City Council - Regular Meeting
The Floresville City Council meeting on July 22, 2026, began with a motion to enter executive session, which sparked a discussion regarding the timing of public comments. A council member questioned the decision to hold public comments after the executive session, citing inconsistencies in scheduling and a lack of transparency for citizens.
About this meeting
- Government Body
- City Council
- Meeting Type
- City Council
- Location
- Floresville, TX
- Meeting Date
- July 22, 2026
Transcript
13 sections
during and after such comments are made. Profane, insulting, or threatening language, including racial, ethnic, or gender stories, will not be tolerated. Any refusal to abide by these rules or disruption of the meeting may result in cancellation of the speaker's remaining time, removal from the meeting room, or a charge for disruption of a public hearing.
At this time,
Heavenly physicians with wisdom and our words with respect. Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.
It's . No.
602 regarding items on the motion to go and proceed council to meeting post-session pursuant to section 551.071, 551.072 and section 1.05. Texting disciplinary rules of professional conduct to consult with legal counsel to deliberate about real property as follows. uh one project writer two projects and also for item b um items do i have to say them all that or can i just say items one through five on b and then item number one under item c second five second five miss um mr
Motion made by Mr. Francis, second by Mr. Cancun. All in favor?
I need to ask you a question between the motion. What is the reason to go into the executive session before the comments? And I see that the comments were put off, even for the council, off. What kind of game do we play of having the comments here? One week they're on and one week they're off. Can you answer that, Libo?
Council members, Veronica Rivera is the attorney. The public going into the decision is the right of the presiding officer to make that decision. In terms of the comments, the comments were removed last time. and a memo was sent to all the council regarding that decision to have the so that we can ensure that we are, that we are complying with the .
Okay, I understand that. But for the citizens out there that come here ready to at least comment on, not on the agenda items or whatever they're gonna do, but they're here. All of a sudden, we're going to go back there for an hour or two without, you know, that is totally wrong. Every week, it's a different change. Every week, it's something new. It's either you live in the city or you don't live in the city. And the people and the taxpayer need to know what's going on. comments were hiding something that people should, and I'm not saying that, but it sure seems like it to me. If you sit out there and talk to the citizens out there, you know, that is very, you know, I think before, I wasn't going to appoint someone to the FEDC, but, you know, I know that we're going to talk about it because it's on the agenda regardless if I say it now or I don't say it, it's on the agenda. My thing is, the comments are off one week and another week they're off. I need the policies, all the changes for the voters out there. But I want the people, and at the same time, every time we start an agenda, a meeting, it's Dora Barrera, which you and Dora can choose. That's fine. We have a vote on the floor.
Motion by Ms. Dora Barrera.
All this was was to get the evaluation process.
We have a motion all in favor. Or against 1 motion test.
All right.
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.