Park Commission - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Park Commission
Meeting Type
Park Commission
Location
Dane County, WI
Meeting Date
March 17, 2026

Transcript

271 sections (from 322 segments)

0:000

I'd like to call we need to order the Dane County Arts and Cultural Affairs Commission. Can we have roll call, please? Chair Richardson?

0:091

Here. Vice chair of Leon Meyer? Here. Commissioner Claire? Here. Commissioner Keurat?

0:180

You speak a little of Pam?

0:201

Commissioner Keurat?

0:230

And you're on mute. Okay.

0:25 – 0:361

Here. Commissioner McKinney? Here. Commissioner Pfaff? Here. And commissioner Uddesy? Here.

0:360

Oh, good. Yeah. And we for the records, we do have quorum.

0:411

That's correct.

0:42 – 0:560

Thank you very much. So our first order of business is to approve the minutes from 02/17/2026. Hopefully, everyone has had a chance to review them, and the chair would like to get a motion for

0:562

approval. I can motion.

0:59 – 1:340

It's been moved that we approve the minutes from 02/17/2026. We don't need a second. Is there any discussion, revision, deletions, corrections? Bearing none, all in favor say aye. Aye. Motion approved. Mote minutes are approved. Of those who are interested, the executive committee minutes will be are on or will be on the the shared drive and on LEGISTR.

1:341

Yep. They're

1:343

all they're published on here. Alright.

1:37 – 2:240

First thing, as you all know that we are entering, one of our two most important times of the year that is the grant review cycle. We're we're entering cycle one, and we can just get an overview, of where we are with the grant review. Believe we have a 103 total, applications that we need to, review and and consider. When I put the chart up, that includes seven capital, 23 short order, and I believe 73 project 74 project grants. So, Augusta, can you just kinda walk us through any percent changes and so forth?

2:25 – 3:011

Yeah. So the remarkable thing this cycle, we we have the difference between twenty twenty six and 2025, is the number of short order applications. So we have, like, about 4.6 times more short order this cycle. The project is pretty in line with past cycles, but we're seeing the numbers go up as we come out of COVID and just the world. So compared to cycle one last year, we have about 26% more requests total than 2025.

3:02 – 3:180

So so we have 304 346,730, from those from those 103 applications Mhmm. Come to a total of $346,730 in funding request.

3:200

K? And in terms of available dollars, we have Augusta?

3:261

212,000 for the entire year for 2026.

3:31 – 3:510

Right. Oh, okay. Just just to make sure we're all on the same page, our total allocated taxpayer funded grant dollars available for cycle one and cycle two is $212,000. Mhmm. At the executive committee and we normally have more application in cycle one than we do cycle two.

3:52 – 4:200

The executive committee approved allocation of 55% of the two twelve to have $116,000 as our cycle one grant budget. And any question on how that, how we arrived at that number? Doug, this is your first first, grant cycle. Was that clear as far as how we arrived at the one sixteen?

4:23 – 4:353

I yeah. I mean, I'm not sure. Is that just from the allocated budget that the Dane Arts got? Is that where it came from? I'm not sure about that.

4:35 – 4:500

Yes. The the in the Dane Arts departmental budget, $212,000 from tax period dollars is is allocated for the grant pool dollars.

4:500

And that that amount is $212,212,000 dollars.

4:554

Okay. That makes sense.

4:560

And 55% of that is we allocated for the first cycle that comes to a $116,600.

5:07 – 5:210

I would like to get a motion so we have on record that our budget for this year, for this cycle rather, is $116,600 which we will stay within. Can I get a motion to that effect?

5:243

Yeah. Yes.

5:270

That Doug, are you moving?

5:303

Yeah. Yes.

5:31 – 5:540

Okay. Doug is moving that we approve our cycle one overall budget. Overall grants dollars available is $116,600. We don't need a motion. Any discussion on that? Bear with none. All in favor say aye. I can't see faces, so

5:545

I Aye. Have

5:553

Aye. Aye.

5:56 – 6:200

Okay. Motion approved. So our overall budget for cycle one is a $116,600. Now let's go to our Capital One budget. Net for for your information, Doug, from we have three, I guess, three different grant categories.

6:21 – 6:570

The overall grant pool dollars, which there are 74 applications. We also have, a grant category of short order grants and also capital grants. And several years ago, we approved that we would allocate 5% of our overall cycle one grant dollars to, to the capital grant budget. And that would and that would come to $508,100 $5,800. Again, 5% of the $1.16 600.

6:574

Right. Disregard my notes and my director's notes. I made a mistake on I was dealing out these numbers. So this what you see right now is the numbers we go by.

7:06 – 7:280

So in so in other words, the seven app the the seven capital grant applications will, will have $5,800 to work with. So I'd like to get a motion to approve the capital, grant, budgeted dollars of $5,800.

7:285

I will so move.

7:30 – 7:490

Been moved by Mary that we approve the cap the cycle one the 2026 Capital One cycle one budget is to be $5,800. Any discussion? Bearing none, all in favor say aye.

7:491

Aye. Thank

7:51 – 8:130

you very much. It that's been approved. Now our next, individual budget item is our short order grants, and we have 20 what 23. 23, which is a big increase. We usually get between five and seven.

8:13 – 9:030

And this year, we had a big jump to 23 with the total budgeting request of $20,216. Mark and Augusta are recommending that we allocate 5% again of dollars, which would come to $5,800. So as you can see, there will there'd be some tough decision. And again, the short hour grants are usually reviewed by by Mark and Augusta and and whatever team you you put in place and will make a recommendation on how the $5,800 will be allocated versus the 22,000 in request. So that's gonna be some tough decisions that will need to be made.

