Remarks by Shane Stolarczyk
392 remarks on the record, newest first · Page 5 of 16
- Play at 2:46:46
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. Knowing that we only got a few minutes left before lunch, we're going to skip 26 and 27 and move directly to consent agenda. There are two items on consent agenda. Has everyone reviewed them? Would anyone like to take any out for separate discussion and voting? If not, I'll entertain a motion at this time as to approving the consent agenda.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:47:16
“Seconded by? Second. Commissioner Carpenter. Is there any further discussion? If not, Marisa.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:47:31
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. We're going to try to knock out a few more of these little ones here. Consideration of possible action regarding number 31. Consideration of possible action regarding interlocal cooperation agreements with DPS to use the new TXCR interface to report DPS convictions. We have a couple of judges here. Will you be the point people to kind of just give us a brief summary of what the agreement, the significance of this, please? Thank you for showing up today.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:48:50
“Would you all be able to prepare? Because I just, you know, if this is approved, I'll sign it. But if you can prepare similar ones and get them to Melissa, we'll get them all signed.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:49:06
“But we'll get those disseminated to you after court today. All right, so I move to approve an interlocal cooperation agreement with DPS to use the new TXCR interface and report DPS convictions. Do I have a second? Second. Motion by the judge. Checking by Commissioner Chapman. Any further discussion? There being none. Teresa, you're up.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:49:33
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. Let's knock out another. Thank you. Thank you. 32, consideration of possible action on the interlocal agreement for fire protection services between the City of Bernie and Kendall County. Commissioner Regan, you're up.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:50:19
“Next up, 33. Consideration possible action regarding FY26 First Amendment to the agreement between Kendall County and and Cadelia VFD from October 1, 2025 through September 30, 2026, with an annual allocation the amount of $78,875 and the annual stipend of $10,000. Commissioner Chapman?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:51:14
“Any further discussion? There being none, Teresa, please call the vote.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:51:25
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. We're going to knock out 34 and 35 and call it lunch break. Consideration possible action? Yes, sir.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:51:36
“We are 27. I'm sorry. Let me see. Let me see. I didn't mean to interrupt you, sir. No, thank you. No, I want to make sure we're all taken care of here.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:51:59
“So does medical director impact you? Okay. So let's knock out 27 two before we break. Okay. So let's take care of the fire department quick. Thank you for that pointing that out. Uh, Consideration of possible action regarding the Kendall County Emergency Medical Service and First Responder Affiliation Agreement for Fire Protection and Emergency Services between Kendall County and Condalia. Commissioner Chapman.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:52:42
“Motion made by Commissioner Chapman, seconded by the judge. Any further discussion? If not, Teresa, you're up.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:52:54
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. And last one, before we get back to 27, consideration of possible action regarding the FY26 HIPAA Business Associate Agreement between Kendall County and Candelia VFD. Commissioner Chapman?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:53:17
“Okay, I second that. So motion by the judge, second, or motion by Commissioner Chapman, second by the judge. Any further discussion? If not, Teresa, you're up.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:53:33
“Aye. Motion carries 5-0. So we're going to circle back to agenda item 27. Consideration of possible action and selection of the recommendation to award the proposal determined to be the lowest and best evaluated offer in response to RFP 2026-11, inmate health care services, and to authorize the county judge to execute the final contract under review by general counsel.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:54:30
“It seems like it wasn't even close. They had a sizable point differential between the next best competitor. So is your recommendation to approve the Southern Healthcare Partners?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:54:46
“And you're consenting to that? Yes, sir. Okay. Well, I move to select the proposed Southern Health Partners, Inc. as the lowest and best evaluated offer in response to RFP 2026-11, Inmate Healthcare Services and And I'll authorize the county judge to execute the final contract review by general counsel. Do I have a second? Motion by the judge. Seconded by Commissioner Chapman. Any further discussion?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:55:35
“Thank you. Okay. If there's no further discussion, Teresa, please call the vote.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 2:55:47
“Motion carries five to zero. So we are going to be in recess. And when we resume with agenda item 26, and then pick up with agenda item 36 after that and run through them. It all depends on how long that's going to take. So with that, we're in recess for lunch until 1 o'clock. We'll work on that.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:15:24
“But if we have an objective committee determining the factors, this should be a moot point because it's objective and it's been put together by people that have no dog in the fight. And that's the whole point of having a review committee to keep objective bias out of it. Because it sounds like I just walked in, but people aren't happy with the results of this and have someone in mind that they want this contract to go to. Because that's the only reason for people to be coming down and sharing about this process. Am I correct?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:15:59
“Did anyone have an issue with the way Catherine Green's RFP went?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:16:10
“We have to trust our purchasing agent. We hired her to do a job. She has no skin in this game to skewer results one way or another. We have to trust her. And we created a policy and we got to follow the policy.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:21:41
“Because obviously she's directed to a particular vendor, and that's why you're rejecting the top three proposals.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:21:59
“The only reason you're objecting to the process is you don't like the result. Nope. If it was the result that you wanted, you wouldn't be objective.”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026
- Play at 3:22:21
“What was the RFQ? Did it require backup?”
Commissioners Court · Sep 8, 2026