Clark County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

By the time. Time's 07:00. Now it's gonna let me. Alright, so good evening folks. We're gonna get the meeting started, we're gonna call it to order. A meeting for Planning Commission for Clark County, Tuesday, May 5. If you wouldn't mind, please rise and join me in the pledge of allegiance. And roll call, please.

Chair Frazier? Here. Vice Chair Mojica? Present. Commissioner Stone is excused. Commissioner Kirk? Here. Commissioner Kolarski? Here. Commissioner Brady? Here. Commissioner Roitman? In attendance. Mr. Chair, have a quorum.

Alright, Commissioner Stone is excused. Alright. So first item of business is public comments. It's a part of our meeting per Nevada revised statutes where anyone from the public can come down. You can speak on any item. The commission cannot vote or act on it but you're more than welcome to make a public comment. Now it's time to do that. Okay. Alright. No public comments. Then we'll move on to the next item of business. Thank you.

Alright. The next item on the agenda is approval of the agenda after any additions, holds, or deletions. At this time, staff has the following requests: Hold the following no date specific per the applicant, Item 12, UC 20 six-one 156 Hold the following to the 05/19/2026, Planning Commission meeting and the corresponding Board of County Commissioners meeting to 06/17/2026, per the applicant, item number 21, PA26-seven 100,010 item 22, ZC26-one 137 item 23, WS26-one 138 and item 24, TM26-fifty 33. For the applicant's information, additional re notification fees may be required in accordance with Title 30 for items held or deleted or if there are any modifications to the original application. The public hearing items are going to be opened as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the date previously stated.

This is for items twelve, twenty one, 22, 23, and 24. If there are no requests by the Planning Commission or any members of the public, the agenda stands ready

for your approval. Can I get a motion for approval of the agenda?

Mister chair, I make a motion to approve the agenda as presented, holding item number 12 with no date, and holding items 21, 22, 23, and 24 to the June 17 planning commission meeting.

Thank you very much. Go ahead Commissioner Roachman.

I think we want to hear item number 12 tonight actually. The applicant's here, and I believe they're ready to present that.

Okay, so the motion will be

Motion will be then to approve the agenda only holding items 21, 22, 23, and 24 to be heard on June 17.

Alright, and we're gonna hear number 12 in its order. So the motion on the floor.

I'm sorry, it's gonna be the May 19 PC.

Okay, so that would be the May 19 Planning Commission meeting and the June 17 That's Board of County Commissioners correct.

Alright, very good. Motion on the floor cast your vote. That motion passes. Next item.

The next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes. The Planning Commission briefing and regular meeting minutes from 04/07/2026 are ready for approval.

Alright, I'm gonna motion for approval of the minutes.

Motion to approve the minutes as presented.

Alright, motion on four, cast your vote.

I'm sorry, but my machine is black. So I'll have to vote.

Say yes, raise your hand. Yeah. Passes. There you go. Motion passes. Next item. I vote

Just a quick announcement before we move on. For the audience's information, items on tonight's agenda are final action unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or otherwise denounced. All appeals must be filed in writing to the Comprehensive Planning Department by five p. M. On Wednesday, 05/13/2026, and any appeals from tonight's meeting will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners on Wednesday, 06/03/2026, at nine a.

M. In these chambers. Per Title 30, person may appeal an item. An agreed person includes the applicant, someone who attended this meeting in person or through an authorized representative, or someone who has submitted comments in writing, which may include a post card or letter. Members in the audience must complete the meeting sign in sheet found near the dais to confirm their attendance at this meeting.

Mailed notices of appealed applications will be sent to the property owners within the same notification radius as the original application and to those listed on the meeting sign in sheet. Additionally, any person may call the Comprehensive Planning Department at (702) 455-4314 or go to the county's meeting agenda webpage and review the meeting notice of final action to find out if any items have been appealed. Next on the agenda are the routine action items which consist of items number four through 10. These items may be considered together in one motion and are subject to the conditions listed with each agenda item. If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.

Thank you staff. Alright so this is the time we're going to vote on the routine action items. Those And are items four through number 10, and that will be in one vote. So we're gonna approve all of those items in one vote. So if anyone in the audience has an issue or would like to hear one of those items separately, now is the time to come down and ask that that item be removed from the routine action items. Alright, seeing no one coming down to remove those numbers, we will entertain a motion for the approval of the routine action items.

Motion to approve routine action items four through 10.

There's a motion on the floor. Cast your vote. Motion passes. Thank you. Next item is number twelve, eleven.

Alright. And that is final action unless appealed. The next item on the agenda is item number 11. Item number 11 is UC2642, holdover use permit for proposed banquet facility in conjunction with an existing commercial center on a portion of 1.74 acres in a CG Commercial General Zone, generally located South Of Tropicana Avenue and East Of Doonville Street within Spring Valley.

Alright. There's an applicant in the audience for number 11. Oh, yeah, come on down. Alright. So name and address for the record, and tell us about your application.

My name is Rebecca Mohan.

Oh, so so it either there's either a handheld mic in front of you or one yeah. You

My name is Rebecca Mohan. I am the owner of Wow Party Decor. The address is 5785 West Tropicana Avenue. I'm requesting an approval for a small reservation only event space designed for intimate gatherings such as baby showers, birthdays, and family celebrations. This is not a nightclub or a bar or a public entertainment venue.

We only we don't allow walk ins, ticket events, or outdoor gatherings. All events are prescheduled and take place fully inside the space. Our maximum occupancy is limited to 60 guests, and events are short in duration, typically two to four hours. We are committed to being respectful to neighbors. We do not use outdoor music. We do not allow loitering outside, and we ensure guests live in order in orderly customer. Customer. To with We work a the

to we the

the we seeing a that serves the community business. Without

negative

of impact nearby the residents. I respect I respectfully ask for your approval.

Alright. Thank you very much. Alright. So we're gonna open this application up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience wanna speak on this item? Now's the time to come down and speak on it. Alright. Seeing no one coming down to speak on this item, we're gonna close the public hearing and I'll open it up to the commissioners for questions and comments.

Kipken Kolarski, yes. I just wanna know why you didn't show up at town board. I'm gonna be real frank and honest with you because you need to show up.

I understand. I haven't got any information about it. This is the only email I got.

You were told when you first did your application, I know you were given a sheet because every applicant is given a sheet that shows the dates that you need to show up. So I don't know why you didn't show up. To me it's important that you show up. Okay? So I'm not certain how I feel on this project. I think it's a good project, but you need to show up.

