Environment, Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee - Regular Meeting

Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Transcript
Video
Agenda

About this meeting

Government Body
Environment, Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee
Meeting Type
Environment, Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee
Location
Dane County, WI
Meeting Date
January 20, 2026

Transcript

362 sections (from 394 segments)

0:000

It's 03:47. Let's call this meeting the order. So first off the bat, let's do the roll call here.

0:121

Okay. Corey Rich? Present.

0:190

I'll come back to her.

0:201

Okay. Matt Noon?

0:220

Present.

0:231

Michelle Redd?

0:242

Red here.

0:26 – 0:531

Ted Ward. Ted Ward today? Checking. Tierney? Here. And Brianna Frank? Here. And Kate Mziara? Here. Oh, hi. Your. I don't know. I do feel strange as. I didn't.

0:55 – 1:230

Okay. So And then just for the analyst purposes, we do have this, like, tree board operating every minute. It looks like kinda just, like, a reminder for everybody, especially new folks that come in here. I know you're familiar with probably all of those acronyms that maybe currently, you should. But not everybody is.

1:23 – 1:440

And so just kind of, like, make sure everybody's heard, hit each other, and we're inspired. We just want everyone to be valued. That's what that's about. It's making my best feel loved. That's important, especially as they have, like, some new transitions coming up.

1:46 – 2:200

So if there were this variation of when it's made of accident stuff, has anybody, hopefully, everybody's had a chance to review the minutes. The minutes have been emailed out to the group. So if anyone has any, issues or things that they like to see changed in, minutes from our last month's meeting, I should speak up now. And if not, is there a motion to approve those

2:203

minutes? Motion's to approve min minutes. Sorry.

2:251

I'll second.

2:27 – 2:410

Okay. So there's a second to approve the minutes here. All in favor of approving the minutes, say aye. Mhmm. All opposed, say no. So the motion passes. Good, Lisa?

2:42 – 3:150

Okay. So let's move on here to the project and general updates. So I think we've made some pretty good progress here kicking off the new year. We have three sub groups that have been meeting, or at least two of them, but at least three that have been formed. So we have the events group, which I think we'll start off first, but then we'll go on to the trip tree crabs group and then tree preservation of our workloads. I think Katie, if

3:151

you're still prepared. I can.

3:174

I guess that you're interested in Lisa,

3:22 – 3:465

do you have our little, like, planning sheets? I kind of assumed that I didn't print any off. Maybe I just wanna but, basically, we met last week. It was Corey, Matt, Lisa, and I, to review and kind of come up with, like, a events game plan for, this coming year. And so I think we worked off of an old one.

3:46 – 4:335

We kind of looked at the work plan for 2022 and reviewed it to see if there's anything we wanted to continue with this year or start fresh. I think mostly we just started fresh with it. We kind of decided to focus on the Earth Day Arbor Day events that we had pretty good success with last year, a lot of traction. So those would be our kind of main events for 2026, and then we discuss, working towards a career fair. So, hopefully, maybe latching on to either I know MATC has done one historically or kinda seeing what's out there and getting ourselves a table at a career fair.

4:33 – 5:155

And then we are also discussed a, like, agriculture field trip, and maybe collabing with Thane County Parks, Adam, on that. So that would be kind of our focus for the second half of the year after, the big April event. So then we transition into planning that for the fall, and I think we were bookmarking roughly, October or November for those events. So after April, those we'd have the next few months to kind of figure out where everything falls. And then end of year kinda to regroup, see everything went, debrief, and then look forward to 2027.

5:15 – 5:285

So I don't know if there's anything I'm missing from that meeting, but that was kinda the rough overview of what was discussed on that our game plan for the year.

5:34 – 6:200

I think one one of the things we talked about, if you look at April there, we have, like, one, two, three events, that we listed our our discussion, kinda concluded with, that we should focus on events where there's gonna be lots of traffic and where we can get out there and really, like, interact with people. In the past, we probably did quite a few more events than that, and that was a bit overwhelming. So I think part of our idea was to, like, scale back and focus on things that we think are most worthwhile for our time. Well, just to put a put a little add

6:20 – 7:033

on to that. Brianna brought up, prior to this meeting that maybe get to see if we can get it to the Garden Expo. I'll I agree with that idea. That would be a lot of foot traffic, probably the largest single event for, you know, for Dane County as far as foot traffic would be concerned. So, last year, operation fresh start was gifted free table space there so we could reach out and see if, if the tree board might have similar luck. And then, actually, we did that and then yeah. I think we did that and then we were posted on where Mueller show from that or maybe it was in the opposite order. But there was some cool press that came out of it. So I think it

7:03 – 7:140

was a great idea from Diana. Lisa, do you know anything about that? Do you think we could get a, like, free table then or something, or does it get to be too late?

7:14 – 7:451

It's probably too late since it's the second week in February, but, I can ask Amanda, from the show whether it's still possible. The other possibility, I don't know whether there would be room in the extension booth for anything, but if if possible, I can check. But I'll definitely ask ask Amanda. So I think

7:453

if we list it for this year, it's still a worthy target for next year.

7:48 – 8:024

Well, in this year, it unfortunately, the Garden Expo runs into the WA conference. Sure. So it makes it difficult for folks here that might attend that conference. Yeah. And often

8:023

Maybe we maybe we plan to do it in '27 then.

8:084

It's very unusual for that to happen. I think this is the first time that that's ever happened.

