About this meeting
- Government Body
- Board of Zoning Adjustment
- Meeting Type
- Board Of Zoning Adjustment
- Location
- Columbus, OH
- Meeting Date
- December 9, 2025
Transcript
35 sections
Yeah. Dreaming and um and recording All right. Um, I'm going to call this meeting of the Italian Village Commission to order. Um, our next business meeting will be Tuesday, December 30th. Um, be happening. That is happening, right? As of now, I'll check in on attendance and it might be canceled. Okay. At 12:00 p.m., um, the next month's hearing will be Tuesday, January 13th at 4 PM. um could swear you in, Nick. Um raise your right hand. Uh do you swear to tell the truth to the best of your ability this evening? Yes. Okay. Um introduction of commissioners present. Paige Kaplansky, Shannon Salvador, Joe Bardi, Jordan Smith. I'll let Commissioner Sudi sit down. Um Jason Sudi. Do we have a public forum? There are no items for public forum. Okay. Do you want I can pause and then you could do staff approvals. Give me a sec. Go ahead. Okay. You're already somewhere in staff, right? Yep. You're you're cooking. All right. Approval of staff approvals. What page do we have today for our beginning? Looks like two. Wow. Page two. Gotcha. Okay. Can I have a motion for approval of staff approvals? So moved. And a second. Second. All in favor? I. And I'll read through for abstensions. 1096
say. So on 714 North Eye, 157 Warren. Uh 266 East. That's it. No abstensions anywhere. All right. Hearing none, it's passes as voted on. Okay. So, going back to the start. Um, do we have a motion for approval of the minutes from November 10th, 2025? And do I have a second? Second. All in favor? I opposed and abstensions. Okay. Motion carries. With that, staff, do we need to know anything before we dive into this agenda? Um, I don't believe so. Um, I haven't heard from any applicants. So, as far as we know, everyone will be arriving soon, hopefully. And your first applicant is present. Okay. Well, that makes it easy. Um, then we'll call you up to the uh the table here, 1119 Mount Pleasant Avenue. It's COA2500977. If you want to have a seat, and uh once you get settled in, we'll get you sworn in. All right. Will you please raise your right hand and state your name for the record? Buzzy Biddinger. Is this on? I think it's working. Yeah. Okay. And do you promise to tell the truth in your testimony to the best of your ability this afternoon? I do. Excellent. So, we'll have staff and then we'll go to you and then it'll be our turn. So, up up for you, staff. Yes. Um, this is a request for action for signage um to install a 26 and 12 inch by 13inch metal hanging sign that hangs 9 ft from the ground with the sign bar being 11 ft from the ground. and to install an outdoor camera. Um, the work has been completed. This application is the result of a code violation with the number listed in your agenda. Um, there was no December business meeting, so staff analysis is that the installed sign is appropriate and does follow the short north design guidelines for signage. HBO staff placation on the agenda as
the outdoor security camera falls outside of the scope of a staff approval. Um because the work has already been completed, HBO staff directed both portions of the application um to the commission for review and approval. But the recommendation on this is approval of the application COA2500977 as submitted. Um the basis for that recommendation is the short north design guidelines um on signage pages 3.37 and those are the pages. So, that's all. All right. Nice and easy. I love it. Um, yeah. What do you have for us? Hi, everyone. My name's Buzzy. I'm the owner of Studio West 614. Um, we moved to Mount Pleasant in July, I believe. We're going into our fourth season. Um, we are a dance studio. We are, um, an inclusive space uh, particularly for LGBTQ plus youth and adults. Um, this move was extremely exciting. um business is booming and I I want to first apologize. I didn't know that I needed permission for this signage. Um I was also in the middle of breast cancer treatment. My brain was kind of all over the place. Um I am now cancer free, so we're on the other side of that. Thank you. Um so I I am I'm very sorry. I would have absolutely uh requested for this. Yeah, I agenda from our um our previous uh studio. I I didn't have none of this was was a thing before. So, I I honestly just didn't know. So, I am very very sorry and I appreciate you all taking the time to meet with me and um hear my case. Big deal. Honestly, it happens. It happens, does it? Okay, that makes sense. So, we'll just talk through it. Um uh anybody want to jump in? Have any thoughts? I don't have any issues with the sign. I think this camera is similar to what um we've seen on other businesses. It's like very
like the market right next door to where I live has a very similar Yep. Uh like two or three on their building. Um so I have no problem with that either. Other thoughts? Yep. I'd agree. Okay. No comments. No comments. Carly, you can jump in here in a second if you need to. Uh yeah, no comments. Uh, the one thing I will say I'm very excited about is last year on the annual garbage pickup day for Italian Village. Uh, this was like four bags of garbage like right around here because it was before you moved in. Okay. It was like an abandoned zone and it was I'm just so glad somebody's in here. Oh, good. There were tires in up there. Like it was bad. It was clearly a place loitering and just like things were getting tossed out. Nobody was caring for it. So, okay. Uh this is a huge improvement and this is very additive to the neighborhood. Um and I think it's uh it's great. There's no no issues with the sign. Um you know just a lot of things you don't even need to come in for. But if you just contact staff if you want to do something on the exterior they can tell you whether or not wonderful it's something you can do just on your own. You might fill out an application. You may or may not have to come in here for most basic things. You don't have to do anything. Okay. So just so you don't get stuck in a similar situation. You know there's kind of a large concrete area out front. if you ever want to do anything out there, just consult with staff and they can let you know if you need to pivot or keep moving forward. That is wonderful to hear because I was going to ask if I could Our sign is so small and I think I would like to have something where it's more obvious that we are a dance studio. I think a lot of people miss the sign completely. Um so I mean I I can reach out a separate time, but yeah, work with staff. Um, you know, one of the things that's pretty, um, uh, ingrained into the neighborhood, as I'm sure you're aware, is there's a lot of art components. Yeah. So, while there are signage requirements for,