Thanks. You wanna go to Reitman and then you

It's his.

Okay. So so vice chair, Monica?

Yeah. I I agree. You one time is an excuse. Three times is unacceptable. So I am not gonna support this because three times you have not shown up to town board. And I'm sure you I'm sure staff have you been in touch with the applicant?

As far as as far as I'm aware, yes. They're given a meeting information sheet that will list out the town board and the

So she's been informed of these town meetings. Yeah. It's unacceptable. I will not approve this.

Commissioner Reitman?

I tend to agree with my fellow commissioners that I think we've, each time this has come before us, it's been a couple times now that we've held it. And you haven't appeared for those times either, right? This was on the agenda a couple times staff and we kept on holding it. Is that right?

I believe it was on the agenda about a month ago when you held it there for them to be able to go back.

Was that the first time I held it?

That was the first time, yes.

I'm not gonna approve it. Right now I'm between either a denial or a denial with prejudice. I guess theoretically I could hold it one more time for town board. Right, staff? And then if you don't show up to that town board, then we will deny with prejudice?

That is something you could do, yes. Anyone have any big problem with that?

It's acceptable to

me. Yep. Okay. If you do not go to this next town board or you do not show up to the next meeting, then we will deny with prejudice. And from what I understand, it'll be a year until you can apply after that. And then it'll take probably another five or six months for you to be back in front of us. So you must go to the next town board and when the town board comes here I'm gonna think about what they have to say. That I'll motion for UC 260142. Do I need to motion or just hold it?

Don't leave yet because you need to hear this. Okay? Don't walk away please.

From speaking with staff, think we can, if you want to do the next town board we could probably get them on is fivetwenty six.

Let me ask you one thing. Because we've held it a couple times now, will there be additional notices or anything else like that?

Not yet. No? Okay.

Alright, yeah. Then that's what I wanna do.

So it would be I'm

sorry.

I just wanna make sure she writes down the dates of when she needs to be at the town board and this board.

Mr. Chairman, I think the applicant is fully aware. I don't think she needs to be castigated in public. She knows she needs to go to the meeting. Let's move on. Let Commissioner Reutten make the motion. Let's vote. Okay, what's

the date that I need to?

Fivetwenty six Town Board and sixtwo PC.

Motion to hold to the, oh I just lost it

May, June 2 Planning Commission. June 2 Planning Commission, so

you can tie the May. Thank you everyone.

Alright, so there's a motion on the floor to hold. Get staff with if you have any questions. Cast your vote? That motion passes for a hold. Good luck. Next item.

The next item is item number 12. Item number 12 is UC 20 six-one 156. Use permits for the following. One, a museum and two, office as a primary use. Waiver of development standards to reduce parking. Design review for a proposed museum in conjunction with an existing officewarehouse and mini warehouse complex on 5.16 acres in an IL industrial light zone generally located South Of Hacienda Avenue and West Of Cameron Street within Paradise.

Name and address for the record. Tell us about your application.

Good evening commissioners and chairman. My name is Damon Hardy, h a r d y. I'm at 633 House Blend Lane, Henderson, Nevada 89052. I'm here with the applicant, Ms. Sherry Goldstrom.

4565 Raven Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Thank you.

Thank you very much. I'm here on behalf of the applicant Sherry Goldman with nostalgia Street Rods who is present here with me today. You mentioned the site address is 5375 Cameron Street located on the West Side of Cameron Street between Hacienda and Dewey Drive, approximately 5.16 acres. It's made up of several offices, office warehouse, lease spaces, vehicle maintenance, as well as many warehouses. Mister Art and Shirley Goldstrom have been a pillar in the community for over the last sixty years.

They're born and raised here. And they as far as their business goes, they were very instrumental on the demolition of the dunes as well as the Hacienda as well as the Riviera. And they also had a trucking company who hauled off all this debris. And so also they had pre engineered for demolition. So they've been a pillar of the community.

Also they have amassed a huge, over sixty years, memorabilia with vehicles and throughout Las Vegas and throughout this community. They currently, for the last seventeen years, have ran a museum open to the public that they're able to present and show off their artifacts and their collectibles so the family could benefit that as well as the community. We recently presented the reason why I wanted to we wanted to present hold this item was because we're trying to get with our architect to revise our site plan in order to adhere to the town board conditions. The town board approved it with some conditions and we'll go through some of the conditions tonight that we're ready to accept and go forward with that. The first requirement that they quarried parking spaces that they were short 17 spaces.

We're willing to, on the West Parking Lot, as you see right here, there's a vast area there we're able to, if we can restripe and add additional 20 to 40 parking stalls if need be to meet the requirements for the parking. Right in this location right here. Also some of the conditions also were that we are supposed to provide safety around the outside display, which is located right here. There's basically 17 spaces that are instrumental. They have trucks that are inoperable.

They're stationary. They're only for display. And if you like, I could show you an example. We have stanchions around them currently for the public to look at. These are the vehicles that were used in the hauling of the material from the imploded dunes and the material that was removed from the properties at that time of the implosion. So there's some trucks there. We'll show you a couple of examples of the stanchions. Again in the last seventeen years we haven't had any problem with any safety or anybody being injured. Nobody climbs on these vehicles. And please note also that they go by appointment only at this museum and they're all guided.

They're all personally guided throughout the buildings and to this outdoor display. So there's no wandering or open viewing of any of the memorabilia in this property. Those are some of the conditions we're willing to adhere to. We also spoke with one of the planners recently and they mentioned that there's on-site pedestrian, they have conditions now for on-site pedestrian access. And some of the conditions are either changing the pavement material, pattern, or color, but not painting, but not be able to paint the marks on the floor or use decorative bollards or raise medians with landscaping or stamped or stained concrete.

Currently this property is paved with asphalt and there's also valley gutters that are throughout the property. And we prefer to just paint the pedestrian accesses from one building to the next to meet those standards. But however, in the new Title 30 we're not allowed to do that. So that was one of the reasons why we wanted to hold over this application due to the fact that we're trying to come up with some different solutions as to provide the requirements needed to provide safety for the pedestrians. So I'm here on your behalf.

If you'd please allow us the opportunity to continue to go forward with this museum and be able to benefit the community and and just wanna do it right to make sure we have all the permits necessary in order to go go ahead and do that. So I am I'm up for suggestions or questions that you may have at this point.

