City Commission - Regular Meeting
The City Commission approved two proclamations, one declaring May 2026 as ALS Awareness Month and another declaring May 3-9, 2026, as National Small Business Week. The Commission also discussed and approved several consent agenda items, including event agreements and a significant amendment to a recreation license agreement with the School Board of Broward County. A key discussion point was the city manager's annual performance review, which generated varied feedback from commissioners and the public.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Commission
- Meeting Type
- City Commission
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Meeting Date
- May 5, 2026
Transcript
1427 sections (from 1,698 segments)
Everybody, and welcome to the city commission meeting this 05/05/2026. Thank you all for being here today. We have quite a long agenda, so we'll try to get through it tonight. Just to let some folks know that after the consent agenda, we're going to break and go back to the afternoon agenda in which we're talking about a a park design plan that was proposed for the beach. So for those of you who are here for the first time, welcome.
We begin our meetings with the pledge of allegiance, a moment of silence, and then we have some special presentations tonight. We have two tonight. So if I could please invite Shauna Roberts, Zuri Williams, and Zoe Williams to please join me by the podium so we can all do the pledge of allegiance together. And may I ask you all to please rise? How are you? You all good? You all set? Put your your right hand on your heart. Do you your that's it. Very good. And you may begin.
The rose my lightness is the flag of The United States Of America and to a clever one nation on a god invisible lives here just for all.
Spell that.
Token of our appreciation. Thank you so much. You wanna take a picture?
Yeah. Come on.
We're gonna go in front? Okay.
Come on, mom. You come see. No. No. I can't. Okay. I mean, how do they represent, sir? How pretty? Very
good. Thank you.
Okay. At this moment, I'd like to invite everybody to share in this moment of silence. And tonight, keep especially in your thoughts, the following people who recently passed away, Mary Cotton, Hattie Corley, Dorothy Bailey Young, and Joseph Almaturo. Thank you. Okay.
Thank you so much. At this time, I also like to take a point of privilege to announce some recent retirees in our from our our community. These are, individuals who have worked with the city for more than twenty years. We have Yvette Martinez, police officer, who's been with us twenty three years. Thank you, Yvette, for your service to our city.
We have Derek Armstrong, who is a paramedic firefighter, who's been with us twenty three years. Thomas Filia, who is a firefighter, been with us twenty five years. And Ricardo Pardo, who's captain in fire rescue, who's been with us twenty seven years. So thank you so much for your service. Okay.
Hard shoes to fill, but, thank you for your service. So, before we vote on the agenda, we have a few announcements. We have a walk on resolution calling for a special election to be held on 11/03/2026 to elect a city commission candidate, with regard to commission District 1 and to establish a qualifying period for the special municipal election. Second walk on is a resolution providing notice of intent to enter into a comprehensive agreement for a qualifying project for the Melrose Manor stormwater improvement projects. And the third walk on is a resolution providing notice of intent to enter into a comprehensive agreement for a qualifying project for the Riverland stormwater improvement project.
Also, r five, the CAM was updated to add exhibit two resolution to the CAM, and exhibit two resolution was added. So, may I hear
a motion to approve the agenda and the minutes as, as amended?
Move. Second. To move the seconded, please call the roll. Oh, first of all, let's call the roll of the commission.
Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glassman? Here. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Here. Vice mayor Sorensen? Here. Mayor Trentos?
Here. Now please call the roll on the vote to regarding the, agenda and the minutes. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And the the minutes and the agenda as amended have now been approved. So let us begin with the presentations. I'd like to ask and invite our vice mayor, vice mayor Ben Sorensen, to present a proclamation regarding amio amyotrophic lateral sclerosis awareness month in the city of Fort Lauderdale. And if I can please ask Gabriel Walker and Tina Duane and, Sadia Polagun of the ALS Association to please join the vice mayor. Are any of you folks here?
Thank you. Come on up. Thank you for being here.
Yeah. I
I have.
Oh, okay. Good to good to see you, Gabriel. Thanks for being here. Thank you. Well, this is in recognition of ALS month here in the city of Fort Lauderdale. I'm want to share this with you and then ask you to share some some words would be fantastic. And just share with me Gabriel's mom has ALS, so this is especially meaningful for you. So thank you for being here, Gabriel. Yeah. Whereas ALS, also commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease, is a progressive, fatal, neurodegenerative disease in which a person's brain loses connection with their muscles, slowly reducing a person's ability to walk, talk, eat, and eventually breathe.
Whereas thousands of new ALS cases are diagnosed each year, and on average, every ninety minutes one person is diagnosed, while another loses their life to the disease. Whereas the causes of ALS remain largely unknown, there is no known cure, and certain populations, including military veterans, face a higher risk of developing the disease. And whereas the ALS Association is the largest philanthropic funder of ALS research globally, having committed more than $154,000,000 to support over five fifty projects across The United States and 18 other countries, while also providing critical support services to individuals and families affected by ALS. And whereas ALS Awareness Month provides an opportunity to increase public awareness of the challenges faced by people living with ALS, recognize the profound impact of the disease on individuals and their families, and encourage support for ongoing care. Now, therefore, we as city commissioners of the City Of Fort Lauderdale proclaim May 2026 as ALS month here in the city dated this May, June May 2026, signed your mayor, Dean Jay Trantellis.
Hello, everyone. I would like to thank the city of Fort Lauderdale, for their decisive action in, making this proclamation. I sent a auto generated email that was created by the ALS Association, and I was not expecting to be here tonight. So thank you again to the city of Fort Lauderdale. Thank you to the ALS Association for all the work that they do, and thank you for the support that you have provided to my mom. It's not easy, living with a person who has ALS. I wrote some stuff down, but, you know, I would like to speak about my mother, Iris Cortova Martin. ALS has taken many things from her. It's taken her ability to walk. It has taken her ability to even raise a cup of coffee to her own lips.
It will take her voice away soon, and eventually, it will take her life. Those are not easy things to say, and I've come to terms with that in my own way. Maybe my mom hasn't. Maybe the rest of my family hasn't. I'm here today to talk about that because it sucks.
But importantly, it's taken away her agency. My mom has always been the matriarch of my family. She did everything for everyone, and we are picking up a lot of slack now. It's hard. It really is.
It has given me some things for diagnosis. It has given me some time to grieve with my mother. I don't think many people get that opportunity to grieve alongside the person who's dying. It's given me the opportunity to speak to her and tell her all the things that I have to say and things that maybe I didn't wanna say earlier before, you know, she goes. It has given me time to reflect on the foundation that my mom has provided for me, but also for my family, for my brother.
It's given me new perspective on what I wanna see from my own life. But, yeah, this is dedicated to my mom, Iris Martin. Thank you.
everyone. I'm the development manager for South Florida. I just wanna thank the city commission and, first importantly, Gabriel, for what you did. Your mother's a hero, and I want you to know that. And I also want you to know anything that you all are able to do to support all we do at the association means so much, and you are heroes too. Thank you, guys.
Thank you so much, vice mayor. I appreciate it. Our next presentation, I'd like to invite, commissioner Glassman to present a proclamation regarding National Small Business Week here in the city of Fort Lauderdale. And in doing so, I'd like to invite the following persons to accompany him at the podium. Russ Clint from the Economic Development Advisory Board, Alison Myers also from the board, doctor Kimray Mizelle Hill, and David Lang, both from the Economic Development Advisory Board.
From the Hispanic Heritage Chamber, Mary Sol Mary Sol Gonzalez. From Broward County Library, Frank Panetti. From the NFTE Arrow, that's Daniel Williams. Todd Holt and David Coddington from the Greater Fort Lauderdale Alliance. Portia Garcia, director of community services here in our city, Katrina Johnson, assistant director of c d CSD, and then the following four people from the economic development division, Melissa Mata, Sharda Sobers, Vaughn Howard, and Amber Cabrera.
I wanted the rest of all of you come on up here now. Let's just let's get everybody up here. Okay. Thank you, mayor. Good evening, everybody.
It's a pleasure to present this proclamation from the office of the mayor, city of Fort Lauderdale, in recognition of National Small Business Week. Whereas for more than sixty years, the United States Small Business Administration has celebrated National Small Business Week, recognizing the vital contributions of America's entrepreneurs and small business owners to the strength of our economy and communities. And whereas small businesses play a critical role in economic growth, representing approximately 97% of all businesses in Broward County and serving as a driving force behind local job creation and innovation. And whereas the Greater Fort Lauderdale Alliance serves as a key partner in advancing economic growth in the region, providing leadership and strategic support for business attraction and expansion. And whereas the AERO Small Business Expo provides Fort Lauderdale entrepreneurs with access to vital resources that strengthen the foundation of the local business community and whereas the City of Fort Lauderdale's Economic Development Division in collaboration with community partners and members of the Economic Development Advisory Board, supports small businesses through targeted initiatives and programs, including Cis Drunk Community Talks, StartUp FTL, and the building business with Impact Pitch Competition, connecting entrepreneurs to capital, mentorship and growth and long term success.
And whereas the innovative tools such as SizeUp FTL empower small business owners with data driven insights to benchmark performance, identity opportunities and make informed decisions, supporting a more competitive and sustainable business environment And whereas, during National Small Business Week twenty twenty six, the City of Fort Lauderdale launches the Small Business Big Impact Shop Local campaign, celebrating the entrepreneurs and industries that define each commissioned district and encouraging neighbors and visitors to support local businesses. Now, therefore, we, as City Commissioners of the City Of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, do hereby proclaim May 2026, as National Small Business Week in the city of Fort Lauderdale and urge the residents of our community and communities across the country to support small businesses. Dated this, the May 2026, and signed by the mayor, honorable dean j Trentalis.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay. As we proceed into the agenda, at this point, we'd like to, ask each member of the commission if they have any item from the consent agenda that they would like to pull and vote on separately. Let's see. We're gonna do that for the consent agenda. Okay. Some people have signed up to speak on the consent agenda items, but we'll see if any of them are gonna be pulled. Commissioner, Herbst, do have any mem any items of the consent agenda? Okay. Commissioner Beasley Pittman?
None.
I have none. Commissioner Glassman? None. And vice mayor?
CR two, please. CR two? Yes. CR two.
Okay. So several people have signed up to speak on other items, but, just for questions only except Kiara Stevens. You want to speak on c m three? Is Kiara here? Is Kiara here?
No. Oh, questions only? Okay. Alright. So, except for, c r two, do I hear motion to approve all the consent agenda items?
Moved. I hear a second?
Moved and seconded. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herbst? Yes. Commissioner Glossman? Yes. Mister Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And all those consent agenda items are now approved except c r two. You're welcome to stay for the rest of the meeting if you'd like. C r two resolution establishing a living seawall permit fee assistance program. Vice mayor.
Thank you, mayor. Just wanted to highlight this. It's, I think, a shining example of our commitment to our waterways, and it's something we've been working on for a while. And for those of you who might not be familiar, a living seawall is a seawall that is often three d printed with a material that's pH neutral, so more advantageous for our waterways. It is oftentimes designed similar to mangrove roots so that it allows for greater adherence of oysters, seagrass, other marine life to it, which allows for better marine environment for all of our marine animals.
It is what this ordinance does is allows for a 100% rebate when a property owner, business, or resident decides to build a living seawall and chooses a living seawall rather than a traditional seawall. So it provides economic incentive to that resident to build something that's really going to have a more profound, positive impact on our environment and our waterways. And we have, many examples of living seawall being, constructed and considered in the city, in large part, as a result of this ordinance. This ordinance will be the first in the country first in the country that allows a 100 rebate of fees for living seawall construction, which is gonna benefit the entirety of the city. We have, it looks like Harry are here from, Church by the Sea, which is exploring a living seawall, Rich Walzer.
We've been exploring living seawall possibilities as well. So there's, just mayor, I just wanna thank everyone. And and, mayor, I also wanna thank our former chief waterway officer, Marco Aguilera, who was very helpful in this. Todd Hinshu, thank you for your great work in this. Again, leading the way in waterway quality, waterway improvement, not just in the city, but in the country.
It says a lot about what we're doing. And city manager, I also wanted to highlight city attorney. City attorney, if you could just share with us just because city attorney's office doesn't always get recognized. But if you could just share with us a little bit what you and your team have been working on to bring this to us today to to so we can better understand city attorney's role in something like this.
Well, thank you, vice mayor. It is actually a collaborative effort with the city manager's office. We've got a a great team working on projects like this, and we work together to develop and craft something that is beneficial and meets the intent of of your request to have an ordinance do this. We we work as a collaborative team.
Thank you. Thanks for that. Thank you.
Thanks for that work. Thanks for the recognition.
Yeah. And I appreciate it. City manager, thank you for your work on this. It's a it's a really a great moment in our our history, and I think we're gonna see more and more living seawalls coming across the city, which is gonna be fantastic. Yep. Thank you, Nancy. Susie Bailey also might not be here, but she's also been very helpful in this, instrumental, as have many of you in the audience. So I just want to thank you for that work. Mayor, I will move the item, if that's all right.
Okay, so CR2 is being introduced. Just to just to piggyback on your comments, you know, it's we have a lot of seawalls in this city. Right? We do. Over a 160 miles of waterways, and, you know, it behooves us to start somewhere.
You know? Just in one place is not going to make a big difference, but over time and collectively, we'll continue to find ways to nourish our our our sea life, the the marine life that exists in all of our canals and and our rivers, And considering what we've you know, how we have polluted our waterways over the years, it seems that it's about time we turn the clock and try to do the right thing. So I, I applaud the efforts of the city and, and our city staff in moving this forward. So as the resolution has been introduced, please call the roll.
A resolution of the city commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida establishing a permit free assistance program to encourage the installation of living sea wall walls providing a 100% discount on city based building permit fees for qualifying projects and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst?
Yes.
Commissioner Glassman? Ditto everyone's comments. This is really a great step forward. Yes. Thank you.
Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson?
Yeah. And I see Steve Whitten out there, marine advisory board chair. Thank you, Steve, for your continued work on this and other efforts. Yes.
And mayor Trent House.
Yes. And that item is now approved. Thank you. Okay. So, so now we have to pause the evening agenda and move back to the afternoon agenda in which the issue regarding, the parks improvement on the beach is called business four, and a number of people signed up to speak.
And so I just wanna begin that process. I'll call your names three at a time, and, and I'd ask that you take the two minutes that you're allotted and and and convey your remarks within that time period. So we'll start out with Lorraine Saunders, followed by Fabian, Camille, and a lot of other names, and, Aspen Vincent. Are you folks here? Is Lorraine Saunders here?
How about, Fabian? How about Aspen Vincent? How about Nancy Thomas? Followed by Tricia Halliday. Followed by Mikaela Conka.
Good evening. I was gonna say good afternoon, but now it's evening. Nancy Thomas, 41 year resident of Fort Lauderdale. I think our beach is wonderful. All my guests and relatives love it because you can see it from a one a.
You don't have to have buildings blocking you like you do in Miami. The rendition that EDSA has put together, it just doesn't give the public enough information because this is a public beach, the whole thing. And this is only part of it. And there have been a lot of questions raised, which I don't know how much you'll hear because not everybody could stay, about it's just not enough information for the public because we need a full rendition of the beach. We've passed the bond the bonds for it.
I guess EDSA, I'm not blaming them, I guess they're you know, they were asked to do this section. But the city needs to provide a full rendition of what's proposed here because it's our beach.
you hear me?
Saw I'll stop the stop the clock. Do you saw the you saw the renderings on the backup? You saw the renderings on the backup. Right? You saw all the dip all the pictures. There was some elevations, and there's that schematic. What let me help you out here. What is it that you don't understand so we can kinda bring
you through? What what has arisen among the public are some of which some issues were addressed earlier. The picnic tables, the grills, the shade, the restrooms, the playground. If you just looked at this, you really wouldn't know what the rest of the beach was going to look like. And and that's the main thing is that before this goes any farther, the public wants to know, well, how does it affect the other parts of the beach?
Because that's a public beach, and we've we passed the bond issue, and half of the money spent on this is gonna be for that.
Well, the thing is this this proposal that that's before us is only regarding this section. There are gonna be many projects throughout the beach over the years, and that's and I don't think this I don't think the city is prepared to give you, you know, one big master plan, which has never really been contemplated in this this particular proposal. So I don't want you thinking, like, that something else is gonna be built or added to the beach other than what's here attached. This the only thing the only thing that that's we're considering as a commission is what you see. In fact, I think it's on page 13.
You're just showing one page, but this page 13, which is the 13. Yeah. Which has the let's see.
Mara, I'm asking them to pull it up. Pull it up if you want. Yeah. Could you please Yeah. Page 13?
13 or the one right before this one. It's hard to see. K. We'll we'll get we'll get some options up. Page 10. Excuse me. Page 10. Could you pull up page 10?
I printed off page 10. It's one of these two.
No. No. No.
It's not?
No. No. No.
I paid printed pages ten and eleven.
Page well, you you printed up 11. Page 10.
Is that what you're bringing up?
I'm bringing up page 10. I don't want you to be misunderstanding anything. I want you keep going.
Keep going.
Page 10. There we go.
I got both of those right here.
Well, it's okay. Now everyone can see it. So this is all we're contemplating, what you see here. Nothing else on the beach. Nothing to the north. Nothing to the south. The only proposal that's before the commission right now is what you see there.
But, mayor, the public didn't know that when they looked at this.
It's it was attached to the agenda.
That nothing else was going to be moved, that we weren't gonna have any limited space for what's there already?
Well, look at this picture above there. What you see above there is what exists. And right now, all we have there are the basketball courts, which are staying where they are.
Okay. Yeah. That's great. And that that's a wonderful concession. I appreciate that. Okay. Well, I'm just telling you that the public may see something that you don't, and not everybody is able to go to the agenda and read all the backup and know what's going on.
It's only 12 pages. It's not all of the agenda. It's only so this is a perfect opportunity. You said you you didn't have enough information, so I don't want you leaving here tonight thinking you're leaving without all the information. This picture tells it all. We this is what we wanna create. Looks nice, doesn't it?
It does, but we don't need four pickleball courts. That takes up too much space.
Okay.
Two basketball courts, two pickleball courts. That was the original plan, and that's all we need.
Okay.
It looks like it goes pretty far south, and something's gonna be lost with an extra two pickleball courts.
And that was a request by the city commission. I read all that. I was I heard it. We don't need four, and I will stand by my word. I've talked to a lot of people about, well, what's the rest of the beach gonna look like? We half this money is bond money. We've been waiting since 2019.
Okay. Well, we'll see. We don't know. That's not what this is before, though, Nancy. This is just the only thing
we've you, what people want is they want a full rendition of what the beach is gonna look like in case there are changes that we don't like.
Okay. Thank you. Trish Holiday.
Good evening. It's been a long day. I know you guys have put in a
Day's not over yet.
I know it's not.
It's getting started.
However, I I have the same question that Nancy had, and it's a beautiful picture. Looks great. However, one of my first questions was, I thought originally we were supposed to have two pickleball courts. When did we go to four, and how was that determined? And then I know this afternoon, it was decided that we don't have to have plastic grass.
We can do other things. But in fact, I think you the terminology was used that ecological something rather. Renourishment. Thank you. And building dunes, which would be wonderful. I think that's a wonderful idea. However, the plastic brass, because, you know, with the heat index issues and the vapors and everything, would not be the greatest thing there. As so we were hoping that that will be next. And let's see. What else did I have written down here?
And well, on here, I can't see. I was wondering question about the the picnic tables. So I just wanted to verify again that this was a you've done a wonderful job, but this is a public beach, and I want the public to be able to make a choice. Okay?
Thank
you. You can
answer me about the the number of pickleball courts, that would be wonderful as well.
Okay. Thank you.
Could I ask a question? I I'm just curious because I know a number of people have objected to the turf, and I'm just curious why.
Why? Because it breaks down. Number one, it's hot. It's so hot. If it's 90 degrees, nor you know, regular turf will stay around that time. If if it's gonna be in the sun, which it's gonna be in the in there, I mean, it'll be an extra 10 to 15 to 20 degrees hotter. And not only that, you'll get vapors coming off of it, which are not since it's plastic, it's not going to be very good for the
You know, there there's a lot of people at very high end houses that are putting these into their backyards, and I understand that. It's incredibly popular right now. So I'm
I understand that, but we can't do anything about people in private
residence since we can. But but but no.
What what I'm getting to the point of, though, is that I pass along? It seems to be very popular. You're suggesting is that people won't like it out there, and I wanna understand why. Because people are paying tens of thousands of dollars to put this in their backyard so that they can enjoy it. Apparently, they don't find it to be a 150 degrees and not tolerable. They they're they're literally spending $20.30, $40,000 to install this.
I understand that. And I just I have a feeling it has to do more with education and communication out there to what exactly they are putting in their backyard.
Your point, commissioner, I I would also agree with you. But to tell you that the quality of the artificial turf has really progressed over the years, the makeup of the material is very different from what it first was. And I will also tell you, in my district is the Las Olas Oceanside Park. There's a large area of artificial turf that people are doing yoga classes on every weekend. People are gathering. My office has never received one complaint about the artificial turf at the Las Solas Oceanside Park. First of all, it's cleaner. You will not have to use pesticides on the grass, and people would, of course, complain about the pesticides if we had to use pesticides. We will not have to have an irrigation system. We will not have mosquitoes.
We will not have everything that the natural grass would do there, and it has proved to be really very successful at the La Sola Socanside Park. Again, no complaints. People are gathering there in all in all weather, hot, cold, you name it. Again, for those classes, for the gatherings, have festivals there all the time.
How long has that been down so far?
Just out of curiosity.
About five years? About five years. At least five years.
Okay. Good. Now I I will guarantee I will I will say that there are variations of of the the different types of of brass.
By the way, I think the sand would be as hot. Sand.
Sand is very hot.
But you don't think the sand is gonna get up on top of that artificial turf? I mean, come on. Let's let's I
think we
can go natural, which you said that you could do earlier.
And, also, by the way, the maintenance of regular turf would be at least 100,000 a year to keep that Right. As opposed to something far less.
You know what? This is a city.
Yes. It's a city.
That that that was so excited. I mean, and I was excited too when you decided not to use plastic straws on the beach, and you're gonna put plastic grass on the beach. Come on.
Come on. Come on.
Come on.
Come on.
On. Alright. Come on. Alright. I I I wanna answer one more question. There is another question. Alright. Yeah. Mikayla Wait. I I no. So so By the way, have a question about the restrooms. It's important to know. The reason we're not seeing that is the restrooms, the picnic tables, the grills are not affected by this. That's all to the south, and it's still staying there. That's why that's why it's not on the on the renderings. Thank you.
Alright. Mikayla Conka?
She's not here? And and, mayor, while
we're waiting for that so, commissioner Glassman, wanted to ask you that because that actually came up in my agenda briefing last night where we talked about the Oceanside Park. And I said, I wasn't aware of any complaints. I've been I've been there a lot, and I've never noticed that it's particularly hot when I've sat there, or I haven't burned myself when I've been there.
No. No one has. In fact, we gather there even for the city events. We'll be gathering there for the American beach party at the end of this month. Right. And we always have the ceremonies there. It's it has not been an issue. That's all.
Okay. No. Thank you.
I appreciate that. I I I wasn't sure if your office had heard anything or not.
Not at all.
Okay. Continuing. John Roth, followed by Leo Lorenz, followed by Vicky Mowry. Jean, I know you were here this oh, there you are.
Right there.
Ready? Okay.
Ready. Okay. Commissioners, sit sit on.
You're on.
Okay. Commissioners and
The mayor.
Everyone mayor and vice mayor and everyone who's on the days and all of the public that's here. My name is John Roth. I live in 4 Seasons Condominium, which is just over the Intracoastal Waterway. I've lived here thirty five years in the same place on the water. I'm a boater and very involved with the marine community because that was my business. Anyway, I'm not a basketballer. I'm not a pickleballer. But my wife was
Maybe you should start. It's fun. It's fun.
So anyway, the deal is that I walk this area for many, many years, and I'm a mechanical engineer. I look at how things are built, how much they cost to work, to make work, how much it cost to clean. And I'm just gonna start with a couple of things that I've noticed about this, especially directed to the the landscape architects and the people who have conceived this project. My overall opinion is that there's not been much market serious market analysis of the future customers and clientele of who would use this facility. You say it's the same people that we have now.
You're saying no one's gonna use the basketball courts? No.
Oh. I'm not saying that. Who are the people that will come? And so I would say that, for example, people who are the kind of customers who use the St. Regis will not usually brush shoulders with the people, our basketballers.
I don't know about that.
Probably not. I don't know about that. Because I've worked in worked in 40 large marinas around the world. Right. And they're all similar to the St. Regis. And the clientele of the people who have a 120 foot and larger yachts do not usually hang around with low level mechanics like myself and or managers. So they have to look at who is gonna be there.
And what
are the conditions?
What does that have to
do with the viability of this project?
Well, the thing is is if people don't like it, they won't come.
But the argument has been for us to retain the basketball courts because we have a public that uses them. That has nothing to do with the same reason.
About I'm talking about cutting down all of the pine trees so we don't have any shade.
There are no pine trees
there, sir. On this picture. This is what they've What
are you talking about?
Well, I'm looking at the picture right in front of me, and I see all palm trees where there used to be pine trees.
Look at the picture in the in the corner. That's the existing condition. Tell me where all where all these trees you're seeing.
Well
That's an aerial view of what's there now.
Well, that's an aerial artist's conception, and it's been managed. So on the right hand side
Is that a is that a modified I can't hear you.
The Google Earth aerial?
It's a Google Earth aerial.
Trees are located just south of the image, the artist rendition Right. South of that.
That image been modified in any way?
No. No. That's not true. But, anyway
I I'm gonna I I will take him at his word. Thank you.
Okay.
So the thing is is that you come over the bridge. They've got major work done at the on the bridge itself at the bottom. They've got an area which is be make a nice raised patio. You could put a band down there for music or something if you wanted. And there's an exit and an exit.
And you've taken out a lot of the space underneath and replaced it with very small little cubicles for the maintenance on the guys on the beach. And I just look at this from the point of view of maintenance of the artificial turf. You'll probably need more machinery to maintain the artificial turf than what they have now. So they're gonna need space for that and none of that stuff is small. And everything that they're showing on the drawing is small spaces.
So some a lot of work needs to be done to make this thing compatible with Parks and Recreation Department and the financial side of this. So there was a mention just when I heard this morning or this afternoon that said that the people can move their picnic tables around. The picnic tables are heavy, and they use a high lift to move them around. They don't use people picking up your
own family picnic table. Said people pick them around. I think the city staff boos them around.
Not once you get there in the morning. Insinuation was that I heard was is that when you get there and you're gonna have a fantastic place to move in and if there's not spaced to your liking, you will be able to pick one or your family would be able to pick up a picnic table and move it.
We don't want people picking up picnic Okay.
That's fine.
Can you please complete your remarks because your time
is Okay. My time is up. Thank And I hope that you do more work on this because I've had projects before in my life and you think everything is just perfect and hunky dory.
Okay.
And nobody comes.
Alright. Thank you.
Thank you.
Nobody come. Nobody John, those pickleball courts will be full. People will come. Trust me. They'll come. The people will come. They'll play basketball, and all four pickleball courts will be full all the time.
pine trees are all the way to the south. I don't think they shade that area.
And Because it's not part of this it's not something part
of the open plan.
Project. Not
part of this plan.
