Remarks by Terrence Fugazzi
277 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 12
- Play at 1:59:35
“Yeah, like on 8.1, it's just a small matter, which is it says the attendance on our study session was from Mayor Dave Bozo. I'm sorry? I thought you'd get a kick out of that one. Thank you. I don't know how that happened. Good catch. But in addition to that, 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5, I have a couple of questions on.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:03:03
“YES. SO STARTING WITH 8.3, AND I MIGHT HAVE BEEN BETTER TO CATCH THIS EARLIER ON, BUT IT'S FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY. specifically about repeated police service calls counting against, you know, deeming basically the business owner. I think there's a government code that covers this. I think it's, I've got down here Section 53165, basically not allowing to, penal decisions may weigh this, bars local agency from penalizing a resident owner or tenant or other person. including designating the property as a nuisance because someone summoned the police for a crime or emergency. For instance, even…”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:04:04
“I said that. That's why I prefaced it that way.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:04:19
“I'd have to go back and look. I think it's page 62 and 66 of our packet, not of the ordinance. Right.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:04:47
“In that case, I'll move to adopt 8.3 with that in mind when it comes around. You obviously have to now take this to the public, I guess, right?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:05:19
“Oh, next one. Okay. Okay. On the EV chargers, specifically, there's a couple of things. First of all, we have to obligate this by the 31st of January. Are there any issues with us? We've had some timeline issues with a lot of projects in the past, and I know that that looked like a condition on it. Do you see that as not a problem?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:06:01
“And also there were, in some of the original documentation, it said there were six dual-part charging stations, but now it says that there are up to four of them.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:06:45
“Okay. All right, that's all the questions.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:06:55
“On 8.5, super happy to see it there. Just want to know if we can get on the record when we're expecting to see all those improvements be made. Is there a timeline that the public can expect?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:07:32
“So still within the school year? Still within the school year. Okay, thank you.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:07:48
“And just for clarity on 8.3, how is that going to be dealt with?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:08:05
“Okay. Okay? Do you have the first? I think you had the first.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:23:27
“Specific questions around the water heater electrification portion. Given the numbers that I saw here just off the top of my head, it looked like about 275 on average. per each, 74 divided by the 300 or what have you. Is that really reasonable in this new world of electrification where panels and all sorts of new conduit and cabling and all of these projects which have been estimated to be, some of them, $10,000, $12,000, $15,000 to electrify? Is that a reasonable estimate? And the $74,000, is it we are setting a flat fee for any one of these electrifications, or we're just reducing the…”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:25:19
“And that includes everything that it would possibly take to do that. So if it required a full panel update and everything else, that would normally be probably in $1,000 or $2,000, right, to get cost recovery with all of the inspections and everything. It's now going to be $150.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:25:54
“So to be clear the things they're trying to do at the state really isn't going to help people at the level that they're trying to propose it's going to help them because it's really only going to lower that one little portion. Got it. Thank you very much.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:46:33
“So when we look at the $230 million cost estimate, how is that derived in terms of obviously, is it today's dollars? Is it you've come up with some sort of a scale-in plan for which of these parts is happening, when, and then applied, you know, what might be an estimated inflation rate to it? How did you come to $230 million?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:47:15
“So as you said, it's going to cost more if we do it in phases? 10% more, 20% more, 50% more?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:47:58
“$230 today. We have to obviously bond to get the money to do this. And then we start to build it out. And in its entirety, if you built it all at once, it would take two years to do or three years to do. Probably three at least. It's not conceivable that we would do it all at once, right?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:48:36
“Right, so 230 isn't really a reasonable number to use because it would never happen that way, right?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:48:53
“It could be like a half a billion dollars by the time we finish. I'm not going to.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:49:28
“Right, right. So I'm somewhat confused. Maybe the public's somewhat confused. This is probably for the city attorney. When we talk about the significant and unavoidable, and then the staff report says it's not a significant historic resource, and then we read the letter and it says it's a significant historic resource and substantial adverse effect, And so there's all of these, you know, the Wheeler Center conflicting things when I read the report. How should the public understand that from the city attorney?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:52:59
“So you stated that saving it would cost too much money, and was that considered in the plan to save it and make it one of the options? And if so, how much was it going to cost to bring it up to standards?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:54:11
“So it really wasn't just the cost. It was, hey, this isn't really sitting in the right spot. This isn't sitting in the right spot. And so therein is what we did.”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:54:32
“Do you already have a sequence of how you're going to roll these things out yet? There is no sequence. You haven't contemplated which thing we're going to do first?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026
- Play at 2:54:59
“Last question, I promise. The community really wanted to have a year-round pool. I've seen a lot of different things about that in the report. Also, even in recent emails that the council has gotten about having lap pools and an indoor pool and the right size pool and all of these things. You know, are we enclosing it? Are we not enclosing it? Everything I saw was it's an outdoor pool, right?”
City Council · Oct 5, 2026