Alright. Thank you very much. I will open the application up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience would like to this is a time when anyone in audience would like to come down and speak on this item, now it's time to do so. Alright. Seeing no one coming down for to speak on it, I will close the public hearing and I'll open it up to our commissioners for comments. I'll start with commissioner Kowarski.

Thank you, mister Chair. I was at the town board when when this application was presented. I know that the town board members really liked the project. They just had concerns about the outside and and the safety concerns for people not just being able to walk all around or get into the equipment. So if you can comply with whatever safety measures we can get staff to help us get along with, then I can surely, surely have you continue to work with staff. Can surely support this application. Absolutely. Yes, absolutely.

Alright, Commissioner Vice Chair Mojica. I would like

to add to that. I'd like to know what the options are for safety. Do we have any suggestions? Is anybody working with them on what to do? We we we take pedestrian safety very seriously, and you can tell us all day that nobody jumps on those trucks and nobody's gonna get near them, but you don't have eyes behind the back of your head, and you're not there, so you can't guarantee that. So I would like to see something, some type of barrier, safety.

May we may we ask with stanchions and or, like I said, they're all publicly guided with a guide into every property of this in the area of this property. Like I said, nobody's ever climbed on these trucks during the

Do we have any suggestions?

Please, we're open for suggestions.

As he stated, Title 30 does require that you have some sort of pedestrian walkway from the building to parking spaces such as that so that something that could be done that would meet Title 30 requirements?

Will you allow us to go ahead and use paint to identify those areas?

It does need to be a Title 30 would require that it be a different texture, a different something.

So Title 30 specifies what the options are? Yeah. My suggestion would be for you to work within Title 30 and work with the planner.

Alright thank you. I would just say for the record that I'm satisfied with what the applicant has presented. And following town board recommended approval items, I support the application. I'll I'll turn turn it over to Commissioner Workman.

First staff. So do you mind putting up your map again? That is good, thank you. So, okay, so in the staff briefing it says we want adequate safety measures, right? And it says designated walkways, protective barriers, and improved methods or something for circulation and conflict points.

So is the concern that when they are Let me ask you a question actually, before I get to stuff. The main museum is that, can you point to where, like if you're gonna be walking out some tours, some patrons, where are they gonna walk out from and where are they gonna walk to?

Okay. They start here.

Yep.

And they walk here.

Yep.

And we walk along the building, and then we walk them down here to this area.

Yep.

And then we walk them back to this area.

Got it. And there you have kinda like some rope things in front of the the the trucks.

Yes, sir.

And when you say no one climbs on them, do people enter into them?

No. I'm sorry.

Ask Do they enter into the trucks?

No. The trucks

the They just look at them.

They just look at them. They they don't go near them. They they don't touch them. They don't do anything. And they're inoperable also.

Okay. Thank you. So, for staff, would temporary, like those, what do you call those things you have in front of the trucks? Stentions?

Stentions.

Staff with temporary stentions that were placed, because in my mind we kind of have a designated walkway here and then maybe it's just along the, if you can move your photo for a moment please ma'am. If we had some stensions that when we are giving tours kinda just, I mean are we concerned that people are gonna walk into the empty parking lot? I'm a little concerned that our recommendations are, our requirements here may be a little overkill. And so I'm trying to get an idea of what is the safe, because if Commissioner Stone was here, he would be reminding me that our main purpose is safety. So I agree with the other comments that we want to be safe here. But what are we asking for?

I think the issue that staff had is that this is ultimately and primarily an industrial use of a property. So you have mini warehouse, you have office warehouse. So it's the idea that people are walking around in an area that may have larger vehicles, cargo, that sort of thing. And so I think that's where the issue is.

Okay, let me ask you one more question. So you we see where the parking stripes are and then we see where the the cars are. This building here to right? Yep. That long building. That is part of the museum?

Yes. That is all the museum. And the only this is the only right here where my finger is going. This is all of our tenants and nobody ever gets cargo there. Nobody gets it's it's literally just foot traffic.

So for staff, I'm not saying I'm gonna require this, but if we did require that temporary extensions get placed from this this is like the East Building. If there was a temporary extension that was placed that with like some signage or something that made sure that people were aware that they're not supposed to be approaching the industrial buildings to the West. And that really they're just supposed to kind of walk down the pathway and then walk around the cars and then walk past and stay within this. And maybe some paint as well. Maybe some paint on the ground and some temporary Would that make us feel better about the, as opposed to like what, otherwise we're talking about like special pavement for texture or some kind of dollar.

I think that would be a little bit of overkill personally.

So I would say that Title 30 requires that there be some sort of formal walkway, not just a temporary extension. But if they're able to put paint on that, say that they're gonna put paint down with a temporary plan, that's something that we could work with. How do you guys feel about some paint on the walkway and then when visitors are there,

you put some temporary extensions. It'll be it'll be like the red carpet, I think. The red the red trucking carpet.

That'd be IP. We I feel that I feel good about that. What about you?

Yes. 100%. And that's really the way we treat our guests. We we never leave a guest unattended. Unattended. We walk with them the whole entire way. So the red carpet thing would be just what they're getting now.

Well, I look forward to jumping on that red carpet one day. So yes? And some signage?

Of course.

Cool. Commissioner Reichman, would just offer that if you wanted to also, you could do maybe a two year review period so they can come back for us if you

You guys can come see us again in two years?

We'd love to.

Okay.

We'd like to invite you all also to come see the museum.

Yes. We would.

I I I looked at the photos online after we had our chat the other day, and I think it looks very cool. So I I I'm definitely gonna be

Lot of history there. Gonna

be great.

If everyone else is good, then alright. I'd like to motion to approve with Commissioner Reutman.

Commissioner, real quick, if you can just make sure when you're making this motion to include the condition for a painted walkway.

That's what I'm gonna do.

Okay, perfect.

I'm gonna do the striping for the parking. Wait, did we land on how many parking spots we're gonna have? What do you guys think?

We can put thirty, forty. Right now we're 17 according to the plan.

Okay. So 30? Perfect. Of course. 30 parking spot striped parking spots, a painted pathway with temporary extensions and signage when folks are being guided. They have to be guided, and I think that hits both us and Town Board. I motion to approve with those conditions

and

the two year review period.

We'll come back

in here. Thank you. Team effort up here guys.