Okay. Okay. You Okay.
Deep
pitched football, and they're starting to break 90 degree sun. They like to find some shade.
Okay. Have you been on any of the city's pickleball court?
Alright. Alright. Alright. Okay. You haven't been.
Alright. Alright. Alright.
I'm telling you they're playing all day, all night. They're playing. Okay.
They're playing.
Thank you.
They're playing.
Yes, sir. Wait a minute. Mayor, there was Yes. Quit Your honor.
There was
there were mentions about Palms. I just wanna, you know, advise you all that. Again, this is a high level conceptual that is being shown here. There is some data that we do have that suggests that approximately 21 pounds will be removed from the site to accommodate the pickleball courts, and we're estimating that 80 pounds will be installed
as part of this project. Okay.
Great. Thank you. So that's a net of 60 pounds. Okay.
Quentin, just one any pine trees be impacted?
Based on what we have at the moment, no pine trees will be impacted. There is one tree that would be removed and 21 palms that would be removed.
Okay. Thank you. Leo Lorenz. Is Leo here? Followed by Vicky Mowry, followed by Ted and Sarah.
Good evening, mayor and commissioners. The proposed plan that we have come up with and that we've reviewed negatively impacts the residents and the visitors to the park. There's a growing uproar about the proposed layout and the fact that it is not being generated by the city internally to accommodate the wishes of the community. It's been confirmed that this plan has been put forth only for the benefit of the developer of the Bahia Mar and the CDD. They sugarcoated, saying that it's a win win for all the residents, but we don't see it that way.
Okay. Number one, it removes the exercise equipment and the stations from its current location, and it puts it at the south end of the park near the bathrooms away from where the basketball courts are. Yes. People use the facilities together and do not wanna hike back and forth between the locations when they're playing basketball and then working out at the workout areas. People wait their turn to get into a basketball game, typically.
They go over, and they work out at the exercise stations while they monitor the progress of the game to fin to the finish. According to the drawings right now that you're showing, you you can't see the basketball courts because you got the pickleball courts in a way. Everybody wants to keep the workout stations in its current location. They don't want it changed. Number two, the proposed plan removes the picnic tables and the grills to the South side.
Nowhere on those pictures up there do they show picnic tables and grills in their current location now. They're being shifted further to the South. Parents can no longer have a watchful eye on their children while they're playing basketball on the courts. And we got children out there that are, like, from six to 12 years old. They're always on the courts. Parents supervise them while they're there on the picnic tables and the grills. They can't see them if they're way down on the other end.
Okay. Please conclude your remarks.
And the placement of the four pickleball courts on the beach, doesn't make any sense out there either because most of the pickleball players that we know, they say that it is not a good idea to be playing out there. Two pickleball courts might be good, but not four. And I'll just let it go at that.
Okay. Great. Thank you so much.
Vicky Mowry?
Be before you start running that clock, may I ask for two for a correction on earlier today, way earlier. Believe the gentleman from EDFA said that mentioned shade structures, which was not listed on any of the material that I looked at. Also, there was a
Wait. Wait. Wait. What did
you just say?
Shade structure.
What about shade structure?
That was mentioned as one of the options.
Options where?
Coming into this area. Okay. It wasn't on any of the written material. Okay. It was just mentioned.
Okay.
Secondly, staff, I believe, is
who mentioned that indeed where
the pickleball courts are, there are grills and picnic tables that will be moved. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me.
I don't see him, but okay.
I am Vicki Mowry. I live at 1 Las Olas Circle at the beach. This beach is really the people's beach, and the people who use it do so in a variety of simple, enjoyable ways. They picnic. They sunbathe. They relax. They shoot hoops. They exercise. They have quiet time, or they party with family and friends. They know what to expect when they go to that beach.
Expansive views of the ocean and seemingly endless sand and sun. This is the people's beach. Why are you, our elected officials and guardians of our city, even entertaining the idea of mucking up this area with 1,700 square feet of concrete for a welcome pad or central plaza, as though the natural beauty isn't welcome enough. Artificial service surfaces and blocked views with fencing and dense landscaping around pickleball courts is not needed or wanted. And about these pickleball courts, the developer who has a long and enriching lease on our property should build those courts on his property, not on this.
The beach isn't the the beach isn't some bargaining chip to be batted back and forth for the benefit of a developer's project. We, the people, are not a project. What we need from you is continuing maintenance. I'm about done. Upgrades as necessary, such as the exercise equipment, and keep picnic tables and grills in plentiful supply. We need you to listen, and we expect you to respond accordingly. Thank you.
Thank you.
Mayor Mayor?
I I just need I I need to address a couple of things, Vicky, but I thank you for your input. But I I want folks to understand something, and I know there are people in the room that don't seem to like pickleball. And I you know, whatever. I I hear from people all the time that they're excited about this. They want more courts at Holiday Park. There are trust me. There are people out there that like pickleball. They are there. So here's the deal. Why are they not here? Because typically, the people that come to the meetings are people that are opposed to things. That's been our history, I think. So that's the reason. So let me just explain. We signed an agreement as a commission.
This commission in January 2024 entered into an agreement with the Bahia Mar and the Taxing district that they created for themselves to raise money. We entered into an agreement with them in January 2024. It's a legal binding agreement more than two years ago. That agreement says that the basketball courts will be removed and replaced by pickleball. When that word got out, people were upset, and I understand that.
They came to the commission. They said, please don't do this. Do not remove the basketball and replace it with the pickleball. So we went back to the developer, and we said, okay. Look. There's a public outcry. People do not want to see the basketball courts go. What can we do? So the first thing I asked for them was to extend that agreement past January 2027. We are legally obligated right now legally obligated right now to have all of this finished by January 2027.
We can't do that. That's impossible. So what we said to the developer was please tell your CDD, your community district, please tell them that we need an extension. So our legal team is working on that extension now to give us more time so that we don't get sued and lose. So the development team said, fine. We will reconsider. So we will keep the basketball courts. By the way, those basketball courts don't look great today. They're all being totally, totally refurbished. Okay?
I'm not arguing that, of course. The as they should. They're being totally refurbished. Remember, the legal contract says they're to be removed. And the only way that we could get around that was by both parties, the city and the community development district agreeing to that. So here's here's here's the crunch. Here's the crunch. At any point in time, this developer could actually say to us, you know what? We're just going back to the original legal agreement that we have with you. So what
do you think about that?
And then we'd be we would be behind between a rock and a hard place. It's not true. It's true. It it's true.
Alright. Let's stop.
We're not gonna get into a disagreement with that, but it's it's true. So what everyone tried to do was come up with something that made sense for everybody so that we could move forward, so that we would have the pickleball that was guaranteed in the legal agreement. We could have the basketball that we brought back, and in the meantime, make the area really a very much a community area. This is not going to be a private area. I've heard that misinformation. It's not. This is open to the public. Of course, this is for the public. This is for all the public to enjoy, all of the new fitness equipment. By the way, there is a designated fitness equipment area right to a gym, about 2,500 square feet, I believe, right to the south, which on your view would be to the right of the pickleball.
So I I I think that everyone came up with a great middle of the road compromise where everyone should be happy with something. Will everybody be happy with everything? Probably not, but we never see that anyway. But there's, I think, a lot of reason to be happy about how we got from where we were with the elimination of the pickleball I'm sorry, of the basketball to something for everyone. And in the meantime, doing some really nice landscaping. I think when this is done, people are gonna be very happy. People are gonna enjoy it. I think people are gonna say, wow. This is a really pretty little area of the beach on both sides of that pedestrian bridge that crosses a one a. So it's really important just to know the facts.
I wanted everyone to understand the legal the legal ramifications of what's going on here and how we had to finesse and make sure that we just don't get sued and lose and then everybody loses. The money is not all of the Parks Bond money. The money is just some of the Parks Bond money. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the development team's also kicking in a million dollars on this, I think.
Yes.
The community development district will reimburse the city up to a million dollars for eligible improvements.
That's what I thought. So that's where we are. That's the history of how we began this discussion, and this is where we are now. That's all. I just wanna make sure everyone understood everything. Thank you.
Thank you so much. Ted and Sarah followed by, Kendall Antoine, I think it says, and Mary Furtick.
Hello, everybody. My name is Ted and Sarah. I'm the president of the River Oaks Civic Association. Thank you everybody on the dais for letting me be here. Boy, that was I don't even know after that, mister Gasman, if I even need to speak or not. I guess it's already, made up. But what I'm saying what Vicki said was absolutely correct. This is the residents' beach. This is the people's beach. This is the one area.
It's the wide area of the beach that we can come and picnic, that we can come and park, we can play some ball, we can go into the water, and this is the part we we have. Anything to the north, it's all the hotels. Everybody is all into the, you know, having their little private beaches or or their own beaches in front of the hotels. This is for the residents. It always has been.
Because I was born here in 1956 in Broward General Hospital. I've lived in River Oaks for sixty years, and I'm still there today, and I wouldn't live anywhere else. But this part of the beach you know, there's two iconic views when you're riding around, Los Oles Boulevard I mean, Fort Lauderdale. When you make that turn onto Los Oles and you see those beautiful, magical, lighted trees going down the median strip on Las Olas Boulevard. That's magic. That is boy, that says Fort Lauderdale. That's and you guys are gonna take that view away from us. The other one is when you're coming east on 17th Street, you make that curve down by the Yankee Clipper, and then you're going around there, Portland. You got that straight view. You see the ocean.
You see the beach. That's another iconic view of Fort Lauderdale. And now you wanna take that away from us. Everything seems to be geared towards the visitors. You know, people actually live here. And but it's like we couldn't just have a swimming a hall of Fame swimming pool. We need an aquarium. Oh, I'm I'm surprised with all you you guys like to cruise that we don't have a roller coaster on top of the aquarium because we just need to cram as much stuff as we can everywhere we can. So so let's let me see if
I understand this correctly. Well,
so I
don't I might not even
You you're going down the street here. Oh, yeah. East on I'm talking. Stop. Okay? Stop. Come on. Some some never So we're going down a one a. Right? And what do you see? Parking lot with cars. Right? Parking lot with cars. Okay? No no obstructing of the ocean there. Right? Then you got a wave wall. Okay? No obstruction there. It's two feet tall. And now all of a sudden, a a pickleball court, which is on the ground, is suddenly obstructing the view. Tell me how tell me the thought here.
Because look. What? Like you said with this picture, it tells it all right there. That's all you need to know
about it. What view is now being obscured by pickleball courts?
The ocean. When you're coming in your car, making that great curve around 17th Street by the Yankee Clipper
Yeah.
Right there. You are not gonna have the view that you have coming over. Just like we don't have the view that per great view coming over Los Solos Bridge anymore. Ted, come on.
Come on.
And then the other thing
is this.
Nowhere near We do not need to pour
in endorsement. Ted, this is nowhere near the Yankee Clipper. You know that. Correct?
Yeah. Was born here.
So so you're you're talking about something that's a thousand yards down the beach.
Okay? 800.
Yeah. Okay. So, mom, let's I know you wanna talk, and I know you have a point of view. Yes. And I think your point of view is to be respected, but I just want to keep it in context and listen. You can't create your own facts. Okay?
Oh, I'm not creating facts.
Okay. Alright. When you say you're obstructing the view when you've got you've got two rows of cars and a wave wall, I can't see how pickleball courts that are flat
on the ground are obstructing your your ocean. Those those palm trees are not there now. Those are part
of the 80 You don't want palm trees?
I'm I'm speaking now. Yes. And that you you don't have the palm trees there right now that that you normal you would have obstructing the view. They're not there. They're gonna be planted there. And you know what I think too when it comes to these pine trees that they say they're not gonna touch? I know this city and I know these developers. Suddenly, they're gonna be deceased just like the trees on Las Olas Medium. Why? And all those pine trees have to go because an arborist that they paid for is gonna come not next I mean, very, very soon and claim that they are sorry. All these pine trees are diseased. They gotta go. Even though he sat here and told us that, oh, we're not touching the pine trees. Okay. I've heard that before so many times.
And you know what I see when I see this picture right here? Yes. I see about 20 cement trucks pulled up pouring concrete on our beach, the beach sand, which should never happen. This is a turtle nesting area.
Do wanna play basketball on
sand? Spot.
Do you wanna play basketball on sand then?
That's there. That's there.
Oh, but you're saying you don't like concrete on the beach, so why don't
we We said pouring more concrete. You were listening.
You were hearing it. Insane.
Isn't that good enough?
What now?
This is gonna be I could see 20 of those round cement trucks just in line pouring that thing right down on our public beach, the people's beach, on the beach sand, which they should have no be able to get any permits to pour this cement on our beach. Ted, don't you realize that people like to play sports? Oh my gosh. We have pickleball. You almost run into a pickleball wherever you go. Right. Why is that? Why is it? We need it in everywhere, then let's let's take out this, this gazebo over here on Espanon Park. We need pickleballs over here too. I'm surprised you don't work on it. Ducks along the river walk with pickleball courts on Good idea. Good idea.
Alright. Next. Thank you, Tim.
While he's going to his seat. Thank you. Yeah. I and, mayor, you know, I I love the concrete phobia. We took away a lot of beach when we did that whole sidewalk along a one a. We took away a lot of beach. When we built the iconic wave wall, the length of the beach, we took away the sand. We took away the beach. Where was all the concrete phobia then when we built those things from concrete? I I'm just wondering.
It's okay. Okay.
Thank you.
Kendall followed by Mary Fertig followed by Chris Tchaikowski. Is Kendall here? Nope. Okay. Mary Fertig? Oh, there's Mary.
Hi. How are you?
I'm good.
How much time do I have?
You have two minutes.
Two minutes. Alright. Well, then I better get this out quickly.
Come on, Mary.
Alright. So we're
listening to your presentation earlier. I had a question. When the bond passed in 2019, what was contemplated for this space? You don't have to answer these questions, but you can. And then I just could when this when you got a contribution from the CDD, and I know that was a lot of conversation about that, but I have to say that having attended the meeting on Lockhart ten days ago, I have to wonder what are they getting for their $1,000,000 contribution.
Maybe nothing, but that would be a question I have. What rights to this do are they given for the contribution? Alright. The next thing I wanted to say was this this really blew up about a year ago, a little more than a year ago. So I was glad to see they picked EDSA, and they're local, and that's great. So that makes me wonder, did you have a meeting with the community about what the community would like to see at this site before coming up with this traffic? And if not, who who did who who did they meet with? These are all questions you can answer. You can write to me, mister.
And you said before the Central Beach Alliance?
Don't take my time, though. I love Bill, but just add me a few more minutes in.
Well, I'd love to come, Bill.
But mister Brown is the president of the Central Beach Alliance.
would say that. And his neighborhood association would be the one that would be the public. And he says that because we're not voting on anything tonight, it's gonna be presented to them at the next meeting.
And my question is, because I believe, and you can add some more time in for the time you took, but you spoke so well that I'm glad you
shared it.
Yes. Thank you. My
my point on this, Dean, is and that's great, but I believe this this beach belongs to everybody in Fort Lauderdale. I believe it really belongs to the people in the county, the tourists we entice to come here. This is, as Vicky said, this is the people's beach. So I think it's wonderful they're going to the Central Beach Alliance, but I think there's some other constituencies they should have met with as well. And maybe there's time for that.
And then you could bring people in instead of closing people out. So I just wanna I don't have much time, so I wanna say I like to think in 1953 that my grandmother went to the polls to vote on the ordinance on this speech, which keeps it public for all time. Now I did bring it, and I could read it to you, but you're cutting me off on time, so I won't. So can you let me just read the end of it? Because we have a lot of conversation about a public speech.
And this speech, unlike almost every other one that we talk about, this was subject to a referendum of the people. And so it said, as aforesaid, it shall not be amended or repealed except upon a vote of a majority of the electors at any regular biennial municipal election. It gives it just that much more strength. And so this is a public beach. It was a conscious decision by the voters to make it a public beach. And so whatever you do with this piece of property, with this beach, I hope that you do it by including everybody in this room and everybody who couldn't come tonight that wants to speak on it. Mary, can I ask
you a question? Yes. Looking at this picture, can you show me where in this picture the public is being excluded from the use of the beach?
Well, I think that came up earlier when the advertisements, which are still online, discussed a private beach club. But that's not
that's not what we're
Private beach.
Not proving.
And I'm not saying you are, Dean. I'm simply saying because I know you wouldn't you wouldn't because you know this referendum was passed in 1953.
And we make it very
different unless all
of us got together and said we want to make it a private beach club.
Right. But it's not.
It's not.
Yeah. Every single square inch of this, what you're seeing today, is open to the public. I can go there. You can go there. Everybody can go there. And So we're not taking away anything from the public, and I don't know why people keep saying that.
So I would just say I'm glad you're making that statement. And if and the one thing that I think could really help the public to really accept and adopt that is if you start meeting with all the people who have tried to have a voice in this and haven't been able to before you come back to the next conference meeting. And then see what their vision is for this beach. Not what the vision of a few people is, but what the vision of the of the people who own the beach would be.
Got it. Okay.
Thank you.
You're welcome. Chris followed by Barbara Stern followed by, Jeris Goss.
First, I'd like to start off by thanking commissioner Herbst for all of his service. You will duly be missed in your fiscal common sense, man, which is something that seems to escape us here quite a bit. First off, there's a lot of different things that were covered here, and we'll start off with the big one. The outrage came when we found out that it was gonna be a deal done with changing out pickleball for basketball courts. Nobody knew about that. So we really got ticked off about that. The whole pickleball thing to me, we're so sick and tired of hearing about pickleball enough already. It's Patel now. We you guys are missing it. Fake grass at the beach.
It's called the beach for a reason. You're gonna put fake grass there. And, since everybody's typing away on their computers, go ahead and just Google for a second. Is fake grass harmful? Go for it. Because the environmental protection agency, the National Institute of Health don't take my word for it. The National Environmental Institute of Health, three different colleges, and the sustainable advisory board that mister Ansir and I went to proved that all of these things are bad. Not just the heat, not just the bugs. You're still gonna need, pesticides to kill the weeds and everything else. Bad idea. This whole thing is a bad idea. Private developers have no business on public land. Oh, well, it's public. It's public. Where are these concession stands coming from?
Where are these shaded areas coming from? What should be done with the beach should be maintained by the city? And if the city was doing its job, we wouldn't need any of this. You guys should be maintaining the basketball courts. You guys should be maintaining the exercise equipment. That's what the park bond was for. But here we are. We're gonna take a million dollars from the guy across the street that nobody knew was happening so we can build his little dream because we're legally obligated, right, to pickleball courts. We've had enough of this stuff. You guys need to get your act together. Thank you.
Good evening, mister mayor. Before I go into my speech, may I just have a point of privilege to answer one of your questions about where did all this concern about the privatization of the beach come from? And I believe that was the messaging from the developer. Good I
I don't dispute that. You're not wrong on that, but but that's been that's been changed or will be changed. Yeah.
But will be changed.
Yeah.
Okay. So the problem is it's not being changed now. And quite frankly, I'm glad to see that these materials refer to this as the Fort Lauderdale Beach Park because in Jimmy's writes dedication of fiction that he sent to the commission and the historic preservation board in his attempt to block historic preservation designation for this beach. He refers to it as the Bahia Mar Park, which it is odd. It is the Fort Lauderdale Beach Park. So I'm glad at least that's part of the presentation.
We've settled that tonight.
K. Well, thank thank goodness for that because he continues to refer to it as Bahia Mar.
We got
And I believe that's part of what the problem is because all these additions that we're seeing, there are things that have been in advertising for the Bahia Mar St. Regis project. For instance, I'll pass around the advertisement for yoga on the beach, which they are doing in the sand. Why do we need a concrete platform for yoga? It's being done in the sand. We should be able to continue doing it on sand, but it's something to promote what they have in their advertising materials. We heard about a shade structure. If you go through the Bahia Mar St. Regis' marketing materials, they're advertising a little gazebo on the beach to enjoy your sunset. So when people talk about, is this for us?
Maybe it's because of the advertising and marketing materials coming out from the Bahia Mar. They are the ones who have created this problem. That is why we were here today. The agreement was for a two pickleball courts, not four. Commissioner Glassman asked for four. I don't dispute that pickleball is all the rage, and they will probably get used. I think it's a horrible location when you think about the wind velocity and trying to play out there. In terms of of the grass or artificial turf, Have you ever tried to get sand out of that? Have you traveled around? I've seen it in California. It's a joke. How are we going to maintain it? This isn't what the people wanted. This is what the Bahia Mar St. Regis wants to match their marketing.
We don't need to move the exercise equipment. It should stay right where it is. What kind of welcome center do we have? We had to hear that it needs to be more welcoming for the people, make it usable. People are on that beach all the time. We don't need this to make it usable. Go down there on any given Saturday or Sunday. It's packed. We did hear today, it doesn't show up in the materials, that the grills and the picnic tables will have to be moved somewhat. Go down there on a Saturday or Sunday.
I'm gonna date myself and bring up the united colors of belt of Benetton because that is what it is like down there. It's like the United Nations of people enjoying that section of the beach. And when you're pushing it further south, all I can seem to ask myself is, are we trying to move that from being in front of the St. Regis? So as you come up with these plans, I encourage you to reject this current design. The exercise equipment should stay where it is. The picnic tables and barbecue grills need to stay where they are. Figure out your design. Go back to the two pickleball courts. We were not in threat of being sued.
That agreement said it could be modified. The CDD doesn't even have the money yet. Last time, according to their financials that were filed for the September, they only have about $6,000 or maybe they're negative $3,000. They don't even have the money because they haven't even broken ground. Have they even sold enough units yet to break ground to start collecting dollars? So maybe mister Tate can give us a a timeline for when that'll happen to find out, because I thought we should already be at that process by now. So thank you.
Alright. You're welcome. Thank you. Jarvis, followed by Nicole Holmes, followed by, Michael Gerhardt, and then wrapping up with Maggie Hunt.
K. Good evening, mayor and commissioners. I'd like to start by assisting regarding the turf question. The space has become more engineered structured. We're losing natural flexibility and so and social feel that made them valuable in the first place.
Regarding Ted's point, the obstruction views the obstructive views is valid because public spaces aren't just about movement through them. They're also about the openness and experience being there, the skyline. Although there are broader environmental impacts considered, like storm water, drainage concerns, maintenance, lifespan maintenance, and construction waste, my focus here today is preserving the existing community, staying with connection and un staying with the connection and unintended consequences. EDSA designs spaces for the people. I'm here asking you to also account for the existing human culture already happening.
I appreciate the courts being preserved. Thank you. My concern is the connection displacement of the existing workout and community space. The plan shows and talks about everything connected, but the space already functions as one socially, not just physically. As far
as this
slide up there, I'm guessing the concrete line is where the workout space would be because we don't wanna divide that area. I'm not 100 sure on that. I haven't really looked into all that. But if you divide it, you still have the same pieces, but you lose what makes it special. It's energy and quality of life.
Elevation should come at should elevation shouldn't come at the cost of what's already there. Regardless of curb appeal, these plants are breaking up something that's already that already functions organically. I understand there are legal infrastructure obligations driving parts of this project. Just please consider revisions. Thank you.
Thank you so much. Is Nicole Holmes here? No. And Michael Gerhardt, you've already spoken. And Maggie Hunt. Maggie, are you here? Is there anyone Maggie, there you are. Anyone else wish to speak on this item? Okay.
Well, I know everybody is not necessarily environmentally, you know, caring as some other peep as others are. But, you know, when when the rain happens, it's gonna wash chemicals and all the nanoplastics that are in that grass out into the ocean, and we're already starting to see fish with little plastic particles in there. While I know most of it comes from plastic bottles and waste down in the ocean, I just don't feel like we need to contribute. I don't think it's a necessary area. And, you know, when you talk about Central Park, that's a more necessary area because you've got really heavy foot traffic there with the festivals and the music events.
And, yes, it looks better, but it still looks like plastic. When I'm thinking about enjoying an idyllic place on the beach, it doesn't involve sitting on a big giant piece of green plastic grass. You know? I would avoid it, actually. And I I don't know if it gets hot or not, and I appreciate the fact that there's a lot of shade trees there.
I hope whether there's sand or whatever, I hope that there's enough trees there to to provide a little bit of shade there. As far as yoga goes, people that make a point of going to the beach for yoga go there for the uneven surface in the sand. If you're a beginner, you might not be able to do it, but then you could maybe Bihumar would have a place over by the intercoastal. It has a beautiful view where you could just be on the grass there for beginners. It's just not a necessary place, as I see it, to have artificial turf there.
You go to the beach. People go to the beach because they want in the sand, and the presenter said, who wants to sit in the sand? Well, me and everybody I see there on the weekends and the holidays that pack those beaches that are there and so happy to be on sand. And I see them picnicking, and I picnic there, you know, with a towel on the ground. In fact, if you want a picnic with grass, we have so many public parks to picnic in.
I think one of the I think as the more artificial turf that we have, I think, in our parks, more people get upset about it. And maybe you haven't gotten emails about it, but if you go look on social media, there's a lot of people that aren't in it. Yes, I have seen in people's backyards on the water and stuff. I I don't know what makes what percentage makes popular, but I appreciate the point that some people think like it. So the other the last question I have too is about, you know, when we did those parks bond and we planned all the other parks, there was stuff online, you know, to say, oh, what do you want here?
What do you want there? What do you think about this? What do you think about this? And way back then, I didn't I mean, I didn't see I filled out that survey, and I didn't see anything on there for the beach. And that's a park. Right? And I so would assume the same process would happen. And maybe it happened, I just skipped over that part and didn't see it somehow online. But I was there something way back when we passed this bond and we're talking about what we wanted at parks where people got input as to, hey. If the beach is gonna change and have this park area, what would people like to see?
Because I got some ideas that aren't on there. I'm I'm sure there's people that would've wanted pickleball also, but I'm sure they would anyway. I'm just wondering where that where that was in the beginning. Thanks.
Alright. Thank you. Is there anyone else who wish to speak on this item? Did you sign up?
I did earlier, but I didn't hear my name.
Oh, I'm sorry. Well, come on up. Tell tell us your name.
Tell us your name. Good evening, everyone. My name is Fabian Diaz.
Oh, yeah. I called you earlier. Yeah. Oh, you did? Yeah. I'm confused. That's I couldn't pronounce your the rest of your name, though. You had a lot of names on there.
Go ahead. Well, hello, everyone. Thank you guys for your time today. So I've been a Broward County resident for the past six years, but I have been using these bars and the outdoor equipment at Lauderdale for over ten years. That's actually when I started my calisthenics journey. I don't know if you guys are aware what that is. It's body weight training, basically. But with that being said, I really don't think that the pickleballs are needed. I don't see South Beach or Miami Beach having pickleballs everywhere. They rather have upgraded equipment and also volleyball courts as well.
So that's something that could be considered for this. But overall, I think we just need an upgrade to upgrade the already existing equipment and not and not add many of these things that are just I don't know. It just I love the beach the way it is right now, and I feel like many people are very familiar with the way it is already. And, basically, it's it just needs to be upgraded with new newer equipment, better equipment. And I also think that instead of the pickleball courts, we should be adding more workout areas so we can help our youth also have more accessibility to workout equipment even if they cannot afford it.
We we know that South Florida has been becoming more of a health and wellness place lately and, you know, pushing more basketball courts and workout areas instead of pickleballs. For me, I think that's what would push people to become stronger. And yeah. Okay.
