Regular City Commission Meeting - Regular Meeting

Wednesday, March 25, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Regular City Commission Meeting
Meeting Type
Regular City Commission Meeting
Location
Hollywood, FL
Meeting Date
March 25, 2026

Transcript

1014 sections (from 1,197 segments)

10:500

All right, mayor Ron.

10:51 – 11:321

All right. Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to City Hall and the City of Hollywood. Today is echo day. I hear an echo. Today is 03/25/2026. We're here for a regular city commission meeting, although as we always like to say, there's never a regular meeting because there's always important and exciting and impactful substance on the agenda. Today is no different. And so before I ask everyone to rise for the Pledge of Allegiance, I would like to extend a moment of privilege to Commissioner Quintana. We all, all of us, as a community, lost a great special friend, our good friend Frank Leonardi.

11:32 – 11:431

And Idoma would love to reflect about Frank, remember him. And if anyone would like to join her in some comments on the dais or off, we invite you to do so as well. Idoma.

11:43 – 11:572

Thank you so much, mayor. I think that probably many people in the room today and perhaps many people at home have, at some point, come in contact with Frank Leonardi.

11:59 – 12:262

and I worked together at Broward County with Commissioner Fert for the last almost twelve years. And we really got to know each other well. But everyone up here on the dais has stories to tell about Frank's influence on their life. And I'll tell you, we're all going to miss him. But Arlene, if you would just show who we're talking about.

12:26 – 12:472

This is Frank. Frank was 97 years old when he passed away about two weeks ago and he worked until about six months ago.

12:48 – 13:172

man lived a full life. He was such a big presence at Rotary. If you go to the library, he was always there. You can see that he spent time in relationship with Commissioner Bladner and with Commissioner Hernandez. I do feel sad that I won't get to be with Frank every day anymore.

13:17 – 13:432

But there are just so many good memories together, a man so full of joy and brought joy to so many. So, his job at the county was really constituent services. So, people with difficult problems in their lives would walk into the library office. And he helped everyone with the same open heart, no matter what their situation was. He didn't judge them.

13:43 – 14:132

And he just did everything he could to help, never letting bureaucracy stand in his way. He had a reputation for advocating for residents passionately to the point where people would do whatever he said just so that he would stop calling and harassing the people on staff. So Frank was a big spirit, very much a good man and a good heart, and we have lots of great memories to share of him. Thank you, mayor.

14:14 – 14:451

Thank you, Adama. Great reflection. I knew Frank from when I first ran for mayor. He really befriended me and kind of took me in and gave me a lot of guidance along the way. He was politically active in Hollywood for decades, even ran for a city commission, I think, the eighties or nineties? 2000. 2000? 2000. With ninety seven years, it's hard to keep track. I only knew him for, like, the past eleven. But I know he had a great history starting out. His family served was a US veteran, right?

14:455

Yes, Korea.

14:46 – 15:101

Korea. Served in Korea. Also owned, I think, a restaurant in the Northeast before he moved to Hollywood. He was a very proud Italian American here in the city, gave a lot of his time and a lot of love to the Italian American club here in Hollywood. And all that Idelma said was such a great heart, a gentleman, always treated everyone with respect and really had that old world character to him that really stood out.

15:10 – 15:401

And I'm going to miss a really good friend. I used to tell people, I'm going to lunch with my 90 year old friend because I was so proud of the fact that he was so with it. As Delma said, he even worked and would drive and would have his own unofficial parking spot right in front of the library. And thanks to everyone, Javon, for accommodating Frank's needs in his, you know, final years where his mobility, you know, started getting less and less. But a lot of us a lot of reasons to be proud of this person, to have in our community.

15:40 – 16:051

He Commissioner Gruber, who's not here today, reflected when he learned of Frank's passing that Frank was like his little league coach in the rotary baseball days. So this is going back almost fifty years of Frank's contributions to the city and his impact on kids and what he gave of himself along the years. And so we're really gonna miss him for the person. I know his family, he's gonna miss him dearly. But we're all certainly proud to have known him.

16:05 – 16:391

And again, we're just going to miss him. I'm going to miss him. And just grateful to everybody here who did their best also to help Frank in his final year of life where his physical ailments took the best of his mobility. His his mind though, I want you to know, stayed sharp all the way to the very end until he was, you know, intubated, let's just say. And Commissioner Caleri, you, you know, like you do to so many people who have medical needs and are in their final moments in life, you go so above and beyond.

16:40 – 17:031

And your heart really goes out to people. And you just try to help them navigate this medical care that's so complicated. And you do it because you care about the people and about Frank, which you guys knew, I think, for decades from the rotary days, too. So thank you for all that you did to try to help Frank at the end, well. Yadavna, the family, Abim, all the friends.

17:03 – 17:381

I know he was excited about a lunch that he was scheduling with George Keller and some old foe and some sorry, wouldn't say old folks. Some older older generation of Hollywood leadership that Frank knew along along those decades. George's history, who we know he's, you know, in his final days of service here in Hollywood, go back decades and he knew Frank for those decades. So it kind of speaks to Frank's legacy with all of you who have been here for decades and knew him. So I'm going to miss you, Frank. Tracy?

17:41 – 18:216

Hi. So yes, just to add a note. So we all have people that walk in your lives for a short period of time or you've known probably your whole entire life being in Hollywood and Frank is one of them. He definitely would leave his mark. And his mark was a phone call every Mother's Day, every Christmas, every holiday you can think of, even probably Memorial Day. And he would always say, I just want to call and tell you I love you And thank you. Thank you for being in my life. And he thanked everyone, good, bad, indifferent. And he loved everyone. And he truly gave his all just to make people happy.

18:21 – 18:496

And if anybody ever met Frank, I think that you could feel that love. You could feel that energy. And he just wouldn't skip a beat. He wouldn't miss a beat. He'd make sure if you were in the room, he would find you. He would tell you thank you, how much he loved you. And really, he did it his way. He was a go getter, stubborn as all get out. God bless him, stubborn as all get out. But that's what made Frank Frank.

18:49 – 19:326

And God bless his children, Ada, Dina, and Frank Junior, Diane, his ex wife, who they were with him every minute up to the end. We tried as much as we could as colleagues and friends. But ultimately, I know the day before he passed, I had the privilege of sitting in the room and talking with him briefly and his daughter. And the best part, I think, is he made his mark because he was able to tie bonds with his family and build bridges. And you know what? What a blessing that is. And so I'm sure he's smiling up in heaven down on all of us. And he's doing keep up the good work. And we're going to keep it up for Frank. So thank you for having that opportunity to meet you, Frank. Love you.

19:347

Great words.

19:34 – 19:531

And Tracy, as you're talking, I want to let this moment go without saying how much Frank appreciated the nursing staff and the doctors at Memorial Health Care System and Memorial Pembroke specifically. They took good care of him, even when he was a little resistant to the care. And so just big thanks to their

19:538

hearts as well, everyone at Memorial.

19:551

Mayor. Commissioner Hernandez, then Biederman.

19:58 – 20:187

Thank you, mayor. I love Frank. Frank was, as you said, from the old school. He just told you how he felt and really could care less how you felt about what he said. Frank was the type of person that would just tell you how he felt and what he thought of what was happening. And that's what I loved about him. So we will miss you, Frank. Love you.

20:191

Kevin.

20:21 – 20:599

So as everybody's already said, I, too, have known Frank a long time, back to the early 2000s when he ran for District five commissioner. And we are friends with his daughter. His granddaughter went to school with my daughter. So there's a lot of connection there. As Commissioner, Vice Mayor said, he was always about building connections, building bridges. And he was a resource to many. But I think many of us were a resource to him because he knew who to call to get something done a lot of times. But nobody could say it better than Frank, so let's see how this goes.

21:032

Uh-oh. I'm gonna put it on speaker.

21:079

Speaker. Speaker.

21:08 – 21:2510

Speaker. Morning. It's just me to say hello to you and your lovely wife, daughter. You're what? Two wonderful people, and I love you so much. You you're the only one that's called me, and I love you for that.

21:256

Everybody that? Know the truth.

21:27 – 21:4410

Make me more busy, but you are busy too, and I love you for calling me. I just wanna put my word in with you that I love you and your wife. And if you get a chance, just call to say hello. Okay, Kim, thank you. Bye bye.

21:4511

They called you too.

21:479

And he didn't call me to say Happy Mother's Day, but he called me to say Happy Father's Day.

21:511

He called me on the Jewish holidays. Just a real special guy.

21:559

And Thanksgiving.

21:571

George, do you want to say something?

22:00 – 22:2712

I can remember. And we had talked recently and had another luncheon planned. And what I could always count on was we would solve all the problems of the city and then the world at those luncheons. And I only say that partially kidding because Frank had a real feel and understanding for geopolitics and how things worked. And he was many times, we would bounce things around.

22:27 – 22:5512

And he always gave very sage advice. And he understood and was sharp and knew what was going on. And he was still in the game. So it was always a pleasure. After a while, I did the driving instead of him because sometimes he turned on sidewalks and we didn't need that anymore. But it was always a pleasure, always. And I will definitely remember him at every lunch we do now.

22:55 – 23:431

So let's think of Frank, everyone, as we rise for the moment of silence followed by the pledge. All right. Another important moment for us. Let's please recognize our veterans, active service personnel, and their families. You're here, we always take a minute to recognize you.

23:481

Roll call, please, clerk.

23:4913

Commissioner Hernandez. Here. Vice mayor Coleri.

23:5413

Commissioner Gruber? Commissioner Biederman?

23:5713

Commissioner Cantana?

23:5913

Commissioner Schuham? Here. Mayor Levy?

24:02 – 24:341

Here. All right. Let's show the attendance being that. Our consent agenda items five through 10 today don't usually require individual discussion. However, if there is a comment card, a speaker card on one of the items, we'll hear it later. Or a member of the dais may ask for an item to be brought up later. We entertain that as well. Item number seven on consent just has a term sheet update that was left here on the dais. And so with that, Pat, are there any speaker cards on five through ten?

24:3513

No cards.

24:366

Motion to approve. Second. We

24:39 – 25:061

have a motion from Vice Mayor Caleri and a second from Commissioner Quintana to approve consent agenda items five through 10. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the items carry six-zero. Before we get to our 1PM presentations, proclamations, and awards, I'd like to invite Chief Devlin and a number of other folks who wanted to extend a moment of privilege of their own.

25:11 – 25:3515

Thank you, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, city manager. I appreciate it. You always allow us each quarter to come up here and recognize our outstanding officers, our outstanding civilian employees. So today, I'd like to recognize just a little something different. And on behalf of the police department, we'd like to recognize and honor city Manager George Keller on his last day of official day of commission meeting here with the Chief Special Recognition Award.

25:49 – 26:3215

So besides obviously being an outstanding city manager over the last three years and bringing the city forward in many aspects through initiatives and projects, his leadership, his mentorship, and friendship. The relationship with George really started with the police department shortly after financial urgency. George was one of the first ones that stood in and said, what happened to you was unfair. It shouldn't have happened. And he's going to fix it. Honestly, those are some of the darkest days in the police department. And to be heard from somebody like George, the assistant city manager, meant the world to us. So they weren't only words throughout his career. He stood by here. He stood at this very podium at risk of his own professional peril and dug in there and got us through financial urgency, took care of us and treated us fairly.

26:32 – 26:4715

So you talk about legacy or how you'll be remembered. Besides being a great city manager, you talk about the police department throughout the years and history, your legacy will be that you stood by the police department as a true friend an honest person and got us through financial issues. So that, we thank you, George. We're forever thankful.

26:51 – 27:141

I don't think I had ever heard the word restoration before George's letter. But I came to understand it. Thank you. Thank you all. Can't let this moment go by without asking Andrew and folks from the Fraternal Order of Police to have their own moment of privilege. George?

27:16 – 27:4216

Thank you, mayor. Mayor, vice mayors, commissioner. Obviously, we're just gonna keep this train rolling a little bit. George, ever since I took over as the president of this police union, it's been a breath of fresh air with your professionalism and your just overall relationship of how you lead. Public service is not for the faint of heart from anybody, especially elected officials.

27:43 – 28:1316

But it's it's easy for me to come up here and demand certain things, and we need this and need that. But as a city manager specifically, you're caught between a rock and a hard place, And you're balancing so many things that I could never conceptualize with until I started having those conversations with you. And it's been enlightening. It's opened up my eyes, not just from looking up, but looking level with you. And you treated me not as somebody lower than you, but as a partner in our relationship.

28:13 – 28:3316

And it's always been something I will always cherish. So on behalf of the Fraternal Order Police, we got you something a little bit better than the chief. Just saying. So, obviously, this is our symbol. This is like a Captain America shield for you. Every kid wants to be a cop at one point in their life.

28:331

George, you gotta gotta show it this way. Oh, wow. Look at that. Alright. So

28:41 – 28:5316

if you can hang it up in your bathroom, your garage, wherever you wanna put that thing because that's massive. I ordered it. I was like twenty two inches. That's pretty small, no, nope, no, it's not. I just want to, again, thank you for your leadership and thank you for always that partnership.

29:007

Where's the handle? He needs to

29:029

put it on the back of his car so it doesn't get stopped.

29:22 – 29:381

Alright. Well, you know that was important for a police chief and also the FOP. But fire never wants to get outdone, right? So at this moment, a moment of privilege for Fire Chief Levy and the command staff.

29:41 – 30:0417

So George, I'm the short timer here. I've only been here for ten months now. Time flies when you're having fun in Hollywood. But it's been a privilege to work with you in the short time that I've been here. I want to thank you for entrusting me to lead this amazing organization. I put some words down. I'm not as good as Chief Devlin. I'm saying that in public when it comes to public speaking. But I put some words down. We have something to give you as well.

30:04 – 30:4817

But we are going to outdo the police chiefs award and give you a fire helmet signed by the members of the fire command staff. So, George, it's a privilege to stand here today to honor a leader who has been steady a steady hand for the city and a true champion of the first responders. On behalf of the entire fire department, we wanna thank you for your years of dedicated service and for the unwavering support you've shown our department through your tenure. To mark this milestone, we want to present you with something that carries a great deal of weight and tradition in our world. We're proud to present you with our very own white fire helmet signed by the members of the Hollywood Fire Department command staff.

30:48 – 31:1217

In the fire service, the color of the fire helmet is more than just gear. It's a symbol of the rank, responsibility, and leadership. While most firefighters wear yellow, black, or red, the white helmet is reserved exclusively for chief officers. It represents the person who stands back to see the big picture, directing resources, and ensuring the safety of every soul on the scene. It symbolizes the weight of decision making just as you've steered this city through challenges and growth.

31:12 – 31:3517

The white helmet signifies the ultimate authority in the calm at the center of the storm. It's a reminder that while we protect the citizens, you have spent your career protecting the infrastructure and the people that make us make the city run. George, may you hang this up may you hang up your hat as the city manager's aide, but we hope that this helmet serves as a permanent reminder that you always be part of our command family. Yeah.

31:461

on a roll, George. I've had a lot of great

31:4912

Yeah. I did not know this was coming. DAY: So thank you very much. And I'm going to keep quiet so I get through it here.

31:561

Alex with the International Association of Firefighters.

32:043

I I thought that was a shield and an axe, you're ready for battle.

32:121

We're going to appoint him as an ex officio negotiator to finish up the unfinished business.

32:19 – 32:383

I'm good with that. George, I'm going go ahead and echo much of what's already been said. You've led this city through some dark times and some really great times. I did also write a couple of words down, if you don't mind, if I could read it. Obviously, good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners.

32:39 – 33:083

George, I want to take a moment to recognize the years of dedication and service that you have given the city of Hollywood and its people. George, your leadership has guided this organization through both steady days and challenging times. The role you hold is not an easy one. Definitely not easy. It requires balancing priorities, making difficult decisions, and always keeping a long term well-being of the city and community in focus.

33:09 – 33:373

That responsibility you've carried with commitment and professionalism. Throughout your service to Hollywood, you've left a lasting impact on the city, not just in policies or projects, but with people. You've helped shape an organization that continues to move forward, adapt, and serve. Often in public service, the work is often behind the scenes. It's not always recognized, it's rarely easy, but it truly matters.

33:38 – 34:053

The work that you have done matters most. As you step into retirement, I hope you do so with a strong sense of pride in what you've accomplished and the legacy that you've left behind. You've earned the opportunity to slow down and enjoy the next chapter, whatever that looks like for you. You didn't just manage a city, you helped build it, shape it, and leave it stronger than you found it. So on behalf of Local thirteen seventy five, Hollywood professional firefighters, we thank you for your service.

34:24 – 35:011

Congratulations, George. I'll tell you, I know we're the the city employees and the whole city team is gonna have a moment to celebrate your retirement with you, I think, tomorrow. But before beforehand, and on behalf of the entire city workforce and behalf of the city commission and the residents of Hollywood, I'd like to be the one to it'll be honored to read to you this what's inscribed here, George R. Keller junior, city manager, in recognition of your leadership and dedication to the city of Hollywood. Your vision, integrity, and commitment helped shape this community for more than three decades.

35:01 – 35:441

City manager, deputy city manager, assistant city manager, department director, planning administrator, community development director, and back a long time ago, urban planner, with appreciation for your lasting legacy of service, 1978 through '99 and 2015 through 2026. Congratulations. I'd like to invite everyone up for a photo of George and all of these different competing, you know, meaningful recognitions. If you can please, FOP, bring up the plaque. Let's bring up the helmet.

35:44 – 35:551

Everyone who wants to join this photo police command staff, fire staff, employees, residents, whoever wants to be in this historic picture for George, please join us.

37:1918

That's as close as you guys can get. Three, two, one.

37:271

Those are not Thank you. A a large format.

37:3318

We also have a video.

37:446

Hi, guys.

37:54 – 38:321

Always good moments. Right? Alright. Well, thank you so much, everyone, for that important moment of privilege recognizing George and his years of service here in Hollywood. But he is committed to continue volunteering for the city, I just want you to know, on the city's pension board.

38:32 – 38:531

So George, I know you'll still help us guide our good way going forward. Absolutely. At this moment, we will extend to the 1PM proclamations, and awards in this meeting. Item number 11 is I'd like to call back up, please, Chief Devlin, awarding members of the Vice Intelligence and Narcotics Unit with the Chief's Special Recognition Award.

38:58 – 39:3115

Well, thank you again. And George, nothing further for you. Don't worry. We're good. But I do I may be having an extra badge, a gun to give you after I take it from the FOP president. I will get to that after the meeting. Seriously though, again, thank you for allowing us. And we come up here and we recognize our officers and our civilian employees every quarter. But there's a group of individuals who don't get the recognition that they deserve, And that is our Vice Intelligence and Narcotics Unit. They don't get that recognition for a number of reasons, but it's certainly not because they seek it out.

39:31 – 40:0515

And they're quite happy doing their long term, fruitful investigations in the shadows. Heck, even when I see them out in public, I'm not allowed to acknowledge them. So they did come in and give a brief on some of their investigations to the city manager, assistant city manager, as director of public safety. And at that time, that team said it would be a great idea to recognize them publicly. And I couldn't agree more. So although they're not here today, they are watching on TV. And we won't be able to say their names. But it is important for them to know that we see them. And we are thankful for them. And we are grateful for the work that they do. So Deanna.

40:09 – 40:4019

DANIELLE Good afternoon. I'm Deanna Beteneschi, public information manager for the Hollywood Police Department. Starting back in 2024, the members of the Vice Intelligence and Narcotics Unit initiated several complex and highly sensitive investigations, ranging from illicit narcotics to prescription drug diversion schemes and into multi level fraud syndicates. The VIN unit is compromised of seven detectives and one sergeant. All seven detectives are assigned to various federal and county task forces, which greatly enhances the law enforcement effectiveness of the Hollywood Police Department.

40:40 – 41:4119

At the 2025, their collective efforts resulted in the undeniable disruption of some of the highest levels of criminal activity, and in some cases, the destruction of these criminal organizations altogether. The performance of the Vinn unit over the last two years has yielded the seizure of over 130 firearms, 1,000 grams of heroin, 72,000 grams of cannabis, 6,000 grams of fentanyl, 7,000 grams of MDMA, 48,000 grams of cocaine, 19,000 grams of meth, 800 prescription tablets, and approximately $66,900,000 in currency and assets. This high level overview does not include or quantify the unit's ability to gather and utilize intelligence at varying levels of need with remarkable effectiveness. Due to the sensitivity of their assignment and law enforcement mission, these members will not be named publicly. Their commitment to duty, in conjunction with their professional representation of the Hollywood Police Department, makes us proud to award each detective and the sergeant the Chief Special Recognition Award to honor their accomplishments.

41:41 – 41:5319

While we can't say their names, know that these dedicated officers are watching remotely so they can get the recognition they deserve. So if we can please get a round of applause for the Hollywood Police Department venue. JAMES

42:08 – 42:4215

That was very nice. Thank you. And in case the venue didn't couldn't see, you got a standing ovation. So great job, guys. And keeping on with the awards and the recognitions, I know there's many times where we bring forward resolutions to you with technology advancements and at the direction of the city manager, director of public safety. We've done that over the past two, two and a half years. It's really brought the department forward in our technology unit. So I thought it important the city manager thought it important to share with you visually what those resolutions and what those assets have been doing and what we've been up to. So we do have a short video to play for you so you don't have to listen to me anymore. It's the end of here to talk about it.

46:40 – 47:251

Well, thank you, chief. I know that these investments in technology to help ensure the public safety of our city is something that, as as you mentioned in the outset, Georgia has been a big proponent on. And I think public safety, Georgia, has been obviously, you know, one of your priorities, funding it adequately and and and demanding and leading to to the good results that we have along with the chief, the command staff, and all the officers and civilian staff of both public safety departments. So it's great to see this get to where it has. And we know that with the police headquarters completing construction later in the summer, that the fusion center and the technology is gonna even get more robust and be just that much stronger of a tool to keep everybody safe in Hollywood.

47:25 – 47:381

So very exciting and transitional time with AI, all of it, you know, having needed the city to to move forward with investments and decisions early. And and thanks to you, George, and the team. Yep.

47:38 – 48:2112

Yeah. If if I could, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, I tell you what's impressive, like the secure briefing we had last year with the VIN unit, the things that are happening and the work that's being done that you don't see is always there. And it results in having the kind of environment and the kind of community that you can enjoy and that you want to have that's not interrupted by those kind of things that you see happen in so many places. And it's not that we're immune from it. Just a few days ago on the beach, springtime, and there was suddenly a gathering of a large number of people.

48:22 – 48:4712

And special ops and everybody else participated in not only recognizing it and being prepared for it, but responding quickly and even used some other cool equipment, including the LRAD, which is one of my favorites, that resulted in really not much happening at all, which is exactly what you want. And couldn't be happier. Couldn't be happier.

48:47 – 49:091

Well, you, chief. Thank you to Lieutenant Burroughs. Lieutenant Burroughs, thank you so much. And to everyone, only good things. When I saw the VIN unit recognition, I said to myself, hey, wait a second. Are they really going to be here? And of course, we understand why not. And it makes all the sense. And the guys and gals perhaps watching, appreciate it. Thank you, and thank you for your good work.

49:09 – 49:451

All right. Proclamation recognizing National Autism Acceptance Month. I'd like to recognize Commissioner Quintana, please. She will be presenting the proclamation. Accepting the proclamation will be Fire Chief Jeff Levy with the Fire Department and Fire Rescue, who always have to know professionally how to attend to the medical needs of everyone in our community, including those folks with autism. Commissioner Quintana, please.

49:45 – 51:002

Thank you, mayor. A proclamation, city of Hollywood, Florida, in recognition of Autism Acceptance Month, April 2026. Whereas, April is recognized as National Autism Acceptance Month, formerly Autism Awareness Month, focusing on fostering understanding, inclusion, and support for individuals on the autism spectrum. Throughout the month, organizations emphasized moving beyond awareness to promote acceptance, celebrate neurodiversity, and advocate for resources, with April 2 marked as World Autism Awareness Day. And whereas autism is a complex brain disorder that often inhibits a person's ability to communicate, respond to surroundings, and form relationships with others, And whereas, according to the World Health Organization, approximately one in one hundred and twenty seven people worldwide, or about sixty one point eight million people, have autism spectrum disorder, based on global data from 2021.

51:00 – 52:022

And whereas ASD is a group of developmental disabilities that causes challenges in many areas of one's life, some of the profoundly affected areas include social communication and behavior. Children with ASD may be nonverbal or may have restricted or repetitive behaviors. And whereas ASD affects people of all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds, and whereas the month long observance of Autism Acceptance Month takes place each April, highlighted by World Autism Awareness Day on April 2. World Autism Awareness Day was adopted by the United Nations in 2007 to shine a bright light on autism as a growing global health priority. World Autism Awareness Day activities increase worldwide understanding of autism and emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and early intervention.

52:02 – 52:242

Additionally, World Autism Awareness Day celebrates the unique talents and contributions of individuals with autism around the world. Now, therefore, Josh Levy, mayor of the City Of Hollywood, Florida, and the Hollywood City Commission, hereby proclaim April as National Autism Acceptance Month in the city of Hollywood, Florida.

52:291

Chief.

52:30 – 53:1417

Thank you, commissioner, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. And this is important. As you know, Commissioner Cantana is wearing the autism awareness shirts being sold by the fire department. Police department's doing the same thing. We, in the month of April, our firefighters and police officers will be wearing these t shirts to recognize the importance of Autism Acceptance Month. One of the other things I want to bring to your attention is something that we have on the fire department. Our police officers and our firefighters go through training on how to recognize, communicate, and treat those with autism. So I'm going to this is our sensory kits. These kits are designed to help us care for children and those particularly with autism spectrum disorder. These sensory and other sensory sensitivities during emergency situations.

53:14 – 53:4317

When we respond to a call, the environment can be overwhelming with sirens, flashing lights, multiple responders, and physical contact. For some children, this can trigger intense anxiety or sensory overload. When that happens, communication breaks down, assessments are delayed, and situations can escalate quickly. These sensory kits give our crews simple, effective tools like fidget items, tactical objects, and noise reduction options to help calm and engage the children. This allows for us to build trust, reduce anxiety, and safely move forward with care.

53:43 – 54:2817

From an operational standpoint, this leads to faster assessments, better cooperation, and reduces the likelihood of needing restraints or sedation. It also improves the safety of both the patient and our personnel. Most importantly, it reflects the commitment to providing compassion, inclusive emergency care to all members of our community, especially those that are most vulnerable. All these sensory kits are carried on every one of our ambulances. So when we respond to a situation that we identify, whether it's somebody that's on the autism spectrum or even a child or an adult that is having some issues and we're not getting through to them or they're nervous and they're affected by those factors, we can break out this kit and helps us reduce the anxiety and be able to treat these more faster.

54:282

Thank you.

54:291

Beautiful. Please come on. We'd like to take a photo to help spread the word.

54:3214

may, just a quick word.

54:331

Sure. Commissioner Quintana?

54:34 – 55:162

Just a quick word. You know, everything that has to do with the brain, I feel like there's so much that has been learned, but there's so much that's still unknown about how the human brain works. And I just love that I want to repeat the line from the proclamation that World Autism Awareness Day celebrates the unique talents and contributions of individuals with autism around the world. Because we do call it a disability, but the truth is that the more we learn, the better we're able to understand. If you meet one person with autism, you've met one person with autism, and it shows up in so many different ways.

55:16 – 55:392

And all of us have someone in our lives who may or may not be diagnosed with the label. Many of us work with people, have people in our family. And so, let us just always keep an open mind about the different ways that people are in the world, and really learn to appreciate the differences for what they bring to us. So that's all I wanted to say. Thank you.

55:391

JOSEPH Jose, please come on up.

56:0420

Ready? 123. One more. 123.

56:34 – 57:031

Thank you. You. All the picture is how we get the word out about the proclamations. And that's a good segue to the next and final proclamation, recognizing Paralyzed Veterans of America Awareness Month, which is April 2026. I'd like to invite commissioner Schuham to present the proclamation to mister Juan Perez. He's past president of the Paralyzed Veterans of America, Florida chapter. Please come on up, mister Perez. And commissioner Schuham, go ahead.

57:05 – 57:3721

Thank you, mayor, and thank you, mister Perez, for being here. Paralyzed Veterans of America Awareness Month, April 2026. Whereas in 1984, the Paralyzed Veterans of America set aside a week to raise awareness for issues of importance to paralyzed veterans and all individuals with disabilities. And in 2011, the Paralyzed Veterans of Florida, Inc. Extended awareness for the entire month of April because it is important to recognize the many sacrifices made by veterans.

57:37 – 58:4821

And whereas many of our neighbors within the boundaries of the city of Hollywood, Florida, have served as members of the armed forces, and in doing so, honored our community with exemplary dedication. And whereas it is important that we recognize the sacrifices made by our community's veterans who are paralyzed, Their stories of hardship and triumph provide life affirming lessons for all of us. And whereas paralyzed veterans help their fellow veterans at VA facilities, meet with school children, as well as Boy and Girl Scout troops to share their experiences, and to aid other people with disabilities by their advocacy for civil rights issues, including achieving accessibility in public buildings. And whereas there are many local community service organizations, particularly those serving our youth, that seek involvement in worthy projects and Paralyzed Veterans of America Awareness Month meets and surpasses that standard. And whereas the city of Hollywood honors paralyzed veterans because they personify the highest ideals of service to our country, sacrifice of self, and perseverance in overcoming adversity.

58:48 – 58:5921

Now therefore, Josh Levy, Mayor of the City Of Hollywood, Florida, and the Hollywood City Commission hereby proclaim April 2026 as Paralyzed Veterans of America Awareness Month. Thank you.

59:04 – 59:2122

Mr. Mayor, commissioners, on behalf of the Paralyzed Veterans of America, Florida chapter, thank you for this award. And I appreciate to be here. Thank you very much.

59:21 – 59:431

Well, we thank you, mister Perez, for your service to our country. We thank those men and women of the armed forces that are serving today to protect The United States around the world. Appreciate all the sacrifice that yourself and your families have made so that we can all be here and be free in this land and spread that around the world as well. So thank you so much. Please come on up.

59:43 – 1:01:001

If you could position yourself, we would love to take a moment to take a photo and help spread the word. Well, as we said at the outset, every meeting has impactful moments. Right? And we've already had a great number of them

1:01:02 – 1:01:241

So let's go ahead. We've got a really good hearted member of the community who is in the publishing world. Miss Isabel Borden is here. And she is the president and founder of the Latin Business TV magazine. And she was involved with our centennial celebration and took a lot of pride in the centennial celebration of the city of Hollywood.

1:01:24 – 1:01:501

And through the Latin Business TV Magazine, also published a special one hundredth year City of Hollywood anniversary edition, who she so proudly put together. And we are proud to have you here and to share your spirit for what the city of Hollywood has accomplished and the direction that it's going. So thank you so much, Ms. Borden, for being here. The floor is yours.

1:01:51 – 1:02:2123

Thank you, mayors. Thank you, vice mayor and commissioner. So I'm so excited here because this city's past peace and love is many recognized and many people, very, very good people here. So, I'm so happy to stay here. So, today, decided to celebrate this magazine because it's for the Holyoke City, a special for one hundredth century.

1:02:22 – 1:02:5523

And it's for me the honor to present this edition. And congratulation, the mayor and the office, the mayor, and all the, your team, the commissioner, the mayors, and the police, and other office help for the city made better always. And happy to introduce this magazine for us.

1:02:56 – 1:03:341

Well, thank you so much for featuring all the accomplishments of the city and recognizing the elected officials. Some of them are completing their fourteen years of service this year. And I know this will be a very much appreciated memory for them to just really use this edition of the magazine, of Latin Business Magazine, as a keepsake. But you really put a lot of heart into the stories that you wrote here about the city and about its elected leadership. So we thank you. And I'd like to love to extend an opportunity for you to say what you'd to say in Spanish as well, since the magazine is, I'm sure, bilingual and you have a big audience. So please go ahead.

1:03:35 – 1:04:1323

Yes. English is Spanish. So Latin Business Network Magazine Latin Latin Business Awards We organized very big Spanish, please. We organized very big events for the women entrepreneurs here in the South Of Florida. And in this moment, the addition is for DCT. In the next month, it's for the woman's entrepreneur. So thank you so much.

1:04:141

Oh, we'd love to take a photo with you if you'd

1:04:1523

like Yes, please.

1:04:161

Thank you so much. Go ahead, Commissioner Hernandez.

1:04:24 – 1:04:487

Thank you, mayor. Thank you.

1:04:5817

Do you want to get in there?

1:05:119

Let's do one

1:05:2218

more. Three. There you go. There you go. Three two one. Very nice.

1:05:54 – 1:06:181

I can say that with a good accent fast, but it it goes down real quick. I'll make up the words as they go along. This is regarding the annual report for the Emerald Hills Safety Enhancement Board. Welcome to mister Ruben, who is the chair of the board. Item 15.

