speaker 10

Congratulations. The other recipient of the Meritory Service Award, will firefighter Robert Burrito please come forward. Firefighter Robert Burrito, newly assigned to the department, demonstrated extraordinary courage, composure and decisiveness during a high stress Edgewater condo incident. While positioned at a pinch point supply hose to the interior crews, he identified that a firefighter inside the structure was running low on air. Recognizing the urgency, Firefighter Burrito immediately followed the hose line into the zero visibility interior without hesitation or direction.

24:06 – 24:46Speaker 10

Inside the hazardous environment, he quickly located the member operating and identified the firefighter that was in distress. With calm precision, he connected his buddy breathing hose, enabling the team to safely exit the building. His actions under extreme pressure reflected exceptional situational awareness initiative and an unwavering commitment to safety of his fellow firefighters. That a new firefighter responded with such skill and confidence speaks to his professionalism, composure, and strong potential for leadership. Firefighter Robert Burrito's selfless dedication exemplifies the highest traditions of the fire service, and making him highly deserving of this Meritorious Service Award.

24:46 – 25:49Speaker 10

Congratulations. For the Lifeguard of the Year 2025 award, will Marine Safety Officer, Michele Gonzales, please come forward. Marine Safety Officer, Michelle Gonzales, joined Ocean Rescue in 2023, and has quickly distinguished himself through hard work, strong leadership, and unwavering commitment to the team. In a short time, he has earned his respect of his peers and his superiors alike for his professionalism, reliability, and positive attitude. Recently promoted to Marine Safety Officer, Michel has proven to be an outstanding addition to his staff.

25:49 – 26:44Speaker 10

His exceptional physical ability, dedication to public safety, and willingness to go above and beyond make him a true role model, and wholly deserving of this recognition. Congratulations. For the Firefighter of the Year 2025 award, will Alejandro Guzman please come forward. Firefighter Guzman exemplifies dedication, leadership, and innovation, making him an outstanding candidate for the firefighter of the year. Over the past year, he has devoted countless hours to advancing the department's drone and robotics program, transforming them into highly capable soon to be state recognized operational teams.

26:44 – 27:26Speaker 10

His efforts have strengthened the special operations team, enhanced firefighter safety, and improved decision making during the complex and high risk incidents. In addition, he serves on the Advanced Life Support Competition team, dedicating significant time, both on and off duty, to providing advanced medical care to the community. Firefighter Guzman also mentors his peers, develops training resources, and ensures proficiency with emerging technologies supporting critical operations, including hazarded materials responses, technical rescues, and large scale emergencies. His professionalism, initiative, and selfless commitment to both his team and the community make him a true role model, and highly deserving of this award. Congratulations.

27:43 – 28:07Speaker 10

All right, there are two members receiving this award. It is the Supervisor of the Year 2025 award. Will Lieutenant Allen Beach please come forward? Lieutenant Beach has devoted his life to serving our community. Since joining the city as a lifeguard in 1988, he has exemplified what it means to lead with purpose, integrity, and compassion.

28:07 – 28:43Speaker 10

Throughout his distinguished career, Lieutenant Beach has consistently gone above and beyond the call of duty. He has trained, mentored generations of lifeguards, instilling not only the skills required for this job, but also the values that define true public service. His actions have directly contributed to the saving countless lives, and his presence has been a consistent source of strength and reliability for both his team and the community. Known for always stepping forward when others are in need, Lieutenant Beach embodies selflessness and dedication. His unwavering commitment, exceptional leadership, and lasting impact make him truly deserving of this award.

28:43 – 29:35Speaker 10

Congratulations. All right, last but not least. For the last supervisor of the year 2025 award, will Captain Evan Goodwin please come forward. Captain Goodwin exemplifies exceptional leadership, consistently leading from the front and setting the highest standards throughout both action and mentorship. He inspires his crew to excel modeling accountability, professionalism, and operationally excellence in every training session, emergency response, and daily station activity.

29:35 – 30:18Speaker 10

Deeply committed to the growth of his personnel, he invests in mentorship, skill development, and team cohesion, creating a culture where discipline, pride, and excellence are expected and achieved. On the fire ground, Captain Goodwin demonstrates strong command precedent and sound decision making under pressure, ensuring safe and effective outcomes in each of the most complex incidents. Beyond operations, he dedicates himself to ongoing training, continuous improvement, and knowledge sharing, enhancing the readiness and proficiency of his team. Throughout his leadership, Captain Goodwin has made a lasting impact on his station, the Special Operations team, and the City of Hollywood, making him truly a deserving Supervisor of the Year. Congratulations.

30:29 – 31:12Speaker 1

Well, thank you to everyone, chief, who were recognized today, and the whole department for your professionalism and all the, you know, individual accounts of of your service and what caused you to, you know, win the praise and and respect. Earning these awards really speaks to your own personal professional commitment and and how you react in the moment and, in the end, how that serves our greater community and provides for public safety. We're you have a lot of community pride in the fire department and and beach safety. And, you know, moments like this when we hear the stories of what you guys do is just elevates the pride in all of us. I want you to know that we have a proud group of residents, 155,000 strong in Hollywood, that appreciate what you do. So thank you so much.

31:12Speaker 9

Thank you, mayor. Would you mind if we took a picture?

31:14Speaker 1

Let's do it.

31:16 – 31:27Speaker 9

Can I get all the award recipients to come up for a picture, please? All of the award recipients, come up for a picture, please.

31:58Speaker 1

Ready? One, two, three.

32:01 – 32:13Speaker 12

Nice. Hey. Nice. I'm sorry. Great. Three, two, in. Three, two, one. Very nice.

32:29 – 33:13Speaker 1

Alright. Thank you all. Alright. We have a proclamation, three of them. Let's begin with, commissioner Quintana, who will present a proclamation recognizing the seventy fifth anniversary of the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge. Accepting the proclamation, I think we have some folks here. Is Edward here, the worshipable master, Alexander Smith, the senior warden, Stuart Davies, the secretary, Wallace Fine, treasurer, Wayne Kisendath, past master perhaps Bolivar Vazquez or Alexandre Merrou might be here.

33:13Speaker 13

Come on over in the front.

33:14 – 33:27Speaker 1

Come on up, And commissioner Quintana, the floor is yours once the folks come on up. Lodge 299.

33:34Speaker 1

See Andre Brown is here.

33:37Speaker 13

He's not here with the lodge, though.

33:39Speaker 1

I think he might be a Mason.

33:41Speaker 13

Are you with this lodge?

33:48 – 34:44Speaker 13

Well, everyone, I am so very, very pleased to be able to celebrate with our role, Fulkerson Masonic Lodge here at City Hall. These folks are right down the street from where I live, and they contribute so much to our community. So with that, I'll read the proclamation, City of Hollywood, Florida, in recognition of the seventy fifth anniversary of the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge, 04/18/2026. Whereas, the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge number 299FAM was founded in Hollywood and received its official charter from the most worshipable Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of Florida on 04/18/1951. And whereas the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge was named in honor of Doctor.

34:44 – 35:47Speaker 13

Roe Parham Fulkerson, from 1870 to 1949, one of the founding fathers of the city of Hollywood, who dutifully served the community as an optometrist and member of the Florida State Legislature. Doctor. Fulkerson was also a distinguished Freemason, prolific speaker, writer, poet, and a dedicated local community leader. And whereas, like its esteemed namesake, the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge has served Hollywood as a vibrant and dedicated civic organization for over seven decades, fostering the Masonic principles of faith, hope, and charity. The lodge has been instrumental in supporting the local neighborhood with charity programs, events, and celebrations that unite and uplift people of all ages and backgrounds.

35:48 – 36:38Speaker 13

And whereas this seventy fifth anniversary milestone of the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge is a testament to the dedication of its founders, members, and volunteers who have continuously supported and strengthened our community. Now, therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the City Of Hollywood and the Hollywood City Commission, hereby honor and congratulate the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge of Hollywood on its seventy fifth anniversary, commend its invaluable contributions to our community, and do hereby proclaim 04/18/2026, as a day in celebration of the seventy fifth anniversary of the Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge in the city of Hollywood, Florida.

36:44 – 37:11Speaker 16

Hello, everybody. I'm Ed Vaitulis, the master of the lodge. I would like to make a brief statement. On behalf of Roe Focus and Masonic Lodge number two ninety nine, I extend our sincere gratitude to the city of Hollywood for proclaiming 04/18/2026 as Roe Fulkerson Masonic Lodge seventy fifth anniversary day. Seventy five years ago, at our lodge's beginning, the founding members of

37:11 – 37:42Speaker 16

lodge carefully chose the name of the organization to honor Roe Fulkerson, a founding figure in the city of Hollywood. He exemplified the outstanding civic service and left a lasting legacy through his many contributions to the community. His integrity and dedication established him as a pillar of our community, an example that we continue to uphold and continue to strive to emulate today. Thank you very much.

37:43Speaker 13

Thank you so much.

37:47Speaker 1

Please come on up. We'd love to take a photo with you guys and help spread the word about the lodge.

38:42 – 39:05Speaker 18

For your unwavering commitment and service. In addition to this proclamation, we look forward to celebrating and honoring you at our Volunteer Appreciation Dinner on Tuesday, April, sorry, at 06:00PM at the Boulevard Heights Community Center. On behalf of the city, we extend our sincere gratitude. Your impact does not go unnoticed and our community is better because of you. Thank you.

39:11Speaker 8

Want to grab the

39:12Speaker 1

proclamation there? Thank you. Let's a photo real quick. Anybody from HR, come on up.

40:01Speaker 12

Thank you, guys.

40:11 – 40:35Speaker 1

Final proclamation. Let's invite vice mayor Coleri to present a proclamation recognizing Earth Day and Arbor Day of this year. Accepting the proclamation, I believe, will be Elaine Franklin. She's the city's environmental sustainability coordinator and the staff liaison to the sustainability advisory committee. It's two big titles there, Elaine. Welcome. Vice mayor Coleri, please.

40:37 – 41:33Speaker 2

Mic's on, so I didn't have to a chance to pre read this, so I apologize. Proclamation City of Hollywood, Florida, recognition Earth Day, 04/22/2026, and Arbor Day, 04/24/2026. Whereas Earth Day, observed annually on April 22, and Arbor Day, celebrated on the last Friday in April, serve as an important reminder of our shared responsibility to protect and preserve our natural environment. And whereas the city of Hollywood, as a vibrant coastal community in South Florida, is connected to and dependent upon the health of our oceans, beaches, waterways, urban tree canopy, and native ecosystems. And whereas rising sea levels, coastal erosion, extreme weather events, and habitat loss pose ongoing challenges that require proactive environmental stewardship and community resilience.

41:34 – 42:23Speaker 2

And whereas, trees play a critical role in reducing heating and cooling costs. Improving air quality, preventing soil erosion, supporting wildlife, and enhancing the beauty and livability of our city. And whereas, environmental conservation efforts, including coastal restoration, mangrove protection, tree planting initiatives, and reduction of pollution are essential to safeguarding our natural resources for present and future generations. And whereas in honor of Arbor Day twenty twenty six, the Public Works Department will plant an oak tree at Rose's Garden located at 510 South 24th Avenue on Thursday, 04/23/2026 at ten a. To provide shade for visitors while enjoying the park.

42:23 – 43:03Speaker 2

And whereas in celebration of Earth Day twenty twenty six, the Hollywood Sustainable Advisory Committee will host a conservation village in collaboration with 4ocean and support from Margaritaville Hollywood Beach Resort on 04/25/2026, from 9AM to 1PM at the Hollywood Beach. And now therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the city of Hollywood, Florida and the Hollywood City Commission hereby recognize 04/22/2026 as Earth Day and 04/24/2026 as Arbor Day in the city of Hollywood. Alright.

43:07Speaker 1

Sounds like we have some great events coming up, Elaine.

43:09Speaker 19

Yes. Thank mayor. Yes.

43:11 – 43:56Speaker 20

Thank you, mayor. Thank you, commissioners, city manager, and staff. In addition to those two events, I just wanna highlight two exciting details in Hollywood. One, turtle nesting season started March 1 as it does every year. Leatherbacks are the first species to start nesting here. They tend to have small populations, so we have small number of nests. But we already have six leatherback nests on Hollywood Beach. So that's about one per week. That's very exciting news to have that. The other I'd like to highlight is we are doing a tree planting project that will focus mainly in the West and south areas of Hollywood that will be complemented by some tree and plant giveaways. So stay tuned for those details. So those are some ways that the city continues to support wildlife and our urban canopy here in Hollywood. So thank you for this recognition today.

43:57 – 44:40Speaker 1

Thank you. Thanks for all the effort. Please come on up. All right. That concludes our proclamations, not but not to be outdone.

44:40 – 44:57Speaker 1

We have four presentations. So let's begin with mister CJ Davila. He is the director of the Florida Green Building Coalition. And he would like to share an award to the city of Hollywood for achieving the green local government recertification. Mr. Davila, welcome.

44:57 – 45:25Speaker 22

Thank you. My name is CJ Davila, I'm the executive director of the Florida Green Building Coalition. The Florida Green Building Coalition is a green building certification program that was founded in the year 2000. We are the largest certification program in the state of Florida, having just surpassed 46,000 projects statewide. The city of Hollywood has completed their green building certification or sorry, their green local government certification recently, in 2025.

45:25 – 45:52Speaker 22

The city of Hollywood first certified in 2012. I wanted to just review the program a little bit. The program judges the city on water conservation, energy conservation, disaster mitigation, a lot of different factors. The city of Hollywood scored 33% of the total points available to them in 2025. So I wanted to really recognize that.

45:52 – 46:30Speaker 22

I wanted to recognize the mayor, the commissioners, the city manager, Elaine Franklin, Isaac Wechtler with Code Green, and all the employees who contributed to this extraordinary feat. We are in Hollywood today, so I'd be remiss if I didn't recognize Barry Fask, one of our former presidents of our board, and a long time Hollywood resident. He was very passionate about Hollywood and the Florida Green Building Coalition. So I wanted to recognize him. Also, in 2025, we started our version five of our local government certification program.

46:30 – 47:11Speaker 22

Since then, only three local governments have completed the program. Hollywood is the second highest ranked city to complete the version five, which is much higher than version four. So really wanted to congratulate you guys for that. And in 2025, you were the highest scoring city across the state of Florida. So we recognized you last week in Miami at our annual Green Achievements Awards. So once again, really wanted to recognize you, let the taxpayers know that you guys are doing a great job of saving them money and resources. And on behalf of our board, we'd like to thank the city of Hollywood for all their work.

47:12Speaker 16

Great. Thank you.

47:16Speaker 1

Let's see what you got there. Sure. All right. I love that. Please, let's take a photo.

48:02 – 48:39Speaker 1

Appreciate everybody's effort in that regard. Alright. Presentation number two. Let's invite miss Joanne Fullerton Reiss. She's the chair of the African American Advisory Council, and she would love to share her annual report for the advisory committee. Hello, miss Reese. If there are any members of the committee or staff liaison that would like to join Ms. Reese, you're welcome to.

48:46Speaker 23

I have that one.

48:47Speaker 1

All right, looks like we've got a great presentation here.

49:15Speaker 23

Good afternoon. You can hear me? Good afternoon, Mayor Levy.

49:19Speaker 1

Good afternoon.

49:20 – 50:00Speaker 23

Commissioner Kalari and the commissioners. But don't let me forget my commissioner, Peter Hernandez, the professionalist. Joanne Reese, as you said, I'm here to present the annual report for the African American Advisory Council. And as you see, the slides are so beautiful. And I don't want to be remiss without recognizing our liaison, our very professional, polite, dedicated I mean, words can't even explain how she has presented herself, how she supported the council.

50:00Speaker 23

And it's there through all of our concerns. And they're to correct us, as well. So don't think that she's

50:07Speaker 1

not does the same for all of us, too.

50:08Speaker 23

So we appreciate Allison and know

50:10Speaker 7

Yes. Exactly what

50:11 – 50:34Speaker 23

you mean, Ms. Reese. Purpose of the African American Advisory Council is to keep the city commission informed about the needs and the concerns of the African American in the city of Hollywood. The council is dedicated to promoting fairness, equality, economics, employment, housing, education, and cultural Look at our pictures. Current membership.

50:35 – 51:16Speaker 23

Joanne, I was hoping that she would be here, but she's really, really the force behind the council as well, Joanne Tate. And those are basically our board, our slideshow, Black History Month. Oh, goodness. It was at Washington Park. And I know you guys were there. We had a phenomenal, phenomenal event. And the keynote speaker, regional manager, all the and don't let me forget our spoken word young man, Destin E. Ward.

51:16Speaker 1

president of The United States.

51:17 – 51:48Speaker 23

JULIETTE F. Following that, that was in February. So in Juneteenth, Georgette is not here. Was hoping that she would be here. But anyway, we had a very nice presentation at the MLK Park. And it was a good day. I mean, the band was really jazzy. It was like, oh, my god. That's great. And it was great.

51:48 – 52:09Speaker 23

And we had a good day. Oh, now, going back to school for the haircuts. And Joanne Tate, our vice chair, she instrumented this. And it was at MLK. And we were able to get in I can't remember how many students through Sandra and got their haircuts.

52:09 – 52:35Speaker 23

The kids were so, so happy for getting the haircuts that day. And don't let me forget our goals and accomplishments for 2026. We're going to host and it's now, we've already done twenty twenty six Black History Celebration. And we're going to assist with the Juneteenth celebration, partnership with South Broward Juneteenth Celebration, S. Georgette Leslie Wiggins.

52:35 – 53:08Speaker 23

And in effort to support the local businesses this is our main focus for right now we are developing a directive for those businesses to create their program to provide support and connect with them and their resources. So we have been working diligently with the city also with that. And AAC is the host, again, the back to school haircut events and a sneaker drive this time. So we're happy to be able to do that. So we want you to join us.

53:09 – 53:28Speaker 23

Those of you that are interested in becoming a member of the board, here's where you can log on and make your appointments and fill out your application. The meetings are held on the fourth Thursday of each month. And we're happy to see you there. Thank you very much.

53:32 – 54:10Speaker 1

Thank you, Ms. Reese. Really high quality programs year round by the ACAC, and especially on the holidays. Thank you, all the volunteers, the board, and Alison as well. Thank you so much. Great to see the progress. All right, Chris Kanter. Let's see one up that. Chris is here. He's the chair of the Education Advisory Committee. And let's hear all about what the advisory committee is doing to further good education BROWN: here in our city. Welcome, Chris. CHRISTOPHER Good afternoon, everybody. I would be remiss if I did not point out and give honor to our school board member, Ms. Debbie Hickson, is here in the audience today. We appreciate all that she does for

54:10Speaker 1

our And who else? Mara Bowman.

54:15Speaker 24

Mara I didn't see her. And Mara as well.

54:17Speaker 1

Mara Why don't you guys join Chris up here?

54:19Speaker 25

Mara Bowman, school board member.

54:20 – 54:35Speaker 1

Come on up, school board members, please, if you'd like. And if there's anyone else who serves on the advisory committee here, the education committee, you can feel free to join Chris.

54:49Speaker 24

I'm sweating on a presentation. I'm sorry.

54:51Speaker 1

I'm not sweating.

54:54Speaker 24

No, I'm not sweating.

54:56Speaker 1

It is a little hot in here, though.

54:57Speaker 24

Right. I could

54:59Speaker 26

I'm kidding.

55:06Speaker 1

Well, in the meantime, thank you for our school board members for being here. I know you all had a I think a long school board meeting. I think it was yesterday. So and so

55:16Speaker 2

SPEAKER Are those of our advisory board

55:18Speaker 24

of those? No. I do not see them here. Yeah, they'll

55:27 – 55:44Speaker 1

Chris, maybe while they're queuing up the presentation, perhaps if school board members would like to say a few words. I know that some of them have interacted with the advisory committee and can express any please, countywide school board member Debbie Hickson first, please.

55:44 – 56:05Speaker 27

Good afternoon, everyone. This is not what we we came for something else. But good afternoon. Nice to see everybody. We are very happy to be here today. We did just have a school board meeting. Thank you to the Hollywood Advisory Committee for I believe you do scholarship, yes,

56:05Speaker 15

for students?

56:06Speaker 24

We do the grants. Grant

56:08Speaker 27

Okay, right. The BEF grants, they actually just had the hootenanny to celebrate those teachers who received grants from

56:17Speaker 1

Sounds Irish.

56:18Speaker 27

No, it was no, a hoot, like like cowboy ish. Okay. And they had the cowboy hats on and had a good time Hootman.

56:27Speaker 1

Thought I heard Mark Rose say that once before. That's why I said Irish.

56:29Speaker 27

Anyway, we're you know, great things are happening at Broward County Public Schools. And we're happy for the partnership that we have with the city. So thank you.

56:37Speaker 1

Thank you all. Thank you. Ms. Bowman.

56:40 – 57:15Speaker 28

Thank you. Commission, great to be here today. So just a couple updates that we have. And I know that this has been rolled out before. But I've worked with Commissioner Gruber, Commissioner Biederman. We have the Sloan Stephens Foundation doing tennis on the West Side of town. And on our board meeting on the twenty first, we're going to be signing a contract with Overtown Youth Center for a pilot program at McNico Middle School, which was brought to us by Mayor Levy and Commissioner Quintana. So I really

57:15Speaker 1

And I have to give credit to Congresswoman Debbie Wasson.

57:17Speaker 28

Congresswoman, yes.

57:19Speaker 1

Brought Alonzo Mourning here. And all the stars lined up. And your partnership was critical. So thank you.

57:23Speaker 28

So great things are happening with your support. And we really appreciate it. Thank you very much.

57:27Speaker 1

Thank you, Maura. Thank you so much. Chris, back to you. That was a good feeling there.

57:33 – 58:06Speaker 24

CHRIS Thank you, everyone, and thank you school board members for everything that you've done for us and continue to do. Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. I'm Chris Cantor, chair of the City of Hollywood's Education Advisory Committee. Also, thank you very much, staff, for all you do in leadership. This is our annual report. Throughout the country, public education remains under strain. Enrollment continues to decline in many large districts, and teacher shortages persist. Meanwhile, voucher programs are expanding at both state and federal levels. The U. S.

58:06 – 58:45Speaker 24

Department of Education is nearly dismantled. Its headquarters are about 70% vacant. Remaining staff are moving to a smaller building and the building they're in right now, it's going to the Department of Energy. Meanwhile, districts are merely trying to survive. In Florida, these pressures are more intense. We now have universal vouchers with no income cap. Between 2021 and 2025, voucher use doubled. Now that went from about 12% to 24% statewide. As you all know, when enrollment declines, so does funding. Here in Broward County, the impact is real.

58:45 – 59:16Speaker 24

During the past decade, our district lost more than 40,000 students. Earlier in this school year alone, officials reported another 10,000 student loss. So far, the school board has approved six school closures due to under enrollment that had to happen for the next year. About 34 schools have been named in the coming years, does not mean all 34 will be closed, but have been named. There's now a district hiring freeze with the plans to cut at least 1,000 jobs each year for the next three years.

59:17 – 59:54Speaker 24

In Hollywood, the future is ominous. No public school has closed yet, but our buildings remain underenrolled. Florida's Schools of Hope legislation complicates matters, enabling charter operators to co locate at existing sites practically for free with the district paying the cost. Our own Quest Center, Hollywood Central Preparatory K-eight, Mary and Bethune Elementary and McNichol Middle Schools are among 27 Broward Schools campuses that charter operators already targeted unsuccessfully. For now that measure is still being looked at.

59:55 – 1:00:18Speaker 24

Nonetheless, our committee stood in the gap. We partnered with the Broward Education Foundation. We awarded grants totaling $20,000 to 19 Hollywood classrooms that went right into the hands of your kiddos and mine. We analyzed enrollment trends and we examined career and technical education pathways. We identified barriers to student lunch access.

1:00:18 – 1:00:41Speaker 24

We prioritized our work upon best practices in teaching, engagement and advocacy. Now, I'm going to be honest, like many advisory boards, we faced our challenges. Reaching quorum has been difficult. Despite midterm appointments that this commission gave to us, the struggle continues. We've only reached quorum about 20 sorry, 60% of the time, and we're continuing to work on that.

1:00:42 – 1:01:40Speaker 24

As the committee addresses root causes and action steps, we welcome your feedback and your support. So looking ahead to 2026, well what are we going to do? First things, we're going to keep our community up to date on education policy, engage parent and civic groups, and continue to work with public charter and private schools for one goal, that is in our mission to make Hollywood's educational opportunities Florida's best. Now these priorities mean that much of the work will center around not just promoting our educational opportunities and partnering with them, but also working to protect our schools as much as possible from losing more students and potential closures, or becoming sites for co location, working alongside our board members, municipality the municipality, and our community. Now, if closures become imminent, we will focus upon engaging our entire community with the school board, our two school board members, and district staff, as we will do ourselves to advocate for fair, reasonable, and equitable approaches.

1:01:41 – 1:02:31Speaker 24

Finally, our committee recently became aware of the city's white paper outlining a potentially by right zoning approach for micro schools. The Department of Development Services and our staff liaison are currently working to secure a date for collaborative meeting time. It's my sincere hope that the city and this committee will work hand in hand moving forward prior to any action being taken by the commission to ensure that any such proposal is informed, that is, by a thorough study of the city's existing educational landscape and a careful assessment of its potential impact. I also believe it's vital that we play an active role in facilitating meaningful conversations and opportunities for stakeholder input as part of that process. With that said, I invite you and all of our residents to our upcoming meeting on April 20 at Sheridan Technical College.

1:02:31 – 1:02:45Speaker 24

We're taking a tour, and we're going to get an up close look at their exceptional career programs. 06:00, feel free to come on out and be a part of that. I want to thank you as chair for your continued support and your trust in me. I welcome any questions or feedback you may have at this time.

1:02:45Speaker 1

Thank you. Vice Mayor Calera. Let's, please.

1:02:51 – 1:03:09Speaker 2

Hi. So thank you for all the efforts. I understand the quorum. Just one thing I want to note, we did reach out to our youth ambassadors for the city of Hollywood asking for participation, as well as the historical site, the historical club students. So we put that out there yesterday.

1:03:09 – 1:03:37Speaker 2

Hopefully we'll get some bite. But I think one really important question, not just for education purposes, and I'm glad that our school board members are also here. And I know my staff will probably be like, why? But it is a topic being in the broad league of cities, we constantly are talking about it with the SRO compensation and working with the school boards. So I just don't know if you guys are privy to that information and what is it that you all are doing to help facilitate some type of

1:03:39Speaker 2

Compromise dialogue and making sure that our students are safe within their schools.

1:03:43Speaker 24

Yes, it's such You

1:03:44Speaker 2

know they are, but to continue that.

1:03:46 – 1:04:23Speaker 24

Absolutely. And safety, of course, is the number one thing that we all hope for for our kids when they go, right? First of all, to backtrack a little, thank you for your work with the youth ambassadors. They will be joining us on the twentieth as well. We're excited about that and having that representation on the committee. The news about the SROs just kind of hit within the past week or so. We've got it. We've been going back and forth, myself and our staff liaison. I do plan on bringing that to our committee and talking about it. And I was reaching out going to be reaching out this week to our board members and those in the know staff, so that I can get real information that's really strong information, not just hearsay, in the hands of the committee.

1:04:23 – 1:04:43Speaker 24

I do think we need to look at that and kind of know what the next steps are going to be, and then how we can really work to organize and engage our community. I think a lot of times our community is so busy doing the work and working that those opportunities don't seem natural to them. And we need to create as many natural inflows as we can to have those conversations.

1:04:43 – 1:05:07Speaker 2

So I think that it's really, really important that education and knowledge about the situation, whether it be what direction they go in. So I would offer any assistance that you need to get the proper information. I'm sure that the school board would offer that as well. I can't speak on behalf of them, but I think it has to be a joint effort. And we have to be able to communicate and find out what's the best way to go to make sure that that safety is ensured.

1:05:07Speaker 24

Absolutely great. And I will be sure to take that to you then. Thank you.

1:05:10 – 1:05:38Speaker 1

Thank you, Chris, for all your insight and the work of the committee. Just to the city manager and team, I would just mention that perhaps when you bring forward the annual board appointments, if there are any boards that you might want to consider reducing the number of members in order to enable a lesser number of people to create a quorum, then you might want to analyze that for this and any others that suffer lack of attendance and make it easier for them to do their work.

1:05:38Speaker 24

And we're getting their full transparency, doing everything we can to make sure that people are excited in there. I think April was a great start to that and getting to see that campus head on.

1:05:48Speaker 1

Board Member Biederman.

1:05:49 – 1:06:09Speaker 14

Since you brought it up, first of all, Chris, thank you for your stepping up to be on the advisory board and being the chair. But secondly, as opposed to reducing the number of seats, I would much rather add alternate seats. That's a much more authentic and it's a much better it's more

1:06:10Speaker 1

I'd love more participation.

1:06:11Speaker 14

it's just I think it's more effective.

1:06:15Speaker 14

looking for. Have alternates as opposed to reducing the number

1:06:17Speaker 1

of seats. That's a good idea. I think that achieves both goals.

1:06:20 – 1:06:35Speaker 24

And if I can just interject I'm so sorry, Mr. Mayor. I think the one thing that is going to be very crucial is there's a lot of crucial stuff happening right now that we need to be getting our hands on, it's kind of reinforced the direction that we're taking. I think that will definitely increase MASTERS: engagement.

1:06:35 – 1:06:57Speaker 1

Thank you, Chris. Appreciate it. Alright. Our final presentation. Let's talk about parks and athletics. Let's go ahead with the actually, he's the parks and athletics manager. Alex, was was Alex Nonemaker? He'll tell me if I pronounced that wrong. This is the annual report for the Marine Advisory Council. Alex.

1:06:57Speaker 17

Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, and nailed it. Absolutely perfect.

1:07:01 – 1:07:19Speaker 17

Thanks so much for that. My name is Alex Donnemaker. I'm the Parks and Athletics Manager for Parks Recreation and Cultural Arts and the new staff liaison to the Marine Advisory Board. So while I'll be giving you a report, I have only met with the board one time. So we're looking forward to getting another meeting in tomorrow night. So we'll go ahead and move along.

1:07:22Speaker 3

I do love the skate park. It could be waterfront at some point. But right now, it's

1:07:28Speaker 17

We're going start with one of my projects that we brought forward. You already approved on a consent agenda. The Boulevard.

1:07:33Speaker 1

Thank you. Thank you. Love it.

1:07:40Speaker 3

we're gonna be the skateboarding.

1:07:41 – 1:07:52Speaker 1

I think we are definitely the skateboard capital of Broward County with the Justice Skatepark and now, of course, with Boulevard Heights, where we are the place to skateboard in Broward County.

1:07:52Speaker 17

Justice Skatepark is widely visited throughout the As my staff's there, they encounter people from all over that come to enjoy that skate park.

1:08:00Speaker 1

Yeah, know people that drive from all over for it.

1:08:02Speaker 17

It's wildly popular. A great hit.

1:08:04Speaker 1

Soon to have more parking as well, thanks to Vice Mayor Kalari's initiative.

1:08:09 – 1:08:23Speaker 17

We certainly welcome that. Marine Advisory Board presentation. I have notes in front of me if you want me to swing with.

1:08:23Speaker 1

Go ahead, Alex. And hopefully, we'll catch up with the visuals.

1:08:26 – 1:09:18Speaker 17

So the Marine Advisory Board's purpose is to develop ways to increase revenue from the marine industry sector in Hollywood to develop strategies to encourage student and residents to pursue careers in the marine industry, increase marine activities and opportunities for Hollywood residents and tourists, and to provide recommendations to the commission based on specific findings and research. The board's appointed and serves at the advisory capacity to the commission. Highlighting the achievements for 2025, the board was able to advocate for marketing promotions in current and proposed natural artificial reefs, considered and researched nearshore multifunctional structures that can reduce wave energy while also producing coral reef habitat. A letter was sent on behalf of the board to the commission requesting a fertilizer ban. A letter was sent to the commission advising the risk of extreme weather.

1:09:18 – 1:09:50Speaker 17

The board was active in promoting and volunteering at the Cardboard Boat Race, which in the years that I've been here seems to have its highest attendance year after year after year. Additionally, they supported the waterway cleanup activities, which we were able to host out of two locations and saw wonderful attendance at. Upcoming for twenty twenty six, we're going to stay with some of the main goals, which is going to be advocate for marketing and promotion of current and proposed natural artificial reefs. We're looking to formulate a new marine event. Additionally, we'd like to improve communication between local municipal marine advisory boards.

1:09:50 – 1:10:29Speaker 17

There's been a bit of an effort to try and get more involved with the County Marine Advisory Board and bring in our neighboring cities boards to have a more coalesced voice. We're looking to research the feasibility of hosting a Countywide Marine Advisory Board Summit to get everybody together and get them on the same page, as well as promote and conduct the annual youth fishing tournament and cardboard boat race. We're continually looking for speakers. If you're interested in promoting anything at the next couple of board meetings, feel free to reach out to me. We'd love to have somebody in the know come and present to us. That's going to wrap up our findings for this year's report. And thank you for your time. If you have any questions, how do

1:10:29 – 1:10:57Speaker 1

Thank you, Alex. Just one note, if you could. I know you're just now been designated as the staff liaison. But a subject that we've been talking about, We The City, for a long time, and I think it's a big need and perhaps we can find some grant funding for, is in Northlake specifically, there's a very shallow draft in the waterways. It really restricts the boating opportunity for especially for the people who live there and can't necessarily, you know, navigate during certain tides and even always.

1:10:57 – 1:11:30Speaker 1

So I do do think it needs some maintenance dredging. And so if that could be put on your radar of the advisory board to work with the city as well and to start looking at that. I think we need to align ourselves up for how that can take place. I think Fort Lauderdale does it very frequently. And even some private owners in Fort Lauderdale, I know, just hire a dredging contractor to do maintenance dredging in front of their docks. So perhaps we need to also let our homeowners know what they can do if there is something within the wall that they can do that's feasible and just have an opportunity to make the navigation in Northlake a little better.

1:11:30Speaker 17

Sounds like an agenda item we'll have for tomorrow. Absolutely.

1:11:33Speaker 1

Great. Thank you.

1:11:33Speaker 3

Thank you, guys. Thank you, Alex.

1:11:35 – 1:12:20Speaker 1

All right. All right. That concludes our presentations, ladies and gentlemen, and our proclamations. So thank you so much. I know that a number of you are here for some time certain items that we'll get to, some quasi judicial items. I'm going to go ahead because I know there's a lot of people here on '22. I think eighteen will be quick and then we'll take '22 and then we'll go ahead with the rest of the agenda. Let's go ahead with 18 as an ordinance of the City of Hollywood City Commission vacating a portion of the Platter Alley lying between Block 53 Of The Platter Of Hollywood, Platte Book one, page 21, more specifically as described in exhibit A, etcetera, as provided in the agenda. This is for Alta Hollywood and the Gaia residence. It's an ordinance on second reading advertised as a public hearing in conformance to state statutes and city codes.

1:12:20Speaker 1

There have been no changes since the first reading. I'm going go ahead and open the public hearing. Are there any speaker cards on item 18?

1:12:27Speaker 1

Public hearing is now closed. Is there a motion from the floor?

1:12:31Speaker 2

Motion to approve.

1:12:33Speaker 1

We have motion from Commissioner Vice Mayor Coleri, second from Commissioner Biederman, Commissioner Schuham.

1:12:39Speaker 15

I was just commenting on your rescheduling. I think there's a lot of people here for item 19.

1:12:45Speaker 1

So let's go ahead on the motion real quick. The motion let's go ahead and read the ordinance and call the roll call vote.

1:12:52 – 1:13:15Speaker 30

ANNETTE An ordinance of the City Commission of the City Of Hollywood, Florida vacating a portion of the Platte Alley lying within Block 53 of the Platte Of Hollywood, Plat Book one, page 21, and more specifically described in exhibit A attached here to and incorporated herein, providing a severability clause, a repealer provision, and an effective date. Alta Hollywood, Gaia residences.

1:13:17Speaker 6

JULIE Commissioner Gruber? JULIE Yes. JULIE Commissioner Biederman?

1:13:22Speaker 6

JULIE Commissioner Quintana?

1:13:27Speaker 6

Commissioner Schuham?

1:13:30Speaker 6

Mayor Levy? Or vice mayor Vice mayor Clary? Yes. Mayor Levy?

1:13:37 – 1:13:50Speaker 1

Yes. Alright. Let's show the ordinance passing on second reading unanimously. So I think there why don't don't you raise your hands if you hear on item 22? This is for the residential development on 16th Avenue.

1:13:51 – 1:14:28Speaker 1

Alright. Let's go ahead and take 22 if there's no objection from from the dais here from majority of us. Item 22 is resolution of the city commission considering a request to review the planning development board's action on a design and site plan for a four story 22 unit residential development located at 2101 Through 2111 North 16th Avenue. This is an item from development services that was requested by us. Also on the dais, there has been some additional information distributed to us, which looks like a bunch of legal descriptions and what have you that'll be explained.

1:14:28 – 1:14:41Speaker 1

And let's go ahead and offer the opportunity for staff to present. Before we do so, I'd like to ask the city attorney to go ahead and read the quasi judicial proceeding instructions.

1:14:41 – 1:15:22Speaker 30

JULIE Florida courts have determined that there are certain types of matters, including item 22 on today's agenda, which are to be treated differently from other issues considered by the commission. Most decisions of the commission are legislative in nature, meaning that the commission is acting as a policymaking body. However, in quasi judicial matters, the commission is applying existing rules and policies to a particular factual situation and is therefore acting like a judge or jury in the courtroom. In such cases, courts have determined that due process and fundamental fairness require that more formal procedures be followed. Therefore, in quasi judicial matters, all witnesses are sworn in and subject to cross examination by the parties.

1:15:22 – 1:15:47Speaker 30

In addition, the decision of the commission must be supported by competent and substantial evidence presented at the hearing. However, in Hollywood, we have adopted a rule that allows for the waiver of quasi judicial judicial formalities. Waiver can only occur if agreed to by staff, the applicant, and any member of the public who is present. Therefore, at this time, I ask that the mayor inquire as to whether there is anyone who objects to waiving the quasi judicial formalities.

1:15:48Speaker 1

JOSHUA All right. Thank you so much, city attorney. Does either staff, the applicant, or any member of the audience object to proceeding informally?

1:15:56Speaker 29

JOSHUA The applicant requires it to be done quasi judicially to maintain the competent substantial evidence standard.

1:16:02 – 1:16:19Speaker 1

So we have an objection from the applicant. So we will proceed more formally. So let's go ahead. City clerk, please stand up, wave to everybody. If you're here to speak on item 22 regarding residential building for 16th Avenue, please stand up.