8:121

Yeah. Yeah. It's yours is usually end of the month. Right. And

8:164

this time, the Sunday is overlap, so it makes it really difficult for people that are attending that conference to be regarded expert.

8:260

Yeah. That's a really good idea. Talk about foot traffic. Oh, I wonder about how to out if you're we got what foot traffic behind.

8:32 – 8:524

And I know that our business has, like we do a pull down that says, ask an arborist, but it could be ask an expert. And then we slide in a person that's like, everyone has a card, and it slides into, like, a pull down so that people can know that they can kind of ask questions. Learn things now. Cool.

8:570

Yeah. Because

8:593

I talked

8:590

him. Of the expo, like, a couple years ago, I still look at people for that.

9:054

So And it's just it's a neat thing to be a part of. It's it feels like it kicks off spring. Yeah. And there's so many people. There's a lot of good empathy.

9:160

Even though you're not kicking off spring.

9:184

It's true. It's

9:201

true. But it feels

9:200

like Yep. You That's important.

9:224

Right? Just want us there. Right? Okay.

9:29 – 10:090

We have a few people online. You guys have any questions about what we discussed up here? Right. So then, let's see. Then we had our tree group meeting, and that was Brianna, myself, Tedward, Lisa? I'm not sure. Brian. Brian. So I think it was the four of us. And I don't know if either Brian or Emma, would you be alright to give them an update on what we discussed.

10:10 – 11:224

So one of our main objectives for that meeting was to pull everything out of Matt's brain, and create the standard operating procedure that could be handed off, to anyone that was either interested in TreeCribs, or currently running them that perhaps maybe needed to if there's a change in hands of who is the lead on helping with those, just that it's an easy document for them to pick up, read, understand what are, what what we what they need to to run them, what the supplies that will be provided are, what they're looking at as far as hours, and then just basic instructions on how to, so the idea was to kinda put together a draft of the standard operating procedure, which is actually done. And then I'm going to give Matt a call and ask him all sorts of questions so that we can kind of elaborate on, you know, where it says water trees. Well, how many water trees? How much water? When?

11:22 – 11:384

How often? Under what temp you know, what temperatures do I need to so all of those details will will be laid out on in a in a neatly run document so that things are easier. I think that that about recalcitrant.

11:38 – 12:120

Yeah. Just another update. So some of us know, but we also earned currently applied to for $5,000 to the w a n a, trials and demonstration grants, the second year that they've offered this grant opportunity. So we received 5,000 more dollars to support this program going into the next I think it's four years. So that that's another, like, involvement of projects.

12:12 – 12:450

Now I feel like we have significant momentum between the national or the Natural Research Foundation grant on top of this grant, on top of the or the the tree board funding as well that we might need. And one other thing is that I'm not sure if anyone from our group, from the the TreeCrib group is interested, but I'm supposed to meet with the Leaf, team next week, and that's gonna be on-site. I think it'll be at Shabazz.

12:46 – 12:590

And I I thought about trying to get the science teacher from Shabazz out there. I mean, I guess it's a little bit weather dependent. Right? It's gonna be the I mean, the four three, so it might not be a good idea to do that.

12:594

Do have a time and a day yet?

13:00 – 13:450

We have a day, and I think it's I think it's Tuesday, but there's an alternate, like, Wednesday. And another person I thought about inviting was the the board of directors. They're the board chair of the board of directors from the Natural Research Foundation from the the CB Bass and the grant that we got. He would like to agree with us as well. So I thought, like, maybe we could try to combine those groups of people with the people from the tree board that are interested in working on this and, science teacher as well with the coordinator. So just something I'm thinking of for next week.

13:454

What are you thinking about the people, officials, by the end of month?

13:50 – 14:020

I have to check the coordinator one more time real quick, you know, and kinda, like, nail down that time. So I would say, like, hopefully tomorrow.

14:024

I mean, I would definitely love to come. I have my schedule doesn't, like, less than two weeks notice, but I have actually hoping afternoon.

14:130

Does does everything, like, aligns? I think it'd be great to have, like, a larger group out there.

14:20 – 14:363

Man, have you connected with Caleb Williamson or if you can over with Williamson over about the project, though? No. I haven't. Alright. I can send over her contact. Of course, she'd be a a great contact there. Mhmm. So she's the director of conservation.

14:360

Okay. And I think we'd

14:383

be excited about this project. Yeah. That's all good.

14:436

Sounds really cool, Matt. Super excited.

14:464

Woo hoo.

14:473

It's fun.

14:53 – 15:300

So I think that's mostly what we got going on there, unless someone else has a question from the Internet. Alright. So we talked about establishing a third working group, although we did not meet last month. And the third reason for that, I kinda wanted to get some documentation together. Prior to our meeting, I shared with everybody, like, a sample report of what I was thinking that could be useful tool for each municipality.

15:30 – 16:010

So just based up on suggestions from Brian and a few other people, We're working on revising that, documentation, even, like, a map to, like, identify this, environmental resources that are valuable to each municipality and the ecosystem service services that they provide. So that should be done this week or next, and my plan is to get our group together once more. And I'm trying to think of everyone that was on that group. Brian

16:034

Kathy once.

16:04 – 16:480

And Kathy. So that's kinda what I'm bringing up to the so for that's another thing. Forgot to mention to the rest of the folks. But Kathy is officially resigning from the tree board along with Laura. So we lost that one person from our group. Think Ted worked. Yeah. Volunteered. I can't remember. Maybe not. Who's the director? Oh, I guess we might wanna try to replace the cap date on that worker with someone else. I don't think we need to, like, determine that right now, and and I also think it could be someone if that's okay, maybe someone from outside of the main challenge framework.

