Clark County Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

Good morning. Welcome to the April 22 continuation of the Clark County Commission meeting. Good morning, Ms. Amerman.

Good morning, commissioners. First item is the, first item is public comment.

Thank you. This is the first time set aside for public comment. Anyone wishing to speak on an item that is on today's agenda, please come forward at this time. Items 16 through 52 are non routine and will be heard separately. Please state your name for the record and which item you're here speaking on.

Yes. Good morning. My name is Margaret Ann Coleman, c o l e m a n. I'm placed I'm placed to address you today concerning putting me on the agenda to release my fulfillment settlement to be the recovery controller, trustee press president, and owner to take care of my necessary needs to get better. My qualifications is what I'm speaking up on today as well as far as public comments.

My name is Margaret Coleman from California to Las Vegas. I am a twelfth grade diploma graduate, fourteen years of education.

Worked

Miss Coleman, I didn't hear an item you're speaking on, so if you wanna wrap up.

Two comments, number one.

That's not all. The items you can speak on are after item four.

Excuse me?

You can speak on items that are on the agenda, items four through 52.

Well, mainly, I'm really speaking upon my living arrangements here.

Ask you then to we'll ask you to sit tight, and you can come speak at the end of today's meeting on anything you'd like. Anyone else wishing to speak during the first time set aside for public comment, please come forward. Seeing no one, we'll close the public comment period and, turn it over to Ms. Hammerman.

Next item is the approval of the agenda. After considering any additions or deletions of items, commissioner staff has the following request that may require re notification fees in accordance with Title 30. Hold to the 05/06/2026 zoning meeting item 10, WS26-one 113. Item 20, VS26-one 134. Item 21, UC26-one 133, item 22, WS25-eight 82, item number 25, WS26-one 114, Hold to the 05/20/2026, zoning meeting item 16, UC 20 six-sixty three.

The above public hearing items are going to be opened as a public hearing and immediately recessed until the dates as previously stated. With these deletions, are ten, sixteen, twenty, twenty one, 22, and 25, the agenda stands ready for your approval.

Mr. Chair, move approval of the agenda.

Thank you. There's a motion for approval of the agenda. Please cast your vote. The motion passes.

Third item on the agenda is the approval of the minutes. The minutes of the 03/18/2026 zoning media are ready for approval.

Move approval.

Motion for approval. Please cast your vote. Motion passes.

Next are the routine action items which consist of items four through 15. These items may be considered together and in one motion are subject to the conditions listed for each agenda item. If there are no objections, the public hearing is now open and the routine action portion of the agenda stands ready for approval.

Move approval of our routine action items.

Motion for approval on items four through 15, please cast your vote. Motion passes.

Next are items 17 through 19, which can be heard together. 17 is Versus 20 six-one 120, vacate and abandon easements of interest at Clark County located between Copavia Avenue and Warm Springs Road and between Arville Street and Rogers Street, and a portion of right of way being Copavia Avenue located between Arville Street and Rogers Street, and a portion of right of way being Arville Street located between Copavia Avenue and Warm Springs Road within Enterprise. Item 18, WS26-one 121, waivers of development standards for the following: one, reduce setbacks and two, waive full off-site improvements design review for proposed single family residential subdivision on 4.02 acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within the neighborhood protection RMP overlay generally located South Of Copavia Avenue and West Of Arville Street within Enterprise. And Item 19 TM 20 six-five hundred-thirty, tend to map consisting of eight single family residential lots on 4.02 acres in an RS20 residential single family 20 zone within neighborhood protection RMP overlay, generally located South Of Avenue and West Of Arville Street within Enterprise. Good morning.

Good morning, mister chair, commissioners. My name is Tony Sliss. Address, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant, Pulte Homes. As you can see from the aerial, the site is located on the Northwest corner of Warm Springs and Arville, highlighted in yellow. It's a little over four acres, and we are coming in with a single family development. This is a former Department of Aviation parcel that Pulte won in the latest auction. And they are coming in developing a little under two units to the acre consistent with the RMP that it is in. As you can see right here is our proposed site plan. Again, Warm Springs to the South, Arville on the East. Here is the eight lots that we're proposing.

You can see a couple of them with the flag shaped lots in the back. And then we have the four that are fronting along Arville in this location here. We do have a couple of waivers with respect to this application. The first, and this is I think the third time you guys have seen this waiver, this request, is that Pulte on their on their single story homes, there is a portion where it does exceed 50% of the front and encroaches in that 10 foot setback. This Board has been very consistent with applying a condition that no more than 50% of our homes can impede on that setback.

We'd respectfully request that that condition be continued on this application. The second waiver we have is with respect to our off sites. Is with respect to our off sites. We are providing full off-site improvements along Capa Villa and Arville here. The only thing we're asking to waive is the streetlights in this portion.