Sorry, Commissioner Reutman. Can I have you say that one more time so we can get Yes? It down

30 parking spots. Striped. Striped. Painted walkway.

Signage

and extensions when visitors are present. Those can be temporary, but up when they're present. Escorted visitors at all times. To your review. Have I missed anything? No. Okay. And with those conditions I motion to approve

I'm so sorry. Do you have an idea of where you want that pathway to go from?

Yeah, think the path, I will leave it up, yes. I think we just want at least one line that goes north to south that, right, to make sure we're all in agreement here. And then so like it'll be like a reverse L. Like kind of comes down and separates the industrial building, comes however across the side of this building that goes north to south on the eastern part of the

Over here.

Right, the property. And then goes kind of like however many feet from the that are already on the display. So they are kind of walking out, walking down, walking over, walking back. You're going have to watch this video. Got

it. I want to make sure we

do it correctly. It's going to look like I'm dancing up here, right? Do we have everything we need?

Yes. I think

we should be good now, yep.

Thank you. Motion to approve UC 02/60156 subject to the conditions that I think are now clear.

Alright, so there's a motion on the floor. Cast your vote.

Commissioner Mojica, yes. Micah Peters.

Alright, that motion carries.

Good

luck. We thank you all very much. Thank you for your time.

So much.

Alright, that is final action unless appealed. Our next item will be item number 13, WS26-one 147, waiver of development standards to reduce setbacks in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.21 acres in an RS 5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone generally located South Of Grossmont Avenue and West Of Ausbistien Way within Sunrise Manor.

Thank you staff. Name and address for the record and tell us about your application.

Good evening. My name is Christian Rivas. I'm the owner of 5573 Grossman Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 9110. I'm here today to request an approval for a rear yard setback variance. First of all, I wanna acknowledge that I built the structure without going through the proper process, permit process.

I understand it was my mistake and I take full responsibility of it. This structure was not built for rental or business purpose. It was intended to provide a place for my loss to live. So the main issue here is that one corner, like you can see here, one corner of the casita is located at three feet one inch from the rear property line where five feet is required. However, this only affects a very small portion of the structure due to the irregular shape of the lot.

As you move away from the corner, you have a sixteen eight setback increases. Additionally, the patio, is right here, extend one foot from the property line. However, the structural posts are within compliance distance. I have spoken already with the neighbors and they have no objections to the structure as it currently exists. I also have a letter from the neighbor that is close to this patio that is fine to just keep it like that.

Just to mention this, when I buy the house, this patio was already built. I mean, I'm responsible for it right now, but it was like that when I buy the house. I respectfully request approval for the structure to remain as built. I am committed to complying with all other requirements working with the county to resolve properly. I truly want to do right the things right. I'm here to correct my mistakes and move forward in compliance. I respectfully ask for your consideration.

Alright. Thank you very much. So I'm gonna open this application up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience like to come down and speak on this item? Seeing knowing one coming down, we're going to close the public hearing and I will, turn it over to commissioners for questions, comments. Okay. Commissioner Moheka? Yes.

I just have a simple question. Do you you said you spoke with the neighbor. Did they give you a letter?

Yes.

Do you can you please present it to us, give it to staff so we can look can you put it on the and that's the immediate neighbor.

Right? Yes.

Oh, yeah. If it looks good to you, it looks good to us.

Alright. Do you have a photo of what the patio looks like now?

I have a photo on my phone.

That's perfect. And just put it on. If it looks good to you, we can see it.

Okay, so no other questions. I'll turn it over to Commissioner Kolarski. I can support application.

Thank you mister chair. I'm okay with it. The the post as far I don't To this day I still don't know. Do we go by the eve or do we go by the post? That you know, because that's two different numbers. And it could be a difference between whether or not it meets setback or whether or not it doesn't. So I think we need to somehow maybe look at code or something and make a decision on what we're gonna use, what we're not gonna use. I don't know. Just throwing that out. But I can support this.

I can see that the eve on the patio, that was the one that I was most concerned about. That that wouldn't go on to neighbors. Again, it's the tip. You're talking just that tip on both of the projects. So I'm gonna move to approve WS 26 dash one four seven with staff's if approved conditions, and that means you have one year to get the permits and get it inspected.

Alright. The motion on the floor cast your vote.

Commissioner Mahika, yes.

Alright the motion carries. Good luck. That

is final action unless appealed. Item number 14 is WS 26 six-one 154, waiver of development standards to reduce the setback in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 0.22 acres in an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone within the airport in Byron's AE65 overlay, generally located South Of Twinkle Star Drive and West Of Walnut Road within Sunrise Manor.

Is the applicant in the audience for item number 14. Alright let's hold it and we'll, well I won't say that. We'll hold it. I'll hold it for one session and then if you guys could reach out to the applicant.

Alright so that would be May 19. I'm sorry? Two weeks or one month? Two weeks. Two weeks, so May 19.

May 19, okay. So I'll put a motion on the floor to hold WS 20 six-one 154 to the May 19 Planning Commission and staff will reach out to the applicant. Thank you. Motion on the floor? Cast your vote.

The motion carries. Next item.

The next item is item number 15, WS26-one 160, waiver of development standards to increase the wall height in conjunction with an existing single family residence on 1.64 acres in an RS 5.2 residential single family 5.2 zone generally located South Of Spanish Gate Drive and West Of Butler National Drive within Spring Valley.

Yes, sir. Name and address for the record. Tell us about your application.

My name is, Chris Christoff. I'm with HH Consulting. 2510 West Horizon Ridge Parkway, Henderson, Nevada 89052. And I'm here on behalf of the, owner of the property. We drew the plans for him. We're a structural engineering firm, and we're helping him get this approved. Something that he started without permits, and he was caught in the process. And now we're trying to make it right. So this is the property. Let's see if we can see.

And the intent that the owner has is just raising his, property walls at the front of the property and part of the sides of the property and the back so people are not looking into his property. Currently, the walls at the front are very short. They're about four feet tall. And people can walk. They walk their animals, their dogs, and they're just standing looking into his property.

So the intent here is just to kind of block view into his personal private space. In the back, however, it's, wrought iron. So we're just increasing the wrought iron height, since HOA does not allow any solid walls in the back. And this elevations here show the front of the property as is proposed. The back of the property, rot iron, gets increased. And then these are the side walls, which are east and west of the property.

Okay. Alright. Thank you very much. Does that conclude your presentation? Does that conclude your presentation?