16:52 – 17:103

Maybe I think maybe even target somebody from a municipality that we would be looking to go, you know, present this to. Right. Right? I think the that info would be much better than anything that I've got to say, certainly. But

17:104

I think that Target and someone who's been recently involved, but I think Ian would be a good person to pick up to become part of the meeting that.

17:220

Or an engineering group. Maybe, I guess, more.

17:32 – 17:533

That's that's my fault. We target this I think we've kind of agreed that we're hoping this would be something that's not just a Madison, like, doctor. Mhmm. I think we wanna target somebody from a non Madison municipality to make sure that it's not It is. Purely urban focused.

17:53 – 18:170

But I think it's, you know, also important to have some type of model for for town as well. Yep. It's like we're kind looking at different machines. Oh, that's that's my thoughts there then.

18:194

Do we wanna?

18:260

Yeah. Mhmm. Mhmm. I'd be

18:29 – 18:463

interested in if Brian's got any suggestions for folks that would need to target for the, like, outside of the tree board for the preservation group. Are you pretty well connected in, you know, across across the county?

18:49 – 19:016

I don't have any suggestions at the moment. The only two communities that have really done, like, quote, unquote, tree preservation ordinances would be Fitchburg and Madison. Other than that, they really don't exist.

19:024

Walk the people that don't accept.

19:050

Of course.

19:08 – 19:214

So do you do you know any smaller managers, whether it's town or town, that might be interested in the discussion?

19:26 – 19:423

Is there anything that exists out in Mount Morab? It feels like that might be a you know, that that's an interesting kind of village slash town in my opinion. They've got a little more robust urban center, but it's largely rural. Yeah.

19:47 – 20:136

I don't think, I mean, I could be wrong. Our person out here, I don't think would be interested. But let's see. So town of Dunn, Hardy Krueger there, he actually now that I think of it, he does have a little bit of their ordinances I mean, they're towns, so it's a little bit more loose, you could say. But they also have they have a heritage tree ordinance.

20:14 – 20:376

He might be interested, but he also has and this is why I hesitate because many of my municipalities, they just they wouldn't have the time necessarily. But, you know, if we get the right one who's interested, sure. Party's just been hard to get ahold of in general, so to ask them to do that in ordinance, but maybe. Right? So I don't know. Off the top of my head, I don't have anyone for you specifically.

20:420

Yeah. I think those are the people that we do a Right? The people that are short on time, so that's gonna be what all those towns are experiencing. They don't have, like, a urban forest.

20:524

I'd make it would be person. Very important to make sure that our meetings are thought out and pointed.

21:000

Yeah. Mhmm. And maybe they don't have to be different.

21:054

Well, that's a good point. They could just be invited.

21:096

So maybe

21:094

we should meet and hash that out as a subcommittee and have them by the list. Right. That's I think that's probably a wise making that up.

21:22 – 21:476

And I do have some grant meetings coming up here in the next month, which are a little bit more, quote, unquote, intimate, so I could ask if they're interested at in those meetings. Just thinking about it too, Matt, so you were working with Cottage Grove, I believe, or maybe you're just looking at their ordinance. You know, there might be something there. Again, their leadership has bounced back and forth a little bit, but I think it's back with Park

21:47 – 22:056

Rec, and they may be interested. They they redid the they redid their ordinance or added to it, had a review done not so long ago. And like you said, you saw some stuff in there that they didn't even know they had, so that which was actually positive stuff. So maybe?

22:05 – 22:320

Right. Then Heidi Murphy. I don't know what you call the the person who charged them. That was but but I think she's a administrator, maybe. She's an administrator right now, but she's also a commissioner for the Black Works. I've been kinda familiar with that. I'm working a little bit here and then with the college area. Think think that might be good.

22:336

Yeah. So I I think maybe we could take that to our our little group and have a bigger discussion on that and and point down a list of folks.

22:414

Already have the agenda for our first meeting.

22:51 – 23:320

So I think we're good here for projects and general updates. And then we can move on to e, the discussion items. So number one, I just wrote work through each meeting. So I don't know. I guess this is something that we could facilitate outside of this meeting, or maybe for some people, it's well, I'll there to facilitate inside for a particular work to do. I'll just kinda throw that out there and let people choose. For me, it doesn't matter. It doesn't

23:324

So I think Trikriv has the next meeting all set. Like, they have Right.

23:350

We're good. And I think we got it.

23:365

Yeah. I think we have our next view, actually.

23:390

Yeah. Makes me So it's just not

23:41 – 23:534

Alright. Well and maybe we just pick a week like we did for crooks and just send out a recurring. And then, yeah, it's fun.

23:530

If it's further enough out there and recurring, then see if we can find our out, which seems to be the case for folks. So

24:024

yeah. So Mondays and Fridays, what that's the day.

24:070

Mondays and Fridays? About what about you, Brian? Is there particular days that we should just stay away from?

24:15 – 24:276

Mondays and Fridays actually work pretty good for me as well. Most of the municipalities don't wanna do anything on Mondays and because they're so busy because weekend stuff. And then Fridays, they usually have half days or they're not there. So

24:274

That's great. Sometimes we just make a date, call it up, file it, and then just make it a reoccurring. Like yep.