9:040

Being that, still wanna get a motion to approve the short order budget of $5,800. Can Can I get a motion to that effect?

9:19 – 9:410

Been moved that thank you, Doug. It's been moved that we approve the short order grant budget of $5,800. Any further any further discussion? Bearing none, I'll oh oh, I'm sorry. I should I should also add no. Well, that that let's approve that first. All those in favor of budgeting $5,800 for short order applications, say aye.

9:423

Aye. Aye.

9:440

Aye. I didn't hear a couple more. Aye.

9:473

Nope. Aye. Okay. Thank you.

9:50 – 10:110

Motion approved. Now, Mark, do you wanna explain that we've since there is a big difference between the allocated $5,800 and, the request of 22,216, Mark, do you wanna explain that you're gonna take $5,000 from another line item in the department budget?

10:11 – 10:344

In the office budget, yes. I'll take another 5,000 from two different lines to add to the short order so we can at least compensate the applicants with some kind of funds related to their request. Not all will be funded based on what they submitted, but we wanna have at least half of what they requested available for allocating funds to the short order applicants.

10:35 – 11:250

So the so the the real short order budget will be the 10,800 because from from the offices, another line item will add to that. There's still a bit, you know, difference between the request of 22,000 versus the $10.08 that we have available, to allocate. But that's a challenge that, that we've had over the years, and that that and that is likely to continue. Now the final final deduction is we out we give our panelists $100 to do the heavy lifting of reviewing the grants in detail. We have 30 panelists, $100 each.

11:26 – 12:370

So that will be $3,000 that will be allocate that that will be given to panelists as a thank you for putting in many hours of work including re reviewing the grants, scoring the grants, and then coming to the panel review session, is an hour and sometimes two. And that's our thank you for putting in the hours. So when you subtract that, our net budget for cycle three for the grant school dollars for the for the 74 applications will be $101,400. That's our bottom line number that AM that is what we'll plug in into the formula that we will make it will make decision to make it work that we stay within that number. So I would like to get a motion to put on record that our cycle one net budget grant pool budget for the seven four applications is $101,101,400 dollars.

12:400

Can I get a motion to that effect?

12:445

A motion.

12:46 – 13:080

There was, Kelsey? Yeah. Okay. It's been moved by Kelsey that we approve our net cycle one grant budget of $101,400. Any further discussion on that? Questions? Bearing none, all in favor say aye.

13:083

Aye. Aye. Aye.

13:100

I can't see face it now. What once again, all in favor say aye.

13:19 – 13:520

Aye. Ayes have it. Motion approved. So that is our net, our net dollars that we have, to work with. So we have 101,000 to work with. We've got 346,000 in request. So we have a challenge ahead of us again this cycle. Now the panel the panel review session will be taking place very starting soon. Know mine is next week, but we still need two chairs.

13:541

Oh, thanks, Kelsey. I saw you signed up for

13:560

We got one. So we need one additional chair. What's the date for for that chair?

14:031

Thursday, March 26, and it would be 08:30AM to 11AM.

14:084

Called once. Called twice. Share.

14:121

Maybe it was I'll not

14:13 – 14:560

see it. And, Doug, I I since this is your first time, I would suggest that you sit in on one of the sessions. Okay. Again, you you pick the time, you know, that is best for you and, you know, all all I'm asking is that you sit in to observe because we rely on the panelists a great deal. They do the heavy lifting as far as they review, they dissect the grants in much more detail than we could ever can't could because, you know, since we need to scan our not only our assigned grant, but review as many as we can.

14:56 – 15:560

There were at one point in time, we asked commissioners to review all of them, which was a big ask. Now we are asking that you at least read through at least read through the summary. But, Doug, it'll give you more confidence in the process as for so you'll see that when the panelist score scores each of the app application, again, they do a deep dive and they they debate among themselves before they score because we we really rely on their scores that we put their scores into a mathematical formula, and then that tells us how the dollars should be allocated based on the panel score and our available dollars. So, again, I would strongly suggest that that that you pick a time to at least sit in. Even if you can't sit in for the entire period, I yeah.

15:56 – 16:100

So I would suggest just so you have, more, trust and confidence in this portion of the process. Do I One more chair. He's gonna ask the question. Oh, I'm sorry.

16:113

Do I join by where it says joining the Zoom open to the public and listening in? Is that how I do it?

16:191

No, Doug. I'll I will send you a link, like our commission meetings.

16:232

And you'll

16:241

Yes. I'll add you to a calendar invite, and then I'll just loop you into the emails going forward.

16:301

You can either sign up on the spreadsheet or just email me.

16:351

Maybe what I'll do is I'll send you an email after our meeting with the dates, and you can just let me know which one you wanna join.

16:425

Okay. If you can sign up on the spreadsheet though, Doug, it'll let the chair know that you'll be there, and then we can plan for that. You're welcome. Join any of us.

16:513

And are are are they done through Zoom or they done in person?

16:550

Zoom. Zoom.

16:57 – 17:080

Yeah. So, the session that you signed up for, Auguste, will also send you the list of the application there will be reviewed during that session.

17:10 – 17:580

And they're usually about 12, at least for my session, believe they were they were 12. So that's about how how many will will will be, reviewed. Of course, now each commissioner was assigned, application to read, which, again, you are strongly encouraged to to do so. Hopefully, the, one of the grants that you were assigned to read, the panel session that you sit in on, that one or several of them will be reviewed. So, again, it'll it'll help you as you read through them to see what the panelists look for and what they consider to be important in in the merits of the application, the and the proposal that is being submitted.