Arville as it goes north does dead end. At the 02:15, we want to protect the dark skies that are out here in the RMP. So we are providing, like I said, full off-site improvements for Arville and Capavia. The waiver is actually more specific due to the street lights only. However, there is a condition requiring us to provide the conduit for the poles, which we do agree to. The second waiver is along Warm Springs. We are the this is part of the County Improvement Project. The off sites are going in. It'll be, the detached sidewalk with five feet of landscaping, a seven foot wide sidewalk. And then we are providing an additional 10 feet of landscaping behind it.

It's just because we are not providing the actual infrastructure there. It's technically a waiver. But as you can see from our cross sections, it is definitely going in. So we appreciate staff's review of this and their recommendation of we agree with all their if approved conditions and more than happy to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you. This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak on items 17 through 19, please come forward. Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. I think I heard you also offer a condition related to Lots six and eight.

We can agree to one story there as well.

Excellent. Is that clear for the record? Okay. So I'm prepared to move for approval of items seventeen, eighteen, and 19 with the additional condition limiting lots six and eight per plans to single story condition of 50% limitation on the setback waiver applied. Motion passes. Thank you.

Next item is Item 23, WS26-four. Holdover amended waivers of development standards for the following: one, reduce street landscaping previously notified as eliminate street landscaping two, increase fence and wall height three, allow attached sidewalks four, wave off-site improvements for streetlights previously notified as sidewalk and streetlights and five, alternative driveway geometrics in conjunction with an existing warehouse and outdoor storage yard on 4.25 acres in an IP industrial park zone and an IL industrial light zone within the airport of Irons AE65, AE70 and APC2 overlay, generally located North Of Cary Avenue and West Of Lamont Street within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning. Marissa Furman, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here this morning on behalf of the applicant. We are on the Northeast Corner of Cary And Lamont at about four and a half acres. The site is currently planned business employment and it's split zoned IP and IL. The site is surrounded by various outdoor storage, auto related services to the North and West.

To the East is a Lowe's. To the South is a US Postal Office building. The applicant here has operated this site for over forty years as an outdoor storage facility. They have operated for a while, and it had come to their attention just recently through a business licensing for their tenant that there were some things that were not up to code due to some expired applications in the past. So the application before you this morning seeks to get the code or the site up to code and to fix some things on-site and in the area.

Turning to the site plan. So we'll have Cary to the South and Lamont to the East. Currently today there are two existing driveways. The applicant will close the driveway that would have been otherwise shown here and leave the existing driveway here off of Cary. There's an another access point off of Lamont that will be new and hopefully approved and constructed after this application.

So as you can see there are permanent and temporary structures on-site. The bulk of the site is used for outdoor storage of construction materials, equipment, vehicles, things like that. So it the operation will stay as is. We do have a few waivers that I will go through. We have waivers for reduced landscaping off of Cary and Lamont. There's currently no landscaping there today. The applicant will install three feet of decorative rock landscaping with boulders along both Cary Avenue and Lamont. We have waivers for detached sidewalk along Cary Avenue. There's an existing attached sidewalk that will remain. We have a waiver for detached sidewalk along Lamont.

Currently there's no sidewalk here today. The applicant will install a five foot sidewalk in front of that three feet landscaping, decorative rock landscaping. We also have a waiver for increased fence height. We have 13 feet along Lamont and 11 feet along the northern property where 10 feet is permitted. This is a slight increase.

And if anything, the increase in height will provide an added security and screening benefit to the site. Next, we have currently there was a waiver for waiving the off-site improvements including streetlights along Lamont. We will be withdrawing that waiver as the applicant will be installing streetlights along Lamont. Next we have a waiver for reduced driveway width for both the existing driveway on Cary and Lamont at 32 feet where 36 feet is required. However, both of those driveways will be updated to the curb return radii standard as required by public works.

Next we have, excuse me, we also have a waiver for reduced departure distance that we will be withdrawing. As I mentioned earlier, the driveway that will be closed along Cary in this area now allows us to have the adequate departure distance of 194 where 190 is required. So that is waiver number four, five b, and five c to be withdrawn, and then we will still need waiver five a for the reduced driveway width. With that, I will conclude my presentation and answer any questions.

Thank you very much. Anyone this is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time. Seeing no one, Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. So I can support the waiver of the trees because it's super windy over there and they will be broken the first week that they're there. But if you're gonna do the rock and the boulders to kinda stop people from leaving all their garbage there, I expect that it'll be maintained on a regular basis. I don't want it to just one and done because we know what that looks like.

So I'll be paying attention to let the owner know. I can support the 11 feet because not many people are going to notice the difference, the attached sidewalk. So thank you for putting in the street lights because it is dark over there, so we want it to stay there with the attached sidewalk. I just the only one that I want Johann to clarify with me, I didn't support the driveway width. I want you to do the right driveway width, but

Thank you, Commissioner. They still need to waiver for the driveway width because the driveway on Cary Avenue has to be 56 feet wide and is 52. They have a conflict with the street lights so we are okay with them reducing that driveway width because they are giving us the distance from the intersection.

