Zoning Hearing Master - Regular Meeting

Okay. Mrs. Turner, if you and others do not have any objection, then I will take a look at it. I am not expecting you. But I want to know that I am doing this to see from the side because I cannot see from the distance. Okay. We are fine. Okay.

We have a meeting with the representative and our representative and the appeal. It seems that the main issue of this protest has been raised. It is very important to maintain the truthfulness of the protest in some issues. The issue is whether or not the two proposals have been evaluated based on the same published statement and whether or not the same number of scores can be determined based on each of the proposals submitted. In contrast to the proposals of the Valued Committees, the Valued Committees have scored based on their status and current situation. And at the same time, RHC, RHC, which is written in the case of the answer, has been forced to evaluate many difficult statements. This section is full of details because RFP, RFP, TAB A, B and C had decided on the zero-point Valued Statement and the most important point. According to RFP, every prosecutor knew how the point would be given. 20 points for the organization, 20 points for the organization and 10 points for the productive process. The county does not only ask this question that whether one of the representatives is organically organized or not, but they have also asked some unquestionable questions and have repeatedly discussed the organization of the organization, the introduction of five unquestionable proposals, the gradual development of the work, the distribution of the success of the proposal, the productive process, the nature and nature of the project. The most important issue was that the Kenakata Committee gave clear instructions that each proposal should be based on the fact that it is equivalent to the requirement and the budget. If we think about the proposed budget, and if we talk about the situation or the previous knowledge of the funders, then the proposal of Roll Hearts is more equivalent to the RFP format and the immediate requirement. There has been a lot of criticism in the application for the collection of adubon, but this is not a question of the simplicity of the answer. We do not claim to have reached such a conclusion in the mid-term career that someone has deliberately misled or misled. It is not that the desire to be deliberately misled at all, but it creates a kind of understanding of a 32-year-old relationship in a natural way. The problem is created only when due to that understanding, a specific answer and special convenience are given to incomplete subjects. Anyone who gets a complete answer from a familiar place can be considered complete. Because the fundamentalists already know what they want to understand. It is not easy to get the same kind of detailed answer from a new competitor. For this reason, it is necessary to use the published fundamental statements written on the collection. There is not a single matter to give an exact answer to the uncertainty and RFBs outside the collection. The main question was, which of the collection statements made the point based on the invisible statement? If we keep them side by side, there is a close link between RHC and the fact that they have gained as much as they deserve. In the end, Scores are not easily determined by the method of writing a large section in them. Instead, we are making a quick reply for the value of the same words in the same sentence. In the search box, in the tab for information, Adubon Ranch has been given 17 scores to Unish and Rohal Heart Cattle. The first issue to be given to our candidates was the introduction of FPL license. The RFP only mentioned that we have to provide a license certificate and all business licenses with a permit or license certificate. After that, the county had a follow-up meeting where they were discussing that the license was not registered. There was no clear category mentioned. Mulayan Karira, who had taken points from the FPL license of RHC, said that our subcontractor did not fulfill the conditions of the turf and ornamental department. However, Mulayan meeting where they talked about these issues again, did not talk about a suitable category of personal needs. We still don't know. We think this is agriculture. Miracle. No one actually says this. This is not mandated. There is no benefit from that. This is reached at a high level through the principle of introduction that the committee has scored according to their needs. However, if the licensing category of this application is not mandated, and only wants to comply with one of the requirements and the license, but how can we cut the point if we do not get the approval of our department? Moreover, we have clearly stated in our official statement that according to the requirements of our compatible subcontractor, only knowing the correct license will include our subcontractor. We have more than a year before the entry of the leasers. The license of the subcontractor was only valid for a year. The category that the county will talk about by the end of the year will be valid for the entry before the entry of the leasers. We had another subcontractor at Moukhi Kupusthapo, who had the ability to spray aerials and had the same license category as Adubon. We were afraid to cut the score because there were no conditions, the language of the application was not proper, and the administrator had made a mistake by keeping this principle in mind. A potential seller was accused of not being a subcontractor, who did not have a clear category, when the submission required a subcontractor to provide a license and a license plate, whether it was necessary or not, the question was raised. The biggest problem was that The Procurement Department said that we have fulfilled the needs of the bid at this time because we had provided a Banichik license and a certificate. Then why was our point cut for the written tariff and ornamental license in accordance with the agreement? If we have fulfilled the needs of that category, it has been said in accordance with the act no. 1 issue that they have written that our category was not correct. So what was correct? We are very happy to know that. We had also submitted our subcontractor's application, which was associated with our first initial proposal, where it was said that the subcontractor will follow all the rules and will keep all the required licenses related to this property use. In it, the written storage, use, income, property, share and other material requirements are all different. Our first proposal said that we will collect the required license before taking the responsibility. Here is a clip of the main scoring meeting where our points were cut to use the subcontractor. According to the introduction, it is said that our points were not cut, except that it was only considered as a possible failure, but you can see here. It is not certain why it is not letting me listen.

Jodi apnar score aparjabto hai, tabhe eti jama dae. Sambhabbo. Abaro. Sambhabbo. Kintu ami korechilam.

Sutarang apnara shekhane dekte patchen. You can see there that our point was cut to use the subcontractor. According to the introduction, it was said that it was a possible failure. However, the same member says, yes, it was a possible failure, but still our point was cut. In the case of Adubon's subcontractor use, it was also said to be a possible failure, but in some cases it can actually be a possibility that the work has been given to the subcontractor. And this is taken from the previous timestamps from the Mulyan meeting. Moving forward, we have a clip that we don't want to disturb you because you have misinterpreted our main concept, where we just said that we don't know if it is a license category. We thought that they were talking about our co-contractor's mistake and we not only provided the picture, but also the license of our aerial pesticide sprayer and the picture of working on our other property. There was no mistake with them like our other subcontractor, that RFP was also required. However, we could not see this as a problem. We took the help of our subcontractors and gave them a thorough introduction and indicated that we have these requirements and a valid license as well. Apart from that, we have also seen our aerial sprayer. We have seen their license and we have seen that they are actually spraying with our agricultural license on the land that their subcontractors had introduced. After that, no score has been changed. This is a re-match meeting where they have re-scored after the initial establishment, where we have discussed the issues of license and requirement and some other issues, but the score has not changed. After that, the memorandum issued by TAB-A Joggotai Aashajak, which is the fifth co-operation of all of them, is mentioned there that there is a proven track record of the work of the Audubon Ranch. Regarding the role of hard cattle, there was a lack of some necessary information. And as you can see, I have highlighted the scores for you here. It is said in TAB-A Section 1 to provide a number of years to work in this field for the above-mentioned products. There is a roll heart cataleptic here, which is equivalent to 1B, 2B to 4B. You can see 30 years for each category. You can see 30 years for Kipnashak, 30 years for Charon Bhoomi Katar, 30 years for Khotikarok Agacha Neuntran. After that, when you go to Aduban Erti, there is no mention of any year. It is only said that we have been doing this since 1984, which takes more time than my age, but this is a simple answer. According to them, this does not clearly describe the years of each department. This is exactly what they wanted. We were told not to give the necessary detailed information. But where is this question? There is no mention of the year of work in each of the necessary fields. Tab 1.6.4.1.2 says there should be a comprehensive plan for the development and maintenance of their cattle farming and maintenance of their cattle farming and the implementation of their implementation. This is the role of the Heart. We have mentioned the development of cattle farming, the development of cattle farming, the maintenance of Avokatham, and the improvement of the environment. It is stated in the proposal of Audubon Ranch that the ranch manager has a degree from the University of Florida and has written about land and forest. There is nothing about cattle or livestock, whether they have a shelter or not, or whether they use their independent cattle or IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their IFAS method, or whether they use their