17:590

So, Deshaun, are we, okay on March 26?

18:036

Yep. You can sign me up.

18:040

Okay. Great. So we have our chairs

18:085

Thank you.

18:08 – 18:420

For each of the panels. Thank you very much for that. That's very that's very important. So we we we have our dates, we have our chairs, and we're ready to to move on to that phase of the process. K. Any further any other discussion on on the grant review topic? Okay. So let's move on to the next thing. Any further discussion on the new grant allocation models?

18:42 – 19:131

Yeah. Mark and I have discussed a couple of different items that we wanna look into for implementation in the near future. Mark proposed an individual artist grant. It's called an artist and community collaboration grant. So that's something that you developed at the Wisconsin Arts Board. Right? We'll take a look at that and see how it fit. It seems like it will fit in with the types of applications we're getting. We're seeing a lot more individual artists and makes sense to kind of fit that process with the community needs.

19:13 – 19:304

It forces the artist to match with a nonprofit, so they automatically have a fiscal receiver. So they're not opted by themselves. It worked at the arts board. I thought it would be a good one to try and implement. Now it'd be a matter of how we allocate funds to Yeah. To that new category.

19:31 – 19:560

Yeah. That that's my question. So are you in your thinking, are you will you be recommending that we then allocate x number of dollars or x percent of the total budget just for individual applications so they'll all be competing for a finite Correct. Set of dollars? Correct. Okay.

19:56 – 20:351

Yeah. We also based on the feedback that Deshaun presented from the focus groups, we're seeing a lot of interest in a legacy grant. So a grant specifically tailored for returning organizations or established organizations. So I'm gonna look into the legacy grant model that Wisconsin Arts Board has and Madison Art Commission. And then we also talked about this having a set award amount. So it would be if you are awarded your $1,500 or $2,000 just so they know if we apply and we get it, we know how much we're getting instead of trying to kinda guess or having it fluctuate. So those are

20:36 – 21:074

And finally, we're thinking about not so much what they think they'll make for the future in terms of their organization, but what they did in the past as an application. So tell us what you've done so they're not trying to make up what they'll plan to do in the following year, which is a lot harder than saying, well, we completed this project last year. We're gonna do something similar next year or this year. A lot easier than saying, well, I think we wanna do this next year, but we're not sure. So it makes the whole process easier. We did that at the Wisconsin Arts Board as well, which made the whole process much easier.

21:08 – 22:100

No. I, I noticed, in, the application that I was reviewing for my panel session, there were it seemed to be many more true project grants and not an annual thing that that they do, but it was a one time specific new crew project. They had a start and ending versus an ongoing app operation. So that and so and that is what we really hope to be moving to where it is a crew project, and a lot of them were were new projects that had not been that funding had not been requested for previously. So that was I mean, I noticed that in my set of of grants, know if if anyone else had had noticed that as well, but that would be a question to see that they were true project grants or app applications rather.

22:120

So in anything else on the on the, your thinking on the allocation models?

22:183

One other one would be if we do it

22:20 – 22:384

by budgets, annual budgets of the organization, separate them between those. Those would would be considered higher budgets over 500,000 and those below something like that, which would put applications in a more equitable position with each other. So those are some of the things we're thinking about for presenting to you in May. Okay.

22:40 – 22:535

Yeah. Just a little clarification. Curious how you're thinking about new. Like, are there parameters on that? Like, this would be a first time or a first or second time person, and also how you're thinking about legacy.

22:54 – 23:104

Well, that's what the legacy would take into consideration. Those that have applied numerous times like Mass and Opera, Symphony, they would go on to a legacy category. So we're thinking maybe the past three years consecutive app applications in both cycles, so then put them into a legacy position.

23:11 – 23:260

But, you know, but based on the survey, what they're asking for, those that have applied before and established organization, they'll need to give you their information about who they are and how long they've been in business.

23:264

That's a legacy award. So I get awarded one year, and they automatically be awarded the same amount the next year

23:330

without having to apply. Oh oh, without having to apply? It's continuous for two

23:384

years, maybe three years depending on what we decide. But, yeah, that will eliminate them having to apply each year.

23:45 – 24:020

And that that will that won't conflict with the county's procurement process. And that the county also does multi year contracts in in a sense?

24:024

It wouldn't

24:033

be a multi

24:03 – 24:154

year contract. It would be the same as the app a grant review. They just wouldn't have to go through the process. They would just we'll just file the same paperwork each year as opposed to a multi year grant. Does that make sense?

24:150

Okay. So

24:16 – 24:334

if ASNOP would apply this year, they get the legacy award. So they won't have to apply next year, but there'll still be same information will be sent to them in the following next year based on what they got this year, a contract. So there's no difference in how it's procured.

24:340

But they'll still tell us what their project is for the next year. Right.

24:383

Right. Okay.

24:394

Without having to add all the information of what they do traditionally in these applications. Okay.

24:455

So this may be for another time, but just curious, Deshaun, do you have any reaction I mean, you were thought through this so carefully. Is do you have any thoughts about what you're hearing?

24:57 – 25:326

Just mostly that those I think those things are worthwhile to explore. I think the setting up a set amount after looking at this year's budget intrigues me more because I think I'm sure everybody on the call will agree, like, it feels terrible seeing $350,000 in need, and we have a $116,000 to give out this cycle. It's it doesn't feel good. And as an artist applying for that, it also doesn't feel good, which came up a lot in the in the the focus groups and in survey, the lottery system of I'm applying for this, and I know I won't get that. And so if they're coming in with a set amount, it allows them to, again, get peace of mind.

