Remarks by Tyson Eyre
120 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 4 of 5
- Play at 1:44:26
“The big benefit in my mind of this is giving the public more opportunity to speak, be heard, understand a little bit more of the concept rather than just a one-shot go. There's multiple steps where the public can put in involvement, and I appreciate everything that we've heard tonight. That being said, I would entertain a motion or further discussion if you have it.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:45:32
“Motion and a second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Nay. All right, this moves forward. When will it go to city council? September 8th. September 8th. Tuesday. At 7 o'clock here. And again, I just want to say I appreciate, again, all of the input. Definitely helped give me some clarity on thought. And again, we welcome this level of discussion at every meeting. But thank you again for your input tonight.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:47:30
“Seems like a little bit of a goof. Oops.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:47:44
“Any questions for staff? This is a public hearing. We will invite anybody in the public that would like to speak to this to do so now.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:50:49
“Thank you. Anybody else that would like to speak to this item? Seeing none, we'll close the public hearing. Applicant, would you like to address anything you heard?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:51:51
“I know you don't have the contract in front of you. The resident has brought up a contract where he brought up language that was assumed that it would come into the city with a certain zoning. I'm not saying whether that is or not, but I think the city really needs to cross their T's and dot their I's to make sure. If there was some agreement that's not being made, transitional holding does not make sense. there wasn't the agreement and then there's something else there that's obviously different but I'm I'm curious with you saying you don't know the details of the contract I am not wanting…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:57:34
“I have a hypothetical question, if I may. If we had goofed and instead of public facilities it was granted a zone of heavy commercial or whatever, any other zone, right, what would be the applicant or the”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 1:58:48
“gets into some legal nuances but i would say if that's how it was recorded we would honor what was on the plot so again that was more hypothetical i was just curious because again we don't run into this very often if ever and um yeah the th5 zone is a technical residential zone although it has no rights to development is that correct yeah it's primarily agricultural yeah right um and that is i mean over the nine years i've been on this commission that is the standard usually of what things when they get annexed when they come in that way there's no necessary water dedication at that time that…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:05:00
“Can we include that this is to clean up an administrative clerical error? I will second that. No, that's good. Motion and a second. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? When does this go before the city council? September 8th. September 8th. That would be the final approval. City council does final approval on this. All right, three point...”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:06:52
“Does our code identify it as visible wall or not? It does not. So is this a discretionary item?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:07:44
“I assume you are the architect or engineer in the back.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:07:51
“Let's move forward. Jacob? Jacob brought up a great question. Is the percentages that you are looking at, is that considering the hidden portion of the wall, or is this strictly just the visible portion of the wall?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:09:57
“You used the word probably. Are we not sure how the dimensions were calculated?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:10:11
“Again, my question is just more on were those percentages where you were meeting 17%, is that of the entire structure, whether it's visible or not, or is that of strictly just the visible portion? Okay. Yeah. Okay.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:11:59
“I particularly don't love it when we, the city, request exception to our own code. That always makes me feel wonderful. For sure. I feel like, I mean, I'm not an architect or an engineer. I feel like there's an opportunity in two spots that you could add some either real windows or glazing, which would be the parapets on both sides above in that small, narrow area. Again, it does not even need to be real windows. It could be glazing that looks like windows, right? I just feel like there's ways to get creative that doesn't compromise security, but allows the city to say, hey, we meet our own…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:14:15
“And that's where glazing that looks like a window that is not structural, doesn't need to be supported, might be an option, right, to look into something. We've done that before. We've even helped other people to that same standard in the past. I mean, I've been on this commission for nine years. I've seen a few things that we've done. We've seen requests like this. Sometimes it's been granted. But for our own facilities, I don't like to bend our own rules for us. Like, why are we doing that? That totally takes out our needs. I think that's why there is the variance process, too. For sure.…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:15:49
“With some sort of a glazing that looks like windows that isn't windows, that's not structural, something that you can put on, obviously you want it to look okay. You want it to be still a beautiful building, et cetera. Is that something that you have considered?”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:16:09
“Does not. To my understanding, Kim, it does not.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:18:00
“I totally understand where you're coming from. For me, it's just strictly a ethics. We want to hold ourselves to the standard that we are self-set. We made this standard. We wrote the code. We put it in there. Yes, there is a process for you and anyone to come and ask for a variance. I just hate that we give ourselves a variance. We have a code. Why would we design outside of our own code? Or why would we allow the design to even go outside of our own code? I think that's just because this is a glorified storage system. I don't care if it's a metal air hanger. I don't care. Whatever. We have…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:19:02
“I think we as a city should hold ourselves to the standard that we ask everyone else to follow.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:19:44
“I have a question about, it looks like you have two other doors. You have the two man doors. Are those doors as well in the middle? Are they metal? Is that what you asked? Are they doors? Yeah, those are doors, yeah. Could you make those? Put a window on them. Put a window on them, just like the other two, and you probably hit your 20%. I mean, I don't know. I don't know the calculation. But put your glass, even if it's fake glass, right? But put it so it matches the other two doors, and that maybe gets you to the number you need.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:20:35
“If it gets you to 20%, you don't need approval.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:20:41
“Right? That would... Work it. Get to 20% and then you got it. I don't know if...”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:20:54
“Oversize them. Make them a little bit bigger. I don't know. I don't know. And again... I'm not an engineer and I know there's a lot that goes into this. I'm not discounting what you do for a living.”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026
- Play at 2:23:17
“know and i would say the buildings up on tippin willis highway had the same issues right they were like oh we got people working in there the sun's coming in all these different things and oh and if you're asking us to use that as a finding give us the data if you added one more window how many temp what degree of temperature are we talking like if you want us to use that as a finding i need facts i need some data on that And I'm not saying that it's wrong, because I'm sure adding a window could potentially add some challenges. But if you have data, give us data. If you don't have data, then…”
Planning Commission · Aug 13, 2026