1:06:21 – 1:06:5324

JEFF I'm mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. I'm here to present the annual report for the Emerald Hill Safety and Enhancement District. I wanted to start by saying thank you to Chief Devlin, Detective Diaz, and the officers of the Hollywood Police Department, and my fellow district board members for their support and assistance in enhancing the safety of the district. So we're happy to report that based on the information provided to us by the Hollywood Police Department, that our district has significantly less crime than the surrounding areas. And that's due to two things.

1:06:53 – 1:07:2924

We have police patrols, have proven effective to create a safer community. And we've enhanced that security by relicensing Flock Safety license plate readers this year, which provide HPD notifications to direct access to the '20 fourseven feed of six LPRs placed at key points of ingress to the district. This is also now part of a broader mesh network that the city has been that the police department can respond to. Next item is we've balanced our budget. That's been very difficult.

1:07:29 – 1:08:2624

We've been able to do it by tailoring the hours our patrols the hours that we patrol. We would like to expand them to cover areas during holiday seasons, for instance, or during times of heightened security issues. This year, we promoted community engagement, encouraging meeting attendants to share our ideas with public. And to that, we've actually this is in response to what we discussed with the commission last year, which is the commission suggested that we go out and we apply for grants to see if we can bring in some extra funds to reduce that cost to our constituents. And unfortunately, no viable grants have been identified.

1:08:26 – 1:09:1824

And that's been after several months of talking back and forth with the city grant writer. The last thing on the agenda, really, is that we, under the direction of Commissioner Gruber and at your request, we went out and we polled the people in the district to see really to ask them two questions. One was, do they want to continue with the district? And the second was, do they increase support in the annual assessment from $250 to $500 Now, the poll questions were written in conjunction with Commissioner Gruber, and the results were tabulated at an open meeting with Commissioner Gruber there so that everyone could see that we were doing it the right way.

1:09:201

JOSHUA TRANSPARANTIS yes.

1:09:23 – 1:09:5224

And we had approximately 24% of ballots returned. So that's 124 out of five ten possible ballots. And to response to, do you want to extend this district beyond a 2027 expiration? We had 81.3% saying, yes, we do. So we think we are doing a good job, and we're helping with the community to create that safety that they want.

1:09:52 – 1:10:3424

And then regarding the second question of, do you support an increase? We have a super majority of people saying yes. So over two thirds had said, yes, we're Okay with increasing that amount. So to that end, I've met via phone with the city attorney and reached out to the city clerk. And we're actually going to draft a new ordinance, which would extend that sunset for ten years and would increase that annual assessment up to $500 So just wanted to let you know and so you're aware of what's happening.

1:10:3524

Well, thank you. And that's all that I have for today.

1:10:39 – 1:11:121

JAMES Well, thank you, Mr. Rubin. I know that Commissioner Rubin, as you mentioned, has obviously been very much involved with the district. And I understand from the item and speaking with the city manager that what your district now needs is for the city commission to consider the results of the of the that was those polling questions, the extension of time, the increase in the in the fee. And so I would ask the commission that if you want to comment that we would extend our support to having an item come to us for decision at that time.

1:11:12 – 1:11:401

So I certainly support it. And so I'll extend now the opportunity to speak to anyone else on the dais. Commissioner Hernandez, I just want to make a point of parliamentarian organization here that my system, when you press the Speak button, is just activating your microphone. So I don't really see a queue of folks allowing me to activate the person next in the queue. But Commissioner Hernandez here has queued in, of course, and his microphone is there. Go ahead, Commissioner Hernandez.

1:11:40 – 1:12:0620

Commissioner, I'm sorry. Just one moment before you speak. I just wanted to let the commission know that due to Commissioner Gruber's inability to attend today, he did want to reach out to me and my office and express his support for this, for the ten year extension, and also for the amount that the Safety Enhancement Board is seeking. So I wanted to let all of you know that the commissioner for this district does support the measure.

1:12:077

Commissioner Hernandez. Thank you, mayor. I certainly support the extension. I certainly support the increase. The question that I have would be for the city attorney and the city clerk.

1:12:17 – 1:12:557

I believe that the ordinance that we had talked about a particular way of There you go. Thank you, Mayor. Regarding the ordinance that was established, there was a process, a particular process, in order to poll the residents of the area. As long as that process is being followed and the majority of the people, in this case, the super majority of the people approve that, I am certainly in support of bringing the ordinance back for the extension and the increase. Thank you.

1:12:5524

Thank you.

1:12:55 – 1:13:261

Alright. So it looks like we have four in support. Gruber in absentia according to the city attorney. So thank you so much. We'll have an item come before us for official adoption. Thank you, David. And thank you to Ohio police for embracing this district and obviously extending your own know how and helping them with their supplemental funds to better take care of the district. Thank you so much. All right, ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our 1PM presentations, proclamations and awards. There are a few time certain items.

1:13:27 – 1:13:501

I'll go ahead to the 01:15 time certain item and there's a 01:30. For those that are here on the beach presentations, those are a 03:30 time certain item. So if you need to stretch your legs, we do have an hour and fifteen minutes before those items can be presented. In the meantime, we'll go forward with the the agenda. Let's go ahead with our one fifteen ordinance on second reading.

1:13:50 – 1:14:311

It's an advertised public hearings advertised in conformance to state statutes and city codes. No changes since the first reading by the police department. An ordinance of the Commission of the City of Hollywood amending chapter 98 of the code of ordinances entitled Marine and Waterway Regulations, Boats and Other Vessels, creating the applicable section in the code entitled Overnight Anchoring Limitation, Revising the Penalty Provisions and Providing for a Severability Clause and Repeal Provision. This really is an enhancement that was made through state law that enables us to even better manage the anchorage our waterways. I'm going go ahead and open the public hearing. Are there any speaker cards on item 16?

1:14:3113

No cards.

1:14:321

Public hearing is now closed. Vice Mayor Caleri?

1:14:346

Motion to approve.

1:14:36 – 1:14:471

We have a motion from Vice Mayor Colari, second from Commissioner Schuham to approve this ordinance on second reading. I'd like to invite the city attorney to read the ordinance, and the clerk will call roll call.

1:14:48 – 1:15:1220

An ordinance of the City Commission of the City Of Hollywood, Florida, amending chapter 98 of the City Of Hollywood Code of Ordinances entitled Marine and Waterway Regulations, Boats and Other Vessels, by creating section 98.015 of the code of ordinances entitled overnight anchoring limitation and revising the penalty provisions, providing for a severability clause and a repeal provision.

1:15:1313

GREGORY Commissioner Hernandez?

1:15:1813

Commissioner Gruber? Commissioner Biederman?

1:15:2113

Commissioner Quintana? Yes. Commissioner Schuham? Yes. Mayor Levy?

1:15:26 – 1:15:381

Yes. Alright. Let's show the ordinance passing unanimously six o on second reading. Next is an ordinance as well. It's a quasi judicial item.

1:15:38 – 1:16:291

That's an ordinance on second reading advertised as a public hearing in conformance of state statutes and city codes. This is from the Department of Development Services. I'll go ahead and read the ordinance into the record, and then we'll go through with an inquiry as regards to the quasi judicial procedures or proceeding informally, which I imagine we will. Let's go ahead. It's an ordinance of the city of Hollywood changing the zoning designation of 1.11 acres generally located on 19th Avenue between Jackson And Van Buren Streets, municipally known as 1841 To 1857 Jackson Street, 1856 Van Buren, and the corresponding folio numbers from Parkside high intensity mixed use to Federal Highway medium high intensity mixed use, amending the city's official zoning map to reflect this change in zoning and to provide for an effective date.

1:16:291

City attorney? With regards to the quasi judicial procedure. Oh,

1:16:38 – 1:17:1720

Florida courts have determined that there are certain types of matters, including items 17 on today's agenda, which are to be treated differently from other issues considered by the commission. Most decisions of the commission are legislative in nature, meaning that the commission is acting as a policymaking body. However, in quasi judicial matters, the commission is applying existing rules and policies to a particular factual situation and is therefore acting like a judge or jury in a courtroom. In such cases, courts have determined that due process and fundamental fairness require that more formal procedures be followed. Therefore, in quasi judicial matters, all witnesses are sworn in and subject to cross examination by the parties.

1:17:17 – 1:17:4220

In addition, the decision of the commission must be supported by competent and substantial evidence presented at the hearing. However, in Hollywood, we have adopted a rule that allows for the waiver of quasi judicial formalities. Waiver can only occur if agreed to by staff, the applicant, and any member of the public who is present. Therefore, at this time, I ask that the chair inquire as to whether there is anyone who objects to waiving the quasi judicial formalities.

1:17:431

JAMES Is there any objection from the applicant to waiving the quasi judicial formalities?

1:17:4725

JAMES Mr. Mayor, on behalf of both my clients, Ventis and Gadamus, we waive quasi judicial.

1:17:531

JAMES Okay. Staff, you waive.

1:17:5626

ANDREW WINGITT, staff waives.

1:17:581

All right. Commissioner Hernandez, I see you go ahead.

1:18:02 – 1:18:137

Mayor, if there hasn't been any I don't know if the public waves or not. But if there hasn't been any changes on the staff in the ordinance, I move to motion to approve.

1:18:13 – 1:18:321

All right. We do have a waiver of the quasi judicial procedures. We do have a motion on the floor. I anticipate there are no speaker cards on item 17. Pat? Correct. All right. We have a motion from Commissioner Hernandez, second from Commissioner Schuham to approve the ordinance on second reading. I'd like to invite the city attorney to read the ordinance, and we'll take the roll call vote.

1:18:3214

Excuse me.

1:18:3313

Did you open the public hearing and close it?

1:18:361

I asked that there were speaker cards, but I'll go ahead and open the public hearing. Pat, are there any speaker cards?

1:18:4113

DAVID No cards.

1:18:421

MALAN: The public hearing is now closed. Thanks for keeping me in check. And let's go ahead to the city attorney on the motion.

1:18:47 – 1:19:3420

DAVID An ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida changing the zoning designation of 1.11 acres generally located on 19th Avenue between Jackson And Van Buren Streets, municipally known as 1841 To 1857 Jackson Street, 1856 Van Buren Street, and folio numbers five thousand one hundred forty two-fifteen-one-seven five forty, from PS3, Parkside High Intensity Mixed Use District, to FH2, Federal Highway Medium High Intensity Mixed Use District, amending the city's official zoning map to reflect the change in zoning designation and providing for an effective date.

1:19:3613

Commissioner Hernandez?

1:19:3813

Vice Mayor Kalari?

1:19:4013

Commissioner Gruber? Commissioner Biederman? Yes. Commissioner Cantana? Yes. Commissioner Schuham? Yes. Mayor Levy?

1:19:501

Yes. Alright. Let's show the ordinance passing unanimously six o on second.

1:19:5325

Thank you, mister mayor, madam vice mayor, members of the commission.

1:19:55 – 1:20:321

Thank you, council. Alright. Item 18 is a one thirty time certain item, an ordinance of the city of Hollywood amending the city's existing comprehensive plan by amending the potable water sub element of the utilities element to adopt by reference the water supply facilities work plan 2025 update in accordance with the applicable Florida statutes as specifically set forth in exhibit a and obviously providing for an effective date. This is an ordinance on first reading advertised in conformance in accordance with state statutes and city codes by the Department of Development Services. Andrea.

1:20:33 – 1:21:1326

Good afternoon, mayor. You said it right. This is an amendment to the city's comprehensive plan regarding our potable water for the city. There's been a lot of talk about water and infrastructure over the last several meetings. And one thing we all know is that water is not unlimited. It's something that has to be managed and projected based on our population growth. And that's exactly what this does. The days of having unlimited cheap water are moving behind us. And our rate structures are going to change over time in response to that. And what this plan does is it sets forward what our estimated water supply and demand is going to be.

1:21:13 – 1:21:5726

And it ensures that we will have that adequate supply over time. So the city of Hollywood is within the South Florida Water Management District's authority. And based on state statute, once South Florida Water Management updates their plan, all municipalities within their jurisdiction are required to update their plans based on that information. So here we are today. And we're updating our plan. We're continuing to show reduced consumption. We're maintaining and upgrading our facilities as required. And all of our projections are positive. And so this is first reading of an ordinance. We will transmit it to the appropriate state agencies and then come back to you for adoption.

1:21:571

I'd like to open the public hearing pad. Are there speaker cards on item 18?

1:22:0013

No cards.

1:22:011

Public hearing is closed. I'd like to entertain a motion by

1:22:056

Motion to approve. Second.

1:22:081

We have a motion from Vice Mayor Caleri and a second from Commissioner Quintana to approve the ordinance on first reading. City attorney.

1:22:16 – 1:22:4920

An ordinance of the city of Hollywood, Florida amending the city's existing comprehensive plan by amending the potable water sub element of the utilities element to adopt, by reference, the water supply facilities work plan 2025 update in accordance with section 163.3177, subsection six, subsection C, subsection three, Florida Statutes, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit A, and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Hernandez? Yes. Vice Mayor Caleri?

1:22:5013

Commissioner Gruber? Commissioner Biederman?

1:22:5413

Commissioner Cantana? Yes. Commissioner Schuham? Yes. Mayor Levy?

1:22:58 – 1:23:371

Yes. All right. Let's show the ordinance passing unanimously six-zero on first reading. Thank you so much. All right. Since it is not 03:30 yet, we'll come back to items nineteen and twenty. Item 21 has been withdrawn by the city manager for later consideration. Item 22 is a resolution of the City Commission, City of Hollywood, appointing city commission members as voting and alternate voting delegates to the Broward League of Cities for the twenty twenty six, twenty twenty seven year. City clerk, who's our current slate for the Broward League Of Cities? If you could just enter the record? And if you don't know, I'll ask Commissioner Cleary.

1:23:3713

I know Commissioner It

1:23:396

is myself. I believe Commissioner Hernandez is alternate.

1:23:447

The alternate, yes.

1:23:456

And then the alternate alternate is you, Mary Levy. Okay.

1:23:48 – 1:24:041

Well, you know what? Since you so graciously fulfill that role, and I do attend and take it seriously, there hasn't been a need for myself as the alternate alternate to really represent the city as a voting delegate. I think maybe Commissioner Hernandez has attended some

1:24:05 – 1:24:226

And I have delegated to him on certain events that I wasn't able to attend. But just taking note that come this November, my term is up. So I'm assuming that it would just automatically take over as Commissioner Hernandez and just put that in suit because things get

1:24:23 – 1:24:441

Would you be willing to continue as a voting delegate until November? Yes. So if a vice mayor Coleria would like to continue as the voting delegate, and there is no objection to, commissioner Hernandez continuing as the, alternate voting delegate, I think that completes the slate, as needed right now. We have a motion from Commissioner Biederman.

1:24:451

Second from Commissioner Schuham. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously.

1:24:52 – 1:25:391

Thank you. Item 23 is an exciting resolution. I see some folks in the audience who might be wanting to talk about this opportunity to really expand Stan Goldman Park. This is a resolution of the city commission, City of Hollywood authorizing the city to execute a purchase and sale agreement, special warranty deed, and require any other required closing documents for the purchase of property located at 600 Knights Road from BlueVis LLC in the amount of $5,250,000. There is some corrected information that was put into the record here on the dais, just updating some of the closing costs and some minor language in the contract that perhaps Lisa will tell us about.

1:25:401

This is from the Department of Communications, Marketing, and Economic Development. Lisa Liotta, floor is yours.

1:25:46 – 1:26:3627

LEAHLEY Good afternoon, mayor. For the record, Lisa Liotta, development officer, Department of Communications, Marketing, and Economic Development. I'm pleased to be here today to present the opportunity for the city to acquire the former Knights of Columbus property located at 600 Knights Road. As the mayor mentioned earlier, we did have to make some very minor changes to the purchase and sale agreement and the resolution in regard to additional costs associated not the purchase cost, but additional costs that are traditionally absorbed by the buyer. We'll begin with a brief forgive me with a brief history and overview of the property.

1:26:36 – 1:27:2627

The property was acquired by the Knights of Columbus on 06/01/1966, for $11,600 At the time of the purchase, it was undeveloped land. And construction of the clubhouse took place shortly thereafter. Bluvis LLC purchased the property in November 2023 for $4,600,000 The property taxes in 2025 were approximately $52,700 The property is approximately two acres. And it includes a clubhouse that is 7,828 square feet. The land use is community facility.

1:27:26 – 1:28:2927

And the zoning is Commercial District C4. The property was listed for sale in March 2025 for $6,500,000 On 06/10/2025, the Planning and Development Board approved a design, site plan, and variance to reduce landscaping for a 22,000 square foot outdoor Padel facility. The property was then marketed as an opportunity to purchase an approved Padel facility and for future redevelopment, including Live Local Act. In February 2026, the price of the property was reduced to 5,995,000.000. The property is strategically located and completely surrounded by Stan Goldsman Memorial Park.

1:28:29 – 1:29:2927

Its acquisition would create a contiguous park corridor extending from Hollywood Boulevard to Johnson Street, and provide approximately 105 additional parking spaces to support the park's many amenities, including pickleball courts, the skate park, the dog park, and the fitness walking trail. Additionally, the existing structure offers the potential to be repurposed to support the needs and programming of the Parks Recreation and Cultural Arts Department and free up parking spaces from other facilities. Staff negotiated the terms and final price of $5,250,000 with the listing agent. The commission is paid for by the seller. Funding for the purchase is available in the fiscal twenty twenty six operating budget and capital improvement plan.

1:29:34 – 1:29:5027

And as we know, section 13.03 of the city's charter requires that any purchase of a property in excess of $250,000 be approved by a fiveseven vote of the commission. Thank you.

1:29:50 – 1:30:261

Thank you. Thank you, Lisa. All right. Well, we're here to consider the purchase of this property and the purchase agreement that is part of this item. I'd like to ask if there are any I see the city clerk walking in if there are speaker cards on item 23. No cards? All right. I do see some folks here from Hollywood Pickleball. They want to speak Yes. Please come on up, and you can fill out a card. Oh, we do have one card. Alex Riccio, Hollywood Hills. Are you on item 23 on this item?

1:30:2628

I can defer to them if you wanna defer.

1:30:281

No. No. Go ahead. I have your card.

1:30:36 – 1:31:2028

Thank you, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. My name is Alex Riccio. I'm a Hollywood Hills resident. I'm also the dad of a six year old boy who loves the new Justice Skate Park. I'm also an aspiring pickleball player, although I'm horrible. The pickleball guys can tell you that. Stan Goldman is a victim of its own success. Thanks to the facility and programming upgrades, it is very hard to get a parking spot at any time of day, particularly if you have a six year old boy trying to get out of a moving car to go skate. This purchase is forward thinking, in my opinion, because my favorite part about it is it's a true asset. It allows for revenue generation, which mitigates the cost of the purchase over time.

1:31:20 – 1:31:4828

Having witnessed firsthand the care with which Hollywood Pickleball Group cares for their adjacent court, I know that those parking spots will be very well looked after. And the city won't have anything to worry about with what's going on at that facility. So I rise and join Hollywood Pickleball in encouraging you all to make this purchase, particularly given the revenue generating nature of the property. Thank you.

1:31:481

Thank you, Mr. Risio. Mr. Todd Fipiano. Come on up, Todd.

1:31:58 – 1:32:314

Good day, mayor, commission. Thanks for the opportunity to speak. I'm on the board of Friends of Hollywood Pickleball. We kind of run the program over there and very active in the community. I was born and raised in Hollywood, 1958, Memorial Hospital. Born and raised here, still here. My kids were raised here. My kids went to that skate park. We have parking problems, as the city knows, everywhere, which is a problem for everybody as well. Over there, since they did the skate park over, our pickleball community, we have over 4,500 members on Facebook.

1:32:31 – 1:32:564

They're not all here all the time, but we have a lot of transients and snowbirds and stuff that come through here. We also have Jefferson Park, which is east. The city has been looking at this property for quite some time. And we definitely endorse buying it. I mean, saw the purchase price in 1966. If that wasn't a typo, it was $11,000,000 So it's a no brainer, I guess. Oh, 11. Okay. I thought there was an extra couple of zeros.

1:32:561

A little inflation since then. But yes.

1:32:584

Yeah, I mean

1:32:5810

It's still

1:32:591

a bargain on vacant land.

1:33:00 – 1:33:344

Yeah, it's a bar. It goes up. I mean, it's the park would be continuous from Johnson Street all the way, like they brought up to Hollywood Boulevard, which would make it all stay on Goldman. Now, the parking excess that the city could use and we could use, we did have an agreement with them for a while to use that parking. And it was wonderful. And now it's not so wonderful, trying to manage the parking over there and so forth. But we certainly would like to condone and recommend that we approve. And as a resident, I wish you would buy it. So that's all I got to say.

1:33:34 – 1:34:121

Thank you, Todd. That concludes the speaker cards? Okay, great. So I'd like to call on folks to speak on the item. Obviously, Commissioner Kalari is Vice Mayor Kalari is queued in first because Stan Goldman has been really a a great focus area for her over the years of her commissionership here in Hollywood overseeing and and and pursuing the improvements that that made this park really I think the most active public space in the entire city after the beach is now Stan Goldman Park between the pickleball and between Justice Skate Park.

1:34:12 – 1:34:501

And for those of us that drive by it every day, even in through 10PM at night, it's super active and there's cars all over the place. So with that, I just do want to mention that if someone's going to make a motion, just to be consistent with the corrections that were made to the corrected item, when you make the motion, let's just say in an amount up to $5,275,000 up to, and not just the amount of. This way it gives the staff some needed flexibility to not exceed the 5.275, but if it comes under that by resolution, we give it that latitude. And with that, Vice Mayor Caleri.

1:34:51 – 1:35:246

So I feel first, today, I feel like I might have hit the lottery, which is super exciting. Because when I first stepped into this role as commissioner almost fourteen years ago, the first complaints that I received as commissioner was deal with the homeless issue. It's a scary park. It needs just be a walkable park. The pickleball courts and the skate park were old roller hockey courts with fences up that were inundated by homeless individuals and drugs and you name it.

1:35:24 – 1:35:486

And so with a lot of hard work, it started off with clearing out some of the foliage and making it a Hollywolf Park. And we represented Pete Brewer and Mel Pollock awards. We put a lot of effort into it with the community. And we had Be Mine Dog Show. North Central was very active in that.

1:35:48 – 1:36:106

Patty Antrigan. I mean, I can just name so many people who really helped make that what it was. And then it grew into Justice Skatepark and the Pickleball courts. And so it's really become such an amazing synergy in the heart of Hollywood. It's literally in the center of Hollywood.

1:36:11 – 1:36:356

And then most recently, we just did the naming of the walk of Chris Hickson Memorial Walk. So you can walk along the water, the manatees, see the just nature in its finest. And I even remember discussion years back when we were trying to relocate the historical home that was by the JCC Hall. Do remember the name of that?

1:36:361

JCC Hall? Oh.

1:36:389

The Garden Club.

1:36:39 – 1:37:196

The Garden Club home. And we had thought that we could move it into the center of Stan Goldman and use it for like photo, picturesque type of atmosphere and really provide something. There were three phases. We just finished phase two. I don't know if phase three will ever come to fruition. But it was incorporating the train station and having a complete usage from Hollywood Boulevard to Johnson Street parking and such. But what do they say? Build it and they will come. Well, we built it and they have all come. And now I went from homelessness and Scary Park to, we don't have enough parking and we need help.

1:37:20 – 1:38:056

And here we are now with this opportunity. It has knocked on the door a couple of times and hindsight is twentytwenty. We had the opportunity many, many years ago to purchase the Knights of Columbus when it went up for sale for 2,400,000.0. But times have changed obviously, and now we definitely see the demand and the need. In addition, which I'm surprised we didn't talk about or present and maybe logistics can be provided. Where the funding is coming from for the purchase of it is through our parking fees and our impact fees. So it's not affecting our general funds. We have to utilize those funding. And we can provide a source of revenue in addition to it. Does anybody want to speak on that or am I okay?

1:38:05 – 1:38:256

Did I say anything wrong? Okay. With that being said, this is really an amazing opportunity for the city of Hollywood, not to prevent affordable housing. That's not the purpose of that. And so I want everyone to be put away because we understand the need and the demand.

1:38:25 – 1:38:566

But it's the right place and the right structure. And a structure of such that has been presented in the past would never fit. There's one road in and one road out. The traffic would be insane and it would be really an unsafe area if that were to go to its point. Really also in addition to that, which I'm super excited about is the opportunity for us to have our parks and recs as a central hub for their parking vehicles, for our meeting area.

1:38:56 – 1:39:156

And the building itself, we had a commission in the community in the past. So this building can be multi use, multitask fundraising. I think the sky's the limit. And it really just will be an added bonus to the city of Hollywood and we will definitely get a return on our investment. But most importantly, it's safety.

1:39:15 – 1:39:466

For me, parking is such a huge issue and this now will provide us and award us the opportunity to provide parking in a safe manner and also utilize the park to its fullest ability. And this is gonna be one of those parks that everybody's gonna wanna be at. And I am super excited if it passes today. And so I would love to make a motion to approve the purchase up to 5.275. And maybe we can negotiate a little bit more, but I'm excited about it. And thank you.

1:39:461

All right. We have a motion on the floor. Second from Commissioner Schuham. Let's go to Commissioner Hernandez for discussion.

1:39:54 – 1:40:257

Thank you, Mayor. Vice Mayor Caleri, you've done a great job pushing for that park to be cleaned up, active, and now, a way coming to fruition from all the residents in the area and all the residents of the City Of Hollywood. But I've got a couple of cleanup questions that I'd like for the residents to also be aware of as well. Number one, the parking impact fees are some of the monies that is being used for that to happen. I want to make the public aware that there will be parking fees to be able to park in this place.

1:40:25 – 1:40:487

There's not going to be free parking. That goes hand in hand with having the money from the parking. So my thing is informative in nature. It will probably be a nominal fee, but there will be parking fees in order for this parking area to be used. Also, it's being purchased with impact fees.

1:40:48 – 1:41:407

So my question to the commission, my question to the city manager, my question to the city attorney is how is this area going to be classified according to the charter amendments that have been put in place from the charter review committee regarding the sale of this property or the use of the property. In other words, we have in our charter that it's coming through, that no park land or anything like that could be sold without going to the residence. So being that this is being purchased with parking revenues, And it could be used for other things other than just as a park. How does the commission feel that this should be classified? I want the public to know and I want us to be

1:41:401

Well, guess the question is

1:41:417

Moving forward.

1:41:42 – 1:41:571

Real quick to your point, Peter, since we're using in part park impact fees, does that bind the property to be called a park or considered to be a park? And if you don't know the answer, we can research it. But your point is well taken in terms of that. Go ahead.

1:41:58 – 1:42:1520

I would agree with you because we are clearly delineating this as a parcel of land that is appropriate for the use of park impact fees. I believe that it would be characterized as a park. I would like a bit more time to be able to research and answer your question fully and come back to you.

1:42:157

What about the fact that we're using parking revenues to purchase it? That's not a park.

1:42:21 – 1:42:4420

That's not a park. There are two different parts that are two different pieces that are being used to purchase this land partly, parking impact fees and partly park impact fees. And so to the extent that park impact fees are used for, I believe, the actual building, that would be considered parkland to the parking section.

1:42:44 – 1:43:047

It done could more than you can skin the cat more than one way. But my point is, the park impact fees can only be utilized for new park new building Expansion. New expansion and building and stuff like that. Yes. But what the land that it's being the majority of the land is going to be used for parking and is going to be generating revenue.

1:43:04 – 1:43:367

So the parking department can own the land and they can lease the building to the park itself. I don't know because all of the land is not going to be a park. And that's the reason that I'm bringing it up. So if we need more time in order to do it, rather than for you to say it's going to be a park because I don't foresee it as being a park, being used for parking revenue and parking revenues are being used to purchase it. So I don't have an issue one way or the other, but let's delineate this in the proper way in order for everyone to have a clear understanding of what it is that's being done.

1:43:3620

I'll work with staff to determine

1:43:38 – 1:44:037

Yeah, fine. This could be done on a second reading, the clarification as to how it's going to be classified. But I just want everybody to be aware that the parking in the area is not going to be free and the land itself may not be a park because in reality, it's not being used as a park. It's being used as amenity, as an amendment for the park. But nonetheless, that's up to you guys to figure out. But that's wanted all to add.

1:44:031

Thank you. Hold on. Commissioner Cleary?

1:44:07 – 1:44:486

This is not a From my understanding, we're giving the approval to purchase. So in the negotiation fees, if that could be worked out, so that we understand. Because you are correct. We don't want to get into splitting of the hairs and what is what and what's not. We just wanna make sure that we're doing the best for the area, less impact but providing that importance of parking and facility that could be used for storage. It could be used for parks and recs. It could be used for several different things. And I guess what you're saying is not limiting our hands?

1:44:48 – 1:45:037

Well, my point is, right now what we're voting on is the purchase of it. And I'm okay with that. I just wanted to make it clear to the residents that we are okay with the purchase, but how is it gonna be classified? It should come back to us for us to be able to make that decision. I don't think that this

1:45:031

What we do with it after we buy it. Correct.

1:45:066

Okay, perfect.

1:45:067

That's all. I just wanted to make everybody aware of the fact that there will be parking fees.

1:45:10 – 1:45:261

JOSHUA And I think it would be suitable and appropriate to bring back a resolution with whatever that decision of the commission is on how to use this property. Once we own it and legal has a chance to review it, bring back an item so that it's set in And the public a record for the legislative intent.

1:45:267

And the public would then be able to weigh in as well. Yes.

1:45:2911

Thank you,

1:45:349

mayor. So I mean, at first glance, I shared that I had serious reservations about

1:45:421

Sticker shock? Taking

1:45:43 – 1:46:189

well, it's not just sticker shock. I have serious reservations about taking property off of our tax rolls that, number one, we're spending a lot of money to buy that has limited return on investment other than the feel good purpose of it. And number two, we're taking $50,000 off of our tax rolls. So $50,000 over ten years is $5,000,000 So we're really paying $11,000,000 for this property in reality. I'm happy to hear that we can use parking revenues to buy it.

1:46:19 – 1:47:179

I had similar concerns to Commissioner Hernandez about the disposition of the property. Know, but whatever we could do in the wording to make it that we're not tying the hands of future commissioners similar to what we experienced with thirteen oh one when they did that acquisition that they made sure there was language in there that wasn't tying our hands. I want to make sure that we have the similar language in this purchase so that if there's something that happens in five years or ten years or twenty years that a future commission can do something with the building that might benefit all the residents of Hollywood, I think that we need to make sure that there's language for them to look back on our discussion today that our intent isn't to, in perpetuity, to really lock up this property.

1:47:171

Are you saying pickleball might not be popular in twenty

1:47:199

I'm saying that we don't

1:47:201

That was a joke, everybody. That was a joke. We know it's just growing in popularity.

1:47:249

Well, listen. Fifty years ago, I don't think they thought golf would be a dead sport. And I'm not saying it's a dead sport.

1:47:301

Revival now. Revival.

1:47:319

I'm not saying it's a dead sport. It's reviving. But at some point, they thought that so and it has nothing to do with pickleball.

1:47:381

Yeah, I know.

1:47:38 – 1:48:099

Know. It has to do with locking a property up. We just locked up 47 acres. Now we're going to lock up another two acres. So I just want to make sure that it's clear, and I'll vote for this, but I'm voting for this that we're clearly going to have language that isn't going to tie the hands of future commissioners on what the disposition of this property would be without having to go to a special referendum.

1:48:091

I gotcha.

1:48:109

All right, we're not doing a referendum to buy it. I don't think we need a referendum to sell it or other future development that might be appropriate at a later time.

1:48:21 – 1:48:591

All right. Well, staff, hearing the city commission's points on this, if between now and the closing you need to utilize any particular set of funds to make this purchase, assuming it's gonna be approved for purchase today. We're not binding ourselves today to a source of funds even though you've described to us the source of funds that you've identified. So just take this discussion to heart because commissioners are making a good point in terms of the flexibility, whether it's public works usage of a building or what have you. We don't want a limited opportunity considering the dollars paid and that there is a finite number of facilities that the city has to city has to use.

1:48:59 – 1:49:251

What if the the utility department needed the property in the future to have, I don't know, a a some kind of a well or a a lift station, pump station, you name it. I think that's the point the commission is getting at, and so I think the point's well taken. We do have a motion and a second on the floor for the purchase in an amount up to $5,275,000 on this resolution. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously. Six oh.

1:49:296

Can I retire now?

1:49:301

Hold on. Hold on. Commissioner Galleri?

1:49:336

Can I retire now? George, I'm going out with you right now.

1:49:381

A fourteen year endeavor for this part of Park East. Congratulations, Vice Mayor Calera. I know this has been a big focus area of yours.

1:49:486

Thank you.

1:49:481

And congratulations to those who were worried this was gonna be an intense use over there because it was up for sale.

1:49:546

Thank you, pickleballers, for coming out.