Alright. That it? Alright. Thank you. Yes. Thank you. Alright. No one has signed up to speak. So this was just to disc for discussion purposes. I think now the the the the folks at Bahama are gonna take this to the CBA now, and we'll get some feedback from the community there. And then the city manager will bring it back at some future meeting.
May I find out when is that future meeting? And I asked that question because we've been discussing this properly. We've gone through several iterations. I think for two years, we've been discussing exactly where all these elements are going to be. I know that we, you know, we keep having discussion, keep having discussion. It's not bad. Some folks in the public don't pay attention till a little bit later than others. That's not bad. It's just the way it is. But I I'm just not interested in continuing to kick the can down the road.
At some point in time, we are going to have to make a decision as a commission as to what we're going to do here, and I certainly hope that will happen before we take our summer break. So city manager, when do you envision this coming back to us in the evening for a vote on the site plan? We actually did vote. Well, we had a con we had a consensus on the site plan, and then that went away, right, because there was a change of heart. And so this is not a new topic. I'm just curious as to when you see us actually seeing a boat at night on the site plan.
As shared in the backup material, we intend to come back to the commission on or before 07/02/2026 with an amendment to the interlocal agreement to extend the timeline. Between now and then, it is anticipated that we should be able to have an audience with the Central Beach Alliance to share information and gather any additional feedback and incorporate that in the materials for July 2 or before. So you
see this coming back to us for a vote prior to our summer break?
I think that is feasible. Okay. Thank you.
Okay. So that would complete our afternoon agenda for now. Right? Are we going to not we're not gonna have business, we're not gonna have the other two business items? We're gonna defer that to another meeting. What have we decided to do there?
What have
we decided to do
this commissioner? Does impact District 3. I wanna defer to the commissioner.
What do
you wanna do?
I really think we could wind this up in a discuss it in a short manner. I think we should go ahead and take care of it tonight.
Okay. Now or at the end of the evening meeting? Now. Is there anybody here who's on the let's find out who's still here. Anyone here on Business 5 and Business 6? Two oh, well, just the the I don't see
I I believe we could do it in a, timely manner. I believe we can do it in a timely manner if we could move forward, please, mayor. Okay.
Alright. Move on to Business 5 then. Presentation of the evaluation of the proposal submitted by David Mancini for Riverland portion of the, Melrose Manors, Riverland stormwater improvement Fortified Lauderdale project. Brad?
Thank you, mayor. We have Brad Cain, public works director. Before he begins, you'll recall that I shared a letter to the commission on January 5. Since then, we've been made apprised of some changes to what we know as the site conditions. And as a result, we're bringing forward this item for discussion. There is a companion item, so business five and six are very much related, and I'll allow director Kane to proceed.
You can speak to both of them.
Yeah. Yeah. Thank you, manager Williams. Good evening. Brad Cain, public works director, mayor Trent Tutelis, vice mayor Sorenson, fellow commission. The presentation tonight, if I if we could flip them to Melrose versus Riverland, we could do that.
Good.
Yep. Thank you. So I'm just gonna try to highlight some of these things real quick and and get to the the real items at hand as it relates to the unsolicited proposals. Just to recap the scope of the work for these two projects combined, whereas you see in the slides here, it's basically a neighborhood design drainage and construction of stormwater infrastructure in both of, the areas, which consists of the following items there, 21 miles of drainage, five twelve hundred drainage structures, two water quality structures, and two stormwater pump stations, water and sanitary sewer line relocations, and some swell improvements. This is what I really wanted to get to, which is really, you know, one of the key updates here.
The current project status, as we have it, the the project currently is about in 60% design. But as I get to this one issue, as you'll see, the city's design phase timeline has been extended by one year, and that's because we've just learned very recently of some conflicts as it relates to some FP and L undergrounding projects that are happening in the area that create conflicts with the design of this project. And, therefore, that's going to delay our timeline in terms of completing design by about another year. The other thing just to understand, we're also working currently with the Chipmunk property to get the necessary drainage easement. That probably will come to commission at some time this summer.
That's not gonna affect this, but the other item, as I just mentioned, is really important to understand that that has an effect on our ability to complete design as we anticipated it currently. The next slide just talks about the different regulatory permits that, you know, are required for the county, US Corps of Army Engineers, FDOT, and FDEP typically for a drainage project of this size. Just kind of just pointing those out to everybody just for informational purposes.
Mister Kane, could you speak up a little bit of force, please?
Thank you.
Thank you. Absolutely.
The unsolicited proposals we received on 12/23/2025 were from Mann Conn and David Mancini and Sons for the design, construction, and delivery of stormwater improvements within the Melrose and Riverland neighborhoods. They were two separate proposals, which is why we had them in two separate, presentations tonight, but very little difference in terms of the overall information being provided, which is just a couple of slides, which I can explain, as we go through this. The Melrose Manors one, which we're talking about right now, was, submitted by Mancon, and Riverland was by David Mancini and Sons. Just a little background, on Mancon, they have over thirty years experience in the underground utility infrastructure business in South Florida specializing in stormwater, sanitary sewer, water mains, force mains, and drainage system construction. They have experience in delivering large scale projects of this size, including neighborhood improvements and pipeline.
The unsolicited proposal specifically related to Melvo's included, as I pointed out here, 62,000 linear feet of gravity stormwater pipe over a thousand linear feet of force main over 740 drainage structures, and one stormwater pump station for this particular project. This is the other slide that's pretty critical to understand. So as it stands today, our anticipated completion, for design won't incur until 2027 with a construction period in the range of two to four years. And as we get through this process of the additional design, we'll have a better idea on actually where that will fall in terms of the years of construction. The estimated completion time as far as we have it right now is somewhere between 2029 and twenty twenty thirty one.
In the unsolicited proposals we received, it's the same for both. It's two years guaranteed from notice to proceed. So, basically, if we gave them an NTP in July, they would have substantial completion by July 2028. Now this slide here is just showing the city's estimated cost of this individual project related to Melrose is about $80,969,007.21. Mann Con's price was around $91.08 $41.59.
And I need to just point out in the original, package that we submitted, there was an error on these numbers in both projects as related to information we had received from our consultant. We basically, there was some inversions of the basins that were involved. So those numbers, particularly in this one, were way higher than the difference now, which is only about $11,000,000 gap, and it still falls within the high estimate for the overall project. But I needed to point that out because it was pretty significant in this one, but now that number has been updated and corrected.
So so, Brad, just so I'm clear. So this this is post that design change based on the utilities in the, in the right of way? Just just so I'm clear on that. Right? Your your $80,000,000 estimate, 81,000,000.
That that is where we see it today. Right. Right.
As of right now.
Correct. As of now, once we go and do the additional design work and get to 60% on that again, that number will probably change. And as we get to 90% and a 100%, that number will change as well.
Sure. It'll firm up, it'll it'll it'll change, and it'll it'll it'll narrow down to what your final number is likely
to be. That's in the next twelve to sixteen months. Yes. Okay. Correct. Thank you. So we're at the point we're at today is for consideration from the city commission is, some of the things that would go into the, p three if it was accepted. We are looking at putting in significant damages as it relates to liquidation, you know, to encourage this project to be completed in a timely fashion. The contractor is guaranteeing, the maximum price with no change orders, and that would be negotiated in the agreement. And all permitting from regulatory agencies have to be obtained before any construction, on these projects, and that's the same for both projects.
But we would negotiate separate agreements, for each one based upon, the scope of work. So the next steps, at this point would be, either to reject the unsolicited proposal, continue advancing with the current design bid build approach, utilizing the city's upcoming prequalifier contractors list for this project and for others, or we can accept the unsolicited proceed in accordance with the statutory requirements by advertising the proposal to invite, competitive submission through a public notice competition period, which could be at minimum twenty one days, or by conducting two public notice meetings to present the proposal received public input and make a determination of public interest. And that's what we're looking for guidance on today from the city commission.
Quick question. So on page nine, it says the city estimate was 84,000,000 for Riverland, but the truck contractor's proposal came in at 79.
So there I haven't I haven't got to that proposal. This is specifically talking about Melrose. But I it's but
I I'm just it says city estimate $84,050,000, and then it said and that's the same number for Riverland. Am I not reading this correctly?
There there is updated numbers for Riverland 2, which I'm not on yet, and those numbers have have have varied. There's variables.
So is the contractor's proposal greater than or lesser than the city's estimate?
It's greater than in both. It's greater in both? Correct. It still falls within the overall higher end of the engineer estimates, but it is higher than both the current estimates at this time.
Okay. But, Brad, wouldn't we also be then subject to an increase because of the time delay that we would be going through waiting for all the other stuff to fall into place? In other words, how you can't really use that number today. I think it would definitely increase. Correct. Going through this process and with the design change in
the next twelve to sixteen months, and then having it back at 60% and then 90 and a 100, apt these those estimates absolutely are subject to change and not necessarily lower.
No. That's that's my point. Thank you.
So, commissioner Beasley Pipps
What is your what are your thoughts on your district?
Yes. It's in my district. And when, I had this conversation, my drive with this is with the opportunity of the method in which this project will be done, given the opportunity of addressing in a a quicker matter of the flooding, putting down these bank these drain basins that would also address some of the issues that we're having with the flooding. With that being said, could we call up the the proposal to let them explain also, what was shared so we can understand how this would, move this process, in a manner that would be really, proactive while we're going through this process.
David?
Okay. Mancini?
We have David Anthony. And Anthony Mancini. Yes.
And if you could share with us the concept of methodology regarding the storm basins that you're proposing to put in place initially.
Good evening, mayor. Good evening, commission. This project, Melrose Manors in Riverland, is a neighborhood with zero infrastructure. It is a a quite literally a a bull just collecting water. There is there is nothing there's nowhere for the water to go.
So our first task and our first sequence, if we're awarded this project and we advance into, construction would be immediately implementing protective measures for this rain season, that would stay into effect in the next rain season until the project is complete and the lift station is fully operational. It may not prevent, but it will definitely help in a major rain event.
Where where do you see the the water flowing into? What we
would do is in the low lying areas in these neighborhoods, we would drop catch basins in these neighborhoods, and then we would set up temporary pumps where we would we would divert water from the low lying areas directly out into FDOT right away instead of using, as you remember, the large pump trucks that are maybe one fifteenth the capacity of these pumps.
When you say FDOT right away, why don't you put that into simple terms, Sonny?
Existing infrastructure to the north and south of the neighborhood.
Is there a river or canal anywhere near this neighborhood? There is. And that's where the water would
be pumped into? It would actually be pumped into existing drainage systems that the state manages in a major rain event. It would push the water out of the neighborhood.
Okay. That's all I wanted to say. Yes, sir. Thank you.
Thank you. With this, I am I want to move in, an acceptance of this unsolicited proposal and asking that the my colleagues, have a consensus and we move in this direction. I do not want to, witness our neighbors in Merritts Manors and Merritts Park experience, what we have in the last several years. If there's an opportunity to, reduce that flooding where it's not high standing, understanding that this is not a complete fix, but it is a way to address the problem to bring down this issue. So that's my recommendation that we accept this.
Okay. What does the rest of the commission think about this?
I I agree with the district commissioner. From my perspective also, and I think from the rest of the districts, actually, this project, correct me if I'm wrong, creates a little bit of a bottleneck for the phase two projects because of the size and the constraints of it. If we don't expedite this and move in this direction with the unsolicited proposal, I'm afraid that our delays of at least another year to a year and a half just to get through all of our design phases will just create an awful bottleneck for all of the rest of the phase two projects in all of our districts, including more in District 3. So I I really think this doesn't just, behoove District 3 immediately, but it also helps the entire city in making sure that our tranche two projects are moving smoothly ahead. Any other comments?
Yeah, mayor. I completely support, commissioner Beasley Pittman, and we need to move as quickly and efficiently as possible towards infrastructure, and this is vital. So I'm happy to support and excited about moving forward with, with infrastructure. Okay.
So thank you, mayor. So we had an opportunity to chat this morning. So let's talk about some of the things we discussed this morning. As I shared with you, I'm not a big fan of p threes for what's otherwise a very basic project. You know, p threes should be limited to those things that are somewhat unique in nature. Now as I said to you, and I'll say it publicly, these are great companies. We've used them for a lot of projects before. I'm very comfortable with the with the companies involved. That's not the issue. I am a little concerned about the about the process.
So talk to me, and let's share with, with everybody what you said about being able to move forward faster than we can right now. Because where we were before in terms of being previously at Brad, correct me if I'm wrong, 90% design previously before we found out about the utilities?
Six 60.
I thought we were at 90, but the previous is up.
We were at 90% design before we found out about the
About the utility. Right.
That's it.
Prior to the Right. Prior Right. Prior to current. So and I and I know these proposals had come in earlier, and I will tell you, candidly, I would not have been at all willing to consider doing a p three when we were at 90% design. We were ready to go out on the street, and so it would have made absolutely no sense. I'm willing to consider it now because of the argument that's made about advancing this and the time it's gonna take for us to get to 90% design before we can go out to bid. So tell us a little bit about what we talked about earlier about your willingness to move forward with this at your risk because I think that's a very important aspect for me.
Sure. Go ahead, Dave.
Yeah. So if this is approved, we will be taking it on in a design build format. And by that alone, we will take over the design. The city will hand us where they're at today, and we will plan to break it up in phases to be able to accelerate getting that infrastructure in the ground within three months, having actual pipe and structures installed in a neighborhood, which in the event of a rainstorm, what happens now, there's no there's nowhere to drop a pump. So there's no struct there's no infrastructure in the neighborhood as it sits right now.
So if anybody lives in Melrose, when it's a heavy rainstorm, you see they're using the vac truck pump trucks because that only needs a couple inches of headwater to be able to suck the water and dispose of it outside the neighborhood. But in changing that to a design build, we can install you know, do the design in phases, smaller phases rather than designing the entire project and putting that out for bid. We can design one critical block, get those pipe and structures installed quickly much faster than the whole project's permitting, and as a result, in a rainstorm, be able to drop our pumps into that infrastructure that we install quickly and be able to pump the water out of the neighborhood much faster.
Okay. And we're also talking that we're looking at this as a as basically a GMP with the same at risk. So, basically, you guys are gonna own your price. We own it. Yes, sir. Oil goes up to a $140 a barrel. We're in trouble. You still own the price. Right?
Yes, sir.
Okay. Which is why I'm writing. Which is why your estimate is coming in higher than our engineering estimates because you've gotta build some contingency into your numbers because that that's your that's that's your wiggle room in case everything goes even even even further south than we are today.
The there is also, in addition to those contingencies, absolutely are included in our price, the estimate definitely doesn't have that stormwater response. So we're taking on for the duration of the project managing if there is any flooding.
And that's the one thing we didn't get a chance to discuss today and I wanted to ask you about. So storm related events, I mean, obviously, anything other than a hurricane force majeure, but just regular, you know, regular weather.
Well, even in a hurricane event, we will have a plan of action to be able to address that and will. We're gonna take over the neighborhood as it relates to flooding until the project is delivered fully complete.
Okay. Well, again, as I said to you earlier today, for this kind of a project, I would not have been in favor of it previously. But given the fact that we're we're looking at a a sixteen month setback, I think it makes sense for the neighborhood to do this. So I'm comfortable with moving it forward. I also will share, with the commission.
One thing I I did share with the with with the two companies, and and they understand where I'm coming from, I don't think they object to it, is given the enormity of the amount of money that we're spending, I I would not be in favor of the minimum number of days of putting this out for other companies to bid. I'm very much in favor of the fact that whenever we're putting public taxpayer dollars to work, that we afford people an opportunity to compete for those dollars. So I I I think for anybody to put a bid together in three weeks in something of this magnitude I I do public bids for other companies that I consult with, and I can tell you it's an enormous undertaking. So I hope we have a reasonable amount of time that encourages competition. That's all. Thank you.
Just to clarify, the minimum number of days for a competition period is twenty one days, but it can go up to a hundred and twenty days. So we would want that level of feedback from the commission if there was a decision to proceed to accept the project and set a competition period.
So I'm I'm just saying not the minimum. This is not a project of $80,000,000 for each for each component that we're talking a $160,000,000 give or is is not a twenty one day time frame that I think is reasonable for the
vendor community. So what are you recommending?
I was gonna ask this. Thank you, mayor. What recommendation?
Sorry. I I think 30 is probably realistic. 45 would be ideal, but 30 is probably realistic. I like 30. Alright.
So leave
it at
I just don't wanna delay too much. And, actually, I think the I think what we're gonna find, I'm gonna make a prediction that no one else is gonna come in on this because the pricing that we have guaranteed now actually falls within the range of what we thought it was going to be. A little bit on the high end of the range, but it does fall within the range. And yet those are numbers that don't even take in as I said, that do not take into consideration what we're still facing where those numbers will really escalate. So I'm good with 30. I'll defer to the district commissioner, but I wanna get this started.
Yes. I I wanna get this started as well. I am comfortable with the 21. Too. I I wanna I want to see this move forward. I have with what we've discussed and what's on the opportunity, I believe that this is the time for the community. It may be considered, what, nine days, but twenty one days to me is comfortable. I wanna move forward for our community can feel comfortable. You know, every time it rains, we're getting these phone calls about the water, being fearful of the storm. So if there's anything that I can do to represent to alleviate that, I believe this is the way to go. So I'm rep representing twenty one. Me too.
Alright. So
I'm 3021. I agree with 21.
Okay. Alright. Before we before we move on, city manager, can I ask a couple questions? How how are we paying for this? Is this a thirty year bond?
So for all of our Fortify Lauderdale projects, we utilize bond revenue.
Is that a thirty year bond?
We have several issuances. There's actually one on your agenda tonight for phase two.
Is that what's related to this project?
We already have some funding in place for this project as it's related to phase one.
Okay. So it and and how long does that bond period usually last?
I'd be that Matthew is coming forward with that detail.
Sorry. I don't have it right in front of me, but usually we're doing thirty year bonds on.
Right. I'm just so just so that we have some perspective here, and I'm going to support this tonight. But just so that we have some perspective, because city manager, you in the past have like, when we talked about the city hall, when the projection of what the actual cost will be for a project at at, you know, this 148,000,000 or the high estimate is a 173,000,000. It's not really 173,000,000. It's probably more than half 1,000,000,000.
Isn't that correct? Where are going where'd you go with that? As I as I try to compare, you know, the analysis that we that that we were that was posed to us when we're discussing the new construction of the City Hall, the City Hall was estimated at at I think it was the $200,000,000 mark. You estimate it was gonna cost over 700,000,000. So the reality is that this Melrose Manor's Riverland storm mitigation project is not really a 148, and it's not really a 173. It's really half $1,000,000,000. Isn't that correct?
Yeah. And, mayor, the important thing to note was the city hall $720,000,000 was inclusive both of the debt service, the developer's equity, as well as the o and m costs, which were $6,000,000 a year. I like to do a it's kinda like with your mortgage. Right? So you take a mortgage out on your house. It's for a certain price. You should, in your mind, at least double it because by the time you're done paying for it, it usually, with the interest cost will end up costing almost double the cost. And so it's a similar situation when we issue bonds. We do pay a debt service. We're very fortunate that because of our strong credit rating, it usually is at a favorable rate. But you're right, there is interest costs that come along with issuing
debt. Does
this cost include operation and maintenance of the stormwater system?
So we budget as you look at our Stantec models each year in June, you'll notice that we budget for the expansion of the operations and maintenance of our stormwater system as we bring new projects online. So we've beefed up our staffing as well as the overall operating costs associated with the stormwater system.
But these prices that are on our on page nine
They would not. They would be specifically for the projects. Right.
And I just wanna add that every time we do a bond issuance, we do indicate how much it will cost the city over the life. So whether it's thirty years, we share that information at that time.
Isn't a this isn't a thirty year number.
That's correct. But we do share that in other agenda items that speaks to the revenue that is supporting this project.
But we don't highlight it ever like we did with city hall, do we?
So I'm just the point I'm trying to make is that in in full disclosure, being transparent here, the public should know that this project is not the price that we see here. It's much more than that. And and that's why when we talked about the city hall, I thought that that July number was was was not only inaccurate, but it's distracting from a from a a credible conversation regarding the cost of a new city hall because it wasn't really $720,000,000. It was much less. And for some reason, you added the developer's fee.
You added, you know, thirty years operation and maintenance. I mean you know? So I want I wanna make sure that going forward that we present numbers that are real and and and when we get back to the city hall conversation that we don't keep piling on numbers of for whatever reason that we did that, when in fact, you know, the prices, what we're presented now, and and what it what it costs us over thirty years is another is another cost that we'll we will have to absorb in in future budgets. But I I bring that up as a point because you didn't do it here, but you did it with the city hall. And that's why I'm concerned that, you know, you didn't also bring it up here because the reality is this is gonna cost us half $1,000,000,000.
$511,514,331.08.
Thank you, doctor Spock. Just ask the CPA.
Really very important because Yvette, when you talked about like, you should look at it like when people have a mortgage on their home. That was what I was trying to get out in the conversation about city hall. A real estate agent advertises a a five
Excuse me. Please don't yell from the audience.
A real estate agent doesn't advertise a house at what it will cost after a thirty year mortgage. They advertise the purchase price of the house. Same thing when you purchase a car and you get a car loan. But for some reason, we didn't do that before. But now we need to let's make it apples to apples. That's all. If we're going to highlight something, like, on that last project with big bold letters and tell tell the residents that we're spending 3 quarters of $1,000,000,000 on a city hall, it's a little disingenuous is what I'm saying. That's all. Thank you.
Alright. So let's move forward. I think the twenty one days is the consensus. I think that these neighborhoods have suffered long enough. Not just so many of our neighborhoods were never built with proper infrastructure. A lot of them were built on the cheap by the original developers, and now we're we're having to pay for it. But And
and I'm sorry, Maryann. Just to clarify, Merrill's Manor was built without infrastructure at all. Saying. They have zero.
That's what I'm saying. All these all these neighborhoods were built on the cheap without without sidewalks, without storm water, without pump stations, without a lot of things. And and so now so just like a lot of the rest of the infrastructure in our city, we're making up for lost time, for failure to invest like we should have in the past. And, you know, it's about time we do this because I remember when I was campaigning in 2020, and we're standing in in in huge pools of water over in Melrose Manors because there was no infrastructure. And we had tremendous rain three days before the election. Lucky us.
Mhmm.
But let's move forward as aggressively and as as quick as quickly as possible on this. Alright.
Thank you. And
That's with four that's with regard to business five and business six.
Yes. Okay. Later on this evening, we do have two walk on items related to these conference discussion items that will address the competition period.
Alright. Great. Alright. That's it for the afternoon discussion. We're done. Conference, that meeting is concluded.
That's it. Alright. Now let's move on to regular afternoon, buddy.
All those folks are here from Melrose Manors and Riverland Road. The item is going forward. Moving on to our one appointment of board and committee members. Mister clerk, would you please like to read the names into the into the record?
Are they taking their lights off, please?
Mayor, we have motions also before before resolutions. I can't hear you. What motions?
Motions.
M one. Did I skip motions? Oh, I'm sorry. M one, motion approving a service agreement with Pepe Gatka related to the installation of a mural in Peter Feldman Park. Before we get there, I saw the rendering. Who can speak to me on the rendering?
have Josh Harden, our cultural affairs officer.
Josh, you may have answered this question before, but I just wanna make sure I understand if you Josh, this rendering is not just one side. It's all sides because this is a significant amount of money we're paying for a a mural, and I just wanna make sure that we're not just paying, you know, this amount of money for one side. So so the same kind of artwork will appear on all four sides of this?
Yes, sir.
Exactly. Alright.
Alright. Someone like to move the item? So moved. Do I hear a second?
Second. Moved and seconded. Any questions regarding this? Josh, this is gonna be finished in June? We're hoping so. Yes, sir. Well, it's been a long time. It has. Yes, sir. Long time. So let's get Pepe moving. Absolutely. Thank you.
Thank you so much. He's back in
the country.
He's back in the country. Yes. Thank you.
Appreciate it. Thank you so much.
May I please call the roll? Commissioner Herbst? Yes. Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman?
Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And m one's approved. M two, a motion approving an agreement pursuant to a multistep procurement process, request for qualifications, prequalification for design build services, and so forth and so on. This is regarding core construction services of Florida. This is regarding Fire Station Number 13. No one has signed up to speak. Does anyone have any questions? No?
Very excited about this, mayor. Thank you.
Yes. About time. Right?
Yeah. Yeah. It's gonna be excellent.
May I may I clarify that this also has to do with medical substation number 88? Yeah. So there are two facilities in one, and fire stir Fire Station 13 is the last of the 2004 fire bond projects. So we're very excited to see this come forward.
You know, those those projects, when I was commissioner, we voted to build all those fire stations for $20,000,000.
It just shows you how long you've been around. Yeah. Yeah. And how long
it how long it costs us when we wait and delay like this. Right? Yep. Okay. It's been moved. Has it been seconded? Second. Okay. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Mister Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Soardson? Yes. Mayor Trent Ellis?
Yes. And m two is approved r one. Now the appointment of board and committee members. Please read the names into the record.
Thank
you, mayor. For tonight's resolution, aviation adviser board, Lewis Gava, nominated by vice mayor Sorenson. Board of adjustment, Jay Shechman, nominated by vice mayor Sorenson. Cemetery system board of trustees, Kelly Scurry, nominated by vice mayor Sorenson. Charter revision board, Michael Albeda, nominated by commissioner Glassman. Economic development advisory board, Elena Jean Francois, nominated by commissioner Beasley Pittman. And marine advisory board, Theodore Morley, nominated by vice mayor Sorensen, and that rounds it out.
Okay. Any other modifications or additions? There being none, would someone like to introduce the resolution? Introduce. Resolution has been introduced. Please call the roll.
A resolution of city commission of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, appointing or nominating if applicable, board and committee members as set forth in the exhibit attached here to amend a part here of. Commissioner Herbst? Yes. Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Mister Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trent Ellis?
Yes. And r one is now approved. And I wanna thank those individuals who have volunteered to sit on the board and committees. Thank you for your commitment to our to our city. R two, resolution approving an interlocal agreement between the city of Fort Lauderdale and Broward County for a $3,000,000 sir surtax grant match program for Breakers Avenue. When are we gonna get Breakers done already?
Excuse me. May I Mayor. Remember your first charrette in 2003?
2003?
In Breakers Avenue? Well, it's only twenty three years later. Almost the same amount of time we waited for Mary Brookle Avenue to get named. Right? Almost the same amount of time. Yeah. I would be very happy to Would you like to introduce the resolution? So pleased to move this resolution. Yes. Any questions with regard to this? There being none, please call the roll.
A resolution of the city commission of the City Of Fort Lauderdale, Florida approving an interlocal cert tax funding agreement for city of Fort Lauderdale between the city of Fort Lauderdale and Broward County for the Breakers Avenue Resiliency and Traffic Improvement Cert tax grant match program authorizing the city manager to execute the interlocal agreement and any required documents associated with the interlocal agreement and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And r two is approved. R three, resolution approving a grant agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for $1,000,000, state appropriation for the Las Olas Boulevard safety improvements and Americans with disabilities upgrades west the Western Corridor from Andrews Avenue to 17th Avenue. No one has signed up to speak. Someone please introduce the resolution.