24:37 – 25:110

So, moving on to number two. Lisa, could you pull up the work plan update? And I'm not really sure if we even need to go look at this right now, but maybe once people wanna have one more look at this, like, make sure they're happy with how things stand. I think it's a little bit, you know, influx because we have these different work groups that are trying to help us figure out or create our work by home groups.

25:134

I mean, I thought thought from as a newcomer, it was simple enough so that it puts yourself in a corner. Mhmm.

25:240

So this is the new pet, Lisa, by the way.

25:264

Isn't it? No.

25:28 – 25:390

That's for the events, work plan. Oh, sorry. One? We have, like, a general Dane County Board board plan 2026.

25:394

Hopefully, objectives.

25:400

And there's not there's not really a strategic plan.

25:433

A chart

25:440

like this month. Month more of this. Abroad, I think. I'm all Then if you can.

25:511

Sorry. That Oh, sorry. Take me a minute to figure out where that might be.

26:013

So I'm thinking of that. Yeah. It's tighter in the in the Google Drive itself 2026 work plan draft. Okay.

26:141

I need to find the don't know. Think the order

26:200

You're you're looking at a I way right now. You think of think things are pretty much kinda resolved when you trust every document.

26:363

I mean, looking through it, it looks like we're we're making good plans to accomplish everything that we listed at the kind of on the top line there.

26:491

Sorry. What'd you say the title was again? Approval of.

26:550

It just says, like, 2026 work plan. Yeah. 2026 work plan draft.

27:004

I'm not finding it and shared with me.

27:120

I think that's alright. Sorry.

27:191

We get rid of the

27:214

Make sure. Should we get there?

27:240

Yeah. If we have to.

27:283

It should be coming their way.

27:314

Oh, thank you.

27:35 – 27:466

So if we were doing the January, you know, summary of or review of how to use Legistar and Google Drive, we might not be having this problem.

27:494

January is almost over. Right?

27:511

I know.

27:556

I just thought I'd be a little snarky, you know. Had to get something in there.

28:02 – 28:160

Yeah. So one thing I'm wondering right now, Corey, do we have something in the work plan that addresses how the data entry board could assist the, ordinance that we work with. I don't think we

28:20 – 28:483

we just have tree preservation ordinance resource and then the folks that are on that and then impending of resources, input structure, and example, then it's a question mark. I'm not sure how to put the inflection on that, that's that's kind of what we mentioned there. So we don't we don't have anything laid out about supporting the one that we went on last year. But

28:494

it could be included in that umbrella.

28:51 – 29:073

I think so. Yeah. I think that committee that'd be for that committee to figure out how we have continued to support and advance that ordinance from last year, or we just work on a daily ordinance throughout the.

29:124

Do we maybe wanna add to the workflow streamlining our application process?

29:160

Not a bad idea.

29:243

Trayboard. So

29:324

I mean

29:356

That one may be a little bit out of our hands, but we can certainly find out and do our best to make it as efficient on our end as possible.

29:53 – 30:320

Okay. Any other comments on the 2026 work plan? Okay. So let's move on to the discussion item of the tree board applicants. What we've done historically is as a tree board, we review applicants, and then the tree board will make a recommendation of which applicant should be public or banks or fill the entity they can board seats.

30:33 – 31:400

So I I sent everybody the three applicants that we've had, and now we have two official resignations from one from Kathleen and one from Laura. So we have three applicants on two seats. So we're gonna have to come up with a way to evaluate these three candidates for those two seats at this point. We I'm thinking these subgroups that we've created have worked pretty well and efficient for working on specific tasks. So my recommendation would be to form a subgroup or maybe a a group that would look at and evaluate these tree board applicants, taking feedback from all of the tree board members to provide a recommendation for which applicants that we do will recommend.

31:40 – 32:140

So that that's one option. There are other options out there, but that's that's kinda one thing I've been thinking about. So and on top of that, that same subgroup could look into further of how to come up with a system where anytime that they found a true board and it has to review or discuss true board applicants, we can just slip into some type of both their session, if that's possible.

32:18 – 32:294

Brian, do you have any feedback on that as far as is there a way that we could get a closed door session permanently approved so that the Dane County Tree Board can have an open discussion about

32:29 – 32:401

That's a Michelle question. It's Okay. It's a county thing. Gotcha. Brian won't be able to help us with that.

32:414

I apologize, Michelle.

32:43 – 33:010

Well, I think we've all probably I don't know if I've here long enough. That's probably dealt with that situation, you know, having to go in a couple of stores. So so sure. I don't even know if that's That one up. Sorry. That's open to everybody. I have any feedback. Question.

33:021

Do you have any input, Michelle?

33:084

About closed session? On the potential of having, the

33:17 – 34:022

ability to have a closed session and permanently approved for the specific purpose of discussing applicant applicants? Yeah. We we basically need to run it through court counsel and make it a compelling enough reason. Closed session is something that should be pretty rare because, you know, it's you know, the the philosophy is, you know, open government. And with closed session, obviously, you're removing the public from discussion of a government committee. And so, you know, if we decide we want one, I will help push for one. So, you know, basically, whatever I can do to support the will of the tree board is what I'll do.

34:04 – 34:180

So a follow-up would be what do other boards in Dade County that have to deal with the same protocols that we do? How do they review candidates and provide recommendations or have some type of discussion?

34:19 – 34:592

I know that, you know, it all comes down to you know, we can certainly give a recommendation, but it comes down to, in this case, whoever the, county executive chooses to appoint, that's what happens. And then that list of folks approved by her comes before the full county board for the final approval. And I don't recall ever being in a committee where there has been, like, intentional discussion about the different applicants like this.