1:16:19 – 1:17:34Speaker 1

The clerk will give you a sticker, you'll be sworn in as a witness. Yeah, that's why I wanted to go first. Even if you think you might speak or you're not sure, just go ahead and get sworn in. If you'd like to decline speaking later on, you'll have an opportunity to just wave on. I don't believe that council needs a sticker,

1:17:36Speaker 6

you're gonna speak, you gotta have a speaker.

1:17:44Speaker 1

And if you do plan on speaking, Pat has the speaker cards. If you haven't filled one out, please do so.

1:18:01Speaker 6

Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, So help me, God.

1:18:12 – 1:18:33Speaker 1

Thank you all so much. This time, I'd like the commission to fulfill our duty, and that is to share any ex parte communications that we might have had on this item Please be seated. For today. I'll go ahead and begin. Yesterday, I had an in person meeting with the architect, Joe Kahler, legal counsel, Keith Polyakov, and the property owner, his name was Gil.

1:18:34 – 1:19:11Speaker 1

They came in and spoke to me about the project details. And after the planning and development board meeting, I had a discussion with the architect as well, and I believe Mr. Polyakov as well by phone about this item later on when he was retained. And then, of course, city staff, some brief discussion with, I believe it was Andrea Winget, to talk about the Planning and Development Board and how this came to be with us having to call it up today. So let's go ahead. I'll go down the line for ex parte communication sharing. Let's go with Commissioner Schuham.

1:19:12 – 1:19:40Speaker 15

Thank you, mayor. I, too, had a virtual meeting yesterday I think it was yesterday with the applicant's attorney, architect, and owner. I have talked with staff about this. I have also talked with Broward County staff about this. And after the PND board meeting, but prior to the appeal, I spoke with several neighbors about the property.

1:19:41 – 1:20:07Speaker 8

Thank you. Let's go ahead with Commissioner Hernandez. Thank you, mayor. I had discussion with staff. I've had discussion with the architect and the attorney for the project. I was at the subsequent board meeting of the PND board. I have received quite a bit of emails. I believe that was about it for me.

1:20:07Speaker 1

Yeah, just a good note on that. Emails for all of us are in the public record. Let's go ahead to Commissioner Gruber.

1:20:15 – 1:20:31Speaker 7

Yep. So I also met with the applicant architect and counsel this week, spoken to staff about this. And counsel for the applicant had reached out to me after the PND to discuss.

1:20:32Speaker 1

All right. Let's go to Vice Mayor Colari.

1:20:36Speaker 1

Let's go to Commissioner Biederman. The same. And Commissioner Quintana.

1:20:42Speaker 13

And myself, all the same parties.

1:20:45Speaker 14

Okay. You know what, Mayor? Forgive me. By chance, I bumped into school board member Maura Bowman last night, we had a little discussion about it.

1:20:54Speaker 1

All right. City attorney, that's sufficient?

1:20:57Speaker 30

Yes, that is sufficient.

1:20:58 – 1:21:26Speaker 1

Thank you. All right. So let's go ahead. Since we're proceeding quasi judicially, there'll be a little more formality with the order of things and specific time limits and time opportunities, and also an opportunity for counsel to cross examine any witness if they wish. So this will start with a staff presentation, which is limited but does not need to take thirty minutes, followed by a five minute cross examination opportunity by the applicant.

1:21:26 – 1:21:45Speaker 1

And the commission will have an opportunity to ask questions along the way. Following the staff, we'll hear from the appellant and then we'll go ahead to public speakers and then final round of five minute comments. So our staff presentation, please.

1:21:49 – 1:22:12Speaker 31

Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. My name is Alicia Lewis. I'm with the law firm of Nason Yeager. And I am honored to serve as staff attorney. Before Andrea gives her presentation, I wanted to qualify her first as an expert witness and then enter some items into the record. So please state your name for the record.

1:22:13Speaker 18

Andrea Windjett, Director of Development Services.

1:22:16Speaker 31

And Andrea, how long have you been in that position?

1:22:19Speaker 18

I have been at the city for almost twenty four years. And I have been a director for probably the last three to four years.

1:22:29Speaker 31

Last question, I promise. And do you hold any specific degrees or special?

1:22:35 – 1:22:47Speaker 18

I have a two year degree in environmental science, a bachelor's degree in planning, and a master's in management. And prior to working at the city, I worked for a private consulting firm.

1:22:48Speaker 31

And I would like to enter into the record the agenda and the backup materials that have been included already and are available to the public.

1:22:57 – 1:23:45Speaker 18

And in addition to the backup materials that were available online, Mayor, you mentioned there was additional backup material that was left on the dais as well. That will also be entered into the record. That information on the dais includes the city's 2005 adopted ordinance for the Regional Activity Center, where the area was expanded. And page four of 84 identifies the subject property in the backup on Exhibit A in that ordinance. There is also the county's ordinance for the land use plan amendment relative to the RAC that is being added into the backup ordinance February and February at the county with their subsequent maps attached.

1:23:45 – 1:24:03Speaker 18

And in addition to that, there is a twenty sixteen-twenty two city ordinance where the city rezoned the subject property before you today from a residential zoning to a Federal Highway 1 zoning designation. And in addition to that is also the traffic study.

1:24:04Speaker 1

Thank you. Please go ahead with staff presentation.

1:24:07Speaker 6

Excuse me, mayor. That will be staff exhibit A or exhibit one, I'm sorry.

1:24:15 – 1:24:43Speaker 18

Thank you so much, mayor. As you mentioned, we're here today to talk about the property at 2101 Through 2111 North 16th Avenue. This property is here before you. It's not very common for the commission to see these types of requests. But there was a commission, what we call a commissioner request for review, where I believe four commissioners had expressed some concerns with the action of the Planning and Development Board regarding this property.

1:24:43 – 1:25:19Speaker 18

The Planning and Development Board is the city's local planning agency. And they have the authority to approve and deny projects relative to site plan and design. And if the commission has concerns with their actions, the commission is able to call it for review, which the commission exercised that option. Thus, we are here today. This project was presented to the Planning and Development Board in February, where there was a tie vote and no action had taken place, which is the reason why the commission called this for review.

1:25:20 – 1:26:05Speaker 18

At that time, the applicant chose to include a variance request on their application for a corner cord variance, a corner cord dedication at the time. The applicant has revised the plans to do a partial easement and a partial dedication, which has eliminated the need for the variance. As such, the project before you today is a development by Wright project, which satisfies all of the subsequent criteria. And I will walk you through that now. The property is located just East of Federal Highway on the northern end of our jurisdictional boundaries.

1:26:05 – 1:27:00Speaker 18

You could see here today the property is a residential structure and surrounded by different residential structures, as well as South Broward High School. The property has a land use of regional activity center. And it is zoned Federal Highway Low Medium Intensity Multifamily District, also known as FH1. The property is about 0.18 of an acre, or 20,000 square feet. Before we dive a little bit more into the specific request, some of the information that was entered into the record before you are some actions that the city previously took place.

1:27:01 – 1:27:47Speaker 18

The previous land use for this property pre-two thousand and five was low medium residential, six to 10 units per acre. The city then expanded the regional activity from our original downtown core to generally I-ninety 5, Pembroke Road, and touching Sheridan Street, which was inclusive of this property as identified in the exhibit on the dais. The city had to do a land use map amendment as well as a text amendment, and so did Broward County. The city was the applicant of the map amendment and made the application to the county. The county's map is a general pictorial graphic of the represented area of the city's request.

1:27:48 – 1:28:10Speaker 18

The city's request clearly included this property as identified in the backup. And planning council would agree with that as well. The city furthermore recertified its map at the time. And the text and the county accepted the city's maps that were recertified as part of that. So this property is within the Regional Activity Center.

1:28:12 – 1:28:41Speaker 18

Several years later in 2016, a rezoning took place. And this property was rezoned from RS5 to the zoning that it has today, Federal FH1, Federal Highway. And if we move along to the next slide, the site plan that's before you today, the property is considered double fronted. The front setbacks are 20 feet. The side setback is 10.

1:28:41 – 1:29:07Speaker 18

The rear is 20. The height is 45 feet. There are some slight encroachments on the height, which are permissible under the zoning and land development regulations for the parapet and other elements. There are 22 units with a mix of one and two bedrooms. They are required 34 parking spaces. Actually, let me make sure I clarify that because they are

1:29:06Speaker 1

required They 30

1:29:09 – 1:29:32Speaker 18

have four additional spaces. And some of those spaces are tandem, which is also permissible under the zoning code. And those will be specifically applied to the two bedroom units. Here are some general design renderings of the property. And here is a better one where you can see the fenestration, the ornamentation, and the angle of the property from the corner.

1:29:35 – 1:30:36Speaker 18

As identified in your backup, this project is consistent with the applicable design criteria with architectural design compatibility, scale, massing, and landscape, in addition to the site plan standards for open space, circulation and parking, safe and efficient access, community services and utilities, building and other structures, and other requirements. It's also important to note that this project based on the size of this project, a traffic study is not traditionally required with this. However, recognizing that it was proximate to the school, the city did request a traffic study, which showed that the traffic is de minimis and no further improvements were necessary for that. And that is also left on the dais as well. In addition to that, as with all new construction, all new construction is required to maintain their own drainage on their property.

1:30:36 – 1:31:23Speaker 18

Within this area, the city, through its storm water master plan, has identified that there are some flooding concerns within the general community in this area. And as such, that plan identifies five years or so out from now that there will be improvements to that community. Some of those improvements may include a storm water pump station and drainage wells, as well as some piping along 24 inches piping along Liberty Street. This project is, as I mentioned, is required to retain its own drainage. However, as part of that, the city has requested that they do some off-site improvements in this area to help alleviate some of the flooding that is taking place within the public rights of way.

1:31:24 – 1:32:05Speaker 18

And so the applicant will be required to do some improvements along 16th And Sheridan, which will help alleviate some of the flooding within that intersection. And it's also important to note that some of the drainage in this area also stems from the overuse of the swales and the compaction in that area. So that tends to lead to some of the localized flooding that is taking place within the community. And with that, as I mentioned, the project is consistent with the design and site plan criteria. And as a belt and suspenders, to remind the applicant they do have to comply with public art, there is a condition relative to that. And as such, staff recommends approval.

1:32:07Speaker 1

Thank you, Andrea. Does that conclude staff direct presentation?

1:32:13Speaker 18

Counsel? That concludes staff's presentation.

1:32:15Speaker 1

All right. There's an opportunity for a five minute cross examination by the applicant's counsel if he would like to cross examine any witnesses of the

1:32:22 – 1:32:42Speaker 29

JEFFREY Thank you, Mayor. Keith Poliakoff here on behalf of the applicant. For Ms. Wenjig, we absolutely certify that she's an expert witness. No issues with that. Just have one question. Did you ever speak to anyone in Broward County about this issue, about the RAC, or anyone at the Broward County Planning Council?

1:32:45Speaker 29

Who did you speak to, and what did you discuss?

1:32:48 – 1:33:03Speaker 18

I spoke to the executive director, Barbara Blake Boy, regarding the alleged discrepancy that has been raised regarding Broward County's map not showing this area within the Regional Activity Center.

1:33:03Speaker 29

And what did she tell you?

1:33:06 – 1:33:29Speaker 18

She told me that the map is a general depiction of the area intended to be included and that the city's ordinance, which includes the individual parcels and the legal description, is what we had put forth and what prevails and that the city therefore recertified their maps. And so this property is therefore part of the Regional Activity Center. And no further action would be needed by the city.

1:33:30Speaker 29

Thank you. No further questions.

1:33:32 – 1:33:49Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. City Commission has an opportunity to ask any questions of staff at this point. Are anyone any folks who chimed in? Vice Mayor Caleri, anything to staff? All right, me activate your mic. Go ahead.

1:33:50 – 1:34:25Speaker 2

Just curiosity of a couple of things that you had mentioned. One, so I'm glad to hear if this is moving forward as far as addressing drainage, which always is a huge concern, not only for myself, but I think as the commission and the city in general. But you said May about a pump station, a lift station, and such. That word is broadly used. And so I just would like some clarification on that. There may be a pump station. There may be. What is it based on?

1:34:26 – 1:34:37Speaker 18

It's based on what identifies in the storm water master plan. And I could have the city's technical expert give you additional information if you're concerned about if it's a May or it will be done in five more years.

1:34:37Speaker 2

Yes, that's what I'd like.

1:34:41 – 1:35:00Speaker 1

So I'll consult with our city attorney as to whether or not we can, right now, call someone who hasn't been presented as a witness right now. Just if you can direct us for later questions, or is this permissible now, counsel?

1:35:04 – 1:35:21Speaker 30

If this person was listed previously as a possible witness, then they would be included as part of staff's presentation. And at this point, they could be crossed during staff's presentation. I do believe that she is going to be qualified as an expert first.

1:35:23Speaker 1

Mr. Poliakoff.

1:35:24Speaker 29

JOSHUA Yeah, we fully MACHT: agree with staff's expertise. There's no reason to waste time.

1:35:29Speaker 1

Thank you. JOSHUA All All right, Alicia. Welcome back.

1:35:32Speaker 33

Hi. Good afternoon, mayors, vice mayors, commissioners. Your

1:35:37 – 1:36:20Speaker 33

ALISIA VEDERA Feria with Public Utilities, Utilities Permit Review Manager and Floodplain Administrator. Yes, this is already identified in the stormwater master plan. So it's a matter of when funding becomes available, which should be in the next capital improvement program, next five years, could be five to ten. But yes, first there's a 24 inches along Liberty. Then there's drainage wells at the end of Liberty and also a pump station. So that's supposed to cover the entire basin for the whole Westlake area that leads the water over into that area to alleviate everything between 16th and 14th.

1:36:20 – 1:37:03Speaker 2

So is it considered, just out of curiosity, is it considered one of our hot spots that we noted? If it is And the reason why I say it is the may kind of like, it may get done, it may not. And I would like to put on the record that it should be a priority if it's definitely one of the hotspots. Second, that it is a school zoned area. And so there's a priority getting our children to and from school. So I think that, however, this is just my opinion. But since we're talking about it and it's been brought up and there is concern, I think that that should be one of the priorities addressing, especially if it's considered a hotspot in a flooding area. And with all of the other implementation that goes with it, with schools and driving to

1:37:04 – 1:37:33Speaker 2

from kids, I think that should be that. So thank you for clarification. I don't know if I need support for that. And then the second thing is, I guess Andrea can answer this for me. You mentioned about overuse of swales. Has code or anyone implemented or have we thought of doing a capital improvement as far as the swale restoration program going in that area since we've noticed that it's become a problem?

1:37:33Speaker 18

Not that I'm aware of. It's been identified in the city storm water master plan as one of the reasons why there is some additional flooding in the area. So it's intended to be addressed as part of that.

1:37:43 – 1:38:26Speaker 2

Okay. So I'm just going to make a couple of statements and then leave it up to everyone else. We tear up a road. And we've talked about this several times. We tear up a road. We disrupt the neighborhood with construction. And then after we do such, then we come back a year later and we change it up and do things. I think that this is a prime opportunity for us, whatever the result is today, to really look at where we're at and what needs to be addressed. So that the disruption, if there is any, based on the decision the commission makes today, that we address all the issues at one time. So the disruption is minimal as much as possible instead of going in.

1:38:27 – 1:38:53Speaker 2

Whether that's working with the developer and the city staff together as a team, however it goes. But I think that that to me is a priority because we don't want to have the construction going on if it gets approved today. And then a year later go and tear up the streets. And then a year later go, I think we can coordinate and work together. And that would be my request as we move forward. But I'm here to listen to everyone else's questions and comments. Thank you.

1:38:53Speaker 1

Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez, with any questions to staff?

1:38:56 – 1:39:09Speaker 8

Thank you, Mayor. I do. Andrea, if I may. The zoning that we have, if I wrote it down correctly, FH1 is the current zoning?

1:39:09Speaker 8

was done in 2016?

1:39:11Speaker 8

And that allows up to 45 feet high?

1:39:14Speaker 8

Is there any higher density or higher limits in that area?

1:39:18 – 1:39:29Speaker 18

As you move, I believe there is, as you I was going to say further west fronting Federal Highway. It generally steps up probably to about 14 KAUFFMAN: stories. But I could get you the exact answer if

1:39:29Speaker 8

No. I just wanted to know that could actually go higher getting closer As to

1:39:36Speaker 18

you move towards Federal Highway.

1:39:37 – 1:39:50Speaker 8

Federal Highway. And then have another question and maybe answer why we haven't a lot of resistance or a lot of people. Is this the first project of four story in the neighborhood that it's been allowed since 2016?

1:39:50Speaker 36

That's correct.

1:39:51Speaker 18

To the best of my knowledge.

1:39:52 – 1:40:07Speaker 8

Okay, no. I've driven through the area pretty much. I don't see any other, but I do see that the zoning allows it. So that might be one of the reasons why this is happening, that everybody's concerned about the area. But this was done back in 2016.

1:40:07 – 1:40:29Speaker 18

Yes. The regional activity center, it's intended to be identified as a growth area of the city. And so we're starting to see it now build out with that future vision that we started in 'twenty five when we expanded, rezoned in 2016. And now we're starting to see it further start to expand to the north and south areas.

1:40:29 – 1:41:08Speaker 8

Thank you. And even though I agree with what the Vice Mayor Clari have said regarding prioritizing areas so that we don't disturb it again, in this case, it's a private development that is taking place. And I'm not sure that the private development should prioritize what our goals are for the storm water department that has already been identified. But I agree with her that we should pay attention to what development is taking place in order to alleviate the residents in that area. Because this being the first project that comes up of this magnitude in that area, that's something that the residents need to be aware of that we're going to address the flooding problems as well.

1:41:09Speaker 1

Thank you. Noted. I think Vice Mayor Cleary wants to

1:41:13 – 1:41:25Speaker 2

Just for clarification purposes, I specifically asked if it's one of the noted hotspots that we all have that is a problem throughout the city. And we all have this is not in my district, may be in yours.

1:41:25Speaker 8

It's not in mine either.

1:41:26 – 1:41:38Speaker 2

So that just shows that we're aware of all the hotspots in the area. And so if that is a hotspot, instead of disruptiveness from a personal construction site, let's get it all done at one time if possible.

1:41:38Speaker 2

my request was.

1:41:39 – 1:42:01Speaker 8

I know, and I agree with you. I just don't know what the department, the utility department has on their books as to where they're going to start and what they have planned. So I don't want to disrupt that plan. I just want them to realize that this is one of our target area and there's construction going on. If they can prioritize it, please do so, whether it is the swell or whether it is the pump station that's coming through.

1:42:01 – 1:42:19Speaker 1

Yep. Andrea, just a quick question for me and then we've got two others. You mentioned that this item here, this application is made as a matter of rights. In other words, what you're saying is that the property owner has the rights in zoning and land use to construct what it is they're proposing.

1:42:20Speaker 1

And there is no variance request by us. And so really, the commission does not have a choice but to approve this lawful application, correct?

1:42:31Speaker 18

Correct, based on the criteria that's before you today.

1:42:33Speaker 1

And then following the site plan approval and consideration would be design?

1:42:39Speaker 1

Okay. Let's go to Commissioner Quintana, then Shuham.

1:42:43 – 1:43:06Speaker 13

MARY Thank you, mayor. I wanted to just make sure I understood, because when I spoke with the attorney and the property owner I think you said, right? Just to make sure I understood that there is additional drainage that this project is going to adopt in its design in order to address some of the common area flooding

1:43:07Speaker 13

Above and beyond what our city project is going to do?

1:43:10Speaker 18

Correct. As part of the permitting process, the applicant will be requested to provide additional drainage along North 16th Avenue and Shenandoah to alleviate some of the flooding at the intersection.

1:43:20 – 1:43:33Speaker 13

Okay. Yeah, I just wanted to make sure I understood that and that everybody else got a chance to in case they missed it. And then is this intended to be rentals or condominiums?

1:43:33Speaker 18

The applicant can address that as part of their presentation.

1:43:35Speaker 13

Okay. All right. Then my other question is probably going to be answered that way, too. All right. Thank you.

1:43:42Speaker 1

CHRISTINE Commissioner Schuham.

1:43:43Speaker 15

I don't know if this is for counsel, but when will the public have the opportunity to make their comments today?

1:43:50Speaker 30

MARY H. Following the staff presentation and the applicant presentation, then all others MACHT: for public comment may speak.

1:43:59Speaker 1

And that is typically three minutes unless decided as otherwise by the

1:44:02Speaker 15

Okay. Then I'll hold my questions till then. Thank you.

1:44:05Speaker 1

JOSHUA All right. Thank you so much. Andrea, let's go ahead now. There's a thirty minute opportunity for the applicant to present.

1:44:15 – 1:45:18Speaker 29

JOSEPH Mayor, if you just give me a minute while they pull up our presentation. And we have hard copies for commission as well as staff. And yes, Commissioner Hernandez, they are page numbers on them. Mayor, just for housekeeping purposes, our PowerPoint presentation is part of the applicant's record. Along with that is their formal submission to both the commission, the Planning and Development Board as well.

1:45:19 – 1:45:40Speaker 29

And with us are our experts who we have previously noted and provided you with their resumes, including Joseph Kahler, the architect. We have Carl Peterson from TrafTech. We also have our civil engineer who's available by phone. And I think he's online right now.

1:45:42Speaker 1

Are you entering any of these items separate from what Andrea has already submitted into evidence?

1:45:48Speaker 29

S. Application package, which is part of your backup, is what we're referring to now as part of the evidence submitted.

1:45:56Speaker 1

Has that already been admitted, Pat, and labeled?

1:45:59Speaker 6

What about the pelvic floor?

1:46:01Speaker 29

Yes. I just mentioned that as well.

1:46:03Speaker 37

You want that?

1:46:04Speaker 1

So would that be exhibit B?

1:46:06Speaker 21

That's correct.

1:46:07Speaker 29

Composite exhibit B.

1:46:08Speaker 37

JAMES I believe exhibit two. Exhibit two.

1:46:13 – 1:47:03Speaker 29

JAMES DAY: Thank you, mayor. I'll begin, but I'm going to be I'm definitely not taking thirty minutes for this one. Florida courts have made it clear that once staff says that it should be approved and you've recognized your staff as an expert, that the burden of shift under competent substantial evidence switches then for the commission or public to be able to prove by competent, substantial evidence that staff is wrong. Due to the fact that there are no other expert witnesses testifying, it would be impossible for anyone to do so for an Azerbai project, which is why I'm going to make this presentation a little bit shorter than normal. First and foremost, I was not involved with this development at the early stages when it went to Planning and Development Board.

1:47:03 – 1:47:33Speaker 29

But I do know that several commissioners were at board meetings when this was discussed. And it did fail to get approved or denied by a three-three tie. In Florida courts, when something isn't approved, it's considered to be denied, which is why it gave the opportunity to be ripe for commission call up. The issue at the Planning and Development Board got stuck on the variance. And I'm going to just jump right there that everyone understands what occurred.

1:47:34 – 1:48:08Speaker 29

Originally, staff was seeking a 20 foot corner court at this intersection. But if you can read the letter that was provided to us from staff right after the planning and development board hearing, it says, please note that the corner of Shenandoah in the alley only requires a six foot dedication triangle. And therefore, the 10 foot setback is not implicated, which means, whoops, there's no need for a variance. We only needed that top corner cord. We didn't need that entire amount based upon our right of ways map.

1:48:08 – 1:48:31Speaker 29

And therefore, this didn't require a variance. Because it didn't require a variance, staff then went back before the Planning and Development Board and said, hey, would you guys reconsider this now that the variance isn't an issue? And Planning and Development Board declined to do so. And based on the call up, that's why it's here today. Everyone here knows where this property is.

1:48:31 – 1:49:14Speaker 29

I actually had the opportunity to take all the comment cards from Planning and Development Board and public outreach meetings and the like. And for those comment cards that I could read, I actually emailed every owner who came to those meetings to discuss this item. And I do want to thank several of them who actually contacted me in response to ask me direct questions about the project rather than just listening to other residents on information that really was not correct that I was able to clarify for them. So I thank those of you who called me for taking the time to do so and understanding these issues further. This is the property at issue.

1:49:14 – 1:49:36Speaker 29

It's important for everyone to understand where the FH1 line is, that the city rezoned all these properties. All of the properties directly on Shenandoah, right across from the school is FH1. Why is that a reason? I speak about this later in the presentation that some people brought up school issues. Oh, it's so close to the school.

1:49:37 – 1:50:10Speaker 29

Are you worried about a four foot building, four story building near the school? Well, property directly across from the school is the same FH1 entitled as of right to go to the same 40 feet. We're actually over 100 yards away from the corner of the swimming pool, blocked by trees, a gate, everything else that's out there for any of you who've been to South Broward. So we're probably one of the furthest properties away from the school. Everything else is directly abutting the school that shares the same zoning category.

1:50:10 – 1:50:47Speaker 29

So I just wanted to make that clear. If you look at the line that goes north south, which is the FH1 line, there's a reason why staff did that. And that's because everything to the left of the line is a mixture of multifamily and single family. And then as you go closer to Federal Highway, which is a 14 story height limit, that's everything even greater in density and mass as you approach federal. And then everything to the right or to the east is single family protecting the community with a step down zoning, which goes from fourteen-four and then to their 30 feet.

1:50:47 – 1:51:19Speaker 29

One thing to note and I show it later on the presentation, but it's important to understand while we're 40 feet, this is all in the AE flood zone level, which means that the RS single family homes next to us, which is 30 feet, have to build a new house there at six feet over floodplain plus one. So they're 37 feet. So I don't want anyone to get confused by that. Because of the new FEMA regulations, they're at 37 feet. And it's important for them to know that when understanding the project.

1:51:19 – 1:52:00Speaker 29

I know staff showed a good photo of the property. This is the property. It's been utilized for several things over the years before the owner who's present bought it, including Joe Kahler did the approved design for an ALF here, which was a 20 bed ALF that was not there when Gil purchased it, but was at some point approved by Joe Kahler on this site. Our site plan is a very clean site plan. A resident asked me about parking. We're over parked. And I want to just make sure that everyone understands how that works. It's a mixture of one and two bedroom apartments. There are thirteen one bedrooms. That's 13 parking spots.

1:52:00 – 1:52:39Speaker 29

You need one space per every one bedroom under the city code. Then there are nine two bedroom apartments. And when you add that together, that's an additional 14 spots because those have 1.5 per every two bedroom apartment is the parking for a two bedroom. And then they are required to have three guest spaces, which are 30 spaces. But when you add in an additional four, which is not required by COBE, but they put in four extra spots for a small development, they ended up with 34 parking spots, which is over the requirement, all parked underneath the building.

1:52:40 – 1:53:23Speaker 29

All loading is under the building. Everything takes place under the building. There's nothing on the street. Everything is under this building. A resident asked me a question as well about the trash. The trash is on the alley, just like every resident there who has their trash cans on the alley. But ours is in an enclosed portion of the building. Trash is dumped through the trash chute. It lands into a dumpster, which is an enclosed part of the building. On trash day, you roll up the gates to that enclosed structure. You roll out the trash. It gets picked up. You roll it back in, and you close it again. Trash is not set out. There's no place for residents to throw out trash except for directly within the dumpster inside their building.

1:53:24 – 1:53:53Speaker 29

Here are some of the elevations that are not three d renderings, but elevations just so that everyone can see. This is the northern view elevation. This is the southern view elevation. And then we have the eastern elevation and the western elevation, which I'll speak about more in a minute. This is called isometric views, which is the top down view so that everyone can see how the buildings are oriented as it relates to them.

1:53:53 – 1:54:19Speaker 29

Most importantly to me is actually that view looking northeast, the top one. And it's because you can really see their amenity deck, which is on the 2nd Floor of the building. When Joe Kahler designed that amenity deck, he purposely put it where he did to avoid any impact to the single family homes. The pool and an amenity deck is facing to the west. It's on the Northwest side of the building.

1:54:19 – 1:54:48Speaker 29

The building is blocking the entire amenity deck to ensure that no one would be looking at anyone's yards from the pool deck, any of those issues. Everything is looking directly towards that area. And Joe can testify in a minute that that was all done on purpose. Looking at the proposed plan again, we went through that, the initial 1st Floor. This is the 2nd Floor that I mentioned before, where you have the pool, the summer kitchen, the fitness center.

1:54:48 – 1:55:30Speaker 29

All corridors are essentially the same in the building. But after Floor 2, they all look down in that smaller corridor down to the pool. And that's 3rd and Floor or 4, and they all match. A resident called and asked me about traffic. And I know that normally a 22 unit development doesn't propose much traffic. It's a very small makeup. But because residents were concerned, we ordered a traffic study that was done. And we did traffic analysis. Based on the traffic analysis on a use that was approved there in the past, in the morning, it's looking at four additional AM trips. In the afternoon, it's three less trips.

1:55:31 – 1:56:12Speaker 29

And in the evening, it's six more trips. And that is the traffic that this site has as a result of the traffic study. For the first time in Hollywood that I've ever done a project, we looked at the level of service. And it's all A. Every road here is an A rated road and maintains its A standard, even with the six additional evening trips. And that's important to understand. I mentioned this before, and the commission jumped on it immediately, that the drainage here is a problem. And we're improving it a lot. And I'll explain that in a second. But this whole area of that dark blue is AE.

1:56:12 – 1:56:49Speaker 29

There's only one flood zone worse than So this is like the second worst flood zone according to FEMA in the area. And that's why anyone who rebuilds their home there can actually end up building to a little bit more than 37 feet because it's based on the crown of the road, etcetera. But that's why. It's because they're all in the AE flood zone. When our engineer, who used to work for the city actually, designed the storm water management for the project, he did it all with underground tanks and an injection well that actually takes the storm water, goes into the aquifer to clean it.

1:56:49 – 1:57:09Speaker 29

And that's how it's done today. It's over capacity in size so that if flooding should occur, it will take some not a lot, but some of the additional storm water. In addition to that, the applicant has agreed and it was touched on by Andrea before that we have mammoth swales here. We have the swale on 16th. We have the swale on Shenandoah.

1:57:10 – 1:57:45Speaker 29

That they're agreeing, if Alicia says, let's do this in conjunction with our drainage project, to put in full exfiltration trenches there, to put in French drains to whatever standards the city is eventually going to want so that we can pre prepare for the eventual storm water connection. There's also actually two storm grates right outside of our project on two of the streets. And if those need improvements while we're doing it, the owners said, just let us know. We're happy to do it. Our engineers said, without the city doing the main infrastructure, it's not going to do much.

1:57:45 – 1:58:06Speaker 29

But it will help. And so if Alicia wants us to do it now, we've previously committed. Andrea said we committed to do it. And we would like to do that as part of the project as a community benefit for the project. And again, for anyone wanting to see these swales on Shenandoah And 16th, and you even have a little one on the alley, this is what they look like.

1:58:06 – 1:58:31Speaker 29

And that's where we are happy to provide additional drainage to the project. I mentioned this before, but it was interesting that someone said, oh, people are going to be looking at the swimming pool in South Broward. South Broward is really far away from the first balcony unit of this project. It's really far away. I did it from the property line to the corner of the pool.

1:58:31 – 1:59:04Speaker 29

And it's over a football field, the way that you have to look through all those trees and the fence and everything else to even be there. And it's important to note that every single property across from the school, including the one directly to our south, are FH1. So that issue is a non issue that was considered by the commission when it approved the FH1 in the area. A resident at Planning and Development Board mentioned that she had solar panels. And we certainly didn't want to impact those solar panels.

1:59:04 – 1:59:30Speaker 29

In fact, that was one of the first things I said when I joined them is I said, Joe, you have to commission a shadow study. Because if we are impacting her solar panels, we need to figure out what we can do. Because although there's no right to solar panels, there's no right to the sun, everyone knows that, she spent money on it. And it's not for us to want to impact her. So a couple of days ago and it took a while because Joe had to commission the study.

1:59:30 – 2:00:05Speaker 29

They came back with the shadow study. And with that shadow study, you can see that the solar panels are almost never in the shade except for one panel on December 21 at exactly 4PM is slightly touching one of the panels. But at all other times and quite frankly, it's luck that the sun is coming from the opposite direction based upon how the building's oriented. But there's no shade on the single family neighborhood at all. It is all actually going to the West based upon the orientation of the project.

2:00:06 – 2:00:50Speaker 29

I think the residents here, Joe pointed her out earlier, I did send her the study directly based upon the only email that I could find on the comment cards. I apologize if you didn't get it. But I'm happy to give it to you at any point if you didn't receive my email. I think Commissioner Biederman mentioned early on that he bumped into a school board member yesterday. And school board members are being called saying, hey, this project's close to the school. What are you doing about it? And at the request of Commissioner Schuham, I actually reached out directly to the school. And I had a conversation with the principal. And here are some of my emails back and forth, which you can't read, where he asked me to send him the plan, etcetera. The plans were all sent to the principal.

2:00:50 – 2:01:29Speaker 29

And he has those. And we told him, if we can be of service, just let me know. But I have reached out. And I've given him everything that he asked for. Land use was brought up. So I'm going go through it really quickly. Because some of the residents were saying, oh, the land use at the county is wrong. The reason why I have a little bit of an issue with the continue emails that I got through public records requests saying that is the individual who called Barbara Blake was told by Barbara Blake that this is not an issue. They were specifically told, yes, the Iraq on the county map is not accurate. But we had to pick a map of 15,000, I think she said, 15,000 acres.

2:01:29 – 2:01:51Speaker 29

And it's where they drew the line. And if they made a mistake, we'll fix it. The rack is based upon what the city requested to us. And quite frankly, for anyone who knows the other argument, she said this isn't a thirteen oh one situation for them because in this case, the city actively requested the RAC to be created. And they didn't change the boundaries created by the city.

2:01:51 – 2:02:20Speaker 29

They just approved it. And if you look at the legal description that was submitted by the city, it specifically has in these properties in both its application of the county and the legal description itself. It specifically recognizes part, which is why Barbara Blake told Andrea, this is a non issue. You guys totally belted and suspended this by not only providing us the maps, but providing us the legal description. And it's an issue we'll fix on our end.

2:02:20 – 2:02:48Speaker 29

Joe did a couple of new views for everyone to be able to see if they haven't. This is the view from the corner of North 16th Avenue and Shenandoah Street. It's the Northeast view of the building. And then the next one he did is the view from Shenandoah Street, a direct head on looking north view of the building. Commissioner Quintana asked, yes, at this time, it is proposed to be rentals.

2:02:48 – 2:03:20Speaker 29

If the market changes and interest rates change and it can become sellable, the owner will tell you he'd be very interested in doing so. But right now, the financing mechanism is not for sale for multiple reasons in being able to get construction financing now to actually build the development. But it's something that he's always looking at and everyone knows that homeownership's important. But at the same time, rents, especially at market here, is actually 120 AMI. There's a need for that as well.

2:03:20 – 2:03:37Speaker 29

And he did smaller units on purpose to enable the rents to be more competitive for people who are looking for a brand new product. At this time, I'm going to ask Joe if he wants to add you want to come up and add anything about his design. And then we'll conclude our presentation to be asked any questions.

2:03:44 – 2:04:07Speaker 37

Afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. Again, my name is Joseph Kahler, Kahler Architecture, 20 Fourseventeen Hollywood Boulevard in Hollywood, Florida. Yeah, we're really very happy with this project, how it kind of developed. It was totally a bit different in the earlier stages. We opted for glass railings, where before it had concrete block.

2:04:07 – 2:04:41Speaker 37

It was more brutalistic. So we actually wanted to make the building really much, much nicer. And through the year and a half to close to two years, where we got to this point today, there was always improvement and improvement on all the finishes so that the building would look great. And again, as of right, this building has totally been designed as of right. There's no variances, no special exceptions, nothing, everything. The heights are proper. The setbacks are proper. The count of parking spaces are proper and according to code. Thank you.

2:04:41 – 2:05:20Speaker 29

JOSHUA Thank you, Joe. And the one thing I just want to add is when we met with commissioners on this, we actually had prior renderings that didn't show all the actual improvements that he made. So up there is the full redesign that changed all of the concrete to glass. So that's why it looks different. He actually made all those improvements to this building. With that mayor noting that the commission doesn't really have much say on an as of right project, we rest our presentation with the ability to close and ask questions of any of the individuals who may wish to speak. Thank you.

2:05:20 – 2:05:40Speaker 1

Thank you. All right. That concludes the applicant's presentation. There is an opportunity for staff to cross examine any of the applicant's witnesses. Is that something you'd like to do or not necessary? Thank you. Commissioners, you have an opportunity to ask questions of the applicant. Commissioner Hernandez?

2:05:40 – 2:06:05Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. I'd like to ask the applicant a question, whether it's him or his architect. The landscaping that you provided has beautiful tall trees. I want to make sure that the landscaping that it gets installed reflects what the rendering does. And I don't know if staff has the prerequisite for when it comes to the landscaping, or if we're just asking what the minimum landscaping is. Maybe you can answer that.

2:06:05 – 2:06:25Speaker 37

JOSHUA Usually, when we go through the whole site plan approval process, commissioner, we are forced to put the exact plant material on the rendering. In other words, you can't just make it pretty without really backing it up, saying that's not the tree that you're putting in. So everything that's shown there is what was proposed to be installed.

2:06:25 – 2:06:39Speaker 8

The reason that I ask is because what we were giving doesn't have a list of landscaping materials. I don't know what is there. So if that's a four story building, one, two, three, four, that means that those canary palms are going to be around 30 feet

2:06:42 – 2:06:58Speaker 37

No. Well, it would be the canaries and any palm tree is based on the trunk height. That's how you call the height, not the fronds. So basically, it's close to two and onetwo stories, I think, of that building.

2:06:58 – 2:07:19Speaker 8

25, 30 feet? I'm just asking because the residents here deserve to know that the same picture that we're looking at is what the end product is going to look like. I just want to make sure the staff takes a note of that when it comes to the landscaping material that's going to go on the site. Because it looks beautiful. I just want to make sure that it's reflective of what's going to be there. That's all.

2:07:19Speaker 1

only question. Joe, so there was just a follow-up on Commissioner Hernandez's point the landscape schedule and the plans have been submitted to the city?

2:07:28Speaker 37

JOSEPH Yes, they have. And they've been approved. And that's allowed us to go to PND.

2:07:33Speaker 1

JOSEPH Okay. Let's go to Commissioner Schuhnham for questions to the applicant.

2:07:38Speaker 15

I have a question for counsel for the applicant. On your page six

2:07:49 – 2:08:21Speaker 15

Where you are talking about we see that in this FH1, the applicant's property is as far to the east as it could be. And so the first neighbor east of that, you're saying, in that residential zoning, as I understand what you're saying, is depending on I'm not sure what a single family home could be built today to 37 feet.

2:08:21Speaker 29

That's correct.

2:08:21Speaker 15

Can you walk us through that again?