1:49:56 – 1:50:281

Thank you all. Alright. It's not 03:30 yet, so we'll go on to item 24. Resolution of the City Commission, City of Hollywood declaring the city of city's official intent to reimburse itself for capital expenditures for certain municipal improvements by incurring debt, maximum principal proven maximum maximum principal amount of debt, nature of project costs, authorizing incidental action, repeal of prior inconsistent resolutions. That's a mouthful department of financial services. Adam, why don't you give the public a quick summary of this item?

1:50:31 – 1:50:5615

Sure. Good afternoon. Adam ADAM Meischbeck, assistant city manager. The intent behind this item is a companion item to the prior item regarding the Knights of Columbus building, would be that if the city's intention would be to take out a debt issuance on this purchase and the eventual potential construction work related to this project. It allows us to be able to do that in the future. This is an intent resolution for us if we choose to take a debt issuance out on the property.

1:50:571

All right. Thank you, Adam. I'll entertain a motion.

1:51:0129

Motion to approve. Motion to

1:51:027

approve. Second.

1:51:04 – 1:51:181

We have a motion from Commissioner Beeterman, second from Commissioner Hernandez to approve item 24. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, show the item passing unanimously five o with commissioner Kalari absent from the dais.

1:51:18 – 1:51:511

Item 25 is a resolution of the city commission, City of Hollywood authorizing the city to apply for and if awarded, accept the Florida Inland Navigation District 2026 Waterway Assistant Program grant for the Waterfront Access and Resiliency Project in an amount up to $1,500,000, etcetera, authorizing one to one matching funds to be paid from the general obligation bond project funding and executing all applicable grant agreements, again, if awarded. This is from the Department of Design and Construction Management.

1:51:5121

Motion to approve.

1:51:531

Well, let's go ahead and invite Jose real quick here to say a few words about the item. And then we have a public speaker, Pam Borgio.

1:52:02 – 1:52:3830

Good afternoon, commissioners. And so this item is to supplement the funding that we currently have with the tidal floating project. It's mainly for the keyhole, but on the north, the north keyhole. And the idea is to really continue to build on the preliminary design or everything that has been done for the tidal floating project and adding additional funding. It's mainly to elevate the sidewalk around the keyhole and also to provide opportunities for adding the living shoreline.

1:52:381

A living shoreline in the water, yeah.

1:52:40 – 1:52:5830

Yeah, living shoreline in the water, which was contemplated as part of the scope for the tidal floating project anyway. So the grant is up to that amount. We're submitting up to $3,000,000 They could give us less. But if we get up to $3,000,000 then the matching funds will come from the tidal floating amounts that we have today.

1:52:59 – 1:53:101

Okay. Public speaker card, Pam Borgio. Thank you, Jose. Is Pam here? Pam Borgio? Alright. Commissioner Schuham, floor is yours.

1:53:1021

Just a motion to approve.

1:53:13 – 1:53:571

We have motion and a second to approve item 25. No speaker cards. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, the item carries unanimously five-zero. All right. Well, concludes all the items in our regular agenda but for our advertised presentations. And even though there are not items of quasi judicial, we could probably take them up now, it's only fair to those folks who we told this was a 03:30 that we hold on this item. So I'll just ask members of the body if they want to move forward with comments by the city commission, city attorney, city manager now or we do. All right. Since vice mayor is on a roll, let's go ahead since she's first. Vice Mayor Kaleri with any comments today?

1:53:57 – 1:54:246

Well, I have one, a couple more things, I guess, on my agenda before my end here in November. I would like to take the liberty to ask for support. And let me, if you just bear with me for one moment. Arlene, do you have that as well? So here we have a couple of pictures.

1:54:24 – 1:55:056

And I have been asked Detective Jerry Christensen, who has played a pivotal role in shaping youth intervention programs in the city of Hollywood. His efforts began with a personal investment and evolved into the city supportive initiative. Through his advocacy, the Hollywood City Commission initially provided Boggs Field as a dedicated PALS facility. Laying the foundation for a structured program that has positively influenced thousands of local youth. Detective Christensen's vision and leadership expanded the PALS offerings to include basketball, football, boxing, academic programs.

1:55:05 – 1:55:386

And his vision ultimately led to the construction of the current Powell facility. Prior to the Powell facility, Detective Christiansen used his trunk and provided services for the youth in need in that area. It was formally dedicated in 2001 to Powell. The facility is located at 2311 North 23rd Avenue, and now serves over four fifty youth daily. Anywhere between two hundred and four fifty youth daily.

1:55:38 – 1:56:106

Particularly from the underserved surrounding neighborhoods, including Liberia. Reinforcing that the Hollywood Police Department's commitment to provide community oriented policing. I am requesting, by the support of my commission, for renaming of the Powell Building in honor of retired detective Jerry Christiansen, for his lifelong commitment to youth engagement, community policing, and public service that has left a superb enduring legacy.

1:56:121

All right.

1:56:13 – 1:56:286

Support. Chief Devlin, if you could come up and say a few words as well. And after a few words, I'm going make even a special bigger request. I might as well go all the way, right? Go big or go home.

1:56:281

That's your motto.

1:56:29 – 1:56:5315

Thank you, Vice Mayor. I really can't add more than what you've read here today. But Jerry did start the out of the trunk of his car. The caring that he showed for the children in that neighborhood is undeniable and really unbelievable what he did. And his passion to start the Pal and get that going and keep it going, What a great honor, long overdue in my opinion. So thank you for that. I appreciate it.

1:56:536

And normally, we don't name we have currently, but usually we wait until the passing. But I'd like to

1:57:001

Take a fiveseven vote, yeah.

1:57:026

Take a fiveseven vote. And my request with that fiveseven vote would be, how long can you get that utilized, chief, or implemented?

1:57:1215

Upon this passing, I will order this tomorrow. We'll get it in the next couple weeks and have a nice ceremony.

1:57:17 – 1:57:306

So the faster we could do it, the better. Just for appreciation and the support for Jerry while he's here and present, sound, and mind, I think that it would be monumental to provide this gift to him.

1:57:31 – 1:58:021

So it's just great to hear and actually learn about Jerry. I didn't have the pleasure of meeting him since he started his work with PAL, obviously, many decades ago. But just want to express my pride in everyone else that since him that's expanded the PAL program. So many kids have benefited from it, including, you know, Patrick Aguinore himself who was kinda came out of the program and now is leading the program. So we have a lot to be proud of, a lot of great mentorship that happens for kids there from all over the city.

1:58:02 – 1:58:301

It's something to be proud of when when we invite people to the city. We can showcase these kids programs that we do, that PAL does. And really, it's a feather in the cap of the city of Hollywood. And so, certainly supportive of this as as we we we have. So just for the folks who are wanting to know how this works, we will have an item come before the city commission and hopefully the next or following city commission meeting to adopt the resolution for the naming.

1:58:31 – 1:59:031

And because the gentleman is living, thankfully, that'll require, Adam reminding me, a sixth, seventh vote. So when the resolution comes, I'm sure it'll be unanimous. And we'll go ahead and take that action. And if we have the opportunity to have Mr. Christensen here for the pleasure of the moment, then that would be beautiful to be, aside from, of course, commemorating signage at the site at a future date. So at this moment, Commissioner Cleary, we've got support to bring back the item forthwith. Good enough, city clerk? Thank you.

1:59:036

We can't take a vote today? We have six here. McCann?

1:59:081

I think that the naming policy has an You

1:59:136

know, instant gratification.

1:59:141

It's Okay. It'll come quick.

1:59:17 – 1:59:426

All right. Thank you so much, everyone. And my last comments are, I just want to say the Hollywood Youth Ambassadors have had the opportunity, thanks to Alison, Lauren, and Tamara, arranging the opportunity to visit our facilities throughout the city. Thus far, we've been able to go to public works. We were able to go to the PD and most recently to the fire department off of Sterling.

1:59:42 – 2:00:116

And they got to use the hoses and just see how everything works. And actually, the most important thing to me is they were greeted with open arms and they also were taught CPR. And they weren't certified, but they were given the tools to be able to save a life. And so it's just so important for them to be exposed to everything that the city has to offer. And we are going to continue to go out.

2:00:11 – 2:00:386

But I want to personally thank the fire department for such a great experience, the police department and public utilities thus far. And the youth investors are on their way to see every department that this city has to offer, expose them to opportunities that they had no idea about. And they're really learning such valuable opportunities for their future and direction, leading them in the right direction. So thank you, thank you, thank you. And that's all I have.

2:00:391

All right. Thank you, Vice Mayor Coleri. Let's go ahead to Commissioner Gruber is absent today. Let's go ahead to Commissioner Biederman.

2:00:51 – 2:01:269

Thank you, Mayor. I just have one thing to cover, that's to thank Alex from DCM for communicating with me about the upcoming traffic calming project happening in District 5. I could be critical at times, but when kudos are due, kudos are due. So thank you, Alex. And to remind everybody about first of all, thanks to Parks and Rec for the great concert that they had at the Boulevard Heights Amphitheater.

2:01:26 – 2:02:489

And invite everybody on April 4 to the next concert, which is going be Latin music. So we encourage everybody to come out, enjoy the free parking, enjoy the free concert under the Ocamic and if they continue with their plan, I assume there's going be free hot dogs for the first 100 people that come out to the next concert also. And I think that we're going to do some kind of raffle drawing for the people that show up on April 4. And again, I'm looking forward to having a great Memorial Day concert on May 22 and looking forward to stepping it up also with maybe some flag giveaways, more raffles. And if Parks and Rec can reach out to the American Legion and the VFW and the organizations like that so that we can get a collaboration and invite more and more people so that more groups involved, as more people, maybe we can get like one of the high schools to do some an opening act for the main attraction would be great.

2:02:499

But I appreciate everything that they're doing. Thank you.

2:02:521

Thank you, Commissioner Biederman. Let's go to Commissioner Quintana.

2:02:57 – 2:03:222

Thank you, mayor. I wanted to express appreciation for Christina Rivero. She's the media person working with our Parks and Rec department. And I think she's doing a great job of spreading the word of the many programs that Parks and Rec is growing. So please follow on Instagram HollywoodFL Parks and Rec.

2:03:23 – 2:03:532

I'm happy to see that there are some new programs being developed to be delivered in our community centers. As you know, I've been kind of harping on the idea that certainly the community centers in my district were lacking programming and I'm seeing efforts being made to address that. So I want to express appreciation for that. I also am seeking support from my colleagues. We've been talking so much about water and I think we'll continue to be talking about water.

2:03:53 – 2:04:422

So I'm asking if you would support engaging our staff and our sustainability department to develop programming related to water conservation and resilience in our city with the effort of empowering our residents to take individual and community action to find balance in their relationship with water. So what that might look like is ways to safely store rainwater in order to reuse. So that's something that people can do right there at their home, empower them to do that, learn about rain gardens, and perhaps other ideas that will be developed with our staff. So looking for support from all of you. Thank you.

2:04:422

I see three. So I'm good. Thank you so much, everybody. And that's it, mayor.

2:04:491

Thank you, Commissioner Quintana. Commissioner Schuham?

2:04:55 – 2:05:3021

Thank you, mayor. First, I want to just thank the Hollywood Lake Civic Association and the Hollywood Police Department for an excellent event on Sunday. We had the lake softball versus the police department. I think we had 100 people from the community out there. And it was really great. I want to thank the fire department for the goodie bag they left up here today. All sorts of nice things from Hollywood Fire. Of course, the police department says they don't have to give us things like that. Just sharing. But it's very nice.

2:05:32 – 2:06:2321

Also, we had our conference today. And I had raised a suggestion for the city, which is another city in Hollywood to commemorate the eightieth anniversary of the end of World War II and the Holocaust. Did a beautiful sculpture and have placed it in one of their public parks. And I think for Hollywood, this would be a great endeavor to acknowledge the Holocaust, commission an artist, determine the proper location, determine the proper inspiration, be it the Holocaust or a combination of the Holocaust, and of course, the tragedy several years ago in Israel on October 2. So what I'm looking for is support to have staff begin to look at the idea of commissioning an artist.

2:06:23 – 2:06:4621

As you had mentioned this morning, Vice Mayor, it took several years to get the COVID memorial in place. I don't envision this being something as complicated as that. But it could take a while to put out artist requests and things like that. So do I have support for staff to begin to look at a piece of public art commemorating the Holocaust and the recent tragedy in Israel?

2:06:46 – 2:07:211

Support. And I just do want to echo a good point that Commissioner Hernandez made during conference meeting when we had briefly discussed this, that we we have a sister city in Israel, Herzliya, of which there is a budding artist community as well. And I think together with the initiative of soliciting, inspiring, asking, working together with, commissioning art from those sister cities, that perhaps we can collaborate with Herzliya to see if they can help us through that and really have something meaningful in so many ways combined together.

2:07:231

love to see the sister city committee work on that, Peter. Go ahead, Peter.

2:07:287

Thank you, Mayor. I'm in support of that, and I think it's very fitting.

2:07:312

Thank you.

2:07:32 – 2:07:5721

Thank you all. And lastly, you know, it is the city manager's last meeting. He got plenty of attention at the beginning of the meeting, but I just wanted to publicly thank him. The past few years, we've had the benefit of some very calm, consistent, and transparent leadership. And it's very deeply appreciated. And also just want to thank you for leaving us a remarkable staff. So thank you.

2:07:571

All right. Commissioner Hernandez, floor is yours.

2:08:02 – 2:08:187

Thank you, mayor. Doug Park, Stammon Goldman, can we name it after one of our officers, K-nine Kimbo. I'm looking for support for that in order to honor our K9 genera.

2:08:181

Support. Absolutely. Support.

2:08:19 – 2:09:037

So thank you. Short and sweet. A tweak for the notification that comes in the mail for us from the developing world that the department says that they must mail. And I think everybody knows how well the mail carriers and the mail services is. All we would ask is if they could also email the same notice to mayor and commissioner so that our staff can be aware of that notification and put it in our calendars so that we don't get it a day or two before and then have already been committed to something else during that time, if that's something that we can do. I don't know if the city manager feels that we need support from the commissioner, or is that could just be a directive from you in order to

2:09:031

Let's just give support. I think we all echo the support of that. We would like that. It's not already part of process we'd like it to be. It's just a Okay.

2:09:12 – 2:09:467

Okay. And then I want an announcement that the Sister City International Program appointed a new chair yesterday. We have a new chair, the same vice chair. They are actually looking to do something with the youth in sending them to international conferences so they can be aware of what Sister Cities International Program does. And they've already started fundraising, which the money will go into the city.

2:09:46 – 2:09:597

CAFA will write the check out to the City of Hollywood. And hopefully, it will be earmarked for the Sister City International Program, if that's okay with the city manager. Sorry, George. I'm putting you to work all the way to the last day.

2:09:5910

All good.

2:10:01 – 2:10:207

Okay, thank you. That's the only thing. That was just a point of information. And, you know, I think I've known George for better part of four decades. So in different positions, he's always been the same.

2:10:20 – 2:10:517

He's been level headed. Even when things have been very controversial, he always finds a way of having another way of doing something that is not as confrontational as it has been. So for having been able to work with you from the private sector, with the nonprofit sector, and the community sector, congratulations, long overdue. But just don't go out and buy a farm, believe me. Pleasure working with you. Thank you.

2:10:51 – 2:12:031

Thank you, Commissioner Hernandez and commissioners for your comments. Certainly represents that we have a community that is both mindful of its heritage and, at the same time, always looking forward to continual improvement and continued evolution and betterment. And that goes to the agenda that we have in front of us today. And George, it is fitting that in your last meeting, are really reflecting on the past, honoring people in the past, improving the city, and at the same time showing that there is a a great variety of work that needs to be done by all the department heads and everyone under them throughout the city organization. If we think about the improvements and the new leadership of fire chief Levy, who you recruited to the city, Joseph Kroll, and the work set under public works that's ever growing and demands more and more and is exciting because we're giving him more resources to police and their advancements in the new headquarters that's about to come online, public utilities, the very large set of of improvements that they're seeking to make to the water, wastewater, and storm water throughout the city.

2:12:03 – 2:12:441

I can look at each department. Parks and Rec has an ever growing list and ever more exciting results to show for it with the bond investments in the various parks, golf, pickleball, you name it across the board. I think recreationally, we're in the best set ever in the city's history with renewing facilities, but yet at the same time, to ever improve the activities that we have at our community centers. And I spoke at the Hollywood Hills Civic Association just the other week, and the center manager of David Park was asking feedback about his plans already to introduce yoga and tai chi and other activities that he's seeking out to activate, you know, that community center. Know that same work is happening across the city.

2:12:44 – 2:13:241

Roger having coming in with code and parking to help modernize that. We saw an item today on on consent to bring forward new technology to help market make parking more more user friendly and easier to manage and less costly to manage. Andrea with the big set of work with development services and every everything under her her realm with development services is is going to be continue to need updating and work, and Jose Cortez coming back to help lead that effort as assistant city manager. Russell being the awarded building official of the year. We know we have a great team.

2:13:25 – 2:14:071

Thanks to you for attracting some of them, retaining them, empowering them, leading them. And we know we're gonna make you proud as the commission and the leadership here in the city continues to work on the endeavors of a of a city that's worthy of our of our vision statement to empower the city to be, you know, economically and culturally viable and thriving, you know, for future years and future generations in the city. And so thank you, George, for your service to the city. You took the role very seriously, and you handled it seriously. And now we're continuing that work in the same serious fashion. So thank you so much. With that, I'll ask the city attorney if she has any comments today.

2:14:08 – 2:15:2120

I do. I have an announcement. So I have an announcement for an executive session regarding critical infrastructure. Pursuant to Florida statute section 286.0113, subsection three, subsection A, governing public meetings, I, as the attorney for the city of Hollywood, wish to advise the city during this public meeting that I desire to hold a shade meeting on Wednesday, 04/15/2026, at 9AM to discuss issues regarding critical infrastructure. Invited to attend this meeting are the mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners, future city manager Raylan Story, assistant city managers Adam Reichbach, Jovan Douglas, and Jose Cortez, director of public safety, Chris O'Brien, Vincent Morello, director of public utilities, Cassandra Myers, Assistant Director of Public Utilities for Operations Amir Khan, Public Utilities Asset Manager Phyllis Shah, Deputy Director of Public Utilities and Finance Donnelly Chin, Senior Project Manager Giselle Hippolito, senior project manager, Phil Cook from Hazen and Sawyer, and myself.

2:15:22 – 2:15:5020

And on a personal note, I just also really want to thank George for his service. I haven't known him as long as everyone else, only the past five years. But I do want to say that, George, you have always been a support to me and always been so kind and generous with your knowledge and with your experience. And I have appreciated, especially in the past year and a half, your support and your friendship. So thank you so much, and we'll miss you.

2:15:501

Thank you. George, before we let you speak, we do have fifteen minutes, Akhil. I know you won't want to talk for fifteen minutes.

2:15:58 – 2:16:471

So as I was looking out and calling out departments and thinking about the workload, I mean, continuing to look out, we can see the great work that Allison Saffold's been doing with her set of responsibilities. Tammy Heckler in this ever evolving world of HR management and health health care management and the steps we've taken to reduce the health care costs of the city. Rahim and and kind of being seen, I think, as taking a leadership role with the AI revolution that's upcoming and all the cybersecurity and improvements and that IT has been making. Joanne Hussey with all of the work and the expanding, you know, reach of of CMAD has been exponential over the past number of years and is only continuing to move forward. And I know I'm missing some.

2:16:47 – 2:17:151

Ryan Coot, who's done such an exemplary job with community development in helping further those programs and I know now has been promoted to a more senior position in that regard. I see some folks here from Budget who keep doing things most professionally, finance, you name it. I'm probably missing some people and not seeing them here. But we really have a team that I think our residents who are seated on this side of the room can really be proud of. We want you to be successful in what you're passionate about.

2:17:15 – 2:17:471

And that includes all of Hollywood's responsibilities, from infrastructure to business opportunity to life here, quality of life, and all of it combined. None of it stays and is looked to an island on its own. It's all intertwined. In order for Hollywood to be successful for everyone, every realm of our city's responsibility needs to be successful. And that's a little bit of a segue to the discussion we're going to have about the beach and its current condition as well. So George, thank you for helping us lead the way here. Sure. The floor is yours.

2:17:47 – 2:18:1612

Thank you, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. Just a couple of public announcements, and then I'll keep my personal comments brief. Spring Marshmallow Drop, Saturday, two to 4PM, Boulevard Heights Community Center, fun family event for children up to the age of 10. Egg hunt, over 30,000 marshmallows dropped from a helicopter bounce house and special visit from the Easter Bunny. Also, Arts Park Experience, Tank and the Bangas.

2:18:16 – 2:18:3912

There you go. Sunday at seven to 10PM Arts Park Young Circle, rap with rich melodies. Tank's album, The Heart, The Mind, and The Soul, was awarded Best Spoken Word Poetry Album at the twenty twenty five Grammys. She is in concert with support from Miami based Neo Soul Quintet Bungee. I got that all out.

2:18:40 – 2:19:0812

So I'll keep my personal comments brief because, one, I want to get through them. And two, I will probably send you all something in more detail in writing. Obviously, last commission meeting today and Tuesday, last day as a city employee. But I will tell you that what I won't say is goodbye because I am let's see if I can get through this.

2:19:136

You could blame it all on Wise. He brought you back.

2:19:17 – 2:19:3512

Yeah. I'm going to, as you said, Mayor, continue to volunteer in service with the pension board. And will continue as an ambassador for the city.

2:19:35 – 2:20:221

Well, we're proud to have you. We could do an eleven minute clap, you know, kind of like so, treat it as George, thank you so much. We know those folks here, members of the community. I can see Wilson here who's been active in the community for decades as well. John Pasalakwa, other folks that are here, Civic Association folks, Terry, longtime beach people like Dan Kennedy.

2:20:23 – 2:20:441

You know, what we do here as a city takes all of us to bring that forward. And there's so many stories that everyone can tell and reflections. And that story continues. And so thank you for leading us to a good position and enabling Raelynn to have the best organization GREGORY that this city has ever had that she can start with to continue your work.

2:20:44 – 2:21:0112

Yep. We're in a much different place than we were a few years ago. And the city has been able to create such a good foundation to fully realize its potential going forward.

2:21:061

It's a very

2:21:0712

proud moment for the city.

2:21:08 – 2:21:311

It is a proud moment. I will tell you, it is also a proud moment for the state of Florida because they seem to want to manage everything we do as well. So it's like we're co managers now. So, you know, you know, we're proud of where the city is, everyone, today. It's it's much stronger financially.

2:21:32 – 2:22:331

At the same time, the list of needs of the city, primarily infrastructure wise, really outweigh the city's opportunity to fund fund everything to the speed and to the rate of investment that we would all want for ourselves. And so we're mindful of all that. We have some long term plans that'll see the city's improvements come forward over the next couple decades. At the same time, there are some storm clouds ahead with regards to threats to whether it's home rule, local control, or the funding of cities and how perhaps property tax reform, if it's put to the voters and will impact the city, might impact the rate of improvement that we can offer our residents here. So that'll just mean that we'll have to work that much harder on on realizing the city's vision and the city's goals with the the set of dollars and the regulatory framework that we have to abide by as one city out of about four eleven in the state of Florida.

2:22:331

So with that, we're going to recess until 03:30. That'll give you about seven minutes to stretch your legs and come back at 03:30. Thank you.

2:39:05 – 2:39:171

Alright. Thank you so much. We're back in session here at the city commission meeting. If you haven't yet filled out a speaker card and you'd like to speak on the beach item, then that's Pat. She's waving her hand.

2:39:17 – 2:39:521

Just walk up to her desk and submit your speaker card. If you'd like a blank card like Craig has right there, he's filling one out now. And so remaining on our agenda today, we have the 03:30 time certain items, presentations regarding the Hollywood Beach hotel property, and also an overview of the feasibility study and zoning analysis that has been conducted and is continuing for Hollywood Beach. I'd like to now turn it over to the city manager to speak on the item, and then he'll bring up Department of Development Services. George.

2:39:52 – 2:40:1812

Thank you, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, and to all the members of the public and staff listening out there. As you mentioned before, these items really flow together in the presentation. We'll kind of flow from one to the other and together so we can really treat them as such. What this is and what this isn't, we don't anticipate nor expect any kind of formal action or vote today. This is for informational purposes.

2:40:18 – 2:40:4412

This is to talk about the issue, whether it be singular in the first one or the broader view in second part. Because obviously, the beach in the city of Hollywood and a special focus on the central commercial core of the beach is a very special place for the city. And there is a lot of interest there. There's a lot of desire there. There's a lot of market activity there.

2:40:44 – 2:41:3912

It's only gotten more interesting in recent years with Live Local and then some litigation that we happen to find ourselves under right now. So literally, any day now, we will get a judge's decision on that litigation. And what we thought was the smart thing to do was, as we discussed concerning that litigation over four months ago in an executive session, was to have some information and to be proactive about dealing with a public process that would kind of focus the vision of what this city wants the Central Beach to be and how do we get there. And to get there in a proactive, managed fashion with public input and process and not be in a reactive one that might find itself imposed upon us by those kind of actions of the courts as well, too. So that's what this is about.

2:41:39 – 2:42:2012

It's a start. And we anticipate from here future steps will involve a good deal of public process and comment and workshops long before it comes back for any kind of formal action to the city commission. And obviously, we anticipate to get a lot of that public input started right here today. But to have some foundation and some information to work from, I'm going to ask Andrea Winget, director of development services, to give both of those presentations flowing together, first addressing the Hollywood Beach Hotel resort property and then fitting into the grander issue of the beach and especially the central commercial corps. Thank you.

2:42:21 – 2:42:4026

Good afternoon. Thank you, city manager, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. Andrea Winget, director of development services. As the city manager and the mayor said, we're here today to talk about items nineteen and twenty on the agenda together. These items are with regard to Hollywood Beach.

2:42:41 – 2:43:2526

It's looking at the feasibility, a high level zoning analysis of the beach, and as well as the Hollywood Hotel. The city manager talked about this is a start of a conversation. We're here today to provide information and facts, and no decisions are being asked to be made. While I'm kicking off the presentation, there'll also be speakers from Anand Balram and Cameron Palmer, both from the Planning and Urban Design Division. And while they'll be up here representing the planning team, there are also several other team members from their staff who worked on this Nicole, Urja.

2:43:26 – 2:44:0526

And I could have forgotten someone else. But the whole team was really on this. There was a lot of passion behind getting it right and bringing forward factual information today. And they had that through the support of Calvin Giordano and their team. Also Jim Hickey, Dave Dixon, and Eric Liff are here. And they are also our planning experts, as well our economic analysis experts. While they aren't standing up here presenting, they are here to help us answer questions. So we have a variety of experts. We can triage your questions through. And I'll be more than happy to help you navigate that when the time comes.

2:44:09 – 2:44:4626

The city of Hollywood just celebrated its one hundredth birthday. We're 100 years old. We have a long history. Again, we're here today to initiate a conversation. We're not starting a conversation in the middle or picking up something at the end. We're simply here to share information for future, again for future policy consideration. We have a five part agenda that we're going to walk you through. It will be a little bit lengthy. I apologize for that. But we have a lot of facts that we felt is really important to start this conversation with.

2:44:49 – 2:45:2726

So we're 100 years old. We all know our founder was Joseph Young. So before we really jump into where we're going, it's important to just recognize and take a step back and remember where we've been. The beach was created very intentionally by Joseph Young. It was important that we balanced public access, thoughtful design, and economic vitality. That vision still matters today. And it's not a constraint, but we need to use it as a guide. The beach is meant to be public. It's the backbone. It's the experience of what people feel when they're here.

2:45:29 – 2:45:4926

And not just the beach, the Broadwalk itself as well. The built environment is meant to support and complement that experience. It shouldn't dominate it. It's important to consider human scale, light, openness, the design. And that's the feeling that we all get when we're out there today.

2:45:51 – 2:46:2126

The beach wasn't done based on a reactive or a piecemeal. It was planned out. It was very intentional and thought out. It was always meant to be, and at least in the Central Beach Park, economically attractive a mix of uses and destinations that people of all walks of life are attracted to. Over time, that vision seems to have been narrowed down to more so of a height discussion about what's going on out there.

2:46:21 – 2:46:3826

Height should always be looked at as a tool and not the principle driving us. We always want to keep in mind what does something feel like? How does it function? And is it thriving today? Today we have aging buildings.

2:46:39 – 2:47:1526

We have underinvestment. There's a pattern where reinvestment has been becoming more difficult over the last several years or decades. We also have a state legislator that is determining the fate of many, the entire state, all the municipalities in many critical areas for our city, including the beach. We all hear the words live local. We all know that those types of laws that are coming down from the state can determine our fate if we allow them to.

2:47:15 – 2:47:4826

But if we put the necessary tools in place and create the appropriate safety nets and guardrails, we can determine what our future will look like. And that's really why we want to start this conversation, because we know what's going on at the state. And we want to control our destination of our city. So before we jump into our conversation of what the beach looks like and some other interesting facts, let's talk about how we got here. In 1994, we had baseline zoning established.

2:47:49 – 2:48:1826

In 1997 we had the beach CRA that was established to reduce slum and blight on the beach. In 2002 there were additional protections created. And in 2005, city staff was asked to look at the beach heights. And at that time, recommended a tapered approach to building heights. Having the heights reduced as it stepped down towards the broad walk and increased as you move towards A1A.

2:48:19 – 2:48:5426

At that time, the city commission chose a different direction and adopted a flat, more or less 65 feet in most of the area out there on the beach today. And we'll go into more detail on that. Shortly after that, we had the design, the CRA master plan done by Ziskovich. And at the time, Ziskovich was told, look at the design and the principles that are out there. Let's not focus on the height because we've just addressed the height.

2:48:55 – 2:49:2326

So how can we look at setbacks, look at design elements and other architectural features in order to help promote reinvestment? In 2019, there was a study done, a workshop that the commission did, where hotel incentives were discussed. We talked about looking at, should we be scaling height at that time? At the time, nothing ended up moving forward from that. There were shifts in priorities.

2:49:25 – 2:50:0226

It's also important to note that a lot of the studies that have been done haven't necessarily taken a multidisciplinary approach when they were evaluated for those regulations to be put in place. We need to look at comprehensive data. We need to make sure that that drives just some of our decision making and so that we're making deformed decisions based on the data that's provided to the policy holders. So what are we doing today? Today we're again initiating a conversation.

2:50:03 – 2:50:2626

We fully recognize as staff that there is a lot more work that needs to be done before any decisions are considered to be made by this body. We're not asking you to arrive at any conclusions today. We're just beginning a process. We recognize we need to do more analysis, more engagement with the public. We need to refine exactly our study.

2:50:31 – 2:51:0226

Again, to be clear, we're not proposing any text amendments today. We're not proposing any land use amendments. We're not proposing any regulatory action to take place from staff. We don't have a predetermined outcome. We're providing factual information. We're providing scenarios, all of which starts a conversation amongst us and our community. And so now Anand's going to come up and talk us through where we're going.

2:51:0631

Hi, everyone. Good afternoon. Anand ANNAN Bahram with Planning. It's great to be back.

2:51:121

Good to have you back, Anam.

2:51:13 – 2:51:3631

Thank you. And thank you to Andrea for kicking off the presentation. So now that we've established much of the context and the purpose of today's discussion, I want us to focus on where we are today and the questions that we need to be asking to move forward. At a broader look, this is about the greater Hollywood Beach. And really, it comes down to a few fundamental questions.

2:51:37 – 2:52:1031

First, is the existing zoning framework aligned with today's market realities? Not the market that was ten or twenty years ago, but today, and where is it going? Secondly, we want to understand what are the constraints that are limiting feasible redevelopment across the beach, whether that's physical constraints, regulatory constraints, or economic feasibility. And how do we begin to think about maximizing public benefit within those realities? Third, does the existing vision still achieve the outcomes that we desire?

2:52:11 – 2:52:4931

Or does it need to be redefined to reflect current conditions and future goals? Now, to help ground that conversation, we are also using the Hollowed Beach Hotel as a case study, not because it's unique, but because it actually illustrates many of the broader challenges associated with the beach. And it's important not just as a redevelopment site, but because it represents the charm, scale, and character that we often associate with Hollywood Beach. At the same time, it's aging with operational and economic challenges. And it highlights where the current zoning framework may limit reinvestment.

2:52:50 – 2:53:4731

So rather than speaking in abstract terms, this gives us some tangible, real world examples to inform policy and decision making, market conditions, and physical realities that we have to contend with. Ultimately, serves as a lens and a means for us to step back and really ask ourselves, are we creating the conditions for reinvestment and long term success? Or are there gaps between what we intend and what is actually achievable? And that's really important to frame these questions so that moving forward, we're grounded not only in subjectivity and perspective, individual perspectives, but we're grounded in data and reality and not solely on assumptions. So, as we move forward, as Andrea mentioned, we have begun to conduct a study that really examines the economic realities around a lot of this.