His name is Eddy. We have 118, 219 and 220 numbers. As you can see there.

They have stated that there was a lack of detailed data, they did not provide the number of the year, but they have given the number of the two members. And if you look at the agreement 5, section 2, it is said that there was a lack of detailed data on their needs, but if they do not meet the required needs of RFP, then how did they get the full number? This is not an easy task. In addition to this, another note was mentioned that the Adubon Ranch is associated with the Asankho Sakriyo Peshadar organization. This was a very important issue that was as amazing as all the members of the Moolayan Committee. However, RFP test has clearly stated that it must be related to the current Gavadi Animal Production. Right. Bumdike Shobar Upore Aduban Ranch Royeche Tampa Sports Authority Board Gawadi Poshu Utpadaner Shathe Prasangik Noi Praktan Shabhaputi Bortoman Noi Banker Praktan Porichalok Prasangik Noi Ebong Bortomano Noi Sefnar Christian Academy Board Gawadi Poshu Shathe Prasangik Noi Freewheel Baptist Church Trustee Etio Gawadi Poshu Shathe Prasangik Noi Bole Dhare Nitshi If you are interested in Rolhart, we have more information for you if you want to talk to them about the future of animal production and the present. OMRFC has provided a number of initiatives, but we were criticized because they were considered to be normal products. Okay, if we go back, we can see that our answers were very similar to those of Aduban Ranch, which had fulfilled the conditions of RFP. The language of all the current political organizations of them was very similar to ours. But we have been accused of saying that they are of ordinary nature. One of the members of the committee said something like this. What is it called to say a member of the party? I think it was not very difficult to guess the meaning of it. And when they wrote practice, they did not mean it. The members of Om Aduban have been considered to be appropriate, or they are not. Something like this has been mentioned in the scoring sheet. Uncertain member of the party. These are not. Ohm 1.6-4.1 is moving forward. It has been said that they are financially successful in the market. The investors say that they are financially successful in the market. Okay, if I had paid $1,50,000 for 32,000 records in 32 years, I would have been financially successful. Ohm, but they are financially successful in the market. There is no fear to say this. When you have such an advantage that you have not made any changes in 32 years or more than my age, you have not made any changes, you have not done anything. Ten years ago, the county first got this and it is like this. They have been providing the same amount of money for so many days. Of course, they are financially successful. There have been many changes in the market in 32 years. There was no computer 32 years ago. Possibly the price was not right to be the same. Our main problem was with the recognition of the public. The representative knows that all the relevant facts have been provided and the committee has discussed all the questions and answers in detail. If that is the case, and if they have seen the current and current results, then even though there are six positive and positive results in the roll heart cattle, why are we considered ordinary by counting the five of the autobahn as their strength? Clearly, they did not read the conditions and the questions as well as they should have read them. This is the answer to the representative. ETI SANGJUKTI BARO Again, Otoban claims that they have a professional track record and many professional committees, and we had no idea about the facts, or we just heard that they did not mention the necessary facts. They did not have such a formal or professional meeting. We have given a lot of detailed facts about the soil, pH, pH and our degree. Here, we have followed the instructions and have given a clear picture. ATOBAN does not provide the necessary detailed data. The data on the ATOBAN has been mentioned and has given a comprehensive data in terms of land size, which has been noted by many members of the committee, sometimes 33,000, sometimes 40,000, which has been changed repeatedly. The ATOBAN has mentioned the Gavadi-Posu-Charan or Gurnan method. Only the story of the forest and soil, RHC, RHC, the relationship of Gavadi-Posu-Shilpa has also given the name of the current and ongoing association, where the ATOBAN has given the title of half-financial and half-inclusive association. And those that were formal, those were just like the rules of R.H.C. There is no such department where the auto-ban tab A has given a more detailed answer to the question. Our subcontractor had fulfilled the requirement of license and license, but our number has been cut for one department. After clarifying the exact date and time, the subcontractor will collect the correct license at that time. There has been no change in the score. During the actual establishment, we had discussed the issues. There has been no change in the score in any way. The Moolayan Committee has only said, no, there is no change in the score. That's it. I think we had nothing important in the entire process. This is only tab A, tab B. This is for introduction, Issue 3, Umm, Our Resistance. This is Issue 5, Botte. Atoban Ranch got 18. They had occupied the land of their own and others. Roll Heart Cattle was our main concern. There was no talika of the private property of the owner of the land. As we said earlier, as it was an extra room to clarify them, as we mentioned in our main introduction, it was written in RFP and Athoba. and or there was talk of a different shape and age. Those who have a child or a child, they know that if you work for others, then your work needs and your mind is running your own company for a long time. If I work for the county, I can't be late. But if I work for myself, who will blame me if I do this? That's why we have only paid rent and land, because they are very concerned about the quality of work. We do not have to provide income to our in-time service, we do not have to pay rent, we do not have to work in this unit independently, or we do not have to keep any property. This is in our own house, in our own property. How can we afford the county's rent to show this? Then, before that, at the Poonarai Daka Sabha, where the committee had spoken on this matter, they said, we and or said, we and or said, Uddriti Chinho, Chamotkar, they had a meeting and said that it was about land or their own land, but they did not do anything and did not change any score. And, um, until the end, they came back to the uproar that had come in the case of the F-Pal license. Nothing has been done. In order not to destroy their own land, two points were cut from here and from the other members of RHC, which was mentioned in the scoring sheet. It was not advisable to destroy their own land. There were only the words of Paridhi and Akar's five different approaches. That's why our points were cut. We wanted to know from our acquaintances about our performance and appeal, why our points were cut. If their own land is not a problem, then why their scoring is not related to their own land? The RFP has been scored outside, and they have spoken about this. They said that we did not need to do this. But then they cut the points and returned the points, which is the correct solution. It is said that the two points that we had mentioned, it has all gone up and they have only said that we should not give four points and four points for each property and other issues. There were other three different components. Our landlord, Malika Nadeen, had no mention of that important question. We have again made it clear that why only IJARA or Jomir Talika was given, our point was cut. As a result, no change has come. According to his statement, the problem was not that IJARA or Malika did not take, but RFP and RFP did not have Talika of those three departments. Then I would like to ask you to show you the availability of Adubon, which is in tab B. This is the first part of their tab B, where the five ideas of the same size and size have been discussed. In response to their own statement, they have also raised the issue of zero interest at the end. However, look at how they have given five shares of the property here. And what they have mentioned about their land has been given here. They did not give zero interest for every five shares of the RFP they wanted. At that time, there was no mention of any property in the account, and the account was not included in the statement. There is no doubt about the success of the project, it is just a matter of history and the current state of India. There is no proof of success in any of the five properties of Talika Bhukta. There is only the mention of the presence of land in one of the five properties, seed cultivation and agricultural development. This is the part of the discussion that we had mentioned earlier that we did not give the Talika of each product as well as possible. We did not write much in detail about them and one of our members first cut 10 points for each of our five ideas. In any case, if you see the answer of Adubon, that they have one of the two parts of TAB-B, that is, the environment and seed production. There are only two points in particular. One point has been said that if we do something, then we will spray or cut the grass. This is the fundamental issue of this population. If you look at the five ideas of Roll Heart Cattle, we have written exactly the same thing, but we have written it five times as needed. This was the introduction of our tab B.A. As you can see here, there is a lot of information about how to spray and control grass. Very good. Look right here. Yes, we have everything. Spray, spray, and cut grass. I think they were right. That is, one of our members has taken 10 points and then 5 points because we did not give the title of that 0.2 section or did not mention all the factors of the five concepts in the title of Aduban Ranch. I have a clip here, where the members of this board are. In the recording, it is seen that they have cut 10 points and then it is suggested to cut 5 points because each property does not have one point.