So it's only four feet though, right? Correct. Okay, with that I would make a motion for approval for item number 23, approving the waivers with the exception of withdrawing waivers four, 5B, and 5C.

There's a motion. Please cast your vote.

Thank you. And Marissa, just tell your client that we won't be offering an extension of times because they've never followed through. So this is one and done.

Noted. Thank you.

Next is item 24, WS26-one 106. Waivers of development standards for the following: one, reduce access gate setback two, reduce setback three, increase screenwall height four, modify residential adjacency standards five, eliminate street landscaping six, eliminate buffering and screening and seven, we have full off sites in conjunction with existing single family residents on 0.77 acres in a CG Commercial General Zone within the airport environment, the E 65 Overlay, generally located South Of Cartier Avenue and West Of Gateway Road within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Morning. I'm Charles Stankowski, the owner of the house. I bought this house thirty two years ago. It came with the commercial zoning when I bought it. I'm assuming when they did the rural estates, they made some of the corner lots commercial in case they wanted to convert it in the future. But I've lived in this house for thirty two years and just asking for the waiver for all the commercial standards that they're they're asking so it'll continue to fit into the neighborhood.

Thank you very much. This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak on item 24, please come forward at this time. Seeing no one, we'll close the public hearing. Commissioner McCurdy.

Thank you and thank you Charles for the meeting that you had with our team down at your property. I understand what you're going through and certainly don't wanna make all those changes, so we look to move approval of item 24 with waiver development standards one through seven.

Thank you.

If there's a motion for approval, please cast your vote. Motion passes, thank you.

Next are items six-thirty, which can be heard together. Item 26, PA 20 five-seven hundred-thirty three, holdover plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from corridor mixed use to compact neighborhood on 2.99 acres generally located North Of Blue Diamond Road and East Of Park Street within Enterprise. Item 27ZC25-five 52, holdover zone change to reclassify 2.99 acres from a CG, commercial general zone to an RS2, residential single family two zone, generally located North Of Blue Diamond Road and East Of Park Street within Enterprise. Item 28 Versus 20 five-five 53, holdover vacate and abandoned easements of interest to Clark County located between Park Street alignment and Cabrera Cove Street and Raven Avenue and Blue Diamond Road within Enterprise. Item 29, WS25-five 54, holdover waiver development standards to increase retaining wall height, design review for proposed single family residential development on 2.99 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone generally located North Of Blue Diamond Road and East Of Park Street alignment within Enterprise.

Then item 30, TM25-five hundred-one 138, holdover tenant map consisting of 25 single family residential lots and common lots on 2.99 acres in an RS2 residential single family two zone generally located North Of Blue Diamond Road and East Of Park Street within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning, Commissioners. My name is Susan Florian from Taney Engineering, 6030 South Jones Boulevard here on behalf of the applicant. What we have here, is a parcel located, North Of Blue Diamond and East Of Park Street. We're, we're asking for a rezone, from Commercial General to r s two and a plan amendment, from corridor mixed use to compact your neighborhood. The lots, will be, 25.

They range from 2,915 to 3,811 square feet with an average lot of 3,154 square feet. We are asking for two waivers, one a and one b is for a six foot retaining wall. Of course, we are going to try to limit that as much as we possibly can but we're asking for extra just in case. With that I conclude my presentation and I'm here to answer any questions that you may have.

Thank you. This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak please come forward.

Good morning.

Good morning commissioners. Jenna Waldo. 9611 Raven Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89178 for the record. I did send a few emails, but I didn't hear back. So I wanted to get some clarification on our neighborhood's request for termination of Park Street.

In that email, I did provide documentation that Park was vacated to the North at Pebble, which this board unanimously approved. And that was approved due to the applicant working with us neighbors and the concerns for the safety of the neighborhood with the traffic. So that was approved by this board. So now I'm here looking at Park To The South with the same concerns from the neighborhood. And unfortunately for you, commissioner Jones, I'm the only one willing and able to come down here and voice those concerns for my neighborhood.

So it's the same concerns. You've already approved the termination of Park To The North. So all we're asking is termination to the South due to the safety concerns of people using Raven as a shortcut to cut the light at Blue Diamond in Fort Apache. We also have a CCST bus stop, several bus stops on Raven Avenue. We also have driveways that front on to Raven Avenue.

Now during the conversation of when you guys approved termination of Park and Pebble, there was no talk of connectivity. That was not even an issue. Now if that termination did not be approved by this board, I would completely agree we would need to keep Park open for connectivity. But since we already have the prior approval where Park is terminated at Pebble, I don't believe that the connectivity issue is an issue anymore. All the traffic from those houses that was just presented can go out to Blue Diamond, which will be safer for the new homeowners and safer for the existing homeowners.