25:32 – 26:166

You you're wasting less time focused on this, and you you know where else you need to procure your money. So that makes sense. The legacy model, I think a lot of folks were asking about that, particularly to lessen the application burden year after year. If you kind of know us and trust us when we have a track record, don't make us go through the whole thing again. Some kind of truncated process was primarily what they were asking for. That makes perfect sense, to allocate. So, yeah, I think it it makes sense, as long as we go about our, digging into this the right way and then once we make our decisions given enough runway to inform the community I think is paramount, so before we make any changes. But I think all those things are worthwhile looking into and bringing it back to the table.

26:17 – 26:340

Okay. Alright. Anything anything else on the allocation, model? Okay. Thank you, Mark Augusta. Next, mission statement and vision statement. I'll turn the, you know, the mic over to Fran.

26:35 – 27:162

Thank you kindly, Rod. I appreciate it. I'm gonna share my screen here. So, I just wanna give a shout out to Am and Deshaun and, of course, Mark and Augusta for working on this, with me. And we took a good look at all of the, mission and vision iterations out on the various sites, that have evolved over the years. Here. Let me let me make this a little larger for you. Can everybody see that? Can everybody see that okay? Yes.

27:16 – 27:292

Okay. Alright. So first, starting with the mission statement. So I'm in this section here. We determined that a mission statement really should talk about what we do and what our impact is.

27:29 – 28:082

It should really be one sentence. It should be memorable, and it should really guide all of our decisions. So, currently, the iteration that was most prevalent out on various sites was engaging participation, connecting people, and inspiring expressive living in Dane County, Wisconsin. And so what the group now has proposed is this one in red, to enrich the quality of life in Dane County, Wisconsin by supporting, promoting, and ensuring equitable access to the arts, culture, history, and creative expressions for all residents. Creative expression for all residents.

28:08 – 28:312

So that's what we're proposing for the new mission, we thought. And please chime in, anybody who helped work on this. But we felt that it it was pretty all encompassing, of what we do and really pulled out the high or key important elements of what Dane Arts does and is achieving. So any other comments or thoughts on this?

28:353

Okay. It's

28:367

it's very it's very clear. Good job to everybody who worked on it.

28:402

Thanks, Bossy.

28:42 – 29:010

Okay. We if possible, we do want to up formally approve our mission and vision statement, if if the group is is ready to do that. Again, I'm I'm not sure if this was sent in advance or this is everyone's first time seeing this.

29:011

First time for something Yeah.

29:024

I think that

29:033

we we should go

29:04 – 29:200

back right now. Okay. That's it. If if the commissioner is is is comfortable in doing that. So, Fred, would you like or to, make a motion to approve the, the mission statement as presented?

29:222

Sure. I will make that motion.

29:24 – 29:464

Why are you why are you we still need other commission members to see and review the commission and vision statement. So if you approve it now, then does that become an mission statement? If it's approved by the majority, yes. But I I didn't I didn't I didn't think everybody had from the creation has seen this more than once to give them some time to reflect on it. It

29:470

That's that's why I asked if this was sent in in advance. And No. No. It, okay, it was that's in advance.

29:542

I did not send it.

29:55 – 30:144

No. I think we should do this prior to the new board arrival and and when all of you leave in May whoever's leaving, and and wait for the approval from from the county exec on current numbers and do that before we start a new fiscal year and commission year. Does that make sense?

30:15 – 30:270

This Okay. So so okay. Because you are proposing that we, right now, mull over the mission statement but not have it approved until after June.

30:274

Well, not so much after June. I just wanna make sure every commission members have a chance

30:303

to Oh, sure. Yeah. Yeah. But yeah. Okay. Yeah. We could we

30:352

possibly, put could we possibly add these to the to the minutes? Is that an appropriate way to do it?

30:42 – 31:180

Yes. Yeah. That does. Again, yeah, that's why I asked if they because this was sent in advance so that everyone has had a chance to mull it over and apparently not so, yes, your your your point is is well taken. So you are okay. So today, we are simply introducing, the recommendation from, from the committee, for the commissioners to consider and and, at a later date, we'll do some tweaking and, ultimately, file approval. Right?

31:182

Okay. That was different than what we had planned in the executive committee meeting.

31:211

Just Right.

31:22 – 31:384

That's the advice that four or five commission members that aren't here. I don't know if they've seen this. You know, we have we have to have a commission meeting where everybody's present. Right. So I just don't wanna approve something and then hear from a commissioner. Why have a chance to see that? I don't know what that's

31:392

Well, no. But goal of attending the meeting.

31:410

No. But but then we are approving it at a commission meeting. They need to be here. If they are here, then they're I wanted to

31:506

be here.

31:503

Right. I just

31:514

wanna make sure everybody else is Yeah.

31:53 – 32:080

Point point point well taken. We need to see it mulling over in our heads. Someone might come back with a tweaking of a word here and there. There's no problem there. So that's the proposed mission statement. Now, Frank, we'll move to the vision statement.

32:10 – 32:432

Okay. And just also to make clear, this is in our shared drive in the marketing and branding folder. So everyone has access to this, and you can come in and review this. I'm I just cleaned up this document. It's called Danart's branding and marketing guidelines final, and it's just sort of the final version. It doesn't mean it's approved. Okay. So moving on to vision statement. So doing a little research on vision statement, we agreed it should be one sentence. It should be the change or the thing that we're working towards.