2:08:23 – 2:09:04Speaker 29

JAMES Sure. It's a 30 foot zoning code height. But that limitation is over the FEMA base flood elevation. Your planning staff would be able to address this a little more. But because the AE category is six feet, the way that I've been told and Andrea, please correct me if I'm wrong it's six plus one, which gives them the 37 feet total. But then Joe told me last night that you could actually get more height there because it's based on an average height based on cables of the roof and some other factors. But I only did the base minimum, which is the floodplain plus the 30 feet on the code, which is where they

2:09:04Speaker 15

And the highest elevation of this project?

2:09:07Speaker 29

With flood is 45. 45.

2:09:10Speaker 15

Okay. So the highest elevation here is 45.

2:09:13Speaker 29

Built up from, you know, not yes. Yes.

2:09:17Speaker 15

JULIET Yes. And the neighbor immediately to the east, if they chose, could build a house at 37?

2:09:23Speaker 29

JULIET At least. It may actually be higher because that 37 is an average of the height is an average of

2:09:31Speaker 15

So a portion of

2:09:33Speaker 29

the house was 30, sorry, and another portion was 45. But yes, it's an average.

2:09:38Speaker 15

Can I have Andrea confirm that at this point?

2:09:43Speaker 1

This is questions to the applicant. Why don't we

2:09:46Speaker 29

Okay. But definitely please with your staff how they do that measurement. But Joe can add more, because he builds them all

2:09:52Speaker 19

the time. Yeah. Usually in

2:09:53 – 2:10:27Speaker 37

the flood zone, commissioner, normally they don't take it from grade, because then it would be unfair for someone in the flood zone to lose the allowable height that they give other people in the X zone, which is a non flood zone. So basically, start with what FEMA plus one is. That starts your height. Then you're allowed 30 feet. But 30 feet, if you have a gabled couch, it's between the mean roof, a peak between the peak and the eave. That's how they take the height. So it's even taller than that, ultimately. That's what I was trying to say.

2:10:28Speaker 15

And thank you.

2:10:30Speaker 26

Yeah, thank you very much.

2:10:31 – 2:10:50Speaker 15

And Mr. Policoff, please state again what you said about because Ms. Widget has been confirmed as an expert and opined that she believes the project to be appropriate, that the commission has no discretion. Is that your point?

2:10:50 – 2:11:31Speaker 29

I didn't say no discretion. You're still the commission. There's a long line of cases that make it clear that once the planning staff, as qualified expert, finds that it meets all applicable code requirements, that competent substantial evidence has been met. And therefore, in order to show that staff is wrong, because that's what you'd have to prove otherwise, you would have to have your own experts and otherwise show that staff was wrong to switch the burden of proof to deny an application. So the commission does always have the final say, but you would have to do so within the legal requirements to prove that your staff was incorrect in their findings.

2:11:31Speaker 15

Okay. Thank you.

2:11:33 – 2:12:17Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. That concludes questions to the applicant. Now is an opportunity for public speakers. Everybody's got an opportunity to speak for three minutes. And then we'll have an opportunity to ask you any questions if we'd like. So go ahead, Pat, if I can get the speaker cards, please. Alright. Let's go ahead with mister Robert O'Neill followed by Ellie Savate, Alex Alexieva, followed by When you come up, you'll proffer anything, and then counsel will tell me if it's Okay for you to provide any documents. And you'll hand it to the city clerk if that's the case.

2:12:18 – 2:12:41Speaker 1

Robert O'Neil is he here? All right. No, Robert O'Neil. Elisa Vet, Elisa Vet Alexieva. Did I close? All right. She'll tell me. Followed by George Bagrakos, then will be Raymond Leyali. If you can get yourselves lined up to be ready after Ms. Alexieva.

2:12:42Speaker 15

Can I get my mom?

2:12:44Speaker 36

Okay. All right.

2:12:54 – 2:13:19Speaker 39

Good afternoon. Elizabeth Alexieva, resident. I live right across from the proposed project. Before I begin my presentation, I urge you to think about one question, and it is, who do you work for? There are three serious issues that I have seen with this project, And each of one of those issues, taken independently, lead to the same conclusion.

2:13:19 – 2:13:43Speaker 39

You should not approve that project. But taken together, you have no way but to deny it. The first issue is the zoning. And I understand that you brought some information in, but that's not competent substantial evidence. What's competent substantial evidence is what I learned listening to you, mayor, on February 26.

2:13:43 – 2:14:22Speaker 39

What competent substantial evidence is the maps that are with the county, because county governs. If you go with the link and look at the maps, right now, what you will see is that this project is outside of the proposed development. Now, the second issue, if we get to it, is whether this project complies with Article six. Specifically, I did see that the person from the city looked at 6.23. It tells what the city commissioner shall look at in approving it.

2:14:23 – 2:15:01Speaker 39

None of the criteria is met. None of the criteria regarding density, regarding harmonious relation with the surrounding structures, none of it is met. And finally, I want to talk to you about trust and transparency. And believe me, I have very little hope that we will get the right result today. And the reason is that there has been a pattern of behavior from the city to the residents that makes me really, really upset and makes me lose trust.

2:15:01 – 2:15:28Speaker 39

So here's how this process lacks transparency so far. First, we never received any information about any rezoning in 2016. Second, I requested public records as to how it was mailed or published or whatever. No response whatsoever. No of our other public records requests were responded to either.

2:15:29 – 2:15:58Speaker 39

We were supposed to have a technical meeting. It didn't happen. We were supposed to have numerous officials look at it. It didn't happen. And finally, my request to intervene so I can present evidence was denied despite the Florida law. And I cite the date, the Naples, and St. Petersburg case. So that's how much we feel unheard. And I really hope that at the least you deny it you delay Thank

2:15:58 – 2:16:15Speaker 1

Thank you, Ms. Luxieva. George guys, instead of clapping, what you do at these meetings is you do jazz hands. It's kind of a silent way to show support, but not delay or interrupt. Let's go to George. Welcome. Followed by Raymond Liala.

2:16:16 – 2:16:32Speaker 41

My name is George. I live at 1538 Shenandoah Street. I'm 100% disabled Vietnam War veteran. And I've lived in that house for forty two years. That neighborhood was not at all what it is about to become when I bought that house there.

2:16:33 – 2:17:07Speaker 41

We bought houses there to enjoy the peace, tranquility of that neighborhood. The RAC zoning, for all the debate and everything that we've had about it today, is flawed. Your own resolution in the packet of information that you sent out for this meeting, the verbiage in your own resolution says that buildings should be of compatible height next to one another. How do you put a 45 foot building next to a single family home literally 15 feet away from it? How do you do that?

2:17:07 – 2:17:45Speaker 41

Would any of you like to live in a house like that? That's what one of our residents, one of our neighbors is forced to look at. If you look at the packet that was just disseminated to you briefly before the meeting, If you go to page 22 or 23, you'll see photographs. I don't know what the attorney for the architect is talking about not being able to see anything at the school. But these photographs were taken at 45 feet with a drone at the edges of the proposed development.

2:17:46 – 2:18:11Speaker 41

And if you look at the pictures, you'll see they're quite revealing. Vice Mayor Kalari mentioned the safety of schoolchildren. Where is the safety of the schoolchildren when the 14 story building that went up at the corner of Shenandoah And Federal has a clear line of sight? Remember, I'm a military guy. I look at that and I see the sharpshooter's dream.

2:18:12 – 2:18:48Speaker 41

You can see right into the courtyard of South Broward High School. I remember when you guys put up parking signs right after nineeleven because you were afraid somebody was going to come in there and harm the kids. But now you routinely put up shooting vantage points in close proximity to public schools and intrusive into the neighborhood like you wouldn't believe. This particular one, this is on the north side of the proposed development. You could literally pick the nose hairs of a person in this swimming pool.

2:18:49 – 2:19:16Speaker 41

Look how close it is. Again, would you like this next to your swimming pool? No. In the forty one years I've been a member of the American Legion and being a war veteran, I've learned a lot about leadership. And leadership is not something that I take lightly. You all should exercise some leadership today and deny this project until these things are all clarified.

2:19:16Speaker 42

You Thank George. Your

2:19:17Speaker 1

Thank you, Raymond Lavalli, followed

2:19:23 – 2:19:39Speaker 1

Skanslav Kryav. Welcome, Mr. Lovalli.

2:19:41Speaker 43

You, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. My

2:19:45Speaker 43

is Raymond Lovalli, 1519 Liberty Street here in Hollywood. I've

2:19:53 – 2:20:11Speaker 43

on this Lee Street excuse me, Liberty Street since 1956. I'm still on that street. Mom and dad bought a house, three-two. I bought the house across the ways. Been there with my wife for fifty seven years.

2:20:12 – 2:20:40Speaker 43

And I'm sure that mom and dad, if they would have known that they were going to have a four story building in that area, they wouldn't have bought there. And also, George stole my speech. He told you everything. I'm 100% disabled, retired Air Force for over thirty two years. And what's going on today, I probably saw more in the war than what's going on today.

2:20:41 – 2:21:16Speaker 43

But please, cancel this building, this four story in our beautiful, quiet neighborhood. They mentioned the garbage. The garbage truck today has to go on 15th Street, 15th Avenue, and back the truck in to the alley because there's a dead end that's a little street there. And if he comes in from another direction, he can't make it in there. So that's going to be a serious problem.

2:21:16 – 2:21:34Speaker 43

They make it sound real good, but on the other hand, reality may not be there. So I hope that you reconsider and cancel this building, four story building. Thank you very

2:21:34Speaker 1

much. Thank you, Mr. Lovalli, and thank you for your service as well.

2:21:36 – 2:21:48Speaker 43

Thank you. Thank you, sir. Oh, one more thing. Thank you for the barbecue every year that you treat us veterans. I really appreciate MACHT: that. Thank you very you're a good man. Thank

2:21:48Speaker 1

I'd rather do it. ROBERT SCHENGSLAV Kraev, followed by Jerry Kish, then Alex Mahan.

2:21:57 – 2:22:10Speaker 44

Hi. My name is Svetoslav Kraev. I'm a twelve years Hollywood resident. Raised my family there. And I've been super grateful to have the opportunity to live in such a beautiful neighborhood until now.

2:22:10 – 2:22:46Speaker 44

I wonder how many voting members have actually visited the site. We have heard about the many issues so far that the project is going to create, such as intrusion of privacy, exacerbation of flooding, and traffic. Another core issue is compatibility. How is a four story concrete block compatible with a neighborhood of a single story, single family houses? City planners, Delgado and Butler, voted sorry voted no to the motion due to compatibility and density issues in the last meeting.

2:22:47 – 2:23:20Speaker 44

They noted that this building pushes density to the absolute limit while sitting right at the zone border. In reality, the Broward zoning map suggests that it's even outside that zone. As a result, the motion was cancelled. This plan completely ignores the requirements for harmonious relationship with the surrounding area. I'm convinced that this development will have a long term damaging effect on our community. So before we vote, I urge you to come to the location and see for yourself. Thank you.

2:23:20 – 2:23:36Speaker 1

Thank you. Jerry Kish, followed by Alex Mahon, then Julie Terencechenki. Hello, Ms. Kish.

2:23:36 – 2:23:57Speaker 21

Hello. Jerry Kish, 1513 Shenandoah Street. I've been there for thirty five years. And have you thought about when you all campaign, we hear about our rights being protected, safeguarding our community and environment, and guarding against extreme agendas. And that's why we're here.

2:23:59 – 2:24:29Speaker 21

We received an email from you with the photos of the petition that our neighbors signed not wanting this project. And included there were photos of the flooding that affects our neighborhood. And that was just during regular rainstorms. It doesn't just go down Shenandoah, but the approximate 15,000 square foot lot that is being proposed to be used for this project, that's going to be gone. It's going to be filled with concrete.

2:24:29 – 2:25:08Speaker 21

And that's porous land that absorbs the water that comes down our alley, even with it being there. The backyards of the people on both Liberty and Shenandoah are flooded consistently. So it's low. And we can see that a project could be going after all the existing problems are fixed. And with the water plan that's going on and not being ready for five years, that's a problem.

2:25:09 – 2:25:48Speaker 21

The other aspect that I researched in reading your resolution was the section five point three point one point four A two and three, the harmonious relationship between existing architectural language and composition and the proposed construction. Well, I don't know what anybody is looking at. I know that there are no two story buildings on Shenandoah Street at all, let alone four. And same with Liberty between 14th Avenue and 16th Avenue. So how can it be harmonious?

2:25:50 – 2:26:14Speaker 21

The proposal just doesn't fit within the context of the proposed construction. And it's not consistent with the surrounding structures. The flooding is, well, a problem. We haven't been able to fix it yet, and it's not fixed now. The safety of the schoolchildren, of course, is questionable.

2:26:15 – 2:26:37Speaker 21

The traffic that exists now, the turning of the bus loop, and the proximity to this project is just way too questionable to be recognized as being safe. So please, do the right thing. We are the people that pay your salaries.

2:26:38Speaker 1

Thank you, Ms. Kish. Yes. Alex Mahon.

2:26:43 – 2:26:55Speaker 1

Followed by Julie Terencechenkie. Then Johanna Carlton or Clayton. Hello, Mr. Mahan.

2:26:55 – 2:27:39Speaker 45

Good afternoon. My name's Alex Mahan. I live at 1537 Shenandoah Street. I'm directly next to this building. It's not true that that 45 foot tall building is going to cover my solar panels. It will. It's going to cover more than half. I don't know what he's talking about. But, you know, for one panel to be covered, one's too many. They're going to do more than half. The flooding. I've answered this question three times. I'm not going to answer it yet. The architect claims that they're going to drill tunnels and piping to ship all this fresh water out, rain water. Great.

2:27:39 – 2:27:54Speaker 45

What happens to her at King Tide? When that salt water comes up, fresh water, there's no place to go. King Tide is not just one day. It's two days before and two days after the peak. Utility trucks.

2:27:57 – 2:28:37Speaker 45

Utility trucks going down my back, back road, my utility road has hit my fence three times. Once I fixed it, twice WastePro fixed it. They can't make the turn. Excuse me. Because their fence on this property goes all the way to the utility. That truck cannot make the turn. Okay? They back up or they back out. Fine. They've got that solved. What happens if a fire truck tries to get down there? They can't make the turn. Maybe a ambulance could. I don't know. But it'd be tight.

2:28:37 – 2:29:22Speaker 45

And if they're in a rush to save somebody, it ain't gonna happen. I will have no privacy in my backyard. I have a pool, beautiful backyard. We've been there for, oh, twenty five, thirty years. I have a beautiful pool, beautiful backyard, and a beautiful sitting area. And I will have zero privacy back there. When they're talking about privacy to the school, he's saying the trees, there's a palm trees. They're this big. They're gonna block their ability to look into the high school pool or tennis courts? I don't think so.

2:29:23 – 2:29:37Speaker 45

Something's got to be done to protect those children at the high school and protect my backyard. It's only fair. And fix my solar panel problem. Thank you.

2:29:37Speaker 3

Thank you, Mr. Julie

2:29:40Speaker 1

Terencechenkie, followed by Johanna Clayton, then Debbie Hickson. Hello, Julie.

2:29:53 – 2:30:36Speaker 47

Julie Tereshchenko, 2125 directly next to the property. First of all, I'll digress slightly. I truly appreciate you addressing the flooding and the potentially concurrent construction. I really appreciate you driving through the neighborhood. Thank you all so much. And I will say that I'm a proud member of this neighborhood because I think that what you're seeing from the people who are here is a tight knit community. And that is where we are. I bought this house because I have a quadriplegic epileptic child. She's no longer a child. She's now 20.

2:30:36 – 2:31:09Speaker 47

And the lady who owned the house before had a son who was severely disabled. And hence, the house ensured both privacy and compliance. I hope none of us are ever disabled, but all of us will be elderly. We will all face the same issues. While I appreciate the traffic study that suggests that introducing 34 parking spots will decrease traffic by a given number of cars. And I'm an applied mathematician. I find that hard to believe. I would like to say that we have flooding. And guess what? When that street floods, nobody can get out or in.

2:31:09 – 2:31:44Speaker 47

If my daughter has a seizure for more than three minutes and nobody can get to her, she's dead. Privacy. This is a picture of my property. And this is what you're looking into. Outside of that, I would like to say that while I agree with you, I believe in the American principle that people have the right to their own property. I have a right to my privacy. I have a right not to be flooded. And I have a right to a harmonious neighborhood. This building does not fit in. In fact, that was brought up at the planning commission meeting.

2:31:44 – 2:31:58Speaker 47

One of the reasons why it was not approved was the fact that it was not harmonious with this neighborhood. Should I construct a house next time? I will construct a tall one if I win the lottery. However, none of us have so far. And none of us are constructing a house just now.

2:31:58 – 2:32:44Speaker 47

Hence, we're all stuck being the dwarfs next to this particular property. I would like to emphasize the fact that while I appreciate the city addressing the flooding in the next ten years, I would appreciate it then building this building post addressing the flooding. I would also say that I would really greatly appreciate the respect that all of us have seen and the understanding that by introducing these, whether it meets the minimum code, there is such a thing as the letter of the law and there is such a thing as the spirit of the law. This does not meet the spirit of the law. I believe in one of the emails that I sent, I touched a picture of a small restaurant parking, which basically created a disaster.

2:32:44Speaker 47

I cannot get across there for five to ten minutes, because all the cars are parked on the grass, and there is somebody directing traffic. Thank you so much.

2:32:52Speaker 1

Thank you, Mr. Ershchenko. Let's go to Johanna Clayton, followed by Debbie Hickson, and then will be Kenneth Fernandez.

2:33:27 – 2:33:47Speaker 48

Commissioners, mayor, I'm Johanna Clayton. I live at 1537 Shenandoah Street for over twenty years. I'm directly adjacent and proposed by whatever oppose this project. This development is not compatible with our neighborhood. A four story building next to single family homes is completely out of scale.

2:33:47 – 2:34:14Speaker 48

This area already experiences frequent flooding during heavy rain in Kingdomsides. During the prime meeting, it was described that this project could act like a mini dam pushing water straight into adjacent properties. The city needs to fix flooding issues and drainage before this project gets approved. What is the most troubling is how this process was unfolded. We were never properly involved for zoning changes in 2016.

2:34:14 – 2:34:51Speaker 48

We received notice for only six days for the tech meeting, not sufficient time to prepare. We were promised another meeting and that was not honored. We've asked again and again for documents from the city that we are entitled to. We only received them yesterday. Has a site specific drainage hydrology study being completed and fully approved? And if flooding gets worse, who will be responsible for mitigation damages? The developer, the city or both? And by the way, the thing that he brought in FEMA flood map, that was an old survey. That was 2024. The new one is 2025.

2:34:53 – 2:35:14Speaker 48

Hang on, let me see. The building, Hollywood Recreation Activity Center Map goes through the alley, budding up to 15. Insufficient parking as a traffic analysis has been done. 22 apartments, only 34 parking spots spilling into our streets. Concerns for residents, schools and children.

2:35:14 – 2:35:58Speaker 48

This project also directly impacts me with the solar plans. Too much, too dense, too impactful to our neighborhood like adding large rental building and transient residents into a stable long term community threatens the fabric of what this special community puts. Hollywood has already overdeveloped rental, approving this project further strains traffic and infrastructure. Residents trusted the city to protect our investments and our character in neighborhood, not to devalue property in order to generate more tax revenue to give the develops developers, please uphold the PDB's denial. I ask the the you guys to do the right thing here.

2:35:58 – 2:36:33Speaker 48

I urge you to consider flooding, safety of our children, accessibility to our neighbors and their values. I am asking you to do the right thing, not just for the dollar sign And, you know, please do not be negligent because there's going to be school children. And also George has probably gave you the things from the drone from 40 feet up. They can see straight into the school pool, straight into the tennis courts, and you know what's going on. You know, there's so much on the web. It's not right. Do the right thing, Thank you, Clayton. Let your conscience be your guide.

2:36:34 – 2:36:52Speaker 1

Debbie Hickson, followed by Kenneth Fernandez, then Terry Cantrell, and the final speaker will be Anne Ralston. If you submitted a card, please speak to the clerk. You need to fill out a card. See the clerk.

2:36:52Speaker 5

I'm from I was in Tennessee for five years.

2:37:00Speaker 1

Elizabeth Elizabeth, you'll have a chance. We'll call you up afterwards. Debbie Hickson, please come on up.

2:37:05 – 2:37:17Speaker 27

Thank you. Good afternoon, again. As you're aware, I'm one of the county wide school board members for Broward County. But I'm here today as a resident of the city of Hollywood. It's been brought up already.

2:37:18 – 2:37:54Speaker 27

The concern that I have, the concern that we have, is about student safety. I really didn't think about it until I walked into the courtyard of South Broward High School recently and realized the new building that's being built, if I can see their balcony, they can see the kids in the courtyard. And we know from 2018 that the unthinkable happens. I'm sure when the code was passed in 2016, it was not on anyone's mind that someone would even fathom the idea of taking a shot at a student in a school. We don't live in that world anymore.

2:37:54 – 2:38:25Speaker 27

We live where it could happen. It does happen. It did happen. I live that every day. So when you look at the idea of four stories being right where the pool is, where the tennis court is and actually, when you look at the picture, the bleachers to the football field, there could be people who would be on those balconies that have unfettered access to the safety of our students.

2:38:25 – 2:39:06Speaker 27

It would be wrong of us not to come here today. I'm sure nobody thought about that. Honestly, I don't think either of us did till we were standing in that courtyard and went, Oh my God. This is, it's like they're right on top of you. So you can look at a picture and say it's a football field away. But even the football field, when you look that very tall building on Federal Highway, you can see the balconies. And if I can see it from the football field, they can see the people on the football field from the balcony. And that's farther distance. This is right there. We live in such a crazy world where people do things we never expected them to do.

2:39:07 – 2:39:37Speaker 27

To take pictures is even an invasion of privacy. You brought up safety. We could put, it doesn't matter what SRO is in there. It doesn't matter what fences are there. If we're giving them access because of height, then we're not promising the security that I owe them and that you owe them. So I would please ask you to think about that. I'm not trying to squash any development in our city. I love the city of Hollywood. I love all of you. I love Keith.

2:39:38 – 2:40:03Speaker 27

But this is beyond that. And I think it's something that we don't typically think about. But unfortunately, I live in a world where that's where my mind goes. So I would ask you to please think about the security piece of this and to not support this particular height anywhere near our school because it does compromise the safety of our students. Thank you.

2:40:03 – 2:40:15Speaker 1

Thank you. Afterwards. Let's go to Kenneth Fernandez, then Terry Cantrell, followed by Ann Ralston.

2:40:16 – 2:40:55Speaker 49

Good afternoon, Mr. Mayor and the commissioners. My name is Kenneth Fernandez. I live at 1538 Liberty Street, which is adjacent to the property being discussed. I know I've emailed some of you with my concerns, especially about the flooding. I know you're really tired of hearing about flooding at this point, but it's a severe issue last year with just a tiny bit of rainfall. My garage flooded probably six inches. Okay? And to make matters worse, all the traffic that goes by creates a wake. I literally stood out in floodwaters at my own risk trying to clear the drains.

2:40:55 – 2:41:27Speaker 49

The system was overloaded. You mentioned there's a hotspot. Our neighborhood is known to be problematic. Right? We talk about traffic studies. That's great. But we're doing traffic studies in silo. There's a huge building come up at the end of our street. As soon as that building gets populated, it's going to, for sure, result in an increase in traffic down our street. I think these studies need to be done as a cumulative analysis by the city and not in silos because that's not how it works.

2:41:30 – 2:42:11Speaker 49

Okay. So I know there's drainage wells on this property and they're going to try to contain the water and whatnot. But what happens when those drainage wells get overwhelmed? Right? You already heard about the king tides. We know that the water table is high here. Right? I know they're digging 100 something feet. Who is going to be responsible when we see those drainage wells overflowing, pushing water onto the street, onto our adjacent properties? Who do we look at? Do we look at the city? Do we look at this developer? Who do we look at? So something to think about. Also, we talked about the rack.

2:42:11 – 2:42:53Speaker 49

So I guess the original map with Broward County stopped at 16th. The Hollywood rack pushes it over to the alley, which makes no sense because you're basically putting I'm sorry if I'm not trying to be offensive here, maybe it's an oversight, right? How do you have a four story building next to a one story building? Literally everything around this property is one story, literally. If you don't believe me, please drive by, right? How is that possible? And then to add insult to injury, on top of that, I believe the zoning allows for 25,000 square footage. And they're at 29,000 almost. So where is that extra 4,000 square foot coming from? Who approved that?

2:42:53 – 2:43:19Speaker 49

Why is it getting special treatment? You say the structure is compatible? Not really. It's four times the height? Not really. The last thing I'm going to mention is the school. Would Debbie Hixson be here if she didn't think this was a real problem? I know he said there's trees, but they're cutting down all of the big trees. Don't tell me palm trees are going to protect the kids. We don't want anything bad to happen to them. We love our kids. I have a four year old daughter. Thank you.

2:43:19Speaker 1

Thank you. Terry Cantrell, followed by Ann Ralston.

2:43:26 – 2:44:04Speaker 38

Thank you, Mayor Commission Terry Cantrell, resident of the beautiful and historic Hollywood Lakes neighborhood, also the president of the Hollywood Lakes Civic Association, today speaking on behalf of that. I'd just like to start by saying make sure that the residents that have been here and the speakers that have poured out heartfelt comments and all that realize that their comments mean absolutely nothing to you because we're quasi judicial. My comments don't either, although I've spent twenty three years on the preservation board dealing with the city's zoning and land use laws. So maybe that would make me an expert witness. But I don't think that's necessary today.

2:44:04 – 2:44:48Speaker 38

And funny how a Scrivener's Error can go both ways, Keith. Isn't that funny? We have a Scrivener's Error now. Have Scrivener's two different maps, two different Scrivener's Errors. This is a good example of unintended consequences in rezoning. The HLCA fought this ten years ago. We argued with Leslie Del Monte and others. This was too deep into the neighborhood. Most of the rack eastern boundaries end of 17th Avenue, not 16th Avenue. There's nothing there that would warrant a four story or 45 foot or FH1 zoning that deep into the neighborhood, right up against RS5 zoning. That's the problem. It was a problem back then. And now you can see why it's a problem now. So, you know, again, I mean, this is not Central Hollywood. Central Hollywood is different.

2:44:48 – 2:45:30Speaker 38

There's a lot of RM, old RM zoning in Central Hollywood, RM18, RM24. You had a lot of mixed use residential and multi use. But this is not the same. This is strictly a residential neighborhood that now we're dealing with a four story building. And, you know, again, Central Hollywood has become a basically transient rental city in that area. No one's building anything. If this project was going to be built as a condominium, that would I know I'd personally feel a whole lot better. Maybe the neighborhood would, too, because there would be pride of ownership. It's not that at all. Or another rental, just another one of those rental buildings.

2:45:30 – 2:45:46Speaker 38

Commissioner Hernandez looked forward to the five story, 40 unit building next door to you pretty soon. Joe's probably got one in the pipeline right now and ready to build. Because that's going to happen right next door to you, too, I'm sure. So, of course, the lobbyist has already said, you have no choice. He's dictated the mandate.

2:45:46 – 2:46:18Speaker 38

You have to vote for it. It's a done deal as far as the lobbyist goes. And that's just a shame. You just heard from the school board in a very, very good point too about the proximity to this and these higher buildings, too. So in hindsight, it would have been much better if the applicant and their architect and their team had gotten together with the neighborhood years ago when they were contemplating doing something there, maybe coming up with something lower scale, not as dense, and not so problematic for the neighborhood. That did not happen. Thank you.

2:46:19Speaker 1

And Ralston. And then we'll hear Elizabeth.

2:46:26 – 2:47:15Speaker 11

Good afternoon. First, the last time I checked in grade school, 01:30 does come before two And you took this agenda item out of order, which there are people here for item 19 that was to be heard, time certain, at 01:30 or after. We knew this was going to be a long, kind of a debated issue. And now that the developer has made it quasi additional, and as Terry said, none of us we're just wasting our breath up here. But I do find it fascinating that when neighborhoods don't want something, which is clearly what this neighborhood doesn't want, and the lakes didn't want, clearly, the mitva in their neighborhood, gee, zoning doesn't seem to matter.

2:47:16Speaker 1

Elizabeth? JACKIE Just your full name for the record.

2:47:21Speaker 5

JACKIE Hey, just remember, guys, I've

2:47:23Speaker 1

been in JACKIE Full name for the record.

2:47:24Speaker 5

JACKIE was in a neighborhood.

2:47:26Speaker 1

JACKIE What's your full name?

2:47:27 – 2:47:48Speaker 5

JACKIE Elizabeth A. Barnett. My mom has just passed away this week. If I get out of line, you'll understand. Sorry, Tracy, that you lost yours so close to mine. And my question for you is

2:47:49Speaker 1

Elizabeth, enter the mic if

2:47:50 – 2:48:28Speaker 5

Okay. With all of Florida being developed, why is he coming here and putting a four story building in here where there's counties that are cheaper to develop. The ground is probably not sinkable because that is a low line thing because it is on East the side of I-ninety 5. A lot of that land was probably just marched. They had probably put lots of dirt years ago in it.

2:48:28 – 2:49:03Speaker 5

Because if you look at the old pictures, it's got now, I know some of the old people. I know some of y'all. And I am hoping that you all have a backbone if you haven't been threatened by developers or companies from the past. Because I don't have Uncle Louie or Aunt Connie here. Some people might know about that.

2:49:10 – 2:49:54Speaker 5

Former mayor kind of said that and I couldn't believe it and I had to check it out with somebody. And they said, yeah, he said that that day against developers. And then I found out they were pretty much swimming with the fishes, which I am probably half Italian because my grandma was Connie, which was Contessa, which you would look up that in the Google Moffitt, which my great grandfather was cut fingers and went to a Massachusetts hospital back in the 1900s and died. He was from Naples, Italy. Naples.

2:49:54 – 2:50:32Speaker 5

So I'm hoping these developers will go somewhere else where there is better land deals, cheaper land, cheaper this and develop it. Because you are worried about kids but then when it comes down to the almighty dollar, you are not. I'm sorry to say. And I hope you all, if you need a backbone, you'll vote it down. Because some people kind of tell you stuff behind closed doors and give you the feeling that you might be swimming with the fishes. Thank you.

2:50:33 – 2:50:54Speaker 1

Thank you, Ms. Barnett. And condolences about your mom passing. All right. That concludes public speakers, ladies and gentlemen. There is now an opportunity to ask questions of any of the public speakers if anybody so wishes. If not, let's go ahead to five minutes for the applicant for any final comments. Commissioner Schuham, did you have a

2:50:59 – 2:51:18Speaker 1

the public speakers? Okay. So right now, in our process, we have five minutes by the applicant, five minutes by the city. And then we'll hear about applicable law from the city attorney. And then we'll deliberate. Okay. Hold on. I'm hearing from both sides. Let me recognize Commissioner Beeterman first.

2:51:20Speaker 14

So we were handed this packet of papers on the dais.

2:51:23Speaker 1

One of the public speakers.

2:51:24 – 2:51:44Speaker 14

Competent evidence that we need to address. Because I didn't see the city or the applicant objecting to it being handed out. So I'm just curious where we are, because normally we are it's unusual. This packet was Is the applicant in the city given a copy of this?

2:51:44Speaker 29

No, nor is it deemed to be competent, substantial evidence, because the presenter is not an expert. They just handed you materials.

2:51:51Speaker 1

I think it would be regarded as informational if counsel wants

2:51:56 – 2:52:27Speaker 30

to I agree. It would be regarded as information, which, of course, you hear. But as we have in our policy, the members of the public will be permitted to present non expert opinions. But the commission is expressly advised that public sentiment is not relevant to the decision, which must be based only upon competent and substantial evidence presented at the hearing, as there were no qualified experts. I would agree, actually, with applicant's counsel in this case that it does not constitute

2:52:27Speaker 1

WOOD: competent and substantial evidence. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez.

2:52:34 – 2:52:45Speaker 8

Thank you, Mayor. I would actually like to ask the school board members some questions, if I may, because you ladies have brought up a very, very good and concerning point to me.

2:52:46Speaker 1

So Ms. Hickson was the only one that was, I think, sworn in and has a sticker. Correct. Ms. Morabaughman does Okay, good.

2:52:53 – 2:53:20Speaker 8

I just want to make sure. And I thank you for being here. And the questions that I have is, the concerns that you have, have you brought that up to the Broward League of Cities and to the other cities regarding construction next to schools with clear sight regarding the safety issues that you have? Because you brought up an excellent point that I'd never thought of, but thank you for bringing it up because that is concerning.

2:53:21 – 2:53:40Speaker 27

Thank you for the question. And honestly, just as I said, we were recently there. And when you're standing there is when and honestly, Mara looked at me and said, I never thought of that. So I just think of things differently, unfortunately. But it's a good point.

2:53:41 – 2:54:07Speaker 27

We were trying to think of how many schools have buildings like that. And there are some. I've been to every school across the county. But here's an opportunity of new development where you have the opportunity not to add to the extra part of it. But I would say there are not a lot of schools that have that close of a proximity of buildings that tall, especially high schools.

2:54:07 – 2:54:33Speaker 27

I can't think of any high school that does. Elementary schools do that are coming to my mind. But it's a good point and actually going tomorrow to the League of Cities dinner. So it's something that we should I mean, brought it up to the superintendent. And he said, we can't come here representing the school board, but we could just share what our concerns are.

2:54:33 – 2:55:11Speaker 8

No, no. And they're very valid concerns. And I think that for our staff, I'm not sure what we can do regarding this particular application because it is not currently in the codes. But I would ask our staff to actually take notes of some of the comments that have been made regarding safety for the children in school for further development when it comes down the road. And not only for the city of Hollywood, but the multiple cities in Broward County, so that we can all look at the same thing and try to protect our children. I thank you for being here. That was the only question I have. And just to ask, if you haven't, to please talk to the Broward League of Cities to see how we can address something like this on a broader basis. Thank you. Thank you both.

2:55:11Speaker 5

Thank you so much.

2:55:12Speaker 1

Thank you. Any further questions from any of the speakers? I'll just call the queue. Commissioner Vice Mayor Caleri? No?

2:55:19 – 2:55:56Speaker 2

I think that just trying to do a little bit of Google research and see about schools. Definitely you're impacted, Ms. Hixson, and no one would ever want to be in those shoes. And I understand the deep concern, but just by doing some research, there are schools that have apartments. And while we would love to avoid any issues and protect our children across the board, there are some issues with schools that have that. So I think that it would be a really challenging Especially a very challenging topic to address.

2:55:56Speaker 1

In an urban area like this, it's definitely a problem.

2:55:58Speaker 2

But I hear you loud and clear.

2:56:01Speaker 1

Let's get to Commissioner Biederman.

2:56:03 – 2:56:39Speaker 14

So Commissioner Hernandez brought up something very valid. You know, while I totally empathize with school board members and the safety of our children, I think we all nobody can deny that we all want to keep our kids safe. Just to point out that Hollywood Hills also has apartment buildings over and I get it. Let's move forward and let's move forward and let's try to stop the further threats. But Hollywood Hills also has apartment buildings to the west of it.

2:56:40 – 2:56:55Speaker 1

All right. So that concludes questions to the speakers. Now we'll have five minutes for the applicant final comments, followed by five minutes of any staff final comments. And then there's an opportunity for one more. Keith, go ahead.

2:56:55 – 2:57:21Speaker 29

Thank you, Mayor. I'll be brief. First, in regards to the school issue, I probably do more schools in Broward than most people. Every school I've ever done wants to be close to a residential area because they all want their kids to be able to walk or bike to school. If you passed a regulation in the future that said you can have no building over two stories, three stories near a school, you would never have a Downtown Hollywood because of the high school that's right there.

2:57:21 – 2:57:41Speaker 29

You wouldn't have Block 40, Block 57. They have a rooftop playground. It's a charter school. There are hundreds of schools in urban areas that have outdoor playgrounds that would be impacted by any such regulation. I have the utmost respect for that position and the tragedies that have occurred with schools.

2:57:42 – 2:58:26Speaker 29

But unfortunately, it's not a practical solution to say that you can never have a school or a high rise in your downtown or anywhere within proximity to school, especially with the number of charter schools that are existing private schools and the like. I have numerous schools that are on the horizon that are directly adjacent to apartment complexes. And with the state's new micro school policy allowing schools of 150 and less to basically be any commercial industrial, you would have no high rises in any city. So I appreciate the point of view, but it's not practical or possible. For the individual who brought up the issue on the traffic study, it did look at all approved developments within the city.

2:58:26 – 2:58:58Speaker 29

I wish he had read that study before making that comment because particularly the one on Federal Highway was examined based upon the traffic impact. And it still showed A rated roads and the like. Although Terry and Ann mentioned that what the residents say is meaningless from a quasi judicial standpoint, we still feel it's important. I always feel it's important, which is why I sent so many emails out to residents asking them to share with me their concerns. Because without hearing those concerns, I couldn't have produced a shadow study.

2:58:58 – 2:59:25Speaker 29

I couldn't have gotten the exact traffic numbers and the like. So while I appreciate that it may not mean anything in a quasi judicial setting, I disagree it's meaningless. I actually think it's very important. Because when we can resolve issues, we try to resolve them, including the location of the swimming pool and the like, to try to ensure that we're having the least amount of impact as possible. I also feel for the residents who didn't know that FH1 came into place.

2:59:25 – 3:00:03Speaker 29

I feel for them. When cities do mass rezonings, it's not required to be mailed notice. It's advertised in the newspapers. You guys did publications and the like when that came about and the civic groups met. But no, you don't send out 100,000 mailers saying that the zoning category is changing. And we are the first to come in under the new zoning category. But then it comes to the situation of property rights. And to the resident who I'm sorry to hear of your loss. And thank you to everyone who served our country who came up and testified today. There were individuals who spoke about, why do you buy this lot?

3:00:03 – 3:00:44Speaker 29

It's a multifamily apartment complex that he saw the opportunity to make better. And that's why he bought it. He loved the location. He loved the fact it was already multifamily. And then when he met with Joe Kahler, he said, you are to design this to meet the exact code requirement. Do not seek a special exception of variance, anything. I want to meet code. And if someone eventually told these individuals, hey, you can only build a 100 square foot home on your property, they would go crazy the same way this guy is saying, I can't believe I'm even here today. I have property rights and I'm building what's within my requirement property rights. And with that, mayor, we close and are happy to answer any questions.

3:00:44 – 3:00:56Speaker 1

Thank you. An opportunity for city staff for any final comments. Andrea, if I could ask you to maybe run through the criteria to get a refresher.

3:01:08 – 3:01:54Speaker 18

And while we're bringing up the criteria, as you know, the criteria, staff's analysis of the criteria, the applicant's analysis of that criteria is all available within your backup. And any prior as Keith mentioned, any prior land use and rezonings were done in compliance with Florida Statute one hundred sixty six and one hundred sixty three with regards to the noticing requirements at that time. And some of that is included in the backup, and some of that may not have been. But I can assure you it was done. And additionally, the landscape plans are the last two pages of the attachments, which one of them does list some of the tree species that will be there as well.

