Planning Commission - Regular Meeting

can show up on Monday, but I don't even know if the lobby will be open. So, um, Tuesday at 7 p.m. next door. All right. Um, we're going to go ahead and get started. We have enough for a quorum. Is everybody else up?

Oh, yeah. Who's Okay. since I think you're the only one that's out. So that's good. We're fine. Perfect. Thank you. Um we are gonna since we have our new planning commissioner, Christopher, um we are going to do election of officers since uh Steve Pippen was elected chair and has since been elected city commissioner. Um, so we're going to do that at our meeting on Tuesday night. Um, and we're going to go ahead and get started with our agenda, um, with our consent agendas. All righty. Item number one is BPC 2408-006 for a hillside protection site plan for Hillview Estates um, 1108 Chelsea Courts.

Oh, sorry.

All right. The purpose of this um application is they are wanting to extend their driveway to go around basically the entire house. This is their current layout right here of it. You go to the next slide, please. They're going to extend it all the way back here. That way there's a easier way to access the house and um not have to access the large front steps at the front door. Here's a more zoomed in with the landscape. So, I just wanted to extend the sidewalk or sorry, not sidewalk, driveway to the rear, also to allow parking, easier access into the house and not have to climb up the the front door area. Um, the reason why it's before you guys is because it's in the um hillside protection. You guys have any comments, questions, concerns on this application? Now my only question it it is hillside protection but it's this is all right.

Yes. Yeah. Okay sir. Yeah. Anything um any improvements to the lot or the building and in the HP is required to come before the planning question. So even if it's just like a little portion um of HP on the lot, it will still come before you guys. I'm curious. Does that include a fence? I've always wondered that. I I don't know if the plan had a fence on it or not, but um if it did, no matter typically we require a fence permit for the fence,

right? So, if it didn't, regardless of whether it's hillside, but is there any special designation for being hillside that there are any extra things that would be involved for a fence? No, ma'am. I didn't think so. Okay. All right. We're good. The new driveway looks the property line though. Is that it fits within the setbacks and everything? the driveway. It starts at the back of the the existing driveway goes right there. So, it's already kind of setbacks. Anyway, is it was it is it like a grandfathered in exception? Is that what was going on there?

Driveways can go to the property line unless there's a public utility and drainage easement and and then engineering has to improve the encroachment within the PUD. Okay. But engineering's looked at this and they're okay with it. I mean, you have to get into your property somehow, so it has to cross over, right? And um driveways are um a type B structure, so they're not required to be within the setbacks.

So, just one point of clar clarification for the for those that are new, Todd's correct, it can be in the PUB driveways can be no closer than 5T to the property line, though, new ones. And we have a lot around the city that are there already. And um typically you just let them go if they're there already. Mhm. Unless in this case where they're doing no new work, but I I think this one's probably 5t off of the property line, so it's okay. Thank you. Yes, sir.

I have a I have a question just since I live in an old neighborhood. So when people are redoing their houses uh and they redo their driveways, they should be five feet off the property line. No less than five feet. Wish I had known that a few years ago. Not for my own son. My neighbor. It's a little close. All right. Thank you.

All right. Item number two is BPC 25507-006 for a revised final plat for Heathrow Hill subdivision 5216 Harpath Ridge Drive. little vicinity map action here. Next slide, please. All right. So, the purpose of this request is to consolidate this existing lot with the house with parcel G right here. Um, the owner of this existing residence also owns this parcel G. They just had never consolidated it before. So, they're wanting to consolidate this lot into this lot. he owns both of them. Now he'll own one singular lot instead of two separate that are right next to each other. Um the NBSL back here is 35 because this is a separate subdivision. Same with right here, but then it goes back to I believe that's a 20 foot set uh setback because lot 22 is within the same subdivision as this lot 21 right here. That's why there's the difference in um NDSL. But again, he's just consolidating the two lots he already owns into one lot.