32:44 – 33:172

AM also defined that as inspirational high level description of the desired future that we aim to bring about. Currently, it's all Dane County citizens and residents leading expressive lives in connection with one another, which we didn't feel was super aspirational. So what we're proposing is the arts as a vital civic force, strengthening connection and belonging, fostering growth, and igniting a vibrant creative community. Any other thoughts or comments on that?

33:18 – 34:020

So how how as commissioners, you know, review this later, how would you like to proceed in there? Would you like commissioners to, to, to make their suggestions on the shared drive, and then the committee will meet again to take a look, at those suggestions and then come back with with the final, recommendation for both the mission statement, and the business statement that I'm I am suggesting that we have that wrapped up by the June meeting to make a, to to to approve at at the June meeting.

34:03 – 34:264

I'm gonna jump in. I don't think anybody's gonna make any changes. I just wanna make sure everybody sees it. So I think we make the May meeting decision and let everybody know in advance as soon as we finalize this decision on mission and vision. That's fine. Because I really don't think the other four or five folks or even some of you may make any changes because, it stands at on its own merits written as Fran put out here.

34:26 – 35:070

Okay. So is there a consent I can't see faces. So is there a consensus on that will be our approach and that we will include, both of the statements, in the minutes so that we all those who are present can see it. Those who are not will get the minutes and see it, and we'll be ready, to make. In the meantime, if there are any suggestions to to either send those to friend or or add them to the shared drive with the understanding that we'll be making that we'll be approving either, hopefully, both, during the May meeting. Is is there a consensus on this?

35:083

Yes. Yes.

35:10 – 35:222

We can we just, put intention in the minutes so that we're asking that everybody review? And if they have any questions or concerns that they bring it to them. So it won't be till the June meeting then that we

35:224

will No.

35:220

No. May. May. Right. Yeah. Also, the minutes that we we will be approving during the May meeting.

35:293

Yep. Okay.

35:302

And feedback is welcome, I would say. I would encourage

35:340

people. Yeah. Absolutely.

35:36 – 36:155

Yeah. I I just a quick, note about punctuation. Yeah. I wonder about commas and semicolons. I wonder if anyone there are different approaches to this. I wonder if there's any like, Mark and Augusta, is there someone at the county level who would wanna make sure that it's representing that the punctuation is the way they want it? You could do it two different ways. In other words, you could put a I I don't see the text in front of me now, but you can put an extra column in that, comma in that first one after, I think, history. Right? And then this this the vision one could be separate the chunks could be separated by semicolons. This may be minor, but we live in Madison.

36:150

Yeah. Yeah.

36:165

Got a lot of academics who are gonna be like, what?

36:193

Yep. And just to be to

36:21 – 36:422

be clear, the vision statement isn't a complete sentence. You know? And so there, you know, there was discussion around that. I, you know, I think it's okay. It gets the point across even though it's not a complete sentence. But that's if that's something that people would like to discuss, and I'm I'm all about it.

36:424

That's a good point. Yes. I have some grammatical issues, punctuations that I can suggest when I send them to you, Fran. Okay.

36:515

But it's beautifully done. Thank you so much. I love it.

36:542

Thank you to the team

36:55 – 37:080

for sure. And, yes, we do want to be grammatically correct. So so once we have the content, then we'll tweak it as needed. Okay. So

37:093

I have a statements. I have a Okay.

37:12 – 37:498

Just to comment, I really, you know, sitting through these sessions, Fran just exhibited this amazing leadership because we really had robust conversations and really talking about the meaning of specific words. And and we weren't all in agreement. So I when she presents this, it seems like it was really easy, but there was just a lot of discussion and depth of thinking that went in on this. So I get a little worried about then people not attending this meeting and understanding that, and then they're just gonna read this and and not understand all that went into it. So I'm just gonna say I don't agree that we shouldn't approve this.

37:49 – 38:138

I think it should be approved. And then I think we're open to other commissioners that aren't haven't attended this and understand what went into it. They certainly can comment on it, and then we could always revisit it. But I'm not in agreement that this is not approved at this meeting, which is what I think the whole intent was of having this having this group of people really spend an enormous amount of time and thought on on coming up with this recommendation.

38:144

Would that include grammar and punctuation we could change at a later date if we approve today?

38:20 – 38:328

Yeah. Again, I think those are the punctuation is a minor. It doesn't change the intent of the language of what what's done here. So I think that's something that could certainly be be, tweaked. Then

38:330

I vote on it. So we can make a motion, and, we will will either vote in favor or not.

38:443

I would I would make a

38:462

motion that we approve the mission and vision statement as presented today.

38:508

And I would second that.

38:523

Then I won't talk to anybody else.

38:552

Then With the understanding punctuation can be altered.

38:590

It it's been

39:008

And and the understanding that if somebody has a, you know, a a very strong opinion, we can always revisit it.

39:072

Or we encourage them to attend the meeting.

39:104

Right. Yeah. It it We encourage them.

39:120

It has been moved that we approve the mission and vision statement as presented. Any further discussion?

39:235

Thank you for sharing that, Anne.

39:25 – 39:360

That's all. If if there is no further discussion, all in favor of the two statements approval of two statements, aye. I need to speak in Aye.

39:38 – 40:110

And we have a majority of eyes. So, did you see them different, Mark Augusta? I think we have the majority, saying aye. So, Kelsey Kelsey, I didn't see your note. Sure. Just appreciate the effort. Oh, okay. Okay. So, the most the motion has been approved. We have our new enhanced mission and vision statement. Thank you, Fran, Anne, Anne, Mark, and Augusta and Deshaun.