2:53:49 – 2:54:2131

And in order to do so, we have I'm going the wrong way. Back. Sorry, guys. So in order to do this, we employed a number of scientific methods in order to help answer these questions. We structured a data driven approach to help support what these answers ultimately are and to provide opportunity to question them in the parameters of that data.

2:54:21 – 2:55:1431

So GIS analysis was used to identify where redevelopment opportunities exist across the beach. We looked at a parcel level evaluation and assessed size, age value, location, flood exposure, and market trends of various parcels along the beach. We looked at development scenarios where we conducted a developer pro form a to assess and understand the financial realities around development on the beach, which assumes land value costs, acquisition costs, construction value, etcetera. We also use this to help distinguish between what could be built and what is actually feasible. We also did a jurisdictional scan across South Florida and looked at various case studies to understand what their policies were and what their natural outcomes were.

2:55:15 – 2:56:0131

We also looked at the assessment of the potential value created through development and what public benefit ultimately resulted from that development within these jurisdictions. Overall, this shifts the discussion from opinion to evidence based, from theoretical outcomes to fiscal outcomes. And this provides the foundations for the findings to follow. Before we jump into some of those things, I just want to rehash land use planning within Broward County because, as many of us know, we are really at the behest of the parameters that the county puts us in as it pertains to land use. We know land use is established at the county level and sets the overall framework for Hollywood Beach and the city at large.

2:56:02 – 2:56:3531

The city's comprehensive plan, on the other hand, implements that framework and zoning is the ultimate implementing tool. As we move from county to city zoning, the regulations become more increasingly restrictive And this is most evident in Central Beach. At the county level, I want to, just for everyone's benefit, note that there is no limit on hotel density. Within the commerce designation of the county, there is no restriction. That is something, however, that the city comprehensive plan aims to establish.

2:56:36 – 2:57:1631

Conversely, height is not regulated through either comprehensive plans. That is a tool that is leveraged through the city zoning to manage growth on the beach. All of this to say is there is a potential misalignment between what is permitted and what is actually achievable on the beach. As we move forward into some of the spatial analysis that was conducted, we did conduct this analysis to identify where redevelopment is most likely to occur. This combines multiple layers, not just zoning, not just land use, but also physical constraints as well as market realities, or market activities rather.

2:57:16 – 2:57:5031

From left to right on the screen, we see future land use, we see zoning, we see flood exposure, we see recent market activity. And this allows us to move beyond a single variable and understand how these factors interact across the beach. We also considered parcel level conditions such as building age, lot size, ownership patterns, and proximity to commercial areas. And the goal is to identify clusters of opportunity, not just isolated sites for potential redevelopment. This helps distinguish where reinvestment is feasible, where it is constrained, and where policy adjustments may have the greatest impact.

2:57:54 – 2:58:2631

As we move on, as I mentioned, we did do some test sites, some what if scenarios to explore what redevelopment could look like. And, you know, in a very general sense, we examined three distinct scenarios. And each scenario represents a different set of assumptions around height, as well as development activity. The baseline reflects the existing zoning conditions, meaning no change, no regulatory change, just what can be built right now. And this generally is maintaining the five to six story restriction.

2:58:27 – 2:59:0731

This allows us to understand what is feasible under today's regulations. The medium scenario on the screen helps begin to test moderate increases in height in the range of 10 to 15 stories. This helps evaluate whether incremental changes improve feasibility. And then lastly, we have our medium to high scenario, which explores up to 30 stories above grade. Before I jump into the specifics around the actual scenarios, I just want to describe developer contributions very briefly.

2:59:07 – 2:59:5131

So, developer contributions in the world of development often refers to the potential dollar value that the public can stand to benefit through development activity. It is not a developer handing over a pot of money to the city and saying, Do whatever, But it is an exchange of value. So, as an example, a developer may stand to benefit from a pro form a basis by additional height and as a result, the city may ascertain or yield a benefit that could be open space. It could be public parking. It could be affordable housing.

2:59:51 – 3:00:3131

It could be historic preservation. And that often is associated with a dollar value. That dollar value and that exchange, of course, is a policy decision based off of what is most, often what is most needed in the area to determine what that is. So, and that will make more sense as we move forward in the next slides, as we describe some of the scenarios and the potential value that can be yielded depending on the incremental increase in height. As we evaluate the baseline scenario, I just want to note that the massing shown on the screen is purely conceptual and is just used to support the pro form a.

3:00:31 – 3:00:5031

It's not a proposal. It's not intended to respect a specific development outcome. The gray buildings simply reflect an existing condition of what is on the ground today. And the highlighted massing illustrates a business as usual. So that is the yellow, the conceptual massing.

3:00:51 – 3:01:1831

Under this baseline condition, there are no changes to zoning. Development feasibility is not achieved within the pro form a. This is consistent across North Beach, Central Beach, and South Beach. And importantly, I want to note that both the county land use, county land use and city's comprehensive plan support this type of development. However, zoning constraints limit the ability to realize it in a financially viable way.

3:01:18 – 3:01:4431

I also want to note, we often see development in North Beach, and you know, that is an active trend. That doesn't necessarily mean that development is feasible. That just means the circumstances with which development is occurring is different than South And Central Beach. Oftentimes, in North Beach, these are private homeowners wanting to build their dream homes. And that investment is worthwhile for them in other areas of the beach.

3:01:44 – 3:02:1731

Doing that is not scalable, especially if you are doing it with the intent to profit. As we move forward and look at our medium scenario, this scenario tests moderate increases in height, generally in the 10 to 15 story range. At this level, projects begin to move from infeasible to feasible. Returns start to approach market benchmarks, meaning reinvestment becomes likely. The massing shown here, again, is conceptual and is used to illustrate scale and form, not a proposed design.

3:02:18 – 3:02:4631

At this intensity, land use at both the county and city level support this type of growth, again, within certain parameters. However, current zoning does not permit it. This highlights a key misalignment. Policy frameworks allow for this level of development solely from a density perspective, but zoning restricts it in terms of height. It is also important to note that while feasibility improves in this instance, the level of height does not generate a significant value.

3:02:47 – 3:03:3431

In other words, the project is viable, but there is not an enormous public benefit yielded from this scale of development. And this reinforces that moderate increases in height are about enabling reinvestment, but not necessarily seeking that developer contribution. As we look at our last what if scenario, we are using the Hollywood Beach Hotel to really understand what would be required to make a site like this feasible. This scenario assumes that the existing hotel remains, with development occurring around it. It also assumes potential reconfiguration of the F dot ramp to unlock additional land and improve site functionality.

3:03:35 – 3:04:1931

The imagery shown, again, is illustrative. I also want to note that on the screen as well, we have an example from Boca Raton that demonstrates how reinvestment and new development can be integrated while maintaining character and making rehabilitation of historic structures more feasible. At this level of intensity, the key takeaway is that development becomes fully feasible and begins to generate meaningful public benefit. This is where the capacity for reinvestment, as well as contributions towards public realm infrastructure and resiliency, are most meaningful. Importantly, it is important to note Broward County land use does not restrict hotel density within commercial designations.

3:04:20 – 3:04:5331

So in this regard, the city's comprehensive plan and zoning does introduce those limitations. So we are the ones limiting the potential reinvestment specific to this parcel. So while the broader policy framework does support this type of intensification, local regulations currently constrain it. And this reinforces that achieving these outcomes would require alignment between land use intent and zoning implementation. So we want to move forward and look at some case studies.

3:04:53 – 3:05:2931

And this is where we really conduct our jurisdictional scan. So this section looks at comparable case studies to understand how other communities have approached growth, as well as community benefit. For each of these examples, they reflect different approaches to balancing development, intensity, design, and community outcomes. Sunny Isles shows what happens when height is maximized with limited emphasis on public realm and community character. North Bay Village reflects a more transitional model where redevelopment is occurring incrementally.

3:05:29 – 3:06:1531

Fort Lauderdale demonstrates how increased height can be paired with structured public realm benefits and design standards. Miami Beach shows how a controlled approach where character and scale are preserved while allowing reinvestment. And then Hollywood Beach, we are going to end on highlighting both challenges and opportunities associated with the site within our existing regulatory environment. There are consistent tools, particularly around how additional development capacity is used and ultimately how public benefit can be generated. So as we look at Sunny Isles, it's helpful here to note that we are not utilizing this as a model of outcome, but as a model of mechanisms from a policy approach.

3:06:15 – 3:06:4831

I want to make clear we do not envision Hollywood Beach to be Sunny Isles. The key takeaway is not the BUILT form, but the framework used to generate public benefit. The program provides multiple contribution options rather than a singular requirement. This includes a trust fund with four direct financial contribution or delivering improvements on-site. Those improvements can include affordable housing, beach access easements, park and open space improvements, public parking, dedication of land or right of way.

3:06:49 – 3:07:2631

It also scales incentives based on context, such as waterfront location or site assembly. So the strength of this approach is flexibility and the ability to align development intensity with public benefit. At the same time, there are clear trade offs on that outcome. It has resulted in a continuous high rise frontage that creates a canyon like effect that erodes human scale and character. There's a heavy reliance on a single arterial, which limits walkability and pedestrian comfort and many of the developments have inactive podiums, private lobbies that do not contribute to a vibrant streetscape.

3:07:27 – 3:08:0431

So, to be clear, again, for those who may have missed it, we are not suggesting Hollywood Beach becomes Sunny Isles. What we are evaluating here are the tools and how value is captured and translated into public benefit. When we look at North Bay Village, this is a more structured approach to height with community benefit. The program clearly defines what the community needs and ties additional height directly to delivering those outcomes. In practice, projects receiving additional height in exchange for tangible improvements, such as parks, waterfront access, in some instance, kayak launches, and pedestrian connections.

3:08:05 – 3:08:4231

It also includes a defined contribution framework. Fees are calculated through a study and tied to the amounts of bonus height being received. For example, for every 10 feet of height carries a per unit or per room contribution. There's also a structure for contributions through transfer of development rights, which is of interest of exploring, and payments of in lieu options, such as workforce housing contributions, that are clearly established. So the strength of this model really is predictability for not only city staff administering it, but also the development community leveraging it.

3:08:42 – 3:09:1431

Developers understand what is required, and the city can ensure that growth delivers the specific outcome that is desirable. At the same time, it's important to recognize that the context is different. The urban form and island geography and development pattern are not directly comparable to Hollywood Beach. But the underlying approach linking height to clearly defined public benefits through a structured system is highly relevant. Fort Lauderdale takes a very different approach than the last two examples.

3:09:15 – 3:09:4731

They link additional height to design performance rather than a fixed fee or contribution schedule. Here, contribution is based on a point based system that evaluates design compatibility and community benefit. Projects earn capacity by meeting specific criteria tied to the surrounding context. This creates a direct relationship between what the community values and what is incentivized. Higher quality design, better integration with the surroundings, and resiliency feature are all rewarded in exchange for height.

3:09:48 – 3:10:3031

In effect, height becomes a tool to achieve better outcomes, not just additional density. This approach allows for flexibility since the scoring system can be tailored to different areas and conditions. And the key takeaway is that this aligns development incentives with design quality, achieving the community character that Fort Lauderdale wants to see. One of the This is our second last case study, and this is the city of Miami, which takes a geography based approach to deliver contributions. Additional height is tied directly to contributions into a dedicated resiliency trust fund.

3:10:31 – 3:11:0731

The contribution is calculated based on the cost of resiliency infrastructure multiplied by the number of bonus units or capacity generated. This creates a clear and predictable relationship between increased development and public investment. Funds are then reinvested within the same geographic area supporting projects such as storm water systems, street elevation, sea walls, and green infrastructure. The strength of this model is it directly links growth infrastructure to the resiliency needs of the area. However, it is more focused on capital improvements and less focused on urban design or place making outcomes.

3:11:08 – 3:11:4531

The key takeaway here is the ability to geographically tie value to value created by development to targeted public investments. So this brings us the conversation back to Hollywood Beach. Up until this point, we've looked at how other communities structured growth, feasibility, and public benefit. Now we want to ground our discussion in our local context, using Hollywood Beach Hotel as a reference point. I want to emphasize that this is not a proposal, but a real world example of the conditions we're working within.

3:11:45 – 3:12:0731

This helps connect the policy discussion to an actual site with real constraints and real opportunities. At this point, I'm going to hand it over to my colleague Cameron to walk through the current condition of the hotel and the regulatory framework that governs it, including how land use zoning and existing entitlements shape what is, what is not, and what is feasible today.

3:12:12 – 3:12:3611

Thank you, Anand. Good afternoon. As Anand stated eloquently, today is not about a proposal, but it's simply an understanding of the case study, this case study being the Hollywood Beach Hotel, the constraints, opportunities on the site, and the story. The Hollywood Beach Hotel is located on approximately 10 acres of land. And I'll go into the division of that in a little bit.

3:12:37 – 3:13:0211

The existing height of the building is approximately 78.5 feet, or seven stories. The hotel was constructed in 1925 and was constructed in ninety days by Joseph Young. And it was his jewel in the vision of Hollywood by the sea. The current land use in the comprehensive plan is general business. The current zoning in our zoning code is his Broadwalk Historic District Commercial 25.

3:13:03 – 3:13:3111

And the historic status is the building is not designated on the National Register, but it is a contributing building in our historic district overlay. Zooming in closer to the site, we want to take a look at what we know as the Hollywood Beach Hotel. Oftentimes, when those words are said, we're referring to the building. But really, it's much more than just the building. It's the greater site and the lands that surround the building that make up the idea of the Hollywood Beach Hotel.

3:13:31 – 3:14:0611

And at the time of inception, it imagined that this property would work together. And as we go through this presentation, we will see that theme reemerge. As it pertains to ownership, I wanted to provide the commission a bit of a breakdown on how the parcel looks today. It is heavily fragmented, with the hotel sitting on a parcel in of itself and the adjacent lands plaza to the ocean are under the same ownership. So these are parcels eight and three, depicted in red on the screen.

3:14:06 – 3:14:3311

The surrounding lands are owned by two different entities. Parcels one, two, four, and six on your screen, depicted in blue, are owned by Gary Jaffee. And then finally, and we can never forget, Parcel 7, which is the F dot ramp and associated landscape area within the ramp. Getting ourselves a step closer to the property, we're moving to what it looks like today. And on the screen, you'll see some images that are taken by staff of the existing conditions of the property.

3:14:33 – 3:15:1911

In its vacancy, the property has fallen into disrepair with roof and tarp damage, compromised stucco, compromised structural elements, water intrusion, and mold in certain parts of the hotel. And at present, the property is being brought before the unsafe structure board. And you may ask, why is that action being taken? And this is because the pictures shown before and the conditions that are taking place at the site have led to the city raising a flag that a potential situation of demolition by neglect be taking place here. And the unsafe structured board's job is to hear and review applications of the building official to review his or her actions and to provide a final decision.

3:15:19 – 3:16:0911

They can either affirm, modify, or reverse decisions made by a building official upon appeal or application. And the board's role is limited to determining whether a structure is unsafe and whether it should be repaired, secured, or demolished. The authorities focus on structural integrity and life safety considerations and does not extend to zoning, development, and land use matters. However, the decisions of the board as it pertains to the condition of the structure are indeed final. So the request of the app that the city has put before the unshaped structure board is to have the property owner repair within thirty to sixty days and obtain a permit to secure the building envelope by repairing or replacing the roof, windows, doors, walls, any exterior openings to prevent further water and moisture intrusion.

3:16:11 – 3:16:5711

Now, it's important to understand that at this juncture with property, the unsafe structure board is one of the few mechanisms the city has left to bring the property owners to the table and to highlight the urgency or the dire condition of the property and to demonstrate the seriousness that the city has towards maintaining this property or bringing attention to the existing conditions. As a reminder, the city does not own the property. And therefore, the unsafe structure board is a mechanism which we are using to ensure that the property does not fall into total disrepair. Now, the outcomes of the board are outside the control of the city, and those include several different options. The board may rule in favor of the city and at order that the reappears be conducted as requested.

3:16:57 – 3:17:2411

The board may rule in favor of the city, but issue an order of a different action and a different course. Or the board may rule contrary to the city and issue an order of a different course. So again, this could go in many different ways. And the hearing is set for April 15. So after analyzing, or rather understanding the conditions of the slide, let's take a moment to observe the constraints that affect this property.

3:17:24 – 3:17:5611

And one of the primary leading constraints that affects this property, but also many other properties along the beach, are FEMA and coastal construction control line considerations. For the purpose of this presentation, I'll refer to that as the CCCL. And on the screen, there are some several stats as it pertains to this specific property. But I think I want to the main thing I want to highlight is that this challenge is not unique to the Hollywood Beach Hotel. And that's what makes this case study such a pertinent one, that it has elements that are both unique to the site, but also affecting sites throughout the beach.

3:17:58 – 3:18:4511

Both FEMA flood based elevation and the CCCL both have implications on what construction can take place on the site or what redevelopment at what level the new redevelopment can take place on this property. It is important to note that the CCCL bisects the Hollywood Hotel, meaning that any construction seaward of that line has to be built at a much higher elevation than just the standard elevation on the screen. And that would equal 17 feet on the screen before you. Switching gears a bit to understand another constraint, and it's a rather important one, are the financial constraints that this property is facing. The property has accumulated a tax burden of over $750,000 over the last couple of years with the city.

3:18:46 – 3:19:2611

Beyond that, there is debt accumulation on the property with mortgages totaling more than $120,000,000 and one of the mortgages pending auction. It's important to understand these constraints when looking at this property, because it is the reason why the property is a non performing asset. Furthermore, it's complicated by that it remains vacant and non operational. And now, with the foreclosure or the pending foreclosures of certain elements, ownership uncertainty is becoming another constraint that the site is facing. And the reason I say site is because while this is just a hotel segment or a hotel parcel, what happens to one parcel inevitably affects all parcels.

3:19:31 – 3:19:5711

On this slide, we speak about opportunities. So we spoke about the constraints. Let's switch gears and talk about opportunities. On the site, again, this is not a proposal. This is not a design exercise. This is simply staff highlighting areas on the property that have potential for opportunity. And they're color coded on the screen, but I'll go over them briefly with you. The purple is the oceanfront element of the property. The red is the historic Hollywood hotel building. The yellow is the surrounding properties.

3:19:57 – 3:20:2611

And then the blue is the F dot ramp and the terminus view of the hotel. Now, we're going to discuss a case study. Yes, a case study and a case study, to keep it interesting. We're going to look at a hotel that's we wanted to evaluate hotels within the Florida State area to see if this trend was unique to Hollywood, or is it indeed something that other municipalities or other properties are facing. And what we found was that in the case of St.

3:20:26 – 3:21:1711

Pete Beach, Florida, the Don Cesar is a similarly situated hotel, a beachfront property, that was designed in 1925 and constructed in that time frame, similar to the Hollywood Beach Hotel. It was also converted to military purposes during World War II, similar to the Hollywood Beach Hotel, and fell into disrepair, similar to Hollywood Beach Hotel. The difference in the story with the Don Cesar is that in the 1970s, the property was acquired for $460,000 Now, I know a lot of you are our gasping. I've converted that number so it's a little bit more understandable. In today's value, that's 3,600,000.0 And at the time, a significant sum of renovations were done, the total of $3,500,000 which converts to today equals $50,000,000 And then after that rehabilitation, the property was then listed in the National Register.

3:21:17 – 3:22:0211

But it's important to understand the takeaways of this scenario when we compare it to the parallels of our own scenario of the Hollywood Beach Hotel. When a low basis and a manageable reinvestment sum is presented, original restoration is clearly possible. However, if those conditions, low bases and manageable reinvestment, are not both present, then restoration alone is unlikely to be able to revitalize the site, because the conditions that existed back then or in other scenarios may not be existing here in the Hollywood Beach Hotel scenario. The image on the screen you're going see now for our second case study in a case study is the Boca Raton, which we previously and Ann previously alluded to in his scenario slides. And this hotel took a different direction.

3:22:02 – 3:22:3111

And it's very interesting how this story unfolded. Very similar, this hotel was built in 1926, the age of big hotels. And it was built in the Boca Raton, the municipality of Boca Raton. It's a waterfront property along the Intracoastal with a large surrounding land with a large surrounding grounds to the hotel historic building. Of note, you'll see on the right of the image I've highlighted it in red for your ease of viewing is the 27 story tower that was added to the property in 1969.

3:22:32 – 3:23:0811

I want to take a moment to pause here to say that staff is not recommending the design, the form, or any of that in this example. We are simply showing what was done in a different municipality. And while the times have changed and design considerations will naturally change, the Boca Raton Hotel did this to remain financially viable. And in doing so, they were able to preserve the historic building on the site. The relationship between the low rise historic building and new, at that time, modern tower demonstrates how a hotel or how a business can pivot to be financially feasible while maintaining historic context.

3:23:1316

Bear with me.

3:23:14 – 3:24:0411

So through our research, we're able to see certain trends and parallels with our hotel here at Hollywood Beach and others throughout the state, where we see deterioration in other sites, repurposing in other sites, and how those other case studies overcame those challenges. It's important to note that with our particular case, the interconnectivity of all the challenges cannot be ignored. The vacancy that leads to deterioration, that leads to unsafe structure actions, which leads to temporary repairs, that leads to continued decline, and then we go back up to the top that starts with vacancy. It's a cycle, and it's quite vicious at that. It is important to note that without change or without intervention, similar to our examples that we studied, repurpose or rejuvenation or revitalization of the site will be extremely difficult.

3:24:05 – 3:24:5011

And that's where reinvestment comes in. And again, this is an observation we made from the case studies, that with reinvestment, reinvestment is able to break the cycle that is currently seen on the site and lead to different outcomes that are perhaps the productivity that we were looking to achieve, things such as planned growth versus temporary repairs, activated public realm instead of deterioration, context specific restoration instead of unsafe conditions, and lastly, and probably the most importantly, landmark development instead of vacancy. And these are key elements that are important. They emerge when there is a plan and a vision and a direction. So I don't want you all to get lost on this chart.

3:24:50 – 3:25:3011

I'm going to walk us through it carefully. But up until now, we've been speaking about a lot of elements that are outside of the city's control. We observing the conditions that are impacting the site in this case study. But I want to bring it to I want to bring our discussion into the regulatory framework, because these are things that we do have some control over. And there is overlapping regulation as it pertains to this site and many sites throughout the beach. Starting on the far left of the table, we have the county comprehensive plan. And I'm going to read the county and the city comprehensive plan together. There are certain commonalities. They're both in commerce or general business land use designation. Both plans do not speak about height.

3:25:30 – 3:25:5211

Comprehensive planning is not about height. It's not something that's covered in that document. While there's no hotel density prescribed in the county plan, the city's plan goes a little step further and prescribes a density, depending where you are on the beach, from 50 to 300 rooms per acre. The hotel pool is a pool of hotel rooms. The county does not have such a program.

3:25:52 – 3:26:3111

The city has created this mechanism to pool hotel rooms. Flexibility units, the county provides a maximum density. The city has to abide by that density, but also provides on top of that density criteria for the use of those units. Stepping one down closer to the property, we're talking about zoning. So we're talking about the second to last right column where it says current zoning permissions. The property is zoned Broadwalk Historic District. The height there is limited at 40. And it's important to note the height is not limited in any other document except the zoning code. We speak to the hotel density. The zoning further restricts the density to 70 rooms per acre.

3:26:31 – 3:26:5911

As it pertains to this zone, the hotel pool and flexibility units are not being implemented. And then lastly, I think it's really important for us to look at the last column and that is the existing hotel today. With regards to the zone, the zone is the same. With regards to the land use for residential uses, those are being investigated through the memorialization of legacy entitlements. When it comes to height, you'll notice the height of the hotel is actually taller than the zone prescribes, at 78 feet versus the 40 feet that the zone prescribes.

3:27:00 – 3:27:4211

The hotel density is 123 rooms per acre, if you were to do the math based on how many rooms on the site to the site area, which is above what the zoning code would otherwise prescribe. And there's no hotel pool or flexibility units applied on this site. So in summary, the objective of this presentation is to demonstrate the constraints, the opportunity, and the legal framework. On the screen, you'll see a chart that's very similar to the charts that Anand was showing you. And it's just talking about the tools that we have in our toolkit that are ours to use and are to leverage to receive a productive or incentivize a productive end result.

3:27:42 – 3:28:2611

It's very important for us to realize that as non owners of this property, there's many things that we cannot do. But as the city and the body functioning in the regulatory framework, there are many things there are certain things that we can do. There are certain elements that are within the city's control, whether it's seeking to memorialize legacy units, or is it leveraging hotel room density, or modifying height restriction, or creating design parameters. These are within our controls. And on the screen, you'll see those are highlighted with the green boxes to show the tools that are in our toolkit, so to speak. And with that, I think I've spoken talked to your ear off on the Hollywood Beach Hotel. I'm going to hand it back to Anand to speak about initial findings and carry on with the remainder of the presentation.

3:28:261

Thank you, Cameron.

3:28:2931

Hi, everyone, again.

3:28:301

Welcome back.

3:28:31 – 3:29:0231

JAMES I am back to talk your ear off now. So as we move forward, I just want to contextualize this a little bit because I know up until this point, we've heard a lot and we've received a lot of information. So I do want to ground us in both the broader framework and the site specific conditions. Now that we have that context, we can begin to look at some of the analysis and what some of that information is telling us. So what are the consistent patterns that we're seeing across the beach?

3:29:02 – 3:29:2131

Where the constraints are and where the opportunities are? How do those findings begin to inform a path forward? And I just want to emphasize that these are initial findings. They are not firm conclusions. But they do start to highlight where alignment may be needed between policy zoning and market realities.

3:29:24 – 3:29:5731

So let's start off with the first of two slides that kind of describe our findings. The analysis points us to a few consistent themes across the beach. First, there are three distinct character areas, which I think many of us are aware. North Central and South Beach have all different physical conditions, all distinct development patterns, and very different market dynamics. This means that a one size fits all approach is not appropriate, depending on how we decide to move forward with intervention on the beach.

3:29:57 – 3:30:2731

Second, building conditions are a key driver. And we're seeing clusters of aging and underutilized properties, which creates both a need and opportunity for reinvestment. And importantly, these conditions vary across the beach, influencing where changes more likely occur in the near versus longer term. Third, resiliency is an underlying factor. Flood elevations and ongoing infrastructure projects will influence how and where development ultimately occurs.

3:30:28 – 3:31:2531

In addition to where and how based off of infrastructure availability, I do want to note that FEMA requirements ultimately change the way building design will happen in a contemporary way. And without a strategic approach to design contextually, we may not be receiving the same public realm that we are expecting. On their own, these aren't a justification for increased height, but together these findings reinforce that a future policy needs to be targeted, context specific, and grounded in both physical and market realities. As we move on, we also want to discuss Live Local and the legislative nature of the state as we know it today. Live Local is shaping conversations across the state in terms of how redevelopment occurs and who determines the fate of that redevelopment.

3:31:26 – 3:32:0931

As we may be familiar, Live Local allows for the highest height within one mile of a prospective development site above three stories or whichever is greater. This means the city needs to be proactive in defining where and how height may be accommodated, but also in a strategic way. Live Local provides specific exemptions that exempt sites from being benchmark sites. And those are through bonus programs, special exception, or variance. So any approach to enable additional height within the beach should be within one of those frameworks as to not snowball or deliver unintended consequences associated with redevelopment on the beach.

3:32:10 – 3:32:3431

All of that to say, what we are trying to emphasize is we should be avoiding by right entitlements. Second, the case studies. They show that there are multiple ways to structure growth and deliver tangible public benefit. But the most effective approaches balance urban design, historic context, coastal resilience, as well as economic feasibility. No single tool solves everything.

3:32:35 – 3:33:1131

It's all about how they're combined and utilized together in a strategic way, again depending on context. Third, I want to emphasize urban design. Heightened density alone do not determine success or economic viability. The quality of streets, the quality of our open spaces, the quality of our public realm are what shape the ultimate experience of the beach and help to support and maintain the character that we know and love. Design should be a primary tool utilized to guide development, to set expectations, and make development sustainable and predictable.

3:33:13 – 3:33:5231

We should not be just reacting to increased height, but establishing a framework to ensure that growth enhances the character of the beach as opposed to detracting from it. Looking back at the city's past approaches, there were strong values that were utilized to guide Hollywood Beach. But there was not necessarily a clear end state or defined identity of what the beach should ultimately become. Direction on form, intensity and economic role need to be clearly established. And this often leads to case by case decision making or inconsistent outcomes over time.

3:33:52 – 3:34:4131

And on the screen, I have, you know, displayed a pre application that we received on the top which lends itself to, you know, what the development community can expect from our current and existing code, which is really unfortunate because this type of development results in oftentimes Nicole, who is our urban designer and city architect, advocating for better design. And that's what we see on the bottom. That's the same property designed with a different design application. But there is no guiding document that serves to provide that predictability to the developers, to staff, in terms of what this commission, what this public desire from development on the beach. And this is really the core of the issue.

3:34:41 – 3:35:0031

There's a lack of a unifying vision. An updated master plan would help better address that. It would identify what Hollywood Beach should look like moving forward. It would align policy, urban design, and market realities into a single framework and help coordinate infrastructure investment across departments. And that fundamentally is necessary.

3:35:00 – 3:35:3131

We need to assess this above and beyond the realities of planning. There are infrastructures and implications of growth. There's mobility implications to growth. There are abundance of other technical issues that need to be resolved as we realign our policy. Ultimately, an updated master plan would provide clarity and reduces a need for project by project negotiation, improve predictability, and ultimately lends to higher quality development from the outset.

3:35:31 – 3:36:2831

But most importantly, it establishes a consistent identity for the beach and one that can guide decisions over time, while still allowing for flexible outcomes. So, as we move forward into some things that we're hoping the commission will consider, height should be considered in a context specific way on the beach. Every area has different characteristics that should be approached very differently. North Beach, the priority in our minds is maintaining the existing low rise character, generally within the range of two to four stories, with targeted and context specific updates to allow modernization of the existing code, to eliminate some of the long standing variances that planning staff have received over the years, specific to setbacks, open space, amenity space, and those types of things. In Central Beach, the focus begins, the focus shifts to supporting hotel investment.

3:36:29 – 3:37:0031

We know there's a pent up demand for hotel reinvestment in Central Beach, but the longstanding constraint has been the height constraints. This is where moderate height, generally in the range of 10 to 15 stories, can help enable that reinvestment. But this should be paired with careful transitions to protect views, access, and the pedestrian experience overall. In South Beach, the pattern is already established. Higher intensity exists today, so the approach may be to align with that existing character.

3:37:00 – 3:37:3231

There are very few development sites that would offer the same intensity, allowing heights up to approximately 25 stories while improving the quality of design, ground level activation and relationship between buildings and the street. Overall, the key takeaway of this is height should not be applied uniformly. It should be calibrated based off of geography and context to ensure the desired outcomes. And I just have a couple more slides, so just bear with me. We're nearing the end.

3:37:33 – 3:38:1731

As we move into near term considerations, you know, there is an opportunity to establish a targeted overlay framework. Again, a bonus program that removes us from the jeopardy of Live Local. The purpose of this would be to enable reinvestment in the short term without predetermining or jeopardizing our long term objectives. This would not be a one size fits all approach where we would be prescribing uniform heights within these areas, but attempting to implement something that supports gradual transitions rather than uniform height applications across the beach. The focus would be calibration, not maximization of what could be on the beach.

3:38:17 – 3:39:1831

It would be using feasibility as a guide, but balancing it with design considerations, as well as community character. The framework could also incorporate tools like transfer of development rights, allowing development capacity to be redistributed in a way that aligns with the goals of the comprehensive plan and the existing goals of the Hollywood Beach. It could support targeted increase in density rather than broad based changes that may have insurmountable effects. All of this requires design analysis along with community engagement to ensure that we are getting it right in whatever regulatory framework we propose, particularly around how height is distributed, how areas transition, and how the public realm is impacted or otherwise activated. And most importantly, this is an intern step and is not intended to replace or predetermine the outcomes of a future master plan, but rather allow progress while the longer term vision is being developed.

3:39:21 – 3:39:5031

As we take a little bit of a step back, I do want to emphasize that there are many ways that the city can request public benefit. This outlines the potential framework linking height to public benefit, where the focus is on many different things. It could be one thing. It could be many things. It can be a combination thereof, where public benefits could be infrastructure, open space, housing, activation, economic vitality, urban design.

3:39:50 – 3:41:0231

Really that is a policy decision based off of what is most needed on the beach. And again, as I mentioned, there's many different things that could be done to address one of the many challenges of the beach. As we look at the longer term considerations for the beach, this is about setting a clear long term direction through a beach master plan to establish a unified vision with defined character for each sub area grounded, and grounding all decisions in technical realities of infrastructure, mobility, and resilience to support and accommodate that growth. We would translate that growth into clear design, into a clear design and skyline strategy, develop context based heights and gradual transitions, not uniform increases, focusing on redefining tools that we already have at our disposal, and of course, leveraging overlays and bonus frameworks to shape outcomes and not expanding entitlements. Ultimately, we would want to ensure everything is coordinated and implementable, and at the bottom line, height and form should ultimately be driven by design, technical analysis, and community input.