3:01:55 – 3:02:49Speaker 18

And so here are the site plan standards that are looked at as far as compatibility with regards to the site plan with can I go forward? Before we jump into that, here's the design criteria. There's four criteria that have to do with architectural design components compatibility, scale, massing, and landscape. Based on the criteria and based on the rezonings and the land use plan amendment that was done, staff has found and identified in your backup that this meets the criteria before you today. Additionally, there are site plan standards that go through the environment, open space, circulation, parking, a variety of items regarding access, utilities, buildings, and other structures, levels of service, any other requirements.

3:02:49Speaker 18

And staff has found that it meets all the applicable criteria.

3:02:53 – 3:03:05Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. All right. So that concludes staff's final comments. City attorney, if you could advise the commission as to the applicable law before we deliberate.

3:03:06 – 3:03:20Speaker 30

JULIE Yes. As Andrea Wenjie just mentioned, as she showed you the criteria, the standard is that you feel that the criteria has been complied with. And you feel that you have seen substantial competent evidence to that effect.

3:03:21 – 3:03:37Speaker 1

Thank you. Alright. City commission, I do have some folks who've indicated they'd like to speak. And, of course, at some point, we'll entertain a motion and a second for this resolution. Let's go with Commissioner Biederman.

3:03:37 – 3:03:51Speaker 14

So I have a question. I don't know if Steph can answer this or if the applicant can answer this. The applicant mentioned that this is currently a multifamily property. Is it a duplex, triplex? Mr. Poliokov?

3:03:51Speaker 29

After it was an ALF,

3:03:54Speaker 9

it was converted to a six unit apartment complex.

3:03:56 – 3:04:12Speaker 14

All right. And are there other multifamily buildings in this neighborhood? Because we were led to believe by somebody that pretends to be an expert that continues to mislead this commission, claims that this is a strictly single family neighborhood.

3:04:12Speaker 29

Everything not everything, but a lot of the properties west of that FH1 line are multifamily. And that's probably why that line was created where it was.

3:04:21Speaker 14

Okay. Thank you.

3:04:24Speaker 1

Nothing further. Commissioner Hernandez.

3:04:29 – 3:04:45Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. I actually have a couple of points that I want to bring out, if I could find. Because I look for the landscaping, it's difficult to find out. So if you could, and I couldn't find it. So my concern is the height of the trees that were there.

3:04:46 – 3:05:22Speaker 8

And to the point that Mr. Policoff brought up regarding there would be no development around the downtown or anything like that. I think that the point that the board member, school board member brought up is a good point. And I think it's something for us to consider, not necessarily to avoid building buildings, but in order to prepare the obscurity of some of the clear sight clear line of sight to some of those particular vulnerable places for our children through landscaping. So we have the ability to do some of that. That's what I was asking our staff to look into so that we can protect our children.

3:05:22Speaker 1

As well as on school property.

3:05:24 – 3:06:09Speaker 8

Correct. Correct. So there will be a two way street. Because that's a point that has never been brought up, at least in my years. I've never heard of it. And it's a very valid point. So I think it needs to be considered. Having said that, the garbage pickup time. Can we condition any of this development regarding the time for garbage pickup when it comes to commercial right next to residential? It's a question to staff. If that is something that it would be amiable to them. I don't think it's doable, but I think that we have had complaints from the residential neighborhoods. The commercial nearby pick up their garbage at 04:00 in the morning. And we have cited them that they cannot do it before X amount of time. That's valid concern.

3:06:09Speaker 8

I want to address some of the concerns that we can.

3:06:12Speaker 1

Maybe there's already an ordinance on the books.

3:06:14Speaker 8

There is. But I want the residents to realize that we're looking at this. Something like that. Sure.

3:06:23Speaker 1

City manager.

3:06:24 – 3:06:42Speaker 12

So I was just speaking with our public works director. And we already do have an ordinance on the books. And so if we need to do a better job enforcing that with some of our haulers, we certainly can do that. But it's 7AM throughout most of the city, 8AM over on the Barrier Island.

3:06:42Speaker 8

JOSHUA Okay. And that's a concern. Go ahead, Keith.

3:06:45 – 3:07:01Speaker 29

Want The one thing I just want to mention, if you look at our PowerPoint, we have a direct alley behind our location that goes north south. So that truck that he sees going to 15th and backing up, that's not the one that services this property. We're an alley on our own, which is where the service is.

3:07:01 – 3:07:34Speaker 8

Thank you. And one of the comments that was made, I do think that there is multiple residential units in sight. Like I said, I've driven by. There's duplexes or triplexes. There are multiple residents. It's not all single family residents. But there isn't any four stories. And that was what I asked earlier, if this is the first one. And this is the first one that I see that would happen and this is why we're having the issues that we're having. Having said that, Terry, I live right next to a four story building.

3:07:35 – 3:08:11Speaker 8

And I'm sure that there's more coming underway. There's one right down the block that it was another four story building. So it's not that I'm saying do it in somebody else's backyard and not in mine. I'm not saying do it at all. But that seems to be what the purpose was for the Regional Activity Center and some of these zonings that are taking place in order to intensify the developments along the TOD, which is a transit oriented corridor. Does this goes too far into the neighborhood? I may agree with you. I think that it does. I think that we should keep it within certain blocks. 16th Avenue is two blocks within 18th Avenue.

3:08:11 – 3:08:39Speaker 8

18th Avenue is Federal Highway. But in this particular case, being where it is, maybe it is. But when it comes to that, we're being told that if this development is by right, the only thing that we can consider is a design and a site plan. And as of right now, the site plan, the issues that the residents have brought up is being addressed by the developer. When it comes to the landscaping, I want to make sure that the trees are tall and they're bushy in nature.

3:08:39 – 3:08:59Speaker 8

And if you don't have that, and if we can't ask the developer to do it on their own, I would ask for that to take place because of the issues that have been brought up. So I don't know if the developer has the ability to ask or say that they will do that. And if they do, please come out and say it. Maybe

3:09:00 – 3:09:15Speaker 1

a good way to screen from the school would be, as you mentioned, Commissioner Hernandez, canopy trees planted in the swale. Although I know there are limits as to what is allowed to be planted in the swale. I'm not sure what specimens are allowed or not. Whatever possible you can

3:09:15Speaker 8

do, please do so because it's a legitimate concern. Thank you.

3:09:21Speaker 1

Okay. Commissioner Schuham. Thank you, Mayor.

3:09:26 – 3:10:02Speaker 15

You know, obviously, this is an incredibly difficult item. I first just really want to thank the neighbors that have come out. I have been to that neighborhood many times. I have met with the neighbors. You are very blessed to have each other. It's an amazing, amazing place to live. And I really appreciate what Commissioner Hernandez just said. I mean, we are given the zoning. This is something that did not happen recently. It happened in 2016.

3:10:03 – 3:10:27Speaker 15

the activity center change was back in 2005. So as a commission, it's not a question of a backbone. It's a question of legal constraints. And I'm sure I'm not alone up here thinking, God, you know, I really want to find something for these residents legally. And I don't see it right now.

3:10:29 – 3:10:58Speaker 15

I think that the issue, one issue, and I don't know if this is Damaris or Andrea. As I understand it, and this is separate from the zoning, this is more of a procedural thing that I'm thinking maybe. The case that came to the P and D board that was denied included a variance. This is an appeal of that case. It seems to me that the appeal is of a different application.

3:10:59 – 3:11:36Speaker 15

The variance is not there. So we're being asked to look at something completely different, but yet it's deemed an appeal. So my concern is, why isn't it mandated that the developer take this new application with no variance, which is different than what was decided at the P and D Board? Why aren't they mandated to go back to the P and D board or to start over with application? That How can they come to us with this appeal?

3:11:36Speaker 30

JULIE I will defer to staff to explain that, since it's through the ordinances.

3:11:44 – 3:11:55Speaker 18

So following the board's vote on this, staff did bring it back to the board and asked them to reconsider it to hear the project. And the board chose not to.

3:11:55Speaker 15

You were asking them to reconsider

3:11:58 – 3:12:10Speaker 18

To reconsider case. Right. And we also explained that they had worked to eliminate a variance. But at the time, it was determined. They decided they did not want to rehear the case.

3:12:10 – 3:12:51Speaker 18

We also looked at it from the lens of could it come back through the process as a new project, as you suggested? So when this project started the development review process, we were under the prior process. And so as everyone knows, we recently adopt we went from the Technical Advisory Committee to the DRC, the Development Review Committee. This project started under TAC and continued under the process that was in place at the time. Should they resubmit under today's code, the size of the building would allow it to be administratively approved by staff.

3:12:51 – 3:13:31Speaker 18

When we were discussing that, I said, I don't know that I would look at the administrative approval of this. And so it is the best case to bring it back to see if the board would reconsider it. And then they chose not to until the commission called it for review. It is very common when we are working with applications, if they come out of a planning board and come to commission, that there are modifications to plans depending on the type nature of the request that is there, that there are changes that happen. The site plan and the design of this project is exactly the same as it was when it went to the board.

3:13:38 – 3:14:04Speaker 15

The issue of it, whether it is or is not in the rack. It is, I guess, ironic that in this case, it's a scrivener's error. So enough said about that. Drainage. I think that all of us who sit up here are well versed in the condition of the city and the hot spots.

3:14:04 – 3:14:28Speaker 15

I very much appreciate what Vice Mayor Calhary is suggesting. Should the project go forward, I completely agree. And I appreciate the applicant's offer. The maximum amount of stormwater work that is being anticipated by our stormwater master plan should be done. So at a minimum, the residents impacted are impacted to the least.

3:14:28 – 3:14:53Speaker 15

So if there is a motion on this, I think it should absolutely include that as a requirement. City attorney, my question is, the next step, assuming today the site plan is approved, does the design go to P and D board, or does it come back here? Or is it what happens? What's the process?

3:14:53Speaker 1

Design is part of today.

3:14:54Speaker 30

You're considering design today?

3:14:56Speaker 30

both the design and the site plan?

3:14:58Speaker 5

Oh, it's both? Yes.

3:14:59 – 3:15:47Speaker 15

Okay. So then as part of that approval, I would ask for several things. And one would be that prior to the project moving forward, that staff and the applicant meet with the parents of the child who is so severely disabled and assure that any accommodations that need to be made for that particular household are addressed as a condition of the design. I would also ask that, as a condition of the design, that meetings with the school principal continue. And to the mayor's point, I agree.

3:15:48 – 3:16:11Speaker 15

I think it's much more difficult to put the screening on the side of the residential property than it would be to put it on the side of the school. And so I would ask, as a condition, that there be a meeting with the school and efforts be made to somehow screen those fields and swimming pool from the 4th you know, 2nd And 3rd Floor.

3:16:20 – 3:17:02Speaker 15

On slide 11, right here, compatibility. A harmonious relationship between existing architectural language and composition and proposed construction. So, Andrea, I think where things need to be explained a bit further to me, certainly, and maybe to others When we're talking about compatibility and even scale and massing and harmony, are we talking about with the existing surrounding buildings? Or are we talking about what is permitted in the existing surrounding buildings?

3:17:03 – 3:17:16Speaker 18

It refers to both. Because we know that the intent of the underlying land use and zoning here is to change allows for a change in character of the area. And that has to be taken into consideration.

3:17:17Speaker 15

So just by virtue of making the change in the zoning, you're anticipating that you're going to have a four story next to a one story. Is that what you're saying?

3:17:26Speaker 18

The zoning code should have taken those items into consideration.

3:17:31 – 3:17:47Speaker 15

So then the next part of that question is, Okay, so now you have a four story next to a one story. What is it that makes that harmonious? What is it that you guys looked at, in your professional opinion, to say these two things are compatible? When to look at them, they don't look compatible.

3:17:47Speaker 18

There is the required setback in addition to the additional distance of the alley that's provided.

3:17:52Speaker 15

So it's not that they're aesthetically compatible in any way. It's just that they're falling within the allowable guidelines.

3:17:58 – 3:18:11Speaker 18

Correct. And if you look at it from a larger perspective of how the height increases as you move towards Federal Highway, you have that step down effect from a higher to mid level to low rise.

3:18:12 – 3:18:32Speaker 15

GREGORY So when the residents say, understandably, this is not compatible to our single family home, we're saying, that doesn't really matter because the property that this gentleman purchased allowed him to go to four stories. And as long as he is building within the existing criteria, we have no basis to say that's not compatible. Is that what you're saying?

3:18:32Speaker 18

Correct. As identified in your backup material and staff's analysis.

3:18:37 – 3:19:23Speaker 15

Okay. And then just another thing. This kind of goes with the I guess, third condition, which is and I appreciate the applicant saying that they are designing their drainage system to absorb, for lack of a better term, more storm water than their project is legally required to absorb. So by virtue of building this building, notwithstanding the concern of the residents that you're taking away permeable space, you're actually increasing the removal of storm water versus what they have now. And Keith, if you want to just give us a yes or no.

3:19:23Speaker 15

Is that what you're saying?

3:19:24Speaker 29

You're absolutely correct.

3:19:25 – 3:19:59Speaker 15

So the other thing I would ask and I think this might have been Vice Mayor Calhary as well on the swales is to the extent, in addition to whatever maximum we can do maybe it's the same, because I think the swales are in the stormwater master plan that those swales be looked at by this developer to increase the storm water from the surrounding neighborhood that can be improved from where we are today at the time that this building is constructed.

3:20:03Speaker 1

Are you saying a capture the swale dip?

3:20:05 – 3:20:24Speaker 15

Yeah. And also, it's the compaction. It's just basically we've seen presentations here of how to improve swale, the use of swells by aerating them, redesigning them. And it's not expensive. And as long as we're tearing up this area, this is the time to do it.

3:20:24 – 3:20:52Speaker 29

CHRISTIAN Commissioner, we agreed to that in our presentation, that we'll continue to do that. The applicant will stipulate to items two and three that you brought up. We'll continue to work with the principal on the landscaping. And we will do the swell work that I previously committed to. We can't agree to one because I don't really even understand it. But an ADA accommodation on our property for someone else's property, it didn't No, I'm

3:20:52Speaker 15

saying that as part of the approval of your design to the extent there's a reasonable request from the high school.

3:20:59Speaker 29

GREGORY No, no. On the child with the disability, we're not impacting them.

3:21:04Speaker 15

GREGORY Well, I don't know that. I think that they are concerned.

3:21:08Speaker 29

We're happy to meet with them.

3:21:09 – 3:21:25Speaker 15

Yes. I think that the family is concerned that by the addition of these units, that traffic and configurations that they now have the benefit of will be negatively impacted. And that family's life will be negatively impacted.

3:21:25 – 3:21:42Speaker 29

We're happy to have staff set up that meeting, which our architect and owner will appear at. And by the way, as far as the swale, I just got yelled at by saying there's some utilities and other things in there. So we will work with staff based upon what we're allowed to do, clearly.

3:21:44 – 3:22:10Speaker 15

And I would just say, like I said, I mean, this is not an easy job. And it's not for the faint of heart. It can't just be based on what we think is the best thing to do. It has to be based on the criteria that is in place today. And oftentimes, that criteria has been put here by people that have come before us.

3:22:11 – 3:22:34Speaker 15

And so I would just say and I think this very much goes to the school board members' points that you can't anticipate the future necessarily. I think, to Commissioner Hernandez's point, it's a great idea. Let's take a look. Maybe we can't lower buildings, but we could maybe come up with some code ideas that protect surrounding schools. And I think that is it for me. Thank you.

3:22:34Speaker 1

Thank you. Let's go to Vice Mayor Colari.

3:22:38 – 3:23:03Speaker 2

So I think we've all I mean, I'm sure there's a couple more people in the queue. But I just want to say, again, you are correct, Commissioner Xuem. This is not an easy position to be in. Rules are set and we have laws to follow. I will say though, affordable housing has been a topic that not only the city of Hollywood has faced, but the entire Broward County.

3:23:03 – 3:23:44Speaker 2

The amount of individuals moving in is the supply and demand, Elizabeth. Has nothing to do with the backbone. And I really resent the fact and I'll be completely honest I resent the fact that we are pitted against our community and saying that we never make the right choices. And why do I say that? The Planning and Development Board had the opportunity to vet out all of these issues. And they chose to not base their opinion based on facts. And knew that it was going be turfed to the commission to pit us against the community. We put a planning and development board in place to make these decisions. And they failed to do so. And now it is here in front of us.

3:23:44 – 3:24:05Speaker 2

And we have to make decisions. And then we get the short end of the stick. Because we look like the bad guys who are not doing the right thing because the citizens have come to speak to us and express their opinion. And that is fully unacceptable. And a state, we can't speak out in the audience.

3:24:05 – 3:24:33Speaker 2

Everyone had their opportunity to speak. So please out of respect, let's not do that. As a matter of fact, one of our former commissioners who sits on the planning and development board specifically said, he's not making his decision based on facts. And as much as he's allowed to do that, we here wish that we did not have the opportunity to just make our decision on facts. And we want to endure the compassion that all of you have expressed.

3:24:33 – 3:24:58Speaker 2

Because quality of life is number one. And for anybody who thinks that we do not care about quality of life in the city of Hollywood is completely inappropriate. And I am completely offended of some of the statements that were said, but you have a right to say what you need to say as well. Something that was mentioned about 37 feet. An individual in that area that owns a home can build their home up to 37 feet.

3:25:00 – 3:25:21Speaker 2

Right now, anyone in that neighborhood can do that. Ma'am, again, we cannot speak out. And yes, you can. I'm really not sure why we would only address the individual who came up and spoke, her heartfelt speaking. And I do have empathy 100%.

3:25:21 – 3:25:49Speaker 2

But I feel that every individual that came up and spoke, not just the individual who has the seizure and epileptic child, but the veterans who have served our country and protected us also have rights. Every person in this room has a right. Every person in this room, we trust their values. But again, we are faced with the challenging decisions. It's not compassion versus compromise.

3:25:49 – 3:26:15Speaker 2

It is about what our rights are and what we have to do. I, as district three commissioner, have a lot of homes that are affected by the RAC as well. And it has been years that we have heard these exact same comments. This is nothing new. But we have to make decisions based on true and ultimate facts.

3:26:18 – 3:26:29Speaker 2

Keith, if you could please tell us if we decide to go against the facts and go on our hard shell, what happens?

3:26:30 – 3:26:42Speaker 29

The owner who's actually closed a lot of times I bring matters before you that they don't close. This guy owns the property based on the as of right development. We'll immediately file suit. He's already told me.

3:26:42 – 3:27:21Speaker 2

And that will create tax dollars issues and will create litigation. Will it buy us time? Yes. So what I feel is as a commissioner, as a vice mayor, and as a representative of the city for fourteen years, this isn't my first rodeo. And it is very challenging and it is very heart felt. We understand your concerns. But what we can do and what I have said is that we find solutions to the problems. The solutions are what I started off this commission meeting saying during this topic is the flooding. The mitigation of flooding. You cannot get to your house during flooding.

3:27:21Speaker 2

So let's work on the flooding. It is a priority. Let's address that. Let's put that at the top of the list. We're disrupting a neighborhood by construction.

3:27:31 – 3:28:08Speaker 2

We might as well disrupt the neighborhood by construction and fixing the problem. And that is a win win for everybody. So based on the facts that we've been given and based on the facts, I'm going to make a motion to approve. With exceptions of swale restoration, making sure that this is a priority for our storm water master plan. And not just single out the individual who came and had the heartfelt speech about her handicapped child, which we empathize with.

3:28:08 – 3:28:51Speaker 2

But also for all the residents in the area that are going to be impacted, have meetings with them, Keith, please. Address their concerns and try the best to accommodate them. As far as the school shooting, thank you, Debbie, for coming out and speaking about that, that there's the possibility. Well, there's a possibility almost everywhere. You can be in the young circle with all of the high rises. And children playing in the arts park can be shot out from one of those high rise building. And we won't know where it's coming from. And it'll be an investigation beyond our knowledge. It is really challenging times that we live in, but we can't prevent things. In addition to that, please everyone know that we're not here to be the bad guys.

3:28:52Speaker 2

We're going to try to help find some of the problems. But we also have rights that we have to follow. So with that, my motion stands on the floor. I'd like a second.

3:29:01 – 3:29:18Speaker 1

All right. We have a motion to approve the design and site plan with, I believe it was, the Crawford conditions. And I don't know if you want to enunciate them. Tracy had mentioned the Stores operation regarding flooding.

3:29:18 – 3:29:30Speaker 2

Well, I would like to prioritize it being a hotspot that we are all aware of, that we make sure we put the lift station as funded. We make sure we get the swale restoration in place all during

3:29:31 – 3:29:43Speaker 1

So the city's project will be part of the city's work. And we can reiterate that during our comments. But in terms of the conditioning of this particular site plan, we talked about landscape buffering, cooperation with GREEN: the school. Go ahead.

3:29:43 – 3:30:13Speaker 29

Yeah, we've agreed to make sure the record is clear. But we will continue to reach out to the school principal. And I spoke to Mr. Kaler. We will design some additional landscaping on the school property to shield that corner. It's only a corner over there. We will provide that plan to the principal to see if he will approve it. If so, we will install it at our cost. We're agreeing to that. We will continue to work with the city on the swale as it relates to the drainage based upon their landscape requirements and the utilities, which was just brought up.

3:30:13 – 3:30:30Speaker 29

And we'll do whatever the city wants us to as it relates to that. And based upon what Commissioner Cleary says, we will allow staff to create another meeting at City Hall where the applicant and architect will come to listen to other concerns to see if anything else can be remedied.

3:30:30Speaker 3

CHRISTIAN All right. We have

3:30:32Speaker 1

a second from Commissioner Hernandez. Let's have final comments of We

3:30:37Speaker 1

CHRISTIAN motion on the floor. Commissioner Hernandez, go ahead.

3:30:41 – 3:31:03Speaker 8

CHRISTIAN Some of the things that I was going to say have already been said. And I'd like to thank Keith for agreeing to meet with the immediate community. And I'd to thank everyone that came out and voiced their concern. We learn here from everyone that comes up, what are the issues that we may not even see? And I'd like to thank you all for coming.

3:31:04Speaker 1

Thank you. Commissioner Biederman.

3:31:06 – 3:31:57Speaker 14

So I'll start out by saying a very vocal resident always talks about, instead of being against projects, see how we can improve projects to have a happy medium. Not just to be against it fully but how can we improve it so that it's not such an obtruse building or that's not the right word, that's not the right word, sorry. Based on what I saw and correct me if I'm wrong, the applicant or somebody, the orientation of the building is so that it's very limited site to the school. Like, majority of the apartments are facing other directions, not towards the school. Can we create faux balconies on those units that are facing the school to minimize the impact to the school?

3:31:57Speaker 29

It would destroy the aesthetic design in those units from a marketability standpoint. They still have windows. So that doesn't change anything.

3:32:06Speaker 14

Changes They don't have to be windows that open.

3:32:08 – 3:32:19Speaker 29

What changes it is what Commissioner Schuham and Commissioner Hernandez said in Tulare, which has increased that corner landscaping so that to block visuals. And

3:32:19Speaker 45

that's what we're going

3:32:20 – 3:32:41Speaker 14

to do. Just trying to think of things to minimize the impact. One of the things that stood out to me in my meeting with the applicant and the architect is their ability to create the Swell projects. Projects. As everybody knows, I'm a big advocate for recapture the swale citywide.

3:32:41 – 3:33:11Speaker 14

I think it's one of the best things and most effective, quick remedies to streets flooding is to have the more swales to capture more water. The other thing that I want to make sure I mentioned because I neglected earlier was that it was mentioned we should go out there. I went out there. I was out there for about forty five minutes. Yes, I was actually out there during my meeting with this one of my meetings yesterday that was over Zoom.

3:33:11 – 3:33:46Speaker 14

I was sitting in the swale area of this unit looking around and seeing what's going on so that I too can have a appreciation for what's going on in the neighborhood. That being said, based on all the criteria and the letter of the law, I would support this. And just the fact that more swells immediately, even before the city gets to it, is going to benefit the neighborhood a little bit, and at least that particular interception. Thank you.

3:33:47Speaker 1

Thank you. Commissioner Quintana?

3:33:50 – 3:34:34Speaker 13

So speaking of swales, just knowing that part of what contributes to flooding in that neighborhood is that the swales are really compacted and that all the kids who drive to school and don't have any place to park are parking all along the swale. And that is part of the problem. I don't know that we have a solution for that, just all those hundreds of kids going there. But whatever we can do in this project to make it definitely that V shape on the swale because you can bet your bottom dollar that you're going to have kids parking on the swale of this new development as well because they're lacking where to park. And you're going to end up with problems with flooding in that way.

3:34:35 – 3:35:05Speaker 13

So I heard something about there's utilities in the swale, you may not be able to do it. But whatever you can do, you're going to need to do. People are going to be parking there as well. I don't see any way that we could justify not approving it by law. But I understand where you all are. And believe me, all of this is I was there three times. My son went to South Broward High School, so I did spend a lot of time. But it's been a few years. So I've been there three times in the last week to better understand what's around you. I empathize.

3:35:06 – 3:35:52Speaker 13

I kept imagining, well, what will happen if I get a four I mean, where I live, too, we're kind of at a place where it's a transition to higher level buildings. And how would I feel if I have something right next door that's four floors? So just know that we get it. It's like change is difficult and this is definitely going to be a change for your neighborhood. But the other thing I really think makes a big difference is who's going to manage this property and whether that person or that entity manages it well and ensures that it's well maintained, that it's considerate of the people around it, and that even though those folks are renters, that those folks be people who care about the place where they live and they'd be held accountable for that.

3:35:53 – 3:36:06Speaker 13

That's really important. Not just just because they're renters doesn't mean that they're going to be a negative impact. It just depends on who's managing the property. And so once that gets to that point, that's an important conversation to have. And that's all. Thank you.

3:36:07 – 3:36:24Speaker 1

Well, thank you all so much. We do have the motion and a second. Take a vote. I want to express my thanks to everyone who's come to speak. Certainly, there is a friction when you're dealing with the property owner at the boundary of a more intense zoning district.

3:36:24 – 3:37:10Speaker 1

Here, this property is right at the boundary of FH1 and the single family residential to the east. And there's a transition and friction there. And so the city commission certainly understands your points. But at the same time, as was mentioned by the attorneys and by us who understand the legal framework, the property owner has the zoning to construct this by right. And the city does not have a legal ground to deny the approval of a site plan and design when it complies with the criteria and where the evidence presented in a quasi judicial hearing indicates that the evidence is competent and substantial in that regard.

3:37:10 – 3:37:39Speaker 1

And so with that, I thank everyone for coming. We have a motion and a second on the floor. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Thank you all for being here. Right. Pat, how many speaker cards do we have on item 19? How many?

3:37:40 – 3:38:12Speaker 1

Because I don't wanna get into public citizen comments. Siobhan is here, and she's going to say, Josh, you kept me waiting. Thirteen, and there's only seventeen minutes. Alright. So we'll we'll wait we'll wait till after. I don't know. Unless we unless we cut the the time. Start it and then

3:38:22 – 3:38:50Speaker 1

Alright. Let me take a look at the agenda real quick as people leave. Why don't we go ahead and take item 20 real quick? It shouldn't take too long. Are there how many speaker cards on item 20? Pat? Item 20? Excuse me. Guys, for everyone who's here on item 19, realize that in

3:38:51 – 3:39:19Speaker 1

Realize that in sixteen minutes, we have citizen comments, which is at five. I don't know how many citizens are here, but that's gonna be a hard stop. And I don't wanna have item 19 stop halfway unless you want us to cut down your time to one minute, in which case, we can get through it in sixteen minutes. I don't wanna do that either. So how many speaker cards do we have on item 20? One card. Alright. Let's get through item 20. No. Not yet.

3:39:19 – 3:40:07Speaker 1

That'll be at 05:00. Let's quiet down. I need the speaker card for item 20. Item 20 is an ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida changing the zoning designation for 0.59 acres of land jointly located at 2200 Jackson Street, along with the unaddressed parcels on Jackson Street, as described in the agenda item, more specifically described in exhibit A, from Dixie Highway Medium Intensity Multifamily District DH2 to DH3, and amending the city zoning map to reflect the change in zoning designation. This is an advertised public hearing advertising conformance to state statutes and city codes.

3:40:08Speaker 1

It is here on first reading by the Department of Development Services. We have one speaker card when we get to the public hearing. And let's go ahead from staff.

3:40:16Speaker 30

First, mayor? Yes. This is quasi judicial.

3:40:20Speaker 1

Okay. Do you feel like you need to read the quasi judicial proceedings again?

3:40:26Speaker 30

No. I think that item 20 is now sufficiently noticed under the quasi judicial proceedings.

3:40:33Speaker 9

prefer that she read

3:40:34Speaker 30

We should ask. Oh.

3:40:37Speaker 1

All right. Well, I'll just say this. Does the applicant or the staff or anybody object to proceeding informally for this quasi judicial proceeding?

3:40:45Speaker 26

JOSHUA Staff does not object.

3:40:47Speaker 1

JOSHUA Okay. Does the applicant object to proceeding informally?

3:40:51Speaker 50

Liz Somerstein, we don't object.

3:40:52 – 3:41:05Speaker 1

Having no objection from anyone to proceed informally in this quasi judicial proceeding, we will go ahead as that. Cameron, please. Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners public. My name is Cameron

3:41:05 – 3:41:27Speaker 26

CAMRON Palmer. I am the chief planner and assistant director of development services. Once the presentation loads up, I'm going to walk you through I'll be here with you briefly. We're here to discuss a rezoning on 2200 Street and its enverance parcels, a total size of approximately a little over half an acre. Just bear with me as the presentation is pulled up.

3:41:39 – 3:42:11Speaker 26

Thank you. All right. The property is located central portion of the city, just South Of Hollywood Boulevard and the Young Circle at 2200 Jackson Street, with several unnumbered parcels. On the screen is an aerial image of the property as it exists today, fronting the South side of Jackson Street, with the property highlighted on your screen in yellow and the zoning boundary in red dotted line. As it pertains to the subject site surroundings, to the north of the subject site is multifamily residential.

3:42:11 – 3:42:38Speaker 26

And to the east and west are non residential uses that front along the South Dixie Corridor. So by way of background, I just want to back up and provide a little bit of site history. The applicant is currently under contract with regards to three parcels as part of a site assembly exercise. On the screen are the three parcels highlighted in purple, blue, and orange. The total acreage of the assembly exercise is three acres.

3:42:39 – 3:43:12Speaker 26

As you could see in the image on the screen, the zoning boundary in red jogs around parcels one and two, which will be the basis of our discussion today. So as I said before, 2200 Jackson Street is the main site. And the unaddressed parcel, parcel 2, is part of the zoning request today. And as you can see, it falls on the left side, or rather the west side, of the zoning boundary that is in irregular shape. The parcel that is particularly in question today is the parcel highlighted in yellow, which is a portion of Parcel 1 in the entirety of Parcel 2.

3:43:12 – 3:43:50Speaker 26

These two parcels together are the basis of the rezoning request. The rezoning request is intended to straighten out the zoning boundary line, as described on the screen in the red dotted line, to allow for a more cohesive development site as part of that greater lot assembly exercise. Taking a closer look at the existing zoning in the area, as you can see on the screen to the left, this is the existing zoning map as it exists today. You'll see the DH3 zone in a darker orange and the DH2 zone in a lighter orange. And you'll notice that in the area of question, the subject site, is an odd or irregular jog.

3:43:50 – 3:44:27Speaker 26

The proposed request today is to rezone that parcel, the two parcels as said before, to DH3 so that it squares off the DH3 zone, allowing for it to align with the zone pattern to the north and south of the property. As it pertains to land use, the property is within the Regional Activity Center. And as a summary of today's request, the existing zone is DH2, Dixie Highway Medium Intensity multifamily District. And the request is to rezone the red parcel on the screen to Dixie Highway High Intensity Mixed Use District DH3. Again, the total size of both parcels together is a little over half an acre.

3:44:29 – 3:45:16Speaker 26

With regards to height implications and I'll go through this a little bit slowly, but not to take out too much time the DH2 zone provides for five stories maximum at 55 feet. The DH3 zone provides for 140 feet maximum at 10 stories. The DH3 provides for a buffer zone, which height restricts any areas of land that are 200 feet within a DH2. So on your screen, you'll see that the area shaded in yellow is a height restricted area because it's measured from the zone line 200 feet out. Because the zone boundary is irregular in nature and in shape, therefore the buffer restriction area is also irregular in nature, resulting in a very large buffer on the DH3 zone shown in Figure one on top.

3:45:16 – 3:45:47Speaker 26

What the applicant is requesting is to rezone the parcel to DH 3. This would allow for the buffer zone to be far more contained in a manner that's more regular and aligning with the zoning district. And then DH 3, which is highlighted in green on your screen, is permitted to go to 10 feet 10 stories, rather, and 140 feet. It's very important to note that the parcels themselves being rezoned in the middle of the screen in the yellow irregular box will remain with the same height permissions. Right now, today, DH2, it's limited to 55 feet, a maximum of five stories.

3:45:47 – 3:46:30Speaker 26

And in the future configuration, even though it's going to be zoned DH3, it will remain height restricted due to that buffer protecting the DH2 zoning district, meaning the parcel in of itself mostly remains the same height. Keep in mind that the lands to the left or to the west of a solid red line on your screen is also owned by the applicant or under contract by the applicant as part of the lot assembly. And this exercise is being done so that the lands closer to DH to the Dixie Highway, in green on your screen at the bottom, are allowed to develop in a more cohesive and standard manner. With regards to rezonings, the criteria are found in Article five of our zoning and land development regulations. And staff have reviewed all five criteria and found application consistent with them.

3:46:31 – 3:47:10Speaker 26

Accordingly, staff is recommending approval for the requested rezoning request, as it is compliant with the zoning and land development regulations and our comprehensive plan. Now, while we're not here to speak about the site plan, I know this is the exciting part of the presentation where we talk a little bit about what's happening on the site. The applicant is currently working with staff through the development review process to process design and site plan request. This is moving separate to the rezoning and is being done so intentionally to allow the applicant to have more time to work through the detailed specifics of the site design. So on the screen is the conceptual site plan that's currently working its way through the system and is still being commented on and revised as appropriate.

3:47:12 – 3:47:37Speaker 26

On your screen, you're going to see the conceptual elevations with Dixie Highway on the left of the screen. As stated before, the intent of this rezoning is so that the intenser and higher uses can be faced the Dixie Highway corridor. And the building tapers down from nine stories, despite the provisions that allow them to go to 140 feet and 10 stories. They're coming from nine. And they're working their way down to 42 feet or four stories to allow for that taper effect, which is what the zoning code intended.

3:47:39 – 3:47:58Speaker 26

Lastly, this is a conceptual rendering. Again, it's conceptual, and the applicant is still working closely with staff to refine it, to make sure that it is the greatest and best as we work with them through the development review process. On the screen again are your criteria for the rezoning. As a reminder, the request before you is solely for the rezoning, as the site plan designers are still working through the system. We'll

3:47:58Speaker 8

Thank go quickly you,

3:47:59Speaker 1

Cameron. Thank you. Any presentation by the applicant? Are there questions to staff? Hold on. Commissioner Colari, go ahead.

3:48:08 – 3:48:24Speaker 2

So just so we're not in the same predicament that we were just in. I do have a question. Have we reached out to the residents in the surrounding area? Number one. And number two, what is to prevent the developer from going to the maximum?

3:48:26 – 3:48:59Speaker 26

Rezoning requests are required to have two public outreach meetings, which applicant has fulfilled. Further to that, the design and site plan process also requires two public outreach meetings, which are underway. As it pertains to the development that is taking place on the site, as a reminder, today's request is strictly about the rezoning and the provisions we provide as part of that rezoning request. It's not a site plan request, and therefore, the conditions or the analysis that was done for this site does not pertain to the building that is being currently revised and refined. Do you Maybe

3:48:59Speaker 1

the applicant can give you some confidence

3:49:01Speaker 1

What the plan is.

3:49:01Speaker 2

Because I just feel like we're putting the cart before the horse.

3:49:05 – 3:49:41Speaker 50

LISSA Hi, Liz Summerstein. We have a presentation, but it's very similar to what Cameron presented. So I'll spare you in the interest of time. In terms of the height, so the rezoning, even when we rezone, there's still these supplemental regulations in the code. So when you're within 200 feet of DH2, you do have to taper down the height. So even if you do rezone this, it's a very small portion of the overall assemblage. There is still the restriction. In terms of public outreach, we did do two public outreach meetings for the rezoning. The residents that did come had positive to little feedback. And we had our first public outreach meeting yesterday on the site plan.

3:49:41Speaker 2

Okay. Thank you. Motion to approve.

3:49:43 – 3:49:54Speaker 1

We have a motion from Commissioner Kalari and a second from Commissioner Biederman to approve the item. I'm going to call on Commissioner Hernandez and then take the open the public comment period.

3:49:54 – 3:50:36Speaker 8

Thank you, Mayor. I haven't heard anything negative regarding this particular development. Everything that they've said has been positive. The only concern that some of the residents have is management. And it goes back to, if it's a good management company, we will have a thriving development. If it's not such good, we will probably come back to you because some of their fear is, in years past, we've had an apartment called the Teresa Apartments, very similar in nature. And management went downhill, and so did the neighborhood. So I would ask the applicant to please talk to their developer and says, the key to success for the longevity of the project is management.

3:50:37Speaker 1

Thank you. Siobhan McLaughlin, go ahead and open the public hearing. Siobhan?

3:50:44Speaker 2

That's for citizen

3:50:45 – 3:50:57Speaker 1

This just says item 20. No? Alright. Public hearing is now closed. We have a motion and a second to approve the ordinance on first reading. City attorney, please read the ordinance, and clerk will call the roll call vote.

3:50:57 – 3:51:40Speaker 30

An ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida changing the zoning designation of 0.59 acres of land generally located at 2200 Jackson Street, along with unaddressed parcels on Jackson Street, folio numbers 5140 two-sixteen-one-two 370 and 5,140 50, as more specifically described in exhibit A from Dixie Highway Medium Intensity Multifamily District, DH2, to Dixie Highway High Intensity Mixed Use District, DH3, and amending the city's zoning map to reflect the change in zoning designation.

3:51:41Speaker 6

Commissioner Gruber?

3:51:43Speaker 6

Commissioner Biederman? Yes. Commissioner Quintana? Yes. Commissioner Schuham? Yes. Commissioner Hernandez?

3:51:50Speaker 6

Vice Mayor Caleri?

3:51:51Speaker 23

Yes. Mayor Levy?

3:51:53 – 3:57:36Speaker 1

Yes. All right, let's show the ordinance passing unanimously on first reading. It is about 04:57 now. We are going to recess for three minutes and come back for citizen comments at 5PM. Thank you.

3:57:37Speaker 51

Alright, ma'am. We're on.

