The Hamlet Rankings
What towns fight about at the mic
We read the meetings. We count the people whose comments took a side on each question, for and against, and rank the places.
How these rankings work · Cite as: Hamlet City Index Rankings, October 2026
- 82,000+ meetings read
- 1,600+ places with remarks on file
- 2,200+ officials with remarks on the record
Homeless encampments, place by place
More places had mostly comments against homeless encampments (73) than for (62)
Los Angeles, CA ranks #2 most opposed to homeless encampments among large cities and counties. See Los Angeles’s meetings
Should the city clear homeless encampments? Against means against sweeps; services and housing instead. For means clearing them and enforcing camping bans. Each dot is a place where 3 or more people spoke: across, how their comments split, from all against to all for; up, how many spoke.
- More against
- Even
- More for
Also came up in 104 more places where fewer than 3 people spoke
146 places where it came up · 377 people whose comments took a side: 187 against, 190 forMeetings since Oct 19, 2024 (the same 24 months for every topic); newest Oct 13, 2026. Source: Hamlet, from public meeting video. Automated reading of each comment. It can miss or misread some. Fainter dots have not yet met the ranking bar (10 people at 2 or more meetings).
How often it comes up
Came up in 3% of meetings in Q3, down 22% from Q2
- Q1
- Q2
- Q3
- Q4
- Q1
- Q2
- Q3
Share of meetings tracked that took it up, by quarter. Source: Hamlet.
Places ranked on homeless encampments
Most opposed
By share of comments for, the lowest share for first. Each person counts once. Numbered places have 10 or more people at 2 or more meetings.
| Rank | Place | AgainstFor | Against | For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland CAShare | 7 | 5 | |
| 2 | Los Angeles CAShare | 7 | 6 | |
| Also on this side, too few people or meetings to rank | ||||
| Phoenix AZ | 4 | 0 | ||
| Clackamas OR | 2 | 0 | ||
| Colorado Springs CO | 2 | 0 | ||
| Kansas City MO | 2 | 0 | ||
| Fort Worth TX | 1 | 0 | ||
| St. Louis MO | 1 | 0 | ||
| Charlotte NC | 1 | 0 | ||
| Oklahoma City OK | 1 | 0 | ||
33 more places. The full list and the split between officials and the public are part of Hamlet for business, our paid service.
Get the full listLeast opposed
By share of comments for, the highest share for first. Each person counts once. Numbered places have 10 or more people at 2 or more meetings.
| Rank | Place | AgainstFor | Against | For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durham NCShare | 5 | 5 | |
| Also on this side, too few people or meetings to rank | ||||
| Ramsey MN | 0 | 1 | ||
| Fulton GA | 0 | 1 | ||
| Chandler AZ | 0 | 1 | ||
| Hays TX | 0 | 1 | ||
| Boston MA | 0 | 1 | ||
| Albuquerque NM | 0 | 1 | ||
| Tucson AZ | 0 | 1 | ||
| Raleigh NC | 0 | 1 | ||
| Clark NV | 0 | 1 | ||
33 more places. The full list and the split between officials and the public are part of Hamlet for business.
Get the full listWhat about your town?
Find your townTry: Denver, CO · Reno, NV
How these rankings work
- Where it comes from
- Public meetings of city councils, county boards, planning commissions and school boards, read from each body's own video and transcripts.
- What is counted
- Every remark about the topic, found by the same search terms in every place and marked for, against, mixed or neutral by an automated reader, with a second model checking each one. Mixed and neutral remarks are not counted.
- People, not remarks
- Each person counts once per place and topic, on the side they took most often, however many times they spoke. A person split evenly takes no side.
- How officials count
- Today every speaker counts once: in the meetings counted now, a speaker's role is only an automated guess. Once our roster confirms who an official is, elected and appointed officials will count as 3, since they decide the outcome and speak on the record under their own names. Public commenters and staff count as 1 and are never named.
- The score
- Weighted voices against, divided by weighted voices for and against. Before ranking, every place gets 10 more voices at the national rate for the topic, so a place with four voices cannot top the list by chance; a place with a hundred barely moves.
- Who is ranked
- A place where at least 10 people spoke on the question, each counted once, at at least 2 different meetings in the last 24 months. The weight for officials orders the ranked places; it never lets a place in. Places with fewer show as lighter dots and are not ranked.
- Same-size places
- Places are ranked only against places their size: large (250,000 or more), mid-size (50,000 to 250,000) and small (under 50,000).
- What it is not
- Not a poll of residents. It is the public record of who showed up and what officials said. The places are those whose meetings we hold, not a sample of the country.