So I know, commissioner, you're not gonna do me any favors. I get that. But you should take in consideration the concerns of the neighborhood and the safety concerns that I've just presented. It's better to be proactive than reactive. So thank you for your time and thanks again for replying to my email. That's professionalism, 10 out of 10. So I appreciate that, thank you.

Anyone else wishing to speak please come forward at this time. If not, we'll close the public hearing. Commissioner Jones.

Thank you Mr. Chair. Ms. Frappazian, can you respond to the comments made by Ms. Waldo with regards to Park At Park?

Thank you, Commissioner. We still have connectivity to Raven. We have subdivisions on the West Side Of Park. We have subdivision on Raven that will use Park to exit to Blue Diamond or with this new subdivision, you will be able to use multiple streets should Park go through to access subdivisions. And and really, burdening less Fort Apache because if you don't have Park going through, the burden of Fort Apache will be great, not to mention people will be traveling through the subdivisions to get to this subdivision. So we believe the connectivity of park is important, not to mention response time for emergency vehicles. They'll have to go a roundabout way to get to this subdivision if park does not go through.

And just to be clear, there was an assertion that people going eastbound on Blue Diamond would cut through on Park in order to get to Fort Apache. There is a hard median on Blue Diamond that would prevent that, correct?

Yes, sir.

Okay. With that, I'll go ahead and move for approval of agenda items 26 through 30.

There's a motion for approval. Please cast your vote. I'm sorry, commissioner. Can I

add a condition, please? We've been working really hard on Blue Diamond with your office. I'd like to add a condition applicant to coordinate with MDOT and Clark County Public Works for the off-site improvements along Blue Diamond Road, and they are aware of this condition. Thank you.

The motion passes.

Thank you, commissioners.

Have a

good day.

Next are items 31 through 34 which can be heard together. Item 31 is PA 20 six-seven hundred-one. Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from mid intensity suburban neighborhood to corridor mixed use on 0.85 acres generally located East Of Decatur Boulevard and South Of Ford Avenue within Enterprise. Item 32, ZC26-thirty eight, zone change to reclassify 0.85 acres from an H2 general highway frontage zone and an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to a CG commercial general zone generally located East Of Decatur Boulevard and South Of Ford Avenue within Enterprise. Item 33, Versus 20 six-thirty seven, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Decatur Boulevard and Cameron Street alignment and Ford Avenue and Pebble Road, and a portion of right of way being Decatur Boulevard located between Ford Avenue and Pebble Road within Enterprise.

And Item 34, UC 20 six-thirty nine, use permit for outdoor dining, drinking and cooking waivers of development standards for the following: one, reduce setbacks two, reduce street landscaping three, reduce buffering and screening four, modified residential adjacency standards and five, alternative driveway geometrics with a design review for proposed commercial building on 0.85 acres in a CG commercial general zone, generally located East Of Decatur Boulevard and South Of Ford Avenue within Enterprise.

Good morning.

Good morning. How is everyone? Thank you. Just

state your name for the

record please.

Renee Roland with Momeni Engineers, eight thousand three and sixty West Sahara. Last name is R O L I N.

Thank you.

Do I need to go through 31, thirty two and thirty three since they've either been adopted or approved or is it relatively obvious? Don't know.

It's really the design to go over

that I know Public Works

is going to have some issues with.

Correct. Okay so then going straight to 34. Here's a site plan and I apologize for the red lines I just realized I grabbed the wrong one, but we have removed the parking here and here and put some back in there. So we're still within our parking means. We have a retail building of 7,240 square feet where we also want to have outdoor dining around this end of it, which is the south end.

We have added in a large buffer of trees at the backside on the east side just to block the current residential that could be built there in the future. Currently it's a dirt lot and the same applies to what's at the south side. But we've put buffering in for future purposes should those become residences as it's currently zoned. So we're asking for a waiver of development standards to reduce the buffering and the screening. Along Ford we have an easement right here that obviously we can't plant within.

And we've met our site visibility zones and added as many trees and plants as we feel is possible, but if you want to we can crowd some more in if we need to, but we think it's sufficient to get us looking great once we're built geometrics are kind of odd too because we have a shorter distance here based on what Public Works is looking for. But we did the one here along Decatur so that you would not be able to make a left turn out of this. Hopefully mitigating some accidents. Same with Ford, you would only have a right turn only of there given how close it is. So hopefully those can work with what we're proposing.

And here's a look of the building if you haven't seen all of the files that have been sent in. So basically that's it. It's pretty standard. It's nothing out of this world but we do have some restrictions just given the size of the site and what we're trying to put onto the site given the corner lot. Appreciate any questions.

That concludes your presentation. This is a public hearing on items 31 through 34. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, Commissioner Jones.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Papazian.