35:013

So other other committees are just, like, leading into the, discretion and whims of the county exec?

35:11 – 35:342

Yeah. It it is within her power to assign mean, it's one of her responsibilities to assign these people. You mean, committees will give a recommendation to the county exec saying, hey. You know, please take this into consideration. But ultimately, it is, you know, fully within the power of the the county exec.

35:36 – 36:131

I think the way we've usually done it is that we do make a recommendation and send it to the county exec's office, real fully realizing that it may be over overruled. But that's I've not except for once, it's always been approved, but each county exec is different. And I go, do you remember Matt? Well, I mean, we just got Brianna

36:130

who I I think there were recommendations for you.

36:161

I yeah. I think they

36:170

We are

36:171

on the tree board.

36:180

It's not

36:184

like How much the county executive should Like, what criteria would the fuse to shoot?

36:24 – 36:380

Oh, if it's not our recommendation. Right. Exactly. Yeah. I think it's just First of first served for yeah. So or it just, like, books take a lot longer, you know, by providing that recommendation. I think, also, but the time is possible. I

36:39 – 37:081

think also because our subject matter is pretty narrowly focused, whereas perhaps some other and maybe Michelle and I maybe I'm not right here, but I think maybe because we usually look for people with some expertise in the realm of trees that perhaps that has influenced the decision, but I don't know.

37:09 – 37:224

So that sounds like, for me, your recommendation of having the subcommittee gather, you know, the overall consensus and and coming together to present at at an open meeting?

37:26 – 37:440

I don't I mean or we could I'm thinking that we could just have this, like, subgroup, get feedback from everyone. That's so good. Yeah. And I don't need think we need to have it, but we could just say that They'll reach out to all the board members, come up

37:444

with Separate and present them to

37:480

Submit the recommendation. Census, then we don't need to come back to the whole.

37:543

So, basically, an ad hoc committee that occurs essentially only when we have, you know, at least the following weeks a single time.

38:061

That sounds easy enough to go. We we do have these other subgroups, so maybe it isn't any different. Michelle, do you

38:15 – 38:402

Yeah. I I am getting increasingly more uncomfortable, and I guess I'd like to connect with, corp counsel on this because it's it's like borderline. We're not charged with, like, personnel decisions. You know? And I looked through the the three applications that you sent, Matt, and I'm like, I don't know these people.

38:41 – 39:142

You mean, I don't know the extent of what is behind what they wrote in their paragraphs. I mean and I I I don't know. It it makes me it makes me feel a little uncomfortable just the limited information that we have, having discussions and judgments about people who applied. Am I making sense?

39:16 – 39:520

I mean, I think a lot of us do have, like, some experience with, Kenneth, at least in the past. It was, like, kind of the. And, you know, we've had a lot of discussions too about, like, what type of roles we want to have on the training board. I I mean, I I feel like the alternative is just, like, leaving it up to randomness and waiting for who knows how long to these positions will get filled without the three boards supporting. But we've done that in the past.

39:53 – 40:313

Yeah. Am I I guess I I have a concern with whether this would be prioritized in any way if we weren't kind of pushing the issue of trying to get the positions filled. I mean, even even with, you know, the push from the tree board at times, it's taken a considerable amount of time to get people officially approved. Right? I've shared several times that, like, I stopped attending meetings and assumed that I was not accepted at one point because, you know, it's it's been, like, four or five months since I applied. Like, I guess

40:321

Yeah. I think for me, it took minimum of six months.

40:355

I genuinely was like, okay.

40:361

I guess I'm not in.

40:37 – 41:085

I haven't heard anything about it. And then, like, if we don't make a recommendation, what are the next steps to ensure that this has some sort of follow through? Are we like, is that a fair ask? I guess I don't really know how it works, but I feel like we're we're I mean, our maybe required isn't the right word, but we should have x amount of members present at meetings for them to be valid. So should it be be able to ensure that those seats are filled in some way? I don't know.

41:083

Required, do you? We have

41:104

paid for them. We can't meet. Right? But we just gotta call them.

41:135

Right. So if we're down two to three members, that makes it a little difficult for meetings.

41:21 – 41:473

I I do understand, Michelle, your your concern as well. I just don't know if I yeah. I feel like there there are other considerations to explore. But, certainly, I'm interested in hearing what solutions we may be able to come up with as a as a board or get input on. Like, okay. If it's not appropriate for us to discuss candidates and make recommendations out

41:471

Well, what are the next steps? Yeah.

41:49 – 42:023

How do we ensure the positions get filled? Because I I don't think that we'll be prioritized, you know, for the exec has a lot going on. You know?

42:040

Michelle?

42:05 – 42:492

Yeah. We can certainly okay. So I did just send corp council an email. I you know, chances of him being available for a phone call at 04:31 on a Tuesday afternoon are pretty slim, but we'll see if he's available. And we can certainly, you know, connect with the county exec's staff and say, hey. You know, we are really looking forward to your appointments. You know? When can we expect, you know, action on that from your office? You mean, something like that to push it through faster? I mean, I completely agree with the, you know, the the frustration that government works very, very, very slowly quite frequently.

42:51 – 43:031

Part of the problem is that the county board only meets once a month. And if there are more pressing items, things get bumped. So I We do meet twice a

43:03 – 43:232

month most of the time. It's a little bit less over the summer, and then it's more during budget season. But on average, it it is twice a month. But it is I mean and then not everything gets put on the agenda that you would expect to be put on the agenda. So, you mean, there's there's a lot of moving pieces. Yeah. But it it does move very slowly.