um, location and size, uh, there are a lot less requirements when it comes to art. Okay? So, just think about it that way. if there's something that especially since you have a bit of a blank canvas here since it's a nondescript building and you got a big area in the front if there's some way you could you know maybe incorporate art to indicate to people that dance is happening there would love that would be great for us and it hopefully be really nice for you yeah I would that's that's what I had in my mind so perfect love it sounds great um the other thing you can always do if you have a concept that's really basic as basic as it is you can come in for a conceptual review which just means you have no obligation to do anything you can just come in and we'll talk to you about it and then we'll give you our opinions and then okay you can pursue it or not. Awesome. So hopefully very easy. I'm glad to hear you're doing well. Yeah. Thank you. Okay. With that, can I have a motion for approval? Yes. Okay. Motion to approve. Motion to approve COA2500977 as submitted. Do I have a second? Second. All in favor? I opposed. Abstensions. All right. Great. Thanks a lot. Good luck. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. All right, we are Do we have 79 Hamlet? Is that what you're here for? Yep. I believe the only applicant currently present is for application um four or four or your Warren you're Yeah, we're Are you ready? Ready to jump right in? It's exciting. Don't even have time to catch your breath. Okay. This is uh 86 Warren Street, COA2501282-8. Oh, no. That's not Never mind. That's it. Two. I'm done. I'm done saying it. Um and if you will raise your right hand and state your name for the record. Steve with Urban Order Architecture. And you promise the truth to the best of your ability this afternoon. Excellent. All right. Staff. Um
yes. This is a request for action for an exterior building alteration to replace um 24 original wood windows with new Marvin Ultimate aluminum plaid wood windows which are from the approved list and to replace two non-original windows with new Marvin Ultimate windows. Um there was no the staff analysis there was no December business meeting and we note there are two non-original windows on the property that HBO staff would support replacing as they are currently aluminum windows and I'm sorry I can start scrolling um through these photos as well. Um, HBO staff did conclude a site visit to examine the condition of the windows in June of 2023. Um, following the site visit, HBO staff determined that the existing windows on the property were historic and in repable condition. HBO staff advised the applicant um, oh, we advised the applicant of the site visit in these findings and the applicant requested to present the windows to the commission for final determination at this hearing. Um, HBO staff from the current photos still find the windows to be historic and in repairable condition. Um, our recommendation on this one is to split the application into two parts with part A being the two non non-original aluminum windows and part B being all of the original historic windows. Um, with the recommendation to approve part A for those two non-original aluminum windows to be replaced and to continue part B to allow the applicant time to explore the repair of those windows. The basis for that recommendation is city code 311611 um 2 56 and and 12 and the Italian village guidelines on windows and that's all. Okay, over to you. Um, reason that I'm here, I understand that historic preservation office and
staff is always about repairing original fabric. Uh, in my experience, it a few years ago, the historic preservation office went through all of that process about windows and when to repair and what if we're replacing them, what should they be replaced with? Um, and I've I've gotten approval to replace many windows in historic districts. And I've also tried to me or my clients have tried to fix these old windows and it's just sort of a stop gap. Like they still don't function. We end up replacing parts of them like rails and styles and the wood that that we use now is much worse than the window or the than the wood is that is in those existing windows. And in this case, we also have some non-functioning storm windows that whatever they're those are also sort of obscuring any original fabric that we have. So, but those those would be removed then if the new windows were put in place. The storm windows would they'd sort of be integrated? If we got new windows, we would get rid of the storm windows. Gotcha. Um, so it is sort of an arduous process to repair old wood windows. I've done it. It's mostly it's it's just not as successful. So I I believe in this
case my client would just leave the windows that they have and then maybe we would look for storm windows. But I'm also not having a good luck. Nobody's making storm windows anymore. So yeah, you know, we have failing windows, bad storm windows. We don't have a great option to get new storm windows and to fix the existing windows. We're just sort of What's uh what's happening with these the ones that are swinging? Those are in that side dormer that's on the second floor above the porch. Okay. And you can sort of see that those don't fit. I don't know where they came from. Would would you be replacing them with something that was similar or completely different? We the same simulated divided light casement window that gotcha. Okay. All right. Who wants to dive in on this one? I have a question. And maybe this is a silly question. I don't know. But when you look at these photographs, the interiors in almost all cases look beautiful and perfect. And then on the outside is where the rot is occurring. Is it because of flashing? Am I just getting the wrong picture because I don't know exactly what window I'm looking at because they aren't labeled. Nice job of labeling them on the outside, but then the pictures I don't think have a label in them. So, I'm a little confused. If you look at If you look at that window. There's deterioration on that bottom rail that somebody sort of tried to putty or I don't know what they were trying to do, but it's that's deteriorated. And then there's
another there are shots of the window open. So when you when you see that open, it's the side styles are hollow from where the is there no flashing? What's going on that there's Well, the this is the interior window. So the flashing would be No, but I mean on the exterior you see that. Is it flashing a flashing problem? Why are I mean these some of these windows look really bad. Um, so originally the windows were installed within the brick wall and then water would go down to the sill and wash out. Then sometime they put storm windows on. And when you put storm windows on, they're supposed to be weak holes at the bottom to let that water out. Painters like to [ __ ] them. So then any water that does get between the storm window and the prime window causes damage. They're probably decades old storm windows too, right? Oh yeah, they're Yeah, they look old. Yeah. I mean, even if they didn't [ __ ] them, they easily just could have gotten plugged by and there's a lot of paint. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, I don't know if that addresses your question. The flashing would have it probably wasn't originally flashing on the original wood window because it's setting back three inches from the face and everything would wash out still. So, the homeowners have done cosmetic improvements to the inside to basically try to make the best of it. Yes. Yeah, I gotcha. But you can see like there's there's a photo of like the lock the right upper and bottom sesh. They don't line up. So that doesn't work. So then somebody drilled holes to put nails in to