It does.

Okay. Thank you. Alright. So I'm gonna open the application up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience like to speak on this item, now's the time to come down.

Should I leave this here?

You can if like. She might have her own stuff. Okay, alright that sounds good, thank you. Now. Alright. So name and address for the record?

Hi. Cheryl Lastera. 8391 Plum Creek Court, Las Vegas, Nevada. 8 what is my 89113.

Close enough.

Yeah. I've only lived there thirty years. I am the only direct neighbor next to this project. I'm are we on the screen? I'm probably let's see, I'm right here. I have this little wall right here.

So

I came home a year and a half ago to people working on my wall. They wouldn't stop. I had to yell at them. I had to threaten to call the police. I finally had to take a mallet out and start hammering cinder block off my wall.

They finally stopped, yet they continued on to the master association wall. Did probably half a football field, I would say, about 150 feet. It would be this entire wall, whatever that is. I don't even know. After that, I told them I need approval from the Master Association.

I need all kinds of other approvals. I never got any approvals. This is what my wall looked like before. Pretty standard wall. This is what my wall has looked like for one and a half years.

Now, they have offered to like just fix it and put it and make it pretty. I don't want that. I want it done the right way. I want it from step one to step two to step three. I want all the walls tested. These are forty year old walls. They may not even be up to code. They have to be fully tested. They have to be permitted. They have to be inspected.

They need full approval from the ARC. I'm not opposed to this. If he wants to raise his wall and have all the privacy that he wants, he can have all the privacy that he wants. Just don't do it at my expense and don't mess with my walls without asking me and then call me and yell at me and tell me that I took principal. Well, I pay a lot of money every month to have a principal to take him to. He told me that I don't like brown people. My husband is fully brown. He told me that I don't like rich people. I've been living on the golf course for thirty years. I'm doing just fine.

I don't have, you know, whatever this giant house that he has. I'm doing okay. And then he told me that I'm bipolar. Oh yeah. Oh it's lovely. I don't care if he builds his walls. He can build his walls all he wants. But I want it done the right way. I've lived here for fifty years. I've lived in my house for thirty years. I lived the prior person who owned this, we never had an objection. If something needed to be fixed, we both fixed it. We both paid for it. It was very amicable. I would call her, she would call me, we would get it done together.

Like with all of my neighbors. It's beyond me that someone would be so entitled as to go and do this to somebody else's property. I would never do anybody with that. And then not even apologize. Truly, it's appalling. But honestly, I've lived here long enough. If I wanted to oppose this, I could have made one phone call and you would have had a truckload of those cards in front of you saying oppose. I don't want to oppose it. I want it done the right way. That's all I got to say.

Thank you very much, ma'am. And and I and I think we're in we're he's in the process of getting that done for you.

He he's actually a nice guy.

Yep. Okay. Very good. Name and address for the record, and then give us your comments, please.

Lisa Perry. This is on behalf of the Spanish Master Association, 7495 Mission Hills Drive. I don't know if my comments made it to the commissioners here, if it did? Okay. Then I don't have to speak right.

Okay. So on behalf of the Spanish Straw Master Board, they do not oppose raising the wall, which the north facing wall is shared with the master association and a portion of the east facing wall, provided that it is constructed in compliance with applicable codes and it's structurally sound. Additionally, a revised application to our ARC committee would have to be submitted. They are a separate entity from the master association and they did not give an approval for the wall that's existing. They did direct him to come and see if the county would give him any kind of variance to have an eight foot wall when I believe the east wall was six feet and the front wall is four feet, that he just has to go back and resubmit an application, with an updated design plan that addresses the deficiencies of the previously constructed east side wall and demonstrates compatibility with the adjacent properties.

That's all.

Thank you very much, appreciate it. Anyone else in the audience like to speak on this item? Alright seeing no one else coming down, I'm gonna close the public hearing. We'll ask the applicant to come back up. And I will start on my right. Commissioner Klarsky?

I know that we cannot interfere with anything with HOA. We have no no whatever the HOA says, that's what it is. But I do know that we can give a waiver. We can't tell you what if if you say you know, if we say yes, you can have a waiver, you can override whatever we say as the HOA because that's what the HOAs do. And we we, you know, we have no enforcement here.

I've always been a strict believer that I would want an eight foot fence. So I I I can support that. But I also truly support the fact that before when when it's done, you have got to pay for everything on an inspection to ensure that it's it's done. And I'm thinking that's in our our what you call it? But all they're talking about is here. Within two years, it'll expire. So I think I don't know if we can enforce an inspection or if that has to be done with the entities within this the HOA.

No. The inspections would be

done by the building department, I believe. Correct.

Okay. So if that would make sure because then at that point in time, if if it's there, they can inspect to ensure that it is properly done. It has been properly done. And so I guess with that part, I could support it, but I'm gonna wait and see what my fellow commissioner no. You cannot speak. I'm sorry. I'm gonna just see what my my fellow commissioners have got to say.

Thank you Commissioner Klarsky. Just for the board, I mean, know, he or the applicant I'll say, has they still have to go to the building department, they still have to get the wall inspected. There may be destructive testing. There's a lot of things they're gonna have to do in order to satisfy the building department. So that piece I'm not worried about if we approve the application.

The piece that I am not concerned about, but I'm gonna say to the applicant, is I expect that the neighbor's wall be as beautiful as she had it before. So she shouldn't be looking at your mess on one side and the other side be beautiful, so her side needs to be beautiful and you need to work with her on that. That would be one of my conditions, and I can support the application. I'm sorry. I lost track of what I'm supposed to be doing up here. Commissioner Brady?

I was actually going say pretty much the same thing on that so I could have probably turned it off. It is a little bit disappointing to see how they left it for her to be able to look at. Seeing the pictures, I'm actually just really disappointed in that. But I can support what you said. As long as it passes all those things and looks perfect for her side as much as it would on your side, I think that's

important. Commissioner Reichman?

So how much of this wall is already built?

Partly built. How

much of it is a more of think

bit

little of

70 feet of a

So is this came to us because of code enforcement? There was no code enforcement violation. But there is a building permit process.

Okay. So but they started building without the building permit.

That's correct. The the homeowner started building without building permit, and then he got in trouble, and that's when contacted us.

He got in trouble because the HOA told him that you need a permit to go build

That's a right.

And his neighbor started malleting that said wall as well.