3:41:05 – 3:41:4731

As we look to next steps, the slide outlines a clear phased path forward. First, we would initiate community engagement, seeking input from the community in terms of what public benefits are worthwhile to pursue, where does height belong, where should height not belong. Building an understanding around feasibility with the community, understanding what the constraints are, what the opportunities may be. Second, we would advance a targeted overlay in the near term as a tool to allow for reinvestment of the beach. Again, provided that public benefit is received, it would not be an as of right entitlement.

3:41:47 – 3:42:3831

There would be very specific criteria that would need to be met. We could then refine the bonus strategies and bring forward options to city commission for their consideration. Third, we would want to begin our beach master plan process, which we know will likely be a longer process. This would establish the long term vision, begin to establish the sub area character, and a design framework. Fourth, we would want to complete the technical studies associated to ensure sustainable development is feasible, ensuring that there are plans for infrastructure improvement to facilitate the development, ensuring resiliency goals are met, ensuring mobility options are aligned with growth, and finally return to commission with a refined and implementable option for the beach, grounded both in community input as well as technical analysis.

3:42:39 – 3:43:2031

Overall, our near term actions paired with our longer term plan hopefully will generate a plan for the beach that we can all stand behind. Again, as we continue the conversation, I just want to remind us of what this presentation was meant to do today versus what it was not meant to do today. This is about continuing the conversation, not concluding it. We set out to really frame the issue, what the constraints are, and what the opportunities are. We do intend today and in the future to always ground the conversation and data in feasibility, in terms of practical redevelopment opportunities.

3:43:21 – 3:44:0031

But again, in terms of what the community can bear and how we maintain the character and the long standing vision of Joseph Young. We want to highlight the trade offs between market realities, constraints, and public benefits. And just as important, this is not a policy proposal. There are no zoning changes today. There are no entitlements being imposed on any specific property. There are no predetermined outcomes. The goal of today is to align the direction and next steps. And from here, the conversation ships to you all. What direction feels appropriate for North, Central And South Beach? And with that, I conclude.

3:44:00 – 3:44:331

I want to thank our professional staff. I think you're getting this round of applause because it was clearly a well done and well researched approach to a very heartfelt and sensitive topic in the city of Hollywood, and that's the great Hollywood Beach. I think we all know it's a special place. As you all said at the outset, it has a special character to it. And we want to, as we look to make it economically successful for the future and in a manner that retains its character, its scale that we all love.

3:44:33 – 3:45:071

But through the recommendations and the analysis he presented, I think we can all, in a level headed fashion, pursue that goal and achieve probably the best of both worlds the economic success, addressing some of the problems that were pointed out, and at the same time preserving character of the different sub areas. So I really want to thank Andrea, Anand, Cameron, and the planning staff for a job well done with this presentation. So Pat, if you could please hand over the speaker cards. Let's hear and have this initial public comment opportunity. As everyone knows, this is a high level presentation today.

3:45:08 – 3:45:471

And we will continue with public conversation in the weeks ahead and ultimately get to these near term goals that were set out. All right. Pat, did you Pat, one card per speaker, correct? You already sorted it out? Okay. Whether you know, wrote 19 or 20, it doesn't matter. I'm gonna call you on this, so don't worry about that. Alright. I'm gonna call them as I have them. Let's begin with Michael Seltzer and we'll follow with Alex Riccio, then Skipper, I believe. Okay. Mr. Seltzer, welcome.

3:45:478

Thank you. I live at 956 Hollywood Boulevard. And just to be very honest, I have a client looking to purchase the Hollywood Beach Hotel.

3:45:571

There are many clients looking to purchase a Hollywood Beach Hotel.

3:46:01 – 3:46:218

That's right. The property. There is a discussion of who owns the property now. Does Madison Capital own it or does retreats own it? Who is going to do those repairs, or who's going to walk away from the repairs?

3:46:21 – 3:46:498

Whose responsibility is it? I used to live in Bal Harbour. I don't know if anybody else has lived in sunny isles of Bal Harbour. I don't know if anybody else has not been able to drive a car in those areas from mid December, probably till the March, April. The traffic is horrendous, absolutely horrendous.

3:46:51 – 3:47:198

To do the same thing that's been done in those communities here is terrible. I moved to Hollywood Boulevard. I was told the traffic would be terrible, hardly terrible. The roads in Hollywood, in that portion where you're looking to redo the zoning, will not handle the kind of traffic that you're looking at. It's bad enough today with what we have.

3:47:20 – 3:47:558

When these gentlemen did their studies of these different properties, I think you should look at Hillsborough Beach. Their zoning is spot on. And when you're looking at the Don Cesar Hotel, you should look at the Vinoy in Downtown Saint Pete, a very old hotel, 100 years old, that was redone several times with condos built adjacent to it. North Bay Village is hardly a study. There's not enough built there and finished to look at the traffic that's going to be generated there, which is bad today.

3:47:58 – 3:48:368

I don't know the public benefit there is for all this traffic. I really don't. And before you make a decision, maybe you should hear from a developer, whoever's going to buy the Hollywood Beach Hotel, to decide what they see and what they want to develop. Because having these nice people decide might not even come close to what somebody who has money that has to be invested to decide what they want to develop and what is going to make sense. I put myself down for number nineteen and twenty because there's two separate things, and it was three minutes each.

3:48:361

No, it's three minutes total because it's a combined presentation. So go ahead

3:48:408

and Well, I have more to say, but I'm finished for the moment.

3:48:43 – 3:48:561

Yeah, I'll be continuing conversation. This won't be the only time for public comment on this, everybody. Alex Riccio, followed by Mr. Skipper, then Dennis DiMartino.

3:48:56 – 3:49:1928

Before you start my time, I just want to second the gentleman's comment that this was two separate agenda items. The clerk requested that we fill out two separate speaker cards. I've written two separate speeches. And so I implore the commission to reconsider and allow the two agenda items to be spoken on separately.

3:49:221

Well, clapping, please proceed. There'll be one opportunity. And then continuing conversation.

3:49:26 – 3:49:5228

Well, maybe my thank you. Maybe my commissioner can read it into the record during her comments. Good afternoon. My name is Alex Riccio. I'm a resident of Hollywood Hills. I'm here this afternoon to ask for balance. We all understand that the world is changing. FEMA requirements are becoming more demanding. Resiliency standards are evolving. Tallahassee is intent on cutting tens of millions of dollars from our budget.

3:49:53 – 3:50:2828

Construction costs, insurance pressures, and market conditions are shifting in ways that make modernizing our beach more complex and, at times, less financially feasible. These are real challenges and they deserve thoughtful solutions. To that end, I am encouraged the commission is having staff thoroughly research the topic and present their findings in a public forum with public comment. I trust that same level of public engagement and input will continue as you make your way through this very important decision making process. But as we adapt, we must also protect.

3:50:29 – 3:51:1428

What makes Hollywood, Hollywood? Thankfully, our city is not defined by towering skylines or dense high rise corridors. No, what sets us apart, what draws residents, visitors, and investment, is our identity as a small town beach community. It's the human scale of our neighborhoods. It's the openness of our skyline. And most of all, it's the unique, walkable charm of our historic Broadwalk. That identity is not accidental, and it cannot be reclaimed once it is lost. It takes preservation through intentional decisions over many years. Let me be clear. This is not an argument against modernizing Hollywood Beach.

3:51:14 – 3:51:4128

It's an argument for thoughtful modernization that honors our brand and our history with public engagement at the forefront. We can meet resiliency goals while still respecting scale. We can support economic feasibility without defaulting to over development. We can adapt to new realities without abandoning our identity. I urge you to consider the policies of incentives that help bridge this gap.

3:51:41 – 3:52:1828

Whether that means creative design solutions, flexibility in certain requirements in lot sizing, programs that modernize our charming but aging motels, many of which are not up to code in an effort to reestablish Hollywood Beach as the historic small lodging destination leader, or targeted approaches that allow projects to remain viable without dramatically changing our skyline. Because ultimately, our brand is not just about marketing. It's about it's an economic asset. It's why people choose Hollywood over other South Florida destinations. It's why they return and it's why they invest.

3:52:18 – 3:52:3628

If we lose that differentiation, we lose the character and we lose our competitive advantage. So this afternoon, I respectfully ask you to continue leading with intention to weigh resiliency, modernization, and project feasibility alongside preservation of history, brand identity, and beach experience.

3:52:361

Thank you, Alex.

3:52:3728

And to ensure that as Hollywood evolves, we all know it must, that it remains recognizable, authentic, and true to what makes Hollywood special.

3:52:451

Thank you. Well said. Rocky Skipper, followed by Dennis DiMartino, then Kathy DeBona.

3:52:58 – 3:53:1732

Good evening, everyone. And I hope you can hear me. I can't speak loudly. And I got my voice back. The project has and the study that they did, it has some loopholes.

3:53:17 – 3:53:4432

And it incorporate the infrastructure. I want to hear more about the infrastructure projects. The sewer lines, traffic, anything that has to do with infrastructure. They were concentrating mostly about the height. Regardless of the height, we have to fix the infrastructure first.

3:53:45 – 3:54:4432

The other thing that the traffic, we have traffic problems now on Hollywood Beach, some due to the construction and a filling of sinkholes that's gradually coming on the beach. And, I didn't know, I didn't hear anything about those issues because the traffic that comes up there, it has a variable of, it has sinkholes and water the high tide. I'm glad to see that the city and the state and the county are working together to put the dunes in. But the city had, at one time, had the jetties. I didn't see anything about the jetties.

3:54:44 – 3:55:2232

But the state is putting in jetties in Clearwater Beach. They're clearly jetties in the South Side Of Bell Harbor. They were putting jetties in, back in, again, where they took them out before. On St. Augustine Beach, this is a beautiful beach, but they have the same situation that has to do with Sunny Isles because the high rises there are filling, under the high rises, it's filling with water.

3:55:22 – 3:55:4432

So, and Sunny Isles has that problem, also. So, I have to commend them for the studies, but has a lot of loopholes about infrastructure and repairs. And its cost relies on the taxpayers and the city. Thank you.

3:55:441

Thank you, Skipper. Let's go to Dennis DiMartino, followed by Kathy DeBona. And following Kathy will be John Pasalacqua.

3:55:55 – 3:56:4029

Good afternoon, esteemed commission and residents. Now, I loved that presentation. It was full of a multitude of directions you can take from the wonderfully welcome to the incredibly destructive. And, I think I'm going to do something different today. I'm going to step all the way to one side and see what you think of it. Because I think we should eliminate all the zoning requirements right now. I think we should eliminate the master plan. I think we should go into the build mode. Now, don't listen to the rabble out there, the people that they call the electorate, the constituents. They don't know what's good for them. They don't know what they want. You know who does? The developers. Those guys with the $500 shoes and those carpet bags full of little baubles of glass and concrete that they lay at your feet and leave with them full of cash. Those are the people that know what we want.

3:56:41 – 3:57:1129

Those are the people we should and don't listen to those those those knucklehead people that talk about resiliency and renewability. They don't know what they're doing. What we have to do is we have to dig. Dig, dig, dig until the waters of the ocean, the waters of the intercoastal meet in the middle. Of course, we won't have any parking or green spaces, but hey, that's in the future. I'm not going to be here. That's way off. I'm not worried about that. I'm worried about building, building up, up. So the people can drive from Miami to Mar A Lago and not once see the ocean.

3:57:12 – 3:57:3929

That's what's going to wind up being and that's what we should have because the people on the beach don't need to see the sunset, the people inland don't need to see the sunrise. It looks the same anyway. So I want you all to go forward and think carefully about the different directions you can take and think about what we really want, the future. Do we want a beautiful Hollywood with charm and beauty that people come from all over to see? Or do we want to tell the tourists, oh, you're not welcome here.

3:57:39 – 3:58:0129

This is only for high rises and for rich people. It's not for the regular person to come in. We don't want all these little restaurants and shops along the broad walk. We don't want all these small boutique hotels that people come back to year after year because they get such good service and because they're such quaint little places? What is it that we want? Think about it.

3:58:016

Thank you.

3:58:05 – 3:58:191

By the way, a way to do that is like this. It's called Jazz Hands. It's kind of a silent way to have the meeting continue going. But it definitely was worthy of Jazz Hands. Let's go to Kathy DeBona, followed by John Pasalakwa, then Donna Green.

3:58:221

Hello, Ms. DeBona.

3:58:2521

Here. Thanks.

3:58:3133

I'll behave.

3:58:33 – 3:59:115

Mayor, commissioners, city staff, all of our first responders and their chiefs that are here, all the personnel, all of our visitors, all of our guests, those of you that are online or at home, where I usually am watching this, I'm so glad to be here. I'm glad to be here for many reasons. First of all, I do want to say kudos to all those who have been recently promoted. Good choices, good choices, excellent personnel. I'm very, very sad to see George leave.

3:59:11 – 3:59:435

You know that. I gave you a good bottle of booze the last time I saw you. Yes, it's gone. And I'm also so pleased for Raeleen, who has been with us for so long and certainly is well deserving of everything that she has accomplished and will accomplish more. And with that, kudos also goes out to and some of you may or may not be aware we have renovated and renewed the Hollywood Arts Fest after twenty years of being asleep.

3:59:43 – 4:00:125

And it was recently a great success in Young Circle at Arts Park, I thank our commissioner for attending and giving us such praise. It was well done. It was done through the Arts Selection Committee with Mike Wharton, they did a great job with that. Okay. With that I also want to recognize that in the audience today we have several leaders from our civic associations and from our business association.

4:00:13 – 4:00:425

I'm not here to represent the Hollywood Beach Business Association as their vice president. I'm not here to represent the Hollywood Beach Civic Association as their president. I'm not here to represent any of the several boards and advisories that I sit on as a member. I'm here as Kathy. I'm here as a thirty two year resident owner, tax paying, very proud, very proud Hollywood resident.

4:00:42 – 4:01:355

I'm here to represent my feelings and those of those many people who have spoken to me about the following. I'm here to talk about reality now and reality to come. Preserving the quality and integrity of our beach as existing natural and history filled elements is vital, as we witness so much change due to current development and future possible prospects. Residents, both owners and visitors, businesses and renters, return and remain supporters and contributors to our economy, often due to what is known as Hollywood Beach. Hollywood Beach from bridge to bridge, from Hallandale Line to the Daniel Line.

4:01:351

Thank you, Kathy. I'm sorry, that was three minutes.

4:01:375

That was it, It's so fast.

4:01:391

But you'll have plenty of opportunity. This is going to come to one of those associations, I think, later

4:01:445

this morning. So I can come back at the end?

4:01:461

JON No, but at the next meeting.

4:01:485

thought maybe. But thank you all for listening, and you know where my heart lies.

4:01:521

JON PASSILACQUA, followed by Donna Green, then Anne Ralston.

4:01:58 – 4:02:2834

JON PASSILACQUA: Evening, mayor, commissioners. Speaking on item 20, but I know nineteen and twenty are pretty much related. But I'd like to first say, excuse me, because I don't know when I'll speak or see some of the commissioners here. But to commissioner Kolari and to commissioner Biedemann, who are termed out, I want to thank you for your years of commitment of dealing with all of this and putting all your time in. You're the most senior leaving after, what, fourteen years or so.

4:02:29 – 4:03:0534

I want to tell Commissioner Schuham, you're off to better places, hopefully, and you continue your political work and community work, and to George, who's leaving us in a good position, strong and with a good team. So that said, on the item that I was here to speak on, I was part of the ordinance that created the 65 foot. I was here. I've been in Hollywood for forty five years on the beach. And I participated on the planning and zoning when that ordinance was in.

4:03:05 – 4:03:4034

So it gave us, it basically stopped the clock, okay? And what has happened? You can't stop the clock forever. The reality is the rules have changed. Times have changed. The ocean has changed. So, but what that time did, it gave us a time to look at what other people have done that is wrong. So we can take into consideration as we do move forward. Staff did a great presentation. This is the first step in moving forward.

4:03:41 – 4:04:2434

You don't have an option to not do anything. Things have to change. They gotta be tweaked. That I'll leave up to staff and the whole process to what it gets tweaked to. But we need to tweak it. You've got to adjust to what we're dealing with, FEMA. Tallahassee will push your button and then you won't have a choice. So what I am saying is, it's the first step to the people who are just against everything. Keep an open mind people, be careful what you wish for. I'm not a betting man, but I know if you don't do anything, you're going get something rammed down your throat.

4:04:25 – 4:04:4634

And that is with the live local at some level or another. So work with the landowners who have developable sites that have constraints. As a developer, I know costs have gone up a lot. So we need to work with them. Thank you.

4:04:461

Thank you, John. Jazz hands for Donna Green, followed by Ann Ralston, then Terry Cantrell.

4:04:55 – 4:05:2514

Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Donna Green, 526 North Rainbow Drive. I've lived in Hollywood more than thirty five years, and I love my city. So that's why I keep coming back to talk about why I love it and why I want it to be protected from certain elements that I see in our horizon that don't appeal to many of us who've moved here to Hollywood. Most of the people who moved here that I know moved here for the unique character.

4:05:25 – 4:05:4714

And, you could be in a suburban neighborhood like mine and twenty minutes later be on the beach, feel like you took a mini vacation to, you know, a quaint beachside town. That's what we dreamed about when we moved here and that's what we got. And we love it. And obviously, I am not in denial. I'm a realist.

4:05:47 – 4:06:2314

I know things will change. I know we have to change. But I also think this is a complete reversal from what we all want to see Hollywood be. This seems to give more excuses to approve high rises, generally. And using live local as an excuse to allow greater height rather than trying to keep our buildings more moderate, using some other types of negotiating with developers, and using our master plan, not just throwing it out.

4:06:24 – 4:06:4414

So, I'd like to see residents have a voice. My voice, I'm here at 03:00 in the afternoon. There was no parking at City Hall. I had to go around and find it. I am not typical of most people who can show up to City Hall, to these feedback, you know, presentations.

4:06:45 – 4:07:2214

If we're really gonna do this, we should have the whole city vote on whether they want this. Because it's going to change all of our beach. And, it's going to have huge repercussions, especially hurricane evacuation, flooding, potential storm surge issues, all of those things which will change our beach, the reason we all love it so much. So, please don't confuse more development with progress. The historic hotel that has issues really should not be used as the example of what we should do on the beach.

4:07:22 – 4:07:5914

That's a very special, unique, crumbling building, which is 100 years old. It's not typical of anything else on the beach. So, don't think that should be used as what we're looking at. So, please, just consider what we're doing. And don't kill the unique charm of Hollywood, where we have to find our few beach parks to go and enjoy the open space. Right now, we have something unique. We can market it. We can improve it. So please don't let this be our only way. Thank you.

4:07:591

Thank you, Donna. Anne Ralston, followed by Terry Cantrell, then Katherine Udon.

4:08:07 – 4:08:4235

I concur with Alex. We should get six minutes, not three. These are two separate items. This is a way to shut the public up. There's a whole room full that want to speak, thinking they were going to get three minutes each. So that being said, number one, she's the grand old lady. She's got historic value. If you continue to say she is not on the national registry, because that's convenient for you to get rid of the overlay district. My house is not on historic registry, yet I have to follow the rules. That's on the one.

4:08:42 – 4:09:2435

The developers let these buildings go to, you know what, in a handbasket, and then they come in and say it can't be repaired. As far as the public getting benefit from these developers on the beach, I've been waiting for forty two years for my tax dollars to go down on all this development we have, Young Circle, all big beautiful high rises that I now can't get in and out of my own neighborhood. I flood like crazy, so I don't know where this water is going to go when you take away green and put this. My husband and I moved to Hollywood in 1983. We drove down A1A.

4:09:24 – 4:10:0235

You know what made us stop and buy in Hollywood? The beach. We lived at the beach. It was gorgeous. It's eclectic. It was mom and pop. I had friends come down from Pennsylvania that would stay in mom and pop. Wonderful little hotels, motels, and it was great. You could go now, I can't afford to go to Margaritaville and I used to be able to walk to the lake and watch the fireworks, now I see buildings. I was with the property appraiser's office when I had vacant lots at the beach, I'd go there to take a picture of a vacant lot, and all of a sudden there's a seven story building going up.

4:10:02 – 4:10:4335

I don't know how high it went, but I'm taking a picture that doesn't belong to me anymore. Now it goes to a different department. So I'm worried about the wildlife there, the turtles. You keep taking sand away and putting buildings that's lighting on the turtles for turtle season. And like Donna said, it's a beach. You got two bridges to come and go off that beach. There's a hurricane, where are those buildings going to go if they go blowing down? They're going to go in the intercoastal. You're not going to get these people off the beach that quick. And then how are they going to get back if the beach is destroyed?

4:10:44 – 4:10:5635

Then they can't even get to their homes. So I'd like my flooding fixed in Southlake. I don't have a drain that I can find. But thank you, and I still think we should have had six minutes.

4:10:571

Terry Cantrell, followed by Katherine Yudin, then Lynn Smith.

4:11:03 – 4:11:4736

Thank you, Mayor Terry Cantrell. I filled out one card for number 19 and not two. If I had filled out two, I'd be just as upset as Alex. Terry Cantrell is also the chair of your historic preservation board. And I believe, hopefully, you've all read the email I sent a couple days ago about the National Trust Historic Preservations program called Historic Hotels of America. When I was vice president of the HHS about twenty years ago, we brought the National Trust down to take a look at the hotel. And they were very enthused. They so were, this absolutely fits into our portfolio of 300 plus hotels that generate about $5,000,000,000 a year in revenue. We've all been to the Biltmore in Coral Gables. We've been to the one that was shown on the slide in Clearwater.

4:11:49 – 4:12:1136

The Breakers, of course. Lynn and I spent a weekend at the Omni Grove in Nashville, North Carolina. So that's the potential for that particular property. And as you know, because you've already dealt with this with other historic preservation items here in Hollywood, that it's not the inside of the property. It's the facade we need to save.

4:12:11 – 4:12:3936

You could cut the hotel completely and rebuild it, barring there's not that much structural issues I don't think there are and rebuild that hotel and make it a wonderful historic hotel and get on that program, too. And by the way, one thing that wasn't mentioned, and maybe this could be clarified by staff, if I'm not mistaken, the unsafe structure board is only looking at the '19 50 addition to the rear. They're not looking at the entire hotel. That entire hotel is rock solid. That hotel is not going anywhere.

4:12:39 – 4:13:0336

Maybe interior issues, obviously, but I believe they're only looking at the 1950 addition. So you might want to get that clarified, too. So I would just say that those of that have been around as long as I have remember Lan Tabachnik. This was Lan's idea for the Hollywood Beach Hotel about fifteen years ago. He called it the Grand Floridian Hotel.

4:13:03 – 4:13:3536

And it had a tower about 14 stories on the vacated Taylor Street side on the north side of the property that would match up the south side of the property with about 14 story building that's been there for many, many years now to frame the building out. And he was going to restore it. Of course, he had all the ownership issues that everybody has now. So my point here, based on historic preservation, is that that absolutely potential is there for a historic hotel and that should not be discounted in any way. Thank you.

4:13:351

Thanks, Terry. Kat Udin followed by Lynn Smith, then Andrea McCarthy.

4:13:46 – 4:14:1118

Good afternoon, Kat Udin. I've spent many vacation days coming into City Hall to speak up for our beach, but it's worth it because it's the reason why I'm here and it's so special. I was just reflecting recently how lucky I have been to be able to raise my two boys on the sand. I'm going to start a little bit differently. I really appreciate many things in the presentation.

4:14:11 – 4:14:4118

I appreciate the suggestion of the five step process, that height and density alone do not equal success. There are so many ways to make our beach successful. And we have to really focus on all of the ways that we can make our beach successful despite the height and density. I appreciate all stakeholders coming to the table. The residents, the businesses, the tourists, even the developers, the resilience experts, everybody together to make a good plan for our city.

4:14:42 – 4:15:2618

I appreciate trying to get ahead of the Tallahassee preemption. Tallahassee is always trying to take away our local power. So I understand the need to try to do a little defense in rezoning. I appreciate the public access that is really important to me, graduated heights supporting tourism, hotels over condo towers. I think that's better for tourism and hurricane evacuation. But we also need to incorporate this in the process. The comp plan 2,050, we all submitted comments for that residents. And please take into consideration all of the comments from the comp plan 2,050. Resiliency and flooding is obviously really important to me. I went to the Broward MPO resiliency infrastructure A1A meeting recently.

4:15:26 – 4:16:0518

And there are a lot of challenges in the future in 2070 when it comes to emergency vehicle access being reduced or stalled. Keep in mind, there are a lot of projects that wanted to go taller, but they didn't. And they brought it down to a reasonable size, and they're still going to make a profit in their beautiful projects. Hollywood Moon, 901 South Ocean, they wanted to go taller. Now, it's going be an appropriate height. Eterna, the quint. So, if they can do it, other people can do it as well. And let us save our public lands. Let's save 1301. That's one spot that we can actually save, right now.

4:16:06 – 4:16:4618

Nine extra parking spaces is not going to do it. There's no way that you can say it won't affect public access. It will. Nine extra parking spaces is nothing. You put a 27 story tower there and 25 stories on the south end of the beach, there goes your public parking. Right now, I can't use my annual resident parking pass at Magnolia Terrace. Why? The excuse was because too many condo residents were parking there. So they took away the ability for all of us to use our pass there. It will affect public access. Let's save that land. And I appreciate Alex Recchio's comments. And I look forward to working with him on the city commission. Thank you.

4:16:471

Thank you. Lynn Smith, followed by Andrea McCarthy, followed by Maureen Villaverde.

4:16:5437

Before I start

4:16:5637

Clive has a medical emergency. He needs to leave. And I changed places with him because he is president

4:17:01 – 4:17:131

Clive, did you have a medical reason to go ahead out of order and not have anybody angry with me? Said, come on up. Lynn said that you are I'll be quick. That you're limping. I see you limping a little bit, so come on up.

4:17:13 – 4:17:470

I've got a little bone spur. It's gigantic. But I just this whole presentation was very informative. My head is spinning. But I think we kind of gloss over the Hollywood Beach Hotel and how important that thing is to the city of Hollywood. There is not one building standing today in the city of Hollywood that means as much as that building does to the history of our city. It means something to the founder. It means something to the people that live here. It means something to the Jewish community, like the Hampton House in Miami. This thing checks all the boxes to be saved and preserved, and not necessarily by sticking a gigantic condo in the middle of it.

4:17:48 – 4:18:290

I know that it needs to be redeveloped. I know that we need some sort of new component, maybe off to the side. But this thing has been in Channel four, Channel seven, Channel ten, WLRN. We made a documentary about it that won an Emmy. The city did a historic survey at the beach in 2003. And that survey said, this building is so important it qualifies for listing on the National Register. And they suggested that it gets put on the National Register. And it just never had. And through all this talk, I never heard the incentives that are offered by the county. 100% ad valorem tax credit for you can take a dilapidated building, which Dade County has done all over the beach.

4:18:30 – 4:18:560

You can name quite a few hotels on Miami Beach that were dilapidated like the Hollywood Beach Hotel. Take their current value right now, the building value, which has got to be in the toilet. And any improvement that you do to that, it's a 100% of that improvement is not taxable. So you're taxed on that original value when it was a decrepit building. And there's also a federal income tax credit up to 20%, if it's a commercial building and it's open up to the public.

4:18:56 – 4:19:350

We are not exploring all the pots of incentives that are available to the city of Hollywood to save one of Joseph Young's most important buildings that not only served Hollywood, I will remind you, that was the largest hotel in Broward County. Everything that happened in Broward County, happened at that hotel because all Fort Lauderdale had was the tiny little Riverside and maybe a little Los Oles Inn. We had the Grand Hotel that served the county. It's more important than any other building left because the list is long of Joseph Young's buildings that are gone and they're gone forever. This is the only one left and it's the biggest grandest thing that was ever built in the county.

4:19:35 – 4:20:170

And as far as structural integrity, I know that it's poured concrete. Every wall between every room is four inches of poured concrete. And I think the roof is concrete too. So Terry Cantrell's correct. You blow out the inside, you restore the facade and people, you will never go wrong and nobody will ever be sorry in twenty years if they look at that hotel and they go, thank God the city commission did not allow this thing to get ruined or demolished. It will be a legacy that all of you guys could enjoy if you do that. And we just turned a 100 And Hollywood deserves their signature hotel, like the Biltmore, the Breakers, the Don Cesaire. All those other cities have their signatures. We deserve it. We are worth it. So please make

4:20:171

the right decision. Wow, that was good. Minutes. Lynn Smith, followed by Andrea McCarthy, then Maureen Villaverde.

4:20:3337

Thank you, Josh. I thought it was important that we hear from him before he left.

4:20:361

ANDREW Sure.

4:20:39 – 4:21:0937

Andrea said something about we can determine who we are. We is residents, and we are the ones that should be determining them. My concern is that you guys will decide what the future of our city will look like, what our historic properties I'm seeing tons of that downtown in Hollywood, as you know. So I want to know that we have made the right decision. I'm not sure if we could do anything on a bond like we did the GO bond.

4:21:09 – 4:21:4737

I think the residents, rather than fighting with you because you know, as you go on, all of you will be seeing this room full of 500 people in the lobby and whatever if this goes forward. So why not go forward hand in hand? And maybe we could put something on a ballot where we can decide who we want to be. We is not just you guys sitting up there. We is all of these people here and all of our residents throughout the city. And I want you guys to remember who we are. It is not you. We put you there to decide what the future of our city is. And I'm not sure that you really believe that sometimes. I feel sometimes you decide what you want to do.

4:21:48 – 4:22:1837

And so it is my question if there's some way we can put it on a ballot so that if the city wants to become new and modern and knock down everything, that you will know that. Because all we have is these confrontations that we don't need to have if we decide I mean, we can fill rooms with people, which we will continue to do. And you know that we will because we can get everybody out if we need to. But I would like to know what we want to be. Do we want to save the Hollywood Beach Hotel?

4:22:18 – 4:22:5137

Do we want to watch I watched the great Southern go down in the ground after a meeting with a preservation board. And somebody from the city said, we're in the process of hitting it with a wrecking ball, which was hit for two weeks. And I had gone to the Broward County Preservation Board, and they told me it was not a safe structure. But it was after it had been beaten for two weeks, there wasn't very much left. I want to make sure that we don't do this to the Hollywood Beach.

4:22:51 – 4:23:2937

But I think more important, what I want to say is I would like to determine from all of you guys for you to ask what we want. We want I mean, you have room after room, emails after emails. And I think we need to go in the middle someplace. I think that we need to do that. We have to have young, new things for young people. I'm doing this with my civic association. I now have three board members that are young with ideas that are just sometimes off the wall. But I have to listen because I'm not going to be here forever. They're going to be here. So I think that you guys need to listen to the young people and the residents of the City Of Hollywood. I thank you for paying attention.

4:23:311

Andrea McCarthy, followed by Maureen Villaverde, then Bernard Zascovich. Hi, Andrea.

4:23:41 – 4:24:1838

Andrea McCarthy, resident of Hollywood. I just wanted to say the staff was mentioning that North Beach, they weren't going to do hike because of private residence. Well, also, there are private residents on Georgia and SURF and other areas. So you might want to consider that because I'm sure they would not be happy with a 15 story or 25 story next to them also. I think they need to really look at where the private residence I know, a matter of fact, there's a really nice little temple over.

4:24:18 – 4:24:3438

I think it's on Georgia. And you might want to have them relook at that. I'm sure they have a lot of other places to look at. Also, I didn't hear a lot about evacuation. We have hurricanes all the time.

4:24:35 – 4:25:1838

So I'm just going to have to bear with me and read. So building more high rise condominiums on Obaria Island is creating a serious public concern. In the event of a hurricane, the island already has limited roads and exits. Adding more high rise building means adding thousands of additional residents, cars, and visitors who would all need to evacuate at the same time. This increases traffic congestion and makes it more difficult and more dangerous for people to leave quickly during an emergency.

4:25:19 – 4:25:5238

We only have two bridges to get out. At the same time, our barrier island is already facing environmental challenges. The land is slowly sinking, sea levels continue to rise, and flooding has become a serious and recurring problem. I look at it right now, when we get the king tides, it is just I know they're trying to make the roads higher on the Flower Streets and that. And they're having such a difficult time.

4:25:52 – 4:26:2938

It's just I don't know how they're going to do it. They try, but it's a very difficult situation. If you go on A1A, start with the cement. They'll get ready to put cement over on it. It'll flood. They have to start all over again, the engineers. Just tell you, the flooding's terrible. These conditions make a large scale evacuation even more complicated and risky. We should decrease barrier island density and not over develop it. I know that the staff said that they would ask the residents and include us.

4:26:29 – 4:26:4938

I just want to make sure that the residents of Hollywood deserve the opportunity to discuss these issues before more development decisions are made. Communities such as Emerald Hills and Hollywood Hills received prop oh, Okay. You, Proper notice. Can we also receive proper notice?