Yeah. hold the windows. Yeah, I saw that because and this could be fixed with re-roing and all, you know, all of those things, but the upper sashes drop or or they're cocked shut. Yeah. Yeah. Understood. All right. You're a you're usually a a window person. What do you think? window per Well, I think it's I mean from a cost perspective right now with the funding that's available, it's cheaper to renovate them because you can get like 20 grand a year from the Department of Health or lead abatement and that's the renovation of your wood windows. I have a couple friends doing that right now um in Victorian Village. Um, I was very sad that I couldn't do that because mine were already vinyl. Um, so I mean that I guess that's why I think we haven't really been seeing a lot of these requests because I think people are using that money to renovate. Um, so that's a question I have if you guys have looked into that. I did not because these aren't I I would say like I get it, but they're not beyond I don't think any of them look like fully beyond repair. Like if this were my house, I would and I had free money, free grant money, I would do that instead. Um because I mean these obviously have lead paint on them, right? um all the pain out of Yeah, they um so my question is has that been looked into? And then if it hasn't I don't know. I I can't really remember. I feel like it's just been a while. I forget what we've been doing
very honestly. I mean it's been a little bit people It's been kind of case by case basis. Yeah, I I I think that the like that right there again, it's very hard to know just from the one shot, but like for me that one seems like that could probably get replaced, you know. Yeah. Um, and so yeah, and I guess that's that I am sympathetic to your um your argument that if they all need replacement physical pieces that would then substitute for the original, like it's kind of like how many pieces then are we replacing until it's not the original window. So, um, from from my take, I I think this one the exterior shots look pretty bad to me. Um, the one thing I'm really liking in your argument is the potential to get rid of the storm windows because it's such a nice house. It's such a cool house and uh I think that would be an additive for me. Um, so that's why I'm feeling a little more flexible about it. But again, I I I can't say that that's definitive on my part. So, other thoughts? I have another question. Will you be able to duplicate the profile of the windows and the trim and everything as it is? Yes. That's critical, I think. Yeah. Yeah. I think Marvin has done a really good job of this is what an old window looks like. Yeah. And all of the trim pieces and things will be the same. Yeah. So, um, this will be installed to the back of the existing brick mold exterior trim. So, the wood brick mold stays in place and you're just replacing everything. Yeah. So, um,
yeah. So there's a square exterior trim. Then it drops in and our new window will just be that profile that would exist where the storm windows are installed. Now um sort of to Jason's point, these are really old storm windows that were haphazardly installed. um they're they're helping but they're awful. And then to Shannon's point, even if we could get a grant to for lead abatement, lead paint abatement, I don't know that I still like that solution. I think I would still push because of the storms. Because of the storms. Yeah. Oh, you hit something. I was just going to say, um, for me, the sashes don't look as bad and those look repairable. Um, I'm looking at photo 14. You know, I think having more photos like that to show the actual the jam, the head, that deterioration, I think, would put it over the top for me because I just don't think there's enough photographic examples, you know, and I think you're saying that that's predominantly the case where the pain is peeling. You know, there's probably Dupoint issues with that storm panel where there's condensation and there's no ventilation with that weep. But, um, you know, I think more examples to kind of show how that deterioration has happened on the frame would kind of put it over the top for me.
What do you think? Yeah, I would agree with that too. Um I think the from the standpoint of like you were saying the function of um the operability and the um fact that you since these are single pane and you have to have that storm window. Um both of those like functional pieces are a good argument for replacement. Um but I would agree that seeing more of that uh evidence of the jam um which is harder replacement rather than the sashes like he was saying that might just be a lot of paint or whatever it may be. Um I think will help um sway the commission. Um, so we have Anybody else? I'm sorry. I just had one more thing is um we always require a drawing or for each condition that would show how you're going to, you know, do the new brick molds and that kind of thing. So that would be a part of the submission. I actually have that. Good. I thought so. um from many other applications with regard to actually that image there um kind of the more craftsmanesque button pattern. Are you guys sticking with that or Yes. would you guys consider doing something a little bit different? Um seems a little stylistically a little different than the rest of the house. Yeah. Um I can be open to that. it. I would be open to something else. My sort of my go-to is if we don't know what it is, we go back with what is there. Um I don't
know like we did a garage there with a four light casement which I'm sure that my client would be open to that or is that what we're look is that what you're looking for to get it more double hungish? Yeah, I think that would probably at least for me I think that would be kind of a nice So um with uh the transition in staff just to get a sense of what your com comfort level is um you know sometimes what we'll do is uh sort of a subcommittee based on the recommendations. Are you comfortable with that or is that something that you'd rather go a different direction? What what are your thoughts? Um subcommittees are you know um very typical. I've done them before and I'm like if that's your preference here, I definitely think it's appropriate. Okay. Um do we have a couple folks that would be willing to take that on if Steve was able to submit some additional photos to uh you know kind of give a get a sense of that whether they thought there was Yeah, I can do that. Okay, sounds good. So, sounds like Joe and Paige are willing to take that on. So, with that um sorry, the subcommittee consisting of who? Oh, Joe Page and Okay, thank you. And then um so then we could make a motion that's essentially contingent upon the their findings in that process. Um and then ideally uh get it resolved based on what what is shown and what we what we found. Um so am I moving it to go to subcommittee or I have to move to approve? I think we move to approve with the subcommittee's review. Is that right? Yeah. Approve on the condition of the subcommittee's final approval. One more question. Sure. Nick, do you know if