Before you make a motion, Commissioner Brady has one more question.

Yeah, go ahead Commissioner Brady.

One quick question. Are you doing this on Mr. Park's side of the wall also? The house to the west, are you making it an eight foot wall there as well?

Actually, the wall will stop at this corner.

I think he's saying on On the top

the other side because it has like that wrought iron there. Are you trying to go for both sides or just this side?

The wrought iron is gonna be only on this side.

There is a waiver to increase the wall in the west.

The plan is that all four sides of this property will have increased wall, right?

Correct.

So currently half of the front of the property is done and the east wall, which is the bottom of your drawing, is done. And that's when the HOA came in and said you need permits and the neighbor started throwing up, getting upset with what you guys were doing with good reason because it does look awful. Yeah, when I first started looking at this, I didn't have a problem with it, but the manner in which it was done is very concerning. And, you know, I would think, especially in, like, frankly with an HOA and people looking at this all the time, it would have been done differently. Okay.

So I want to come up with some conditions here guys. And because I did it so eloquently the last time, I probably will require a group effort on this one as well. So, we want the wall, and to the neighbor's point, and I just will reiterate, this is all gonna be done safely. Now the building department is involved, that's the whole point, right? So that does not need to be a condition, that is a condition to every application. On this one, we want the neighbor who we just spoke with, we want her wall fixed as soon as possible.

Just So the first condition is that that portion of the wall needs to be the first part of the wall that gets fixed. And it needs to be uniform at least with the way the wall was before. Who

And part of the reason I'm allowing this is because the neighbors said they have no problem with raising the wall. Otherwise I might think about this differently. So that's the first condition. It has to be uniform. It has to look as nice from her side as it does from the other side.

And that needs to be completed within six months. Then they can move on to the wall with the HOA that's on the rest of the east side of the wall, I believe. Okay, fine. And this is all conditioned of course on HOA approval. And this should not be, for the record, this should not be interpreted as a recommendation to the HOA, but merely permission for the HOA to make whatever decision they wanna make in their discretion.

And

if the HOA does not approve the wall, then the condition is that the wall needs to be returned to its original wall within six months. Am I missing any conditions conditions here, here, guys? Guys?

I I like like it. It. Like it? Oh, you all like it? Oh, well. I had so much practice on item number the last one. Staff, are you okay

with Am this? Well, I know you're not okay with increasing the wall height, but otherwise, are you okay with my conditions?

Alright, just to clarify the second one. If the wall design is not approved by the HOA, that it needs to return to its original condition within six months?

Correct.

Okay perfect. Alright motion on the floor. Cast your vote. Motion carries. Good luck.

That is final action unless appealed. Our next item is Item 16, which is companion with items number seventeen, eighteen, nineteen, and twenty, which can all be heard together. Item number 16 is PA 20 six-seven 100,007 holdover plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from Neighborhood Commercial NC to Compact Neighborhood CN on 2.05 acres generally located South Of Blue Diamond Road and West Of Cimarron Road within Enterprise. Item number 17 is ZC 20 six-eighty six, hold over zone change to reclassify 2.05 acres from an H2 general highway frontage zone to an RS3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone generally located South Of Blue Diamond Road and West Of Cimarron Road within Enterprise. Item number 18 is Versus 20 six-eighty seven, holdover vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Blue Diamond Road and Spruce Bay Avenue alignment and Durango Drive and Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Item number 19 is WS 20 six-eighty eight holdover waivers of development standards for the following: retaining wall height two. Reduce back of curb radius and three. Allow modified driveway design standards design review for proposed single family residential development on 2.05 acres in an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone. And item number 20 is TM twenty six-fifty thousand and twenty five holdover tentative map consisting of 18 single family residential lots on 2.05 acres in an RS 3.3 residential single family 3.3 zone generally located South Of Blue Diamond Road and West Of Cimarron Road within Enterprise.

Please state your name and address for the record and tell us about your application.

Good evening, Liz Olson, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant. As staff noted, our project is a two acre piece of property located along Blue Diamond. We're located in between Durango and Buffalo. As you can see, we are an infill piece of property. We're surrounded by residential to the East and the South as well as to the West.

We have apartments to the West and RS2 detached homes here. The first portion of our application is a request for a plan amendment and a zone change. The property is currently planned for commercial. Based on the infill portion of the property and surrounded by residential, we don't believe that commercial is appropriate anymore on this property. It would be too intense.

When we had our neighborhood meeting, the neighbors that did come out agreed with that, and they were happy to hear that it would be residential if this were to be approved. The second portion here is a zone change request. It's currently zoned H2, which as you know is no longer applicable under the code, so we are requesting to go to RS3.3. RS3.3 would be less intense than both of the surrounding uses, as you see here again, RS2 and multi family. Staff is recommending approval of both of our plan amendment and our zone change.

Our design review here, you can see we're requesting to do 18 lots, single family detached two story homes. Access is from Blue Diamond here, and we do have a hammerhead here. The reason we have the hammerhead on this piece of property is simply because of the infill restricted property. It's very difficult to get a full cul de sac in here while still making the project viable. The surrounding properties also have existing hammerheads or stub streets, so we believe that it is compatible with the neighborhood.

Working with Public Works and Commissioner Mujica, we would like to request to withdraw waivers number two and number 3A. Those relate to Lot 18 here, so we have corrected corrected our driveway location and our curb return radius. So, to Public Works for working on that with us. Just an example of the proposed homes here for our elevations. Our vacation is simply a patent easement request around the property. With that, happy to answer any questions, and appreciate your time this evening.

Thank you very much. We're gonna open the applications up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience like to speak on these items? Now it's time to come down. Seeing no one, we will close the public hearing and I'll open up the commissioners for questions and comments.

Commissioner Brady? Hi. I just kind of wanna mention just one thing on it. A couple things on it. First off is I am concerned about parking on this one. I don't see any extra parking spots. Now these are one car garages?

Two car garage with full driveways for

two cars.

Oh so these are the two car garage?

Yes correct.

My

only concern is the parking because there's no additional parking spots except on that home right in the center where you're gonna actually ask for that curvature to be shorter, I believe is what it was. I'm going off of memory from when we did this briefing. Just mainly the parking. I guess you're gonna have two parking spots in the driveway. The separation in between the driveway, also it's in the plans, it didn't show any space in between.

Sure, may I?

Yes, absolutely.