I know it makes life easier, but I wonder if there's a tax advantage to that for assessment. Maybe because he's adding more land that's not been improved upon. I think it's more of just a cleanup item. I think originally there was a dis dispute on maybe ownership of that of that piece. So, he got it. He claimed it. He he got it. So, now he's incorporating it into his lot. cuz it has no access. It's not like you can. It's just kind of open space or something. Yeah, it's only.5 acres. Yeah, it's not that big. Any comments, questions, concerns outside of what's already been.

Item number three is another revised final plat for forest of Brentwood subdivision, section 2, lot 55 for 706 Forest Park Drive. The purpose of this request if you have the next slide please. Alison is there want wanting to if you can. Yeah.

They are wanting to abandon or remove this drainage easement in the rear right here. What it's going to do is just going to allow them a little bit more space to add onto their house. Um they are removing this uh non-conforming detached structure right here. clear this garage. We have informed them that that garage will need to be removed prior to the signing of the final plot. Um engineering's already looked at this. Um from at least from what I can remember, there's no issues from engineering on this standpoint. Um again, just removing this to add a little bit more space to build on their lot.

Somebody's the beneficiary of the drainage easement. There's a declarance for easement. So the um sign off and approval. There is a on the recorded plat it does show the drainage easement but they the drainage easement on the plat is not what's actually out there on the property. It's um other words the ditch is outside of the easement. Yeah, the ditch the ditch is they they've surveyed out the ditch line. You can see L1, L2, L4, right in this area of bank.

So they put it in the recorded plot. It's shown right here, but the it's actually up in this area. So, what they're doing is they're um relocating kind of relocating to where it actually is supposed to be or it is on the lot. Again, it's another little clean up clean up of the plat. But on the lot, the actual water is moving through, not through the drainage ditch that's being the actual water is already Yeah. The actual water is going to make up here.

Okay. which we we did another point of clarification. We did have them add a stream buffer to the stream. So, uh as is typically required. So, they're um getting the advantage of removing the drainage easement, but then the disadvantage of having to add the stream buffers. Did I say that right, Kevin? Yes, that's right. Brian, did that answer your question or comment?

So, does our legal the city's legal department work with the applicant of lawyer? I mean, that's a you're actually amending an easement. They are they are revising the lication of the easement to to reflect field conditions. So it's a cleanup item basically. Sure. We I mean an applicant doesn't declarance excuse me the applicant can't amend unilaterally amend an easement without the declarance sign off. So, I just assume that there's a lawyer involved.

Well, I I think if I'm not complaining your concern, uh the um the legal issue here is that the plat was prior recorded in the location that it is. That's the legal recordation of the prior easement. We're re-recording the plat to reflect to reflect that. So, I don't think there's any other legal documentations or sign offs that have to occur. He's signing off. We're signing off on the plat. All the other entities and agencies are signing off the plat. The owner signing off on the plat. So that would be the new legal recordation of the drainage easement. So the easement is not getting amended.

There is no there is no second separate instrument for that easement of which I'm aware. The only instrument for that easement is shown on the existing plat is the plat. Who? I don't know my legal ease. Who owns the easement? Why was it put there to begin with? Who is it that needed? It's a public easement. Yeah, it's a public easement. So, the city would lives in the

Yeah. And so, yeah, the we we own the easement. They own the property. All parties are signing on this plat. We've done this a lot in the past. A lot if if We're missing something. We've been missing it for a while, so I don't think we are. We're not. Yeah, you can kind of see it. Um, it's shaded in red, but you can kind of see the um drainage ditch right here. Like it's a concrete ditch.

There's like a city. No, you answer my question. It's a city. Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Sometimes there are sewer easements or other easements that are recorded by instrument and so if this plat was being recorded it would have to refer to that instrument as being abandoned. Yes. But in this case the plat is actually the instrument that recorded the deed which answers my question and it's in the the purpose of the plat mentions the removal of that easement and the addition of the

Thank you. Does the 60 foot stream buffer mean that they can't build within that? I notice it already touches the house, but it's it's a 60 foot average, so 30 foot minimum. So they have to have at least 30 feet, but wherever they do have 30 somewhere else on the lot, they have to make up for that difference. So that they have to have 90 somewhere else. So that Okay, got it. Sort of like OSRD. Lots of measurements. Next.