there are other photos from the staff site visit or did you put them all in here? I put them all in the that we had on file into the packet. I think it was sort of weird because application started with Connie Torbach. Oh, okay. And let me see. Uh, my client got frustrated and then it was co things happen. 86 a long trail of individual property uh applications. We got um I have May of 23. Oh, well now I'm seeing these here. These are the from May of 2020. If you do you does the commission want to see these photos now? Honestly, I don't think so because it's been five years, six, five and a half years. So at this point, I mean that that a lot can happen. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Five and a half years. A lot can go wrong. So all right. I thought my I appreciate you digging this. Thought my WebEx stopped. We're all good. So um motion then. Yeah. All right. Uh move to approve application COA2501282 um on the condition that our subcommittee um reviews uh submitted materials including um additional photos and um details of exactly how uh the window will attach to the brick. Is that the correct way to say that? Okay. Um yeah and and if they are good with um the level of damage uh if they decide that the level of damage warrants replacement
um then the product that you have submitted is good to go. And did you want the subcommittee to review the casement style the final casement style collection? Okay. Yeah. All right. Do I have a second? Second. All in favor? I I oppose and abstensions. All right, sounds good. Great. Thank you. Um All right. Stay away from that lead page. I don't know. No doubt. But I'm telling you that you should look into that for other clients that program. It's like 20K. You have to do it. You can't do it all at once if you want all the money because they only give you like 20,000 a year. There's like a maximum because it's tax return. It's a like it's a tax credit. It's pretty good. Um but yeah, Mario Yeah, Mario is getting 40 grand out of that. It's pretty great. Yeah, and we get nice. So, thank you. Neighborhood. Thank you. Um okay, so staff, is there anything else we can do without the applicants here? We've got three. So, there were um item five in particular, we thought the commission, if there was a business meeting, might be able to move that to staff approval. And so, we can read that into the record. And if you sure can approve to if you if you're going to vote to approve a submitted, you can do that here without the applicant present for any of the cases on the agenda. All right, let's try that one. So, we're going to do 688 North High Street, which is COA2501292. Um, this is a request for action for an exterior building alteration to remove two existing six panel wood entrance doors and to install two light uh two full light storefront doors per the submitted materials. Um, and the staff analysis here is that the two existing doors are non-historic six panel doors. The applicant proposes replacing the uh doors with storefront entrance doors. And given the doors are not historic and the replacement doors are on the
f on the first floor in line with the storefronts, HBO staff find the storefront storefront doors to be a suitable replacement doors in the proposed locations. Uh the recommendation is approval with the basis for the recommendation being 31611 standards for alteration 25 and 6 and the Italian Italian village guidelines on doors. Okay, excellent. Anybody have thoughts, comments? My thought is that um even though they say those doors aren't historic, that there is a certain kind of character to having that much wood uh versus having a completely open glass door. And I like the fact that there is something in there. I don't know that we can ask them to keep that for that reason, but I'm assuming they are also keeping the wood panels that are above the door as they are, which has a certain kind of historic characteristic, which I think contributes to um the historic nature of the building. So, I'm okay with it, but I just anybody else felt like maybe there shouldn't be so much wood removed and replaced totally with a glass store. I um would agree with that. Um any other thoughts? Like I'm thinking that the panel at the bottom of the door from the detail that they showed is maybe the height of the bottom of the six panel door. So, it's relatively small compared to the other pieces along the front facade where it's probably 18 or 20ome inches tall.
I don't know. Does anybody else feel like this um is too contemporary? You got you got a thumb? Yeah. Um so, they it's truly just the door panel itself that would be replaced. Is that correct? Yes. Since this basically this lab is coming out, putting in the new as far as I'm understanding. Let me check their specifications. Yeah, I would have just with all the um wood trim around it, it would be nice if it could be a wood door with I don't mind how um whatever amount of glass they would want to see in it, but I think that um would align a bit more with the adjacent storefronts. Um, and then maybe like Carlo was talking about, you could get that um, larger like kick plate vase if it was more of a 3/4 door or something. Um, but I I guess that's a yeah, it's my opinion on how it could align with the neighboring properties and the rest of the case itself with those two wood panels above and the clear story window above too. And if there's more information you'd like to see from the applicant, I think you can definitely proceed with continuing just Yeah. Okay. And get we can bury this kind of feedback and see what else they can submit for um the January hearing. And knowing which of these styles, you know, is it narrow, medium, or wide? Yeah, it's the medium that they've seeded. I like I think that the wide is would probably do what you're requesting. And then maybe if there's a band at the base as well. I mean this is this facade is so nicely detailed. So I hate to just see this contemporary art even though you know where it says the gallery is
relatively contemporary. But I I do think you know sometimes when they just send us a product cut it they're not specific enough to let us know. We need to see what that elevation is going to look like. Yeah. I feel like this one shows the like exit push bar from the inside. Um, so that would be very obvious from the outside as well if that was the straight glass. Yeah. Yeah. Which Yeah, maybe they haven't thought this through. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. I can really I can um when you all continue it, they'll get that continue load and I'll incorporate all this feedback so they can kind of reconsider their their selection here. So for that one, just um a hardware um specific hardware that they're planning to use would be helpful for the for that one as well. I almost wonder if it could be slightly taller because it's you know if you look at the elevation you know the transom bar goes across pretty consistently and then they added another one to that. Oh, you're right. It's like almost like a spacer. It's a fake tree. Yeah. So I almost wonder if you can go taller with it. I think I like that idea because I think then the glass s suits the frontage of the building because it's in line with all the other Yeah, it creates a nice continuity across that storefront. Probably going to be a relatively custom door. I like it too, but I I don't mind the double transom. I thought it was interesting that that ended up being that way. But I'm sure you could get a tour of that. I wonder if that's painted glass. Interesting question too. Yeah. Could be. Yeah. Interesting. Okay. Sounds like we're going to continue this one. Um,