3:57:38 – 3:58:18Speaker 1

Alright. It is a little past 5PM, and let's go ahead and have citizen comments. It's an opportunity for you to speak on any, any subject, but not on an item that is the subject of, today's agenda, separate from that. So if you're here to speak, I'll just say if you're here to speak on the vessel exclusion zone, know that that's item 19, and we'll call that next. So if you are here to speak on that and you filled out two cards with intention to speak on both, please let me know and I'll waive you from citizen comments and you'll speak on that item when we call it. All right, let's go to Ann Ralston followed by Julie Greenfield. Yes, citizen comments.

3:58:19Speaker 5

You can speak on anything you want.

3:58:21 – 3:58:33Speaker 11

It's citizen comments, as far as I know. First off, welcome, Braylen, as your new position. I'm wearing my I cannot wait next Wednesday, ribbon cutting.

3:58:35 – 3:59:16Speaker 11

Years we've been waiting, golfing on Thursday. Let's go. So thank you, Citi, for that. Well, actually, taxpayers on passing the bond. Coming here today for a 02:00 item, number one, I think it's very disrespectful to the people that came for the 01:30 time certain item. Time certain items should be just that. And we do know we run over time. You had a lot of proclamations, whatever. But it's just, to me, very disrespectful for the citizens that have come for a specific item. And if you know there's one that's controversial, let that one lapse and get the ones that maybe take a little less time, because you're way over the 01:30 anytime.

3:59:16 – 3:59:57Speaker 11

I don't think you heard it till 02:15. So I'm just saying, as a courtesy to the citizens that actually put you in office, I think having timed certain items. The other thing about a time certain item I'm not sure about and why it's done is if citizens comments, which we only get twice a month at 05:00 where most people are getting out of work, is why would you put another item 05:00 time certain when it's kids and you're making them wait, or you're making us wait? It just makes no sense to me. Put it at 04:45 if they're out of school, or 05:30 after sending his comments, whatever, So they're not sitting here waiting around listening to me run my mouth.

3:59:58 – 4:00:32Speaker 11

Parking is a major issue in the city when there's a meeting, especially if there's a controversial issue. I drove around this parking lot three times trying to find a park. Everybody was parked illegally on grass, everywhere, anywhere you could not find. To me, it makes sense when you have something controversial that maybe city vehicles, code enforcement vehicles, development services vehicles park at the city parking lot and just have a trolley bring them back and forth. That just makes so that there's more parking.

4:00:33 – 4:01:01Speaker 11

If you want participation from the public, which I'm hoping that you do, make it easier for them when they come, not circle and get frustrated and leave. I'm just a diehard. But that issue needs to be at some point addressed. Because these are the last three meetings I've been to. It's been very hard to find. And that's without a controversy. So could you please consider that?

4:01:02 – 4:01:26Speaker 1

You. I do see the kids here. Would the folks here on citizen comments be willing to wait a few minutes if we pivot real quick to the presentation by Commissioner Quintana recognizing the student artist winners with the Broward Sierra Group, plastic no? All right. I'm trying to, you know yeah.

4:01:27 – 4:01:48Speaker 1

And by the way, Ann, I just had the same conversation that you mentioned about not city staff not setting a time certain item at 05:00. And Raelynn is going to look at the timing of all of these items and better manage that for the city. All right. Let's go ahead with Julie Greenfield, followed by Elizabeth Barnett.

4:01:49 – 4:02:31Speaker 51

Okay. Thank you. Julie Greenfield, again, the time certain agenda item at 01:30. We've been here since four. The same parking issues are the same things that I would talk about. I had to excuse myself and move my car, because I was in a three hour zone. In driving around, I did consider some of these empty buildings that sit around the circle. But guess what? There's a tow zone. So I'm not going to park my vehicle there. I'm sure that if our law enforcement officers and first responders did, they're probably safe. And they're not going to be worried about being towed. There's got to be other ways. People are scared to come speak. I spoke with many individuals about number 19.

4:02:31 – 4:03:02Speaker 51

And I'm really confused as to why I can't talk about that now, if citizen comments is allowed to talk about anything. And traditionally, if I had missed my daytime spot, I would be able to talk about the buoys now. So that's really confusing. But the people I spoke with, everyone looked at me confused. They don't understand why the city would reduce that rate. And many of them are afraid to speak. I'm not going to ask someone why. You all know I'm very comfortable getting up and speaking in front of you. And I've been doing this since I was 14 years old. So it's not a big deal.

4:03:02 – 4:03:39Speaker 51

But many people are afraid for whatever reason. I know that there's lots of emails, I'm sure, that are in your inbox from citizens as well as civic associations. One thing I was really glad that I did get to sit through was the Marine Advisory Committee annual report. I had the privilege of delivering that twice to this commission when I was the co chair of that committee. It saddened me to realize that a city staff member was delivering it, not one of its own board members, as the other groups did, and that there is not a connection to the county.

4:03:39 – 4:03:58Speaker 51

I sit on the County Marine Advisory Committee. And I do so proudly, because it makes a difference. When I asked to be reinstated or renewed, this commission denied that with me for our own city board. That right there was telling. I also know, just as Mr.

4:03:58 – 4:04:26Speaker 51

Cantor had said, because I personally spoke with members of the Marine Advisory Board, they have left. They don't have a quorum. This is a big problem. The number 19 topic that we're not allowed to talk about, that wasn't addressed in his annual report. I thought that was very telling, that you have city staff talking about all these other projects with the Marine Advisory Board, but they did not mention anything to do with safety on the beach.

4:04:27 – 4:04:49Speaker 51

These are the experts that you all had put in place on this advisory board. Why wouldn't you have talked with them about something that's going to come up before the board? That just as they put out and those were things that I was glad to see they put forth about fertilizer and so forth. Those were things we worked on, even when I was on that board a couple of years ago.

4:04:51Speaker 1

JULIET Elizabeth Barnett, followed by Eric Pachelle.

4:04:56 – 4:05:22Speaker 5

This is for my mom. She's adopt she said at the adult living facility at Presidential Place, she introduced my fiance to them as her adopted son. Now, that's Okay. But after hearing it, it kind of gets to you even though you're the daughter. Know, like, mom, I'm here.

4:05:22 – 4:05:42Speaker 5

You know? But he needs an abrasion on his heart. And I guess maybe the police department or the retirees can help by staying with him because he needs somebody to stay with him. And I can't drive. So I can't take him home.

4:05:42 – 4:06:12Speaker 5

He has got to be taken home by somebody. And I am willing to pay that person to stay with him at the hospital as an outpatient. Might become a day night overnight patient. Because I know my mom wants him to have the surgery for his abrasion of his heart. Because if his heart goes over 170 or 107 or you know over, he can go into heart attack.

4:06:12 – 4:06:51Speaker 5

And he's been rushed to the hospital twice when we were in Linden, Tennessee. 35 miles away was the closest hospital because they're hospital closed. So I'm hoping, you know, maybe they have an organization with the former retiree fire police department could help. Or somebody in the commissioners that has anybody that needs, you know, a little paying job. I'm willing, you know, to give him a good price to help him because I know my mom would have wanted him to have this.

4:06:51 – 4:07:11Speaker 5

And I don't want him to miss this operation and can't get it because he doesn't have anybody around. Even though he was raised here, most of his friends are gone. Some of them are dead. He is only 57. Yeah, 57.

4:07:11 – 4:07:50Speaker 5

So I am hoping you all can help. My phone number, you can reach me right now at 5, no, (754) 230-7775. And I've heard that people still hear about my mom, Faye Barnett in records. Because I guess she was one of those people that was the 10% working, you know, you have 100 people working, but she was at 10% that helped and did real good. And thanks to Tracy Kollary to help with the pension and all that stuff.

4:07:51Speaker 5

Because when there was nobody helping the police department, Tracy came forward or they were looking for somebody and Tracy was it.

4:08:01Speaker 1

Thank you, Elizabeth.

4:08:03Speaker 5

CDC needs help with their trucks. So if anybody knows somebody who can help them with their trucks

4:08:10Speaker 1

Thank you, Elizabeth.

4:08:11Speaker 5

Working because she helps the city

4:08:13Speaker 1

Appreciate it.

4:08:14Speaker 5

A lot. And I know you all helped Nadine, but she needs more help

4:08:20Speaker 1

Thank you. With speaker.

4:08:22Speaker 5

Next speaker. Family problems. Okay. Thank you.

4:08:25Speaker 1

Eric Pachelle, followed by Jonathan Anderson, then Heather Schuller. Eric, how

4:08:35Speaker 2

are doing? Eric

4:08:38 – 4:09:18Speaker 52

Packter, good evening. Thank you for your time. I am here recovering from shoulder surgery to express my concern about this dune project on the beach. I I mean, understand the purpose of it and the flooding problems. But let's face it, the beach has been here a lot longer than we have been. Floods and storms come and go. King tide season has been here for a long time. Could be managed, as far as I've heard, with temporary barriers in the gaps. But these dunes are horrendous. I don't know if any of you guys have been there to see them. I don't know if you guys have been there to speak to the people who live there or who have business there. But nobody wants them. And I'm not talking about narrowing them. I'm talking about getting rid of them and finding another solution to them. They limit beach access to people who want to use it.

4:09:21 – 4:09:43Speaker 52

They limit emergency vehicle access. They're hard for they're going to be horrible for businesses. And they're unsightly. I mean, beach is beautiful. It's become a, you know, beach has become a nationally known beach. It's horrible and it's unsightly. And it's got lower property values, ultimately. So I request urgently that we not only narrowing them, but get rid of them and find another solution.

4:09:43Speaker 1

Thank you. Thank you, Eric. Thank you for being here. Anderson, followed by Heather Schiller, then Maria Moraso.

4:09:54 – 4:10:23Speaker 53

Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, and our newly elected city manager. It's good to see diversity in action in Hollywood. Unlike America top positions, we don't have this kind of diversity. I want to also wish my beautiful friend as she stepped up to run for District 6 within Broward County. I wish her success and I'll be there for you.

4:10:23 – 4:11:02Speaker 53

You run against a good friend of mine, but I've known you longer than I've known Ryan. And also, I want to thank the commission for helping me out during my time when I had to high lean on my property. I've complied, they've pretty nice. I still got some work to do. Also, I'm back involved with Washington Park Homeowners Association. I want to appreciate Peter. I grew up in the district that Peter is from. I was at Alex High School, I've seen the Alex last class graduate in 'sixty eight. When I was a kid, that used to be our playground, the gymnasium. Now, that whole complex is fenced off.

4:11:02 – 4:11:38Speaker 53

That tennis court that has about six quarter nests dying, swimming pools is not available to the public, And also, I've been told by the school board, I'm going start going to the school boards now since I've been retired, that that facility is very underutilized. I would like for you all to tell me, do you see anything wrong with me? Do you see anything wrong with my melanated skin? Why in America we still have the fight against the blackness? Why are they going to ban books against the story that's not being told about America?

4:11:39 – 4:12:13Speaker 53

America didn't treat my ancestors well. We say 1865, last Juneteenth, Emancipation Day, but then Jim Crow was born. Then other non just policies were born. And hopefully, this year, I applaud the UN voting that the Transatlantic slave trade was one of the most grievous crime against humanity, that we, as a city, can create a sister arrangement with Ghana or one of the other African countries. We do it to South America.

4:12:14 – 4:12:38Speaker 53

So, it's time for us to play the field straight up because I'll be more up here speaking because I realize right now, like speaker before me said, A lot of people are scared and frightened. You put on your pants just like I do. That's one thing about me, I got educated. Not just from the public school system, I do a lot of personal reading. So, know American history and we need to tell a true story.

4:12:39 – 4:13:00Speaker 53

I think Hollywood could be the real true story because we had a book about diversity, and you're showing it. So, hopefully, I'm going talk to you all about some things that we'd like to see, and like I told my commissioner one about the beach, we have all these bridge crossing without no sand, but one street where they have the kinetics yogurt

4:13:00Speaker 1

You, Jonathan.

4:13:01Speaker 53

is sanded. Thank you.

4:13:03Speaker 1

Thank you, sir. Heather Schiller, followed by Maria Morasso, then Siobhan McLaughlin.

4:13:13 – 4:13:24Speaker 46

JON Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners. My name is Heather, I've been snorkeling our reefs oh, thank you. My name is Heather, and I've been snorkeling our reefs for nearly thirty HENRY: years. We all share the

4:13:24Speaker 1

same goal, and that is safety. Heather, we're going to have an item on that next.

4:13:29Speaker 46

I thought we could speak about anything at the citizen comments.

4:13:32Speaker 1

Well, I just have the city attorney check. Go ahead, city attorney.

4:13:35 – 4:14:00Speaker 30

Due to the policies and procedures of the city commission, it has been decided that no duplicative items, Next. It's considered I'm

4:14:00Speaker 7

It's so okay.

4:14:03Speaker 1

Maria Maraso.

4:14:06Speaker 27

area. Learning the

4:14:08Speaker 48

on, thank you.

4:14:10Speaker 36

I'm going to talk

4:14:12Speaker 1

Okay. On the next item. Right. Siobhan, followed by Jenny Wenschel, who I think is going to speak on that.

4:14:20 – 4:14:59Speaker 32

Siobhan McLaughlin, 1409 Rodman Street. I'd like to echo the comments by Ms. Ralston and Ms. Greenfield about the disrespect for people's time. I know I'm beginning to sound like a broken record about this, but it is not a new concern. Reordering the agenda the way you did just out of the blue is just not fair to the residents. So I would, again, ask that it not happen. Again, the poor planning and time management with the agenda items, scheduling two things at 05:00. I understand the commissioners have every right to express themselves and their feelings, ask questions, and to establish a record. And I fully support that.

4:14:59 – 4:15:38Speaker 32

But I do think sometimes it is repetitive. That as you ask residents sometimes to say already spoken, maybe you could just acknowledge that a point was made before you repeat it. Finally, but I would like to say at some point, maybe the commission could consider adding a requirement for the planning and development department to consider the needs and wishes of the residents. I certainly think in the last few projects that have come up, many of the residents, many of my neighbors feel that the planning and development department is actually out against them. I would use a vulgarity, but I can't quite bring myself to do it.

4:15:38 – 4:16:04Speaker 32

But I am very disappointed in the planning and development staff. And I feel they are just absolutely antagonistic to the residents' request. And it may be because they are not allowed to consider the wishes, the popularity of a project. And I understand that, but perhaps you could add some mechanism where the wishes and desires of the residents in a surrounding project could be considered. And I thank you for your time.

4:16:05 – 4:16:21Speaker 1

Bob Glickman, followed by Pamela Smith, then Isabel Barney, Phyllis Levy, and Andres Bunano. Hello, Bob.

4:16:21 – 4:16:38Speaker 34

Hi. Good evening. Bob Glickman, Hollywood Beach. I'm here to speak about the dunes. But before that, as long as I have everybody here, I just want to mention one more time, we would love to have mid block crosswalks along A1A. So the dunes that they're putting up on the beach are rather

4:16:41Speaker 1

Yeah, go ahead.

4:16:41 – 4:17:23Speaker 34

So the dunes that they're putting up on the beach are not what anybody agreed to. They're overtaking the entire beach. There's no place for anybody to sit. It's really a disaster. They've put the ropes and the posts up already. As of today, they started to take some of them down on the eastern side. But still, they've overtaken the beach. There are areas in front of the Positano, in front of North Beach Park where they already have dunes. And you know what they did? They put dunes in front of the dunes. So what kind of sense does that make to anybody? I don't think it makes any sense at all. What was the point of doing that? Doesn't make any sense. You're taking over the beach.

4:17:23 – 4:17:51Speaker 34

People want to go to the beach to enjoy the beach. There's no place for anybody to sit right now. We have the seaweed coming up. The seaweed is taking up 10 feet of the beach. I don't know about you, but I'm not sitting next to the seaweed. It's not the best smelling thing in the world. So you want to get as far back as you can. How far back can you go? You have to sit behind the dunes between the dunes and the knee wall. But that's for beach equipment.

4:17:53 – 4:18:29Speaker 34

Now we see the beach patrol zooming up and down the beach in this little narrow area of beach. There are people laying down. There were people sitting there. It became a dangerous situation. I know beach patrol has to do their job. They need a speed limit. It's not full out throttle. As they're going along, they need to slow down. I know it's going to take them a little bit longer. I know it's difficult. Sometimes they can't see what's in front of them. But they have to be careful. What's going to happen when the turtles start nesting? We're going to start having the nests. You're going to have the poles around the nests.

4:18:29 – 4:18:58Speaker 34

It's taking up more of the beach. There's less and less room for people to sit. Where in this equation are the residents, the residents of Hollywood? Where are the tourists that we rely on? I spoke to you all about, at our building, have commercial establishments in the front. The dunes are so high. They weren't supposed to be higher than the knee wall. Unplanted, they're over three feet high right now. And the posts are four feet high. What is the point of that?

4:18:59 – 4:19:26Speaker 34

You're going to ruin the business where there are businesses. We did not get an exception like they did at the Marriott. Maybe we need an exception also. And I would like to see you get us get one. I would also like to see you walk this on the agenda today and do something about the Dunes. You've walked items before onto the agenda. I would ask you to do it again to help the residents of Hollywood. We own the beach.

4:19:27 – 4:19:56Speaker 1

Thanks, Bob. Pamela Smith followed by Elizabeth Isabel Barney. I'm sorry? Okay. We'll call it. We'll we'll take that one up. And you are panelist Smith? Yes. How about Ms. Barney also? Okay. Phyllis Levy on this? Okay. And Andres Bunano on 19. Great.

4:19:56 – 4:20:28Speaker 1

Well, that concludes citizen comments, and we do have a special presentation by commissioner Quintana. As you can see, there are school children here, and some of them competed and are winners of a particular Hollywood student art contest and participated in the Sierra Club's plastic waste art competition, Commissioner Quintana. Tell us all about these amazing artists in our city. There we go. We we double pressed. Go ahead.

4:20:29 – 4:20:57Speaker 13

Thank you so much, mayor. Thank you, everyone in the room and everyone who may be watching. I am just so very proud of the young people that you're going to be hearing from in a moment. For the last three years, I've served as a judge for the Sierra Club's plastic waste art contest. The young people are from all over Broward County.

4:20:57 – 4:21:29Speaker 13

And this year, Hollywood was represented by 10 people, 10 young people between sixth and twelfth grade. Next. And most of them are here today. They not only created some amazing creative artwork, but they also wrote essays where they talked about the meaning of their artwork. The theme for this year's plastic waste art contest was water is at the center of everything.

4:21:30 – 4:21:59Speaker 13

The judging included the criteria of creativity, the connection to the theme, and the visual impact of their work. The first, second, and third place winners were all won by Hollywood students. Yes. And so, they're here with their families today. I'm gonna try to make it as quick as I can because I know we've got folks waiting to speak, but please do help me in celebrating them.

4:22:00 – 4:22:19Speaker 13

We have with us today, we have Caitlin Lauzy. Did I say your name right, Caitlin? And, next slide. Caitlin is here and her piece was, out there in the lobby. You'll be able to see it on your way out.

4:22:20 – 4:22:55Speaker 13

The title is Where the Water Meets Our Choices. The results of the choices we make on a daily basis accumulate in our waters, our coastlines, and our bodies. Caitlin's mixed media oil painting blurs the lines between art and reality, and it encourages the viewer to contemplate the materials that harm our oceans and disrupt serenity commonly associated with the sea. We've got Maya Rodriguez and Sheila Wise. Next slide.

4:22:55 – 4:23:50Speaker 13

Maya, she created a piece that reflects on humanity's tendency to overlook the suffering of animals and the environment, using events like the defacement of a Florida manatee and the spread of microplastics to illustrate how carelessness became becomes harm. The artwork urges viewers to confront this indifference, emphasizing that our survival is intertwined with the well-being of wildlife and the ecosystems we damage. It calls for small, consistent acts of responsibility, reminding us that meaningful change begins with everyday choices. Riley, Riley Caston, she's in seventh grade, and the title of her piece is Repurposed Outfit. A piece that's wearable artwork made from repurposed clothes, books, and plastic bags.

4:23:50 – 4:24:18Speaker 13

It transformed discarded materials into a symbol of environmental responsibility, inspired by growing up around polluted beaches and learning how little plastics is truly recycled. The outfit becomes both a creative solution and a call for sustainable action, and it invites viewers to imagine the future shaped by reuse and mindful choices, showing how fashion can help tell the story of the earth and inspire change.

4:24:19 – 4:24:53Speaker 13

Riley. Camilo Agosta, the title of his piece is The Effect of Plastic Waste on the Bird Species. It's all out there in the lobby. It's easy to overlook how our single use plastic lifestyle impacts the marine environment, yet it's over 17,000,000,000 pounds end up in our oceans every year and make their way into the food web. Marine birds are particularly at risk as they get entangled in litter and mistake plastic bits for food, eating them and feeding them to their chicks.

4:24:53 – 4:25:12Speaker 13

And that's what you see in his piece. Amazing that these kids it's all made from garbage and then the art is gorgeous. Third place, we had such a hard time, the judges did. All right, Camilo. There was a tie for third place because they were all so good.

4:25:12 – 4:25:58Speaker 13

This one is Natalie Acostas and the title of her piece is Made of What Kills Us. Natalie's artwork weaves together her Oneida heritage, environmental values, and the personal identity through a series of turtles crafted from recycled materials. Each turtle embodies a different threat caused by human pollution, from plastic ingestion to entanglement, highlighting the urgent dangers marine life faces. The piece serves both as a cultural expression and a call to action, reminding viewers that protecting these sacred creatures is essential to the health of the planet that we all share. Yay, Natalie.

4:26:02 – 4:26:30Speaker 13

Our second third place winner, Vivian Horwath. Vivian came back because she actually was a winner last year as well. And she's a youth ambassador, Commissioner Kalaris reminded me. The title of her piece is Water is the Center of Everything. She created a piece that shows how pesticides from agriculture reach our waterways and eventually our ocean, along with single use plastic microplastics from water bottles, plates, utensils and more.

4:26:31 – 4:27:09Speaker 13

Without proper care of our water sources, the system is at risk of collapse. Change is in the hands of the people. All right, Vivian. And one of our second place winners actually had a very unique I'd never seen this before. Did a claymation piece. It's Mara and Sophie Neiman. And amazing, you know how long it takes to make something like this for these young students in ninth grade. Congratulations to them. And they're not here today, but we can still clap. It's an amazing feat.

4:27:13 – 4:27:44Speaker 13

Our first place winner is she here? Oh, our first place winner, she so proud of her. She lives in Washington Park. She was there with her mother and her art teacher. And this artwork portrays a water nymph figure whose serene upper body contrasts sharply with her pruned, deteriorating lower half, symbolizing the hidden consequences of water misuse and pollution.

4:27:44 – 4:28:09Speaker 13

Built from plastic waste, cardboard, and handmade paper clay, the sculpture reflects how human activity from industrial cooling systems to chemical contamination quietly drains and damages vital water sources and invites viewers to recognize water as an interconnected, vulnerable life force that sustains every part of our world, and that is Faida Legger.

4:28:15 – 4:28:51Speaker 13

The contestants each received a special recognition in Washington, D. C. The congresswoman represented them with a certificate for their work And the judges were presented there with all of the winners. But, out in the display, it's not just the winners. You'll get to see all of the students' work. All of it was excellent. And so, Mayor, I wonder if it would be okay if we took a picture with all of their kids and they brought their families with them, if their families could join us as well.

4:28:52 – 4:29:11Speaker 1

Thank you so much the students here. It's really it makes us proud and excited to see all the creativity and the artistic expression and using all of these different plastic waste items and delivering the message that we all share as well. So come on up. Let's take a photo, everybody. Yes, sir.

4:29:13 – 4:29:32Speaker 14

It's great to see all the children here and the youth that created this artistic stuff to bring awareness to our environment and things like that. But what I want to say is it's a shame that the news is here for a controversial issue, but yet they can't cover this great positive experience.

4:29:34Speaker 2

Well, it's true. But they are only given a signpost.

4:29:38Speaker 13

We don't want their families to You

4:29:40Speaker 2

don't want to bring your phone?

4:29:41Speaker 1

Well, we've got the news right there, Arlene. Right?

4:29:44Speaker 12

Yeah. No. I'm gonna make

4:29:45Speaker 1

We're gonna spread the word on social media. Yeah.

4:29:49Speaker 2

Because that's really important.

4:29:59Speaker 13

Congratulations.

4:30:04Speaker 2

Oh, mom. Come on. She wants to take a picture. Come on, girls. Back up.

4:30:07Speaker 13

I want to I can just make an announcement.

4:30:09Speaker 1

Go ahead. You're at Caleri?

4:30:14Speaker 1

Go ahead, you don't want to.

4:30:15Speaker 46

Okay, wait. Picture first.

4:30:18Speaker 2

I don't think we were looking. Take it again. We weren't looking.

4:30:27Speaker 13

And I just have one more thing I want to announce. You guys, it's a total surprise for you, but your pieces are gonna be on exhibit at the Art and Culture Center.

4:30:37 – 4:31:01Speaker 13

Starting in the next couple of days, you'll see it there, and then it'll be there until the end of the month. And there's a special reception, which you'll get an invitation in honor of your work at the City of Hollywood's Art and Culture Center. Thank you to the Sierra group, Broward Sierra group for your work in helping these students do this work.

4:31:15 – 4:31:36Speaker 1

All right. Thank you all so much. Let's give them a moment to leave. 21? No.

4:31:37 – 4:32:14Speaker 1

Let's go ahead with 19, though, since it's popular. Alright. Item 19, ladies and gentlemen. And I and I wanna tell you, we had a room full of people for item 20 about the zoning issue, and so, you know, we had to pick, pick one. And so I'm sorry if you had to wait longer than, longer than 01:30. You definitely have. But as you can see, some of these items take hours. Alright. Let's go ahead to item 19. It's an ordinance on second reading advertised in conformance with state statutes and city codes.

4:32:15 – 4:32:39Speaker 1

This is an ordinance of the city commission, City Of Hollywood, Florida, amending chapter 98 of the code of ordinances entitled Marine and Waterway Regulations, Boats, and Other Vessels to Create a Vessel Exclusion Zone providing for a Subability Clause and a Repeal Provision. This is from the Department of Fire, Rescue, and Beach Safety. And before us, we have our wonderful chief of fire, rescue, and beach safety, Chief Levy. Welcome, sir.

4:32:39 – 4:33:04Speaker 9

Mayor, Vice Mayor, Commissioners, City Staff, the item before you today is a second reading of proposed amendment to chapter 98 of the city code titled Marine and Waterway Regulations, Boats and Other Vessels. This ordinance is the first formal step, as you know, in mandating the permitting process for establishing the designated vessel exclusionary zone. There are a couple of changes from the first reading that were discussed. And I'll just itemize those real quick. There's a few changes.

4:33:05 – 4:33:38Speaker 9

As discussed at the first reading at the will of the commission, the change was made. Originally, it was stead east of the mean high water line. And it was changed to East of the mean low water line for the second revision here. And then there was a couple of clerical errors that were corrected, one being where it said underwater diving regulations more than 100 feet from the shore. We just made it to conform with chapter 99, where it says more than 150 feet, 50 yards from the shore in accordance with section 99.

4:33:39 – 4:33:59Speaker 9

Cleaned up some language, equipping where it said equipped with a float and dive flag. We just made it say equipped with a float and state of Florida approved diver down flag. And then where it said prominently visible for 200 or excuse me, 300 yards, it was changed to just prominently visible for the dive flag. So those were the changes from reading one to reading two.

4:33:59Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. So to say it in a nutshell, chief, if you're swimming farther out than 50 yards, then the rule is you need a state approved diver down flag.

4:34:09Speaker 1

And then from there on out, beyond the vessel exclusion zone, a boat is supposed to stay how far away from a diver down flag?

4:34:17Speaker 9

State statute states that boat has to remain 100 yards from a diver down flag.

4:34:21 – 4:34:53Speaker 1

300 feet beyond. Okay. Thank you. All right. Thank you so much. Let's go ahead and hear from any speakers on item 19. Go ahead and open the public hearing. So if you're here to speak on this item, please make sure you've filled out a speaker card. I do have a stack, so you probably all have filled them out. Alright. Jenny Wenschel, please come on up. Hey, I'm a fan too.

4:34:53Speaker 3

Alright. Well, we need to be done.

4:34:54Speaker 1

We've we've been scuba diving together.

4:34:56Speaker 3

Yeah. Yeah. We have. We need to do it again.

4:34:58 – 4:35:32Speaker 54

Alright. Hi, everybody. As you know, my name is Jenny. And I am an avid diver. And I have done bleh. I'm nervous, sorry. And I've done hundreds of beach dives locally over the past thirty years. Beach diving, for anybody that doesn't know, is a type of diving where you enter the water from the shore. Typically, it involves gearing up on land, walking to the water, and surface swimming a distance out before descending onto the reef. If you look out onto the ocean and the near shore water is a light color, that's all sand.

4:35:32 – 4:36:17Speaker 54

The dark color is where the reef begins. It's not uncommon for us to swim much further out, either on the surface or underwater, depending on our dive plan. Per Florida statue, I must carry or display a diver down flag. The minimum measurement is 12 inches by 12 inches. It's that big. It's protecting me from boats. This, that flag, and my own personal awareness, is the only thing that's protecting me out there. My biggest fear of diving is not sharks. It's not barracudas with smiley teeth or lionfish or fireworms. Lionfish have spines.

4:36:17 – 4:36:58Speaker 54

They can put you in the hospital. My biggest fear out there on the water is boats. Boats. Boats that are driven by people who do not know what a diver down flag is or simply choose to ignore the 100 foot boundary per state statue. I've been diving in Hollywood on Yellow Brick Road, which is straight off of Margaritaville, and had a boat nearly miss my flag. I heard the boat coming. I hunkered down low onto the reef so I wouldn't get caught. And I hoped that I didn't have a sudden emergency where I suddenly had to surface and deal with that boat. I looked up. I did see the prop wash.

4:36:58 – 4:37:23Speaker 54

They were that close to me. They were right above me. My fear is that I'm sorry. I've been beach hiving in other locations where on a regular basis boaters completely disregard the exclusion zones and dive flag boundaries, oblivious to the lifeguards yelling and screaming at them to leave. My fear is that by bringing the boating exclusion zones closer to shore, you're putting more people at risk.

4:37:24 – 4:37:52Speaker 54

It's dangerous enough for us locals who know the risks. Tourists who swim, snorkel and dive off the beach and don't know the rules and regulations combined with boaters who are not paying attention creates a recipe for disasters. Divers and snorkelers must have dive flags, yet boaters openly disregard them with minimal repercussions. We've all seen the boats close to shore flying at high speed. I've been on the surface and seen those boats coming at me.

4:37:52 – 4:38:11Speaker 54

And let me tell you, it's not a good feeling. I have no idea if that boater is paying attention, has seen me, and will take appropriate action or not. Please, bringing the exclusion zone closer to shore is a safety issue. And thank you for listening.

4:38:12Speaker 1

Thank you, Jenny. Let's go to Isabel Barney, followed by Marci Celentani.

4:38:24Speaker 27

Marcy left you. Okay. Good

4:38:28 – 4:38:51Speaker 40

afternoon. I've been here before, basically saying the same thing. And, there is such a thing that says do over and over and things might change. So I'm here hoping that things might change. The proposal to move the Hollywood vessel exclusion line from 300 yards to two eighteen yards off shore.

4:38:52 – 4:39:18Speaker 40

The change create real safety risk. Our near shore reef is not like offshore dive sites. Divers typically dive only 10 to 20 feet below the surface. That means snorkelers and divers are much closer to both traffic and propellers. Dive flags alone are not enough, even experienced boaters struggle to see them at speed or in rough conditions.

4:39:19 – 4:39:46Speaker 40

And many operators in our waters are inexperienced. There also seems to be a misunderstanding about access to the first reef. Short access to the reef is difficult. Swimming 200 to 300 yards through waves, currents, tides with gears, sometimes seagrasses and stinging jellyfish all make it very challenging. From a boat, it's often just a short swim.

4:39:47 – 4:40:09Speaker 40

So moving boats closer doesn't improve access. It increases conflict between boats and people in the water. Also consider that shore divers and snorkelers directly support our local economy. They use public parks, visit beach site restaurants, and support local businesses. Protecting safe shore access helps protect city revenue.

4:40:10 – 4:40:50Speaker 40

There is also environmental impact. Anchoring on shallow reef and rock ledges causes direct and lasting damage. These systems are fragile and slow to recover, bringing boats closer, increasing risk. As Julie mentioned in the past, a better solution would be installing mooring buoys to prevent anchoring damage to the reef. This reef is one of the only living near shore reefs in our Continental United States. It supports tourism and makes our city unique. Please keep the 300 yard vessel exclusion line in place to protect our reef, keep us safe, and support our local economy. Thank you.

4:41:00 – 4:41:13Speaker 1

You said Marcy left, right? Mike Ryan, followed by Phyllis Levy. Good evening.

4:41:13 – 4:41:46Speaker 25

Good evening, guys. Thank you very much. Are you are we voting on this tonight? Yes. We are. Very good. My name is Mike Ryan. Have lived in Hollywood for almost eight years. I would like to thank Mr. Mayor and the City Council for hearing please today. I'm an avid scuba diver. I have a Facebook group with almost 1,200 members. We dive in Hollywood waters on the regular. Perry Street, which Jen just talked about, we hit about once a month. The western edge of the Perry Street site, which is absolutely fantastic.

4:41:46 – 4:41:59Speaker 25

If you guys have never been out there, I invite all of you. I'll take you out there and show you. It's absolutely beautiful. It's made up of these huge rocks that are about as big as your car. And the very western edge of that site is at 200 yards.

4:41:59 – 4:42:33Speaker 25

So boats would be directly over the site the way it is now at 300 feet. It's just a little tiny sliver of the eastern edge of the site. So if you guys pass this resolution, it's gonna put boats directly on top of that site, which would be extremely dangerous for me, all the members of my group and anybody who wants to utilize that particular site. I worked on dive charters part time. And as a dive professional, when you're on the boat and you're up at the very top looking out for flags, they're extremely hard to see.

4:42:34 – 4:42:48Speaker 25

Jen would say it's a one foot by one foot. So if you're up on top of a boat looking for a flag, they're really, really hard to see. And we've got folks coming in that don't know our waters. They don't know where the dive sites are. They don't know to be aware enough to be looking for dive flags.

4:42:49 – 4:43:21Speaker 25

So bringing them closer to where we're trying to dive is just a recipe for an accident and waiting. There was an accident two weeks ago I don't know if you guys heard over in Venice where a woman was diving with her boyfriend. And her flag got grabbed by a boat and she got yanked up from 30 feet. And if you don't know about diving, if you get pulled to the surface immediately, that can cause a decompression sickness, which can be incredibly potentially deadly neurological issues, cardiac issues if you get an embolism that pops into your blood. So that's extremely dangerous.

4:43:21 – 4:43:40Speaker 25

We don't want that to happen here in Hollywood. You guys have invested a lot of money in artificial reefs. You're trying to market Hollywood as an eco tourist destination. So moving boats closer to where those things are just doesn't make any sense. I guess the fire department has a feeling that if you move them closer, then people maybe aren't going to swim as far out.

4:43:40 – 4:44:21Speaker 25

That's a problem that is going to exist anyway. People are going to go out past the buoy. Just because there's a buoy there doesn't mean that somebody swimming out to it is going to stop at that particular spot, especially if the reef is an additional 100 or two yards beyond where the buoys are going to be placed, if you guys pass this resolution. Like some other folks said, Hollywood is extremely unique that we have this reef so close to the shore. I've been all around the world that it really does not exist in many places. So we need to be very, very careful about protecting me and my group and all of the folks that are enjoying their waters and enjoying it from underneath the water. Thank you.

4:44:21 – 4:44:48Speaker 1

Thanks, Mike. I just want to point out, Mike, that up on the screen is a line that shows where the reefs are. And just as you look, there's Perry Street depicted right there. And the gray area there is the artificial reef, the boulders that dive. And notice that it's east of the 218 line. And if the line were, for argument's sake, 300 yards, that would be dead right on that reef. And so if you look at

4:44:48Speaker 29

It's not. The dashed line

4:44:49 – 4:45:10Speaker 1

is two eighteen, and the first solid line is 300. And I just want to point out that right now, as you all know, there are no buoys at all. And so it's not as if we're bringing anything in. It's that, for the first time ever, there'll be a protected vessel exclusion that protects not only divers, but also beachgoers and everything else. So I just wanted to point that out.

4:45:10Speaker 25

In that invitation though, you're bringing them too close.

4:45:12Speaker 1

I gotcha. Phyllis Levy, followed by Pamela Smith.

4:45:17 – 4:45:55Speaker 55

Good afternoon. Is this good? Okay. Good afternoon, mayor and commissioners. My name is Phyllis Levy. I have lived in South Florida since 1978. And I recently moved to North Beach. And it's gorgeous. It's amazing. I can't believe what a paradise this is. And I recently went snorkeling for the first time. This whole thing is brand new to me. So I plan to go often with my friends and family. And I'm new to this whole controversy. There's people who live in my building who are very dedicated.

4:45:56 – 4:46:35Speaker 55

And they really have spent so much time working on this issue. And I believe that they're right. My biggest concern has always been safety. I have worked for traffic safety issues. And now, of course, this is another safety issue that I'm dealing with. And I never realized how dangerous it is to be out there snorkeling if a boat is coming along. And it would be a terrible tragedy if someone was injured or killed by a boater. And now you have new people doing this, like me. And I don't even have a dive flag yet. So that's something I'll get.

4:46:35 – 4:46:56Speaker 55

And you have new people who rent boats. And they don't know the deal. So our job is to make everybody safe. And the placement of boys, which you will be considering, is crucial in this matter. Right now, the existing 300 yard line places boat activity near or over areas along our reef system.

4:46:56 – 4:47:30Speaker 55

So that's already on top. Listen, I've been listening to this, and we're all lobbying for 300 yards. I've looked at it, and I think 400 yards would be much more sensible getting past those reefs. But I think we can compromise at 300 if you're able to do that. And moving the boundary closer to shore to the two eighteen yard would significantly increase overlap and bring the boat traffic directly into areas where many people are actively snorkeling today.

4:47:30 – 4:48:00Speaker 55

What I'm asking is simple, that the boundary is placed where it truly separates boats from swimmers, creating a clear safety buffer that prevents overlap in active reef areas. As a new snorkeler, I want to feel confident that when I enter the water, I'm not sharing the same space as motorized boats. We all share the same ocean. We all want safe access and safe enjoyment of these reefs. Thank you for your time and for considering public safety in this decision. Thank you.

4:48:00 – 4:48:13Speaker 1

Thank you. Pamela Smith followed by, I think we already heard from Heather Schuller, right? No? Not yet? Okay, I'm sorry. It's just a name that I saw. All right, Pamela Smith.