All right. Uh, next one is another um, hillside protection in Heathrow Hill subdivision. Uh, 107 Lookout Ridge. Um, this is one of the lots up on the hill in Heathrow Hills. Um on Lookout Ridge, there's a shared um driveway that goes up around the corner from Heather Hills Drive to service all of these lots up here like this.

Yeah, it's it's it's steep. Um it's one of the I think this lot is a buildable lot and still vacant. Um and then they're building on this one. Um, so this request is the construction of a 4,143 square foot house. The property is 1.37 acres access from a shared private drive located off Heathrow Hills Boulevard. Um, the proposed residence will include born batten siding painted black with light gray stone and cedar used as um, accent materials. And then it will have a shingle roof and um standing seam metal. Um so here's a closer up of the site plan with the house on it. Um here's some schematics of their proposal of what the house will look like once it's constructed. Um and then uh a condition that staff has is that we're a mandatory pre-construction meeting will be required for the site prior to issuance of the permits and there are 16 standard conditions of approval and this house will require a fire sprinkler system since it is like located within the hillside protection. Um and then they're going to be extending um water and sewer um from the culminac. So there's already connection there of um 1,000 square foot

4,000 square foot home. 4,000 I saw 1,000. It's got a um basement, three levels. Will you actually be able to see this? You'll be able to see the top of it. We've got some views, right? Um pers perspective views. It we forgot to put in the PowerPoint. Oops. I think it may be in your packet. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. on the iPad. Gota,

but you can like you can see that um it'll be no more than what you can see of the houses already up there. All right.

Any other questions? Is that Lookout Ridge, is that a private drive? Yes. Yes. It's gated, right? Yes. That's the access point for construction, too. Yes. Yes. Is it It is gated. I didn't notice the gate when I was gated or just private. It's just private. I think it has used to have a chain years ago and then now it doesn't have the chain anymore. So, so I didn't drive up at being a newbie. When I drove by yesterday, I was like, "All right, mailbox at the bottom." Yeah. Should we drive up there if we want to even a private drive? Okay.

Bring your bags and show everybody. All right. Okay. Next one is another um this one's a revised hillside site plan located in the Hell View Estates um subdivision 107B um Highland Road. So, it is the parcel that is outlined in red. Um here is existing. Um they've got house, school, and a little shed over here. Um they are going to be oops um remove. So, they're adding, let's see, request um is to construct a 531 foot garage, a 510 square foot first floor edition, a new entryway, and a new porch. Um there's an existing deck that they're going to be removing and replacing. And there also um the request also includes the construction of an accessory structure which will um need to be approved by the board of zoning appeals. Um and the lot is uh 6.84 acres. Here's um some renderings of the house with their additions. um some more schematics of the house with their accessory structure back here in the rear. And then um this is what the

proposed accessory structure will look like. Um and some views of like the house is not visible. It will not be visible and is not visible from lower elevations. It's pretty pretty tucked in there. All right. Item number six is BPC2508-00003 for a limited duration event for a food truck rally at Brentwood High School. Um they've been having this food truck rally for the past few years. Um it's going to be in the same location as it has been right along Murray Lane within their parking lot area. Um their hours there going to be 14 food trucks present. Uh, it's going to take place on Friday, September 19th from 11:15 a.m. to 1:15 a.m. Um,

they are, sorry, PM. Sorry, not not ever. Um, they're going to begin setting up the food trucks around 10:15 a.m. and then leave around 1:30 p.m., but the actual event for people to actually buy the food is from 11:15 to 1:15. Do they do these twice a year? They do. Okay. When you guys say year, I'm like, I don't feel I feel like I see this more often. So, it's twice a year. Fall. Spring and fall. Okay. Spring, they have the field day. Yeah. And then this one's for their um homecoming. And then you have the list of the 14 food truck, which sound pretty good, honestly. Yeah. I might stop by.