anybody else have any other comments before we do that? Can I have a motion to continue? So moved. And a second. Second. All right. All in favor? I opposed and abstained. Okay. that. So, that one is continued till our next regular meeting. Uh, do we want to look at these other two while we're here just to see what's happening since we didn't have a business meeting? I say you certainly can. Yeah, let's give it a shot. So, let's look at 779 Hamlet, which is COA2501268. See what that's all about. Um, this was a request for action for landscaping. They would like to replace the existing concrete with new concrete per the submitted site plan and to install two additional 36-in ballards between the sidewalk and alley. um staff analysis. While there was no December business meeting, um this application was placed on the agenda for the commission to review due to the proposed placement of the two additional ballards. Um the ballards from the site plan, as you can see, are proposed to be placed directly between the end of the sidewalk and the alley. So, it's kind of near or in the ride ofway. Um, and uh, in addition to commission review because it is close to the ride ofway or in the right ofway, the applicant will also likely need review and approval from building and zoning before installing the Ballards. Um, our recommendation on this one was continuation and that's based on city code 31613A and the Italian village guidelines. Oh. Oh, yeah. Right now, which application you here for? Um, 692 street. Oh, yeah. Okay. We were just talking about that. So, um, we actually moved to continue it already because you weren't here. Sorry. Um, but, uh, I don't know what procedurally, what can we do? Um, you I've actually had this happen, but just a motion to reopen the case. You need a second and affirmative vote and then you can retalk it and rediscuss and also then revote again. Okay. So, why don't we uh just put What do we need to do with the one we have open right now? Move forward
and come back if that's what you prefer. Okay, sounds good. So, that's what we'll do. So, can I have a motion to uh reopen case? Oops, I gotta find it, of course, because I just uh COA2501292 and a second. Second. All in favor? I posted. Okay, so he's reopened. So, now we are on that case. If you could raise your right hand and state your name for the record. Uh Derek Bonar with the Wood Companies. And you promise to tell the truth to the best of your ability and your testimony this afternoon. Yes. Excellent. Okay. So, we already heard from staff and you missed our discussion, but now we'll rehab our discussion. That's okay. We're just going fast today because nobody's here. So, um tell us what your thoughts are and then we'll kind of get back into that. Perfect. So, uh we've got um apartment building we've owned for a long time. Um we've got two doors that enter from uh High Street. The main entrance for the apartment building is on the back. So, the second and third floor are um almost all apartments. Um, we've had some issues recently um quite a few of them of people using that as a water closet and um camping and sleeping out there. So, uh on top of that, the door has been pried open. You can see in the arrows there, there's some quite a few busts and broken stuff. So, um, we can replace it with the same door, but with our issues that we're having, um, we think if it was aluminum and glass, it would be a little more transparent and less likely to be someone's home and toilet. Fair sense. Um, I'm open to suggestions on the storefront. uh if you're like half light glass or you know we just typically it seems like the neighborhood from all our buildings we have down here um are that medium style aluminum door with the clear glass but if you have suggestions we're open to it. We're trying to do black because it's pretty much black there and that's about it. All right. Who wants to talk about the stuff we talked about? I could start um sympathetic to what's going on there.
that part we didn't know and um I can imagine that that would be uh kind of jarring if you come down you try to open the door and from either side and somebody is sitting there. Tough situation I know. Um, so the thing that we felt like is this is such a nice building and the detailing on the front of it is so nice that we were hoping that there could be something that doesn't go all the way to just straight glass for the entire area of the door and that maybe that band I don't know if you could put up the band. Um, Nick, could you show That's okay. Could you show the drawing that shows the wood along the bottom of the facade along the the wood trim piece at the bottom of the windows? I'm familiar. Of course. Yeah. So, just so that if you had something that um wasn't so contemporary, completely glass, there could be a little bit of uh trim on the bottom, maybe on the sides. One of the things that we um are asking for is more details about the door itself, the exact widths and how a drawing that shows how this door would fit in there. Then the other thing that we talked about was the transoms. We notice that there's a double transom. Um if we if you look at where the um gallery sign is and maybe zoom into that um I think this picture might show one of these I think there's actually a drawing of it. Yeah. And so there's this double transom and you can see how that aligns with the um sign band to each side of it. um that if there's a way that that could be um to make sure that you're incorporating that, we thought maybe making the George holler and