But what? Isn't it because of the 5 mandandas? So I have seen that as a mandanda. Yes, this is the beginning. I am saying that they have done it and at this stage I may not have that confidence. But then it has been said that the real family is their confidence and how the situation is going, he says, and the main protocol. Is that a separate material for computer accounting at this time?

I could not see the actual performance because I did not see the actual performance of the performance. So, I saw this invisible part as it was. So, you are seeing that. Right. So, she said that they did not see the invisible performance and she cut those points. So, I think in the case of Adubon, it was as good as getting a unique score from two members of the board for only two words. If we were to give five different solutions to the answers to the questions we requested, success, agenda, date, and results, and Aduban has given a common and common answer to many of those questions, then which of the mentioned questions will make Aduban more likely to give points in terms of information? And if we forget the words of success and success, it will not work. The members of the committee who spoke about the undisputed facts, they did not object to any kind of point cutting in order not to mention them. It seems to me that the dentist facilities are being established as if it is a series of applications for any organization. Again, I am only referring to the primary answers, not to any other organization. You know, no one else is buying a separate side drug and this is made based on the fly control concept that has been given to me by all means and has been successfully or slowly implemented. Because the score of Roar Heart Cattle was low, you might think it was due to the presence of Roar Heart. No, no, it was due to the presence of Adubon. It is in the transcripts of Sunani's Bikel 4 pages 88 minutes to Bikel 5 pages 88 minutes long. However, two members gave their own score, even if it was due to the part of their request where our points were cut, they were only told that they did not do so. It makes the same perspective even more interesting that our Bisha Sonu Jai has been used in our score. Ohm is here again. There is a lot more in this part.

All of them. They have added a lot of parts to the proposal, but the parts they have actually added are not visible here. They have a lot of range. This is not right. I did not take this matter seriously. You know, most of them have been associated with it for many years and they have been invited from the 80s. In fact, this is very worrying. I will say the same. Yes, apart from this, they did not mention the reasons for their success. We can only assume that they were successful and that's why they were applauded, because they were ignored. Yes, that's why I took a point for it. In fact, I think I am taking the principle of taking a point. That's why they thought that 5 out of 5 was successful. But I will assume that a committee of education will not ignore someone who is not doing a good job. But they thought 5 out of 5 was successful.