4:26:491

Sure, of course. We'll have more opportunity.

4:26:5138

Thank you very much for your time.

4:26:541

Maureen Villaverde, followed by Bernard Zascovich, then Pam Borgio, followed by Julie Greenfield, then Craig Chasson.

4:27:03 – 4:27:4839

DISTinguished mayor, commission, my name's Maureen Villaverde. I live on South Ocean Drive. You're going to think I got together with Andrea McCarthy. I have much of the same concerns. The major one is the safety of the residents currently on the Barrier Island. We have one road, A1A, to egress to the two bridges. At parts, A1A is only two lanes. It's not currently able to handle the traffic we currently have. Adding more density puts everybody on that barrier island at greater risk. I know in the past I've sent you pictures from the Trafalgar fire, one of the condos along A1A.

4:27:49 – 4:28:2639

A1A had to be shut down in both directions. This was for an apartment fire. This wasn't even a full condo on fire. This was not catastrophic. And yet traffic was backed up for hours in both directions, because that's how long for the emergency vehicles A1A had to be shut down. I feel like this presentation, although very well done, is putting the cart before the horse. Before you can even look at rezoning, I think you need to look at what the Barrier Island can handle and then go from there. Thank you for your time.

4:28:28 – 4:28:391

JAMES Thank you, Maureen. Let's go to Bernard Zaszkovich, followed by Pam Borgio, then Julie Greenfield. MR. Mr. Master Plan himself. Welcome, Bernard.

4:28:3940

MR. Thank you very much. I'm Bernard Zaszkovich. I think last time I talked about this was twenty years ago. BERNARD Welcome back.

4:28:46 – 4:29:3540

BERNARD But I'm happy to be here. This is, in a sense, one of those intractable problems because everyone makes a good point from their own point of view. When we did the plan, one thing we did was we carved out the Hollywood Beach Hotel property because I never imagined that it could ever be under a singular ownership. The process of acquiring all of the fractional ownership condos I think there were three different condo associations, hundreds, if not thousands, of fractional owners. So I want to say, first of all, congratulations for all the effort by whomever was involved to really get the project into a singular ownership.

4:29:35 – 4:30:0240

I just want to emphasize how significant that is. And had that happened twenty years ago, I probably would be saying the same thing that I'm saying now, which is it should really be treated on its own. There needs to be an overarching concept for the Barrier Island. But that property I've toured it is in really bad condition. It's all chopped up.

4:30:03 – 4:30:4540

It's a total mess. And the biggest problem is that the extent of the ability to do anything is limited by the area of its outside walls. It has no other ownership. The only property that it owns is the building. It doesn't own any of the land. It doesn't own the road. It's compromised by the ramp that I think is one of the ugliest things that ever happened. And this is really a very significant problem. And it needs to be considered very thoughtfully. And in order to do something with it, it will require a very bold statement.

4:30:45 – 4:31:1240

So I just want everyone to be prepared for that. In terms of the rest of the beach, I don't have enough time. But in general, what we did twenty years ago was try to set up a plan that would allow for even the small property owners to have an opportunity to renovate. But there were requirements that needed to happen. The parking needs to be created, but it can't be created on a 40 by-eighty lot.

4:31:12 – 4:31:4740

Some people have more units than the density would allow. There needs to be some grandfathering. There needs to be other aspects because I'm going to run out of time that need to be considered. So I completely support the staff report that I heard, which is it really should start with urban design. Because there's really two options. One is a wholesale change. The other is microsurgery. Microsurgery takes time. It requires a lot of thought. Probably the best way to keep the character is the rest of the island needs microsurgery.

4:31:47 – 4:32:0240

And the city has to step up and create some of the public support, like in the form of garages and open space, that will allow the property owners to simply improve their property without having to go through extreme measures.

4:32:03 – 4:32:161

Thank you, Bernard. It's great to have you here and looking forward to your engagement. I appreciate you being here. Pam Borgio, followed by Julie Greenfield, then Craig Chasson.

4:32:21 – 4:32:5533

Good evening, everybody. Thank you all for being here today. In regards to the Hollywood Beach Hotel, the grand lady, She should be preserved. However, unfortunately, I think it's beyond preserving it. So smarter development is good. We all need to expand. And we need to grow. And that's the direction our commission has been going. Change is not always welcome. But smarter change is what we need.

4:32:55 – 4:33:1933

And smarter development and smarter infrastructure is also part of those requirements. So whether we help and retain her, or we do something different with the property. But something needs to be done. It's just way too long. Moving past that project, in regards to the height and the density of our beaches, I disagree.

4:33:19 – 4:33:4933

I think we need height and density throughout the entire city. It's not just what is happening local, it's also what's happening statewide. And I'm in fear of my residential home having a newly acquired townhouse or condo that's going to happen because of the live local that's going on. So, have to take a stand. And we need you, as our elected officials, to help us help our community.

4:33:49 – 4:34:0633

We're trying to grow too fast. And we need to look at it from a different direction. I don't have the answer. But I think if we come together and we can come up with different ideas, we can improve our city. The beach is already profitable.

4:34:06 – 4:34:3533

And it's why people come to our community, and why they're moving to our community. But condos and townhouses and high rises are not the only answer. Let's build homes. Let's get back to the character of Hollywood, the diamond of the East Coast, as our mayor used to say many, many years ago. And mayor, if I may, I'm going to read out to something that you spoke about several years ago.

4:34:36 – 4:34:5233

And I'm sure times have changed and your mind has changed. But I want to remind you and everybody here of what you stood for. So, this is with respect. You have stated, I want bright, new, modern development. That's what make things vibrant.

4:34:52 – 4:35:3033

We also want to protect Central Hollywood Beach from overdevelopment. We're going to adhere to the master plan, which preserved the charming character of Hollywood Beach by not allowing buildings taller than 40 or 65 feet, depending on the location. As mayor, I have always deferred and protected the existing height limits along the Broadwalk area. There has not been one new tall building approved along the Broadwalk during my time as mayor, because the investment community knows that violating the height limits of Central Beach is a non starter for Hollywood. Thank you.

4:35:301

That has been the case over the past almost ten years.

4:35:3533

Yes. There is more to that, but you get the gist of it.

4:35:381

Yeah. Let's go to Julie Greenfield, followed by Craig Chasson, then Marci Camarco. Hi, Julie.

4:35:48 – 4:36:2041

Hi, good afternoon. I am going to echo what Alex had stated. I do believe strongly that we filled out two cards. They were two separate entities in the agenda. And they should have their six minutes. Also, I could not articulate better than what he said. I don't have faith, unfortunately, because I've been to many of the meetings of collecting data. And as Kat said, the 2050 plan. I was in a parking study. Where's the results?

4:36:20 – 4:37:0041

What's happening? I don't feel my voice is heard, even though I'm being told, Oh, we're going to hear your voice. So, I can't implore enough how important that really is, because the feedback and what happens shouldn't be from a few people. And it also shouldn't be from city staff that's coming from different areas and different perspectives. And do they own a home here? Do they even live in this city? I have invested my time, my energy, my family money into the city of Hollywood. I think that North Beach is seeing development. Why? Because it's quiet.

4:37:00 – 4:37:4341

Yes, it's where I live. I'm glad to see what's happening and what's being planned for North Beach because of those parks, because of the quiet nature. Why else are people gonna easily put their money into that area versus maybe the noisier sections, the more party sections? We're adding entities along the broad walk that are these commercial party houses, having more and more transient people here. That's not what I want. I understand we need a balance. I don't want big hotel developments that are going to bring in people that don't care about my city the way that I care about it. And we're the ones left cleaning up behind it. I have a lot more questions to the presentation than I had answers. A lot of them.

4:37:44 – 4:38:2441

They vary in from the criteria that determined what was feasible, and when our current isn't feasible. The different cities that were looked at. Most recently, Lake Worth, they held strong just in October. So, their height restriction, they held to, I think it was 65 feet. Yes, 65 feet. Ormond Beach is sitting at 75. Jacksonville Beach, 35. Siesta Key varies. Captiva, 35. My point is, and even Fort Myers, after Hurricane Ian, they actually raised it to 45 to allow for the flooding issue that they had from Hurricane Ian.

4:38:24 – 4:38:5141

So, what other cities are we looking at that are a more moderate approach? Someone saying medium is more than double. You're looking from five, six stories to 10 to 15. I don't understand how that's medium. To me, that's large. So, a lot more questions than I had answers from this. And I truly hope that the feedback of the residents, such as myself and others, at a time appropriate that everyone can come to, is what's needed.

4:38:511

Thanks, Julie. Craig Chasson, followed by Marci Camarco, then Tom Lander.

4:39:01 – 4:39:2642

Hello. My name is Craig Chasson. Hello, mayor. Hello, commissioners. I think you've got a great mix out here of a little bit of everything. I mean, I've heard it all. I kind of agree with it all. Take a big mix of everything. Anan's slide with the considerations, with the heights between Central, South, Central and North Beach was spot on. Like, spot on.

4:39:26 – 4:40:0042

South, you want to go 15 to 25 down there, we agree with that. The Central Beach, that 10 to 15 is a great nook. And obviously, the North Beach area, which is built smaller, that three to four story is just excellent. I think that the Hollywood Beach Hotel, something needs to be done with it. It could be eight, ten, 12 stories. I think that's a great median. It could be knocked down and redone in a historic way. You can try to gut it. Good luck to that, but Okay. But there's definitely a happy median all over the place here.

4:40:02 – 4:40:2542

It's really about it. That's all I got. I'd like to see, actually, though, the Intracoastal Waterway from Hollywood Beach to Sheridan Street. Like John Pasquale did a beautiful project with three or four stories with the parking underneath. And you can see out to the water from there. You can see right through. I think that's a great idea. I don't know what it's currently zoned at. And the gentleman, Mr. Skovich how do you say it?

4:40:25 – 4:40:5742

SCOVIG. SCOVIG. He was talking about those 40 by 80 foot lots in Central Beach. Again, it's impossible to do five stories there. I brought this up about a year ago. Cannot do five stories on a 40 by 80 foot lot with retail underneath, with parking. It's just not going to work there either. So I know there are some people, I have some friends there that have a single story house or a two story house that's dilapidated. They'd love to build a single story, two story, three story. I think it would be a great mix for the neighborhood as well. I think I've covered just about everything there. So I thank you all very much.

4:40:57 – 4:41:161

Thank you, Greg. Thank you. Marcy Camarco, followed by is Marcy here? If not, let's go ahead with Tom Lander. He'll be followed by Esteban Koffzmann, then Doctor. Henry Pevsner, and finally will be Keith Polyakoff.

4:41:17 – 4:41:5722

Tom Lander, representing myself. First I want to say that Hollywood Doughnut Factory heard that I was going to a commission meeting. They sent some doughnuts. Dear above, please bless these donuts. They're good to eat. They are a treat. Let them touch lips and not hips. Amen. Okay, now first I want to say that I, when I signed up, I was told I had to sign up two different cards. To make that change at the time is not correct.

4:41:57 – 4:42:4022

And it also doesn't follow Robert's rules of order. Because our statements are supposed to be germane to the issue before us. But then let me give some compliments and kudos. Doctor. George Keller, I don't know if you have doctorate degree, you do now. And Andrea and the rest of the staff. I want to just say the work that I've seen in the last few years of bringing neighborhoods together and listening to the residents is so commendable. And you're going to be missed, sir. Next, about the issue before us. I served on the community development board years ago.

4:42:40 – 4:42:5922

And when I did serve on that, I remember they wanted to get money to redo this wonderful idea of having an ocean walk thing with shopping. And I went into the building and I said, I don't want to waste money on something like this. That's not going to work. So I was the no vote. Something has to happen to Hollywood Hotel.

4:43:00 – 4:43:3022

What I am also concerned about is I want to compliment the city leaders here coming up with the idea of let's get ahead before the state chops off our kneecaps about what we can do to the beach. So to plan this and coming up with a plan is admirable and it's going to help things so much. Okay. So I want to thank all of you on that. I do feel that we have to separate Hollywood Beach Hotel from the rest.

4:43:30 – 4:44:1322

I want to keep that small vibe of beautiful buildings that we have. It's what brings when I ran an Airbnb, the reason when people would go to South Beach and Fort Lauderdale insisting they had to go And then they want to drive down to Key West. They said, you don't have to go to Key West. Go to Hollywood Beach and you're going to see. And that's the beach they fell in love with. And finally, thirteen o one, I believe it should go before the voters. But hey, you know, you can ignore your planning department. You can ignore Broward County and so forth. But really, we're not going in the direction. I think most people here feels that a vote to the public would be good.

4:44:1322

If you think so, just go like this.

4:44:161

Thanks, Tom.

4:44:1722

Thank you.

4:44:191

Esteban.

4:44:2022

Hey, I did it under time. Woah.

4:44:22 – 4:45:001

Esteban Kofsmann followed by Doctor. Henry Pevsner and then Keith Polyakov. If anybody's here for citizen comments one second. I know it's forty five minutes after. If you had a specific issue that's not related to the beach item and you wanna talk to a staff person, if you could raise your hand, the city manager can direct someone to help you with it just in case. No? You? Okay, sir. City manager, if you could have a staff member attend to that fellow. I know this is gonna take a while before we finish this item, so if he has a specific issue, let's give him the help he needs. Estevan, go ahead.

4:45:01 – 4:45:3943

Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners. My name is Esteban Kofsman representing the Chateau Group and affiliated entities, owners of vacant assemblage at 329 Through 353 Buchanan Street and 336 and 338 Michigan Street, fronting North Ocean Drive Street, a 1 A. Chateau Group is a real estate development firm based in South Florida with extensive experience developing conscious condominiums and mixed use projects, high rise and low rise.

4:45:43 – 4:46:4343

have been following the city's planning process for years, The CRA's beach master plan, the beach redevelopment plan, the A1A Scenic Highway Highway corridor studies, and multiple public charrettes have constantly pointed in the same direction. This corridor needs meaningful mixed use, high density development to fulfill its economic and community potential. Those were the city's own words in the city's own public record. The current five story, 65 foot height cap on our site is not consistent with that vision. It has kept a significant, well located parcel vacant and unproductive, and it stands in direct contradiction to what this commission and its planning bodies have discussed publicly for years.

4:46:45 – 4:47:2343

Because the city has not acted to bring zoning into alignment with its own stated goals, we are left with one path forward. We intend to pursue a Live Local Act project on this site that is not our preference. Our preference is a collaborative zoning solution. But this commission's own inaction has pointed out in that direction. We are ready to build.

4:47:25 – 4:47:4343

We've been ready to build. We are ready to contribute to this community. We are asking this commission today to open that conversation before the only option left is the one the state has already handed us. Thank you.

4:47:44 – 4:48:021

Thank you, Esteban. Doctor. Henry Revesner, Pevsner? Okay. Keith Poliakoff, and then I had a card handed to me by the clerk Henry Haft. I think we had citizen comments listed, but he wanted to speak on this item. Keith KEITH Polyakov.

4:48:02 – 4:48:3244

KEITH you, mayor. I'll try to be brief. I represent a lot of the individuals who have spoken about Astrid, Hollywood Beach Resort, thirteen oh one, Chateau Group. So a lot of clients have a lot of vested interest in Hollywood and have expended considerable funds to be in Hollywood. First and foremost, congratulations and kudos to your staff for a very significant presentation that took, I'm sure, endless hours for them to produce.

4:48:32 – 4:49:0144

Andrea Cameron and Anad did an amazing job today. But basically, what they were asking you in the end is make a decision. Tell us where you want to go as a collective body for the future of Hollywood so not only that we as planning staff know where the city is going, but so that also developers and redevelopers in the city know where the city is going as well. I want to speak briefly about a couple of the clients because they were spoken about today. First, Astrid.

4:49:02 – 4:49:2444

They're the ones who have the live local litigation against the city of Hollywood. They came here. They assembled huge portions of property with one goal to build a hotel, a 13 story hotel, 135 foot hotel. And when the city said absolutely not, they said, well, we're stuck. We need to do something, which is how Live Local came to be for them.

4:49:24 – 4:49:5844

Those of you who know that the Florida legislature just amended Live Local four point zero for the fourth time. They will continue to amend it each time that a municipality tries to figure out a way around it. So, Mayor, when you all say we need to figure out something before the Florida Legislature figures it out for us, it's 100% correct. Because developers are willing to work with the city if you set a reasonable height, a reasonable density for them to follow. Jumping clients real quickly, thirteen oh one was brought up.

4:49:58 – 4:50:3644

Thirteen oh one was PRH thirteen oh one was approved by a unanimous vote of the city commission for the RFP. Unanimous vote. I don't want anyone to forget that. Then it came before you for the lease, which was, I think, a five-two vote at that time. But in regards to PRA age thirteen oh one, the final plan is in design. It will be back before you in July for final approval. And at that point, that building will be built and that deal is cooked. In regards to Hollywood Beach Resort, a lot of statements, misstatements were made about that. And I'll state it real quickly. It's four zero one residential units that were there.

4:50:36 – 4:51:1244

People keep calling it a hotel. It was four zero one condo units. I just want to be clear on that. In addition to that, they would be definitely willing to work with the city on height and preservation aspects, provided that they go hand in hand. What are they getting in exchange for preservation? And finally, on HBR, because it's so important to state, you bring them before an unsafe structure board. Don't be shocked with what that answer is going to be. If they force the total demolition of the building, that's a real possibility that the city has to understand.

4:51:121

Thank you. Henry Haft. Hi, Henry.

4:51:219

JOSHUA Thank you.

4:51:2225

Yeah, thanks for accommodating.

4:51:231

JOSHUA You got it, of course.

4:51:24 – 4:51:5625

First, I just want to say that was excellent, Cameron and Anand. It was a great presentation. I could tell all of you worked really hard on it. And you put a lot into it. And it was presented very well. I don't agree with all of the various assessments. But I'd actually like to I'm sure the full report is like this. If there's a way I can see it, I would read it. So it was nice. I would like to make a comment.

4:51:56 – 4:52:2025

I didn't see anything until the very end about community engagement. Maybe that I guess that wasn't really the focus. It was a little more on what the options were. But it kind of makes it seem like an afterthought. And I'm sure that wasn't your intent. But that needs to be on the front end. I think some other people have talked about that. That kind

4:52:201

of should need to be on

4:52:21 – 4:52:4225

the front end. And then I would ask, maybe you want to do a study with the renderings you did. Because this is what would happen. If we went to 15 stories on that central beach, you'd have fifteen, fifteen story buildings all lined up to see what it looks like in the picture. And it would be, yikes.

4:52:43 – 4:53:3925

So yeah, maybe it tapers down as you go north. But that would, anyway, and then for the commission, I would just say this is just very early in this process for you to think about how we're going to redesign the beach. I would just caution, and I think maybe some of the passion from the residents, especially those that live in District 1, that live in the Lakes area and at the beach, it almost kind of feels like because this is going to be revenue for the city, which is important. But it almost feels like you're mining our district for revenue all the time, Putting up high rise buildings so this is going to generate revenue. Putting up, you know, allowing developments on the beach that, you know, a lot of people don't want because it's going to raise a lot of revenue.

4:53:39 – 4:54:0125

Revenue is important. But I just want to make sure we think about all of that, that it shouldn't all be on the burden of, because of the location that we're in, while we could get more revenue out of it, it's not always fair to us that are living there. So just something to think about.

4:54:01 – 4:54:491

Thank Thank you. Well, thank you to everybody that came out to speak on this presentation. Certainly, it started with a very well laid out analysis of the beach, its history, its current situation. And by virtue of the state law that we're dealing with, you know, that we ought to take a look at this circumstance now and try to control our destiny as was stated. And so I know that everyone heard that, everyone can appreciate, you know, why we're talking about this and that we, as a community, are mature enough to be able to have a conversation about a difficult issue, one that is, of course, touches the most, I would say, beloved part of our city.

4:54:49 – 4:55:181

So I, as the mayor, of course, agree with everyone that it needs to be done with a careful hand. Bernard Zaszkovich talked about microsurgery in order to maintain the character and I think that's what myself and I'll make my further comments later feel that it needs to be done. We can't have a blanket increase in height. No one wants to see the Broadwalk experience change from what's there. No one wants to see a 10 or 15 story building on the Broadwalk.

4:55:18 – 4:55:481

I don't. And that's not what I think this process is going to lead to because that's not even what, for example, the planning staff suggests. And so I thank you for being part of this initial opening conversation. I'll talk a little bit more in detail afterwards, and I'll turn it over to commissioners who might want to reflect in an open forum or ask questions of any of the professional staff or anyone else that they might wanna ask to come forward at this point in time. Let's go to vice mayor Coleri.

4:55:516

Did you want to do do you want to do citizen comments really quick?

4:55:541

How many people do have here for citizen comments? All right. Let's do it with three folks.

4:55:596

All right. Go ahead. I will waive my time for you to do citizen comments. And then I will begin. But I would encourage you all to stay because I have to address some of your comments, if that's Okay.

4:56:1222

Give me a second.

4:56:136

And I have to go to work, too.

4:56:161

Right, Siobhan. Actually, we have about six cars.

4:56:1945

Thank you. I have

4:56:196

to go to my other job after this.

4:56:24 – 4:56:5645

Siobhan McLaughlin, 1409 Rodman Street. I just want to talk, actually, about the decision by the mayor to combine the two elements. I wasn't coming to speak. I was coming here to actually listen to the presentations. But I want to talk about the process. The droning on and on and on with that presentation sort of causes attrition with the residents who could stay. That's not fair. Donna Green pointed out the time of the meetings. So I think you need to actually also consider the residents. Citizens comments should have started almost an hour ago.

4:56:56 – 4:57:2545

Last time I was here, I came, I left my mom at home, kind of dozing. And I understand the Albertalli's issues were very important. But I actually sent a text to the mayor to ask him to start citizens comments. I think it is disrespectful to the residents who do come that you don't start on time. This is not the first instance where an issue that is very important comes up, and it gets truncated because you have to interrupt.

4:57:25 – 4:58:0545

It seems to me there could be better planning when you know an issue is important. And then let the citizens who do come out for citizens comments to be able to speak on time and get their points in. There is a process. I have to say, my faith was shattered by the 1434 Monroe Street and the faith in staff. And I really question whether or not some things are driven by policy and the end result versus the process that goes into it. And I want to say that I really hope that with the development, whatever happens with the beach, that we do listen to the residents. So thank you. And Commissioner Colari, thank you for waiving your time.

4:58:06 – 4:58:181

Thank you, Siobhan. Alex Risio, followed by Anne Ralston, then John Walsh, Andre Brown, and Tom Lander. And that'll close out citizen comments. Alex.

4:58:1928

Good afternoon. Approximately three years ago, the city I'm sorry?

4:58:231

Say what you did.

4:58:24 – 4:58:406

Well, the thing is that we raised the hand of who had citizen comments. Three people raised their hands. Now we're having people additional comment cards come in. It's an hour after citizen comments. So I'm going to now take my time back after the third speaker speaks, because that's unfair as well.

4:58:4028

I'm happy to yield back now.

4:58:437

If I could

4:58:446

just can't play cat and mouse here. But go ahead, sir.

4:58:457

JAMES If I could

4:58:46 – 4:59:0728

have the six seconds back on the clock, please. Thank you. Good afternoon. Approximately three years ago, the city commission appointed me to the Charter Review Committee. Our committee made up of 11 residents from all six city districts, met dozens of times, both here at City Hall and out in the community, taking public comments at every meeting over the course of approximately a year and a half.

4:59:07 – 4:59:4528

We engage with our community and with each other in an effort to offer clarity and even change to our city's charter, in essence, the city's constitution. One charter amendment our committee approved by super majority aimed to fundamentally change how city owned land is leased. First, we expanded the protected property class from the original just parks and golf courses to include recreational facilities, historical properties like the Hammerstein House and the Art And Culture Center. And yes, any and all city owned properties East Of The Intercoastal. Secondly, we cut the allowable ninety nine year lease in half, creating a lease term maximum of fifty years.

4:59:45 – 5:00:4028

And thirdly, we took the decision making power completely away from the city commission and gave it solely to a majority vote of the people. Therefore, any lease of city owned properties within the newly expanded protected property class for a term of fifty years or more inclusive of any and all renewal options, would require the approval of a majority of Hollywood voters. Simply put, if what the Charter Review Committee approved was the law of the land in Hollywood at the time, related groups ninety nine year lease of 13 o one, would have required a majority vote of Hollywood's electorate for approval. All of our ballot questions were then transmitted to the previous city attorney for legal sufficiency review and final language drafting. While most of the finalized ballot questions were without issue, the one pertaining to the leasing of certain city owned properties was frankly and inexplicably, the exact opposite of the committee's intent and had to be removed from the ballot.

5:00:40 – 5:01:1728

Once the inaccuracy was discovered, the city commission did the best it could at the time in fairness to you all, given the circumstances. You adopted the language as intended by the Charter Review Committee via ordinance, which you did not have to do, to be automatically sunsetted at this year's November election at which time, Hollywood voters will finally have the chance to vote on the corrected ballot language. Which brings me to today. In an effort to ensure that the same mistake is not made again, I respectfully make the following three requests. One, immediate, and to the extent you haven't already, immediately direct the city attorney to draft the corrected language.

5:01:17 – 5:01:5428

Two, reconvene the Charter Review Committee or at a minimum consult with its former members to approve said corrected language. And three, once approved by the Charter Review Committee, direct city manager Story, sorry George, to put the item on the next available agenda, so the commission can perform its purely ministerial role of transmitting the Charter Review Committee's approved language unchanged to the Broward County Supervisor Of Elections. My requests are appropriate, legally sound, and ensure the integrity of our charter and the trust of the voters. The charter demands it and the people deserve it. Thank you.

5:01:551

Thanks, Alex. Anne Ralston.

5:01:58 – 5:02:4235

Thank you, Tracy, for giving your time. First and foremost, George, I was going to pull every agenda item just for fun. But I've refrained from that, and best wishes on your retirement. Two, a couple of things on calming issues for these speed humps. Hello? Thank you. The thirteenth, there's calming issues that are around the city that are supposed to be flashing the speed limit sign. It flashes how fast you're going. The one on 13th Avenue has never worked. I've tested it going too slow and a little too fast.

5:02:42 – 5:03:1235

It doesn't go on. The new speed humps on Polk Street, the signs that we all love so much are being blocked by trees. You can't even see the sign that says there's a speed hump there. I was lucky enough, I all sent you a picture yesterday, my neighbor's yard got two signs, back to back, one that is blocked by the tree that's going the wrong way to say a speed humps there. Mine on one side, but they have two signs.

5:03:12 – 5:04:0835

I'm not sure what the reason is, and then the speed humps, the new ones that got put in, the old ones are fine, you can go over them at speed limit. The new ones, even with them, some of them shaved down wasting a bunch of money that they got put in, and now you cannot still shave down, go over them at 25 miles an hour. On 22nd Avenue, I was told that mine had to be in front of my front door because it had to be far enough away from the alley for a car to come out, or an intersection to be able to see. If you go down 22nd Avenue, close to Taft Street, it's about two feet away from the intersection and it could be the one on Wilson and then the one on 22nd is like within three feet of an alley. So it doesn't give the car enough time.

5:04:08 – 5:04:3135

So I don't know why I was told mine had to be in front of my front door, but all these new speed humps that were seem to be paying for twice still don't work shaved down. So please be aware of that. And if anything that the county can do about all these signs, it's ridiculous. You go down, there's just way too many signs. Thank you.

5:04:32 – 5:04:451

Just for the record, no one's paying for speed humps twice. The contractor is correcting the construction of them at their own cost. John Walsh? Andre Brown?

5:04:4746

Right, man. Give me a chance to get up there.

5:04:481

Yes, sir.

5:04:4946

That clock's not ticking.

5:04:51 – 5:05:4846

it. I'm living too. May our commissioner, city manager, and tell my brothers and sisters, I am a resident who who's who who cares about public trust, And I have a few questions for a commissioner on this board. Public records show your campaign took about $2,000 from Keith Pollakoff, and he's sitting right there. And the government law group, mister Pollakoff, is a developer lawyer, and he has been connected to development fighting in Hollywood, including thirteen o one South Ocean Drive.

5:05:48 – 5:06:5446

He also represent the developer, La Souza City of Hollywood, at January 25 over a Hollywood Beach project. We all know lawsuits like that can cost the city time and a lot of taxpayers money. So the simple question is, if you oppose 1301, why did you take campaign money from key protocol And what should residents think when a public official fights for a project in public but still takes money from the person tied to it. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but it's a question that I would like to have a straightforward answer to. Now, I wanna say this here.

5:06:56 – 5:07:3046

My cousin who passed away over there in Ebenezer Baptist Church, he the one put Anderson that's over there, and he went to his church. So whatever people think they're trying to do slick, doing campaigns, I know everything about it, mayor. That's my family over there in in Hollandaire. Well known. So don't never thank you.

5:07:31 – 5:08:0246

I have blinders on, and I don't know what's going on. I know everything. What's going on? Who doing this and who doing it, and what suitcase is being put up to somebody's door so they can get it and put it in the house? I know all about this. I had been doing this two days ago. My point is this. Don't never think that Andre Brown don't know what you're doing. Bottom line.

5:08:031

Thank you, Andre. Tom Lander is the final speaker for Citizen Comments.

5:08:17 – 5:09:1122

I'm not gonna put any humor into what I'm gonna say now because I'm really concerned about the laws that state of Florida is doing. And this comes because we're trying to our state is trying to erase gay, lesbian, transgendered, bisexual people. I hope that when we vote this year for a pride month, or my Hollywood pride or Saint Patrick's Day or Hispanic heritage, that regardless of what thing happens for you, that you will take a stand for those citizens. Our schools can't get people, teachers to be sponsors of the gay straight alliance clubs. I took 12 students up.

5:09:11 – 5:09:4922

I do not believe that this generation should go through what I went through when I was 18, hiding who I was and trying to pray the gateway. And going for five years to meetings for me not to be gay. I just want you to know it didn't work, in case you weren't sure. But I want you to take a stand for all citizens of our community, ethnicity, sexual expression, etcetera. If I could have had a choice of being straight, I would have been straight.

5:09:51 – 5:10:1822

It wasn't a choice that was given to me or any other individual. So I want to thank you that you've supported these things throughout the years. And don't back down, stand up. And if you get arrested, I'll be there taking the cameras and photoing. I really want you to know that times we may disagree. But never ever do I not have a great love for you guys. Okay? God bless you.

5:10:181

Thank you, Tom. Thank you, Tom. Alright, Vice Mayor Caleri. We're back to the presentations on the beach.

5:10:266

Okay. Thank you.

5:10:281

Yeah, me click.

5:10:2918

Drop the mic.

5:10:301

Yes, here we go. Go

5:10:31 – 5:11:146

ahead. Mic. Okay. First of all, Tom, I don't think you'll have anything to worry about, no matter what party affiliation. We love Hollywood and we love everyone that's here. I think I speak on behalf of all of us. The pride, the mayor took that initiative and we all support it 100%. So I think we're just fine. And I'm sorry you had to go through whatever circumstances you had to go through. People are people and we love everyone in Hollywood. Okay, with that being said, so there was a quote that was made and I really want everyone to listen to this that was said today. And I believe it was from our astute guest here. Everyone makes a good point from their own point of view. And really that sums up everything. I could tell you the sky is purple.

5:11:14 – 5:11:406

You could tell me the sky is blue. And we can give facts and reasons on what we see. And our own opinion is what our opinion is. So I thank you for that. It was wonderful. So a couple of things that were mentioned. One, just a news fact. We are all residents of Hollywood, including the elected officials that are sitting up here. I've lived in Hollywood over forty five years. I love my city.

5:11:40 – 5:12:066

I have a condo on the beach. I love the small town. We love our city and that's why we decided to run for office to be the voice for the residents. That doesn't mean that we have to agree all the time. Because we as elected officials, and I say this, it seems like a broken record, have a lot more information and a lot of other things that we have to balance, not just what's happening in my backyard.

5:12:06 – 5:12:506

So with that being said, I have so many different notes that I want to address. One, I'm going to speak for Commissioner Gruber that he's not here. But he always brings this up and I've always listened. And I know we're gonna agree to disagree with Commissioner from District 1. But evacuation route. Forty eight to seventy two hours. If you adhere to the media and the individuals who are experts, they tell you to evacuate the beach. Don't wait till the last minute. That's going to cause traffic jams. And he always says, the Keys evacuates and there's one lane in and one lane out.

5:12:50 – 5:13:296

So I think that if we adhere and we follow the rules, there should be limited amount of problems. And police, our amazing police department helps with only people going out and not coming in. So that I think we need to kinda let it go. As far as parking goes, suggestion, I don't know where we're at, but yes, I think it was Julie who brought it up regarding parking or maybe it was someone else. We mentioned working with the county and Cove allowing parking to be utilized in a completely unlimited parking lot that never gets utilized.