43:25 – 43:430

Yeah. And just like one one last thing, there have been instances in the past where it was actually really important for the tree board to be able to provide a recommendation to your applicant. I if we weren't able to do that, it wouldn't cause problems for the whole.

43:48 – 44:014

So as it stands right now and I'm I I just don't know. So please jump in and correct me if I'm, saying the wrong thing. So we shouldn't do any of these applications. It should just

44:010

be helpful.

44:013

It shows that your advice right now is that for the time being,

44:05 – 44:412

we need to table any discussion of the applicants? Because like, I like, my radar is going up like, oh, this is this I'm not comfortable with it, but, you mean, I am not the only member of Treeboard. I would feel most comfortable if we waited on, like, full out discussion until I hear back from corp counsel. And he does respond, like, in a very, very timely manner. I mean, I'm I'm shocked at how much he can actually get done every every day.

44:41 – 45:022

So I would expect to hear from him, you know, certainly by tomorrow or the next day at the very latest. I mean, that puts us off another month unless we add another meeting in. So I don't know. I know that's kind of a non answer. You know, personally, I'd rather wait, but I am one voice on the tree board.

45:03 – 45:233

Is it possible without, like, violating, blocking forum and those kind of things to, to get, like, a clarification on this question sent out in the email form? And then it's like, okay. Yep. We're we're good to review the Maybe we could see if there's anybody that wants to form a, you

45:230

know Yeah.

45:231

Like, quick little group like we discussed already. Yeah.

45:273

You know?

45:27 – 45:532

We can we can have one way communication. So whatever whenever I connect with corp counsel, I can let Lisa and Matt know, and then Matt can forward out one way BCC information. You know, the whole thing with walking quorum is that we don't want a a voting block making decisions not in a public format.

45:54 – 46:100

Okay. Yeah. I mean, we were never talking about having a full on discussion of the applicants. We were talking about having a subgroup Yeah. You know, make a recommendation based upon feedback without violating any blocking or rules. So

46:111

And then that would come back to the main board and then the main board

46:15 – 46:360

Well, or the main board right now could essentially just authorize that subgroup to make recommendations based upon the feedback that they've received from three board members without violating any particular rules. As long as court counsel says in SQL. Yeah.

46:391

Michelle? I don't know if she heard that.

46:45 – 46:562

Yeah. No. I I'm putting myself on pause until I get official legal recommendation on how to proceed.

46:56 – 47:094

So if if we if the Dane County Tree Board did not make the recommendation, what would happen to the district applicant applicants? They would go to the county exec, and they then they just hear back

47:090

Unless yeah. Unless they start covering them.

47:121

Yeah. I I don't we've never done it that way. We've always made a recommendation. Oh, okay. Don't know.

47:215

Has that been, like, discussed as a greater group in the past? I'm curious how it's been done in the past whereas it's

47:284

Like, a recommendation had to come from somewhere.

47:303

We we always would have we'd always recommendation in the past.

47:345

And I'm assuming that was just discussed at a meeting, or, like, how did

47:381

you make the recommendation? We

47:410

We voted on that?

47:42 – 47:561

Yeah. Oh, we we did have a discussion then. All of those were done before we had other than face to face meetings. But that's not anticipated.

47:56 – 48:100

So in those circumstances, we were outside or something like that. Well

48:10 – 48:311

Well, that's a Michelle, if if it is only a if we notice a meeting as a face to face meeting, meaning that we don't record it, is that is that going around the law? Or

48:331

Okay. Well, that's what we've done for years and years, I'm afraid. We didn't know any better,

48:414

I guess.

48:413

Thank you for my Sterling record.

48:445

Well, it sounds like

48:454

it will hear back, and we'll know a little bit more. Yeah.

48:471

Yeah. That's fine.

48:480

I guess we're not gonna vote to authorize a subgroup to make recommendation.

48:571

Then So we you're right.

48:590

Or do you guys think they should vote that pending?

49:023

I I did file this voting to have a subgroup pending the answer

49:080

from from was it

49:103

core count count count or

49:120

To make an approval of a recommendation. Yeah. Because some of these people, they were they have five months ago.

49:195

Who knows, like, what the interest is anymore?

49:220

Right. Yeah.

49:233

That's that's one of true.

49:244

It's not

49:251

fair to them to

49:265

No. And it's not like you get a sort of notification, like, you'll be reviewed, and it could take months. It's just, like, you send it off into the abyss and cross your fingers.

49:353

In 10/23/2025, is when Michael replied. You know?

49:424

Are we not allowed to talk on?

49:450

We can't. Have.

49:471

Have in the past said that the

49:52 – 50:034

I mean, even just a monthly Yeah. Email saying your application is still pending. Still being reviewed. I would have appreciated that just to know that it's I would think that's well, obviously.

50:035

Like, oh, okay. Yeah. I guess it takes a while.

50:063

I was like, all of us think we we get an application. We should send a preemptive, like

50:101

Hey. I got it. Automatically

50:120

stop. Yeah. But, you

50:143

know, basically, like This

50:164

may take

50:163

three months or more. Yeah. This process may take several months. And, you know, like, to be fully transparent, it's slow.

50:255

Yeah. Yeah. I didn't know

50:271

what to expect, so I was like

50:290

Yeah. I was asked

50:303

to apply and then was like, dang. I guess they asked me, and then

50:345

Yeah. I was like, what did I put in there?