All right. Um, next one is um for a a revised PWF, which is a personal wireless what's the S? Service facility.

Service facility. Um it is located off of or located on the property of 1598 Ragsdale Road and it is up here in the um way back on the property and you've got Echo subdivision over here and um Tus Hills on the the back end of it. Will this increase the service in Brentwood at all or is it just a replacement of existing services?

They are going from um Sprint to Verizon. So if you have Verizon then it may be a benefit. Um, they're removing one Verizon mount with two antennas and I mean, sorry, one Sprint mount with two antennas and they're going to Verizon with 12 antennas and a bunch of other stuff that's listed in terms report. Um and then they are also um adding a generator um and then new equipment cabinets. And then there's also going to be an ice bridge connecting the tower to the

What's an ice bridge? Um it from my understanding it is to protect the cables. um from ice. It's all it's it's ground level within the the fenced compound. Okay. Um so it's nothing that's going to be visible up on the tower or anything. Is what about the antennas? Is that the same? The additional antennas. Is there any change visually?

Um so they're Yeah, it's in the middle. So there's two existing there's one up here, one antenna up here, and one in mount down here. Um so they're removing this middle or they're replacing this middle one. Um the height of the tower is not changing. The tower itself is not changing. Um their lease space is not changing. Um it is just replacement of antennas and then some ground equipment. Verizon service in that area has been a visible side of town. So

and this should hopefully help that. I wonder if this should actually be taken off of consent just so people would know that there's some improved. Not that they wouldn't know, but I mean, you know, it gets buried in consent and there's pretty much an emphasis been stressed on improving our service in Brentwood. This takes three minutes to cover on the regular agenda and maybe gets a little more publicity. Does the city commission also have anything to do with this? Uh, we're working on other things. Not this one in particular, but we're working with the different companies trying to get some new and improved income.

This would just be another incident of trying to improve service to Yeah, just a side note to that too, you actually out in Nolanville, which this is kind of out that way, they're changing the water tower. The water tower has antennas on them. The new water tower you can't put antennas on. So what we have out that way may even get worse before it gets better. Thank you. Noville Utility District, right? Yeah. So, you know, again, too, this just might be a little boost. Maybe it gets some some coverage from the local newspaper. This was a regular item. Just my thoughts. I think we

Who uses this tower? Is it T-Mobile? Who is it? Sprint uses it now. I don't know who the other I can find out who Sprint is no longer exist. It's now T-Mobile. So the question is is T-Mobile clients going to people that use T-Mobile going to be affected by the transition? Probably. Well, so I don't know. There's they kind of share, don't they? I mean, I don't think just because I'm on Verizon means I don't use a T-Mobile tower. And so I think Verizon getting a better tower gives kind of everybody a boost in that area. And T-Mobile very well could be one of these other mounts. I don't know who these other mounts are, but I can find out for you. Yeah, that'd be helpful. Okay.

And they're not looking at cutting anybody's service off in this transition. It's just an automatic type of switch, right? From what you know. Correct. So you want to put it on the agenda then? I I would like it just so it' be a little more publicity. You need the PR. Is that what it is? You need the publicity right now. Okay. I'm fine with moving. I'm fine with moving. I think maybe having some discussion, you can call it publicity, but just some education about what this looks like and what's happening. And 12 new antennas doesn't mean 12 new sticking way up. All the applicant frames it as a positive. And then, you know, and we kind of maybe reach out to the press and say, "Hey, by the way, look at this good thing Brentwood's doing for its citizens."

Yeah. is increasing our self-service in areas that it's not great. Right. And we will continue to do that which leads into the next thing. [Music] Yeah. But I don't know, we don't know who the other two um providers on you know somebody's getting there including self-s service and then that's the story. Yeah. And this is one of the ways that can occur that really doesn't involve Yeah. But it's not a negative and it's not a new tower. I mean it's an existing tower, right? Um and there's no change to the tower itself. So

I think all that is good information for people that are paying attention to understand how this can happen. Okay. Well, I will um find out who the other two existing providers are. Um and then we will move this to the regular agenda.