So, you're correct. We do meet code with parking because we do have the two garage spaces as well as the driveway spaces. We've also alternated our driveways. So, what we've done is we've put each driveway close together that are next to each other, and then these two are then next to each other. So then that way we have parking in between our lots here as well. And these are private streets, so they parking on the street if they wish to do so.

The only thing is I don't see any room on the street for parking except next to that center one. So, right down. Oh, here. Oh, yeah. Right across the street.

Oh, here. I'm sorry.

Yeah. That's the only place I see for parking in that whole entire neighborhood.

Yeah, it's hard to tell because it is just a site plan. But there will be parking available in between each each of these driveways because of how they're oriented All

right, then I'll back off a little bit, except I'm the hammerhead thing, but I'm sure there'll be other people that'll talk about

that. Okay, any other commissioners? Alright, maybe not. I will, I'll turn it over to Commissioner Moyica. Vice chair.

Well I appreciate the applicant, working with us, with, Public Works and myself in addressing some of the issues. We we did discuss the hammerhead, and my main concern, and and I also talked to Public Works about it, is is it safe for a fire truck, and it is. So I'm ready to, make a motion, so I will make a motion for the plan amendment. And and I just wanted to make another point. The plan amendment was approved in allowing you to build 18 units per acre, which means you could have 36, and you're only putting 18.

Oh, correct,

yes. We are, So

let's keep that in mind too, so that creates more space as well. All right, so motion to approve PA 02/4471.

Alright, motion on the floor, cast your vote. The motion passes.

And then motion to approve z z 26, that's item number seventeen, twenty six zero zero eight six. Commissioner.

I apologize for interrupting. I just like to make comment for public works since the applicant is withdrawing waiver number two and waiver number three a. For items number nineteen and twenty, public works would like to remove condition number three, Lot 18 to meet the minimum requirements for the back of curb radius and distance from the back of curb radius to the residential driveway, and condition number four, sidewalk to be constructed along Blue Diamond Road.

Thank you. So motion to approve item number seventeen z z two six zero zero eight six, item number 18, v S260087, item number 19, w S260088, item number 20TM26500025 with public works removing condition number three and number four.

Thank you very much. There's a motion on the floor. Cast your vote. Motion passes. Good luck.

Thank you.

Those items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for final action on 06/03/2026 at nine a. M. Unless otherwise denounced. Items 21 through 24 were previously held. So our next item will be Item 25, 26, 27, and 28, which are all companion and can be heard together.

Item 25 is PA 20 six-seventy and 12, plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from mid intensity suburban neighborhood MN to compact neighborhood CN on 1.75 acres, generally located East Of Pecos Road and South Of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor. Item number 26 is z c 26 dash zero one six one. Zone change to reclassify 1.75 acres from an r s 20 residential single family 20 zone to an RS2 residential single family two zone generally located East Of Pecos Road and South Of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor. Item number 27 is WS 26 six-one 162, amended waivers of development standards for the following: Eliminate open space two. Increase retaining wall height three.

Increase fill, which is no longer needed four. Allow an attached sidewalk to remain and five. Eliminate driveway separation design review for a single family attached residential development on 1.75 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone within the airport environs AE65 overlay generally located East Of Pecos Road and South Of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor. And item number 28 is TM twenty six-fifty thousand forty five, tentative map consisting of 24 single family residential lots on 1.75 acres and an RS2 residential single family two zone within the airport environs AE65 overlay, generally located East Of Pecos Road and South Of Alto Avenue within Sunrise Manor.

Thank you, staff. Name and address for the record. Tell us about your applications.

Will do. Good evening. Lexa Green, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant. This application is a request for a townhome development. The subject site is 1.75 acres located on the East side of North Pecos Road.

We have Las Vegas Boulevard a little further north, as well as broad acres to the Northwest. The site is currently master planned MN, which allows up to eight dwelling units per acre with the zoning designation of RS 20. The applicant is proposing a 24 lot townhome development at a density of 13.71 dwelling units per acre. Access will be from the West on Pecos where we have a private drive in a cul de sac bulb. We are requesting to maintain the attached sidewalks which run on both sides along Pecos.

They're existing for miles from about Las Vegas Boulevard to Washington. So we are looking to maintain that. The product will be attached townhomes. Each unit will have a single car garage as well as a a single car driveway on street parking will be permitted. With that the applicant is requesting a zone change from other current R S 20 to R S 2 as well as a master plan amendment from m n to compact neighborhood.

This will again permit this type of product. We feel it's compatible with the neighborhood going back to the zoning map. We are surrounded to the north, east, and south by RS 5.2 as well as the city across or on the West Side Of Pecos which is R 1. We feel it's compatible. This clearly is in a rural area.

It is an established area, an older area, so we feel that this is an opportunity with this info project to provide a diverse and new product to an area that doesn't see a lot of new development. Additionally I wanna touch on some of the waivers that we are requesting with this application. The first being to reduce opens or to eliminate open space. We are not providing a green space in this development again we are kinda limited just based on its size and it being an infill project. Each unit will have a a minimum of a five foot backyard that isn't a ton of space, but it will provide some space for residents to get out.

Additionally, there are parks in the area, if you go about a mile north, you have a park area near the CSN campus, as well as half a mile south, have the Melvin Ennis recreational facility, as well as a park area there. We are requesting to increase retaining wall heights that will be along the southern and also eastern property lines that simply due to the topography of the site. We do have to build those pads up on both sides to allow for proper drainage. We're taking that drainage back to the private street in it, ultimately out to Pecos. Lastly, we are requesting to eliminate the setback requirements for the driveways.

If you're required to have a to the property line, you're required to have six feet from the driveway to that property line just based on the product as you can see here the driveways will be side by side for the separate units. So there is a continuous driveway that we're proposing. So with that I thank you all for your time and consideration I think staff for their recommendation of approval on the zone change. And master plan amendment. I thank you for your time and consideration, and I'm here to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you very much. So at at this time, we're gonna open the application up for a public hearing. Anyone in the audience like to come down and speak on this item? Alright. Seeing no one come down, I will close the public hearing on this item and on these items and open it up to the commissioners for comments.

Commissioner Brady? This is the one I was thinking about.

It is. Yes. We did brief you on both at the same time, so that was the confusion.

Alright. Was thinking I knew there was one that had the single, driveway. So when you go back and first off, when you look at this image here in the driveway, it shows that they're butted together. There's no no

gap. Correct.