40:114

And and Deshaun. Do we start implementing the new statements then on all our sites?

40:18 – 40:332

So, yeah, the next step would be for Augusta and I just to get together, and we can can get everything updated in the location. She already took the time to indicate where all of those are, so that should be a pretty pretty quick update. Augusta, do you have any concerns?

40:351

I don't think so other than it What? Some versions of our logo with remnants of it, like Engage, Connect, Inspire, but but we can do it piece by piece.

40:450

Yeah. Well Like, the intent is that the motions approve effective immediately, so now we systematically go through and make We'll

40:542

take care

40:553

of it. Right?

40:550

Because Like

40:562

I said, I'll message you.

40:570

We can start to put it in place.

41:004

It's not at all. Love those, so we can take the ones that happened.

41:041

Definitely. So just yeah. Just

41:060

Alright. Thank you. We have Can

41:086

I make a point on that?

41:103

On the shot. Yes.

41:11 – 41:426

Yeah. I just, I get that approved effective immediately, but I also think that we're discussing a whole slate of changes right now. And to to Dan Hart's, I think we should be mindful of how we make changes to the public. Like, to to just update our mission and vision, and it's just a new thing, to me, feels like not the best approach in terms of us actually communicating to the public, especially if we want a greater presence in the community. So I just think that we should be mindful and think about, well, what is that communication to the public like about this thing?

41:444

So do you have a recommendation on how we communicate that?

41:486

No. Because we we're just having a conversation right now. So I have no time have had no time to think about that, but I think that I would not recommend that we immediately just go update all the websites and things right now without communicating to the public.

41:58 – 42:382

So can I just I I have a thought on that? So my thought is the mission and vision in that exercise is actually more of an internal exercise. It helps us define our work. And so we went through that discussion talking carefully about all of the elements of those and the work that we do, and we were factoring in, I think, some of the upcoming changes. And we we discussed at length about the reference to youth and fostering, and whether or not that should be something to include, and we felt that that was, yes, an important part of the work that we do.

42:38 – 43:052

I personally feel that is Joe Q Public gonna care what our mission statement is out there? Like, I don't think they're going to analyze it. This is just my opinion, but I don't think they're gonna sit and analyze what our mission or vision is. It's for us that we know and understand the work that we're doing and what we're saying to the public about it. Then I think the work that we build off of that and share with people is gonna be really critical.

43:06 – 43:302

Now that being said, I wasn't anticipating we're gonna put out a press release that the mission and vision statement changed. I wasn't thinking this was something we were gonna be, you know, really shouting from the rooftops. It was gonna be a subtle change because there's inconsistencies all over. So this was gonna sort of lay a foundation for our work that was more stable. That's how I was envisioning it. Yes.

43:31 – 44:066

Yeah. Which is fair. And and I and I understand that. My my only counterpoint is while, sure, I think if we make the change, will the community care? Ultimately, no. But I think there's an opportunity to make the community care is my point. Mhmm. But, like, by all the changes we're doing as opposed to just acting and expecting people to come to us, the conversations we've been having about how do we connect better with the community which is the whole foundation of things like the road show. And so I think that there is an opportunity to be vocal about, hey, we're updating this thing for this reason and here's where that's taking us. Like, here's this new version of Dane Arts and how we're moving forward.

44:06 – 44:346

So even if we don't, I'm not saying we need to put out a press release right now but thinking about if we're gonna update this stuff immediately, how are we communicating that in something like the roadshow of like, hey, we have this updated mission and vision and here's what that means for your township or your city within the county as we go around. So I just think that there is an opportunity to communicate it to build stronger affinity with artists and organizations and, you know, government officials, etcetera, throughout the county.

44:341

I think, yeah, I

44:35 – 45:187

think there's a way that we could make it work with both Fran and Deshaun's ideas. Like, maybe maybe a press release is too much, too far, too much effort, you know, and something we don't wanna put our efforts into. But I think sharing with the public the these exciting changes or these exciting improvements might be just a joy to share with the community. So social like, you know, a a social media post of, like, you know, we we have reenvisioned our mission and vision statements. We'd like to share it with you or sharing it at our grant review sessions at the beginning introduction or even at the Dana Arts conference.

45:187

I think that there's, you know, smaller ways that we can share with the community the joy and the efforts that we're putting into, improving everything.

45:293

I I am. And I'd be I'd

45:317

be I'd be happy to work with people as well in order to figure out what exactly that is or what type of messaging or, statements we're sharing with the public.

45:43 – 46:088

Yeah. So again, I just one comment. I love this love this meeting. Right? We're having these conversations where we're we're really giving difference of opinion, and then we're gonna find the alignment and consensus. This is what happened when we did the mission statement and the vision statement. To me, what a great a great commission. So I think that's great. I have a little nuance on what everybody is saying. I don't feel the mission statement, the vision statement is a change that needs to be communicated.

46:08 – 46:498

I think it's getting us consistent and having better language around what we're really all about. So I am with Fran and that this is more of an internal thing, and then it sets the foundation as we do communicate with the how we're gonna do this and how and how it impacts, you know, our our different target audience members. That's where I think the communication has to go out, which I agree with both what Kelsey and Deshaun are saying. It really needs to be thoughtful and and and, done purposefully. But the mission and the vision is really just the the canvas that we needed to better define, so I don't think that needs a a specific communication out to the public.

46:49 – 47:172

And can I just say also, I really hear Deshaun's concern, and he's wanting us to put our money where our mouth is in essence? So, like, not just talking the words, but making the actionable changes. And I think I think this is the foundation for that, and I a 100% agree. Like, with or things that people can actually tap into, I I think that's really, really critical and that this is a basis for that. So I'm not entirely disagreeing with the issue.