only having the one transom sign kind of going across there. But just really all of those things looked at so that you're retaining this really nice historic character of of the building as well as then compromising and giving you some visibility that you need. How'd I do? That was a good great run. Anyone any other thoughts to add? Think um nope. I think she covered it. Um, yeah. I just wanted to make sure you're clear that essentially how you have those two wood panels above your door. We were wondering if you could eliminate the bottom one and have that door um full height there to match. You see the 686? Yeah, they're a little funky because both sides are a little bit different. So, I think it was a taller door probably originally like whenever the building was built. I think the six panel was probably when we renovated the building in the early 80s, like when it was Rigby's back in the day. Um because it's like they're they're different heights. They're just all kind of weird. So, we've probably to get a normalish size door. Um it's a 68 door now. They're about it's already been cut and trimmed and they're both not 68, but they're 68 in air quotes. Um so, we could go with like a sevenfooter or an eight foot. the 8 foot would be kind of almost all the way up, but that it would all need rehattered and so it would all kind of not get replaced, but need to be kind of loved. Um, but I think we could go with an 8ft door and that would basically get you it would remove that bottom transom, you know, within a close proximity. Um, and you guys would rather see a more historic looking door. I know that sometimes we get in trouble when it's historic looking but not historic. That's why we were thinking storefront. Um, yeah, it's kind of a interesting spot here because you have like
these two setback portions that I mean they're of the facade but they're also very distinct I think on what they function as. So, I'd be okay with it being a little less. Uh, I like I would prefer the wide style at at the very at a minimum instead of the medium and then potentially some type of like SDLs. Yeah. Because um you had brought up the idea that if there's going to be that like a bar in the middle Yeah. you're going to be able to see that from the outside. I don't think by occupancy counts we'll need to have a full panic bar. But the one I highlighted that like what is that a 3/4 inch tube? You know that's like a making that thicker and maybe having you know like get to where you were Yeah. I'd be I'd be happy doing the wide style. We looked at a half panel door like half glass but it just it felt like it was trying too hard if that makes sense. Busier. Yeah. But if if you would rather see a wide style I'm totally open to that. And if you want us to put SDLs in it, I mean, we it's not that horribly expensive. I don't know that. How about that? Okay. I think it's better without. Okay. It's a wide wide style 8 foot. Would frosting the glass be better or worse. I think I don't know. I think that may hurt harm your problem. No. I mean, no, no, no. We prefer I mean, we just It's Yeah, it's just a staircase behind it. It's nothing. Is the other glass completely clear or is it tinted at all? Uh I think the all the other storefront glass is that uh historic what is it? Starfire glass or whatever that like ultra clear stuff is. I think from a security standpoint it's better to see somebody that's standing there than having Yeah. Okay. Um not to keep putting these things off on other people since we didn't have a business meeting, but does anybody interested in doing a subcommittee for this one or not?
You want to wait till they have more information next month. Would we I guess would the sub would it just be moved to prove if they can do the 8 foot? Yeah. Um no panic hardware 8 foot tall. Yeah. I think we just want to see the you know see the final drawing of the door so we know it's the right Yeah. Keeping so 30 8 foot wide style. It's roughly I think if they're both different it'll be like roughly like a 1x six on each side. We can do that in real wood. We'll paint it black to kind of hide as much of the frame as possible. Staff, are you okay with that level of description for you to take that on or would you rather have subcommittee to take a look at it or would you rather have a drawing? I say I can we can definitely like take it like have it be the staff. I just want more detail on like what final materials you want us to review. I think like do you want us just like this level or do you want a drawing or I mean I'm as long as you're comfortable. I'm comfortable. Okay, I think we should have a drawing. Um, it doesn't have to be elaborate, but just so that we make sure that we're on the same page. Um, and then so with all the other details, is was that enough with regard to the wider style 8 foot um wood trimmed? Absolutely. Yeah. Okay. Excellent. Okay. With that, somebody ready to make a motion? I have to I can never operate. 688. This is 688. Correct. So, wait, was it a sub or staff? I think staff. Okay. Um, so motion to approve COA2501292 with the condition that the applicant will be submitting a drawing showing an 8 foot wide style door um with height. Sorry, what you said wide. Eight foot height, right? Eight foot height with
a wide style door. There we go. Oh, I got you. I just you said it right. I didn't understand. Want a foot wide door in there? Yes. Um and then uh no panic card um shown I think that was that correct? Clear glass. Clear glass. Yes. Um wood painted black. Did you say that? With the trim around the rest of the to match the existing surrounding trim. All right. Do we have a second? Second. All in favor? I opposed and abstensions. All right. Thanks a lot. Thanks for making it in. Yeah. Hey, no problem. We're just clicking through today. Um, okay. Let's go back to what we were just talking about. 79 Hamlet Street, which is already open. Yes. So, um, so I'm I guess I'm seeing the poles on this drawing. Yes. They be in the real world here, there, and there. Oh, I see. Next to the where the sidewalk comes out. I bizarre. It's almost like they need three, not two. I'm actually liking that side. I don't really understand. Well, can I say something? Oh, yeah. So, I was going to say they say this one. I don't know why it is we're getting such um abbreviated drawings these days, but there's no detail. You still need a detail through concrete showing if it's 4 concrete, what's the the base and the subbase underneath that. And then they also need to show is that going to be a turndown slab so that there is a a kind of edge to it that can take up the variations in the driveway and then in the two ballards that are in there which I really don't if there is a curb why do they need ballards? Um the actual curb I think it's the edge of the sidewalk. Yeah, that's the but well then that kind of counts as a turned down
slab but not exactly. But then um they're showing them so that they're partially in the concrete and partially out of the concrete which would not be something that you could do. So they need to think that through what they're really trying to do there. And so with those um is there support for the ballards at this location with the Okay, I'm trying to I just not sure on that. I'm trying to get a sense if it's even in their yard or in the rightway. I'm just It's just a little hazy sense. The ballards that are in the other location, the support is at the protecting mechanical equipment and they're in on the property that's in the other side of the concrete. But to protect the entrance of your sidewalk but not your porch like why like at that point are we having a ballard every five feet or not five feet but three feet it it doesn't make any they would need to tell us why they want those ballards. Yeah I think it's that discussion anticipate and I'm I'm I know there'll be a continuation um people are coming around that corner on the alley and sure disrupting it. So, I think that's the motivation, but I not to I completely agree with all the commissioner's comments and I'll relate to you though just to provide that context as well. I mean, we have a lot of houses on alleys that don't have ballards. Exactly. So, yeah, I think we would want to be very careful. I think one of the advantages here too is that they have it looks like they have room for stone. Yeah. To move put some more rocks closer to the front of it. Right. Yeah. And they have bushes that are providing height. I was going to ask about like alternatives to ballards, but they're open to anything other than Yeah. something more like natural. Mhm. Yeah. Something natural, I guess. I don't know. Why do they want the faucets? They don't want their house. Is there a reason they need concrete? That sidewalk as