Transition. All right, moving on. Okay. Um, our next um item is a minor site plan alteration for 200 POW place um located here in the Maryland Farms area right here. So, we've got um Maryland Way. Let me zoom in. Um, and you've got Virginia Way back here and PAL placed right there. [Music] All right. So, um, ASD Sky requests approval of minor site revisions at the building entrance. So, they're going to be um reconstructing their courtyard for this um development, and they're going to be doing uh some improvements such as uh an outdoor kitchen, an outdoor uh with an outdoor grill, an outdoor fireplace, and a bunch of new landscaping. And then um they are also going to be painting the building. So here's what the building looks like right now. Um it's currently under construction. I think they're doing tenant finish stuff. Um this used to be where the American Addictions um was at one point in time and then I think it became a a multi-tenant and now I don't think anyone's in there. Um, so this is kind of this is their proposal. So it's going to be painted a um dark gray with some dark green accents. Most of the dark green is going

to be within the courtyard and then some accents on the outside. Um Oops. And then they're also proposing um a an outside staircase to provide um access outside to the second level. They're also going to be doing proposing this rebar um structure that's going to house an elevator. Um

let's see if and I've got some rendering. So, this is kind of what the Oops. their their courtyard will look like, and it's going to have a a mezzanine um with like a little pavilion. Um so, they're adding a lot more trees. So, they're going above and beyond what our um landscaping ordinance requires. Um here is kind of down below what rebar structures um look like. And then over here is kind of what the um out exterior stairs and mezzanine kind of will uh look like. I

I wondered what the rebar structure was when it was in there. I didn't know. Now that's a good visual. Are they going to put some kind of like So that it won't rust. Rust. Yeah, I'm kind of talking. I'm getting old. Yeah, because rusty reaper is not the look we're looking for. That's a good question. They may want the rust look like I think it's already going to look quote unquote look rust like. So that's why the rendering is orangeish because they are planning on rebar patina somewhat like like what we're seeing there. Yeah,

I think it's a good improvement for the building. I do too. And I think we're going to see a lot more of this modernizing and updating from just brick to something a little bit more interesting. 70s and 80s building. I think it'll draw more people to the the office park to be able to have a modernized look. I think this is good. Something this detailed is probably done with the retenanting of the building tenants request. Is there any is there any building signage going up? Um not that we're aware of.

We have not been uh we've not received a a proposal. Um there is that a couple years ago we did a monument sign for them. So if they choose to do signage they can do it on the monument sign. I don't know if they'll you if it's new owners. I don't know if they'll allow for signage on the building. It's up to the new tenant owners or building owner

won't be here. But a lot of I mean Maryland Farms is kind of empty since CO and a lot of these property owners are trying to get new tenants in and the only way for them to do that is um by updating a lot of these older it's just like service merchandise and getting the mural and all that. It's very just trying to bring people in. Yep. trying to bring people back into this area and obviously for the city of Brentwood that's really important. So yeah, I mean this building behind us has been vacant since co I mean no one's in there.

All right. Um next one.

All right. Item number nine is BPC2508-007 for a minor site plan alteration for the Pearree Village Shopping Center. Uh where it's Kroger, Petco, First Watch, um right here off of Franklin Road. Um they're requesting approval to repaint the Village Shopping Center. The current coloring on the shops are a mix of tans, browns with white accents along the roof line and metal accents at each front entrance. Kind of you can kind of see like right here. And there's some other designs they have as well. Um the modifications will encompass the entire shopping area. So not just the two couple stores that I listed. Um but they do include Kroger and Petco. the they would modify the current coloring to um the white roof line to an alabaster color, the metal front door accents to a black coloring and the tan brick areas to a grizzle gray with a light brown striping along the front to an urban bronze. Um this will modernize the existing shopping center. Um I do want to note lastly that the work has already been completed on these stores. I think they ought to have to redo the little clinic. I I I don't like it. I think it's way too much. I think they stepped out of bounds and I think they tried to cover that up here. They can put the sign, but I don't think they ought to have the blue.