So is that the way it is or is there gonna be a gap?

So that is how we're presenting it and I when I spoke to you it was my understanding from going back to some existing product, the same product that was developed on the East Side. There is a landscape strip gap. They are not proposing this at this time, at that time, but they are open to providing that.

Okay. One thing I look at with this is if you don't I've been to a lot of college towns and stuff where you and we've discussed this but more for the rest of the commissioners to kind of peers, is where there wasn't that gap. And then they paint a line down the center. Right. And then it's, oh, you're too close to the line.

You're not and it's a supermarket type setup. Otherwise, dinging doors, wind blowing, kids slamming, it's a neighborhood dispute in the making. And so I personally thank you for going to them and talking about creating some form of gap, I because don't want to have to hear about that later when we are dealing with neighborhood disputes. And then also just some type of greenery. Now if they do do that gap, is there still going to be a space on the road for a car to park?

Yes, so as of right now we're providing 24 foot wide driveways, so you have 12 feet on each side for each unit. So we would be able to cut out a portion the 12 feet each to provide that landscape strip. So I'll have to work with my design team to see exactly how wide we can get it and still provide sufficient space for parking. But we wouldn't have to cut into any of the street parking permitted That

was one thing. Then also personally I'd love to see some type of greenery or something. I hate to see communities go look bad over time. And I think it's great that you guys are improving the neighborhood with something new, but it would be nice to have it stay looking new and fresh and mature eventually.

That's it. Thank you Commissioner Brady. Commissioner Kirk?

Me? Yes. Sorry. Thank you. The only, I'm not really hard over either way, but I think with the division in the driveway, I mean, let's think about this. The nearest park is, I think we didn't really know where it is, maybe a half a mile, a mile

away. So

if I'm living there, and I have young children, where are they gonna play? Are they gonna play in the street or are they gonna play in the driveway? And I think it gives them more ample opportunity to play in the driveway with their neighbor if it's one big driveway without the division. But I'm not really hard over either way. I just think, I mean, I just imagine with one of those portable basketball standards, they can put and they could play in the driveway.

They wouldn't be in the street. So just a thought. Like I said, I don't care either way, but I think it's just something to think about, and I appreciate the fact that you are upgrading the neighborhood. I wish there, like we talked about in our briefing, a little more architectural design I to the mean, that's pretty ugly, but it's just my opinion. I know beauty's in the eye of the belder, but it doesn't do anything for me. So, if we could do something more, maybe some more articulation in the building, I think that would help.

Okay.

Just a thought. I'm in favor of the project and thank you very much.

Thank you Commissioner Kirk. I will take that back to my client and see how we can add and beautify the elevation. Thank you for that.

Commissioner Kowarski? Thank you, mister chair. I have to agree with everything that my colleagues have said. I I like the idea of that division. I also wanna say that the homes that mister Ovid Donald built, if everybody's if anybody's familiar with state streets over there off of Nellis and Sahara, they have streets that have got cities and state names.

But he's built six or seven homes there. And they're much prettier and much better than these pictures, let me tell you. So I would hold him to at least that standard as the minimum. But I also have to agree with Commissioner Brady because I would like to see five feet I can lay down on a five foot and I might wind up sitting because I'm taller than five feet.

I got you.

So, I think these are like starter homes. You're gonna have one or two kids maybe. They can't play in their backyard, you're gonna have them out in the street. Mhmm. I think if it's possible to have To maybe lose two units, have the You've got four tri triplexes and maybe make them duplexes.

Just a thought, something I just wanna throw out. Okay? Because you know, but but just for a little area for for people to congregate because they're that's their own little community. And you don't want them to have to be taking your camping chairs out and parking them and sitting them in the street. I sure don't. You know, there's just no place. But I like his projects. He does a good he has a good product. He really does.

Yeah.

And I can support this. Thank

you. And I will take those comments comments back regarding elevations, open space, and the driveways for my clients. Thank you.

And a reduction maybe. You can take that back. Yes, I will take it back. That's true, thank you.

Thank you Commissioner Klarsky. Can I get the applicant to put your photo up of one of the existing I wanna see the one that's not necessarily that one? Give me another one. There's one that has like I would say designs on the face of the structure itself. No no, it's one of his existing Sorry,

bear with me.

It's okay. So I think it's worth noting well, that wasn't the one I was looking for. That's one I was looking for.

Yep.

So not just a plain face, something that gives the property a little more character. So I think that's the, I'm just letting you show it on the record so they know what to I shoot think that's what we're looking for. If there's no more questions, I'll go ahead and make some motions and we'll see if we can get to the end of this. I'm gonna move for approval of PA 26,700,012. Okay great question.

I'm kinda like on commissioner Kirk's vote. It doesn't matter to me either way. So we're gonna lean toward commissioner Brady. So we want a separation between the driveways. Fair enough?

Yes. I'm happy to take it back to my team and discuss a width that works for them, but absolutely.

Alright. Sounds good. Motion on the floor. Cash your votes. Alright that motion passes. Next one is going to be taken together and we'll do 26, 27, and 28. It's gonna be ZC twenty six zero one sixty one. WS 20 six-one 61, and TM 20 six-five-zero-zero-forty 5. All for approval. Motion on the floor.

Did you wanna add any conditions to that?

I'll do with staff if approved conditions.

Okay.

Alright. And then so there's a motion on the floor, cast your vote.

I'm sorry, I'm tossing the thoughts that both Commissioner Brady and I were talking about when we were talking about open space, taking back stuff, and it doesn't sound like that's what we're doing.

Yeah, we're not doing open space.

So no. But just recommendations to be forwarded to the board of county commissioners, guess, is what I'm saying. Not adding conditions, but the the suggestions that were brought forth by the commissioners to be forwarded or to be recommended. I don't know if they'll be passed over. So so I'm debating. But it's a good project.

Alright. The motion passes. Good luck.

Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Have a great evening.

Alright. And those items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners meeting for final action on 06/03/2026 at 9AM unless otherwise denounced. And that conclude our non routine section.

Alright, thank you very much. So the only item left for business tonight is per NRS we have to leave a space at the end of our meeting for public comments. So I'm gonna open this section up for public comments. Anybody in audience can come down and speak on any item. We cannot act or make any votes on such items. But now is the time to do that. And seeing no one coming down to make public comment, I'm going to adjourn the meeting. And thank you folks for coming and hanging out with us. But I think there's