opposed to like compressed gravel or something or as opposed to it just being grass? Yeah. Oh. I feel like so I think one thing that might be an interesting discussion with them because since it doesn't appear that sidewalk really goes anywhere is that what would they be interested in maybe like instead of like a lower decorative ballard without the concrete and more of them but you know it would be Oh that's interesting like a stone Yeah. Yeah. our little wall or something like something back there that was that was more delineating the edge of the alley and then it's grass on the other side because right now I I again like you said John I'm not really sure what the purpose of this sidewalk is and I also wonder if they truly understand the reason this concrete has broken up is because it wasn't leveled out right so car's right install all that concrete is correctly is significant well there detail right about the base. Yeah, because this just, you know, they obviously didn't um install that correctly. Yeah, I think they're going to need a curb. Yeah, it's going to have to be reinforced in some way in order for this. But you can turn, you can take the concrete and pour it like this so that you don't have to do a separate curb, which costs a whole lot more money. Yeah, I'm just wondering if Yeah, I think they need to look at But I'm with Joe, why why do they even need this? If they wanted a walkway so you weren't walking on the the road, you could just do a compressed gravel. That would be a fraction of the cost. It would look better. I would save the money and walk in the alley myself. But that's just me. You would say what I would save the money walk in the alley. That's just me. Yeah. Or they can plant something here. Got hedges
all along there so people aren't going to run into their house. the down spout is like smashed up against the concrete which can't be helping their Yeah, I think there's just we need a discussion. Yeah, I think is Would the commissioners like to see any sort of survey or property line study for this application? Yeah, it may doesn't have to necessarily be a survey at this point, but if they have a survey, that'd be awesome. But even if they could just get an estimated edge of property versus the edge of the alley just from whatever public sources are available. Um, as long as we started with that, then we can at least have the discussion. If they have a survey, that's awesome. But I count asking them why they want this concrete sidewalk. I I have an example of an alley loaded property with Ballards, but no sidewalk that's similar. Yeah. If you want to pull it up on um the Google Street, it's on uh the corner of Mount Pleasant and like East 4th. I could probably get this address. Uh 1166 Mount Pleasant. It would help if I opened it in Chrome. You just got you got binged. Being the search engine that never quite found the right thing ever. I love it. All right. Um now if you just like turn around like a 180. So right there to the left. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Good example. Yeah, that's a that's much more Yeah, good good call. See, to keep people from driving into their house. Yeah, especially like bigger bigger trucks like delivery trucks who turn down the wrong way. Like I've seen a semi trailer try to go down the side before. All the buildings around me plus mine have been hit by cars. Really? Yeah. Wow. Yeah. I think that's interesting. I I do think not that we need
to keep piling things on your plate, but another thing I think would be an interesting discussion kind of across historic neighborhoods is what are appropriate ballards and like some kind of set of standards for where when and where they go in. We're just totally making it up allowing something like that. So, what are they doing? Yeah. You know, what are their natural alternatives? And they have even tighter alleys than we do. So, I'd like to see that. It's typically just to repair the curb and relay the sidewalk. Yeah. Like it's like but like do they have ballards anywhere? Like do they have any protection for like can you remember what only in front of gas meters typically are they permitted like as like an actual like code standard requirement? They also have like their alleys are kind of like curbed alleys cuz it's ours are obviously like free brick homes. We were a little bit homes. Yeah, you were definitely more bored. Were you but that's terrible. Okay, that's interesting. So I yeah I think that's a that's it's worthy of a it's worthy of a discussion. So may if they can come in and we can kind of talk about it for say did that come through? It's a good question. All right. So with that I think I would recommend that we continue this one if everybody's all right with that. Can I have a motion on that one to continue? So moved. And do I have a second? Second. All in favor? Opposed? And abstensions. All right. That is continued. our next regular schedule meeting. And then one more to go. Um, who's the second there? I'm sorry, I missed it, too. Okay. Uh, which one did I miss? Fourth Street. Fourth Street. Yeah. All right. Fourth Street. So, um, I'll open Oops, I blew it. I shut it. Uh, we'll open COA250127872 North Fourth Street. All right. Um this is request for action for an exterior building alteration for
the installation of a mural. Um to paint a forest mural on the south elevation for the submitted materials and rendering. Um noting that the mural does meet the requirements outlined in the short north design guidelines for murals, but we note that the proposed sealant for the mural has a 5-year product life cycle. So, HBO staff would recommend the commission require the applicant submit a long range maintenance plan to ensure the mural's condition is maintained properly on a high visibility side of the structure. Um, our recommendation was approval with the condition of a long-range maintenance plan, but without the applicant, they can't agree to that. So, of course, it be continuation in that case. The basis for that recommendation is the short north design guidelines on murals. Could we uh could we make them the motion just contingent upon whether they agree to that? Um, I think because it's like an additional material, you could, but if it were a change to the application overall, then they'd have to be present, I think. But because you're just saying if you submit this, then it's okay. I think it would be allowable. Gotcha. So, just real quickly, my take is since it's, you know, we've kind of since this fits a a wall that we say we can do hard on, uh, I'm in support of it. I will also say and again we don't get to comment on the art living in Jeffrey. I I think I got the point already what it used to be. I could move on from the representative art about that. Not to say they we shouldn't do this one. It's just I I feel like it's a the theme is now reached its conclusion with this one. So, I just am putting that out in the world for ether so future artists can be more in more in tune with whatever muse they have and don't have to necessarily tap into the historic legacy of the industrial section of the area. So, that said, I don't really have anything else about it. Um, what other who else who else has comments, thoughts? Is there an issue with page 10 of the application where there's a deadline? That's them basically saying please approve