I'll introduce it, mayor, and just thank city staff, transportation and mobility, Milosch, the whole team. This is gonna be a fantastic improvement for those with disabilities and and challenges and and also for all folks, on seventeenth. So thank you.
Okay. Resolution has been introduced. Please call the roll.
A resolution. City commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida approving a state funded grant agreement with the state of Florida Department of Transportation authorizing the acceptance of the grant funds from the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $1,000,000 for the construction of the Los Olives Boulevard safety improvements with American with Disabilities Act upgrades and authorizing the city manager execute the grant agreement in any and all documents necessary or incidental to accept such grant funding on behalf of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trent Ellis?
Yes. And that item is now approved. R four, resolution approving a grant agreement with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development for the construction of the Breakers Avenue resiliency and traffic improvements project in the amount of $850,000. One person has signed up to speak. Is mister, Joe Askerberg still here? He is not. Okay. Anyone else wish to speak on this item? There being no one, would someone like to introduce the resolution?
Yes, sir. This is a companion to that. Thank you to the federal government and congress, congressman Moskowitz for all of his help in getting us, these funds for the Breakers Avenue project.
Please call the roll.
A resolution city commissioner the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida approving a grant agreement authorizing the acceptance of the grant funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Breakers Avenue Resiliency and Traffic Improvements Project in the amount in the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida in the amount of $850,000 delegating authority to the city manager to execute the grant agreement and any and all documents necessary or incidental to acceptance of such grant funding on behalf of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst? Yes. Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentales?
Yes. And that item is now approved. R five, city manager annual performance review. I understand the city manager has a presentation.
I just have a few introductory comments.
Was there I was told there might be a video.
No. There's no video. There's an attachment exhibit one.
Right.
Okay. So has everyone had a chance to review the, the attachment?
Alright. Okay. Anyone wish any do you have any comments you'd like to make?
Thank you, mayor. I just wanna start by saying that it has truly been an honor and privilege to serve as your city manager over the last year. It has been fourteen years since the city of Fort Lauderdale welcomed someone external to the organization to come in and serve in this capacity. So it has truly been a year of growth and learning and progress. Exhibit one reflects a sampling of the work that has been done under my leadership but with your guidance and support through the strength of our very, very capable team of individuals.
I've had the opportunity to go out into the community to learn more about the neighborhoods and the districts and the concerns. I've met with stakeholders. I've had a chance to do ride alongs with various operational departments and learn more about the needs of the operation. I'm very proud that our city remains financially solvent. This year, we have reimplemented a financial integrity principles policy, and we haven't done that in ten years. And so I'm really proud of that. This year, we also established an emergency reserve fund.
We haven't what? We haven't maintained what was that?
Financial integrity principles. We had not refreshed those in about ten years. Oh. And so I'm I'm really proud of the work that we've done to advance various capital projects, to receive funding for projects, some of which are on tonight's agenda. I'm proud of the reorganization that we've done, which has allowed for new departments to thrive and to allow existing departments to be even more productive.
Our team is full of momentum, and I think the past year has taught me a lot about the strengths of our team members. And they've been very flexible and agile. No matter what I've asked for, they found a way to deliver, and I really appreciate all of them for that. And if if every member of the staff could stand up at this time just to be acknowledged for all the work that you do. So this is not just my performance evaluation.
It's truly a reflection of the team and the way that each and every team member contributes to our success. And so I appreciate any feedback that you may have. We're all a work in progress, and I'm truly proud of our efforts to date. And I know this is only the beginning of more positivity to come. So thank you.
Alright. So a number of people have signed up to speak. So before the commission has their conversation, why don't we just listen to the public? I'll call your names by threes. Jerry Nesbitt Gerald Nesbitt senior, Dudley Dudley Harvard, and Ted and Sarah. Is Gerald Nesbitt here?
They left here.
Left? Is Dudley here? Oh, come on up. Then Ted and Sarah.
Cheryl left.
This is Dudley. Right?
Yeah. This is Dudley.
Good eve good evening, everyone.
Good evening.
Mayor, commissioner, staff, and everyone. My name is Dudley Etienne Harvard, and I proudly serve as the president of Sunset Civic Association within District 3 under the leadership of commissioner, Beasley Pittman. I'm here today to speak in support of our city manager, miss Williams, during her annual performance review. From what I've seen and what is reflected in her leadership, she demonstrates a strong commitment to responsiveness, accountability, and community engagement. Those are not just words.
They're experienced firsthand within Sunset. Miss Williams took the time to personally meet with our civic association and the residents. She didn't just listen. She act. She ensured we were connected to the right department, the right staff, and the right, solutions.
That level of follow-up speaks volumes about her leadership, style, and dedication for serving the neighbors and not just some. Effective leadership at the city level requires collaboration, transparency, and ability to move priorities forward, and we've seen that in action. Her approach aligns with what residents want, a city that listens, responds, and delivers. On behalf of Sunset community, I wanna say thank you, and I look forward to continue to work together and seeing even more progress under your leadership. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. Ted and Sarah followed by Steve Whitten followed by doctor John Hill.
Ted and Sarah, president of River Oaks. I didn't plan on speaking twice tonight. I thought I was one in the afternoon and one in the evening. But I just wanna say, you know, River Oaks, we have a strange relationship with some city officials, you know, especially in the past, and a few department heads refused to come to River Oaks for to our civic association, meaning because they claimed there was a hostile environment. But, I just wanna say that we had Raquel very early when she was hired, and we weren't the first. I know downtown was, but we were right there, number two or three. And, and let me tell you, from that day on, she really wowed our civic association. Listen. And the key not only that, it it was the people that she has brought with her. Let me tell you.
I was speaking with Brad Cain this, over this past weekend about the rain because, you know, from River Oaks, we have a flooding problem. I reached right out to him, and he reached right back to me. I met with Quentin at the Gorbets Park, you know, on ground level. He came out, and and we walked the ground. Anytime I've reached out to to them, they have always come through.
And she was smart enough to keep Chris and Ben back here that are vital parts, you know, and, you know, knew who to keep and who to replace. And I agreed with every one of her every one of her commands, and she's a hit in River Oaks. She's I think she's a benefit to the city of Port Lauderdale, and we're just I am. I know. Let me see for myself. I'm just very happy that she's our city manager.
Good. Thank you.
Is Steve Whitten here? Steve. Followed by John doctor John Hill, followed by Bobbie Bobbie Henry.
Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. First of all, congratulations for passing the Living Seawall permit of fee assistance, a tremendous program. And as Ben said, one of the leaders in the country, so congratulations for that. A quick moment of your time, please. I didn't come here tonight to celebrate Raquel's success, but I came instead to celebrate yours. This is about the five of you as much as it is about Raquel and her team. As my old Italian partner from Harrison, New York used to say, there is no I in team. I wanna tell you how proud I am of all of you for taking the shot with what I thought was a still somewhat untested young woman from Miami, and look at the results. Look at the group. At the respect.
Look at the collective respect for all of you. You picked the right person. You did it, and our reside residents are reaping the collective benefits of your hard and insightful work, the work hard work of Raquel and her team, but it's all a result of your efforts. Through your efforts, we are truly one of the most respected waterfront communities in The United States, and it's now not just lip service when we refer to ourselves as the boating capital of the world. What's happened over the last couple of years, etcetera, particularly the last year, we are indeed the boating capital of the world.
We're not the yachting capital of the world. It's boating for everybody. And, again, you did this. You collectively collectively created created one of the hottest, most vibrant melting pots of the community. Raquel simply keeps the lights on and the city functioning, but it's all a result of your efforts. We absolutely look the part. Look at you guys, everybody on the team. We speak the part of a true big waterfront city. Allow me to share. Back way too many years ago, I was in a master's program in in behavioral psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, and we participated in a groundbreaking study on Bell Telephone employees.
Do you remember operators? What motivates employees more? Is it more money, or is it acknowledgment? It turned out the extra dollar so wasn't nearly as important as acknowledging somebody for their outstanding efforts, a k a job well done. We definitely all use some additional pats on the back. No gratuitous bullshit, but some simple acknowledgments of people for jobs well done. I'd like to suggest we take a moment to applaud what Raquel and her team have accomplished, but even more importantly, what this group has accomplished. I can't wait to see what the next twelve months hold for the city under your collective leadership, everybody's leadership. Come on, everyone. Let's get up and applaud Raquel
and the five bosses on the day. Terrific job. Thank you. You
could keep talking, Steve. No. Doctor is doctor Hill here? Oh, there you are. Followed by, Bobby Henry, followed by Titiana Johnson.
Honorable mayor, commissioners, and special kudos to commissioner Beasley of District 3 of which I'm in. I apologize because they have some lorential problems with my throat here and trying to vocalize, so I hope that I can make some lucidity in in you guys understanding what I'm saying.
doctor John h Meisel Hill the third, an offspring of one of the most influential black families here in Broward County, the Hill Mazo family. I am a retired medical professor in the anatomical sciences, military science professor, FIU adjunct professor in the College of Public Health and Environmental Toxicology. This is my very beautiful daughter, which I'm so proud proud of. She's yeah. Well, the mayor will let me talk.
She'll let me talk. I'll be I'll be patient here. Okay. So I I'd like to say something very complimentary about our city manager. That's why I'm here.
Our love Raquel Williams, for her exceptional leadership and dedication to our city. Hats off to you. Her constant guidance, fortitude, thoughtful making decisions, and the complete transparency to forwarding our city into significant and very, very advantageous and progressive matters through dedication, through Okay. Alright. Well, anyway, we we commend her, and we have really appreciated our services to the city.
And we hope she continues to do the work that she's done. Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Bobby Henry followed by Tatiana Johnson. Anyone else wish to speak? That's it. Good
evening to everybody, mayor, vice mayor, and the entire commission staff, and to everybody in the room. I wanna take my hat off and tipped it to the lady. I was trying to find three things that you did, but instead I got seven. I'm not gonna read them. You talked about them tonight.
What I wanna say on behalf of my family, my sisters over there, we're another one of those families in the community that is exceedingly proud to be a part of this. And city manager, your staff and all of its diversity speaks to where this community, this city can go, and you can take some credit for that. The gentleman before the gentleman before me, he said it best. Because of you all who's sitting up here, you made it possible. She couldn't do it alone.
So you all need to be commended, and we all need to understand what it means to have diversity as a team. And I'm spelling team with two m's. Together, each can accomplish much more. And you got a team here, so I think you need to use it. And I learned something tonight coming here other than laughing at y'all sometime when y'all put on y'all performances.
I learned about a natural seawall and what that meant. I learned about grass, fake grass, and how it can cause damage. I learned how people who can disagree and in the end agree to get something done, and that's what it's all about. So I wanna say to the community, don't let this be your last time coming here, and don't be afraid to have a difference. It's okay for us to have a difference, a to be different. That's okay. So you you matching the button on me, are you? Thank you. The band's gonna
play the band's gonna play in a couple sec.
And, again, thank you so very much. And, miss Williams, keep it up. We got your back.
Miss Johnson.
Good evening.
Go ahead.
Good evening, everyone. Today, I rise to speak in support of someone who is not only making a
difference that microphone down a little bit. Yes. Pull it down a little bit more. Get it right.
There you go. Yeah.
Okay. Good evening, everyone. Today, I rise to speak in support of someone who is not only making a difference, but redefining what true service to a city and community looks like. In every neighborhood, there are people who talk about change, and then there are those who do the work. The individual work we're recognizing today falls firmly in that second category.
Working as a city worker in this space, she carries not just the weight of responsibility, but the hopes, voices, and lived experiences that many too often go unheard. And yet they don't just show up, they show out. They show up when resources are limited. They show up when challenges challenges feel overwhelming. They show up when others step back.
But more importantly, she shows results. Because of her dedication, families are being supported, voices are being amplified, and doors that once felt closed are now opening. They are building trust where there was doubt, creating opportunity there where there was scarcity, and inspiring others to believe that real change is possible. Represents in representation matters, but impact matters even more, And this individual brings both. She reminds us that leadership is not about titles. It's about service. It's about consistency. It's about having the courage to stand in spaces when you may be the only one and still choosing to give all for the greater good. So today, we don't just acknowledge her. We stand in full support.
We support her vision, support her work, and we commit to standing us alongside her because when one person is doing great things for the community and city, it's up to all of us to uplift, protect, and continue that momentum. Let's not just applaud her efforts, but let's match her energy. Thank you.
Thank you. Is anyone else wish to speak? Okay. Raquel, do have any other comments?
Well, I just wanna say thank you to every member of the community who spoke tonight on my behalf and to those who have shared with me over the past year words of encouragement and support. Also, to those of you who have held me accountable and who've said, hey. What's going on over here? We need the city to do better in this area. So thank you for the continuous feedback and the support.
Alright. You.
before I open it up to the commission, and I'm sure everyone on the commission would like to say something, I think that listening to the public here tonight has been very helpful in understanding the image and the impression that you have given the community since you've been here a little over one year now. And I think that's important because I think that people look up to you as a role model. And and and having been having come from, you know, Miami Dade and and now here in our city, you know, people continue to want to see people from their community rise to levels of of leadership and importance and want to see them succeed. And I think we all want to see everyone succeed. The thing is that and I'll tell you, I have to agree with the person who made the comment that, you know, you brought a lot of very quality people to our city.
Many of the assistant city managers and directors that have now been hired, you know, have brought a significant amount of value to to our city. But, you know, what what I wanna bring up also, however, is that there are there are situations which, you know, I have great concern over. And so let me let's all sit back and, you know, I want I want you to understand me, and I want everyone to understand where I'm coming from. You know, I love Fort Lauderdale, and we have spent and I personally have spent many, many years on this dais as a commissioner, as in a mayor, trying to accomplish the things that I believe this this community has wanted to see. And we have made great strides, starting from, you know, sports arenas, sports centers, underground infrastructure, getting us through COVID.
It's been there have been challenges every time we turn around, and it's been an interesting ride. And and I have to say that, you know, this commission in its different forms have have really risen to the task of of trying to accomplish the things that needed to get done. And so we set that standard, and we set that those those goals. And and it's really the purpose of a city manager to fulfill those goals. And and that's and so to that extent, I think it's important for us to understand that, personally, I feel that a number of the things that this commission has asked this the city manager to fulfill, Realistic efforts have been have been made.
But I also want you to understand my frustration in seeing a number of things that were not fulfilled. And and it's very difficult for me to continue to stay on this path and not be able to verbalize my frustration in some of the things that, you know, I feel that when the commission says something, the city manager responsibility is to fulfill those responsibilities. And and one of those things is understanding how this commission does business. And I know, for example, commissioner Herbst has never been a fan of p three development, but p three development has always been a very important aspect of how we've gotten things done in the last eight years of this city. In fact, when it was first introduced by the state legislature as an as a these unsolicited proposals, it's been a handy tool for the city in order to get things done.
You've often fought against it, and you verbalized it on many occasions to people both within the city and without how frustrated you are with the p three approach. And in many cases, we have seen you fight back against trying to handle some of these projects from that perspective. And that's very frustrating for for a commission that has made it a priority that the p three process is very important to our city and and to see the see frustrations materialize because we we thought we had a person who's going to work with us, not against us. And it's really important that the commission feel feel comfortable in knowing that a city manager is not working behind his back and and having an alternative agenda that does that doesn't that isn't consistent with her own vision. And I think that and and I can go into detail, but right now I just wanna talk in generalities because we have a lot ahead of us.
We have a lot of projects we're trying to fulfill. I'm very happy we are going ahead on a p three project with Mancini tonight. We've we've we've given direction to the commission to the manager now to to move forward on those projects, but it's been very frustrating in the past to try to work through those processes. Moreover, we have a concern about your relationship with our our public safety departments. For the last several months, I've heard nothing but frustration and difficulty in your relationship with the public safety departments.
Our fire chief, our police chief, our mid level command staff, there there are tremendous amount of frustration, and and that's not a good thing. The city manager should always work in sync with our with our public safety departments, and and we're finding that that that's not happening. In fact, there's a significant amount of pressure on them to even leave the city because they can't continue to work with you. And and I think that to me, you know, we're happy with our our police department. We're happy with our fire department.
We're not looking for change. So when we when we asked you to join our city, you know, it wasn't so much to it was there to be a facilitator to fulfill the goals of the commission, not to be a disruptor, to upset the the the foundations of some of the it's taken us years to try to create. And and here we're finding ourselves constantly trying to to to I don't know. Trying to make sure that our city stays intact and we don't continue to lose personnel who who have told us time and again they're they're ready to leave our city because it's fine. They're finding it difficult to work under your directives.
And I find that particularly frustrating because just the other day, got a call from a union chief who said he's been trying to reach you for the last couple of weeks, and you're not returning his phone calls. And that's not good, and that's not that's not how we wanna run our our city, and it's it's disrespectful. And a lot of the a lot of the community partners that we deal with, whether they be union people, whether they be people in other industries and or other levels of government, continue to inform me that you've often been very dismissive of them, and you've often been unwilling to work with them. And and that's not good because we spend years trying to build relationships in this city, and you come in here with a somewhat imperious attitude that has been very frustrating. I know.
I know. You should know what's going on, folks. I know. Well, I I think you should hear it because this is what's going on. Okay.
And so and so and so for that reason, it's it's it's alarming that we have to we are now at a at a crossroads as to, you know, our relationship with you and to determine whether or not, you know you know, what's our what are our next steps? It's very frustrating because, you know, you've been very friendly towards me. You've shown compassion in many situations. You've, you know, you've you you show up at a lot of events, and it's been it's been welcoming because not all city managers have been that way. You have you know, you've directed your attention in places where before they places have been ignored.
But at the same time, you know, we find that it's it's becoming it's it we're at a point in our in our governance that we have to make a decision where we're going from this point forward, simply because I refuse to accept the fact that our public safety people are are at their wit's end. And and why that's happening and why why that behavior and that and that relationship has has occurred. It's never happened before in any of our city managers, and trust me, we've lived through a number of them in the last eight years. But the reality is that we that it's not something that we can continue to to to sustain. So those are my initial remarks.
And but I wanna just point out one other thing. You know, there was a situation in which the NAACP had a press conference a couple weeks ago regarding an allegation of racism within our our department. And I had asked you the day of that of that press conference whether you knew anything about it, and you said that you didn't know anything about it. But I have an email here that was that you received over a week prior to that news conference in which you were informed about it. And it's very clearly states that all this all the issues that were that arose that were stated in that news conference.
And, you know, it it created a very bad impression of our city because there were unsubstantiated allegations, yet there was a press conference making those allegations. It made our police department look bad. It made our police chief look bad, and I don't know whether that was deliberate or whether it was indifference. But the reality is that I don't believe you were honest with us with regard to that moment. And why is that so important?
It's so important because I love my city. I've spent years representing the city, and I don't want to know that I have a city manager that's prepared to throw someone under the bus and and not try to work with within the department and with with our community to be able to resolve issues that I find extremely revolting. I think racism is a terrible thing, and I think that that anything we could have done to avoid that situation should have been undertaken by your office, especially since, according to this email, you knew everything about it the week before. So before I ask you to respond, I'd like to hear from the other members of this commission. I'll start to my left.
Commissioner Herps, do you have any comments to
make? Thank
you, mayor. Wow. I was not aware of of that. So this is news to me, and that that's very disturbing, Mikhail.
I mister Herbst, could I interrupt you for a second?
Yeah.
The mayor just shared some very biting feedback of the city manager. So, mister Herb, I I'd like the city manager to be afforded the opportunity to to respond to that, if that's alright. Sure. Prior to us us talking through, if that's all right, commissioner Herbst.
That that that's absolutely fine. I'd I'd like to I'd like to
Thanks.
Get a response to that. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, commissioner Herbst and vice mayor Sorenson. As it relates to the allegations of hostile work environment at the Fort Lauderdale Police Department, I was not aware that the NAACP was going to be holding a press conference to talk about those allegations. What I was aware of is that there were some concerns with an exam related to a sergeant's test. When I was made aware by our police chief of the concerns, I met with him, actually tried to give him some advice as to how to approach the situation and try to manage it and make it better. He actually was intending on putting out a statement to the entire police department, and he shared that statement with me, and I gave him some feedback on it.
I no way anticipated that it would become a press event. We handle allegations or concerns administratively all the time.
Honestly Yeah. I'll let you finish. But so your relationship with the the African American community and with Marsha Ellison, who happens to be in the audience, is that distant that she would not have alerted you, that she was going to have a press conference regarding something so significant?
I I do
I don't think you wanna go there, Amir. I really don't think you wanna go there,
I do not I do not have it is my it is my assessment that the NAACP likely wanted to have a press press conference without city staff having knowledge of it in advance. That press conference was scheduled for the morning of a city commission meeting. When the chief made me aware of the press conference, I shared that immediately with every member of the city commission.
Commission. So any allegation as to my involvement with the press conference or me throwing any public safety professional under the bus is baseless. Since I've
shared joined the city, our police department has done nothing but get better and better. We have shaved off $1,200,000 in overtime, not by accident, but because I involved myself as well as the Office of Management and Budget to help get that under control. Since I joined the city, our police department is now sending crime stats to FDLE, something that was not happening on a regular basis prior to my inquiring about it. So all I've done over the past year is provided support. You can check from last year's decision packages as well as my most recent meeting with the police department, whereas I've been very supportive from a financial perspective and from a guidance perspective where necessary.
Our police department continues to make strides. Is it perfect? Absolutely not. No police department is. We're seeing our overall crime rate go down, but there's also areas that I think we all would like to see improve. That's what a city manager does. A city manager doesn't shy away, but I engage. Our police chief and fire chief know that they have my ear. I've actually scheduled weekly meetings with both of them to ensure that they have an opportunity to share with me whatever it is that may be a concern or a need. As to the fire department, also, I've been very supportive of the fire department.
We've also shaved time, about half $1,000,000 worth of overtime over the past year. They have been supported in every facet and capacity by me and the rest of the administrative team. In terms of public private partnerships, I have no challenge with public private partnerships. I will always work in the best interest of the city under the guidance and leadership of the commission. Over this past year, major public private partnerships have been advanced under my leadership, not by accident.
Our city hall project, albeit that we are exploring additional options at the direction of the city commission, has advanced more so this year than it has in years. Again, that is because we put our head down and we've done the work, and we continue to do the work with pride. In terms of any union reaching out to me, I'm not sure which union president that might be. I periodically have coffee with FOP president, maybe every other month. I speak to our fire union president, maybe once a month.
So I'm I'm not really sure of which union president you are referring to. I never want to come across as dismissive or imperious. Sometimes a person in my role has to be assertive and has to be a leader. I'm not sure of what the dynamic has been prior to my arrival, but I'm working every day to learn more and more about what this commission demands and seeks from me. I've done nothing but push the city forward.
What you've seen in exhibit one, not just a collection of things that we've accomplished, but things that I've put on my plate not because anyone asked me to, not because the commission directed me to, not because staff said this is something that has to be done. There's so many elements that have been completed and done based on me assessing and observing and making a decision that we can do even better than we've already done. So as your city manager, I am proud of the team that we have in place. I am proud of being able to help build the team to be even stronger. And if there are areas or relationships that are weakened because of my style or my approach, and what I've shared with every team member is that I ask questions.
I'm naturally inquisitive. And some questions probably should have been asked many years ago. And I'm now asking them not because I'm doing a gotcha, but it's because I want to help. I wanna help. And so if if it is that the commission has challenges with my style or my approach, just know that I'm amenable.
I am flexible. It's great to hear the feedback. My goal is to continue to progress. Many of the items that you see here before you have lingered for years, years. We have pushed so many capital projects forward this year. We've cleaned up so many things. I spent the first six months just finding where the bodies are buried and addressing issues that have gone unaddressed. Did that cause me to have to keep my head down? A lot? Yes.
But while I was keeping my head down, I was pounding the pavement. I was at every neighborhood association meeting at every possible city related event or function. I have dedicated so much of my time because it's required of me in this role, but also because I love service and I love what I do, and I'm committed to what I do. I don't ask anything of my team that I wouldn't do myself if I didn't have the time or if I know they have the expertise, so maybe they're probably better at doing it. But my team knows how hard I work.
They know how late I stay, they know that I'm up early, and they know that I'm committed. And I'm hoping that this commission knows that I'm committed as well. I would be disappointed to think that the commission may think otherwise. I have dedicated myself in terms of purchasing a home in this city, something required of me, and thankfully, the commission offered a grace period in which for me to do so. I have ensured that we have left no stone unturned.
I do not just keep the lights on. I push Fort Lauderdale forward, and I have taken that approach since day one. And, hopefully, that is acknowledged here today. If the fire chief or police chief, is supportive of the statements made today. That would be the first that I'm hearing of it.
I have I have never heard that either one of them wants to leave, the city. I have always supported them. I even brought them to Tallahassee, some a place they had not been to before, to help advocate and lobby on behalf of the city. I've done quite a bit to ensure that those departments are supported and funded. So I continue to be committed to leading with integrity and delivering excellence, something that I have said since day one.
And these accusations and the aspersions that have been cast, I receive them in the manner in which they were offered as feedback, and I will work to address any of these concerns. But know that I continue to be dedicated to this city and to giving my all. Thank you.
Alright. Thank you.
Commissioner Herbst, do you have any comments?
So, again, as I was starting to say, so thank you. Thank you for that explanation. I'd I'd like to understand a little more about that, though. So what exactly did you know? When did you know? Because if if you recall, as soon as I found out that the NAACP was was going to be having this press conference, I immediately asked you, you know, what's going on? And candidly, you weren't quite that forthcoming with me initially. You just said, you know, there were different versions of it. I didn't realize at that time, and you weren't exactly, again, forthcoming with me, that you had been aware of this for at least a week prior. So that's that's this is and and I'm surprised to hear that because I would have expected you to have shared that with me, that you knew about this for a while.
You said there was going to be an IA investigation. And as I told you, I wasn't I wasn't interested in the IA investigation. I wanted to know what you knew at the time. So
So the sergeant's exam controversy, which is what I'll characterize it as, it was an evolving matter. The members of FLPD on all sides of the argument were providing their concerns at various moments in time. So it was an evolving situation. We even had a staff call, city attorney included, human resources, outside counsel, to determine how can we address this matter. Do we need to talk to Miami Dade College, the folks who do the exam on our behalf?
Do we need to talk to anyone in human resources that has some insight into this? And so when you asked me that day at the commission meeting after it was brought up from the dais, I had heard rumblings. None of it was substantiated, and I shared with you the advice that we had discussed at a team with counsel that because the NAACP had been asking for FDLE to step in and to investigate the matter, we thought the approach would be best handled by internal affairs in combination with our Office of Professional Standards to give somewhat of an outside element. Even at that time that I shared that with you, that was still evolving and not the final determination. Until I sent that to the city commission via email, I think it was the following day.
Right.
So there within police departments, from my experience, there's always something. There there's there's usually some issue. And I've heard that with FLPD in the past, there have been issues surrounding exams, whether it's a lieutenant exam, sergeant's exam, and the police chief can probably attest to that. I view this as standard police operations, that there's always gonna be someone wondering why they either made it on the list or didn't make it on the list. And someone, I believe, within the department has invested time in trying to find out if maybe someone cheated or someone had a a greater opportunity than they did.
I really don't know all the facts. To this date, I don't know all the facts, which is why internal affairs is looking into it. Did I want to have that conversation on the dais? Absolutely not. I do think it's embarrassing for Fort Lauderdale Police Department.