4:48:13 – 4:48:52Speaker 56

Yes. Hello? Can you hear me? Hi. I want to thank you so much for honoring the schoolchildren and doing recycling. I loved it. And it gives me hope for the future and the environment, which is why we're here about nineteen. Good, good afternoon. I want to thank you for allowing me to speak to you about an issue that I truly believe is a major and long reaching importance for our beautiful city and shoreline. I am not a snorkeler, probably because I read Jaws at an early age.

4:48:53 – 4:49:27Speaker 56

But my friends and loved ones are, not counting all of our wonderful tourists. I don't need to have a firsthand knowledge about being under the water to know how dangerous it is to combine boats and swimmers. The scarred backs of our manatees prove that flesh and propellers don't mix very well. My heart says that this is a very clear safety vote. But in issues like these I've been around for a

4:49:28 – 4:50:10Speaker 56

And history has taught me it is often the bottom line, which is money. That is the winning point. So I appeal to you to remember the incredible amount of time and tax dollars that have gone into refurbishing our reefs and building the Thousand Mermaid Project, which is a huge tourist and ecological success. Careless and inexperienced boaters and I'm sure none of you but they'll be coming, and they will destroy what has taken so long to build and accomplish. Please don't make this mistake.

4:50:10 – 4:50:35Speaker 56

That will take a decade to rectify and rebuild that fragile ecosystem that you've worked so hard to build. And as a PS, I implore you to imagine the liability and bad publicity if anyone, especially a tourist, is injured because of a bad vote today. And thank you so much.

4:50:37Speaker 1

SHULAR, followed by Julie Greenfield.

4:50:45 – 4:51:13Speaker 46

That's right this time. Good afternoon again, Mayor and Commissioners. My name is Heather. I've been snorkeling our reefs for nearly thirty years. We all share the same goal here today, and that is safety. We appreciate the effort to create clear boundaries. But in Hollywood, where that boundary is placed matters just as much as having one. I'd like to address four points. One, buoys at two eighteen yards will not create separation. It will create overlap.

4:51:13 – 4:51:50Speaker 46

A couple of people have already said this today. One of our most popular snorkeling destinations, Perry Rocks, begins ironically at exactly two eighteen yards. Boats attracted to buoys at two eighteen yards would be legally positioned directly over snorkelers. That is not a safety zone. That's a collision course. Two, Hollywood won't be safer simply because two eighteen is farther out than other cities. Most cities are only protecting beach swimmers. They don't have the reef attractions or the high volume of shore snorkelers that we have. Dania Beach already operates with a 300 yard boundary and no buoys. That is our neighbor.

4:51:51 – 4:52:31Speaker 46

Three, the solution here is simple. Fire Chief Levy's common sense recommendation was to place boundaries outside near shore reefs. That logic is exactly right. We just need to apply it to other popular near shore reefs, not only the Mermaid reefs. The recommendation from active snorkelers and divers in Hollywood is to place the boundary past the inner reef. This would achieve true separation. It would keep the boaters on one side of that reef ledge and it would keep the snorkelers on the other. That is a true safety win for all. Four, Hollywood is different from other cities. I just recently learned this fact.

4:52:31 – 4:53:02Speaker 46

There are only three other cities in all of Florida with the shore access this close to the Florida coral reef tract. Just north and south of us, it's much harder to reach from shore. Here in Hollywood, it's just a ten minute swim with fins. Our extraordinary proximity to one of the largest reef ecosystems in the entire world, combined with our mermaid reefs, means we have a responsibility other cities simply don't have. Hollywood holds the Blue Wave Beach Award for safety and habitat conservation.

4:53:02 – 4:53:47Speaker 46

We are a city that leads. We have the obligation to protect shore snorkelers accessing one of the rarest natural resources on the planet. Broward Reefs already generate 2,100,000,000 annually. We know this. Safe access is not just a safety issue. It's the foundation of our economic future. In closing, please, please take the time. Review the new information that continues to come forward before finalizing this decision. Our ask is simple. Please place boundaries past the inner reef ledge for true separation, for fair and safe reef access for all, and for the continued national recognition this extraordinary city deserves. Thank Thank you so much for your time and consideration.

4:53:51Speaker 1

JULIE Greenfield, GREENFIELD: followed by Maria Moroso.

4:53:56 – 4:54:29Speaker 51

Hi. Thank you, commission. As a boater, diver, snorkeler, paddle boarder, water sport enthusiast, you name Pretty it, much, mermaid everything, I have really looked at this from every angle and trying to think of what is the safest zone. And I truly believe that is what we all want, whether it's our city staff as well as the commission, without impeding anyone's rights. One of the things that hasn't been talked about, again, today is this idea of a straight line, right?

4:54:29 – 4:55:05Speaker 51

There was talk about mirroring what Hollendale had at two eighteen yards. So when you're coming up from Miami, we have a straight line. Well, I think we all can recognize that, just like on land, there isn't a straight line in boating. In fact, boaters know this better than drivers because you have channel markers. Whether it's in the ICW, out on the Keys, or anywhere else, if you're not within those red and green channel markers, you're going to run aground. Well, does that mean? That means you're going to damage your vessel. Sometimes you might get stuck. I get to watch it all the time behind my house in the ICW when it's at low tide. It's actually kind of comical.

4:55:06 – 4:55:47Speaker 51

But we're talking about boats. Sure, could cost hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars on some of these vessels, but we're not talking about boats. We're talking about people, okay? We're talking about people being in the way of these boats. I've sent you, just yesterday, a video that I took on March 23, trying to relax on the beach, into where that 12 by 12 flag I took it. I watched some video. I'm watching it, watching it As it waved, as we've all talked about, depending on the conditions of the wind and the ocean, it is not always visible. It was a very near miss of this scuba diver. Now, we're saying, well, that's because we don't have buoys. If we had buoys, it wouldn't be a problem.

4:55:48 – 4:56:33Speaker 51

No, not necessarily. Because now, when you have a buoy, that boat says, hey, I can legally come up to that line. And yes, there's going to be people that are not familiar with boating and the boating laws here in Florida because of our tourists and how easy it is to rent all these boats. And what's going to happen is they're going to try to tie up to the buoy. Okay, well, yes, it's going to say no and whatever. But who's out there monitoring all of this? As I stated earlier in my citizen comments, I am part of the Marine Advisory Committee for the county. I brought this up to the county and asked. The law enforcement officers that were there said that it is the city's responsibility for law enforcement to monitor 300 yards out. What a convenience on that line.

4:56:33 – 4:56:56Speaker 51

I asked. I said, wait a minute. What about the grant money that we're voting on? Can they be used for the after hour support for the city of Hollywood? Absolutely not. That grant money is for inland waterway. So my question, too, to this commission is, have you thought about who is going to police it literally with the boats, and how much money this is going to cost the city?

4:56:57Speaker 1

Thank you. Maria Morasso. Guys, do the jazz hands. Morasso, followed by Ari Spirit.

4:57:05Speaker 36

Okay. We moved very recently here, so I'm new to the proceedings.

4:57:12 – 4:57:30Speaker 36

we live in paradise, and we have it. I have a very, just very simple question to all of it. Why are we even considering this? Why are we considering something that is already, we need the boys, yes, but at 300, why make it 200?

4:57:31Speaker 57

It doesn't exist. Does not.

4:57:33Speaker 1

Okay, keep going, Mr.

4:57:34 – 4:57:58Speaker 36

Zuckerberg. Well, then, excuse me, I don't live here, but then why? Then please consider all I'm not going to reiterate what has been said about the reefs, environment, security. Just then make it if 300 is hypothetically what has been working until now, then let's consider putting the buoys there, not something less that is going to have all these effects. Thank you.

4:57:58 – 4:58:18Speaker 1

Thank you, Ms. Moroso. Ari Spirit, followed by Martha Hernandez. Alright, left. Martha from Fort Lauderdale. Where's Martha? Not here. Siobhan, Siobhan McLaughlin, followed by Andres Bonano.

4:58:21 – 4:58:50Speaker 32

TALK ABOUT A Marathon. Good afternoon again. Siobhan McLaughlin, 1409 Rodman Street. And I neglected to introduce and thank Raelyn and welcome her as our new city manager. I'm here to ask you to reconsider your vote, changing the boating barrier from 300 to two eighteen yards and leave the current boundary in place. I'm not much of a beachgoer. I'm not a diver. I'm not a snorkeler. And ordinarily, I would not comment on a proposal like this. And I would leave it to more informed and passionate members of the community.

4:58:50 – 4:59:13Speaker 32

I can, however, mention, as I worked as an RN in the Ryder Trauma Center in Miami, the potential for devastating and deadly accidents from propeller or boating accidents. I've seen these wounds. I've comforted families and friends in the TICU after such accidents. These wounds are horrific. They are a potential for traumatic amputations, head injuries, massive blood loss, and even death.

4:59:14 – 4:59:46Speaker 32

The potential for just one accident or death should be reason enough not to change the boundary. I did a very cursory review of the literature this morning. It points out that motorboat propeller injuries can result in extensive damage to soft tissue bones with severe functional disability, amputations, and high mortality. There are still no recommendations and protocols for the management of such injuries, blah, blah, blah. And although there are several potential solutions that aim to prevent or ease motorboat propeller injuries, there is still lack of consistent regulations.

4:59:47 – 5:00:18Speaker 32

I would like to point out, and I read that because not one study recommended lowering the safety barrier between boater and the public. For a city to endanger its residents visitors so recklessly without good reason is hard to understand. For a city to endanger its reputation as a friendly beach destination among visitors, snorkelers, swimmers is foolish. The consequences of just one tragic accident should be enough to leave the 300 yard barrier alone. And I respectfully urge you to do so. Thank you.

5:00:18 – 5:00:29Speaker 1

JOSHUA Andres Bonanno, followed by last speaker, Brian Perruz. BERNSTEIN: Good afternoon.

5:00:29 – 5:00:58Speaker 58

I'm a scientist. And as a scientist who recently moved here, one of the things that you do is you look at data, you analyze it, and you look at it different ways. And then you come to a logical conclusion of what that data is telling you. So I'm sitting here listening to all this discussion, reading this. And all of a sudden, I'm going, are we looking at this the wrong way? I haven't heard why you want to change it. What are we getting for that change? What benefit does it have? Is it monetary? Is it what's the reason?

5:00:58 – 5:01:38Speaker 58

I haven't heard a single reason yet brought up. What favors you going from 300 to 118? So it's true. We discussed this earlier. There is not a good study that has good quantitative data about the safety difference between two eighteen versus 300. But shouldn't we in the side of caution? So what are good reasons not to change the present situation? And you've heard several today. Number one, safety. So if safety is a major thing, and you don't want a city that has a bad reputation because a boat ran over a tourist or somebody that just moved here.

5:01:38 – 5:02:14Speaker 58

Isn't it better to mutate it at 300? Second, isn't it ironic? We gave award earlier today for environment. We had students who got awards for environment. And now what we're talking about is brigging boats very close to the coral reef or above the coral reef, which have active motors. And you have to have also a throw you have to anchor somewhere. So you throw your anchor, you destroy coral. So what is the logic? Isn't one of the beautiful things around here that we have one of the most beautiful coral reefs close to shore? And isn't that good for the reputation of Hollywood?

5:02:15 – 5:02:53Speaker 58

So again, what's the logic? And third, we also know, because we're human, we know what happens when you set limits. You put a limit of 30 miles an hour for your speed, everybody goes 35. You put a limit of 50 miles an hour, you go 55. So what you're doing is simply bringing that persons that are not respecting that limit and let me tell you, we've seen a lot of people that don't respect that limit when I'm out at the beach. You're bringing them even closer. So what are you gaining by this? So let me finish again. I think we're discussing the wrong question. The wrong question is not, why should we go to two eighteen?

5:02:53 – 5:03:04Speaker 58

The question is, why are you requesting to change from 300 to 18? What are you getting back for it? I am unclear about that. As a scientist, I would never make a decision that way.

5:03:05Speaker 3

Thank you. We have

5:03:08 – 5:03:21Speaker 1

one last speaker. Let's go ahead and hear from Brian Pruis, and then the commission in the order in which I have the buzzing. Hey, JAMES

5:03:21 – 5:03:56Speaker 57

Just a short person. Mr. Mayor, vice mayor, members of the great commission of Hollywood, Florida, and to Raelynn Story, our new city manager, congratulations on the promotion of city staff. Thanks for all you do. I want to start off by saying thank you to all of you for the hard work that you do. Sometimes it's thankless work. But it's not, because I'm telling you, I thank you for everything you've done for Hollywood. That being said, my name is Brian Perruis. I'm a local attorney, business owner, one block from City Hall. I live at 820 Harrison Street, near Terry Cantrell's house, for the record.

5:03:56 – 5:04:34Speaker 57

He is my neighbor, good friend as well. I don't have a boat, but I like boating. I don't dive. But my dad was a competitive free diver and escaped communism in Cuba by swimming Guantanamo Bay, in case you didn't know that. That being said, I sat here in the audience and met some really great people from my neighborhood, from District 1 where I live, who are concerned about what's happening and what may happen. So I listened. Some of them left. And I said, Well, I'm here. I listened to what you had to say, and I agree with a lot of what you're saying. Would you like me to step in and support you?

5:04:34 – 5:05:09Speaker 57

And they said, Yes. So I'm here supporting the divers and the boaters of our community. And all I'm asking for is for you to listen, which I think you are. I want you to take into account that they're looking for maximum separation between boats and divers, boats and swimmers, scuba or snorkelers? I don't think that's too much to ask. And I think we're going in the right direction with this. 14 year old kids can drive boats. We all know that. I have an 18 year old kid who's a great driver.

5:05:09Speaker 9

I have a 22 year

5:05:10 – 5:05:33Speaker 57

old daughter who's so so. It is what it is. We have a lot of tourists in the area. They rent boats and they can do whatever they want. And they do most of the time. And they're drinking and having a great time. So I get their concern. My background I used to be a federal agent. I did reinforcement for the Department of Justice. I have a little bit of understanding of this. And all I ask for you is to listen and do the best you can to keep our divers and boaters safe. Thank you very much. Have a great evening.

5:05:34 – 5:06:15Speaker 1

Thank you, Brian. All right. That concludes the speaker cards on the second reading of this ordinance. I just do want to point out, and thank you for all recognizing that safety is an important thing, of course. As someone who is a boater and also a scuba diver, obviously, we all agree about that. We all know the dangers of shallow water scuba diving and the proximity to boats. And that, yes, it is hard sometimes for boats that don't have big center consoles and hot tall bows. It's kinda hard for them to see the area immediately in front of them. I have a very small boat and I can see very closely. But so the risk is obviously there for divers all the time.

5:06:15 – 5:06:39Speaker 1

Anytime you're in a in a with that small dive flag, I agree. Sometimes in in wave action, it's especially, it's hard to see. But when we saw this item for the first during the first reading, this map in front of us was produced. And we all have the interest of having everything safe. We also want understand that people like to scuba dive from boats as well.

5:06:39 – 5:07:28Speaker 1

And so we take into account where boats can access, that boats want to reach these reefs as well and scuba dive. And when you take a look at the line of the two eighteen, which was consistent with the city to our south, city of Hallandale Beach, you can see where the line is, where sometimes it's west of the reef line. And other times, it's over the reef. And then you look at where the 300 yard line is, and that's totally above the reef line as well. And so my point really is that knowing the waters out there and knowing the reefs out there, anywhere from 160 yards I'm looking over here to more than four thirty yards, the entire area is a dive able, enjoyable reef area.

5:07:29 – 5:07:54Speaker 1

And so there's also limitations as to where state or whichever the enforcement authority is chief, I think it's the state allows the restriction of boating as well. And so when the city had proffered two eighteen yards to be consistent with the city to our south and the buoys there, the chief had spoken with, I think, the regulating authorities over at the state. Chief, maybe you can tell us where you've gotten to.

5:07:55 – 5:08:18Speaker 9

So yes, mayor. So we've communicated with the state, obviously, at the beginning of this and since then. And the state takes every exclusionary zone on a case by case basis. So it's all predicated on an ordinance passing. They do review the draft language ahead of time as a courtesy. They did review our language. They did say that it meets their requirements. But ultimately, it's taken on a case by case basis.

5:08:18 – 5:08:39Speaker 1

All right. Thank you, chief. So look, my short point is that whether it's two eighteen or if you're pushing boats an extra three fifty feet into water, it's all going to be a dive area. And so you do have to pick a line. And the map shows it more than we can suggest that we know by heart.

5:08:39 – 5:09:09Speaker 1

And this wasn't a map that I produced. It was a map that was produced that's available and is a scientific map, so to speak. And so, again, for boats to access the reefs for sufficient distance from the shoreline, two eighteen is a a ample distance. I think it'll it'll keep people safe, of course. The exclusion zone will be substantial, larger than any other beach from Miami Beach North to beyond Fort Lauderdale.

5:09:09 – 5:09:54Speaker 1

We'd be the farthest and the most expansive vessel exclusion zone that there is in South Florida at two eighteen yards, six sixty some odd feet. And I think that that's a substantial distance. And keep in mind that what we'll what we always want to see is, of course, boaters managing their vessels safely. And whether or not there is a buoy or not, we all depend on that boater for responsible being boater. Right now, there's no buoys. There's never been. I've been scuba diving for thirty years or more. And all of you have been scuba diving for many years without a buoy. Now we'll have buoys. It'll be better in that way.

5:09:54 – 5:10:18Speaker 1

But you've always relied to date, to boaters being aware and keeping you safe. And that's not going to change buoy or not. We're all going to rely on boaters seeing those dive flags, buoy or not. So in any case, let's go to the commissioners. Let's go to Commissioner Schuham, then Hernandez and Biederman.

5:10:19 – 5:10:46Speaker 15

Thank you, Mayor. You know, I think I made it clear the last time, and I'll reiterate, I can't support the two eighteen yards. It is a random number based on unpermitted buoys that exist in Hallandale. Maybe now they'll apply for permitting. But it was a completely random number, whereas Hollywood has always had an ordinance of 300 yards.

5:10:46 – 5:11:14Speaker 15

Now, you can say that that wasn't approved by FWC. But this city and our law enforcement, over the years, have enforced their 300 yards. So we are, in essence, bringing boats closer. So to the mayor's point, I think that what the residents are saying is that this city has acted in ways to encourage shore diving. We put in near shore artificial reefs.

5:11:14 – 5:11:39Speaker 15

We have the Perry Rocks there. And this is something that we've encouraged people to do, learn how to do, and are passionate about. We have not had a single person come and speak to us that says two eighteen yards is better than 300. So the question is and I agree with the scientists why move it closer? I totally understand, Commissioner Gruber, your desire to have these buoys.

5:11:39 – 5:12:00Speaker 15

But have them at 300 yards. That's what the residents are saying. It makes no sense what we're doing here. Yes, you're always going to have the buoy line, unless we go out past four thirty yards, which no one has even suggested. You're always going to have the buoy line cross over some portion of the reef.

5:12:01 – 5:12:43Speaker 15

But to reduce the distance from shore that swimmers can have confidence that no boats will be permitted to reduce that area is just simply nonsensical. And there is not a safety official in this audience that would say putting a buoy line at two eighteen is safer than putting a buoy line at 300. They may say a buoy line at 300 is safer than no buoy line. But it doesn't make sense to bring things closer than what this community has put up with and lived with and gotten used to and boaters and experts, and people that take groups of divers. So I want to thank you for convincing the community that we can live with these buoys.

5:12:43 – 5:13:13Speaker 15

Well, this is the first time it's come before us. When it was presented to us back in September, there was a lot of misinformation about the two eighteen. But what we do know is that the Dania Beach Pier is at two eighty five yards, And a boat is not going to get within 15 yards of that pier. So coming from north to south, 300 yards also makes sense for boaters. So I wish that I could jump on this.

5:13:13 – 5:13:54Speaker 15

And I would if it were at 300 yards. We would get the buoy lines. We would have this kind of consent that is of interest to all of us to not have these disparities, but to arbitrarily reduce to two eighteen, based on a discussion that never happened before September, I believe, in contrast to adhering and holding up the 300 yards that we had always had in our ordinances, is nonsensical. So I would make a motion to amend to keep everything that our chief has put into this ordinance exactly as he has it. But wherever two eighteen yards is printed, it is amended to 300. And that's my motion.

5:13:55 – 5:14:06Speaker 1

All right. We have a motion for 300 yards. Is there a second at this time? Motion dies for lack of second. Let's continue discussion. Commissioner Hernandez.

5:14:08 – 5:14:32Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. I'd like to ask mister Andrea if I can ask you a question. If you can come up, please, if you don't mind. You said that you don't support us moving the buoys closer because you feel that there's a 300 yard ordinance, correct? Where did you get that information?

5:14:33Speaker 58

I don't understand what your question is. I'm sorry.

5:14:37Speaker 8

Where did you get the information that a 300 yard ordinance exists?

5:14:41Speaker 58

Well, my understanding is that that's what exists at the present time and that's what's been followed thus far.

5:14:47 – 5:15:26Speaker 8

JOSEPH That is incorrect information. Okay. JOSEPH No, no. And that's the reason I asked because sometimes the public gets misinformed. And I just ask, I've asked in the past our fire chief if there is an ordinance and there is no ordinance at the state level. I have asked our fire, I mean our police chief if there's an ordinance at 300 yards and they said no because there's no way of measuring it. So I like to know where that information comes from because it's pitting the public against us. I want to know, could somebody please cite the source with that information Please. Comes from. Yeah.

5:15:26Speaker 58

But let me ask this. Is it even a relevant question? If you're saying we're going to go from 300 to two

5:15:32Speaker 8

eighteen No. Nobody's saying that we're going from 300 to two eighteen.

5:15:35Speaker 58

the document says that you have posted online, that you have posted for this meeting.

5:15:40Speaker 8

I can tell you that I'm not aware of a 300 yard ordinance that exists.

5:15:46 – 5:15:59Speaker 8

And that is the reason that we're going with the two eighteen in order to highlight it. So I'll ask the people that do know. Because if the document says that, then we may very well be misleading. I like to ask the attorney and the chief.

5:15:59 – 5:16:17Speaker 58

But may I ask you then, you or the rest of the panel that did not want to second this, can you give me a reason why you would go from 300 to $2.18? What is the logic? Is there money involved? Is there something else involved? Because I don't understand the desire to go from 300 to $2.18.

5:16:17Speaker 8

Because if 300 doesn't exist. So what we're trying to do is

5:16:21Speaker 58

Well, let's make it 300.

5:16:22Speaker 8

Well, but that's your choice. I thank you for your time. And I'm going to ask

5:16:26 – 5:16:38Speaker 30

Commissioner, I just want to clarify that we currently, at the city level, do have an ordinance that says 300 yard feet. Sorry. However, that has not gone through the state process.

5:16:38Speaker 30

want to clarify where that is.

5:16:40Speaker 8

So we have an ordinance that hasn't been approved by the state? Correct. I'd like to ask a fire chief to come up if I can.

5:16:51Speaker 8

When you spoke with the state, do they have a preference of particular yardage off the shore?

5:16:58 – 5:17:24Speaker 9

The state takes the recommendations on the city ordinance on a case by case basis. So based on the jurisdiction that is proposing the ordinance, when we submit it to the state, that's what they look at when we're submitting the ordinance. So to what Damaris said, we do have a city ordinance. It's just not on record from the state. When we went to inquire regarding the permitting process for the proposed exclusionary buoys, that's when we identified that there was no ordinance on file with the state.

5:17:24Speaker 8

Okay. Do you know if the lifeguards actually enforce any of this ordinance as I far as

5:17:31Speaker 9

will be happy to call up the ocean rescue chief.

5:17:33 – 5:17:53Speaker 8

Please. And the reason that I know is because right now, we have residents that are supporting the 300 yards. But when this first started, they wanted no buoys. That's true. So this is, for the record, so we're trying to come up with something. Yes, hi, how are you?

5:17:53Speaker 3

Hi, good afternoon. Mayor, Vice Mayor, commissioners, Joyce Furman, Marine Safety Chief.

5:17:59Speaker 8

Hi, Joyce. The question I have is what distance do you guys use and do you use a gauge because we don't have any buoys? More or less, what do you look for?

5:18:09 – 5:18:20Speaker 3

We go for the color change. So it's brighter right before the reef line, and it gets darker where the reef is and forward. So any time a boat comes in

5:18:21Speaker 8

On the lighter of the water?

5:18:22Speaker 3

GREGORY On the lighter side, they're on top of sandbars, so we whistle them out.

5:18:26Speaker 7

GREGORY DELL:

5:18:27Speaker 8

I'm not going to hold you to it. More or less, what's the distance? Because that seems to be closer than the 300 yards.

5:18:34Speaker 1

If you look at the first image that was up on the screen, it's basically at the two eighteen.

5:18:38Speaker 3

It depends where you at.

5:18:40Speaker 1

It depends, yeah.

5:18:40Speaker 3

Okay. It's not a straight line.

5:18:42 – 5:18:53Speaker 8

So, Okay. That was what I was basically told by the police chief is we have no way of enforcing it because we can't measure it. We can't see. We go by estimate. Is that not correct?

5:18:53 – 5:19:04Speaker 8

Okay. So do you feel that the BUI will help you enforce the ordinance that we will put into place with a more balance.

5:19:06Speaker 1

And there's also a time when there's no public safety out on the beach, no guarded beach. The buoys would obviously protect MACHT: everyone. There's no lifeguards there. Would be

5:19:16Speaker 3

single Or we lives. Marking it would help the boat stay.

5:19:19Speaker 8

JOSHUA On the other side.

5:19:20Speaker 3

JOSHUA On the other side.

5:19:21Speaker 8

JOSHUA We would only help. Okay. So the point to the residents is we try to enhance something that, even though I just learned it, it is, which I don't know when it was enacted.

5:19:32Speaker 35

'70s, I think.

5:19:33Speaker 30

It looks like it was enacted in 1972.

5:19:37 – 5:19:54Speaker 8

1972. And it hasn't been signalized ever since then. And it hasn't been approved by the state as well. So it's an ordinance. It's a law. It's a feel good law that it exists, but it cannot be what's the word I'm looking for?

5:19:54Speaker 1

It's not identified.

5:19:55 – 5:20:12Speaker 8

Well, number one, it's not identified and it's not enforceable because you can't measure it. So it's a feel good ordinance, just like we have some others. But nonetheless, thank you for your time, both of you. And that's the reason that I wanted to answer to the resident. It's not that we're trying to bring it closer. It's something that in reality, it doesn't exist.

5:20:15Speaker 27

It does exist. Exist. No.

5:20:18Speaker 1

Not to boaters, it doesn't exist.

5:20:20Speaker 8

Okay. With all due respect, no, I'm not asking you to come back up.

5:20:23Speaker 58

This is a distance. I mean, that doesn't Thank

5:20:26 – 5:20:38Speaker 8

you for your time. But my point is, I don't believe that we're hurting anybody by doing this because there isn't any signalization. Why do it at all then?

5:20:38Speaker 1

Guys, we're not gonna

5:20:39Speaker 8

I a motion to approve the ordinance as it was come in front of us for a second reading.

5:20:46Speaker 1

We have a motion to approve the ordinance as presented. Is there a second? Second. We have a second and a third. Let's go to Commissioner Biederman.

5:20:54 – 5:21:08Speaker 14

So I have a question. Siobhan, can you come up for a second? I respect your opinion. And I respect the fact that your experience as a nurse

5:21:08Speaker 32

In the trauma ICU at Jackson?

5:21:10Speaker 14

And your civic involvement.

5:21:12Speaker 14

All right? So earlier today, we were talking about the dunes. How do you feel about the dune issue on Hollywood Beach?

5:21:21Speaker 32

I don't go to the beach.

5:21:22Speaker 14

How do you feel about based on talking to people, how do you feel about the dunes on Hollywood Beach?

5:21:27 – 5:21:52Speaker 32

I think generally they're positive, but I don't know. What I do know is that the accidents, propeller accidents, are absolutely devastating. And so for safety's sake, that's the only reason. I'm not a beach person. I used to never come to the city commission meetings unless it was a civil liberties issue. And this is a safety issue. I have waited four and onetwo hours because I do have experience as a trauma nurse, Commissioner Beamer.

5:21:52Speaker 14

And I appreciate that.

5:21:53Speaker 32

These accidents, the potential is just devastating.

5:21:57Speaker 14

DAVID And that's what we're trying to prevent.

5:21:58Speaker 32

DAVID I understand. DAVID Thank you. DAVID And

5:22:03Speaker 14

Julie? Same question.

5:22:10Speaker 14

I'm just trying to drill down on something here.

5:22:13Speaker 5

You're right.

5:22:13Speaker 3

Have the same question. How do you feel

5:22:14Speaker 14

about the dunes on Hollywood Beach?

5:22:16Speaker 51

How is it relevant to the Bowie discussion?

5:22:19Speaker 14

It's relevant to me balancing my thought process, let's just say that. So that's the question.

5:22:29Speaker 3

How do you feel about

5:22:30Speaker 14

the dunes on Hollywood Beach?

5:22:31 – 5:23:04Speaker 51

So I'm in favor of the dunes on Hollywood Beach because without the dunes on Hollywood Beach, we're not going to have a beach. So if the people that came up here and talked about, oh, they're taking up this, they're taking up that, I'm not going to be on the beach without them, the beach is going to erode. We have watched it. We have watched the renourishment project. We have watched that sand that has come in already erode out. So without the dunes, there will be erosion after erosion after erosion. And Surf Road is going to be where you're all going to be sitting. And then I'll actually have beachfront property, because I'm just on the other side of Ocean Drive.

5:23:04Speaker 14

And I tend to agree with you on some of this. The video you sent us

5:23:13Speaker 14

Based on your I mean, there's no markers. But how far out do you think that dye flag was?

5:23:20 – 5:24:03Speaker 51

Probably at this 300 yard or so. So if you go back into the video and I have some still shots, too we talked about where that bright blue line is. And then you have the dark blue. So as one of the other professional diver or you know, more experienced than I am. I've only been diving certified for a year. That light blue line is sand. You can tell that. So, this person was out in the dark blue. So, it's around this 300 yard mark where that boat was coming in and did I mean, you can see in the video very clearly how they swerved around, because it was that oh no, oh, you know what moment, I'm sure, in their head. I've experienced it myself.

5:24:03 – 5:24:15Speaker 14

If we had buoys out there at 218, the diver would have known that they were in a boating area and they might have stayed inside the

5:24:15 – 5:24:55Speaker 51

JULIE No, two absolutely not because that's not where the reef is. You're going where the reef is. So what's going to happen is the other pictures and videos I didn't send you that I have from that I'm telling you, for like an hour on the beach, I had the most anxiety of my life. I was ready to just go home. I watched two other boats come that light blue right where that light blue to dark blue line was, which is probably in this zone that we're talking about, in this 200 to 300. So, they were here. Isabel's husband was the snorkeler. So, I had a diver on my right and a snorkeler on my left. And I watched him go out. That diver is safer.

5:24:55 – 5:25:32Speaker 51

Hopefully, they're smart enough to not have their dive flag wrapped around like the woman that was drugged from the video I sent you. Okay? You're not supposed to do that for the exact reason of what happened to her. It should be something where you just drop and let it go. Worst case is, you no longer have a dive flag, but you're still safe because you're under the water. Isabel's husband is former military. How the man can hold his breath, I have no idea. He free dives and catches lobster, right? But that's limited air capacity. The boats were coming close to him as well because, again, you're going out to the reef.

5:25:32 – 5:26:05Speaker 51

Those boats were inside of this line going along. And so exactly what we said was going to happen and is going to happen is going to continue to happen. And I watched it without the buoys happening. And I have the utmost respect for our beach patrol. They have flagged they have whistled me, which I didn't hear. It was another swimmer who said, I was trying to go get a balloon out of the water. And because I didn't have a dive flag, and I guess I was going out too far, they whistled me in. And I had to wait for the balloon to come to shore. I could hear it. Well, I didn't hear it.

5:26:05 – 5:26:24Speaker 51

Someone else flagged me and alerted me. There was no whistle that day on those other two boats that were already closer to shore. And I've already said this in front of the commission. Even if they did whistle, you're on a boat. The engines are going. You've got the music going. You're probably having a conversation. You're not going to hear the whistle. You're not.

5:26:24Speaker 14

And that particular reason is why I support additional drones being deployed by our fire rescue and beach safety.

5:26:33Speaker 10

Absolutely. And

5:26:34 – 5:26:46Speaker 14

I spoke about it at the last meeting and I'm hoping that beach safety is going be able to use drones to ward off the boats that come within our vessel exclusion zone. Thank you very much.

5:26:46Speaker 5

Appreciate You're welcome.

5:26:47Speaker 51

Thank you for that extra time.

5:26:48 – 5:27:50Speaker 14

So the reason I asked is because it seems like some of the speakers today that were asking us to keep the vessel exclusion zone at 300 yards were citing economic impacts. But yet, when it comes time to support the smaller dunes, economic impacts don't matter anymore. So it's all in opinions. So we have to balance opinions with facts and that's why I support the two eighteen because I believe that we need to have a clearer vessel exclusion zone that is more manageable by our beach safety and if our lifeguards have to go rescue somebody or worn off a boat, that closer proximity is easier to manage. My opinion, and I'm going to vote based on my opinion.

5:27:50Speaker 1

Thank you, Commissioner.

5:27:51Speaker 14

That's why I'll support this.

5:27:52Speaker 1

Thank you, Commissioner Biederman. Let's go to Commissioner Gruber.

5:27:56Speaker 7

Julie, do you mind coming back up?

5:28:00Speaker 51

Not at all. Honestly appreciate the dialogue and the time. Thank you.

5:28:05Speaker 7

Yeah. Question. So you agree 300 yards, these buoys, are totally necessary, correct?

5:28:13Speaker 51

Well, I'm not going to say they're necessary, right? Am I in agreement that they could be helpful? Yes. I'm not saying I don't want them at all. No,

5:28:22Speaker 7

I'm You're not thinking one vessel exclusionary buoys are like work?

5:28:27 – 5:28:48Speaker 51

I don't know, because we've never had them here on our beach. So potentially, I think they will. There is also that counter that we said, because kind of the opposite of what we were talking about, where people there was originally worry people are going to swim out to them. We already kind of squashed that. But boats will be able to come up closer to them, because now they know.

5:28:49Speaker 51

But I do think you know what? I am going to change in thinking about what I saw on March 23

5:29:10 – 5:29:53Speaker 7

So the reason we are here, right, is one of the first things I brought up when I got up here was and as someone who surfs, who snorkels, who swims, who does the whole thing and I love the beach, I'm always at the beach, is because I saw what you saw so many times, and I've been close to getting hit, I said, I can't believe we don't have these. And there was a camp, and Commissioner Schuham, you championed this. People said, we we don't believe that these are effective, even though they're in the water around the world and argue. And and don't no one wants to look at them. And for years, I begged to bring this back and I still got the same thing.

5:29:53 – 5:30:29Speaker 7

And I've spoken to people that live on the beach that told me, I don't want to look at them and and that's why we didn't have them. Now, I don't know why you're turning your head. I can I know who Yeah? They No. Behind you. Sorry. So so then when I snorkeled, when I realized where our our artificial reefs are going, you know, now it's even crazier that we don't have these. So I brought it back up. Chief Levy was tasked to come up with a recommendation to the scientists. There's a lot of data that went to it into it. That 218 is exactly the distance that our neighboring Hallandale has.

5:30:29Speaker 3

They don't have a reef?

5:30:31Speaker 24

They don't have a reef to protect it.

5:30:32Speaker 47

Yes. And with the booty. And there's, like, three

5:30:34Speaker 1

Guys, let's not go back and forth.

5:30:36 – 5:31:20Speaker 7

Okay. The two the two that that was our staff recommendation from our fire chief. That's what we went with. Now, if the way the way it's being presented is that we were bringing these in. These things, they didn't exist. They didn't exist. So, you know excuse me? You're bringing me work. So so my question to all of like, it's to all of you was where were you all if you dive all the time to say, hey, how come we don't have vessel exclusionary buoys? Which would make me think, like, Julie, like you just said, you really don't even want them. So the farther out they can be, the better. I mean, you just basically said, you don't think they're effective, you you know? Right. What's that? Okay.

5:31:22Speaker 7

Anyway, okay, fine. Okay, fine. Okay, I'm done.

5:31:25Speaker 1

All right, let's go to, guys please, Commissioner Quintana, then Caleri, and then we'll take a vote on the motion.

5:31:32 – 5:32:04Speaker 13

So I think I wasn't here when, with that history about people saying they didn't want to see it because it's blocking view or whatever. I've heard you guys refer to it, but I wasn't here for that. But it sounds like we're in agreement that buoys are necessary. And what I think is in question is about where they should go. And I don't have any experience, as you guys know, because I remind you every time, snorkeling or boating.

5:32:04 – 5:32:50Speaker 13

But I'll tell you that Julie's video really scared the bejesus out of me. And I I do observe a lot about what happens with people on land when they're driving and how people on land with a car behave when there's pedestrians. And it really is kind of frightening to think about how we will enforce. I like Commissioner Biederman's idea about drones being part of it. But I think, you know, hard as our police officers work to try and make sure our roadways are safe, they have a hard time look.

5:32:50 – 5:33:39Speaker 13

I mean, every Monday when I'm driving to work, I look and see how many signs have been knocked over over the weekend, how many, you know, things have been run over, buildings that have been run over. And if people in boats behave that way, I am really scared about the risk for divers. And I, when I look at the map that's on the screen, I can see how 218 has, you know, a good section that isn't obstructed by the reefs, although it is really close to the rocks. Is that what that is in the gray? Yeah.

5:33:39 – 5:34:18Speaker 13

And so I can understand what the people who snorkel there are saying about a lot of people are there, and that they're at greater risk at 218. When I look at 300, then I see how much of it is over the natural reef. And that's scary. I mean, honestly, where I it just looks to me that the place where we're least risky is on the other side of the natural reef. Like, there, there's not I would think that that would be the safest place to put the buoys.

5:34:19 – 5:35:08Speaker 13

And, I mean, just without having direct experience like you do, Commissioner Gruber, that's just what makes sense to me, in terms of making sure that the people so I'm thinking about the people who are snorkeling or swimming from the shore being like pedestrians on the roadway. And then, the people who are in the boats, you know, they they we kind of design our roadways for cars and the ocean is so vast and available to everybody who's in a boat. But if you're coming there from the shore, you have a lot less capacity, you know, less space where you can enjoy the ocean. So, I mean, that's just what I'm thinking And I'm open to, you know, being told I'm wrong. But that's what makes sense to me.

5:35:09 – 5:35:34Speaker 1

Yeah, I'll just say that one thing. Yeah, I just wanted to point out that boats want to access these dive sites as well. And if, when you put the line too far, then boats can't access as easily. They have to then swim 200 feet to the dive site when they could have been closer. And that's a danger to those scuba divers and snorkelers as well. I'm sorry. Please don't. Please don't. Okay, Commissioner Kaleri.