That blue is egregious to me, but you know, I don't know. I I don't mind approving them for the upgrades, but I think they have to take away the blue. Is that something that's in our purview? Right. for me to say, "Hey, you can say it." You don't like the blue. You approve the colors. I mean, it's up to you. I think you have to determine that. Um, maybe it's not consistent with the surrounding area.

So, that would probably be the basis for that, but obviously you'll have to move it from consent to regular. Can you guys talk to the applicant and see what their thoughts are about removing the blue? I think we can make a I mean comment later to them. Sure, we can reach out to them since the whole building's already painted.

What would you see as a alternative? To me, this this little clinic sign, you see how you got Kroger with the beige behind it. You could continue that over there. It's just it's a huge amount of blue. Yeah, the little clinic sign itself did not change. It is still the same square footage, but it looks I think it kind of looks bigger to people because they did add the the blue. Here's the question. Was the blue brick before? So you can't unpaint brick. I'm pretty sure it was brick, but you can make it.

Then you'd have a solid gray muted. Yeah, they could make it gray like the entrance is. Yeah. Why would they make and set it apart? I mean, if they want to set it apart and accent it, they can accent it the same as the front there. Now we're playing designer, which isn't our job. Um, but yeah, I think we talked to them and see I saw that the first thing I like, whoa, that's a lot of and it's also it's not our fault that they already did it. So, right, it's a lot easier to do this if they wouldn't have already done it, but that's that's a them problem. We can reach out to them and suggest that they come out come up with maybe an alternative design, okay,

to show at the meeting. And then in that we'll say um well if they don't then we'll move it to regular. Well I would I guess we just move it to regular anyway. I would suggest we go ahead and move it. We'll move it to regular and then we'll decide. I think we can tell them we're not opposed to to this right here. It's the little clinic part that they overstepped on and need to correct for us to move forward. I think everybody generally agrees that this isn't bad here. So if they were to agree to change it uh at that meeting we can't say good it passes you have to resubmit I guess or do so in advance of Monday Tuesday

Tuesday I I think if I think if the applicant brought a brought another option for the little clinic portion you know or or said that hey we'll paint the blue the gray gray, right? Then I think it's fine for you guys to I do agree with amendment on it and just say, you know, this with the little clinic option being in gray, then we can vote on it that way. Condition of approval. Yeah, that is a condition and and that way they know ahead of time. Yeah. Now, what's the rationale for wanting to make the change? Because we've had discussions about the painting of buildings that are going on in the city of Brentwood. So what is our rationale now for this item?

It's not consistent with the same. It's not consistent with what's in the area. It's not consistent with the building. It's not consistent with the building because there's not any other place on the building that's going to be redone really like that blue. So we all under Is that legit? It's before us. We've had discussions on paint before and we've always been told you got to we're not going to get into that business establishing the paint standards with throughout the city. We can't establish paint standards, but we can establish that if you're coming up with a building, which is why for us to begin with because we do have the jurisdiction to opine. Remember the paint building and that being the point opine pine

that I mean like Ryan said it's it's we have the ability to opine, but we need to listen to feedback back and forth. Okay. But we can say anything we want really. You know, if we say you look better green, whatever, but we would do that. have opinions and this but the opinions need to be based upon reasonable which would be consistency particular system it's a little bit bold this is what this is 2021 is what the little plan looks like yeah and see that you put that in there I just turn it yeah this is what it looked like before just kind of sitting they did it blue for a reason they're going to say I want it to pop

they want it presume they're going to say I want to change And then we can debate whether we we think it should pop on a completely different Yeah. Because everything around it doesn't pop shows what similar it should be ample. Yeah. We will reach out to the applicant. We're going to move with it to regular. Yes. That's a new owner of that shopping center, right? Yes. Yeah. Um of that shopping center and Brentwood. No, same owner. The same owner, right? Same owner here. Brentwood Place sold.

