Remarks by Teddy Hodges
28 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 1 of 2
Did you see that email that came out from the chamber about they're looking for nominees? Yes. So I don't know who all got that, but city staff.
Does that take into consideration our future park plans? Or is that just current active parks?
What was the amount of people that took the survey this year and then compared to 2019?
Are there demographics there? Are you taking any demographics on the top of the responses, like male, female, owner, renter?
I think a couple of key points. There's some things like we should do that tomorrow, like our wayfinding and trail mapping, right? Identification and notification. And then even with, we know we're short on pickleball fields. We know we're short on baseball fields. We know we're short on programmable fields. Those are all, we know that. We're taking those down as we can.
Is this city funds, or is it donor funds, or what's that look like? Probably city, we probably have to talk.
The bind implement and the tabs and the folders.
Mary, can I do this? Yes, please. Great job. And just to plug, if anybody wants to judge DECA competitions, this is what you'll see. Not at this level, but... These girls are awesome. They're another level. Yeah, but the state or local or decade competitions, they're awesome. And it shows that these girls are actually learning valuable tactical skills for the future.
like the Ochre Hills or Summit Trail or like non-specific, not like an Eric's Trail or after somebody or something more just geographically.
Because they're wanting signage on that trail to signify the sponsor. I don't like the idea of naming the trail. Allowing them to sponsor it.
But if you look at the freeway signs or highway signs, it's just the name of the organization.
I have something about the athletic complex, maybe. If we're really bringing 75,000 people out on weekends, like these tournaments, there should be like a food truck alley. There is. Just making sure. I digress.
OKAY. THAT'S IT FOR ME. THANK YOU, WENDY. THAT'S IT FOR ME. THANK YOU, WENDY. THAT'S IT FOR ME. THANK YOU, WENDY. I'M JUST UPSET I MISSED THANK YOU, WENDY.
Well, they can only go up to 1,000 feet, and then you can put garage space on there.
So... If your plan review fee is not based on your valuation, the permit fee would be... Yeah, your permit fee is valuation.
We have some checklists down there, not for this.
Well, are you talking, so are you talking like application fees or the actual bill, like the permit fee? Because I think like Nathan, like there's two different things. Yeah. Like when I come submit an application, I'm going to pay 250 or 589 or whatever that is for the application. And then if I get it approved, I'm going to pay the $1500 or 2000 for the permit.
Same concern because it goes over their roadways. And so it's, yeah.
I'll make a motion to approve resolution number R44-2026, approving a shared use path and pedestrian structure cooperative maintenance agreement with UDOT for a trail along Mountain View Corridor.
Okay, we'll move on to item 11.2, discussion and consideration of a request to amend Olympia Master Development Agreement to add a definition for affordable new homes. Include conditions necessary to comply with the requirements of affordable housing infrastructure grant board and modify certain sections of the development standard. City file number M2026-140. Blake.
Thank you, Blake. Any points of discussion? All right, seeing none, I'll look for a motion.
Motion by Matt, second by Tara. Tara? Yes. Matt? Yes. Jared?
And I'm a yes, that motion carries. Okay, we'll move on to discussion item 11.3, discussion to consideration of Utah affordable housing infrastructure grant fund disbursement agreement with UDOT. Back to you, Blake.
Thank you, Blake. One point that I forgot to bring up on the last one as well. This is not adding any units to the already agreed MDA.
Yeah, I just wanted to make sure that was clear for anybody listening or watching.