As you can see there, I did not mention their success, they did not mention the docking rate, but let's talk about them. If they do not write down the points for which we have been deducted, 10 points and 5 points, then it is fine if they do not write down the success story. But we have taken it into account because for this reason we have been ignoring them for 32 years. You can take it into account that it is true, but the question is that it has to be there. It was appropriate to deduct points for not writing down one of their needs. If not, we will just be confused and give them a hint. If we go outside, it is a completely different part. I have here the answer to the question about our points of interest, where we have discussed that they do not refer to the topics requested and are not cut for the same point. Maybe that's why they don't know that we had already accessed the public record request through the Aduban proposal during our return. The answer to this question is that we do not have any evidence to prove that the participants did not re-evaluate the score for the problems clearly mentioned. The ombudsman said that this is due to the lack of a clear view of the site as the site of our law firm Trinobhumi Prastuti, Beech Bapon and Akramanattak Udbhit Neumtran. Where is the point of aduban for the lack of success, lack of cleanliness, lack of a clear view of the site, the lack of a clear view of the entire re-evaluated value? Even after the members mentioned that they had forgotten to mention these points, everyone has increased their scores by 18. We had reduced one point from each work. The members had cut points to avoid mentioning all this. Every member had said this. But only one person had said that this had happened. The relatives know that they have read all the questions. They have read all the questions, but until one of them does not write, they have all gone to their dormitories. Then they took an email one or two times. But in the case of Rohard, we did not write anything and they have cut the number for each. There is not a single violation here. Um, and we are not sure that the reason is that a member of the committee, who is an IFAS extension, will not be able to help him from the Aruban Ranch to Leeds. They have mentioned the IFAS, they have mentioned it more than once. They have mentioned that their ranch manager had gone to Florida. I had gone too. Um, I do not keep it under any section or power of our profession. My degree is not in ranch management, but its psychology is a little different. Not a single member has cut a single point for the Aruban Ranch in tapping. The points must definitely be in the process of tapping only. Our problem was that there were members of such a committee who did not know about its presence in the financial committee. Calf Throop Percentage? What? Don't the members know? What is Swine License? If you are an IFAS Hillsborough County Extension and are not a class of Gowbadi Poshu Ranch Management for this IFAS member, who was in Texas that day, you were learning about Calf Throop Percentage. How do the owners of the small business have to operate their business there? How do they not know any of these words? Or could I have clarified it with the members of the committee? Why were they there if they could not make up the same conditions that they thought about their entire business that they had paid us the most and cut off only one point? And yet again, after a brief introduction, they had asked us exactly the same question that they had asked others. After a brief introduction, we were not asked any questions. Only a simple question was asked. Are you the owner of Goru? Did you take Goru Leeds? They were also asked the same question. Oh, what about stewardship? A question of a few seconds that this one IFS member had done, which we could not remember because it was not in line with our 20-minute request, which we were trying to clarify for the score. Oh, that's a problem. This is such a topic that we think proves the most controversial. The subject comes to the field of swine licensing. And when this issue comes, then again we are not saying that the invasive treatment of the Adubon Ranch or invasive fertilizers is not good or that it is not normal. This is really unusual. We cannot compete with it. We are not rejecting it. We do not go to that property year after year. What we need to spray or where to spray, it is difficult to say now. Amra samputti pawar par jokhun apni er kichu angso nie nayan, tokhun amade samputti dekhar ek matro sujog thake shankhipto drive-thru, jekhane sadhushwara bolen, oh, ekhane goru ache. Ja amra amadeur purano uposthapunai bole chilam, ei proshama nelakai amon kichu goru ache jader ekhane thakar katha nai. Oh, hai, etao. Amra ja dekhechi ta kebol rastatheke hi dekhechi. Amra jani na amader ki spray korte habe. Amra jani na kibhabe spray ba chikitsa korte habe karon amra shekhane nahi. It will be difficult for us to give a detailed idea of how to spray each agacha because we will see how. How will we know? We have given the main issues under our subcontractor, where 2,700 below, 2,700 above and 5,700 below. These are the terms that we have kept in mind because we do not know exactly what we need. This property does not need silver. We need other properties. There is no need for this. We cannot give a complete answer like those who have been there for many years. This is why they have mentioned that we have not given any evidence of any of the three types of invasive diseases. That is right. In this section, our problems have not only been related to Borno-Sukor, but also related to Saranjam. This is the Talika of Adubon's Saranjam. If they have more than 40,000 acres of land and only this Saranjam is there, but if you calculate it, you can see that they have almost two tractors in every property. It is said that they have a huge Saranjam Talika, which shows that they can have as much Saranjam as a company. One of the members said the same. This was the roll heart of Saranjam. In the case of our property, it means that there can actually be five tractors in the Lower Green Swamp. We have offered more Saranjam. It was also said in RFP that what will you do to get Saranjam? Shekhane bola chilo, Saranjam thakle ta kibhabe sangroho kara habe. Apni kibhabe janben je eti malika na din ki na, borto mane ache ki na, ar na thakle kibhabe ta arjan kara habe? Amra sehi sab bisod biboron diechi. Aduban kebol boleche, ei amade Saranjam er talika. Ebong talikarti die dieche. We have answered the relevant questions in the RFP regarding Saranjam. Finally, let's talk about the license of Bonno Shukar. The license of Bonno Shukar of Adubon Ranch has not been mentioned once. They also knew that they did not need to stay here. They did not need this. We have stated from the first day of our application that we have a federal swine license. The same ordinary consent for which we had been authorized, was mentioned in the case of the swine license. We knew that this is ours. We have stated that we have a swine license according to the standards of our organization. We have said this again at the time of our application. We have stated this again at the time of our official appointment and appeal. How many times can a person say that he has it, he does not know. And how many times can someone say that they do not have it and there is no need for it. But the representatives had said that we did not comply with the physical license in the first application. Instead, we were made clear by means of just saying this. Until June, it was the same as not to mention their license, that is, the same as it has been shown. We do not know how the six-month delay and three periods are not compatible with PDF. But it seems that this is how the current issue is going on. The members of the committee did not know what the feral swine license actually was. We thought this was their job. They don't know what the license is. In the case of the county, this is the only possibility. Because we had mentioned this. This was the main budget committee. We had definitely mentioned that we have this. If they do not know what this is, they will discuss it. We had said on the first 8th January mission that we have a swine license. Then on the 31st of January, he also said to write a report. And then on the 9th of January, he also said this. Members of the committee were told what license is required for their liege. This is the requirement according to the Leeds condition. It was said in RFP that this is illegal. It was said there to comply with this. RHC did not comply with this. We had a 50% limitation. We had said that we have a license. We had mentioned that the owner has a license. If they had asked us the next day, we would have provided it with them. We had said that we have a license for both of us and we had complied with the email with the license number and surname. There was no mention of Adubon in RFP. According to Adubon's report, it was specifically stated in 9 February that they do not need to have a license. 9 of them did not say anything about the license or anything like that. You will believe that if you do not need it, then you will not say anything about it. Whatever it is, it was a joke after our other reports. How did they get Sam Logg's license in County? Here is their main RFP which says that we have received 240 Feral Hogs in the last 12 months. I am taking a statement from their INGB. They have said in response, whatever it is, our request has been made clear that we do not use sugar, so we do not need any license. But if they really know what the meaning of the license is, then they have said that if you work to hold sugar, then you need it. In their RFP, I have highlighted here that There are currently five deaths in total. This was also part of our response. After the initial establishment, where RHC said that the need for these was to be met with the county administration, which did not give consent to these requests. There are various types of emails for consent. Someone had asked the FDACS and State Veterinarian for a license contact by email, and had taken Sam Loss's license certificate. Um. Because we didn't know about his identity until we got to know about his identity. So I'm saying again, the girl from the other county took the license from the FDACS with her. The girl from the other county wanted to know about the date of the license from the bailiff. When they once noted that it was before them. The county gave them time until the end of the day to discuss the license with the lawyer of the other county on June 5 and June 10. On June 18, the last event to be held was Naimi, where we held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for the first time on January 31st and held the event for There was no need to take time until the end of your day. Either there was no need for 5 days or 10 days, or there was no need for this short time from February to June. Residents knew that this was the equivalent of 4.18.2. I am not sure who was asked to provide the license and the veterinarian, FDACS, emailed the county attorney to give them more time and see how the equalization can be done. But again, I don't think the issue is like this everywhere. This is the answer of the dealer. As no request has been submitted for this amount, the county considers these three as a small amount and has agreed equally. It is not appropriate to be a small amount. This is RFP, RFP, otherwise necessary. We have paid a small amount for other small amounts. Why not in this case? I think this is not a proposal for us, it is a proposal for them. I do not understand that you did not know the source and did not ask to submit it within five months, how to email a single person and we never know when it came, it is equal. Other than that, 4.4.18.2 states that for the county, the highest number of offers will be given in terms of the number of discussions and the availability of all the facts. Actually, I don't understand how we were given equal recognition. In our case, why didn't the state or FDACS, FDACS or the Secretary of State email them? We don't have to give it at the end of the day. It doesn't matter if you put it in front of you, because here it is said that all the fees must be tested once every 24 hours. You are telling me that a person who lives inside the property, can he test all the five fees of a large property in 24 hours? This is the email that we had given to our client where they had said that we did not give our physical license number. If you look closely, the license number is there. We do not have our official address, we have only given an email in our appeal where it is written that here is your Swine Dealer License Number. The representative says that we did not give this to that girl before. Of course, it is here. The email with the license number is the one that we submitted on the day of our performance, which was January 31st. The only place we got the license for the agreement was here. An email from Aaron Cardenas to Dr. Bailey. Sam Logg's license was issued on February 26, 2026. If you see, on February 26, 2026, the date after the announcement was announced that there was no need for their signature. After we spoke, they said they needed it. This is an email sent to Ethan Carsey of INGB Shimburg. It is written here. When did they get it? They said that He has a license for the county. We did not know that he has a license for the county and we did not know until June 5 that he would get the recognition. Again, June 10. It is written here that he lives in the property. This is his own license. This has been confirmed. Since 2015, he has had this license. Amazing car. Those were called Talika Bhutto. So it was not possible to issue any car to the Audubon Ranch. We did not say that. It is difficult for me to believe that people are taking everything out and there is no connection with the sale or disposal of the Audubon. Where I requested a FOI, Pat Thompson and his son, from the Audubon Ranch, Sefnar's Lower Green Swamp Shogun Farms, to reach Gavadi Poshu, I found a record. I would have liked to give this, but due to the time limit, they did not have as much time in their hands. This is what the authorities claimed that only this place is in their possession, that they have a license or not, and ask them to deposit it. It does not seem to go outside at the same time. I don't think this is the same kind of discrimination and discrimination. This is what I said on Monday. If you want, I have a copy for you, sir. From ATFDX, Nebhaja says that this is an old record, which was originally made for the people for the establishment of its license issued in 2015. It now has a new facility, a mailing address, and it was made by mistake. February 26, 2026 At that time, they will definitely change the location of their facility, where this license will be used to hold the case. If you look at the F-Ducks from the public record request, you will see that there is a batil written there. Sam Lowe was never a owner. He was just a ranch manager. I thought he was a ranch manager, Pat, who had a degree from Florida University. He is now living in Australia. The new owner was Dennis Carlton. The location was Honor Murphy Road. There was no case in the property. He is in Australia and there is a batil written there. This is a different location. Clearly, he did not have any license for the Lower Green Swamp. If you look here, his residence for the Lower Green Swamp, where the Lower Green Swamp is located, which he claimed to be his, was done on February 4, 2026. Only two answers were given, after our response was sent, where it was said that they do not have it and they do not need it before applying for their INGB. Then the facility was updated and for this facility, their license was not issued before February 26, 2026. At the time of the RFP submission, they did not fulfill their requirements. They said that they did not do it, but the county has somehow gone too far. So, in a sense, our question is simple. All these patterns, all these various things that they have taken, they have still got a good score. Is it because the county did not get any money in the year to empty the property and they do not want to take a new loan compared to the loss of the last 32 years? I do not know why they did not look at it in the same way. But the question is that if we kept the names side by side and gave the name of Aduban in exchange for the first time, would they have paid more seriously? They have been asked for the same issues, which are not included in the committee members' discussion or submitted documents. Therefore, we request you to reverse the principle of introduction and to refer to our RFP, RFP and T for our opinion on the issues discussed. Because we do not object to the reasons that we have seen and the main problem was that there was no independent view in the case of UBHOI PAKHHA Jogguta MULLAYAN.