I do think the press conference was embarrassing for the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. But I do expect that our police chief, when these matters come up, that he takes a proactive approach. And I think he did in this situation, and he actually came to me and shared it with me. However, I think the situation was far bigger than what he or I anticipated, and here we are today. So I in no way intended to keep any information back from the commission. This is very much an administrative situ or at that time, it felt like an administrative situation, and it escalated into the media, unfortunately.
So I'm I'm less focused on the specifics of what we're talking about. What I'm what I'm more concerned about is if you were having meetings with the city attorney and talking to Miami Dade College, this is the first time actually you've shared that with me. So what I'm concerned about is that I don't feel like you're being forthcoming with us, telling us what it is that you know. So I know that there's a lot of things you don't know. I I certainly accept that, that there are things that are known.
There are things that are unknown. What I expect is full and complete disclosure of the things that are known, and I I don't think that I've gotten that from you, and I'm disappointed. I I when I ask you a question, when I ask you what do you know, I don't want half answers. I want full and complete answers. Here's everything I know as of right now, and when I know more, I will share it with you immediately.
If you were meeting with the city attorney and you're talking to Miami Dade College, that's a lot of activity, and I would have expected to have known that when this came up. So I'm disappointed with that. I I will tell you, I am I haven't had these conversations with the chiefs, but I have talked to the rank and file, and I've shared this with you before. I I can tell you that that they're unhappy. You know, I know there's been conversations about a vote of no confidence, and that concerns me greatly.
You know, we've had this once or twice before in our history going back over thirty years. You know, once when I was here, once, I believe, when the mayor was here prior to that. So I do know that that the the folks that wear the uniform in PD, and I'm not talking about the executives, I'm not talking about the command staff, I'm talking about the guys that are out there, guys and ladies that are patrolling, are not happy. And that is a management issue that I do think you need to deal with. The other thing that concerned me today, and we didn't get a chance to talk about it, was the the city auditor's report.
There's an individual named in there who I have been talking with you about for the past year, and I've I've explained to you my my feelings about the management, what's been going on, and you haven't addressed it. And I think that's also a failure to address problems. And and and this audit report reflected that failure of management that took place up there, and this was things that I brought to your attention, and you haven't addressed it. So I think these things reflect, I think, again, perhaps lack of experience. So I am concerned about that.
I was worried about that when we brought you on. You know? I I was very strong in advocating for somebody with decades of experience because I think a city of our size and complexity requires
Sir, please. Bobby, please sit down. Please sit down or you'll be asked to to leave. You are not please. The commissioner is speaking. Please sit down or please sit down.
So, actually, I'll I'll I'll respond to that. You asked a very good question. I'll respond to that. So I don't believe that you go from having no experience as a city manager to being a city manager of a billion dollar city. I think you cut your teeth on a smaller city, you learn how to do it. There's a you're you're you're asking me a question, I'm trying to respond. Please, give give me give me the give me Alright. Alright. Alright. This is not a dialogue back and forth. I'm giving you my answer. I'm trying to be respectful to the question that was asked, and I'm sharing my my thoughts with you. But we got here here, and I've been trying to work with you since you've got here. I've done my best to mentor you and share with you as much Alright. Please? No. I wouldn't hug her. Okay? Please. Respectfully.
I know what I did and didn't do. I shook her hand. I wouldn't hug her. I'm sorry? I'll give you a hug. Come on up.
John, don't don't don't respond.
That was that that was, yeah, a rhetorical question. Thank you. So my thought is your your first year has not been knocking it out of the park, and I don't think you're overly surprised to
hear that. I I
I think you have room to grow. And I'll leave it at that.
Mister Beasley Pittman?
Yes. First, I wanna say, mayor, I'm disappointed that you used the word we, with your, summary because I don't the direction that you went, I do not include myself with the statements where you said we as a commission because I am in the position in where I stand. What miss Williams, our city manager, has been able to accomplish in this year, I am quite pleased with. Yes. There's room to grow.
The frustration you're talking about, I'm not familiar with. This conversation about officers who are not they're frustrated saying that they're gonna leave the agency. I've been billing a rapport with our officers, with the fire department, and I'm the I am one who will say to individuals when I see them, how are you doing? How's things going on? Is there anything that you're not pleased with that's going on within the department, within the city?
You can share with me because I want to know. Those individuals who I have spoken with, people that I'm a say it this way, people who look like me, people who do not look like me, they have not expounded on any situations that they feel that miss Williams is dismissive or incompetent. So the part about the we, please, I'm I'm gonna ask that you rephrase that and say and identify whoever agrees with that because I do not, and I want that on the record. Alright? Because miss Williams, I'm looking at someone who's come in as an outsider, never worked within our city, and has been able to build relationships, been able to achieve things as she said, and that we have witnessed things that have been unaddressed, un not even considered, and she's been able to execute them and make changes.
I since I've been in this seat, when we talked about the flooding in Melrose Park specifically, and I shared with the commission, I shared with others that in a conversation, it was determined or revealed that when Melrose Park and, now Lauderhill, when they were all under Broward County before the annexing, at 31st Avenue and Broward Boulevard, there was a storm water gate. And for the past years, no one has been able to come to an agreement with Lauderhill to get that gate open when it's raining. So when we're seeing those floods, it's because the water was cut off and the water was trapped in Merrill's Park. It took five years to get to a place that a conversation that city manager Williams initiated, and now we have an agreement with Lauderhill to make sure that that storm water gate is open. So all these things that have been cited, I'm not familiar with.
What I am familiar with is the individual who's working for this city for this city overall. And I'm I'm gonna use the terms that I hear all the time. Where are these people that's complaining? I hear it every time. When I bring something forward or if I wanna support something, where are the neighbors? Where are these individuals? I wanna hear them. I wanna hear these people who are saying that they are not happy with this city manager. Because it is there's no right now, there's no proof with it. She's doing a great job. Yes. There's room for improvement. Yes. She's on the job. Yes.
She's been answering our questions. And to for me, yes, there's been some things that may have, been some delay, but minimal. She's doing the job. And I'm I'm gonna tell I'm gonna say this. Let it fall where it fall. I'm offended. I am truly offended. A woman that's in this position, working for this city, and for us to discard it. I'm offended. It's not acceptable.
And even if you are frustrated, why are we waiting till tonight? Twelve months twelve months has been in this position. And now the other position, you give three months evaluation, six months, nine months. Where haven't you said anything before tonight? To me, this is a shame. This is a shame, and it's an opportunity for us or for some of us to make a claim of what they don't like on a grandstand. We hired her. We have faith in her. So why would we put this out in a open atmosphere like this?
Well, commissioner commissioner, as you know as excuse me. As you know, we are only allowed to discuss these things at these meetings.
I agree, but you can also address with her.
And we and I have. K. So but you don't know that because you're not allowed to know that. You're only allowed to know what we discuss in public.
But also at conference? Yes. At conference, we have an opportunity to bring up any item that we are not pleased with, anything that we want to discuss before.
Correct.
So, again, that was an opportunity. Yes or no. If someone wanted to Wait.
The best opportunity
to discuss this was during a review process, and that's what we're here for.
I understand that. However, why would we wait twelve months?
Because this was her review date.
Let me let me say what I said before.
There has been twelve months. There have been opportunities along the way to bring up concerns that we have with our city manager. And to do this tonight at her annual review, to me, was a strategic tactic to this to credit the work she's done in the twelve months. I think we it should have been done in a different manner.
Okay. Well, I respectfully disagree that I have not brought up my disagreement with her on certain matters that have come across us over the past year, and we don't have to go into detail right now. But there have been multiple times where I've disagreed with the city manager. I may not have been flailing my arms or yelling or screaming, but I have expressed myself. But that's not it's not about me. Okay? It's about what's best for the community. So commissioner Glassman, do you have any comments?
I can finish.
Oh, actually, I was I'm sorry. Go ahead, commissioner. Okay.
Also wanted to say, with this, I'm I'm hoping that the direction of this conversation is one that we are going to support our city manager moving forward, give an opportunity for growth and change. This is not the time to be a commission that says we're gonna now look for a new city manager. We look like individuals who are dysfunctional. How many city managers have we had in the last ten
years? Okay.
I am finished now, mayor. Thank you.
Okay. Commissioner Glassman. Yes.
Thank thank you, mayor. City manager, you and I have had a lot of conversations. Right? I have not been shy, and you have not been shy. I wouldn't want your job for anything. Okay? Not at all. Excuse me, please. I can we just talk and respect each other? That'd be so nice.
I have always told you when I had a I have a very busy district, and you know that. There is so much happening in District 2, and and you know that. And I'm not gonna go into everything that we've had a conversation about with because you know exactly what's on my mind every step of the way. The first bump in the road that we had together over a project, we went out to lunch. We discussed. We we sat there for three hours. We went through everything. I am hearing little bits and pieces from my colleagues, and I'm agreeing with little bits and pieces of everyone that's speaking because I've heard the same things. I mean, I'm sure the mayor is not the only one who's hearing from people. We've all heard these things.
So do I think do I think there's room for improvement? Yes. I do. But I think what I've always been telling you is what I think can be improved upon. We have to make this work. We have to make this work. I know you're working really hard, and I I want this city to just keep moving forward. But I also want you to know that I'm always gonna be honest with you. I always have been honest with you. Whenever I've been disappointed, whenever I've been upset about something in my district, I let you know immediately.
And then we get to work together on it. But that doesn't mean that everything's perfect. This, I'm sure, has not been easy to listen to all of this, but it's been an honest conversation. But we have to get to a point where everyone has that trust. We have to get to a point where everyone feels that they're not being pressed on. Everyone in this city, the entire staff, has got to feel not just listened to and appreciated, but they have to feel room to breathe. They have to feel not necessarily beaten on. So if they feel that, that's what they feel. I can't change that. You can change that.
I don't have that one to one relationship on a daily basis with everybody. But but I am gonna say to you that we will continue to work together, and we will continue to make sure that whenever there is a bump in the road or a problem, we're going to get over it, and we're just gonna keep moving forward. Just like just like I have always come to you whenever there's an issue, I'm not hiding anything, I would hope that you would too. We've heard a lot tonight. So I think there's a good list of things that we can work on together.
But I respect every single comment that each one of my colleagues is making, and and I understand where each one of them is coming from. And I I wanna make sure that we that we take that advice, and we take those feelings, and we take everything that we've heard, and we work on it. That's all. That that's all I can ask from this moment on. Thank
you. Okay. Commission vice mayor.
Thank you, mayor. I'm gonna take some time here, so just get comfortable. Raquel, you and I have daily conversations. I provide you, I think, regular feedback around what I think you're doing right and what I think you're doing wrong. Is that is that accurate? That's accurate. Do I call you sometimes at 09:30 at night, sometimes seven in the morning to work on behalf of the citizens of Fort Lauderdale?
That's accurate.
As I've told you many times, I think you are doing an excellent job. And when I think you can improve, as you and I have talked many times, I give you that immediate feedback. Is that right?
That's accurate.
And have we had some tough conversations about some of the things I think you can do to improve? Yes. Vice mayor. And I know a little bit about this, because for twenty years, I've been doing corporate leadership training and executive coaching. So I know a little something about evaluating talent at the highest levels, and cultivating and developing talent, because that's my other job.
So feedback is fantastic to get, both corrective feedback and both feedback, of what you're doing well. So let's let's take some time to go through all this because there's a lot lot here that's all worthwhile to dig in. Okay. Let's talk about p threes. So tonight, this afternoon, we talked about a p three for Melrose Park in Riverland, which is to provide stormwater infrastructure for a neighborhood that's never had it.
To my awareness, city manager, you did nothing to block that or stop that but encouraged a dialogue. And it from my perspective, you've continued to have an open mindset towards that p three possibility? Is there am I missing something on that?
I provided feedback to the commission earlier this year based on the conditions of the project at the time. And when those conditions changed, there was more even more room for a conversation, and I have always been open to conversations about public private partnerships, including the two on today's conference agenda.
When you and I have talked about various p three projects, You've consistently shared with me concerns about p three projects, about the pros and cons going a unsolicited p three route, and the pros and cons going a city route, a traditional city RFP process route. That's a healthy, important dialogue to have. And it's important to consider the pros and cons of all options, especially as we evaluate P3 possibilities. Let's go on to public safety. So, like, fire chief, if you could have the fire chief come up, city manager.
Chief Cohen. Fire chief, thanks for being here. So heard some serious concerns about public safety and about public safety leadership following what what the mayor said. Ready to leave the city. Are you ready to leave the city, chief?
No, sir. I'm born and raised in the city, the last thing I ever wanna do is leave the city of Fort Lauderdale.
Gotcha. So
And I know it's gonna be hard talking about your boss in front of your boss during her evaluation. How do you think she's doing?
You know what? In full transparency, I I think that manager Williams and I were off to a rough start last year. And I think since that time, we've had a lot of meetings. We've worked together, and I feel like it it's completely changed. I I feel like we have a very open communication. We're willing to work together. There's a lot of things that are are moving forward that that I've never imagined to be possible moving forward. I I think the union contract is a lot further along than I had imagined that it would be, and and I do feel supported. K.
How do
you feel the rest of the fire department feels about the city manager?
I would assume. That's a rough. That's more of a union question for the union president than it is for me. I have not been alerted to any challenges that are taking place. My understanding through the union is that they're very happy and that everything is moving forward. I I believe, you know, we're looking at our next negotiation meeting in a month, I believe, if June something, if I'm not mistaken. But I haven't heard any challenges or or nothing has been brought to my attention. But the body would not bring it to my attention. They would bring it to the union president's attention, and then it would go from there, of which I would expect them to meet with the manager and work out whatever those differences may be.
Okay.
I've been on ride alongs with Fort Larro Fire Rescue. Is that right?
Yes, sir.
Yeah. I've spent time with our firefighters. I've talked with them regularly. I have heard very strong support for you from the rank and file, and I've heard very strong support for a city
manager in the
rank and file. That's been my experience when I'm riding along and spending time with our firefighters. Is that surprising or shocking to you? No, sir. Not at all. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate it. Absolutely. Chief chief of police, you
I might just say something. Please, ma'am. You can't expect an employee to be able to, respond honestly and objectively when their boss is being asked, excuse me. I'm speaking. You can't expect them to, to be as forthright as you're expecting them to be. Folks, I'm gonna clear the room if I can't speak. Okay? So please be please be respectful. Whether you disagree with me or not, I I have to an opportunity to speak with my colleague here. Please do not point your finger at me.
And if you can't be quiet, I'm gonna have to ask you to leave the room. Okay? I think it's I think it's professionally unfair for you to ask, each member of our senior staff to come up here and to say something honestly and objectively in front of their boss as to, their as to as to her quality of leadership, do it's it's you're not gonna get an objective answer, and they're just gonna give you what you wanna hear. So I don't know what this exercise is all about. If you have an interest in asking them, you can ask them privately. But to do this in public and to do it in front of the city manager, I think is unfair, and I think it's it's unproductive.
Mayor That's my opinion. Thank you. Thank you for your feedback, mayor. I think it's unfair that you would label our city manager as having a imperious attitude, which means domineering in arrogance. That's unfair.
Well I've heard it multiple times from multiple people throughout the city staff for a number of weeks and months, so that's why I'm I'm saying it.
Okay.
Okay? That's so It's unfair that that that that behavior should be felt. Okay? No no employee should ever have to feel that way, but that's what people have said to me Okay. To the point where two of her two people in her office have have left her office and have taken jobs within the city in a pay cut just to get away from her. So keep those things in mind.
K. Thank thank you, mayor. I I will. I will. I appreciate that. Chief, chief police, you coming up here? Mayor, then why don't you share with us who are the leaders who are will are about to leave the city? Please do tell us.
You have a right to continue to talk.
You know,
I'm not I'm not here to be cross examined by
you. Okay.
I'm just If you have something to say, you say something. If you have people you wanna call up and ask, you can ask them, but I'm not gonna be cross examined by you. And I'm certainly not gonna reveal confidences because Okay. You're trying to build a case.
Okay.
Okay.
Chief Police, thanks for being here. How's your relationship with the city manager?
So when she started even before she started, we met I think it was the Sistrunk Parade, and we went to lunch. And we began the relationship then. And we too, at the beginning, she had concerns, as she raised tonight, about crime statistics, about overtime, and we met quite consistently at that point. We definitely had long talks, including at the bowling alley. We've had a number of long discussions.
And through that time, she is correct. Overtime has improved. And our crime statistics, we uncovered what was happening with that. There was certainly no malice there. There was a computer reporting issue that she was correct about, and we did correct it.
Today, we do meet regularly, weekly, if not biweekly, and that's just with public safety. But then we also have meetings regularly, quarterly for the overtime and for the crime statistics. Thorough and through, we have had a lot of long, sometimes difficult discussions. But in the end, it is correct that things have improved in those two areas for sure.
Thank you. Chief, have you and I talked about the city manager?
We have.
And have you given me some critical feedback about the city manager around how she could improve?
Yes. I did.
City manager, did you and I talk about how you could improve your relationship with the police chief?
Yes. We've had a conversation to that effect.
Yep. I
believe the police chief is being honest and forthcoming. I believe the fire chief is being honest and forthcoming. I do not think they are sugarcoating or withholding back. That is my view, chief. Appreciate your candor. What's your sense of the department and their feeling of how things are going right now?
So it was mentioned earlier about the number of city managers. I was in a unique position because I was the eighth chief in three years. So when I came into that department, it was absolutely a time of turmoil, a time of lack of leadership, a vacuum, if you will. And it it had to be steadied. The the department was, at that very moment, was very volatile.
I've done my best to do that, steady it, done my best to fill vacancies. I've done my best, I hope, to make my employees feel welcome, respected, supported. And the one thing that I I really am proud of is my employees see me. It was mentioned how many events city manager goes to. I think I go to a number of them as well.
And my employees see that, and they come with me. And I think in the last three years, under my leadership as chief, we have seen a community grow around a police department that I think the community at that point felt had left them or had abandoned them. So I think my employees are on the same page with me in that regard. But, again, I would echo the fire chief. The union leaders are a great source for that information.
And as a couple of you have mentioned, talking to them one on one. I know commissioner Beasley Pittman does that often because I've seen her do it very often. That's your best feedback is when you get them one on one, if I'm there standing next to their side, they might say something that they're not going to say if I'm away or that they would say if I was away. So in my estimation, I think we're in a very good place.
Thank you, chief. Appreciate it. Thank you.
You're welcome. May I? So so, May, I'm gonna be really honest now. I don't know how many of you ever had a chance to watch the commission meeting. I don't even know how many years ago that was. George Kretzis was the city manager. And I'm just gonna say this now. I'm gonna be really honest because I I've listened to everyone up here. So we have to figure something out here because if you remember I don't know how many years ago. Was that 2006 or '5?
Seb 2007. It must have gone on for about three or four hours that that pay for performance review. You were on the commission at that time. No. I was not. Oh, you were not on the time?
Was that commissioner Smith? It was no. It was Charlotte Rascham.
Okay. Well, Charlotte Rascham. I remember that we heard from all of the commissioners, and and it was down the line. And then the mayor, mayor Seiler at the time, said, because it all hinges on what he had to say, the mayor actually said that because he had heard such a split split on the commission in terms of feedback, in terms of experience, in terms of rating, that he actually voted to and I don't know if he made the motion, but he actually voted to remove George Gretzis. And it created a lot of shock waves, but I I wanna know how we get past this when, obviously, there is such a range of feelings, such a range of opinions, such a range of experiences.
I will agree with the mayor. I don't think it was fair to ask the the two chiefs to speak, and I you know, what are they gonna say? Please. They they Yeah. We don't control Mister May I finish? May I
I was speaking actually when you interrupted me just now.
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought you were done. No. Oh, I thought you
said mayor.
I thought you said, okay, mayor. Oh, I'm sorry. I apologize. In. Go ahead. Take it away. Okay. Take it away.
K. Appreciate it. Thank you. So thank you for that feedback, both chiefs. I'd like to go through city manager some of the exhibit here to ask you some questions. Can you can we city clerk, can we pull up the the exhibit there, please?
Thank you.
First thing I wanna talk about city manager on this exhibit is and we're going for page four. One of the first points you say there is reduce the city's personnel budget growth from 8.1% in FY 'twenty five to 7.5% in FY 'twenty six and now projected further decrease to 5.08% in FY 'twenty seven. Talk to me about what that means, please. So every year,
personnel costs typically go up. There is some level of growth that is anticipated based on cost of living allowances, merit, health insurance costs. So there is that level of expectation. And so what we've done and and what we continue to do, you'll see a downward trend in the level of growth in our personnel budget. So that is one of the avenues we're taking to try to be fiscally responsible.
Two of the approaches that support that is that we have streamlined our performance evaluation process. At this time, management category one employees are capped at a 3% merit increase. In the year prior to my arrival, members of management category one, there were various levels of merit ascribed to different employees, some earning as much as 9% or 6% or anywhere in between. And so we've streamlined that to be more in line with some of our bargaining units, and that is one of the avenues that we've taken to try to limit personnel costs as well as tie the performance evaluation more closely to actual goals and accomplishments as opposed to a summary of work done in the prior year. We have also reduced by 10% the travel and training budget for management category one employees to help to limit some of our costs.
Our human resources department has been very active in trying to negotiate our agreements with our health providers, and so we're constantly looking for ways to improve in that area.
K. Thank you. That that matters in my view, especially given further budget budget deficit projections and and property tax possibly reforms. Miss Mary, can I just dig a little deeper here?
Go ahead.
So explain to me what is 5% of what? 7% of what?
So salaries and fringe benefits.
So you've reduced salaries from 8.1% and you project 5% in 2027. That's that's impossible. It's it's not impossible. Be well, first of all, it's projected against a growing budget. So, clearly, that's gonna figure into it.
It's gonna be a smaller if you if if you keep the amounts if you keep the amounts constant, it's gonna be it's gonna be a smaller percentage as the as the budget total increases. But you would but with with your adding more and more personnel to the budget, I don't see how things come down when they should at least be even. I don't understand. I don't I don't know how those numbers work.
We're largely filling existing vacancies, and assistant city manager Yvette Matthews can explain in greater detail how we're reducing those costs.
How many assistant city managers do we have now? We currently have four. How many did we have when you took office?
When I took office, there were two acting and two permanent. So four.
Four. So still so those remain the same.
Correct. We memorialized the four that I was introduced to when I came.
Right. Okay.
Good afternoon or evening, mayor. Each year, we look at our salary and wage budgets year over year. So we look at the growth in personnel costs. What we expect to see on an annual basis is really growth that's tied towards our merit and our cost of living adjustments. So over the past in the past year, the merit and cost of living adjustments for most management category employees have been a 3% merit, a 3% cost of living adjustment.
Those numbers go slightly higher as you look at our public safety personnel, which have anywhere from a 4% step, which is their commencement with the merit for a management category employee. And then their cost of living adjustment has been tied for our public our police has been tied to Social Security COLA with a floor of 3%. And then for our IFF members, it has been tied to the seventy fifth percentile calculation. What we're seeing year over year is a compounding of a couple of different things. So last year what we saw was a high volume of retirements.
And with those retirements, it tended to reset a lot of the personnel related costs. So we did see a slowdown of the increase in salaries. And even though we did add a few positions within the general fund, because our overall salary costs were remaining consistent, as the manager was talking about the way that she has been filling those roles, you saw that with the personnel growth. So we had a number of changes, but we did not see our personnel costs exceed what we anticipated regular growth to look like.
So so these numbers are not they're they're not a percentage of the total cost of personnel. They're they're actually reflecting you're just giving a smaller a smaller, increases in wages for year to year.
As a percentage of total personnel. So it's your salaries and benefits together, and it provides the year over year.
So the raises are smaller. That's what you that's what that's all that reflects.
Component. There are a number of components Right. And that feed into the growth of a budget this bit.
But it but it sounds as if it's a it's a percentage of the total cost of personnel has been decreased from 8% to 5%. That's not as
growth has
been decreased. Growth has been Correct. Correct. Okay.
Mhmm. So the budget's still growing. It's just not growing as astronomically fast as it was growing. Absolutely. Okay. Got it. Mhmm. One question I just wanna ask because I I I just wanna make sure I understand. So all the years I've been here, we've only ever had two ACMs. So and you know I've objected to the four ACMs. We are top heavy. I've made that very clear when we went through the budget. I I think I've made that very clear to you. So we got way too many Indians and not enough chiefs way too many chiefs and not enough Indians around here. Do we have four ACMs plus a deputy?
No. No. No. Okay. The deputy's included in that in the account. Yes.
Well, I will tell you flat out, and I'm not trying to get rid of anybody. Please don't take this the wrong way. We don't need four assistant city managers in the city. Okay? I also objected to when we increased the departments. I told you that too. I know you everybody voted for this when we went through our budget, but I objected to that too. So, again, I just so we're clear on this budget stuff, I've I've been a strong opponent of the growth in the number of departments, the administrative overhead, and the expenses. So I will say that we need to slow that down going forward. We need to be leaning into the fact that things things are going to get tight. Please, please, please start embracing frugality.
I I can share with you that thus far, through our budget meetings with the various departments, the only two departments that are looking for positions are fire and police, and the those would be from the general fund. Most other departments have not asked for any positions this year because I've shared with them at the budget kickoff that this year, we are going to be even more conservative. So just wanna share that with you in advance. The fire department has asked for 23 positions, I I believe, and I think the police department has asked for 21 positions, all from general fund. I have not brought that forward to the commission at this time.
We're still discussing those requests, but I am being very mindful of those concerns, and I just wanna make sure that we're on the right track.
Well, we we also have a number of new positions that that you've created too. Again, we've got some new very, very expensive positions that you created that never existed before, and they're in that city manager's office. So I I I don't want you to keep adding positions to the city manager's office. You're building your executive staff. You're stocking them with people who make $250,000 a year, and we can't afford that. So let's let's stop doing that, please. I think the one thing I told you when when we hired you is I don't want you to bring up everybody you ever worked with in Miami Beach.
And and I I certainly have not.
It sounds like
I just wanna pause the meeting for, excuse me, just wanna pause the meeting because we need to extend the meeting. It's almost 10:00.
Motion to extend. To what time? Eleven. Second.
Second. Do I call the roll?
Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor John Talis?
Yes. Meeting's extended to eleven up to eleven. Vice mayor.
Yeah. Thank you, mayor. If you could scroll down, achieved a triple a bond rating from S and P Global Ratings. Tell us a little bit about how that happens, city manager, and what does that mean?
So when we get ready to issue bonds, there's a process that we go through where we're evaluated. And so our team between the finance department, the office of management and budget, the city manager's office, we meet with these rating agencies as well as with our financial advisers and bond counsel to try to be as attractive as possible, so that we can have a rating that will yield greater returns for the city in terms of savings. And so while the city has achieved a AAA bond rating in the past, not every bond issuance is guaranteed to have a AAA bond rating. When we brought forward the special obligation bonds, we shared with the rating agencies the various measures that we have in place that makes the city of Fort Lauderdale financially sound and worthy of that bond rating. So that when we are trying to invest in infrastructure or capital projects like a city hall, those things are important.
Thank you. Do all cities get triple a bond ratings? Is that just kind of a standard? No.
That is not a standard.
But we've had it for
How long I was gonna say how long have we had it.
We've had it since we've had since Chris Lagerbloom, which is, like, 2019.