5:13:30 – 5:14:046

And that would help with an abundance amount of parking on the beach. So, if we can continue to look into that, that will help with the parking issue. Looking into Hillsborough was mentioned, I think from our estu gentlemen here as well, in comparison. They're the most northern part of Broward County. If they're in Broward County, even they're on the cusp. And a different element. But it's something to look into. We always take consideration, so I like the suggestion. Someone said live local is an excuse. It is not an excuse.

5:14:04 – 5:14:166

It is the facts. We are all dealing with it. And we're dealing with it because of the demands and needs for affordable housing. And it's not just on the beach. I don't know who said that.

5:14:17 – 5:14:586

I, as a matter of fact, had meetings and we all have meetings with our city manager and staff and come up with ideas of other ways where we can promote and support positive growth in our city. I've suggested Hollywood Boulevard, just west of Presidential Circle, those old plaza strips with the huge parking lots in the back. There's a lot of potential and opportunity. Unfortunately, you wanna go where the diamond is and that happens to be the beach currently. But the reality is, we are growing.

5:14:59 – 5:15:456

Someone also said that the infrastructure, that we have deteriorating infrastructure with these mom and pop condos, if they were not upkept, the forty year condo issues on and on and on, new development meets FEMA standards, it is safe and it will not end up in the intercoastal. That was an issue that was brought up. So, I'm not trying to belittle or say that anyone's opinion is wrong. But the most important thing is finding that middle ground and compromise. As far as the Hollywood Beach Hotel, every one of us have supported and sat up here to prevent demolition by neglect.

5:15:45 – 5:16:276

We have fought hard for our historical neighborhoods to prevent demolition by neglect. We have actually had hours, endless hour meetings with individuals who bought a house, purposely let the house, who was historic, become dilapidated and want to turn out and we pushed for it to be salvaged. So I don't think by any shape or form that not one of us sitting up here do not support the history and the character that Hollywood offers, not just on the beach, but throughout the entire city. The threats are really horrible. I think I'm at my point of the threats.

5:16:27 – 5:17:126

People call up here and say, we voted you in office, we'll vote you out. It's just not the way to do things. We gotta find that middle ground and we gotta work together as a team and not against each other. And one decision, I will say thirteen oh one, which I fully support still and I can agree to disagree with others. I think it's the best thing for our city. We've talked about it. We've had meetings about it way before it came to a vote. We voted on it and we're moving forward. And I think it's going to be a tremendous positive impact for the city of Hollywood. My biggest question I think that I have today is, we don't wanna change our view, our height on the beach.

5:17:12 – 5:17:426

We wanna keep our central beach the way it is. But there has to be growth. And we talked about that hugely today. But I wanna know from Andrea or whomever, how did we get here today? What sparked this presentation? And what sparked the motivation for this to happen? Is it because of the threat of Live Local? Is it because of a lawsuit? Is it because of just having a crystal ball and saying maybe this is where we think we're gonna see ourselves in the future?

5:17:43 – 5:18:1812

CHRISTOPHER Commissioner, it's all those things. And you might even remember I know it's a long time ago, back over four months ago when we had that executive session. We talked about getting information, working with our outside consultant that would give us some foundations to start to analyze the different aspects of the issues and then to start a public process. And this is the start of that public process. But yes, all those things and as you know, we're waiting literally any day for a judge's ruling on the litigation involving the property in Central Beach. And that will be impactful.

5:18:18 – 5:18:556

So I have a question, specifically to that. We are damned if we do, and we're damned if we don't. Either we accepted what the presentation was or the thought process from what I understand. I don't even think I ever saw it. I don't even think it came across my, was presented to me of the original. Did anybody else see it? They were working on it to see what it was. In my understanding, it was 10 feet, 15 feet, the original presentation. Is that what it was that got us into this that now we're in litigation with them? Thirteen thirteen stories?

5:18:561

The hotel that was proposed?

5:18:586

Yes. That I never saw.

5:19:001

and thirty five feet.

5:19:00 – 5:19:176

135 feet. And now, so our plan that was suggested is no more than 15 stories. Correct? Correct? A 135 feet is 15 or 13? 13 stories?

5:19:171

Shorter than Margaritaville, a little taller than Hollywood Towers.

5:19:21 – 5:19:346

So are we confident that because of the presentation that we saw today can I speak about the executive session? I feel like to be transparent

5:19:3420

I think that we should not. I believe, as we are still in the middle of litigation and it

5:19:39 – 5:20:076

is So then like why are we so are so Okay, conceptually. Thank you. Conceptually. Why are we presenting 15 feet? Do we think that 15 stories. Why do we think sorry, 300 yards, 300 feet, back to 15 stories, 15 feet. Do we think that this is going to be the new new? Is that why we presented the 15 stories as the new moving forward? Or is it just a conceptual idea?

5:20:07 – 5:20:261

No, think they presented 10 to 15 in Central Beach for the business district area because that's what's existing there today. And if you were to align, let's just call it, new hotels with the existing character of these sporadic 10 to 15 story buildings that exist there, then it's a match to what beach already has. It doesn't go beyond what's there.

5:20:266

Okay. But Margaritaville goes beyond. That's 17 stories.

5:20:301

And they're not recommending that, though. Right.

5:20:33 – 5:20:546

25 stories? No. Well, whatever it is. So I just want to get back to where we started versus where we may end up. That's my biggest concern. I'd rather us have smaller than huge. Am I wrong for saying that? Does everybody else feel that way?

5:20:55 – 5:21:2631

So, in efforts to answer the question, I think, you know, fundamentally, where we're at right now in suggesting the height is surely based off of character as well as economic feasibility. I think throughout the presentation, one of the big emphases that we wanted everyone to take away is that height and density should not be applied uniformly, That there is a context specific approach that needs to be applied that doesn't result in a wall of 15 stories at any point of Central Beach if we're using that as a case study.

5:21:26 – 5:21:436

Okay, hypothetically then. If we declined a development two blocks from Margaritaville at fifteen thirteen stories, 15 stories, why would we do that if it fits within our suggested package?

5:21:446

Just hypothetically. Our

5:21:461

zoning just doesn't allow it, right?

5:21:4731

JOSHUA Our zoning doesn't allow it.

5:21:481

JOSHUA And you can't get a variance.

5:21:49 – 5:22:3231

JOSHUA The rules are the rules until we change the rules. And changing the rules needs a thoughtful approach to how we do it to ensure whatever development that we accept as a municipality is done sustainably and not just as a reaction to something. So in that particular instance, even before the Live Local application, that application was not in conformity with our prescribed rules and regulations. We have no ability necessarily to permit it until we change the rules. So looking at past development, looking at development interests, looking at market feasibility, the impetus of this is to explore how we can allow height, again, without compromising the overall character and feel of the beach.

5:22:346

So I think maybe I'm going to have to ask the mayors on the phone instead of verbally. Can I?

5:22:441

Well, not specific to that.

5:22:46 – 5:23:016

I feel that a lawsuit that we're posing is there a way that we can prevent that lawsuit from moving forward so that we don't get a Live Local Act 25 foot story tower and shove that argument?

5:23:01 – 5:23:2620

I think this is probably something better discussed offline to avoid any sort of litigation discussion here. I would say that staff's presentation today was not done in conjunction with my office in regards to the lawsuit. I believe they simply consulted with an outside consultant to create this study. And it was not done in direct response to anything from the litigation.

5:23:2712

Right. It's

5:23:281

not relevant to it.

5:23:29 – 5:24:1512

Right. And although there are a number of issues that got us to this point today, what we said at the very beginning is this was a starting point in a process that will have us, based on some foundation of information and understanding, go forward now and develop wherever the process takes us in terms of public input and what we want to have our vision of Central Beach become, today's a starting point. So as we said also, there's no decisions or actions to be taken today. So I would caution against trying to pin down any specific answers today. Today is a start of a discussion and a process.

5:24:15 – 5:24:346

JULIE Yeah. But correct me if I'm wrong. If a decision if we could make a decision, doesn't that prevent the opportunity of a ruling of a court and then they shove it down our throats and some 25 story, 30 story tower goes right in the middle of Central Beach? No. We couldn't make a decision to say and say no?

5:24:37 – 5:25:021

So obviously, there are consequences if there's a ruling against the city that other property owners might rely on and try to apply for live local anywhere within a mile of Margaritaville. And that's the threat here. And that could apply to the frontage on the broad walk that we want to protect at 40 feet and it could apply anywhere within a mile. It is a there goes Hollywood Beach scenario if the live local, you know, judgment goes against the city. And yes, it could be appealed.

5:25:03 – 5:25:411

And so it's but it's a it's a looming threat. And so I think we're here because we want to provide an opportunity and an option to landowners that are sitting on property that's sitting vacant on a beach in South Florida, on one of the most popular beaches in the country. And they're telling us they want to build hotels that would be inconsistent with the character of what's on the beach. And if they can't, then they're telling us flat out here in the microphone today, like another one did today, that they see no choice but to build the apartment projects. And so the question before the city is, at large, the community is, do we wanna wait for that circumstance?

5:25:41 – 5:26:301

And even if it's a 70% risk, do we wanna take that risk? Or do we wanna at least offer the bonus program that can enable that same property owner to choose our bonus program and build a hotel that we think contributes more to the to the Central Beach's economic vitality, our our desire to have tourism, and bring in guests that'll spend money on the broad walk and walk around and not and have less cars on the beach because an apartment building would generate more cars and not the same economic activity of the spending of tourists. So it's really us deciding, do we want to create an opportunity for hotels that's economically feasible on Central Beach? Or do we want to sit here, do nothing, and take the risk that apartments will show up whether we like it or not because that's the direction the state is taking? That's what's at stake here and why we're having the conversation.

5:26:30 – 5:27:021

And so the question is, what do we feel is enough to offer that alternative to a Live Local type project, because that's the threat, to these property owners so we can get contributing hotels? And and they're saying 10 to 15 stories is consistent with the environment. And it's not everywhere. We can restrict the bonus program to a certain portion of the a one a, you know, east of a one a frontage of a one a. In other words, not the full block, the whole same discussion we've had for years on the tapering down to the broad walk at 40 feet.

5:27:03 – 5:27:291

We're not gonna change the zoning of the beach, but if we offer a bonus program that allows those vacant land parcels that are gonna be live local if if the local, you know, ends up being, right, allow that to be hotels situated along a one a and then quickly scaling down, then we, I think, we get the best of both worlds. We maintain the beach character but we also allow the economic vitality on a one a and bring in guests to stay in our city and spend money. And so Okay.

5:27:296

Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Yeah.

5:27:301

Yeah. Picture

5:27:3110

that would

5:27:327

depict exactly what she said.

5:27:40 – 5:28:156

Go ahead. The only thing I wanted I'll let you speak over his next. I just want to say about Andre Brown's statement. I think we are, there's nothing about guiltiness. I think that we're all in this together. And when we receive funding, whether you're running a campaign, good or bad, whatever it's for, you want to keep friends wherever they're at. And whoever gets in, no one has a crystal ball and say who's going to get into office or who's not. And so Andre, just know the fields. Everybody receives funding. And I think that it's unfair to call someone out.

5:28:16 – 5:28:311

All right. I'm sorry. Commissioner Schuhann, then Biederman, then Hernandez, then Quintana. That's the queue. Kevin says to wake him up until he thinks you're going talk for a long time.

5:28:31 – 5:28:5821

So thank you for the coffee, because it's definitely needed. Like Commissioner Cleary said, there is just so much information that we received. It is very hard to kind of organize thoughts, but I'm going to do the very best I can. First, I have to agree with the residents, mayor, that I think they came in with two separate agenda items. We had two separate agenda items. We had two separate PowerPoints until

5:28:591

And the city manager decided to combine them, told me that. And so that's why we did it that way. So let's not make it an issue.

5:29:05 – 5:29:3421

It's So the there's that. Second, I want to really express my thanks to staff. I thought you did a really great job. And I think it's safe to say I was the most skeptical person up here. But it was well thought out. I don't agree with it, a lot of it. But kudos for the effort. Kudos for taking the time. And deeply appreciate it. I think I can't remember which resident said it.

5:29:34 – 5:30:1821

I think it might have been Donna Green, actually. But I guess my one criticism is that before we got here we had two separate PowerPoints, which made sense. And Mr. Zugovich, it's like really a privilege to have you here. So thank you for being here today. But it made sense because the Hollywood Beach Resort I'm sorry, Cameron. That is not should not be used as an example for what could happen. It may be an example of what happens when a historic property is allowed to deteriorate. But it should not be used as a comparison for anything up and down the beach. That property is unique.

5:30:18 – 5:31:0321

That property should stand alone. I believe that property should get bonuses for historic preservation. But it should not be treated as an example for the rest of the beach. But really, other than that, I thought generally it was a very well done presentation. So Andrea, thank you to you and your staff. The other thing I want to say and also thank you to all the residents who came out today all the residents, developers, everybody. I think we just have to hear from all of these voices. I think one of the reasons I asked, why are we here today and not in a workshop? And the answer was, time is of the essence. Time is sensitive.

5:31:04 – 5:31:1921

But what I would implore staff to do is get these meetings scheduled. We're going to need three, four, or five workshops. Let's get them on the calendar now so that we know we're not going to get into these pickles down the road. We'll have them on the calendar.

5:31:191

They'll need four workshops of the city commission, but go ahead.

5:31:24 – 5:31:5821

And in that vein, the public workshops, too. I think I really appreciate to the outgoing and incoming city managers who have vocalized to me and to this commission repeatedly, this is here for public input. And I know we mean that. When we did this I have so many residents that have come to me that were involved in what we call the Zugovich Master Plan. Residents that poured their heart and soul into working with these consultants to come up with a plan.

5:31:58 – 5:32:3521

And I feel very confident, Raelyn, that when we do this again and I think it was maybe Clive who used the word tweaking we definitely need tweaks, right? I feel very confident that notwithstanding what has happened in the past or recent past, that this commission and this city staff is going to take resident input very seriously. And we are not going to disregard what our residents say. We're not going to be dismissive of residents. We weren't dismissive back in February when this was put together.

5:32:35 – 5:33:1521

We will not be dismissive today. The other thing I, too, mayor, I think microsurgery is a great term for this. Thank you, Mr. Zagovich. Because we can't change beach heights. The Live Local Act is preventing us from doing that. So the only way to do this is through bonuses, incentives, whatever. And that's where we are counting on you, staff, to come to us with these great ideas. What is it that we can extract from developers to make the beach the most beautiful it can be? For me, and I know for many residents, it's beautification.

5:33:16 – 5:33:3921

It's making sure we don't get and I'm sorry to the owners of this project we don't want Costa. That building should never have been constructed the way it was. And I think a lot of people say, you know, when you have just a fixed height, that's what you're going to end up with. And I am concerned about the property at Oklahoma because it's so many blocks. So we have to be creative in looking at these things.

5:33:39 – 5:34:0521

And I know with Anon and Cameron and Andrea and the whole team, that we will get good input. So that said, I am, of course, a huge supporter of Hollywood maintaining its unique low profile beach. And I just want to go back again to the master plan. There were two principles. We've talked about one of them today.

5:34:05 – 5:34:3421

We've talked about principle one back from December, preserve the character and scale of Hollywood Beach, which I think is very important. But we did not talk about principle two from back then, which was make Hollywood Beach a model green community. We just spent a lot of money on reefs. We're investing in Keating Park to make that a marine educational center, all these things. And I don't want that to get lost.

5:34:34 – 5:34:5421

Yes, it'll be very nice to have higher hotels. And another consideration for me is these should be five star hotels. I mean, if you're going to give a bonus for something, it shouldn't be to a red roof in, Okay? Nothing personal. But I don't want to lose the second component, which is a model green community.

5:34:55 – 5:35:2421

And we did not talk about that at all today. So I think that's really important as well. I guess a question that I have for staff is, when you talk about feasibility, I'm assuming you're talking about economic feasibility. So how is that determined? If you have a property owner who bought their property, and I think the example that you gave, like, on the West Coast for the Don Cesar Hotel, they paid $400,000 for it or something.

5:35:25 – 5:36:0721

That owner is not economically challenged, right? But when you're talking about economic feasibility, you're talking about the fees is it feasible because of what that private owner decided to do? When we talk about the Hollywood Beach Resort and tax liens, we didn't cause that owner to have tax liens. The owner caused the owner to have tax liens. So I just think we have to be very, very cautious when we are talking about feasibility. We need to ask ourselves, what do we want as a Hollywood? City What do we want that beach to look like? What do we want to incentivize? We want to incentivize resiliency. Whether we want to incentivize hotels.

5:36:07 – 5:36:4221

Whatever those things are, that's our decision. That's what the feasibility should be about. What we want our beach to look like. And what our residents want our beach to look like. I mentioned Costa. I mentioned high level design. There was a very brief mention of shadows. I know that is extremely important to the residents of Hollywood. We talk about Sunny Isles because it's created a high profile canyon. But it's not just that there's tall buildings.

5:36:42 – 5:37:0521

It's that those tall buildings cast shadows on the beach most of the day. So I think shadows are very important. I understand the dilemma that Fort Lauderdale is having by being so fixated on that they've created a monotony in their building designs. I have full confidence that you guys are going to figure that out. We don't want monotony in our design, and we don't want shadows on our beach.

5:37:06 – 5:37:3621

Another thing that wasn't mentioned is actually, I think Greg Chazan mentioned it briefly. But we currently, as I understand, Andrea, we don't allow residential construction for the most part on the West Side Of A1A on A1A. But some of those lots are so incredibly narrow. And you have mentioned this before, mayor. You know, and I have great love for the Seaside Village and the Quint and all of those buildings.

5:37:36 – 5:38:2221

So to the extent that that type of thing may be encouraged with some slight changes, you don't have to answer today. But I just think that's something that needs to be looked at. And there's a few other things that I would love to get off my chest. But because I am confident that the process is going to go through an intentional resident driven process, that I am going to withhold until we hear what the residents come back with. But I personally very much support the restoration, to the extent possible, of the Hollywood Beach Resort.

5:38:2221

It is the heart and soul of that beach. Threats to demolish that don't go over well with me. And I'll leave it at that.

5:38:291

Thank you, Commissioner. Let's go to Commissioner Biederman.

5:38:33 – 5:39:069

My bluntness, I'm sorry. Lots to absorb here today, lots of information coming from all angles. So let's just try and move along with some of the things that I picked out and some of the things that I want to get off of out into the open. First, it's a pleasure to have Mr. Zukovich here. I do have a question, if you don't mind. If it's appropriate.

5:39:061

Yeah, sure. Of course.

5:39:17 – 5:39:369

So I did have a question. You brought up the Hollywood Beach Hotel. There's been a lot of talk about the Hollywood Beach Hotel. I do agree with Commissioner Shuham on one thing, that it should have been two separate items. And I was expecting it to be all about beach height on one item and a scenario with the Holly Beach Hotel on the other.

5:39:37 – 5:40:149

But since you brought it up and tremendous amount of knowledge and your years of watching Hollywood grow and decline, can you you mentioned the Holly Beach Hotel and how it's deteriorated to a point. Have you been in there recently? Clive Taylor said that it's solid as a rock. There's other people that say it's going to fall down. Do you have any information that we don't have up here about the stability of that facility?

5:40:15 – 5:40:4040

I'm not a building inspector. I'm an architect. I've been in the building. In my opinion, there's very little, if anything, left of the historical interior. The facade is very much in a position where it could be replaced, restored, renovated.

5:40:40 – 5:41:1740

But the building itself has had so much abuse over the years with the different condos, the fractional stuff. I do a lot of work in Miami, South Beach, other places. Historic preservation is something that I kind of grew up with. I used to be chairman of the Miami Design Preservation League. My sense of the existing building is the amount of money that it would cost to restore the interior would be incredibly significant.

5:41:17 – 5:41:5240

And the opportunity to provide the services, even something as basic as parking, there's no room. The property is complete it's hard to describe it. But the thing that shocked me most about that property is the fact that it owns not one square foot outside the walls of the building. So every development project I've ever done, there's a site and there's a building. In this case, there is no site.

5:41:52 – 5:42:3140

They don't own anything else. The garage is owned by others. The ramp is owned by FDOT. The building itself is the site. And that, to me, is the biggest problem with the project, which is why, frankly, when we did the work twenty years ago, we left it out. I mean, we could really not imagine what could be done. It was owned, as I mentioned already, by thousands of different fractional owners. There was no site. The ramp is right in its front yard. I think it's a big challenge.

5:42:32 – 5:43:1640

And it's going to require a tremendous amount of conversation and probably agitation among many people to try to figure out what could possibly be done. The big problem is unless something is done, the beach will always be less than it could be. And in order for something to be done, it's going to require incredible effort compromise And and I know this community. I love the stuff. I'm so happy that you still feel good about the work that we did.

5:43:17 – 5:44:4340

But to be honest, if the Hollywood Beach property could be something that magically would appear and be state of the art and iconic for the city, it would create a tremendous amount of energy for people to restore and renovate the properties they already have, which was our intention in the master plan. But when that major property is still undone and impediments to good new construction, like your staff has very ably laid out, the zoning and the laws need to be changed in order to allow people within the beach to find a way to renovate their properties according to several issues. One is the new threat of Live Local, which would be devastating. But even without Live Local, there needs to be an accommodation made to invest in providing the services that the homeowner and the property owner can't do. Because otherwise, they only have one other alternative, which is to aggregate large parcels.

5:44:43 – 5:45:1240

Once you aggregate large parcels, now you've lost the character. So this has always been the problem. And when we did the plan last time, our recommendations were have the city find a way to get property and build the parking so the property owner doesn't. Try to aggregate a promotional campaign so that people want to come and spend money here. Deal with the issues of the beach.

5:45:12 – 5:45:4640

I remember one of the big successes we had was we convinced FEMA, in the event of a hurricane that devastated the property, to allow for habitable uses below the flood line of the 17 and onetwo feet. And we actually got the letter that allowed that. I don't know if we would get a letter like that again. There are so many threats to this beachfront that I don't know how to say it strong enough. The reason I'm here is I've gotten calls from people.

5:45:46 – 5:46:2940

Would you please show up? But I'm not here as your consultant. I'm not here in any other respect. I'm just here to let you know that the threat is serious. And there needs to be a real focus on how to resolve it. And it's going to be a really difficult I mean, just hearing the conversation, it's not really possible for everyone to come out having what they want. So you're going to have to face the music somehow. And the worst thing that would happen, in my opinion, is for nothing to happen. That is just going to be continued deterioration. And no one is going to like it.

5:46:30 – 5:46:4140

Some people might be happy for a period of time because they can live out their lives in the properties that they have. But in terms of the future, you've got to come to terms with change.

5:46:419

I'm a big believer in compromise and

5:46:441

win That win

5:46:46 – 5:47:129

being said, I have one more question for you. But before I say ask, I'm going lead up to it. So we have the city charter, which is like the US Constitution, that has 27 amendments to it. And we have several amendments to our charter. And then you have acts and laws of the federal government that change over time.

5:47:12 – 5:47:559

And we have a comprehensive plan and a master plan that change over time, right? So when you created what you created twenty some odd years ago, was that was your intention that this was gonna be a forever plan or was it supposed to be fluid and it would change with times because twenty years ago we couldn't envision we couldn't envision and live local. We couldn't envision hyperinflation. And what you could buy for $80,000 twenty years ago is a half $1,000,000 today. So there's no we have an affordability issue and a supply and demand issue.

5:47:56 – 5:48:089

So that being said, can you think back twenty years and say, we expected it to be fluid and it would be changed over time? Or was this what was going to be a written in stone kind of thing?

5:48:0940

That's kind of a funny question, I guess, to me. But I could. I'm clairvoyant. I'm not clear

5:48:189

A lot of people put a lot of stop to what you did twenty years ago and say it shouldn't change. That's why I'm asking.

5:48:24 – 5:49:2240

GREGORY No, my answer is, had the plan found a way to be implemented, meaning people would have taken their properties, been able to put money into them, renovate them, restore them, make it more charming, more viable. And had there been a way for transportation and parking and other issues to have been implemented so that that would have changed, we would have a very different vitality to the existing beachfront. I was hoping that that would happen. And the only thing that we could do, because we can't impose anything, all we can do is really suggest things, is that that would be a way to protect the character. Today, twenty years later, there needs to be different options.

5:49:22 – 5:50:0640

Those buildings are not the same. The state of our economy is different. Resiliency and sea level rise has changed. So the simple answer is no. Of course, things change. And we knew they would change. But there's a big difference when you can implement something and live with it for decades. That gives you a much longer period of time between changes. When nothing happens, that interval of change compresses because now the threats are bigger. The deterioration of different things is advanced.

5:50:07 – 5:50:2640

The climate has taught us that we need to get serious. And state government is hanging a sword over your heads. So I agree with the mayor. This is a matter of urgency, I think. And I don't think there's an easy answer to resolve it.

5:50:27 – 5:51:0540

It's going to require like in the old days on the cowboy movies, you'd have to leave your gun at the door. I think this community has to leave their gun at the door and try to figure out what can be done that could be achievable quickly so that you can spur redevelopment now so that the only option is not high density residential development that the state has basically imposed on everyone. It's a threat to all these communities. So I don't know if I'm being helpful or not.

5:51:059

GREGORY No, you are. And I appreciate you being here

5:51:07 – 5:51:4040

and honoring. GREGORY I'm totally candid with my remarks. I would say this to any community. I mean, this is a big threat to places that have history and character. And there's no real winning answer here. It's about trying to find a way that will protect you long enough to make something happen. So I would just encourage that to happen and for people not to dig in their line in the sand and prevent something from happening.

5:51:41 – 5:51:599

Thank you very much. I appreciate it. You're welcome. So it amazes me that the same people are saying we're letting the city deteriorate and we got Drek all around, but yet we try to do something and they want to fight the change. You should change, you should make it better but we don't want change kind of thing.

5:52:02 – 5:52:369

I mean, we all love our city. I mean, I could say for everybody in the room, we all love the city But I'm not part of the we that, you know, when we stand up here and we say we, we, we, I'm an I when I'm up here. I'm not a we. So I love our city. I've lived here for over forty years and I don't plan on going anywhere else. My wife thinks we're gonna die in the house that we're living in. I'm go somebody said, take me out. Somebody recently died. She said, I'm not going anywhere. You're gonna carry me out.

5:52:36 – 5:53:199

And I think that happened. Master plan is fluid. For those that say we should vote on this particular plan or we can vote on 1301 or we could vote on anything, if we could force every resident or every taxpayer to vote, I would be all for it. The problem is the only people that are traditionally, the only people that show up to vote are the ones that are energized for one side or the other. And I think the majority of Hollywood residents that we've proven in the last two elections are happy with the direction that we're going in.

5:53:19 – 5:53:509

I was overwhelmingly reelected. Commissioner our vice mayor was overwhelmingly reelected. The mayor was overwhelmingly reelected. I think that we have a mandate from the residents that we are headed in the right direction. For those that say, well, developer could build 10 stories and not 15 stories and still make money, then become a developer, put your money where your mouth is and you could save a building and go with 10 stories instead of 15 stories.

5:53:50 – 5:54:389

I think the quote of the day is is Lynn Smith. We elected you to make the tough decisions but yet we want to vote on everything. So we've maintained for years that we were elected to make those hard decisions and that's what I've done over the last fourteen years and that's what I'm gonna continue doing for the next eight months and six days. For those that mentioned we should buy the Hollywood Beach Hotel in order to save it, that I would put on the ballot because if you tell the residents we're gonna raise their taxes to buy a hotel, I'm pretty sure they would vote against it. There was a lot of talk about Sunny Isles.

5:54:38 – 5:54:579

We don't wanna be Sunny Isles. I don't wanna be Sunny Isles. I'm not gonna speak for the rest of the board here. But I don't know how you can argue against a 1.7 millage rate as opposed to an eight point something millage rate. So maybe Sunny Isles isn't doing the wrong thing with a 1.7 millage rate.

5:55:02 – 5:55:449

Commissioner or vice mayor already talked about the emergency evacuation that the experts and we rely on experts said that there's not a problem with it. Somebody said something about we should just build single family houses. We shouldn't have multi family housing or multi family buildings but the only way to preserve green space is by have it going up, not out. You know, suburbia was built but you're taking up all these lots and you're not housing everybody that needs to be housed. So that's why we have the rack where we're creating up a little bit so that we can preserve some green space and still provide housing to people.

5:55:46 – 5:56:189

You gotta preserve green space and the only way to do that is to go up. Julie Greenfield said, you know, I'm sorry some of these people left because they didn't wanna hear what we had to say. But I I'm on Julie Greenfield but I wasn't pointing that at her. I'm just being generalized that I wish people would stay around to hear the entire deliberation and not just see the presentation and make their own determination on it or their interpretation on it. But Julie said, we need to hear from many of the people, not the few.

5:56:19 – 5:57:049

But yet, it's the few that want their voices heard the most. So I would want to hear from the many and when I go to Publix and I talk to people at Publix, I hear from the many. When we go to the parks and we hear from the many or we you know, so I think all of us should want to hear from the many. Final question and this is about moving forward. How do we prevent when this comes back to us and I hope it does, how do we prevent every block from becoming a 15 story building without doing spot zoning?

5:57:04 – 5:57:389

That's what I wanna hear. If somebody could talk about it now so that the public could hear, I think it would be great. I think I agree that I would love to see a five star Ritz Carlton on Hollywood Central Beach and I think all our business owners would like to see that and I don't think one person should have made the decision for the rest of us. But how do we yes. How do we do it without spot zoning? Could we just do it has to be a hotel with so many rooms in it in order to get some height? And I think that would help with the whole live local.

5:57:38 – 5:57:5231

So I think what's important to recognize is nowhere in the presentation are we suggesting that we need to rezone. That is the fundamental thing that we're trying to avoid JOSEPH

5:57:489

We're suggesting

5:57:49 – 5:58:1431

to avoid live local implications. What we are suggesting is a bonus program or an overlay program that can be geographically and contextually applied to allow for the end result that we perhaps envision after we do community engagement, after we assess what makes sense. All the presentation suggests is 15 stories within Central Beach makes sense, but not a uniform application.

5:58:141

As And not everywhere.

5:58:1631

Not everywhere.

5:58:179

But how do you do that without spot zoning?

5:58:19 – 5:59:0331

So it wouldn't be spot zoning because we're not rezoning. So it would just be an assessment that certain portions of the beach, if you want to think of it as a transect, may be more suitable for additional height versus others. So it would just be a matter of a policy regime, policy writing suggesting that in certain areas, would have additional height of 15 stories or 15 stories cap and then taper down, let's say, to the broad walk, if that's what the consensus is. But in essence, it would only be eligible for property owners who are willing to exchange something, a public benefit, for that height. So it would not apply to everybody.

5:59:0331

It would be contextually applied, but it would be predictable.

5:59:079

So do we have to determine the public benefit in a policy that the commission adopts?

5:59:1511

Yes. Or would it be

5:59:161

A menu and a framework.

5:59:179

Make me an offer, kind of.

5:59:19 – 5:59:4731

I mean, realistically, it is one of the fundamental questions that we do need to answer. And as part of that, we also need to understand the variety of issues that the beach is experiencing. And then, once we really understand what that is, we're able to make that recommendation based off of what value we believe development will be able to yield. Because we want to collect value, but we also want to make sure it amounts to something. We can collect something.

5:59:47 – 6:00:0931

It may never amount to anything. That doesn't do us any good. So, is a strategy that needs to be thought about. All we're suggesting is, as part of this discussion, is that additional height will be beneficial to the ultimate renewal of the beach if done strategically. And we need to evaluate what that kind of trade off is as we develop the bonus program.

6:00:09 – 6:00:249

So is the bonus program similar to our green building code where we want you to give us 10 things out of 20 things in order to build GREENBELL: something over whatever it is, 30,000 square feet or something like that.

6:00:240

Is it something similar to that that

6:00:2631

you're Not recommending? Really in terms of that. I mean, green building program is our green building program. If you're building within the city, you have to adhere to that section of

6:00:3522

the But you

6:00:357

ordinance. Get to

6:00:369

pick 10 out of 20 then

6:00:3731

Correct.

6:00:379

Whatever the number is.

6:00:3831

JOSHUA you they're not necessarily getting anything in return. That is just the expectation of the city of Hollywood when you build here. We expect some level of sustainability through that product.

6:00:489

So if you want 15 stories, we expect you to do

6:00:5231

right now

6:00:539

Twice as much green space or twice as many parking spaces or whatever the case may be.

6:00:58 – 6:01:1631

Yes. And that will be a policy decision made by commission, whether it's infrastructure resiliency, whether it's a lump sum put into a trust, whether it's public parking, whether it's historic preservation. The options are really endless. It's just a matter of what we want to prioritize to fix through the development process.

6:01:169

So would it be something like, if you want to be a three star hotel, you could get 10 stories. But if you want to build a five star hotel, you get 15 stories?

6:01:2731

I mean, I guess you could. But again, we would want to evaluate that against all of the other potential options.

6:01:3423

Okay. Yeah.

6:01:359

Thank you. No problem. I think I covered everything I wanted to cover. Thank you.