That's right. What else, Janab?

The most important thing for us is that whatever we have done to come to this education, it seems to be very meaningless. It seems that we had been talking about losing from the beginning. We have seen that no one else has beaten us, because everyone thought that they had no chance of winning, that the current leader is holding such a short time that the county will repeat their negligence, so it is impossible for others to lose. Which is really a very important issue. We had said this to the first speaker. Even if we cannot say that we have had the property for many years, we have fulfilled all their wishes and other conditions. In the case of the written answer, we have been very seriously investigated, which was not without any doubt and the matter is very clear. We just hope that you will review everything again, see our points and solve our problems with our mistakes. Tell us about the mistakes we have made in their case. We just hope that someone will see everything in a unique way, will write down the names, will understand what your personal values or impressions are. You will see how the investors worked and the mistakes that were discussed in the meeting. So, I thank you. I hope you can give me that power point. I thought you would give it.

Okay, thank you. Okay, Mr. Simbarg, I think it's your turn now. You can. Okay, we will take 5 minutes break. Yes, I have kept it there. Okay, thank you. If they are too small, it would be better if you sent me one of them in email. I was about to say the same. Yes, I can do that too. That would be great.

Thank you. I will give you this in PDF, then you will have one in every page.

Is that too good?

Okay. The way it has to be printed in PowerPoint? Yes, that would be great. Okay, absolutely.

Thank you.

Don't forget to send all the pages like this.