this so that I can tell GCA that I'm doing this and yet they're not here. Yeah, artists. But that would be I mean if you all continue it today that would not have any bear like they would just have to wait on theirs and go to GCAC. It's um no agreement with the commission or city or anything. Right. Right. But yeah, this is one of the locations like if everyone remembers we've been going through these locations with the Short North Arts District. So we've approved this location that they can cover the whole thing. So now it's just like the final like yes, go do it and we aren't allowed commenting on the art itself when it comes to our approval. Although Jason just Well, you can you can pine I didn't say everyone vote for it. I can't I can't base my vote on it. Um I actually one thing I like about this is the chance to get rid of this giant phone number on the side of the building. Yeah. Um, so any thoughts on what we we like to do today? I mean, I'm fine with approving it and just saying with the condition that they agree to submit a maintenance plan. I agree. Agree, too. All right. Is that your motion? That's my motion. All right. Do I have a second? Second. All in favor? I opposed and abstensions. All right. Look at that. We did it. Um, okay. Uh, I think that reaches the end of our regular our application agenda. Is that correct? Yes. All right, sounds good. Uh, other business today. Uh, we have none here. Okay. When do we do the um the reappoint stuff of of officers? I know Morgan called me about it. Is January. It'll be on your January agenda. Okay. Sounds good. Chair. All right. Do we have a new person? What's that? Oh, the new commissioner to take um Oh, I haven't heard yet. I haven't heard. Oh. Um,
do you know at all? Do you know what the timeline is for the the appointment? Oh, for the vacant. I've not heard any names being sent up from our office yet. So, I believe our office is still identifying a name to send up to the director. Okay, sounds good. I know people have sent stuff in from last time. Well, I wasn't sure what to do because someone had approached me who I think would be good. They can email Yeah. the IVC email and we'll forward it on to the committee in our office that Okay. select candidates and things. Uh, another thing, uh, just two seconds. Um, uh, we were discussing, Nick and I were discussing about the the wonder bread, wonder bead, wonder bed sign as it continues to lose letters. So, um, in checking with uh, the basically enforcement, our best mechanism to get it rolling is to make a 311. Uh, so anybody that feels like going on and doing a 311, I will do one. I'm sure my wife will do one because she really hates it. And I'm going to mention it tonight at Italian Village uh Society uh that you know hopefully if we get a a steady stream of people complaining about it that will keep the heat on um because they are supposed to be maintaining it as part of that overall development. So it's essentially is an unmaintained portion of the property. Uh, so you know, I wouldn't be surprised, and this is total speculation, I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they came in and wanted to, you know, change the whole thing over to simulated LED or simulated neon. At this point, though, it's just like burning out like one one thing at a time, which first of all sucks because it's cool, but also it's kind of like one of the signature things of the neighborhood. And you know, if you go into any gift shop that has Italian village stuff, it's probably one of three things that are on the picture and now it's kind of ridiculous. Yeah, it just looks dilapidated and junky. So anyway, that's my new thing. Try and do something about it. Um, another thing. Oh,
I do want to while we're just sitting here talking, um, that the Short North parking whatever that committee is called that I'm on, I can never remember the name of it. That meets once a year. um where we used to get a whole bunch of money for uh the parking Lua fee back in the day, which of course no one does it anymore since the code changed. Regardless, it's um the group that interfaces with um with Bets's group and that uh you know, basically there are a number of mobility processes that go through the Short North that we authorize. and you know the continued things are free bus passes for residents of the neighborhood um assistance with lift rides for people who work on the street um all kinds of things like that. So it's good it's it's you know it's been really successful program um the one I wanted to mention to all of us was that the city is piloting micromobility corral on the side streets along the short north. So you may have seen some on the side streets. I believe Warren has one and um gosh, I just saw another one. I think maybe on third, second, I can't remember. Anyway, they're around the side and they're essentially painted boxes where a parking space would be and it has a symbol of microobility, like a scooter, a bike symbol in them. And they're working with the two scooter companies to geoence the trips, which means that it's restricted on where you can park those when you're near High Street. In other words, you have to send a picture of it in the box and the AI part of their analysis theoretically will reject your trip if it doesn't go it doesn't end in there. So, it's could be really cool uh because if it works there, they're open to, you know, considering it maybe for fourth or fifth or other places around the village and around the other places of the city. Uh and it obviously would reduce clutter of scooters and and things on the sidewalks dramatically. So, that's that's kind of what's
going on. Other than that, you know, just kind of cooking along. Other business, any thoughts? All right. Do I have a move to adjourn? I move that we adjourn. Do I have to say the meeting of I don't think so. We're not that formal. Um, do I have a second? Second. All in favor?
This transcript was automatically generated from the official public meeting video and is presented unedited. It reflects remarks made on the public record by elected officials, staff, and public commenters. Transcript accuracy may vary; view the original recording for reference.