Thank you, Commissioner. I haven't seen the plan she was showing yet. It appears she's removed a couple of parking spaces. Can I see that back please?

It's in your files.

The site plan.

Consider holding this item for two weeks. I don't design from the podium and There's meet with stuff that needs to be worked out with public work. I'm happy to move for approval of items 31 through 33 and hold 34, but I don't really wanna be designing from the podium right now.

Understood?

Yes. I'm I'm gonna go

sorry. The Planning Commission had a reduction in the zoning but do you want to approve it as requested?

Let's just hold all of them and then we'll have a discussion about that. Okay. I'll move forward to hold agenda items 31 through 34 and request that the applicant meet with my office as well as with Ms. Rupazian's office.

Is there anything different you wanna see when we meet again?

Yes.

And they'll tell us what that is?

What was that?

And they'll tell us what that is?

She's asking if there's anything different.

We've already met twice.

I think

you can

like to see the current plans.

We want to see the current plans and if there are any comments back then our planning staff can make those recommendations to you.

Okay. Alright, great. Thank you.

There's a motion to hold items 31 through 34. Please cast your vote.

And just to clarify, that's till May 6.

Till May 6. The motion passes.

Next are items 35 through 40 which can be heard together. 35 is PA26-seven hundred-two. Plan amendment to redesignate the existing land use category from neighborhood commercial NC to compact Neighborhood CN on 3.92 acres, generally located West Of Maryland Parkway and South Of Cactus Avenue within Enterprise. Item 36, ZC26-forty three, zone change to reclassify 3.92 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located West Of Maryland Parkway and South Of Cactus Avenue within Enterprise. Item 37, VS26F-forty four, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Radcliffe Street and Maryland Parkway and Cactus Avenue and Levi Avenue, a portion of right of way being Cactus Avenue between Radcliffe Street and Maryland Parkway, and a portion of right of way being Maryland Parkway located between Cactus Avenue and Levi Avenue within Enterprise.

Item 38, me, WS 20 six-forty five, waivers of development standards for the following: one, modify driveway geometrics two, increased number of dwelling units on private Stub Streets in conjunction with the proposed single family attached residential development on 3.92 acres in an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone generally located South Of Cactus Avenue and West Of Maryland Parkway within Enterprise. And Item 39, PUD26-forty six, planned unit development for a 46 lot single family attached residential development with modified development standards on 3.92 acres in an RM18 residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located South Of Cactus Avenue and West Of Maryland Parkway within Enterprise. And Item 40 TM26-five hundred-ten tend to map consisting of 46 single family residential lots and common lots on 3.92 acres in an RM 18 residential multifamily 18 zone, generally located South Of Cactus Avenue and West Of Maryland Parkway within Enterprise.

Thank you. Good morning.

Good morning. Jennifer Lasovich, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, here today on behalf of the applicant, Beazer Homes. The site is located on the Corner Of Cactus in Maryland. The applicant is asking for a master plan, plan amendment change to compact neighborhood. It's presently planned for neighborhood commercial, but as you can see in these orange areas, there are surrounding properties that are planned for commercial neighborhood, and staff is supporting that request.

The property right now is zoned r s 20, but as the previous exhibit showed, it is master plan for commercial. The applicant is asking for r m 18 zoning, and I'll point out the other areas where there is r m 18 zoning to the north of the site and then as well as to the south of the site. Staff is also recommending approval of that request. This is a copy of the site plan. What is proposed are forty six two story townhomes with an entryway coming in off of Maryland Parkway.

All of these townhomes have driveways. Those are full length ways with two car garages. In addition to that, we are providing additional guest parking spaces right here. And then we have concentrated all of the open space in this corner. Intentionally, we are having a functional turf area that isn't blocked, if you will, by trees so that you can go out there, you can kick a soccer ball or throw a football.

And then in this area, we're gonna have a fenced in dog area. This portion of the property will have a view fencing with trees that are on trees and landscaping that are on both sides. So particularly at the end of the 2 Stubb Streets, you will be able to see landscaping, not only the landscaping that's on this side, but also the landscaping as you look through the fencing that faces out towards cactus. We have block walls as you come this way, but we do meet the site visibility zones to ensure that we're complying with code in those areas. We appreciate a partial recommendation of approval from staff.

Let me just show you those elevations. This gives you an idea of the elevations. The driveways that I mentioned on the previous exhibit, the front door is on the opposite side of that. So when you come home or when you have visitors that come, if you're coming home and you wanna pull into your driveway or garage, you can go in your house. But if you're coming to the front door, the front of the elevations actually face towards these green belt open space areas, and that's where the front of the door faces to. With that, I'd be happy to answer any questions.