Okay. Thank you. I think I have this with me, but there is no problem. Thik ache. Aapni ki prostoot, Mr. Simbard? Aami aapna ke kichu khawar shomai dhare phelechi. Aami buchte parchi. Dukkhi to. I am starting in a minute, but I want to start by saying something to you. Let it be clear here. What is inside? Whatever you think is my golden need. Yes. Possibly. Until when? I hope so. Bishwetir upor bhitti kare. Jogtik bhitti, rupo karthe naye, jano eti kono prokolpoi na ebong theek ache. Federal aini ja tar kache chawa hoyni. Bholhartare rupo sthapito proman, jodi ta jatheshto hoye amita nitchi. Eti hawa uchit. I am lucky enough to represent them and I do it. What rights do they have in this property? It has been mentioned several times for a short time. Okay, I think this is really a great announcement. Dennis Carroll Sr., Dennis Carroll Jr. has the right to their protected land. Counties take more than three decades. They have done extraordinary work in animal husbandry in that property of Mobile County. And it is clear that the leach is going on at that time. So it is not right to consider it as any kind of profession. I will say that they do not have the opportunity to work only with these people. What is their name? 1,000 acres means 1,000, 1,000. They are part of this breed. This is a part of the breed. Greater Central Florida's Gawabadi breed. This should be taken into account. And I hope. This is something new today. I think what Ms. Turner said has something to do with it. They were talking about this chart. They had taken a different mentality from their devotion. They didn't say anything about it. It was meant to be taken in the sense of a weakness. In fact, Mr. Stromer has mentioned this letter many times on June 15, 2016, that we have come to the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion that we have reached the conclusion At that time, the participants in those sections got less points. They got less. In those sections. And if you look at the clips, you will understand that they clearly said that the issue of the power of the participants was there. The weakness of those proposals has been evaluated. People had given their consent for the week of war. And I will say that they do not clearly state any strength or weakness. In terms of value and their view of gold, if you use the facts that will be given to the county in the evaluation council. They took a guess at the answer and gave their own answer with the score. And they gave the answer according to what they were told to do. Miracle. It should be seen differently. And the subject they did not discuss today was category number. This is actually one of them. It was not in the sense of weakness. It was a rule that the county should get 50 points. This was the rule. They got 50 points. That section. Everyone else but 4.0 in all sections. In their sense. Each of them got 5.02 points. Again, the division that was lost today was a division. They were not neutral. They were in a state of weakness. There were many issues, such as a division and About the economic aspect and this track record. As a human being, they have mentioned 700 acres of land in the settlement in this area, and they were the first in the picture of the whole place. Muralayan committee has done muralayan through various means and has seen the progress. Which one? The one who lived there was a carpenter. It is said that what they were asked to do was given to them. The property that they had to give. All this is going on in the middle. This artist and they talked about them. Fun. Where did you talk? Did you say there? Okay. Mulla and Karira there. Only there and those who did not participate, it was the same record in such a situation where people said, okay, I have given this, but I am saying this is the same and when you see the question and answer record of the investors, then the investors understood their work as a organization. Now I am inviting you from Webstar Abhidhan. It is the common denominator among humans that we have received in today's prayer meeting. The Jatis are comparing this and saying, Biden and with them. Okay, you have raised this issue and Big Go. Okay, that's not it. I will say Mr. Street and Big Go. That's not a problem, you said. Oh, they said one problem, they have proven on the surface that they have a swine license. And on the surface, they have not provided their bond and request. It is considered to be a small fraud. If they give you this proof in the future, they can leave. They said, Oh, I could get a copy of ours. I want to say, they have given you another 25. They did not give the county the money. They said this is a swine license. Each is under the Real License Department of 2015. Today, they have a paper letter of 177 in the county reference. Uposthapona. Tar license chilo. Ebong jodi eti kono somosha na hoi, tabe kono somosha ni. Ubhoi uposthapokeri swine license chilo. Ebong jodi ebong amra bolechi eti ekti fiberer daitto. Amar license ekti somosha. ATAE somosha ti niye ase ebong ami sudhu. Puro path tao. They can be different for different people. And the subject was discussed based on the shape and size of the operation. Conclusion Another subject was the extra step, the extra step of the intervention, i.e. to say in a visual way that the subject of our relative shape and size was given. 800 acres. I don't know how 700 acres are. 700 acres. What has happened to 700 acres? Their size is different. I had a flower. They said this because I was there. They said this. People gave. They said they told me to buy more than one. They said they might be able to take two. You can say it was a short. Not good. Not good. Aami eti khuja payechi. Bera. Oiko matto. Mullayon kari. They want to be. They. They. This is for a payment. I like this. There was a line about the same school, the same school was over. But every department was divided into the department where the patient was. The time period. Pricing. What were the needs of the transcript Pricers and what were they doing here? Their strengths were known. Their weaknesses were known. And this weakness is a good point. They don't have any problems. They are very quiet, they don't have any fear. As one. Kono bitti chharai je eti spashtotoi bhul chilo na. Bitti kare. Upo lobdho. Rekorder upor bitti kare jamun. Cheye chilo je bhulbosoto ajker apilti kebol. Upo kari. The principle will be in the personal check of the county court, which you wanted to return for a short time. You will get it, I will let them speak at the end, so keep it in mind. We will come back there soon. Okay, county. Yes.