5:35:35 – 5:36:08Speaker 2

So hopefully I can bring this in. There's a lot of misinformation, a lot of opinions, a lot of experience. How this all came about, yes, commissioner Gruber has spoke about this for many, many years. Yes, we've had the input of not putting buoys period because it will obstruct the view. All of these crazy things that we've all talked about, really, but what does any of that matter?

5:36:08 – 5:36:24Speaker 2

Whether you like the buoys or you don't, the buoys are necessary. But what we haven't talked about today, and hopefully I can kind of narrow it in. One, shame on us for putting the coral reef. I mean, that's how I feel right now. We brought something into our city that's supposed to be beneficial.

5:36:24 – 5:36:59Speaker 2

That's supposed to build the sand and make something that is a tourist and community based attraction so that everyone can enjoy our beach, visitors and residents. But now that we have put this in, it's kind of created a little bit of a barrier to some extent. Why? Because now we've increased swimmers in the water more so than that was already there. And that becomes a higher risk of safety issues for our residents.

5:37:00 – 5:37:43Speaker 2

Period. No, no, but both divers and swimmers. So it's like you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't type of situation. Right? So here we come to where I've listened to everyone. Voters violate the 300 bird's eye view all the time. They violate it. Because you can never tell, and I spoke with beach safety officers that are on the beach. Who say that it's difficult. And our beach safety is here to bird's eye view where that lee line of 300 is.

5:37:43 – 5:38:24Speaker 2

And it changes constantly because of the way of the wind and the waves. And so one minute it could be at 300, next minute it could be at two fifty, the next minute it could be three fifty, where that line is. But regardless of where that line is, voters constantly are violating it. We've heard that from every speaker I think today. How today came about, or how I think our first one, and anybody, I feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, is we based it off of 218 of Hallandale Beach for uniformity purposes is the main reason.

5:38:24 – 5:39:04Speaker 2

So scientific, if you want scientific, it was based on uniformity. We can argue all day long. Dania, sir, we can have you yell out, okay? And if you let me finish, I'm gonna get there. Okay? So please. Dania has a different mechanism. You have the port that you come out, and I said at the last meeting, and you have the pier. And in between, Marine, the Army of Engineer and Corps, they use that area for training purposes, military purposes, submarines, you name it. Granted, we have them off of ours as well, but they have to go further out.

5:39:04 – 5:39:30Speaker 2

But there's inhibiting, because we reached out to our fellow colleagues along the coastline about what their, where their limit is. What is their exclusionary vessel limit? You have 300 in some cities that maybe have roofs or don't. And you have 300 in other cities, and then you have two eighteen. So where do we, we hear residents who live on the beach.

5:39:30 – 5:40:11Speaker 2

It is not your beach, it is everybody's beach, right? And we have to do what's most importantly. I'm a trauma nurse too. Seventeen years ICU trauma right here at good old Memorial Regional. And I can tell you, propeller injuries are far and few between. They're devastating, yes. I can agree with Siobhan a 100%. But the amount of propeller injuries that we have had at Memorial Regional in the last seventeen years, compared to motor vehicle accidents, supersede by a million. Period. Shark bites actually are more than propeller bites, propeller cuts.

5:40:11 – 5:40:45Speaker 2

But they are devastating. We've had more issues in inlet water than we do in the ocean, as far as propeller hits. But I'll get you the facts on that because that's new information as Siobhan came up. But I can tell you from my expertise, it's been very, very limited. But you don't want it to happen to anybody. So where we are today is, we have some exclusionary areas with a 100. 100 feet. A 100 yards? 100 feet. I get them all twisted.

5:40:45 – 5:41:09Speaker 2

And then we have 300 and then you have the two eighteen. It's about compromise. And it's about making sure that we try to provide the best safety that we can. And finding that happy medium. If you lay those exclusionary vessels, you're a 100% correct.

5:41:09 – 5:41:49Speaker 2

You're putting it right on the reefs. Right on them. Because they have to narrow them down. If you do two eighteen, it's least gives a starting point. In addition to that, I appreciate the fact of whoever sent this information. I don't know, maybe was it Julie or whomever sent this information. I think that this is really important information. But I also feel that it's partially can be opinions to some extent. Because I did the research on the Blue Wave Beach Award. It's mainly based on cleanliness and safety, but more so on cleanliness.

5:41:49 – 5:42:32Speaker 2

But we use that. We also have an individual that came and said that the emails that were sent out was a mass email. You just respond to it. You put your name in because it's a party. And you put your name in and the email gets sent to the city that you're in support of it because of a narrative. A false narrative or a narrative. I'm not going to say a false narrative because that's not my opinion. It's a narrative. They put their name in and we got the generated email to us. And yes, we got a lot of emails. But then once I spoke to that individual and said, are you aware there are no buoys there currently? Had no idea. They had no idea. They thought we were moving the buoys in. They thought there were buoys there and we don't have them.

5:42:37 – 5:43:28Speaker 2

The 300 yard boundary, listen our lifeguards, whether it's in state rule or not, that's what they abide by because of the lining and that's how they whistle in. But, the one point that I really wanna stress is, how hard is it for our lifeguards to get out and help any individual at 300 yard versus two eighteen if needed? And to me, time is well, there's a saying in the hospital and Siobhan will know, time is brain. And the longer it takes to get to somebody at 300 yards versus two eighteen, whether they get hit by a propeller, bit by a shark, or drowning, or having a massive heart attack, or are in distress, that's my concern. Because they're the ones who are the first responders.

5:43:28 – 5:43:46Speaker 2

They're the ones that are gonna get out there and rescue those individuals that need the help. And some ridiculous comment that was made in my opinion is that they're gonna grab onto the bully if they're in distress. Well, you know what, I want them to. Because then we can get to them faster. So, I am support of two eighteen.

5:43:46 – 5:44:18Speaker 2

I don't think that I think there's a lot of factors that are involved and worst case scenario, I think I would like to find out. I don't know who and how these are implemented. But if we find that two eighteen is too close and there are issues and swimmers are finding that it becomes a problem, how can those be relocated? And if so, is there a huge amount of cost for that? No one's getting their pockets lined.

5:44:18 – 5:44:53Speaker 2

No one is taking a bribe. We're just implementing something that is gonna provide safety. You could say it's red and I could say it's black. But at least we're finding that middle ground where we're providing safety to some extent and then we could always adjust it if need be in the future. We can add additional buoys and we can make changes. But let's get something there that provides safety and provides that safety not only for our residents, but for our voters, but also for our lifeguards who are there every day trying to provide the most safety possible. That's my opinion.

5:44:53 – 5:45:04Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. I think we're ready to call the question. All those in favor of the as an ordinance, let's clerk, let's read the ordinance. City attorney, please read the ordinance and call a roll call vote.

5:45:04 – 5:45:21Speaker 30

ANNETTE An ordinance of the City Commission of the City of Hollywood, Florida, amending chapter 98 of the Code of Ordinances entitled Marine and Waterway Regulations, Boats and Other Vessels, to Create a Vessel Exclusion Zone, providing for a severability clause and a repeal provision.

5:45:22Speaker 6

JULIE Commissioner Gruber?

5:45:25Speaker 6

JULIE Commissioner Biederman?

5:45:27Speaker 6

JULIE Commissioner Quintana? No. JULIE Commissioner Shuham? No. Commissioner Hernandez?

5:45:33Speaker 6

Vice mayor Coleri? Yes. Mayor Levy?

5:45:36 – 5:45:48Speaker 1

Yes. Alright. Let's show the ordinance passing on second reading, five to two. Thank you all for your time. Alright.

5:45:49 – 5:46:37Speaker 1

Item 21, ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida amending article 13 of the city charter entitled limitation on sale, lease, or purchase of city owned real property by amending the mentioned sections subject to a subject to approval by the electorate at a referendum to be held on 11/03/2026. This is an ordinance on first reading, advertising informants of state statutes and city codes. There is a sheet on our dais with some extra included language that inserts including renewals into the 75 word ballot provision. This is from the office of the city attorney. City attorney, if you want to just, for the record, share how you got here with the item and where it's gone.

5:46:37 – 5:47:01Speaker 30

Absolutely. Thank you, mayor. If you will recall, in 2024, this ballot initiative was proposed by the twenty twenty four Charter Review Committee. And at that time, it went through the process of ordinance reading and was placed on the ballot. However, the language that appeared on the ballot was deemed to be very confusing.

5:47:01 – 5:47:41Speaker 30

And as a result, we then requested that the language was pulled so that the electorate could have an opportunity to vote on the correct and clear language so that they could make a clear choice. What the commission did at that time was to place an ordinance into effect to essentially act as though the initiative had passed in the ballot at the time. And with the agreement that this language would return on the 2026 ballot, that is what we are doing now. So I have drafted this language. The language has gone through review of several people in my office and others in the city.

5:47:41 – 5:47:59Speaker 30

Also, I have sent the language to the twenty twenty four charter review committee members for their feedback. The handout in front of you is in part a language change that is due to feedback from some of those members. So this is the first reading of that ordinance.

5:48:00Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. Are there any speaker cards on item 21?

5:48:03Speaker 2

Motion to approve. Where

5:48:08Speaker 1

is the charter review chair? Oh, Peter?

5:48:13Speaker 1

Go ahead for a second, Peter.

5:48:15Speaker 1

take it back. Withdraw. Sorry. I'm just lighting everybody up. Go ahead, someone.

5:48:22Speaker 2

Go ahead, Peter.

5:48:25 – 5:48:49Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. By the way, thank you to the commission for doing what it is that you're doing. And thank you for the city attorney to actually count the words, because that was kind of heartbreaking after all the year and a half or two years worth of work that we put into for this not to happen. I believe that this exemplifies the spirit of what the Charter Review Committee wanted. So I'll make a motion to approve.

5:48:50Speaker 1

All right. We have a motion from Commissioner Hernandez, second from Vice Mayor Collier, to approve the ordinance on first reading. City attorney, please read the ordinance. And the clerk will call the roll call vote.

5:49:01 – 5:49:32Speaker 30

ANNETTE An ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida, amending Article 13 of the city charter entitled limitation on sale, lease, or purchase of city owned real property by amending section 13.01 entitled sale of city owned property, Section 13.02 entitled Lease of City Owned Real Property, and Section 13.03 entitled Purchase of Real Property by City, subject to approval by the electorate at a referendum to be held on 11/03/2026.

5:49:34Speaker 6

Commissioner Gruber?

5:49:36Speaker 6

Commissioner Biederman? Yes. Commissioner Quintana? Yes. Commissioner Schuham? Yes. Commissioner Hernandez?

5:49:44Speaker 6

Vice Mayor Caleri? Yes. Mayor Levy?

5:49:47Speaker 1

Yes. Let's show the ordinance passing unanimously on first reading, and it will come for a second reading. Good. Alright. Onto our regular agenda, ladies and gentlemen.

5:49:56Speaker 7

Dogs. How many more?

5:49:58 – 5:50:12Speaker 1

Only three items. What category? But they're all they're all good things. Let's go ahead to resolution of the city commission naming the dog park at Stan Goldman Memorial Park as K 9 Kimbo Dog Park. Commissioner Hernandez.

5:50:13 – 5:50:28Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. It was brought to me by actually, the chief can actually talk. But it was brought to me by the residents, which happened to be here, which is Carol and Andy. And they can speak more about it. But I'd for the chief to say a few words.

5:50:28 – 5:50:53Speaker 4

Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Mayor. Very quickly, yes. It was recommended and brought to Commissioner Hernandez by longtime residents Andy and Carol Karp. And I'd like to thank them for that, to name the park after K9Kimbo. K9Kimbo was killed in the line of duty 10/13/1997 in a very valiant way. We do have a very, very short video to detail the heroic actions of K9 Kimbo that day, if you can indulge. It's, I think, sixty seconds long.

5:51:56 – 5:52:20Speaker 4

Truly a heroic effort by K-nine Kimbo. And as you know, we made the promise to always remember our fallen officers. And K-nine Kimbo is no exception. And the renaming or naming after this park will do just that. Let our residents learn more about K9 Kimbo and his heroic actions that day. He saved Officer Keats and undoubtedly other officers and citizens that day. So to carry on the story and his legacy, I'm truly grateful to the Carps. Thank you.

5:52:30Speaker 59

I have good afternoon, but now it's good evening.

5:52:33Speaker 8

It's still daylight.

5:52:34 – 5:53:32Speaker 59

Mayor, Vice Mayor, Commissioners, Staff. We as a city need to honor our heroes and canine kimbo was a great warrior who was killed protecting his hammer, Officer Kevin Keats, and protecting the city of Hollywood. Officer Kevin Keats is still alive today thanks to K9 Kimbo. Naming the dog park in Stan Goldman Park would be a great way to remember K9Kimbo so we will never forget the sacrifice K9Kimbo made to keep our city safe. We thank the men, women, and canines of the Hollywood Police Department who risk their lives every day to protect our lives.

5:53:32 – 5:53:46Speaker 59

And we want to thank the men and women of the Hollywood Fire Rescue and Beach Safety for their service. We thank you for this time to speak. Thank you. Thank you.

5:53:50Speaker 1

Well, thank you to the CARPs for bringing the idea forward. And thank you to Commissioner Hernandez for extending it to the commission. It's a real great honor for all of us to honor this canine.

5:54:00Speaker 8

Motion to approve.

5:54:02Speaker 1

We have a motion from commissioner Hernandez, second from commissioner Schuhem to approve the resolution. All those in favor, aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously.

5:54:12 – 5:54:59Speaker 1

On to another good resolution, a resolution of the city commission, the city of Hollywood supporting the naming of Broward County's North Beach Hollywood North Beach Park in the city of Hollywood in honor of late commissioner, city and county commissioner, Suzanne Gunsberger. As you all might know, the county commission has an item to do this. And there is a comment period that I believe expires in just a couple days. So we wanted to make sure to place a formal resolution so that the city of Hollywood's voice where Commissioner Gunsburger lived and represented us for so many years and helped to cause the creation of this park could come from the commission as a body, reflecting the sentiments of not only us, but also the entire city.

5:55:02Speaker 1

a motion from Commissioner Coleri and a second from Commissioner Schuham to approve the resolution. All those in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously.

5:55:12 – 5:56:00Speaker 1

Thank you. And we'll get that submitted to the county before the seventeenth, and so bring it for my signature, please. Item 25 has a resolution of the city commission, city of Hollywood approving authorizing appropriate city officials to issue a purchase order to ten eight Fire and Safety LLC, doing business as ten eight Fire Equipment for the purchase of a Pierce Impel top mount pumper, otherwise known as a fire truck fire engine, in an amount up to $1,100,000 and change based on the Florida Sheriff Association purchasing program contract and in accordance with our procurement code. This, of course, is from fire safety and beach rescue. Motion by Vice Mayor Coleri, second from Commissioner Hernandez to approve item 25.

5:56:00 – 5:56:39Speaker 1

All those in favor, aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Awesome. Madam Clerk, I believe that concludes our our regular agenda and all the preceding items. Alright. Let's get to comments by the city commission, city attorney, city manager. I know we had a a few speakers come and talk to us about the predicament on the beach with regards to Dune project. And I know that this is a subject that requires discussion today because and so what I'm asking the commission is if they're Okay that we just bring this up as a discussion item now as opposed to someone introducing this in their time?

5:56:39 – 5:56:52Speaker 1

Yes. Okay. All right. And so you all have received the emails, received the calls. Maybe you've been at the beach yourselves and have seen the impact on the recreational area of the beach caused by the project.

5:56:52 – 5:57:58Speaker 1

And when you look further and I know for weeks now, the city team has been corresponding and letting the county know that we found some noncompliance in the implementation of this project with what the contract terms have been. And so the contract has a provision that says that if there's a cause, which means that the contractor and through the county has violated and not constructed the project in the fashion in which it was agreed that the city, of course, for cause, has an opportunity to terminate this contract, not only for convenience, which we have that provision as well, which requires a sixty day notice. But with regards to a violation of the contract for cause requiring a ten day notice, my understanding is that there's been for way greater than ten days notice to the county and to direct its contractor to correct its errors. And they haven't. And we've heard from the residents because of that.

5:57:59 – 5:58:48Speaker 1

And they've cited the severe impact to the recreational area of the beach caused by this noncompliance and also just the general impact. And so I know that when this first came to us, you know, we took this very seriously, knowing that this would you know, we have one of the most popular beaches in the world and in the country here. And I think the impact, especially caused by the noncompliance, has you know, very severe. And so you've received, you know, many, many emails asking us to reconsider this, and I think we really ought to. And so I know that, you know, we have an agreement and that we, you know, cooperated with the county and their desire to expand dunes.

5:58:48 – 6:00:12Speaker 1

We all share desires to have the most resilient beach possible. But we also can't lose what the beach is and the recreational capacity to this project. It was I think it was Bill Gates who, before the COP twenty six or twenty five conference in Brazil, had written a very lengthy piece that that even though we all share value and responsibility to be good stewards and protect our our our resiliency, we shouldn't do that at the expense of economic success and the livability of various parts of the world in exchange for that. And so to display, my point is to displace the beach area that this project is in the direction unstoppable, it seems, do because they're plowing ahead, I believe we ought to really reconsider the agreement here. And maybe this is a lesson learned for us as a city commission, as a city, that before we invite anyone to come to our city and construct a project that we us knowing our city in a much greater, more detailed capacity than anyone else, we ought to be in control and deciding ourselves what to do.

6:00:12 – 6:00:32Speaker 1

And I think we let too much of the lever here. But all that said, I believe that the county had any ill will here, of course. Resiliency of the coastline is something we all agree with. And we cooperated. And so I think we all had good intentions.

6:00:32 – 6:01:06Speaker 1

We did. Of course, the county does and did. But I think we need to discuss as a body the impact that we're seeing out there caused as well by the by the, you know, noncompliance with the agreement and the arguments defending the noncompliance. I just feel like we need to take this over even if it'll come at settlement cost, even though there is cost to cancel this agreement. I think we need to go back to the drawing board on this and decide how to manage resiliency in the parts of the beach that this project currently is implementing on.

6:01:06 – 6:01:20Speaker 1

So disastrous implementation, I think, even though a well intentioned endeavor. And so I want to open this. The commission has to discuss this because if we're going take any action on the agreement, we need to give direction to the staff. Commissioner Gruber.

6:01:20 – 6:01:53Speaker 7

Thank you, mayor. Arlene, are my pictures? Do you have them? I was going use them in my comments, but now we're doing it now. So I was at the beach this last weekend, and I was in front of Hollywood Towers. Actually, I was there a few weeks ago when Bob had brought it up in our last meeting and I was concerned. And I'll just show you with Okay. So here's my picture. So this is in front of Hollywood Towers, right? So you see where everybody's sitting?

6:01:53 – 6:02:24Speaker 7

That's the dune. It just hasn't been roped off yet and in front of it is what's left of the sandy beach. So they haven't roped it off yet. I made the mistake of telling a few of those people I was a city commissioner just because I was starting to talk about the June project and they're ready to like kick me off the beach and said, I know. I don't like it either. I don't like what I'm seeing. If you can flip to the next picture, and I'm just going go over the pictures. I walked the whole beach, probably about five miles over the weekend. Arlene, can you go to the next one? Yep.

6:02:25 – 6:02:43Speaker 7

Not sure what order. So this is one of our tractors that drives that actually had almost flipped off that cliff having to go around those people. You can see where the posts are. So there's really enough room there for single file people at the beach. You could go to the next picture.

6:02:43 – 6:03:21Speaker 7

It's scary to see that little kid running in front of that tractor. That's how we had to go around them. And if you go I encourage all of my colleagues to go to the beach, see it from north to south and see what we've done because it's different in different places. It does appear that where we put dunes where the beach is really narrow, there's some significant cliffing starting already, which is very, very dangerous and that is typical from what I've heard when you put a dune on a narrow beach because the first high tide comes and it starts pulling it away. Next picture, please.

6:03:25 – 6:04:10Speaker 7

This is in front of the diplomat. Those kids are playing on the dune. There's no beach left in front of the diplomat. And that's their equipment that's in the front there. You could go to the next picture. Our lifeguard stand, if you zoom in on that, is about to get washed away because there's no place for our lifeguard stand. The Diplomat has no beach. I'm sure all of you saw the GM from The Diplomat's email yesterday. This is, I mean, to do that to an 800 room convention hotel that depends on the beach being a part of their business model, I I mean, that could bankrupt them. So it's a major safety hazard.

6:04:10 – 6:04:30Speaker 7

I don't know if there's any more pictures. Arlene, you have another one? The the the Right. So you see, look look look where our garbage can is compared to where the water is. Like, the the behind it is all So that's in front of the diplomatic aid. Yeah. And the tideline. Is there any more pictures? I think that's it. Oh, that's my video.

6:04:30 – 6:05:07Speaker 7

Do you have sound? It's quick. If you can start from the beginning with sound. 11 10 steps from the high tide line to the dune. That's what's left of the beach. So that I counted that off. So it's the worst part oh, and in front of what we just supported naming Sue, Gunsburger Park.

6:05:10Speaker 1

You can mute that.

6:05:11Speaker 7

You can mute. Another picture, I think. Arlene? Sorry. I just have a lot from different parts of the beach and I think you really need to see it.

6:05:26 – 6:06:01Speaker 7

That's now that's when the beach is empty in the morning. That was one of our vehicles. That's what's left of the beach. So when the beach is busy, there's no room for emergency vehicles. I know, chief, we spoke. We had a near drowning a couple days ago and whatever vehicle was coming had no access. Right? If you wanna touch on that before we get to the next picture. No. I just sent it.

6:06:01 – 6:06:19Speaker 7

There's not there's not another one of North Beach? Okay. Well, anyway, in in North Beach, the one we just supported naming after Sue Gunsberger, there's there's no beach there at all. So anyway, chief, sorry, go ahead.

6:06:19 – 6:07:04Speaker 9

So yes, commissioner, as you stated on Sunday, we had a near drowning in North Beach. And lifeguard, praises to the lifeguard. They did an amazing job. The person has a second chance at life. But that being said, that lifeguard's backup that lifeguard's backup was coming from a distance utilizing the supervisor's vehicle. They had to utilize the surf road in order to get through. And and not only did they have to utilize surf road, they couldn't get the pickup truck onto the beach because of the dunes impeding the access. So that lieutenant had to take all of her medical equipment and hike it over the dunes to get to the patient. But that also created a problem for us also getting the patient off the beach. We had to manually carry that patient off the beach.

6:07:04 – 6:07:23Speaker 9

We're in the past. We've been able to put them into the back of the pickup truck, utilize the pickup truck to take them out to the street for ambulance. But Joyce can attest to that during the weekends and the busy times, there is no access for the ATVs, even for law enforcement, to get up and down the beach. They're having to navigate Surf Road when it's accessible.

6:07:25Speaker 1

I mean, I think this really needs to go back to the drawing board for all these reasons. That's we're why talking about this guy.

6:07:31 – 6:07:48Speaker 7

Yeah. Agreed. No. I'm just pointing all that stuff out. When I agreed to this, one of the things was that the county had agreed that the maximum amount that the Dune would take up was a 30% of the thanks, guys. 30%, right?

6:07:48Speaker 12

It's essentially a two to one ratio.

6:07:51 – 6:08:18Speaker 7

The And the rest would be recreational areas. So now that they haven't adhered to that and now we have a major safety issue. I mean, on busy weekends when it's rough, the fact that our lifeguards can't get to someone who's drowning, I think it's something that we need to look at like immediately, especially in these spots, like in front of the diplomat where there's nothing and see what to do. You know?

6:08:18Speaker 1

So you support terminating the pursuing termination of the agreement and going back to the drawing board on this?

6:08:23 – 6:08:34Speaker 7

I would do that. I would do that. This can't stay like this from a safety hazard, from an economic impact hazard. I mean, have this dune's in front of a hotel that has

6:08:34 – 6:08:59Speaker 1

a seawall. Let's remember that in front of Diplomat and Margherita and Marriott, we did say, you know, sand only, no vegetation, no posts, no rope. Although they then put They posted and no said in front of the Marriott. And so it's out because they understand that they've been giving issues. But I think, look, it's my opinion that this needs to go to the drawing board.

6:08:59 – 6:09:21Speaker 1

And I want everyone to say how they feel. You've received all the emails from residents. It's a very serious thing. This is our number one asset. And while we all support resiliency, I think we can admit this has been a real disaster in implementation and is completely altering to a much greater extent than we ever considered the function and the safety on the beach.

6:09:22 – 6:09:59Speaker 1

And putting all that aside, clearly there's cause for termination here because of the noncompliance, and it's been noticed. And so whether or not we get into a tussle with the county, I don't have anything negative to say. Everyone joined this with the spirit of wanting to improve resiliency. We still share that. But I think this disaster of an implementation requires us to go back to the drawing board and rethink how we keep this mega recreational beach resilient and still available for recreation. We have a knee wall. We have, as Commissioner Gruber said, I think he mentioned the

6:10:00 – 6:10:14Speaker 1

The Tiger Dams. And so we really need to reconsider things. That's my opinion. So let's see how the body feels. And if we have do I have support of at least three of us to bring back that? Okay. But let's hear from everybody else. Commissioner Schuham, go ahead.

6:10:15 – 6:10:46Speaker 15

So I definitely appreciate the concerns. I will say, I guess, two things. First is that a lot of what we're seeing on the beach is seasonal. I know we have Christie here. I have never heard that what's been installed so far is causing that cliffing. We get that cliffing every year. The picture of the tractor on the edge, that's what Joe's crews do. They smooth out that cliffing. What is it? An escarpment?

6:10:46 – 6:11:03Speaker 15

Is that the word? So we see this all the time. That said, I'm not saying the situation is acceptable. I'm just saying I don't think we should conflate typical cliffing this time of year, and typical treatment by our beach maintenance with the dunes. Those are not the same issue.

6:11:04 – 6:11:32Speaker 15

Now, because of the I mean, we've had very, very windy weather for a long time. And so the beach, as it does this time of year, is narrower. And, you know, it's, in a way, we've gotten to see what could happen with these dunes here. So I think that it's definitely a lesson learned. I personally never got really any complaints about anything until they hit Hollywood Tower.

6:11:32 – 6:11:56Speaker 15

That was a real problem. And we've gotten a letter or an email from the county already saying they acknowledge that what's in front of Hollywood Tower is in error, and will be corrected. So, I'm not suggesting that this doesn't have to be fixed and relooked at. And I absolutely, you know, safety first. We told them to have a 10 foot path.

6:11:57 – 6:12:27Speaker 15

I personally think terminating this contract is a drastic measure without first listening to our experts, where has the county gone wrong, and giving them the opportunity to correct it. And so I don't think there's a lot of disagreement. But I think a termination for default without having them come in and respond they've already told us they agree in front of Hollywood Tower that the numbers are erroneous. We haven't settled on what the correct numbers are. Our measurements and I know Jose's measurements differ.

6:12:28 – 6:12:44Speaker 15

That's where we need to have a resolution and make sure it's done properly. So that's my 2¢. Yes, there's definitely been a lot of problems in this particular area. But some of what's in your picture, we see every year. Every year.

6:12:44Speaker 7

Thank you. If I could respond to that or

6:12:47Speaker 1

Let's go hear from the rest of the body, if we could. Commissioner Beerman.

6:12:51 – 6:13:28Speaker 14

So believe it or not, I'm not so ready to terminate a contract with the county. As much as I don't trust the county, I'm not ready to terminate. I think there's got to be a fix. My biggest concern is once they put something in, we're not going to be able to fix it and take it out based on the protection of dunes and all that. So I mean that's my biggest concern. I also took pictures. Arlene. And I think these show a lot clearer than boots on the ground as commissioner Gruber took pictures.

6:13:28Speaker 7

Flip flops on the ground.

6:13:29 – 6:13:53Speaker 14

Flip flops on the ground. Good. So look how much of the beach that Dune is taking up. And yes, it's in front of Hollywood Tower and yes, I get it. The county claims that they're accepting responsibility that maybe this is an error. But there's pictures going up and down from here. But this is crazy to see.

6:13:53Speaker 2

Yeah. There's no beach left for people to use.

6:13:58Speaker 14

I think that's going to the south. So

6:14:03Speaker 1

I think the whole approach is is a problem.

6:14:05 – 6:14:32Speaker 14

It's it's it's it's a problem. Yeah. Yeah. On a flip side, I think it's crazy for Hollywood Towers to use the I I don't want to sound like a hypocrite because that's what I criticize the most of. But I think it's crazy for Hollywood tower to claim that dune is too high when their commercial space is on the 2nd Floor, not the 1st Floor.

6:14:33 – 6:15:17Speaker 14

I think other businesses have a bigger problem when they're at sea level. But in the same sense, this is taking up a lot of beach that, as everybody says, we're known for our beaches and people, you know, on a July could you imagine July 4? What's gonna happen to the dune? We're gonna have police arresting people for trespassing on a dune because there's gonna be thousands of people sitting on a dune on a July 4 or a Memorial Day weekend. They just won't have to be is crazy. Yeah. And we need to have an injunction of some sort till we could sort it out. But to just arbitrarily say, County, take your toys and go home, I think is a knee jerk reaction. So

6:15:18 – 6:15:49Speaker 1

look, my opinion is that there's this needs to go back to the drawing board and this five year agreement in the way it's in the way in which I think the design is defective now that we see it in person. One of the provisions was stay away from the palm trees. The coconut trees have been put into the sand now about possibly two or more feet deep. And I did some research at the time and found that's not healthy for a coconut tree. We might lose our coconut trees.

6:15:49 – 6:16:31Speaker 1

And so they were supposed to dig two foot circumference of at grade sort of planting areas for the trees, and they haven't done that. And so there's a lot of problems with the implementation of this project, and I think it really warrants going back to the drawing board. The only way I know to send it to the drawing board to terminate this particular agreement and study what we need to do for Hollywood Beach. And I understand that maybe the county won't participate in a reconsideration and a redesign, and that's Okay. We have to be responsible for our beach, knowing its characteristics and its recreational uses and how people enjoy it and how to best lay out the resiliency.

6:16:31 – 6:17:10Speaker 1

But in the meantime, for this particular agreement, they've obviously violated the direction here, what was approved. And the only way to stop that and prevent it from continuing to the point of no return is, in my opinion, to terminate. So I thank those of you who supported bringing that to us. I do think there needs to be a stop work order right away. And hopefully you all agree with that, too, to be enforced by Hollywood police. We can't have this continue and them say, well, we have an agreement. We to terminate, and we have to stop it, is my opinion. Commissioner Coleri?

6:17:10 – 6:17:46Speaker 2

I just really think that the most important thing is, again, once it's placed, you can't get rid of it. You're already in it, And you can't get out of it. So we see that there's an issue. In addition to that, we've heard from a lot of residents that have sent personal emails, not cut and paste, about the sand being blown onto not only the broad walk, but also onto the side roads. We've also heard about the entrance ways, accessibility of handicap.

6:17:46 – 6:18:18Speaker 2

I mean, there's just a slew of emails that are personally written from the heart of the impact that this has caused and the negativity that it has provided. And a picture is worth 1,000 words. And if you look at these pictures, majority of our beach now has become a dune. And that is not what I think any of us were set up to do. So I am in full agreement, Mayor, of cease and desist, if that's what you want to call it. Terminate, however it is, to go back to the drawing board and try to figure out how we move forward.

6:18:18Speaker 1

Move forward.

6:18:18Speaker 2

Yeah. Because if we let it continue and try to work through the nooks and crannies, we're going to find ourselves in a really bad predicament, I believe.

6:18:28Speaker 1

Commissioner Gruber, I see you again and again on top of the list. Is it Okay if we let Commissioner Hernandez speak, since you already spoke? Yeah.

6:18:37Speaker 7

Just wanted to

6:18:37Speaker 1

Commissioner Hernandez? Thank you, mayor.

6:18:40 – 6:18:58Speaker 8

I'm in agreement of stopping what's happening right now. But I'd like to know if there is a possibility to do an injunction so that we can stop the planting of the dunes until we can actually agree in a delineated design.

6:18:58Speaker 1

That's why we need to terminate. This is a five year agreement, Peter.

6:19:02Speaker 1

I think we really need to reconsider all of it. And the best way to stop that and prevent that is to terminate.

6:19:09 – 6:19:25Speaker 8

And I'm okay with that, but here's what I'm afraid of. And this is something that I can remember back when the Doom project was presented to us. The Broward County helps us with the payment of the renourishment of the beach. And if we don't do the Dooms, they will not help us. So they're trying to

6:19:25Speaker 1

hold I don't think that's federally supported for the most part. And I think they all have an interest in the economic success of Hollywood Beach. Just we do, I don't want to live by a threat.

6:19:36 – 6:19:49Speaker 8

GREGORY Neither do I. And that's what I was saying. If we could actually stop the planting and actually look at the delineation of what's taking place. But as it is right now, I agree with you. Let's stop this, and let's go back to the drawing board.

6:19:49 – 6:20:00Speaker 1

There used to be a new design. So everybody who's wanted to speak has spoken once. I don't think Commissioner Quintana has. Let's go ahead, Commissioner Quintana.

6:20:01 – 6:20:12Speaker 13

I was just wondering what efforts have been made to communicate with the county and what the county is saying about responding to what obviously is a problem for our city?

6:20:16Speaker 13

So It wasn't for you. It was for

6:20:18Speaker 1

Oh, I'm sorry. Was distracted. Sorry.

6:20:22 – 6:20:33Speaker 12

This really came to a head over the weekend when there was a lot of the post and rope going into areas of the beach that are critically narrowed right Can

6:20:33Speaker 1

you show that picture that I sent? Go ahead, Rylane. Sorry.

6:20:36 – 6:21:30Speaker 12

MARY And so that resulted in some immediate outreach to county staff regarding the project. And I will say we have been throughout Chris Roschak, our Chief Resiliency Officer and our design and construction management folks have been monitoring the project. And we have brought several different issues over the course of this from the handicapped access issue, which was sort of some confusion in what the commission wanted originally in the design of the cross throughs or the access points. We've brought that to their attention and came to a resolution of that. But it has this is a project that is operated on a very fast timeline.

6:21:31 – 6:22:12Speaker 12

In order to get it done before the heart of turtle nesting season prevents any additional work from taking place and contractor leaves. And so while we have brought forward things, the response time to come up with a resolution, the project has just continued to move on. And so we have resolved a few of these things. But there has been this sort of new problems are being created before we solve the last problem or try to resolve the last issue or conflict. So I hope that that kind of gives you a little foundation.

6:22:12 – 6:22:40Speaker 12

As it relates to the latest, we did immediately have some conversations. The staff was out on Monday surveying everything, looking at it. We followed up on Monday with them and started having them go and look. There are actual project managers out there looking at it. On Tuesday, more conversations.

6:22:41 – 6:23:05Speaker 12

I was in contact with the county's chief resiliency officer I don't think that's her exact title but Doctor. Jennifer Horado, who oversees this entire division. She has been responsive. We spoke several or we texted and spoke yesterday. We spoke this morning a couple of different times.

6:23:06 – 6:23:39Speaker 12

The actual project manager was out there today meeting with Chris Roshchak and Christy Brush from Moffett and Nickel. Jose was also out there as well as I think Mark Gambrel from DCM as well. So they have been willing to make some adjustments. I think the question is just, can we agree on what all of the adjustments are needed within the remaining time frame? And so that is the thing that is a little challenging to kind of figure out.

6:23:40 – 6:24:34Speaker 12

This contractor has very little time left, and we have a lot of changes that we think are needed. So if you would like to see the work that Chris has done and the team has done and see those images, we're happy to go through that a little more thoroughly with you. I do think that we have some that it will, we have gone quite a ways into this with a contract with the county. There clearly are areas that we believe they are out of compliance. We have a ten day notification period of this non compliance to cancel the contract or terminate the contract for cause.

6:24:35 – 6:24:53Speaker 12

We did send them notice. What we've been, of course, noticing of them of different aspects of concern throughout. But we did officially ask them to stop work on Monday when we were dealing with

6:24:53Speaker 1

And did they?

6:24:54 – 6:25:32Speaker 12

Current situation. The work did not cease on Monday. They were continuing. But they have now subsequently removed the posts that were erroneously placed in front of Marriott. They have gone out and they're willing to remove some other things. I honestly think you see some of the pictures where we see a width of about 40 feet of dune to maybe 10 to 15 feet of what we believe is open recreational beach in some of the worst areas. That should almost be

6:25:32Speaker 13

The other way around.

6:25:33 – 6:26:06Speaker 12

Yeah. And that much more. So in that instance, the initial conversation was, well, maybe we could move that 10 feet. But you still see that that would be 30 feet to maybe 10 to 15 feet. Again, we're still way off. Now, I think that conversation did evolve over the course of the afternoon. That was why some of our folks were missing from the meeting. They were literally out on the beach working through this. And so if you would like to get more of an update from them, we can do that.

6:26:07 – 6:26:58Speaker 1

Look, I don't have confidence that we can reach the right solution for the permanent measure on Hollywood Beach too quickly and in a hurry reacting from a failed implementation of this particular effort, this consequence will last forever for our beach. And so I think as much as we don't like to unroll or unwind agreements, this is a situation that I believe very strongly that it calls for us to stop it in its tracks, terminate, redesign. If the county wants to participate, great. And if not, we have to take the resiliency of the beach into our hands and find the right design that takes into consideration public safety, maneuverability, recreational space, and resiliency all in one for this top five beach in the country. It's top five because of its sandy, enjoyable area.

6:26:58 – 6:27:19Speaker 1

Yes, we want to protect it. We need to find the best way to do that, the way that preserves the recreational enjoyment of the beach. What you see in the picture in front of you completely takes that away. And that's made more apparent by the noncompliance with the terms. But I think the impact has been so great.

6:27:19 – 6:28:03Speaker 1

And to hear the fire chief talk about the added time and reaction and response opportunity of beach safety to respond considering the congestion that this also caused and the lack of maneuverability, we need to take that very seriously and decide, again, not only for the factor of what if there is a storm one day, but what about every day that people need to be rescued and people need to enjoy this beach and and for the beach to be maintained. So again, thank you for those who support terminating this and and taking this back to the drawing board. Again, without any ill will toward our county partners. I appreciate them stepping forward and saying, we'll help pay for Dunes. But we can see that this implementation has been failed.

6:28:04 – 6:28:47Speaker 1

And we really ought to go back to the drawing board. And if we need to go out alone, that's Okay. It's our beach, Hollywood Beach. We're responsible. And we ought to control that. I think the approach in the five year period and everything about the agreement and its inability to get to where it was supposed to be and the delay and the issue of how fast the contractor is moving and needs to move. The only way to really preserve our options and to preserve the beach for all of the reasons stated is to stop this agreement. And I understand it's heartache for all of us. No one wants to do that. But let's admit, there's got to be a better way than this. And this implementation can't continue because it's been bad from the beginning. And it's not going to get better.

6:28:47 – 6:28:58Speaker 13

I'm just wondering if there's still room for being able to avoid us having to expend the cost of it on our own.