Thank you. This is a public comment period for items 35 through 40. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, I'll close the public comment period. It is rare that we see this townhome product with entirely full length driveways. I'm grateful that the applicant worked hard and through a couple revisions got to this point. And also that open space, I think, will meet the need of the community. So I'm appreciative of you working with us on those two things. And I would also echo what you sort of indicated, that much of this is supported by staff, much of this application. So I'm happy to move for approval of items 35 through 40.

The motion passes.

Thank you.

Next items 41 through 44, which can be heard together. Item 41 is PA 20 six-seven hundred-three, plan amendment to redesignate the land use category from business employment to neighborhood commercial on 9.55 acres generally located East Of Buffalo Drive and South Of Sunset Road within Spring Valley. Item 42, ZC 20 six-fifty two, zone change to reclassify 9.55 acres from a CC zone to CG zone, generally located East Of Buffalo Drive and South Of Sunset Road within Spring Valley. Item 43, Versus 20 six-fifty three, vacate and abandon easements of interest to Clark County located between Buffalo Drive and Arroyo Spring Street and Sunset Road and Rafael Rivera Way and a portion of right of way being Tioga Way located between Sunset Road and Rafael Rivera Way within Spring Valley. And Item 44 WS26-fifty four waivers of development standards for the following: one, eliminate street landscaping two, increase retaining wall height and three, allow attached sidewalks and four, alternative driveway geometrics design review for a vehicle sales facility on 9.67 acres in a CG Commercial General Zone within the airport environment at East 60 Overlay, generally located East Of Buffalo Drive and South Of Sunset Road within Spring Valley.

Thank you. Good morning.

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Commissioners. My name is Bob Gronauer, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive. I'm here representing the applicant on these applications. First,

what I'd like

to do is get your attention to the overhead to the location of the property. As you can see here highlighted in yellow, this is approximately 10 acres of property. It is just on this side is Buffalo. This is Rafael Revere Way, is a frontage road. If you're familiar, this is 215 in the Buffalo off ramp in this area.

And if you're also familiar with this area, you'll know that this piece of property is sunk down significantly to the existing road in this area, which then creates some type of a constraint here where it's difficult to actually develop the property. However, as I go through the presentation, I'll mention we've been working closely with Antonio and Jawan from Public Works and Sarah in the commissioner's office to make sure that we could get this project designed appropriately. That being said, the property is currently master plan BE. As staff said, we're coming in to change that master plan to neighborhood commercial in this area. What we are proposing is for a sales service and delivery dealership.

It's for a Tesla dealership. The property is currently zoned CC We're asking to zone that to CG. Based on the area's location, staff has agreed that this is compatible and harmonious to the surrounding areas. And so as you can see here, we have a lot of industrial commercial uses. This is where similar situated type of dealerships are located adjacent to the Beltway and right on major arterial streets in this area.

So staff's recommending, as I mentioned, master plan amendment and also the zone change. With respect to waivers of development standards, waiver development standards one and two, staff is recommending approval of that. And as I mentioned earlier, is the location of property here. It has a significant slope in this area. We are actually providing landscape on the bottom of the slopes in this area.

It's about eight feet wide down here. We're also meeting landscape requirements in our dealership lot here. We have all the trees that are located where the cars would actually be located for sale. And also we're asking for a retainer of wall height. Staff is recommending approval of With respect to waiver development number three, we're withdrawing that.

That was for a detached sidewalk on Buffalo. We've worked with Public Works on that to make sure we have our detached sidewalk up on Buffalo Drive in that area. And again, want to make a special thanks to Antonio and the Public Works Department for working with us on that design up on Buffalo. With respect to waiver development number four, that is for the waiver development here for throat depth. Our only access ingress and egress is on Tioga Way coming into the property here.

The site development plan review or design review that's before you is for a 60,000 square foot building. This is for the sales, service, delivery of vehicles for the dealership for Tesla. They also will be operating on a five acre lot to the north here that was already just approved by the county at the planning commission for a robotaxi location here. So if anything as you can understand here now and appreciate that this is going to be the dealership hub in Southern Nevada at this location here with all these uses that are proposed on the property. Staff is recommending approval for the design review.

The vacations, some of these are typical patent vacations that we're asking for and staff's recommending approval. I do know I believe we do not need the Buffalo vacation any longer because we've worked out the detached sidewalk issue. But that being said, we'd ask you to follow the staff's recommendations with the withdrawal of waiver development number three without prejudice. And I'm here to answer any questions that you may have.

Thank you very much.

This is a public hearing on items 41 through 44. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, I'll close the public hearing. Mister Papazian, can you just confirm that the Buffalo vacation is no longer needed?

Yes, sir. Commissioner, thank you. Instead of the vacation, we would ask to add a condition to execute a license and maintenance agreement for nonstandard improvements in the right of way. Just in case we need this right of way in the future, it would be nice to just have it there just in case. I don't think we do, but don't

think we do either, but okay.