Right. I'm not sure. Absolutely.
But how how bond ratings work, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is it's not based on past bond ratings. It's a fresh new analysis Right.
Every year.
That's correct.
Yeah. Historic performance doesn't matter. I understand.
Okay. Okay. Just to be clear.
Thank you. We're very happy that she maintained the consistency of our spending and borrowing structure. So,
Okay. Absolutely. Yeah. That's a huge positive. Huge positive. Great. If we go to the next, if you roll down, please, to the top of page five. Develop and secured city commission approval of new emergency reserve fund as well as the city's financial integrity principles. So, Yvette, please correct me if I'm wrong, but part of what that includes is the 25 of our annual operating budget to be in reserves. Is that saying that right?
Yeah. There were two components to this. The commission memorialized the target fund balance of 25%. And in addition to that, established an emergency reserve, which at that time was one percent of our general fund operating budget.
Great. Which another success, I think, both of the city commission and the city manager to be fiscally responsible and fiscally conservative in a very difficult time. So another great win. A little bit further down, overall crime rate decreased by 8.3 from 2024 to 2025. City manager, tell us a little bit about that. What does that mean?
Sure. So when we look at our violent crimes and property crimes, this is a combination showing a decrease. As I mentioned before, I'm really proud of FLPD and all the work that they've done to decrease our overall we do have some, strides to make in terms of looking at our violent crimes, and we are implementing the group violence interruption program as well as some other strategies to try to focus more on violent crime. So I'm hoping that next year, this decrease will be even more significant.
Thank you. That matters and is very important in my view. Public safety and continuing decrease in overall crime is critical to our our city. And that's, in my view, credit to you. And she This is 2425.
This is She didn't start until '25.
She was here. Yeah. The I think the crime statistics continue to decrease. So happy to get chief to come on up. Come on up, chief Schultz, if you don't mind. Let's get some we'll get some real time feedback, mayor and and commissioner Glassman. Chief Schultz, if you would share with us latest crime stats, how are
we doing on reductions or increase in overall crime? So it is correct. Overall crime has gone down and continues to go down. What the manager was referring to is the assaults. So we have been taking a deep dive into that, and we've been keeping manager advised of that. It appears to be more domestic related. So that is something that we're working through. And I do agree that the group violence program that we are initiating will have an impact in various parts of crime, but especially when it comes to violent crime. So even as of today, violent crime continues to decrease year over year? In gen overall, yes. But there have been increases in assaults.
K. Thank you very much, chief. Welcome. Great great news. Let's go to the bottom of page five. Recruited and graduated the largest fire rescue class since 1999, including 35
firefighters. That was the federal program we applied for, which which which was before she even came on. This was this was a grant that we got from the federal government.
Right. The the SAFR grant.
Yeah. The
SAFR grant. Brought on how many people? 35. Thank you.
Great. So is that a success or not
a success? Happened before she got here.
Okay.
Okay.
So it
is a success.
I mean, we have to call it like it really is. Let me just check. Instead of just Grant's name, we have to call it like it is.
We haven't We just are.
There are
a lot of things that Absolutely. Has has participated in and competed in. No one is denying that. You can go down the whole list. Something she was part of and something she wasn't. I think she I think she, like, overstated a few things here. But, look, we're not we're not talking about these things. These are all very, you know, clear, and and I'm happy that, you know, some of these things were done in concert with our staff. And, you know, she's got we got over 3,000 people that work for the city, and I have to commend every single one of them for participating, achieving these these initiatives and and goals. So but, you know, the things that I brought up have nothing to do with specific achievements and goals.
We're talking about relationships, environment. We're talking about attitude problems. You know, if these are things that can be worked on and achieved, then then these are things that need to be worked on and achieved because we have, you know, we have dissension within our ranks. And and no one's gonna come out here in public and and confess to it. But when you speak to people one on one, if they feel that they can trust you with anonymity, then you'll find out that more and more people are are realizing that that things need to change.
You know, maybe this conversation has been very constructive, and we'll be able to you know, going forward this in the future, we'll be able to be more responsive and responsible, and and maybe that's what needs to come out of this conversation. But it needed to happen at this point at the review because today today, we're we're gonna going to decide whether or not to give her an increase in salary, whether or not not to give her an increase in salary, and whether or not to maintain her position. So I think that all these things that are being said are very constructive, and I think the city manager is hearing it. And and I think going forward, hopefully, we'll be a better city.
Great. Yeah. I agree. And I have plenty of conversations one on one, mayor, with all types of city employees, and I think they're very candid with me. And the the feedback you're receiving from individuals clearly a little different than what I'm receiving. So that's but that's part of the perspective. You you may have a different, you know, ability in that, and that's that's great. And that's why we get to talk through all this. So this is great. Great. That's great. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you, ma'am. Please. Ma'am, you had the chance to speak. Please don't yell from the audience.
You sorry.
City manager, what what role, if any, did you play in supporting having the largest fire rescue class? Is it did he play no role?
So while the city did apply for the SAFR grant prior to my arrival, the fact that we were able to recruit and graduate this many firefighters in one period is astonishing. So I give full credit to the fire department. And what you'll see in this exhibit is that everything that I do requires a team. So there's no accomplishment in here that doesn't come with the effort of our team. There are some things in here that I've initiated on my own, and there are some things in here that I have advanced.
If there was a project that was initiated in 2020 but hasn't moved since 2020 but has now moved in 2025, yes, I'm gonna participate in taking some credit for that project moving. So, yes, the city is fluid. There are projects that have started before my time, but everything that I've done in the past year has been to advance progress. Thank you.
Thank you.
City manager, as we think about the many successes you've had, you also, just as as all of us, many opportunities for growth and development. Why don't you share with us a few of those opportunities for improvement that you see as you self reflect as a leader here at the city. What can you be doing better, and what do you commit to doing differently, going forward? Maybe based on the feedback you're hearing today or maybe just your ongoing self evaluation of of how you're doing?
Thank you for that. You know, I'm definitely processing, the feedback, and I think it is constructive and informative. I think that I, in this moment, realized that I could do a better job of asking for transparent feedback along the way. I do have opportunities to meet with various members of the commission on a regular basis. And, you know, some of the things that I'm hearing today, perhaps I could have heard sooner had I asked, you know, maybe a more difficult or uncomfortable type of question.
Perhaps some of these things aren't as easy to to share in the regular course of of business. So I I'm gonna take that with me going forward. I'm I'm gonna be more deliberate about asking those types of questions. Also, I I do wanna make sure that I'm prioritizing, time management. It while being busy at work and doing the actual day to day management, there is something to be said for building relationships and having more conversations and opportunities to get that feedback.
And so I I probably need to find a little bit more of a a balance between the management side of the work and the relational side of the work.
Alright. Well, why don't we bring this conversation to a close? I think everyone's kind of if you don't mind, vice mayor, I I know we have a lot of other business to do tonight. So Great. Is there a motion to introduce a resolution?
Yeah. I'd like to
introduce a resolution. So the resolution r five exhibit two, is that what this is titled at? I don't know. Where's our city attorney?
It is r five.
Yeah. This is this is section one city manager Raquel Williams based salaries increased by blank percent.
So that would be the resolution. So someone would like to introduce a resolution and put a number in there?
Yeah, Mara. Thank you. I'd like to. Oftentimes, not all the time, but oftentimes we provide a 3% raise. And so I'd like to suggest that introduce a resolution that city manager's base salary has increased by 3% effective 04/02/2026.
Okay. So anyone have any further questions or comments?
Well, again, I I didn't get a finish a chance to finish last time, but I did defer to the vice mayor. I'd like to just finish that comment. Thank you, if you don't mind. Again, we're not having the discussion that we should be having with a split commission right now. So that's the discussion just like when, mayor Salah had to opine the reason why he made a change because he said a split commission could not function that way, and that's why he went in the direction that he did. There's a there's a big split here, and we have to figure out I mean, we're just gonna say, okay. Well, forget that whole conversation, and let's do a raise. I don't know. It just seems really strange to me. So I don't know where we are as a commission.
I've only seen that in the past. When a split like this occurred, that was a big problem. So do we just is that the elephant in the room and we just don't go there, or just hope that it gets better? Or what do you think, mayor? You're you're the mayor.
Well, I'm the mayor, but I'm also listening.
Can I ask a question before? When the mayor started his introduction to, his statement, What was your opening statement? You said you were not gonna do what tonight?
I don't remember my words.
Well Wanna play it back?
I hope someone can play it back because I thought you were saying that you were not going to vote against the city manager.
I don't remember saying that.
Am I the only one that heard that from the dais? Yeah. I'm the only one that heard it?
I didn't hear that.
I didn't say anything about voting.
Okay. Well, I I well, maybe it wasn't voting, but it did not appear that you were going in the in the direction that you would be going against the city manager. Maybe it wasn't voting, but I heard that you would not be going against the city manager. Okay. But no one else heard that. Okay. Alright. And yeah. Because if okay. I'm sorry. Go ahead. I again, I thought I heard when you began your your statements.
So, mayor, I I'm happy to respond to commissioner Glassen, but I wanna defer to you. I'm good.
Thank you. Okay.
Yeah. So well, I I I did I
did ask the mayor what you wanted to do here.
Well, there's a there's a resolution there's a resolution on the floor, and it could either be voted up or down. And and and so that's what we need to do right now.
and I just need to ask the clerk to call the roll.
A resolution city commission of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida providing for a 3% merit salary increase for city manager Raquel Williams effective 04/02/2026. Commissioner Herbst?
Mister Glassman? I I just have a question.
About 3%, what is the salary right now?
The dollar value of a 3% merit increase is $10,000.
It makes about $350,000 now.
$10,815.
The current salary is $3.50 plus benefit.
My base salary, I have since received a cost of living allowance. My base salary is $3.64 $9.09 and 78¢.
Thank you. I'm going to just basically vote on past practice of this commission. We grant a 3% raise to all of the charter officers, and it's always unanimous. This is not unanimous, so I'm gonna have to vote no.
Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. And mayor Trenton?
I'm gonna vote no. So is is any I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. This is completely disrespectful.
K. So I'll introduce a resolution.
Can I make a suggestion? Don't you take a five minute break? This has gotten very intense. Alright? Let's just take a five minute break, and then we can come back to this.
The days, We're gonna resume our meeting now, please. Where is commissioner Herbst? Okay. So the the resolution that was introduced by the vice mayor failed. May I make a suggestion?
I mean, clearly, there's there's there's a dissension on this commission, and and I feel that there may be opportunities here for both the commission and the city manager to to learn from this experience tonight. I think that I think that we should allow the manager to continue in her position, but I think that we should understand that we need to we need to perhaps invoke some sort of probationary period of of, say, six months and see how relationships continue and to see how the operation of the city continues and to use that six month period in which to examine how we might better perform and how the relationships might improve and that and that we should always be cognizant of the fact, as everyone has admitted, that things could always be better. I did hear something that was said as we were we were going into our our short recess, and I heard someone scream out a black woman. And the suggestion was somehow we're being racially prejudiced or gender prejudiced against an individual. Let me just tell you something.
Dean Trentell has voted for Raquel to be our city manager. I didn't care about her gender. I didn't care about her race. And tonight, I don't care about her gender, and I don't care about her race. This commission has never ever taken those factors into consideration.
Everything is based on merit. And tonight when we speak, we're speaking about merit, we're speaking about performance, and we're speaking about expectations. We're speaking about honesty. We're speaking on goals goals, and we're speaking on, you know, the opportunities that we have as a city to go forward. It's been pointed out that there have been several city managers in the past several years, and everyone has come and gone for different reasons.
But the reality is that this commission and this mayor needs to have a good working relationship with the city manager. When I first became a mayor in 2018, we did not have that good working relationship. And at the end of that first year, we had to let the city manager go because that relationship had deteriorated from bad to worse. And we were able to to engage new city managers, and each city manager that we had helped move the city forward. And that's based on a working relationship that the mayor and the rest of the commission have with this with the working staff.
So my recommendation is that we take no action on a resolution tonight and that we keep things status quo, and that we and that we revisit this situation within six months and to see, you know, where things are and how people how people feel towards their jobs and towards their city. But I can tell you that I have the utmost faith in all the senior staff that we have right now, and I would hope that absolutely nothing should impact that relationship or impact their status here in our city. And if if as soon as I hear that anything has compromised or jeopardized their status here in our city, I will immediately call this to the attention of the commission. And we'll and if we have to take any further action, we'll do it at that time. But the reason why we have low crime rates is because we have a great police department, probably the best in the state.
The reason why we have the best response times from our fire department is because we have the best fire department in the state, and we continue to complement with additional staff people every year to help make it better and better. I've I remember when I first became a member of this commission in 2003, all we heard was complaints about response times, about inadequate service, about failure to communicate. We never hear that anymore. Our our first responders and our public safety people have out have engaged throughout the neighborhoods, continue to participate in neighborhood events, and make themselves their friends, not their not their enemies. And this commission has only one purpose, to ensure the safety of its community and to make sure that the well-being of each and every member of this community is taken care of.
And that's all I care about. And I know that's all every single member of this commission cares about. So I think I can speak on behalf of the commission when I say that, commissioner Beasley Pittman. And I feel that we have an opportunity tonight to try to make things better. Things have not been better. If they were, we wouldn't be having this conversation. So trust us. We there are there are shortfalls in what's been happening. So let's understand that. We're making this stuff up.
So I'm hoping that we can move forward, and we'll continue with the rest of the agenda tonight. But I I would I don't know if we need to take any further action on our on this on this item. The resolution didn't pass, so let us just keep the status quo and let us, continue to operate as a city because I know we all love our city. I know we all wanna see the best for our community, and I think that we're gonna be able to achieve that in the in the months and years ahead. Thank you.
With the status quo, is there any do we have to do anything, vote, put it as a resolution, do anything to cement this in what you're saying?
We don't have to take any action on it.
Okay. So just the the the verbal record that we are doing a six month probation. Correct.
Yep. Eric Banks, I the so let let's see. Let's Jerome, head of HR, if you'd come on up here. So if you don't mind, please here still? Okay. Good. Yeah. Thanks. So the city manager's role, I believe, is one that's at will. Right? Is that right? Can be terminated at any point. Well, we have
contract, so it's not entirely at will. There are consequences for any termination. Yes, sir. Jerome Post, director of human resources.
Thanks, Jerome. How would you describe the contract in general? Is it at will? Is it there's can termination be for any reason?
I think the mayor described it pretty well. It is at will, but there are consequences if it is terminated before date.
Right. Thank you. So it is at will. So city manager can be terminated at any point. So the idea of that the city manager needs to be on a probationary period, I think, is not a healthy one for her leadership, for the city's leadership. She is always being evaluated, I think, by all of us, and we all shared some some great feedback around how she's doing. So, mayor, I'm completely fine with status quo and and continuing to move forward. And, but I don't think we need to fix a a probationary title, on some period of time.
Well, we're not voting on it, so it's just I'm just putting it out there. That's all.
Okay. Great. So I think that's that's your perspective, which is perfectly fair. And but I think holistically, we're we're not gonna categorize it as such. So thank you. Thank you, Jerome. Appreciate it.
Okay. Moving on to r six, quasi judicial resolution approving a site plan level two Central Beach development permit for 13 story, 54 unit multifamily development at 623 Bayshore Drive. Anyone wishing to speak must be sworn in, the commission will announce any site visits, communications, or extrovert opinions received and make them a part of the record. Commissioner Herbst, do you have any disclosures? Commissioner Beasley Pittman?
Yes. Stephanie Toothaker, a group, someone in that group.
Okay. I have met with Stephanie Toothaker, and I believe her client, commissioner Glassman.
Hold on one second. I apologize. Yes. Stephanie Toothaker, several meetings. I also attended the Central Beach Alliance meeting when this was presented to the neighborhood. Thank you. And and, actually, many site visits over the years. Thank you.
And but this is the vice mayor.
Thank you, mayor. Yes. Applicant. Thank you. Okay.
Several people have signed up to speak. I'll call your names one by one. Armando Luna, are they part of the team? Okay. And and Arthur Arthur Marcus also part of the team? No. Arthur Marcus. Arthur, there you are. Followed by Bill Brown, followed by Abby Laughlin. Abby, are you still here? There you are. Hello, Abby. And 17. Okay. Great. Please go ahead.
Mayor and commissioners, Arthur Marcus. Before I speak, I I would like to ask if the applicant can give their presentation because it doesn't make any sense for us to speak about a project that's not yet been presented. And I know we've seen it in the agenda, but presentations and reading are two different things.
Are you prepared to give a a okay. Sure.
Mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, thank you. I I do have a presentation. I wasn't planning on giving the whole thing. We, we, started with a project. There are two buildings that are there today. The project is referred to as Opus at 701. We spent a tremendous amount of time in the neighborhoods presenting to the Central Beach Alliance. I believe mister Brown is here, ultimately was approved by Central Beach Alliance. I I have a feeling I didn't know they were gonna be here. I have a feeling I know why people are here. One of the buildings that is that is being demolished is called Manhattan Tower. There is an old metal I don't know what to call it. It's an old metal
Structure.
Structure that sits in front of it. We have done structural analysis on that. It is not structurally sound. We did work with the historical society. I had actually expected miss Zeiler to be here. We've been working with her. My client recreated the structure to to do to honor what was there previously, and it's gonna be a sculpture in front of the building. We also did a historical record that's proposed to be a part of the building, And we ultimately ended up changing and making revisions to the site plan itself. We're originally asking for a number of waivers on the sides of the buildings for balcony projections. In working with our direct neighbors, Larivre and the building next to it and La Cascade.
We removed all those. We are not asking for those waivers. This project is only before you on a request for the height in the Central Beach. You can go from one twenty to one forty four. Only the commission can grant that. But we did do a full historical record of that structure. The structure is not in good shape. The buildings are in even worse shape. And my client worked very closely with the historical society to make sure that we honor that history. While it can't be saved, we will, do everything appropriate to make sure that it's honored, and I'm I'm happy to answer any questions.
Okay. So let me ask
you a few questions. I'm looking at your renderings, page six. You know, the Manhattan Tower has been part of Fort Lauderdale for a very long time. Mhmm. It's rusting. It's it's not structurally sound.
It's not.
Okay. We're we're all we're all aware of all of that. Okay? But it doesn't mean we want to erase it from the streetscape of Fort Lauderdale. Now I see what you've done on the inside, and this, like, like, a little small scale version of it.
We did. Oh, thank you. This is
What is the
I apologize. Let me take you to it. Because we
did I'm already there. A sculpture.
There on page six.
You're on page I was gonna bring it up for
Where else
is it? Where else do
you see it?
Right there.
There it is. Right. So we did hire a sculptor to recreate that that metal structure that is not structurally sound and create it in the front. And we worked with Patricia Zeiler in the historical society to do a proper plaque that honors who created that in the first place, and it'll it's not done yet, but that's something that we've been working on actively.
Okay. Now having said that
Is there any way your client can create a scaled version of it?
The the size it is today?
Yes. With the words Manhattan Tower, and somehow install it inside the lobby, because you have a very tall lobby there. Or at least this is the court Port Courcher. This is the the drive up.
Yeah. This is the entrance to the
to the building.
mean, if you wanna pay a true homage to the to that look, I mean, can your client do a little bit better job at trying to it they obviously, it can't be restored, but can it be recreated?
I don't think the size can be recreated. And we by the way, we I will offer again today. We have offered that to the when we first met with at CBAs, we got some comments back from folks like, well, I'd love to have it. We said, it's yours. Come take it. You're you're welcome to donate Because
you could have followed
But I think we can make it we can make it certainly bigger, but I don't think it can be
so for example,
like Yes.
When they when we redid the Parker, right, we didn't destroy the facade. We kept the facade, and it's actually it it really blends so well, you know, with the architecture of
the building.
I agree.
And I
think that I think that a better effort can be made to perhaps try to maintain the integrity of that look so that when people come to that address, they don't say, hey, what happened to Manhattan Tower? I understand. You know what I'm saying?
That's a good comment. And I I certainly think we can work with it's not built yet, so we can work with the sculpture to make it larger in scale. I don't think it can be the same size because it actually is but
I think you could one of these columns can certainly accommodate that.
A really that's a great that's a great comment.
Oh, well, thank you. I I I think it's great. I okay.
See what your people can do.
We were happy to do that.
Because I I really Yes.
You know, I've lived here forty four years now, and I've looked at it for forty four years. And it's just it's just part of the kitschy look of Fort Lauderdale. Don't have lot left. Right? Understood. It'd be nice to at least preserve some of that. I know when I'm anyway, I won't go into all that, but I just think that'd be good to have have a little bit more respect for the existence of that of that look. I mean, if you go by there today, it's all rusted and kind of Yeah.
You know?
And I know the I know I knew the previous owners. I don't know if they're still the current owners, but they've been wanting to sell this property. And they always had the opportunity to to designate that historic, but they chose not to because they wanted to be able to redevelop it.
I know. So okay. That's my only comment.
And I I'm sorry.
Yeah. No.
I and we had
a conversation when we talked about this project. Can you tell us what you're going to be doing? Because we talked about perhaps a a gallery, a photo exhibit working with the historical society, doing more than just the homage with the sculpture, but actually creating a gallery Okay. Where we tell the story of the Manhattan Tower.
We hired Peacock architects to create a pictorial history of this the the other building that's being demolished, I don't think anybody noticed. But this one, because of that metal structure that's in front, so we hired Peacock and Associates to create a pictorial history, and that's meant to be inside the lobby of the building. This is a 54 unit multifamily product. So that that was a commitment that we had already made and agreed to make. I I think the mayor's comments are very well taken. We can certainly make it larger in scale and try to incorporate it more. I'm I'm happy to commit to that this evening. That's I appreciate it. I think that I think I think it would be very nice. I think we could and and we did engage with miss Zeiler.
Know she wasn't feeling well tonight, but we did engage with her to say, we'd like to work with you, to do a proper plaque, to honor the history. So that that's all. I'm happy to commit to that this evening.
Excellent. Okay. I think mister Marcus will be happy.
Good evening, mayor and commissioners. Arthur Marcus. As you know, Manhattan Towers, as the mayor just said, is one of our most beloved and recognizable historic landmarks in Fort Lauderdale. It really is unfortunate that our city is rich in cultural history as we cannot or or will not protect our legacy. There needs to be in the future a more focused approach to ensure that our legacy is protected and funded for future generations.
I have specific comments about certain things in the report. The DRC report for this project states that the city must follow a public policy to protect its historic resources. If the city is fall is following this policy to protect its historic resources, then how does approving the demolition of Manhattan Towers further the case for protection and preservation? Number two, the DRC report further identifies Manhattan Towers as one of 26 new potential historic landmarks in North Beach. Sorry for my voice here.
However, these are empty achievements. Since the city is not designated, any of these properties has historic none of them are legally protected, and all are likely to be demolished. This is 26 buildings in North Beach that are mid century modern examples. A lot of the this includes Birch Tower. This includes Birch House.
This includes every famous building on the beach you've seen. And the third one, as an architect, I also respectfully and professionally disagree that the that the findings of the structural assessment justify demolition of this building. All structural materials in South Florida deteriorate over time. Everything deteriorates, including us including us. I'm almost done.
But you look fabulous, Don't worry.
If sprawled concrete and corroded steel concealed beneath layers of paint had ever been taken this seriously, there would have never been any renovation of the art deco district in South Beach. I know because I was there, and that's exactly what was happening with every single building. Of course, these can be serious structural conditions if left unattended to, if they hardly justify demolition. To me, it's ridiculous to say that paint and spall concrete are cause for demolition of a historic building. What is missing from this entire discussion is the fact that it does cost money to pay for restoration.
The DRC report also states that the building has been substantially altered, but does not state how it has been altered. Alterations can be undone, and alterations do not justify demolition. And her adding hurricane windows is not a is not an alteration. This is my last comment. It it has been said that an act of ethical remembrance is the refusal to allow absence to become invisibility.
Memory is a moral act because it is the act of choosing which story to keep alive. I hope you as a commission can choose to keep our joint cultural history alive in Fort Lauderdale. Alright. Thank you.
Arthur, I'd like to just have a a quick conversation
Of course. Because I think
this is really important for the city as well. So first of all, thank you for your years of service on the historic preservation board. You're welcome. So here we have a structure that's gonna be demolished. Charles McKierahan. Correct? Right. Okay. So let me ask you this question, and and I'm serious about this. And I think I alluded to it when I texted you about this because I saw your your letter to the editor.
Why are we not as a city seeing the historic preservation board bring these to our attention, these kinds of buildings? Why why the historic preservation board in our ordinance has the ability to move a designation application forward on any building, any structure. Now let me just finish, please. That did not happen with Manhattan Tower. We could do we could do thematic districts. We could designate Charles McCurahan buildings if we wanted to before they all disappear. You mentioned Birch Tower. Again, Charles McCurahan. All over the place, Charles McCurahan. Why don't we do thematic districts?
Why there's such and I I brought this up over the years since I've been sitting here that I just don't think that we do enough starting with the historic preservation board to bring these forward. I we also have a, supposedly, a Broward Trust for historic preservation, not a peep on this building. But for five months, we heard about sand on the beach and how it had to be designated. Was that a missed opportunity? These are questions that I think about, and I wonder why we're just not using the organizations and the agencies that are out there supposedly doing this work, but they're not.
Commissioner, I agree with you a 100%. And let me tell you a little bit about my experience with the historic preservation board. I was on the historic board for eight years. I was chairman probably for six. I I lost count.
And one of the things I tried to do a number of years ago was bring thematic historic districts to the board and to the commission. It was defeated at the planning and zoning board, and it never made it to the commission. What I find in government, in people who are, let's say, amateurs, that we volunteer for the boards, there is no sense that people on the historic preservation board, either through lack of experience or lack of knowledge, they don't feel comfortable bringing any of these buildings towards demolition. They don't feel comfortable going against the owner of a building. They just don't feel comfortable doing their job.
And I I say that because most of them have no idea that we can bring a building like Manhattan Towers to the board and further to the rest of the commission. So, yes, in theory, the system should work. In practice, it does not. I know people are grounded in what the historic preservation board can do, but it's still amazing that so many members don't understand the process, don't understand what goes on. So in answer to your question, I don't have an answer.
I mean, I've tried when I was on the board to do what you're you're saying, and I never felt supported by the board. There was not enough support to bring it to you on the commission, and there was just not enough, how do I say, knowledge that people would want to do this. Yes. I know it's the historic preservation board, and that's the line I've used practically in every meeting we sat in when things got out of hand. And I said, guys, remember who we are.
But there's no courage. There's no bravery in bringing it forward. So I think we as a city, and I I will let Mikaela speak for Broward Trust, but, you know, I think we as a city need to reassess how we are working with historic preservation because it not only has to be supported, it has to be funded somehow. I mean, obviously, somebody needs to pay for
the rent. We do have we do have transfer of development. Right? I know. So so we have those. I fought for years to get that done, and we got it done. So but this this particular owner didn't care about that. I understand. So and and to the commissioner's point, you know, spending time and effort on trying to designate sand on the beach as historic versus something like this. I mean, you have to choose your priorities here and what's realistic and what makes sense.
Okay? And it's not your fault. I'm just saying you, meaning the historic preservation community. You know, we I would have loved to have designated this historic if the property owner worked wanted to participate with us, giving them a transfer of development rights, giving them the giving them a financial benefit by participating in that program. But but there was no there was no incentive that anyone or any any initiative that was ever taken by anyone, not so much from the historic preservation board, but anyone in the community to suggest to him, hey.