50:391

Michelle was on the phone.

50:41 – 50:556

Yeah. Probably with court counsel. So Michelle had mentioned that she didn't feel comfortable making a recommendation, because she doesn't feel like our application had enough information or whatever. Okay. That's kinda news to

50:564

feel comfortable discussing Right. To make a recommendation.

51:033

Brad, are you suggesting that do we need to make our application more robust, more, like, informative?

51:101

It comes from the county. We don't have any input.

51:135

And then if we already have like, we have applicants right here. All of these have recommendations from people off the board or that we're

51:214

off the board.

51:213

So like, there's pretty good information. I mean, we didn't do them.

51:26 – 51:566

Okay. I was confused about that because I was like, that's it's new it's new to me. I mean, I guess we've rarely had more slots than or I'm sorry, more people applying than we had slots for. And in those cases, we did have applicants who were clearly, better positioned than others. So it was easy, but it's new to me that this whole not being comfortable making recommendations thing.

51:58 – 52:200

Well, I mean, maybe we should just move on to the action items, and then we make a motion that would create a subgroup and that we authorize that subgroup to make two recommendations based upon feedback from the data entry board pending council's communication

52:203

with Michelle. Yeah. And

52:234

Yeah. I'm comfortable with that.

52:256

Yeah. That right now.

52:260

Let's just

52:266

do it.

52:270

Yeah. So did you get that, Lisa?

52:295

No. I did not. Well, anyone's named that.

52:314

We all said that.

52:323

Sure that someone else said

52:340

I don't know. I can make that one.

52:364

What? I'll Yeah. Mean, can you make a motion?

52:395

I can do it. Yeah. Put my name down.

52:423

Who makes that

52:421

Well, exactly, what is the motion?

52:465

to create a create a route that would be authorized to make a recommendation to the county exec. Is that right?

52:541

To that. Or

52:550

Yep. Yep. Yeah. Okay. I knew so.

52:573

And the pending approval Right.

53:01 – 53:130

And the recommendations are gonna be based on feedback from Yeah. Three board members. There will be no walking for them. Got that covered. Be careful with reading now.

53:145

Oh my gosh. My

53:186

guess is that that we probably can't do it directly to the exec. It would have to come back to the board. But Yeah. Neither neither here nor there.

53:250

You mean the accounting board? No. Over here.

53:283

So the

53:294

the committee would report to the board, then you would make the right thing.

53:346

Correct.

53:35 – 53:531

Okay. So, the motion is to create a subgroup that would take input from the tree board and use it to make a recommendation to the full board that would go to the county exec for vacancy. Yeah.

53:545

Do we need a a little little caveat of, like, pending approval? Pending approval.

53:583

And did I hear Michelle say that she had not been?

54:021

She's still on the phone.

54:033

Oh, okay.

54:040

Okay. Alright.

54:063

Well, I I second that.

54:090

Alright. That was kinda tough. Sorry. There's one other thing I

54:15 – 54:491

Can we do that, though, without Michelle here to Let's go to take both. Okay. So we have the motion that was maybe. Bridge. Okay. But but alright. So we have it ending Yeah. Until Michelle gets back. Alright. There has been cosigning of it. So

54:503

Yeah. We'll we'll circle back and bring the vote. We'll let

54:531

Michelle is back. Jeremy, did I noticed your mic is open. Did you have a comment? No.

55:014

It's fine now.

55:07 – 55:480

Alright. We can circle back to that as soon as Chuck gets back. We'll wrap up the meeting as quick as possible. I don't think we need to officially vote to approve our work plan. It seems like it's kind of a living document. That's fine, maybe. That should be good. Probably put it on our website if thought that would be useful or if anyone else have changes they'd like on the website. One other thing to note that I I noticed maybe Brian knows are the I Tree funding, I guess, was the seats. And they are, like, requesting by their speech support for the I Tree program.

55:48 – 56:050

It's something to be more could submit if you wanted. You could send it to the forest service or your state forest there, probably for professional representative, probably state forest that would be most appropriate for us. What's the time plan? I only found out about this today.

56:07 – 56:310

So but that's I think, like, as, like, my personal work organization, that's something I would like to do. Might be something that I can that works for too. I don't know how many people use that IT software. It's like a a collaboration between US Forest Service and the baby tree company. They developed this tool. So

56:33 – 56:496

Just a little clarification there. The email should go to the I believe it's the chief of the forest service. I went and sent it to our state forester, and they'll they'll they'll take letters from anywhere. So

56:520

So you're you're probably well aware this time?

56:55 – 57:066

Yeah. And I I brought it to the WAA as well. I know it was last meeting before, to also write a letter of support if they so choose.

57:080

So, something I was thinking we should be, doing as a tree board, Brian, if you're familiar with this.

57:191

I'm sorry. I lost I lost that while I was trying to word some of the other things from

57:240

Great. Great. I

57:264

mean, I'm in I'm in support of writing a letter of support for

57:31 – 57:440

This is for supporting the I The I Okay. Okay. Don't think you're, like, much of this.

57:453

Not not familiar any kind

57:47 – 57:590

of those risk working with every three clients. So I'm I'm in favor of it. Anyone?

58:074

Check. So

58:100

I'm in favor for the tree board to submit a letter for recommendation for support of the I Tree program, USDA I Tree program

58:493

And the motion all step and update of splits.

58:546

Brianna, were you taking that on?