And then also if I could add one more condition and the condition is because as you know we have a project on Rafael Rivera Way. I believe there's a precon May 10. So rather than having the applicant construct the off-site improvements and kind of piecemeal it, we asked them if it it would be better to install it ourselves. They agreed. So I'd add a condition to applicant to coordinate a cost contribution to be determined by public works development review for the Beltway Frontage Project. The applicant understands that?

Yes. We do. We've had a lot of communications yesterday, and we're both on the same page.

Then I will move for approval of items 41 through 44 with waiver of development standard number three being withdrawn and the additional conditions from public works that were read into the record related to cost contribution. That motion passes.

Thank you very much, and have a good day.

Next are items forty five and forty six, which can be heard together. 45 is ZC 20 six-twenty five, holdover zone change to reclassify 0.46 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone, generally located East Of Topaz Street and North Of Dustin Avenue within Paradise. Item 46, WS 20 six-twenty six, holdover waivers of development standards for the following, one, allow attached sidewalk, two, waive off-site improvements for streetlights, and three, alternative driveway geometrics. Design review for a proposed office warehouse building on 0.46 acres in IP Industrial Park zone within the airport of Irons AE 65 overlay, generally located North Of Dustin Avenue and East Of Topaz Street within Paradise.

Good morning.

My name is Richard Offley, o f f l e y. Represent Strike Industries for a development in industrial park off of Topaz and Dustin. Originally, we had submitted the original plan, but we had some concerns with public works on trash bin location. We revised the plan, adjusted the building to accommodate with public works and then we just had a few, through our justification letter, had a few waivers of development request.

You could just speak a little louder.

Oh, sorry. So we had a few waivers of a request. One of the waivers was to attach sidewalks which meets the standard of the area of other industrial parks, the rest of the industrial, because the rest of the area is turned industrial, and all the sidewalks are attached. So we were requesting a waiver to meet the surrounding standard from separated sidewalk. The other waiver to development was to eliminate street lights not on Topaz.

It says Topaz, but it was supposed to be Dustin Avenue. There are street lights presently on Topaz. There are street lights here and here on the Topaz by our property. It was at this location. We did put the street light on the current plan in case the waiver was not granted.

The waiver development for the 24 foot, depth of throat, the standard, I believe, is 25 feet. We got 24 feet four inches. So that waiver we requested. And then waiver further reduction from the corner of the property because the property is only so large. So we moved it to the furthest point of the property and put the entrance on Topaz, which was the longer distance, the greater distance from the corner.

Does that complete your presentation?

Yes, sir.

Thank you. This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to speak on items forty five and forty six, please come forward. Seeing no one, Commissioner Gibson.

Thank you. Mister Papazian, terms

of

the public works concerns, help us understand that those are addressed.

Address. Thank you, sir.

Thank you. Thanks for your work, reworking, on the site. I move approval of items forty five and forty six.

Thank you very much.

Motion passes.

Next items forty seven and forty eight, which can be heard together. 47ZC 20 six-one 130, zone change to reclassify a portion of 1.64 acres from an RS20 residential single family 20 zone to an IP industrial park zone, generally located South Of Cheyenne Avenue and East of Betty Lane within Sunrise Manor. And Item 48, UC26S0131, use permits for the following: trucks, parking and staging and two, outdoor storage and display. Waivers of development standards for the following: one, modify residential adjacency standards two, eliminate buffering and screening three, eliminate parking four, eliminate street landscaping five, eliminate throat depth and six, wave full off-site improvements design review for proposed truck parking and staging and outdoor storage and display on 1.64 acres in an IP industrial park zone within the airport environs AE 80 and APZ 1 overlay, generally located South Of Cheyenne Avenue and East Of Betty Lane within Sunrise Manor.

Good morning.

Good morning, Chairman and Commissioners. Dave Turner, 333 North Rancho Drive, representing the applicant. With the zone change, what we're asking for is a zone change from, RS 20 to IP. It's just for this little sliver of property here, the balance of the site is already zoned IP so I think that's pretty much an easy fix there. Commissioner Kirkpatrick, thank you for meeting me yesterday.

I think we've addressed most of concerns that you had. I just wanted to bring the revised plan to you, Sean. We've provided a paved transition along Cheyenne to go into the future driveway here. We've also moved the throat depth back to 25 feet as recommended and moved the guard shack back. We've also added that guard shack as we discussed. We also will be putting a sign on the fence adjacent to the gate that basically for emergency access so that people can get ahold of the owner. Other than that, I think we've addressed everything. The adjacent property is zoned RS 20 although it functions as an industrial site. I've got a copy of that here. So I think we've addressed all your concerns.

If I missed anything, please let me know. We ask for your approval.

Thank you very much. This is a public hearing on item forty seven and forty eight. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward. Seeing no one, we'll close the public hearing. Commissioner Kirkpatrick.