Let's work on this as a project together, and we wanna save this building. And that was never done. So, anyway, gotta wrap this up. So I just I I appreciate you coming here tonight, Arthur.
But I I I think I'll just end with one thought for you. The process does not work. Like I said, it works in theory as you've outlined, but it does not work in practice. Okay. And I think a longer talk with Tricia and maybe the board, but more needs to be done because, obviously, this is the first of probably 26 demolitions in North Beach.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you again, mister Brown, for your service. And, miss Tuthaga, could we make sure we also incorporate a lot as much as possible about Charles McCurahan and that not just the building itself, but okay. Great. Thank you.
Please proceed. Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, members commission, Bill Brown, president of Central Beach Alliance. In the interest of time, I just will say that everything that Ms. Toothaker spoke about in meeting with the CBA, meeting with the board, meeting with the neighborhood residents was accurate at the at the final presentation. Well, the first presentation of of the general membership, it was raised, and Abby was think you were even there at that meeting about the signage.
And then we later learned the structural integrity of the property and the signage and and the sculpture itself just would not work. One of the things that the other things is the balconies. They've reduced the size of the balconies as miss Toothaker said, and that would help the the immediate neighbors some of their concerns. But the the one concern which has no bearing on this was they don't I don't want this in my backyard. I it's blocking my view, and we know views aren't unarguable. They're not protected. They're not protected.
Right.
So at the final conclusion after the presentation, it was at held it was quite a large turnout, and we had it at the Los Oles Beach Club. And the final vote was 61% of the membership that evening was there, supported it, and 39% did not. I think we had close to a 140 people. It was a packed room. So
Okay.
And and and and mayor, we wanna commend you on working with the developer and possibly changing, maybe making that sculpture bigger. But they did take our input on that sculpture, and they're to be commended for that. Thank you.
Thank you, Bill. Abby? I'll give you two and a half minutes since you haven't been here in such a long time. Thank you.
This is the longest I've ever left my dog at home. So Oh, you see this is important to me. It's an emotional support? Tonight. Yes. Yes. I'm gonna change a little bit about what I was gonna say after what your questions were to, you know, to to Arthur. But something absolutely is not working. You know, you say that the Historic Preservation Board can bring these projects up for a vote. But the chairman does not set the agenda.
The agenda is set by Trisha. And I know that Arthur, you know, several times tried to, as he talked about, bring up the thematic district, but you can't even get it on the agenda. You have to bring it up under for the for the good of the city. So, you know, it is a very difficult process try to bring anything up, you know, to even get it on the agenda. But they're not the only ones who can make a decision about whether or not to bring something up for designation.
You. There's only you know, besides someone like the Broward Trest, who probably has no money and is concerned about a slap suit, the only other folks who can make a designation are are you guys. And you Can't two people on a board get something put on
an agenda? I thought is that not a rule? I thought I thought if two or two what is Anthony Wait. Can we stop the clock? Because Yeah. We'll stop the clock. I Anthony, I thought that if two people on a board wanna put something on agenda, they have the what am I mistaken?
No, mayor. Anthony Fajardo, director of development services. So, typically, what we've seen with boards is if something is brought up under Good of the City and the board has a consensus to have it on an agenda, we would put it on the next agenda. So it would be a part of that discussion under Good of the City, but it can appear on the next agenda if I so
Okay.
I thought so. I thought there was a way to do it. Okay.
I Tricia's not here, so I can't confirm with her what those interactions have been. Room. I didn't see her. Yeah. She's out of the country right now.
So Oh, I didn't look far enough.
Yeah. Alright.
It would be it would be a lot easier for the Historic Preservation Board to know about these if they could have these development projects flagged. They never are told that any of these historic properties are coming up for redevelopment. And that's one of the things that Tricia could do is put that on the agenda. I don't know why they're not, you know, automatically flagged. But my final request with my last few seconds to try and give a little more time to this building is please do not issue a demo permit until there is a building permit.
If you issue the demo, you know, this this got I won't I won't go into hearsay. At least we get to enjoy this building for a few more years, because if you don't do that, what's gonna happen is they're gonna knock it down, they're gonna find they can't they're gonna find they can't sell, they're gonna knock it down, and then they're gonna just try to flip it, which is what happens with with most, you know, almost every property that's been knocked down has been has been flipped. So it gives an incentive if the, you know, if the developer knows that you can't not And and I don't know why we can't change that in the the ULDR. Also, we're never given access to these structural reports. It's not The structural reports need to be part of the agenda.
I mean, part of the backup. You know, we're just told, oh, you know, everything is, you know, everything is no good, and it's got too much rust. I mean, and it's got too much spalling. We never get to see these
The engineering report?
The yes. We no. We never get to see the developer's structural report. We're just, you know, depending on what the attorney says that everything is Okay.
Okay. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
Anyone else wish to speak on this item? K. Did you wanna sign up? You have to sign up.
I did.
Okay. Go ahead.
So yes. So good evening, mayor. Go ahead. Commissioners and vice mayor. It's historic preservation month.
And I would hope that that should this mat that should matter to the city of Fort Lauderdale. The question is, are we treating it like it does? Right now, we are about to lose four contributing historic resources in the North Beach area of the Barrier Island. Broward Trust is here tonight to discuss one of them, Manhattan Tower. Manhattan Tower, by architect Charles McKierahan, is one of the most prolific he was one of the most prolific designers associated with the mid century modern and the classic nineteen fifties to sixties styles.
His work includes the Birch Square, Castro Convertibles, the iconic La Go Mar. I'm here this evening in solidarity with Arthur Marcus and Abby Laughlin, two passionate citizens, many of you know. Broward Trust believes we can do better when it comes to protecting, preserving, and saving our historic resources. Abby and Arthur do too. Discussing the importance of our historic resources, part of that responsibility comes with being a certified local government.
City staff, especially Tricia Logan, who has done an outstanding job of inventorying those historic resources through the architectural resource surveys. After all that, why we still are why are we still about to lose four more contributing structures? Only 26 contributing structures remain in this iconic neighborhood, which has also been documented as a potential historic district. We know preservation works. All one needs to do is look at success stories in other states that have preservation programs.
Preserving historic buildings and districts strengthens community identity and pride. It supports heritage tourism and local small businesses. It encourages reinvestment in established areas instead of instead of unnecessary demolition. It also advances sustainability by reusing existing structures and conserving embodied energy of older buildings. Just as just as importantly, it creates opportunities for Please
please complete your thought.
Opportunity. It
it yes. It it it provides opportunities for continuing education and involving our community in these historic resources. And I just would like to add that I was not trying to designate sand. I was trying to designate the 3rd Fort Of Fort Lauderdale, which is our namesake. Thank you.
I I do have a question, mayor. So thank you for the remarks. However, where was your organization, and why did you not file an application on Manhattan Tower if you feel so strongly about the building?
Shneur Glassman, I think you're well aware of the fact that I did have a meeting with the previous owners. Uh-huh. At your request. Yes. I spent an hour and a half with them trying to have a productive, positive conversation of the importance of the historic preservation of that property. They made it very clear that they did not have any desire to preserve it through the historic designation process.
And does the ordinance say that
trust, and I've said this before, I will say it again, Broward Trust is not about imposing our will with an owner that has made it very clear that they do not have any interest in the historic designation process. What I will say is what Abby said, and that is we we all you all know that the Historic Preservation Board as well as the Commission has the opportunity based on the ULDR to make these historic designations, whether it's through the Historic Preservation Board or the Commission itself. One of the things that I wanted to mention was that I think it's very important that monthly Tricia Logan start placing on that agenda at the HPB meetings whereby one property is chosen that is a contributing structure to the historic preservation based on the architectural resource surveys so that we can start having a discussion about the importance of that prop property. One of the things that Tricia has shared with me over and over is that Robert Crock let me finish, Dean.
Mayor Could you just let me finish?
I'm just trying to finish.
Ma'am, no. I'm not trying to interrupt you, but we we're gonna run out of time, and I need a motion to extend the meeting.
I have one last statement
Okay.
That I would like to make.
Okay.
And that is if once a month, for the good of the meeting, based on the architectural resource surveys, a contributing property is presented to the board so that they can start to decide whether or not the HBB should make an application for historic designation. Okay. We don't have the financial resources.
Okay.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you. And just for the record, the Broward Trust for Historic Preservation has filed designation applications without the consent of the owner. So that was not a 100% correct.
Okay.
No. That's not true. We very had contentious issue up here once when the owners were split. One opposed where was that? That was in your
That was on Andrews Avenue.
On Andrews Avenue. You filed an application for designation, and you did not have the consent of the owners on that building. So let's just be honest. It's much better when we're honest. Thank you.
Do I hear a motion to extend the meeting or till twelve to 11:45? 11:11 forty five. Second. Second. Then move to second. Please call the roll. Commissioner Herps? Yes.
Commissioner Glossman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? No. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. Okay. So does anyone else wish to speak on this item? Do I hear a motion to close public hearing? Second. Remove the second. Please call the roll. Commissioner Herbst?
Yes. Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sortson? Yes. Mayor Trentellis?
Yes. In public hearing, R H 6 is now closed. Someone like to introduce a resolution.
Introduce. To what? Approve? Yes. Is that, yes. Thank you. It says approving a site plan.
Okay. Introduce, R 6. Please please call the
roll.
A resolution. City commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida approving the issuance of a site plan level two beach development permit for the development of a 13 story 54 unit multifamily development known as OPUS at seven zero one at a height that exceeds the maximum structure height as provided in section 47 dash twelve point four point one located at 623 Bay Shore Drive and 701 Bay Shore Drive, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, having a land use designation of Central Beach Regional Activity Center in the Intra Wholesale Overlook Area zoning district and a additional height request for the development. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glossman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman?
Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Chair Trentellis?
Yes. And r six is now approved. Moving on to r seven, quasi judicial resolution approving amendment to site plan level four development permit for Sorrento, formerly Ocean Park Residences. This is at 2851 To 2901 Northeast 9th Court, Sunrise FTL Ventures. Anyone wishing to speak must be sworn in, and the commission will announce any site visits, communications, or expert opinions or expert opinions received and make them a part of the record. Commissioner Herbst, do you have any disclosures? And commissioner Beasley Pittman?
Yes. With.
Okay. I believe I did too. We keep changing this.
Name. We
keep name the project.
Keep sending it through.
Here's well, the her her her, client keeps makes, spending a lot of money, unfortunately. Yes. Commissioner Glassman.
Yes. Thank you. I met with on 01/14/2024 and 03/31/2026. Numerous site visits, and I've had conversations with members of the boards of almost every single neighboring condominium association. Thank you.
Okay. And and vice mayor?
Yes. Applicant. Thank you.
Okay. And I didn't disclose either. I also met with the applicant if I if that wasn't made clear. So the applicant signed up to speak, but, does anyone expect her to do a presentation, or anyone just have any questions of the applicant? We have several people who've signed up to speak. Bill Brown, are you still here? Yeah. Can someone I've been this has been bothering me all night. Can someone do something with that light? I feel like I'm I'm I'm I'm like a french fry under a heat lamp.
Well, you dim the wrong light. That light.
Are you afraid it'll show your wrinkles?
Yes. Many wrinkles.
French fry It's late
so we can have fun. Bill Brown, president of Central Beach Alliance. Thank you again for for allowing me to speak. I'll I'll be really brief on this one. I it's been a roller coaster for the residents. Once they saw the demolish of Franco and Vinny's, they were excited to hopefully see this area start improving. We've had a problem with the homeless, around there, especially with the seven eleven. So we the CBA was very involved with the original design of the two towers, one being a hotel and one being a condo residential building. And then they came back, they revised that to do away with the residential component. Just make it as a hotel.
Correct? And then keep a smaller building for for a parking. And now they're coming back with the the plan that's before you. We still are supportive of this project, and I know the surrounding neighbor condo presidents have all expressed their support of the project. I think some of them will will speak to that tonight. And I I think this is just gonna help really help that area, especially with the action that's been taken now with Sunrise Lane, having the funding for that improvement of that district. And this is just going to add to help enhance that whole area on that North Beach area along. Thank you, commissioner Glassman, for all that support.
Okay. Thank you, mister Brown. I can't read the writing here. Mister mister Zayner, is he here? Oh, yes. Am I pronouncing that correctly?
Yep. That's correct. Please proceed. Mayor, vice mayor, and commissioners. I keep it short because we thought also we're gonna talk in another sequence.
And I believe that the speakers after me, which is Shari Johnston and Peter Heckempleischne, they will outline in more detail what I'm gonna say and explain the support from Sonora East Convenium, and there is little a little I can add right here. My hope is that we will see the Sonesta development completed around the time when we know that commissioner Glasman intends to have the Sunshine Lane District upgraded. I think that together, these improvements would be a great addition to our neighborhood and help to attract new owners as well as visit us and new business as we discussed at our meeting. Thank you.
Thank you, sir. Sherry Johnston followed by Peter Hecken Heckenleichner.
Hi. My name is Sherry Johnston. Good evening to all of you. Just want to add my genuine support as a member of the board of directors at Sunrise East of this project. We are so excited to look forward to having beautiful sidewalks, lovely landscaping Finally. A wonderful safe area to walk ourselves and our pets. And we appreciate all that Integra has done to improve as far as they have the property. But we're in complete support, excited, and that's it.
Great. Is Peter here? Peter, there you are. Oh, there you
I'm Pete Hecht. I'm Hechtner. President of
Sunrise East, 2800 Sunrise Boulevard. I was on the board and president of the board when those first came forward. That's five years ago, two iterations ago. So, hopefully, the third time is a charm. What I did wanna say is to remind the board or the commission that Sunrise East is really depending on designation of the dozen parking spaces on Northeast 9th Court for Sunrise East use and operation.
We're losing over 12 parking spaces from what we have now, and, that's just essential to us. We can't, excuse me, get delivery trucks, construction vehicles, or anything else into our garage because it's a six foot four height on the garage. We need some place in our general operations for those vehicles to be. And so, we will be approaching the city commission in the appropriate time to have some kind of arrangement to designate those spaces for Sunrise East. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. Robert Dean, are you here? He left? I haven't seen him in years.
this is the item that Mikaela signed up for. She didn't sign up for the other one. So is she still here? No. Okay. No one else has signed up to speak. Someone please move to close public hearing. Move. Second. It was seconded. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herbst? Yes. Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentellis?
Yes. And public hearing on R 7 is now closed. Would someone like to introduce the resolution?
Very happily, and I wish you all the best. Let's get going. Let's get going.
Thank you. And, commissioner, I'm
assuming that's for approval? Yes. It is. Okay. Alright. A resolution to city commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida approving amendments to the site plan level four beach development permit for the development known as Serrano located at 2851 Slash 2901 North East 9th Court, Fort Lauderdale, Florida having a land use designation of Central Beach Regional Activity Center in the Sunrise Lane area zoning district to add 12 multifamily residential units, a 113 hotel rooms, 1,800 square feet of commercial use, and approving a park reduction request for the development. Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Gentiles?
Yes. And that resolution is now approved. Congratulations. E h one, public hearing and ordinance amending the City Of Fort Lauderdale comprehensive plan future land use map from low, medium residential, and medium residential to commercial land use designation. This is in 1680 Northwest 31st Avenue.
Quite a few people have signed up to speak on this. Quite a few people have signed up to speak on this. So we'll start out with April Young. April, you here? April Long Young is not here.
Is it Walter Haney? Did he leave? Linwood Haney?
Is this Linwood?
That's April.
Oh, that's a oh, April. Okay. Yes, Mayor.
Who are you?
Oh, good evening.
Say good evening, everyone. Thank you for allowing opportunity in the space to be before you this evening. I know it's rather lengthy. I just wanted to bring to your presence the concerns of our issue that has been brought before you many occasions. However, we actually have hundreds, if not thousands, of signatures of dignitaries versus residential that have opposition to the processing of this matter.
However, I just want to make sure that we address the clerk, to be aware of as well as the attorney that there is actually a active TRO, inside of Broward County being case number 2516240. The city is aware of it versus the county versus the opposition of owners of the property versus investors. We, the people of Fort Lauderdale, have countless, numerous of times addressed, provided expeditious letters. We have spoken with our governor. We have presented him a letter that we have moved over to federal.
We've spoken with Scott's office versus Molly Ashley versus EPA versus other counterparts. We do believe, without a doubt, since we're here as a family in the city of Fort Lauderdale, that it is very vital that there is actually accountability for the lives of all members of Fort Lauderdale.
April, what exactly is your objection? I have
My objection is that you have not presented a certificate of health clearance of risk, and there's definitely not any when it comes down to environmental clearance. If you can produce that, the issue, as I stated to DRC, it's not about the investors. It's about accountability for the residents. And as I'm speaking to you, previously, mayor, on, last, twenty twenty three that we've spoken, prior to that, I had lost several members. But as of '25, I've actually lost my daughter as well.
I actually have just lost left the hospital two days ago, and it says it's environmental infection. There is not any reason as to why, if we're so concerned about our community, that we would not do due diligently and service the people that's in that area.
So let me ask you this. So it seems to me that the condition of the lake, right, is what is causing the negative impact on the health of the community. And my understanding is that this developer wants to improve the condition of the lake, which would then help the the impact that it has on the community. So why would you object to an effort that's being made to improve the condition as opposed to the status quo, which is making everyone sick?
Well, mayor, that's easy for you to actually utilize those words. But in fact, right now, it is causing more havoc than it is actually rendering any service. If you all on the panel can provide a clearance for my health, for everybody else's health. This is not just a District 3 problem. As I have stated within a report, we're on a runoff.
But clearly, I can actually show you that there's barricades that is out here inside of the perimeters of the city, and you'd never ever put barricades unless there's an erosion, unless there is havoc, unless there is some type of issue. We're not consuming, and we're not trying to contemplate, and we're not using speculation. This is a a fact finder. So our only thing that I am standing here to you, and we're not asking, we are demanding, Provide us a certificate of certainty that there is no risk health wise. Do the same thing for environmental issues.
It's not about the fact that whether the investors can do anything, because right now, we have seventy five years' worth of havoc, and it is not justifiable for anyone to have to sit and listen to all the scrutinizing and all of the other things that are actually, you know, perspiring within the room to tell me that you can really look in my face and tell me that you're rendering me service or anyone else. I refuse, and everyone else refuses to have one more loss of life without a cause.
So let me
So what what is the problem producing the facts?
Let me ask mister
let me ask mister Lockrey to respond to that. Okay? Yes. You can please I thank you for your for your comments, and let me have have mister Lockrey respond to that.
Make I wanna make sure that we're on record and that whatever whatever transpires tonight, we will move forward for an emergency. So I just wanna put the clerk on notice as well as the attorney.
Okay. Thank you.
Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, members of the commission. Robert Locker on behalf of the applicant. Mayor, I think I think potentially where your question is going is what is happening in the lake, which is adjoining the Wingate site. And although miss April, and I'm glad she's feeling better today, did not reference Wingate, I think a lot of the issues around this general area, we all know, stem from the history of that site. That's not the site that's before you today.
This is an area that's north of that that has suffered in some ways just like the overall community has from the impacts from that. And as you alluded to, as part of this, an an application that's already been approved both by Broward County and the state of Florida that's underway, and that was an application approved back in 2023, and the work began in 2024 to cap that lake, the the burrow pit that's to the north of Wingate, which is the property our client owns, to cover that, cap it up, and to fill in the entire lake. This application is for a land use plan amendment. I have a presentation I could make if you want us to, but I know the hour's late. This is for a land use plan amendment to change that area from a residential designation to a commercial designation, which we believe is more appropriate for the site and for the area.
As it relates to environmental issues, though, again, separate from what's before you tonight, there is review that's done both by the state of Florida and by Broward County quarterly reports. Four times a year those reports are sent. There's environmental testing being done to ensure that the condition of the site is in no way enhanced, so we don't have worse situation, and in fact that it does get better with the capping of the site. I know miss April also referred to a court case that had been filed, and she gave the Katz number. As your city attorney may may know, that case was actually dismissed by judge Levinson on April 28, so it's no longer pending.
Alright. So so you're currently okay. Wait a minute. April, you had your opportunity to talk. I I okay.
April, I wait. I just sent you wait. I just sent April, I excuse me.
then I need to be in a
He wasn't making reference to you. He's making reference to a court case. Okay. Alright. So you've had an opportunity to speak. I asked mister Lockrey to respond. Mister Lockrey has responded. Thank you so much, mister Lockrey. The next person who signed up to speak is Sebastian Bromfield. Is Sebastian here? No. Robert Bostik. Is Robert here? Good evening, sir.
Good evening. How are you doing? I'm Robert. How y'all doing out there? Well, really, what I'm here for is about the development that y'all got going on right now. Right? And I heard that it would bring a lot of opportunities and jobs and stuff like that. I didn't hear nobody talk about that. And I like to be a part of the program that y'all got going so I can be, you know, up for for a job, a great job, or anything like that. I think another thing what the lady was trying to say, they don't want words. They want proof. You know? That's pretty much what the people need is the proof. I hear that there are gonna be a lot of opportunities and stuff, so I wanna be a part of that. You know?
Thank you. Yes, sir. Thank Robbie Hicks. Is Robbie here? Jody Cunningham?
Sharon Alexander? Well, we don't do that here. So she and she I gave her much more than I normally give. So, Ashley Davis? Is Ashley here? Followed by, followed by is Linda Patrick here? Okay. So after Ashley speaks, then you're up next.
Good evening. My name is Ashley Zachary Davis. My family has been in the Rock Island Lake Air community since 1969. My grandparents built their house over there. My mother and I lived on, well, actually at 3080 Northwest 17th Street. At 16 years old, I was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. We lived directly in front of the dumpster area, and I was affected. I got treatment, and then I went to college. And during that time, my mother passed, so we lost our home. I completely understand and sympathize with the people who have lost family members and have been impacted by the things that contaminated the environment.
However, we cannot continue to live in the past and dwell on the things that cannot be changed. Over the years, we have watched that rock pit sit there, and no one has done anything to in either improve the contamination or offer to build anything on that land. I feel like the opportunity that Prologis is offering is something that will not only bring betterment to that rock pit, but also jobs and opportunities to the area. I am studying for my general contractor's license. Most of the projects and jobs that are available are in Palm Beach or in Miami.
What about that community? If you it's infested with drug addicts, homeless people, and people who are suffering with mental illness. There's not really any job opportunities in that area. They have a training program that they're offering. They have testing that they've done on the on the soil. They've offered this community the opportunity to review this information. Certain people, I would not name, have rejected that information. The bible says that my people perish for her lack of knowledge. If they don't know about what they're offering, it's because they don't wanna know.
Okay. Thank you, Ashley. Ashley Davis? No. I'm sorry. That's right. I just called you. Sorry. Linda Patrick, followed by Malcolm Steel. Is Malcolm here?
I don't know. Think she's.
Oh, she Elav? And Lee Ann Barber. Good evening, Linda. Good evening. I wish everybody's printed like you did.
Good evening. Before I start, I would like to say, mayor, commissioners, on last year about this time, we presented a video to you guys where we interviewed different people in the neighborhood with their concerns with the health issues and everything. That's been a year ago. We haven't heard not one thing. But, anyway, good evening, mayor, vice mayor, commissioners, and members of the board.
My name is missus Linda Patrick, and I stand before you today on behalf of concerned residents in our community regarding the proposed zoning change of the Rock Pit Lake. We are here united in one clear message. We are not in favor of this zoning change. This is not simply about land use. It's about the people.
It's about our families. It's about our children, the seniors, and the long term health care and the safety of everyone who calls this community home. We have serious concerns that this proposed change places our environment, our water, our air quality, and ultimately our well-being at risk. At this time, there are too many unanswered questions. We do not have sufficient information to fully understand the potential environmental and health impacts of this project.
That alone should give us pause. We are formally requesting that comprehensive independent tested testing be done, overseen by the health department to access any risk to the community's health and safety. Before any decisions are made, we deserve clear, transparent data about how this project could affect the live our lives. Additionally, we have had we have not had a proper community meeting with the EPA regarding this project. That is deeply concerning.
The residents who will be directly impact have not been given a meaningful opportunity to be informed, to ask questions, or to voice concerns in an open or official form forum. We are asking for due process. We are asking for transparency. And most importantly, we are asking for protection. Mayor and commissioners, your role is to safeguard the interests of the people you serve.
Today, we are asking you to stand with your community, to listen to our concerns, and to act in the best interest of our collective health and safety. Until proper testing is completed, until full environmental and health impacts are clearly understood, and until this community is fully informed and engaged through official channels, we respectfully urge you to deny this zoning change. Our message is simple. We do not want this change not at the expense at the expense of our health, our environment, and our future. So thank you for your time.
And, also, mayor, I would like to remind you as I close that you said that it's your job and the commission's job to ensure the safety of
the community. Alright. Let me ask you a question before you leave. Let me ask you a question. Is the status quo satisfactory for you? Do you wanna keep things the way they are? With testing? Forget testing. No development. Leave everything the way it is. Do you want anything do you wanna leave it the way it is?
Okay. Is it is that is it gonna change? Is it gonna change things?
No. I'm saying no change. No change. Won't touch the lake. Won't no building. No development. Do you want is that is that is that an option?
Let me tell you something. I've been living in the area for over forty years now. Nothing has ever been developed since they've been working over there. We got wild animals that's roaming the neighborhood, coyotes, foxes,
whole lot
of things because their environment, their habitat had been had been compromised.
Right.
So So so the
So I'm fine with it saying the way it is.
No. You're not. No. You're not. Because because you're telling me in your speech and your words are very I mean, I have to tell you, you know, very articulate and and and thought provoking. But the point is that that we wanna we wanna change things to make to take away the hazardous environment that the neighborhood has living lived next to for many decades. And here we I please don't yell. If you want something to if you wanna speak, you have an opportunity to come up here and speak. I don't want just yelling like that. Please.
So so this my understanding, mister Lockrey will will will be here to to attest to it, but mister Lockrey has explained to me, and I assume the other members of the commission, that there is an opportunity here to clean things up. And in order to do that, they want to build a they wanna build a project that is part of the project. They're gonna clean it up. They're going to remediate the the hazardous component, you know, clean up the lake, clean up the waterway, and help the neighborhood. Is that something that you wanna see? I would think you would. Bear, to tell you
to tell you the truth, Mir.
Yeah.
How is it gonna how is the area gonna be cleaned up when the adjacent area is already contaminated? So if the adjacent area is already contaminated, that means that area is contaminated as well, the area that they're cleaning up. And then who's overseeing them? There's no oversight at the construction site as to if they're doing violations or what don't we don't know what they're dumping in the in the lake, what they're filling the lake in with.
Yes. We do. Yes. We do. We do know what they're doing.
Do you know do you know, ma'am?
Yes. It was explained to us and shown to us exactly what's gonna happen, and it's all being done But
you're not you're not there in person. That's funny.
I'm not there. Stand there and watch some pour concrete in the lake. I'm not going to see that. But I do know that they're acting under a permit by the health department to move forward on a process that's going to ultimately take away the exposure of the hazardous materials that you have been living next to for so many decades. That's the goal. No one is try ma'am, do not do not yell. Do not yell. We'll ask you to leave the room. We're you're gonna be removed from the room now. Ma'am, you're gonna be removed because you're you're misbehaving.
