The Hamlet Rankings

What towns fight about at the mic

We read the meetings. We count the people whose comments took a side on each question, for and against, and rank the places.

How these rankings work · Cite as: Hamlet City Index Rankings, October 2026

  • 82,000+ meetings read
  • 1,600+ places with remarks on file
  • 2,200+ officials with remarks on the record

Short-term rentals, place by place

More places had mostly comments for short-term rentals (96) than against (84)

Orem, UT ranks #4 most opposed to short-term rentals among mid-size places. See Orem’s meetings

Download imageSquare for Instagram

Should the city allow short-term rentals like Airbnb and Vrbo? Against means bans or strict limits. For means allowing them. Each dot is a place where 3 or more people spoke: across, how their comments split, from all against to all for; up, how many spoke.

  • More against
  • Even
  • More for

Also came up in 119 more places where fewer than 3 people spoke

190 places where it came up · 696 people whose comments took a side: 333 against, 363 forMeetings since Oct 19, 2024 (the same 24 months for every topic); newest Sep 17, 2026. Source: Hamlet, from public meeting video. Automated reading of each comment. It can miss or misread some. Fainter dots have not yet met the ranking bar (10 people at 2 or more meetings).

How often it comes up

Came up in 7% of meetings in Q3, down 7% from Q2

  1. Q1
  2. Q2
  3. Q3
  4. Q4
  5. Q1
  6. Q2
  7. Q3

Share of meetings tracked that took it up, by quarter. Source: Hamlet.

Places ranked on short-term rentals

Most opposed

Places where more people spoke against, ranked by the method's score (10 voices at the national rate added), so a big crowd outranks a small one. Each person counts once. Numbered places have 10 or more people at 2 or more meetings.

Most opposed on short-term rentals: the places shown, with how many people took each side
RankPlaceAgainstFor
1Baytown TXShare121
2Maui HIShare104
3Humboldt CAShare75
4Orem UTShare87
Also on this side, too few people or meetings to rank
Clarke GA60
Santa Fe NM50
La Mesa CA30
Monterey Park CA30
Little Rock AR52
San Luis Obispo CA20

57 more places. The full list and the split between officials and the public are part of Hamlet for business, our paid service.

Get the full list

Most supportive

Places where more people spoke for, ranked by the method's score (10 voices at the national rate added), so a big crowd outranks a small one. Each person counts once. Numbered places have 10 or more people at 2 or more meetings.

Most supportive on short-term rentals: the places shown, with how many people took each side
RankPlaceAgainstFor
1Independence MOShare524
2New Braunfels TXShare314
3San Bernardino CAShare28
4Stillwater OKShare46
5Alameda CAShare67
Also on this side, too few people or meetings to rank
Pasco WA09
York VA04
El Dorado CA15
Fishers IN15
Costa Mesa CA03

57 more places. The full list and the split between officials and the public are part of Hamlet for business.

Get the full list

What about your town?

Find your town

Try: Denver, CO · Reno, NV

How these rankings work

Where it comes from
Public meetings of city councils, county boards, planning commissions and school boards, read from each body's own video and transcripts.
What is counted
Every remark about the topic, found by the same search terms in every place and marked for, against, mixed or neutral by an automated reader, with a second model checking each one. Mixed and neutral remarks are not counted.
People, not remarks
Each person counts once per place and topic, on the side they took most often, however many times they spoke. A person split evenly takes no side.
How officials count
Today every speaker counts once: in the meetings counted now, a speaker's role is only an automated guess. Once our roster confirms who an official is, elected and appointed officials will count as 3, since they decide the outcome and speak on the record under their own names. Public commenters and staff count as 1 and are never named.
The score
Weighted voices against, divided by weighted voices for and against. Before ranking, every place gets 10 more voices at the national rate for the topic, so a place with four voices cannot top the list by chance; a place with a hundred barely moves.
Who is ranked
A place where at least 10 people spoke on the question, each counted once, at at least 2 different meetings in the last 24 months. The weight for officials orders the ranked places; it never lets a place in. Places with fewer show as lighter dots and are not ranked.
Same-size places
Places are ranked only against places their size: large (250,000 or more), mid-size (50,000 to 250,000) and small (under 50,000).
What it is not
Not a poll of residents. It is the public record of who showed up and what officials said. The places are those whose meetings we hold, not a sample of the country.