6:28:58 – 6:29:28Speaker 1

I think we should be happy to spend our own money and control our own destiny on the sandy beach. I think we've learned that if we let whoever it might be design things for us and tell us how things ought to be on our beach when we know it best, we ought to realize that we do know it best and that we ought to really design things in a way that, again, preserves all of the factors that we need to consider safety, access, recreational opportunity, look at where the lifeguard stands are being pushed to.

6:29:28Speaker 13

Obviously, this is not being implemented the way it should This is obviously not right. I'm just wondering if there's something in between to try and

6:29:39 – 6:29:57Speaker 1

I'm happy to get in between. But in order to get in between, we need to stop this in our tracks, spend ample time redesigning this idea, and then implementing it at another period. That's my feeling. So all right. You guys want to discuss this further? Let's go to Commissioner Schuham.

6:29:57Speaker 15

So city manager, has the work stopped?

6:30:03Speaker 12

I need to ask staff that was out there today if they saw a work stoppage.

6:30:10 – 6:30:46Speaker 19

I'll give you a quick update. So they finished the sand placement. There's no more big trucks going on there. I asked them. We sent them an email on Monday to not plant and install any more poles. It kind of went on a little bit more because the contractor is trying to move pretty quick. So that kind of got rained back again. I talked to Stephanie to that. And I asked her again, are you guys planting anything? I said, we're not planting anything until you all give us direction. Depends. Because I told them.

6:30:46Speaker 15

So all the sand is in and nothing's being planted?

6:30:49 – 6:31:00Speaker 19

They're not planting. Well, they told Stephanie told me they are not planting. Okay. The contractor is doing their thing. So I just need to make sure that hopefully, they are not. But that's why she said, that they're not planting.

6:31:00 – 6:31:20Speaker 15

Is there any dispute between the county and its contractor? Or is the county saying their contractor's fine? In other words, we're talking about a violation of the agreement between the city and the county. But I'm curious if the county is concerned that its contractor has violated its contract.

6:31:20Speaker 19

I don't know if they are. We've told them the areas that we feel they are of concern. But I don't know if they have communicated to them or not.

6:31:28 – 6:31:55Speaker 15

Yeah. So I would be very careful because the design is ours. We gave them our master plan. And Christie helped us put it together. And that's their obligation is to put this thing in per our master plan and per the agreement. So my I totally support stopping what's happening. I do not support terminating a contract for default tonight. I think that really could backfire on this city, and we could end up having to pay the contractor. Who knows what the

6:31:56Speaker 15

Excuse me. Can I finish?

6:31:57Speaker 1

You'd to bring that

6:31:58 – 6:32:21Speaker 15

Knows what the potential risk is? So my suggestion is that we put an emergency meeting on our calendar when the county can come here, hear what they have to say. Obviously, are going to look at this and not agree that this is right. We already know that because we have emails from them. So the concern, to Commissioner Kalari's point, is yes, it gets very serious when the plants go in, but the plants are not going in.

6:32:21 – 6:33:17Speaker 15

So my recommendation, put an emergency meeting on the calendar, get the county in here, and resolve it. And maybe the resolution is stop work until next year, but to not give that contractor and that county an opportunity to express to us how to make it right, and we just unilaterally terminate for default without any further discussion, I think we're putting our city at risk of being on the wrong side of a contract dispute. So that would be my suggestion, is let's get all the parties, including all of us, in the room with the appropriate staff from the county. At that point, if they just say, excuse my French, screw you guys, we're going do it our way, that's a different story. But to make this decision tonight, I think, is not a good contractual decision unless you guys tell us that they have indicated that they are prepared to completely breach this contract no matter what happens now.

6:33:17 – 6:33:59Speaker 15

And I don't think that's the case. There has not been enough discussion with the county. So that would be my recommendation. Let's make sure that the plants aren't going in, which it sounds like you're there. Let's get something ASAP next week at the latest. And maybe they pause their contract for a year. We get the opportunity to continue to receive the funds to build this dune, but make sure that it's done without this unexpected, you know, erosion and things like that. Now, again, I kind of go back, and I would love to hear from Christy, but I live there. And this happens every single year. And this year has been really severe because we've had this cool, windy weather for a long time.

6:34:00 – 6:34:26Speaker 15

And if anything, it's given us an opportunity, to your point, to see, woah, maybe that two to one is not right. Because we're looking at it in the summer months, where the beach is wider, not in these winter months, where we have all this escarpment concerns and things like that. So I would prefer to look at this as an opportunity to make it right. I really don't want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. I think it's premature.

6:34:26 – 6:34:48Speaker 15

I think we have got to give the like you say, the county is doing this with good intentions. We are acting with good intentions. If nothing gets planted, then the issue really between now and let's say we can get something on the calendar for next week is life safety. And rip it out, you know. If you're concerned that you can't get a lifeguard to a safe take the pole out.

6:34:48 – 6:35:24Speaker 15

I mean, that's an easy one. And as long as the plants aren't in there, I think that, you know, we are fine to give it a week, give them an opportunity to see the pictures that we're looking at. But again, I go back to having had really a single complaint until two days ago when it hit Hollywood Tower. And obviously these pictures are unacceptable. Nobody is arguing that this is how it should be. I would just argue that it would be not right to not give our partners an opportunity to come and speak to us. And if they say, hey, we're sorry. This is it, or we're gone, then Okay.

6:35:24 – 6:35:55Speaker 1

So what I requested support for and received was to bring back at our next city commission meeting the termination, because we would have to vote on that. So that does give time for the county to meet with city staff and express whether or not they are willing to redesign and keep the agreement in place. It's obvious the design obviously doesn't support what we need to have on the beach for recreation or for public safety the violation of the two to one ratio. All of it, I think, needs to be reconsidered. And so

6:35:55Speaker 15

GREGORY But I want to be a part of those conversations, all of us. I mean, we

6:35:59Speaker 1

spent That would come to a city commission meeting at the next city commission meeting, is my point. In other words, the request for support was to bring because we're not going to vote tonight, to bring back an item.

6:36:09Speaker 15

JOSE Okay. I misunderstood. I thought you wanted to vote tonight. No, we're not going to

6:36:13 – 6:36:26Speaker 1

that I got support to bring that. But in the meantime, I want the agreement of all of us to give direction to staff and for the county to hear that in the meantime, it's stop the work, like, forthwith. Jose?

6:36:26 – 6:37:11Speaker 19

Just a couple of comments. Their contractor can only work until April 30. So that will be a concern on figuring out how if we are going to say, hey, stop the work, that has to happen because they are that the last time for them to work is April 30. Just to add a little bit and I think maybe Christie and everybody else will add to this A lot of what has been seen in this job is that the erosion on the beach has continued since the renourishment in a very exponential manner. So they even did the surveys that were done in February 2026.

6:37:12 – 6:37:44Speaker 19

There was an adjustment to the width of some of the dunes in some areas because of that you know, escarpment not escarpment, the beach receding. It seems like there's a need to look at this project and evaluate what this baseline is and how much it needs to be looked at. I think the more you look into this condition of the two to one, which obviously in the Doom Master Plan is intended to, hey, two parts of beach versus

6:37:45Speaker 1

Sounds good on paper.

6:37:46Speaker 19

As it gets narrower, it becomes less implementable, yeah? If you get down

6:37:53Speaker 15

It's clearly not two to one in that picture.

6:37:55 – 6:38:20Speaker 19

Even if you have two to one in certain areas, if it's too small and you dedicate 16 feet, you only have 30 feet of beach in certain areas. So there are areas that we might need to revisit and say, hey, look, this area those areas around the in the areas where we have the existing dunes where we already have dunes and there was an extension of the dunes outside and there's erosion in there.

6:38:21Speaker 1

So Jose, short, question the design has problems.

6:38:23Speaker 19

Yeah. The design problems from the baseline consideration given how quickly the erosion has been happening. So

6:38:32Speaker 1

So That's why saying we need go to the drawing board.

6:38:35 – 6:39:20Speaker 19

I agree. And that's my point is that originally when they changed it, it was meeting again the new survey that came up in February that was different from the original one. It was changed again. Now they're going through construction. When they start putting the poles, we all said, holy freaking moly, this is really a lot. It's really not a although they will disagree in some areas that it's not a two to one, we have measuring ourselves and looking at the pictures. You don't really have to measure a lot. Can tell that there are some areas where the two to one is not there. But again, a lot of it has to do with this issue of the beach receding, which is a portion of it could be seasonal. She probably answered that more than me.

6:39:20Speaker 19

But it would be ideal that you do have a two to one ratio in all seasons in the beach because you don't want to be in situation where So

6:39:28 – 6:39:56Speaker 1

it begs the question as to whether or not the design was properly really set out. And so let's hear from the rest of the body. I think I've repeated myself by now. I just do want to also mention that considering the fifteen day timeline and that it's not going to suddenly be corrected and finished in fifteen days, I think the posts and the rope that have been put in there as of right now need to be removed as well. So I just want to put that on the record.

6:39:57 – 6:40:11Speaker 14

Commissioner Biederman? So I would support a stop work order, however we have to stop them, till we could figure it out. But my concern is how many tens of millions of dollars it would cost us to cancel the contract with the county?

6:40:11Speaker 1

It's like a 1 and a half million dollar contract. They

6:40:15Speaker 14

violated it. We're talking about future. How many tens of millions

6:40:18Speaker 4

of dollars is it going cost

6:40:19 – 6:40:40Speaker 14

in the future based on what their promises are for maintenance and all these other things? Who's the permitting agency, Raelynn? And maybe we can get the permitting agency to come in and say, this isn't what we permitted. You guys got to stop. And then it's not on us to stop them. It's the permitting agents, whether it's Army Corps or the state EPA It's or the the

6:40:40Speaker 12

Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

6:40:42Speaker 14

So maybe they need to come in and do a stop work order based on the fact that it's not what they permitted, right?

6:40:50Speaker 1

You want to wait for them? Do we want to control it?

6:40:52Speaker 14

No, I mean, I think that

6:40:53 – 6:41:31Speaker 12

The challenge is that this is not like normal construction projects where you here's my site, and my site isn't changing. The site is the beach and the beach is constantly changing. And so they had a plan that showed certain dimensions. And the base of that, the site, has shrunken dramatically in certain areas. And now they're still building the 40 foot plan on the less than 50 foot site.

6:41:32 – 6:42:13Speaker 12

And so that is the challenge. And the contractor is those are some of the issues that I think we're facing. Staff supports a stop work order, if that's what we want to call it. We would like not to see any additional work of installation of rope, installation of plants, installation of posts, until we can really come to some agreements, if we can. And I do think that there are what we have identified now, seen it in action.

6:42:14 – 6:42:53Speaker 12

There are several areas that don't work for our public safety folks, don't work for the conditions on the beach in the worst case scenario, and quite frankly may have been misguided to begin with. We all thought that we wanted to keep this 10 foot path next to the knee wall. But that's coming off the usable width of the beach and will actually be behind a dune. And quite frankly, our public safety folks have found that not to be beneficial. In many cases, there are other obstructions within that area that aren't dune but are a tree or other infrastructure.

6:42:53 – 6:43:18Speaker 12

And so now it's really not 10 feet clear. I think the idea was to maybe visually we were hoping for this more meandering type of dune that would preserve some of these treed areas that people enjoy and that you could still get our equipment, our gaiters, our rescue equipment, our vehicles along that knee wall. That is not happening. That does not happen.

6:43:19 – 6:44:02Speaker 12

It is. It is. And that's why I'm saying there were some design flaws that I think we thought were well intended at the time, but are not functioning as we thought they would. And this needs to be one of those surgical type of things where we look at each area and really figure it out based on the conditions that are there right now with the contractor. And instead, it's like, here's your blueprint. Go. And the contractor is going great guns. And county staff is not there doing these nuanced type of adjustments. And we've tried to be there, but we don't control their contractor.

6:44:02 – 6:44:55Speaker 14

So here's my final comments. Number one, I would it's hard to believe that the beat shrunk that much in these pictures that we have that much of a disparity. Number two, we have a workshop next week on Wednesday from nine to eleven. I think we should have an executive session because if we're going to cancel the contract, I think that could be potential legal action which would allow us to do an executive session in the morning that day. So I think we should do an executive session in the morning prior to the septic to sewer workshop if my colleagues agree and the attorney thinks it's legal.

6:44:57Speaker 14

And finally, I'd like to hear from Chris and Christie is that their name?

6:45:04Speaker 1

Sounds like a law firm.

6:45:06 – 6:45:39Speaker 14

On what they saw today, what their opinion is. Because we're sitting up here setting policy but they're the experts and I have faith in Chris representing the city as much faith as I have in doctor Gerardo representing the county. So with the city manager's approval, I'd like to hear what Chris has to say. But we are running into a late night. I don't know if it makes sense based on we're bringing it back anyway, but it's up to you.

6:45:40Speaker 1

I think it would be a little

6:45:41 – 6:46:00Speaker 12

Well, you would like to at least I think it may be beneficial for you to at least see some of the pictures for everyone to kind of get on the same page as to some of the dimensions and some of the issues. I think you have a pretty good idea. Certainly, of you have been out there and really seen it. But we'll try to do a brief presentation.

6:46:01Speaker 42

Arlene, can you bring up the PowerPoint, please?

6:46:04Speaker 14

Josh, also sounds like

6:46:06Speaker 42

with the PowerPoint.

6:46:07Speaker 14

Governor from New Jersey.

6:46:08Speaker 1

Chris Christie.

6:46:14Speaker 12

The PowerPoint.

6:46:18Speaker 14

Thank you, Chris.

6:46:19 – 6:46:32Speaker 42

Of course. Thank you. Good evening. So some of the comment earlier in all the photos that we've seen talked about the ratio of the two to one. And that's what we had kind of focused on.

6:46:32 – 6:47:15Speaker 42

A lot of this discussion didn't just start over this past weekend, but has been ongoing with the county in maintaining that access. And like we talked about, public access for the beachgoers themselves, for fire rescue. We've been talking over the past couple of months with police chief and fire chief, the lifeguards, and hearing all of these same concerns as we've gone through the project. So what we did this week is went out and we did some spot checking just along the beach and just to see if we could see where we are with this two to one ratio. So I'll start on the right side of the graphic, which is at Douglas Street.

6:47:15 – 6:47:47Speaker 42

This is just north of North Beach Park. And this is an area where fire rescue had some issues getting through more recently with their vehicles. And what we saw there is the overall beach there is 63 feet. And that's kind of a comment that I'll make throughout this whole slide, is that the beach has narrowed. And to the point that Commissioner Biederman just brought up in some prior comments, we have seen some very severe erosion happen even since the county did their initial survey.

6:47:47 – 6:48:32Speaker 42

But also, they did a field survey in January. And even since January, we've seen more severe erosion with all the wind and waves we've seen. So in that, starting with Douglas Street, that overall beach width is about 63 feet. The new dune was about 24 feet. Open beach was about 39 feet in that section that we looked at. And that gives us about a ratio of about 1.6 to one, so less than the two to one. Going a little further south to near Scott Street and Liberty Street this is in the area of the Hollywood Towers, where we have received a lot of the feedback more recently. A lot of the photos that we just saw are from that area. And the beach in those areas range from about 69 feet to 79, so still fairly narrow. We had an offset from the knee wall that's been discussed.

6:48:32 – 6:49:01Speaker 42

So that offset was about 11 feet in that area. The dune width was approximately 34 feet, so a little bit less than the 40 feet that was designed, but still near that design footprint. And Open Beach ranged from about 34 feet at Scott Street to 44 at Liberty. And it gives us, at Scott Street, only a one to one ratio, nearly the same amount of dune to Open Beach. And then at Liberty, it was about 1.3.

6:49:01 – 6:49:36Speaker 42

And we try to do our best to try to figure out that open beach area. This was not an official survey, but I was out with Christie, our consultant. And we did our best to measure from what is called the seaward side of the eastern part of the dune to what we could see now as the current high water mark, they call it the rack line or the debris line where you see the seaweed collect. So we did our best and tried to do some spot checking along there. And then moving further south, South Of Keating Park, the beach gets even more narrow in that section, about approximately 56 feet wide.

6:49:36 – 6:50:16Speaker 42

This is South Of Keating approaching down towards the Diplomat. We had areas with one existing seawall. So they did do a smaller offset of only three feet. The dune width in those areas were about 28 to 29 feet. And then because the beach meanders and the width changes, they did do some modification of the dune from 29 feet in one location to 17 in the other, but still leaving us with a ratio of even a lesser than one to one. So meaning that the open beach was less than the width of the dune in those areas. So it's very concerning in that southern section.

6:50:17Speaker 3

Thank you. Thank you, Chris. So

6:50:21 – 6:50:49Speaker 1

I have other folks who wanted to speak here. Don't think we heard from Commissioner Hernandez yet. Then we'll hopefully, I think we've we've found a direction, stop work, bring back an item to consider termination at the next city commission meeting. In the meantime, you'll have time to speak with the county. But I think, as Ray Lynn has pointed out, we really need to reconsider this design. It's defective as it applies to the beach, and the implementation has obviously been with a lot of default. Commissioner Hernandez?

6:50:50 – 6:51:06Speaker 8

Thank you, mayor. This is a picture that it's almost impossible to see with the effects that's taking place on the beach, although the measurements are good. But what I like to go back to is to the picture that we had earlier today, a little while ago.

6:51:06Speaker 42

I can also show some of the these are screenshots from a video, from a drone video, that the police did. So this is showing some of those snapshots

6:51:14Speaker 1

Heating beach.

6:51:15Speaker 42

Along the beach.

6:51:15 – 6:51:40Speaker 8

No, I want to go back to the picture. There you go. Stop right there. This is my background. And basically, this is earthwork. It doesn't make a difference if you do it on a private side or if you do it on a beach. Because when you look at to eliminate the contract based on a two to one ratio, two to one ratio of what measurement? This is flexed. This is moving. The beach is being eroded so the measurement ends less.

6:51:40 – 6:52:02Speaker 8

Yet what the contractor may have was what the survey said months ago. And he's going by that contract. So to the contractor, he's going by the letter that, you don't have to agree with me, but I just, no. So for the contractor, I put myself in the contractor's place, he's doing what he was being paid to do. What's happening here is the beach is eroding so the area is getting smaller.

6:52:02 – 6:52:32Speaker 8

So we may not have a say as far as them breaching the contract because the contract says, do it based this measurement out of this survey. What we're not taking into consider or what they're not taking into consideration is that that is moving. That contract needs to be adjusted as the beach moves. Here's where they failed. And they failed altogether, period. There's no question. You see that palm tree? We were told that the palm trees were gonna be

6:52:33Speaker 1

Have the wells.

6:52:34Speaker 8

Driven around that the wells would be protected. That's not being protected, quite the contrary. It's being drowned.

6:52:41Speaker 1

And that's not the worst of it by far.

6:52:42 – 6:53:26Speaker 8

Oh, I know it's not the worst of it. But my point is, if we're gonna go to, you're not doing what you said you were gonna do, let's go to what we know that we can actually prove that they're not doing. And why this is not happening? Is because the equipment that they're using is too large of equipment to be able to make a well around that palm tree. They're not using the proper equipment to be able to mitigate those. And they're roping in this thing rather than to rope around in order for us to be able to maintain that palm tree properly. That's where you have the ability to say, you're not living up to your contract. The two to one ratio when it comes to the measurement, that's flexion motion. The nature is taking care of that and they will say, I was told to do 60 feet. I'm doing 60 feet.

6:53:26 – 6:53:49Speaker 12

The two to one, can I just clarify? I want to just make sure it's clear to everyone. The two to one ratio is in our agreement, our access agreement with the county that they agreed to maintain that separately. They have an agreement with their contractor that's based on a template. They were to be adjusting the template with their contractor to meet the terms of our ILA.

6:53:49Speaker 8

But I'm going to my point.

6:53:50Speaker 12

But I understand what I just

6:53:52 – 6:54:27Speaker 8

I'm going to my point. Our agreement is two to one with the county. The contractor doesn't care what our agreement is with the county. He's got a set of measurement that he's doing and that's what he's doing. The problem that we have here is that the contract is ignoring what our plea is. Because he's not working for us. They're working for the county. And as far as they're concerned, they want to get this job done before April 30 so they can move on to the next project. So I agree with the mayor that we need to stop this. Whether we cancel the contract or not, that's up to us and how the county reacts to what our pleas are.

6:54:28 – 6:55:06Speaker 8

The truth of the matter is, we don't want dead coconut trees. We don't wanna be able to hinder our beachgoers being able to go to a beach because of what's going on. We need to be flex in nature, if you would. That's not happening because the contractor is not listening to us because they don't work for us. And the county is not reacting fast enough with the contractor in order for that to take place. So I agree that we should tell them stop tomorrow. Don't do anything else until we come back. April 30 is around the corner. It's two weeks. They're not going be able to finish the job unless they do the planting and they may not be able to correct it to our satisfaction.

6:55:07 – 6:55:32Speaker 8

So the fact that the people from the beach are saying this is already three feet high plus the planting, we're not going to be able to see the beach. Now based on what we have, we know what the intentions were when it comes to the doing. We need to be flexible and be able to adjust it. I agree that we need to stop this. So my suggestion is, I would say stop it tomorrow.

6:55:33 – 6:56:03Speaker 8

And then, we don't have to cancel the contract. We just need to say, don't move, don't do anything else until actually we come to an agreement as to what's going to be done. Because right now, the contractor is moving forward with whatever contract he has with the county, but that's not the same as what we have with the county. And they may say, well, it's exactly what we said we're going to do. We do two to one ratio based on that measurement back from February when the measurement is not the same today.

6:56:03 – 6:56:40Speaker 8

So the fact that they're doing 40 feet dunes in an area that it's now 60 feet, it doesn't make any sense for us because it kills our beach, it kills our economic engine. And that wasn't the intent. I don't think that was the intent from the county. I don't think that was the intent from us. And we need to be able to protect our beach. So I would say, stop it, stop it tomorrow. And then let's see where it goes from there. Because as you can tell, just by that, that is something you can say for sure. That's not being protected and you said you would. The other measurement, you may not be able to have a leg to stand on because the contractor is doing exactly what he's being paid

6:56:40 – 6:57:18Speaker 1

to do. So I think we have consensus, city manager, to stop work tomorrow immediately, bring back an item for termination or modification of the agreement at the next meeting. My hunch is that if they cooperate and we can let the agreement survive and go through a redesign and have public safety involved and really look at this with the detailed surgery that it needs to have, then I would love for the county to participate in that. But I can understand if they would say, we're walking away. Go ahead and do your surgery on your own.

6:57:18 – 6:57:58Speaker 1

I think, still, the city needs to do this surgically, even if there's a tussle about the termination of the agreement. It's that important to us. And I don't say it lightly. And none of us enjoy that. But we have to be, I think and we are adult enough to recognize where we had also made a mistake in implementing a design like this and having it be implemented like this to the detriment of and to the impact that we're seeing on the beach today that weren't contemplated. So it's Okay. We need to redesign, and we need to look at things again and reconsider the approach, hopefully with the county. Commissioner Schuhem, go ahead.

6:57:58 – 6:58:43Speaker 15

So some information that I would like first of all, I would like a copy of the ILA, because I want to understand, what does it say about the two to one ratio? Does it just say two times dry beach to one dune with no measurement, no milestone, no standard? Is it just two to one? What does it say? As Rae Lynn said, if the design is misguided and we terminate, we're technically in breach. Who's responsible for paying for all the plant material that's been purchased? And if it's us, maybe we should take possession of it. These are the things that I think we need Christy's information. I mean, there's a lot of unknowns. When you talk about terminating a contract, whether it's for convenience or for default, there's lots of opportunities to mitigate damages.

6:58:43 – 6:59:13Speaker 15

And I want to make sure that we're doing that. This contractor, to your point, which is why I'm agreeing with you, he's probably doing exactly what he's been asked to do. And so if we breach our contract with the county and that guy gets terminated, we're going to be responsible for the breach between the county and their contractor. And so all of these things have to be considered and considered quickly. So what I would like us to discuss briefly is a list of all the things that we see that are wrong.

6:59:13 – 6:59:36Speaker 15

We've already talked about the POMs. We've talked about the emergency lane. We have talked prior to today a lot about the access, because Joseph's been trying to convert that to grade. The two to one ratio, are there other issues that we need answers on from the county, or are those the four things? What are all of the areas that we're struggling with?

6:59:36 – 7:00:12Speaker 1

So Carol, I think all those, but also, let's admit, some of the design and I know that it'll be touchy with the county some of the design as to where and how linear and continuous the doing is is, I think, a problem for beach safety. And so I really think it has to go not only to the issues of where the work hasn't complied with the letter of the agreement between us and the county, but also to get the county's buy in that we need to hold our horses and redesign this for a better result for Hollywood Beach. Or maybe it's an

7:00:12 – 7:00:27Speaker 15

interpretation thing, because it could be the meandering is something we envisioned based on the beach line changing. And so based on the interpretation of the two to one ratio, maybe it should be meandering. And so that would be a violation. Or

7:00:28Speaker 1

there should be some areas where there is no room or not wise to have a doing. In other words, be more sporadic. All I'm saying is we ought to really look at this again. I mean, let's admit

7:00:37 – 7:00:57Speaker 15

I have no problem with that. But for the purposes of tonight, I would just like to if there's others, for example, Commissioner Gruber, you were out there. These are the ones that I have really focused on, the access things and the trees. You know, there's been things that we've talked about. But if there's others, I want to just try to collect

7:00:57Speaker 1

The height of the posts and the posts?

7:00:59Speaker 15

I think the posts were going be cut down.

7:01:00Speaker 1

No. I'm looking where the hole is in the rope.

7:01:04Speaker 15

The height of the post.

7:01:05Speaker 1

I don't think there should be any post and rope to begin with.

7:01:07Speaker 8

No, but here's the thing. If you're trying to get that from us tonight, I don't think it's proper. I'll you what's

7:01:13Speaker 15

All inclusive, but at least so Damaris has the list that's really bothering us right Well,

7:01:19 – 7:01:30Speaker 8

they can just look at the video and find out. But I can tell you that the one thing that's important is for them to stop. And then we can walk over there. We can talk to our staff. We can look at it and say, make the list of those things that you're talking about.

7:01:30Speaker 15

We've done that. But I

7:01:31 – 7:02:11Speaker 8

don't think that list is available right now. And I don't think that it's proper to try to come up with one just right now. I think the key here is to stop it, reassess it, and then talk to the county and says, these are the things that we don't find that are going the way we thought it should be going. Can you fix those? And if they say yes, okay, then we can turn around, let's proceed. And if they say no, because of A and YZ reasons, then we have a choice to make. But the key is to stop it so that this doesn't continue. And then let's reassess what's happening and have a conversation with them and says, can we do it the way that we envision? And that's all we're asking for.

7:02:11Speaker 8

So we can have the public Thank you. Buy in

7:02:13 – 7:02:53Speaker 15

So I think that, I think there's consensus to ensure that the work has stopped. I don't think there's anybody suggesting that the contractors should continue. I think that you have a list of four or five of the most critical points to at least commence discussions. I'm out there all the time. I know several of us have been out there a lot. And so we need to those are the most pressing. Now remember, we did agree to carve out Central Beach. You made exceptions in front of the hotels. So we did tweak this design. But I also don't want to lose sight of the fact that we had a master plan that a ton of people spent a ton of time on and was agreeable.

7:02:53 – 7:03:09Speaker 15

So, Christy, I would just you're here. I would like to hear from you. Is there anything wrong with the master plan, or is it the execution that's the issue right now? I mean, we know beaches move.

7:03:09 – 7:03:42Speaker 35

We do know beaches move, yes. So the master plan did anticipate, as we've all been discussing, the two to one ratio, two parts beach, one part dune. That premise was based on an average beach width at the time, which we're going back to 2017, 2018, 2019. I don't think anything's fundamentally changed with how beaches work. But we are seeing a lot of erosion right now.

7:03:43 – 7:04:50Speaker 35

We are experiencing these king tides, potentially effects of sea level rise. I think that is something we discussed briefly when talking to the counties, just taking into consideration to some degree current conditions and really this concept of resilience and what that means. We chose to only update the master plan in the sense of the approach to the dune elevation in some areas. But in terms of the master plan as a baseline, it did reference the chronically eroded beaches. And it did reference the fact that there should be special consideration given in those areas that were identified as tending to be narrower over time, which was primarily by the diplomat, but also some of these areas of North Beach where we are seeing the issues.

7:04:51 – 7:05:25Speaker 35

Those were discussed with the county. There were some adjustments made, as we've all seen, but obviously not enough of an adjustment. So I feel like the fundamentals and bones are still there and are still valid in a relative sense. But I do also think that we've all learned some important lessons. And one of those is potentially taking into consideration sea level rise, exacerbated storm events, exacerbated erosion.

7:05:27 – 7:06:07Speaker 35

I know we're all being optimistic about the potential benefits of the sand bypassing at Port Everglades. But that's still years out. So I think we do need to take a conservative approach, be protective of the city, be protective of the beaches. As everyone has said, public safety is paramount, tantamount. I guess one thing I would say, given where we are and this is just my personal opinion is that we do have an opportunity right now, potentially working under the county's permit. We have two weeks. If we want to move sand

7:06:07Speaker 8

Now is the time to do it.

7:06:09 – 7:06:50Speaker 35

Now we have time and a permit to move sand. April 30 is our cutoff for moving sand. So if we really feel like we have, I know we feel like we have a few areas that are serious emergency access, life safety locations, I really feel like that should be the priority in discussing with the county because it's only really through them that we have the legal ability to fix those moving sand. The planting of the plants, the things that have stopped, those can be dealt with in time and space. But my concern is working with the opportunity we have right now.

7:06:50 – 7:07:06Speaker 15

So city managers, if possible I don't know if you have walked this project yet. But is it possible to collect, first and foremost, those list of areas that need to be addressed under the permit before April 30?

7:07:07 – 7:08:04Speaker 12

Absolutely. I mean, we've already started to do that. And I think that we understand the concerns that residents have raised, the hoteliers have raised, our public safety personnel have raised, beachgoers have raised. And I think we have a pretty good handle on it, putting it all together, coming to agreement with what needs to happen. I think the most important thing right now is getting agreement from the county to stop the work to allow us to attempt to figure out what can actually be done then between the time when we figure this out and the remainder of the permitted period, and then what needs to wait until the fall when we could begin work again?

7:08:04 – 7:09:03Speaker 12

And is the county willing to stay on in that discussion and be a partner? Will they maybe seek to extend the permit through FDEP that might allow for some more of this surgical approach? I think what we have seen is this sort of overall idea of just kind of coming in and getting it all done is not maybe the right way to do it. It sounded good, but it doesn't create the amount of flexibility that we needed to really be able to address the ever changing conditions and really be targeted in how to do this so that it can be accepted while we wait to see those future benefits of these projects that will be helping us in the long term. But in the near term, we still have some very seriously eroded areas.

7:09:04 – 7:09:43Speaker 1

All right, everyone. Well, I think we've discussed it and we've given direction. And so to sum it up, we're going to stop work. We're going to review everything with the county. And we're going to bring back an item at the next commission meeting to have an item on the agenda. So if the commission does decide to take whatever action, that will be properly presented in a resolution and give us the leeway to make a decision at that time. All right. Thank you all so much. Let's see if there's if anyone has additional comments on other subjects. Let's run through the list. Commissioner Biederman, items today for comments or a wave?

7:09:43Speaker 14

We're done with all the agenda items?

7:09:46 – 7:10:04Speaker 14

Okay. I just want to make some announcements. First of all, thank you. The lights at Driftwood and Hollywood Westfield are looking great. Thank you to Nuresco and all the hard work they're doing.

7:10:07 – 7:10:18Speaker 14

Remind everybody out there that septic to sewer workshop number three is next Wednesday at 9AM. Mayor, you're going to announce the mayor's chess thing?

7:10:18Speaker 1

You go ahead.

7:10:19 – 7:11:05Speaker 14

Okay. So this Saturday at David Park is going to be the mayor's chess challenge. Sunrise.gov/chess, I think, is the address to register. And if you are interested in knowing and being involved in the trees that will be planted along Washington Street and along 72nd Avenue, that is going to be at the Kay Gaither Center, 6291 Funston Street at 6PM on April 20. And while I voted in favor of supporting the naming of North Beach Park after former commissioner Sue Gunsberger.

7:11:06 – 7:11:45Speaker 14

There are so many other unsung heroes out here, out in our citizenry that also deserve such an honor that have had impacts. And to be honest, I was hoping that we were going to name North Beach Park or work on naming North Beach Park after Bob Giacen. That was very instrumental in creating North Beach Park back in the day. So if we come up with something to name after Bob Giacen after, hopefully, he'll be with us for a long time. But at some point, I think we should honor him with naming something after him.

7:11:45 – 7:11:57Speaker 1

I might want to propose, at the right time, Commissioner Beeterman something to the county to name in North Beach Park some feature or an element of the park. It could be a great way to do it. Okay.

7:11:57Speaker 14

Thank you very much, and have a great night, everybody.

7:12:00Speaker 1

All right. Thank you. Commissioner Quintana, anything tonight?

7:12:04Speaker 13

I actually did have something, but I think it's been such a long night. I'm going to wait until the next

7:12:10Speaker 1

Thank bring it you. Commissioner Schuham?

7:12:12 – 7:12:35Speaker 15

I just want to thank everybody from staff that helped with the One City at a Time event that memorial put on on Saturday. It was incredibly well attended and well done, as per usual. And just thank Molina and Christina for another incredible salsa fest. And the rest can wait.

7:12:35 – 7:13:14Speaker 8

Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez. Thank you, mayor. Great salsa fest. Also, I would ask that the city give us an update as to when the one way that's going to take place and those street ends, sidewalks, and what have you. And if we could actually meet so I could show you the ones we're talking about. And what's going to happen with the parking spaces that are too narrow South of Washington Street on 19th Avenue and what have you. An update when it comes to that. If we could get also an update regarding the lighting. I know that we were waiting for some equipment and material to come back.

7:13:15 – 7:13:40Speaker 8

If that has happened, people from the downtown would like to know. And I would ask Code if we could actually do a sweep when it comes to from Pembroke Road, including some of the fences on the businesses on Pembroke Road that if you go by, can see that there's a great deal of signage on their fence all the way to Hollywood Boulevard and so on, just so we can keep everything fresh.

7:13:40Speaker 1

On which road? Just clarify.

7:13:42Speaker 8

Pembroke Road. Pembroke Road, just

7:13:45Speaker 1

From Dixie to 95 kind of thing?

7:13:47 – 7:14:03Speaker 8

Yes, sir. Please come out, whether it's got a dune or not.

7:14:03Speaker 1

Savor Soflo on Hollywood Beach, Kevin. All right. Vice Mayor Kaleri had to step out.

7:14:11Speaker 2

Hi. I'm here.

7:14:14Speaker 1

Thank you, Vice Mayor. Any comments or are you waving? I

7:14:19 – 7:14:50Speaker 2

just have one comment and then I'll waive the rest. But Stan Goldman Park brought to my attention. There's two things that I need for someone to look into, overnight parking. People are leaving their trucks in overnight parking in that area. I don't know how we could address that. And in addition, on Friday evenings, a roller skate group is coming with a ramp, their own ramp, and their own railings and, drinking alcohol on the premises between six and eight on Friday night. Just FYI. That's it. Thank you.

7:14:52Speaker 1

Alright. Commissioner Gruber, you wave? I wave. All right. I'll wave as well. City attorney?

7:15:01Speaker 30

No comment. Thank you.

7:15:03Speaker 1

City manager?

7:15:05 – 7:15:41Speaker 12

There were just a couple of things that I would like to update you all on. One is kudos just quickly, to our Office of Human Resources and Risk Management. Mental Health America has once again I think this is an important thing, given some of the things we've heard lately Mental Health America has once again, for the fifth straight year, recognized the city as a 2026 platinum recipient of the Bell Seal for Workplace Mental Health. And this is the nation's leading recognition for US employers committed to creating mentally healthy workplaces. We improved our score.

7:15:42 – 7:16:19Speaker 12

And this really goes to show the work that our benefits and wellness team is doing in our Office of Human Resources and Risk Management. Can you move forward on the slide? The next one up is our Ben Well newsletter. And this comes out each month and is just chock full of opportunities for our employees to be as healthy as possible, both physically and mentally, and also to have some fun doing it with things like virtual cooking demos and things like that. So I just want to congratulate them.

7:16:19 – 7:16:34Speaker 12

Then on a more serious note, I need to bring up Andrea Winget very quickly to go over what occurred today at the Unsafe Structures Board related to the Hollywood Beach Hotel and make a couple of other important announcements. Good

7:16:35 – 7:16:55Speaker 18

afternoon, Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Commissioners. Andrea Winget, Director of Development Services. So early today, as many of you know, the city presented if we go to the first slide back one, two. This one. The city presented the Hollywood Beach Hotel to the unsafe structure board.

7:16:55 – 7:17:34Speaker 18

The city actually prevailed in what we were asking for. There were some slight tweaks that the board had with it, really relative to the dates of when they would need to comply with the order. And they also did add in that the mezzanine on the east side be looked at for selective demolition as well, because of the condition of it, which is a picture in there. So that was one add on. But we really did we got what we were asking for. The official board order is expected to come out in a week. So this is just a general representation of what they discussed today. We will share that with the commission when we do receive that.

7:17:35Speaker 1

JAMES Andrea, my one question is, was the building represented? And

7:17:39Speaker 18

I was just participate. JAMES Yes. I was just going

7:17:44 – 7:17:58Speaker 18

property owner did have an attorney who showed up today. And they actually were requesting a continuance. And the board just went with what staff's recommendation was and said, why kick the can down the road? You need to maintain your building. Maintain it.

7:17:58 – 7:18:31Speaker 18

So we did get the order issued today. And so we will share that with you. And I just would also just like to take a minute for those who might still be up late watching the commission meeting, that we do have another survey that we're putting out for the Washington Park area. We're trying to finalize all the recommendations from the community. And so if anybody is watching this at home, if you scan the QR code and please take a look at our survey that is out there so you could share your insights of what you're looking for out in that area.

7:18:32 – 7:19:07Speaker 18

And in addition to Washington Park, we also have another study that is out there. And that is for the Hollywood Beach study, where we're also requesting information from the community relative to the beach and creating a bonus area for the beach. So here is another QR code for that. I would also like to announce that we do have two upcoming meetings relative to the beach, two engagements. One is at Boulevard Heights, scheduled on April 29 from 10AM to 8PM.

7:19:07 – 7:19:25Speaker 18

It is an all day event where people could come in and share their ideas and communicate with staff and the consultants as well. We also have a second event at the Garfield Street Community Center on April 30, which is also from 10AM to 8PM. And that concludes my remarks.

7:19:31Speaker 12

No further remarks.

7:19:32Speaker 1

This meeting is adjourned. Thank you all.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.