58:582

Sure. Did

58:594

you want

59:006

me to send you the email that I had shared with the WAA, or did have you that one?

59:054

Who was drafting it for the WAA? You know? Like, do you want me to draft it for both of them?

59:146

No. I think the WAA one perhaps was already sent in.

59:184

Okay. Sure. Thank you.

59:236

And then I see Michelle has her hand up. She's off the phone. She's ready to tell us stuff.

59:282

K. I got good news and bad news. What do you want first?

59:320

Bad news.

59:384

Oh, I I shouldn't have asked.

59:40 – 1:00:132

I'm gonna start with good news. Okay. The good news is we can, yes, have a discussion, an open discussion in our regular meeting here about the applicants and, you know, form a recommendation through our discussion to forward to the county exec. You know, the the the corp counsel is like, you know, certainly, you know, be you know, focus on strengths, be as kind as possible, but, you know, this is a recorded public meeting, you know, that will be saved and anybody can watch it. So, yes, we can do that.

1:00:14 – 1:00:572

The challenging news is that and I I swear that this is a differing opinion than I got a couple years ago. For those who have been on the tree board for a while, a few years ago, we had official work committees. I don't remember what we called them, but we did I I went through an ordinance amendment process to get the I think we had three subcommittees going, and we had to it it was an ordinance amendment. They have, what do you call it, Lisa, when they when they go night night, when they, like, go out of existence? I mean, they only had the they sunset it.

1:00:571

Yeah. We sun. Yeah.

1:00:59 – 1:01:352

Yeah. They they sunsetted by ordinance. So those were legal. Those were staff. They had agendas, minutes. They were publicly noticed. I am told that we need to do a very similar process to have work groups now. He said it does not require an ordinance amendment, which would take at least a couple of months, but that I need to connect with county board staff to make sure that we legitimize them and make them public, and we would have to have, you know, agendas and minutes and and everything for those.

1:01:365

So can I ask

1:01:373

a clarifying question? I thought I thought as long as we remained under quorum, like, that was that this was to allow us to,

1:01:44 – 1:02:190

like, be efficient and mobile and actually get stuff done. Yeah. We're not these aren't actually they're not board groups. It's just three board members that are not in quorum getting together on their own free time. You know, we're not documenting this as per diem. That's why we dissolved those official work groups. These are, like, nimble things we can, you know, get together. That was the whole purpose of why we got rid of those. So I I don't know. I don't think we I don't think it's worth called something else. Oh, yeah.

1:02:193

Friends, they will.

1:02:205

Yeah. Then We're grabbing coffee. The right word.

1:02:23 – 1:02:560

I I don't know. I don't I'm not sure what's the right answers here because we already passed our the the time. And it seems like this is kind of a bigger discussion at this point. Yeah. I don't know if we can resolve all this. But it's I think it's something that I can work with, like, with Michelle to try to recap some of the things that went on in the past and make sure we have more clarification on this. I think that's the best way to proceed is giving the time.

1:02:56 – 1:03:361

And it works. Yeah. I I have thought that there was I I agree with your memory, Michelle, that we had made those work groups, and then somebody else on corp council said that we didn't need to have official noticed work groups where I had to be there and, you know, agenda minutes, the whole nine yards. But I don't I don't remember who it was that you talked to, but that's my memory as well. That that's why we sunsetted those groups and that we were allowed to make these other groups. But maybe

1:03:391

we have a different person we're working with now that has a different legal opinion.

1:03:44 – 1:03:596

Well, bottom line, the coffee chats, are not making any decisions. They are bringing information they're gathering information and bringing it to the board for the board to make a decision. So there's nothing that's in the dark.

1:04:02 – 1:04:131

Except the discussion. Do we wanna just make this a

1:04:141

we have to make this a agenda item for

1:04:153

next yep. Yep. Next month is a good word.

1:04:17 – 1:04:410

Yeah. Sorry for still a lot of confusion for everybody. But I think I'll try to get that all straightened out as soon as possible. So I think I'm gonna able to do it. We got Teachers, meeting items and dates, February 17.

1:04:426

So the WAA is during that time, so I'm not sure how many people that would affect. I know Adam won't be able to make it. I won't be able to it. Brianna probably won't be able to make it.

1:04:504

I won't be able to make it.

1:04:521

Often. Yeah. I wouldn't be there.

1:04:530

We'll have to figure that one out. So thanks for the heads up reminder. H, public comments and items not in the agenda.

1:05:026

I have something.

1:05:05 – 1:05:296

Just just note that Dane County, not necessarily Dane County Tree Board, for the efforts at Indian Lake Arbor Day celebration last year was nominated for an ISA Gold Leaf Award. And my understanding is we were awarded it or Dane County was awarded it, and that will be presented at the, on probably on the seventeenth, actually, whenever the award's mentioned is at the WA.

1:05:30 – 1:05:413

Brian, do you know if, I believe Urban Tree Alliance was also nominated and awarded one for their work in Fitchburg in the Dreams Haven this morning? No. The Operation Fresh Startup shout out in.

1:05:411

And you said what it what the award was called. Gold Leaf, did you say? Yep.

1:05:464

P I s a gold leaf. Thank you.

1:05:50 – 1:06:050

Alright. Thanks for that, Brian. Items, such other business as allowed by law. Is there a motion to adjourn the meeting? Rich makes a motion to adjourn. Second.

1:06:051

I can second it.

1:06:060

All in favor of adjourning the meeting say aye. Aye.

This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.