You need to leave. You're disrupting the op you're disrupting the proceedings here. You need to go. So answer that can you I mean, aren't we trying to do the same thing? Aren't we trying to help the neighborhood in some way?
No. No. We have pictures there.
You have pictures of what?
Pictures of the debris and all the different
It's a mess. It's a mess.
No. No. No. No. I'm talking about what's over there now. But we're trying to change that, aren't we? It's not gonna change.
If it's contaminated They brought they brought
it about the gas can to the site?
The site. The city have cited them before.
So it's just it's a it's a series of things that has been going on.
So Lockrey we'll show this to Mr. Lockrey. Ask him to respond to that.
And what is he gonna do? Alright, Sham.
Mister Locker, you wanna respond to that? It's a it's a legitimate question. I I mean Alright. It's okay. You asked the question.
Exactly where these pictures are or what they are, but I if I you know, this is a gas tank that looks like for somebody's lawnmower that's Looks like somebody threw it there. Yeah. This is not the site that you can tell. It's not a site that's being filled in, so it's not exact I can show pictures of our site. I'm I'm not saying it's not from the area, but it's it's different.
And then there's a series of pictures of different materials. What I can tell you is and then and I can point to it. We actually give it to you. What we do know is that the Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection have regulated this fill. It is part of their program, and they do inspect and do analysis of all the samples that are done. So it is a burrow pit that's being reclaimed, that's part of a mediation plan, and we're following all the regulations that are in place.
Okay. Thank you. Leanne Leanne I'm sorry? Leanne Barbara?
And and and by the way, these these photographs are old. Right? It's
Okay.
Hello. I'm Leanne Barber. I'm representing the Roosevelt Gardens Civic Association. Yes. Which is adjacent which is just outside of the city limits, but adjacent to the Wingate site.
And there were a few people that were were here, but they left because it's so late. We we've not we've been totally out of the loop because we're not in the city limits. And we found out from our neighbors that the PNC meeting was going to be held, so we went to that in January 21. And if you've read the minutes of the meeting, there were about 60 people that attended this meeting from the neighborhoods that are surrounding the Wingate and Rockpit Lake site. And we raised a lot of concerns, and, you know, the concerns were that we're not we're not included in the process.
We wanted to have the county or the city come and explain the the engineering issues and have let us have a dialogue. And it was all recorded beautifully recorded in the minutes, sound very accurate, but we've not had anything since then. And we found out about this meeting this morning because we're not in the loop, because we're, you know, in the in the BMSD. And so we have asked Prologic. The only contact we've had is with Prologic, and they're they wanna talk to us about how great their warehouse distribution site's gonna be.
And our view is we don't really wanna talk about a warehouse distribution site until we have the concerns that we have raised addressed. And when you talk about the the lake being you know, that you're mitigating the risk of the lake, the way we see it is the lake is a there's been a storage facility for contamination running off the Windgate, the rent Windgate site. And when that's gone, then we're we're concerned about where the runoff's gonna go. And and there's so there's runoff from Windgate, and then there's runoff from stormwater runoff from the residents. And I we don't think that it's been properly addressed, and we'd like to have independent engineers talk to the community about what the plans are so that we can feel comfortable that it's going to
be addressed. May
I I just have some questions for miss Barber. So I've done some research prior to this meeting because I wanted to sort of know what I was talking about and get a better understanding. So correct me if any of this is wrong, but what I have found is with regards to your neighborhood, Roosevelt Gardens, 18 emails were sent to Eddie Pierce and you from from 01/23/2026 through 04/29/2026.
Mhmm.
There's been consistent interaction about drainage testing and environmental impacts. Both Eddie and you attended a community meeting on 03/25/2026, and insisted that you would not schedule a meeting with the HOA unless there was a presence from the city or county officials. And testing reports were shared, with Eddie Pierce, who is the vice president, on 04/28/2026, and he supposedly is presenting to your board to foster a potential Zoom meeting between Prologis and your board. Is any of that incorrect?
He was given a report, but we have not seen it because he was not able to to access it. And we've not seen an e p so, yes, we have told them that we want to see a in independent analysis of what what the environmental impacts are going to be. That what Prologic has talked to us about is let us take you to another location, let us talk to you about business development, let's talk to you about what and how it's going to create jobs and as I said to you earlier in the meeting, we don't want to have that discussion if the underlying issues have not been addressed.
No. I understand all of that. It's just that when you made your testimony, it it certainly sounded to me, maybe I misunderstood, that you've just been totally out of the loop on this. And yet here, I have documentation that points to all of these emails for the last four months, meetings on all of these different topics, training, testing, environmental impacts, and and a lot of back and forth. So that's why I'm just a little, you know, confused with that. And supposedly right now you are in the process of at least your vice president is in the process of setting up a meeting in between the board. And it just seems like there really was a lot more communication and interaction than you led us to believe when you testified. That's Mhmm. Thank you.
I'm good.
Okay. Alright. Thank you. Does anyone else wish to speak on this item? Did you sign up? You need to sign up. Did you sign up? Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah. We we didn't hear you before. Please go up. Please go on up.
Good night, everyone, mayor and the panel, and everyone else who is still here. I'm from Golden Heights community, and I wanted to just touch base on a couple of things. And the things that we're looking at in our community is the environmental effect of what's going on currently, what has gone on, and what we would like to see going forward. That's one. Two, the second thing is drainage.
In our community, everything drains into the lake. That's where all the storm water goes for our community. We got our roads were redone back in 1999, and all of our drainage went to the lake. That's a concern for us for flooding from my community. That's a concern for for Leon's community because they are anything that overflows or writes down into that community.
So for us, we're looking at the environmental impact for us where it concerns us for flooding. So and there is still I hear a lot of talk about drainage is gonna be put in place, so on and so on. But the city, when they came out to our community and they spoke with us, someone from the city, they say, yes. There will be flooding in our community. Yes. There is another major flooding occur. We would be flooded out just like everybody else, and it will take days.
Well, you'll be flooded because of the current situation or if it's if the situation is altered?
We'll be flooded regardless because all of our storm water goes into that lake.
And if it
fills up runoff.
And if it fills up, then
It still has to go someplace. Right. So that's a concern for us.
Okay. I understand. So, mister Lockrey, do you wanna address the drainage issue there? Mhmm. Would you let mister Lockrey address?
Address the drainage issue, and
then we'll we'll come back again. We'll do back and forth.
Oh, did you have did you have something more to say? Oh, okay.
So that's one.
Okay.
The next thing that we have that's going on in terms of what's happening now because of the the dredging and the digging and everything else that is going on, the ash that has been over at that site, it's been disturbed. It's now coming over the community. They have gone out and sprayed water in folks' home, but that does not fix the issue. I'm sorry? Oh, seriously?
Thank you. Appreciate that. That does not fix an issue because it's not dust. It's actual the actual ash that is now coming into homes. So people are now coming up with new diseases, respiratory issues, different things of that nature. Our concern is and we have no issue if going forward a construction has to happen. But what we would probably like to see is proper testing so that this way, once and for all, we know that cleanup is truly done and everything in our community is safe for us. Okay.
That's where we need you guys to come in.
That's fair enough. Okay. Thank you. Mhmm. Sorry. Calvin. Mister Sapp? And that'll be the last person. But before you speak, need a motion to no. Keep going. I need a motion to extend the meeting.
Motion to extend the meeting to 12:15.
Hey. Do I hear a second? Come on. I've got a lot of walk ons tonight.
Second. God. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentales?
Yes. Please proceed, mister Sapp.
Okay. The the problem with I'm familiar with the process about what you're doing, but the problem occurred is that we shouldn't be attacking the zoning now because it shouldn't be because of the simple fact that that's a residential area. Now I'm familiar with the rock pits that you have covered up in Daniel, Davey, where all the new shopping center is down in Dania because I lived down there for six months in 1964. I played softball all over Davey. I'm familiar with all the rock pits that have been covered up in Davey.
The ones off of 84, that's fine. But that's a residential area. So why should we change it from residential to commercial? We are putting the cart ahead of the horse.
Well, the problem I'm gonna stop the clock. The problem is that the site that has been used for the incineration and everything around it is zoned residential. Okay. It should never have been zoned residential.
Okay. But it had it you're right. Because the dump was there. The dump was there, and it was zoned residential. Commercial. Zoned residential. The dump was zone residential.
The part that we're talking about. The section that we're talking about.
Okay. But we were we were thinking about the lake.
Okay.
Closing the lake. Mister Lockrey, is the lake was the process Mister Lockrey, is it the lake zone?
What's the what's the zoning for the lake area?
Right. But that's my question. Why should we change it to commercial? Would you wanna build houses on the lake? Well, if you close the lake in, you're closing in anyway. Right?
You can't you can't have people The
30 the 35 listen. The 35 acres of lake that you're closing in, you wanna build warehouses on. Okay. Why can't you build houses on it?
Because it's best not to have people living above a contaminated site. That's the whole point of this.
Well, that's what they say when they took the when they put the city hall over 19th Street, 19th Avenue. When they tore the school down Yeah.
You mean the building department. You don't mean city hall.
You mean the building department. Building department.
Right.
Okay. But they used the same excuse. First of all, the school was there. They probably were contaminated. Okay. Now then you told the school down and put the building department down on contaminated ground. So so what's contaminated and what's not?
Okay.
Alright. Okay. Contamination suits whosoever want.
Alright. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Five seconds. Go no. You gotta say it up there. Gotta say it up there. Five seconds.
Five seconds. You just made a statement. Why would we wanna have it residential to bill on something contaminated? You just said it.
I know I said that.
So if it's gonna be cleaned up, it will not be contaminated.
But there's still standards so that Exactly. People are not exposed to contamination. Right.
And if it remains in the in the zoning that it's in now, that means that it has to be properly cleaned. If it moves to that other zoning, then the the levels go up. So they don't have to do the the restrictions that they would have on the Level 2. If it moves to the level three, it it's out of the water.
I don't I don't know if that's true.
I don't know. Trust me.
I don't know if that's true.
You can ask the
I think the remediation of it is the same no matter what.
Ask the attorney when he comes. When you move to that other level, when it's commercial, if the contamination level would have to be managed the same, or is it a higher standard?
Alright.
Okay. Thank you.
Alright. Thank you. Do I hear a motion to close public hearing? Second. Moved and seconded. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herz, commissioner Glassman Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman, vice mayor Sorenson
Mayor Trent Ellis.
Yes. Public hearing on PH one is now closed. Someone please introduce the ordinance. Before we introduce I'll let you comment. I just want
Oh, okay. Yeah.
Alright. Someone please introduce the ordinance.
Introduced.
It's been introduced? Okay. Commissioner Beasley Pittman.
Yes. In regards to the comprehension plan, there are some things that some items I have questions about. Moving forward with this, understanding that we would be changing the zone from b two to b three. Is that correct?
Yes. Commissioner, let me let me back up. The item before you tonight is just the first reading in the beginning of a process that will involve additional review by the Broward County Planning Council and Broward County. So this is a land use plan amendment, the first step of that to go from residential to commercial. At the time we went to the planning and zoning board, we were also asking for a rezoning.
The Planning and Zoning Board approved both the land or recommended approval, both the land use plan amendment and a rezoning to b three. Since then, we've had an opportunity to talk to you and also hear from the community. What we're what we are proposing is that when we come forward with a rezoning, which is after the land use plan amendment or contemporaneously, but further down the road, we would change to the B two zoning district rather than the B three if the B two is changed at that point to include our warehouse distribution use. So that's that's the discussion we've been having with staff to to go to a more restrictive zoning district if it allows this use.
Okay. Also, in those conversation, we talked about the use of that that land. This is being the use intent is for warehousing only.
That's correct. Distribution warehouse distribution, what's called a logistics center. That's correct.
Okay. There's been conversations about a data center being on that property. Could you elaborate on
that? Absolutely. Yes. We are not proposing and have not proposed a data center on the property that's the subject of the application tonight or that we're representing. That's correct.
Alright. One other item. As an opportunity for the community, would you be willing to include in this comprehension plan a neighborhood deed restriction where that the zoning that is decided on and the fact that it would only be logistics warehouse type of a use and no data center, would we would you be willing to include this in the comprehension plan as a security to the neighbors?
Yes. Certainly. We would voluntarily promote and suggest that we could do what's called a declaration of restrictive covenants that would be part of the application when it comes back to you on adoption if if you recommend to transmit and move it forward tonight on first reading. So on second reading, we could have that in place because we recognize there are a number of uses that are allowed in the Commerce District generally, and even more specifically in B3 and B2, that the neighborhood wouldn't want, and we have no intention of doing. Things like liquor stores and auto repair and all of those things. So yes, we could restrict the property from those uses and as well as data center use so it could not be utilized on this property. Also,
if you could elaborate a little bit more for the neighbors, what that that document would how they would benefit, and they would be, in a sense, the owners of that deed.
Certainly. So a declaration of restrictive covenants is a restriction between multiple parties or two parties, however many parties join it, that gets recorded against the property, runs with the land no matter who owns the property, and can be amended. It depends on what the declaration actually says, but can be amended only pursuant to the conditions of that declaration. And so what we had talked about is a declaration by the owner of the property, placing that restriction on the property by recording it that would run-in favor of the city where the city commission would have to amend it. But as as as you've discussed, we could also add other parties such as neighborhood associations as well to that declaration, so they would have to consent to any changes to that in the future if that was the case.
That's easy it's not easy. It's it's simple for us to agree to that because we have no intention to use the property for any of those other uses.
Could we have someone also from maybe, Chris, if you could help us with this a little bit? Because this is something that I believe would at least give some security to the neighborhoods. Are we able to work with the neighbors to ensure that this deed is included in the comprehension plan and the items that we have already talked about. Because it's my understanding that there has not been an opportunity to communicate with those neighborhoods. And I'm thanking Lake Eyre, Golden Heights.
Also, what are the ones that are in that 500 yard association of that demographics? So are we able to do that to ensure that this is a part of this plan moving forward?
Yes, ma'am. Anthony Fajardo, development services director. So, the declaration would be a separate item from the, comprehensive plan, but we can help facilitate that conversation. And once they enter into that agreement, it would be binding. So it wouldn't really be part of this as I understand it, but it would be a separate binding document that's
Are we in addition
to reference to it in the comprehension plan.
We can. Because it's not a challenge. Right.
Okay. Because I growing up in this community, my passion is with the neighbors and what's going on there and wanting to make sure what we're doing tonight, thirty years, forty years, fifty years from now, not gonna be a repeat of what we have lived and are living in the community. So wherever we can offer a safeguard, that's what I want to accomplish tonight.
Yep. We can definitely help do that.
Okay. Okay.
Pam, could I ask one question? Just Please.
Curious. What's the objection to data centers?
The data centers, we have the electricity, the vibration, the the use of water. And then also what's being offered to the neighbors has been given a buffer zone that would allow the neighbors that are on the waterfront to be able to still experience the waterfront. Mhmm. But with adding a data center, now would you sit in your backyard and enjoy the humming of a data center, or they also the extra use of electricity and water that will be immediately affecting those homeowners in the area.
Would they notice the electricity consumption? I mean, would that be apparent to them?
Yes. My understanding, what I'm learning about data centers, yes, it would affect the neighbors and really the city as well.
Okay. Thank you.
One one comment I do wanna make just real quickly to to clarify. What we would do is is draft a declaration of restrictive covenants that city planning staff, city attorney would review. To the extent that the neighborhood had input in that, that's great. But what I do wanna point out is we can have it run-in favor of someone like the neighborhood even if we don't actually have them signed to it, in the event that we're not able to have those meetings moving forward. I do want to say as part of this process, we've had five community meetings over the last year. We're going to continue to do that through the process, but, obviously, you know, attendance and and the folks who are gonna attend that is up to them, not up to us, but we'll certainly invite them.
Okay. Thank you, Robert. Commission have any other questions or comments? There being none, please call the roll.
In ordinance of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida adopting an amendment to the City Of Fort Lauderdale comprehensive plan future land use map changing the designations from low medium residential and medium residential to commercial for the land area generally legally described as being Southeast one quarter of the Northwest one quarter of the Northwest one quarter and the South one half of the Northwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of the Northwest one quarter and the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of the Northwest one quarter and the Northwest one quarter of the Southeast one quarter of the Northwest one quarter and the South one half of the Southwest one quarter of the Northwest one quarter of Section 32 Township 49 South, Range 42 East located East Of Northwest 31st Avenue, West Of Northwest 28th Avenue, South Of Northwest 19th Street, and North Of Northwest 15th Court, all said lands being the city of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, and authorizing the proper city officials to transmit the proposed amendments supporting data and analysis to reviewing agencies providing for severability, repeat providing for conflicts, and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst? Yeah.
Commissioner Glassman? Could you repeat that?
Of the Northwest Okay. Thank you. Yeah. I'm a I'm a yes. Thank you. Thank you.
Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentellis?
Yes. And PH one is now approved. Moving on to OFR one, first reading of an ordinance amending chapter 28 article two of the code of ordinances to clarify ownership, maintenance, repair, installation, and cost responsibility for sewer laterals and related sewer infrastructure. Mister, Zukovitsky, you're the only one that's are you still here? He's the only one that signed up to speak. Yes, sir.
Okay. Good evening, everybody. Speaking with you, Lara, I just wanna make two points. I think it's a great idea for city to actually take over. And the reason why there's two big benefits for the city. Number one, for the p p people, the next. For the city, I mean, when individual hires hires the contractor to do the. I mean, don't get me wrong. There's lots of great contractors out there, but there's also shabby ones. And that will reflect on the longevity of a sewer system throughout the city.
If anything goes wrong from a bad job five or ten years from now, it's gonna cost the city. I've been in the union for twelve years as a tradesman, and I promise you nobody does it as good as the city force, number one. Number two, benefit to the people. It's a hefty cost on a developer to do the. Okay?
And that cost can raise every time to the buyer, to the renter, to everybody. If the cost of the, if the cost of developer is decreased, the cost of the sale is decreased, the rental is decreased, I'm done. It's been a long it's been a long evening. I
think Okay.
I think I got my point across.
Okay. Thank you, sir. Anyone else wish to speak on this item? There being none, someone like to introduce the item, introduce the ordinance? So The ordinance has been introduced. Please call the roll.
Mayor, I have some questions and comments on this. Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. Thanks. Al, if you you can alright. Thanks. So thank you, Al and and Brad, for your work on this. This is great where we're heading. Al, I've shared with you several emails that I've gotten from neighbors about this and just wanna go through them, if you don't mind.
So let's maybe start with Rich Katz. You know, I I can summarize it, but he he's he's asking in the judgment of the city, the existing building sewer is not in good condition or free from infiltration shall be replaced. What stands out to me as a whole is if the city's assuming responsibility, it's unclear why the property owner is required to perform and submit an inspection to a city owned lateral. So let you
Yeah. That's in the good Albert Carbon, the utility service director. That's in section twenty eight fifty eight of the proposed ordinance. It's the same really language where we just replace public works for utility services. And we do redefine in other definitions with the difference between the sewer the city owned lateral and the building lateral.
This one tied this specific section talks about the existing building lateral sewer that's defined as the the ladder that's on the private property. They're responsible to TV that, make make sure that's in good condition. And then if that in the view of the city, it's not in good condition, they need to replace it. Another comment that I saw was that we do say replace. One of them says it could be repaired or lined.
I think we can add that in second reading to make that clarification. In the opinion of the city, that's good good condition, they can line it. So, yes, it we define the the building sewer as being on their side. They're responsible to to verify their side of the line is because they once it passes into private Yeah. Or to a public sewer, then it's our responsibility.
Okay?
Yep. That's great. Thank you. So that's that one. Then let's see.
So now I'm going to Earl Prisley's email, which I think was that suggested modification, which I think you're alluding to, which is in the judgment of the city, this is the adjustment. The existing building sewer is not in good condition or free from infiltration shall be replaced or realigned, if applicable. Such a replacement and all associated costs shall be the responsibility of the city. The repair is within the city's right of way, such replacement and cost shall be the responsibility of the owner if the repair is within the owner's property limits, it shall be performed under approved permit. So I think you're amenable to that.
Yeah, that's where we say replace, and he wants to just put in the repair or line.
Yep. And we you think we can add that view. Appreciate that. And then Eric Silva's email, in order to view avoid any confusion with future interpretation, staff may wanna amend other code sections to add utilities meant where right of way is used, and then he lists several suggestions below.
I I looked at those, and I don't I don't think those are necessary. That's judgment my judgment Yep. Is that we define the service lateral as as a sewer lateral extending from the again, on their side. We saw the the the sewer lateral that's on our side. We say it's on private it's on public property or right away. We're defining that. We define the building sewer, which is their responsibility on their private property.
But I think putting that private sewer or building sewer and saying it's outside the seas right away is redundant.
Yep. And and it seems like he's making a distinction between sewer line and utility easement. Is that is that your understanding?
Correct. That's where we said the sewer lateral, which is defined as on as the definition eight, I think it is. I'm trying to read it right here. Or or 82. Excuse me. Definition eight two. That's where it says the city's it's the city's responsibility. And it says and where the term when used for the house outside the Seizman line is at the house connection that's out that's outside the easement or right away. So I don't think that's it's redundant. It's redundant. Yeah.
Yeah.
In other words, you public right of way is inclusive of the utility easement.
Or utility easement. It says what that is.
Yeah. And it But
then when you get on the private side, it we don't make that. It's on private property.
Yep. Great. That makes sense. And I think those were the totality of pieces of feedback we got from those emails. Does that sound right?
So yes. So so right right recommendation will be approved with the modifications we talked about. We'll make those modifications that'll be printed in the the second reading.
That sounds fantastic, Al. Thank you. This is great piece of of of updated ordinance. I'm really excited about that. Thank you, Al. Mayor, we're good. Thank you.
Very good. Please call the roll. In ordinances, city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida amending chapter 28 water, wastewater, and storm water. Article two of the code of ordinances of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida by amending definitions, providing clarifying language to distinguish private sewers from public sewers and service laterals in the right of way along with adding the possible requirements for a deal of conflicting orders provisions and providing for an effective date. We have Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glossman? Yes. Commissioner Viza Pittman? Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And OFR one is approved on first reading. OFR two, first reading first reading. Acquiesced a judicial ordinance approving the vacation of a 127 foot long by 40 foot wide portion of Northeast 8th Street and Northeast 15th Avenue. Anyone wishing to speak must be sworn in, and the commission will announce any site visits, communications, or expert opinions received and make them a part of the record. Mister Schein, we didn't talk about this, did we? Where is he?
Right here.
Oh. Good evening, mayor, vice mayor, Billson Sunberg representing the property owner. We did not meet about this.
I didn't think so. Okay. Any disclosures, commissioner Herbst? K. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? I had none. Commissioner Glassman?
I believe I did. He knew who to speak to. Thank you. The
the district commissioner for the
None for me, mayor.
Okay. Mister Schein was the only one who signed up to speak, but I'm sure he has nothing to say. So please move someone please move to close public hearing.
Moved. Second.
Moved and seconded. Please call the
roll. Commissioner Herbst. Commissioner Glassman. Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman. Vice mayor Sortsman. Yes. Mayor Trentos.
Yes. The public hearing is now closed on OFR two. Would someone like to introduce the ordinance? Introduced. The ordinance has been introduced. Please call the roll.
In ordinance of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida vacating approximately 40 foot wide by a 120 foot long portion of Northeast 15th Avenue Northeast 8th Street right away adjacent to parcel a Raybour plot according to plot thereof as recorded in plot book 93 page 44 of the public records of Broward County, Florida located West Of Northeast 16th Avenue, North Of Northeast 7th Street, East Of Northeast 15th Avenue, and South Of Northeast 8th Street. All said lands being the city of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentels?
Yes. And OFR two is now approved on first reading. OFR three, first reading. Also, quasi judicial ordinance approving the vacation of 719 square foot right of way and road easement within a 10 foot wide by 65 foot long portion of Northeast 15th Avenue. Anyone wishing to speak must be sworn in, and the and the commission will announce any site visits, communications, or expert opinions received and make them a part of the record. Commissioner Herbst, do you have any disclosures? Commissioner Beasley Pittman? We didn't talk about this either. Did you talk to him?
Yes. He did. Mister Schein. He knows who to speak for.
Did this our commissioner?
Thank you very much.
None. K. Only mister Schein is signed up to speak, and someone please move to close public hearing. Move to second. Move to second it. Please call the roll.
Commissioner Herbst. Commissioner Glassman. Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman. Vice mayor Sorensen. Yes. Mayor Trent Ellis.
Yes. And public hearing is now closed on o f r three. Would someone like to introduce the ordinance? Introduced. The ordinance has been introduced.
In order to the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida vacating approximately 10 foot wide by 65 foot long portion of Northeast 15th Avenue right of way in Road East, dedicated by Raybor Platt according to Platt thereof as in plot book 93, page 44 of the public records of Broward County, Florida located West Of Northeast 16th Avenue, North Of Northeast 7th Street, East of Northeast 15th Avenue, and South of Northeast 8th Street, all said Lansing, the city of Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. Commissioner Herbst? Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And OFR three is now approved on first reading.
Thank you. Happy Wednesday, mayor. Thank you.
Now we're just at three walk ons. We have the walk on resolution regarding the election. Election. Do someone like to introduce the resolution? Introduced. Resolution's been introduced. No anyone wish to speak? No one wish to speak. Please call the roll.
Hey. Resolution of city commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida calling a special election be held on 11/03/2026 to elect a city commissioner from Commission District 1 establishing a qualifying period for the special municipal election and providing for severability rescission of conflicting resolution provisions at an effective date. Commissioner Herbst, commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trentiles?
Yes. And that resolution is now approved. Next two resolutions concern the the drainage issues that we talked about earlier with Melrose Manors and Riverland. The first one is with regard to Melrose Manors. Would someone like to introduce the resolution? And you wanna put twenty one days there?
Yes. Twenty one days.
So what's the specific date? What's twenty one days?
We will need to work with the city clerk so that this can go to the Florida administrative record. Once we have that date, we will share it with the commission, and the clock will start.
Okay. Very good.
The the resolution has been introduced. Please call the roll.
A resolution of city commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida providing notice of intent pursuant to section two fifty five point zero six five Florida statutes to enter into a comprehensive agreement for the Melrose Manor stormwater improvement project accepting unsolicited proposals proposal from Mancong Inc. Notice of intent to accept other proposals for the same project and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glossman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorensen? Yes. Mayor Trent House?
Yes. And that resolution is now approved. Resolution regarding the Riverland Road drainage project accepting the solicitor proposal. Who'd like to introduce that resolution?
Energous for twenty one days.
Twenty one days. No one wishes to speak. Who's calling all?
A resolution city commissioner of the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida providing notice of intent pursuant to section two fifty five point zero six five Florida statutes to enter into a comprehensive agreement for the Riverland stormwater improvement project accepting unsolicited proposal from David Mancini and Sons. Notice of intent to accept other proposals for the same project and providing for an effective date. Commissioner Herbst?
Commissioner Glassman? Yes. Commissioner Beasley Pittman? Yes. Vice mayor Sorenson? Yes. Mayor Trentos?
Yes. And that resolution is now approved. Is there any further business of the city? None on my end. Thank you. Any other questions or comments from any members of the commission? No. Meeting's adjourned. Thank you.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.