6:01:401

Thank you, Commissioner Hernandez.

6:01:451

the timer on that, Peter?

6:01:467

Twenty three minutes, five seconds, and point three three minutes.

6:01:491

Peter's claiming 23 at the middle.

6:01:53 – 6:02:187

Well, by the time I realized I needed to time people, that was the only one I could time completely. Thank you, Mayor. By the way, I think the biggest message here that I've listened is nobody listened to the plan twenty years ago. There was nothing done. What he said clearly, and by the way, the CRA was in play.

6:02:18 – 6:02:427

The CRA was there. Build the parking facilities for the property owners to just rebuild their property without having to have the requirement of parking. That's what I heard. If I heard that correctly, that's what the city commission twenty years ago was told. They didn't listen.

6:02:42 – 6:03:107

Nothing was done. Twenty years later, we can't do that. We don't have that ability. But that was the message that was loud and clear that he didn't come out and say it bluntly. But he said, twenty years ago, we suggested that the city made the parking facility, which by the way, is a way of getting the money back from that facility just because those other individuals will have to be able to rent spots on that particular building.

6:03:11 – 6:03:407

Doesn't have to be a building with anything else but parking. I've been telling the developers, if you do parking and you rent the parking space, you get more money than if you actually rent the apartment. They've done the numbers and that is true. You get more money back out of parking spaces than you can out of an apartment. Whether it's one apartment or two apartments. Just do the math. It doesn't hurt. So now we're twenty years later. And I'd like to ask the staff too, if you could go to actually page 40, if you don't mind. Can you do that?

6:03:50 – 6:04:067

you do page 40? All right. Yeah. And the reason that I do that, I'm not being facetious, but I guess I could be, is because the presentation doesn't have any numbers. I have asked not to bring any presentations in front of us that doesn't have any numbers because Otherwise

6:04:061

an a, but yes, you're right.

6:04:077

Well, no. Because otherwise, the residents, when they wanna see it online, they can't find the numbers when we say a number. Actually, they're saying it's on the top left corner.

6:04:177

There you go. Perfect. Where we can't see it because Take it back.

6:04:2026

It's not in the usual spot. I apologize.

6:04:227

Okay. It's Okay. No.

6:04:237

first one, it doesn't have it. And I started for the first one. But I see page 40. So I'm glad it matched. Page 40.

6:04:33 – 6:05:087

And by the way, I'm going by memory. There you go. Perfect. I'm going by memory. Those are great depictions. Because it was told see, what happens is sometimes you guys make the presentation and you do it in a way that some of the people just don't catch the fact that you're coding these things. The top right says there's five stories. The bottom one has eight to 10 stories. And you said this would be a better product and I agree 100%. Design, landscaping, boxing, everything.

6:05:08 – 6:05:297

But yet the people, once you tell them it's so many stories, they don't wanna hear anymore. Zero. They don't wanna hear anything. They just said, no, no, no, leave it the way it is rather than to look at it and assess it and said, this is a better product. Great presentation by the way. And now that I know where the pages are, let's go to page 48, if I remember it right

6:05:291

now. Actually,

6:05:33 – 6:05:487

let's do, yeah, yeah. Oh, the end, no, I got twenty minutes to do this. Let me see. No, it's actually page 45, sorry. I'm going by I wrote the page numbers, so it's 45.

6:05:51 – 6:06:147

Can anybody see the coast? You can see where it's nice and sunny. You can see, that's the Margaritaville. Is that not correct? Can somebody correct me if I'm wrong? The Margaritaville on the right? Yes. With the blue. Okay, that's the Margaritaville. Do you guys see much shading on the sand? Not a whole lot, right? And how many stories is the Margaritaville?

6:06:151

About 180 feet.

6:06:167

Okay, 17 story if I remember correctly. Yet, you look at the building behind it. That building has been there for many, many years.

6:06:266

There's more shading

6:06:277

in I the don't remember. I'm not going, I'm not, I was told not to single anybody else. I'm not single. That building has been there for many, many years.

6:06:35 – 6:07:277

lot of those people that live on that building don't want any other building to be built on the beach to do any shading. But yet, they provide a heck of a good shade for anybody that wants to be on the beach and not get any sun. My point is the residents that don't want it are benefiting for what's there and they're affecting the other people. And that effect affects the rest of the residents of the city, Hollywood based on value. So if the presentation is about we need to get our button gear and do something about this before it gets done for us, I'm in agreeance with that because twenty years ago, nobody paid attention to you need to be investing in parking garages so that everybody else can upgrade their property without having to worry about the requirements of parking.

6:07:27 – 6:07:577

See parking is the animal that's gonna bite all of us. I'm going through that in the downtown area. The beach is going through that area And the CRA wasn't paying attention, was asleep at the wheel. Quite frankly, most of the other CRAs have invested in buying the land, doing something about it and turning it into what they want. Hollywood CRA decided to give the money away and have nothing to show for.

6:07:57 – 6:08:307

So I still am resentful about that. But nonetheless, we're paying for the what's that? Garages. We have garages that are built on a postage stamp property because we didn't wanna buy the one next door to make it look right because we have personality issues with that person rather than to address it as a business and maybe have somebody else be the one to negotiate rather than the one person who thought he was King Kong. At the end of the day, we as residents and we as commissioners right now are Excuse me?

6:08:301

Talking about the Nebraska Street garage and if some property to the east could have been purchased to make it bigger.

6:08:357

Could have and should have been purchased. Look, I didn't interject on somebody else's comment. Please don't do it on mine, if you don't mind. Great.

6:08:439

I I wanted to make sure you clarified it.

6:08:45 – 6:09:087

No, no, I get it. I'm not timing myself. I'm looking at that. Look, I don't want to do this. But the point is, the point that staff is bringing to us, it is not the height that makes a difference. It is the design and how you approach it. Mr. Suscovich brought it to our attention. You have to be surgical about what you want to do. And at the end of the day, it has to be done.

6:09:09 – 6:09:527

We don't, we look, I'm not going to talk about what the litigation is or not, but I can tell you that if the question that it was done earlier was, are we prepared to make a decision if we're gonna get a quality hotel versus something that we don't want? I am ready to make that decision without disclosing anything about anything else. I am ready to make that decision because once the state signs what needs to be signed, we're not gonna have any choice. And by the way, one of the things the staff is talking about is changing the ordinances rather than to rezoning. That takes two readings.

6:09:53 – 6:10:237

And state can also consider zoning in progress when it comes to their decision. Once their decision is made and you're looking to do something different, it's not going to affect their decision. No matter what we do, they would still be able to have the ability to do the housing that they're looking to do by right. And so those are the concerns that is being brought to us as a commission that we need to face and act on. Unfortunately, we're behind the eight ball.

6:10:25 – 6:11:057

Alex, thank you for bringing up the issue regarding the charter review. I can tell you that it had been addressed already by the city attorney's office. But thank you for bringing it to our attention and bringing it to the forefront. Gratefully appreciate that because that's something that we need to do as a body. And we need to adhere to and I think the city attorney has agreed to actually go back and interview some of the individuals that were there to make sure that what the essence of what the charter review wanted and voted for, which it was a representation of the residents, actually becomes adhered to by this commission.

6:11:05 – 6:11:237

And I was the chairman at the time. I can only talk about the experience. Look, great presentation. It's a reality check to some of the residents that feel that the acquaintance of the city of Hollywood is something that we can protect. At this point, it's really not up to us.

6:11:24 – 6:12:047

The state has listened to the developers. And unfortunately, it seems that the city of Hollywood is still at the tip of the spear when it comes to poking the bear. Everybody was entertained with what happened here regarding whether the county comp plan amendment was actually modified by somebody that, whether they had the right or not had the right, it was done administratively. It wasn't a I forgot how it's actually said a retroactive amendment that has to be brought up to the planning board and the planning board has to vote on. It wasn't done.

6:12:04 – 6:12:317

It was done administratively. So this was something that they were focusing on doing. In meantime, somebody else went to the state and says, look, I'm having this problem. Do you want the 900 people a day that come to the state of Florida have a place to live? They said, sure. And now we're dealing with them. And now what we're trying to do is catch up. Great presentation. And by the way, for those people that felt that there were two items, there were two presentations. Actually able that it was germane to the topic.

6:12:33 – 6:13:117

There was two presentations that were combined as one and I get it. I would have rather seen the six minutes for some people, but we'd still be here on that. And ever since then, it'd been like an hour and a half or two hours afterwards. So for the brevity of time, I think everybody was able to say what they needed to say. But I also agree with the public when they said there was two items. There was two item numbers, but in essence, there were two presentations. In years past, we did not allow people to comment on presentations. We've kind of opened it for the people to be able to open on presentations. So it goes to the saying, no good deed goes unpunished. You, Alex.

6:13:11 – 6:13:277

Well, no, at the end of the day, we want people to realize that we've opened more and more for people to be able to have a say for us to listen to it. But it seems like no matter what we do, it's never good enough. I think I've done my seven minutes already.

6:13:27 – 6:13:381

So I've had enough. All right. Commissioner Quintana, then me. And then hopefully a short second round by anyone. And then we'll finish up. Let's go to Commissioner Quintana.

6:13:38 – 6:14:172

Thank you, Mayor. I'll try to be focused. I mean, I did make a couple of notes about the presentation itself. I wrote down and this may or may not make sense to anyone, but I'm just going to go ahead and say it out loud. The North Bay Village example, I wrote down, Anand said that it focused on determining what the community needs. And what I wrote next to that is the community needs a way to implement the resilience plan. I mean, everything else for our beach

6:14:171

really I'm sorry. That was the wrong button. Go ahead.

6:14:23 – 6:14:582

As far as I'm concerned, I'm thinking how do we keep the beach afloat? How do we keep things from being underwater? And the choices are basically, are our taxpayers gonna have to bear the cost of that, or can we count on the development community to help us pay for that? We need the development community to help us because our residents can't afford what that's gonna cost. And then I wrote the city of Miami example.

6:14:58 – 6:15:292

Anand said that it focuses on resiliency, but it doesn't focus as much on the design outcomes. So I think in both cases, there's something to learn that we could possibly incorporate into what we do. There was a lot of information. But kind of the overarching thing that didn't have to do with the content of the presentation thank you, by the way. I mean, what an amazing this is what I keep saying.

6:15:29 – 6:16:122

Like, I have so much faith in our planning department that we have an amazing group of people working there. And the way that you presented it in such a balanced way that took into account what our residents' voices have been saying and really treated our residents with respect, I think that's really important. I think it's really important that we send a message from here that we respect our residents and that we're listening and that we wanna hear from them, while at the same time not making enemies of our development community. We need both. But what I wrote is that it's not just what we do, it's how we do it.

6:16:14 – 6:16:332

How we do it. I'm sorry, mister Poliokov. I I didn't think that today we had to make a decision, as you suggested, that we were here to make a decision. That's not what I thought I was here for. I think decisions made by intimidation and fear seldom make good decisions.

6:16:35 – 6:17:042

I understand we have urgency. We have threats. But I highly resent having to make a decision due to a threat. And the threat actually and the intimidation actually makes me resist whatever it is that's being offered. I am very stubborn, and I am not willing to compromise for money.

6:17:05 – 6:18:012

I'm willing to compromise for good, but not just for money. You gotta show me how the money is being used for something good. I think, in the interest of being brief, I would just like for us to look at slide number 47 to remind us about what was laid out as our next steps. This is what I thought we were kinda here to do. Our next step was to initiate community engagement, do informational outreach on really having our residents understand what it means when we say that reinvestment is becoming more difficult on the beach.

6:18:02 – 6:18:442

I mean, we need to say it very plainly. We use a lot of really beautiful professional speech, but I think we need to speak plainly about why it's becoming more difficult to reinvest on the beach. So, for me, like, if we use this slide as our guide for what comes next, then a lot of the controversy and kinda tension that has been part of this meeting today could really be diffused if we use this as our guide for what happens next. So I just, once again, let's take a look at this. I don't need to read to you, but I really thought that's what we were here for. Thank you.

6:18:44 – 6:19:121

Thank you, Commissioner Quintana and everyone. So I had put together what I think is obviously the logic. Some questions were, why are we having this conversation? So let me just get through some of the notes that I put together. So, yes, it all starts with the foundation of the master of plan twenty some odd years ago, even though the staff showed today that the sixty five feet was determined in advance of that.

6:19:12 – 6:19:381

And the Zascovich plan sort of taking that as the city's decision from a couple of years prior had really put in together, let's just call it the inspiration for reinvestment that Bernard described. And that plan, the master plan, did give a clear vision for Hollywood Beach, walkable, vibrant beach, strong tourism, local business activity, preserving the beach, unique character. That was a driving vision. And that vision is still the right vision that we all have for today. We wanna see that character preserved.

6:19:39 – 6:20:221

But we also have to acknowledge what's changed over the past twenty years and that everything around it has changed. And one thing that we haven't discussed is the viability of existing, let's just call it the motel business in because a lot of what we're talking about here is the the commercial core of the beach. You know, with the I had a conversation with one motel owner. How much do you pay in windstorm insurance? How much do you pay in property taxes? How much are you getting a night? Oh, I have to I'm competing with other motels that are going as low as $80 a night. I don't love the customer that's coming in because of that and we're becoming a beach of last resort. We're kind of like it's a race to the bottom of who can charge less. Other people have other motels are have more rooms.

6:20:22 – 6:20:491

They can afford to have a lower per room rate. That leaves the little guy not being able to earn enough. And with the mounting costs of operation, insurance, taxes and and and if they have a mortgage, then that too, mortgage interest and and and principal, then they're really having a tough time surviving. So that we have to kind of take to heart. We also know that the tourism business has changed a little bit with short term rentals competing with these small motels.

6:20:49 – 6:21:281

And I'm not saying that, of course, I love the beautiful, older, you know, well designed, you know, single level hospitality, small lodging that we have. I don't wanna see any of that go away. But we do have to recognize that are there are some realities that are affecting the the type of product that exists in the beach and and that can't change because of the zoning that we have today. And it's not about the height. It's about parking and other retail requirements and things of that nature that really don't allow that small building to be a new small building and be able to be functionally usable or even approved because of the lot size and different things of that nature.

6:21:28 – 6:22:121

So our zoning is definitely a problem. And what's also changed, as we all talked about ad nauseam today, is that state laws really can change how much cities control have over development. And so we have to be honest about where we stand today. Despite the strong vision that we set twenty years ago, we've seen very little reinvestment on the beach. And just think about it. Where what other beach in South Florida or probably anywhere that has a strong market do you see vacant land sitting there undeveloped? Very expensive vacant land that the owner sees no economic use for and has basically left to stagnate for decades. That's not a compliment to the master plan. It's not a compliment to the city. It's a reflection of of of a problem.

6:22:13 – 6:22:421

A lot of properties are aging instead of being reinvested in. And mind you, I think we've had success in doing our best to get the property improvement programs and we can claim some very beautiful successes. I'd love for every single one of those small buildings to have that but not everybody comes together for the investment, doesn't come forward. And so and the reason, again, for a lot of this lack of investment continued, you know, stagnation with with some significant property is specifically caused by our current zoning code. I think everybody can understand that.

6:22:42 – 6:23:231

It's the height limit, the FEMA cutting you at the bottom, us cutting them at the top and not having enough to to work with together with parking requirements that together result in an inability and at the very best result in the cost of product that that exists and that that's that's the consequence of of our plan. The retail mandates, I've spoken to staff. Right now, if you build something in the Central Beach on the in line streets, you need to have retail at the bottom. Well, we all know that Costa's retail is not successful. And with the Broadwalk being everywhere that people wanna be in a one a to some extent because it's those destination restaurants there, we don't need to commercialize the side streets.

6:23:23 – 6:24:061

That's too much and we don't need as much space to fill. We see in Downtown Hollywood when you have half a million square feet, it's hard to fill it even on Hollywood Beach. So that retail mandate is definitely a problem. Needs to go away quickly, staff. If we're talk gonna talk about easy to get to zoning fixes that will help release some things, getting rid of the retail mandate, really deciding what to do with parking requirements, maybe we lessen them. We don't want stacks of garage all over the beach. So I would say parking under the stilt building that's similar to North Beach, similar to The Keys. That's how you build in a resilient fashion. If, God forbid, there's a flood one day, you know, the water just goes right through. There's no property damage.

6:24:07 – 6:24:431

But not go beyond that. And if people wanna park beyond that, then they're gonna have to park in public parking or tell their guests, we don't have parking. Take it make sure you take an Uber. We're a walking destination. And that's a compliment to what we want. Now, of the flip side. If we do nothing and live local wins the day and mind you, local can also win a day at 65 feet if someone wants to build it. But apartments require more parking. And so, again, all the more reason to have hospitality in central core and not apartments. Hotels require less parking.

6:24:43 – 6:25:221

Or we can, through less parking, force them to tell their guests leave the car at home. And maybe some guests decide not to go to that hotel. That's fine. It's a leave your car at home guest experience. So again, the height limits, the parking requirements, the FEMA minimum floor elevation, and the retail mandate really kill and have caused this stagnation, even for a hotel. So we do have a gap. We want the reinvestment, but our current rules prevent it. And if we don't address that gap, nothing changes or worse because of Live Local, we lose control. And I think that's the that's the guiding light for me is I don't wanna lose control here. The state adopted Live Local Act.

6:25:25 – 6:25:421

We know that they would bring forward residential projects with less local restriction. That means apartments and with fewer tools, never mind design. We really have our hands tied when it comes to Live Local, right, on a lot of things. So the choice is obvious for us. We are at a decision point.

6:25:42 – 6:26:181

If we do nothing and allow state law and market forces to dictate outcomes, that's one option do nothing. And it'll be, as Peter said, shoved down our throat. Or we act now and shape the development and the opportunity through a bonus program that's live local proof and that aligns with our vision of a beautiful hospitality driven beach that welcomes guests, high end hotels, yes. We want to elevate the quality of the beach and bring in guests that will spend money at the Broadwalk businesses and dine at the restaurants. All that said, don't imagine suddenly a beach where suddenly all the small lodging goes away.

6:26:18 – 6:27:071

That's not the outcome of this. With this bonus program that I believe should be limited to being aligned along A1A, along the East Side of A1A, and how deep we go is a decision to look at it in person and decide what is functionally necessary in order for that hotel to function as a 10 to 15 story, for example. So how deep it goes from A1A depends on the functional and maybe we need an architect to do a hypothetical mock up certain depths and decide what is feasible because we don't want to overdo it. I don't want the beach to be, as someone said, a row of 15 story hotels, definitely not more east than they need to be. And so I see the bonus program is limited along the East Side Of A1A.

6:27:07 – 6:27:341

That will create winners and losers in terms of property owners, and I'm Okay with that. That's just otherwise, we don't achieve the surgical result that we want and preservation of character. Just to complete what I put together, the master plan always envisioned the beach being tourism driven. Again, hotels support local business, create jobs, bring visitors that activate the broad walk. Residential doesn't create that same economic activity.

6:27:34 – 6:28:151

So the solution is evaluating the targeted bonus type program for hotels that we've been talking about here. It's not a blanket increase in height. Obviously, with Live Local, we can't touch the 65, 50 and the 40. And it's a we need a structured program where additional height is allowed in the right locations and with special public benefit as an outcome of that and that results in a win win. So we've talked about how the public benefits work, that if they seek additional height, we get meaningful benefits, resiliency, infrastructure improvement, public space, high quality architectural design.

6:28:15 – 6:28:581

It's about exchanging height for public value only where we want to allow the height. So again, preserving the character of the beach is a priority. We have to do it strategically, not everywhere. Buildings have to be designed with proper scale. We want to keep the pedestrian scale, especially as you get near the broad walk exactly the way it is, protect that. The view corridors are important to to keep the pedestrian feel. It's about design and not just bigger buildings. That's not no one cares about a bigger building. We need just viable buildings in the right place. So at the same time, again, we need to review the outdated regulations.

6:28:58 – 6:29:381

And I think that, when it comes to the next steps timetable, we don't have the luxury of waiting two years to get to step five here. Anand, I think the way you set it out, the near term brings to the city commission a text amendment and it has to go to P and D. Has to go to P and D quickly and fix the current zoning for all the things that we can do quickly to fix it because we want to give options to people that that are not live local. I want to prevent that and that that judgment is looming and I'm afraid about what what happens with that, to be honest with you, Because then it opens every property on the beach to basically the height of Margaritaville. Let's just say it like it is, right?

6:29:38 – 6:30:101

And that's a very big danger. And I question the city attorney I'll question out loud is, what is the risk of even waiting for a judgment? If there is a even a fiftyfifty chance we lose and we know we want to do something viable for the beach anyway, I mean, the risk is the judgment gets rendered. People are going to rely on that and seek projects, never mind the one that we're in litigation with. And even if it's appealed, they can probably still I don't know that it doesn't get worse for us.

6:30:11 – 6:30:291

So maybe there is some sense in doing an executive session to discuss resolution of that suit without waiting for a judgment. Because a judgment that says Hollywood lost also makes an impact for the entire state, for people that are trying to protect and not use certain buildings as benchmarks.

6:30:3020

Certainly, if you would like me to call an executive session, then I'm happy to do so. And we can do an emergency executive session if we need to.

6:30:397

I would support that.

6:30:401

Here you go. You do

6:30:419

it the same day you already announced? You could announce it now?

6:30:4420

Well, I could announce an executive session right now if we need to.

6:30:501

You mean you have to pick a date and time and

6:30:5120

Right. And if you want to say

6:30:531

Copy that exact script that you had for the other one and just do it the If you want twenty minutes say after.

6:30:5820

April 15, which is the date that we currently have the shade session to do the critical infrastructure tour, then I can make an announcement

6:31:081

to One hour before or after that. I mean, I support that. I think we need to have a conversation.

6:31:2020

me. In the mic, please.

6:31:22 – 6:31:511

I'm sorry. So in an executive session, we're allowed to discuss ongoing litigation, not in the sunshine without the plaintiff being here, and to discuss perhaps a proposal. But I think even in a proposal and they'd have to cooperate. They'd have to agree to a settlement where we'd have to enact new zoning if we were to offer something beyond the zoning today. We can't necessarily, through executive session, give them property rights that our zoning code doesn't provide for, right?

6:31:52 – 6:32:1220

That's correct. So in an executive session, we could have a more detailed discussion about what was allowable, what was possible. Right now, if there was direction to simply have us enter into negotiations, absent us having a more in-depth discussion over what you guys might want to see or not see. Or dismissal of

6:32:121

the lawsuit or what have you. Yeah. Right. Yeah.

6:32:171

So we need the executive session to discuss the options. Yeah. So if you want But

6:32:236

does that where does that put us then with the litigation itself?

6:32:2820

So with the litigation

6:32:291

Well, we could advise the judge to hold off pending settlement. Is that something we can do?

6:32:3420

We can talk to plaintiff's attorney and see if Okay. Could do a joint motion for a stay of the order since nothing has come down at this point.

6:32:431

That's something that's

6:32:4420

And possible, then we can have the executive session on the fifteenth.

6:32:496

But it won't eliminate what's already in the process. So we can have this discussion, kind of meeting of the minds

6:32:551

Well, would hold off because we would hold off a judgment while we DUNLAP: enact something that

6:33:0020

There's no judgment current judgment that's out. But it's just in the judge's deliberating regarding the summary judgment hearing.

6:33:10 – 6:33:341

So just continuing on. Again, if we don't evolve, we risk losing the the improvements that we stand to gain. We'd be falling behind seeing the aging of and just continued vacancy. Again, it's about maintaining local control really here. We wanna, as Andrew said in the beginning, we want to control our own destiny.

6:33:34 – 6:33:591

And the only way we can do it is if we offer these property owners something different than live local and determine where that opportunity exists. Doesn't mean no one else is going to try to sue, but they have to start at zero. And so this particular situation is is at minute 99. So again, we don't we don't wanna change the vision of Hollywood Beach. We wanna update how we achieve it.

6:34:00 – 6:34:261

And the goal is simple, to encourage reinvestment where we want it, the type of investment that we want, not state law wants, support the tourism, preserve the character, keep it on A1A, and ensure that the city shapes the future of the beach. With that, I just do want to touch on some of the other zoning issues and kind of ask you all what you think. No, that she's going to announce the executive session today.

6:34:2620

No, going to

6:34:271

announce announced it.

6:34:286

Don't we have to approve that?

6:34:291

No. She just announces there's

6:34:3220

no action that's taken to simply announce the executive. So

6:34:37 – 6:35:001

maybe we need some feedback from commissioners to give staff direction here. But since I don't anticipate well, first, west of A1A, think everyone agrees. And we've talked about the North Beaching of Central Beach a little bit. And that means the high quality residential that we've seen come, the low scale two, three, four story residential that is in North Beach. We've seen some of that quality come to the residential half of the Central Beach.

6:35:00 – 6:35:451

But South of the residential where it ends, basically, I want to say Scott Street ish, We've seen, basically, the West of A1A lots stagnate. They're basically asphalt lots, or they're just vacant on the intracoastal. Just imagine, highly valuable property. But our own code that restricts it to commercial is a problem because the product that's really there and on set it, it could only be a high end homes. Okay? And that's beautiful. It keeps within the character of the beach and brings in much needed investment. In order to do that, we need to amend our code and maybe even the comp plan, depending on how you our own comp plan. We don't need to go to the county, don't think, to allow for residential there. So I think we all have a consensus that we want staff to include that in the near term fixes.

6:35:45 – 6:36:071

Correct? Yeah. So and then I want to add this. If we all anticipate that we're not going to, through the bonus program, touch the let's call it the eastern more parts of all the interior blocks and Central Beach, the commercial part so as you approach Surf Road, we all imagine that's scaling down. We're not gonna really allow for a bonus program to put 15 stories on Surf Road.

6:36:07 – 6:37:211

I don't imagine we are. So if we're not gonna do that and the lots that are there today still need a viable path for reinvestment and some of those motels are not viable and we want to give the property owners a way to improve that's economically feasible, then then we should allow for residential, single family residential, which by the way is low rise and is within the 65 feet, of course, on that eastern portion, third, whatever we wanna call it, of those blocks. Now, the problem in the code with providing for that is that the code today, because it's commercial, requires that house, let's just say, we're imagining to have commercial at the bottom floor, which is not what we want and it's not where it's belong not not where it's suitable or or should belong. So we need to do whatever we need regulatory wise to get rid of that requirement and really enable that mixed use vision in the appropriate parts of the Central Beach commercial area. Now, another question for us, because I've seen property owners get stuck, like, for example, Massimo, who was here at Gramanzini, they built a building that is conforming to our height requirements with senior frogs at the bottom.

6:37:21 – 6:38:131

And they had always wanted, like, an apartment at the top. And they struggled with our current code to even be allowed to have an apartment at the top. And so, besides that, let's just call it the eastern part of those interior blocks, do we, as a commission, want the fixes to also include residential in the in the broad walk area that is, again, limited by the height limits that's there today. But if we have the active bottom bottom floor, which is basically the restaurant or the shop or what have you, do we want to allow at second level or higher residential? And that could be enough to bring forward improvements to those older buildings that keeps it within the low rise scale and gives an economically feasible opportunity because you could have an Airbnb or two on the second and third floors or even the fourth if you can keep it in 40 feet, I doubt it.

6:38:13 – 6:38:431

Say three floors, two or one is Airbnb. I'm just saying what's practical in the market. The bottom floor remains restaurant or commercial and have something viable for an investment. That's a decision we're going to have to make at some point. And he couldn't. He couldn't because of the code today. So does that offend anyone that he would have an apartment at the top of of the Broadwalk restaurant, for example?

6:38:439

It meets the mixed use.

6:38:44 – 6:38:591

It meets mixed use. So Andrea, we need to fix that. If if there's a limitation like described, let's allow for the mixed use residential, commercial on the Broad Walk within the current height limits. That's what we're saying. Sorry. Kevin, go ahead.

6:38:59 – 6:39:139

I think it meets the ability to give us a choice when we come back to here. It doesn't mean we have to accept it. It means that let's hear that choice and what that choice would do.

6:39:131

Yeah. And so I want them to be prepared

6:39:1522

The pros

6:39:159

and cons of it.

6:39:16 – 6:39:581

I want you to be prepared with knowing what parts of the code or the city comp plan we need to quickly fix and put before the P and D board so we have some good news for property owners that are either not doing anything or that think that, oh, wait. We need to wait for a live local. We can just wait. We can have a bonanza here. That's not what we want. We want to give them a viable alternative that keeps within the character of the area. So I think that's where we get the win win, everybody. We get tasteful reinvestment in the right places. On the beach hotel, everybody wants that site to be the crown jewel all over again. And I think it needs to be, obviously, a conversation with people like Bernard Daskovich, architects, on what the outcome of that is.

6:39:58 – 6:40:341

I think whatever we do there needs to gently but practically force the two property owners to work together. We only benefit if it's master plan together, even if they don't want to work together in a development because they can't come to a meeting of the minds financially. We need that whole entire footprint planned together. And so whatever bonus program we create for the beach hotel site needs to pretty much in effect force them to come together. We can't have the hotel pursue one thing and the Jaffee properties another and expect it to be successful for what we want for our beach.

6:40:361

That's not what maybe some of them want to hear, but we're here for Hollywood. And it needs to be done tastefully and in a good product kind of way. And that's it. Ms. McFlair.

6:40:466

I got to go.

6:40:47 – 6:41:3820

JULIE Mayor, if you'd like, I can make the announcement now. Yes. Pursuant to Florida Statute 286.011, subsection eight, subsection A, governing public meetings, I, as the attorney for the city of Hollywood, wish to advise the city during this public meeting that I desire to hold an executive session to commence directly after the conclusion of the previously announced shade meeting on 04/15/2026, which will commence at 9AM. Invited to attend this meeting are the mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners future city manager, Raelyn Story the development services director, Andrea Wenjett the assistant director of development services and chief planner, Cameron Palmer outside counsel, Dan Abbott and myself.

6:41:38 – 6:41:531

Can we have that be a time certain for the notice of 10AM? City manager, if the initial meeting is good enough for an hour, the first executive session, I'd like this executive session to be announced with a time certain. I think it needs to be. You said immediately following.

6:41:5320

But let's give

6:41:541

it a time.

6:41:5520

Okay. So at 10AM or immediately following? It's a tour. It's 11AM.

6:42:011

JULIE Oh, it's 11AM. Okay. 11AM then.

6:42:0320

JULIE Or a

6:42:0343

suit time.

6:42:04 – 6:42:291

JULIE think we need a time certain on that. Last, since Mr. Polyakov is here and we're talking about having an executive session, perhaps you can work with our city attorney's office to if you have enough confidence, of course, you have the right to decide. We want to prevent a judgment while we're doing this. Just participation just here and doing something with the courts, if that's possible.

6:42:29 – 6:42:4644

Sorry, Mayor. I just texted the client, and they are amenable to that. Essentially, tomorrow, we would file a joint motion saying that the parties are engaged in active settlement negotiations and respectfully request that the case be stayed until the court is informed otherwise. And that we'd agree Is that

6:42:4620

good enough? I've also reached out to outside counsel. And so we'll coordinate on filing that joint motion.

6:42:51 – 6:43:031

Is that good for a commission? Yeah. Yeah. All right. All right. So I do have the queue if you do want to speak, anybody, for a quick second round. Commissioner Schuhem, then Hernandez, if you like. Go ahead.

6:43:03 – 6:43:2821

So honestly, mayor, you touched on two of the things that I had missed in my first comment. One was just towards the end where you talked about the adjacent properties to the hotel. My comment was, we need staff to do something to force those owners to play in the sandbox together. You know, if it were just a historic preservation bonus, then Mr. Jaffee gets nothing.

6:43:28 – 6:44:0721

And he needs to really understand how this is going to work. So, completely support that idea and curious as to how you're going to make that happen. The other thing was parking for hotels. You said exactly what I was going to say. I don't know, Someone was telling me that, right now, hotels on the beach require one spot per room. I don't know if that's true. But obviously, anybody coming to Hollywood Beach from the Fort Lauderdale Airport has taken an Uber. And so that we need to address. Commissioner Hernandez, I wanted to respond to Mr. Rizio as well.

6:44:07 – 6:44:3221

That counsel has addressed the charter issues. But thank you for bringing it up. But I've also had conversations. So all of that's being properly addressed. Unrelated to this discussion, but Andrea, can somebody please get with Ann Ralston and look at the signs on her street to see if they're pointing in the right direction. And that's it. Thank you.

6:44:321

Thank you. Commissioner Hernandez. Thank you, mayor. Out of

6:44:377

the presentations that we have combined, this is the best decision out of no decision that this commission could have made. So that was it.

6:44:48 – 6:45:091

All right. Well, does that satisfy the staff in terms of giving you sufficient direction on moving where we need to move? And yeah, alright. We're getting thumbs up from the team. Compliments to the presentation. It was logically presented and really told a a very complicated story and a very easy to follow way. So thank you so much. Alright. This meeting is adjourned, everybody. George, love you.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.