Thank you, mister chairman, and thank you, mister Turner. You know I've been working on this area for eleven years. We're four people away from Gidner Den, so thank you for agreeing. So we will approve of the special use permit to allow truck parking and staging as long as, A, that there's a guard check there, two, that you provide the on-site contact information on the outside of the fence so that we can see And it on the we will approve the outdoor storage and display as long as, A, that there's no stacking of the CONEX boxes higher than the fence line, and two, that no interoperable vehicles are allowed on the property for an extended period of time. So what we don't want to see is it being a tow yard of broken down vehicles.

So on the waivers, want to talk about waiver number three, you agreed the additional seven parking spots, so I wanna make sure

that Yeah, I think we can can withdraw number three.

Okay, withdraw number three. Waiver number four, we're gonna change the definition to say applicant has agreed to alternative landscaping consistent with the proposed SID standards. And so that way in the SID, we factored in boulders and rock, so that'll be part of the big SID. We're doing it all at once. You're gonna work with on waiver number five that's been addressed, correct? So I can withdraw that or just put it's a minimum of 25 feet?

He has met the minimum, so he can withdraw that waiver, Commissioner.

Withdraw waiver number five. And waiver number six will read that the applicant has agreed to participate in the upcoming SID and will continue to work with public works. So that lets you get going. That keeps us all on the same page. And I want to be clear, which is already in here, that there's when we do the SID as well, there will be security cameras, there will be street lights, all of that, and no green mesh, no matter what you do. I know that staff likes that, but I don't because it's graffitied and it's torn with all the wind. So that would be my motion. Unless you have something else, Jo Anne.

Could we make sure the applicant provide us the revised plan so we can have them on file as well, please?

Yep, absolutely.

Great, that's my motion. There's a

motion for items forty seven and forty eight. Please cast your vote. The motion passes.

Thank you very much. Have a

great day.

Thank you.

Next is item 49 AG26-nine hundred thousand one ninety five, discuss whether to initiate a master plan amendment to the Clark County's trails map within the Clark County master plan and direct staff accordingly. Commissioner Jones had requested that we take a look at the trails map to, add an alignment on Huala between Gomer and Blue Diamond. So, we're looking for direction to make this change, and then if there's any other changes that you feel necessary, if we can update as well.

Thank you. Commissioner Jones?

Yes, so this specific piece is part of the planned Vegas Valley Rim Trail. So we're just trying to get ahead of things before development goes there and identify it as a good chunk of that Rim Trail that will connect to other areas and sort of open any other ideas on trails.

Can we see a map of all the trails? Asked for that a long time ago in the Northwest, even the horse trails and all that, so we see where they kinda go? Yeah, sure.

I agree with Commissioner Jones. In Henderson, when we did the trail system out there, we have a very extensive trail system. It made all the difference in the world to get it done before development.

Anyone else? You've got sufficient direction.

Thank you. Next item, item 50, AG26-ninety 204, discuss whether to initiate an amendment to the Clark County Master Plan to add a heat mitigation plan, to update statistical information and exhibits, reorganize and streamline information, make corrections and clarification as needed, direct staff accordingly. Last legislative session, AB 96 was approved to deal with heat mitigation and all the jurisdictions have met together to come up with policies. Thankfully, we are pretty much in conformance with the policies. We're just going to make a minor change to sort of supplement what we have regarding cooling stations in public places.

And then similar to what we did with Title III last time, we asked for direction, just common direction if we have minor changes and amendments we need to clarify as time comes on.

May I ask a question? So as we're talking about heat mitigation, do we need to look at you know, I was doing those housing committees and one of the conversations that came up were the color schemes. Now they're all going gray because they say that it's they're trying to meet the energy code, but in my mind, gray brings more heat. So do we need to look at that as well going forward when we talk about these heat mitigation areas?

Sure, I don't think it was part of these specific directions, but we can look into it.

Okay. I mean I just don't want to see L. Gray because I think that's heat itself.

You. Mr. Chair, I just want to note that Commissioner Segerbloom is having a HEAT Summit next week and working with SNS and RTC, so it's a good opportunity to really raise profile of this, and glad that the county is actively involved.

And we'll address Gray too. You need anything further?

Nope. Thank you.

Thank you. And last, were two ordinances for introduction. Item 51, ORD 20 six-nine hundred-one 140, introduce an ordinance to consider adoption of development agreement with MEQ Cactus and Rainbow LLC for a commercial shopping center on a portion of 5.5 acres. And Item 52, ORD 20 six-ninety 227, introduce an ordinance to amend the official zoning map reclassifying certain properties as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on 02/04/2026 and 02/18/2026. Staff recommends that you set the public hearing for May 6.

We will set the public hearing for May 6.

Thank you.

This is the final time set aside for public comment. Anyone wishing to speak, please come forward at this time. Seeing no one, we will adjourn today's meeting. Have a great day.