Okay. Same. This group owns Brentwood Place. Yes. Also. Yeah. [Applause] [Music] Regency. Yeah. And they're the applicant. Um All right. All right. So, number 10, which is now eight.

Okay. So, we've got another minor site plan alteration for AutoPro, um, located at 1610 Franklin Road, um, down near Moors Lane. Sorry, let me get my space back. Our packets are big this month. Um, all right. So, AutoPro requests approval for a minor site plan alteration of an existing out building um located at 1610 Franklin Road. The remodel will include a metal a new metal siding, a new roof, um new garage doors. Um the exist so they're going to be having eight garage doors whereas the existing building has 22 garage doors that will be removed and replaced. Uh, and the building will consist of a tan metal siding with a gray metal roof. So, here's pictures of um the current building. It's kind of in states of this repair. And then this is um what it will be

look like once it's done. So, again, it's going to be a tan tan metal building with a metal um it's on the hill up behind the dealership. It's kind of hard to see. It's back in the woods back in there. They've added a bunch of gravel, so you might want to put it in all-wheel drive. You're busting around back there. I was just curious if this thing fell tomorrow, could they rebuild it or or are they recladding it because it's otherwise wouldn't be able to conform with zoning? They they can rebuild it if it is totally removed that it would still meet setbacks and everything.

Yeah, it's a large kind of deceiving but it's a large

lot I mean it is talked you can't really see it from the road and we have requested kind of it to blend in so that's why they've selected the um this tan color and then it's going to have a lighter um roof color to help with the sun reflection and the fact that they're going to be storing cars in here they don't want them um overheating All right. Um, now moving on to our regular agenda. We've got a revised preliminary plan for the Tibberon subdivision. Um, which is formerly known as the ERCO subdivision. Um, couple think last year. Uh, we did it was it last year? January of 24

did an annexation um of this portion in the red outline. Um and then we're they're so the property that they're adding is already was already annexed into Bratwood. Um and so they're just combining it. So they're going from so they're uh a total of 28 lots and approximately 43 acres. The revision adds 15 acres and eight additional lots. Um the uh let's see, all proposed lots comply with the requirements of the R2 zoning. So they're um I'm sorry, I'm all over the place. Uh here's the um revised preliminary plan. So can you see like Oh, I have one over here. Sorry. Um, so this is the original Erico and then this whole section will be Tibberon. So they're adding this portion over here. There's three lots that front uh Sam Donald Road. These will be 2 acres in size and then um the rest of the lots will access the existing or they'll connect to the existing road. Um, these three lots will have their own driveway mailboxes, whereas the rest of them will have use the uh shared cluster box unit for the subdivision.

Is 11 ft the minimum width for a road in Brenwood? Curious. Or lane, whatever. Right. For a local road. Right. Right. Yeah. I thought so because I noticed that the collectors put lanes on both Ragsdale and split log the improved sections as well just for a bit of uh traffic calming tighter road speed. Good.

I have a question just maintenance wise. Will this be agenda item one and then the tower will be two and then the um shopping center will be three. Is that just kind of how flow? We can do whatever order you prefer. Whatever you guys want. Usually go numbers. Yeah. Following order you guys have to read them to everybody. All right. That is everything. Um where's the new driveway that for those three houses? Uh so two of them will

uh have uh one of them will use the existing drive right here and then these two lots right here will have a shared driveway just one cut just one new cut on Sam Donald if I'm on I'm talking to this guy back here he's representative right Jeff if you're on Sam Donald, how would I get to these two houses back on the this side? Come down that shared driveway. You mean 20 and right? 21 and 22, right? Yes. You'd come down the shared driveway and it would it would fork off. Okay.

Anything else on this item? Okay. Um, that's everything for this agenda. Um, again, the planning commission meeting will be on Tuesday, not Monday, at 700 p.m. That's all we got. Check.