Dhoor Chai

I was able to listen to you. At the end of the day, the Udbeg Committee has announced that this renewable energy is not suitable for agricultural development or land use. One of the members has specifically noted that turf and ornamental renewable energy are not located in the natural area and cannot be used for land use. According to RHC, the point has been cut due to the lack of information provided by the FPL. It does not hold any role in the score of the stolen goods. The score was made based on the opinion of the members of the committee. The RACC claims that the RACC has miscalculated the quotation cost point in the 10th round, which is not compatible with human-like financial conditions, and there was no interest in any other use other than the full amount in any section. There is nothing in Avedon that allows the county to use major expenses instead of major expenses or does not limit scoring only to the full amount. In the case of ATRH or RFP scoring, it is a human-like challenge and it is by no means impossible. According to the third issue, RHC claims that the MULLAYAN committee has used an unprecedented scoring method in the MULLAYAN tab, which has resulted in unequal and disadvantageous scoring. For tab B, the MULLAYAN committee has discussed the implementation of the UBHAI farm and has achieved an appropriate personal score in the context of the committee's discussion. Then, a weak point score has been provided for each farm. The fourth issue, RHC has claimed that they have fulfilled the licensing requirement of the Borno-Sukor Dispensary, because they had submitted a copy of the license of a Borno-Sukor dealer, but the Moolayan Committee is unable to accurately describe this fact. RHCRO has claimed that even though the autobahn is somewhere wrong, it has mistakenly obtained the highest technical score. At the end of the day, the county has considered this deposit as a small interest and has paid the same amount for the farm as it did for the other two dealers. However, the need for licensing has not affected the score of RHC. Fifth Issue The RGC states that the Moolayan Committee has focused on the current ownership of the auto ban and has not given a detailed statement on the ownership of the auto ban or any other property. The auto ban has also provided a statement on the ownership of the auto ban in the Gawadiposu Reservoir and the Lower Green Swamp Preserve, as well as on Central Florida, as well as on other Gawadiposu Reservoirs and public works. Apart from that, it is an effective way to determine the performance of the current business at the time of payment. This can work in the direction or opposite direction of the current business owner. If the Moolayon Committee did not determine the performance of the current work of Ottoban, then it would not be considered as part of the discussion. Issue No. 6. According to the RGC's policy and the county's most important terms, the county can determine the most important terms of any project that can be adopted by the 4.3 Lakh people and the full capacity of this policy is only the county. According to the draft draft, the agency's position or purpose should be considered if it is unlawful or unlawful, if it is unlawful or unlawful, if it is unlawful or unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if it is unlawful, if After discussing the issue with the minister, the county has decided that the Moolayan Committee has worked in a fair and fair manner, has discussed the practical facts and has used their power in a fair and fair manner through a transparent Moolayan process. This was the feeling of their opposition to the award. The Hillsborough County Moolayan Committee did not find any reason to oppose or deny the change in opposition. If the hearing master has permission, I would like to ask Mr. Scott Stommer to solve some issues related to Arc Solutions. Okay, Mr. Stommer, what is your name and where do you work? Scott Stommer, Procurement Director, Hillsborough County. How long have you been working in the county? Um, almost 12 years. Okay. What are your responsibilities and responsibilities in your field? I am in charge of all the procurement or purchase of the county. Okay. Are you involved in the procurement of the Lower Green Swamp Govadi Poshu Charo Nijara Sanctuary? Yes. How was that? That has been carried out by our department and my team has carried out such a process. Right. You have heard about some of the claims made by RGC today. Yes, right. First of all, will you tell the hearing master that what is the scoring in terms of consensus scoring or weakness? The consensus scoring will be determined by each member of the Moolayan Committee, the proposal and the recommendations. They will do this separately from each other. They will come to this meeting and the convenience of the consensus will be that the entire committee will get the approval, the success and the success of the discussion, and then they will decide a common score by reaching a general agreement. They do this together for the sake of everyone's safety and safety. However, this is different from scoring. Is this correct? Yes, it is correct. In the case of scoring, they will give the scores, they will come with them, and this will be just a technical problem. We just score and score them. This morning, several other issues were raised that were not their main concern. One of them was the need for a comprehensive approach to scoring. And the successor was one of the members of the Moolayan Committee, Sarthe Sanghat, who was associated with the IFAS-IFAS extension. Can you remember that? I remember it from this morning's presentation. But I don't remember any of these two. Okay. Do you have any idea about their claims? No, because this is the first time I've heard of it. Okay. I will just say that since I am only listening to this, it is not easy for me to study it. I have no idea. It is not easy to answer it or do anything else. Really, these are new topics. And these are not affecting you in any way or changing you. No. One moment. Okay, can you guess why there was no mention of a non-existent Swine License under the name of ARC-Cesar Adubon? RFP, RFP, etc. were talking about the need for an ordinary Swine License. However, they were doing this process and did not mention it in that way. But at the end of the day, RFP said that they were following the Florida law. And they have said that no one has submitted this, as the truth is known to all, so we have consulted with the state to find out whose license it was. Keep in mind that those who have a license now have the right to change their license at the time of lease. They do not have to be with the same person. They only have to follow Florida law and they only have to have a license or license to carry out their own process if they do any work for which they need their own license. Okay. Okay, can the protestors present any new evidence or evidence that they did not protest in time? No, this is strictly forbidden. Why? Why not? Because I have no reason to investigate it as part of the case. I have no reason to investigate any of these. I actually do not have any reason to talk about this. To be honest, this is very unfair. Okay. I am Barnaby. I want to call another witness. But do you want Mr. Starnoberg to ask a question now or later? Take all the evidence. We will ask a question later. Okay. Next is Forrest Terbyville. If you are sitting in the back, I request you to come forward and if you are sitting in front of the judge, Good morning, Mr. Reel. Please tell me your name and make a statement for the court. Of course. My name is Forrest Tarbibhil. T-U-R-B, son, I-B, Victor, I-L-L-E. Okay. And where do you work? Hillsborough County. Okay. What do you do? I am a conservation environmental lands management. Okay. When we had this conversation this morning, were you with him? Yes, I was. I was the chairman of the committee. Okay. How long have you been involved in this kind of work? Almost 23 years. Correct. And you are familiar with the issue this morning because you participated in it. And you? Did you join the committee or someone else? Someone else did this. Someone else. Correct. Yes. Was the MULLAYAN committee against the RFP and licensing requirements? No, I don't think so. Okay. And why are you keeping this situation? There was a discussion on some issues during the formal discussion, but I did not notice any major mistakes in the FP&L or its requirements. Do you know anything about any representation of the County or Moolayan Committee against RHC? No, I did not note any representation during the discussion or ranking. Do committees have to sign in such a form that tells them that they have no right or anything like that? Yes, RFP, RFP, at the beginning of the process, all members of the committee have to fill a form of association agreement. And in this case, what had been done? Yes, that's right. In the case of MULLAYAN COMMITTEE, ADUBAN, AUDABAN and RHC, RHC, MULLAYAN was used in the case of that MULLAYAN. I do not consider this amount in the context of my discussion and the ongoing discussion of the proposed budget. And I think we have discussed this before, but is this the first opportunity to work as a member of your budget committee? No, in the last 23 years, I have served as the head of the budget committee at least twice or thrice. Please wait for an hour. From Mr. Trimble's side, there is nothing else at this time, Mr. Bartley.

Right.