47:17 – 47:384

What plays into our anniversary fiftieth is when we would make a really announcement about this alignment with the mission and vision statement. I agree with all of everything, but everybody said, but that would be a one time that we could really really showcase the change in language, the mission, and vision.

47:382

That's a year away, though, Mark. Are we gonna wait a year?

47:414

Well, I was gonna do

47:420

it now. Yeah. No. Literally, with organizations in that. Yes. Okay.

47:46 – 47:584

And mentioned at the business conference or at other grant cycle meetings that we have of the change coming, but that is it's part of the twenty twenty twenty seven anniversary of words in everything we send out.

47:59 – 48:392

Okay. Yeah. What can I just add one other thing? Yeah. Logo logo has been tossed around now for quite some time. People have some pretty strong feelings about the logo and where we're going with the logo. So, Mark asked me then to schedule a meeting after the conference for us to talk about logo. So anybody I'm inviting anybody, and please put this in the minutes. Anybody who would like to participate in the discussion on logo, I'm happy to facilitate that conversation. I'm by no means a logo expert, but, we can have a talk about it and try to figure out if it needs updates and what that might look like.

48:41 – 49:370

Any last comments, mission statement, and our communication efforts? This has been a great con conversation. Again, I guess everyone can be can be correct at the same time, and I think this is one of those those those time. But, again, as we are communicating as we are walking our own talk and communicating what our new our new statements are, we are informing everyone, not as in my view, we're not asking for a comment or permission to move forward on implementing on using our new statements. So I just I I didn't know if if that's what you meant, Sean, that we need to get feedback first on how the public feels about our new statement.

49:38 – 50:080

I okay. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Okay. Yeah. Because that and they won't as I am in frame of saying, this is the internal statement or focus for us internally as how we are going to move forward and what our focus is gonna be. And so now, of course, we need to walk our own talk. K. Well, let's wrap this one up. Any any last minute comments on on this topic? Okay. Thank you. Look. Mary, you're gonna say something?

50:085

I emailed the possible grammatic sorry. Punctuation.

50:110

Oh, okay. Okay. Real quick on the portal on the commission portal, Augusta.

50:18 – 50:441

Yeah. So I'm proposing that we discontinue the use of the commissioner portal because it has not been used in quite some time, and then Fran set up the shared Google Drive, which serves a very similar function. So unless anyone objects, I'll just recommend that we keep the portal up, but it would just will not be updated. And then going forward, we'll use the Google Drive to share files and stay up to date and collaborate.

50:44 – 51:050

That's so our official source of minutes and agendas is LegitStar for ongoing conversational type of things. That's what, the shared drive is for. Okay. Anything else on the portal, Augusta? No. Great. Mister Mott, director of report.

51:06 – 51:494

You have the notes. Yeah. I apologize for error on the grant cycle information, but everything's moving forward. The business March conference, have about 45 folks registered now. The early date goes into the March. We're just putting out social media on a regular basis. We have all the presenters set. So everything seems to be organized and ready to go for the conference at the April. We have the posted calendar that we're thinking about how we present that for 2027, the anniversary, and what we do next. And you have notes from the meeting I had with Stephanie. And, what's your friend's name, Fran, that was with us? Sylvia.

51:492

Yes. Sylvia. Right. And, Bettina. Mhmm.

51:524

So I don't know what our next session is for the thinking of the anniversary, setting.

51:582

It's coming up next Monday, I believe. Let

52:014

me see. Alright. Thank you. I'll have my notes in front of me.

52:042

Yeah. Next, Monday, the twenty third at noon.

52:08 – 52:474

And one of the things for, Vanessa and I are doing to start getting to some of these communities we've never been to is taking trips with our posters and our calendars and information about the business conference. We couldn't do it last week because she was sick, but we will start hitting places like Dane, Bristol, Burke, Cottage Grove, areas we've not been to before. I've already reached out to those, miss municipalities and and little towns to say they were coming. So we're gonna start doing that We started wanting to do that today and yesterday, but, obviously, the weather didn't allow us. So that's one of our focuses in following with Deshaun's notes, you know, getting the word out of who we are.

52:47 – 53:154

We've never been to any of these areas, and that's also one of the suggestions in my conversation with county executives of the rural communities. So we're gonna make a point to get out to these communities over the next several weeks as we promote the work of Dane Arts. And I'm still getting a lot of people who have no idea even here at the county who Dane Arts is. So we still have a lot of work cut out for us. Thank you for the work you've done, Fran, on the, vision mission statement, all of you involved in that.

53:15 – 53:424

Again, we still need some volunteer help with the conference. Please let me know if you're definitely going by the end of this month so I have an idea who's there. We have quite a few volunteers lining up from Park Bank, UW. So, hopefully, we'll have enough volunteers. But everything's set for the conference, for the grants, for looking at the poster and calendar, looking at the you saw that Ford and Madison will keep our name on their posters.

53:42 – 54:204

We've given them over 70 artists. I asked them if they needed help this year, and they said, no. They're good. I we quite recommended that they keep our logo on their posters after all we've done for them, and they agreed to that to do it, I don't know, for the next three to five years with Dana Art's logo on that. So that was great, impact. StudyBlock Madison, we have an artist in resident at StudyBlock Madison again. Doctor. Rebecca Rivera is working there. He's also presenting at the at the conference. So we have a great relationship with SteinerBlock and a number of other resources there in in the community. Do you have any questions on my notes?