Do you want to do anything else at this time? I have a few questions. At this time, Mr. Bartley. Yes. He is with me. Mr. Trimble has given me an answer to a question. So I want to talk. I have a question. Yes. Procreatee samparke, um, jokhon. Aami dhare nitchi Mr. Stromar er barno na, ja kora hoe chilo, taa ei nirdishto khetre ja ghotetche tar sathe samanjo sopurno, arthat manus tader rating niye ashche. Then, there is a general discussion about them and their opinions, and then there is an evaluation of the entire committee, and that is the same rating, the selected rating, which is presented in front of the decision-maker. That selected rating is created based on the evaluation of all members of the committee. The members of the committee are not only specialised in their own field, but they are especially involved in this type of RFP from their perspective. And yes, what I have seen in this committee, the discussions, It was completely consistent with such a committee, which has kept the truth and certainty, and in the most accurate way, the RFP's Tab A, B and C are considered to be the specifications of the work carried out. This was an RFP, so it is correct. This is related to my opinion. I have a colleague or employee. Um, can this have any effect on your fixed income? I do not understand what has been said. So I do not know why it will have an effect. It should not have any effect. But those who are investing in these RFPs are all county employees. So, I could not understand. I said I heard this first time in this business. So, I can understand that you heard this first time and it was a little surprising because I did not think I saw something like this. I will come back to this business again because I want to know a little more about it. Um, okay. Um. Oh, Mr. Strowman. There was some discussion that Did you give a warning that they didn't do it? Um apnar dekha tohther bhittite, eteki apnar matamater kono poribartan hoyeche? Na, swine er khetre amonta hoye ni. Onnotir khetre o na. Tai, hai, na, tamonta hoye ni. Ebong ami jani na ghatonar pore ki ghotetche. Abar o bolchi, amra podokkepti niechillam karun eti sarbu sadharane jono unmukto chilo, ebong amra nijera shei license kulo jachai korechi. Ebong abar o bolchi, ja proyojon taholo tader Florida ar ayn mene cholti habe, thik jamonta tader kitnashok license er khetre o mante hoye. Tai, kono kichui amar mato poribartan kore ni. Okay. Um, I don't have any other questions regarding this matter. Mr. Sharer, you said that you need some time after they finish. I am not sure if it is in this matter or not, so I am giving you that help. Just for a little discussion. That's right. Oh! Let's see. Mister, I have a question. Before that, this is for you to change your clothes. Um, I have a question about your possible crime. Um, you gave a hint that you think someone has made a mistake. But then there was a thing that you think there could be a crime. Can you tell me a little more about this?

I have received a reply from Mr. Trudell today, he did not say so. Sutorang, for the sake of the project, give them health and do what he said about cutting 5 points. To keep the rule hard and not to mention the second bullet point and not to label all my related sites separately as a bullet point, it was delayed. At that time, I did not know that this was Parishebar Autabhukto. They did a lot of the same in the case of Adubon. This is more of their big, green project. So we did not mention his name there. We did not know that it was that site, but he and he you know. It was the same number that has cut most of our points in this section. Keep in mind that they had done the same work initially for Adubon and then moved to Atharok in some way. It was that they took the day slowly like this. All the white people were from Atharok, but I will say that it was their friend. We did not budget for such issues. All the other members who had budgeted, why did not they budget? I want to say that they said that I am sorry. What? What? Which member of the committee did this? Okay.

Okay, that's a different question. But I want to know the real reason. What did you think was the real reason? Why do you think she gave more importance to Adubon than others? That's right. That's right. I will let him finish the rest of his presentation. And I will continue the discussion.

We should give permission to report that you had said something negative about us. And you were told that you will not be able to give this answer. The truth is clear, but they did not say anything negative about us. And so it is clear that they will not be able to give any answer. Completely what? The reference to that sentence is not correct because you are not allowed to answer it and it has been allowed to answer during our discussion. We also did not get the opportunity to discuss it. In short, they are saying something that they had mentioned, that was in our interest and we could not answer because their work was over after our question. That sentence is something that I can think of. This is something that was said. We agree that this is a similar sentence. Whatever it is, if the scores that had been given for the qualification are not based on the score, then you cannot get a good qualification if it is not reflected in what was said. Therein lies our problem. It was for that. In the case of the license, they are saying how the location and water environment have changed and in our opinion, we had the email. The department said that they did not issue any license number in the email and it is kept in the catalog. However, we will give you a brief description of the yellow card. Whatever it is, this is the truth that we had mentioned in our opinion, what had happened, that is the proof. I had mentioned that they do not know how to respond to my response regarding its sustainability, which I had never mentioned before. I did not get any description of the same file. They did not issue the right issue, which was sent from Garbel's side on January 29, 2016, where there was an independent press. After affiliation, the new topic I am referring to has been mentioned in some parts that you use this every month. Tab A and Tab B matrix was in one. Right, the main part, Tab A, the questions were answers. I don't think so, they have done their best. And after the affiliation on the 20th, when they did this, it was right for them to do this. I didn't find any difference in their natural presence. In fact, June, you don't need to be able to do this first place because I didn't find any difference. You can see what's going on in the words of IFAZ. Okay. Something that proves that this was not with me, this was not with me. Okay, okay. You are saying that this was a problem. Note that this was with us. You have noted once again that this was with us. We had said that I was afraid because we did not give any package. Again, say that it is not present in a clear way and say that it is not appropriate to say that it is not appropriate to say that it is not present in a clear way. I think we gave it to the contractor, we asked them to mail it and asked them, you know, you must have driven it with a lot of effort. The email was given with the same problem. And of course they had a lot of questions that what does it mean that you don't believe that they should do it. Was it a person or was it actually a person that had to be tested? Did it really happen? Umm, I may have found a way to prove it and some members have suggested that they should have kept their license as a person rather than a person. They don't know whether it should be a personal client or not. And I don't know whether it should be a personal client or not. But they didn't know which license department at that time, because Arvikebol said you two things.

Right. IFAS, University of Florida. What do you do? What do you use? No. Do you use them? And how do you use IFAS for records? We use it for their irrigation. This is just scientific knowledge. If we need irrigation in our field, if we need irrigation or we send soil samples, then it goes and how much soil pH it sends back. IFAS is designed for farmers and farmers so that they can know about their new science, that is, about the type of grass. This is just a fact tool that we use. IFAS is a plant. And again, you don't give money for something like this. Okay. Okay. I wanted to know this. Okay. Anything else? I thank everyone. Yes, everyone has received their invitations very well. And so, now, now, now, it is my responsibility to give an answer within 5 working days. Um. Sekhane bola nahi je aami jodi transcript pete chahi, tabe ki habe? Um. Poh. Poh. Eta khobi druto. Um. Sutorang. Um. I think I need a transcript for this, if you don't mind. And after I get the transcript, I will answer it within five days. Is it a customer service for everyone? Is it a customer service for the county? Yes. Is it a customer service for Rohide? And for the intervener? Wonderful. Okay. Yes, sir. I don't mind.

Actually.

Thank you. If you send me those case sites and you are going to do it. That's fine. Fine. I, I, no, I will not let you do that. But if you want to send me the case sites outside of the original article, I think that's fine. Roll Heart's case is the same. I am ready to accept them. Okay. Um, I don't think it's necessary. Um, I don't have anything else to say outside. I don't have anything else to say. Our interview is over because I have one more. Thank you. Whom