54:200

One quick quest the business of ours, how we're doing on the registration numbers? Is it, is it coming along?

54:284

I think everybody's waiting till the end of the last month when they get their final early bird. So we have 45 people registered.

54:360

Okay. And we're shooting for 125, a 150.

54:424

Okay. I have no idea how that will turn out, but I never have any idea how it turns out.

54:47 – 54:582

How's our how's our marketing efforts compared to last year? I know we had who's that little that powerhouse fella you hired? Mister Moises? Yeah. Moises.

54:58 – 55:314

That's really Hula and kicking it kicking it big time with Hula. We're doing a lot of social media. We have a team of four people. Maybe Shay is handing off social media. We're on Instagram. On Facebook. We're doing regular posting LinkedIn. We're having other folks who are act adding and sharing our information. So Okay. Again, my hope is and it's always been this way. We don't know until the very last minute how many you have and people wait to sign up. Hopefully, the March, we'll get at least a 100 folks listed and registered to sign up. K.

55:312

But we're using his recap from last year and kind of because that was very successful with everything he laid out.

55:370

And are we contacting those who have been to conferences before?

55:433

Yes. Okay. Yes. Yes.

55:44 – 56:034

So we're hitting all the things that they're asking Okay. And collecting donations for the end of the evening, for the conference. So we think we're all good. We meet on Thurs next Thursday again, and then we'll meet every week after that up until the conference. That's my report.

56:030

Any questions to Mark? Comments?

56:07 – 56:195

What's the best way to I mean, I've I've put on the events calendar a place to sign up for the conference, but what's the best way to communicate with you, Mark, and Augusta when we'll be there and who's coming?

56:20 – 57:004

Just send me a note and we'll we'll list it. I did do a site visit that's reminding me about the site visits on my notes. Please make a site visit when I saw the Children's Theatre Madison show. It was a lovely show. Glad we were there. People were happy to see us there. So it's always good to represent. It was a small crowd, but the show is really dynamic, and the little girls that were in the audience were just so fun to watch. And their relationship between the actor and stage with the audience was really nice too. So remind you that there's a lot of events that we can attend to. Just let me know so we can get you tickets. That's something else.

57:020

Going once, going twice, Mark, anything else.

57:06 – 57:454

If you're able to attend the Social Rx meeting, that would be great. Give us some idea on Thursday. It's a webinar of the Social Rx. We've raised $200,000 to bring this group in from Atlanta to start working with the health care industry on allocating the rights for doctors to prescribe the arts as a wellness health care tool. So we had a meeting yesterday with a a school academic session, and we have a meeting today with I mean, meeting tomorrow with health care professionals and a meeting on Thursday with community arts professionals. Again, statewide letting you know about the about the, Social Rx wellness program that we're working on.

57:450

K. Thank you. Anything for, Mary, on the events calendar other than what you just mentioned?

57:52 – 58:195

Yeah. I've I've posted it. There's some great things coming up. On the second tab is is about the, business of arts conference, if you wanna put your name in, but it sounds like it would be smart to let just email Augusta and Mark directly to let them know. And I would just ask, are there just keep reminding us, Mark and Augusta, if there are certain days and certain times of the days you need help, or if you just would like a presence and sort of

58:19 – 58:304

A presence. That's I I think we have enough volunteers. Okay. And the group that we have in place, that's the team that's working on this have been together now three years. So we have a pretty good process in place.

58:30 – 59:140

Excellent. Excellent. Okay. Our next meeting date is April 14 at 08:30, and that will be when we will, have our final, deliberations on the grant allocations. And, hopefully, we can follow our same process. We'll get the scoring to you, ma'am, in time for you to to join us at the executive committee meeting for one final look, and then we'll present it all to the commissioners on the fourteenth. Public comment on item not on the agenda, none. Such as other business is allowed by law, none. Any last minute announcement from anyone, comments?

59:15 – 59:522

Can I just say I went to a bunch of Dane Arts sponsored events? Two of them I didn't even know we had sponsored. Went to, 1919 at the Barrymore that the Four Seasons did. It was called after the war nineteen nineteen. An incredible, like, rockumentary. It was kind of like Hamilton meets I'm not sure what. It was it was amazing, though. It was really amazing. Packed house at the Barrymore, and lo and behold, there was the Dana Arts logo at the end. I had no idea that we were supporting that event.

59:53 – 1:00:182

Also went to the Chrysalis event. I know, Mary, thank you. You were there as well, the storytelling event, which just warms my heart every year. These events are incredible people, and Dane Arts does so much for the community. I'm just blown away every time I go to stuff, and I see that we're supporting this as well. So our reach is far, and we should be proud of this work and take advantage of these events. They're amazing.

1:00:19 – 1:00:350

So I went to the in international festival at the OG. Yeah. Week Yeah. Last Saturday where I introduced two of the performances, which is really fun to do. So I can wait.

1:00:35 – 1:00:504

And they're always needed they're always in need of emcees and Augusta performed there with the Yes. Ken Fitzsimmons from 1919 with the Kisses is presenting at the conference on that program and the work on how you make money as a musician.

1:00:502

Nice. He's a genius. Just saying.

1:00:54 – 1:01:270

Alright. I think we have worked with nine thirty two. Do you have motion any any last minute comments, anyone else? Then can we get a motion to adjourn? They're all going once. Doug? Yes. Yes. We a motion to adjourn. It is 09:32AM. We're right on the button. Thank you very much. Have a good rest of the week, and we'll see you. And be sure to read your grants, your applications. Thank you.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.